ACCOUNTING POLICIES	12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2016
Accounting Policies [Abstract]
ACCOUNTING POLICIES	ACCOUNTING POLICIES Basis of Presentation—The financial statements present the results of operations, financial position and cash flows of the Company and its majority-owned and controlled subsidiaries. Inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated. The Company prepared the accompanying consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”). These financial statements consider subsequent events through the date of filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Use of Estimates—The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires the use of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and accompanying disclosures. These estimates are based on management’s best knowledge of current events and actions the Company may undertake in the future. Significant estimates include sales rebates and return accruals, impairment testing of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets, impairment of long-lived assets, deferred tax assets and liabilities and income tax expense, as well as the accounting for stock-based compensation and retirement and post-employment benefits, including the actuarial assumptions. Actual results may or may not differ from estimated results. Fair Value Measurements—The fair value of financial assets and liabilities are classified in the fair value hierarchy as follows: Level 1— unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities, Level 2—observable prices that are based on inputs not quoted on active markets and Level 3—unobservable inputs that reflect estimates about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Revenue Recognition—MJN recognizes revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the price is fixed or determinable, and collectibility is reasonably assured. Revenue is not recognized until title and risks of loss have transferred to the customer. The shipping terms for the majority of revenue arrangements are FOB destination. Provisions are estimated at the time of revenue recognition for returns and Women, Infants and Children (“WIC”) rebates based on historical experience, updated for changes in facts and circumstances, as appropriate. Such provisions are recorded as a reduction of revenue. The Company offers sales incentives to customers and consumers through various programs consisting primarily of sales discounts, trade promotional support and consumer coupons. Provisions are estimated for these sales incentives at the later of the date at which the Company has sold the product or the date at which the program is offered, based on historical experience, updated for changes in facts and circumstances, as appropriate. Such provisions are recorded as a reduction of revenue. Revenue is recorded net of taxes collected from customers that are remitted to governmental authorities, with the collected taxes recorded as current liabilities until remitted to the relevant government authority. WIC rebate accruals were $212.5 million and $205.1 million at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and are included in accrued rebates and returns on the Company’s balance sheet. The Company participates on a competitive bidding basis in nutrition programs sponsored by states, tribal governments, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and U.S. territories for WIC. Under these programs, the Company reimburses these entities for the difference between the list price and the contract price on eligible products. The Company accounts for WIC rebates by establishing an accrual in an amount equal to the Company’s estimate of WIC rebate claims attributable to a sale. The Company determines its estimate of the WIC rebate accrual primarily based on historical experience regarding WIC rebates and current contract prices under the WIC programs. The Company considers levels of inventory in the distribution channel, new WIC contracts, terminated WIC contracts, changes in existing WIC contracts and WIC participation, and adjusts the accrual periodically throughout the year to reflect actual expense. Rebates under the WIC program reduced revenues by $751.5 million, $763.0 million, and $790.0 million in the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively. Sales return accruals were $57.1 million and $52.6 million at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and are included in accrued rebates and returns on the Company’s balance sheet. The Company accounts for sales returns by establishing an accrual in an amount equal to its estimate of sales recorded for which the related products are expected to be returned. The Company determines its estimate of the sales return accrual primarily based on historical experience regarding sales returns, but also considers other factors that could impact sales returns such as discontinuations and new product introductions. Returns reduced sales by $94.2 million, $89.8 million, and $86.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Income Taxes—The provision for income taxes has been determined using the asset and liability approach of accounting for income taxes. Under this approach, deferred taxes represent the future tax consequences expected to occur when the reported amounts of assets and liabilities are recovered or paid. The provision for income taxes represents income taxes paid or payable for the current year plus the change in deferred taxes during the year. Deferred taxes result from differences between the financial and tax basis of the Company’s assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using the currently enacted tax rates that apply to taxable earnings in effect for the years in which those tax attributes are expected to be recovered or paid, and are adjusted for changes in tax rates and tax laws when changes are enacted. The ultimate liability incurred by the Company may differ from the provision estimates based on a number of factors, including interpretations of tax laws and the resolution of examinations by the taxing authorities. United States federal income taxes are provided on foreign earnings that are not permanently invested offshore. Valuation allowances are recorded to reduce deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that a tax benefit will not be realized. The assessment of whether or not a valuation allowance is required often requires significant judgment including the long-range forecast of future taxable earnings and the evaluation of tax planning initiatives. Adjustments to the deferred tax valuation allowances are made to earnings in the period when such assessments are made. Uncertain tax positions that relate to deferred tax assets are recorded against deferred tax assets; otherwise, uncertain tax positions are recorded as either a current or noncurrent liability. Cash and Cash Equivalents—Cash and cash equivalents consist of bank deposits, time deposits and money market funds. The Company maintains cash and cash equivalent