Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, the consolidated variable interest entity (“VIE”) that the Company controls and of which the Company is the primary beneficiary, and the Operating Partnership’s subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions are eliminated in consolidation. The financial statements of the Company’s subsidiaries are prepared using accounting policies consistent with those of the Company. The Operating Partnership is a VIE as the limited partner lacks substantive kick-out rights and substantive participating rights. The Company is the primary beneficiary of, and consolidates, the Operating Partnership.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) as contained within the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”), Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) and the rules and regulations of the SEC.

Square footage, occupancy and certain other measures used to describe real estate included in the notes to the consolidated financial statements are presented on an unaudited basis.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires the Company to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates.

Real Estate Assets

Depreciation and Amortization

Real estate costs related to the development, construction and improvement of properties are capitalized. Acquisition costs related to business combinations are expensed as incurred. Acquisition costs related to asset acquisitions are capitalized. Repair and maintenance and tenant turnover costs are charged to expense as incurred and significant replacements and betterments are capitalized. Repair and maintenance and tenant turnover costs include all costs that do not extend the useful life of the real estate asset. The Company considers the period of future benefit of an asset to determine its appropriate useful life and anticipates the estimated useful lives of assets by class to be generally as follows:



Buildings		27.5 years
Building improvements		5-25 years
Tenant improvements		Shorter of lease term or expected useful life
Tenant origination and absorption costs		Remaining term of related lease
Furniture, fixtures, and equipment		5-10 years

Real Estate Purchase Price Allocation

Prior to the Company’s adoption of ASU 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the definition of business, or ASU 2017-01, in January 2017, the Company recorded the acquisition of income-producing real estate or real estate that will be used for the production of income as a business combination. All assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination were measured at their acquisition-date fair values. Acquisition costs were expensed as incurred. Upon adoption of ASU 2017-01, the Company records the acquisition of income-producing real estate or real estate that are used for the production of income as an asset acquisition. All assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the asset acquisition are measured at their acquisition date fair values. Acquisition costs are capitalized and allocated between land, buildings and improvements and tenant origination and associated costs on the consolidated balance sheet.

The Company assesses the acquisition-date fair values of all tangible assets, identifiable intangible assets and assumed liabilities using methods similar to those used by independent appraisers (e.g., discounted cash flow analysis) and that utilize appropriate discount and/or capitalization rates and available market information. Estimates of future cash flows are based on a number of factors including historical operating results, known and anticipated trends, and market and economic conditions. The fair value of tangible assets of an acquired property considers the value of the property as if it was vacant.

Intangible assets include the value of in-place leases, which represents the estimated value of the net cash flows of the in-place leases to be realized, as compared to the net cash flows that would have occurred had the property been vacant at the time of acquisition and subject to lease-up.

The Company estimates the value of tenant origination and absorption costs by considering the estimated carrying costs during hypothetical expected lease-up periods, considering current market conditions. In estimating carrying costs, the Company estimates the amount of lost rentals using market rates during the expected lease-up periods.

The Company amortizes the value of in-place leases to expense over the remaining non-cancelable term of the respective leases. Should a tenant terminate its lease, the unamortized portion of the in-place lease value and customer relationship intangibles would be charged to expense in that period.

The Company records above-market and below-market in-place lease values for acquired properties based on the present value (using an interest rate that reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the difference between (1) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in-place leases and (2) the Company’s estimate of fair market lease rates for the corresponding in-place leases, measured over a period equal to the remaining non-cancelable term of the lease. The Company amortizes any capitalized above-market or below-market lease values as a reduction or increase to rental income over the remaining non-cancelable terms of the respective leases.

The total amount of other lease-related intangible assets acquired will be further allocated to in-place lease values and customer relationship intangible values based on the Company’s evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant’s lease and its overall relationship with that respective tenant. Characteristics that the Company considers in allocating these values include the nature and extent of existing business relationships with the tenant, growth prospects for developing new business with the tenant, and the tenant’s credit quality and expectations of lease renewals (including those existing under the terms of the lease agreement), among other factors.

