10-Q/A

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q/A

(AMENDMENT NO. 1)

þ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010

OR

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

001-34258

(Commission file number)

WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL LTD.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Switzerland	98-0606750
(State or other jurisdiction of	(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)	Identification No.)
4-6 Rue Jean-Francois Bartholoni, 1204 Geneva, Switzerland	Not Applicable
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: 41.22.816.1500

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer þ	Accelerated filer o	Non-accelerated filer o	Smaller reporting company o
		(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes o No þ

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date:

As of October 25, 2010, there were 741,424,789 shares of Weatherford registered shares, 1.16 Swiss francs par value per share, outstanding.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION	3
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS	3
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS	36
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK	46
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	48
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION	49
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS	49
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS	49
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY IN SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS	54
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS	55
SIGNATURES	56
EX-31.1
EX-31.2
EX-32.1
EX-32.2
EX-101 INSTANCE DOCUMENT
EX-101 SCHEMA DOCUMENT
EX-101 CALCULATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 LABELS LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 PRESENTATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 DEFINITION LINKBASE DOCUMENT

EXPLANATORY NOTE

     Weatherford International Ltd. (the “Company”) is filing this Amendment No. 1 to its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, which was originally filed on November 2, 2010 (the “Form 10-Q”), to restate financial information for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 due to errors in the Company’s accounting for income taxes. The Company’s management identified a related material weakness with respect to its internal control over financial reporting for income taxes. Disclosures related to these matters are included in Part I, Item 4, under “Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures,” which describes the material weakness and management’s conclusion that our internal control over financial reporting for income taxes was not effective as of September 30, 2010. In addition, further details on the adjustments are included in Part I, Item 1. Financial Statements, under “Note 2. Restatement of Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements”.

     For convenience of the reader, this Amendment No. 1 sets forth the Form 10-Q in its entirety, as modified and superseded where necessary to reflect the restatement. The following items have been amended principally as a result of, and to reflect, the restatement:

• Part I – Item 1. Financial Statements;

• Part I – Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations;

• Part I – Item 4. Controls and Procedures;

• Part II – Item 1A. Risk Factors; and

• Part II – Item 6. Exhibits

     This Amendment No. 1 amends only the portions of the Form 10-Q listed in the sections noted above. The Risk Factors, Forward-Looking Statements and our Disputes, Litigation, and Contingencies financial statement footnote included within this document have been updated consistent with the disclosures contained in the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, originally filed March 8, 2011 and subsequently amended on March 11, 2011 and April 14, 2011. The remainder of the Form 10-Q is substantially unchanged, but is reproduced in this Amendment No. 1 for convenience. With the exception of the updated Risk Factors, Forward-Looking Statements and the Disputes, Litigation and Contingencies financial statement footnote, this Amendment No. 1 does not reflect events occurring after the original filing date of the Form 10-Q other than those associated with the restatement.

2

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except par value)

	September 30,			December 31,
	2010			2009
	(Restated)			(Restated)
	(unaudited)
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash and Cash Equivalents	$	951,382		$	252,519
Accounts Receivable, Net of Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts of $24,477 and $20,466, Respectively		2,529,003			2,510,948
Inventories		2,492,751			2,238,294
Current Deferred Tax Assets		260,128			259,077
Other Current Assets		655,005			721,115
Total Current Assets		6,888,269			5,981,953
Property, Plant and Equipment, Net of Accumulated Depreciation of $4,026,775 and $3,440,448, Respectively		6,931,216			6,989,379
Goodwill		4,141,972			4,156,105
Other Intangible Assets, Net of Accumulated Amortization of $428,276 and $359,052, Respectively		733,132			772,786
Equity Investments		537,505			533,138
Other Assets		353,155			263,329
Total Assets	$	19,585,249		$	18,696,690
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
Short-term Borrowings and Current Portion of Long-term Debt	$	582,628		$	869,581
Accounts Payable		1,200,627			1,002,359
Income Taxes Payable		154,440			201,647
Other Current Liabilities		994,755			927,113
Total Current Liabilities		2,932,450			3,000,700
Long-term Debt		6,694,963			5,847,258
Other Liabilities		431,509			410,359
Total Liabilities		10,058,922			9,258,317
Shareholders’ Equity:
Shares, CHF 1.16 Par Value: Authorized 1,137,670 Shares, Conditionally Authorized 379,223 Shares, Issued 758,447 Shares at September 30, 2010; Authorized 1,093,303 Shares, Conditionally Authorized 364,434 Shares, Issued 758,447 Shares at December 31, 2009		761,077			761,077
Capital in Excess of Par Value		4,682,827			4,642,800
Treasury Shares, Net		(565,464	)		(616,048	)
Retained Earnings		4,435,176			4,456,770
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income		143,123			114,742
Weatherford Shareholders’ Equity		9,456,739			9,359,341
Noncontrolling Interests		69,588			79,032
Total Shareholders’ Equity		9,526,327			9,438,373
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity	$	19,585,249		$	18,696,690

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(UNAUDITED)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)

	Three Months						Nine Months
	Ended September 30,						Ended September 30,
	2010			2009			2010			2009
	(Restated)			(Restated)			(Restated)			(Restated)
Revenues:
Products	$	910,653		$	636,378		$	2,522,867		$	2,029,831
Services		1,619,099			1,508,569			4,775,115			4,368,174
		2,529,752			2,144,947			7,297,982			6,398,005
Costs and Expenses:
Cost of Products		640,752			529,905			1,817,693			1,619,359
Cost of Services		1,255,104			1,068,994			3,637,374			2,966,956
Research and Development		54,457			49,300			156,844			144,434
Selling, General and Administrative Attributable to Segments		257,063			298,203			1,012,853			905,402
Corporate General and Administrative		46,952			54,963			185,144			161,781
		2,254,328			2,001,365			6,809,908			5,797,932
Operating Income		275,424			143,582			488,074			600,073
Other Expense:
Interest Expense, Net		(99,318	)		(90,285	)		(290,376	)		(274,846	)
Bond Tender Premium		(10,731	)		—			(10,731	)		—
Devaluation of Venezuelan Bolivar		—			—			(63,859	)		—
Other, Net		(12,277	)		(11,046	)		(35,681	)		(28,456	)
Income Before Income Taxes		153,098			42,251			87,427			296,771
Benefit (Provision) for Income Taxes		(54,159	)		(4,911	)		(97,384	)		(93,056	)
Net Income		98,939			37,340			(9,957	)		203,715
Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests		(4,286	)		(5,586	)		(11,637	)		(23,018	)
Net Income Attributable to Weatherford	$	94,653		$	31,754		$	(21,594	)	$	180,697
Earnings Per Share Attributable to Weatherford:
Basic	$	0.13		$	0.04		$	(0.03	)	$	0.26
Diluted	$	0.13		$	0.04		$	(0.03	)	$	0.25
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding:
Basic		745,502			724,114			742,192			707,621
Diluted		751,394			735,109			742,192			715,719

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
(In thousands)

	Nine Months
	Ended September 30,
	2010			2009
	(Restated)			(Restated)
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Net Income (Loss)	$	(9,957	)	$	203,715
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities:
Depreciation and Amortization		775,484			654,096
Employee Share-Based Compensation Expense		75,167			85,136
Deferred Income Tax Benefit		(102,102	)		(226,080	)
Devaluation of Venezuelan Bolivar		63,859			—
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan		38,021			—
Revaluation of Contingent Consideration		2,752			(27,368	)
Other, Net		32,773			(16,496	)
Change in Operating Assets and Liabilities, Net of Effect of Businesses Acquired
Accounts Receivable		(59,226	)		213,708
Inventories		(273,887	)		(125,689	)
Accounts Payable		176,284			(95,918	)
Other		16,683			(392,708	)
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities		735,851			272,396
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Capital Expenditures for Property, Plant and Equipment		(717,556	)		(1,269,884	)
Acquisitions of Businesses, Net of Cash Acquired		(58,417	)		(4,749	)
Acquisition of Intellectual Property		(20,784	)		(22,702	)
Purchase of Equity Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates		(1,750	)		(26,999	)
Proceeds from Sale of Assets and Businesses, Net		191,115			113,720
Other Investing Activities		41,840			—
Net Cash Used by Investing Activities		(565,552	)		(1,210,614	)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Borrowings (Repayments) of Short-term Debt, Net		(841,058	)		(237,549	)
Borrowings (Repayments) of Long-term Debt, Net		1,396,553			1,230,262
Other Financing Activities, Net		(7,403	)		9,046
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities		548,092			1,001,759
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash and Cash Equivalents		(19,528	)		4,656
Net Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents		698,863			68,197
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period		252,519			238,398
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period	$	951,382		$	306,595
Supplemental Cash Flow Information:
Interest Paid	$	354,677		$	304,623
Income Taxes Paid, Net of Refunds		257,605			325,920

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

5

WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(UNAUDITED)
(In thousands)

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2010			2009			2010			2009
	(Restated)			(Restated)			(Restated)			(Restated)
Net Income (Loss)	$	98,939		$	37,340		$	(9,957	)	$	203,715
Other Comprehensive Income:
Curtailment and Remeasurement of Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan		—			—			35,111			—
Amortization of Pension Components		173			1,936			1,819			6,464
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustment		143,587			146,155			(9,017	)		306,377
Other		157			153			468			456
Comprehensive Income (Loss)		242,856			185,584			18,424			517,012
Comprehensive Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests		(4,286	)		(5,586	)		(11,637	)		(22,897	)
Comprehensive Income (Loss) Attributable to Weatherford	$	238,570		$	179,998		$	6,787		$	494,115

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

6

WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

1. General

     The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Weatherford International Ltd. and all majority-owned subsidiaries (the “Company”) are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and include all adjustments of a normal recurring nature which, in the opinion of management, are necessary to present fairly our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at September 30, 2010, Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income, Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income and Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009. Although we believe the disclosures in these financial statements are adequate to make the restated interim information presented not misleading, certain information relating to our organization and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted in this Form 10-Q/A pursuant to U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) rules and regulations. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2009 as restated and presented in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. The restated results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for the full year.

     The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period and disclosure of contingent liabilities. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to uncollectible accounts receivable, lower of cost or market of inventories, equity investments, intangible assets and goodwill, property, plant and equipment, income taxes, percentage-of-completion accounting for long-term contracts, self-insurance, pension and post retirement benefit plans and contingent liabilities. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

     Principles of Consolidation

     The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Weatherford International Ltd., all majority-owned subsidiaries, all controlled joint ventures and variable interest entities where the Company has determined it is the primary beneficiary. When referring to Weatherford and using phrases such as “we”, “us”, and “our”, the intent is to refer to Weatherford International Ltd. and its subsidiaries as a whole or on a regional basis, depending on the context in which the statements are made.

     Investments in affiliates in which we exercise significant influence over operating and financial policies are accounted for using the equity method. All material intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

7

WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

2.  Restatement of Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

     We identified a material weakness in our internal controls over the accounting for income taxes in 2010 that resulted in the identification of certain errors in our income tax accounts. The correction of these errors resulted in restatements of our previously reported financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, including beginning retained earnings in 2008, and our condensed consolidated financial statements for each of the quarters within 2009 and 2010. The restated annual results for 2008 and 2009 were included in our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K. In addition, we have amended this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to restate results as of September 30, 2010 and for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009.

     The most significant adjustment for the errors identified relates to the correction of our accounting for the income tax consequences of certain intercompany transactions that were inappropriately tax-effected over multiple years. This error resulted in the understatement of income tax expense by $63 million and $91 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. We also recorded other adjustments to our tax provision to correct for certain errors and items recorded in the improper period. These adjustments were not recorded previously as we concluded that they were not material to the respective periods. These other adjustments resulted in an increase to our tax provision during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 of $27 million, which is primarily comprised of minimum tax in Mexico. Our tax provision was reduced by $2 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 for these other tax adjustments.

     In addition, we recorded other adjustments to correct for previously identified immaterial errors affecting operating income that were recorded in improper periods. These adjustments were not recorded previously as we concluded that these adjustments were not material to the respective periods. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, operating income was reduced by $10 million and $14 million, respectively. The impact of these adjustments reduced operating cash flows by $2 million and $3 million for the nine months ended September, 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

8

WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

     The following tables summarize the impact of these adjustments on our previously reported results filed on our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009.

     The effects of the restatements on our condensed consolidated income statement for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 follows:

	Three Months Ended September 30, 2010
	Previously
	Reported			Adjustments			Restated
	(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Revenues:
Products	$	910,653		$	—		$	910,653
Services		1,623,504			(4,405	)		1,619,099
		2,534,157			(4,405	)		2,529,752
Costs and Expenses:
Cost of Products		640,752			—			640,752
Cost of Services		1,259,247			(4,143	)		1,255,104
Research and Development		54,457			—			54,457
Selling, General and Administrative Attributable to Segments		254,072			2,991			257,063
Corporate General and Administrative		47,014			(62	)		46,952
		2,255,542			(1,214	)		2,254,328
Operating Income		278,615			(3,191	)		275,424
Other Expense:
Interest Expense, Net		(99,318	)		—			(99,318	)
Bond Tender Premium		(10,731	)		—			(10,731	)
Other, Net		(12,277	)		—			(12,277	)
Income Before Income Taxes		156,289			(3,191	)		153,098
Provision for Income Taxes		(7,157	)		(47,002	)		(54,159	)
Net Income		149,132			(50,193	)		98,939
Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests		(4,286	)		—			(4,286	)
Net Income Attributable to Weatherford	$	144,846		$	(50,193	)	$	94,653
Earnings Per Share Attributable to Weatherford:
Basic	$	0.19		$	(0.06	)	$	0.13
Diluted	$	0.19		$	(0.06	)	$	0.13
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding:
Basic		745,502			—			745,502
Diluted		751,394			—			751,394

9

WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

     The effects of the restatements on our condensed consolidated income statement for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 follows:

	Three Months Ended September 30, 2009
	Previously
	Reported			Adjustments			Restated
	(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Revenues:
Products	$	636,378		$	—		$	636,378
Services		1,513,501			(4,932	)		1,508,569
		2,149,879			(4,932	)		2,144,947
Costs and Expenses:
Cost of Products		526,960			2,945			529,905
Cost of Services		1,082,281			(13,287	)		1,068,994
Research and Development		49,300			—			49,300
Selling, General and Administrative Attributable to Segments		287,453			10,750			298,203
Corporate General and Administrative		53,963			1,000			54,963
		1,999,957			1,408			2,001,365
Operating Income		149,922			(6,340	)		143,582
Other Expense:
Interest Expense, Net		(90,285	)		—			(90,285	)
Other, Net		(11,046	)		—			(11,046	)
Income Before Income Taxes		48,591			(6,340	)		42,251
Benefit for Income Taxes		34,369			(39,280	)		(4,911	)
Net Income		82,960			(45,620	)		37,340
Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests		(5,586	)		—			(5,586	)
Net Income Attributable to Weatherford	$	77,374		$	(45,620	)	$	31,754
Earnings Per Share Attributable to Weatherford:
Basic	$	0.11		$	(0.07	)	$	0.04
Diluted	$	0.11		$	(0.07	)	$	0.04
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding:
Basic		724,114			—			724,114
Diluted		735,109			—			735,109

10

WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

     The effects of the restatements on our condensed consolidated balance sheet for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 follows:

	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010
	Previously
	Reported			Adjustments			Restated
	(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Revenues:
Products	$	2,522,867		$	—		$	2,522,867
Services		4,787,809			(12,694	)		4,775,115
		7,310,676			(12,694	)		7,297,982
Costs and Expenses:
Cost of Products		1,817,693			—			1,817,693
Cost of Services		3,640,504			(3,130	)		3,637,374
Research and Development		156,844			—			156,844
Selling, General and Administrative Attributable to Segments		1,009,915			2,938			1,012,853
Corporate General and Administrative		187,330			(2,186	)		185,144
		6,812,286			(2,378	)		6,809,908
Operating Income		498,390			(10,316	)		488,074
Other Expense:
Interest Expense, Net		(290,376	)		—			(290,376	)
Bond Tender Premium		(10,731	)		—			(10,731	)
Devaluation of Venezuelan Bolivar		(63,859	)		—			(63,859	)
Other, Net		(35,681	)		—			(35,681	)
Income Before Income Taxes		97,743			(10,316	)		87,427
Provision for Income Taxes		(7,833	)		(89,551	)		(97,384	)
Net Income (Loss)		89,910			(99,867	)		(9,957	)
Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests		(11,637	)		—			(11,637	)
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Weatherford	$	78,273		$	(99,867	)	$	(21,594	)
Earnings Per Share Attributable to Weatherford:
Basic	$	0.11		$	(0.14	)	$	(0.03	)
Diluted	$	0.10		$	(0.13	)	$	(0.03	)
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding:
Basic		742,192			—			742,192
Diluted		748,382			(6,190	)		742,192

11

WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

     The effects of the restatement on our condensed consolidated income statement for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 follows:

	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009
	Previously
	Reported			Adjustments			Restated
	(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Revenues:
Products	$	2,029,831		$	—		$	2,029,831
Services		4,371,021			(2,847	)		4,368,174
		6,400,852			(2,847	)		6,398,005
Costs and Expenses:
Cost of Products		1,621,196			(1,837	)		1,619,359
Cost of Services		2,965,407			1,549			2,966,956
Research and Development		144,434			—			144,434
Selling, General and Administrative Attributable to Segments		892,822			12,580			905,402
Corporate General and Administrative		162,981			(1,200	)		161,781
		5,786,840			11,092			5,797,932
Operating Income		614,012			(13,939	)		600,073
Other Expense:
Interest Expense, Net		(274,846	)		—			(274,846	)
Other, Net		(28,456	)		—			(28,456	)
Income Before Income Taxes		310,710			(13,939	)		296,771
Provision for Income Taxes		(3,535	)		(89,521	)		(93,056	)
Net Income		307,175			(103,460	)		203,715
Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests		(23,018	)		—			(23,018	)
Net Income Attributable to Weatherford	$	284,157		$	(103,460	)	$	180,697
Earnings Per Share Attributable to Weatherford:
Basic	$	0.40		$	(0.14	)	$	0.26
Diluted	$	0.40		$	(0.15	)	$	0.25
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding:
Basic		707,621			—			707,621
Diluted		715,719			—			715,719

