LBGO 10-Q 06/30/12

10-Q 1 lbgo10q_063012apg.htm LBGO 10-Q 06/30/12 LBGO 10-Q 06/30/12

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(MARK ONE)

[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2012

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _____ to ____

Commission File No. 333-16135

LIBERTY GOLD CORP.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Delaware	80-0372385
(State or other jurisdiction of	(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)	Identification No.)

2415 East Camelback Road, Suite 700, Phoenix, AZ 85016

(Address of principal executive offices, zip code)

602-553-1190

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

___________

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year,

if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the issuer (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes [X] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [X] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (check one):


Large accelerated filer [ ]	Accelerated filer [ ]
Non-accelerated filer [ ]	Smaller reporting company [X]
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act): Yes [ ] No [X]

APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY

PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PRECEDING FIVE YEARS:

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court. Yes [ ] No [ ]

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS

As of August 10, 2012, there were 88,270,833 of common stock, $0.0001 par value per share, outstanding.

LIBERTY GOLD CORP.

(A Development Stage Company)

QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q

FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2012

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Liberty Gold Corp., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), contains “forward-looking statements,” as defined in the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may”, “will”, “should”, “could”, “expects”, “plans”, “intends”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “estimates”, “predicts”, “potential” or “continue” or the negative of such terms and other comparable terminology. These forward-looking statements include, without limitation, statements about our market opportunity, our strategies, competition, expected activities and expenditures as we pursue our business plan, and the adequacy of our available cash resources. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. Actual results may differ materially from the predictions discussed in these forward-looking statements. The economic environment within which we operate could materially affect our actual results. Additional factors that could materially affect these forward-looking statements and/or predictions include, among other things: the Company’s need for and ability to obtain additional financing and that there will be little demand for the Company’s services and products, and other factors over which we have little or no control; and other factors discussed in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).

Our management has included projections and estimates in this Form 10-Q, which are based primarily on management’s experience in the industry, assessments of our results of operations, discussions and negotiations with third parties and a review of information filed by our competitors with the SEC or otherwise publicly available. We caution readers not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made. We disclaim any obligation subsequently to revise any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of such statements or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events.

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

Liberty Gold Corp.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

June 30, 2012 and 2011

Index to the Financial Statements

Contents Page(s)

Balance Sheets at June 30, 2012 (Unaudited) and March 31, 2012........................................................................

Statements of Operations for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 and for the

Period from April 5, 2011 (Date of Entry into Exploration) through June 30, 2012 (Unaudited).........................

Statement of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) for the Period from March 31, 2010 through

June 30, 2012 (Unaudited).............................................................................................................................................

Statements of Cash Flows for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 and for the

Period from April 5, 2011 (Date of Entry into Exploration) through June 30, 2012 (Unaudited).........................

Notes to the Financial Statements (Unaudited)........................................................................................................


Liberty Gold Corp.
(Formerly IBOS, Inc.)
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Balance Sheets

				(unaudited)		(audited)
				June 30, 2012		March 31, 2012

ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
	Cash			$	50,818	$	4,369
	Subscription receivable				-		50,000
	Prepaid expenses				13,362		5,375

		Total Current Assets			64,180		59,744

MINERAL PROPERTIES:
	Mineral properties				1,359,072		1,274,272
	Depletin, depreciation and amortization				-		-

			Total Assets	$	1,423,252	$	1,334,016

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY (DEFICIT)
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
	Current portion of mineral property payable			$	639,572	$	654,319
	Accrued expenses				17,552		-
	Advances from stockholders				28,356		28,356
	Common stock to be issued				-		50

		Total Current Liabilities			685,480		682,725

MINERAL PROPERTIES PAYABLE, net of current portion					50,000		-

LIBERTY GOLD CORP. STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT):
	Preferred stock at $0.0001 par value: 5,000,000 shares authorized;
		none issued or outstanding			-		-
	Common stock at $0.0001 par value: 250,000,000 shares authorized,
		87,566,287 and 88,371,843 shares issued and outstanding, respectively			8,756		8,837
	Additional paid-in capital				1,757,747		1,432,816
	Accumulated deficit				(88,952)		(88,952)
	Deficit accumulated during the exploration stage				(989,779)		(701,410)

		Total Liberty Gold Corp. Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)			687,772		651,291

NONCONTROLLING INTEREST					-		-

			Total Liabilities and Equity (Deficit)	$	1,423,252	$	1,334,016

See accompanying notes to the financial statements


Liberty Gold Corp.
(Formerly IBOS, Inc.)
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Statements of Operations
(unaudited)

								For the Period from
				For the Three Months		For the Three Months		April 5, 2011
				Ended		Ended		(Exploration) through
				June 30, 2012		June 30, 2011		June 30, 2012

Revenues earned during the exploration stage				$	-	$	-	$	-

Cost of revenues:
	Exploration costs				186,300		-		587,690

		Total cost of revenues			186,300		-		587,690

Operating expenses
	Officers' compensation				19,500		6,571		84,765
	Professional fees				75,673		43,707		240,441
	General and administrative expenses				6,896		13,722		76,883
	Impairment of mineral properties				-		200		-

		Total operating expenses			102,069		64,200		402,089

Loss from continuing operations before income taxes					(288,369)		(64,200)		(989,779)

Income tax provision					-		-		-

Net loss from continuing operations					(288,369)		(64,200)		(989,779)

Discontinued operations
	Loss from operations of discontinued operations, net of taxes				-		-		-
	Loss from disposal of discontinued operations, net of taxes				-		(8,067)		-

		Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes			-		(8,067)		-

Net loss before noncontrolling interest					(288,369)		(72,267)		(989,779)

Noncontrolling interest					-		-		-

Net loss				$	(288,369)	$	(72,267)	$	(989,779)

Net loss per common share - basic and diluted
		Continuing operations		$	(0.00)	$	(0.00)
		Discontinued operations			-		(0.00)
			Total net loss per common share	$	(0.00)	$	(0.00)

	Weighted average common shares outstanding
		- basic and diluted			88,617,484		125,991,850

See accompanying notes to the financial statements


Liberty Gold Corp. (Formerly IBOS, Inc.) (An Exploration Stage Company) Statement of Equity (Deficit) For the period from March 31, 2010 through December 31, 2011 (Unaudited)

			Common Stock, $0.0001 Par Value							Deficit		Total Liberty
			Number of			Additional Paid-in		Accumulated		Accumulated during the Exploration		Gold Corp Shareholders' Equity		Non-controlling		Total Equity
			Shares	Amount		Capital		Deficit		Stage		(Deficit)		Interest		(Deficit)

Balance, March 31, 2010			124,100,000	$	12,410	$	45,998	$	(38,096)	$	-	$	20,312	$	-	$	20,312
	Net loss								(42,789)		-		(42,789)		-		(42,789)
Balance, March 31, 2011			124,100,000		12,410		45,998		(80,885)		-		(22,477)		-		(22,477)
	Common shares issued for mineral property acquisition in Alaska		500,000		50		-						50				50
	Forgiveness of debt by former stockholders						30,545						30,545				30,545
	Equity units inclusive one common share and one warrant
		issued for cash at $0.80 per unit on June 28, 2011	75,000		8		59,992						60,000				60,000
	Common shares issued for mineral property acquisition in Arizona		500,000		50		-						50				50
	Common shares issued for mineral property acquisition in Mexico		1,500,000		150		-						150				150
	Equity units inclusive of one common share and one warrant
		issued for cash at $0.80 per unit between July 28, 2011
		and September 9, 2011	712,500		71		569,929						570,000				570,000
	Surrender of 40,000,000 common shares at $0.0001 par value
		on August 10, 2011	(40,000,000)		(4,000)		4,000						-				-
	Common shares issued for mineral property acquisition in Alaska		500,000		50		-						50				50
	Equity units inclusive of one common share and one warrant
		issued for cash at $0.45 per unit between October 28, 2011
		and November 12, 2011	666,666		67		299,933						300,000				300,000
	Equity units inclusive of one common share and one warrant
		issued for cash at $0.99 per unit on December 15, 2011	101,010		10		99,990						100,000				100,000
	Cancellation of common shares issued for property acquisitions
		in Mexico	(1,500,000)		(150)		-						(150)				(150)
	Equity units inclusive of one common share and one warrant
		issued for cash at $0.45 per unit between February 7, 2012	555,556		55		249,945						250,000				250,000
		and February 8, 2012
	Equity units inclusive of one common share and one warrant
		issued for cash at $0.45 per unit March 21, 2012	111,111		11		49,989						50,000				50,000

(continued on next page)

(continued from previous page)


	Common shares issued for mineral property acquisition in Alaska		500,000	50	-			50		50
	Shares issued for advisory board services		50,000	5	22,495			22,500		22,500
	Net loss					(8,067)	(701,410)	(709,477)		(709,477)
Balance, March 31, 2012			88,371,843	8,837	1,432,816	(88,952)	(701,410)	651,291	-	651,291

	Cancellation of common shares issued for property acquisitions
		in Alaska	(1,500,000)	(150)	-			(150)		(150)
	Equity units inclusive of one common share and one warrant
		issued for cash at $0.45 per unit April 23, 201	222,222	22	99,978			100,000		100,000
	Equity units inclusive of one common share and one warrant
		issued for cash at $0.45 per unit May 18, 2012	166,667	17	74,983			75,000		75,000
	Equity units inclusive of one common share and one warrant
		issued for cash at $0.45 per unit June 5, 2012	222,222	22	99,978			100,000		100,000
	Equity units inclusive of one common share and one warrant
		issued for cash at $0.45 per unit June 11, 2012	222,222	22	99,978			100,000		100,000
	Equity units inclusive of one common share and one warrant
		issued for cash at $0.45 per unit June 25, 2012	111,111	11	49,989			50,000		50,000
	Repurchase of shares, June 18, 2012		(250,000)	(25)	(99,975)			(100,000)		(100,000)
	Net loss					-	(288,369)	(288,369)		(288,369)
Balance, June 30, 2012			87,566,287	8,756	1,757,747	(88,952)	(989,779)	687,772	-	687,772