The total amount of non-lease-related intangible assets, including amenity access agreements, tax abatement agreements or other contract rights assumed as part of the acquisition of certain properties, will be allocated to other intangible assets based on the present value of the difference between contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the contracts assumed and the Company’s estimate of the fair market contract rates for corresponding contracts measured over a period equal to the remaining non-cancelable term of the contracts assumed. Other intangible assets are amortized using the straight-line method over the remaining non-cancelable term of the related contracts.

Estimates of the fair values of the tangible assets, identifiable intangible assets and assumed liabilities require the Company to make significant assumptions to estimate market lease rates, property-operating expenses, carrying costs during lease-up periods, discount rates, market absorption periods, and the number of years the property will be held for investment. The use of inappropriate assumptions could result in an incorrect valuation of acquired tangible assets, identifiable intangible assets and assumed liabilities, which could impact the amount of the Company’s net income (loss).

Sale of Real Estate Assets

The Company records property sales or dispositions when title transfers to unrelated third parties, contingencies have been removed and sufficient cash consideration has been received by the Company. Upon disposition, the related costs and accumulated depreciation are removed from the respective accounts. Any gain or loss on sale is recognized in accordance with GAAP.

Gains and losses on the sale of real estate are recognized pursuant to ASC Topic 610-20, Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets. The Company recognizes a gain (loss) on sale of real estate when the criteria for an asset to be derecognized are met, which include when: (i) a contract exists, (ii) the buyer obtains control of the asset, and (iii) it is probable that the Company will receive substantially all of the consideration to which it is entitled. These criteria are generally satisfied at the time of sale. For partial sale of real estate resulting in transfer of control, the Company measures any noncontrolling interest retained at fair value and recognize a gain or loss on the difference between fair value and the carrying amount of the real estate assets retained. The Company classifies real estate assets as real estate held for sale once the criteria, as defined by GAAP, have been met.

Impairment of Real Estate Assets

The Company accounts for its real estate assets in accordance with ASC 360—Property, Plant and Equipment (“ASC 360”). ASC 360 requires the Company to continually monitor events and changes in circumstances that could indicate that the carrying amounts of the Company’s real estate and related intangible assets may not be recoverable. When indicators of potential impairment suggest that the carrying value of real estate and related intangible assets and liabilities may not be recoverable, the Company assesses the recoverability of the assets by estimating whether the Company will recover the carrying value of the asset through its undiscounted future cash flows and its eventual disposition. Based on this analysis, if the Company does not believe that it will be able to recover the carrying value of the real estate and related intangible assets and liabilities, the Company records an impairment loss to the extent that the carrying value exceeds the estimated fair value of the real estate and related intangible assets and liabilities. If any assumptions, projections or estimates regarding an asset changes in the future, the Company may have to record an impairment to reduce the net book value of such individual asset. The Company did not record any impairment loss on its real estate assets during the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016.

Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures

The Company accounts for investments in unconsolidated joint venture entities in which it may exercise significant influence over, but does not control, using the equity method of accounting. Under the equity method, the investment is initially recorded at cost and subsequently adjusted to reflect additional contributions or distributions and the Company’s proportionate share of equity in the joint venture’s income (loss). The Company recognizes its proportionate share of the ongoing income or loss of the unconsolidated joint venture as equity in income (loss) of unconsolidated joint venture on the consolidated statements of operations. On a quarterly basis, the Company evaluates its investment in an unconsolidated joint venture for other-than-temporary impairments.

Rents and Other Receivables

The Company will periodically evaluate the collectability of amounts due from tenants and maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of tenants to make required payments under lease agreements. The Company exercises judgment in establishing these allowances and considers payment history and current credit status of tenants in developing these estimates. Due to the short-term nature of the operating leases, the Company does not maintain a deferred rent receivable related to the straight-lining of rents.

Revenue Recognition

On January 1, 2018, the Company adopted ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, (“ASC 606”), which establishes a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most of the existing revenue recognition guidance. This standard requires the Company to recognize, for certain of its revenue sources, the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration the Company is entitled to in exchange for those goods or services. The Company selected the modified retrospective transition method but had no cumulative effect adjustment to recognize as of the date of adoption on January 1, 2018.

