10-K 1 a2223690z10-k.htm 10-K

Use these links to rapidly review the document
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
PART IV

Table of Contents

 

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

ý

 

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended February 1, 2015

or

o

 

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transaction period from                        to                       

 

Commission
File Number
  Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter, Address of principal
executive offices and Telephone number
  State of incorporation   I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number
 

001-35979

  HD SUPPLY HOLDINGS, INC.
3100 Cumberland Boulevard, Suite 1480
Atlanta, Georgia 30339
(770) 852-9000
  Delaware   26-0486780
 

333-159809

 

HD SUPPLY, INC.
3100 Cumberland Boulevard, Suite 1480
Atlanta, Georgia 30339
(770) 852-9000

 

Delaware

 

75-2007383

           Securities registered pursuant to Section 12 (b) of the Act:

HD Supply Holdings, Inc.: Common stock, par value $0.01
per share HD Supply, Inc.: None
 

  The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC 

(Title of Each Class)

  (Name of Each Exchange on which Registered)

           Securities registered pursuant to Section 12 (g) of the Act:

  None     

  (Title of Class)    

           Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

HD Supply Holdings, Inc.

    Yes ý     No o  

HD Supply, Inc.

    Yes o     No ý  

           Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.

HD Supply Holdings, Inc.

    Yes o     No ý  

HD Supply, Inc.

    Yes ý     No o  

           Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

HD Supply Holdings, Inc.

    Yes ý     No o  

HD Supply, Inc.

    Yes o     No ý  

           Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

HD Supply Holdings, Inc.

    Yes ý     No o  

HD Supply, Inc.

    Yes ý     No o  

           Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.

HD Supply Holdings, Inc.

    ý        

HD Supply, Inc.

    ý        

           Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

HD Supply Holdings, Inc.

       

Large accelerated filer ý

 

Accelerated filer o

 

Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a
smaller reporting company)

 

Smaller reporting company o

HD Supply, Inc.

 

 

 

 

Large accelerated filer o

 

Accelerated filer o

 

Non-accelerated filer ý
(Do not check if a
smaller reporting company)

 

Smaller reporting company o

           Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).

HD Supply Holdings, Inc.

    Yes o     No ý  

HD Supply, Inc.

    Yes o     No ý  

           The number of shares of the registrant's common stock outstanding as of March 17, 2015:

HD Supply Holdings, Inc.

  197,256,618 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share

HD Supply, Inc.

 

1,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, all of which were owned by HDS Holding Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary of HD Supply Holdings, Inc.

           HD Supply, Inc. meets the conditions set forth in General Instruction I(1)(a) and (b) of Form 10-K and is therefore filing this Form with the reduced disclosure format applicable to HD Supply, Inc.

Documents incorporated by reference:

           Portions of HD Supply Holdings, Inc.'s proxy statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with HD Supply Holdings, Inc.'s 2015 annual meeting of stockholders (the "Proxy Statement') are incorporated by reference into Part III hereof. Such Proxy Statement will be filed within 120 days of HD Supply Holdings, Inc.'s fiscal year ended February 1, 2015.


Table of Contents


INDEX TO FORM 10-K

 
   
  Page  
 

 

Explanatory Note

    1  
 

 

Background Information and Glossary of Certain Defined Terms

    1  
 

 

Forward-looking statements and information

    4  
 

Part I

 

 

       
 

Item 1.

 

Business

    6  
 

Item 1A.

 

Risk Factors

    14  
 

Item 1B.

 

Unresolved Staff Comments

    39  
 

Item 2.

 

Properties

    40  
 

Item 3.

 

Legal Proceedings

    40  
 

Item 4.

 

Mine Safety Disclosures

    40  
 

Part II

 

 

       
 

Item 5.

 

Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

    41  
 

Item 6.

 

Selected Financial Data

    43  
 

Item 7.

 

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

    46  
 

Item 7A.

 

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

    88  
 

Item 8.

 

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

    89  
 

Item 9.

 

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

    159  
 

Item 9A.

 

Controls and Procedures

    159  
 

Item 9B.

 

Other Information

    160  
 

Part III

 

 

       
 

Item 10.

 

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

    161  
 

Item 11.

 

Executive Compensation

    161  
 

Item 12.

 

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

    161  
 

Item 13.

 

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

    161  
 

Item 14.

 

Principal Accounting Fees and Services

    161  
 

Part IV

 

 

       
 

Item 15.

 

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

    163  
 

Signatures

    174  

Table of Contents

EXPLANATORY NOTE

        This Form 10-K is a combined annual report being filed separately by two registrants: HD Supply Holdings, Inc. and HD Supply, Inc. Unless the context indicates otherwise, any reference in this report to "Holdings" refers to HD Supply Holdings, Inc., any reference to "HDS" refers to HD Supply, Inc., the indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Holdings, and any references to "HD Supply," the "Company," "we," "us" and "our" refer to HD Supply Holdings, Inc. together with its direct and indirect subsidiaries, including HDS. Each registrant hereto is filing on its own behalf all of the information contained in this annual report that relates to such registrant. Each registrant hereto is not filing any information that does not relate to such registrant, and therefore makes no representation as to any such information.

Background Information and Glossary of Certain Defined Terms

The 2007 Transactions

        On August 30, 2007, investment funds associated with Clayton, Dubilier & Rice, LLC ("CD&R"), The Carlyle Group ("Carlyle") and Bain Capital Partners, LLC ("Bain", and together with CD&R and Carlyle, the "Equity Sponsors") formed Holdings (previously named HDS Investment Holding, Inc.) and entered into a stock purchase agreement with The Home Depot, Inc. ("Home Depot") pursuant to which Home Depot agreed to sell to Holdings, or to a wholly-owned subsidiary of Holdings, certain intellectual property and all the outstanding common stock of HDS and the Canadian subsidiary CND Holdings, Inc. On August 30, 2007, through a series of transactions, Holdings' direct wholly-owned subsidiary, HDS Holding Corporation, acquired direct control of HDS through the merger of its wholly-owned subsidiary, HDS Acquisition Corp., with and into HDS and CND Holdings, Inc. Through these transactions (the "2007 Transactions"), Home Depot was paid cash of $8.2 billion and 12.5% of Holdings' then outstanding common stock.

        Upon completion of Holdings' secondary public offerings in fiscal 2014, CD&R and Carlyle sold all of their remaining original investment in Holdings. As of February 1, 2015, Bain and Home Depot continue to hold approximately 13% and 2%, respectively, of Holdings' Common Stock.

Defined Terms for Indebtedness

        In this annual report on Form 10-K, unless otherwise indicated or the context otherwise requires:

    "12.0% Senior Notes" refers to HDS's 12.0% Senior Cash Pay Notes due 2014.

    "2007 ABL Credit Facility" refers to the senior asset based revolving credit facility entered into by HDS (as successor by merger to HDS Acquisition Subsidiary, Inc.) on August 30, 2007 (as amended by Amendment No. 1, dated as of October 3, 2007, Amendment No. 2, dated as of November 1, 2007, and Limited Consent and Amendment No. 3, dated as of March 19, 2010), in an aggregate principal amount of $2,100 million, a portion of which may be used for letters of credit or swing-line loans.

    "2007 Senior Secured Credit Facility" refers to the senior secured credit facility entered into by HDS (as successor by merger to HDS Acquisition Subsidiary, Inc.) on August 30, 2007, as amended on October 2, 2007, November 1, 2007, and March 19, 2010, which consists of a $1,000 million term loan facility and a $300 million revolving credit facility.

    "2007 Senior Subordinated Notes" refers to HDS's 13.5% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2015.

    "2007 Term Loan" refers to the $1,000 million term loan facility under the 2007 Senior Secured Credit Facility.

1


Table of Contents

    "2012 First Priority Notes" refers collectively to the April 2012 First Priority Notes and the Additional Notes.

    "Additional Notes" refers to HDS's 81/8% Senior Secured First Priority Notes due 2019 issued on August 2, 2012 in an aggregate principal amount of $300 million.

    "April 2012 First Priority Notes" refers to HDS's 81/8% Senior Secured First Priority Notes due 2019 issued on April 12, 2012 in an aggregate principal amount of $950 million.

    "April 2012 Second Priority Notes" refers to HDS's 11.0% Senior Secured Second Priority Notes due 2020 issued on April 12, 2012 in an aggregate principal amount of $675 million.

    "April 2012 Senior Unsecured Notes" refers to HDS's 14.875% Senior Notes due 2020 issued on April 12, 2012 in an aggregate principal amount of $757 million.

    "December 2014 First Priority Notes" refers to HDS's 5.25% Senior Secured First Priority Notes due 2021 issued on December 4, 2014 in an aggregate principal amount of $1,250 million.

    "February 2013 Senior Unsecured Notes" refers to HDS's 7.50% Senior Notes due 2020 issued on February 1, 2013 in an aggregate principal amount of $1,275 million.

    "January 2013 Senior Subordinated Notes" refers to HDS's 10.5% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2021 issued on January 16, 2013 in an aggregate principal amount of $950 million.

    "October 2012 Senior Unsecured Notes" refers to HDS's 11.50% Senior Notes due 2020 issued on October 15, 2012 in an aggregate principal amount of $1,000 million.

    "Priority Notes" refers collectively to the December 2014 First Priority Notes and the April 2012 Second Priority Notes.

    "Refinancing Transactions" refers to the transactions described below in "Description of Indebtedness."

    "Senior ABL Facility" refers to HDS's asset based lending facility issued on April 12, 2012, providing for senior secured revolving loans and letters of credit of up to a maximum aggregate principal amount of $1,500 million (subject to availability under the borrowing base).

    "Senior Credit Facilities" refers collectively to the Senior ABL Facility and the Term Loan Facility.

    "Senior Notes" refers collectively to the October 2012 Senior Unsecured Notes and February 2013 Senior Unsecured Notes.

    "Term Loan" refers to the term loans issued under the Term Loan Facility.

    "Term Loan Facility" refers to HDS's senior secured credit facility issued on April 12, 2012, providing for Term Loans in an aggregate principal amount of $1,000 million.

    "THD Guarantee" refers to Home Depot's guarantee of our payment obligations for principal and interest of the 2007 Term Loan under the 2007 Senior Secured Credit Facility.

Description of Indebtedness

        The following transactions (the "Refinancing Transactions") occurred on April 12, 2012:

    Entry into the Term Loan Facility and the repayment of all amounts outstanding under the 2007 Senior Secured Credit Facility.

    Entry into the Senior ABL Facility and the repayment of all amounts outstanding under the 2007 ABL Credit Facility.

2


Table of Contents

    Bain and Carlyle exchanged certain of the 12.0% Senior Notes held by them prior to the redemption of the 12.0% Senior Notes for a portion of the April 2012 Senior Unsecured Notes (the "Sponsor Exchange").

    CD&R purchased a portion of the April 2012 Senior Unsecured Notes (the "CD&R Purchase" and together with the Sponsor Exchange, the "April 2012 Senior Unsecured Notes Issuance").

    The issuance of the April 2012 First Priority Notes.

    The issuance of the April 2012 Second Priority Notes.

    The redemption of the remaining 12.0% Senior Notes.

    The termination of the THD Guarantee.

        On August 2, 2012, HDS issued the Additional Notes. The net proceeds from the Additional Notes issuance were used to reduce outstanding borrowings under the Senior ABL Facility.

        On October 15, 2012, HDS issued the October 2012 Senior Unsecured Notes. On November 8, 2012, the net proceeds from the October 2012 Senior Unsecured Notes issuance were used to redeem $930 million aggregate principal amount of 2007 Senior Subordinated Notes at a price of 103.375%.

        On January 16, 2013, HDS issued the January 2013 Senior Subordinated Notes. On February 8, 2013, the net proceeds from the January 2013 Senior Subordinated Notes issuance were used to redeem all of the remaining outstanding principal amount of 2007 Senior Subordinated Notes at a price of 103.375%.

        On February 1, 2013, HDS issued the February 2013 Senior Unsecured Notes due 2020. The net proceeds from the February 2013 Senior Unsecured Notes issuance were used to repurchase all of the outstanding principal amount of April 2012 Senior Unsecured Notes at a price equal to the principal amount of the April 2012 Senior Unsecured Notes repurchased plus a make-whole premium (calculated pursuant to the formula set forth in the indenture governing the April 2012 Senior Unsecured Notes to a repurchase date of February 1, 2013). Also on February 1, 2013, the trustee for the April 2012 Senior Unsecured Notes cancelled all of the outstanding April 2012 Senior Unsecured Notes.

        On February 15, 2013, HDS modified the Term Loan Facility to lower the applicable borrowing margins and replace the hard call provision applicable to optional prepayment of term loans thereunder with a soft call option.

        On June 28, 2013, HDS amended the Senior ABL Facility to reduce the applicable margins, reduce the commitment fee, extend the maturity date, make certain changes to the borrowing base, and reduce the sublimit available for letters of credit.

        On August 1, 2013, HDS redeemed all $950 million outstanding aggregate principal amount of the January 2013 Senior Subordinated Notes at a redemption price equal to 103%.

        On February 6, 2014, HDS amended the Term Loan Facility to lower the applicable borrowing margins, extend the maturity date, add a soft call provision applicable to optional prepayment of term loans thereunder, and add a provision whereby HDS may withhold up to $150 million from repayments otherwise required to be made with the proceeds of asset sales and use such proceeds to repay any debt, including debt that is junior to the term loans.

        On December 4, 2014, HDS issued the December 2014 First Priority Notes at par.

        On December 19, 2014, HDS used the net proceeds from the December 2014 First Priority Notes issuance, together with available cash, to redeem all of the outstanding 2012 First Priority Notes.

        HDS's Senior Credit Facilities, December 2014 First Priority Notes, April 2012 Second Priority Notes, October 2012 Senior Notes and February 2013 Senior Unsecured Notes are discussed in greater

3


Table of Contents

detail in "Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 7, Debt" within this annual report on Form 10-K.

Glossary of Certain Other Terms

ASC   Accounting Standards Codification
DCF   Discounted cash flow
DOT   U.S. Department of Transportation
Exchange Act   Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Fiscal 2012   Fiscal year ended February 3, 2013
Fiscal 2013   Fiscal year ended February 2, 2014
Fiscal 2014   Fiscal year ended February 1, 2015
GAAP   Generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America
Gross margin   Gross profit as a percentage of net sales
HDS   HD Supply, Inc.
HDPE   High-density polyethylene
Holdings   HD Supply Holdings, Inc.
Home Depot   The Home Depot, Inc.
HVAC   Heating, ventilating, and air conditioning
IPVF   Industrial Pipes, Valves and Fittings
MRO   Maintenance, repair and operations
NOLs   Net operating losses
Peachtree   Peachtree Business Products LLC
PIK   Paid-in-kind
PVC   Polyvinyl chlorides
RAMSCO   Rexford Albany Municipal Supply Company, Inc.
SKU   Stock-keeping unit
SEC   U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Vendor rebates   Vendors providing for inventory purchase rebates

Forward-looking statements and information

        This annual report on Form 10-K includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Some of the forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terms such as "believes," "expects," "may," "will," "should," "could," "seeks," "intends," "plans," "estimates," "anticipates" or other comparable terms. These forward-looking statements include all matters that are not historical facts. They appear in a number of places throughout this report and include statements regarding our intentions, beliefs or current expectations concerning, among other things, our results of operations, financial condition, liquidity, prospects, growth strategies and the industries in which we operate.

        Forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties, many of which may be beyond our control. We caution you that forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and that our actual results of operations, financial condition and liquidity, and the development of the industries in which we operate may differ materially from those made in or suggested by the forward-looking statements contained in this report. In addition, even if our results of operations, financial condition and liquidity, and the development of the industries in which we operate are consistent with the forward-looking statements contained in this report, those results or developments may not be indicative of results or developments in subsequent periods. A number of important factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in or implied by the forward-looking statements, including those reflected in forward-looking statements relating to our operations and business, the risks and uncertainties discussed in this annual report on Form 10-K (See

4


Table of Contents

Item 1A, Risk Factors) and those described from time to time in our other filings with the SEC. Factors that could cause actual results to differ from those reflected in forward-looking statements relating to our operations and business include:

    inherent risks of the maintenance, repair and operations market, infrastructure spending and the non-residential and residential construction markets;

    our ability to achieve and maintain profitability;

    our ability to service our debt and to refinance all or a portion of our indebtedness;

    limitations and restrictions in the agreements governing our indebtedness;

    the competitive environment in which we operate and demand for our products and services in highly competitive and fragmented industries;

    the loss of any of our significant customers;

    competitive pricing pressure from our customers;

    our ability to identify and acquire suitable acquisition candidates on favorable terms;

    cyclicality and seasonality of the maintenance, repair and operations market, infrastructure spending and the non-residential and residential construction markets;

    our ability to identify and develop relationships with a sufficient number of qualified suppliers and to maintain our supply chains;

    our ability to manage fixed costs;

    the development of alternatives to distributors in the supply chain;

    our ability to manage our working capital through product purchasing and customer credit policies;

    potential material liabilities under our self-insured programs;

    our ability to attract, train and retain highly qualified associates and key personnel;

    limitations on our income tax net operating loss carryforwards in the event of an ownership change;

    our ability to identify and integrate new products; and

    the influence Bain has over corporate decisions.

        You should read this annual report on Form 10-K completely and with the understanding that actual future results may be materially different from expectations. All forward-looking statements made in this report are qualified by these cautionary statements. These forward-looking statements are made only as of the date of this annual report on Form 10-K, and we do not undertake any obligation, other than as may be required by law, to update or revise any forward-looking statements to reflect changes in assumptions, the occurrence of unanticipated events, changes in future operating results over time or otherwise. Comparisons of results for current and any prior periods are not intended to express any future trends or indications of future performance, unless expressed as such, and should only be viewed as historical data.

5


Table of Contents


PART I

ITEM 1.    BUSINESS

Our Company

        HD Supply is one of the largest industrial distributors in North America. We believe we have leading positions in the three distinct market sectors in which we specialize: Maintenance, Repair & Operations ("MRO"); Infrastructure & Power; and Specialty Construction. These market sectors are large and fragmented, and we believe they present opportunities for significant growth. We aspire to be the "First Choice" of customers, associates, suppliers and the communities in which we operate. This aspiration drives our relentless focus and is reflected in the customer and market centricity, speed and precision, intense teamwork, process excellence and trusted relationships that define our culture. We believe this aspiration distinguishes us from other distributors and has created value for our shareholders, driven above-market growth and delivered attractive returns on invested capital.

        We serve our markets with an integrated go-to-market strategy. We operate through approximately 650 locations across 48 U.S. states and seven Canadian provinces. We have approximately 15,000 associates delivering localized, customer-tailored products, services and expertise. We serve approximately 500,000 customers, which include contractors, government entities, maintenance professionals, home builders and industrial businesses. Our broad range of end-to-end product lines and services include over one million SKUs of quality, name-brand and proprietary-brand products as well as value-add services supporting the entire life-cycle of a project from infrastructure and construction to maintenance, repair and operations.

        For the fiscal year ended February 1, 2015, or fiscal 2014, we:

    generated $8.9 billion in Net sales, representing 8% growth over the fiscal year ended February 2, 2014, or fiscal 2013;

    generated Net income of $3 million in fiscal 2014, as compared to a Net loss of $218 million in fiscal 2013, and;

    generated $854 million of Adjusted EBITDA, representing 16% growth over fiscal 2013;

    generated $251 million of Adjusted net income in fiscal 2014, as compared to $77 million in fiscal 2013.

        For a reconciliation of Net income (loss), the most directly comparable financial measure under GAAP, to Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted net income, see "Part II, Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Key Business Metrics—Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted Net Income (Loss)."

        We believe our long-standing customer relationships and competitive advantage stem from our knowledgeable associates, extensive product and service offerings, national footprint, integrated best-in-class technology, broad purchasing scale and strategic supplier relationships. We believe that our comprehensive supply chain solutions improve the effectiveness and efficiency of our customers' businesses. Our value-add services include customer training, material and product fabrication, kitting, jobsite delivery, will-call pickup options, as well as onsite managed inventory, online material management and emergency response capabilities. Furthermore, we believe our product application knowledge, comprehensive product assortment, and sourcing expertise allow our customers to perform reliably and give them the tools to enhance profitability.

        We reach our customers through a variety of sales channels, including professional outside and inside sales forces, call centers and branch-supported direct marketing programs utilizing market-specific product catalogs, and business unit websites. Our distribution network allows us to provide rapid, reliable, on-time delivery and customer pickup throughout the United States and Canada.

6


Table of Contents

Additionally, we believe our highly integrated, best-in-class technology provides leading e-commerce and integrated workflow capabilities for our customers, while providing us unparalleled pricing, budgeting, reporting and analytical capabilities across our Company. We believe customers view us as an integral part of the value chain due to our extensive product knowledge, expansive product availability and the ability to directly integrate with their systems and workflows.

Our Strategy

        Since 2007 we have undertaken significant operating and growth initiatives at all levels. We developed and are implementing a multi-year strategy to optimize our business mix. This strategy includes entering new markets and product lines, streamlining and upgrading our process and technology capabilities, acquiring new capabilities and selling non-core business units. At the same time, we attracted what we believe to be "best of the best" talent, capitalizing on relevant experience, teamwork and change navigation. As a result of this transformation, we believe our Company is well-positioned to continue to grow in excess of the markets in which we operate.

        In fiscal 2014, we focused our investments in high-growth initiatives, primarily in sales initiatives to service our existing customer base, including the addition of new sales talent across the Company and a training facility for our Waterworks business to ensure we continue to have a highly trained sales force; and in the addition of new products and services, including proprietary brands, primarily in our Facilities Maintenance business. We also continue to expand the channels to reach our customers, including investment in mobile technologies and e-commerce, and to acquire new customers, primarily through entering new geographies.

        HD Supply is managed primarily on a product-line basis and reports results of operations in four reportable segments. The reportable segments are Facilities Maintenance, Waterworks, Power Solutions, and Construction & Industrial—White Cap. Other operating segments include Home Improvement Solutions, Interior Solutions, and HD Supply Canada. In addition, the consolidated financial statements include Corporate, which comprises enterprise-wide functional departments that operate in a centralized structure.

        Facilities Maintenance.    Facilities Maintenance distributes MRO products, provides value-add services and fabricates custom products. Our Facilities Maintenance business unit serves the owners of multifamily, hospitality, healthcare and institutional facilities. Products include electrical and lighting items, plumbing, HVAC products, appliances, janitorial supplies, hardware, kitchen and bath cabinets, window coverings, textiles and guest amenities, healthcare maintenance and water and wastewater treatment products. Facilities Maintenance operates a distribution center-based model that sells its products primarily through a professional sales force, print catalogs and e-commerce.

        Waterworks.    Waterworks distributes complete lines of water and wastewater transmission products, serving contractors and municipalities in the water and wastewater industries for non-residential and residential uses. Our Waterworks business unit serves non-residential, residential, water systems, sewage systems and other markets. Waterworks reaches customers through a nationwide network of regionally organized branches and operates a bid-based model, primarily for municipal projects. Products include pipes, fittings, valves, hydrants and meters for use in the construction, maintenance and repair of water and waste-water systems as well as fire-protection systems. Waterworks has complemented its core products through additional offerings, including smart meters (AMR/ AMI), fusible piping solutions and specific engineered treatment plant products and services. Waterworks' services and capabilities allow us to integrate with our customers and form part of their sourcing and procurement function.

        Power Solutions.    Power Solutions distributes electrical transmission and distribution products, power plant MRO supplies and smart-grid products, and arranges materials management and procurement outsourcing for the power generation and distribution industries. Our Power Solutions

7


Table of Contents

business unit serves the utilities and electrical markets. Power Solutions serves electric power plant customers primarily through a bid-based model and, to a lesser extent, sells MRO products through print catalogs. Products include conductors such as wire and cable, transformers, overhead transmission and distribution hardware, switches, protective devices and underground distribution, connectors used in the construction or maintenance and repair of electricity transmission and substation distribution infrastructure, and electrical wire and cable, switchgear, supplies, lighting and conduit used in non-residential and residential construction. Power Solutions also provides materials management and procurement outsourcing services. Power Solutions' capabilities allow us to integrate with our customers and perform part of their sourcing and procurement function.

        Construction & Industrial—White Cap.    Construction & Industrial—White Cap distributes specialized hardware, tools, engineered materials and safety products to non-residential and residential contractors. Service offerings range from pre-bid assistance and product submittals to engineering and tool repair. Construction & Industrial—White Cap reaches customers through a nationwide network of regionally organized branches as well as print catalogs and e-commerce. Products include tilt-up brace systems, forming and shoring systems, concrete chemicals, hand and power tools, rebar, ladders, safety and fall arrest equipment, specialty screws and fasteners, sealants and adhesives, drainage pipe, geo-synthetics, erosion and sediment control equipment and other engineered materials used broadly across all types of non-residential and residential construction.

        Corporate & Other.    In addition to the reportable segments, our consolidated financial results include "Corporate & Other." Corporate & Other is comprised of the following operating segments: Interior Solutions, Home Improvement Solutions and HD Supply Canada. Interior Solutions offers turnkey supply and installation services for multiple interior finish options, including flooring, cabinets, countertops, and window coverings, along with comprehensive design center services for non-residential, residential and senior living projects. Home Improvement Solutions offers light remodeling and construction supplies, kitchen and bath cabinets, windows, plumbing materials, electrical equipment and other products, primarily to small remodeling contractors and trade professionals. HD Supply Canada is an industrial distributor that primarily focuses on servicing fastener/industrial supply markets operating across six Canadian provinces. Corporate & Other also includes costs related to our centralized support functions, which are comprised of finance, information technology, human resources, legal, supply chain and other support services, and removes inter-segment transactions.

Our Market Sectors

        We offer a diverse range of products and services to the Maintenance, Repair & Operations, Infrastructure & Power and Specialty Construction market sectors in the United States and Canada. The markets in which we operate have a high degree of customer and supplier fragmentation, with customers that typically demand a high level of service and availability of a broad set of complex products from a large number of suppliers. These market dynamics make the distributor a critical element within the value chain. Net sales for HD Supply outside the United States, primarily Canada, were $375 million, $326 million, and $248 million in fiscal 2014, fiscal 2013, and fiscal 2012, respectively.

Maintenance, Repair & Operations

        In the Maintenance, Repair & Operations market sector, our Facilities Maintenance and Home Improvement Solutions business units serve customers across multiple industries by primarily delivering supplies and services needed to maintain and upgrade multifamily, hospitality, healthcare and institutional facilities. Facilities Maintenance is a distribution center-based model, while Home Improvement Solutions operates through retail outlets primarily serving cash and carry customers. We estimate that this market sector currently represents an addressable market in excess of $51 billion annually with demand driven primarily by ongoing maintenance requirements of a broad range of

8


Table of Contents

existing structures and traditional repair and remodeling construction activity across multiple industries. We believe Facilities Maintenance customers value speed and product availability over price. In addition, we believe that our leadership position in this sector positions us to capitalize on improving business conditions across our addressable market. For example, we expect to benefit from the relative stability of demand for MRO materials during periods of lower vacancy rates within multifamily housing and higher occupancy rates within hospitality.

Infrastructure & Power

        In the Infrastructure & Power market sector, our Waterworks and Power Solutions business units support both established infrastructure and new projects by meeting demand for critical supplies and services used to build and maintain water systems and electrical power generation, transmission and distribution infrastructure. We estimate that this market sector currently represents an addressable market in excess of $46 billion annually with demand in the United States driven primarily by an aging and overburdened national infrastructure, general population growth trends and the need for cost-effective energy distribution. The broad geographic presence of our business units, through a regionally organized branch distribution network, reduces our exposure to economic factors in any single region. We believe we have the potential to capitalize on a substantial backlog of deferred projects that will need to be addressed in the coming years as a result of our customers delaying much needed upgrades or repairs during the recent economic downturn as well as a recovery in the non-residential and residential construction markets.

Specialty Construction

        In the Specialty Construction market sector, our Construction & Industrial—White Cap and Interior Solutions business units serve professional contractors and trades by meeting their distinct and customized supply needs in non-residential, residential and industrial applications. We estimate that this market sector currently represents an addressable market in excess of $21 billion annually with demand driven primarily by residential construction, non-residential construction, industrial and repair and remodeling construction spending. Construction & Industrial—White Cap is our primary business unit serving this sector through the broad national presence of its regionally organized branch distribution network. Interior Solutions serves its market through a network of branches and design centers. We believe we are well-positioned to benefit from the recovery from historical lows within the non-residential and residential construction end-markets.

Our History

        In March 1997, Home Depot, the former parent of our operating subsidiaries, acquired Maintenance Warehouse / America Corp., a Texas corporation organized on January 26, 1985, and a leading direct marketer of MRO products to the hospitality and multifamily housing markets. Since 1997, our business has grown rapidly, primarily through the acquisition of more than 40 businesses.

        From fiscal 2000 to fiscal 2004, we extended our presence into new categories while growing existing businesses through 10 acquisitions. New businesses included plumbing and HVAC (through the acquisition of Apex Supply), flooring products and installation (Floors, Inc., Floorworks, Inc., Arvada Hardwood Floor Company) and specialty hardware, tools and materials for construction contractors (White Cap). Growth at existing businesses was driven organically and through "tuck-in" acquisitions, expanding our presence in the Maintenance, Repair & Operations market sector (N-E Thing Supply, Economy Maintenance Supply) and flooring and design services for professional homebuilders (Creative Touch Interiors).

        In fiscal 2005, we accelerated the pace of consolidation by acquiring 18 businesses, the largest of which was National Waterworks, a leading distributor of products used to build, repair and maintain

9


Table of Contents

water and wastewater transmission systems. In fiscal 2006, we transformed our business with the acquisition of Hughes Supply, which doubled our Net sales and further established our market leadership in a number of our largest business units, which we supplemented with 11 other strategic acquisitions.

        In 2007, investment funds associated with the Equity Sponsors formed Holdings and purchased HDS and the Canadian subsidiary CND Holdings, Inc. from Home Depot. In connection with the 2007 Transactions, Home Depot obtained a 12.5% interest in the then outstanding common stock of Holdings.