See accompanying notes to the financial statements


Liberty Gold Corp.
(Formerly IBOS, Inc.)
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Statements of Cash Flows
(unaudited)
							For the
			For the Three Months		For the Three Months		Period from April 5, 2011
			Ended		Ended		(Exploration) through
			June 30, 2012		June 30, 2011		June 30, 2012

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss			$	(288,369)	$	(72,267)	$	(989,779)

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities
	Impairment of mineral properties			-		200		-
	Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes			-		8,067		-
	Stock issued for services			-		-		22,500
	Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
		Prepaid expenses		(7,987)		-		(13,363)
		Accrued expenses		(4,630)		-		(4,630)
	Net cash used in operating activities			(300,986)		(64,000)		(985,273)

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
	Cash paid in disposal of discontinued operations			-		(7,574)		(7,574)
	Purchases of mineral properties			(27,565)		-		(647,468)
	Net cash used in investing activities			(27,565)		(7,574)		(655,042)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
	Advances from stockholders			-		28,358		28,358
	Proceeds from sale of common stock			475,000		60,000		1,755,201
	Repurchase of common stock			(100,000)				(100,000)
	Net cash provided by financing activities			375,000		88,358		1,683,559

NET CHANGE IN CASH				46,449		16,784		43,244
Cash at beginning of period				4,369		7,574		7,574
Cash at end of period			$	50,818	$	24,358	$	50,818

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOWS INFORMATION:
	Interest paid		$	-	$	-	$	-
	Income tax paid		$	-	$	-	$	-

NON CASH FINANCING AND INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
	Common shares issued for acquisition of mineral properties		$	-	$	200	$	200
	Common shares to be issued for acquisition of mineral properties		$	-	$	-	$	50
	Forgiveness of advances from former stockholders to contributed capital		$	-	$	30,545	$	30,545
	Mineral properties purchased with debt		$	85,000	$	-	$	739,319

See accompanying notes to the financial statements

Liberty Gold Corp.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

June 30, 2012 and 2011

Notes to the Financial Statements

Note 1 – Organization and Operations

IBOS, Inc.

IBOS, Inc. (“IBOS”) was incorporated as a Subchapter S corporation on April 11, 2006 under the laws of the State of California. It was converted into a C corporation, incorporated in the State of Delaware on March 5, 2009, in a transaction in which the newly-formed corporation issued an aggregate of 9,000,000 shares of common stock to the former stockholders of the S corporation for all of the issued and outstanding shares of IBOS. All shares were held by and all shares of common stock were issued to IBOS’s stockholders and President and Chief Executive Officer, Chief Technology Officer and Chief Financial Officer. No cash consideration was paid. No value was given to the shares issued by the newly formed corporation. Therefore, the shares were recorded to reflect the $.0001 par value and additional paid-in capital was recorded as a negative amount ($900).

IBOS applied paragraph 505-10-S99-3 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (formerly Topic 4B of the Staff Accounting Bulletins (“SAB”) (“SAB Topic 4B”) issued by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”)), by reclassifying all of IBOS’s undistributed earnings and losses to additional paid-in capital as of March 5, 2009.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared as if IBOS had its corporate capital structure as of the first date of the first period presented.

IBOS provided web-based comprehensive selection of electronic medical claims processing and collection solutions to the healthcare provider industry prior to April 5, 2011. IBOS had minimal operations between April 1, 2011 and April 4, 2011.

Change in Control and Scope of Business

On April 5, 2011, a Stock Purchase Agreement (the “SPA”) by and among IBOS’s three officers and directors Deepak Danavar, Ravi Sharma, and James Villalobos, the Company and Lynn Harrison (“LH”) was executed and a closing was held under the SPA. Pursuant to the SPA (i) LH purchased an aggregate of 8,280,000 shares of common stock of the Company (87% of the outstanding shares) from Messrs. Danavar, Sharma and Villalobos for an aggregate purchase price of $370,000.00; (ii) the Company disposed of its California subsidiary by transferring its shares to Messrs. Danavar, Sharma and Villalobos; (iii) LH was elected the sole director of the Company; (iv) LH was elected President and CEO of the Company and Frank J. Hariton was elected secretary of the Company; and (v) Messrs Danavar, Sharma and Villalobos each resigned as officers and directors of the Company. Additionally as part of the change in control the former shareholders agreed to forgive debts outstanding to them totaling $30,544 which have been recorded as contributed capital. As part of the Stock Purchase transaction the Company transferred to a newly-formed company controlled by IBOS’s three officers and directors Deepak Danavar, Ravi Sharma, and James Villalobos, the Company’s three former officers and directors (the “Buyers”), certain operating assets associated with the operations of IBOS’s electronic medical claims processing and collection solutions, subject to related liabilities (the “Business”). Pursuant to the terms of SPA, the assumption by the Buyer of all liabilities and debts of IBOS which relate to or arise out of the operations of the Business and the indemnification by the Buyer of all losses, liabilities, claims, damages, costs and expenses that may be suffered by IBOS at any time which arise out of the operations of the Business. Loss from disposal of the discontinued operations amounted to $8,067.

Upon acquisition of certain gold mine properties on April 5, 2011 IBOS decided to engage in the business of acquiring, exploring and developing mineral properties.

The financial statements for the interim period ended June 30, 2011 have been presented to give retroactive effect to the discontinuance of the discontinued operations.

Surrender of Common Shares from Principal Stockholder upon Change in Control

On April 21, 2011, Lynn Harrison, President, CEO and principal shareholder of the Company, surrendered 351,900,000 shares of common stock owned by her, thus reducing her ownership from 414,000,000 shares to 62,100,000 shares and reducing the Company’s issued and outstanding common shares from 476,000,000 shares to 124,100,000 shares.

All shares and per share amounts in the financial statements have been adjusted to give retroactive effect to the surrender of those common shares.

Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation

On April 26, 2011, IBOS filed a Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation, and (i) changed its name to Liberty Gold Corp. (“Liberty Gold” or the “Company”) upon the acquisition of certain gold mine properties; (ii) increased its total number of shares of all classes of stock which the Company is authorized to issue from One Hundred and Five Million (105,000,000) shares, inclusive of Five Million (5,000,000) shares of Preferred Stock, par value $.0001 per share, and One Hundred Million (100,000,000) shares of Common Stock, par value $.0001 per share, to Two Hundred Fifty Five Million (255,000,000) shares, inclusive of Five Million (5,000,000) shares of Preferred Stock, par value $.0001 per share, and Two Hundred Fifty Million (250,000,000) shares of Common Stock, par value $.0001 per share; and (iii) effectuated a 50-for-1 (1:50) forward stock split (the “Stock Split”).

All shares and per share amounts in the financial statements have been adjusted to give retroactive effect to the Stock Split.

Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation – Unaudited Interim Financial Information

The accompanying unaudited interim financial statements and related notes have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) for the interim financial information, and with the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) to Form 10-Q and Article 8 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. The unaudited interim financial statements furnished reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to a fair statement of the results for the interim period presented. Unaudited interim results are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full fiscal year. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements of the Company for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012 and notes thereto contained in the information filed as part of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with SEC on July 16, 2012.

Reclassification

Certain amounts in the prior period financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on reported losses.

Exploration Stage Company

Upon acquisition of certain gold mine properties on April 5, 2011 the Company decided to engage in the business of acquiring, exploring and developing mineral properties. Although the Company acquired mineral properties, a substantial portion of the Company’s activities has involved establishing the business and the Company has neither started exploring the mineral properties, nor generated any revenue to date. Upon entry into mining exploration business the Company became an exploration stage company as defined by section 915-10-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. All losses accumulated since inception have been considered as part of the Company’s exploration stage activities.

Use of Estimates and Assumptions

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reporting amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.

The Company’s significant estimates and assumptions include the fair value of financial instruments; the carrying value, recoverability and impairment of long-lived assets, including the values assigned to and the estimated reserves, dismantlement, restoration and abandonment costs, which are net of estimated salvage values of mineral properties; income tax rate, income tax provision, deferred tax assets, and valuation allowance of deferred tax assets; and the assumption that the Company will continue as a going concern. Those significant accounting estimates or assumptions bear the risk of change due to the fact that there are uncertainties attached to those estimates or assumptions, and certain estimates or assumptions are difficult to measure or value.

Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions that are believed to be reasonable in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.

Management regularly evaluates the key factors and assumptions used to develop the estimates utilizing currently available information, changes in facts and circumstances, historical experience and reasonable assumptions. After such evaluations, if deemed appropriate, those estimates are adjusted accordingly.

Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company follows paragraph 825-10-50-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for disclosures about fair value of its financial instruments and has adopted paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Paragraph 820-10-35-37”) to measure the fair value of its financial instruments. Paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures, paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three (3) broad levels. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The three (3) levels of fair value hierarchy defined by paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification are described below:


Level 1		Quoted market prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.

Level 2		Pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date.

Level 3		Pricing inputs that are generally observable inputs and not corroborated by market data.

Financial assets are considered Level 3 when their fair values are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques and at least one significant model assumption or input is unobservable.

The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. If the inputs used to measure the financial assets and liabilities fall within more than one level described above, the categorization is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement of the instrument.

The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, such as cash, prepaid expenses, common stock to be issued and mineral property payable, approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments.

Transactions involving related parties cannot be presumed to be carried out on an arm's-length basis, as the requisite conditions of competitive, free-market dealings may not exist. Representations about transactions with related parties, if made, shall not imply that the related party transactions were consummated on terms equivalent to those that prevail in arm's-length transactions unless such representations can be substantiated.

It is not, however, practical to determine the fair value of advances from stockholders, if any, due to their related party nature.

Carrying Value, Recoverability and Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The Company has adopted paragraph 360-10-35-17 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for its long-lived assets. The Company’s long-lived assets, which include mineral properties, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.