balances in U.S. dollars and foreign currencies, which are subject to currency rate risk. Cash equivalents are primarily highly liquid investments with original maturities of 3 months or less at the time of purchase and are recorded at cost, which approximates fair value. Money market funds, which are all incorporated or domiciled outside the U.S., are not subject to the enactment of daily floating net asset value calculation, liquidity fees or redemption gates and continue to meet the classification of cash and cash equivalents. Money market funds totaled $1,022.0 million and $510.1 million at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, are classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy. Inventory Valuation—Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market. The Company determines cost on the basis of the average cost or first-in, first-out methods. Property, Plant and Equipment—Expenditures for additions and improvements, including capitalized interest, are recorded at cost. Depreciation is computed on a straight-line method based on the estimated useful lives of the related assets. The estimated useful lives of the major classes of depreciable assets are up to 50 years for buildings and 3 to 40 years for machinery, equipment and fixtures. Maintenance and repair costs are expensed as incurred. Capitalized Software—Certain costs to obtain internal-use software for significant systems projects are reflected in Other Intangible Assets - Net, and are amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the software, which ranges from 3 to 7 years. Costs to obtain software for projects that are not significant are expensed as incurred. Impairment of Long-Lived Assets—The Company periodically evaluates whether current facts or circumstances indicate that the carrying value of its depreciable assets to be held and used may not be recoverable. If such circumstances are determined to exist, an estimate of undiscounted future cash flows produced by the long-lived asset, or the appropriate grouping of assets, is compared to the carrying value to determine whether impairment exists. If an asset is determined to be impaired, the loss is measured based on the difference between the asset’s fair value and its carrying value. An estimate of the asset’s fair value is based on quoted market prices in active markets, if available. If quoted market prices are not available, the estimate of fair value is based on various valuation techniques, including a discounted value of estimated future cash flows. The Company reports an asset to be disposed of at the lower of its cost less accumulated depreciation or its estimated net realizable value. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets—The Company’s policy is to test goodwill for impairment on an annual basis or when current facts or circumstances indicate that a potential impairment may exist. Goodwill is tested for impairment at the reporting unit level. A reporting unit represents an operating segment or a component of an operating segment. Goodwill is tested for impairment by either performing a qualitative evaluation or a two-step quantitative test. The qualitative evaluation is an assessment of factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, including goodwill. The Company may elect not to perform the qualitative assessment for some or all reporting units and perform a two-step quantitative impairment test. The Company compares the carrying value of a reporting unit, including goodwill, to the fair value of the unit. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the Company revalues all assets and liabilities of the reporting unit, excluding goodwill, to determine if the fair value of the net assets is greater than the net assets including goodwill. If the fair value of the net assets is less than the carrying amount of net assets including goodwill, impairment has occurred. The Company’s estimates of fair value are primarily determined based on a discounted cash flow model. Growth rates for sales and profits are determined using inputs from the Company’s annual long-range planning process. The Company also makes estimates of discount rates, perpetuity growth assumptions, market comparables, and other factors. The Company completed its most recent annual goodwill impairment assessment during the third quarter of 2016. No impairment of goodwill was required in 2016, 2015 or 2014. The Company evaluates the useful lives of its other intangible assets to determine if they are finite or indefinite-lived. Reaching a determination on useful life requires significant judgments and assumptions regarding the future effects of obsolescence, demand, competition, other economic factors (such as the stability of the industry, known technological advances, legislative action that results in an uncertain or changing regulatory environment, and expected changes in distribution channels), the level of required maintenance expenditures and the expected lives of other related groups of assets. Intangible assets that are deemed to have definite lives are amortized on a straight-line basis over their useful lives. Indefinite-lived intangible assets are tested for impairment at the reporting unit level. No impairment of indefinite-lived intangible assets was required in 2016, 2015 or 2014. Contingencies—In the ordinary course of business, the Company is subject to loss contingencies such as lawsuits, investigations, government inquiries and claims including, but not limited to, product liability claims, advertising disputes and inquiries, consumer fraud suits, other commercial disputes, premises claims and employment and environmental, health, and safety matters. The Company records accruals for such loss contingencies when it is probable that a liability will be incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. The Company does not recognize gain contingencies until realized. Legal costs are expensed as incurred. Derivatives—Derivatives are used by the Company principally in the management of its foreign currency, interest rate and commodity pricing exposures. The Company records all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. The Company does not hold or issue derivatives for speculative purposes. The Company designates and assigns derivatives as hedges of forecasted transactions, specific assets or specific liabilities. When the hedged assets or liabilities are sold, extinguished or the forecasted transactions being hedged are no longer expected to occur, the Company immediately recognizes the gain or loss on the designated hedging financial instruments in the consolidated statements of earnings. The Company has elected to classify the cash flows from derivative instruments in the same category as the cash flows from the underlying hedged items. If derivatives are designated as a cash flow hedge, the effective portion of changes in the fair value is temporarily reported in accumulated other comprehensive loss and is recognized in earnings when the hedged item affects earnings