The Company’s revenue consists of rental revenues and tenant reimbursements and other. There was no impact to the Company’s recognition of rental revenue from leasing arrangements as this was specifically excluded from ASC 606. The company identified limited sources of revenues from non-lease components but did not experience a material impact on its revenue recognition in the consolidated financial statements upon adoption. The Company leases apartment and condominium units under operating leases with terms generally of one one year or less. Generally, credit investigations are performed for prospective residents and security deposits are obtained. The Company will recognize minimum rent, including rental abatements, concessions and contractual fixed increases attributable to operating leases, on a straight-line basis over the term of the non-cancellable term of the related lease and amounts expected to be received in later years will be recorded as deferred rents. The Company records property operating expense reimbursements due from tenants for common area maintenance, real estate taxes, and other recoverable costs in the period the related expenses are incurred in accordance with ASC 840, Leases.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents may include cash and short-term investments. Short-term investments are stated at cost, which approximates fair value. As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company had amounts in excess of federally insured limits in deposit accounts with a financial institution. The Company limits such deposits to financial institutions with high credit standing.

Restricted Cash

Restricted cash represents those cash accounts for which the use of funds is restricted by loan covenants and cash placed with a qualified intermediary for reinvestment under Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code. As of December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the Company had a restricted cash balance of $12,114,277 and $28,959,004, respectively, which represents $0 and $17,197,810 of cash proceeds from property sales that were being held by qualified intermediaries as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and $12,114,277 and $11,761,194 set aside as impounds for future property tax payments, property insurance payments and tenant improvement payments as required by agreements with the Company’s lenders as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

The following table represents the components of the cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash presented on the accompanying consolidated statements of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016:



	December 31,
	2018		2017		2016
Cash and cash equivalents	$	142,078,166	$	171,228,485	$	66,224,027
Restricted cash	12,114,277		33,867,523		27,553,851
Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash	$	154,192,443	$	205,096,008	$	93,777,878

The beginning of period restricted cash balance for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, includes $4,908,519, $12,086,960 and $0 that is included in assets related to real estate held for sale as of December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively, on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. All such amounts were disposed of in conjunction with the property sales during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017.

Deferred Financing Costs

The Company capitalizes deferred financing costs such as commitment fees, legal fees and other third party costs associated with obtaining commitments for financing that result in a closing of such financing, as a contra liability against the respective outstanding debt balances. The Company amortizes these costs over the terms of the respective financing agreements using the effective interest method. The Company expenses unamortized deferred financing costs when the associated debt is refinanced or repaid before maturity unless specific rules are met that would allow for the carryover of such costs to the refinanced debt. Costs incurred in seeking financing transactions that do not close are expensed in the period in which it is determined that the financing will not close.

Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company accounts for its derivative financial instruments in accordance with ASC 815—Derivatives and Hedging. The Company’s objective in using derivatives is to add stability to interest expense and to manage the Company’s exposure to interest rate movements or other identified risks. To accomplish these objectives, the Company may use various types of derivative instruments to manage fluctuations in cash flows resulting from interest rate risk attributable to changes in the benchmark interest rate of LIBOR or other applicable benchmark rates.

The Company measures its derivative instruments and hedging activities at fair value and records them as an asset or liability, depending on its rights or obligations under the applicable derivative contract. For derivatives designated as fair value hedges, the changes in the fair value of both the derivative instrument and the hedged items are recorded in earnings. Derivatives used to hedge the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows, or other types of forecasted transactions, are considered cash flow hedges. For derivatives designated as cash flow hedges, the effective portions of changes in fair value of the derivatives are reported in other comprehensive income (loss) and are subsequently reclassified into earnings when the hedged item affects earnings. Changes in fair value of derivative instruments not designated as hedges and ineffective portions of hedges are recognized in earnings in the affected period. The Company assesses the effectiveness of each hedging relationship by comparing the changes in fair value or cash flows of the derivative hedging instrument with the changes in fair value or cash flows of the designated hedged item or transaction.

As of December 31, 2018, the Company did not have any derivatives designated as cash flow or fair value hedges, nor are derivatives being used for trading or speculative purposes.