The Company assesses the recoverability of its long-lived assets by comparing the projected undiscounted net cash flows associated with the related long-lived asset or group of long-lived assets over their remaining estimated useful lives against their respective carrying amounts. Impairment, if any, is based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of those assets. Fair value is generally determined using the asset’s expected future discounted cash flows or market value, if readily determinable. If long-lived assets are determined to be recoverable, but the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives are shorter than originally estimated, the net book values of the long-lived assets are depreciated over the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives.

The Company considers the following to be some examples of important indicators that may trigger an impairment review: (i) significant under-performance or losses of assets relative to expected historical or projected future operating results; (ii) significant changes in the manner or use of assets or in the Company’s overall strategy with respect to the manner or use of the acquired assets or changes in the Company’s overall business strategy; (iii) significant negative industry or economic trends; (iv) increased competitive pressures; and (v) regulatory changes. The Company evaluates acquired assets for potential impairment indicators at least annually and more frequently upon the occurrence of such events.

Management periodically reviews the recoverability of the capitalized mineral properties and mining equipment. Management takes into consideration various information including, but not limited to, historical production records taken from previous mine operations, results of exploration activities conducted to date, estimated future prices and reports and opinions of outside consultants. When it is determined that a project or property will be abandoned or its carrying value has been impaired, a provision is made for any expected loss on the project or property.

The impairment charges, if any, is included in operating expenses in the accompanying statements of operations.

Fiscal Year End

The Company elected March 31 as its fiscal year ending date.

Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents.

Mineral Properties

The Company follows Section 930 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for its mineral properties. Mineral properties and related mineral rights acquisition costs are capitalized pending determination of whether the drilling has found proved reserves. If a mineral ore body is discovered, capitalized costs will be amortized on a unit-of-production basis following the commencement of production. Otherwise, capitalized acquisition costs are expensed when it is determined that the mineral property has no future economic value. General exploration costs and costs to maintain rights and leases, including rights of access to lands for geophysical work and salaries, equipment, and supplies for geologists and geophysical crews are expensed as incurred. When it is determined that a mining deposit can be economically and legally extracted or produced based on established proven and probable reserves, further exploration costs and development costs as well as interest costs relating to exploration and development projects that require greater than six (6) months to be readied for their intended use incurred after such determination will be capitalized. The establishment of proven and probable reserves is based on results of final feasibility studies which indicate whether a property is economically feasible. Upon commencement of commercial production, capitalized costs will be transferred to the appropriate asset categories and amortized on a unit-of-production basis. Capitalized costs, net of salvage values, relating to a deposit which is abandoned or considered uneconomic for the foreseeable future will be written off. The sale of a partial interest in a proved property is accounted for as a cost recovery and no gain or loss is recognized as long as this treatment does not significantly affect the unit-of-production amortization rate. A gain or loss will be recognized for all other sales of

proved properties and will be classified in other operating revenues. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense, and renewals and betterments are capitalized to the appropriate property and equipment accounts.

The provision for depreciation, depletion and amortization (“DD&A”) of mineral properties is calculated on a property-by-property basis using the unit-of-production method. Taken into consideration in the calculation of DD&A are estimated future dismantlement, restoration and abandonment costs, which are net of estimated salvage values. Upon becoming fully amortized, the related cost and accumulated amortization are removed from the accounts.

To date, the Company has not established the commercial feasibility of any exploration prospects; therefore, all general exploration costs, if any, are being expended.

Related Parties

The Company follows subtopic 850-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the identification of related parties and disclosure of related party transactions.

Pursuant to section 850-10-20 the related parties include a) affiliates of the Company; b) entities for which investments in their equity securities would be required, absent the election of the fair value option under the Fair Value Option Subsection of section 825–10–15, to be accounted for by the equity method by the investing entity; c) trusts for the benefit of employees, such as pension and profit-sharing trusts that are managed by or under the trusteeship of management; d) principal owners of the Company; e) management of the Company; f) other parties with which the Company may deal if one party controls or can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the other to an extent that one of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests; and g) other parties that can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the transacting parties or that have an ownership interest in one of the transacting parties and can significantly influence the other to an extent that one or more of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests.

The financial statements shall include disclosures of material related party transactions, other than compensation arrangements, expense allowances, and other similar items in the ordinary course of business. However, disclosure of transactions that are eliminated in the preparation of consolidated or combined financial statements is not required in those statements. The disclosures shall include: a) the nature of the relationship(s) involved; b. a description of the transactions, including transactions to which no amounts or nominal amounts were ascribed, for each of the periods for which income statements are presented, and such other information deemed necessary to an understanding of the effects of the transactions on the financial statements; c) the dollar amounts of transactions for each of the periods for which income statements are presented and the effects of any change in the method of establishing the terms from that used in the preceding period; and d. mounts due from or to related parties as of the date of each balance sheet presented and, if not otherwise apparent, the terms and manner of settlement.

Commitments and Contingencies

The Company follows subtopic 450-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report accounting for contingencies. Certain conditions may exist as of the date the consolidated financial statements are issued, which may result in a loss to the Company but which will only be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur. The Company assesses such contingent liabilities, and such assessment inherently involves an exercise of judgment. In assessing loss contingencies related to legal proceedings that are pending against the Company or unasserted claims that may result in such proceedings, the Company evaluates the perceived merits of any legal proceedings or unasserted claims as well as the perceived merits of the amount of relief sought or expected to be sought therein.

If the assessment of a contingency indicates that it is probable that a material loss has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be estimated, then the estimated liability would be accrued in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. If the assessment indicates that a potentially material loss contingency is not probable but is reasonably possible, or is probable but cannot be estimated, then the nature of the contingent liability, and an estimate of the range of possible losses, if determinable and material, would be disclosed.

Loss contingencies considered remote are generally not disclosed unless they involve guarantees, in which case the guarantees would be disclosed. Management does not believe, based upon information available at this time, that these matters will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results

of operations or cash flows. However, there is no assurance that such matters will not materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, financial position, and results of operations or cash flows.

Non-controlling Interest

The Company follows paragraph 810-10-65-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report the non-controlling interest in mineral properties, its majority owned subsidiary in the statements of balance sheets within the equity section, separately from the Company’s shareholders’ equity. Non-controlling interest represents the non-controlling interest holder’s proportionate share of the equity of the Company’s majority-owned subsidiary, Non-controlling interest is adjusted for the non-controlling interest holder’s proportionate share of the earnings or losses and the non-controlling interest continues to be attributed its share of losses even if that attribution results in a deficit non-controlling interest balance.

Revenue Recognition

The Company applies paragraph 605-10-S99-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for revenue recognition. The Company recognizes revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned. The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the product has been shipped or the services have been rendered to the customer, (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured.

The Company will derive its revenue from sales contracts with customers with revenues being generated upon the shipment of mineral ores upon the Company commencing exploration operations. Persuasive evidence of an arrangement is demonstrated via invoice, product delivery is evidenced by warehouse shipping log as well as a signed bill of lading from the trucking company or third party carrier and title transfers upon shipment, based on free on board (“FOB”) warehouse; the sales price to the customer is fixed upon acceptance of the purchase order and there is no separate sales rebate, discount, or volume incentive.

Stock-Based Compensation for Obtaining Employee Services

The Company accounts for its stock based compensation in which the Company obtains employee services in share-based payment transactions under the recognition and measurement principles of the fair value recognition provisions of section 718-10-30 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Pursuant to paragraph 718-10-30-6 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, all transactions in which goods or services are the consideration received for the issuance of equity instruments are accounted for based on the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instrument issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. The measurement date used to determine the fair value of the equity instrument issued is the earlier of the date on which the performance is complete or the date on which it is probable that performance will occur. If the Company is a newly formed corporation or shares of the Company are thinly traded the use of share prices established in the Company’s most recent private placement memorandum (“PPM”), or weekly or monthly price observations would generally be more appropriate than the use of daily price observations as such shares could be artificially inflated due to a larger spread between the bid and asked quotes and lack of consistent trading in the market.

The fair value of share options and similar instruments is estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing valuation model. The ranges of assumptions for inputs are as follows:


-	Expected term of share options and similar instruments: The expected life of options and similar instruments represents the period of time the option and/or warrant are expected to be outstanding. Pursuant to Paragraph 718-10-50-2(f)(2)(i) of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification the expected term of share options and similar instruments represents the period of time the options and similar instruments are expected to be outstanding taking into consideration of the contractual term of the instruments and employees’ expected exercise and post-vesting employment termination behavior into the fair value (or calculated value) of the instruments. Pursuant to paragraph 718-50-S99-1, it may be appropriate to use the simplified method, if (i) A company does not have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term due to the limited period of time its equity shares have been publicly traded; (ii) A company significantly changes the terms of its share option grants or the types of employees that receive share option grants such that its historical exercise data may no longer provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term; or (iii) A company has or expects to have significant structural changes in its business such that its historical exercise data may no longer provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term. The Company uses the simplified method to calculate expected term of share options and similar instruments as the company does not have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term.
-	Expected volatility of the entity’s shares and the method used to estimate it. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 718-10-50-2(f)(2)(ii) a thinly-traded or nonpublic entity that uses the calculated value method shall disclose the reasons why it is not practicable for the Company to estimate the expected volatility of its share price, the appropriate industry sector index that it has selected, the reasons for selecting that particular index, and how it has calculated historical volatility using that index. The Company uses the average historical volatility of the comparable companies over the expected contractual life of the share options or similar instruments as its expected volatility. If shares of a company are thinly traded the use of weekly or monthly price observations would generally be more appropriate than the use of daily price observations as the volatility calculation using daily observations for such shares could be artificially inflated due to a larger spread between the bid and asked quotes and lack of consistent trading in the market.
-	Expected annual rate of quarterly dividends. An entity that uses a method that employs different dividend rates during the contractual term shall disclose the range of expected dividends used and the weighted-average expected dividends. The expected dividend yield is based on the Company’s current dividend yield as the best estimate of projected dividend yield for periods within the expected term of the share options and similar instruments.
-	Risk-free rate(s). An entity that uses a method that employs different risk-free rates shall disclose the range of risk-free rates used. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for periods within the expected term of the share options and similar instruments.