        Since 2007, we have focused on extending our presence in key growth sectors and exiting less attractive sectors. In February 2008, we sold our Lumber and Building Materials operations to ProBuild Holdings. In June 2009, we purchased substantially all of the assets of ORCO Construction Supply, the second largest construction materials distributor in the U.S., through Construction & Industrial—White Cap. In February 2011, we sold all of the assets of SESCO/QUESCO, an electrical products division of HD Supply Canada, to Sonepar Canada. In May 2011, we purchased all of the assets of RAMSCO, expanding Waterworks in upstate New York. In September 2011, we sold our Plumbing/HVAC operations to Hajoca Corporation. In March 2012, we sold our IPVF business to Shale-Inland Holdings LLC. In June 2012, we acquired Peachtree, which specializes in customizable business and property marketing supplies, to enhance Facilities Maintenance. In December 2012, we purchased substantially all of the assets of Water Products, expanding the geographic footprint of Waterworks.

        On July 2, 2013, Holdings completed an initial public offering of 61,170,212 shares of its common stock at a price of $18.00 per share, for an aggregate offering price of $1,039 million, net of underwriters' discounts and commissions and offering expenses of approximately $16 million.

        During fiscal 2014, we finalized the disposal of Litemor and sold substantially all of the assets of our Hardware Solutions business. For additional information on the discontinued operations, see Note 4, Discontinued Operations, within "Part II. Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data."

Customers and Suppliers

        We maintain a customer base of approximately 500,000 customers, many of whom represent long-term relationships. We are subject to very low customer concentration with our ten largest customers generating approximately 8% of our Net sales in fiscal 2014, reducing our exposure to any single customer.

        We have developed relationships with approximately 15,000 strategic suppliers, many of which are long-standing. These supplier relationships provide us with reliable access to inventory, volume purchasing benefits and the ability to deliver a diverse product offering on a cost-effective basis. We maintain multiple suppliers for a substantial number of our products, thereby limiting the risk of product shortage for customers.

Competition

        We operate in a highly fragmented industry and hold leading positions in multiple market sectors. Competition, including our competitors and specific competitive factors, varies for each market sector. The majority of our competition comes from mid-size regional distributors and small, local distributors; however, we also face competition from a number of national competitors, including Fastenal, Grainger, MSC Industrial, Rexel, Watsco, WESCO and Wolseley plc (Ferguson division).

        We believe the principal competitive factors for our market sectors include local selling capabilities, availability, breadth and cost of materials and supplies, technical knowledge and expertise, value-add service capabilities, customer and supplier relationships, reliability and accuracy of service,

10


Table of Contents

effective use of technology, delivery capabilities and timeliness, pricing of products, and the provision of credit. We believe that our competitive strengths and strategy allow us to compete effectively in our market sectors.

Seasonality

        In a typical year, our operating results are impacted by seasonality. Historically, sales of our products have been higher in the second and third quarters of each fiscal year due to favorable weather and longer daylight conditions during these periods. Seasonal variations in operating results may also be significantly impacted by inclement weather conditions, such as cold or wet weather, which can delay construction projects.

Products

Maintenance, Repair & Operations:

        Facilities Maintenance:    Electrical and lighting items, plumbing, HVAC products, appliances, janitorial supplies, hardware, kitchen and bath cabinets, window coverings, textiles and guest amenities, healthcare maintenance and water and wastewater treatment products.

        Home Improvement Solutions:    Kitchen cabinets, windows, plumbing materials, masonry, electrical equipment, lumber, flooring and tools and tool rentals for small remodeling, home improvement and do-it-yourself residential projects.

Infrastructure & Power:

        Waterworks:    Water and wastewater transmission products including pipe (PVC, Ductile Iron, HDPE), fittings, valves, fire protection, metering systems, storm drain, hydrants, fusion machine rental, valve testing and repair.

        Power Solutions:    Pole line hardware, wire and cable, gear and controls, power equipment, fixtures and lighting, and meters.

Specialty Construction:

        Construction & Industrial—White Cap:    Concrete accessories and chemicals, tools, engineered materials and fasteners, safety, erosion and waterproofing.

        Interior Solutions:    Flooring, cabinets, countertops and window coverings, along with comprehensive design center services, for the interior finish of non-residential, residential and senior living projects.

Intellectual property

        Our trademarks and those of our subsidiaries are registered or otherwise legally protected in the United States, Canada and elsewhere. We, together with our subsidiaries, own approximately 150 trademarks registered worldwide. We also rely upon trade secrets and know-how to develop and maintain our competitive position. We protect intellectual property rights through a variety of methods, including trademark, patent, copyright and trade secret laws, in addition to confidentiality agreements with suppliers, employees, consultants and others who have access to our proprietary information. Generally, registered trademarks have a perpetual life, provided that they are renewed on a timely basis and continue to be used properly as trademarks. We intend to maintain our material trademark registrations so long as they remain valuable to our business. Other than the trademarks HD Supply ®, USABluebook ®, Seasons ®, Brigade ® and Maintenance Warehouse ®, we do not believe our business is dependent to a material degree on trademarks, patents, copyrights or trade secrets. Other than

11


Table of Contents

commercially available software licenses, we do not believe that any of our licenses for third-party intellectual property are material to our business, taken as a whole. See "Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Our Business—If we are unable to protect our intellectual property rights, or we infringe on the intellectual property rights of others, our ability to compete could be negatively impacted."

Employees

        In domestic and international operations, we had approximately 15,000 employees as of February 1, 2015, consisting of approximately 9,000 hourly personnel and approximately 6,000 salaried employees.

        As of February 1, 2015, less than one percent of our hourly workforce was covered by collective bargaining agreements.

Regulation

        Our operations are affected by various statutes, regulations and laws in the markets in which we operate, which historically have not had a material effect on our business. While we are not engaged in a regulated industry, we are subject to various laws applicable to businesses generally, including laws affecting land usage, zoning, the environment, health and safety, transportation, labor and employment practices (including pensions), competition, immigration and other matters. Additionally, building codes may affect the products our customers are allowed to use, and consequently, changes in building codes may affect the saleability of our products. The transportation and disposal of many of our products are also subject to federal regulations. The DOT regulates our operations in domestic interstate commerce. We are subject to safety requirements governing interstate operations prescribed by the DOT. Vehicle dimensions and driver hours of service also remain subject to both federal and state regulation. See "Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Our Business—Our costs of doing business could increase as a result of changes in U.S. federal, state or local regulations."

Environmental, Health and Safety Matters

        We are subject to a broad range of foreign, federal, state and local environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, including those pertaining to air emissions, water discharges, the handling, disposal and transport of solid and hazardous materials and wastes, the investigation and remediation of contamination and otherwise relating to health and safety and the protection of the environment and natural resources. As our operations, and those of many of the companies we have acquired, to a limited extent involve and have involved the handling, transport and distribution of materials that are, or could be classified as, toxic or hazardous, there is some risk of contamination and environmental damage inherent in our operations and the products we handle, transport and distribute. Our environmental, health and safety liabilities and obligations may result in significant capital expenditures and other costs, which could negatively impact our business, financial condition and results of operations. We may be fined or penalized by regulators for failing to comply with environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, or we may be held responsible for such failures by companies we have acquired. In addition, contamination resulting from our current or past operations, and those of many of the companies we have acquired, may trigger investigation or remediation obligations, which may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Available Information

        We are subject to the reporting and information requirements of the Exchange Act and, as a result, we file periodic reports and other information with the SEC.

12


Table of Contents

        The public may read and copy any such reports or other information that we file with the SEC. Such filings are available to the public over the internet at the SEC's website at http://www.sec.gov. The SEC's website is included in this annual report on Form 10-K as an inactive textual reference only.

        In addition, the Company's annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports are available free of charge to the public through the "Investor Relations" portion of the Company's website, www.hdsupply.com, as soon as reasonably practical after they are filed with the SEC. We include our website address in this filing only as a textual reference. The information contained on our website is not incorporated by reference into this report. You may also obtain a copy of any information that we file with the SEC at no cost by calling us, or writing to us, at the following address:

HD Supply
3100 Cumberland Boulevard, Suite 1480
Atlanta, Georgia 30339
Attn: General Counsel
(770) 852-9000

13


Table of Contents

ITEM 1A.    RISK FACTORS

Risks Relating to Our Business

We are subject to inherent risks of the maintenance, repair and operations market, infrastructure spending and the non-residential and residential construction markets, including risks related to general economic conditions.

        Demand for our products and services depends to a significant degree on spending in our markets. The level of activity in our markets depends on a variety of factors that we cannot control.

        Historically, both new housing starts and residential remodeling have decreased in slow economic periods. In addition, residential construction activity can impact the level of non-residential construction activity. Other factors impacting the level of activity in the non-residential and residential construction markets include:

    changes in interest rates;

    unemployment rates;

    high foreclosure rates and unsold/foreclosure inventory;

    unsold new housing inventory;

    availability of financing (including the impact of disruption in the mortgage markets);

    adverse changes in industrial economic outlook;

    a decrease in the affordability of homes;

    vacancy rates;

    capacity utilization;

    capital spending;

    commercial investment;

    corporate profitability;

    local, state and federal government regulation; and

    shifts in populations away from the markets that we serve.

        Infrastructure spending depends largely on interest rates, availability and commitment of public funds for municipal spending, capacity utilization and general economic conditions. In the maintenance, repair and operations market, the level of activity depends largely on the number of units and occupancy rates within multifamily, hospitality, healthcare and institutional facilities markets. Because all of our markets are sensitive to changes in the economy, downturns (or lack of substantial improvement) in the economy in any region in which we operate have adversely affected and could continue to adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. For example, we distribute many of our products to waterworks contractors in connection with non-residential building, residential and industrial construction projects. The water and wastewater transmission products industry is affected by changes in economic conditions, including national, regional and local standards in construction activity, and the amount spent by municipalities on waterworks infrastructure. While we operate in many markets in the United States and Canada, our business is particularly impacted by changes in the economies of California, Texas and Florida, which represented approximately 15%, 13% and 10%, respectively, of our Net sales for fiscal 2014.

        In addition, the markets in which we compete are sensitive to general business and economic conditions in the United States and worldwide, including availability of credit, interest rates,

14


Table of Contents

fluctuations in capital, credit and mortgage markets and business and consumer confidence. Adverse developments in global financial markets and general business and economic conditions, including through recession, downturn or otherwise, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows, including our ability and the ability of our customers and suppliers to access capital. There was a significant decline in economic growth, both in the United States and worldwide, that began in the second half of 2007 and continued through 2009. In addition, volatility and disruption in the capital markets during that period reached unprecedented levels, with stock markets falling dramatically and credit becoming very expensive or unavailable to many companies without regard to those companies' underlying financial strength. As a result of these developments, many lenders and institutional investors reduced, and in some cases, ceased to provide funding to borrowers. Although there have been some indications of stabilization in the general economy and certain industries and markets in which we operate, there can be no guarantee that any improvement in these areas will continue or be sustained.

We have been, and may continue to be, adversely impacted by the decline in the new residential construction market since its peak in 2005.

        Most of our business units are dependent to varying degrees upon the new residential construction market. The homebuilding industry has undergone a significant decline from its peak in 2005. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, actual single family housing starts in the U.S. during 2014 increased 5% from 2013 levels, but remain 62% below their peak in 2005. The multi-year downturn in the homebuilding industry has resulted in a substantial reduction in demand for our products and services, which in turn has had a significant adverse effect on our business and operating results during fiscal years 2008 to 2014, as compared to peak levels. In addition, the mortgage markets continue to experience disruption and reduced availability of mortgages for potential homebuyers due to more restrictive standards to qualify for mortgages, including with respect to new home construction loans.

        We cannot predict the duration of the current housing industry market conditions, or the timing or strength of any future recovery of housing activity in our markets. We also cannot provide any assurances that the homebuilding industry will recover to historical levels, or that the operational strategies we have implemented to address the current market conditions will be successful. Continued weakness in the new residential construction market would have a significant adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results. In addition, because of these factors, there may be fluctuations in our operating results, and the results for any historical period may not be indicative of results for any future period.

The non-residential building construction market continues to experience a downturn which could materially and adversely affect our business, liquidity and results of operations.

        Many of our business units are dependent on the non-residential building construction market and the slowdown and volatility of the United States economy in general is having an adverse effect on our business units that serve this industry. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, actual non-residential building construction put-in-place in the U.S. during 2014 increased 7%, but remains 27% lower than 2008 levels. From time to time, our business units that serve the non-residential building construction market have also been adversely affected in various parts of the country by declines in non-residential building construction starts due to, among other things, changes in tax laws affecting the real estate industry, high interest rates and the level of residential construction activity. Continued uncertainty about current economic conditions will continue to pose a risk to our business units that serve the non-residential building construction market as participants in this industry may postpone spending in response to tighter credit, negative financial news and/or declines in income or asset values, which could have a continued material negative effect on the demand for our products and services.

15


Table of Contents

        We cannot predict the duration of the current market conditions or the timing or strength of any future recovery of non-residential building construction activity in our markets. Continued weakness in the non-residential building construction market would have a significant adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results. In addition, because of these factors, there may be fluctuations in our operating results, and the results for any historical period may not be indicative of results for any future period.

Residential renovation and improvement activity levels may not return to historic levels which may negatively impact our business, liquidity and results of operations.

        Certain of our business units rely on residential renovation and improvement (including repair and remodeling) activity levels. Unlike most previous cyclical declines in new home construction in which we did not experience comparable declines in our home improvement business units, the recent economic decline adversely affected our home improvement business units as well. Management believes that residential improvement project spending in the United States increased in the mid-single digits in 2014, but remains below its peak level in 2005. Elevated unemployment levels, mortgage delinquency and foreclosure rates, limitations in the availability of mortgage and home improvement financing and lower housing turnover may continue to limit consumers' spending, particularly on discretionary items, and affect their confidence level leading to continued reduced spending on home improvement projects.

        We cannot predict the timing or strength of a significant recovery in these markets. Continued depressed activity levels in consumer spending for home improvement and new home construction will continue to adversely affect our business, liquidity, results of operations and our financial position. Furthermore, continued economic weakness may cause unanticipated shifts in consumer preferences and purchasing practices and in the business models and strategies of our customers. Such shifts may alter the nature and prices of products demanded by the end consumer, and, in turn, our customers and could adversely affect our operating performance.

We may be unable to achieve or maintain profitability.

        We have set goals to progressively improve our profitability over time by growing our sales, increasing our gross margin and reducing our expenses as a percentage of sales. For the fiscal year 2014, we had net income of $3 million, and for fiscal years 2013 and 2012, we had net losses of $218 million and $1,179 million, respectively. There can be no assurance that we will achieve our enhanced profitability goals. Factors that could significantly adversely affect our efforts to achieve these goals include, but are not limited to, the failure to:

    grow our revenue through organic growth or through acquisitions;

    improve our revenue mix by investing (including through acquisitions) in businesses that provide higher margins than we have been able to generate historically;

    achieve improvements in purchasing or maintain or increase our rebates from vendors through our vendor consolidation and/or low-cost country initiatives;

    improve our gross margins through the utilization of improved pricing practices and technology and sourcing savings;

    maintain or reduce our overhead and support expenses as we grow;

    effectively evaluate future inventory reserves;

    collect monies owed to us from customers;

    maintain relationships with our significant customers; and

16


Table of Contents

    integrate any businesses acquired.

        Any of these failures or delays may adversely affect our ability to increase our profitability.

We may be required to take impairment charges relating to our operations which could impact our future operating results.

        As of February 1, 2015, goodwill represented approximately 51% of our total assets. Goodwill is not amortized and is subject to impairment testing at least annually using a fair value based approach. The identification and measurement of impairment involves the estimation of the fair value of reporting units. The estimates of fair value of reporting units are based on the best information available as of the date of the assessment and incorporate management assumptions about expected future cash flows and other valuation techniques. Future cash flows can be affected by changes in industry or market conditions among other things.

        The recoverability of goodwill is evaluated at least annually and when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the fair value of a reporting unit has more likely than not declined below its carrying value. The annual impairment test resulted in no impairment of goodwill during fiscal 2014, fiscal 2013 or fiscal 2012. During fiscal 2012 our Hardware Solutions business reached an agreement to amend and extend its strategic purchase agreement with Home Depot. These changes resulted in a reduction of the then expected future cash proceeds from Home Depot. We, therefore, considered this amendment a triggering event and, as such, we performed an additional goodwill impairment analysis for Hardware Solutions. As a result of the analysis, we recorded a non-cash, pre-tax goodwill impairment charge of $150 million during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012. Subsequent to the sale of Hardware Solutions during fiscal 2014 and in accordance with ASC 205-20, Discontinued Operations, the results of operations of Hardware Solutions are classified as discontinued operations for all periods presented.

        We cannot accurately predict the amount and timing of any impairment of assets, and we may be required to take goodwill or other asset impairment charges relating to certain of our reporting units and asset groups, if weakness in the non-residential and/or residential construction markets and/or the general U.S. economy continues. Similarly, certain company transactions could result in goodwill impairment charges being recorded. Any such non-cash charges would have an adverse effect on our financial results.

In view of the general economic downturn in the United States, we may be required to close under-performing locations.

        We may have to close under-performing branches from time to time as warranted by general economic conditions and/or weakness in the industries in which we operate. For example, during fiscal 2014, we closed certain branches and terminated employees as part of our on-going cost savings and profitability enhancement efforts. Any future facility closures could have a significant adverse effect on our financial condition, operating results and cash flows.

We occupy most of our facilities under long-term non-cancelable leases. We may be unable to renew leases on favorable terms or at all. Also, if we close a facility, we may remain obligated under the applicable lease.

        Most of our facilities are located in leased premises. Many of our current leases are non-cancelable and typically have terms ranging from 3 to 5 years, with options to renew for specified periods of time. We believe that leases we enter into in the future will likely be long-term and non-cancelable and have similar renewal options. However, there can be no assurance that we will be able to renew our current or future leases on favorable terms or at all which could have an adverse effect on our ability to operate our business and on our results of operations. In addition, if we close or idle a facility, we generally remain committed to perform our obligations under the applicable lease,

17


Table of Contents

which include, among other things, payment of the base rent for the balance of the lease term. Over the course of the last three fiscal years, we closed or idled facilities for which we remain liable on the lease obligations. Our obligation to continue making rental payments in respect of leases for closed or idled facilities could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

The industries in which we operate are highly competitive and fragmented, and demand for our products and services could decrease if we are not able to compete effectively.

        The markets in which we operate are fragmented and highly competitive. Our competition includes other distributors and manufacturers that sell products directly to their respective customer base and some of our customers that resell our products. To a limited extent, retailers of electrical fixtures and supplies, building materials, maintenance, repair and operations supplies and contractors' tools also compete with us. We also expect that new competitors may develop over time as internet-based enterprises become more established and reliable and refine their service capabilities. Competition varies depending on product line, customer classification and geographic area.

        We compete with many local, regional and, in several markets and product categories, other national distributors. Several of our competitors in one or more of our business units have substantially greater financial and other resources than us. No assurance can be given that we will be able to respond effectively to such competitive pressures. Increased competition by existing and future competitors could result in reductions in sales, prices, volumes and gross margins that could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Furthermore, our success will depend, in part, on our ability to maintain our market share and gain market share from competitors.

        In addition, contracts with municipalities are often awarded and renewed through periodic competitive bidding. We may not be successful in obtaining or renewing these contracts, which could be harmful to our business and financial performance.

Our competitors continue to consolidate, which could cause markets to become more competitive and could negatively impact our business.

        Our competitors in the United States and Canada continue to consolidate. This consolidation is being driven by customer needs and supplier capabilities, which could cause markets to become more competitive as greater economies of scale are achieved by distributors. Customers are increasingly aware of the total costs of fulfillment and of the need to have consistent sources of supply at multiple locations. We believe these customer needs could result in fewer distributors as the remaining distributors become larger and capable of being consistent sources of supply.

        There can be no assurance that we will be able to take advantage effectively of this trend toward consolidation. The trend in our industry toward consolidation could make it more difficult for us to maintain operating margins and could also increase competition for our potential acquisition targets and result in higher purchase price multiples. Furthermore, as our industrial and construction customers face increased foreign competition and potentially lose business to foreign competitors or shift their operations overseas in an effort to reduce expenses, we may face increased difficulty in growing and maintaining our market share and growth prospects in these markets.

The loss of any of our significant customers could adversely affect our financial condition.

        Our ten largest customers generated approximately 8% of our Net sales in fiscal 2014. We cannot guarantee that we will maintain or improve our relationships with these customers or that we will continue to supply these customers at historical levels. During the economic downturn, some of our customers reduced their operations. For example, some homebuilder customers exited or severely curtailed building activity in certain of our markets. There is no assurance that our customers will

18


Table of Contents

determine to increase their operations or return to historic levels. Slow economic recovery could continue to have a significant adverse effect on our financial condition, operating results and cash flows.

        In addition, consolidation among customers could also result in a loss of some of our present customers to our competitors. The loss of one or more of our significant customers, a significant customer's decision to purchase our products in significantly lower quantities than they have in the past or deterioration in our relationship with any of our significant customers could significantly affect our financial condition, operating results and cash flows.

        Generally, our customers are not required to purchase any minimum amount of products from us. The contracts into which we have entered with most of our customers typically provide that we supply particular products or services for a certain period of time when and if ordered by the customer. Should our customers purchase our products in significantly lower quantities than they have in the past, such decreased purchases could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, operating results and cash flows.

The majority of our Net sales are credit sales which are made primarily to customers whose ability to pay is dependent, in part, upon the economic strength of the industry and geographic areas in which they operate, and the failure to collect monies owed from customers could adversely affect our financial condition.

        The majority of our Net sales volume in fiscal 2014 was facilitated through the extension of credit to our customers whose ability to pay is dependent, in part, upon the economic strength of the industry in the areas where they operate. Our business units offer credit to customers, either through unsecured credit that is based solely upon the creditworthiness of the customer, or secured credit for materials sold for a specific job where the security lies in lien rights associated with the material going into the job. The type of credit offered depends both on the financial strength of the customer and the nature of the business in which the customer is involved. End users, resellers and other non-contractor customers generally purchase more on unsecured credit than secured credit. The inability of our customers to pay off their credit lines in a timely manner, or at all, would adversely affect our financial condition, operating results and cash flows. Furthermore, our collections efforts with respect to non-paying or slow-paying customers could negatively impact our customer relations going forward.

        Because we depend on the creditworthiness of certain of our customers, if the financial condition of our customers declines, our credit risk could increase. Significant contraction in our markets, coupled with tightened credit availability and financial institution underwriting standards, could adversely affect certain of our customers. Should one or more of our larger customers declare bankruptcy, it could adversely affect the collectability of our accounts receivable, bad debt reserves and net income.

We are subject to competitive pricing pressure from our customers.

        Certain of our largest customers historically have exerted significant pressure on their outside suppliers to keep prices low because of their market share and their ability to leverage such market share in the highly fragmented building products supply industry. The economic downturn has resulted in increased pricing pressures from our customers. If we are unable to generate sufficient cost savings to offset any price reductions, our financial condition, operating results and cash flows may be adversely affected.

Future strategic transactions could impact our reputation, business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows, and we may not achieve the acquisition component of our growth strategy.

        We may pursue strategic transactions in the future, which could involve acquisitions or dispositions of businesses or assets. Any future strategic transaction could involve integration or implementation

19


Table of Contents

challenges, business disruption or other risks, or change our business profile significantly. Any inability on our part to successfully implement strategic transactions could have an adverse impact on our reputation, business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows. Any acquisition that we make may not provide us with the benefits that were anticipated when entering into such acquisition. Any future disposition transactions could also impact our business and may subject us to various risks, including failure to obtain appropriate value for the disposed businesses, post-closing claims being levied against us and disruption to our other businesses during the sale process or thereafter.

        In addition, although acquisitions may continue to be an important component of our growth strategy, there can be no assurance that we will be able to continue to grow our business through acquisitions as we have done historically or that any businesses acquired will perform in accordance with expectations or that business judgments concerning the value, strengths and weaknesses of businesses acquired will prove to be correct. Future acquisitions may result in the incurrence of debt and contingent liabilities, an increase in interest expense and amortization expense and significant charges relative to integration costs. Our strategy could be impeded if we do not identify suitable acquisition candidates, and our financial condition and results of operations will be adversely affected if we overpay for acquisitions.

        Acquisitions involve a number of special risks, including:

    problems implementing disclosure controls and procedures for the newly acquired business;

    unforeseen difficulties extending internal control over financial reporting and performing the required assessment at the newly acquired business;

    potential adverse short-term effects on operating results through increased costs or otherwise;

    diversion of management's attention and failure to recruit new, and retain existing, key personnel of the acquired business;

    failure to successfully implement infrastructure, logistics and systems integration;

    our business growth could outpace the capability of our systems; and

    the risks inherent in the systems of the acquired business and risks associated with unanticipated events or liabilities, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

        In addition, we may not be able to obtain financing necessary to complete acquisitions on attractive terms or at all.

A range of factors may make our quarterly revenues and earnings variable.

        We have historically experienced, and in the future expect to continue to experience, variability in revenues and earnings on a quarterly basis. The factors expected to contribute to this variability include, among others: (i) the cyclical nature of some of the markets in which we compete, including the non-residential and residential construction markets, (ii) general economic conditions in the various local markets in which we compete, (iii) the pricing policies of our competitors, (iv) the production schedules of our customers and (v) the effects of the weather. These factors, among others, make it difficult to project our operating results on a consistent basis, which may affect the value of our securities.

The maintenance, repair and operations market, infrastructure spending and the non-residential and residential construction markets are seasonal and cyclical.

        Although weather patterns affect our operating results throughout the year, adverse weather historically has reduced construction and maintenance and repair activity in our first and fourth fiscal

20


Table of Contents

quarters. In contrast, our highest volume of Net sales historically has occurred in our second and third fiscal quarters. To the extent that hurricanes, severe storms, floods, other natural disasters or similar events occur in the geographic regions in which we operate, our business may be adversely affected. In addition, most of our business units experience seasonal variation as a result of the dependence of our customers on suitable weather to engage in construction, maintenance and renovation and improvement projects. For example, our Construction & Industrial—White Cap business unit sells products used primarily in the non-residential and residential construction industry. Generally, during the winter months, construction activity declines due to inclement weather and shorter daylight hours. As a result, operating results for the business units that experience such seasonality may vary significantly from period to period. We anticipate that fluctuations from period to period will continue in the future.

        Disruptions at distribution centers or shipping ports, due to events such as work stoppages, as well as disruptions caused by tornadoes, hurricanes, blizzards and other storms and natural disasters from time to time, may affect our ability to both maintain key products in inventory and deliver products to our customers on a timely basis, which may in turn adversely affect our results of operations.

        In addition, infrastructure spending and the non-residential and residential construction markets are subject to cyclical market pressures. The length and magnitude of these cycles have varied over time and by market. Prices of the products we sell are historically volatile and subject to fluctuations arising from changes in supply and demand, national and international economic conditions, labor costs, competition, market speculation, government regulation and trade policies, as well as from periodic delays in the delivery of our products. We have a limited ability to control the timing and amount of changes to prices that we pay for our products. In addition, the supply of our products fluctuates based on available manufacturing capacity. A shortage of capacity, or excess capacity, in the industry can result in significant increases or declines in market prices for those products, often within a short period of time. Such price fluctuations can adversely affect our financial condition, operating results and cash flows.

Fluctuating commodity prices may adversely impact our results of operations.

        The cost of steel, aluminum, copper, ductile iron, polyvinyl chlorides ("PVC") and other commodities used in the products we distribute can be volatile. Although we attempt to resist cost increases by our suppliers and to pass on increased costs to our customers, we are not always able to do so quickly or at all. In addition, if prices decrease for commodities used in products we distribute, we may have inventories purchased at higher prices than prevailing market prices. Significant fluctuations in the cost of the commodities used in products we distribute have in the past adversely affected, and in the future may adversely affect, our results of operations and financial condition.

If petroleum prices increase, our results of operations could be adversely affected. Conversely, prolonged weakness in the oil and gas industry could negatively impact our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

        Petroleum prices have fluctuated significantly in recent years. Prices and availability of petroleum products are subject to political, economic and market factors that are outside our control. Political events in petroleum-producing regions as well as hurricanes and other weather-related events may cause the price of fuel to increase. Within our business units, we deliver products to our customers via our own trucks as well as third-party carriers. Our operating profit will be adversely affected if we are unable to obtain the fuel we require or to fully offset the anticipated impact of higher fuel prices through increased prices or fuel surcharges to our customers. Besides passing fuel costs on to customers, we have not entered into any hedging arrangements that protect against fuel price increases, and we do not have any long-term fuel purchase contracts. If shortages occur in the supply of necessary petroleum products and we are not able to pass along the full impact of increased petroleum prices to our customers, our results of operations would be adversely affected.

21


Table of Contents

        A number of our branch locations serve customers that are either direct or indirect participants in the oil & gas industry, such as our Waterworks business unit's supplying of High Density Polyethylene pipe to oil and gas related customers. A number of our branch locations are also geographically located in or near areas where the oil & gas industry is a significant component of the overall local economy, such as in Texas and in the various shale gas producing regions within the U.S. and Canada. If the prices of oil and gas continue to remain relatively low and our customers are negatively impacted, then our customers' demand for our products and services could also be negatively impacted which would have an adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Product shortages may impair our operating results.

        Our ability to offer a wide variety of products to our customers is dependent upon our ability to obtain adequate product supply from manufacturers or other suppliers. Generally, our products are obtainable from various sources and in sufficient quantities. However, the loss of, or substantial decrease in the availability of, products from our suppliers, or the loss of our key supplier agreements, could adversely impact our financial condition, operating results and cash flows. In addition, supply interruptions could arise from shortages of raw materials (including petroleum products), labor disputes or weather conditions affecting products or shipments, transportation disruptions or other factors beyond our control. Short- and long-term disruptions in our supply chain would result in a need to maintain higher inventory levels as we replace similar product, a higher cost of product and ultimately a decrease in our Net sales and profitability. A disruption in the timely availability of our products by our key suppliers would result in a decrease in our revenues and profitability, especially in our business units with supplier concentration, such as our Waterworks business. Although in many instances we have agreements with our suppliers, these agreements are generally terminable by either party on limited notice. Failure by our suppliers to continue to supply us with products on commercially reasonable terms, or at all, would put pressure on our operating margins and have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, operating results and cash flows. Short-term changes in the cost of these materials, some of which are subject to significant fluctuations, are sometimes, but not always passed on to our customers. Our inability to pass on material price increases to our customers could adversely impact our financial condition, operating results and cash flows.