Fair Value Measurements

Under GAAP, the Company is required to measure certain financial instruments at fair value on a recurring basis. In addition, the Company is required to measure other assets and liabilities at fair value on a non-recurring basis (e.g., carrying value of impaired real estate loans receivable and long-lived assets). Fair value is defined as the price that would be received upon the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The GAAP fair value framework uses a three-tiered approach. Fair value measurements are classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:


•	Level 1: unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical assets or liabilities;


•	Level 2: quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-derived valuations in which significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets; and


•	Level 3: prices or valuation techniques where little or no market data is available that requires inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable.

When available, the Company utilizes quoted market prices from an independent third-party source to determine fair value and will classify such items in Level 1 or Level 2. In instances where the market is not active, regardless of the availability of a nonbinding quoted market price, observable inputs might not be relevant and could require the Company to make a significant adjustment to derive a fair value measurement. Additionally, in an inactive market, a market price quoted from an independent third party may rely more on models with inputs based on information available only to that independent third party. When the Company determines the market for a financial instrument owned by the Company to be illiquid or when market transactions for similar instruments do not appear orderly, the Company uses several valuation sources (including internal valuations, discounted cash flow analysis and quoted market prices) and will establish a fair value by assigning weights to the various valuation sources.

The following describes the valuation methodologies used by the Company to measure fair value, including an indication of the level in the fair value hierarchy in which each asset or liability is generally classified.

Interest rate cap agreements - The Company has entered into certain interest rate cap agreements. These derivatives are recorded at fair value. Fair value was based on a model-driven valuation using the associated variable rate curve and an implied market volatility, both of which were observable at commonly quoted intervals for the full term of the interest rate cap agreements. Therefore, the Company’s interest rate cap agreements were classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy and are included in other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Changes in the fair value of the interest rate cap agreements are recorded as interest expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

The following table reflects the Company’s assets required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis on the consolidated balance sheets:



	December 31, 2018
	Fair Value Measurements Using
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Assets:
Interest rate cap agreements	$	—	$	117,678	$	—



	December 31, 2017
	Fair Value Measurements Using
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Assets:
Interest rate cap agreements	$	—	$	51,646	$	—

Changes in assumptions or estimation methodologies can have a material effect on these estimated fair values. In this regard, the derived fair value estimates cannot be substantiated by comparison to independent markets and, in many cases, may not be realized in an immediate settlement of the instrument.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The accompanying consolidated balance sheets include the following financial instruments: cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, rents and other receivables, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, distributions payable, due to affiliates and notes payable.

The Company considers the carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, rents and other receivables, accounts payable and accrued liabilities and distributions payable to approximate the fair value of these financial instruments based on the short duration between origination of the instruments and their expected realization. The fair value of amounts due to affiliates is not determinable due to the related party nature of such amounts.

The fair value of the notes payable is estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis using borrowing rates available to the Company for debt instruments with similar terms and maturities. As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the fair value of the notes payable was $681,095,544 and $878,004,294, respectively, compared to the carrying value of $693,501,574 and $875,785,938, respectively. The Company has determined that its notes payable are classified as Level 3 within the fair value hierarchy.

Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation

The Company amortizes the fair value of stock-based compensation awards to expense over the vesting period and records any dividend equivalents earned as dividends for financial reporting purposes. Stock-based compensation awards to independent directors are valued at the fair value on the date of grant and amortized as an expense over the vesting period. Awards to non-employees are remeasured at fair value each reporting period and amortized as an expense over the vesting period.

Distribution Policy

The Company has elected to be taxed as, and qualifies as, a REIT commencing with the taxable year ended December 31, 2010. To continue to qualify as a REIT, the Company intends to make distributions each taxable year equal to at least 90% of its REIT taxable income (which is determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction or net capital gain and which does not necessarily equal net income as calculated in accordance with GAAP). Distributions during the three months ended March 31, 2018, and during the year ended December 31, 2017, were based on daily record dates and calculated at a rate of $0.001964 per share per day. Distributions during the three months ended June 30, 2018, were based on daily record dates and calculated at a rate of $0.001683 per share per day. Distributions during the six months ended December 31, 2018, were based on daily record dates and calculated at a rate of $0.001519 per share per day. Each day during the twelve months ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, was a distribution record date.