The Company’s policy is to recognize compensation cost for awards with only service conditions and a graded vesting schedule on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award.

Equity Instruments Issued to Parties Other Than Employees for Acquiring Goods or Services

The Company accounts for equity instruments issued to parties other than employees for acquiring goods or services under guidance of Sub-topic 505-50 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Sub-topic 505-50”).

Pursuant to ASC Section 505-50-30, all transactions in which goods or services are the consideration received for the issuance of equity instruments are accounted for based on the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instrument issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. The measurement date used to determine the fair value of the equity instrument issued is the earlier of the date on which the performance is complete or the date on which it is probable that performance will occur. If the Company is a newly formed corporation or shares of the Company are thinly traded the use of share prices established in the Company’s most recent private placement memorandum (“PPM”), or weekly or monthly price observations would generally be more appropriate than the use of daily price observations as such shares could be artificially inflated due to a larger spread between the bid and asked quotes and lack of consistent trading in the market.

The fair value of share options and similar instruments is estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing valuation model. The ranges of assumptions for inputs are as follows:


-	Expected term of share options and similar instruments: Pursuant to Paragraph 718-10-50-2(f)(2)(i) of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification the expected term of share options and similar instruments represents the period of time the options and similar instruments are expected to be outstanding taking into consideration of the contractual term of the instruments and holder’s expected exercise behavior into the fair value (or calculated value) of the instruments. The Company uses historical data to estimate holder’s expected exercise behavior. If the Company is a newly formed corporation or shares of the Company are thinly traded the contractual term of the share options and similar instruments is used as the expected term of share options and similar instruments as the Company does not have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term.
-	Expected volatility of the entity’s shares and the method used to estimate it. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 718-10-50-2(f)(2)(ii) a thinly-traded or nonpublic entity that uses the calculated value method shall disclose the reasons why it is not practicable for the Company to estimate the expected volatility of its share price, the appropriate industry sector index that it has selected, the reasons for selecting that particular index, and how it has calculated historical volatility using that index. The Company uses the average historical volatility of the comparable companies over the expected contractual life of the share options or similar instruments as its expected volatility. If shares of a company are thinly traded the use of weekly or monthly price observations would generally be more appropriate than the use of daily price observations as the volatility calculation using daily observations for such shares could be artificially inflated due to a larger spread between the bid and asked quotes and lack of consistent trading in the market.
-	Expected annual rate of quarterly dividends. An entity that uses a method that employs different dividend rates during the contractual term shall disclose the range of expected dividends used and the weighted-average expected dividends. The expected dividend yield is based on the Company’s current dividend yield as the best estimate of projected dividend yield for periods within the expected term of the share options and similar instruments.
-	Risk-free rate(s). An entity that uses a method that employs different risk-free rates shall disclose the range of risk-free rates used. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for periods within the expected term of the share options and similar instruments.

Pursuant to Paragraphs 505-50-25-8 and 505-50-25-9,an entity may grant fully vested, non-forfeitable equity instruments that are exercisable by the grantee only after a specified period of time if the terms of the agreement provide for earlier exercisability if the grantee achieves specified performance conditions. Any measured cost of the transaction shall be recognized in the same period(s) and in the same manner as if the entity had paid cash for the goods or services or used cash rebates as a sales discount instead of paying with, or using, the equity instruments. A recognized asset, expense, or sales discount shall not be reversed if a stock option that the counterparty has the right to exercise expires unexercised.

Pursuant to ASC paragraph 505-50-30-S99-1, if the Company receives a right to receive future services in exchange for unvested, forfeitable equity instruments, those equity instruments are treated as unissued for accounting purposes until the future services are received (that is, the instruments are not considered issued until they vest). Consequently, there would be no recognition at the measurement date and no entry should be recorded.

Income Tax Provision

The Company was a Subchapter S corporation, until March 5, 2009 during which time the Company was treated as a pass through entity for federal income tax purposes. Under Subchapter S of the Internal Revenue Code stockholders of an S corporation are taxed separately on their distributive share of the S corporation’s income whether or not that income is actually distributed.

Effective March 6, 2009, the Company follows paragraph 740-10-30-2 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, which requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are based on the differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance to the extent management concludes it is more likely than not that the assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the Statements of Operations in the period that includes the enactment date.

The Company adopted the provisions of paragraph 740-10-25-13 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Paragraph 740-10-25-13.addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. Under paragraph 740-10-25-13, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent (50%) likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Paragraph 740-10-25-13 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties on income taxes, accounting in interim periods and requires increased disclosures. The Company had no material adjustments to its liabilities for unrecognized income tax benefits according to the provisions of paragraph 740-10-25-13.

The estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities are reported in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, as well as tax credit carry-backs and carry-forwards. The Company periodically reviews the recoverability of deferred tax assets recorded on its consolidated balance sheets and provides valuation allowances as management deems necessary.

Management makes judgments as to the interpretation of the tax laws that might be challenged upon an audit and cause changes to previous estimates of tax liability. In addition, the Company operates within multiple taxing jurisdictions and is subject to audit in these jurisdictions. In management’s opinion, adequate provisions for income taxes have been made for all years. If actual taxable income by tax jurisdiction varies from estimates, additional allowances or reversals of reserves may be necessary.

Uncertain Tax Positions

The Company did not take any uncertain tax positions and had no adjustments to its income tax liabilities or benefits pursuant to the provisions of Section 740-10-25 for the interim period June 30, 2012 and 2011.

Limitation on Utilization of NOLs due to Change in Control

Pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code Section 382 (“Section 382”), certain ownership changes may subject the NOL’s to annual limitations which could reduce or defer the NOL. Section 382 imposes limitations on a corporation’s ability to utilize NOLs if it experiences an “ownership change.” In general terms, an ownership change may result from transactions increasing the ownership of certain stockholders in the stock of a corporation by more than 50 percentage points over a three-year period. In the event of an ownership change, utilization of the NOLs would be subject to an annual limitation under Section 382 determined by multiplying the value of its stock at the time of the ownership change by the applicable long-term tax-exempt rate. Any unused annual limitation may be carried over to later years. The imposition of this limitation on its ability to use the NOLs to offset future taxable income could cause the Company to pay U.S. federal income taxes earlier than if such limitation were not in effect and could cause such NOLs to expire unused, reducing or eliminating the benefit of such NOLs.

Net Income (Loss) per Common Share

Net income (loss) per common share is computed pursuant to section 260-10-45 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Basic net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock and potentially outstanding shares of common stock during the period to reflect the potential dilution that could occur from common shares issuable through contingent shares issuance arrangement, stock options or warrants.

The following table shows the potentially outstanding dilutive common shares excluded from the diluted net loss per share calculation for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 as they were anti-dilutive:


	Potentially Outstanding Dilutive Common Shares
	For the Interim Period		For the Interim Period
	Ended		Ended
	June 30, 2012		June 30, 2011
Contingent shares

2,000,000 contingent shares of the Company’s common stock issuable provided that mining operations on the property result in the discovery of 1,000,000 ounces of gold and requires the Company to expend at least $300,000 in exploration and mine development work on the property over three (3) years commencing with the closing under the Alaska mineral property purchase Agreement (“PPA”) entered into on April 5, 2011.		2,000,000		2,000,000

1,500,000 contingent shares of the Company’s common stock issuable provided that mining operations on the property result in the discovery of 1,000,000 ounces of gold or 10,000,000 ounces of silver and requires the Company to pay a 5% smelter’s royalty under the Arizona Asset Purchase Agreement No. 1 (“APAAR1”) entered into on July 18, 2011.		1,500,000		-

Total contingent shares		3,500,000		2,000,000

Warrants

Warrants issued on June 28, 2011 in connection with the Company’s equity financing inclusive of warrants to purchase 75,000 shares to the investor with an exercise price of $1.25 per share expiring three (3) years from date of issuance		75,000		75,000

Warrants issued between July 28, 2011 and September 9, 2011 in connection with the Company’s equity financing inclusive of warrants to purchase 712,500 shares to the investor with an exercise of $1.25 per share expiring three (3) years from date of issuance		712,500		-

Warrants issued between October 28, 2011 and November 12, 2011 in connection with the Company’s equity financing inclusive of warrants to purchase 222,222 shares to the investor with an exercise of $0.59 per share expiring three (3) years from date of issuance		666,666		-

Warrants issued on December 15, 2011 in connection with the Company’s equity financing inclusive of warrants to purchase 101,010 shares to the investor with an exercise of $1.29 per share expiring three (3) years from date of issuance		101,010		-

Warrants issued on February 7 and 8, 2012 in connection with the Company’s equity financing inclusive of warrants to purchase 555,556 shares to the investor with an exercise of $0.59 per share expiring three (3) years from date of issuance		555,556		-

Warrants issued on March 21, 2012 in connection with the Company’s equity financing inclusive of warrants to purchase 111,111 shares to the investor with an exercise of $0.59 per share expiring three (3) years from date of issuance		111,111		-

(continued on next page)

(continued from previous page)


Warrants issued on April 23, 2012 in connection with the Company’s equity financing inclusive of warrants to purchase 222,222 shares to the investor with an exercise of $0.59 per share expiring three (3) years from date of issuance		222,222

Warrants issued on May 18, 2012 in connection with the Company’s equity financing inclusive of warrants to purchase 166,667 shares to the investor with an exercise of $0.59 per share expiring three (3) years from date of issuance		166,667

Warrants issued on June 5, 11, and 25, 2012 in connection with the Company’s equity financing inclusive of warrants to purchase 555,555 shares to the investor with an exercise of $0.59 per share expiring three (3) years from date of issuance		555,555

Total warrants	3,166,287		2,075,000

Total potentially outstanding dilutive common shares		6,666,287		2,075,000

Cash Flows Reporting

The Company adopted paragraph 230-10-45-24 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for cash flows reporting, classifies cash receipts and payments according to whether they stem from operating, investing, or financing activities and provides definitions of each category, and uses the indirect or reconciliation method (“Indirect method”) as defined by paragraph 230-10-45-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report net cash flow from operating activities by adjusting net income to reconcile it to net cash flow from operating activities by removing the effects of (a) all deferrals of past operating cash receipts and payments and all accruals of expected future operating cash receipts and payments and (b) all items that are included in net income that do not affect operating cash receipts and payments. The Company reports the reporting currency equivalent of foreign currency cash flows, using the current exchange rate at the time of the cash flows and the effect of exchange rate changes on cash held in foreign currencies is reported as a separate item in the reconciliation of beginning and ending balances of cash and cash equivalents and separately provides information about investing and financing activities not resulting in cash receipts or payments in the period pursuant to paragraph 830-230-45-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification.

