COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES	3 Months Ended
May 03, 2015
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES	NOTE 9 — COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES Internal Revenue Service The Company carried back tax net operating losses (“NOL”) from its tax years ended on February 3, 2008 and February 1, 2009 to tax years during which it was a member of The Home Depot Inc.’s (“Home Depot”) U.S. federal consolidated tax group. As a result of those NOL carrybacks, Home Depot received cash refunds from the IRS in the amount of approximately $354 million. Under an agreement (the “Agreement”) between the Company and Home Depot, Home Depot paid the Company the refund proceeds resulting from the NOL carrybacks. In January 2013 in connection with an audit of the Company’s U.S. federal income tax returns filed for the tax years ended on February 3, 2008 and February 1, 2009, the IRS issued a Revenue Agent’s Report (“RAR”) which proposed to disallow certain deductions claimed by the Company and a significant portion of the corresponding cash refunds resulting from the Company’s NOL carrybacks. Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, the Company would be required to reimburse Home Depot an amount equal to the disallowed refunds plus related interest. In collaboration with Home Depot, the Company challenged the proposed adjustments of the RAR by filing a formal protest with the IRS Office of Appeals. In July 2014, the Company reached a tentative settlement (“Tentative Settlement”) for approximately $27 million with the IRS Office of Appeals on the outstanding RAR. In order to stop the accrual of interest on the Tentative Settlement amount and as required under the Agreement, in August 2014 the Company made a payment of approximately $27 million to Home Depot which Home Depot then paid to the IRS. As a result of the Tentative Settlement, the Company’s deferred tax assets increased by approximately $12 million before the impact of the valuation allowance. The Tentative Settlement and the carryback claims were subject to review by the Joint Committee on Taxation (“JCT”) and the Tentative Settlement does not become effective nor are the carryback claims finalized until the JCT reviews them without objection or the IRS Office of Appeals executes such settlement, whichever comes first. The JCT is required to review refunds in excess of $2 million. On February 19, 2015, the Company received notification the Tentative Settlement was approved by the Joint Committee of Taxation. As a result of the approval and finalization of the Tentative Settlement, the tax years ending February 3, 2008 and February 1, 2009 are settled and closed to any further adjustments. See “Note 5, Income Taxes,” for further disclosures on the Company’s income taxes. Legal Matters As previously reported, the Office of the United States Attorney for the Northern District of New York (U.S. Attorney) is conducting an investigation related to the activities of certain disadvantaged business enterprises (DBEs), including American Indian Builders and Suppliers, Inc. (AIB). In May 2011, in connection with that investigation, the government executed a search of an entity from which Waterworks purchased assets shortly before the search was executed. On June 20, 2012, the government executed search warrants at two Waterworks branches. In July 2014, the Company received a Civil Investigative Demand (“CID”) issued by the U.S. Attorney pursuant to the False Claims Act in the course of an investigation to determine whether the Company knowingly submitted false claims to the government in connection with the Company’s sales to DBEs, and, in particular, AIB, on federally funded or partially-federally funded projects. The Company is updated by the government on its investigation periodically and continues to cooperate with the investigation. HD Supply is involved in various legal proceedings arising in the normal course of its business. The Company establishes reserves for litigation and similar matters when those matters present loss contingencies that it determines to be both probable and reasonably estimable in accordance with ASC 450, Contingencies. In the opinion of management, based on current knowledge, all reasonably estimable and probable matters, including the United States Attorney investigation matter described above, are believed to be adequately reserved for or covered by insurance and are not expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. For all other matters, except as noted below, management believes the possibility of losses from such matters is not probable, the potential loss from such matters is not reasonably estimable, or such matters are of such kind or involve such amounts that would not have a material adverse effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company if disposed of unfavorably. For material matters that are reasonably possible and reasonably estimable, including matters that are probable and estimable but for which the amount that is reasonably possible is in excess of the amount that the Company has accrued for, management has estimated the aggregate range of potential loss as $0 to $10 million. If a material loss is probable or reasonably possible, and in either case estimable, the Company has considered it in the analysis and it is included in the discussion set forth above.