12

WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

The effects of the restatements on our condensed consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 2010 follows:

	September 30, 2010
	Previously
	Reported			Adjustments			Restated
	(In thousands)
Current Assets:
Cash and Cash Equivalents	$	951,382		$	—		$	951,382
Accounts Receivable		2,535,625			(6,622	)		2,529,003
Inventories		2,493,289			(538	)		2,492,751
Current Deferred Tax Assets		260,128			—			260,128
Other Current Assets		943,740			(288,735	)		655,005
Total Current Assets		7,184,164			(295,895	)		6,888,269
Property, Plant and Equipment at Cost		10,957,991			—			10,957,991
Less Accumulated Depreciation		4,026,775			—			4,026,775
		6,931,216			—			6,931,216
Goodwill		4,141,972			—			4,141,972
Other Intangible Assets		741,796			(8,664	)		733,132
Equity Investments		537,505			—			537,505
Other Assets		347,790			5,365			353,155
Total Assets	$	19,884,443		$	(299,194	)	$	19,585,249
Current Liabilities:
Short-term Borrowings and Current Portion of Long-term Debt	$	582,628		$	—		$	582,628
Accounts Payable		1,200,627			—			1,200,627
Income Taxes Payable		4,390			150,050			154,440
Other Current Liabilities		980,467			14,288			994,755
Total Current Liabilities		2,768,112			164,338			2,932,450
Long-term Debt		6,694,963			—			6,694,963
Other Liabilities		434,843			(3,334	)		431,509
Total Liabilities		9,897,918			161,004			10,058,922
Shareholders’ Equity:
Shares		761,077			—			761,077
Capital in Excess of Par Value		4,682,827			—			4,682,827
Treasury Shares, at Cost		(565,464	)		—			(565,464	)
Retained Earnings		4,895,374			(460,198	)		4,435,176
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income		143,123			—			143,123
Weatherford Shareholders’ Equity		9,916,937			(460,198	)		9,456,739
Noncontrolling Interests		69,588			—			69,588
Total Shareholders’ Equity		9,986,525			(460,198	)		9,526,327
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity	$	19,884,443		$	(299,194	)	$	19,585,249

13

WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

The effects of the restatements on our condensed consolidated cash flow for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 follows:

	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010
	Previously
	Reported			Adjustments			Restated
	(In thousands)
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:
Net Income (Loss)	$	89,910		$	(99,867	)	$	(9,957	)
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities:
Depreciation and Amortization		776,745			(1,261	)		775,484
Employee Share-Based Compensation Expense		75,167			—			75,167
Deferred Income Tax Benefit		(112,053	)		9,951			(102,102	)
Devaluation of Venezuelan Bolivar		63,859			—			63,859
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan		38,021			—			38,021
Revaluation of Contingent Consideration		(448	)		3,200			2,752
Other, Net		42,302			(9,529	)		32,773
Change in Operating Assets and Liabilities, Net of Effect of Businesses Acquired:
Accounts Receivable		(71,920	)		12,694			(59,226	)
Inventories		(272,957	)		(930	)		(273,887	)
Accounts Payable		176,284			—			176,284
Other		(67,334	)		84,017			16,683
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities		737,576			(1,725	)		735,851
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Capital Expenditures for Property, Plant and Equipment		(717,556	)		—			(717,556	)
Acquisitions of Businesses, Net of Cash Acquired		(58,417	)		—			(58,417	)
Acquisition of Intellectual Property		(22,509	)		1,725			(20,784	)
Acquisition of Equity Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates		(1,750	)		—			(1,750	)
Proceeds from Sale of Assets and Businesses, Net		191,115			—			191,115
Other Investing Activities		41,840			—			41,840
Net Cash Used by Investing Activities		(567,277	)		1,725			(565,552	)
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:
Borrowings (Repayments) of Short-term Debt, Net		(841,058	)		—			(841,058	)
Borrowings (Repayments) of Long-term Debt, Net		1,396,553			—			1,396,553
Other Financing Activities, Net		(7,403	)		—			(7,403	)
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities		548,092			—			548,092
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash and Cash Equivalents		(19,528	)		—			(19,528	)
Net Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents		698,863			—			698,863
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Year		252,519			—			252,519
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Year	$	951,382		$	—		$	951,382

14

WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

The effects of the restatements on our condensed consolidated cash flow for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 follows:

	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009
	Previously
	Reported			Adjustments			Restated
	(In thousands)
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:
Net Income	$	307,175		$	(103,460	)	$	203,715
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities:
Depreciation and Amortization		652,996			1,100			654,096
Employee Share-Based Compensation Expense		85,136			—			85,136
Deferred Income Tax Benefit		(209,864	)		(16,216	)		(226,080	)
Revaluation of Contingent Consideration		(27,368	)		—			(27,368	)
Other, Net		(17,397	)		901			(16,496	)
Change in Operating Assets and Liabilities, Net of Effect of Businesses Acquired:
Accounts Receivable		210,861			2,847			213,708
Inventories		(122,252	)		(3,437	)		(125,689	)
Accounts Payable		(95,918	)		—			(95,918	)
Other		(508,323	)		115,615			(392,708	)
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities		275,046			(2,650	)		272,396
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Capital Expenditures for Property, Plant and Equipment		(1,269,884	)		—			(1,269,884	)
Acquisitions of Businesses, Net of Cash Acquired		(4,749	)		—			(4,749	)
Acquisition of Intellectual Property		(25,352	)		2,650			(22,702	)
Acquisition of Equity Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates		(26,999	)		—			(26,999	)
Proceeds from Sale of Assets and Businesses, Net		113,720			—			113,720
Net Cash Used by Investing Activities		(1,213,264	)		2,650			(1,210,614	)
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:
Borrowings (Repayments) of Short-term Debt, Net		(237,549	)		—			(237,549	)
Borrowings (Repayments) of Long-term Debt, Net		1,230,262			—			1,230,262
Other Financing Activities, Net		9,046			—			9,046
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities		1,001,759			—			1,001,759
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash and Cash Equivalents		4,656			—			4,656
Net Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents		68,197			—			68,197
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Year		238,398			—			238,398
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Year	$	306,595			—		$	306,595

15

WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

3. Business Combinations

     We have acquired businesses we feel are important to our long-term growth strategy. Results of operations for acquisitions are included in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income from the date of acquisition. The balances included in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets related to recent acquisitions are based on preliminary information and are subject to change when final asset valuations are obtained and the potential for liabilities has been evaluated. The purchase price is allocated to the net assets acquired based upon their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition.

     In July 2009, we acquired the Oilfield Services Division (“OFS”) of TNK-BP. In this transaction, we acquired drilling, well workover and cementing services operations in West Siberia, East Siberia and the Volga-Urals region. We issued 24.3 million shares valued at approximately $450 million. Under our sale and purchase agreement dated May 29, 2009, if TNK-BP sold the shares it received in consideration for the transaction for a price less than $18.50 per share prior to June 29, 2010, we were obligated to pay TNK-BP additional consideration in an amount equal to the difference between the price at which the shares were sold and $18.50. On June 24, 2010, we entered into an amendment that modifies the provisions relating to the value guarantee mechanism to allow the parties additional time to settle the amount of consideration received by TNK-BP under the agreement. The settlement date has been extended from June 29, 2010 to the earlier of (a) December 1, 2010, or (b) 30 days after the third business day following our public announcement of our quarterly earnings for the third quarter of 2010. In addition, the base dollar amount used to calculate potential guarantee payments was increased from $18.50 to $19.50, and our option to pay the guarantee payment in stock was ended. From October 22 through October 29, 2010, TNK-BP and its affiliates had sold 12.2 million of our common shares in open market transactions at an average price of $17.07 per share. We currently expect TNK-BP and its affiliates to dispose of the remaining shares in a similar manner before expiration of the value guarantee on November 22, 2010. We finalized the valuation of the assets and liabilities acquired in the OFS acquisition during the third quarter of 2010.

     Accounting guidance for business combinations requires contingent consideration to be recognized at its acquisition date fair value. Based on the terms of the arrangement, we classified the contingent consideration for the OFS acquisition as a liability. Such liabilities are required to be remeasured to fair value at each reporting date until the contingency is resolved, with changes in fair value being recognized in earnings. We estimated the fair value of the contingent consideration for the OFS acquisition to be a liability of $84 million at the date of acquisition, $60 million at December 31, 2009 and $152 million at June 30, 2010. This liability was estimated to have a fair value of $62 million at September 30, 2010, resulting in the recognition of a gain of $90 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010, offsetting the $92 million loss incurred during the first six months of 2010. This gain was recorded in the Selling, General and Administrative Attributable to Segments line in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. The valuation of the contingent consideration was determined using a lattice-based model incorporating the term of the contingency, the price of our shares over the relevant periods and the volatility of our stock price.

     In November 2008, we acquired a group of affiliated companies in Latin America. Consideration for the transaction totaled approximately $160 million, which was comprised of approximately six million shares valued at approximately $65 million, non-cash consideration of approximately $75 million and cash of approximately $20 million. Additional consideration of up to $65 million is contingent on the occurrence of future events and circumstances. The additional consideration, if any, is payable in cash or our common shares at our option. We will record this contingent consideration when and if these events occur.

4. Inventories

     The components of inventory were as follows:

	September 30,		December 31,
	2010		2009
	(Restated)		(Restated)
	(In thousands)
Raw materials, components and supplies	$	366,969	$	328,253
Work in process		116,250		115,564
Finished goods		2,009,532		1,794,477
	$	2,492,751	$	2,238,294

     Work in process and finished goods inventories include the cost of materials, labor and plant overhead.

16

WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

5. Goodwill

     Goodwill is evaluated for impairment on at least an annual basis. We perform our annual goodwill impairment test as of October 1. Our 2009 impairment tests indicated goodwill was not impaired. We will continue to test our goodwill annually as of October 1 unless events occur or circumstances change between annual tests that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount.

     During the three months ended September 30, 2010, we incurred a $76 million charge for revisions to our profitability estimates on our project management contracts in Mexico, as the client requested a slowdown in drilling activity to near zero while they re-evaluated the pace of drilling and capital expenditures in the current year.

				Middle East/			Europe/
	North			North			West Africa/			Latin
	America			Africa/ Asia			FSU			America			Total
							(In thousands)
As of December 31, 2009	$	2,097,549		$	698,896		$	1,045,577		$	314,083		$	4,156,105
Acquisitions		4,109			24,058			2,837			—			31,004
Disposals		—			(712	)		—			—			(712	)
Purchase price and other adjustments		(546	)		(643	)		(42,905	)		(6,364	)		(50,458	)
Foreign currency translation		11,667			6,682			(12,103	)		(213	)		6,033
As of September 30, 2010	$	2,112,779		$	728,281		$	993,406		$	307,506		$	4,141,972

6. Short-term Borrowings and Current Portion of Long-term Debt

     The components of short-term borrowings were as follows:

	September 30,		December 31,
	2010		2009
	(In thousands)
Revolving credit facilities	$	—	$	798,500
Other short-term bank loans		10,838		53,007
Total short-term borrowings		10,838		851,507
Current portion of long-term debt		571,790		18,074
Short-term borrowings and current portion of long-term debt	$	582,628	$	869,581

     In September 2010, we completed a $1.4 billion long-term debt offering comprised of (i) $800 million of 5.125% Senior Notes due in 2020 (“5.125% Senior Notes”) and (ii) $600 million of 6.75% Senior Notes due in 2040 (“6.75% Senior Notes”). Net proceeds of $1.386 billion were used to fund our bond tender offer that commenced in September 2010 and repay short-term borrowings on our revolving credit facilities.

     In September 2010, we commenced a cash tender offer for up to $700 million aggregate principal amount of specified series of our outstanding debt. Pursuant to the tender-offer terms, we repurchased $167 million of our 6.625% senior notes due 2011 in September 2010 and incurred an expense of $11 million for the premium we paid on the repurchase.

     In October 2010, we completed the tender offer by repurchasing $327 million and $206 million of our 5.95% senior notes due 2012 and 5.15% senior notes due 2013, respectively. We paid a $44 million premium on these bonds tendered and expect to incur a charge of approximately $42 million in the fourth quarter of 2010. The $533 million principal amounts repurchased in October 2010 are included in current portion of long-term debt in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at September 30, 2010.

     At September 30, 2010, we maintained two revolving credit facilities with syndicates of banks available for a combination of borrowings, support for our commercial paper program and issuances of letters of credit. These facilities allow for an aggregate availability of $1.75 billion and mature in May 2011. There were no outstanding borrowings on these facilities at September 30, 2010. There were $63 million in outstanding letters of credit under these facilities at September 30, 2010.

     These borrowing facilities require us to maintain a debt-to-capitalization ratio of less than 60% and contain other covenants and representations customary for an investment-grade commercial credit. We are in compliance with these covenants at September 30, 2010.

17

WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

     On October 15, 2010, the Company entered into a $1.75 billion unsecured revolving credit agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent. The Credit Agreement replaced our existing revolving credit facilities that were scheduled to mature in May 2011. The Credit Agreement has a scheduled maturity date of October 15, 2013, subject to extension, and can be used for a combination of borrowings, support for our commercial paper program and issuances of letters of credit. Consistent with our prior facilities, the Credit Agreement requires us to maintain a debt-to-capitalization ratio of less than 60%.

     We have a $1.5 billion commercial paper program under which we may from time to time issue short-term unsecured notes. At September 30, 2010, the commercial paper program is supported by our revolving credit facilities. There were no commercial paper borrowings outstanding at September 30, 2010.

     We have short-term borrowings with various domestic and international institutions pursuant to uncommitted facilities. At September 30, 2010, we had $11 million in short-term borrowings under these arrangements with a weighted average interest rate of 5%. In addition, we had $333 million of letters of credit and bid and performance bonds under these uncommitted facilities. The carrying value of our short-term borrowings approximates their fair value as of September 30, 2010.

     In June 2010, we entered into a secured loan agreement with a third-party financial institution and received proceeds of $180 million. The note bears interest at a rate of 4.8% and will be repaid in monthly installments over seven years. The loan is secured by equipment located in the United States, and is included in long-term debt on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet.

7. Financial Instruments

     Accounts Receivable Factoring

     We have entered into an accounts receivable sales program to sell accounts receivable related to Latin America to third party financial institutions. One of our subsidiaries sold approximately $350 million under this program during the second and third quarter of 2010. We received cash totaling $320 million and recognized a loss of $5 million on these sales. These transactions qualified for sale accounting under the accounting standards. The remainder of the amounts due to us was recorded as other receivables in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at September 30, 2010. The initial proceeds received on the sale are included in operating cash flows in our Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows.

     Financial Instruments Measured and Recognized at Fair Value

     The accounting guidance for fair value measurements establishes a valuation hierarchy for disclosure of the inputs to the valuations used to measure fair value. This hierarchy prioritizes the inputs into three broad levels. Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 inputs are quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly through market corroboration, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs based upon our own assumptions used to measure assets and liabilities at fair value. Classification of a financial asset or liability within the hierarchy is determined based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

     The following table presents our non-derivative assets and liabilities that are measured and recognized at fair value on a recurring basis classified under the appropriate level of the fair value hierarchy as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009:

	September 30, 2010
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
			(In thousands)
Other Assets:
Other investments	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Other Current Liabilities:
Contingent consideration on acquisition (See Note 3)		—		—		62,315		62,315

	December 31, 2009
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
					(Restated)		(Restated)
			(In thousands)
Other Assets:
Other investments	$	—	$	40,822	$	—	$	40,822
Other Current Liabilities:
Contingent consideration on acquisition (See Note 3)		—		—		59,563		59,563

18

WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

     During the first quarter of 2010, we received proceeds of approximately $42 million from the redemption of our other investments recorded at fair value at December 31, 2009. The proceeds are included in investing activities in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the period ended September 30, 2010.

19

WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

     The following table provides a summary of changes in fair value of our Level 3 financial liability for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010:

	Three			Nine
	Months Ended			Months Ended
	September 30,			September 30,
	2010			2010
	(Restated)
	(In thousands)
Balance at beginning of period	$	152,326		$	59,563
Unrealized gain on contingent consideration on acquisition included in earnings		(90,011	)		2,752
Balance at end of period	$	62,315		$	62,315

     The related gain recorded during the first nine months of 2010 is included in the Selling, General and Administrative Attributable to Segments line in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.

     Fair Value of Other Financial Instruments

     Our other financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, foreign currency exchange contracts, interest rate swaps, accounts receivable, notes receivable, accounts payable and short and long-term debt. With the exception of long-term debt, the carrying value of these financial instruments approximates their fair value.

     The fair value of outstanding debt fluctuates with changes in applicable interest rates. Fair value will exceed carrying value when the current market interest rate is lower than the interest rate at which the debt was originally issued. The fair value of a company’s debt is a measure of its current value under present market conditions. It does not impact the financial statements under current accounting rules. The fair value of our long-term debt was established based on quoted market prices.

     The fair value and carrying value of our long-term debt and current portion of long-term debt is as follows:

	September 30,		December 31,
	2010		2009
	(In thousands)
Fair value	$	7,989,214	$	6,303,203
Carrying value		7,266,753		5,865,332

8. Derivative Instruments

     We are exposed to market risk from changes in foreign currency and changes in interest rates. From time to time, we may enter into derivative financial instrument transactions to manage or reduce our market risk. We manage our debt portfolio to achieve an overall desired position of fixed and floating rates and we may employ interest rate swaps as a tool to achieve that goal. The major risks from interest rate derivatives include changes in the interest rates affecting the fair value of such instruments, potential increases in interest expense due to market increases in floating interest rates and the creditworthiness of the counterparties in such transactions. In light of events in the global credit markets and the potential impact of these events on the liquidity of the banking industry, we continue to monitor the creditworthiness of our counterparties, which are multinational commercial banks.

     The fair values of all our outstanding derivative instruments are determined using a model with Level 2 inputs including quoted market prices for contracts with similar terms and maturity dates.