Subsequent Events

The Company follows the guidance in Section 855-10-50 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the disclosure of subsequent events. The Company will evaluate subsequent events through the date when the financial statements were issued. Pursuant to ASU 2010-09 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, the Company as an SEC filer considers its financial statements issued when they are widely distributed to users, such as through filing them on EDGAR.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05

In June 2011, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05 “Comprehensive Income” (“ASU 2011-05”), which was the result of a joint project with the IASB and amends the guidance in ASC 220, Comprehensive Income, by eliminating the option to present components of other comprehensive income (OCI) in the statement of stockholders’ equity. Instead, the new guidance now gives entities the option to present all non-owner changes in stockholders’ equity either as a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or as two separate but consecutive statements. Regardless of whether an entity chooses to present comprehensive income in a single continuous statement or in two separate but consecutive statements, the amendments require entities to present all reclassification adjustments from OCI to net income on the face of the statement of comprehensive income.

The amendments in this Update should be applied retrospectively and are effective for public entity for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011.

FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-08

In September 2011, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-08 “Intangibles—Goodwill and Other: Testing Goodwill for Impairment” (“ASU 2011-08”). This Update is to simplify how public and nonpublic entities test goodwill for impairment. The amendments permit an entity to first assess qualitative

factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test described in Topic 350. Under the amendments in this Update, an entity is not required to calculate the fair value of a reporting unit unless the entity determines that it is more likely than not that its fair value is less than its carrying amount.

The guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is permitted.

FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-10

In December 2011, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-10 “Property, Plant and Equipment: Derecognition of in Substance Real Estate-a Scope Clarification” (“ASU 2011-09”). This Update is to resolve the diversity in practice as to how financial statements have been reflecting circumstances when parent company reporting entities cease to have controlling financial interests in subsidiaries that are in substance real estate, where the situation arises as a result of default on nonrecourse debt of the subsidiaries.

The amended guidance is effective for annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2012 for public entities. Early adoption is permitted.

FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-11

In December 2011, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-11 “Balance Sheet: Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities” (“ASU 2011-11”). This Update requires an entity to disclose information about offsetting and related arrangements to enable users of its financial statements to understand the effect of those arrangements on its financial position. The objective of this disclosure is to facilitate comparison between those entities that prepare their financial statements on the basis of U.S. GAAP and those entities that prepare their financial statements on the basis of IFRS.

The amended guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods.

FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-12

In December 2011, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-12 “Comprehensive Income: Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05” (“ASU 2011-12”). This Update is a deferral of the effective date pertaining to reclassification adjustments out of accumulated other comprehensive income in ASU 2011-05. FASB is to going to reassess the costs and benefits of those provisions in ASU 2011-05 related to reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income. Due to the time required to properly make such a reassessment and to evaluate alternative presentation formats, the FASB decided that it is necessary to reinstate the requirements for the presentation of reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income that were in place before the issuance of Update 2011-05.

All other requirements in Update 2011-05 are not affected by this Update, including the requirement to report comprehensive income either in a single continuous financial statement or in two separate but consecutive financial statements. Public entities should apply these requirements for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011.

Other Recently Issued, but not Yet Effective Accounting Pronouncements

Management does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, if adopted, would have a material effect on the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

Note 3 – Going Concern

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets, and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business.

As reflected in the accompanying financial statements, the Company had a deficit accumulated during the exploration stage at June 30, 2012, a net loss and net cash used in operating activities for the fiscal year then ended. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

While the Company is attempting to commence explorations and generate sufficient revenues, the Company’s cash position may not be sufficient enough to support the Company’s daily operations. Management intends to raise additional funds by way of a public or private offering. Management believes that the actions presently being taken to further implement its business plan and generate sufficient revenues provide the opportunity for the Company to continue as a going concern. While the Company believes in the viability of its strategy to commence explorations and generate sufficient revenues and in its ability to raise additional funds, there can be no assurances to that effect. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon the Company’s ability to further implement its business plan and generate sufficient revenues.

The financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

Note 4 – Mineral Properties

Acquisition and Termination of Alaska Property

Acquisition Alaska Mineral Property Purchase Agreement

On April 5, 2011, the Company entered into a Property Purchase Agreement (“PPA”) with Precious Metals Exploration Corp., an unaffiliated seller with offices in Sweden (the “Seller”), to acquire an undivided 60% right title and interest in certain mining claims in Alaska in exchange for (1) 2,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to be issued as follows: (i) 500,000 shares at the closing; (ii) an additional 500,000 shares on each of the first business day following the six month, twelve month and 18 month anniversary of the closing date; and (2) the retention by the Seller of a 5% Net Smelter Royalty, as defined in the PPA. The PPA agreement further provides for the issuance to the Seller of an additional 2,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock if mining operations on the property result in the discovery of 1,000,000 ounces of gold and requires the Company to expend at least $300,000 in exploration and mine development work on the property over three (3) years commencing with the closing under the PPA.

The Company valued the 2,000,000 common shares, the consideration given for the purchase at par, or $200 in aggregate.

The claims consist of three separate blocks that are partially contiguous and located 2.5 miles west of the Pogo 3.6 million ounce Pogo deposit; the Indian claims (2 square miles – 32 state claims); the Aurora claims (1 square mile – 4 MTRSC state claims; conversions in- progress by the Alaska Division of Natural Resources): and the Rainbow claims (1 square mile – 4 MTRSC state claims). All claims are located on State of Alaska lands and are currently active and in good standing. The Rainbow, Indian and Aurora claims are collectively referred to as the RAI properties.

The claims are situated 80 air miles southeast of Fairbanks and 2.5 miles west of Teck-Cominco’s Pogo gold deposit in the Goodpaster Mining District of east central Alaska. Each claim block consists of active State of Alaska mining claims located in the Big Delta B-2 and B-3 1:63,360 Quadrangles. Limited prospecting has found elevated gold and trace elements in a sporadic suite of rock and soil samples on the properties. Quartz vein float samples with up to 2.4 g/t gold and anomalous arsenic and bismuth are found from prospected slopes less than 3 miles from the Pogo mine, on trend to the east.

The Company expended $150,890 in exploration and mine development work for the period from April 4, 2011 (date of acquisition) through June 30, 2012 towards the $300,000 in exploration and mine development work on the property over the three (3) year period as required under the PPA.

Termination of Alaska Mineral Property Purchase Agreement

On June 26, 2012, the Registrant entered into an termination agreement (the Termination Agreement”) with Precious Metals Exploration Corp., an unaffiliated entity with offices in Sweden (the “Contra Party”) of a Property Purchase Agreement, for the purchase of an undivided 60% right title and interest in certain mining claims in the State of Alaska.

Under the Termination Agreement, the Contra Party is returning to the Registrant the 1,500,000 shares that were issued to it and the Registrant is relieved from all further obligations under the PPA. The Registrant had expended $158,890 in exploration costs under the PPA which will not be recovered. The termination Agreement provides for a release of each party.

At the time of the PPA, Management believed these to be promising prospects, but has since determined that other prospects the Registrant owns in Alaska are more promising.

Arizona Mineral Properties

On July 18, 2011, the Company entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (“APAAR1”) with Precious Metals Exploration Corp., (the “Seller”), to acquire a 100% interest in 2 patented claims, 6 federal claims and 25 prospects comprising 660 acres near Kingman, Arizona. Total consideration includes (1) $600,000 in cash payable in installments as follows: (i) $200,000 within one (1) month of the closing of agreement; (ii) $200,000 within four (4) months of the closing of the agreement; (iii) $200,000 within seven months (7) months of the closing of the agreement; (2) 500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock; and (3) a 5% smelter’s royalty. The APAAR1 further provides for the issuance to the Seller of an additional 1,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock if mining operations on the property result in the discovery of 1,000,000 ounces of gold or 10,000,000 ounces of silver. The Seller will have the option to appoint an individual to serve on the Company’s advisory board for one (1) year and shall be compensated for the services at the end of the year for One Hundred Thousand (100,000) shares of common stock.

The Company sold 712,500 shares of its common shares for cash at $0.80 per share during the quarterly period ended September 30, 2011, however the management of the Company valued the 500,000 common shares, the consideration given for the purchase at par, or $50 in aggregate due to the fact that the Company did not obtain an independent third party valuation for the mineral properties acquired.

The “Property” is defined as follows: A) Fountain Head – patented (a lode mining claim in the Walapai Mining District, being shown on Mineral Survey No. 1942, as filed in the Bureau of land Management, and as granted by Patent recorded in Book 16 Of Deeds, page 524; situate in section 4, Township 22 North, Range 17 West of the Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Mohave County, Arizona.) B) Eagle – patented (a lode mining claim in the Walapai Mining District, being shown on Mineral Survey No. 1943, as filed in the Bureau of land Management, and as granted by Patent recorded in Book 16 Of Deeds, page 527; situate in section 4, Township 22 North, Range 17 West of the Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Mohave County, Arizona.). Plus 6 federal claims are located in town ship 22 North, Range 17 west of the Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, as follows: C) Golden Wonder – federal D) Holy Smoke – federal E) High Grade Vein – federal F) Bluebell – federal G) Bluebell Extension – federal H) Golden Legion – federal. Plus 25 Prospects each representing 20 acres adjacent to the claims outlined above.