We rely on third-party suppliers and long supply chains, and if we fail to identify and develop relationships with a sufficient number of qualified suppliers, or if there is a significant interruption in our supply chains, our ability to timely and efficiently access products that meet our standards for quality could be adversely affected.

        We buy our products and supplies from suppliers located throughout the world. These suppliers manufacture and source products from the United States and abroad. Our ability to identify and develop relationships with qualified suppliers who can satisfy our standards for quality and our need to access products and supplies in a timely and efficient manner is a significant challenge. We may be required to replace a supplier if their products do not meet our quality or safety standards. In addition, our suppliers could discontinue selling products at any time for reasons that may or may not be in our control or the suppliers' control. Our operating results and inventory levels could suffer if we are unable to promptly replace a supplier who is unwilling or unable to satisfy our requirements with a supplier providing similar products. Our suppliers' ability to deliver products may also be affected by financing constraints caused by credit market conditions, which could negatively impact our revenue and cost of products sold, at least until alternate sources of supply are arranged.

        In addition, since some of the products that we distribute are produced in foreign countries, we are dependent on long supply chains for the successful delivery of many of our products. The length and complexity of these supply chains make them vulnerable to numerous risks, many of which are beyond our control, which could cause significant interruptions or delays in delivery of our products.

22


Table of Contents

Factors such as political instability, the financial instability of suppliers, suppliers' noncompliance with applicable laws, trade restrictions, labor disputes, currency fluctuations, changes in tariff or import policies, severe weather, terrorist attacks and transport capacity and cost may disrupt these supply chains and our ability to access products and supplies. For example, if the government of China were to reduce or withdraw the tax benefits they provide our Chinese suppliers, the cost of some of our products may increase and our margins could be reduced. We expect more of our products will be imported in the future, which will further increase these risks. If we increase the percentage of our products that are sourced from lower-cost countries, these risks will be amplified. Moreover, these risks will be amplified by our ongoing efforts to consolidate our supplier base across our business units. A significant interruption in our supply chains caused by any of the above factors could result in increased costs or delivery delays and result in a decrease in our Net sales and profitability.

We have substantial fixed costs and, as a result, our operating income is sensitive to changes in our Net sales.

        A significant portion of our expenses are fixed costs (including personnel), which do not fluctuate with Net sales. Consequently, a percentage decline in our Net sales could have a greater percentage effect on our operating income if we do not act to reduce personnel or take other cost reduction actions. Any decline in our Net sales would cause our profitability to be adversely affected. Moreover, a key element of our strategy is managing our assets, including our substantial fixed assets, more effectively, including through sales or other disposals of excess assets. Our failure to rationalize our fixed assets in the time, and within the costs, we expect could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

A change in our product mix could adversely affect our results of operations.

        Our results may be affected by a change in our product mix. Our outlook, budgeting and strategic planning assume a certain product mix of sales. If actual results vary from this projected product mix of sales, our financial results could be negatively impacted.

The impairment or failure of financial institutions may adversely affect us.

        We have exposure to counterparties with which we execute transactions, including U.S. and foreign commercial banks, insurance companies, investment banks, investment funds and other financial institutions. Many of these transactions could expose us to risk in the event of the bankruptcy, receivership, default or similar event involving a counterparty. While we have not realized any significant losses to date, the bankruptcy, receivership, default or similar event involving one of our financial institution counterparties could have a material adverse impact on our access to funding or our ability to meet our financing agreement obligations.

The development of alternatives to distributors in the supply chain could cause a decrease in our sales and operating results and limit our ability to grow our business.

        Our customers could begin purchasing more of their product needs directly from manufacturers, which would result in decreases in our Net sales and earnings. Our suppliers could invest in infrastructure to expand their own local sales force and sell more products directly to our customers, which also would negatively impact our business. For example, multiple municipalities may outsource their entire waterworks systems to a single company, thereby increasing such company's leverage in the marketplace and its ability to buy directly from suppliers, which may have a material adverse effect on our operating results.

        In addition to these factors, our customers may elect to establish their own building products manufacturing and distribution facilities, or give advantages to manufacturing or distribution

23


Table of Contents

intermediaries in which they have an economic stake. These changes in the supply chain could adversely affect our financial condition, operating results and cash flows.

Because our business is working capital intensive, we rely on our ability to manage our product purchasing and customer credit policies.

        Our operations are working capital intensive, and our inventories, accounts receivable and accounts payable are significant components of our net asset base. We manage our inventories and accounts payable through our purchasing policies and our accounts receivable through our customer credit policies. If we fail to adequately manage our product purchasing or customer credit policies, our working capital and financial condition may be adversely affected.

Anti-terrorism measures and other disruptions to the transportation network could impact our distribution system and our operations.

        Our ability to provide efficient distribution of products to our customers is an integral component of our overall business strategy. In the aftermath of terrorist attacks in the United States, federal, state and local authorities have implemented and continue to implement various security measures that affect many parts of the transportation network in the United States and abroad. Our customers typically need quick delivery and rely on our on-time delivery capabilities. If security measures disrupt or impede the timing of our deliveries, we may fail to meet the needs of our customers, or may incur increased expenses to do so.

Interruptions in the proper functioning of IT systems could disrupt operations and cause unanticipated increases in our costs or decreases in our revenues, or both.

        Because we use our information systems to, among other things, manage inventories and accounts receivable, make purchasing decisions and monitor our results of operations, the proper functioning of our IT systems is critical to the successful operation of our business. Although our IT systems are protected through physical and software safeguards and remote processing capabilities exist, IT systems are still vulnerable to natural disasters, power losses, unauthorized access, telecommunication failures and other problems. If critical IT systems fail, or are otherwise unavailable, our ability to process orders, track credit risk, identify business opportunities, maintain proper levels of inventories, collect accounts receivable, pay expenses and otherwise manage our business units would be adversely affected.

        Third-party service providers are responsible for managing a significant portion of our information systems. Our business and results of operations may be adversely affected if any third-party service provider does not perform satisfactorily.

The implementation of our technology initiatives could disrupt our operations in the near term, and our technology initiatives might not provide the anticipated benefits or might fail.

        We have made, and will continue to make, significant technology investments in each of our business units and in our administrative functions. Our technology initiatives are designed to streamline our operations to allow our associates to continue to provide high quality service to our customers and to provide our customers a better experience, while improving the quality of our internal control environment. The cost and potential problems and interruptions associated with the implementation of our technology initiatives could disrupt or reduce the efficiency of our operations in the near term. In addition, our new or upgraded technology might not provide the anticipated benefits, it might take longer than expected to realize the anticipated benefits or the technology might fail altogether.

24


Table of Contents

We may experience a failure in or breach of our operational or information security systems, or those of our third-party service providers, as a result cyber attacks or information security breaches.

        Information security risks have generally increased in recent years because of the proliferation of new technologies and the increased sophistication and activities of perpetrators of cyber-attacks. A failure in or breach of our operational or information security systems, or those of our third-party service providers, as a result of cyber attacks or information security breaches could disrupt our business, result in the disclosure or misuse of confidential or proprietary information, damage our reputation, increase our costs and/or cause losses. As a result, cyber security and the continued development and enhancement of the controls and processes designed to protect our systems, computers, software, data and networks from attack, damage or unauthorized access remain a priority for us. Although we believe that we have robust information security procedures and other safeguards in place, as cyber threats continue to evolve, we may be required to expend additional resources to continue to enhance our information security measures and/or to investigate and remediate any information security vulnerabilities.

Bain's interests may differ from the interests of other holders of our securities.

        Bain and its affiliates own a significant percentage of our outstanding capital stock and pursuant to the terms of our stockholders agreement are currently entitled to designate for nomination two members of our board of directors. The interests of Bain may differ from our interests and from those of other holders of our outstanding securities in material respects. For example, Bain may have an interest in pursuing acquisitions, divestitures, financings or other transactions that, in their judgment, could enhance their overall equity portfolio, even though such transactions might involve risks to other holders of our outstanding securities. Bain is in the business of making investments in companies, and may from time to time in the future, acquire interests in businesses that directly or indirectly compete with certain portions of our business or are suppliers of our customers. The companies in which Bain invests may also pursue acquisition opportunities that may be complementary to our business and, as a result, those acquisition opportunities may not be available to us. Additionally, Bain may determine that the disposition of some or all of its interest in the Company would be beneficial to it at a time when such disposition could be detrimental to the other holders of our outstanding securities. If we encounter financial difficulties, or we are unable to pay our debts as they mature, the interests of our equity holders might conflict with those of the holders of our outstanding notes. In that situation, for example, the holders of our outstanding notes might want us to raise additional equity from our equity holders or other investors to reduce our leverage and pay our debts, while our equity holders might not want to increase their investment in us or have their ownership diluted and instead choose to take other actions, such as selling our assets. Bain has no obligation to provide us with financing and is able to sell its equity ownership in us at any time. Moreover, Bain's significant ownership of the Company may have the effect of discouraging offers to acquire control of the Company.

Our costs of doing business could increase as a result of changes in U.S. federal, state or local regulations.

        Our operations are principally affected by various statutes, regulations and laws in the 48 U.S. states and seven Canadian provinces in which we operate. While we are not engaged in a regulated industry, we are subject to various laws applicable to businesses generally, including laws affecting land usage, zoning, the environment, health and safety, transportation, labor and employment practices (including pensions), competition, immigration and other matters. Additionally, building codes may affect the products our customers are allowed to use, and consequently, changes in building codes may affect the saleability of our products. Changes in U.S. federal, state or local regulations governing the sale of some of our products could increase our costs of doing business. In addition, changes to U.S. federal, state and local tax regulations could increase our costs of doing business. We cannot provide assurance that we will not incur material costs or liabilities in connection with regulatory requirements.

25


Table of Contents

        We deliver products to many of our customers through our own fleet of vehicles. The U.S. Department of Transportation (the "DOT") regulates our operations in domestic interstate commerce. We are subject to safety requirements governing interstate operations prescribed by the DOT. Vehicle dimensions and driver hours of service also remain subject to both federal and state regulation. More restrictive limitations on vehicle weight and size, trailer length and configuration, or driver hours of service could increase our costs, which, if we are unable to pass these cost increases on to our customers, would reduce our gross margins, increase our Selling, general and administrative expenses and reduce our Net income (loss).

        We cannot predict whether future developments in law and regulations concerning our business units will affect our business, financial condition and results of operations in a negative manner. Similarly, we cannot assess whether our business units will be successful in meeting future demands of regulatory agencies in a manner which will not materially adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.

We are required to evaluate and, if applicable, disclose our use of 'conflict minerals' in certain of the products we distribute, which imposes costs on us and could raise reputational and other risks.

        The SEC has promulgated final rules in connection with the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, regarding disclosure of the use of certain minerals, known as 'conflict minerals', that are mined from the Democratic Republic of the Congo and adjoining countries. These new requirements require due diligence efforts in fiscal year 2013 and thereafter, with initial disclosure requirements effective in May 2014. There are costs associated with complying with these disclosure requirements, including costs to determine which of our products are subject to the new rules and the source of any 'conflict minerals' used in those products. In addition, the implementation of these rules could adversely affect the sourcing, supply, and pricing of materials used in those products. Also, we may face reputational challenges if we are unable to verify the origins for all metals used in products through the procedures we may implement. We may also encounter challenges to satisfy customers that may require all of the components of products purchased to be certified as conflict free. If we are not able to meet customer requirements, customers may choose to disqualify us as a distributor.

The nature of our business exposes us to construction defect and product liability claims as well as other legal proceedings.

        We rely on manufacturers and other suppliers to provide us with the products we sell and distribute. As we do not have direct control over the quality of the products manufactured or supplied by such third-party suppliers, we are exposed to risks relating to the quality of the products we distribute and install. It is possible that inventory from a manufacturer or supplier could be sold to our customers and later be alleged to have quality problems or to have caused personal injury, subjecting us to potential claims from customers or third parties. We have been subject to such claims in the past, which have been resolved without material financial impact. We are currently involved in construction defect and product liability claims relating to our various construction trades and the products we distribute and manufacture and relating to products we have installed. In certain situations, we have undertaken to voluntarily remediate any defects, which can be a costly measure. We also operate a large fleet of trucks and other vehicles and therefore face the risk of traffic accidents.

        While we currently maintain insurance coverage to address a portion of these types of liabilities, we cannot make assurances that we will be able to obtain such insurance on acceptable terms in the future, if at all, or that any such insurance will provide adequate coverage against potential claims. Further, while we seek indemnification against potential liability for product liability claims from relevant parties, including but not limited to manufacturers and suppliers, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to recover under such indemnification agreements. Moreover, as we increase the number of private label products we distribute, our exposure to potential liability for products liability claims may

26


Table of Contents

increase. Product liability claims can be expensive to defend and can divert the attention of management and other personnel for significant time periods, regardless of the ultimate outcome. An unsuccessful product liability defense could be highly costly and accordingly result in a decline in profitability. In addition, uncertainties with respect to the Chinese legal system may adversely affect us in resolving claims arising from our proprietary brand products manufactured in China. Because many laws and regulations are relatively new and the Chinese legal system is still evolving, the interpretations of many laws, regulations and rules are not always uniform. Finally, even if we are successful in defending any claim relating to the products we distribute, claims of this nature could negatively impact customer confidence in our products and our Company.

        From time to time, we are also involved in government inquiries and investigations, as well as class action, consumer, employment, and tort proceedings, and other litigation. We cannot predict with certainty the outcomes of these legal proceedings and other contingencies, including environmental remediation and other proceedings commenced by government authorities. The outcome of some of these legal proceedings and other contingencies could require us to take, or refrain from taking, actions which could adversely affect our operations or could require us to pay substantial amounts of money. Additionally, defending against these lawsuits and proceedings may involve significant expense and diversion of management's attention and resources from other matters. As previously reported, the Office of the United States Attorney for the Northern District of New York (U.S. Attorney) is conducting an investigation related to the activities of certain disadvantaged business enterprises (DBEs), including American Indian Builders and Suppliers, Inc. (AIB). In May 2011, in connection with that investigation, the government executed a search of an entity from which Waterworks purchased assets shortly before the search was executed. On June 20, 2012, the government executed search warrants at two Waterworks branches. In July 2014, the Company received a Civil Investigative Demand ("CID") issued by the U.S. Attorney pursuant to the False Claims Act in the course of an investigation to determine whether the Company knowingly submitted false claims to the government in connection with the Company's sales to DBEs, and, in particular, AIB, on federally funded or partially-federally funded projects. We are updated by the government on its investigation periodically and continue to cooperate with the investigation.

If we become subject to material liabilities under our self-insured programs, our financial results may be adversely affected.

        We provide workers' compensation, automobile and product/general liability coverage through a high deductible insurance program. In addition, we provide medical coverage to some of our employees through a self-insured preferred provider organization. Though we believe that we have adequate insurance coverage in excess of self-insured retention levels, our results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected if the number and severity of insurance claims increases.

We may see increased costs arising from health care reform.

        In March 2010, the United States government enacted comprehensive health care reform legislation which, among other things, includes guaranteed coverage requirements, eliminates pre-existing condition exclusions and annual and lifetime maximum limits, restricts the extent to which policies can be rescinded and imposes new and significant taxes on health insurers and health care benefits. The legislation imposes implementation effective dates which began in 2010 and extend through 2020, and many of the changes require additional guidance from government agencies or federal regulations. Therefore, due to the phased-in nature of the implementation and limited interpretive guidance, it is difficult to determine at this time what impact the health care reform legislation will have on our financial results. Possible adverse effects of the health reform legislation include increased costs, exposure to expanded liability and requirements for us to revise ways in which

27


Table of Contents

we provide healthcare and other benefits to our employees. As a result, our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows could be materially adversely affected.

Our success depends upon our ability to attract, train and retain highly qualified associates and key personnel.

        To be successful, we must attract, train and retain a large number of highly qualified associates while controlling related labor costs. Our ability to control labor costs is subject to numerous external factors, including prevailing wage rates and health and other insurance costs. We compete with other businesses for these associates and invest significant resources in training and motivating them. There is no assurance that we will be able to attract or retain highly qualified associates in the future, including, in particular, those employed by companies we acquire. A very small proportion of our employees are currently covered by collective bargaining or other similar labor agreements. Historically, the effects of collective bargaining and other similar labor agreements on us have not been significant. However, if a larger number of our employees were to unionize, including in the wake of any future legislation that makes it easier for employees to unionize, the effect on us may be negative. Any inability by us to negotiate acceptable new contracts under these collective bargaining arrangements could cause strikes or other work stoppages, and new contracts could result in increased operating costs. If any such strikes or other work stoppages occur, or if other employees become represented by a union, we could experience a disruption of our operations and higher labor costs. Labor relations matters affecting our suppliers of products and services could also adversely affect our business from time to time.

        In addition, our business results depend largely upon our chief executive officer and senior management team as well as our branch managers and sales personnel and their experience, knowledge of local market dynamics and specifications and long-standing customer relationships. We customarily sign employment letters providing for an agreement not to compete with key personnel of companies we acquire in order to maintain key customer relationships and manage the transition of the acquired business. Our inability to retain or hire qualified branch managers or sales personnel at economically reasonable compensation levels would restrict our ability to grow our business, limit our ability to continue to successfully operate our business and result in lower operating results and profitability.

Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates may significantly reduce our revenues and profitability.

        As an industrial distributor of manufactured products, our profitability is tied to the prices we pay to the manufacturers from which we purchase our products. Some of our suppliers price their products in currencies other than the U.S. dollar or incur costs of production in non-U.S. currencies. Accordingly, depreciation of the U.S. dollar against foreign currencies increases the prices we pay for these products. Even short-term currency fluctuations could adversely impact revenues and profitability if we are unable to pass higher supply costs on to our customers. Our delayed ability to pass on material price increases to our customers could adversely impact our financial condition, operating results and cash flows.

If we are unable to protect our intellectual property rights, or we infringe on the intellectual property rights of others, our ability to compete could be negatively impacted.

        Our ability to compete effectively depends, in part, upon our ability to protect and preserve proprietary aspects of our intellectual property, including our trademarks and customer lists. The use of our intellectual property or similar intellectual property by others could adversely impact our ability to compete, cause us to lose Net sales or otherwise harm our business. If it became necessary for us to resort to litigation to protect these rights, any proceedings could be burdensome and costly, and we may not prevail.

28


Table of Contents

        Also, we cannot be certain that the products that we sell do not and will not infringe issued patents or other intellectual property rights of others. Further, we are subject to legal proceedings and claims in the ordinary course of our business, including claims of alleged infringement of the trademarks, patents and other intellectual property rights of third parties by us or our customers in connection with their use of the products that we distribute. Should we be found liable for infringement, we (or our suppliers) may be required to enter into licensing agreements (if available on acceptable terms or at all) or pay damages and cease making or selling certain products. Moreover, we may need to redesign or sell different products to avoid future infringement liability. Any of the foregoing could cause us to incur significant costs, prevent us from selling our products or negatively impact our ability to compete.

Income tax payments may ultimately differ from amounts currently recorded by us. Future tax law changes may materially increase our prospective income tax expense.

        We are subject to income taxation in many jurisdictions in the U.S. as well as foreign jurisdictions. Judgment is required in determining our worldwide income tax provision and, accordingly, there are many transactions and computations for which our final income tax determination is uncertain. We are routinely audited by income tax authorities in many tax jurisdictions. Although we believe the recorded tax estimates are reasonable, the ultimate outcome from any audit (or related litigation) could be materially different from amounts reflected in our income tax provisions and accruals. Future settlements of income tax audits may have a material effect on earnings between the period of initial recognition of tax estimates in the financial statements and the point of ultimate tax audit settlement. Additionally, it is possible that future income tax legislation in any jurisdiction to which we are subject may be enacted that could have a material impact on our worldwide income tax provision beginning with the period that such legislation becomes effective.

Our NOL carryforwards could be limited if we experience an ownership change as defined in the Internal Revenue Code.

        As of February 1, 2015, we had U.S. federal NOL carryforwards of $2.25 billion ($786 million on a tax-effected basis). Such NOL carryforwards begin to expire in fiscal 2029. We also had significant state NOL carryforwards, which expire in various years through fiscal 2034. Our ability to deduct these NOL carryforwards against future taxable income could be limited if we experience an "ownership change," as defined in Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. In general, an ownership change may result from transactions increasing the aggregate direct or indirect ownership of certain persons (or groups of persons) in our stock by more than 50 percentage points over a testing period (generally three years). An ownership change occurred in 2014. Based on current estimates, we believe that this ownership change will not materially limit our ability to deduct our NOL carryforwards against future taxable income. However, no assurance can be given in this regard. Future direct or indirect changes in the ownership of our common stock, including sales or acquisitions of our common stock by certain stockholders and purchases and issuances of our common stock by us, some of which are not in our control, could result in an additional ownership change. Any resulting limitation on the use of our NOL carryforwards could result in the payment of taxes above the amounts currently anticipated and have a negative effect on our future results of operations and financial position.

We may not be able to identify new products and new product lines and integrate them into our distribution network, which may impact our ability to compete.

        Our business depends in part on our ability to identify future products and product lines that complement existing products and product lines and that respond to our customers' needs. We may not be able to compete effectively unless our product selection keeps up with trends in the markets in which we compete or trends in new products. In addition, our ability to integrate new products and

29


Table of Contents

product lines into our distribution network could impact our ability to compete. Furthermore, the success of new products and new product lines will depend on market demand and there is a risk that new products and new product lines will not deliver expected results, which could negatively impact our future sales and results of operations. Our expansion into new markets may present competitive, distribution and regulatory challenges that differ from current ones. We may be less familiar with the target customers and may face different or additional risks, as well as increased or unexpected costs, compared to existing operations. Growth into new markets may also bring us into direct competition with companies with whom we have little or no past experience as competitors. To the extent we are reliant upon expansion into new geographic, industry and product markets for growth and do not meet the new challenges posed by such expansion, our future sales growth could be negatively impacted, our operating costs could increase, and our business operations and financial results could be negatively affected.

We could incur significant costs in complying with environmental, health and safety laws or permits or as a result of satisfying any liability or obligation imposed under such laws or permits.

        Our operations are subject to various federal, state, local and foreign environmental, health and safety laws and regulations. Among other things, these laws regulate the emission or discharge of materials into the environment, govern the use, storage, treatment, disposal and management of hazardous substances and wastes, protect the health and safety of our employees and the end users of our products, regulate the materials used in and the recycling of products and impose liability for the costs of investigating and remediating, and damages resulting from, present and past releases of hazardous substances. Violations of these laws and regulations or non-compliance with any conditions contained in any environmental permit can result in substantial fines or penalties, injunctive relief, requirements to install pollution or other controls or equipment, civil and criminal sanctions, permit revocations and/or facility shutdowns. We could be held liable for the costs to address contamination of any real property we have ever owned, operated or used as a disposal site. We could also incur fines, penalties, sanctions or be subject to third-party claims for property damage, personal injury or nuisance or otherwise as a result of violations of or liabilities under environmental laws in connection with releases of hazardous or other materials. In addition, changes in, or new interpretations of, existing laws, regulations or enforcement policies, the discovery of previously unknown contamination, or the imposition of other environmental liabilities or obligations in the future, including additional investigation or other obligations with respect to any potential health hazards of our products or business activities or the imposition of new permit requirements, may lead to additional compliance or other costs that could have material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. See "Part I, Item 3. Legal Proceedings" of this annual report on Form 10-K.

We may be affected by global climate change or by legal, regulatory or market responses to such potential change.

        Concern over climate change, including the impact of global warming, has led to significant federal, state, and international legislative and regulatory efforts to limit greenhouse gas ("GHG") emissions. For example, in the past several years, the U.S. Congress has considered various bills that would regulate GHG emissions. While these bills have not yet received sufficient Congressional support for enactment, some form of federal climate change legislation is possible in the future. Even in the absence of such legislation, the Environmental Protection Agency, spurred by judicial interpretation of the Clean Air Act, may regulate GHG emissions, especially diesel engine emissions, and this could impose substantial costs on us. These costs include an increase in the cost of the fuel and other energy we purchase and capital costs associated with updating or replacing our internal fleet of trucks and other vehicles prematurely. In addition, new laws or future regulation could directly and indirectly affect our customers and suppliers (through an increase in the cost of production or their ability to produce satisfactory products) and our business (through the impact on our inventory availability, cost

30


Table of Contents

of sales, operations or demands for the products we sell). Until the timing, scope and extent of any future regulation becomes known, we cannot predict its effect on our cost structure or our operating results. Notwithstanding our dedication to being a responsible corporate citizen, it is reasonably possible that such legislation or regulation could impose material costs on us. Moreover, even without such legislation or regulation, increased awareness and any adverse publicity in the global marketplace about the GHGs emitted by companies involved in the transportation of goods could harm our reputation and reduce customer demand for our products and services.

Our failure to maintain effective disclosure controls and internal control over financial reporting could adversely affect our business, financial position and results of operations.

        We are required to evaluate the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and internal control over financial reporting on a periodic basis and publicly disclose the results of these evaluations and related matters, in accordance with the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. These reporting and other obligations place significant additional demands on our management and administrative and operational resources, including our accounting resources, which could adversely affect our operations among other things. To comply with these requirements, we have upgraded, and are continuing to upgrade, our systems, including information technology, and we have implemented additional financial and management controls, reporting systems and procedures. We cannot be certain that we will be successful in maintaining adequate control over our financial reporting and financial processes. Furthermore, as we grow our business, our disclosure controls and internal controls will become more complex, and we may require significantly more resources to ensure that these controls remain effective. If we are unable to continue upgrading our financial and management controls, reporting systems, information technology and procedures in a timely and effective fashion, additional management and other resources of the Company may need to be devoted to assist in compliance with the disclosure and financial reporting requirements and other rules that apply to reporting companies, which could adversely affect our business, financial position and results of operations.

Future changes in financial accounting standards may significantly change our reported results of operations.

        The accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP") are subject to interpretation by the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB"), the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, the SEC and various bodies formed to promulgate and interpret appropriate accounting principles. A change in these principles or interpretations could have a significant effect on our reported financial results and could affect the reporting of transactions completed before the announcement of a change. In addition, the SEC has announced a multi-year plan that could ultimately lead to the use of International Financial Reporting Standards by U.S. issuers in their SEC filings. Any such change could have a significant effect on our reported financial results.

        Additionally, our assumptions, estimates and judgments related to complex accounting matters could significantly affect our financial results. GAAP and related accounting pronouncements, implementation guidelines and interpretations with regard to a wide range of matters that are relevant to our business, including, but not limited to, revenue recognition, impairment of long-lived assets, leases and related economic transactions, intangibles, self-insurance, income taxes, property and equipment, litigation and stock-based compensation are highly complex and involve many subjective assumptions, estimates and judgments by us. Changes in these rules or their interpretation or changes in underlying assumptions, estimates or judgments by us (i) could require us to make changes to our accounting systems to implement these changes that could increase our operating costs and (ii) could significantly change our reported or expected financial performance.

        In an exposure draft issued in August 2010 and revised in May 2013, the FASB, together with the International Accounting Standards Board ("IASB"), proposed a comprehensive set of changes in

31


Table of Contents

accounting for leases. The lease accounting model contemplated by these changes is a "right of use" model that assumes that each lease creates an asset (the lessee's right to use the leased asset) and a liability (the future rent payment obligations) which should be reflected on a lessee's balance sheet to fairly represent the lease transaction and the lessee's related financial obligations. We conduct operations primarily under leases that are accounted for as operating leases, with no related assets and liabilities on our balance sheet. The proposed changes would require that substantially all of our operating leases be recognized as assets and liabilities on our balance sheet. The effective date has not been determined. After receiving feedback on the leases project through outreach activities, roundtable meetings and comment letters, the FASB and IASB have begun redeliberations on the proposals included in the May 2013 exposure draft. Changes in lease accounting rules or their interpretation, or changes in underlying assumptions, estimates or judgments by us could significantly change our reported or expected financial performance.

Fulfilling the obligations incident to being a public company, including with respect to the requirements of and related rules under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, is expensive and time-consuming, and any delays or difficulties in satisfying these obligations could have a material adverse effect on our future results of operations.

        As an issuer of publicly listed equity, we are subject to certain reporting and corporate governance requirements, NASDAQ listing standards and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which impose certain compliance costs and obligations upon us. These requirements result in a significant commitment of additional resources and management oversight which increases our operating costs. These requirements also place significant demands on our finance and accounting and legal staffs and on our financial accounting and information systems. Other expenses associated with being a public company include costs associated with auditing, accounting and legal fees and expenses, investor relations expenses, increased directors' fees and director and officer liability insurance costs, registrar and transfer agent fees and listing fees, as well as other expenses.

        In addition, our independent registered public accounting firm is required to provide an attestation report on the effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. If our independent registered public accounting firm is unable to provide an unqualified report regarding the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting, investors could lose confidence in the reliability of our financial statements. Failure to comply with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 could potentially subject us to sanctions or investigations by the SEC, or other regulatory authorities.


Risks Relating to Our Indebtedness

We have substantial debt and may incur substantial additional debt, which could adversely affect our financial health, reduce our profitability, limit our ability to obtain financing in the future and pursue certain business opportunities and reduce the value of your investment.

        As of February 1, 2015, we had an aggregate principal amount of $5,257 million of outstanding debt, net of unamortized discounts of $14 million. In fiscal 2014 we incurred $461 million of interest expense.