     Interest Rate Swaps

     We use interest rate swaps to help mitigate exposures related to interest rate movements. Amounts paid or received upon termination of interest rate swaps accounted for as fair value hedges represent the fair value of the agreements at the time of termination and are recorded as an adjustment to the carrying value of the related debt. These amounts are amortized as a reduction (in the case of gains) or as an increase (in the case of losses) to interest expense over the remaining term of the debt. As of September 30, 2010, we had net unamortized gains of $61 million associated with interest rate swap terminations.

     Cash Flow Hedges

     In 2008, we entered into interest rate derivative instruments to hedge projected exposures to interest rates in anticipation of a debt offering. Those hedges were terminated at the time of the issuance of the debt, and the loss on these hedges is being amortized from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income to interest expense over the remaining term of the debt. As of September 30, 2010, we had net unamortized losses of $13 million associated with our cash flow hedge terminations.

20

WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

     Other Derivative Instruments

     As of September 30, 2010, we had foreign currency forward contracts with notional amounts aggregating to $1,039 million, which were entered into to hedge exposure to currency fluctuations in various foreign currencies, including, but not limited to, the British pound sterling, the Canadian dollar, the euro and the Norwegian krone. The total estimated fair value of these contracts at September 30, 2010, resulted in a net liability of approximately $17 million. These derivative instruments were not designated as hedges and the changes in fair value of the contracts are recorded each period in Other, Net in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.

     We have cross-currency swaps between the U.S. dollar and Canadian dollar to hedge certain exposures to the Canadian dollar. At September 30, 2010, we had notional amounts outstanding of $215 million. The total estimated fair value of these contracts at September 30, 2010, resulted in a liability of $28 million. These derivative instruments were not designated as hedges and the changes in fair value of the contracts are recorded each period in Other, Net in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.

     The fair values of outstanding derivative instruments are summarized as follows:

	September 30,		December 31,
	2010		2009		Classifications
	(In thousands)
Derivative assets not designated as hedges:
Foreign exchange contracts	$	4,323	$	9,831	Other Current Assets
Derivative liabilities not designated as hedges:
Foreign exchange contracts		20,854		18,939	Other Current Liabilities
Cross-currency swap contracts		28,448		26,170	Other Liabilities

9. Income Taxes

     For the three months ended September 30, 2010, we had a tax provision of $54 million on income before taxes of $153 million. Our income before taxes for the three months ended September 30, 2010 includes a $90 million gain on the fair value adjustment to the put option issued in connection the OFS acquisition for which no tax expense has been recorded. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we had a provision of $97 million on income before taxes of $87 million that includes curtailment expense on our SERP for which no related tax benefit was recorded. Our tax provision for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 includes minimum tax in Mexico and the tax impact of changes in our geographic earnings mix, both of which are partially offset by a tax benefit related to the devaluation of the Venezuelan bolivar. For the three months ended September 30, 2009, we had a tax provision of $5 million. Our effective tax rates were 11.6% and 31.4% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009.

10. Shareholders’ Equity

     The following summarizes our shareholders’ equity activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009:

							Noncontrolling
	Total			Company			Interests in
	Shareholders’			Shareholders’			Consolidated
	Equity			Equity			Subsidiaries
	(Restated)			(Restated)
				(In thousands)
Balance at December 31, 2009	$	9,438,373		$	9,359,341		$	79,032
Comprehensive Income:
Net Income		(9,957	)		(21,594	)		11,637
Curtailment and Remeasurement of Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan		35,111			35,111			—
Amortization of Pension Components		1,819			1,819			—
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments		(9,017	)		(9,017	)		—
Other		468			468			—
Comprehensive Income		18,424			6,787			11,637
Transactions with Shareholders		90,611			90,611			—
Dividends Paid to Noncontrolling Interests		(21,378	)		—			(21,378	)
Other		297			—			297
Balance at September 30, 2010	$	9,526,327		$	9,456,739		$	69,588

21

WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

						Noncontrolling
	Total			Company		Interests in
	Shareholders’			Shareholders’		Consolidated
	Equity			Equity		Subsidiaries
	(Restated)			(Restated)
				(In thousands)
Balance at December 31, 2008	$	8,128,593		$	8,048,192	$	80,401
Comprehensive Income:
Net Income		203,715			180,697		23,018
Amortization of Pension Components		6,464			6,464		—
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments		306,377			306,498		(121	)
Other		456			456		—
Comprehensive Income		517,012			494,115		22,897
Transactions with Shareholders		752,005			752,005		—
Dividends Paid to Noncontrolling Interests		(25,047	)		—		(25,047	)
Other		3,118			—		3,118
Balance at September 30, 2009	$	9,375,681		$	9,294,312	$	81,369

10. Earnings Per Share

     Basic earnings per share for all periods presented equals net income divided by the weighted average number of our shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of our shares outstanding during the period, adjusted for the dilutive effect of our stock options, restricted shares, performance units and our outstanding warrants. Our diluted earnings per share calculation excludes three million potential shares for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, three million potential shares for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and nine million potential shares for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, due to their antidilutive effect. Our diluted earnings per share calculation for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 also excludes six million potential shares that would have been included if we had net income for that year, but are excluded as we had a net loss and their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive.

     The following reconciles basic and diluted weighted average of shares outstanding:

	Three Months				Nine Months
	Ended September 30,				Ended September 30,
	2010		2009		2010		2009
					(Restated)
			(In thousands)
Basic weighted average shares outstanding		745,502		724,114		742,192		707,621
Dilutive effect of:
Warrants		553		3,163		—		1,756
Stock options and restricted shares		5,339		7,832		—		6,342
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding		751,394		735,109		742,192		715,719

12. Share-Based Compensation

     In June 2010, the Weatherford International Ltd. 2010 Omnibus Incentive Plan (“2010 Omnibus Plan”) was approved by our shareholders. This plan permits the grant of options, stock appreciation rights, restricted share awards, restricted share units, performance share awards, performance unit awards, other share-based awards and cash-based awards to any employee, non-employee director and other individual service providers or any affiliate. The 2010 Omnibus Plan is similar to our 2006 Omnibus Plan. The aggregate number of shares available for grant under this plan is 10,144,000.

     During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we issued one million performance units, which will vest ratably over a three-year period assuming continued employment and if the Company meets certain market-based performance goals. The performance units have a weighted-average grant date fair value of $12.41 based on the Monte Carlo simulation method.

22

WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

     We recognized the following employee share-based compensation expense during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009:

	Three Months				Nine Months
	Ended September 30,				Ended September 30,
	2010		2009		2010		2009
			(In thousands)
Share-based compensation	$	25,298	$	30,090	$	75,167	$	85,136
Related tax benefit		8,854		10,532		26,308		29,798

     During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we granted one million restricted share awards and units at a weighted average grant date fair value of $15.97 per share.

     As of September 30, 2010, there was $177 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to our unvested stock options, restricted share grants, and performance units. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of two years.

13. Retirement and Employee Benefit Plans

     We have defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans covering certain employees. The components of net periodic benefit cost for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 were as follows:

	Three Months Ended September 30,
	2010						2009
	United						United
	States			International			States			International
				(In thousands)
Service cost	$	—		$	1,450		$	891		$	1,778
Interest cost		765			1,797			1,892			1,772
Expected return on plan assets		(149	)		(1,172	)		(166	)		(1,043	)
Amortization of prior service cost (credit)		—			(14	)		997			(13	)
Amortization of loss		225			41			1,617			249
Net periodic benefit cost	$	841		$	2,102		$	5,231		$	2,743
	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2010						2009
	United						United
	States			International			States			International
				(In thousands)
Service cost	$	978		$	4,415		$	2,672		$	5,063
Interest cost		3,921			5,373			5,677			5,022
Expected return on plan assets		(447	)		(3,514	)		(497	)		(2,976	)
Amortization of transition obligation		—			—			—			(1	)
Amortization of prior service cost (credit)		1,534			(40	)		2,990			(36	)
Amortization of loss		1,139			122			4,851			712
Curtailment/settlement loss		35,453			—			1,063			—
Net periodic benefit cost	$	42,578		$	6,356		$	16,756		$	7,784

     Our SERP was amended effective March 31, 2010 to freeze the benefits under the plan. This resulted in the net curtailment loss shown above. The projected benefit obligation of the SERP after recording the curtailment charge in the first quarter of 2010 was $100 million.

     In April 2010, one executive in the plan left the Company and a distribution payment of $11 million was made. Three additional executives left the Company in June 2010, and we expect to pay out approximately $21 million for their SERP benefits in the fourth quarter of 2010 and incur a settlement charge of approximately $2 million.

     Effective April 8, 2010, our SERP was further amended to allow participants a one-time option to convert their vested, fixed-amount, dollar-denominated benefits under the SERP into equity-denominated benefits. The amendment permitted participants in the SERP to make a one-time irrevocable election before June 7, 2010 to convert between 50% and 100% of their cash balance under the plan into units representing the right to receive registered shares in the Company. During May 2010, the remaining participants elected to convert approximately $76 million of their cash entitlement into approximately 4.7 million shares, which was based on the closing share price on the date of the election.

23

WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

     At September 30, 2010, the projected benefit obligation of the SERP is $100 million and is primarily comprised of the $76 million to be paid in shares and the $21 million to be paid in cash in the fourth quarter of 2010.

     We previously disclosed in our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2009, that we expected to contribute approximately $7 million to our pension and other postretirement benefit plans during 2010. As of September 30, 2010, we have contributed approximately $7 million to these plans and anticipate total annual contributions to approximate original estimates previously disclosed.

14. Segment Information

     Financial information by segment is summarized below. Revenues are attributable to countries based on the ultimate destination of the sale of products or performance of services. Results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 have been restated to correct for previously identified immaterial errors affecting operating income that were recorded in improper periods (See Note 2).

	Three Months Ended September 30, 2010
	Net		Income			Depreciation		Total Assets at
	Operating		from			and		September 30,
	Revenues		Operations			Amortization		2010
	(Restated)		(Restated)			(Restated)		(Restated)
	(In thousands)
North America	$	1,096,963	$	199,029		$	81,843	$	6,427,092
Middle East/North Africa/Asia		601,215		65,718			75,968		4,758,770
Europe/West Africa/FSU		496,113		63,236			56,960		3,764,450
Latin America (a)		335,461		(35,182	)		46,527		2,753,745
		2,529,752		292,801			261,298		17,704,057
Corporate and Research and Development (b)		—		(96,364	)		5,911		1,881,192
Revaluation of Contingent Consideration		—		90,011			—		—
Other (c)		—		(11,024	)		—		—
Total	$	2,529,752	$	275,424		$	267,209	$	19,585,249
	Three Months Ended September 30, 2009
	Net		Income			Depreciation		Total Assets at
	Operating		from			and		December 31,
	Revenues		Operations			Amortization		2009
	(Restated)		(Restated)			(Restated)		(Restated)
	(In thousands)
North America	$	617,288	$	25,088		$	79,737	$	6,347,978
Middle East/North Africa/Asia		598,667		98,059			65,771		4,572,498
Europe/West Africa/FSU		404,006		38,439			45,964		3,586,895
Latin America		524,986		67,087			43,403		3,125,376
		2,144,947		228,673			234,875		17,632,747
Corporate and Research and Development		—		(94,572	)		4,134		1,063,943
Revaluation of Contingent Consideration		—		27,368			—		—
Other (d)		—		(17,887	)		—		—
Total	$	2,144,947	$	143,582		$	239,009	$	18,696,690

(a)	The three months ended September 30, 2010 includes a $76 million charge for revisions to our profitability estimates on our project management contracts in Mexico, as the client requested a slowdown in drilling activity to near zero while they re-evaluated the pace of drilling and capital expenditures in the current year.
(b)	Total assets at September 30, 2010 include the remaining cash proceeds from the September 2010 debt offering. This cash was subsequently used to repurchase the remaining bonds tendered in October 2010.
(c)	The three months ended September 30, 2010 includes $8 million for severance and facility closure costs and $3 million for legal and professional fees incurred in connection with our on-going investigations.
(d)	The three months ended September 30, 2009 includes $9 million for legal and professional fees incurred in connection with on-going investigations by the U.S. government and $9 million for severance charges associated with reorganization activities.

24

WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010
	Net		Income			Depreciation
	Operating		from			and
	Revenues		Operations			Amortization
	(Restated)		(Restated)			(Restated)
	(In thousands)
North America	$	2,903,238	$	434,462		$	243,543
Middle East/North Africa/Asia		1,765,873		215,425			223,397
Europe/West Africa/FSU		1,456,049		176,900			158,602
Latin America (e)		1,172,822		32,883			133,759
		7,297,982		859,670			759,301
Corporate and Research and Development		—		(286,479	)		16,183
Revaluation of Contingent Consideration		—		(2,752	)		—
Other (f)		—		(82,365	)		—
Total	$	7,297,982	$	488,074		$	775,484

25

WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009
	Net		Income			Depreciation
	Operating		from			and
	Revenues		Operations			Amortization
	(Restated)		(Restated)			(Restated)
	(In thousands)
North America	$	2,021,920	$	143,348		$	232,088
Middle East/North Africa/Asia		1,778,292		354,839			184,326
Europe/West Africa/FSU		1,139,177		179,516			115,832
Latin America		1,458,616		236,610			109,816
		6,398,005		914,313			642,062
Corporate and Research and Development		—		(267,939	)		12,034
Revaluation of Contingent Consideration		—		27,368			—
Other (g)		—		(73,669	)		—
Total	$	6,398,005	$	600,073		$	654,096

(e)	The nine months ended September 30, 2010 includes a $76 million charge for revisions to our profitability estimates on our project management contracts in Mexico.
(f)	The nine months ended September 30, 2010 includes a $38 million charge related to our SERP which was frozen on March 31, 2010, $44 million for severance and facility closure costs and $5 million for legal and professional fees incurred in connection with our on-going investigations. These charges were offset by a $5 million benefit related to the reversal of prior cost accruals for our exit from certain sanctioned countries.
(g)	The nine months ended September 30, 2009 includes $36 million for legal and professional fees incurred in connection with on-going investigations by the U.S. government, $34 million for severance and facility closure costs associated with reorganization activities and $4 million in costs related to the Company’s withdrawal from certain sanctioned countries.

15. Disputes, Litigation and Contingencies

     U.S. Government and Internal Investigations

     We are currently involved in government and internal investigations involving various areas of our operations.

     Until 2003, we participated in the United Nations oil-for-food program governing sales of goods and services into Iraq. The U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) and the SEC have undertaken investigations of our participation in the oil-for-food program and have subpoenaed certain documents in connection with these investigations. We have cooperated fully with these investigations. We have retained legal counsel, reporting to our audit committee, to investigate this matter. We have begun negotiations with the government agencies to resolve these matters, but we cannot yet anticipate the timing, outcome or possible impact of the ultimate resolution of the investigations, financial or otherwise.

     The U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry & Security, Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”), DOJ and SEC have undertaken investigations of allegations of improper sales of products and services by the Company and its subsidiaries in certain sanctioned countries. We have cooperated fully with this investigation. We have retained legal counsel, reporting to our audit committee, to investigate these matters and to cooperate fully with these agencies. We have begun negotiations with the government agencies to resolve these matters, but we cannot yet anticipate the timing, outcome or possible impact of the ultimate resolution of the investigation, financial or otherwise.

26

WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

     In light of this investigation and of U.S. and foreign policy environment and the inherent uncertainties surrounding these countries, we decided in September 2007 to direct our foreign subsidiaries to discontinue doing business in countries that are subject to comprehensive U.S. economic and trade sanctions, specifically Cuba, Iran, and Sudan, as well as Syria. Effective September 2007, we ceased entering into any new contracts in these countries and began an orderly discontinuation and winding down of our existing business in these sanctioned countries. Effective March 31, 2008, we substantially completed our winding down of business in these countries. We can complete the withdrawal process only pursuant to licenses issued by OFAC. Our remaining activities in Iran, Sudan and Syria include ongoing withdrawal activities such as attempts to collect accounts receivable, attempts to settle tax liabilities or legal claims and attempts to recover or liquidate assets, including equipment and funds. Certain of our subsidiaries continue to conduct business in countries such as Myanmar that are subject to more limited U.S. trading sanctions.

     The DOJ and SEC are investigating our compliance with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”) and other laws worldwide. We have retained legal counsel, reporting to our audit committee, to investigate these matters and to cooperate fully with the DOJ and SEC. As part of our investigations, we have uncovered potential violations of U.S. law in connection with activities in West Africa. We have begun negotiations with the government agencies to resolve these matters, but we cannot yet anticipate the timing, outcome or possible impact of the ultimate resolution of the investigations, financial or otherwise.

     The DOJ, SEC and other agencies and authorities have a broad range of civil and criminal penalties they may seek to impose against corporations and individuals for violations of trade sanctions laws, the FCPA and other federal statutes including, but not limited to, injunctive relief, disgorgement, fines, penalties and modifications to business practices and compliance programs. In recent years, these agencies and authorities have entered into agreements with, and obtained a range of penalties against, several public corporations and individuals in similar investigations, under which civil and criminal penalties were imposed, including in some cases fines and other penalties and sanctions in the tens and hundreds of millions of dollars. These agencies are seeking to impose penalties against us for past conduct, but the ultimate amount of any penalties we may pay currently cannot be reasonably estimated. Under trade sanctions laws, the DOJ may also seek to impose modifications to business practices, including immediate cessation of all business activities in specific countries or other limitations that decrease our business, and modifications to compliance programs, which may increase compliance costs. Any injunctive relief, disgorgement, fines, penalties, sanctions or imposed modifications to business practices resulting from these investigations could adversely affect our results of operations. In addition, our historical activities in sanctioned countries, such as Sudan and Iran, could result in certain investors, such as government sponsored pension funds, divesting or not investing in our registered shares. Based on available information, we cannot predict what, if any, actions the DOJ, SEC or other authorities will take in our situation or the effect any such actions will have on our consolidated financial position or results of operations. To the extent we violated trade sanctions laws, the FCPA, or other laws or regulations, fines and other penalties may be imposed. Because these matters are now pending before the indicated agencies, there can be no assurance that actual fines or penalties, if any, will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, liquidity or results of operations.