The Company paid off the entire $600,000 in installments for the period from July 18, 2011 (date of acquisition) through March 31, 2012. On October 17, 2011, the Company appointed an Advisory Board member for one (1) year, compensated with 100,000 common shares of the Company at the end of the year of service. As of March 31, 2012, 50,000 shares were granted to the advisor and the shares were valued at $0.45 per share or $22,500.

On July 18, 2011, the Company entered into a third Asset Purchase Agreement (“APAAR2”) with Precious Metals Exploration Corp., (the “Seller”), to acquire a 100% interest in 2 patented claims and 5 federal claims comprising roughly 134 acres in Mohave County, Arizona. The total consideration includes (1) $674,022 in cash payable in installments as follows: (i) a cash payment of $4,188.44 within seven (7) days of closing; (ii) an equal monthly cash payment of $4,188.44 every one (1) month for a further seventeen (17) months, ending in December 2012; (iii) a final cash payment of $598,630, due on the nineteenth (19^th) month following the closing date, being January 2013; (2) 10% net smelter returns (NSR) royalty on the gross mineral production from the Assets until such time as it no longer owns or operates the Assets. After the full balance is paid, the NSR will reduce to 5% from that day forward.

The “Property” is defined as follows: A) Alta Patented lode Mining Claim, Parcel No.330-02-009 and the Sirius Patented Mining Claim, Parcel No. 330 02 011 both shown on Mineral Survey MS 2854A, located in Section 4, Range 17W, Township 22N of the Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, composed of 18 and 16 acres respectively, together with all buildings, tunnels, and shafts and other improvements thereon, and all rents, issues and profits thereof. B) 5 Federal Mining Claims recorded as Copper & Gold, Copper & Gold No.1, Rico I, Rico II,

and Rico III, consisting of approx. 20 acres each, located in Sec. 29 & 30, of Mohave County, T23N R17W, G.&S.R.B.&M recorded as FEE# 2010070725- 2010070729 respectively.

As of June 30, 2012, the balance due was $619,572 under the APAAR2 agreement.

Acquisition of Alaska Mineral Property

Entry into Option Letter Agreement

On April 20, 2012, the Company executed a letter agreement (the “Option Letter”) with Endurance Gold Corporation and Endurance Resources (collectively “Endurance”) with respect to the Company acquiring a conditional option to acquire a 60% joint venture interest in 14 State of Alaska mineral claims consisting of a total of approximately 2,218 acres and numbered ADL703865 through ADL703878 inclusive in the Livengood Area of Alaska (the “Claims”). The Option Letter requires the Company to expend at least $600,000 on the Claims prior to December 31, 2014, with $150,000 to be spent in calendar year 2012. In addition the Company is required to pay $85,000 to Endurance in installments through December 31, 2014. The parties executed a formal option agreement by June 30, 2012 and the Company made initial option payment of $15,000 and expended $8,000 in exploration expenditures as per clause 7 of the letter agreement.

The Company expended $178,300 in exploration and mine development work for the period from April 20, 2012 (date of option agreement) through June 30, 2012.

Note 5 – Related Party Transactions

Advances from Stockholders and Former Stockholders

From time to time, stockholders of the Company advance funds to the Company for working capital purpose. Those advances are unsecured, non-interest bearing and due on demand.

Advances from stockholders and former stockholders at June 30, 2012 and March 31, 2011 consisted of the following:


	June 30, 2012		March 31, 2012

Advances from major stockholder and officer	$	28,356	$	28,356

	$	28,356	$	28,356

The major stockholder and officer advanced $28,356 to the Company and no repayment has been made for the period from April 5, 2011 (date of change in control) through June 30, 2012.

Note 6 – Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)

Shares Authorized

Upon formation the total number of shares of all classes of stock which the Company is authorized to issue is One Hundred and Five Million (105,000,000) shares of which Five Million (5,000,000) shares shall be Preferred Stock, par value $.0001 per share, and One Hundred Million (100,000,000) shares shall be Common Stock, par value $.0001 per share.

On April 28, 2011, the Company filed a Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation, and increased its total number of shares of all classes of stock which the Company is authorized to issue to Two Hundred Fifty Five Million (255,000,000) shares inclusive of Five Million (5,000,000) shares of Preferred Stock, par value $.0001 per share, and Two Hundred Fifty Million (250,000,000) shares of Common Stock, par value $.0001 per share.

Common Stock

For the period from July 6, 2009 through July 27, 2009, the Company sold 16,000,000 shares of its common stock to 32 individuals at $0.002 per share or $32,000 in aggregate.

On April 21, 2001, Lynn Harrison, President, CEO and principal shareholder of the Company, surrendered 351,900,000 shares of common stock owned by her, thus reducing her ownership from 414,000,000 shares to 62,100,000 shares and reducing the Company’s issued and outstanding common shares from 476,000,000 shares to 124,100,000 shares. This transaction was given retroactive effect to the opening numbers at March 31, 2010.

On June 28, 2011, the Company issued to an individual 75,000 Units (each unit being comprised of one share of the Company’s common stock and a warrant exercisable over a three year period for 75,000 shares of common stock exercisable at $1.25 per share). The Units were sold at $.80 per Unit for an aggregate of $60,000.

For the period from July 28, 2011 through September 9, 2011, the Company issued to a foreign institutional investor a total of 712,500 Units consisting of (i) one share of the Company’s common stock and (ii) a warrant to purchase one share of the Company’s common stock exercisable at $1.25 per share expiring three (3) years from the date of issuance. The Units were sold at $.80 per Unit for an aggregate of $570,000.

On August 10, 2011, Lynn Harrison, President, CEO and principal shareholder of the Company, surrendered 40,000,000 shares of common stock.

On June 18, 2012, the Company entered into an agreement to repurchase 250,000 of its shares from an unaffiliated party for $0.40 per share for a total of $100,000.

On June 26, 2012, under the Termination Agreement of the Alaska mineral property purchase agreement, the Contra Party is returning to the Registrant the 1,500,000 shares that were issued to it and the Registrant is relieved from all further obligations under the PPA

Equity Financing Agreement

On October 11, 2011, the Company executed a Share Issuance Agreement with American Gold Holdings, Ltd. (“AGH”) that allows the Company to issue its equity in Units with each unit comprised of one share of common stock and a warrant to purchase one share of common stock. The issue price of the Unit will be the greater of $0.45 or 90% of the volume weighted average of the closing price of common stock, for the five (5) banking days immediately preceding the date of the notice, as quoted on OTC markets, or other source of stock quotes as agreed to by both parties. The exercise price of the Warrants will be 130% of the price of the Unit and the term of the Warrants will be three (3) years from the date of issuance.

The Share Issuance Agreement commits AGH to make advances to the Company up to $ 15,000,000 in tranches of no more than $1,000,000 each and in multiples of $25,000 until October 11, 2013 (the completion date) or to be extended for an additional term of up to twelve (12) months at the option of the Company or AGH upon written notice on or before the completion date.

On October 28, 2011 and November 12, 2011, the Company issued Advance Notice to and received the funds from AGH of $100,000 and $200,000, respectively. The Company issued 222,222 and 444,444 Units consisting of (i) one share of the Company’s common stock and (ii) a warrant to purchase one share of the Company’s common stock exercisable at $130% of the price of the Unit per share expiring three (3) years from the date of issuance at $0.45 per Unit for the advances.

On December 15, 2011, the Company issued Advance Notice to and received the funds from AGH of $100,000. The Company issued 101,010 Units consisting of (i) one share of the Company’s common stock and (ii) a warrant to purchase one share of the Company’s common stock exercisable at $130% of the price of the Unit per share expiring three (3) years from the date of issuance at $0.99 per Unit for the advance.

On February 7, 2012 and February 8, 2012, the Company issued Advance Notices to and received the funds from AGH of $25,000 and $225,000, respectively. The Company issued 55,556 and 500,000 Units consisting of (i) one share of the Company’s common stock and (ii) a warrant to purchase one share of the Company’s common stock exercisable at $130% of the price of the Unit per share expiring three (3) years from the date of issuance at $0.45 per Unit for the advances.

On March 21, 2012, the Company issued Advance Notices to and received the funds from AGH of $50,000. The Company issued 111,111 Units consisting of (i) one share of the Company’s common stock and (ii) a

warrant to purchase one share of the Company’s common stock exercisable at $130% of the price of the Unit per share expiring three (3) years from the date of issuance at $0.45 per Unit for the advances.

On April 23, 2012, the Company issued Advance Notices to and received the funds from AGH of $100,000. The Company issued 222,222 Units consisting of (i) one share of the Company’s common stock and (ii) a warrant to purchase one share of the Company’s common stock exercisable at $130% of the price of the Unit per share expiring three (3) years from the date of issuance at $0.45 per Unit for the advances.

On May 18, 2012, the Company issued Advance Notices to and received the funds from AGH of $75,000. The Company issued 166,667 Units consisting of (i) one share of the Company’s common stock and (ii) a warrant to purchase one share of the Company’s common stock exercisable at $130% of the price of the Unit per share expiring three (3) years from the date of issuance at $0.45 per Unit for the advances.

On June 5, 2012, the Company issued Advance Notices to and received the funds from AGH of $100,000. The Company issued 222,222 Units consisting of (i) one share of the Company’s common stock and (ii) a warrant to purchase one share of the Company’s common stock exercisable at $130% of the price of the Unit per share expiring three (3) years from the date of issuance at $0.45 per Unit for the advances.

On June 11, 2012, the Company issued Advance Notices to and received the funds from AGH of $100,000. The Company issued 222,222 Units consisting of (i) one share of the Company’s common stock and (ii) a warrant to purchase one share of the Company’s common stock exercisable at $130% of the price of the Unit per share expiring three (3) years from the date of issuance at $0.45 per Unit for the advances.

On June 25, 2012, the Company issued Advance Notices to and received the funds from AGH of $50,000. The Company issued 111,111 Units consisting of (i) one share of the Company’s common stock and (ii) a warrant to purchase one share of the Company’s common stock exercisable at $130% of the price of the Unit per share expiring three (3) years from the date of issuance at $0.45 per Unit for the advances.