        The amount of our debt or such other obligations could have important consequences for holders of our common stock, including, but not limited to:

    a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations must be dedicated to the payment of principal and interest on our indebtedness, thereby reducing the funds available to us for other purposes;

32


Table of Contents

    our ability to obtain additional financing for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, debt service requirements or general corporate purposes and other purposes may be impaired in the future;

    we are exposed to the risk of increased interest rates because a portion of our borrowings is at variable rates of interest;

    we may be at a competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors with less debt or with comparable debt at more favorable interest rates and that, as a result, may be better positioned to withstand economic downturns;

    our ability to refinance indebtedness may be limited or the associated costs may increase;

    our ability to engage in acquisitions without raising additional equity or obtaining additional debt financing may be impaired in the future;

    it may be more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations to our creditors, resulting in possible defaults on and acceleration of such indebtedness;

    we may be more vulnerable to general adverse economic and industry conditions; and

    our flexibility to adjust to changing market conditions and our ability to withstand competitive pressures could be limited, or we may be prevented from making capital investments that are necessary or important to our operations in general, growth strategy and efforts to improve operating margins of our business units.

        If our cash flow and capital resources are insufficient to fund our debt service obligations, we may be forced to reduce or delay capital expenditures, sell assets, seek to obtain additional equity capital or refinance our debt. We cannot make assurances that we will be able to refinance our debt on terms acceptable to us, or at all. In the future, our cash flow and capital resources may not be sufficient for payments of interest on and principal of our debt, and such alternative measures may not be successful and may not permit us to meet our scheduled debt service obligations.

        We cannot make assurances that we will be able to refinance any of our indebtedness, or obtain additional financing, particularly because of our high levels of debt and the debt incurrence restrictions imposed by the agreements governing our debt, as well as prevailing market conditions. In the absence of such operating results and resources, we could face substantial liquidity problems and might be required to dispose of material assets or operations to meet our debt service and other obligations. The credit agreements governing our Senior Credit Facilities and the indentures governing our outstanding notes restrict our ability to dispose of assets and how we use the proceeds from any such dispositions. We cannot make assurances that we will be able to consummate those dispositions, or if we do, what the timing of the dispositions will be or whether the proceeds that we realize will be adequate to meet our debt service obligations when due.

Despite our current level of indebtedness, we may still be able to incur substantially more debt. This could further exacerbate the risks to our financial condition.

        We may be able to incur significant additional indebtedness in the future, including secured debt. Although the agreements governing our indebtedness contain restrictions on the incurrence of additional indebtedness, these restrictions are subject to a number of qualifications and exceptions, and the additional indebtedness incurred in compliance with these restrictions could be substantial. These restrictions also will not prevent us from incurring obligations that do not constitute indebtedness, including obligations under lease arrangements that are currently recorded as operating leases even if operating leases were to be treated as debt under GAAP. In addition, the Senior ABL Facility provides a commitment of up to $1.5 billion subject to a borrowing base. As of February 1, 2015, we were able

33


Table of Contents

to borrow an additional $1,202 million under the Senior ABL Facility. If new debt is added to our current debt levels, the related risks that we now face could intensify.

The agreements and instruments governing our debt contain restrictions and limitations that could significantly impact our ability to operate our business and adversely affect the holders of our common stock.

        Our Senior ABL Facility and our Term Loan Facility contain covenants that, among other things, restrict or limit our subsidiaries' ability to:

    dispose of assets;

    incur additional indebtedness (including guarantees of additional indebtedness);

    prepay or amend our various debt instruments;

    pay dividends and make certain payments;

    create liens on assets;

    engage in certain asset sales, mergers, acquisitions, consolidations or sales of all, or substantially all, of our assets;

    engage in certain transactions with affiliates; and

    permit consensual restrictions on our subsidiaries' ability to pay dividends.

        The indentures governing our outstanding notes contain restrictive covenants that, among other things, limit the ability of our subsidiaries to:

    incur additional debt;

    pay dividends, redeem stock or make other distributions;

    make certain investments;

    create liens;

    transfer or sell assets;

    merge or consolidate with other companies; and

    enter into certain transactions with our affiliates.

        Our ability to comply with the covenants and restrictions contained in the Senior Credit Facilities and the indentures governing our outstanding notes may be affected by economic, financial and industry conditions beyond our control. The breach of any of these covenants or restrictions could result in a default under either the Senior Credit Facilities or the indentures governing our outstanding notes that would permit the applicable lenders or noteholders, as the case may be, to declare all amounts outstanding thereunder to be due and payable, together with accrued and unpaid interest. If we are unable to repay indebtedness, lenders having secured obligations, such as the lenders under the Senior Credit Facilities, could proceed against the collateral securing the secured obligations. This could have serious consequences to our financial condition and results of operations and could cause us to become bankrupt or insolvent.

We may have future capital needs and may not be able to obtain additional financing on acceptable terms.

        Although we believe that our current cash position and the additional committed funding available under our Senior ABL Facility is sufficient for our current operations, any reductions in our available borrowing capacity, or our inability to renew or replace our debt facilities, when required or when business conditions warrant, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition

34


Table of Contents

and results of operations. The economic conditions, credit market conditions and economic climate affecting our industry, as well as other factors, may constrain our financing abilities. Our ability to secure additional financing, if available, and to satisfy our financial obligations under indebtedness outstanding from time to time will depend upon our future operating performance, the availability of credit generally, economic conditions and financial, business and other factors, many of which are beyond our control. The market conditions and the macroeconomic conditions that affect our industry could have a material adverse effect on our ability to secure financing on favorable terms, if at all.

        We may be unable to secure additional financing or financing on favorable terms or our operating cash flow may be insufficient to satisfy our financial obligations under the indebtedness outstanding from time to time. Furthermore, if financing is not available when needed, or is available on unfavorable terms, we may be unable to take advantage of business opportunities or respond to competitive pressures, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. If we raise additional funds through further issuances of equity, convertible debt securities or other securities convertible into equity, our existing stockholders could suffer significant dilution in their percentage ownership of the Company, and any new securities we issue could have rights, preferences and privileges senior to those of holders of our common stock.

Increases in interest rates would increase the cost of servicing our debt and could reduce our profitability.

        A significant portion of our outstanding debt, including under the Senior Credit Facilities, bears interest at variable rates. As a result, increases in interest rates would increase the cost of servicing our debt and could materially reduce our profitability and cash flows. Each one percentage point increase in interest rates on our variable-rate debt would increase our annual forecasted interest expense by approximately $11 million based on balances as of February 1, 2015 and excluding the effect of the interest rate floor on our Term Loan Facility. Assuming all revolving loans were fully drawn, each one percentage point increase in interest rates would result in a $25 million increase in annual cash interest expense on our Senior Credit Facilities, excluding the effect of the interest rate floor on our Term Loan Facility. The impact of increases in interest rates could be more significant for us than it would be for some other companies because of our substantial indebtedness.

We may not be able to repurchase our existing notes upon a change of control.

        Upon the occurrence of specific kinds of change of control events, we will be required to offer to repurchase all outstanding notes, including our December 2014 First Priority Notes, April 2012 Second Priority Notes, October 2012 Senior Unsecured Notes and February 2013 Senior Unsecured Notes, until such notes are redeemed in full. Additionally, under the Term Loan Facility and the Senior ABL Facility, a change of control (as defined therein) constitutes an event of default that permits the lenders to accelerate the maturity of borrowings under the respective agreements and terminate their commitments to lend. We may not be able to satisfy the obligations upon a change of control because we may not have sufficient financial resources to purchase all of the debt securities that are tendered upon a change of control and repay our other indebtedness that will become due. Consequently, we may require additional financing from third parties to fund any such purchases, and we may be unable to obtain financing on satisfactory terms or at all. Further, our ability to repurchase our existing notes may be limited by law. In order to avoid the obligations to repurchase our existing notes and events of default and potential breaches of the credit agreement governing the Term Loan Facility, and the credit agreement governing the Senior ABL Facility, we may have to avoid certain change of control transactions that would otherwise be beneficial to us.

35


Table of Contents


Risks Relating to Our Common Stock

Holdings is a holding company with no operations of its own, and it depends on its subsidiaries for cash to fund all of its operations and expenses, including to make future dividend payments, if any.

        Our operations are conducted almost entirely through our subsidiaries and our ability to generate cash to meet our debt service obligations or to pay dividends is highly dependent on the earnings and the receipt of funds from our subsidiaries via dividends or intercompany loans. We do not currently expect to declare or pay dividends on our common stock for the foreseeable future. However, to the extent that we determine in the future to pay dividends on our common stock, our Senior Credit Facilities significantly restrict the ability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends or otherwise transfer assets to us. In addition, Delaware law may impose requirements that may restrict our ability to pay dividends to holders of our common stock.

The market price of our common stock may be volatile and could decline in the future.

        We cannot assure you that an active public market for our common stock will be sustained. In the absence of a public trading market, you may not be able to liquidate your investment in our common stock. In addition, the market price of our common stock may fluctuate significantly. Among the factors that could affect our stock price are:

    industry or general market conditions;

    domestic and international economic factors unrelated to our performance;

    changes in our customers' preferences;

    new regulatory pronouncements and changes in regulatory guidelines;

    actual or anticipated fluctuations in our quarterly operating results;

    changes in securities analysts' estimates of our financial performance or lack of research and reports by industry analysts;

    action by institutional stockholders or other large stockholders (including Bain), including future sales by them of shares of our common stock;

    speculation in the press or investment community;

    investor perception of us and our industry;

    changes in market valuations or earnings of similar companies;

    announcements by us or our competitors of significant products, contracts, acquisitions or strategic partnerships;

    developments or disputes concerning patents or proprietary rights, including increases or decreases in litigation expenses associated with intellectual property lawsuits we may initiate, or in which we may be named as defendants;

    failure to complete significant sales;

    any future sales of our common stock or other securities; and

    additions or departures of key Company personnel.

        In particular, we cannot assure you that you will be able to resell your shares of our common stock at or above the price you paid for them. The stock markets have experienced extreme volatility in recent years that has been unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies. These broad market fluctuations may adversely affect the trading price of our common stock. In the past,

36


Table of Contents

following periods of volatility in the market price of a company's securities, class action litigation has often been instituted against such company. Any litigation of this type brought against us could result in substantial costs and a diversion of our management's attention and resources, which would harm our business, operating results and financial condition.

Future sales of shares by existing stockholders could cause our stock price to decline.

        Sales of substantial amounts of our common stock in the public market, or the perception that these sales could occur, could cause the market price of our common stock to decline. As of February 1, 2015 we had 196,045,385 outstanding shares of common stock, a large portion of which are freely tradeable without restriction under the Securities Act unless held by "affiliates," as that term is defined in Rule 144 under the Securities Act. The remaining shares of common stock outstanding as of February 1, 2015 are restricted securities within the meaning of Rule 144 under the Securities Act, but will be eligible for resale subject, in certain cases, to applicable volume, means of sale, holding period and other limitations of Rule 144 or pursuant to an exception from registration under Rule 701 under the Securities Act. In connection with our initial public offering, we filed registration statements under the Securities Act to register the shares of common stock to be issued under our equity compensation plans and, as a result, all shares of common stock acquired upon exercise of stock options granted under our plans are also freely tradable under the Securities Act, unless purchased by our affiliates. As of February 1, 2015, there were stock options outstanding to purchase a total of approximately 10 million shares of our common stock. In addition, approximately 12 million shares of common stock are reserved for issuance under our omnibus incentive plan and our employee stock purchase plan.

        In the future, we may issue additional shares of common stock or other equity or debt securities convertible into common stock in connection with a financing, acquisition, litigation settlement or employee arrangement or otherwise. Any of these issuances could result in substantial dilution to our existing stockholders and could cause the trading price of our common stock to decline.

        As of February 1, 2015, Bain beneficially owned approximately 13% of the outstanding shares of our common stock. Pursuant to a registration rights agreement that we are party to with Bain, Bain may require us to file one or more prospectus supplements for the sale of all or a portion of shares held by Bain. Registration of such shares would allow Bain to immediately sell the shares into the public market and shares that are sold pursuant to any such registration statement would become eligible for sale without restriction by persons other than our affiliates. Sales of a substantial amount of our common stock into the public market, or the perception that these sales could occur, could cause the market price of our common stock to decline.

If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or publish misleading or unfavorable research about our business, our stock price and trading volume could decline.

        The trading market for our common stock depends in part on the research and reports that securities or industry analysts publish about us or our business. If one or more of these analysts downgrades our stock or publishes misleading or unfavorable research about our business, our stock price would likely decline. If one or more of these analysts ceases coverage of the Company or fails to publish reports on us regularly, demand for our common stock could decrease, which could cause our stock price or trading volume to decline.

Bain continues to exercise significant influence over corporate decisions.

        As of February 1, 2015, Bain beneficially owned approximately 13% of the outstanding shares of our common stock and pursuant to the term of our stockholders agreement are currently entitled to designate for nomination two members of our board of directors. As a result, Bain will continue to exercise significant influence over all matters requiring stockholder approval for the foreseeable future,

37


Table of Contents

including approval of significant corporate transactions, which may reduce the market price of our common stock.

        Bain's interests may conflict with the interests of our other stockholders. Our Board of Directors has adopted corporate governance guidelines that, among other things, address potential conflicts between a director's interests and our interests. In addition, we have adopted a code of business conduct and ethics that, among other things, requires our employees to avoid actions or relationships that might conflict or appear to conflict with their job responsibilities or the interests of HD Supply and to disclose their outside activities, financial interests or relationships that may present a possible conflict of interest or the appearance of a conflict to management or corporate counsel. These corporate governance guidelines and code of business conduct and ethics do not, by themselves, prohibit transactions with our principal stockholders.

Anti-takeover provisions in our charter documents and Delaware law could discourage, delay or prevent a change in control of our company and may affect the trading price of our common stock.

        Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated by-laws include a number of provisions that may discourage, delay or prevent a change in our management or control over us that stockholders may consider favorable. For example, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated by-laws:

    authorize the issuance of "blank check" preferred stock that could be issued by our Board of Directors to thwart a takeover attempt;

    establish a classified board of directors, as a result of which our Board of Directors is divided into three classes, with each class serving for staggered three-year terms, which prevents stockholders from electing an entirely new board at an annual meeting;

    limit the ability of stockholders to remove directors;

    provide that vacancies on our Board of Directors, including newly-created directorships, may be filled only by a majority vote of directors then in office;

    prohibit stockholders from calling special meetings of stockholders;

    prohibit stockholder action by written consent, thereby requiring all actions to be taken at a meeting of the stockholders;

    establish advance notice requirements for nominations for election to our Board of Directors or for proposing matters that can be acted upon by stockholders at stockholder meetings; and

    require the approval of holders of at least 75% of the outstanding shares of our voting common stock to amend our amended and restated by-laws and certain provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation.

        These provisions may prevent our stockholders from receiving the benefit from any premium to the market price of our common stock offered by a bidder in a takeover context. Even in the absence of a takeover attempt, the existence of these provisions may adversely affect the prevailing market price of our common stock if the provisions are viewed as discouraging takeover attempts in the future.

        Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated by-laws may also make it difficult for stockholders to replace or remove our management. These provisions may facilitate management entrenchment that may delay, deter, render more difficult or prevent a change in our control, which may not be in the best interests of our stockholders.

38


Table of Contents

We do not intend to pay dividends on our common stock and, consequently, your ability to achieve a return on your investment will depend on appreciation in the price of our common stock.

        We do not intend to declare and pay dividends on our common stock for the foreseeable future. We currently intend to invest our future earnings, if any, to fund our growth and repay our indebtedness. Therefore, you are not likely to receive any dividends on your common stock for the foreseeable future and the success of an investment in shares of our common stock will depend upon any future appreciation in their value. There is no guarantee that shares of our common stock will appreciate in value or even maintain the price at which our stockholders have purchased their shares.

ITEM 1B.    UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

    None

39


Table of Contents

ITEM 2.    PROPERTIES

Properties

        As of February 1, 2015, we had a network of approximately 650 locations, of which approximately 50 were owned and 600 were leased. We generally prefer to lease our locations, as it provides the flexibility to expand or relocate our sites as needed to serve evolving markets. Our leased locations comprise approximately 17 million square feet while our owned locations comprise approximately 1 million square feet. Our leases typically have an initial term that ranges from 3 to 5 years, and the leases usually provide for the option to renew. We currently lease approximately 55,000 and 145,000 square feet of office space in Atlanta, Georgia and Orlando, Florida, respectively, for our corporate headquarters. We believe our locations meet our current needs and that additional locations will be available as we expand in the future.

ITEM 3.    LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

        As previously reported, the Office of the United States Attorney for the Northern District of New York (U.S. Attorney) is conducting an investigation related to the activities of certain disadvantaged business enterprises (DBEs), including American Indian Builders and Suppliers, Inc. (AIB). In May 2011, in connection with that investigation, the government executed a search of an entity from which Waterworks purchased assets shortly before the search was executed. On June 20, 2012, the government executed search warrants at two Waterworks branches. In July 2014, the Company received a Civil Investigative Demand ("CID") issued by the U.S. Attorney pursuant to the False Claims Act in the course of an investigation to determine whether the Company knowingly submitted false claims to the government in connection with the Company's sales to DBEs, and, in particular, AIB, on federally funded or partially-federally funded projects. The Company is updated by the government on its investigation periodically and continues to cooperate with the investigation.

        HD Supply is involved in various legal proceedings arising in the normal course of its business. The Company establishes reserves for litigation and similar matters when those matters present loss contingencies that it determines to be both probable and reasonably estimable in accordance with ASC 450, Contingencies. In the opinion of management, based on current knowledge, all reasonably estimable and probable matters, including the United States Attorney investigation matter described above, are believed to be adequately reserved for or covered by insurance and are not expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company's consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. For all other matters, except as noted below, management believes the possibility of losses from such matters is not probable, the potential loss from such matters is not reasonably estimable, or such matters are of such kind or involve such amounts that would not have a material adverse effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company if disposed of unfavorably. For material matters that are reasonably possible and reasonably estimable, including matters that are probable and estimable but for which the amount that is reasonably possible is in excess of the amount that the Company has accrued for, management has estimated the aggregate range of potential loss as $0 to $10 million. If a material loss is probable or reasonably possible, and in either case estimable, the Company has considered it in the analysis and it is included in the discussion set forth above.

ITEM 4.    MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

    None

40


Table of Contents


PART II

ITEM5.    MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Stock Exchange Information

        Holdings' common stock is listed on The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC ("NASDAQ"). As of March 17, 2015, there were approximately 303 shareholders of record of our common stock and approximately 34,905 additional "street name" holders whose shares are held of record by banks, brokers and other financial institutions. No dividends were declared during fiscal 2014 or fiscal 2013. Holdings' common stock began trading on June 27, 2013.

Holdings' common stock market prices*:

 
  First
Quarter
  Second
Quarter
  Third
Quarter
  Fourth
Quarter
 

Fiscal Year 2014

                         

High

  $ 26.86   $ 28.77   $ 29.35   $ 30.18  

Low

  $ 20.90   $ 25.23   $ 23.91   $ 27.02  

Fiscal Year 2013

   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
 

High

      $ 22.57   $ 24.75   $ 24.53  

Low

      $ 18.66   $ 19.84   $ 19.70  

*
Price as of close of business

Stock Performance Graph

        The graph below presents Holdings' cumulative total shareholder returns relative to the performance of the Standard & Poor's 500 Composite Stock Index and the Industrial Select Sector SPDR® Fund (XLI) for our fiscal 2014 and fiscal 2013 quarters, commencing June 27, 2013, Holdings' initial day of trading. The graph assumes $100 invested at the opening price of Holdings' common stock on NASDAQ and each index on June 27, 2013 and assumes all dividends were reinvested on the

41


Table of Contents

date paid. The points on the graph represent fiscal quarter-end amounts based on the last trading day in each fiscal quarter.

GRAPHIC

 
  Fiscal 2013   Fiscal 2014  
 
  June 27,
IPO
  Second
Quarter
  Third
Quarter
  Fourth
Quarter
  First
Quarter
  Second
Quarter
  Third
Quarter
  Fourth
Quarter
 

HD Supply Holdings, Inc. 

  $ 100   $ 125   $ 110   $ 119   $ 143   $ 140   $ 160   $ 160  

S&P 500 Index

  $ 100   $ 107   $ 110   $ 112   $ 119   $ 123   $ 129   $ 128  

Industrial Select Sector SPDR® Fund (XLI)

  $ 100   $ 107   $ 115   $ 118   $ 125   $ 123   $ 132   $ 131  

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

        In the first quarter of fiscal 2014, Holdings' Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program to be funded from cash proceeds received from exercises of employee stock options. This share repurchase program does not obligate Holdings to acquire any particular amount of common stock, and it may be terminated at any time at Holdings' discretion. During fiscal 2014, Holdings repurchased approximately 1.9 million shares of its common stock under this program for approximately $52 million.

        Effective November 25, 2014, Holdings retired 1,470,000 shares of its common stock ("Retired Shares") held as Treasury Shares by Holdings in the amount of $40 million. The majority of these shares were repurchased by Holdings pursuant to the share repurchase program discussed above under which proceeds of employee stock option exercises are used to buy back Holdings' common stock in the open market. Holdings reinstated the Retired Shares to the status of authorized but unissued shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, effective as of the date of retirement. In accordance with Accounting Standards Codification 505-30, Equity-Treasury Stock, Holdings reversed

42


Table of Contents

the $0.01 par value of the Retired Shares and the excess of the cost of the Retired Shares over par value to Retained Earnings.

        The number and average price of shares repurchased in each fiscal month of the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014 are set forth in the table below:

Period
  Total Number
of Shares
Purchased
  Average Price
Paid per Share
  Total Number of
Shares Purchased as
Part of a Publicly
Announced Program(1)
  Approximate Dollar
Value of Shares that
May Yet Be Purchased
Under the Plans or
Programs(2)
 

November 3 - November 30

    111,540   $ 28.96     111,540   $ 2,516  

December 1 - December 28

    112,136     28.86     112,136     550,055  

December 29 - February 1

    138,668     28.48     138,668      

Total

    362,344   $ 28.75     362,344        

(1)
The share repurchase program was announced on Form 8-K filed by Holdings on April 8, 2014, and repurchases commenced on June 6, 2014. Repurchases under the program are made in the open market through broker-negotiated purchases, in accordance with guidelines specified under Rule 10b5-1 of the Exchange Act and in compliance with Rule 10b-18 of the Exchange Act.

(2)
The total dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased increases by the amount of cash proceeds received from the exercise of employee stock options as they occur.

HDS Securities

        There is no established public trading market for HDS's common stock. HDS had one record holder of common stock on February 1, 2015, and no equity securities of HDS are authorized for issuance under any equity compensation plan.

ITEM 6.    SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

        The selected consolidated financial data set forth below should be read in conjunction with "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this annual report on Form 10-K. Our consolidated financial information may not be indicative of our future performance.

        HDS has omitted the information required by this Item pursuant to General Instruction I to the Form 10-K.

        During fiscal 2014, HD Supply sold substantially all of the assets of its Hardware Solutions business, a retail distribution operator providing program and packaging solutions, sourcing, distribution, and in-store service, fasteners, builders' hardware, rope and chain and plumbing accessories, primarily serving Home Depot and finalized the disposal of Litemor, a specialty lighting division of HD Supply Canada. In fiscal 2012, HD Supply disposed of its IPVF business. During fiscal 2011, HD Supply disposed of its Plumbing/HVAC and SESCO/QUESCO operations. In accordance with ASC 205-20, Discontinued Operations, the results of the Hardware Solutions, Litemor, IPVF, Plumbing/HVAC and SESCO/QUESCO operations and the gain/loss on disposition of the businesses are classified as discontinued operations. The presentation of discontinued operations includes revenues and expenses of the discontinued operations and gain/loss on disposition of businesses, net of tax, as one line item on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. All prior periods in the Consolidated Statements of Operations have been revised to reflect this presentation. For additional information on the discontinued operations, see Note 4, Discontinued Operations, within "Part II. Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data."

43


Table of Contents

Selected consolidated financial information

 
  Fiscal year ended  
 
  February 1,
2015
  February 2,
2014
  February 3,
2013
  January 29,
2012
  January 30,
2011
 
 
  (Dollars in millions, except shares and per share amounts)
 

Statement of income data:

                               

Net sales

  $ 8,882   $ 8,228   $ 7,647   $ 6,661   $ 6,065  

Cost of sales

    6,324     5,870     5,495     4,811     4,382  

Gross profit

    2,558     2,358     2,152     1,850     1,683  

Operating expenses:

                               

Selling, general and administrative

    1,726     1,649     1,551     1,430     1,353  

Depreciation and amortization

    207     228     306     296     306  

Restructuring

    7     9             8  

Total operating expenses

    1,940     1,886     1,857     1,726     1,667  

Operating income

    618     472     295     124     16  

Interest expense

    461     528     658     639     623  

Loss on extinguishment & modification of debt

    108     87     709         5  

Other (income) expense, net

    (3 )   20         (1 )   (6 )

Income (loss) from continuing operations before provision for income taxes and discontinued operations

    52     (163 )   (1,072 )   (514 )   (606 )

Provision (benefit) for income taxes

    56     58     39     75     28  

Income (loss) from continuing operations

    (4 )   (221 )   (1,111 )   (589 )   (634 )

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax

    7     3     (68 )   46     15  

Net income (loss)

  $ 3   $ (218 ) $ (1,179 ) $ (543 ) $ (619 )

Cash dividends declared per common share

  $   $   $   $   $  

Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding(1):

   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
 

Basic and Diluted (thousands)

    193,962     166,905     130,561     130,557     130,522  

Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Share(1):

   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
 

Income (loss) from continuing operations

  $ (0.02 ) $ (1.32 ) $ (8.51 ) $ (4.51 ) $ (4.86 )

Income (loss) from discontinued operations

  $ 0.04   $ 0.02   $ (0.52 ) $ 0.35   $ 0.11  

Net income (loss)

  $ 0.02   $ (1.31 ) $ (9.03 ) $ (4.16 ) $ (4.74 )

Balance sheet data (end of period):

   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
 

Cash and cash equivalents(2)

  $ 85   $ 115   $ 141   $ 111   $ 292  

Total assets

    6,060     6,324     7,334     6,738     7,089  

Total debt(3)

    5,257     5,544     7,329     5,462     5,249  

Total stockholders' equity (deficit)

    (760 )   (764 )   (1,591 )   (428 )   96  

Other financial data (unaudited):

   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
 

Working capital(4)

  $ 1,163   $ 1,210   $ 1,120   $ 1,012   $ 1,176  

Weighted average effective interest rate on total debt

    8.2 %   8.6 %   11.3 %   11.6 %   11.4 %

Adjusted EBITDA(5)

    854     734     624     447     355  

Adjusted net income (loss)(5)

    251     77     (144 )   (297 )   (376 )

Capital expenditures

    119     131     115     115     49  

Depreciation & amortization(6)

    212     232     309     298     308  

Amortization of acquisition-related intangibles (other than software)

    99     129     220     222     221  

Statement of cash flows data:

   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
 

Cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities, net

  $ 295   $ (367 ) $ (681 ) $ (165 ) $ 551  

Cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities, net

    84     820     (800 )   (6 )   (45 )

Cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities, net

    (404 )   (474 )   1,511     (10 )   (755 )

(1)
Weighted average shares and earnings per share are for Holdings. May not foot due to rounding.

(2)
Cash and cash equivalents as of February 3, 2013 excludes $936 million of cash equivalents that were restricted for the redemption of debt.

44


Table of Contents

(3)
Total debt includes current and non-current installments of long-term debt and capital leases and associated discounts and premiums. As of February 3, 2013, debt includes $889 million of 2007 Senior Subordinated Notes that we redeemed on February 8, 2013.

(4)
We define working capital as current assets (including cash) minus current liabilities, which include the current portion of long-term debt and accrued interest thereon.

(5)
Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted net income (loss) are not recognized terms under GAAP and do not purport to be alternatives to net income (loss) as measures of operating performance. For additional detail, including a reconciliation from net income (loss), the most directly comparable financial measure under GAAP, to Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted net income (loss) for the periods presented, see "Part II, Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Key Business Metrics—Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted Net Income (Loss)."

(6)
Depreciation and amortization includes amounts recorded within Cost of sales in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

45


Table of Contents


MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Item 7.    Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Overview

        This Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations is combined for two registrants: HD Supply Holdings, Inc. and HD Supply, Inc. Unless the context indicates otherwise, any reference in this discussion and analysis to "Holdings" refers to HD Supply Holdings, Inc., any reference to "HDS" refers to HD Supply, Inc., the indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Holdings, and any references to "HD Supply," the "Company," "we," "us" and "our" refer to Holdings together with its direct and indirect subsidiaries, including HDS.

        HD Supply is one of the largest industrial distributors in North America. We believe we have leading positions in the three distinct market sectors in which we specialize: Maintenance, Repair & Operations; Infrastructure & Power; and Specialty Construction. We serve these markets with an integrated go-to-market strategy. We operate through approximately 650 locations across 48 U.S. states and seven Canadian provinces. We have approximately 15,000 associates delivering localized, customer-tailored products, services and expertise. We serve approximately 500,000 customers, which include contractors, maintenance professionals, home builders, industrial businesses, and government entities. Our broad range of end-to-end product lines and services include over one million SKUs of quality, name-brand and proprietary-brand products as well as value-add services supporting the entire life-cycle of a project from infrastructure and construction to maintenance, repair and operations.

Description of segments

        We operate our Company through four reportable segments: Facilities Maintenance, Waterworks, Power Solutions and Construction & Industrial—White Cap.

        Facilities Maintenance.    Facilities Maintenance distributes MRO products, provides value-add services and fabricates custom products. The markets that Facilities Maintenance serves include multifamily, hospitality, healthcare and institutional facilities. Products include electrical and lighting items, plumbing, HVAC products, appliances, janitorial supplies, hardware, kitchen and bath cabinets, window coverings, textiles and guest amenities, healthcare maintenance and water and wastewater treatment products.

        Waterworks.    Waterworks distributes complete lines of water and wastewater transmission products, serving contractors and municipalities in the water and wastewater industries for residential and non-residential uses. Waterworks serves non-residential, residential, water systems, sewage systems and other markets. Products include pipes, fittings, valves, hydrants and meters for use in the construction, maintenance and repair of water and wastewater systems as well as fire-protection systems. Waterworks has complemented its core products through additional offerings, including smart meters (AMR/AMI), fusible piping solutions and specific engineered treatment plant products and services.