     Through December 31, 2010, we have incurred $49 million for costs in connection with our exit from sanctioned countries and incurred $113 million for legal and professional fees in connection with complying with and conducting these on-going investigations.

     Macondo Litigation

     On April 20, 2010, the Deepwater Horizon rig operating under contract with BP at the Macondo well in the Gulf of Mexico exploded and sank, resulting in 11 deaths, several injuries and significant damages to property and the environment.

     Weatherford provided the following services and products to BP on the Macondo well: (1) connected and tightened four intermediate casing strings and one tapered production string (“long string”); (2) furnished a liner hanger on one casing string; (3) furnished centralizers, most of which were not used in the well, and (4) provided float equipment on the long string. The float equipment consisted of a reamer shoe, a float collar and wiper plugs. The float collar is designed to control backflow or ingress of the cement through the shoe track while the cement hardens. At the time of the explosion, Weatherford had two employees on the Deepwater Horizon; they sustained minor injuries.

     As a result of the explosion, approximately 400 lawsuits were filed, mainly for personal injuries, wrongful death and pollution damage. Weatherford is currently named, along with BP and other defendants, in several dozen of these lawsuits. The United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation issued an order centralizing most of these cases in the Federal District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana. The pollution damage complaints generally refer to the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (“OPA”) and allege, among other things, negligence and gross negligence by Weatherford and other defendants. They allege that Weatherford and the other defendants are responsible for property damage, trespass, nuisance and economic loss as a result of environmental pollution and generally seek awards of unspecified economic, compensatory, and punitive damages, as well as injunctive relief. Additional lawsuits may be filed in the future relating to the Macondo incident.

     Weatherford was not designated as a “Responsible Party,” as that term is defined by OPA. Therefore, Weatherford was not charged with responsibility for cleaning up the oil or handling any claims. The Responsible Party may make a claim for contribution against any other party it alleges contributed to the oil spill. Since Weatherford has not been named a Responsible Party, we intend to seek to be dismissed from any and all OPA-related claims and to seek indemnity from any and all liability under OPA.

27

WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

     In the master service contract between BP and Weatherford, under which Weatherford provided products and services to BP related to the Macondo well, BP agreed to “save, indemnify, release, defend and hold harmless [Weatherford, its subcontractors and their affiliates, directors, officers and employees] from and against any claim of whatsoever nature arising from pollution and/or contamination including without limitation such pollution or contamination from the reservoir”. BP further agreed to “save, indemnify, release, defend and hold harmless [Weatherford, its subcontractors and their affiliates, directors, officers and employees] from and against any claims, losses, damages, costs (including legal costs) expenses and liabilities resulting from...blowout, fire, explosion, cratering or any uncontrolled well condition (including the costs to control a wild well and the removal of debris)”. These indemnity provisions include direct claims asserted against Weatherford by third parties and any claim by BP for contribution under OPA. These indemnities apply regardless of the cause of the condition giving rise to the claim. The indemnities exclude claims for injury to Weatherford’s employees and subcontractors. However, as injuries to our two employees were minor, we do not anticipate any significant liabilities with respect to our employees.

     We believe that the indemnification obligations of BP are valid and enforceable. However, BP may seek to avoid its indemnification obligations. Should a court determine that the wrongful death and personal injury indemnity provisions are unenforceable, Weatherford might be liable for injuries to, or the death of, BP personnel and personnel of third party contractors if a case is adversely determined. The cause of the Macondo incident remains under investigation and has yet to be determined.

     If BP were to avoid its indemnities regarding personal injury and a case is adversely determined against Weatherford with respect to the Macondo incident, Weatherford believes its exposure to personal injury/death claims is within the limits of its insurance coverage. Weatherford has a self-insured retention of $2 million. Above that amount, Weatherford has aggregate liability insurance coverage with limits of $303 million. Weatherford believes all claims for personal injury made against Weatherford, even if they are not covered by indemnity from BP, are covered under its various liability insurance policies, up to the $303 million in limits. Weatherford has met individually with its insurers to discuss this matter. While some of our insurers have sent notices stating that they lack sufficient information to adequately assess coverage issues at this time, we do not currently anticipate there will be a substantive coverage dispute amongst Weatherford and its insurers.

     We do not expect that we will have liability for these claims, but the litigation surrounding these matters is complex and likely to continue for some time, and the damages claimed are significant. We cannot predict the ultimate outcome of these claims.

     Weatherford is cooperating fully with the investigations of the accident initiated by various agencies of the U.S. Government and, to the extent requested, has responded to several subpoenas, information and document requests, and requests for testimony of employees.

     Shareholder Litigation

     In June and July 2010, shareholders filed suit in Weatherford’s name against those directors in place before June 2010 and certain current and former members of management relating to the U.S. government and internal investigations disclosed above and in our SEC filings since 2007. In March 2011, shareholders filed suit relating to the matters described in Note 2. We will investigate these claims appropriately. We cannot predict the ultimate outcome of these claims.

     Other Disputes

     As a result of discussions with a customer, we reviewed how the dual exchange rate might affect amounts we receive for our U.S. dollar-denominated receivables in Venezuela. We believe our contracts are legally enforceable and our customers continue to accept our invoices. However, based on the current political and economic environment in Venezuela, we believe a loss is probable. Accordingly, we recorded a reserve of $32 million against this exposure in the fourth quarter of 2010.

     Our former Senior Vice President and General Counsel (the “Executive”) left the Company in June 2009. The Executive had employment agreements with us that terminated on his departure. There is currently a dispute between the Executive and us as to the amount of compensation we are obligated to pay under these employment agreements based on the Executive’s separation. This dispute has not resulted in a lawsuit being filed. It is our belief that an unfavorable outcome regarding this dispute is not probable, and as such, we have not accrued for $9 million of the Executive’s claimed severance and other benefits.

     Additionally, we are aware of various disputes and potential claims and are a party in various litigation involving claims against us, some of which are covered by insurance. For claims, disputes and pending litigation in which we believe a negative outcome is probable and a loss can be reasonably estimated, we have recorded a liability for the expected loss. These liabilities are immaterial to our financial condition and results of operations. In addition we have certain claims, disputes and pending litigation in which we do not believe a negative outcome is probable. If one or more negative outcomes were to occur, the impact to our financial condition could be as high as $180 million.

28

WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

16. New Accounting Pronouncements

     In October 2009, the FASB issued an update to existing guidance on revenue recognition for arrangements with multiple deliverables. This update will allow companies to allocate consideration received for qualified separate deliverables using estimated selling price for both delivered and undelivered items when vendor-specific objective evidence or third-party evidence is unavailable. Additional disclosures discussing the nature of multiple element arrangements, the types of deliverables under the arrangements, the general timing of their delivery, and significant factors and estimates used to determine estimated selling prices are required. We will adopt this update for new revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified beginning January 1, 2011. We do not expect the provisions of this update to have a material impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements.

17. Condensed Consolidating Financial Statements

     As discussed in Note 2, we have restated results of operations and cash flows for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 and we have restated our financial position at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.

     A Swiss corporation named Weatherford International Ltd. is the ultimate parent of the Weatherford group (“Parent”). The Parent guarantees the obligations of Weatherford International Ltd. incorporated in Bermuda (“Weatherford Bermuda”) and Weatherford International, Inc. incorporated in Delaware (“Weatherford Delaware”) noted below.

     The following obligations of Weatherford Delaware were guaranteed by Weatherford Bermuda at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009: (i) the 6.625% Senior Notes, (ii) the 5.95% Senior Notes, (iii) the 6.35% Senior Notes and (iv) the 6.80% Senior Notes.

     The following obligations of Weatherford Bermuda were guaranteed by Weatherford Delaware at December 31, 2009: (i) the revolving credit facilities, (ii) the 4.95% Senior Notes, (iii) the 5.50% Senior Notes, (iv) the 6.50% Senior Notes, (v) the 5.15% Senior Notes, (vi) the 6.00% Senior Notes, (vii) the 7.00% Senior Notes, (viii) the 9.625% Senior Notes, (ix) the 9.875% Senior Notes and (x) issuances of notes under the commercial paper program.

     In September 2010, Weatherford Bermuda issued $800 million of 5.125% Senior Notes due 2020 and $600 million of 6.75% Senior Notes due 2040, both of which are guaranteed by Weatherford Delaware. As a result of these transactions, the following obligations of Weatherford Bermuda were guaranteed by Weatherford Delaware at September 30, 2010: (i) the revolving credit facilities, (ii) the 4.95% Senior Notes, (iii) the 5.50% Senior Notes, (iv) the 6.50% Senior Notes, (v) the 5.15% Senior Notes, (vi) the 6.00% Senior Notes, (vii) the 7.00% Senior Notes, (viii) the 9.625% Senior Notes, (ix) the 9.875% Senior Notes, (x) the 5.125% Senior Notes, (xi) the 6.75% Senior Notes and (x) issuances of notes under the commercial paper program.

     As a result of the guarantee arrangements, we are required to present the following condensed consolidating financial information. The accompanying guarantor financial information is presented on the equity method of accounting for all periods presented. Under this method, investments in subsidiaries are recorded at cost and adjusted for our share in the subsidiaries’ cumulative results of operations, capital contributions and distributions and other changes in equity. Elimination entries relate primarily to the elimination of investments in subsidiaries and associated intercompany balances and transactions.

29

WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
September 30, 2010
(Restated)
(unaudited)
(In thousands)

							Other
	Parent		Bermuda		Delaware		Subsidiaries		Eliminations			Consolidation
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash and Cash Equivalents	$	4,966	$	343,053	$	281,677	$	321,686	$	—		$	951,382
Other Current Assets		9,654		5,794		99,766		5,821,673		—			5,936,887
Total Current Assets		14,620		348,847		381,443		6,143,359		—			6,888,269
Equity Investments in Affiliates		9,109,925		15,138,459		7,248,899		11,438,346		(42,935,629	)		—
Shares Held in Parent		—		—		96,663		468,801		(565,464	)		—
Intercompany Receivables, Net		—		2,217,952		598,376		—		(2,816,328	)		—
Other Assets		8,508		37,177		232,212		12,419,083		—			12,696,980
Total Assets	$	9,133,053	$	17,742,435	$	8,557,593	$	30,469,589	$	(46,317,421	)	$	19,585,249
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
Short-term Borrowings and Current Portion of Long-term Debt	$	—	$	221,435	$	342,604	$	18,589	$	—		$	582,628
Accounts Payable and Other Current Liabilities		88,064		72,748		137,090		2,051,920		—			2,349,822
Total Current Liabilities		88,064		294,183		479,694		2,070,509		—			2,932,450
Long-term Debt		—		5,167,966		1,515,026		11,971		—			6,694,963
Intercompany Payables, Net		162,982		—		—		2,653,346		(2,816,328	)		—
Other Long-term Liabilities		5,188		79,272		2,164		344,885		—			431,509
Total Liabilities		256,234		5,541,421		1,996,884		5,080,711		(2,816,328	)		10,058,922
Weatherford Shareholders’ Equity		8,876,819		12,201,014		6,560,709		25,319,290		(43,501,093	)		9,456,739
Noncontrolling Interests		—		—		—		69,588		—			69,588
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity	$	9,133,053	$	17,742,435	$	8,557,593	$	30,469,589	$	(46,317,421	)	$	19,585,249

30

WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
December 31, 2009
(Restated)
(In thousands)

							Other
	Parent		Bermuda		Delaware		Subsidiaries		Eliminations			Consolidation
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash and Cash Equivalents	$	102	$	47	$	421	$	251,949	$	—		$	252,519
Other Current Assets		496		11,163		98,033		5,619,742		—			5,729,434
Total Current Assets		598		11,210		98,454		5,871,691		—			5,981,953
Equity Investments in Affiliates		9,183,803		14,952,128		6,527,676		11,441,274		(42,104,881	)		—
Shares Held in Parent		—		—		108,268		507,780		(616,048	)		—
Intercompany Receivables, Net		—		1,671,487		1,017,215		—		(2,688,702	)		—
Other Assets		9,376		68,960		190,174		12,446,227		—			12,714,737
Total Assets	$	9,193,777	$	16,703,785	$	7,941,787	$	30,266,972	$	(45,409,631	)	$	18,696,690
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
Short-term Borrowings and Current Portion of Long-Term Debt	$	—	$	352,373	$	1,868	$	515,340	$	—		$	869,581
Accounts Payable and Other Current Liabilities		46,160		107,984		116,404		1,860,571		—			2,131,119
Total Current Liabilities		46,160		460,357		118,272		2,375,911		—			3,000,700
Long-term Debt		—		3,988,162		1,848,191		10,905		—			5,847,258
Intercompany Payables, Net		36,611		—		—		2,652,091		(2,688,702	)		—
Other Long-term Liabilities		8,132		132,155		2,309		267,763		—			410,359
Total Liabilities		90,903		4,580,674		1,968,772		5,306,670		(2,688,702	)		9,258,317
Weatherford Shareholders’ Equity		9,102,874		12,123,111		5,973,015		24,881,270		(42,720,929	)		9,359,341
Noncontrolling Interests		—		—		—		79,032		—			79,032
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity	$	9,193,777	$	16,703,785	$	7,941,787	$	30,266,972	$	(45,409,631	)	$	18,696,690

31

WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

Condensed Consolidating Statements of Income
Three Months Ended September 30, 2010
(Restated)
(unaudited)
(In thousands)

										Other
	Parent			Bermuda			Delaware			Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidation
Revenues	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	2,529,752		$	—		$	2,529,752
Costs and Expenses		52,507			(724	)		(716	)		(2,305,395	)		—			(2,254,328	)
Operating Income (Loss)		52,507			(724	)		(716	)		224,357			—			275,424
Other Income (Expense):
Interest Income (Expense), Net		(35	)		(68,428	)		(30,431	)		(424	)		—			(99,318	)
Bond Tender Premium		—			—			(10,731	)		—			—			(10,731	)
Devaluation of Venezuelan Bolivar		—			—			—			—			—			—
Intercompany Charges, Net		(10,604	)		542			(44,386	)		54,448			—			—
Equity in Subsidiary Income (Loss)		52,759			71,414			366,072			—			(490,245	)		—
Other, Net		26			27,940			(236	)		(40,007	)		—			(12,277	)
Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes		94,653			30,744			279,572			238,374			(490,245	)		153,098
Provision for Income Taxes		—			(4	)		37,863			(92,018	)		—			(54,159	)
Net Income (Loss)		94,653			30,740			317,435			146,356			(490,245	)		98,939
Noncontrolling Interests		—			—			—			(4,286	)		—			(4,286	)
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Weatherford	$	94,653		$	30,740		$	317,435		$	142,070		$	(490,245	)	$	94,653

Condensed Consolidating Statements of Income
Three Months Ended September 30, 2009
(Restated)
(unaudited)
(In thousands)

										Other
	Parent			Bermuda			Delaware			Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidation
Revenues	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	2,144,947		$	—		$	2,144,947
Costs and Expenses		(1,356	)		(5,176	)		(448	)		(1,994,385	)		—			(2,001,365	)
Operating Income (Loss)		(1,356	)		(5,176	)		(448	)		150,562			—			143,582
Other Income (Expense):
Interest Income (Expense), Net		—			(61,397	)		(28,762	)		(126	)		—			(90,285	)
Intercompany Charges, Net		(27,521	)		1,291			(38,486	)		64,716			—			—
Equity in Subsidiary Income		60,622			64,776			80,546			—			(205,944	)		—
Other, Net		9			54,116			(23	)		(65,148	)		—			(11,046	)
Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes		31,754			53,610			12,827			150,004			(205,944	)		42,251
Provision for Income Taxes		—			—			30,528			(35,439	)		—			(4,911	)
Net Income (Loss)		31,754			53,610			43,355			114,565			(205,944	)		37,340
Noncontrolling Interests		—			—			—			(5,586	)		—			(5,586	)
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Weatherford	$	31,754		$	53,610		$	43,355		$	108,979		$	(205,944	)	$	31,754

32

WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

Condensed Consolidating Statements of Income
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010
(Restated)
(unaudited)
(In thousands)

										Other
	Parent			Bermuda			Delaware			Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidation
Revenues	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	7,297,982		$	—		$	7,297,982
Costs and Expenses		(42,384	)		(43,352	)		(1,967	)		(6,722,205	)		—			(6,809,908	)
Operating Income (Loss)		(42,384	)		(43,352	)		(1,967	)		575,777			—			488,074
Other Income (Expense):
Interest Income (Expense), Net		(982	)		(198,470	)		(88,456	)		(2,468	)		—			(290,376	)
Bond Tender Premium		—			—			(10,731	)		—			—			(10,731	)
Devaluation of Venezuelan Bolivar		—			—			—			(63,859	)		—			(63,859	)
Intercompany Charges, Net		(21,972	)		2,289			(130,257	)		149,940			—			—
Equity in Subsidiary Income		43,774			65,775			721,199			—			(830,748	)		—
Other, Net		(30	)		185,191			(646	)		(220,196	)		—			(35,681	)
Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes		(21,594	)		11,433			489,142			439,194			(830,748	)		87,427
Provision for Income Taxes		—			(4	)		72,683			(170,063	)		—			(97,384	)
Net Income (Loss)		(21,594	)		11,429			561,825			269,131			(830,748	)		(9,957	)
Noncontrolling Interests		—			—			—			(11,637	)		—			(11,637	)
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Weatherford	$	(21,594	)	$	11,429		$	561,825		$	257,494		$	(830,748	)	$	(21,594	)

Condensed Consolidating Statements of Income
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009
(Restated)
(unaudited)
(In thousands)

										Other
	Parent			Bermuda			Delaware			Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidation
Revenues	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	6,398,005		$	—		$	6,398,005
Costs and Expenses		(2,074	)		(15,767	)		(1,324	)		(5,778,767	)		—			(5,797,932	)
Operating Income (Loss)		(2,074	)		(15,767	)		(1,324	)		619,238			—			600,073
Other Income (Expense):
Interest Income (Expense), Net		—			(191,515	)		(85,928	)		2,597			—			(274,846	)
Intercompany Charges, Net		(27,530	)		5,095			(98,587	)		121,022			—			—
Equity in Subsidiary Income		210,299			255,397			322,586			—			(788,282	)		—
Other, Net		2			150,077			(356	)		(178,179	)		—			(28,456	)
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes		180,697			203,287			136,391			564,678			(788,282	)		296,771
Provision for Income Taxes		—			—			64,986			(158,042	)		—			(93,056	)
Net Income (Loss)		180,697			203,287			201,377			406,636			(788,282	)		203,715
Noncontrolling Interests		—			—			—			(23,018	)		—			(23,018	)
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Weatherford	$	180,697		$	203,287		$	201,377		$	383,618		$	(788,282	)	$	180,697