Distributions to stockholders are determined by the board of directors of the Company and are dependent upon a number of factors relating to the Company, including funds available for the payment of distributions, financial condition, the timing of property acquisitions, capital expenditure requirements and annual distribution requirements in order for the Company to maintain its qualification as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company declared aggregate distributions of $1.610 per common share including a special distribution the Company’s board of directors declared in the amount $1.00 per share of common stock to stockholders of record as of the close of business on April 20, 2018. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company declared distributions of $0.718 per common share.

Operating Expenses

Pursuant to the Advisory Agreement, the Company is limited in the amount of certain operating expenses it may record on a rolling four-quarter basis to the greater of 2% of average invested assets and 25% of net income. Operating expenses include all costs and expenses incurred by the Company, as determined under GAAP, that in any way are related to the operation of the Company, excluding expenses of raising capital, interest payments, taxes, property operating expenses, non-cash expenditures, incentive fees, acquisition fees and expenses and investment management fees. During the four quarters ended December 31, 2018, the Company recorded operating expenses of $4,717,463, which amount was not in excess of the 2%/25% Limitation as described in Note 9 (Related Party Arrangements), and are included in general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. Operating expenses of $115,212 remain payable and are included in due to affiliates in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2018.

Income Taxes

The Company elected to be taxed as, and currently qualifies as, a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code commencing with the taxable year ended December 31, 2010. To continue to qualify as a REIT, the Company must continue to meet certain organizational and operational requirements, including the requirement to distribute at least 90% of the Company’s annual REIT taxable income to stockholders (which is computed without regard to the dividends paid deduction or net capital gain and which does not necessarily equal net income as calculated in accordance with GAAP). As a REIT, the Company generally would not be subject to federal income tax to the extent it distributes qualifying dividends to its stockholders. If the Company fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, it would be subject to federal income tax on its taxable income at regular corporate income tax rates and generally would not be permitted to qualify for treatment as a REIT for federal income tax purposes for the four taxable years following the year during which qualification is lost, unless the Internal Revenue Service grants the Company relief under certain statutory provisions. Such an event could materially adversely affect the Company’s net income and net cash available for distribution to stockholders. However, the Company believes it is organized and operates in such a manner as to qualify for treatment as a REIT.

The Company follows the Income Taxes Topic of the ASC to recognize, measure, present and disclose in its accompanying consolidated financial statements uncertain tax positions that the Company has taken or expects to take on a tax return. As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company had no liabilities for uncertain tax positions that it believes should be recognized in its accompanying consolidated financial statements. Due to uncertainty regarding the realization of certain deferred tax assets, the Company has established valuation allowances, primarily in connection with the net operating loss carryforward related to the Company. The Company has not been assessed material interest or penalties by any major tax jurisdictions. The Company’s evaluation was performed for the tax years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015. As of December 31, 2018, the Company’s tax returns for the tax years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 remain subject to examination by major tax jurisdictions.

Per Share Data

Basic earnings (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders for all periods presented are computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of the Company’s common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings (loss) per share is computed based on the weighted average number of shares of the Company’s common stock and all potentially dilutive securities, if any. Distributions declared per common share assume each share was issued and outstanding each day during the period. Nonvested shares of the Company’s restricted common stock give rise to potentially dilutive shares of the Company’s common stock.

In accordance with FASB ASC Topic 260-10-45, Earnings Per Share, the Company uses the two-class method to calculate earnings (loss) per share. Basic earnings (loss) per share is calculated based on dividends declared and the rights of common shares and participating securities in any undistributed earnings, which represents net income (loss) remaining after deduction of dividends declared during the period. The undistributed earnings (loss) are allocated to all outstanding common shares based on the relative percentage of each class of shares. The Company does not have any participating securities outstanding other than the shares of common stock and the unvested restricted common stock during the periods presented. Earnings (loss) attributable to the unvested restricted common stock are deducted from earnings (loss) in the computation of per share amounts where applicable.

Reclassifications

Certain amounts in the Company’s prior period condensed consolidated financial statements were reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. These reclassifications did not change the results of operations of prior periods. On January 1, 2018, the Company adopted ASU 2016-18, as further described below. As a result, the Company no longer presents transfers between cash and restricted cash in the consolidated statements of cash flows. Instead, restricted cash is included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning of the period and end of the period total amounts shown on the consolidated statements of cash flows.