        Power Solutions.    Power Solutions distributes electrical transmission and distribution products, power plant MRO supplies and smart-grid products, and arranges materials management and procurement outsourcing for the power generation and distribution industries. Power Solutions serves utilities and electrical markets. Products include conductors such as wire and cable, transformers, overhead transmission and distribution hardware, switches, protective devices and underground distribution, connectors used in the construction or maintenance and repair of electricity transmission and substation distribution infrastructure, and electrical wire and cable, switchgear, supplies, lighting and conduit used in non-residential and residential construction.

        Construction & Industrial—White Cap.    Construction & Industrial—White Cap distributes specialized hardware, tools and engineered materials to non-residential and residential contractors.

46


Table of Contents

Products include tilt-up brace systems, forming and shoring systems, concrete chemicals, hand and power tools, rebar, ladders, safety and fall arrest equipment, specialty screws and fasteners, sealants and adhesives, drainage pipe, geo-synthetics, erosion and sediment control equipment and other engineered materials used broadly across all types of non-residential and residential construction.

        In addition to the reportable segments, our consolidated financial results include "Corporate & Other." Corporate & Other is comprised of the following operating segments: Interior Solutions, Home Improvement Solutions and HD Supply Canada. Interior Solutions offers turnkey supply and installation services for multiple interior finish options, including flooring, cabinets, countertops, and window coverings, along with comprehensive design center services for non-residential, residential and senior living projects. Home Improvement Solutions offers light remodeling and construction supplies, kitchen and bath cabinets, windows, plumbing materials, electrical equipment and other products, primarily to small remodeling contractors and trade professionals. HD Supply Canada is an industrial distributor that primarily focuses on servicing fastener/industrial supply markets operating across six Canadian provinces. Corporate & Other also includes costs related to our centralized support functions, which are comprised of finance, information technology, human resources, legal, supply chain and other support services, and removes inter-segment transactions.

Acquisitions

        We enter into strategic acquisitions to expand into new markets, new platforms, and new geographies in an effort to better service existing customers and attract new ones. In accordance with the acquisition method of accounting under Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 805, Business Combinations, the results of the acquisitions we completed are reflected in our consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition forward.

        On December 3, 2012, we purchased substantially all of the assets of Water Products of Oklahoma, Inc., Arkansas Water Products, LLC, and Municipal Water Works Supply, LP (collectively "Water Products") for approximately $48 million, net of fiscal 2013 settlements. These businesses distribute water, sewer, gas and related products, such as pipes, valves, fittings, hydrants, pumps and meters, and offer maintenance products and repair services primarily to municipalities and contractors. The businesses are operated as part of the Waterworks segment.

        On June 29, 2012, we purchased Peachtree Business Products, LLC ("Peachtree") for approximately $196 million. Peachtree specializes in customizable business and property marketing supplies, serving residential and commercial property managers, medical facilities, schools and universities, churches and funeral homes. Peachtree is operated as part of the Facilities Maintenance segment.

Discontinued operations

        On January 12, 2015, the Company completed the sale of its Hardware Solutions business to Home Depot. The Company received cash proceeds of approximately $198 million, net of $2 million of transaction costs. As a result of the sale, the Company recorded an $8 million pre-tax gain in fiscal 2014.

        During fiscal 2014, the Company initiated and finalized the disposal of Litemor, a specialty lighting distributor within our HD Supply Canada business. As a result of the disposal, the Company recorded a pre-tax loss on disposal of approximately $15 million in fiscal 2014, which includes cash and non-cash charges.

        On March 26, 2012, the Company sold all of the issued and outstanding equity interests in its Industrial Pipes, Valves and Fittings ("IPVF") business to Shale-Inland Holdings, LLC. The Company

47


Table of Contents

received cash proceeds of approximately $477 million, net of $5 million of transaction costs. As a result of the sale, the Company recorded a $12 million pre-tax gain in fiscal 2012.

        In accordance with ASC 205-20, Discontinued Operations, the results of the Hardware Solutions, Litemor and IPVF operations and the gain/loss on sale of the businesses are classified as discontinued operations. The presentation of discontinued operations includes revenues and expenses of the discontinued operations and gain on the sale of business, net of tax, as one line item on the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss). All Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) presented have been revised to reflect this presentation. For additional detail related to the results of operations of the discontinued operations, see "Note 4, Discontinued Operations," in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements within Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this annual report on Form 10-K.

Seasonality

        In a typical year, our operating results are impacted by seasonality. Historically, sales of our products have been higher in the second and third quarters of each fiscal year due to favorable weather and longer daylight conditions during these periods. Seasonal variations in operating results may also be significantly impacted by inclement weather conditions, such as cold or wet weather, which can delay construction projects.

Fiscal Year

        Our fiscal year is a 52- or 53-week period ending on the Sunday nearest to January 31. Fiscal year ended February 1, 2015 ("fiscal 2014") included 52 weeks, fiscal year ended February 2, 2014 ("fiscal 2013") included 52 weeks and fiscal year ended February 3, 2013 ("fiscal 2012") included 53 weeks.

Key business metrics

Net sales

        We earn our Net sales primarily from the sale of construction, infrastructure, maintenance and renovation and improvement related products and our provision of related services to approximately 500,000 customers, including contractors, government entities, maintenance professionals, home builders and industrial businesses. We recognize sales, net of sales tax and allowances for returns and discounts, when persuasive evidence of an agreement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, price to the buyer is fixed and determinable and collectability is reasonably assured. Net sales in certain business units, particularly Waterworks and Power Solutions, fluctuate with the price of commodities as we seek to minimize the effects of changing commodities prices by passing such increases in the prices of certain commodity-based products to our customers.

        We ship products to customers by internal fleet and third-party carriers. Net sales are recognized from product sales when title to the products is passed to the customer, which generally occurs at the point of destination for products shipped by internal fleet and at the point of shipping for products shipped by third-party carriers.

        We include shipping and handling fees billed to customers in Net sales. Shipping and handling costs associated with inbound freight are capitalized to inventories and relieved through Cost of sales as inventories are sold. Shipping and handling costs associated with outbound freight are included in Selling, general and administrative expenses.

48


Table of Contents

Gross profit

        Gross profit primarily represents the difference between the product cost from our suppliers (net of earned rebates and discounts) including the cost of inbound freight and the sale price to our customers. The cost of outbound freight (including internal transfers), purchasing, receiving and warehousing are included in Selling, general and administrative expenses within operating expenses. Our Gross profits may not be comparable to those of other companies, as other companies may include all of the costs related to their distribution network in Cost of sales.

Operating expenses

        Operating expenses are primarily comprised of selling, general and administrative costs, which include payroll expenses (salaries, wages, employee benefits, payroll taxes and bonuses), rent, insurance, utilities, repair and maintenance and professional fees. In addition, operating expenses include depreciation and amortization and restructuring charges.

Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted net income (loss)

        We present Adjusted EBITDA because it is a primary measure used by management to evaluate operating performance. We believe the presentation of Adjusted EBITDA enhances investors' overall understanding of the financial performance of our business. Adjusted EBITDA is not a recognized term under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP") and does not purport to be an alternative to Net income (loss) as a measure of operating performance. We believe Adjusted EBITDA is helpful in highlighting operating trends, because it excludes the results of decisions that are outside the control of operating management and that can differ significantly from company to company depending on long-term strategic decisions regarding capital structure, the tax jurisdictions in which companies operate, age and book depreciation of facilities and capital investments. In addition, we present Adjusted net income (loss) to measure our overall profitability as we believe it is an important measure of our performance. Adjusted net income (loss) is not a recognized term under GAAP and does not purport to be an alternative to Net income (loss) as a measure of operating performance. Adjusted net income (loss) is defined as Net income (loss) less Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax, further adjusted for certain non-cash, non-recurring or unusual items, net of tax. We further believe that Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted net income (loss) are frequently used by securities analysts, investors and other interested parties in their evaluation of companies, many of which present an Adjusted EBITDA or Adjusted net income (loss) measure when reporting their results. We compensate for the limitations of using non-GAAP financial measures by using them to supplement GAAP results to provide a more complete understanding of the factors and trends affecting the business than GAAP results alone. Because not all companies use identical calculations, our presentation of Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted net income (loss) may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies.

        Adjusted EBITDA is based on "Consolidated EBITDA," a measure which is defined in HDS's Term Loan Facility and Senior ABL Facility and used in calculating financial ratios in several material debt covenants. Borrowings under these facilities are a key source of liquidity and our ability to borrow under these facilities depends upon, among other things, our compliance with such financial ratio covenants. In particular, both facilities contain restrictive covenants that can restrict our activities if we do not maintain financial ratios calculated based on Consolidated EBITDA and our Senior ABL Facility requires us to maintain a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of 1:1 if our specified excess availability (including an amount by which our borrowing base exceeds the outstanding amounts) under the Senior ABL Facility falls below the greater of $150 million and 10% of the aggregate commitments. Adjusted EBITDA is defined as Net income (loss) less Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax, plus (i) Interest expense and Interest income, net, (ii) Provision (benefit) for income taxes, (iii) Depreciation and amortization and further adjusted to exclude non-cash items and certain other

49


Table of Contents

adjustments to Consolidated Net Income permitted in calculating Consolidated EBITDA under our Term Loan Facility and our Senior ABL Facility. We believe that presenting Adjusted EBITDA is appropriate to provide additional information to investors about how the covenants in those agreements operate and about certain non-cash and other items. The Term Loan Facility and Senior ABL Facility permit us to make certain additional adjustments to Consolidated Net Income in calculating Consolidated EBITDA, such as projected net cost savings, which are not reflected in the Adjusted EBITDA data presented in this Form 10-K. We may in the future reflect such permitted adjustments in our calculations of Adjusted EBITDA. These covenants are important to the Company as failure to comply with certain covenants would result in a default under our Senior Credit Facilities. The material covenants in our Senior Credit Facilities are discussed in "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources—External Financing."

        Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted net income (loss) have limitations as analytical tools and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for analyzing our results as reported under GAAP. Some of these limitations are:

    Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted net income (loss) do not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, our working capital needs;

    Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect our interest expense, or the requirements necessary to service interest or principal payments on our debt;

    Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect our income tax expenses or the cash requirements to pay our taxes;

    Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted net income (loss) do not reflect historical cash expenditures or future requirements for capital expenditures or contractual commitments; and

    although depreciation and amortization charges are non-cash charges, the assets being depreciated and amortized will often have to be replaced in the future, and Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect any cash requirements for such replacements.

50


Table of Contents

        The following table presents a reconciliation of Net income (loss), the most directly comparable financial measure under GAAP, to Adjusted EBITDA for the periods presented:

 
  Fiscal year ended  
 
  February 1,
2015
  February 2,
2014
  February 3,
2013
  January 29,
2012
  January 30,
2011
 

Net income (loss)

  $ 3   $ (218 ) $ (1,179 ) $ (543 ) $ (619 )

Less income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax

    7     3     (68 )   46     15  

Income (loss) from continuing operations

    (4 )   (221 )   (1,111 )   (589 )   (634 )

Interest expense, net

    461     528     658     639     623  

Provision (benefit) for income taxes

    56     58     39     75     28  

Depreciation and amortization(i)

    212     232     309     298     308  

Loss on extinguishment & modification of debt(ii)

    108     87     709         5  

Restructuring charges(iii)

    7     12             8  

Stock-based compensation

    17     16     16     20     17  

Management fee & related expenses paid to Equity Sponsors(iv)

        2     5     5     5  

Costs related to public offerings(v)

    2     20              

Other

    (5 )       (1 )   (1 )   (5 )

Adjusted EBITDA

  $ 854   $ 734   $ 624   $ 447   $ 355  

(i)
Depreciation and amortization includes amounts recorded within Cost of sales in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

(ii)
Represents the loss on extinguishment of debt including the premium paid to repurchase or call the debt as well as the write-off of unamortized deferred financing costs and other assets or liabilities associated with such debt. Also includes the costs of debt modification.

(iii)
Represents the costs incurred for workforce reductions and branch closure or consolidations. These costs include occupancy costs, severance, and other costs incurred to exit a location. In addition, the fiscal 2013 charges include $3 million of inventory liquidation charges recorded within Cost of sales in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

(iv)
The Company entered into consulting agreements with the Equity Sponsors whereby the Company paid the Equity Sponsors a $5 million annual aggregate management fee and related expenses. These consulting agreements were terminated in conjunction with Holdings' initial public offering in the second quarter of fiscal 2013.

(v)
Represents the costs expensed in connection with the Company's public offerings. All of the shares of common stock sold in fiscal 2014 public offerings were sold by certain of the Company's stockholders. The Company did not receive any of the proceeds from the sale of such shares. Amount in fiscal 2013 represents the costs expensed in connection with the Company's initial public offering, including approximately $18 million paid to the Equity Sponsors in the second quarter of fiscal 2013 for termination of the consulting agreements. See "Note 2, Public Offerings," in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements within Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

51


Table of Contents

        The following table presents a reconciliation of Net income (loss), the most directly comparable financial measure under GAAP, to Adjusted net income (loss) for the periods presented:

 
  Fiscal year ended  
 
  February 1,
2015
  February 2,
2014
  February 3,
2013
  January 29,
2012
  January 30,
2011
 

Net income (loss)

  $ 3   $ (218 ) $ (1,179 ) $ (543 ) $ (619 )

Less income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax

    7     3     (68 )   46     15  

Income (loss) from continuing operations

    (4 )   (221 )   (1,111 )   (589 )   (634 )

Provision (benefit) for income taxes

    56     58     39     75     28  

Cash paid for income taxes(i)

    (12 )   (8 )   (1 )   (5 )   (4 )

Amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets (other than software)

    99     129     220     222     221  

Loss on extinguishment & modification of debt(ii)

    108     87     709         5  

Restructuring charges(iii)

    7     12             8  

Costs related to public offerings(iv)

    2     20              

Other

    (5 )                

Adjusted Net Income (Loss)

  $ 251   $ 77   $ (144 ) $ (297 ) $ (376 )

(i)
Cash paid for income taxes in fiscal 2014, exclude a $27 million payment for the settlement of the IRS's audit of the Company's U.S. federal income tax returns filed for the tax years ended on February 3, 2008 and February 1, 2009.

(ii)
Represents the loss on extinguishment of debt including the premium paid to repurchase or call the debt as well as the write-off of unamortized deferred financing costs and other assets or liabilities associated with such debt. Also includes the costs of debt modifications.

(iii)
Represents the costs incurred for workforce reductions and branch closure or consolidations. These costs include occupancy costs, severance, and other costs incurred to exit a location. In addition, the fiscal 2013 charges include $3 million of inventory liquidation charges recorded within Cost of sales in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

(iv)
Represents the costs expensed in connection with the Company's public offerings. All of the shares of common stock sold in fiscal 2014 public offerings were sold by certain of the company's stockholders. The Company did not receive any of the proceeds from the sale of such shares. Amount in fiscal 2013 represents the costs expensed in connection with the Company's initial public offering, including approximately $18 million paid to the Equity Sponsors in the second quarter of fiscal 2013 for termination of the consulting agreements. See "Note 2, Public Offerings," in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements within Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

52


Table of Contents

Consolidated results of operations

 
   
   
   
  Percentage
Increase
(Decrease)
 
 
  Fiscal Year  
 
  2014
vs. 2013
  2013
vs. 2012
 
(Dollars in millions)
  2014   2013   2012  

Net sales

  $ 8,882   $ 8,228   $ 7,647     7.9     7.6  

Gross profit

    2,558     2,358     2,152     8.5     9.6  

Operating expenses:

                               

Selling, general & administrative

    1,726     1,649     1,551     4.7     6.3  

Depreciation & amortization

    207     228     306     (9.2 )   (25.5 )

Restructuring

    7     9               *

Total operating expenses

    1,940     1,886     1,857     2.9     1.6  

Operating income

    618     472     295     30.9     60.0  

Interest expense

    461     528     658     (12.7 )   (19.8 )

Loss on extinguishment & modification of debt

    108     87     709     24.1     (87.7 )

Other (income) expense, net

    (3 )   20           *     *

Income (loss) from continuing operations before provision (benefit) for income taxes

    52     (163 )   (1,072 )     *   (84.8 )

Provision (benefit) for income taxes

    56     58     39     (3.4 )   49.0  

Income (loss) from continuing operations

    (4 )   (221 )   (1,111 )     *   (80.1 )

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax

    7     3     (68 )     *     *

Net Income (Loss)

  $ 3   $ (218 ) $ (1,179 )     *   (81.5 )

Non-GAAP Financial Data:

                               

Adjusted EBITDA

  $ 854   $ 734   $ 624     16.3     17.6  

Adjusted net income (loss)

  $ 251   $ 77   $ (144 )     *     *

*
Not meaningful

53


Table of Contents

 

 
  % of Net sales   Basis Point
Increase
(Decrease)
 
 
  Fiscal Year  
 
  2014
vs. 2013
  2013
vs. 2012
 
 
  2014   2013   2012  

Net sales

    100.0 %   100.0 %   100.0 %        

Gross profit

    28.8     28.7     28.1     10     60  

Operating expenses:

                               

Selling, general & administrative

    19.4     20.0     20.3     (60 )   (30 )

Depreciation & amortization

    2.3     2.8     4.0     (50 )   (120 )

Restructuring

    0.1     0.1             10  

Total operating expenses

    21.8     22.9     24.2     (110 )   (130 )

Operating income

    7.0     5.7     3.9     130     180  

Interest expense

    5.2     6.4     8.6     (120 )   (220 )

Loss on extinguishment & modification of debt

    1.2     1.1     9.3     10     (820 )

Other (income) expense, net

        0.2         (20 )   20  

Income (loss) from continuing operations before provision (benefit) for income taxes

    0.6     (1.9 )   (14.0 )   250       *

Provision (benefit) for income taxes

    0.6     0.7     0.5     (10 )   30  

Income (loss) from continuing operations

        (2.6 )   (14.5 )   260       *

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax

    0.1         (0.8 )   10     80  

Net Income (Loss)

        (2.6 )   (15.4 )   260       *

Non-GAAP Financial Data:

                               

Adjusted EBITDA

    9.6     8.9     8.2     70     70  

Adjusted net income (loss)

    2.8     0.9     (1.9 )   190     280  

*
Not meaningful

Fiscal 2014 compared to fiscal 2013

Highlights

        Net sales increased $654 million, or 7.9%, as compared to fiscal 2013. Each of our four reportable segments realized increases in Net sales. Operating income in fiscal 2014 increased $146 million, or 30.9% to $618 million during fiscal 2014 as compared to fiscal 2013. Our growth initiatives, cost control efforts and the leverage of fixed costs, resulted in an increase to Adjusted EBITDA of $120 million, or 16.3%, in fiscal 2014 as compared to fiscal 2013. Net income in fiscal 2014 was $3 million, as compared to a $218 million net loss in fiscal 2013. Adjusted net income in fiscal 2014 increased $174 million to $251 million, as compared to $77 million in fiscal 2013. The increase in Adjusted net income was attributable to the sales growth and the leverage of fixed costs. As of February 1, 2015, our liquidity was $1.2 billion. See "Liquidity, capital resources and financial condition" for further information.

Net sales

        Net sales increased $654 million, or 7.9% to $8,882 million during fiscal 2014 as compared to fiscal 2013.

        Each of our reportable segments experienced an increase in Net sales in fiscal 2014 as compared to fiscal 2013. The increase in Net sales during the year was primarily due to growth initiatives at each of our businesses and, to a lesser extent, increase in market volume. The Net sales increase was partially offset by an unfavorable Canadian exchange rate impact, primarily at Power Solutions, resulting in a $26 million reduction to Net sales in fiscal 2014. Additionally, fiscal 2014 was negatively impacted by severe winter weather early in the year.

54


Table of Contents

Gross profit

        Gross profit increased $200 million, or 8.5% to $2,558 million during fiscal 2014 as compared to fiscal 2013.

        Each of our reportable segments experienced an increase in Gross profit in fiscal 2014 as compared to fiscal 2013. The increase in Gross profit is primarily due to sales growth from initiatives and market volume.

        Gross profit as a percentage of Net sales ("gross margin") increased approximately 10 basis points to 28.8% in fiscal 2014 as compared to 28.7% in fiscal 2013. The improvement in gross margin was primarily driven by our category management initiatives, partially offset by the competitive environment, and mix of products and services.

Operating expenses

        Operating expenses increased $54 million, or 2.9% to $1,940 million during fiscal 2014 as compared to fiscal 2013.

        Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $77 million, or 4.7% to $1,726 million during fiscal 2014 as compared to fiscal 2013. The increase was primarily a result of increases in variable expenses due to higher sales volume and investments in growth initiatives. Depreciation and amortization expense decreased $21 million, or 9.2% to $207 million in fiscal 2014 as compared to fiscal 2013 as certain acquisition-related intangible assets became fully amortized during the year, partially offset by an increase in depreciation as a result of new locations, distribution center expansions and investments in technology. Restructuring charges decreased $2 million, to $7 million during fiscal 2014 as compared to fiscal 2013, as the Company completed restructuring activities during the first half of fiscal 2014 that began in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013.

        Operating expenses as a percentage of Net sales decreased approximately 110 basis points to 21.8%, in fiscal 2014 as compared to fiscal 2013. The decrease was driven by a reduction in Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of Net sales, which decreased 60 basis points to 19.4%, and Depreciation and amortization expense as a percentage of Net sales, which decreased 50 basis points to 2.3%. The improvement in Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of Net sales was primarily due to our cost control efforts, including the restructuring actions initiated during fiscal 2013, and the leverage of fixed costs through sales volume increases.

Operating income

        Operating income increased $146 million, or 30.9% to $618 million during fiscal 2014 as compared to fiscal 2013, primarily due to higher Net sales and Gross profit partially offset by higher operating expenses.

        Operating income as a percentage of Net sales increased approximately 130 basis points in fiscal 2014 as compared to fiscal 2013. The improvement was primarily driven by a reduction in operating expenses as a percentage of Net sales and, to a lesser extent, improvements in gross margins.

Interest expense

        Interest expense decreased $67 million, or 12.7%, during fiscal 2014 as compared to fiscal 2013. The decrease in fiscal 2014 as compared to fiscal 2013 was primarily due to a lower average outstanding balance, due to the repayment of debt with the net proceeds from Holdings' initial public offering in fiscal 2013, and to a lesser extent, a lower average interest rate.

55


Table of Contents

Loss on extinguishment & modification of debt

        During fiscal 2014, our debt refinancing and redemption activities resulted in charges of $108 million recorded in accordance with ASC 470-50, Debt-Modifications and Extinguishments.

        In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, HDS redeemed all of the outstanding $1,250 million aggregate principal amount of its 2012 First Priority Notes due 2019. As a result, in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014 HDS incurred a $106 million loss on extinguishment of debt, which includes a $106 million make-whole premium payment to redeem the 2012 First Priority Notes and the write-off of $15 million of unamortized deferred debt costs, offset by the write-off of $15 million of unamortized premium on the 2012 First Priority Notes.

        In the first quarter of fiscal 2014, HDS amended its Term Loan Facility to reduce the applicable margin for borrowings by 25 basis points and reduce the LIBOR floor from 1.25% to 1.00%. The amendment also added a new soft call provision applicable to optional prepayment of Term Loans and extended the maturity of the Term Loans by approximately nine months, to June 28, 2018. A portion of the amendment was considered an extinguishment, resulting in a $1 million loss on extinguishment of debt for the write-off of pro-rata portions of the unamortized original issue discount and the unamortized deferred debt cost. The portion of the amendment considered a modification resulted in a charge of approximately $1 million.

        During fiscal 2013, our debt refinancing and redemption activities resulted in charges of $87 million recorded in accordance with ASC 470-50, Debt-Modifications and Extinguishments.

        In the second quarter of fiscal 2013, we redeemed all $950 million outstanding aggregate principal amount of HDS's January 2013 Senior Subordinated Notes at a redemption price equal to 103% of the principal amount thereof. As a result, in second quarter 2013, HDS incurred a $44 million loss on extinguishment of debt, which included a $29 million premium payment to redeem the January 2013 Senior Subordinated Notes and approximately $15 million to write off the unamortized deferred debt cost.

        Also in the second quarter of fiscal 2013, we amended HDS's Senior ABL Facility to, among other changes, lower the borrowing margin by 25 basis points and extend the maturity date of the Senior ABL Facility to June 28, 2018 (or the maturity date under HDS's Term Loan Facility, if earlier). In connection with the amendment, HDS recognized an approximately $3 million loss on extinguishment of debt for the write-off of pro-rata unamortized deferred debt costs for the portion of the amendment considered an extinguishment.

        In the first quarter of fiscal 2013, we redeemed all of the remaining $889 million outstanding of the 2007 Senior Subordinated Notes at redemption price of 103.375% of the principal amount thereof. As a result, HDS incurred a $34 million loss on extinguishment of debt, which included a $30 million premium payment to redeem the 2007 Senior Subordinated Notes and approximately $4 million to write off the unamortized deferred debt cost.

        In addition, during the first quarter of fiscal 2013, we amended HDS's Term Loan Facility to lower the borrowing margin by 275 basis points and replace the hard call provision applicable to optional prepayment of Term Loans thereunder with a soft call option. A portion of the amendment was considered an extinguishment, resulting in a $5 million loss on extinguishment of debt, which included approximately $2 million of fees, $2 million to write off the pro-rata portion of unamortized original issue discount, and $1 million to write off the pro-rata portion of unamortized deferred debt cost. A significant portion of the amendment of HDS's Term Loan Facility was considered a modification. As a result, HDS incurred approximately $1 million in financing fees that were expensed.

        For additional information on our debt-related activity, see "Liquidity, capital resources and financial condition—External financing" within this section of this annual report on Form 10-K.

56


Table of Contents

Other (income) expense, net

        During fiscal 2014, in connection with secondary public offerings by certain of Holdings' stockholders, we incurred approximately $2 million in related fees and expenses. Additionally, we recognized a $5 million credit associated with the tax-sharing agreement with Home Depot. During fiscal 2013, and in connection with Holdings' initial public offering, we incurred approximately $20 million in related fees and expenses, including an aggregate fee of approximately $18 million paid to the Equity Sponsors to terminate our consulting agreements with them. For additional information, see "Note 2, Public Offerings," in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements within Part II, Item 8 of this annual report on Form 10-K.

Provision (benefit) for income taxes

        The provision for income taxes from continuing operations in fiscal 2014 was an expense of $56 million compared to an expense of $58 million in fiscal 2013. The effective rate for continuing operations for fiscal 2014 was 107.7%, reflecting the $27 million increase in the valuation allowance, which was partially offset by the utilization of deferred tax assets which had previously been subject to a valuation allowance, the increasing of the deferred tax liability for U.S. goodwill amortization for tax purposes, and the accrual of income taxes for foreign and certain state jurisdictions. The U.S. valuation allowance for fiscal 2014 includes an increase of $40 million related to deferred tax liabilities generated by indefinite life intangibles. The deferred tax liability associated with indefinite life intangibles is not available as a source of taxable income to support the realization of deferred tax assets created by other deductible temporary timing differences.

        The effective rate for continuing operations for fiscal 2013 was 35.5%, reflecting the impact of a $115 million increase in the U.S. valuation allowance on deferred tax assets driven by the uncertainty regarding our ability to utilize the NOL for fiscal 2013. The U.S. valuation allowance for fiscal 2013 includes an increase of $40 million related to deferred tax liabilities generated by indefinite life intangibles for continuing operations. The deferred tax liability associated with indefinite life intangibles is not available as a source of taxable income to support the realization of deferred tax assets created by other deductible temporary timing differences.

        We regularly assess the realization of our net deferred tax assets and the need for any valuation allowance. This assessment requires management to make judgments as to the recoverability of the net deferred tax assets and if it is determined that it is "more likely than not" that the benefits will not be realized, valuation allowances are recognized. In evaluating whether it is "more likely than not" that the Company would recover these net deferred tax assets, future taxable income, the reversal of existing temporary differences, and tax planning strategies are considered.

Adjusted EBITDA

        Adjusted EBITDA increased $120 million, or 16.3%, in fiscal 2014 as compared to fiscal 2013. Each of our reportable segments experienced an increase in Adjusted EBITDA in fiscal 2014 as compared to fiscal 2013.

        The increase in Adjusted EBITDA in fiscal 2014 was primarily due to the increases in Net sales and Gross profit. Adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of Net sales increased approximately 70 basis points to 9.6% in fiscal 2014 as compared to fiscal 2013, primarily due to a reduction in Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of Net sales and, to a lesser extent, gross margin improvements.

57


Table of Contents

Adjusted net income

        Adjusted net income increased $174 million, to $251 million, in fiscal 2014 as compared to fiscal 2013. The increase in Adjusted net income was attributable to the sales growth, the leverage of fixed costs and also the positive impact of lower interest expense.

Fiscal 2013 compared to fiscal 2012

Highlights

        Net sales in fiscal 2013 increased $581 million, or 7.6%, compared to fiscal 2012. There are unusual items that impact the comparability of the results between fiscal 2013 and fiscal 2012.

        Fiscal 2012 includes:

    53rd week of operations: $142 million in Net sales, $39 million in Gross profit, $13 million in Operating income, and $13 million in Adjusted EBITDA

        Fiscal 2013 includes:

    Restructuring charges: $3 million in Cost of sales, $9 million in Operating expenses, $12 million Operating loss

        Under our fiscal calendar, fiscal 2012 included 53 weeks of operations as compared to 52 weeks of operations in fiscal 2013. Excluding the impact of the 53rd week in fiscal 2012, Net sales increased $723 million, or 9.6%. Each of our four reportable segments realized increases in Net sales despite unfavorable weather conditions, continued sluggishness in non-residential construction and increased uncertainty in municipal and infrastructure end-markets.

        During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013, management evaluated our cost structure and identified opportunities to reduce costs across our businesses, primarily through a workforce reduction of approximately 150 employees in our Power Solutions business, global support center and, to a lesser extent, our other businesses. As a result, we recorded a restructuring charge of $12 million, which included $9 million for employee-related charges, primarily severance, and $3 million for inventory liquidation related to discontinued products at Power Solutions. The inventory liquidation charges were recorded to Cost of sales and all other restructuring charges were recorded to operating expenses within the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss).

