XML 34 R9.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.7.0.1
Fair Value Measurement
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2017
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurement
Fair Value Measurement
At June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the carrying value of receivables, accounts payable, accrued expenses and distributions payable to noncontrolling interests approximates fair value due to their short-term nature. The carrying values and fair values of debt instruments are as follows (in thousands):
 
 
June 30, 2017
 
December 31, 2016
 
 
Carrying Value
 
Fair Value
 
Carrying Value
 
Fair Value
Lines of credit
 
$
486,300

 
$
486,300

 
$
489,200

 
$
489,200

Syndicated term loans
 
309,713

 
309,713

 
189,989

 
189,989

Bank term loans
 
94,040

 
93,380

 
81,307

 
80,542

Note payable
 
38,328

 
38,459

 
36,232

 
35,396

Solar asset-backed notes
 
98,851

 
104,323

 
101,295

 
102,869

Total
 
$
1,027,232

 
$
1,032,175

 
$
898,023

 
$
897,996


At June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the fair value of the Company’s lines of credit, syndicated term loans and certain bank term loans approximate their carrying values because their interest rates are variable rates that approximate rates currently available to the Company. At June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the fair value of the Company’s other debt instruments are based on rates currently offered for debt with similar maturities and terms. The Company’s fair value of the debt instruments fell under the Level 3 hierarchy. These valuation approaches involve some level of management estimation and judgment, the degree of which is dependent on the price transparency for the instruments or market.
The Company determines the fair value of its interest rate swaps using a discounted cash flow model which incorporates an assessment of the risk of non-performance by the interest rate swap counterparty and an evaluation of the Company’s credit risk in valuing derivative instruments. The valuation model uses various inputs including contractual terms, interest rate curves, credit spreads and measures of volatility.
The Company determines the fair value of its warrants issued using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The significant unobservable input used in the fair value measurement of the warrant liability was the expected volatility of the Company. Generally, increases (decreases) in the expected volatility of the Company would result in a directionally similar impact to the measurement of the Company’s warrants.
At June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis, based upon the fair value hierarchy are as follows (in thousands):
 
 
June 30, 2017
 
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Total
Derivative assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate swaps
 
$

 
$
5,059

 
$

 
$
5,059

Total
 
$

 
$
5,059

 
$

 
$
5,059

Derivative liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Warrants
 
$

 
$

 
$
7

 
$
7

Total
 
$

 
$

 
$
7

 
$
7


 
 
December 31, 2016
 
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Total
Derivative assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate swaps
 
$

 
$
1,632

 
$

 
$
1,632

Total
 
$

 
$
1,632

 
$

 
$
1,632

Derivative liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Warrants
 
$

 
$

 
$
20

 
$
20

Total
 
$

 
$

 
$
20

 
$
20