Segment Disclosure

The Company has determined that it has one reportable segment with activities related to investing in multifamily properties. The Company’s investments in real estate are in different geographic regions, and management evaluates operating performance on an individual asset level. However, as each of the Company’s assets has similar economic characteristics, tenants and products and services, its assets have been aggregated into one reportable segment.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) (“ASU 2014-09”). ASU 2014-09 requires an entity to recognize the revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods and services. ASU 2014-09 supersedes the revenue requirements in Revenue Recognition (Topic 605) and most industry-specific guidance throughout the Industry Topics of the Codification. ASU 2014-09 does not apply to lease contracts within the scope of Leases (Topic 840). In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which delayed the effective date of ASU 2014-09 by one year, which resulted in ASU 2014-09 being effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2017, and is to be applied retrospectively. Early adoption is permitted, but can be no earlier than the original public entity effective date of fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company selected the modified retrospective transition method but had no cumulative effect adjustment to recognize as of the date of adoption of ASU 2014-09 on January 1, 2018. The Company identified limited sources of revenues from non-lease components, and the Company did not experience a material impact on its revenue recognition in the consolidated financial statements upon adoption. Additionally, there was no impact to the Company’s recognition of rental revenue, as rental revenue from leasing arrangements was specifically excluded from ASU 2014-09.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases, (“ASU 2016-02”), amending the existing accounting standards for lease accounting, including requiring lessees to recognize most leases on their balance sheets and making targeted changes to lessor accounting. ASU 2016-02 requires a modified retrospective transition approach. ASU 2016-02 will be effective in the first quarter of 2019 and allows for early adoption. The Company has selected the modified retrospective transition method with a cumulative effect recognized as of the date of adoption and adopted the new standard effective January 1, 2019. The Company evaluated the impact of ASU 2016-02 on its leases both as it relates to the Company acting as a lessor and as a lessee. Based on its evaluation, as it relates to the former, the Company did not experience a material impact on the recognition of leases in the consolidated financial statements because under ASU 2016-02, lessors will continue to account for leases using an approach that is substantially equivalent to existing guidance for sales-type leases, direct financing leases, and operating leases. As it relates to the latter, the Company did not experience a material impact on the recognition of leases in the consolidated financial statements because the quantity of leased equipment by the Company is limited and immaterial to the consolidated financial statements.

In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-11, Leases (Topic 842): Targeted Improvements (“ASU 2018-11”). The FASB issued ASU 2018-11 to clarify ASU 2016-02. The amendments in ASU 2018-11 provide entities with an additional (and optional) transition method to adopt the new leases standard. Under this new transition method, an entity initially applies ASU 2016-02 at the adoption date and recognizes a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption. ASU 2018-11 also provides lessors with a practical expedient, by class of underlying asset, to not separate nonlease components from the associated lease component and, instead, to account for those components as a single component if the nonlease components otherwise would be accounted for under the new revenue guidance (Topic 606) and both of the following are met: (1) the timing and pattern of transfer of the nonlease components and associated lease component are the same, and (2) the lease component, if accounted for separately, would be classified as an operating lease. If the nonlease components associated with the lease component are the predominant component of the combined component, an entity is required to account for the combined component in accordance with Topic 606. Otherwise, the entity must account for the combined component as an operating lease in accordance with Topic 842. For entities that have not adopted Topic 842 before the issuance of ASU 2018-11, the effective date and transition requirements for ASU 2018-11 related to separating components of a contract are the same as the effective date and transition requirements in ASU 2016-02. In its capacity as a lessee, the Company elected to adopt the new transition method offered by ASU 2018-11 and initially applied ASU 2016-02 on January 1, 2019 and recognized a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption. In its capacity as a lessor and based on its evaluation of the components of its lease contracts, the Company elected to use the practical expedient provided by ASU 2018-11 and did not separate nonlease components from the associated lease components and will instead account for those components as a single component.

