XML 99 R12.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
12 Months Ended
Feb. 03, 2013
GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS  
GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS

NOTE 5—GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Goodwill

        The carrying amount of goodwill by reporting unit is as follows (amounts in millions):

 
  As of February 3, 2013   As of January 29, 2012  
 
  Gross Goodwill   Accumulated
Impairments
  Net
Goodwill
  Gross
Goodwill
  Accumulated
Impairments
  Net
Goodwill
 

Waterworks

  $ 1,876   $ (815 ) $ 1,061   $ 1,867   $ (815 ) $ 1,052  

Facilities Maintenance

    1,603         1,603     1,474         1,474  

White Cap

    183     (74 )   109     183     (74 )   109  

Utilities(1)

    284     (99 )   185     285     (99 )   186  

Crown Bolt

    215     (150 )   65     215         215  

Repair & Remodel

    125     (30 )   95     125     (30 )   95  

Electrical(1)

    20         20     20         20  

CTI

    67     (67 )       67     (67 )    

IPVF

                82     (82 )    
                           

Total goodwill

  $ 4,373   $ (1,235 ) $ 3,138   $ 4,318   $ (1,167 ) $ 3,151  
                           

(1)
Utilities and Electrical are reporting units that, combined, comprise the Power Solutions segment.

        Goodwill represents the excess of purchase price over fair value of net assets acquired. HD Supply does not amortize goodwill, but does assess the recoverability of goodwill in the third quarter of each fiscal year. If an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying value, an interim impairment test would be performed between annual tests. Goodwill impairment testing is performed at the reporting unit level.

        On January 30, 2012, the Company adopted the provisions of Accounting Standard Update No. 2011-08, "Testing Goodwill for Impairment" ("ASU 2011-08"), which simplifies how entities test goodwill for impairment and permits an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test.

        The first step of the impairment test involves comparing each reporting unit's fair value to its carrying value including goodwill. If the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying value, applicable goodwill is considered not to be impaired. If the carrying value exceeds fair value, there is an indication of impairment and the second step is performed to measure the amount of impairment.

        The second step involves calculating an implied fair value of goodwill for each reporting unit for which the first step indicated impairment. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined in the same manner as the amount of goodwill recognized in a business combination, which is the excess of the fair value of the reporting unit, as determined in the first step, over the aggregate fair values of the individual assets, liabilities and identifiable intangibles as if the reporting unit was being acquired in a business combination. If the implied fair value of goodwill in the "pro forma" business combination accounting as described above, exceeds the goodwill assigned to the reporting unit, there is no impairment. If the goodwill assigned to a reporting unit exceeds the implied fair value of the goodwill, an impairment charge is recorded for the excess. An impairment loss recognized cannot exceed the amount of goodwill assigned to a reporting unit, and the loss establishes a new basis in the goodwill. Subsequent reversal of goodwill impairment losses is not permitted under U.S. GAAP. HD Supply performed the annual goodwill impairment testing during the third quarter of fiscal 2012 for the seven reporting units with goodwill balances (goodwill balances at one reporting unit was zero prior to the annual testing). In accordance with ASU 2011-08, the Company elected to first assess qualitative factors on two reporting units, Facilities Maintenance and White Cap, to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of each of these reporting units is less than its carrying amount. Based on this assessment, the Company determined that it was not necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test for these two reporting units. The Company bypassed the qualitative analysis on the remaining five reporting units and proceeded with the first step of the two-step goodwill impairment test.

        The Company determines the fair value of a reporting unit using a discounted cash flow ("DCF") analysis and a market comparable method, with each method being equally weighted in the calculation. Determining fair value requires the exercise of significant judgment, including judgment about appropriate discount rates, the amount and timing of expected future cash flows, as well as relevant comparable company earnings multiples for the market comparable approach. The cash flows employed in the DCF analyses are based on the Company's most recent long-range forecast and, for years beyond the forecast, the Company's estimates, which are based on estimated exit multiples ranging from six to seven times the final forecasted year earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. The discount rates used in the DCF analyses are intended to reflect the risks inherent in the future cash flows of the respective reporting units and range from 11.5% to 14.0%. For the market comparable approach, the Company evaluated comparable company public trading values, using earnings multiples and sales multiples that are used to value the reporting units.