33

WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010
(unaudited)
(In thousands)

										Other
	Parent			Bermuda			Delaware			Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidation
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Net Income (Loss)	$	(21,594	)	$	11,429		$	561,825		$	269,131		$	(830,748	)	$	(9,957	)
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income (Loss) to Net Cash Provided (Used) by Operating Activities:
Charges from Parent or Subsidiary		21,972			(2,289	)		130,257			(149,940	)		—			—
Equity in (Earnings) Loss of Affiliates		(43,774	)		(65,775	)		(721,199	)		—			830,748			—
Deferred Income Tax Benefit		—			—			(72,687	)		(29,415	)		—			(102,102	)
Other Adjustments		26,713			(145,518	)		(5,158	)		971,873			—			847,910
Net Cash Provided (Used) by Operating Activities		(16,683	)		(202,153	)		(106,962	)		1,061,649			—			735,851
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Acquisitions of Businesses, Net of Cash Acquired		(44,489	)		—			—			(13,928	)		—			(58,417	)
Capital Expenditures for Property, Plant and Equipment		—			—			—			(717,556	)		—			(717,556	)
Acquisition of Intellectual Property		—			—			—			(20,784	)		—			(20,784	)
Acquisition of Equity Investments Unconsolidated Affiliates		—			—			—			(1,750	)		—			(1,750	)
Proceeds from Sale of Assets and Businesses, Net		—			—			—			191,115			—			191,115
Capital Contribution to Subsidiary		—			(873	)		(25	)		—			898			—
Other Investing Activities		—			41,840			—			—			—			41,840
Net Cash Provided (Used) by Investing Activities		(44,489	)		40,967			(25	)		(562,903	)		898			(565,552	)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Borrowings (Repayments) Short-term Debt, Net		—			(343,073	)		(735	)		(497,250	)		—			(841,058	)
Borrowings (Repayments) Long-term Debt, Net		—			1,386,010			(169,945	)		180,488			—			1,396,553
Borrowings (Repayments) Between Subsidiaries, Net		66,036			(538,745	)		566,326			(93,617	)		—			—
Proceeds from Capital Contribution		—			—			—			898			(898	)		—
Other, Net		—			—			(7,403	)		—			—			(7,403	)
Net Cash Provided (Used) by Financing Activities		66,036			504,192			388,243			(409,481	)		(898	)		548,092
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash and Cash Equivalents		—			—			—			(19,528	)		—			(19,528	)
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents		4,864			343,006			281,256			69,737			—			698,863
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Year		102			47			421			251,949			—			252,519
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Year	$	4,966		$	343,053		$	281,677		$	321,686		$	—		$	951,382

34

WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009
(unaudited)
(In thousands)

										Other
	Parent			Bermuda			Delaware			Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidation
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Net Income	$	180,697		$	203,287		$	201,377		$	406,636		$	(788,282	)	$	203,715
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income (Loss) to Net Cash Provided (Used) by Operating Activities:
Charges from Parent or Subsidiary		27,530			(5,095	)		98,587			(121,022	)		—			—
Equity in (Earnings) Loss of Affiliates		(210,299	)		(255,397	)		(322,586	)		—			788,282			—
Deferred Income Tax Benefit		—			—			(64,984	)		(161,096	)		—			(226,080	)
Other Adjustments		797			(218,834	)		131,530			381,268			—			294,761
Net Cash Provided (Used) by Operating Activities		(1,275	)		(276,039	)		43,924			505,786			—			272,396
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Acquisitions of Businesses, Net of Cash Acquired		—			—			—			(4,749	)		—			(4,749	)
Capital Expenditures for Property, Plant and Equipment		—			—			—			(1,269,884	)		—			(1,269,884	)
Acquisition of Intellectual Property		—			—			—			(22,702	)		—			(22,702	)
Acquisition of Equity Investment in Unconsolidated Affiliate		—			—			—			(26,999	)		—			(26,999	)
Proceeds from Sale of Assets and Businesses, Net		—			—			—			113,720			—			113,720
Capital Contribution to Subsidiary		—			(338,970	)		(39	)		—			339,009			—
Net Cash Provided (Used) by Investing Activities		—			(338,970	)		(39	)		(1,210,614	)		339,009			(1,210,614	)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Borrowings (Repayments) Short-term Debt, Net		—			(460,356	)		82			222,725			—			(237,549	)
Borrowings (Repayments) Long-term Debt, Net		—			1,233,365			—			(3,103	)		—			1,230,262
Borrowings (Repayments) Between Subsidiaries, Net		1,238			(157,970	)		(51,178	)		207,910			—			—
Proceeds from Capital Contribution		—			—			—			339,009			(339,009	)		—
Other, Net		—			—			9,046			—			—			9,046
Net Cash Provided (Used) by Financing Activities		1,238			615,039			(42,050	)		766,541			(339,009	)		1,001,759
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash And Cash Equivalents		—			—			—			4,656			—			4,656
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents		(37	)		30			1,835			66,369			—			68,197
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Year		102			24			50			238,222			—			238,398
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Year	$	65		$	54		$	1,885		$	304,591		$	—		$	306,595

35

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

     Our Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) begins with an executive level overview, which provides a general description of our company today, a synopsis of industry market trends, insight into management’s perspective of the opportunities and challenges we face and our outlook for the remainder of 2010 and into 2011. Next, we analyze the results of our operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, including the trends in our overall business. Then we review our liquidity and capital resources. We conclude with a discussion of our critical accounting policies and estimates and a summary of recently issued accounting pronouncements. When using phrases such as “Company,” “we,” “us” and “our” the intent is to refer to Weatherford International Ltd.

Overview

     General

     The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related MD&A for the year ended December 31, 2009 as restated and presented in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. Our discussion includes various forward-looking statements about our markets, the demand for our products and services and our future results. These statements are based on certain assumptions we consider reasonable. For information about these assumptions, you should refer to the section entitled “Forward-Looking Statements.”

     Our principal business is to provide equipment and services to the oil and natural gas exploration and production industry both on land and offshore, including our ten product and service lines, as described in our Form 10-K. We may sell our products and services separately or may bundle them together to provide integrated solutions, up to and including integrated well construction where we are responsible for the entire process of drilling, constructing and completing a well. Our customers include both exploration and production companies and other oilfield service companies. Depending on the service line, customer and location, our contracts vary in their terms, provisions and indemnities. We earn revenues under our contracts when products and services are delivered. Typically, we provide products and services at a well site where our personnel and equipment may be located together with personnel and equipment of our customer and third parties, such as other service providers.

     Industry Trends

     Changes in the current price and expected future prices of oil and natural gas influence the level of energy industry spending. Changes in expenditures result in an increased or decreased demand for our products and services. Rig count is an indicator of the level of spending for the exploration for and production of oil and natural gas reserves.

     The following chart sets forth certain statistics that reflect historical market conditions:

			Henry Hub		North American Rig		International Rig
	WTI Oil (1)		Gas (2)		Count (3)		Count (3)
September 30, 2010	$	79.97	$	3.87		1,995		1,120
December 31, 2009		79.36		5.57		1,485		1,113
September 30, 2009		70.61		4.84		1,217		1,071

(1)	Price per barrel as of September 30 and December 31 — Source: Thomson Reuters
(2)	Price per MM/BTU as of September 30 and December 31 — Source: Thomson Reuters
(3)	Average rig count for the applicable month — Source: Baker Hughes Rig Count and other third-party data

     Oil prices increased during the first nine months of 2010, ranging from a low of $68.01 per barrel in late May to a high of $86.84 per barrel near the beginning of April. Natural gas prices decreased during the first nine months of 2010 and ranged from a high of $6.01 MM/BTU in early January to a low of $3.65 MM/BTU in late August. Factors influencing oil and natural gas prices during the period include hydrocarbon inventory levels, realized and expected economic growth, realized and expected levels of hydrocarbon demand, levels of spare production capacity within the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (“OPEC”), weather and geopolitical uncertainty.

36

Results of Operations

     The following charts contain selected financial data comparing our consolidated and segment results from operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009. Results have been restated in the following table. See “Item 1. Financial Statements — Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements — Note 2. Restatement of Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.”

	Three Months						Nine Months
	Ended September 30,						Ended September 30,
	(Restated)			(Restated)			(Restated)			(Restated)
	2010			2009			2010			2009
	(In thousands, except percentages and per share data)
Revenues:
North America	$	1,096,963		$	617,288		$	2,903,238		$	2,021,920
Middle East/North Africa/Asia		601,215			598,667			1,765,873			1,778,292
Europe/West Africa/FSU		496,113			404,006			1,456,049			1,139,177
Latin America		335,461			524,986			1,172,822			1,458,616
		2,529,752			2,144,947			7,297,982			6,398,005
Operating Income:
North America		199,029			25,088			434,462			143,348
Middle East/North Africa/Asia		65,718			98,059			215,425			354,839
Europe/West Africa/FSU		63,236			38,439			176,900			179,516
Latin America		(35,182	)		67,087			32,883			236,610
Research and Development		(54,457	)		(49,300	)		(156,844	)		(144,434	)
Corporate		(41,907	)		(45,272	)		(129,635	)		(123,505	)
Revaluation of Contingent Consideration		90,011			27,368			(2,752	)		27,368
Exit and Restructuring		(11,024	)		(17,887	)		(82,365	)		(73,669	)
		275,424			143,582			488,074			600,073
Interest Expense, Net		(99,318	)		(90,285	)		(290,376	)		(274,846	)
Bond Tender Premium		(10,731	)		—			(10,731	)		—
Devaluation of Venezuelan Bolivar		—			—			(63,859	)		—
Other, Net		(12,277	)		(11,046	)		(35,681	)		(28,456	)
Effective Tax Rate		35.4	%		11.6	%		111.4	%		31.4	%
Net Income per Diluted Share	$	0.13		$	0.04		$	(0.03	)	$	0.25
Depreciation and Amortization		267,209			239,009			775,484			654,096

     Revenues

     The following chart contains consolidated revenues by product line for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009:

	Three Months						Nine Months
	Ended September 30,						Ended September 30,
	2010			2009			2010			2009
Well Construction		15	%		15	%		16	%		16	%
Drilling Services		17			16			16			17
Artificial Lift Systems		17			16			16			16
Completion Systems		7			9			12			10
Integrated Drilling		9			15			11			13
Drilling Tools		8			9			8			8
Stimulation & Chemicals		13			5			7			6
Re-entry & Fishing		6			6			6			6
Wireline		6			7			6			6
Pipeline & Specialty Services		2			2			2			2
		100	%		100	%		100	%		100	%

     Consolidated revenues increased $385 million, or 18%, in the third quarter of 2010 as compared to the third quarter of 2009. North America revenue increased $480 million, or 78%, in the third quarter of 2010 compared to the same quarter of the prior year. International revenues decreased $95 million, or 6%, in the third quarter of 2010 as compared to the third quarter of 2009. Our quarter-over-quarter decrease in international revenues was the result of a 36% decline in Latin America that was partially offset with

37

a 9% increase in our Eastern Hemisphere revenues. Our stimulation and chemicals, artificial lift systems and drilling services product lines were the strongest contributors to the quarter-over-quarter increase.

     For the first nine months of 2010, consolidated revenues increased $900 million, or 14%, as compared to the first nine months of 2009. Similar to what was experienced in the third quarter of 2010, the increase in revenues during the first nine months of 2010 was driven by our North American business. International revenue increased $19 million, or less than 1%, as compared to the first nine months of 2009 with an Eastern Hemisphere increase of 10% being offset with a 20% decline in Latin America due to reduced project activity in Mexico.

Operating Income

     Consolidated operating income increased $132 million, or 92%, in the third quarter of 2010 as compared to the third quarter of 2009. The quarter-over-quarter increase comes from (i) a $63 million increase in the gain recorded for the revaluation of contingent consideration included as part of our acquisition of the Oilfield Services Division (“OFS”) of TNK-BP and (ii) a contribution of $64 million from our operating segments (inclusive of a $76 million charge for revisions to our profitability estimates on our project management contracts in Mexico).

     During the first nine months of 2010, consolidated operating income decreased $112 million, or 19%, as compared to the first nine months of 2009. Our operating segments accounted for $55 million of this decrease. In addition, the revaluation of OFS contingent consideration resulted in a year-over-year decrease to our operating income of $30 million and corporate and research and development expenses increased $19 million. The increase in corporate expenses was primarily attributable to higher costs associated with business process optimization initiatives and professional fees. We also augmented our compliance infrastructure with increased staff and more rigorous policies, procedures and training of our employees regarding compliance with applicable anti-corruption laws, trade sanction laws and import/export laws.

     Exit and restructuring costs during the first nine months of 2010 include (i) a $38 million charge related to our Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“SERP”) which was frozen on March 31, 2010, (ii) $44 million for severance and facility closure costs and (iii) $5 million for legal and professional fees incurred in connection with our on-going investigations. These charges were offset by a $5 million benefit related to the reversal of prior cost accruals for our exit from sanctioned countries.

     Exit and restructuring charges during the first nine months of 2009 include (i) $36 million for legal and professional fees incurred in connection with our on-going investigations, (ii) $34 million for severance and facility closure costs and (iii) $4 million for unusable assets and cost accruals in certain sanctioned countries.

     Devaluation of Venezuelan Bolivar

     In January 2010, the Venezuelan government announced its intention to devalue its currency and move to a two tier exchange structure. The official exchange moved from 2.15 to 2.60 for essential goods and 4.30 for non-essential goods and services. In connection with this devaluation, we incurred a charge of $64 million in the first quarter of 2010 for the remeasurement of our net monetary assets denominated in Venezuelan bolivars at the date of the devaluation.

     Income Taxes

     For the three months ended September 30, 2010, we had a tax provision of $54 million on income before taxes of $153 million. Our income before taxes for the three months ended September 30, 2010 includes a $90 million gain on the fair value adjustment to the put option issued in connection the OFS acquisition for which no tax expense has been recorded. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we had a provision of $97 million on income before taxes of $87 million that includes curtailment expense on our SERP for which no related tax benefit was recorded. Our tax provision for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 includes minimum tax in Mexico and the tax impact of changes in our geographic earnings mix, both of which are partially offset by a tax benefit related to the devaluation of the Venezuelan bolivar. For the three months ended September 30, 2009, we had a tax provision of $5 million. Our effective tax rates were 11.6% and 31.4% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009.

Segment Results

     North America

     North American revenues increased $480 million, or 78%, in the third quarter of 2010 as compared to the third quarter of 2009 on a 72% increase in average North American rig count over the comparable period. Revenues increased $881 million, or 44%, during

38

the first nine months of 2010 as compared to the same period of the prior year in line with a 42% increase in rig count. The increase in revenues is principally the result of a strong performance in the U.S. land market, an increase in drilling activity and price improvements.

     Operating income increased $174 million, or 693% in the third quarter of 2010 as compared to the third quarter of the prior year. For the first nine months of 2010, operating income increased $291 million, or 203%, compared to same period of the prior year. Operating margins were 15% for the first nine months of 2010 compared to 7% for the first nine months of 2009. The increase in operating income and margins was due to increased onshore activity in the U.S., prior cost reduction efforts, more favorable sales mix and improved pricing.

     Middle East/North Africa/Asia

     Middle East/North Africa/Asia revenues increased $3 million, or less than 1%, in the third quarter of 2010 as compared to the third quarter of 2009. Revenues decreased $12 million, or 1%, during the first nine months of 2010 as compared to the first nine months of 2009.

     Operating income decreased $32 million, or 33%, during the third quarter of 2010 compared to the same quarter of the prior year and decreased $139 million, or 39%, during the first nine months of 2010 compared to the first nine months of 2009. Operating margins were 11% in the third quarter of 2010 and 16% in the third quarter of 2009. On a year-to-date basis, operating margins were 12% for the first nine months of 2010 as compared to 20% for the first nine months of 2009. The decline in operating income and margins was primarily the result of lower pricing, the negative impact of higher mobilization and start-up costs and a less favorable sales mix.

     Europe/West Africa/FSU

     Revenues in our Europe/West Africa/FSU segment increased $92 million, or 23%, in the third quarter of 2010 compared to the same quarter of the prior year against a 47% rig count increase over the comparable period. On a year-to-date basis, revenues increased $317 million, or 28%, compared to the same period of 2009. Approximately half of this increase was attributable to our acquisition of OFS in July 2009.

     Operating income increased $25 million, or 65%, in the third quarter of the current year as compared to the same quarter of 2009 and decreased $3 million, or 2%, during the first nine months of 2010 compared to the first nine months of 2009. Operating margins were 13% in the third quarter of 2010 and 10% in the third quarter of 2009. On a year-to-date basis, margins decreased from 16% during the first nine months of 2009 to 12% for the first nine months of 2010. The decline in year-to-date operating income and margins was due to pricing declines and changes in sales mix over the comparable periods.

     Latin America

     Revenues in our Latin America segment decreased $190 million, or 36%, in the third quarter of 2010 as compared to the same quarter of the prior year. Revenues decreased $286 million, or 20%, during the first nine months of 2010 compared to the same period of the prior year. The decline in revenue was due to reduced project activity in Mexico, partially offset by significant growth in Brazil and Colombia.

     Operating income decreased $102 million, or 152%, and $204 million, or 86%, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively, when compared to the same periods of the prior year. On a year-to-date basis, margins decreased from 16% during the first nine months of 2009 to 3% for the first nine months of 2010. During the quarter ended September 30, 2010, we incurred a $76 million charge for revisions to our profitability estimates on our project management contracts in Mexico, as the client requested a slowdown in drilling activity to near zero while they re-evaluated the pace of drilling and capital expenditures in the current year.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

     Sources of Liquidity

     Our sources of liquidity include current cash and cash equivalent balances, cash generated from operations and committed availabilities under bank lines of credit. We also historically have accessed banks for short-term loans from uncommitted borrowing arrangements and the capital markets with debt, equity and convertible bond offerings.

