XML 43 R24.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.6.0.2
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
12 Months Ended
Jan. 29, 2017
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES  
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

NOTE 12—COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Lease Commitments

        HD Supply occupies certain facilities and operates certain equipment and vehicles under leases that expire at various dates through the year 2037. In addition to minimum rentals, there are certain executory costs such as real estate taxes, insurance, and common area maintenance on most of its facility leases. Expense under these leases totaled $154 million, $139 million, and $125 million in fiscal 2016, fiscal 2015, and fiscal 2014, respectively.

        Future minimum aggregate rental payments under non-cancelable operating leases as of January 29, 2017 are as follows (amounts in millions):

                                                                                                                                                                                    

 

 

Fiscal Year

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2017

 

2018

 

2019

 

2020

 

2021

 

Thereafter

 

Total

 

Operating Leases

 

$

147 

 

 

131 

 

 

106 

 

 

70 

 

 

45 

 

 

56 

 

$

555 

 

Build-to-Suit Lease(i)

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

105 

 

$

127 

 


 

 

 

(i)          

Represents the future cash payments for the leadership development and headquarters facility currently under construction in Atlanta, Georgia. See "Note 10, Supplemental Balance Sheet and Cash Flow Information" for further information.

 

        The Company subleases certain leased facilities to third parties. In addition, the Company leases certain owned facilities to third parties. Total future minimum rentals to be received under non-cancelable subleases and leases as of January 29, 2017 are approximately $34 million. These subleases and leases expire at various dates through the year 2025.

Purchase Obligations

        As of January 29, 2017, the Company has agreements in place with various vendors to purchase goods and services, primarily inventory, in the aggregate amount of $382 million. These purchase obligations are generally cancelable, but the Company has no intent to cancel. Payment is due during fiscal 2017 for these obligations.

Internal Revenue Service

        The Company carried back tax net operating losses ("NOL") from its tax years ended on February 3, 2008 and February 1, 2009 to tax years during which it was a member of The Home Depot Inc.'s ("Home Depot") U.S. federal consolidated tax group. As a result of those NOL carrybacks, Home Depot received cash refunds from the IRS in the amount of approximately $354 million. Under an agreement (the "Agreement") between the Company and Home Depot, Home Depot paid the Company the refund proceeds resulting from the NOL carrybacks.

        In January 2013 in connection with an audit of the Company's U.S. federal income tax returns filed for the tax years ended on February 3, 2008 and February 1, 2009, the IRS issued a Revenue Agent's Report ("RAR") which proposed to disallow certain deductions claimed by the Company and a significant portion of the corresponding cash refunds resulting from the Company's NOL carrybacks. Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, the Company would be required to reimburse Home Depot an amount equal to the disallowed refunds plus related interest. In collaboration with Home Depot, the Company challenged the proposed adjustments of the RAR by filing a formal protest with the IRS Office of Appeals. In July 2014, the Company reached a tentative settlement ("Tentative Settlement") for approximately $27 million with the IRS Office of Appeals on the outstanding RAR. In order to stop the accrual of interest on the Tentative Settlement amount and as required under the Agreement, in August 2014 the Company made a payment of approximately $27 million to Home Depot which Home Depot then paid to the IRS. As a result of the Tentative Settlement, the Company's deferred tax assets increased by approximately $12 million before the impact of the valuation allowance.

        The Tentative Settlement and the carryback claims were subject to review by the Joint Committee on Taxation ("JCT") and the Tentative Settlement does not become effective nor are the carryback claims finalized until the JCT reviews them without objection or the IRS Office of Appeals executes such settlement, whichever comes first. The JCT is required to review refunds in excess of $2 million.

        On February 19, 2015, the Company received notification the Tentative Settlement was approved by the JCT. As a result of the approval and finalization of the Tentative Settlement, the tax years ending February 3, 2008 and February 1, 2009 are settled and closed to any further adjustments.

        See "Note 7, Income Taxes," for further disclosures on the Company's income taxes.

Legal Matters

        HD Supply is involved in various legal proceedings arising in the normal course of its business. The Company establishes reserves for litigation and similar matters when those matters present loss contingencies that it determines to be both probable and reasonably estimable in accordance with ASC 450, "Contingencies." In the opinion of management, based on current knowledge, all reasonably estimable and probable matters are believed to be adequately reserved for or covered by insurance and are not expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company's consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. For all other matters management believes the possibility of losses from such matters is not probable, the potential loss from such matters is not reasonably estimable, or such matters, if disposed of unfavorably to the Company, are of such kind or involve such amounts that would not have a material adverse effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company. For material matters that are reasonably possible and reasonably estimable, including matters that are probable and estimable but for which the amount that is reasonably possible is in excess of the amount that the Company has accrued for, management has estimated the aggregate range of potential loss as $0 to $15 million. If a material loss is probable or reasonably possible, and in either case estimable, the Company has considered it in the analysis and it is included in the discussion set forth above.