Warrants Issued in Connection with Sale of Common Shares

Description of Warrants

(i) Warrants Issued in June, 2011

In connection with the sale of 75,000 shares of its common stock at $0.80 per share or $60,000 in gross proceeds to one investor on June 28, 2011, the Company issued a warrant to purchase 75,000 shares of its common stock exercisable at $1.25 per share earned and exercisable upon issuance expiring three (3) year from the date of issuance.

The fair value of the warrant grant estimated on the date of grant uses the Black-Scholes Option-Pricing Model with the following assumptions:


Expected life (year)	3.00

Expected volatility (*)	55.91	%

Risk-free interest rate	0.75	%

Dividend yield	0.00	%

* As a thinly traded public entity it is not practicable for the Company to estimate the expected volatility of its share price. The Company selected five (5) comparable public traded goldmine companies to calculate the expected volatility. The reason for selecting comparable public traded goldmine companies is that the Company plans to engage in goldmine business. The Company calculated five (5) comparable public traded goldmine companies’ historical volatility over the expect life of the warrants and averaged the five (5) comparable public traded goldmine companies’ historical volatility as its expected volatility.

The Company allocated the gross proceeds of $60,000 between common stock and warrants based on their relative fair value, estimated on the date of grant, valued common stock and the warrant at $48,000 and $12,000, respectively, using the Black-Scholes Option-Pricing Model with the above assumptions.

(ii) Warrants Issued for the period from July 28, 2011 through September 9, 2011

For the period from July 28, 2011 through September 9, 2011, in connection with the sale of 712,500 shares of its common stock at $0.80 per share or $570,000 in gross proceeds to the investors, the Company issued warrants to purchase 712,500 shares of its common stock exercisable at $1.25 per share earned and exercisable upon issuance expiring three (3) years from the date of issuance.

The fair value of the warrant grant estimated on the date of grant uses the Black-Scholes Option-Pricing Model with the following assumptions:


Expected life (year)	3.00

Expected volatility (*)	49.48	%

Risk-free interest rate	0.33	%

Dividend yield	0.00	%

* As a thinly traded public entity it is not practicable for the Company to estimate the expected volatility of its share price. The Company selected five (5) comparable public traded goldmine companies to calculate the expected volatility. The reason for selecting comparable public traded goldmine companies is that the Company plans to engage in the goldmine business. The Company calculated five (5) comparable public traded goldmine companies’ historical volatility over the expect life of the warrants and averaged the five (5) comparable public traded goldmine companies’ historical volatility as its expected volatility.

The Company allocated the gross proceeds of $570,000 between common stock and warrants based on their relative fair value, estimated on the date of grant, valued common stock and the warrant at $475,000 and $95,000, respectively, using the Black-Scholes Option-Pricing Model with the above assumptions.

(iii) Warrants Issued for the period from October 28, 2011 through November 12, 2011

For the period from October 28, 2011 through November 12, 2011, the Company sold 666,666 Units consisting of (i) one share of the Company’s common stock and (ii) a warrant to purchase one share of the Company’s common stock exercisable at $130% of the price of the Unit per share expiring three (3) years from the date of issuance at $0.45 per Unit for the advances.

The fair value of the warrant grant estimated on the date of grant uses the Black-Scholes Option-Pricing Model with the following assumptions:


Expected life (year)	3.00

Expected volatility (*)	49.48	%

Risk-free interest rate	0.37	%

Dividend yield	0.00	%

* As a thinly traded public entity it is not practicable for the Company to estimate the expected volatility of its share price. The Company selected five (5) comparable public traded goldmine companies to calculate the expected volatility. The reason for selecting comparable public traded goldmine companies is that the Company plans to engage in the goldmine business. The Company calculated five (5) comparable public traded goldmine companies’ historical volatility over the expect life of the warrants and averaged the five (5) comparable public traded goldmine companies’ historical volatility as its expected volatility.

The Company allocated the gross proceeds of $300,000 between common stock and warrants based on their relative fair value, estimated on the date of grant, valued common stock and the warrant at $241,071 and $58,929, respectively, using the Black-Scholes Option-Pricing Model with the above assumptions.

(iv) Warrants Issued on December 15, 2011

On December 15, 2011, the Company sold 101,010 Units consisting of (i) one share of the Company’s common stock and (ii) a warrant to purchase one share of the Company’s common stock exercisable at $130% of the price of the Unit per share expiring three (3) years from the date of issuance at $0.99 per Unit for the advances.

The fair value of the warrant grant estimated on the date of grant uses the Black-Scholes Option-Pricing Model with the following assumptions:


Expected life (year)	3.00

Expected volatility (*)	43.21	%

Risk-free interest rate	0.37	%

Dividend yield	0.00	%

* As a thinly traded public entity it is not practicable for the Company to estimate the expected volatility of its share price. The Company selected five (5) comparable public traded goldmine companies to calculate the expected volatility. The reason for selecting comparable public traded goldmine companies is that the Company plans to engage in the goldmine business. The Company calculated five (5) comparable public traded goldmine companies’ historical volatility over the expect life of the warrants and averaged the five (5) comparable public traded goldmine companies’ historical volatility as its expected volatility.

The Company allocated the gross proceeds of $100,000 between common stock and warrants based on their relative fair value, estimated on the date of grant, valued common stock and the warrant at $82,500 and $17,500, respectively, using the Black-Scholes Option-Pricing Model with the above assumptions.

(v) Warrants Issued on February 7 and February 8, 2012

On December 15, 2011, the Company sold 555,556 Units consisting of (i) one share of the Company’s common stock and (ii) a warrant to purchase one share of the Company’s common stock exercisable at $130% of the price of the Unit per share expiring three (3) years from the date of issuance at $0.45 per Unit for the advances.

The fair value of the warrant grant estimated on the date of grant uses the Black-Scholes Option-Pricing Model with the following assumptions:


Expected life (year)	3.00

Expected volatility (*)	41.56	%

Risk-free interest rate	0.35	%

Dividend yield	0.00	%

* As a thinly traded public entity it is not practicable for the Company to estimate the expected volatility of its share price. The Company selected five (5) comparable public traded goldmine companies to calculate the expected volatility. The reason for selecting comparable public traded goldmine companies is that the Company plans to engage in the goldmine business. The Company calculated five (5) comparable public traded goldmine companies’ historical volatility over the expect life of the warrants and averaged the five (5) comparable public traded goldmine companies’ historical volatility as its expected volatility.

The Company allocated the gross proceeds of $250,000 between common stock and warrants based on their relative fair value, estimated on the date of grant, valued common stock and the warrant at $208,334 and $ 41,666 , respectively, using the Black-Scholes Option-Pricing Model with the above assumptions.

(vi) Warrants Issued on March 21, 2012

On March 21, 2011, the Company sold 111,111 Units consisting of (i) one share of the Company’s common stock and (ii) a warrant to purchase one share of the Company’s common stock exercisable at $130% of the price of the Unit per share expiring three (3) years from the date of issuance at $0.45 per Unit for the advances.

The fair value of the warrant grant estimated on the date of grant uses the Black-Scholes Option-Pricing Model with the following assumptions:


Expected life (year)	3.00

Expected volatility (*)	41.12	%

Risk-free interest rate	0.44	%

Dividend yield	0.00	%

* As a thinly traded public entity it is not practicable for the Company to estimate the expected volatility of its share price. The Company selected five (5) comparable public traded goldmine companies to calculate the expected volatility. The reason for selecting comparable public traded goldmine companies is that the Company plans to engage in the goldmine business. The Company calculated five (5) comparable public traded goldmine companies’ historical volatility over the expect life of the warrants and averaged the five (5) comparable public traded goldmine companies’ historical volatility as its expected volatility.

The Company allocated the gross proceeds of $50,000 between common stock and warrants based on their relative fair value, estimated on the date of grant, valued common stock and the warrant at $41,667 and $8,333, respectively, using the Black-Scholes Option-Pricing Model with the above assumptions.

(vii) Warrants Issued on April 23, 2012

On April 23, 2012, the Company sold 222,222 Units consisting of (i) one share of the Company’s common stock and (ii) a warrant to purchase one share of the Company’s common stock exercisable at $130% of the price of the Unit per share expiring three (3) years from the date of issuance at $0.45 per Unit for the advances.

The fair value of the warrant grant estimated on the date of grant uses the Black-Scholes Option-Pricing Model with the following assumptions:


Expected life (year)	3.00

Expected volatility (*)	36.46	%

Risk-free interest rate	0.39	%

Dividend yield	0.00	%

* As a thinly traded public entity it is not practicable for the Company to estimate the expected volatility of its share price. The Company selected five (5) comparable public traded goldmine companies to calculate the expected volatility. The reason for selecting comparable public traded goldmine companies is that the Company plans to engage in the goldmine business. The Company calculated five (5) comparable public traded goldmine companies’ historical volatility over the expect life of the warrants and averaged the five (5) comparable public traded goldmine companies’ historical volatility as its expected volatility.

The Company allocated the gross proceeds of $100,000 between common stock and warrants based on their relative fair value, estimated on the date of grant, valued common stock and the warrant at $63,698 and $36,302, respectively, using the Black-Scholes Option-Pricing Model with the above assumptions.

(vii) Warrants Issued on May 18, 2012

On May 18, 2012, the Company sold 166,667 Units consisting of (i) one share of the Company’s common stock and (ii) a warrant to purchase one share of the Company’s common stock exercisable at $130% of the price of the Unit per share expiring three (3) years from the date of issuance at $0.45 per Unit for the advances.

The fair value of the warrant grant estimated on the date of grant uses the Black-Scholes Option-Pricing Model with the following assumptions:


Expected life (year)	3.00

Expected volatility (*)	31.17	%

Risk-free interest rate	0.42	%

Dividend yield	0.00	%

* As a thinly traded public entity it is not practicable for the Company to estimate the expected volatility of its share price. The Company selected five (5) comparable public traded goldmine companies to calculate the expected volatility. The reason for selecting comparable public traded goldmine companies is that the Company plans to engage in the goldmine business. The Company calculated five (5) comparable public traded goldmine companies’ historical volatility over the expect life of the warrants and averaged the five (5) comparable public traded goldmine companies’ historical volatility as its expected volatility.