        Operating income increased $177 million, or 60%, during fiscal 2013 as compared to fiscal 2012. On a 52-weeks basis and excluding the restructuring charges, Operating income increased $202 million, or 72%, during fiscal 2013 as compared to fiscal 2012. Our growth initiatives and investments in the business resulted in an increase to Adjusted EBITDA of $110 million, or 17.6%, in fiscal 2013 as compared to fiscal 2012. Excluding the 53rd week, Adjusted EBITDA increased $123 million, or 20% in fiscal 2013 as compared to fiscal 2012. This growth was driven by our sales initiatives, continued focus on margin expansion and cost control, and geographic and product line expansions through acquisitions and greenfields. As of February 2, 2014, our liquidity was $994 million.

Net sales

        Net sales increased $581 million, or 7.6% to $8,228 million during fiscal 2013 as compared to fiscal 2012. On a 52-week basis, Net sales increased $723 million, or 9.6%, as compared to fiscal 2012.

        Each of our reportable segments reported an increase in Net sales during fiscal 2013 as compared to fiscal 2012. The Net sales increases were primarily due to growth initiatives at each of our businesses and, to a lesser extent, increases in market volume and recent acquisitions, partially offset by unfavorable weather conditions, particularly the severe winter weather experienced during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013. Organic sales growth on a 52-week basis was 8.2% for fiscal 2013 as compared to

58


Table of Contents

fiscal 2012. Our fiscal 2012 acquisitions provided $105 million of non-organic sales growth in fiscal 2013.

Gross profit

        Gross profit increased $206 million, or 9.6%, to $2,358 million during fiscal 2013 as compared to fiscal 2012. On a 52-week basis, Gross profit increased $245 million, or 11.6% as compared to fiscal 2012.

        The increase in Gross profit, driven by our Facilities Maintenance, Waterworks, and Construction & Industrial—White Cap businesses, was primarily due to sales growth from initiatives, market volume and product mix. Fiscal 2013 Gross profit was negatively affected by a $3 million inventory liquidation charge recorded under our restructuring plan.

        Gross margin increased approximately 60 basis points to 28.7% in fiscal 2013 as compared to 28.1% in fiscal 2012. The improvement in gross margin in fiscal 2013 was driven by our Facilities Maintenance, Waterworks and Construction & Industrial—White Cap businesses.

Operating expenses

        Operating expenses increased $29 million, or 1.6%, to $1,886 million during fiscal 2013 as compared to fiscal 2012, primarily due to the increase in variable expenses due to higher sales and investment in growth initiatives. On a 52-week basis and excluding the restructuring charge, Operating expenses increased $46 million, or 2.5%, during fiscal 2013 as compared to fiscal 2012.

        Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $98 million, or 6.3%, in fiscal 2013 compared to fiscal 2012. On a 52-week basis, Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $123 million, or 8.1%, in fiscal 2013 as compared to fiscal 2012. The increase was primarily a result of increases in variable expenses due to higher sales volume and investments in growth initiatives. Depreciation and amortization expense decreased $78 million, or 26%, in fiscal 2013 as compared to fiscal 2012. The decrease was primarily a result of certain acquisition-related intangible assets, becoming fully amortized during fiscal 2012.

        Operating expenses as a percentage of Net sales decreased approximately 130 basis points to 22.9% in fiscal 2013 as compared to fiscal 2012. The decrease was primarily due to the lower Depreciation and amortization expense. Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of Net sales decreased approximately 30 basis points to 20.0% in fiscal 2013 as compared to fiscal 2012. This was due to the leverage of fixed costs through sales volume increases and favorable claims experience on self-insured liabilities.

Operating income

        Operating income increased $177 million, or 60%, during fiscal 2013 as compared to fiscal 2012. On a 52-week basis and excluding the impact of the restructuring charges, Operating income increased $202 million, or 71.6%, during fiscal 2013 as compared to fiscal 2012. The improvement was due to higher Net sales and Gross profit and the reduction in Depreciation and amortization expense.

        Operating income as a percentage of Net sales increased approximately 180 basis points in fiscal 2013 as compared to fiscal 2012. On a 52-week basis, excluding the goodwill and other intangible asset impairment, and the impact of the restructuring charges, Operating income as a percentage of Net sales increased approximately 210 basis points in fiscal 2013 as compared to fiscal 2012. The improvement was driven by the reduction in Depreciation and amortization expense, and to a lesser extent a reduction in Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of Net sales, and improvements in gross margins.

59


Table of Contents

Interest expense

        Interest expense decreased $130 million, or 19.8%, during fiscal 2013 as compared to fiscal 2012. The decrease in fiscal 2013 was due to a lower average interest rate on our outstanding indebtedness, partially offset by a higher average outstanding balance in fiscal 2013.

Loss on extinguishment & modification of debt

        During fiscal 2013, our debt refinancing and redemption activities resulted in charges of $87 million recorded in accordance with ASC 470-50, Debt- Modifications and Extinguishments.

        In the second quarter of fiscal 2013, we redeemed all $950 million outstanding aggregate principal amount of HDS's January 2013 Senior Subordinated Notes at a redemption price equal to 103% of the principal amount thereof. As a result, HDS incurred a $44 million loss on extinguishment of debt, which includes a $29 million premium payment to redeem the January 2013 Senior Subordinated Notes and approximately $15 million to write off the unamortized deferred debt cost.

        Also in the second quarter of fiscal 2013, we amended HDS's Senior ABL Facility to, among other changes, lower the borrowing margin by 25 basis points and extend the maturity date of the Senior ABL Facility to June 28, 2018 (or the maturity date under HDS's Term Loan Facility, if earlier). In connection with the amendment, HDS recognized an approximately $3 million loss on extinguishment of debt to write off a pro-rata portion of the unamortized deferred debt costs for the portion of the amendment considered an extinguishment.

        In the first quarter of fiscal 2013, we redeemed all of the remaining $889 million outstanding of HDS's 2007 Senior Subordinated Notes at redemption price of 103.375% of the principal amount thereof. As a result, HDS incurred a $34 million loss on extinguishment of debt, which includes a $30 million premium payment to redeem the 2007 Senior Subordinated Notes and approximately $4 million to write off the unamortized deferred debt cost.

        In addition, during the first quarter of fiscal 2013, we amended HDS's Term Loan Facility to lower the borrowing margin by 275 basis points and replace the hard call provision applicable to optional prepayment of Term Loans thereunder with a soft call option. A portion of the amendment was considered an extinguishment, resulting in a $5 million loss on extinguishment of debt, which included approximately $2 million of fees, $2 million to write off the pro-rata portion of unamortized original issue discount, and $1 million to write off the pro-rata portion of unamortized deferred debt cost. A significant portion of the amendment of HDS's Term Loan Facility was considered a modification. As a result, HDS incurred approximately $1 million in financing fees that were expensed.

        During fiscal 2012, our debt refinancing and redemption activities resulted in charges of $709 million recorded in accordance with ASC 470-50, Debt-Modifications and Extinguishments.

        In connection with the refinancing of the senior portion of our debt structure in the first quarter of fiscal 2012, HDS recorded a charge of $220 million, which consisted of $150 million for the premium paid to the holders of the 12.0% Senior Notes, as contractually required, upon early extinguishment, $46 million of unamortized deferred debt costs and $24 million to write off the remaining unamortized asset associated with Home Depot's guarantee that was terminated in the April 2012 Refinancing Transactions (As defined in "Liquidity, capital resources and financial condition—External financing" section below).

        In connection with the partial redemption of our 2007 Senior Subordinated Notes in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, HDS recorded a charge of $37 million, which consisted of a $31 million premium payment to redeem the 2007 Senior Subordinated Notes and $5 million to write off the pro-rata portion of the unamortized deferred debt costs.

60


Table of Contents

        In connection with the repurchase of HDS's April 2012 Senior Unsecured Notes in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, HDS recorded a charge of $452 million, which consisted of a $422 million make-whole premium payment, a $28 million write-off of unamortized original issue discount, and a $2 million write-off of unamortized deferred debt costs.

        For additional information on our debt-related activity, see "Liquidity, capital resources and financial condition—External financing" within this section of this annual report on Form 10-K.

Other (income) expense, net

        In connection with our initial public offering, we incurred approximately $20 million in related fees and expenses, including an aggregate fee of approximately $18 million paid to the Equity Sponsors to terminate our consulting agreements with them. For additional information on this transaction, see "Note 5, Related Parties," in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements within Part II, Item 8 of this annual report on Form 10-K.

Provision (benefit) for income taxes

        The provision for income taxes from continuing operations in fiscal 2013 was an expense of $58 million compared to an expense of $39 million in fiscal 2012. The effective rate for continuing operations for fiscal 2013 was 35.5%, reflecting the impact of a $115 million increase in the U.S. valuation allowance on deferred tax assets driven by the uncertainty regarding our ability to utilize the NOL for fiscal 2013. The U.S. valuation allowance for fiscal 2013 includes an increase of $40 million related to deferred tax liabilities generated by indefinite life intangibles for continuing operations. The deferred tax liability associated with indefinite life intangibles is not available as a source of taxable income to support the realization of deferred tax assets created by other deductible temporary timing differences.

        The effective rate for continuing operations for fiscal 2012 was 3.7%, reflecting the impact of a $446 million increase in the U.S. valuation allowance on deferred tax assets driven by the uncertainty regarding our ability to utilize the NOL for fiscal 2012. The U.S. valuation allowance for fiscal 2012 includes an increase of $39 million related to deferred tax liabilities generated by indefinite lived intangibles. The deferred tax liability associated with indefinite life intangibles is not available as a source of taxable income to support the realization of deferred tax assets created by other deductible temporary timing differences.

        In addition, the expense for fiscal 2012 was reduced by an adjustment to the Company's valuation allowance as a result of the acquisition of additional deferred tax liabilities in conjunction with the Peachtree acquisition. The Company recorded a $6 million reduction in income tax expense associated with an adjustment to the Company's valuation allowance as a result of the Peachtree acquisition. The impact to the Company's income tax rate of acquiring Peachtree's net deferred tax liability is recorded in the Company's financial statements outside of Peachtree's purchase accounting. Peachtree's net deferred tax liability of $6 million recorded in purchase accounting is available to the Company as a source of future taxable income to support the realization of the Company's deferred tax assets which results in lowering the Company's valuation allowance and income tax expense by such amount.

Adjusted EBITDA

        Adjusted EBITDA increased $110 million, or 17.6%, in fiscal 2013 as compared to fiscal 2012. On a 52-week basis, Adjusted EBITDA increased $123 million, or 20.1%, in fiscal 2013 as compared to fiscal 2012. The increase in Adjusted EBITDA in fiscal 2013 was driven by Facilities Maintenance, Waterworks, and Construction & Industrial—White Cap. The increase in Adjusted EBITDA in fiscal 2013 was primarily due to the increases in Net sales and Gross profit. Adjusted EBITDA as a

61


Table of Contents

percentage of Net sales increased approximately 70 basis points to 8.9% in fiscal 2013 as compared to fiscal 2012.

Results of operations by reportable segment

Facilities Maintenance

 
   
   
   
  Increase (Decrease)  
 
  Fiscal Year  
 
  2014 vs.
2013
  2013 vs.
2012
 
 
  2014   2013   2012  
 
  (Dollars in millions)
   
   
 

Net sales

  $ 2,510   $ 2,331   $ 2,182     7.7 %   6.8 %

Operating income (loss)

  $ 382   $ 307   $ 271     24.4 %   13.3 %

% of Net sales

    15.2 %   13.2 %   12.4 %   200 bps     80 bps  

Depreciation and amortization

    107     126     118     (15.1 )%   6.8 %

Restructuring

    2     1           *     *

Adjusted EBITDA

  $ 491   $ 434   $ 389     13.1 %   11.6 %

% of Net sales

    19.6 %   18.6 %   17.8 %   100 bps     80 bps  

*
Not meaningful

Fiscal 2014 compared to fiscal 2013

Net Sales

        Net sales increased $179 million, or 7.7%, in fiscal 2014 as compared to fiscal 2013.

        Growth initiatives contributed approximately $125 million of the year-over-year increase. These growth initiatives consist of investments in sales personnel, products and technology, aligned with our customers' multifamily, hospitality, and healthcare industries.

Adjusted EBITDA

        Adjusted EBITDA increased $57 million, or 13.1%, in fiscal 2014 as compared to fiscal 2013.

        The increase was primarily due to the increase in Net sales and operating leverage through productivity, partially offset by increased Selling, general and administrative expenses related to the hiring of additional associates to support the expanding business and to drive future growth.

        Adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of Net sales increased approximately 100 basis points in fiscal 2014 as compared to fiscal 2013. The increase was primarily driven by a decline in Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of Net sales. Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of Net sales declined approximately 110 basis points in fiscal 2014 as compared to fiscal 2013 due to the leverage of fixed costs through sales volume increases and cost control efforts.

Fiscal 2013 compared to fiscal 2012

Net Sales

        Net sales increased $149 million, or 6.8%, during fiscal 2013 as compared to fiscal 2012. Excluding the impact of the 53rd week in fiscal 2012, Net Sales increased $190 million, or 8.9%, as compared to fiscal 2012.

        For fiscal 2013, growth initiatives contributed approximately $125 million of the year-over-year increase. These growth initiatives consist of investments in sales personnel, products and technology, aligned with our customers' multifamily, hospitality, and healthcare industries. The acquisition of

62


Table of Contents

Peachtree in June 2012 contributed approximately $30 million of non-organic Net sales. Organic sales growth on a 52-week basis was 7.5% in fiscal 2013 as compared to fiscal 2012. Net sales in fiscal 2013 were negatively impacted by unusually cooler weather in the summer months of 2013, negatively impacting HVAC-related sales.

Adjusted EBITDA

        Adjusted EBITDA increased $45 million, or 11.6%, in fiscal 2013 as compared to fiscal 2012. On a 52-week basis, Adjusted EBITDA increased $53 million, or 13.9%, in fiscal 2013 as compared to fiscal 2012.

        The increase in fiscal 2013 was due to growth initiatives and the Peachtree acquisition. The increase was partially offset by increased Selling, general and administrative expense related to the hiring of additional associates to support the expanding business and drive future growth, and by other variable expenses driven by the volume increase.

        Adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of Net sales increased approximately 80 basis points in fiscal 2013 as compared to fiscal 2012. The improvement in fiscal 2013 included gross margin expansions of approximately 70 basis points and a slight decline in Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of Net sales. Gross margins were favorably impacted by purchase discounts and rebates achieved as a result of higher purchasing volumes. Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of Net sales were favorably impacted by the leverage of fixed costs through sales volume increases, partially offset by the impact of the investment in sales force additions.

Waterworks

 
   
   
   
  Increase
(Decrease)
 
 
  Fiscal Year  
 
  2014 vs.
2013
  2013 vs.
2012
 
 
  2014   2013   2012  
 
  (Dollars in millions)
   
   
 

Net sales

  $ 2,427   $ 2,227   $ 2,028     9.0 %   9.8 %

Operating income (loss)

  $ 184   $ 159   $ 31     15.7 %     *

% of Net sales

    7.6 %   7.1 %   1.5 %   50 bps       *

Depreciation and amortization

    14     14     106         (86.8 )%

Adjusted EBITDA

  $ 198   $ 173   $ 137     14.5 %   26.3 %

% of Net sales

    8.2 %   7.8 %   6.8 %   40 bps     100 bps  

*
Not meaningful

Fiscal 2014 compared to fiscal 2013

Net Sales

        Net sales increased $200 million, or 9.0%, during fiscal 2014 as compared to fiscal 2013.

        Growth initiatives, including fusible piping solutions, storm drainage, treatment plant initiatives, and new locations ("greenfields"), contributed approximately $106 million in fiscal 2014. Net sales was also positively impacted by higher sales volume due to end-market improvements.

Adjusted EBITDA

        Adjusted EBITDA increased $25 million, or 14.5%, in fiscal 2014 as compared to fiscal 2013.

63


Table of Contents

        The increase in fiscal 2014, was due to growth initiatives, partially offset by increased Selling, general and administrative expenses, primarily personnel related to growth initiative investments and variable costs due to the increased volume and inflation.

        Adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of Net sales increased approximately 40 basis points in fiscal 2014 as compared to fiscal 2013. The improvement was due to a reduction in Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of Net sales due to leverage of fixed costs through sales volume increases.

Fiscal 2013 compared to fiscal 2012

Net Sales

        Net sales increased $199 million, or 9.8%, in fiscal 2013 as compared to fiscal 2012. Excluding the impact of the 53rd week in fiscal 2012, Net sales increased $235 million, or 11.8%, in fiscal 2013 as compared to fiscal 2012.

        Growth initiatives, including fusible plastics, storm drainage, treatment plant initiatives, and greenfields excluding acquisitions, contributed approximately $170 million of the year-over-year increase for fiscal 2013. Net sales in fiscal 2013 were negatively affected by decreases in prices due to commodity price deflation, primarily polyvinyl chloride ("PVC") and ductile iron products, and unfavorable weather conditions in the fourth quarter. The December 2012 acquisition of Water Products contributed Net sales of approximately $75 million in fiscal 2013. Organic sales growth on a 52-week basis was 8.1% in fiscal 2013 as compared to fiscal 2012.

Adjusted EBITDA

        Adjusted EBITDA increased $36 million, or 26.3%, in fiscal 2013 as compared to fiscal 2012. On a 52-week basis, Adjusted EBITDA increased $38 million, or 28.1%, in fiscal 2013 as compared to fiscal 2012.

        The increase was due to growth initiatives and, to a lesser extent, the Water Products acquisition, partially offset by increased Selling, general and administrative expense, primarily personnel and variable costs due to the increased volume.

        Adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of Net sales increased approximately 100 basis points in fiscal 2013 as compared to fiscal 2012. The improvement in fiscal 2013 was due to the expansion of gross margins by approximately 70 basis points and a slight decline in Selling, general and administrative expense as a percentage of Net sales. Gross margin improvements were primarily driven by product mix, higher purchase discounts and rebates achieved as a result of higher purchasing volumes, and the Water Products acquisition. The decrease in Selling, general and administrative expense as a percentage of Net sales in fiscal 2013 was primarily due to the leverage of fixed costs through sales volume increases.

64


Table of Contents

Power Solutions

 
   
   
   
  Increase
(Decrease)
 
 
  Fiscal Year  
 
  2014 vs.
2013
  2013 vs.
2012
 
 
  2014   2013   2012  
 
  (Dollars in millions)
   
   
 

Net sales

  $ 1,913   $ 1,843   $ 1,787     3.8 %   3.1 %

Operating income (loss)

  $ 52   $ 45   $ 47     15.6 %   (4.3 )%

% of Net sales

    2.7 %   2.4 %   2.6 %   30 bps     (20) bps  

Depreciation and amortization

    26     25     25     4.0 %    

Restructuring

    1     6           *     *

Adjusted EBITDA

  $ 79   $ 76   $ 72     3.9 %   5.6 %

% of Net sales

    4.1 %   4.1 %   4.0 %       10 bps  

*
Not meaningful

Fiscal 2014 compared to fiscal 2013

Net Sales

        Net sales in fiscal 2014 increased $70 million, or 3.8%, as compared to fiscal 2013.

        The increase in Net sales in fiscal 2014 as compared to fiscal 2013, was attributable to increasing sales volume with our utilities customers, primarily driven by increases in transmission and distribution projects, as well as, expanded products and services with new customers. The increase was partially offset by an unfavorable foreign exchange rate impact on the Power Solutions Canadian business, which resulted in a $17 million reduction to Net sales.

Adjusted EBITDA

        Adjusted EBITDA in fiscal 2014 increased $3 million, or 3.9%, as compared to fiscal 2013.

        The increase in Adjusted EBITDA was primarily attributable to growth in Net sales, partially offset by an unfavorable foreign exchange rate impact. In addition, fiscal 2014 was negatively impacted by unfavorable weather early in the year.

        Adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of Net sales remained flat in fiscal 2014 as compared to fiscal 2013.

Fiscal 2013 compared to fiscal 2012

Net Sales

        Net sales increased $56 million, or 3.1%, in fiscal 2013 as compared to fiscal 2012. Excluding the impact of the 53rd week in fiscal 2012, Net sales increased $92 million, or 5.3%, in fiscal 2013 as compared to fiscal 2012.

        The increase in Net sales in fiscal 2013 as compared to fiscal 2012 was attributable to increasing sales volume with our utilities customers, primarily driven by increases in transmission projects and product and service expansion.

65


Table of Contents

Adjusted EBITDA

        Adjusted EBITDA increased $4 million, or 5.6%, in fiscal 2013 as compared to fiscal 2012. On a 52-week basis, Adjusted EBITDA increased $6 million, or 8.6%, in fiscal 2013 as compared to fiscal 2012.

        The increase in Adjusted EBITDA in fiscal 2013 as compared to fiscal 2012 was primarily due to volume increases in Net sales, partially offset by an increase in Selling, general and administrative expenses.

        Adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of Net sales increased approximately 10 basis points in fiscal 2013 as compared to fiscal 2012. The increase was due to a slight decline in Selling, general and administrative costs as a percentage of Net sales.

Construction & Industrial—White Cap

 
   
   
   
  Increase
(Decrease)
 
 
  Fiscal Year  
 
  2014 vs.
2013
  2013 vs.
2012
 
 
  2014   2013   2012  
 
  (Dollars in millions)
   
   
 

Net sales

  $ 1,481   $ 1,293   $ 1,178     14.5 %   9.8 %

Operating income (loss)

  $ 74   $ 42   $ 24     76.2 %   75.0 %

% of Net sales

    5.0 %   3.2 %   2.0 %   180 bps     120 bps  

Depreciation and amortization

    35     36     32     (2.8 )%   12.5 %

Restructuring

    2     1           *     *

Adjusted EBITDA

  $ 111   $ 79   $ 56     40.5 %   41.1 %

% of Net sales

    7.5 %   6.1 %   4.8 %   140 bps     130 bps  

*
Not meaningful

Fiscal 2014 compared to fiscal 2013

Net Sales

        Net sales increased $188 million, or 14.5%, in fiscal 2014 as compared to fiscal 2013.

        Growth initiatives contributed approximately $107 million in fiscal 2014 driven by our greenfields, Managed Sales Approach ("MSA") and direct marketing initiatives. MSA is a structured approach to drive revenue at a regional level through analysis, tools and sales management. In addition, Construction & Industrial Net sales in fiscal 2014 was positively impacted by improvements in non-residential construction and the residential housing market.

Adjusted EBITDA

        Adjusted EBITDA increased $32 million, or 40.5%, in fiscal 2014 as compared to fiscal 2013.

        The increase in Adjusted EBITDA in fiscal 2014 as compared to fiscal 2013 was primarily driven by growth initiatives and market volume. This increase was partially offset by increased Selling, general and administrative expenses related to variable expenses and the hiring of additional associates to support the expanding business and drive future growth.

        Adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of Net sales increased approximately 140 basis points in fiscal 2014 as compared to fiscal 2013. This improvement was primarily driven by a decrease in Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of Net sales due to the leverage of fixed costs through sales volume increases and cost control efforts.

66


Table of Contents

Fiscal 2013 compared to fiscal 2012

Net Sales

        Net sales increased $115 million, or 9.8%, in fiscal 2013 as compared to fiscal 2012. Excluding the impact of the 53rd week in fiscal 2012, Net sales increased $136 million, or 11.8%, in fiscal 2013 as compared to fiscal 2012.

        Growth initiatives contributed approximately $100 million of the year-over-year increase in fiscal 2013, driven by our MSA, category management and direct marketing initiatives, as well as growth from new geographic markets. In addition, although Construction & Industrial—White Cap sales are primarily influenced by non-residential construction, Net sales were positively impacted by the improvement in the residential housing markets.

Adjusted EBITDA

        Adjusted EBITDA increased $23 million, or 41.1%, in fiscal 2013 as compared to fiscal 2012. On a 52-week basis, Adjusted EBITDA increased $24 million, or 43.6%, in fiscal 2013 as compared to fiscal 2012.

        The increase in Adjusted EBITDA was primarily driven by growth initiatives, market volume, and product mix. This increase was partially offset by increased Selling, general and administrative expense related to the hiring of additional associates to support the expanding business and drive future growth.

        Adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of Net sales increased approximately 130 basis points in fiscal 2013 as compared to fiscal 2012. The increase was primarily due to gross margin improvements of approximately 140 basis points in fiscal 2013, driven by higher purchase discounts and rebates achieved as a result of higher purchasing volumes and product mix. This improvement was partially offset by a slight increase in Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of Net sales due to the impact of the investment in sales force additions and greenfields to support continued growth in our business.

Liquidity, capital resources and financial condition

Sources and uses of cash

        Our sources of funds, primarily from operations, cash on-hand, and, to the extent necessary, from readily available external financing arrangements, are sufficient to meet all current obligations on a timely basis. We believe that these sources of funds will be sufficient to meet the operating needs of our business for at least the next twelve months.

        During fiscal 2014, the Company's use of cash was primarily driven by the payment of interest on debt, net debt repayment, capital expenditures and purchases of treasury shares, substantially offset by cash receipts from operations, proceeds from the sales of Hardware Solutions business and stock option exercises.

        As of February 1, 2015, our combined liquidity of approximately $1.2 billion was comprised of $85 million in cash and cash equivalents and $1,163 million of additional available borrowings (excluding $39 million of borrowings on available cash balances) under our Senior ABL Facility, based on qualifying inventory and receivables.

67


Table of Contents

        Information about the Company's cash flows, by category, is presented in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and is summarized as follows:

Net cash provided by (used for):

 
  Fiscal 2014   Fiscal 2013   Fiscal 2012  
 
  Amounts in millions
 

Operating activities

  $ 295   $ (367 ) $ (681 )

Investing activities

    84     820     (800 )

Financing activities

    (404 )   (474 )   1,511  

Working capital

        Working capital, excluding cash and cash equivalents, was $1,078 million as of February 1, 2015, decreasing $17 million as compared to $1,095 million as of February 2, 2014. Excluding the impact of discontinued operations, working capital, excluding cash and cash equivalents, increased $56 million. The increase was primarily driven by an increase in Inventory and Receivables reflecting higher sales volumes, partially offset by increases in Accounts payable and Current installments of long-term debt.

Operating activities

        During fiscal 2014 cash provided by operating activities was $295 million compared with a use of $367 million in fiscal 2013. The use of cash in fiscal 2013 was driven by the payment of $364 million of original issue discounts and PIK interest related to the extinguishment of the 2007 Senior Subordinated Notes and a portion of the Term Loans. Cash interest paid in fiscal 2014 was $456 million, compared to $527 million in fiscal 2013. Excluding the cash interest payments, including PIK interest and original issue discounts paid, in both periods, cash flow from operating activities increased approximately $228 million in fiscal 2014 as compared to fiscal 2013. The increase in operating cash flows excluding interest is attributable to growth in operations and cost control efforts.

        Cash flow from operating activities in the fiscal 2013 was a use of $367 million compared with cash used by operating activities of $681 million in fiscal 2012. The use of cash in fiscal 2013 was driven by the payment of $364 million of original issue discounts and PIK interest related to the extinguishment of the 2007 Senior Subordinated Notes and a portion of the Term Loans. Additionally, cash interest paid in fiscal 2013 unrelated to extinguishments was $527 million, compared to $621 million in fiscal 2012. Excluding the cash interest payments, including PIK interest and original issue discounts paid, in both periods, cash flow from operating activities increased $82 million in fiscal 2013 as compared to fiscal 2012. The increase was primarily due to an increase in sales volumes, partially offset by an increase in working capital to support the increasing sales volumes.

Investing activities

        During fiscal 2014, cash provided by investing activities was $84 million, primarily due to the net proceeds of $198 million from the sale of our Hardware Solutions business, partially offset by $119 million of capital expenditures.

        During fiscal 2013, cash provided by investing activities was $820 million, primarily due to the proceeds of $936 million from the sale of short-term investments of cash restricted for the extinguishment of the 2007 Senior Subordinated Notes, partially offset by $131 million of capital expenditures.

        During fiscal 2012, cash used in investing activities was $800 million, primarily driven by the net investment of $936 million of cash proceeds from debt issuances, $248 million of payments for business

68


Table of Contents

acquisitions and $115 million in capital expenditures. These payments were partially offset by $481 million of net proceeds from the sale of businesses.

Financing activities

        During fiscal 2014, cash used in financing activities was $404 million, primarily due to net debt repayments of $379 million, including $106 million of contractually required premiums paid to extinguish the 2012 First Priority Notes prior to maturity, purchases of $52 million of treasury shares and payments of $21 million for debt issuance and modification costs, partially offset by proceeds of $48 million from employee stock option exercises.

        During fiscal 2013, cash used in financing activities was $474 million, primarily due to net debt payments of $1,485 million, including an aggregate $59 million in contractually required premiums paid to extinguish the 2007 Senior Subordinated Notes and January 2013 Senior Subordinated Notes prior to maturity, and payments of $34 million for debt issuance and modification costs. This was substantially offset by $1,039 million in net proceeds from the initial public offering of our common stock.

        During fiscal 2012, cash provided by financing activities was $1,511 million, due to net debt borrowings of $1,641 million, which includes the financing of $603 million of contractually required premiums paid to extinguish the 12.0% Senior Notes, the 2007 Senior Subordinated Notes, and the April 2012 Senior Unsecured Notes prior to maturity, offset by payments of $132 million for debt issuance costs.

External financing

        As of February 1, 2015, HDS had an aggregate principal amount of $5,257 million of outstanding debt, net of unamortized discounts of $14 million, and an additional $1,202 million of available borrowings under its Senior ABL Facility (after giving effect to the borrowing base limitations and approximately $35 million in letters of credit issued and including $39 million of borrowings available on qualifying cash balances). We may from time to time repurchase or otherwise retire or extend our debt and/or take other steps to reduce our debt or otherwise improve our financial position. These actions may include open market debt repurchases, negotiated repurchases, other retirements of outstanding debt, and/or opportunistic refinancing of debt. The amount of debt that may be repurchased or otherwise retired or refinanced, if any, will depend on market conditions, trading levels of our debt, our cash position, compliance with debt covenants and other considerations. Our affiliates may also purchase our debt from time to time, through open market purchases or other transactions. In such cases, our debt may not be retired, in which case we would continue to pay interest in accordance with the terms of the debt, and we would continue to reflect the debt as outstanding in our consolidated statements of financial position.