        There was no indication of impairment in any of the Company's reporting units during the annual testing for fiscal 2012, fiscal 2011, and fiscal 2010 and accordingly, the second step of the goodwill impairment analysis was not performed. At the time of our fiscal 2012 annual testing, the fair value of the reporting units for which step one of the goodwill impairment test was completed exceeded their carrying value by the following percentages: 47% for Waterworks, 31% for Utilities, 6% for Crown Bolt, 40% for Repair & Remodel, and 116% for Electrical.

        During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, Crown Bolt reached an agreement to amend and extend its strategic purchasing agreement with Home Depot. While the amendment extends the agreement five years through fiscal 2019, retaining Crown Bolt as the exclusive supplier of certain products to Home Depot, it eliminated the minimum purchase guarantee and adjusts future pricing. These changes resulted in a reduction of expected future cash proceeds from Home Depot. HD Supply, therefore, considered this amendment a triggering event and, as such, the Company performed an additional goodwill impairment analysis for Crown Bolt. During step one of the additional goodwill impairment analysis, there was an indication of impairment, and, accordingly, the second step of the goodwill impairment analysis was performed for this reporting unit. As a result of step two, the Company recorded a $150 million non-cash goodwill impairment in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012.

        The following table presents the changes in goodwill for the fiscal years presented (amounts in millions).

 
  Fiscal 2012   Fiscal 2011   Fiscal 2010  

Beginning Balance

  $ 3,151   $ 3,150   $ 3,149  

Acquisitions

    138     12      

Realization of tax deductible goodwill from a prior acquisition

    (2 )   (11 )    

Impairment

    (150 )        

Translation & other adjustments

    1         1  
               

Ending Balance

  $ 3,138   $ 3,151   $ 3,150  
               

        The Company's discounted cash flow model is based on HD Supply's expectation of future market conditions for each of the reporting units, as well as discount rates that would be used by market participants in an arm's-length transaction. Future events could cause the Company to conclude that market conditions have declined or discount rates have increased to the extent that the Company's goodwill could be further impaired. It is not possible at this time to determine if any such future impairment charge would result.

Intangible Assets

        HD Supply's intangible assets as of February 3, 2013 and January 29, 2012 consisted of the following (amounts in millions):

 
  As of February 3, 2013   As of January 29, 2012  
 
  Gross
Intangible
  Accumulated
Amortization
  Net
Intangible
  Gross
Intangible
  Accumulated
Amortization
  Net
Intangible
 

Customer relationships

  $ 929   $ (614 ) $ 315   $ 1,532   $ (983 ) $ 549  

Strategic purchase agreement

    166     (122 )   44     166     (99 )   67  

Trade names

    153     (41 )   112     152     (34 )   118  

Other

    2         2     1         1  
                           

Total

  $ 1,250   $ (777 ) $ 473   $ 1,851   $ (1,116 ) $ 735  
                           

        During fiscal 2012, the Company recorded $71 million of intangible assets, primarily $66 million in customer relationship intangibles, as a result of the Peachtree and Water Products business acquisitions. The customer relationship intangible assets will be amortized over a weighted-average period of 10.9 years. The remaining intangible assets recorded will be amortized over a weighted-average period of 3.6 years. In addition, during fiscal 2012, $516 million of customer relationship intangible assets became fully amortized and, therefore, were removed from the balance sheet.

        During fiscal 2011, the Company recorded $4 million of intangible assets, primarily customer relationship intangibles, as a result of the RAMSCO business acquisition. These intangibles will be amortized over a weighted-average amortization period of 5.6 years.

        As a result of the strategic purchase agreement amendment and extension with Home Depot, HD Supply performed an impairment analysis of the intangible asset assigned to the strategic purchase agreement. The analysis showed no indication of impairment of the intangible asset assigned to the strategic purchase agreement. The unamortized net book value of the intangible asset will be amortized over the remainder of the agreement, which is seven years. Additionally, Crown Bolt discontinued the use of a certain tradename. As a result, the related unamortized tradename intangible asset was written off, resulting in a $2 million impairment charge.

        Amortization expense for continuing operations related to intangible assets was $243 million, $244 million, and $244 million, in fiscal 2012, fiscal 2011, and fiscal 2010, respectively. Estimated future amortization expense for continuing operations for intangible assets recorded as of February 3, 2013 is $135 million, $105 million, $40 million, $39 million and $38 million for fiscal years 2013 through 2017, respectively.