NOTE 9 — COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Internal Revenue Service

The Company carried back tax net operating losses (“NOL”) from its tax years ended on February 3, 2008 and February 1, 2009 to tax years during which it was a member of The Home Depot Inc.’s (“Home Depot”) U.S. federal consolidated tax group. As a result of those NOL carrybacks, Home Depot received cash refunds from the IRS in the amount of approximately $354 million. Under an agreement (the “Agreement”) between the Company and Home Depot, Home Depot paid the Company the refund proceeds resulting from the NOL carrybacks.

In January 2013 in connection with an audit of the Company’s U.S. federal income tax returns filed for the tax years ended on February 3, 2008 and February 1, 2009, the IRS issued a Revenue Agent’s Report (“RAR”) which proposed to disallow certain deductions claimed by the Company and a significant portion of the corresponding cash refunds resulting from the Company’s NOL carrybacks. Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, the Company would be required to reimburse Home Depot an amount equal to the disallowed refunds plus related interest. In collaboration with Home Depot, the Company challenged the proposed adjustments of the RAR by filing a formal protest with the IRS Office of Appeals. In July 2014, the Company reached a tentative settlement (“Tentative Settlement”) for approximately $27 million with the IRS Office of Appeals on the outstanding RAR. In order to stop the accrual of interest on the Tentative Settlement amount and as required under the Agreement, in August 2014 the Company made a payment of approximately $27 million to Home Depot which Home Depot then paid to the IRS. As a result of the Tentative Settlement, the Company’s deferred tax assets increased by approximately $12 million before the impact of the valuation allowance.

The Tentative Settlement and the carryback claims were subject to review by the Joint Committee on Taxation (“JCT”) and the Tentative Settlement does not become effective nor are the carryback claims finalized until the JCT reviews them without objection or the IRS Office of Appeals executes such settlement, whichever comes first. The JCT is required to review refunds in excess of $2 million.

On February 19, 2015, the Company received notification the Tentative Settlement was approved by the Joint Committee of Taxation. As a result of the approval and finalization of the Tentative Settlement, the tax years ending February 3, 2008 and February 1, 2009 are settled and closed to any further adjustments.

See “Note 5, Income Taxes,” for further disclosures on the Company’s income taxes.

Legal Matters

As previously reported, the Office of the United States Attorney for the Northern District of New York (U.S. Attorney) is conducting an investigation related to the activities of certain disadvantaged business enterprises (DBEs), including American Indian Builders and Suppliers, Inc. (AIB). In May 2011, in connection with that investigation, the government executed a search of an entity from which Waterworks purchased assets shortly before the search was executed. On June 20, 2012, the government executed search warrants at two Waterworks branches. In July 2014, the Company received a Civil Investigative Demand (“CID”) issued by the U.S. Attorney pursuant to the False Claims Act in the course of an investigation to determine whether the Company knowingly submitted false claims to the government in connection with the Company’s sales to DBEs, and, in particular, AIB, on federally funded or partially-federally funded projects. The Company is updated by the government on its investigation periodically and continues to cooperate with the investigation.

HD Supply is involved in various legal proceedings arising in the normal course of its business. The Company establishes reserves for litigation and similar matters when those matters present loss contingencies that it determines to be both probable and reasonably estimable in accordance with ASC 450, Contingencies. In the opinion of management, based on current knowledge, all reasonably estimable and probable matters, including the United States Attorney investigation matter described above, are believed to be adequately reserved for or covered by insurance and are not expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. For all other matters, except as noted below, management believes the possibility of losses from such matters is not probable, the potential loss from such matters is not reasonably estimable, or such matters are of such kind or involve such amounts that would not have a material adverse effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company if disposed of unfavorably. For material matters that are reasonably possible and reasonably estimable, including matters that are probable and estimable but for which the amount that is reasonably possible is in excess of the amount that the Company has accrued for, management has estimated the aggregate range of potential loss as $0 to $10 million. If a material loss is probable or reasonably possible, and in either case estimable, the Company has considered it in the analysis and it is included in the discussion set forth above.