39

     Committed Borrowing Facilities

     At September 30, 2010, we maintained two revolving credit facilities with syndicates of banks available for a combination of borrowings, support for our commercial paper program and issuances of letters of credit. These facilities allow for an aggregate availability of $1.75 billion and mature in May 2011. There were no outstanding borrowings on these facilities at September 30, 2010. There were $63 million in outstanding letters of credit under these facilities at September 30, 2010.

     These borrowing facilities require us to maintain a debt-to-capitalization ratio of less than 60% and contain other covenants and representations customary for an investment-grade commercial credit. We are in compliance with these covenants at September 30, 2010.

     The following is a recap of our availability under our committed borrowing facilities at September 30, 2010 (in millions):

Facilities	$	1,750
Less:
Amount drawn		—
Commercial paper		—
Letters of credit		63
Availability	$	1,687

     On October 15, 2010, the Company entered into a $1.75 billion unsecured revolving credit agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent. The Credit Agreement replaced our existing revolving credit facilities that were scheduled to mature in May 2011. The Credit Agreement has a scheduled maturity date of October 15, 2013, subject to extension, and can be used for a combination of borrowings, support for our commercial paper program and issuances of letters of credit. Consistent with our prior facilities, the Credit Agreement requires us to maintain a debt-to-capitalization ratio of less than 60%.

     Commercial Paper

     We have a $1.5 billion commercial paper program under which we may from time to time issue short-term unsecured notes. The commercial paper program is supported by our revolving credit facilities. There was no commercial paper outstanding at September 30, 2010.

     Debt Offering and Bond Tender

     In September 2010, we completed a $1.4 billion long-term debt offering comprised of (i) $800 million of 5.125% Senior Notes due in 2020 (“5.125% Senior Notes”) and (ii) $600 million of 6.75% Senior Notes due in 2040 (“6.75% Senior Notes”). Net proceeds of $1.386 billion were used to fund our bond tender offer that commenced in September 2010 and repay short-term borrowings on our revolving credit facilities.

     In September 2010, we commenced a cash tender offer for up to $700 million aggregate principal amount of specified series of our outstanding debt. Pursuant to the tender-offer terms, we repurchased $167 million of our 6.625% senior notes due 2011 in September 2010 and incurred an expense of $11 million for the premium we paid on the repurchase.

     In October 2010, we completed the tender offer by repurchasing $327 million and $206 million of our 5.95% senior notes due 2012 and 5.15% senior notes due 2013, respectively. We paid a $44 million premium on these tenders and will incur a charge of approximately $42 million in the fourth quarter of 2010. The $533 million principal amounts repurchased in October 2010 are included in current portion of long-term debt in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at September 30, 2010.

     Accounts Receivable Factoring

     We have entered into an accounts receivable sales program to sell accounts receivable related to Latin America to third party financial institutions. One of our subsidiaries sold approximately $350 million under this program during the second and third quarter of 2010. We received cash totaling $320 million and recognized a loss of $5 million on these sales. These transactions qualified for sale accounting under the accounting standards. The remainder of the amounts due to us was recorded as other receivables in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at September 30, 2010. The initial proceeds received on the sale are included in operating cash flows in our Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows.

40

     Secured Loan Agreement

     In June 2010, we entered into a secured loan agreement with a third-party financial institution and received proceeds of $180 million. The note bears interest at a rate of 4.8% and will be repaid in monthly installments over seven years. The loan is secured by assets located in the United States, and is included in long-term debt on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet.

Cash Requirements

     During 2010, we anticipate our cash requirements will include working capital needs and capital expenditures and may include opportunistic business acquisitions. We anticipate funding these requirements from cash generated from operations and availability under our committed borrowing facilities.

     Capital expenditures for 2010 are projected to be approximately $1.0 billion, net of proceeds from tools lost down hole. The expenditures are expected to be used primarily to support the growth of our businesses and operations. Capital expenditures during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 were $646 million, net of proceeds from tools lost down hole.

     Derivative Instruments

     Interest Rate Swaps

     We use interest rate swaps to help mitigate exposures related to interest rate movements. Amounts paid or received upon termination of interest rate swaps accounted for as fair value hedges represent the fair value of the agreements at the time of termination and are recorded as an adjustment to the carrying value of the related debt. These amounts are amortized as a reduction (in the case of gains) or as an increase (in the case of losses) to interest expense over the remaining term of the debt. As of September 30, 2010 we had net unamortized gains of $61 million associated with interest rate swap terminations.

     Cash Flow Hedges

     In 2008, we entered into interest rate derivative instruments to hedge projected exposures to interest rates in anticipation of a debt offering. Those hedges were terminated at the time of the issuance of the debt, and the loss on these hedges is being amortized from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income to interest expense over the remaining term of the debt. As of September 30, 2010, we had net unamortized losses of $13 million associated with our cash flow hedge terminations.

     Other Derivative Instruments

     As of September 30, 2010, we had foreign currency forward contracts with notional amounts aggregating to $1,039 million, which were entered into to hedge exposure to currency fluctuations in various foreign currencies, including, but not limited to, the British pound sterling, the Canadian dollar, the euro and the Norwegian krone. The total estimated fair value of these contracts at September 30, 2010 resulted in a net liability of approximately $17 million. These derivative instruments were not designated as hedges and the changes in fair value of the contracts are recorded each period in Other, Net in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.

     We have cross-currency swaps between the U.S. dollar and Canadian dollar to hedge certain exposures to the Canadian dollar. At September 30, 2010, we had notional amounts outstanding of $215 million. The total estimated fair value of these contracts at September 30, 2010, resulted in a liability of $28 million. These derivative instruments were not designated as hedges and the changes in fair value of the contracts are recorded each period in Other, Net in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.

     Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

     A Swiss corporation named Weatherford International Ltd. is the ultimate parent (“Weatherford Switzerland”) of the Weatherford group and guarantees the obligations of Weatherford International Ltd. incorporated in Bermuda (“Weatherford Bermuda”) and Weatherford International, Inc. incorporated in Delaware (“Weatherford Delaware”) noted below.

     The following obligations of Weatherford Delaware were guaranteed by Weatherford Bermuda at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009: (i) the 6.625% Senior Notes, (ii) the 5.95% Senior Notes, (iii) the 6.35% Senior Notes and (iv) the 6.80% Senior Notes.

41

     The following obligations of Weatherford Bermuda were guaranteed by Weatherford Delaware at December 31, 2009: (i) the revolving credit facilities, (ii) the 4.95% Senior Notes, (iii) the 5.50% Senior Notes, (iv) the 6.50% Senior Notes, (v) the 5.15% Senior Notes, (vi) the 6.00% Senior Notes, (vii) the 7.00% Senior Notes, (viii) the 9.625% Senior Notes, (ix) the 9.875% Senior Notes and (x) issuances of notes under the commercial paper program.

     In September 2010, Weatherford Bermuda issued $800 million of 5.125% Senior Notes due 2020 and $600 million of 6.75% Senior Notes due 2040, both of which are guaranteed by Weatherford Delaware. As a result of these transactions, the following obligations of Weatherford Bermuda were guaranteed by Weatherford Delaware at September 30, 2010: (i) the revolving credit facilities, (ii) the 4.95% Senior Notes, (iii) the 5.50% Senior Notes, (iv) the 6.50% Senior Notes, (v) the 5.15% Senior Notes, (vi) the 6.00% Senior Notes, (vii) the 7.00% Senior Notes, (viii) the 9.625% Senior Notes, (ix) the 9.875% Senior Notes, (x) the 5.125% Senior Notes, (xi) the 6.75% Senior Notes and (xii) issuances of notes under the commercial paper program.

     Letters of Credit

     We execute letters of credit and bid and performance bonds in the normal course of business. While these obligations are not normally called, these obligations could be called by the beneficiaries at any time before the expiration date should we breach certain contractual or payment obligations. As of September 30, 2010, we had $396 million of letters of credit and bid and performance bonds outstanding, consisting of $333 million outstanding under various uncommitted credit facilities and $63 million letters of credit outstanding under our committed facilities. If the beneficiaries called these letters of credit our available liquidity would be reduced by the amount called.

42

New Accounting Pronouncements

     See Note 16 to our condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

     Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based upon our consolidated financial statements. We prepare these financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. As such, we are required to make certain estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the periods presented. We base our estimates on historical experience, available information and various other assumptions we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates; however, actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. There have been no material changes or developments in our evaluation of the accounting estimates and the underlying assumptions or methodologies that we believe to be Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates as disclosed in our Form 10-K, for the year ended December 31, 2009.

Goodwill Impairment Test

     During the three months ended September 30, 2010, we incurred a $76 million charge for revisions to our profitability estimates on our project management contracts in Mexico, as the client requested a slowdown in drilling activity to near zero while they re-evaluated the pace of drilling and capital expenditures in the current year.

Exposures

     An investment in our registered shares involves various risks. When considering an investment in our Company, you should consider carefully all of the risk factors described in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K under the heading “Item 1A. Risk Factors” as well as the information below and other information included and incorporated by reference in this report.

Forward-Looking Statements

     This report, as well as other filings made by us with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), and our releases issued to the public contain various statements relating to future results, including certain projections and business trends. We believe these statements constitute “Forward-Looking Statements” as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements generally are identified by the words “believe,” “project,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “intend,” “strategy,” “plan,” “may,” “should,” “will,” “would,” “will be,” “will continue,” “will likely result,” and similar expressions, although not all forward-looking statements contain these identifying words.

     From time to time, we update the various factors we consider in making our forward-looking statements and the assumptions we use in those statements. However, we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking events or circumstances that may arise after the date of this report. The following sets forth the various assumptions we use in our forward-looking statements, as well as risks and uncertainties relating to those statements. Certain of the risks and uncertainties may cause actual results to be materially different from projected results contained in forward-looking statements in this report and in our other disclosures. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the following:

• Global political, economic and market conditions could affect projected results. Our operating results and the forward-looking information we provide are based on our current assumptions about oil and natural gas supply and demand, oil and natural gas prices, rig count and other market trends. Our assumptions on these matters are in turn based on currently available information, which is subject to change. The oil and natural gas industry is extremely volatile and subject to change based on political and economic factors outside our control. Worldwide drilling activity, as measured by average worldwide rig counts, increased in each year from 2002 to 2008. However, activity began declining in the fourth quarter of 2008, particularly in North America. The weakened global economic climate resulted in lower demand and lower prices for oil and natural gas, which reduced drilling and production activity, which in turn resulted in lower than expected revenues and income in 2009 and 2010 and may affect our future revenues and income. Worldwide drilling activity and global demand for oil and natural gas may also be affected by changes in governmental policies and debt loads, laws and regulations related to environmental or energy security matters, including those addressing alternative energy sources and the risks of global climate change. For 2011, worldwide demand may be significantly weaker than we have assumed.

43

• We may be unable to recognize our expected revenues from current and future contracts. Our customers, many of whom are national oil companies, often have significant bargaining leverage over us and may elect to cancel or revoke contracts, not renew contracts, modify the scope of contracts or delay contracts, in some cases preventing us from realizing expected revenues and/or profits. Our projections assume that our customers will honor the contracts we have been awarded and that those contracts and the business that we believe is otherwise substantially firm will result in anticipated revenues in the periods for which they are scheduled.

• Currency fluctuations could have a material adverse financial impact on our business. A material change in currency rates in our markets, such as the devaluation of the Venezuelan Bolivar experienced during the first quarter of 2010, could affect our future results as well as affect the carrying values of our assets. World currencies have been subject to much volatility. In addition, due to the volatility we may be unable to enter into foreign currency contracts at a reasonable cost. As we are not able to predict changes in currency valuations, our forward-looking statements assume no material impact from future changes in currency exchange rates.

• Our ability to manage our workforce could affect our projected results. In a climate of decreasing demand, we are faced with managing our workforce levels to control costs without impairing our ability to provide service to our customers. Conversely, in a climate of increasing demand, we are faced with the challenge of hiring and maintaining a skilled workforce at a reasonable cost. Our forward-looking statements assume we will be able to do so.

• Increases in the prices and availability of our raw materials could affect our results of operations. We use large amounts of raw materials for manufacturing our products and some of our fixed assets. The price of these raw materials has a significant impact on our cost of producing products for sale or producing fixed assets used in our business. We have assumed that the prices of our raw materials will remain within a manageable range and will be readily available. If we are unable to obtain necessary raw materials or if we are unable to minimize the impact of increased raw material costs or to realize the benefit of cost decreases in a timely fashion through our supply chain initiatives or pricing, our margins and results of operations could be adversely affected.

• Our ability to manage our supply chain and business processes could affect our projected results. We have undertaken efforts to improve our supply chain, invoicing and collection processes and procedures. These undertakings include costs, which we expect will result in long-term benefits of our business processes. Our forward-looking statements assume we will realize the benefits of these efforts.

• Our long-term growth depends upon technological innovation and commercialization. Our ability to deliver our long-term growth strategy depends in part on the commercialization of new technology. A central aspect of our growth strategy is to improve our products and services through innovation, to obtain technologically advanced products through internal research and development and/or acquisitions, to protect proprietary technology from unauthorized use and to expand the markets for new technology by leveraging our worldwide infrastructure. The key to our success will be our ability to commercialize the technology that we have acquired and demonstrate the enhanced value our technology brings to our customers’ operations. Our major technological advances include, but are not limited to, those related to controlled pressure drilling and testing systems, expandable solid tubulars, expandable sand screens and intelligent well completion. Our forward-looking statements have assumed successful commercialization of, and above-average growth from, these new products and services, as well as legal protection of our intellectual property rights.

• Nonrealization of expected benefits from our redomestication could affect our projected results. We operate through our various subsidiaries in numerous countries throughout the world including the United States. During the first quarter of 2009, we completed a transaction in which our former parent Bermuda company became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Weatherford International Ltd., a Swiss joint-stock corporation, and holders of common shares of the Bermuda company received one registered share of the Swiss company in exchange for each common share that they held. Consequently, we are or may become subject to changes in tax laws, treaties or regulations or the interpretation or enforcement thereof in the U.S., Bermuda, Switzerland or any other jurisdictions in which we or any of our subsidiaries operates or is resident. Our income tax expense is based upon our interpretation of the tax laws in effect in various countries at the time that the expense was incurred. If the U.S. Internal Revenue Service or other taxing authorities do not agree with our assessment of the effects of such laws, treaties and regulations, this could have a material adverse effect on us including the imposition of a higher effective tax rate on our worldwide earnings or a reclassification of the tax impact of our significant corporate restructuring transactions. In addition, our realization of expected tax benefits is based upon the assumption that we take successful planning steps and that we maintain and execute adequate processes to support our planning activities. If we fail to do so, we may not achieve the expected benefits.

• Nonrealization of expected benefits from our acquisitions or business dispositions could affect our projected results. We expect to gain certain business, financial and strategic advantages as a result of business acquisitions we undertake, including synergies and operating efficiencies. Our forward-looking statements assume that we will successfully integrate our business acquisitions and realize the benefits of those acquisitions. Further, we may from time to time undertake to dispose of businesses or capital assets that are no longer core to our long-term growth strategy and the disposition of which may improve our capital structure. Our forward-looking statements assume that if we decide to dispose of a business or asset we will find a buyer willing to pay a price we deem favorable to Weatherford and that we will successfully dispose of the business or asset. Our inability to complete dispositions timely and at attractive prices may impair our ability to improve our capital structure as rapidly as our forward-looking statements may indicate.

44

• The downturn in our industry could affect the carrying value of our goodwill. As of December 31, 2010, we had approximately $4.2 billion of goodwill. Our estimates of the value of our goodwill could be reduced in the future as a result of various factors, including market factors, some of which are beyond our control. Our forward-looking statements do not assume any future goodwill impairment. Any reduction in the fair value of our businesses may result in an impairment charge and therefore adversely affect our results.

• Adverse weather conditions in certain regions could adversely affect our operations. In the summers of 2005 and 2008, the Gulf of Mexico suffered several significant hurricanes. These hurricanes and associated hurricane threats reduced the number of days on which we and our customers could operate, which resulted in lower revenues than we otherwise would have achieved. In parts of 2006, and particularly in the second quarters of 2007 and 2008, climatic conditions in Canada were not as favorable to drilling as we anticipated, which limited our potential results in that region. Similarly, unfavorable weather in Russia, China, Mexico, Australia and in the North Sea, as well as exceedingly cold winters in other areas of the world, could reduce our operations and revenues from this area during the relevant period. Our forward-looking statements assume weather patterns in our primary areas of operations will be conducive to our operations.

• U.S. Government and internal investigations could affect our results of operations. We are currently involved in government and internal investigations involving various of our operations. We have begun negotiations with the government agencies to resolve these matters, but we cannot yet anticipate the timing, outcome or possible impact of the ultimate resolution of these investigations, financial or otherwise. The governmental agencies involved in these investigations have a broad range of civil and criminal penalties they may seek to impose against corporations and individuals for violations of trade sanction laws, the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and other federal statutes including, but not limited to, injunctive relief, disgorgement, fines, penalties and modifications to business practices and compliance programs. In recent years, these agencies and authorities have entered into agreements with, and obtained a range of penalties against, several public corporations and individuals in similar investigations, under which civil and criminal penalties were imposed, including in some cases fines and other penalties and sanctions in the tens and hundreds of millions of dollars. These agencies likely will seek to impose penalties of some amount against us for past conduct, but the ultimate amount of any penalties we may pay currently cannot be reasonably estimated. Under trade sanction laws, the U.S. Department of Justice may also seek to impose modifications to business practices, including immediate cessation of all business activities in specific countries or other limitations that decrease our business, and modifications to compliance programs, which may increase compliance costs. Any injunctive relief, disgorgement, fines, penalties, sanctions or imposed modifications to business practices resulting from these investigations could adversely affect our results of operations. Through December 31, 2010, we have incurred $49 million for costs in connection with our exit from certain sanctioned countries and incurred $113 million for legal and professional fees in connection with complying with and conducting these on-going investigations. This amount excludes the costs we have incurred to augment and improve our compliance function. We may have additional charges related to these matters in future periods, which costs may include labor claims, contractual claims, penalties assessed by customers, and costs, fines, taxes and penalties assessed by the local governments, but we cannot quantify those charges or be certain of the timing of them.