In December 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-20, Leases (Topic 842), Narrow-scope Improvements for Lessors (“ASU 2018-20”). The FASB issued ASU 2018-20 to allow lessors to make an accounting policy election not to evaluate whether sales taxes and other similar taxes imposed by a governmental authority on a specific lease revenue-producing transaction are the primary obligation of the lessor as the owner of the underlying leased asset. The amendments also clarify that when lessors allocate variable payments to lease and non-lease components they are required to follow the recognition guidance in ASU 2016-02 for the lease component and other applicable guidance, such as the new revenue standard, for the non-lease component. The amendments have the same effective date and transition requirements as ASU 2016-02 for entities that have not yet adopted ASU 2016-02. The amendments may be applied either retrospectively or prospectively. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2018-20 will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures and does not expect a material impact on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures from its adoption.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (“ASU 2016-13”). ASU 2016-13 requires more timely recording of credit losses on loans and other financial instruments that are not accounted for at fair value through net income (loss), including loans held for investment, held-to-maturity debt securities, trade and other receivables, net investment in leases and other such commitments. ASU 2016-13 requires that financial assets measured at amortized cost be presented at the net amount expected to be collected, through an allowance for credit losses that is deducted from the amortized cost basis. The amendments in ASU 2016-13 require the Company to measure all expected credit losses based upon historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectability of the financial assets and eliminates the “incurred loss” methodology in current GAAP. In November 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-19, Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (“ASU 2018-19”), which clarifies that operating lease receivables accounted for under ASC 842 Leases, are not in the scope of the new credit losses guidance. The effective date and transition requirements for this guidance are the same as for ASU 2016-13. ASU 2016-13 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating the impact this guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures and does not expect a material impact on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures from its adoption.

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash (“ASU 2016-18”). ASU 2016-18 requires that a statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents. Therefore, amounts generally described as restricted cash should be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning of period and end of period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-18 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The Company adopted this guidance January 1, 2018, and applied it retrospectively. As a result of adopting ASU 2016-18, the Company began presenting restricted cash along with cash and cash equivalents in its consolidated statements of cash flows.

In February 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-05, Other Income - Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets (“Subtopic 610-20”): Clarifying the Scope of Asset Derecognition Guidance and Accounting for Partial Sales of Nonfinancial Assets (“ASU 2017-05”), that clarifies that a financial asset is within the scope of Subtopic 610-20 if it meets the definition of an in substance nonfinancial asset and defines the term in substance nonfinancial asset. ASU 2017-05 also clarifies that nonfinancial assets within the scope of Subtopic 610-20 may include nonfinancial assets transferred within a legal entity to a counterparty. Subtopic 610-20, which was issued in May 2014 as part of ASU 2014-09 (discussed above), provides guidance for recognizing gains and losses from the transfer of nonfinancial assets in contracts with noncustomers. An entity is required to apply amendments in ASU 2017-05 at the same time it applies the amendments in ASU 2014-09 (discussed above). ASU 2017-05 requires modified retrospective application and is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim reporting periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The Company adopted ASU 2014-09 and ASU 2017-05 on January 1, 2018, and experienced an impact on the gain recognized related to the sale of the Second Closing Properties (as defined in Note 3 (Real Estate)). The sale of the Second Closing Properties is considered a partial sale and the Company no longer controlled the Second Closing Properties after the sale. The retained noncontrolling interest was recognized at fair value and a full gain on the sale was recognized under ASU 2014-09.

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting (“ASU 2017-09”). The FASB issued ASU 2017-09 to provide clarity and reduce both (1) diversity in practice and (2) cost and complexity when applying the guidance in Topic 718, Compensation - Stock Compensation, to a change to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award. The amendments in ASU 2017-09 provide guidance about which changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting in Topic 718. ASU 2017-09 requires prospective application and is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. Upon adoption of ASU 2017-09 on January 1, 2018, the Company did not experience a material impact.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework—Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement (“ASU 2018-13”). The FASB issued ASU 2018-13 to improve the effectiveness of fair value measurement disclosures by adding, eliminating, and modifying certain disclosure requirements. The amendments in ASU 2018-13 modify the disclosure requirements on fair value measurements in Topic 820, Fair Value Measurement, based on the concepts in FASB Concepts Statement, Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting—Chapter 8: Notes to Financial Statements, including the consideration of costs and benefits. ASU 2018-13 requires prospective and retrospective application depending on the amendment and is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2018-13 will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures and believes that certain disclosures of interest rate cap agreements in its consolidated financial statements may be impacted by the adoption of ASU 2018-13.