        On December 4, 2014, HDS issued $1,250 million December 2014 First Priority Notes at par. At closing, HDS received approximately $1,232 million, net of transaction fees. As a result of the issuance, HDS incurred and paid $18 million in debt issuance cost, which will be amortized into interest expense over the term of the notes.

        On December 19, 2014, HDS used the net proceeds from the December 2014 First Priority Notes issuance, together with available cash, to redeem all of the outstanding $1,250 million aggregate principal amount of its 2012 First Priority Notes due 2019, and pay a $106 million make-whole premium calculated in accordance with the terms of the indenture governing such notes and $18 million of accrued but unpaid interest to the redemption date. As a result, the Company incurred a $106 million loss on extinguishment of debt, which includes the $106 million make-whole premium payment to redeem the 2012 First Priority Notes and the write-off of $15 million of unamortized deferred debt costs, offset by the write-off of $15 million of unamortized premium on the 2012 First Priority Notes.

69


Table of Contents

        On February 6, 2014, HDS amended its Term Loan Facility, as defined below, to reduce the applicable margin for borrowings from 3.25% for LIBOR borrowings and 2.25% for base rate borrowings to 3.00% for LIBOR borrowings and 2.00% for base rate borrowings, and reduced the LIBOR floor to 1.00%. The Term Loan may be repaid at any time without penalty or premium. In addition, the amendment provided that HDS may withhold up to $150 million from repayments otherwise required to be made with the proceeds of asset sales and use such proceeds to repay any debt, including debt that is junior to the Senior Term Loans. The amendment also extended the maturity of the Term Loans by approximately nine months, to June 28, 2018. Pursuant to the credit agreement governing HDS's Senior ABL Facility, as defined below, the maturity date of the ABL Facility is the earlier of June 28, 2018 and the maturity date of the Term Loan Facility. The amendment therefore effectively extended the maturity date of the Senior ABL Facility to June 28, 2018.

        In connection with the amendment, HDS paid approximately $1 million in financing fees, which will be amortized into interest expense over the remaining term of the amended facility in accordance with ASC 470-50, Debt-Modifications and Extinguishments. A portion of the amendment was considered an extinguishment, resulting in a $1 million loss on extinguishment of debt for the write-off of pro-rata portions of the unamortized original issue discount and the unamortized deferred debt cost. The portion of the amendment considered a modification resulted in a charge of approximately $1 million.

        Affiliates of certain of the Equity Sponsors owned approximately $37 million of the Term Loans as of the date of the amendment. In the amendment process, this ownership was reduced to $30 million. Management of the Company has been informed that, as of February 1, 2015, affiliates of Bain do not beneficially own any part of HDS's debt.

        HDS's long-term debt as of February 1, 2015 and February 2, 2014 consisted of the following (dollars in millions):

 
  February 1, 2015   February 2, 2014  
 
  Outstanding
Principal
  Interest
Rate %(i)
  Outstanding
Principal
  Interest
Rate %(i)
 

Senior ABL Facility due 2018

  $ 96     2.02   $ 360     1.66  

Term Loans due 2018, net of unamortized discount of $14 million and $19 million

    961     4.00     966     4.50  

December 2014 First Priority Notes due 2021

    1,250     5.25          

2012 First Priority Notes due 2019, including unamortized premium of $18 million as of February 2, 2014

            1,268     8.125  

April 2012 Second Priority Notes due 2020

    675     11.00     675     11.00  

October 2012 Senior Unsecured Notes due 2020

    1,000     11.50     1,000     11.50  

February 2013 Senior Unsecured Notes due 2020

    1,275     7.50     1,275     7.50  

Total long-term debt

  $ 5,257         $ 5,544        

Less current installments

    (34 )         (10 )      

Long-term debt, excluding current installments

  $ 5,223         $ 5,534        

(i)
Represents the stated rate of interest, without including the effect of discounts or premiums.

70


Table of Contents

Senior Credit Facilities

Senior ABL Facility

        The Senior ABL Facility provides for senior secured revolving loans and letters of credit of up to a maximum aggregate principal amount of $1,500 million (subject to availability under a borrowing base). Extensions of credit under the Senior ABL Facility will be limited by a borrowing base calculated periodically based on specified percentages of the value of eligible inventory and eligible accounts receivable, subject to certain reserves and other adjustments. As of February 1, 2015, HDS had $1,202 million of available borrowings under the Senior ABL Facility (after giving effect to the borrowing base limitations and approximately $34 million in letters of credit issued and including $39 million of borrowings available on qualifying cash balances).

        A portion of the Senior ABL Facility is available for letters of credit and swingline loans. The Senior ABL Facility also includes a sub-facility for loans and letters of credit in Canadian dollars. The Senior ABL Facility also permits HDS to add one or more incremental term loans, revolving or letter of credit facilities to be included in the Senior ABL Facility up to an aggregate maximum amount of $1,900 million for the total commitments under the Senior ABL Facility (including all incremental commitments).

        At HDS's option, the interest rates applicable to the loans under the Senior ABL Facility are based (i) in the case of U.S. dollar-denominated loans, either at LIBOR plus an applicable margin or Prime Rate plus an applicable margin and (ii) in the case of Canadian dollar-denominated loans, either the BA rate plus an applicable margin or the Canadian Prime Rate plus an applicable margin. The margins applicable for each elected interest rate are subject to a pricing grid, as defined in the Senior ABL Facility agreement, based on average excess availability for the previous fiscal quarter. The Senior ABL Facility also contains a letter of credit fee computed at a rate per annum equal to the Applicable Margin (as defined in the agreement) then in effect for LIBOR Loans and an unused commitment fee subject to a pricing grid, as included in the Senior ABL Facility agreement, based on the Average Daily Used Percentage (as defined in the agreement).

        The Senior ABL Facility will mature on June 28, 2018; unless the individual applicable lenders agree to extend the maturity of their respective loans under the Senior ABL Facility upon HDS's request and without the consent of any other applicable lender.

Prepayments

        The Senior ABL Facility may be prepaid at HDS's option at any time without premium or penalty and will be subject to mandatory prepayment if the outstanding Senior ABL Facility exceeds either the aggregate commitments with respect thereto or the current borrowing base, in an amount equal to such excess. Mandatory prepayments do not result in a permanent reduction of the lenders' commitments under the Senior ABL Facility.

Guarantees; Security

        The Senior ABL Facility is senior secured indebtedness of HDS and ranks equal in right of payment with all of HDS's existing and future senior indebtedness and senior in right of payment to all of HDS's existing and future subordinated indebtedness.

        HDS, and at HDS's option, certain of HDS's subsidiaries, including HD Supply Canada, Inc., a Canadian subsidiary (the "Canadian Borrower"), are the borrowers under the Senior ABL Facility. Each of HDS's existing and future direct and indirect wholly owned domestic subsidiaries, in each case to the extent permitted by applicable law, regulation and contractual provision and subject to certain exceptions (the "Subsidiary Guarantors") guarantees HDS's payment obligations under the Senior ABL Facility (and, in the case of Canadian obligations, each existing and future direct and indirect wholly

71


Table of Contents

owned Canadian subsidiary, in each case to the extent permitted by applicable law, regulation and contractual provision and subject to certain exceptions (the "Canadian Guarantors") guarantee the Canadian Borrower's payment obligations under the Senior ABL Facility).

        HDS's obligations under the Senior ABL Facility and the guarantees thereof are secured in favor of the U.S. ABL collateral agent (i) on a first-priority basis by substantially all accounts receivable, inventory and other related assets owned by HDS and each Subsidiary Guarantor and all proceeds thereof, in each case to the extent permitted by applicable law and subject to certain exceptions (the "ABL Priority Collateral"), subject to permitted liens, and (ii) (x) all of the capital stock of HDS, all capital stock of all domestic subsidiaries directly owned by HDS and the Subsidiary Guarantors and 65% of the capital stock of any foreign subsidiary held directly by HDS or any Subsidiary Guarantor (with foreign subsidiary holding companies being deemed foreign subsidiaries) and (y) substantially all tangible and intangible assets owned by HDS and each Subsidiary Guarantor, other than the ABL Priority Collateral, and all proceeds thereof, in each case to the extent permitted by applicable law and subject to certain exceptions (the "Cash Flow Priority Collateral" and, together with the ABL Priority Collateral, the "Collateral"); in each case, subject to the priority of liens among the Term Loan Facility, the December 2014 First Priority Notes, the April 2012 Second Priority Notes and the Senior ABL Facility.

        The Canadian obligations under the Senior ABL Facility are also secured by liens on substantially all assets of the Canadian Borrower and the Canadian Guarantors, subject to certain exceptions.

Covenants

        The Senior ABL Facility contains a number of covenants that, among other things, limit or restrict HDS's ability and, in certain cases, HDS's subsidiaries to make acquisitions, mergers, consolidations, dividends, and to prepay certain indebtedness (including the December 2014 First Priority Notes, the April 2012 Second Priority Notes, the October 2012 Senior Unsecured Notes, and the February 2013 Senior Unsecured Notes), in each case to the extent any such transaction would reduce availability under the Senior ABL Facility below a specified amount.

        In addition, if HDS's specified excess availability (including an amount by which HDS's borrowing base exceeds the existing commitments) under the Senior ABL Facility falls below the greater of $150 million and 10% of the aggregate commitments (a "Liquidity Event"), HDS will be required to maintain a Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio of at least 1.0:1.0, as defined in the credit agreement governing the Senior ABL Facility.

        The Senior ABL Facility also contains certain affirmative covenants, including financial and other reporting requirements. HDS is in compliance with all such covenants.

Senior Secured Term Loan Facility

        The Term Loan Facility provides for Term Loans in an original aggregate principal amount of $1,000 million (net of $30 million of original issue discount). The Term Loan Facility also permits HDS to add one or more incremental term loans, revolving or letter of credit facilities of up to $250 million plus a certain amount depending on a secured first lien leverage ratio test included in the Term Loan Facility. On February 6, 2014, HDS amended its Term Loan Facility to reduce the applicable margin for borrowings from 3.25% for LIBOR borrowings and 2.25% for base rate borrowings to 3.00% for LIBOR borrowings and 2.00% for base rate borrowings, and reduced the LIBOR floor from 1.25% to 1.00%. The Term Loans may be repaid at any time without penalty or premium. In addition, the amendment provided that HDS may withhold up to $150 million from repayments otherwise required to be made with the proceeds of asset sales and use such proceeds to repay any debt, including debt that is junior to the Term Loans. The amendment also extended the maturity of the Term Loans by approximately nine months, to June 28, 2018. Pursuant to the credit agreement governing HDS's Senior

72


Table of Contents

ABL Facility, the maturity date of the Senior ABL Facility is the earlier of June 28, 2018 and the maturity date of the Term Loan Facility. The amendment therefore effectively extended the maturity date of the Senior ABL Facility to June 28, 2018.

        The Term Loan Facility is senior secured indebtedness of HDS and ranks equal in right of payment with all of HDS's existing and future senior indebtedness and senior in right of payment to all of HDS's existing and future subordinated indebtedness.

        The Term Loan Facility is guaranteed, on a senior secured basis, by the Subsidiary Guarantors. These guarantees are subject to release under customary circumstances. The guarantee of each Subsidiary Guarantor is a senior secured obligation of that Subsidiary Guarantor and ranks equal in right of payment with all existing and future senior indebtedness of that Subsidiary Guarantor and senior in right of payment to all existing and future subordinated indebtedness of such Subsidiary Guarantor.

Collateral

        The Term Loan Facility and the related guarantees are secured by a first-priority security interest in the in substantially all of the tangible and intangible assets of HDS and the Subsidiary Guarantors (other than the ABL Priority Collateral, in which the Term Loan Facility and the related guarantees have a second priority security interest), including pledges of all Capital Stock of the Restricted Subsidiaries directly owned by HDS and the Subsidiary Guarantors (but only up to 65% of each series of Capital Stock of each direct Foreign Subsidiary owned by HDS or any Subsidiary Guarantor), subject to certain thresholds, exceptions and permitted liens, and excluding any Excluded Assets (as defined in the credit agreement governing the Term Loan Facility (the "Term Loan Credit Agreement")) and Excluded Subsidiary Securities (as defined in the Term Loan Credit Agreement) (the "Cash Flow Priority Collateral"), subject to permitted liens. In addition, the Term Loan Facility and the related guarantees are secured by a second-priority security interest in the ABL Priority Collateral, subject to permitted liens.

Prepayment

        The Term Loans may be prepaid at any time without premium or penalty. Under certain circumstances and subject to certain exceptions, the Term Loan Facility will be subject to mandatory offers of prepayment in an amount equal to:

    100% of the net proceeds (other than those that are used to purchase certain assets or to repay certain other indebtedness) of certain asset sales and certain insurance recovery events; and

    50% of annual excess cash flow for any fiscal year, such percentage to decrease to 0% depending on the attainment of certain secured leverage ratio targets.

        The February 2014 amendment of the Term Loan Facility provided that HDS may withhold up to $150 million from repayments otherwise required to be made with the proceeds of asset sales and use such proceeds to repay any debt, including debt that is junior to the Term Loans.

        In addition, upon the incurrence of certain events constituting a Change of Control (as defined in the credit agreement governing the Term Loan Facility (the "Term Loan Credit Agreement")), HDS must offer to prepay the Term Loans (unless otherwise repaid) at a price equal to 101% of their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the repayment date.

        In accordance with the annual excess cash flow provisions of the Term Loan Facility, the Company will be required to offer a prepayment of $34 million in fiscal 2015.

73


Table of Contents

Guarantee

        HDS is the borrower under the Term Loan Facility. The Subsidiary Guarantors guarantee HDS's payment obligations under the Term Loan Facility.

        HDS's obligations under the Term Loan Facility and the guarantees thereof are secured in favor of the collateral agent by (i) all of the capital stock of HDS, all capital stock of all domestic subsidiaries directly owned by HDS and the Subsidiary Guarantors and 65% of the capital stock of any foreign subsidiary owned directly by HDS or any Subsidiary Guarantors (it being understood that a foreign subsidiary holding company will be deemed a foreign subsidiary) and (ii) substantially all other tangible and intangible assets owned by HDS and each Subsidiary Guarantor, in each case to the extent permitted by applicable law and subject to certain exceptions and subject to the priority of liens between the Term Loan Facility, the December 2014 First Priority Notes, the April 2012 Second Priority Notes and the Senior ABL Facility.

Covenants

        The Term Loan Facility contains a number of covenants that, among other things, limit the ability of HDS and its restricted subsidiaries, as described in the Term Loan Credit Agreement, to: incur more indebtedness; pay dividends, redeem stock or make other distributions; make investments; create restrictions on the ability of HDS's restricted subsidiaries to pay dividends to HDS or make other intercompany transfers; create liens securing indebtedness; transfer or sell assets; merge or consolidate; enter into certain transactions with HDS's affiliates; and prepay or amend the terms of certain indebtedness.

        The Term Loan Facility also contains certain affirmative covenants, including financial and other reporting requirements. HDS is in compliance with all such covenants.

Events of Default under the ABL Facility and Term Loan Facility

        The Senior ABL Facility and Term Loan Facility also provide for customary events of default, including non-payment of principal, interest or fees, violation of covenants, material inaccuracy of representations or warranties, specified cross default and cross acceleration to other material indebtedness, certain bankruptcy events, certain ERISA events, material invalidity of guarantees or security interest, material judgments and changes of control.

5.25% Senior Secured First Priority Notes due 2021

        HDS issued $1,250 million of December 2014 First Priority Notes under an Indenture, dated December 4, 2014 (the "December 2014 First Priority Indenture") among HDS, the Subsidiary Guarantors, the Trustee, and the Note Collateral Agent. The December 2014 First Priority Notes bear interest at a rate of 5.25% per annum and will mature on December 15, 2021. Interest is paid semi-annually in arrears on June 15th and December 15th of each year.

        The December 2014 First Priority Indenture, and the applicable collateral documents provide that any capital stock and other securities of any of HDS's subsidiaries will be excluded from the collateral to the extent the pledge of such capital stock or other securities to secure the December 2014 First Priority Notes would cause such subsidiary to be required to file separate financial statements with the SEC pursuant to Rule 3-16 of Regulation S-X (as in effect from time to time).

        The December 2014 First Priority Notes are senior secured indebtedness of HDS and rank equal in right of payment with all of HDS's existing and future senior indebtedness and senior in right of payment to all of HDS's existing and future subordinated indebtedness.

74


Table of Contents

        The December 2014 First Priority Notes are guaranteed, on a senior secured basis, by each of HDS's Wholly Owned Domestic Subsidiaries (as defined in the December 2014 First Priority Indenture) (other than an Excluded Subsidiary (as defined in the December 2014 First Priority Indenture)), and each other Domestic Subsidiary (as defined in the December 2014 First Priority Indenture) that is a borrower under the Senior ABL Facility or that guarantees payment of HDS's indebtedness under any Credit Facility or Capital Markets Securities (each as defined in the December 2014 First Priority Indenture). The guarantees are subject to release under customary circumstances as stipulated in the December 2014 First Priority Indenture.

Collateral

        The December 2014 First Priority Notes and the related guarantees are secured by a first priority security interest in the Cash Flow Priority Collateral.

        In addition, the December 2014 First Priority Notes and the related guarantees are secured by a second priority security interest in the ABL Priority Collateral.

        The security interests in the Collateral may be released without the consent of the holders of the December 2014 First Priority Notes if Collateral is disposed of in a transaction that complies with the December 2014 First Priority Indenture and security documents, and will be released: (i) so long as any ABL Obligations are outstanding, with respect to the ABL Priority Collateral, upon the release of all liens thereon securing the ABL Obligations (as defined in the December 2014 First Priority Indenture) and (ii) so long as any Term Obligations are outstanding, with respect to the Cash Flow Priority Collateral, upon the release of all liens thereon securing the Term Obligations (as defined in the December 2014 First Priority Indenture).

Redemption

        HDS may redeem the December 2014 First Priority Notes, in whole or in part, at any time (1) prior to December 15, 2017, at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the redemption date, plus the applicable make-whole premium set forth in the December 2014 First Priority Indenture and (2) on and after December 15, 2017, at the applicable redemption price set forth below (expressed as a percentage of principal amount), plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the relevant redemption date, if redeemed during the 12-month period commencing on December 15 of the year set forth below.

Year
  Percentage  

2017

    103.938 %

2018

    102.625 %

2019

    101.313 %

2020 and thereafter

    100.000 %

        In addition, at any time prior to December 15, 2017, HDS may redeem on one or more occasions up to 40% of the aggregate principal amount of the December 2014 First Priority Notes with the proceeds of certain equity offerings at a redemption price of 105.25% of the principal amount in respect of the December 2014 First Priority Notes being redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date, provided, however, that if the December 2014 First Priority Notes are redeemed, an aggregate principal amount of December 2014 First Priority Notes equal to at least 50% of the aggregate principal amount of December 2014 First Priority Notes must remain outstanding immediately after each such redemption of December 2014 First Priority Notes.

75


Table of Contents

81/8% Senior Secured First Priority Notes due 2019

        HDS issued $950 million of First Priority Notes under an Indenture, dated, and amended, as of April 12, 2012 among HDS, the Subsidiary Guarantors, the Trustee, and the Note Collateral Agent. On August 2, 2012, HDS issued $300 million additional aggregate principal amount of its April 2012 First Priority Notes at a premium of 107.5%. The 2012 First Priority Notes bore interest at a rate of 81/8% per annum and were scheduled to mature on April 15, 2019. Interest was to be paid semi-annually in arrears on April 15th and October 15th of each year. On December 19, 2014, HDS redeemed all of the outstanding $1,250 million aggregate principal amount of its 2012 First Priority Notes.

11% Senior Secured Second Priority Notes due 2020

        HDS issued $675 million aggregate principal amount of Second Priority Notes under an Indenture, dated, and amended, as of April 12, 2012 (the "April 2012 Second Priority Indenture"), among HDS, the Subsidiary Guarantors, the Trustee, and the Note Collateral Agent. The April 2012 Second Priority Notes bear interest at a rate of 11% per annum and will mature on April 15, 2020. Interest is paid semi-annually in arrears on April 15th and October 15th of each year.

        The April 2012 Second Priority Notes are senior secured indebtedness of HDS and rank equal in right of payment with all of HDS's existing and future senior indebtedness and senior in right of payment to all of HDS's existing and future subordinated indebtedness.

        The April 2012 Second Priority Notes are guaranteed, on a senior secured basis, by each of HDS's Wholly Owned Domestic Subsidiaries (as defined in the April 2012 Second Priority Indenture), other than an Excluded Subsidiary (as defined in the April 2012 Second Priority Indenture), and by each of HDS's other Domestic Subsidiaries (as defined in the April 2012 Second Priority Indenture) that is a borrower under the ABL Facility or that guarantees payment of indebtedness of HDS under any Credit Facility or Capital Markets Securities (as defined in the April 2012 Second Priority Indenture). These guarantees are subject to release under customary circumstances as stipulated in the April 2012 Second Priority Indenture.

Collateral

        The April 2012 Second Priority Notes and the related guarantees are secured by a second-priority security interest in the Cash Flow Priority Collateral, subject to permitted liens. In addition, the April 2012 Second Priority Notes and the related guarantees are secured by a third-priority security interest in the ABL Priority Collateral, subject to permitted liens.

Redemption

        HDS may redeem the April 2012 Second Priority Notes, in whole or in part, at any time (1) prior to April 15, 2016, at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the redemption date, plus the applicable make-whole premium set forth in the Second Priority Indenture and (2) on and after April 15, 2016, at the applicable redemption price set forth below (expressed as a percentage of principal amount), plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the relevant redemption date, if redeemed during the 12-month period commencing on April 15 of the year set forth below.

Year
  Percentage  

2016

    105.500 %

2017

    102.750 %

2018 and thereafter

    100.000 %

76


Table of Contents

        In addition, at any time prior to April 15, 2015, HDS may redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of the April 2012 Second Priority Notes with the proceeds of certain equity offerings at a redemption price of 111.000% of the principal amount in respect of the April 2012 Second Priority Notes being redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date, provided, however, that if the April 2012 Second Priority Notes are redeemed, an aggregate principal amount of April 2012 Second Priority Notes equal to at least 50% of the original aggregate principal amount of April 2012 Second Priority Notes must remain outstanding immediately after each such redemption of April 2012 Second Priority Notes.

11.5% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2020

        HDS issued $1,000 million aggregate principal amount of 11.5% Senior Notes under an Indenture, dated, and amended, as of October 15, 2012 ("October 2012 Senior Notes Indenture") among HDS, the Subsidiary Guarantors and the Trustee. The October 2012 Senior Unsecured Notes bear interest at a rate of 11.5% per annum and will mature on July 15, 2020. Interest is paid semi-annually in arrears on April 15th and October 15th of each year.

        The October 2012 Senior Unsecured Notes are unsecured senior indebtedness of HDS and rank equal in right of payment with all of HDS's existing and future senior indebtedness, senior in right of payment to all of HDS's existing and future subordinated indebtedness, and effectively subordinated to all of HDS's existing and future secured indebtedness, including, without limitation, indebtedness under the Senior Credit Facilities, the December 2014 First Priority Notes and the April 2012 Second Priority Notes, to the extent of the value of the collateral securing such indebtedness.

        The October 2012 Senior Unsecured Notes are guaranteed, on a senior unsecured basis, by each of HDS's direct and indirect domestic existing and future subsidiaries that is a wholly owned domestic subsidiary (other than certain excluded subsidiaries), and by each other domestic subsidiary that is a borrower under the ABL Facility or that guarantees HDS's obligations under any credit facility or capital markets securities. These guarantees are subject to release under customary circumstances as stipulated in the October 2012 Senior Notes Indenture.

Redemption

        HDS may redeem the October 2012 Senior Unsecured Notes, in whole or in part, at any time (1) prior to October 15, 2016, at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the redemption date, plus the applicable make-whole premium set forth in the 11.5% Senior Notes Indenture and (2) on and after October 15, 2016, at the applicable redemption price set forth below (expressed as a percentage of principal amount), plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the relevant redemption date, if redeemed during the 12-month period commencing on October 15 of the year set forth below.

Year
  Percentage  

2016

    105.750 %

2017

    102.875 %

2018 and thereafter

    100.000 %

        In addition, at any time prior to October 15, 2015, HDS may redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of the October 2012 Senior Unsecured Notes with the proceeds of certain equity offerings at a redemption price of 111.50% of the principal amount in respect of the October 2012 Senior Unsecured Notes being redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date, provided, however, that if the October 2012 Senior Unsecured Notes are redeemed, an aggregate principal amount of the October 2012 Senior Unsecured Notes equal to at least 50% of the original aggregate principal amount of the October 2012 Senior Unsecured Notes must remain outstanding immediately after each such redemption of the October 2012 Senior Unsecured Notes.

77


Table of Contents

7.5% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2020

        HDS issued $1,275 million aggregate principal amount of 7.5% Senior Notes under an Indenture, dated, and amended, as of February 1, 2013 ("February 2013 Senior Notes Indenture") among HDS, the Subsidiary Guarantors and the Trustee. The February 2013 Senior Unsecured Notes bear interest at a rate of 7.5% per annum and will mature on July 15, 2020. Interest is paid semi-annually in arrears on April 15th and October 15th of each year.

        The February 2013 Senior Unsecured Notes are unsecured senior indebtedness of HDS and rank equal in right of payment with all of HDS's existing and future senior indebtedness, senior in right of payment to all of HDS's existing and future subordinated indebtedness, and effectively subordinated to all of HDS's existing and future secured indebtedness, including, without limitation, indebtedness under the Senior Credit Facilities, the December 2014 First Priority Notes and the April 2012 Second Priority Notes, to the extent of the value of the collateral securing such indebtedness.

        The February 2013 Senior Unsecured Notes are guaranteed, on a senior unsecured basis, by each of HDS's direct and indirect domestic existing and future subsidiaries that is a wholly owned domestic subsidiary (other than certain excluded subsidiaries), and by each other domestic subsidiary that is a borrower under the ABL Facility or that guarantees HDS's obligations under any credit facility or capital markets securities. These guarantees are subject to release under customary circumstances as stipulated in the February 2013 Senior Notes Indenture.

Redemption

        HDS may redeem the February 2013 Senior Unsecured Notes, in whole or in part, at any time (1) prior to October 15, 2016, at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the redemption date, plus the applicable make-whole premium set forth in the February 2013 Senior Notes Indenture and (2) on and after October 15, 2016, at the applicable redemption price set forth below (expressed as a percentage of principal amount), plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the relevant redemption date, if redeemed during the 12-month period commencing on October 15 of the year set forth below.

Year
  Percentage  

2016

    103.750 %

2017

    101.875 %

2018 and thereafter

    100.000 %

        In addition, at any time prior to October 15, 2015, HDS may redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of the February 2013 Senior Unsecured Notes with the proceeds of certain equity offerings at a redemption price of 107.50% of the principal amount in respect of the February 2013 Senior Unsecured Notes being redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date, provided, however, that if the February 2013 Senior Unsecured Notes are redeemed, an aggregate principal amount of the February 2013 Senior Unsecured Notes equal to at least 50% of the original aggregate principal amount of the February 2013 Senior Unsecured Notes must remain outstanding immediately after each such redemption of the February 2013 Senior Unsecured Notes.

        December 2014 First Priority Notes and April 2012 Second Priority Notes (collectively the "Priority Notes"), October 2012 Senior Unsecured Notes and February 2013 Senior Unsecured Notes (collectively the "Senior Notes")

Offer to Repurchase

        In the event of certain events that constitute a Change of Control (as defined in the December 2014 First Priority Indenture and April 2012 Second Priority Indenture, collectively the "Priority

78


Table of Contents

Indentures," and the October 2012 Senior Unsecured Notes Indenture and the February 2013 Senior Unsecured Notes Indenture, collectively the "Senior Indentures"), HDS must offer to repurchase all of the Priority Notes and Senior Notes (unless otherwise redeemed) at a price equal to 101% of their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the repurchase date. If HDS sells assets under certain circumstances, HDS must use the proceeds to make an offer to purchase the Priority Notes and Senior Notes at a price equal to 100% of their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of purchase.

Covenants

        The Priority Indentures and Senior Indentures contain covenants that, among other things, limit the ability of HDS and its restricted subsidiaries to: incur more indebtedness; pay dividends, redeem stock or make other distributions; make investments; create restrictions on the ability of HDS's restricted subsidiaries to pay dividends to HDS or make other intercompany transfers; create liens securing indebtedness; transfer or sell assets; merge or consolidate; and enter into certain transactions with HDS's affiliates. Most of these covenants will cease to apply for so long as the Priority Notes and Senior Notes have investment grade ratings from both Moody's Investment Services, Inc. and Standard & Poor's. HDS is in compliance with all such covenants.

Events of Default

        The Priority Indentures and Senior Indentures also provide for events of default, which, if any of them occurs, would permit or require the principal, premium, if any, interest and other monetary obligations on all the then outstanding Priority Notes and Senior Notes to be due and payable immediately. The Priority Indentures and Senior Indentures also provide for specified cross default and cross acceleration to other material indebtedness.

Fiscal 2013 and Fiscal 2012 Transactions

        On August 1, 2013, HDS redeemed all $950 million outstanding aggregate principal amount of its January 2013 Senior Subordinated Notes at a redemption price equal to 103% of the principal amount thereof and paid accrued and unpaid interest thereon through the redemption date. As a result, in the second quarter of fiscal 2013 and in accordance with ASC 470-50, HDS incurred a $44 million loss on extinguishment, which included a $29 million premium payment to redeem the January 2013 Senior Subordinated Notes and approximately $15 million to write off the unamortized deferred debt cost.