• Failure in the future to ensure ongoing compliance with certain laws could affect our results of operations. In 2009, we substantially augmented our compliance infrastructure with increased staff and more rigorous policies, procedures and training of our employees regarding compliance with applicable anti-corruption laws, trade sanctions laws and import/export laws. As part of this effort, we now undertake audits of our compliance performance in various countries. Our forward-looking statements assume that our compliance efforts will be successful and that we will comply with our internal policies and applicable laws regarding these issues. Our failure to do so could result in additional enforcement action in the future, the results of which could be material and adverse to us.

• Political disturbances, war, or terrorist attacks and changes in global trade policies could adversely impact our operations. We operate in over 100 countries, and as such are at risk of various types of political activities, including acts of insurrections, war, terrorism, nationalization of assets and changes in trade policies. We have assumed there will be no material political disturbances or terrorist attacks and there will be no material changes in global trade policies that affect our business. In early 2011, our operations in Tunisia, Egypt, and Libya were disrupted by political revolutions and uprisings in these countries. Political disturbances in these countries and elsewhere in the Middle East and North Africa regions, including to a lesser extent Yemen and Bahrain, are ongoing as of the end of February, 2011, and our operations in Libya have not resumed. During 2010, these five countries accounted for approximately 3% of our global revenue. We have taken steps to secure our personnel and assets in affected areas and to resume or continue operations where it is safe for us to do so, and our forward-looking statements assume we will do so successfully. In Libya, we have evacuated all of our non-Libyan employees and their families. At December 31, 2010, we had in Libya inventory, property, plant and equipment (net) with a carrying value of approximately $141 million, as well as cash, accounts receivable and prepaid expenses of approximately $76 million. In cases where we must evacuate personnel, it may be difficult, if not impossible, for us to safeguard and recover our operating assets, and our ability to do so will depend on the local turn of events. In these areas we also may not be able to perform the work we are contracted to perform, which could lead to forfeiture of performance bonds. We currently have outstanding approximately $19 million of performance bonds related to contracts in Libya. Our forward-looking statements assume that we will not incur a substantial loss with respect to our assets or under performance bonds located in or related to affected areas. We have assumed that cessation of business activities in parts of the Middle East and North Africa regions due to political turmoil will be short-lived, that the negative impact on our business will not be material, and that the region will not experience further disruptive political revolution in the near term. However, if political violence were to curtail our activities in other countries in the region from which we derive greater business, such as Saudi Arabia, Iraq and Algeria, and particularly if political activities were to result in prolonged violence or civil war, we may fail to achieve the results reflected in our forward-looking statements.

45

• The material weakness in accounting for income taxes could have an adverse effect on our share price. If we are unable to effectively remediate this material weakness in a timely manner, we could lose investor confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports, which could have an adverse effect on our share price and could subject us to additional potentially costly shareholder litigation or government inquiries. Our forward looking-statements assume we will be able to remediate the material weakness in a timely manner and will maintain an effective internal control environment in the future.

• Recent turmoil in the credit markets may reduce our access to capital or reduce the availability of financial risk-mitigation tools. The worldwide credit markets experienced turmoil and uncertainty from mid-2008 through most of 2009, and certain markets remained challenging in parts of 2010. Our forward-looking statements assume that the financial institutions that have committed to extend us credit will honor their commitments under our credit facilities. If one or more of those institutions becomes unwilling or unable to honor its commitments, our access to liquidity could be impaired and our cost of capital to fund growth could increase. We use interest-rate and foreign-exchange swap transactions with financial institutions to mitigate certain interest-rate and foreign-exchange risks associated with our capital structure and our business. Our forward-looking statements assume that those tools will continue to be available to us at prices we deem reasonable. However, the failure of any counter party to honor a swap agreement could reduce the availability of these financial risk-mitigation tools or could result in the loss of expected financial benefits.

     Finally, our future results will depend upon various other risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, those detailed in our other filings with the SEC under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. For additional information regarding risks and uncertainties, see our other filings with the SEC. Our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934 are made available free of charge on our internet web site www.weatherford.com as soon as reasonably practicable after we have electronically filed the material with, or furnished it to, the SEC.

Available Information

     We make available, free of charge, on our website (www.weatherford.com) our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file or furnish them to the SEC.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK

     We are currently exposed to market risk from changes in foreign currency and changes in interest rates. From time to time, we may enter into derivative financial instrument transactions to manage or reduce our market risk. A discussion of our market risk exposure in these financial instruments follows.

Foreign Currency Exchange Rates

     We operate in virtually every oil and natural gas exploration and production region in the world. In some parts of the world, such as the Middle East and Southeast Asia, the currency of our primary economic environment is the U.S. dollar. We use this as our functional currency. In other parts of the world, we conduct our business in currencies other than the U.S. dollar and the functional currency is the applicable local currency. In those countries in which we operate in the local currency, the effects of foreign currency fluctuations are largely mitigated because local expenses of such foreign operations are also generally denominated in the same currency.

     In January 2010, the Venezuelan government announced its intention to devalue its currency and move to a two tier exchange structure. The official exchange rate moved from 2.15 to 2.60 for essential goods and from 2.15 to 4.30 for non-essential goods and services. Our Venezuelan entities maintain the U.S. dollar as their functional currency. In connection with this devaluation, we incurred a charge of $64 million for the remeasurement of our net monetary assets denominated in Venezuelan bolivars at the date of the devaluation, which was not tax deductible in Venezuela. We also recorded a $24 million tax benefit for local Venezuelan income tax purposes related to our net U.S. dollar-denominated monetary liability position in the country. As of September 30, 2010, we had a net monetary asset position denominated in Venezuelan bolivars of approximately $72 million comprised primarily of cash and accounts receivable. We are continuing to explore opportunities to reduce this exposure but should another devaluation occur in the future, we may be required to take further charges related to the remeasurement of our net monetary asset position. For example, if the Venezuela bolivar devalued by an additional 10% in the future, we would record a devaluation charge of approximately $7 million.

     Assets and liabilities of entities for which the functional currency is the local currency are translated into U.S. dollars using the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date, resulting in translation adjustments that are reflected in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in the shareholders’ equity section on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. A portion of our net assets are impacted by changes in foreign currencies in relation to the U.S. dollar. We recorded a $9 million adjustment to reduce our equity account for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 to reflect the net impact of the strengthening of the U.S. dollar against various foreign currencies.

     As of September 30, 2010, we had foreign currency forward contracts with notional amounts aggregating to $1,039 million, which were entered into to hedge exposure to currency fluctuations in various foreign currencies, including, but not limited to, the British

46

pound sterling, the Canadian dollar, the euro and the Norwegian krone. The total estimated fair value of these contracts at September 30, 2010 resulted in a net liability of approximately $17 million. These derivative instruments were not designated as hedges, and the changes in fair value of the contracts are recorded each period in current earnings.

     We have cross-currency swaps between the U.S. dollar and Canadian dollar to hedge certain exposures to the Canadian dollar. At September 30, 2010, we had notional amounts outstanding of $215 million. The total estimated fair value of these contracts at September 30, 2010 resulted in a liability of $28 million. These derivative instruments were not designated as hedges and the changes in fair value of the contracts are recorded each period in current earnings.

Interest Rates

     We are subject to interest rate risk on our long-term fixed-interest rate debt and variable-interest rate borrowings. Variable rate debt, where the interest rate fluctuates periodically, exposes us to short-term changes in market interest rates. Fixed rate debt, where the interest rate is fixed over the life of the instrument, exposes us to changes in market interest rates reflected in the fair value of the debt and to the risk that we may need to refinance maturing debt with new debt at a higher rate. All other things being equal, the fair value of our fixed rate debt will increase or decrease as interest rates change.

     Our long-term borrowings that were outstanding at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 subject to interest rate risk consist of the following:

	September 30, 2010				December 31, 2009
	Carrying		Fair		Carrying		Fair
	Amount		Value		Amount		Value
	(In millions)
6.625% Senior Notes due 2011	$	184	$	194	$	353	$	380
5.95% Senior Notes due 2012		599		632		599		648
5.15% Senior Notes due 2013		509		533		511		526
4.95% Senior Notes due 2013		253		268		253		263
5.50% Senior Notes due 2016		359		383		360		351
6.35% Senior Notes due 2017		600		670		600		647
6.00% Senior Notes due 2018		498		546		498		514
9.625% Senior Notes due 2019		1,034		1,313		1,034		1,236
5.125% Senior Notes due 2020		799		819		—		—
6.50% Senior Notes due 2036		596		622		596		574
6.80% Senior Notes due 2037		298		311		298		303
7.00% Senior Notes due 2038		498		529		498		517
9.875% Senior Notes due 2039		247		341		247		326
6.75% Senior Notes due 2040		597		632		—		—

     We have various other long-term debt instruments of $20 million at September 30, 2010, but believe the impact of changes in interest rates in the near term will not be material to these instruments. The carrying value of our short-term borrowings of $11 million at September 30, 2010 approximates their fair value.

     As it relates to our variable rate debt, if market interest rates average 1% more for the remainder of 2010 than the rates as of September 30, 2010, interest expense for the remainder of 2010 would increase by less than $1 million. This amount was determined by calculating the effect of the hypothetical interest rate on our variable rate debt. This sensitivity analysis assumes there are no changes in our financial structure.

Interest Rate Swaps and Derivatives

     We manage our debt portfolio to achieve an overall desired position of fixed and floating rates and may employ interest rate swaps as a tool to achieve that goal. The major risks from interest rate derivatives include changes in the interest rates affecting the fair value of such instruments, potential increases in interest expense due to market increases in floating interest rates and the creditworthiness of the counterparties in such transactions. The counterparties to our interest rate swaps are multinational commercial banks. In light of events in the global credit markets and the potential impact of these events on the liquidity of the banking industry, we continue to monitor the creditworthiness of our counterparties.

     Amounts paid or received upon termination of interest rate swaps represent the fair value of the agreements at the time of termination and are recorded as an adjustment to the carrying value of the related debt. These amounts are amortized as a reduction (in the case of gains) or as an increase (in the case of losses) to interest expense over the remaining term of the debt.

     As of September 30, 2010 we had net unamortized gains of $61 million associated with interest rate swap terminations.

47

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

     Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

     At the time of our original Form 10-Q filing, our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2010. Subsequent to that evaluation, our management, including the CEO and CFO, has re-evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operations of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the period covered by this report. Disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”)) include controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and including that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the CEO and CFO, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on this re-evaluation and in connection therewith, the restatement of previously issued financial statements described below and the identification of a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting of income taxes described below, the CEO and CFO have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of September 30, 2010.

     A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. In making this assessment, our management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control—An Integrated Framework (September 1992).

     Management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010. In connection with this assessment, management identified a material weakness in our internal controls over financial reporting for income taxes. Our processes, procedures and controls related to financial reporting were not effective to ensure that amounts related to current taxes payable, certain deferred tax assets and liabilities, reserves for uncertain tax positions, the current and deferred income tax expense and related footnote disclosures were accurate. Specifically, our processes and procedures were not designed to provide for adequate and timely identification and review of various income tax calculations, reconciliations and related supporting documentation required to apply our accounting policies for income taxes in accordance with U.S. GAAP. This material weakness resulted in the restatement for material errors in the income tax accounts in 2008 and 2009 consolidated financial statements and our condensed consolidated financial statements for the each of the quarters within 2009 and 2010.

     The principal factors contributing to the material weakness were: 1) inadequate staffing and technical expertise within the company related to taxes, 2) ineffective review and approval practices relating to taxes, 3) inadequate processes to effectively reconcile income tax accounts and 4) inadequate controls over the preparation of the quarterly tax provision.

     Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

     Our management, including the CEO and CFO, identified no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended September 30, 2010 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

     Remediation Plan

In an effort to remediate the material weakness, we plan to undertake the following:

• Redesign the tax accounting processes to improve the flow of information to provide for more timely generation of account reconciliations and supporting documentation that will facilitate supervision and review of the resulting account analyses;

• Hire experienced personnel within the tax and financial reporting process to ensure effective preparation and review of account reconciliations and analyses and enhance training programs for local finance and corporate personnel;

• Increase the frequency of the preparation of a formal tax basis balance sheet and reconciliations of the all tax accounts to enable more timely detection of potential errors; and

• Implement a quarterly process to highlight significant matters requiring the attention of both local finance and corporate personnel.

48

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

See Note 15 to our condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

     An investment in our common shares involves various risks. When considering an investment in our company, you should consider carefully all of the risk factors described below, the matters discussed within our “Forward-Looking Statements,” as well as other information included and incorporated by reference in this report.

     Physical dangers are inherent in our operations and may expose us to significant potential losses. Personnel and property may be harmed during the process of drilling for oil and natural gas.

     Drilling for and producing hydrocarbons, and the associated products and services that we provide, include inherent dangers that may lead to property damage, personal injury, death or the discharge of hazardous materials into the environment. Many of these events are outside our control. Typically, we provide products and services at a well site where our personnel and equipment are located together with personnel and equipment of our customer and third parties, such as other service providers. At many sites, we depend on other companies and personnel to conduct drilling operations in accordance with appropriate safety standards. From time to time, personnel are injured or equipment or property is damaged or destroyed as a result of industrial accidents, failed equipment, faulty products or services, failure of safety measures, uncontained formation pressures, or other dangers inherent in drilling for oil and natural gas. Any of these events can be the result of human error. With increasing frequency, our products and services are deployed on more challenging prospects both onshore and offshore, where the occurrence of the types of events mentioned above can have an even more catastrophic impact on people, equipment and the environment. Such events may expose us to significant potential losses.

     We may not be fully indemnified against financial losses in all circumstances where damage to or loss of property, personal injury, death or environmental harm occur.

     As is customary in our industry, our contracts typically provide that our customers indemnify us for claims arising from the injury or death of their employees, the loss or damage of their equipment, damage to the reservoir and pollution emanating from the customer’s equipment or from the reservoir (including uncontained oil flow from a reservoir). Conversely, we typically indemnify our customers for claims arising from the injury or death of our employees, the loss or damage of our equipment, or pollution emanating from our equipment. Our contracts typically provide that our customer will indemnify us for claims arising from catastrophic events, such as a well blowout, fire or explosion.

     Our indemnification arrangements may not protect us in every case. For example, from time to time we may enter into contracts with less favorable indemnities or perform work without a contract that protects us; our indemnity arrangements may be held unenforceable in some courts and jurisdictions; or we may be subject to other claims brought by third parties or government agencies. Furthermore, the parties from which we seek indemnity may not be solvent, may become bankrupt, may lack resources or insurance to honor their indemnities, or may not otherwise be able to satisfy their indemnity obligations to us. The lack of enforceable indemnification could expose us to significant potential losses.

     Further, our assets generally are not insured against loss from political violence such as war, terrorism or civil commotion. If any of our assets are damaged or destroyed as a result of an uninsured cause, we would recognize a loss of those assets.

49

     Our business may be exposed to uninsured claims, and litigation might result in significant potential losses.

     In the ordinary course of business, we become the subject of various claims and litigation. For example, we have been named in a number of lawsuits because, along with other oilfield service companies, we provided products and services on the Deepwater Horizon in the Gulf of Mexico. We maintain liability insurance, which includes insurance against damage to people, equipment and the environment, up to maximum limits of $600 million, and subject to self-insured retentions and deductibles of $2 million, per occurrence.

     Our insurance policies are subject to exclusions, limitations, and other conditions and may not apply in all cases, for example where willful wrongdoing on our part is alleged. It is possible an unexpected judgment could be rendered against us in cases in which we could be uninsured and beyond the amounts we currently have reserved or anticipate incurring, and in some cases those potential losses could be material.

     Our insurance may not be sufficient to cover any particular loss, or our insurance may not cover all losses. For example, although we maintain product liability insurance, this type of insurance is limited in coverage and it is possible an adverse claim could arise in excess of our coverage. Finally, insurance rates have in the past been subject to wide fluctuation. In response to the recent catastrophic accident in the Gulf of Mexico, insurance rates are volatile and increasing, and some forms of insurance may become entirely unavailable in the future or unavailable on terms that we or our customers believe are economically acceptable. Reductions in coverage, changes in the insurance markets and accidents affecting our industry may result in further increases in our cost and higher deductibles and retentions in future years and may also result in reduced activity levels in certain markets. Any of these events would have an adverse impact on our financial performance.

     Our operations are subject to environmental and other laws and regulations that may expose us to significant liabilities and could reduce our business opportunities and revenues.

     We are subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to the energy industry in general and the environment in particular. An environmental claim could arise with respect to one or more of our current businesses, products or services, or a business or property that one of our predecessors owned or used, and such claims could involve material expenditures. Generally, environmental laws have in recent years become more stringent and have sought to impose greater liability on a larger number of potentially responsible parties. The scope of regulation of our industry and our products and services may increase further following recent events in the Gulf of Mexico, including possible increases in liabilities or funding requirements imposed by governmental agencies. In early 2010, a moratorium was issued on new deepwater projects in the Gulf of Mexico. Although that moratorium was recently lifted, we cannot anticipate when and to what extent drilling activity in the deepwater Gulf will resume. We also cannot ensure that our future business in the deepwater Gulf, if any, will be profitable in light of new regulations that may be promulgated and in light of the current risk environment and insurance markets. Further, additional regulations on deepwater drilling elsewhere in the world could be imposed as a result of the Deepwater Horizon incident, and those regulations could limit our business where they are imposed. In addition, members of the U.S. Congress and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency are reviewing more stringent regulation of hydraulic fracturing, a technology which is used in one of our business segments, and regulators are investigating whether any chemicals used in the fracturing process might adversely affect groundwater. A significant portion of North American service activity today is directed at prospects that require hydraulic fracturing in order to produce hydrocarbons. Additional regulation could increase the costs of conducting our business and could materially reduce our business opportunities and revenues if our customers decrease their levels of activity in response to such regulation.