The Company allocated the gross proceeds of $75,000 between common stock and warrants based on their relative fair value, estimated on the date of grant, valued common stock and the warrant at $46,920 and $28,080, respectively, using the Black-Scholes Option-Pricing Model with the above assumptions.

(viii) Warrants Issued on June 5, 2012

On June 5, 2012, the Company sold 222,222 Units consisting of (i) one share of the Company’s common stock and (ii) a warrant to purchase one share of the Company’s common stock exercisable at $130% of the price of the Unit per share expiring three (3) years from the date of issuance at $0.45 per Unit for the advances.

The fair value of the warrant grant estimated on the date of grant uses the Black-Scholes Option-Pricing Model with the following assumptions:


Expected life (year)	3.00

Expected volatility (*)	35.90	%

Risk-free interest rate	0.34	%

Dividend yield	0.00	%

* As a thinly traded public entity it is not practicable for the Company to estimate the expected volatility of its share price. The Company selected five (5) comparable public traded goldmine companies to calculate the expected volatility. The reason for selecting comparable public traded goldmine companies is that the Company plans to engage in the goldmine business. The Company calculated five (5) comparable public traded goldmine companies’ historical volatility over the expect life of the warrants and averaged the five (5) comparable public traded goldmine companies’ historical volatility as its expected volatility.

The Company allocated the gross proceeds of $100,000 between common stock and warrants based on their relative fair value, estimated on the date of grant, valued common stock and the warrant at $65,804 and $34,196, respectively, using the Black-Scholes Option-Pricing Model with the above assumptions.

(viiii) Warrants Issued on June 11, 2012

On June 11, 2012, the Company sold 222,222 Units consisting of (i) one share of the Company’s common stock and (ii) a warrant to purchase one share of the Company’s common stock exercisable at $130% of the price of the Unit per share expiring three (3) years from the date of issuance at $0.45 per Unit for the advances.

The fair value of the warrant grant estimated on the date of grant uses the Black-Scholes Option-Pricing Model with the following assumptions:


Expected life (year)	3.00

Expected volatility (*)	35.92	%

Risk-free interest rate	0.37	%

Dividend yield	0.00	%

* As a thinly traded public entity it is not practicable for the Company to estimate the expected volatility of its share price. The Company selected five (5) comparable public traded goldmine companies to calculate the expected volatility. The reason for selecting comparable public traded goldmine companies is that the Company plans to engage in the goldmine business. The Company calculated five (5) comparable public traded goldmine companies’ historical volatility over the expect life of the warrants and averaged the five (5) comparable public traded goldmine companies’ historical volatility as its expected volatility.

The Company allocated the gross proceeds of $100,000 between common stock and warrants based on their relative fair value, estimated on the date of grant, valued common stock and the warrant at $65,530 and $35,470, respectively, using the Black-Scholes Option-Pricing Model with the above assumptions.

(viiii) Warrants Issued on June 25, 2012

On June 25, 2012, the Company sold 111,111 Units consisting of (i) one share of the Company’s common stock and (ii) a warrant to purchase one share of the Company’s common stock exercisable at $130% of the price of the Unit per share expiring three (3) years from the date of issuance at $0.45 per Unit for the advances.

The fair value of the warrant grant estimated on the date of grant uses the Black-Scholes Option-Pricing Model with the following assumptions:


Expected life (year)	3.00

Expected volatility (*)	35.57	%

Risk-free interest rate	0.39	%

Dividend yield	0.00	%

* As a thinly traded public entity it is not practicable for the Company to estimate the expected volatility of its share price. The Company selected five (5) comparable public traded goldmine companies to calculate the expected volatility. The reason for selecting comparable public traded goldmine companies is that the Company plans to engage in the goldmine business. The Company calculated five (5) comparable public traded goldmine companies’ historical volatility over the expect life of the warrants and averaged the five (5) comparable public traded goldmine companies’ historical volatility as its expected volatility.

The Company allocated the gross proceeds of $50,000 between common stock and warrants based on their relative fair value, estimated on the date of grant, valued common stock and the warrant at $31,884 and $18,116, respectively, using the Black-Scholes Option-Pricing Model with the above assumptions.

Exercise of Warrants

For the period ended June 30, 2012, none of the warrants have been exercised.

Summary of Warrant Activities

The table below summarizes the Company’s non-derivative warrant activities through June 30, 2012:


	Number of Warrant Shares			Exercise Price Range Per Share			Weighted Average Exercise Price			Fair Value at Date of Issuance		Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Balance, March 31, 2012		2,221,843			$	0.59 - 1.29		$	0.86	$	281,042		$	-

Granted		944,444			$	0.59		$	0.59	$	152,164		$	-

Canceled for cashless exercise		(-	)			-			-		-			-

Exercised (Cashless)		(-	)			-			-		-			-

Exercised		(-	)			-			-		-			-

Expired		-				-			-		-			-

Balance, June 30, 2012		3,166,287			$	0.59 - 1.29		$	0.78	$	433,206		$	-

Earned and exercisable, June 30, 2012		3,166,287			$	0.59 - 1.29		$	0.78	$	433,206		$	-

Unvested, June 30, 2012		-			$	-		$	-	$	-		$	-

The following table summarizes information concerning outstanding and exercisable warrants as of June 30, 2012 and March 31, 2012:


	Warrants Outstanding						Warrants Exercisable
Range of Exercise Prices	Number Outstanding		Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years)		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Number Exercisable		Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years)		Weighted Average Exercise Price

June 30, 2012 $0.59 - 1.29		3,166,287		2.52	$	0.78		3,166,287		2.52	$	0.78

March 31, 2012 $0.59 - 1.29		2,110,732		2.59	$	0.78		3,166,287		2.52	$	0.78

Note 7 – Commitments and Contingencies

Contingent Common Shares Issuable under the Arizona Property Purchase Agreements

On July 18, 2011, the Company entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (“APAAR2”) with Precious Metals Exploration Corp., (the “Seller”). The Purchase Price was $674,022 payable in installments in the twenty months following the closing, the company is required to pay 10% net smelter returns (NSR) royalty on the gross mineral production from the Assets until such time as it no longer owns or operates the Assets. After the full balance is paid, the NSR will reduce to 5% from that day forward.

Contingent Exploration Cost under the Alaska Property Purchase Agreements

Note 8 – Subsequent Events

The Company has evaluated all events that occurred after the balance sheet date through the date when the financial statements were issued to determine if they must be reported. The Management of the Company determined that there were certain reportable subsequent events to be disclosed as followed:

On July 18, 2012, Bruce Taylor Walsham, was appointed a director of the Registrant. He will serve until the next annual meeting of shareholders or until his successor is appointed. Mr. Walsham entered into a consulting agreement with the Registrant which pays him $3,000 per month and awards him 50,000 shares every three months and under which he agreed to serve as a director.

On August 1, 2012, the Company issued Advance Notices to and received the funds from AGH of $75,000. The Company issued 166,667 Units consisting of (i) one share of the Company’s common stock and (ii) a warrant to purchase one share of the Company’s common stock exercisable at $130% of the price of the Unit per share expiring three (3) years from the date of issuance at $0.45 per Unit for the advances.

PLAN OF OPERATION

On April 5, 2011, we completed a change of control transaction and entered a new line of business. Accordingly, any comparison between the operating results of our quarter last year and this year is not meaningful.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our plan is to acquire potential mineral producing properties by paying the bulk of the purchase price in our stock and to fund our operations through the private sale of our stock. We have acquired several properties to date, but cannot give any assurance that we will be able to successfully sell stock at levels to meet our obligations under our property acquisition agreements. We had only cash on hand of $50,818 at June 30, 2012.

On October 11, 2011, we executed a Share Issuance Agreement with American Gold Holdings, Ltd. (“AGH”) that allows us to sell our shares in Units each unit comprised of a share of our common stock and a common stock purchase warrant. The issue price of the Unit will be the greater of $0.45 or 90% of our share price as determined under the agreement and the exercise price of the Warrants will be 130% of the price of the Unit and the Warrants will be of three years duration. The Share Issuance Agreement commits AGH to purchase up to $15,000,000 of Units in tranches of no more than $1,000,000 each and in multiples of $25,000 on five days notice from us. This description of the Share Issuance Agreement is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Share Issuance Agreement which is an exhibit hereto. Through August 10, 2012 we have received $1,125,000 under the Share Issuance Agreement and have issued or are obligated to issue a total of 2,378,787 shares. $13,875,000 remains available under the agreement through August 10, 2012.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

As a smaller reporting company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act), we are not required to provide the information called for by this Item 3.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, our principal executive officer who is also our principal financial officer is responsible for conducting an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as of the end of the fiscal year covered by this report. Disclosure controls and procedures means that the material information required to be included in our Securities and Exchange Commission reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms relating to our company, including any consolidating subsidiaries, and was made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period when this report was being prepared. Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer concluded as of the evaluation date that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of June 30, 2012 because we do not have sufficient staff to segregate responsibilities. We plan to seek to correct these deficiencies at such time as our operations require additional personnel, but we do not believe this will occur in the foreseeable future.

There were no changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting during the most recently completed fiscal quarter that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

The Company is not currently subject to any legal proceedings. From time to time, the Company may become subject to litigation or proceedings in connection with its business, as either a plaintiff or defendant. There are no such pending legal proceedings to which the Company is a party that, in the opinion of management, is likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition or results of operations.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

As a smaller reporting company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act), we are not required to provide the information called for by this Item 1A.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.

None.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.

None.

ITEM 4. (REMOVED AND RESERVED).

Not applicable.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION.

None.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS.

(a) Exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation SK.


Number		Description

31.1		Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1		Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


	LIBERTY GOLD CORP
	(Name of Registrant)

Date: August 10, 2012	By:	/s/ Lynn Harrison
		Name: Lynn Harrison
		Title: President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal executive, financial officer and accounting officer)