        On June 28, 2013, HDS amended its Senior ABL Facility to (i) reduce the applicable margin for borrowings under the Senior ABL Facility by 0.25%; (ii) reduce the commitment fee applicable thereunder by 0.125%; (iii) extend the maturity date of the Senior ABL Facility to June 28, 2018 (or the maturity date under HDS's Term Loan Facility, if earlier); (iv) make certain changes to the borrowing base and (v) reduce the sublimit available for letters of credit under the Senior ABL Facility from $400 million to $250 million. In connection with the amendment, HDS paid approximately $2 million in financing fees which will be amortized into interest expense over the remaining term of the amended facility in accordance with ASC 470-50. A portion of the amendment was considered an extinguishment, resulting in an approximately $3 million loss on extinguishment of debt for the write-off of the pro-rata portion of unamortized deferred debt costs.

        On February 15, 2013, HDS amended its Term Loan Facility to lower the borrowing margin by 275 basis points. The Term Loans are subject to an interest rate equal to LIBOR (subject to a floor of 1.25%) plus a borrowing margin of 3.25% or Prime plus a borrowing margin of 2.25% at HDS's election. The amendment also replaced the hard call provision applicable to optional prepayment of Term Loans thereunder with a soft call option, which expired on August 15, 2013. The Term Loans may now be repaid at any time without penalty or premium. See above for more recent information on

79


Table of Contents

prepayments under the February 2014 amendment of the Term Loan Facility. In connection with the amendment, HDS paid approximately $30 million in financing fees, of which approximately $27 million will be amortized into interest expense over the remaining term of the amended facility in accordance with ASC 470-50. A portion of the amendment was considered an extinguishment, resulting in a $5 million loss on extinguishment of debt, which included approximately $2 million of fees, $2 million to write off the pro-rata portion of unamortized original issue discount, and $1 million to write off the pro-rata portion of unamortized deferred debt cost. The portion of the amendment considered a modification resulted in a charge of $1 million.

        On February 8, 2013, HDS redeemed its remaining $889 million outstanding aggregate principal amount of its 2007 Senior Subordinated Notes at a redemption price equal to 103.375% of the principal amount thereof and paid accrued and unpaid interest thereon through the redemption date. As a result, in the first quarter of fiscal 2013, HDS incurred a $34 million loss on extinguishment of debt, which included a $30 million premium payment to redeem the 2007 Senior Subordinated Notes and approximately $4 million to write off the unamortized deferred debt cost.

        On February 1, 2013, HDS issued $1,275 million aggregate principal amount of the February 2013 Senior Unsecured Notes at par. As a result of the issuance, HDS incurred $21 million in debt issuance costs, of which $19 million was paid as of February 3, 2013. The net proceeds from the February 2013 Senior Unsecured Notes issuance were used to repurchase all of HDS's outstanding April 2012 Senior Unsecured Notes, plus a $422 million make-whole premium calculated in accordance with the April 2012 Senior Unsecured Notes Indenture, plus $37 million of un-capitalized PIK interest thereon through February 1, 2013. Also on February 1, 2013, the trustee for the April 2012 Senior Unsecured Notes cancelled all of the outstanding April 2012 Senior Unsecured Notes. As a result of these transactions, HDS incurred a $452 million loss on extinguishment, which included the make-whole premium, a $28 million write-off of unamortized original issue discount, and $2 million write-off of unamortized deferred debt costs.

        On January 16, 2013, HDS issued $950 million aggregate principal amount of the January 2013 Senior Subordinated Notes at par. As a result of the issuance, the Company incurred $16 million in debt issuance costs, of which $15 million was paid as of February 3, 2013. The Company committed to use the net proceeds from the January 2013 Senior Subordinated Notes issuance to redeem all of its remaining $889 million outstanding 2007 Senior Subordinated Notes, subject to the required thirty-day notification period. As of February 3, 2013, the Company held $936 million in cash equivalents classified as Cash equivalents restricted for debt redemption in the Consolidated Balance Sheet for the redemption of $889 million of the 2007 Senior Subordinated Notes on February 8, 2013. The $936 million was used to redeem the 2007 Senior Subordinated Notes on February 8, 2013, as noted above.

        On October 15, 2012, HDS issued $1,000 million aggregate principal amount of the October 2012 Senior Unsecured Notes at par. As a result of the issuance, HDS incurred and paid $17 million in debt issuance costs. On November 8, 2012, HDS used the net proceeds from the October 2012 Senior Unsecured Notes issuance to redeem $930 million of its outstanding 2007 Senior Subordinated Notes at a redemption price equal to 103.375% of the principal amount thereof and to pay $23 million of accrued interest. As a result, HDS incurred a $37 million loss on extinguishment, which included a $31 million premium payment to redeem the 2007 Senior Subordinated Notes prior to maturity and $5 million to write-off the pro-rata portion of unamortized deferred debt costs.

Refinancing Transactions and Additional Notes

        On April 12, 2012, HDS consummated the Refinancing Transactions in connection with the refinancing of the senior portion of its debt structure.

80


Table of Contents

        The proceeds of the 2012 First Priority Notes, the April 2012 Second Priority Notes, the April 2012 Senior Unsecured Notes, the Term Loan Facility and the ABL Facility were used to (i) repay all amounts outstanding under the 2007 Senior Secured Credit Facility, (ii) repay all amounts outstanding under the 2007 ABL Credit Facility, (iii) repurchase all of the remaining outstanding 12.0% Senior Notes and (iv) pay related fees and expenses.

        Affiliates of certain of the Equity Sponsors owned an aggregate principal amount of approximately $484 million of the 12.0% Senior Notes which they exchanged in a non-cash transaction for their investment in the April 2012 Senior Unsecured Notes.

        On August 2, 2012, HDS issued the Additional Notes at a premium of 107.5%. At closing, HDS received approximately $317 million, net of transaction fees. The Additional Notes were issued under the indenture pursuant to which HDS previously issued $950 million aggregate principal amount of 81/8% First Priority Notes due 2019. The net proceeds from the sale of the Additional Notes were applied to reduce outstanding borrowings under HDS's ABL Facility.

        As a result of the Refinancing Transactions and the issuance of the Additional Notes, HDS incurred $80 million in debt issuance costs and recorded a $220 million loss on extinguishment, which included a $150 million premium payment to redeem the 12.0% Senior Notes, $46 million to write-off the pro-rata portion of the unamortized deferred debt costs, and $24 million to write-off the remaining unamortized Other asset associated with Home Depot's guarantee of HDS's payment obligations for principal and interest of term loans under the 2007 Senior Secured Credit Facility that was terminated in the Refinancing Transactions.

Unamortized deferred debt costs

        In accordance with ASC 470, Debt, HDS determined that all of the redemption of 12.0% Senior Notes was an extinguishment as either the original note holders were unknown or the refinancing was considered a "substantial" change. As a result of the extinguishment, HDS wrote-off approximately $24 million in unamortized deferred financing charges associated with the 12.0% Senior Notes. Similarly, under ASC 470, approximately $834 million of the 2007 ABL Credit Facility and approximately $1,169 million of the 2007 Senior Secured Credit Facility were deemed extinguishments, with the remaining portions considered modifications. As a result of the extinguishment, HDS wrote-off approximately $22 million of $42 million in unamortized deferred financing charges associated with these credit agreements.

14.875% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2020

        HDS issued approximately $757 million aggregate principal amount (net of $30 million of original issue discount) of 14.875% Senior Unsecured Notes under an Indenture, dated as of April 12, 2012 (the "April 2012 Senior Unsecured Notes Indenture"), among HDS, the Subsidiary Guarantors and Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee to investment funds associated with Bain Capital Partners, LLC, Carlyle Investment Management, LLC and Clayton, Dubilier & Rice, LLC, the Equity Sponsors. The April 2012 Senior Unsecured Notes bore interest at a rate of 14.875% per annum and were scheduled to mature on October 12, 2020. Interest was to be paid semi-annually in arrears on each April 12th and October 12th through maturity, commencing on October 12, 2012, except that the first eleven payment periods through October 2017 were to be paid in kind ("PIK") and therefore increase the balance of the outstanding indebtedness rather than paid in cash. On October 12, 2012, HDS made a PIK payment of $56 million, increasing the outstanding principal balance to approximately $813 million.

        HDS was permitted to redeem the April 2012 Senior Unsecured Notes, in whole or in part, at any time prior to April 12, 2015, at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the redemption date, plus the applicable make-whole premium set forth

81


Table of Contents

in the 14.875% Senior Notes Indenture. On February 1, 2013, HDS repurchased the April 2012 Senior Unsecured Notes in accordance with the redemption provisions of the April 2012 Senior Unsecured Notes Indenture.

10.5% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2021

        HDS issued $950 million aggregate principal amount of the January 2013 Senior Subordinated Notes under an Indenture, dated as of January 16, 2013 ("January 2013 Senior Subordinated Notes Indenture") among HDS, the Subsidiary Guarantors and the Trustee. The January 2013 Senior Subordinated Notes bore interest at a rate of 10.5% per annum and were scheduled to mature on January 15, 2021. Interest was to be paid semi-annually in arrears on April 15th and October 15th of each year.

        HDS was permitted to redeem up to 100% of the aggregate principal amount of the January 2013 Senior Subordinated Notes at any time on or before July 31, 2014 with funds in an equal aggregate amount not exceeding the aggregate proceeds of certain qualified public equity offerings at a redemption price (expressed as a percentage of principal amount) of 103% if such redemption occurred on or prior to January 31, 2014, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the redemption date; provided, however, that if less than 100% of the January 2013 Senior Subordinated Notes are to be redeemed in any qualified public offering redemption, at least 33.33% of the original aggregate principal amount of January 2013 Senior Subordinated Notes must remain outstanding immediately after giving effect to such qualified public offering redemption. On August 1, 2013, HDS redeemed all $950 million outstanding aggregate principal amount of its January 2013 Senior Subordinated Notes in accordance with the redemption provisions of the January 2013 Senior Subordinated Notes Indenture.

Commodity and interest rate risk

Commodity risk

        We are aware of the potentially unfavorable effects inflationary pressures may create through higher asset replacement costs and related depreciation, higher interest rates and higher material costs. In addition, our operating performance is affected by price fluctuations in the commodity based products that we purchase and sell, which contain commodities such as steel, copper, aluminum, PVC, petroleum and other commodities. We are also exposed to fluctuations in petroleum costs as we deliver a substantial portion of the products we sell by truck. We seek to minimize the effects of inflation and changing prices through economies of purchasing and inventory management resulting in cost reductions and productivity improvements as well as price increases to maintain reasonable gross margins.

        As discussed above, our results of operations were favorably or negatively impacted by fluctuating commodity prices based on our ability or inability to pass increases in the prices of certain commodity based products to our customers. Such commodity price fluctuations have from time to time produced volatility in our financial performance and could do so in the future.

Interest rate risk related to debt

        We are subject to interest rate risk associated with our debt. While changes in interest rates impact the fair value of the fixed-rate debt, there is no impact to earnings and cash flow. Alternatively, while changes in interest rates do not affect the fair value of our variable-rate debt, they do affect future earnings and cash flows.

        HDS's Senior ABL Facility and Term Loan Facility bear variable interest rates.

    The Senior ABL Facility bears interest (i) in the case of U.S. dollar denominated loans, either at LIBOR or the Prime Rate, at the option of the Company, plus applicable borrowing margins

82


Table of Contents

      and (ii) in the case of Canadian dollar denominated loans, either at the BA Rate or the Canadian Prime Rate, at the option of the Company, plus applicable borrowing margins. The borrowing margins are defined by a pricing grid, as included in the ABL Facility agreement, based on average excess availability for the previous quarter.

    The Term Loan Facility bears interest at LIBOR (subject to a floor of 1.00%) plus a borrowing margin of 3.00% or Prime plus a borrowing margin of 2.00% at the Company's election.

        A 1% increase in interest rates on our variable-rate debt would increase our annual forecasted interest expense by approximately $11 million (based on our borrowings as of February 1, 2015 and excluding the effect of the interest rate floor on our Term Loan Facility).

Off-balance sheet arrangements

        In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America, operating leases for a portion of our real estate and other assets are not reflected in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Contractual obligations

        The following table discloses aggregate information about our contractual obligations as of February 1, 2015 and the periods in which payments are due (amounts in millions):

 
   
  Payments due by period  
 
  Total   Fiscal
2015
  Fiscal
2016 - 2017
  Fiscal
2018 - 2019
  Fiscal years
after 2019
 

Long-term debt

  $ 5,271   $ 34   $   $ 1,037   $ 4,200  

Interest on long-term debt(i)

    2,238     398     791     723     326  

Operating leases

    582     141     224     138     79  

Purchase obligations(ii)

    723     723              

Total contractual cash obligations(iii)

  $ 8,814   $ 1,296   $ 1,015   $ 1,898   $ 4,605  

(i)
The interest rates for the ABL Facility are calculated based on the rates as of February 1, 2015. The interest on long-term debt includes payments for agent administration fees.

(ii)
Purchase obligations include various commitments with vendors to purchase goods and services, primarily inventory. These purchase obligations are generally cancelable, but the Company has no intent to cancel.

(iii)
The contractual obligations table excludes $5 million of unrecognized tax benefits due to uncertainty regarding the timing of future cash payments, if any, related to the liabilities recorded in accordance with the GAAP guidance for uncertain tax positions.

Recent accounting pronouncements

        Revenue recognition—In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, "Revenue from contracts with customers" ("ASU 2014-09"). The amended guidance outlines a single comprehensive revenue model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers. The guidance supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance. The core principle of the revenue model is that "an entity recognizes revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services." Entities have the option of using either a full retrospective or modified approach to adopt the guidance. ASU 2014-09 is effective for fiscal years, and

83


Table of Contents

interim reporting periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2016 (early adoption is not permitted). The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting ASU 2014-09.

        Discontinued operations—In April 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-08, "Reporting discontinued operations and disclosure of disposals of components of an entity" ("ASU 2014-08"). The amended guidance requires that a disposal representing a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on an entity's financial results or a business activity classified as held for sale should be reported as discontinued operations. The amendments also expand the disclosure requirements for discontinued operations and add new disclosures for individually significant dispositions that do not qualify as discontinued operations. The amendments are effective prospectively for fiscal years, and interim reporting periods within those years, beginning on or after December 15, 2014 (early adoption is permitted only for disposals that have not been previously reported). The impact on the Company of adopting ASU 2014-08 will depend on the nature and size of future disposals, if any, of a component of the Company after the effective date.

        Presentation of an unrecognized tax benefit—In July 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-11, "Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists" ("ASU 2013-11"), which resolves diversity in practice on the financial statement presentation of an unrecognized tax benefit when a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward exists. An unrecognized tax benefit, or a portion of an unrecognized tax benefit, should be presented in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward, except in certain situations, as defined in ASU 2013-11. The amendments in ASU 2013-11 are effective prospectively for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU 2013-11 did not have a material impact on the Company's financial position or results of operations.

        Release of cumulative translation adjustment—In March 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-05, "Parent's Accounting for the Cumulative Translation Adjustment upon Derecognition of Certain Subsidiaries or Groups of Assets within a Foreign Entity or of an Investment in a Foreign Entity" ("ASU 2013-05"), which resolves diversity in practice regarding the release of the cumulative translation adjustment into net income when a parent either sells a part or all of its investment in a foreign entity or no longer holds a controlling financial interest in a subsidiary or group of assets within a foreign entity. The amendments in ASU 2013-05 are effective prospectively for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU 2013-05 did not have a material impact on the Company's financial position or results of operations.

Critical accounting policies

        Our critical accounting policies include:

Revenue recognition

        We recognize revenue when persuasive evidence of an agreement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the price to the buyer is fixed and determinable and collectability is reasonably assured. We ship products to customers predominantly by internal fleet and to a lesser extent by third-party carriers. Revenues, net of sales tax and allowances for returns and discounts, are recognized from product sales when title to the products is passed to the customer, which generally occurs at the point of destination for products shipped by internal fleet and at the point of shipping for products shipped by third-party carriers.

84


Table of Contents

Allowance for doubtful accounts

        We evaluate the collectability of accounts receivable based on numerous factors, including past transaction history with customers, their credit worthiness and an assessment of our lien and bond rights. Initially, we estimate an allowance for doubtful accounts as a percentage of aged receivables. This estimate is periodically adjusted when we become aware of a specific customer's inability to meet its financial obligations (e.g., bankruptcy filing) or as a result of changes in our historical collection patterns. While we have a large customer base that is geographically dispersed, a slowdown in the markets in which we operate may result in higher than expected uncollectible accounts, and therefore, the need to revise estimates for bad debts. To the extent historical credit experience is not indicative of future performance or other assumptions used by management do not prevail, the allowance for doubtful accounts could differ significantly, resulting in either higher or lower future provisions for doubtful accounts.

Inventories

        Inventories consist primarily of finished goods and are carried at the lower of cost or market. The cost of substantially all of our inventories is determined by the moving or weighted average cost method. We evaluate our inventory value at the end of each quarter to ensure that it is carried at the lower of cost or market. This evaluation includes an analysis of historical physical inventory results, a review of potential excess and obsolete inventories based on inventory aging and anticipated future demand. Periodically, each branch's perpetual inventory records are adjusted to reflect any declines in net realizable value below inventory carrying cost. To the extent historical physical inventory results are not indicative of future results and if future events impact, either favorably or unfavorably, the saleability of our products or our relationship with certain key vendors, our inventory reserves could differ significantly, resulting in either higher or lower future inventory provisions.

Consideration received from vendors

        We enter into agreements with many of our vendors providing for inventory purchase rebates ("vendor rebates") upon achievement of specified volume purchasing levels. We accrue the receipt of vendor rebates as part of our cost of sales for products sold based on progress towards earning the vendor rebates, taking into consideration cumulative purchases of inventory to date and projected purchases through the end of the year. An estimate of unearned vendor rebates is included in the carrying value of inventory at each period end for vendor rebates to be received on products not yet sold. While we believe we will continue to receive consideration from vendors in fiscal 2015 and thereafter, there can be no assurance that vendors will continue to provide comparable amounts of vendor rebates in the future.

Impairment of long-lived assets

        Long-lived assets, including property and equipment, are reviewed for possible impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. To analyze recoverability, we project undiscounted future cash flows over the remaining life of the asset. If these projected cash flows are less than the carrying amount, an impairment loss is recognized based on the fair value of the asset less any costs of disposition. Our judgment regarding the existence of impairment indicators are based on market and operational performance. Future events could cause us to conclude that impairment indicators exist and that assets are impaired. Evaluating the impairment also requires us to estimate future operating results and cash flows that require judgment by management. If different estimates were used, the amount and timing of asset impairments could be affected.

85


Table of Contents

Goodwill

        Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price paid over the fair value of the net assets acquired in connection with business acquisitions. Accounting Standards Codification 350, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other, requires entities to periodically assess the carrying value of goodwill by reviewing the fair value of the net assets underlying all acquisition-related goodwill on a reporting unit basis, as defined by ASC 350. We have historically assessed the recoverability of goodwill in the third quarter of each fiscal year. During fiscal 2014, we changed the timing of the annual impairment test from the third quarter to the fourth quarter of each fiscal year, which was considered a change in accounting principle. We believe this change is preferable since it better aligns the test with the preparation of our annual long-range forecasts. The change in accounting principle did not accelerate, delay or cause a goodwill impairment charge. To satisfy the annual testing requirement, we performed the annual goodwill impairment testing during both the third quarter of fiscal 2014 (as of August 3, 2014) and the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014 (as of November 2, 2014).

        We also use judgment in assessing whether we need to test goodwill more frequently for impairment than annually given factors such as unexpected adverse economic conditions, competition, product changes and other events. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit that contains goodwill exceeds fair value, a possible impairment would be indicated.

        We determine the fair value of a reporting unit using a discounted cash flow ("DCF") analysis and a market comparable method, with each method being equally weighted in the calculation.

        Determining fair value requires the exercise of significant judgment, including judgment about appropriate discount rates, the amount and timing of expected future cash flows, as well as relevant comparable company earnings multiples for the market comparable approach. The cash flows employed in the DCF analyses are based on the Company's most recent long-range forecast and, for years beyond the forecast, the Company's estimates, which are based on estimated exit multiples times the final forecasted year earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. The discount rates used in the DCF analyses are intended to reflect the risks inherent in the future cash flows of the respective reporting units. For the market comparable approach, the Company evaluated comparable company public trading values, using earnings multiples and sales multiples that are used to value the reporting units.

        For our first annual goodwill impairment testing during the third quarter of fiscal 2014, we tested the six reporting units with goodwill balances. In accordance with ASC 350, we elected to first assess qualitative factors on the reporting units to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of each of the reporting units is less than its carrying amount. Based on this assessment, we determined that it is not more likely than not that the fair value of each of the reporting units is less than its carrying amount. Therefore, it was not necessary to calculate the fair value using the DCF and market comparable approach for any of the reporting units. There was no indication of impairment in any of our reporting units during the third quarter of fiscal 2014 annual testing.

        For our second annual goodwill impairment testing during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, we tested the six reporting units with goodwill balances. In accordance with ASC 350, we elected to first assess qualitative factors on two reporting units, Hardware Solutions and Home Improvement Solutions, to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of each of these reporting units is less than its carrying amount. Based on this assessment, we determined that it was not necessary to calculate the fair value using the DCF and market comparable approach for these two reporting units. We bypassed the qualitative analysis on the remaining four reporting units and proceeded with the calculation of the fair value these four reporting units using the DCF and market comparable approach. There was no indication of impairment in any of the Company's reporting units in the fourth quarter 2014 goodwill impairment test.

86


Table of Contents

        There was no indication of impairment in any of the Company's reporting units in the fiscal 2013 and fiscal 2012 annual tests.

        The Company's DCF model is based on HD Supply's expectation of future market conditions for each of the reporting units, as well as discount rates that would be used by market participants in an arms-length transaction. Future events could cause the Company to conclude that market conditions have declined or discount rates have increased to the extent that the Company's goodwill could be further impaired. It is not possible at this time to determine if any such future impairment charge would result.

Income Taxes

        Income taxes are determined under the liability method as required by ASC 740, Income Taxes. Income tax expense or benefit is based on pre-tax financial accounting income. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected tax consequences of temporary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. This measurement is reduced, if necessary, by a valuation allowance based on the amount of tax benefits that, based on available evidence, are not "more likely than not" to be realized. The Company recorded a valuation allowance related to its U.S. continuing operations of $27 million, $115 million, and $447 million in fiscal 2014, fiscal 2013, and fiscal 2012, as it believes it is "more likely than not" all of the U.S. deferred income tax assets will not be realized. In addition, the Company recorded a $10 million valuation allowance increase, $2 million valuation allowance increase, and a $13 million valuation allowance reduction related to its U.S. discontinued operations for fiscal 2014, fiscal 2013, and fiscal 2012, respectively.

        The Company follows the GAAP guidance for uncertain tax positions within ASC 740, Income Taxes. ASC 740 provides guidance related to the financial statement recognition and measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The standard prescribes the minimum recognition threshold that a tax position is required to meet before being recognized in the financial statements. ASC 740 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods and disclosure. Initial recognition, derecognition and measurement is based on management's judgment given the facts, circumstances and information available at the reporting date. If these judgments are not accurate then future income tax expense or benefit could be different.

Self-insurance

        We have a high deductible insurance program for most losses related to general liability, product liability, environmental liability, automobile liability, workers' compensation, and we are self-insured for medical claims and certain legal claims. The expected ultimate cost for claims incurred as of the balance sheet date is not discounted and is recognized as a liability. Self-insurance losses for claims filed and claims incurred but not reported are accrued based upon estimates of the aggregate liability for uninsured claims using loss development factors and actuarial assumptions followed in the insurance industry and historical loss development experience. To the extent the projected future development of the losses resulting from environmental, workers' compensation, automobile, general and product liability claims incurred as of February 1, 2015 differs from the actual development of such losses in future periods, our insurance reserves could differ significantly, resulting in either higher or lower future insurance expense.

87


Table of Contents

Management estimates

        Management believes the assumptions and other considerations used to estimate amounts reflected in our consolidated financial statements are appropriate. However, if actual experience differs from the assumptions and other considerations used in estimating amounts reflected in our consolidated financial statements, the resulting changes could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations, and in certain situations, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition.

Stock-Based Compensation

        Our stock option expense is estimated at the grant date based on an award's fair value as calculated by the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and is recognized as expense over the requisite service period. The Black-Scholes model requires various highly judgmental assumptions including expected volatility and option life. If any of the assumptions used in the Black-Scholes model changes significantly, stock-based compensation expense may differ materially in the future from that recorded in the current period. In addition, we estimate the expected forfeiture rate and only recognize expense for those shares expected to vest. We estimate the forfeiture rate based on historical experience. To the extent our actual forfeiture rate is different from our estimate, stock-based compensation expense is adjusted accordingly. See "Note 10—Stock Based Compensation and Employee Benefit Plans" in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements within Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this annual report on Form 10-K.

Item 7A.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

        The information required by this Item is included under "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" under the caption "Commodity and interest rate risk."

88


Table of Contents

ITEM 8.    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Index to financial statements

 
  Page

HD Supply Holdings, Inc.

     

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

    90

HD Supply, Inc.

     

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

    91

HD Supply Holdings, Inc.

     

Consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss) for (i) the fiscal year ended February 1, 2015, (ii) the fiscal year ended February 2, 2014, and (iii) the fiscal year ended February 3, 2013

    92

Consolidated balance sheets as of February 1, 2015 and February 2, 2014

    93

Consolidated statements of stockholders' equity (deficit) for (i) the fiscal year ended February 1, 2015, (ii) the fiscal year ended February 2, 2014, and (iii) the fiscal year ended February 3, 2013

    94

Consolidated statements of cash flows for (i) the fiscal year ended February 1, 2015, (ii) the fiscal year ended February 2, 2014, and (iii) the fiscal year ended February 3, 2013

    95

HD Supply, Inc.

     

Consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss) for (i) the fiscal year ended February 1, 2015, (ii) the fiscal year ended February 2, 2014, and (iii) the fiscal year ended February 3, 2013

    96

Consolidated balance sheets as of February 1, 2015 and February 2, 2014

    97

Consolidated statements of stockholder's equity (deficit) for (i) the fiscal year ended February 1, 2015, (ii) the fiscal year ended February 2, 2014, and (iii) the fiscal year ended February 3, 2013

    98

Consolidated statements of cash flows for (i) the fiscal year ended February 1, 2015, (ii) the fiscal year ended February 2, 2014, and (iii) the fiscal year ended February 3, 2013

    99

Notes to consolidated financial statements

    100

89


Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
HD Supply Holdings, Inc.:

        In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss), of stockholders' equity (deficit) and of cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of HD Supply Holdings, Inc. and its subsidiaries at February 1, 2015 and February 2, 2014, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended February 1, 2015 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule listed in the index appearing under Item 15(c) presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of February 1, 2015, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company's management is responsible for these financial statements and financial statement schedule, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements, on the financial statement schedule, and on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audits (which was an integrated in 2014). We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

        A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

        Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Atlanta, GA
March 23, 2015

90


Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholder of
HD Supply, Inc.:

        In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss), of stockholder's equity (deficit) and of cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of HD Supply, Inc. and its subsidiaries at February 1, 2015 and February 2, 2014, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended February 1, 2015 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule listed in the index appearing under Item 15(c) presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of February 1, 2015, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company's management is responsible for these financial statements and financial statement schedule, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements, on the financial statement schedule, and on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audits (which was an integrated in 2014). We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

        A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

        Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Atlanta, GA
March 23, 2015

91


Table of Contents


HD SUPPLY HOLDINGS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

Amounts in millions, except share and per share data

 
  Fiscal Year Ended  
 
  February 1, 2015   February 2, 2014   February 3, 2013  

Net Sales

  $ 8,882   $ 8,228   $ 7,647  

Cost of sales

    6,324     5,870     5,495  

Gross Profit

    2,558     2,358     2,152  

Operating expenses:

                   

Selling, general and administrative

    1,726     1,649     1,551  

Depreciation and amortization

    207     228     306  

Restructuring

    7     9      

Total operating expenses

    1,940     1,886     1,857  

Operating Income

    618     472     295  

Interest expense

    461     528     658  

Loss on extinguishment & modification of debt

    108     87     709  

Other (income) expense, net

    (3 )   20      

Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations Before Provision for Income Taxes                   

    52     (163 )   (1,072 )

Provision for income taxes

    56     58     39  

Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations                   

    (4 )   (221 )   (1,111 )

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax

    7     3     (68 )

Net Income (Loss)

  $ 3   $ (218 ) $ (1,179 )

Other comprehensive income (loss)—foreign currency translation adjustment

    (13 )   (13 )    

Total Comprehensive Income (Loss)

  $ (10 ) $ (231 ) $ (1,179 )

Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding (thousands)

                   

Basic & Diluted

    193,962     166,905     130,561  

Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Share(1):

                   

Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations

  $ (0.02 ) $ (1.32 ) $ (8.51 )

Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations

  $ 0.04   $ 0.02   $ (0.52 )

Net Income (Loss)

  $ 0.02   $ (1.31 ) $ (9.03 )

(1)
May not foot due to rounding.

   

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

92


Table of Contents


HD SUPPLY HOLDINGS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

Amounts in millions, except share and per share data

 
  February 1, 2015   February 2, 2014  

ASSETS

             

Current assets:

             

Cash and cash equivalents

  $ 85   $ 115  

Receivables, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $16 and $18

    1,088     1,046  

Inventories

    1,069     1,072  

Deferred tax asset

    9     7  

Other current assets

    47     63  

Total current assets

    2,298     2,303  

Property and equipment, net

    372     405  

Goodwill

    3,071     3,137  

Intangible assets, net

    200     338  

Other assets

    119     141  

Total assets

  $ 6,060   $ 6,324  

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)

             

Current liabilities:

             

Accounts payable

  $ 688   $ 664  

Accrued compensation and benefits

    161     149  

Current installments of long-term debt

    34     10  

Other current liabilities

    252     270  

Total current liabilities

    1,135     1,093  

Long-term debt, excluding current installments

    5,223     5,534  

Deferred tax liabilities

    166     114  

Other liabilities

    296     347