     We have significant operations that would be adversely impacted in the event of war, political disruption, civil disturbance, economic and legal sanctions or changes in global trade policies.

     Like most multinational oilfield service companies, we have operations in certain international areas, including parts of the Middle East, Africa, Latin America, the Asia Pacific region and the FSU, that are subject to risks of war, political disruption, civil disturbance, economic and legal sanctions (such as restrictions against countries that the U.S. government may deem to sponsor terrorism) and changes in global trade policies. Our operations may be restricted or prohibited in any country in which the foregoing risks occur.

50

     In particular, the occurrence of any of these risks could result in the following events, which in turn, could materially and adversely impact our results of operations:

• disruption of oil and natural gas exploration and production activities;

• restriction of the movement and exchange of funds;

• our inability to collect receivables;

• loss of assets in affected jurisdictions;

• enactment of additional or stricter U.S. government or international sanctions; and

• limitation of our access to markets for periods of time.

     In early 2011, our operations in Tunisia, Egypt and Libya have been disrupted by the political revolutions and uprisings in these countries. Political disturbances in these countries and elsewhere in the Middle East and North Africa regions, including to a lesser extent Yemen and Bahrain, are ongoing as of the end of February, 2011, and our operations in Libya have not resumed. During 2010, these five countries accounted for approximately 3% of our global revenue. In Libya, we have evacuated all of our non-Libyan employees and their families.

     At December 31, 2010, we had in Libya inventory, property, plant and equipment (net) with a carrying value of approximately $141 million, as well as cash, accounts receivable and prepaid expenses of approximately $76 million. In cases where we must evacuate personnel, it may be difficult, if not impossible, for us to safeguard and recover our operating assets, and our ability to do so will depend on the local turn of events. In these areas we also may not be able to perform the work we are contracted to perform, which could lead to forfeiture of performance bonds. We currently have outstanding approximately $19 million of performance bonds related to contracts in Libya. We could suffer material losses with respect to these assets.

     If political violence were to curtail our activities in other countries in the region from which we derive greater business, such as Saudi Arabia, Iraq and Algeria, and particularly if political            activities were to result in prolonged violence or civil war, these political activities could have a material adverse effect on our business in the region.

     We are involved in several governmental and internal investigations, which are costly to conduct, have resulted in a loss of revenue and may result in substantial financial penalties.

     We are currently involved in government and internal investigations involving various areas of our operations.

     Until 2003, we participated in the United Nations oil-for-food program governing sales of goods and services into Iraq. The U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) and the SEC have undertaken investigations of our participation in the oil-for-food program and have subpoenaed certain documents in connection with these investigations. We have cooperated fully with these investigations. We have retained legal counsel, reporting to our audit committee, to investigate this matter. We have begun negotiations with the government agencies to resolve these matters, but we cannot yet anticipate the timing, outcome or possible impact of the ultimate resolution of the investigations, financial or otherwise.

     The U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry & Security, Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”), DOJ and SEC have undertaken investigations of allegations of improper sales of products and services by the Company and its subsidiaries in certain sanctioned countries. We have cooperated fully with this investigation. We have retained legal counsel, reporting to our audit committee, to investigate these matters and to cooperate fully with these agencies. We have begun negotiations with the government agencies to resolve these matters, but we cannot yet anticipate the timing, outcome or possible impact of the ultimate resolution of the investigation, financial or otherwise.

     In light of this investigation and of U.S. and foreign policy environment and the inherent uncertainties surrounding these countries, we decided in September 2007 to direct our foreign subsidiaries to discontinue doing business in countries that are subject to comprehensive U.S. economic and trade sanctions, specifically Cuba, Iran, and Sudan, as well as Syria. Effective September 2007, we ceased entering into any new contracts in these countries and began an orderly discontinuation and winding down of our existing business in these sanctioned countries. Effective March 31, 2008, we substantially completed our winding down of business in these countries. We can complete the withdrawal process only pursuant to licenses issued by OFAC. Our remaining activities in Iran, Sudan and Syria include ongoing withdrawal activities such as attempts to collect accounts receivable, attempts to settle tax liabilities or legal claims and attempts to recover or liquidate assets, including equipment and funds. Certain of our subsidiaries continue to conduct business in countries such as Myanmar that are subject to more limited U.S. trading sanctions.

51

     The DOJ and SEC are investigating our compliance with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”) and other laws worldwide. We have retained legal counsel, reporting to our audit committee, to investigate these matters and to cooperate fully with the DOJ and SEC. As part of our investigations, we have uncovered potential violations of U.S. law in connection with activities in West Africa. We have begun negotiations with the government agencies to resolve these matters, but we cannot yet anticipate the timing, outcome or possible impact of the ultimate resolution of the investigations, financial or otherwise.

     The DOJ, SEC and other agencies and authorities have a broad range of civil and criminal penalties they may seek to impose against corporations and individuals for violations of trade sanctions laws, the FCPA and other federal statutes including, but not limited to, injunctive relief, disgorgement, fines, penalties and modifications to business practices and compliance programs. In recent years, these agencies and authorities have entered into agreements with, and obtained a range of penalties against, several public corporations and individuals in similar investigations, under which civil and criminal penalties were imposed, including in some cases fines and other penalties and sanctions in the tens and hundreds of millions of dollars. These agencies are seeking to impose penalties against us for past conduct, but the ultimate amount of any penalties we may pay currently cannot be reasonably estimated. Under trade sanctions laws, the DOJ may also seek to impose modifications to business practices, including immediate cessation of all business activities in specific countries or other limitations that decrease our business, and modifications to compliance programs, which may increase compliance costs. Any injunctive relief, disgorgement, fines, penalties, sanctions or imposed modifications to business practices resulting from these investigations could adversely affect our results of operations. In addition, our historical activities in sanctioned countries, such as Sudan and Iran, could result in certain investors, such as government sponsored pension funds, divesting or not investing in our registered shares. Based on available information, we cannot predict what, if any, actions the DOJ, SEC or other authorities will take in our situation or the effect any such actions will have on our consolidated financial position or results of operations. To the extent we violated trade sanctions laws, the FCPA, or other laws or regulations, fines and other penalties may be imposed. Because these matters are now pending before the indicated agencies, there can be no assurance that actual fines or penalties, if any, will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, liquidity or results of operations.

     Through December 31, 2010, we have incurred $49 million for costs in connection with our exit from sanctioned countries and incurred $113 million for legal and professional fees in connection with complying with and conducting these on-going investigations.

     Our significant operations in foreign countries expose us to currency fluctuation risks or devaluation.

     A portion of our net assets are located outside the U.S. and are carried on our books in local currencies. Changes in those currencies in relation to the U.S. dollar result in translation adjustments, which are reflected as accumulated other comprehensive income in the shareholders’ equity section in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We recognize remeasurement and transactional gains and losses on currencies in our Consolidated Statements of Income, which may adversely impact our results of operations. We enter into foreign currency forward contracts and other derivative instruments as an effort to reduce our exposure to currency fluctuations; however, there can be no assurance that these hedging activities will be effective in reducing or eliminating foreign currency risks.

     In certain foreign countries, a component of our cost structure is denominated in a different currency than our revenues. In those cases, currency fluctuations could adversely impact our operating margins.

     In January 2010, the Venezuelan government announced its intention to devalue its currency and move to a two tier exchange structure. The official exchange moved from 2.15 to 2.60 for essential goods and 4.30 for non-essential goods and services. In connection with this devaluation, we incurred a charge of $64 million for the remeasurement of our net monetary assets denominated in Venezuelan bolivars at the date of the devaluation, which was not tax deductible. We also recorded a $24 million tax benefit for local Venezuelan income tax purposes related to our net U.S. dollar-denominated monetary liability position in the country. We currently utilize the 4.30 Venezuelan bolivar to U.S. dollar exchange rate. At December 31, 2010, we had a net monetary asset position denominated in Venezuelan bolivars of approximately $56 million comprised primarily of cash and accounts receivable. We are continuing to explore opportunities to reduce this exposure but should another devaluation occur in the future, we may be required to take further charges related to the remeasurement of our net monetary asset position. For example, if the Venezuela bolivar devalued by an additional 10% in the future, we would record a devaluation charge of approximately $6 million. Effective January 1, 2011, the Venezuelan government again modified the fixed rate of exchange, eliminating the two tier structure and establishing 4.30 as the official exchange rate for all goods and services. This modification will not have a material impact to our financial position or results of operations.

     As a result of discussions with a customer and the economic environment in Venezuela, we reviewed how the dual exchange rate might affect amounts we receive for our U.S. dollar-denominated receivables in Venezuela. We believe our contracts are legally enforceable and our customers continue to accept our invoices. However, based on the current political and economic environment in Venezuela, we believe a loss is probable. Accordingly, we recorded a reserve of $32 million against this exposure in the fourth quarter of 2010.

52

     Customer credit risks could result in losses.

     The concentration of our customers in the energy industry may impact our overall exposure to credit risk as customers may be similarly affected by prolonged changes in economic and industry conditions. Those countries that rely heavily upon income from hydrocarbon exports will be hit particularly hard given the drop in oil prices. Further, laws in some jurisdictions in which we operate could make collection difficult or time consuming. We perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers and do not generally require collateral in support of our trade receivables. While we maintain reserves for potential credit losses, we cannot assure such reserves will be sufficient to meet write-offs of uncollectible receivables or that our losses from such receivables will be consistent with our expectations.

     Any capital financing that may be necessary to fund growth may not be available to us at economic rates.

     Turmoil in the credit markets and the potential impact on liquidity of major financial institutions may have an adverse effect on our ability to fund growth opportunities through borrowings, under either existing or newly created instruments in the public or private markets on terms we believe to be reasonable.

     A terrorist attack could have a material and adverse effect on our business.

     We operate in many dangerous countries, such as Iraq, in which acts of terrorism or political violence are a substantial and frequent risk. Such acts could result in kidnappings or the loss of life of our employees or contractors, a loss of equipment, which may or may not be insurable in all cases, or a cessation of business in an affected area. We cannot be certain that our security efforts will in all cases be sufficient to deter or prevent acts of political violence or terrorist strikes against us or our customers’ operations.

     We have identified a material weakness in accounting for income taxes in our internal control over financial reporting, which, if not remedied effectively, could have an adverse effect on our share price.

     Management, through documentation, testing and assessment of our internal control over financial reporting pursuant to the rules promulgated by the SEC under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Item 308 of Regulation S-K, has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting had a material weakness in accounting for income taxes as of December 31, 2010. If we are unable to effectively remediate this material weakness in a timely manner, we could lose investor confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports, which could have an adverse effect on our share price.

     In future periods, if the process required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act reveals further material weaknesses or significant deficiencies, the correction of any such material weakness or significant deficiency could require additional remedial measures including additional personnel which could be costly and time-consuming. If a material weakness exists as of a future period year-end (including a material weakness identified prior to year-end for which there is an insufficient period of time to evaluate and confirm the effectiveness of the corrections or related new procedures), our management will be unable to report favorably as of such future period year-end to the effectiveness of our control over financial reporting. If we are unable to assert that our internal control over financial reporting is effective in any future period, or if we continue to experience material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting for accounting for income taxes, we could lose investor confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports, which could have an adverse effect on our share price and potentially subject us to additional and potentially costly litigation and governmental inquiries/investigations In March 2011, shareholders filed suit relating to the matters described above. In addition, the SEC is investigating the circumstances surrounding the material weakness and related restatement of historical financial statements. We are cooperating with the investigation.

     Changes in tax laws could adversely impact our results.

     On June 26, 2002, the shareholders and Board of Directors of Weatherford International, Inc. (“Weatherford Delaware”) approved our corporate reorganization, and Weatherford International Ltd. (“Weatherford Bermuda”), a newly formed Bermuda company, became the parent holding company of Weatherford International, Inc. During the first quarter of 2009, we completed a transaction in which Weatherford Bermuda became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Weatherford International Ltd., a Swiss joint-stock company (“Weatherford Switzerland”), and holders of our common shares received one registered share of Weatherford Switzerland for each common share of Weatherford Bermuda that they held. We refer to this transaction as the “redomestication.” The realization of the tax benefit of this reorganization could be impacted by changes in tax laws, tax treaties or tax regulations or the interpretation or enforcement thereof or differing interpretation or enforcement of applicable law by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service or other taxing jurisdictions. The inability to realize this benefit could have a material impact on our financial statements.

53

     The anticipated benefits of moving our principal executive offices to Switzerland may not be realized, and difficulties in connection with moving our principal executive offices could have an adverse effect on us.

     In connection with the redomestication, we relocated our principal executive offices from Houston, Texas to Geneva, Switzerland. Most of our executive officers, including our Chief Executive Officer, and other key decision makers have relocated or will relocate to Switzerland. We may face significant challenges in relocating our executive offices to a different country, including difficulties in retaining and attracting officers, key personnel and other employees and challenges in maintaining our executive offices in a country different from the country where other employees, including corporate support staff, are located. Employees may be uncertain about their future roles within our organization as a result of the redomestication. Management may also be required to devote substantial time to the redomestication and related matters, which could otherwise be devoted to focusing on ongoing business operations and other initiatives and opportunities. In addition, we may not realize the benefits we anticipate from the redomestication, including the benefit of moving to a location that is more centrally located within our area of worldwide operations. Any such difficulties could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition.

     The rights of our shareholders are governed by Swiss law and documents following the redomestication.

     Following the redomestication, the rights of our shareholders are governed by Swiss law and Weatherford Switzerland’s articles of association and organizational regulations. The rights of shareholders under Swiss law differ from the rights of shareholders of companies incorporated in other jurisdictions. For example, directors of Weatherford Switzerland may be removed by shareholders with or without cause, but such removal requires the vote of shareholders holding at least 66 2/3% of the voting rights and the absolute majority of the par value of the registered shares represented at the meeting as well as a quorum of at least two-thirds of the registered shares recorded in the share register.

     We hold shareholder meetings in Switzerland, and our required quorum for those meetings is lower.

     We hold shareholders meetings in Switzerland, which may make attendance in person more difficult for some investors. For shareholders meetings for Weatherford-Switzerland for the transaction of any business other than removal of a director or certain other specified resolutions, a quorum comprises at least one-third of the registered shares recorded in the share register and entitled to vote (and at least two-thirds of the registered shares recorded in the share register and entitled to vote for the removal of directors and certain other specified resolutions).

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY IN SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

     In December 2005, our Board of Directors approved a share repurchase program under which up to $1 billion of our outstanding common shares (now registered shares) could be purchased. Future purchases of our shares can be made in the open market or privately negotiated transactions, at the discretion of management and as market conditions and our liquidity position warrant. During the quarter ended September 30, 2010, we did not purchase any of our registered shares.

     Under our restricted share plan, employees may elect to have us withhold registered shares to satisfy minimum statutory federal, state and local tax withholding obligations arising on the vesting of restricted stock awards and exercise of options. When we withhold these shares, we are required to remit to the appropriate taxing authorities the market price of the shares withheld, which could be deemed a purchase of the registered shares by us on the date of withholding. During the quarter ended September 30, 2010, we withheld registered shares to satisfy these tax withholding obligations as follows:

Period	No. of Shares		Average Price
July 1 — July 31, 2010		22,241	$	13.66
August 1 — August 31, 2010		2,684		16.98
September 1 — September 30, 2010		21,457		15.36

54

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

     (a) Exhibits:

Exhibit
Number	Description
4.1	Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated September 23, 2010, among Weatherford International Ltd., a Bermuda exempted company, Weatherford International Ltd., a Swiss joint-stock corporation, Weatherford International, Inc. a Delaware corporation, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 (File No. 1-34258) filed November 2, 2010).
4.3	Form of global note for 5.125% Senior Notes due 2020 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-34258) filed September 22, 2010).
4.4	Form of global note for 6.750% Senior Notes due 2040 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-34258) filed September 22, 2010).
4.5	Form of guarantee notation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-34258) filed September 22, 2010).
10.1	Employment Agreement, dated September 14, 2010, between Andrew P. Becnel and Weatherford International Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-34258) filed September 15, 2010).
10.2	Credit Agreement, dated October 15, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-34258) filed October 19, 2010).
10.3	Guarantee Agreement dated October 15, 2010 among Weatherford International Ltd., a Swiss joint-stock corporation, Weatherford International, Inc., a Delaware corporation and JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. as administrative agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 (File No. 1-34258) filed November 2, 2010).
*31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
*31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
**32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
**32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
**101	The following materials from Weatherford International Ltd.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language):
	(i) the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income, (iii) the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, (iv) the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income and (v) related notes to the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

*	Filed with this Form 10-Q/A
**	Furnished with this Form 10-Q/A

55

SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Weatherford International Ltd.
By:	/s/ Andrew P. Becnel
	Andrew P. Becnel
	Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) Date: April 13, 2011

56

EX-31.1

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Bernard J. Duroc-Danner, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Weatherford International Ltd.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a — 15(f) and 15d — 15 (f)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: April 13, 2011
 

/s/ Bernard J. Duroc-Danner  

Bernard J. Duroc-Danner 

Chief Executive Officer 

EX-31.2

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Andrew P. Becnel, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Weatherford International Ltd.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a — 15(f) and 15d — 15 (f)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: April 13, 2011
 

/s/ Andrew P. Becnel  

Andrew P. Becnel Senior 

Vice President and Chief Financial Officer 

EX-32.1

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Weatherford International Ltd. (the “Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Bernard J. Duroc-Danner, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Bernard J. Duroc-Danner Name: Bernard J. Duroc-Danner

Title: Chief Executive Officer

Date: April 13, 2011

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The certification the registrant furnishes in this exhibit is not deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that Section. Registration Statements or other documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission shall not incorporate this exhibit by reference, except as otherwise expressly stated in such filing.

EX-32.2

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Weatherford International Ltd. (the “Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Andrew P. Becnel, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Andrew P. Becnel Name: Andrew P. Becnel

Title: Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Date: April 13, 2011

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The certification the registrant furnishes in this exhibit is not deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that Section. Registration Statements or other documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission shall not incorporate this exhibit by reference, except as otherwise expressly stated in such filing.