XML 24 R12.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.3.1.900
Fair Value Measurement
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2015
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurement

Note 4. Fair Value Measurement

At December 31, 2015 and 2014, the carrying value of receivables, accounts payable, accrued expenses, and distributions payable to noncontrolling interests approximates fair value due to their short-term nature. The carrying values and fair values of debt instruments are as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

December 31, 2015

 

 

December 31, 2014

 

 

 

Carrying Value

 

 

Fair Value

 

 

Carrying Value

 

 

Fair Value

 

Line of credit

 

 

194,975

 

 

 

194,975

 

 

$

48,597

 

 

$

48,597

 

Non-bank term loans

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,138

 

 

 

3,853

 

Syndicated term loans

 

 

170,664

 

 

 

170,664

 

 

 

124,571

 

 

 

124,571

 

Bank term loan

 

 

30,740

 

 

 

32,692

 

 

 

33,382

 

 

 

35,653

 

Note payable

 

 

33,059

 

 

 

32,568

 

 

 

29,563

 

 

 

28,900

 

Solar asset-backed notes

 

 

108,880

 

 

 

110,103

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

$

538,318

 

 

$

541,002

 

 

$

239,251

 

 

$

241,574

 

 

At December 31, 2015 and 2014, the fair value of the Company’s lines of credit and the syndicated term loans approximates their carrying values because their interest rates are variable rates that approximate rates currently available to the Company. At December 31, 2015, the fair value of the Company’s bank term loan, note payable and asset-backed notes are based on rates currently offered for debt with similar maturities and terms. At December 31, 2014, the fair value of the Company’s non-bank term loan, bank term loan, and note payable are based on rates currently offered for debt with similar maturities and terms. The Company’s fair value of the debt instruments fell under the Level 3 hierarchy. These valuation techniques involve some level of management estimation and judgment, the degree of which is dependent on the price transparency for the instruments or market.

The Company determines the fair value of its interest rate swaps using a discounted cash flow model which incorporates an assessment of the risk of non-performance by the interest rate swap counterparty and an evaluation of the Company’s credit risk in valuing derivative instruments. The valuation model uses various inputs including contractual terms, interest rate curves, credit spreads and measures of volatility.

The Company determines the fair value of its warrants issued using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The key inputs used to determine value of the warrants was an estimated fair value of the Company’s common stock of $11.77 per share, risk-free interest rate of 1.21%, expected volatility of 32.03%, the remaining contact life of 2.56 years and expected dividend yield rate of 0.00%. The significant unobservable input used in the fair value measurement of the warrant liability was the expected volatility of the Company. Generally, increases (decreases) in the expected volatility of the Company would result in a directionally similar impact to the measurement of the Company’s stock options.

At December 31, 2015, financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis, based upon the fair value hierarchy are as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

December 31, 2015

 

 

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 2

 

 

Level 3

 

 

Total

 

Derivative liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate swaps

 

$

 

 

$

921

 

 

$

 

 

$

921

 

Warrants

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

557

 

 

 

557

 

Total

 

$

 

 

$

921

 

 

$

557

 

 

$

1,478