or is deemed ineffective; cash flows are classified consistent with the underlying hedged item. The Company assesses hedge effectiveness at inception and on a quarterly basis. These assessments determine whether derivatives designated as qualifying hedges continue to be highly effective in offsetting changes in the cash flows of hedged items. Any ineffective portion of the change in fair value is included in current period earnings. The Company will discontinue cash flow hedge accounting when the forecasted transaction is no longer probable of occurring on the originally forecasted date, or 60 days thereafter, or when the hedge is no longer effective. If derivatives are designated as a fair value hedge, both the changes in the fair value of the derivatives and of the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk are recognized in the consolidated statements of earnings; cash flows are classified consistent with the underlying hedged item. Pension and Other Post-employment Benefits—The funded status of the Company’s defined pension and other post-employment benefit plans is measured as the difference between the fair value of the plan assets and the benefit obligation. For the defined benefit plans, the benefit obligation is the projected benefit obligation; for any other defined benefit post-employment plans, the benefit obligation is the accumulated post-employment benefit obligation. The net over- or under-funded status is recognized as an asset or a liability on the balance sheet. Changes in assets or liabilities are recognized in the consolidated statements of earnings upon plan remeasurement in the fourth quarter of each year, or more frequently if a remeasurement occurs. Certain of the Company’s pension plans allow participants the option of settling their vested benefits through the receipt of a lump-sum payment. In the period in which lump-sum payments exceed annual service and interest costs, the Company applies settlement accounting and remeasures the pension obligation, with the resulting gain or loss being recognized immediately. During 2015, the Company changed the method used to estimate the interest cost components of net periodic benefit cost for defined benefit pension and other post-retirement benefit plans. Historically, the interest cost components were estimated using a single weighted-average discount rate derived from the yield curve used to measure the projected benefit obligation at the beginning of the period. The Company elected to use a full yield curve approach in the estimation of these components of benefit cost by applying the specific spot rates along the yield curve used in the determination of the projected benefit obligation to the relevant projected cash flows. The Company made this change to improve the correlation between projected benefit cash flows and the corresponding yield curve spot rates and to provide a more precise measurement of interest costs. This change does not affect the measurement of total benefit obligations as the change in interest cost is completely offset in the actuarial loss reported in the period. The Company accounted for this change as a change in estimate and, accordingly, accounted for it prospectively starting in the third quarter of 2015. The reduction in interest cost for the year ended December 31, 2015 associated with this change in estimate was approximately $2.0 million. Shipping and Handling Costs—The Company typically does not charge customers for shipping and handling costs. Shipping and handling costs, including warehousing expenses, were $99.6 million, $114.1 million, and $118.2 million in the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively, and are included in selling, general and administrative expenses. Advertising Costs—Advertising costs are expensed as incurred and were $223.8 million, $218.7 million, and $206.2 million in the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively. Research and Development—Research and development costs are expensed as incurred. Stock-Based Compensation—Stock-based compensation expense for stock options is measured based on the estimated grant date fair value and recognized over the vesting period for options that are expected to vest. The Company estimates forfeitures at the time of grant based on historical experience, updated for changes in facts and circumstances, as appropriate, and in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. The Company uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to value stock options granted. The expected volatility assumption is calculated based principally on the Company’s historical volatility, and to a lesser extent, on implied volatility from publicly-traded options on the Company’s stock. The historical volatility is calculated over a period of time commensurate with the expected term of the options being valued. The risk-free interest rate assumption is based upon the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. The dividend yield assumption is based on the Company’s expectation of dividend payouts. The Company has determined that it has enough historical option exercise information to be able to accurately compute an expected term for use as an assumption in the Black-Scholes option pricing model. As such, its computation of expected term was calculated using the Company’s historical data. The Company also grants shares of restricted stock units and performance awards. Restricted stock units generally vest on the third or fourth anniversary of the grant date, and are entitled to dividend equivalent payments during the vesting period. Performance share awards vest based on varying performance, market and service conditions. Foreign Currency Translation—The statements of earnings of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries whose functional currencies are other than the U.S. dollar are translated into U.S. dollars using average exchange rates for the period. The net assets of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries whose functional currencies are other than the U.S. dollar are translated into U.S. dollars using exchange rates as of the balance sheet date. The U.S. dollar effects that arise from translating the net assets of these subsidiaries at changing rates are recorded in the foreign currency translation adjustment account, which is included in accumulated other comprehensive loss. Recently Adopted Accounting Standards—In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statement-Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40). This update requires management to assess the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern by incorporating and expanding upon certain principles that are currently in U.S. auditing standards. Specifically, the amendments (1) provide a definition of the term substantial doubt, (2) require an evaluation every reporting period including interim periods, (3) provide principles for considering the mitigating effect of management’s plans, (4) require certain disclosures when substantial doubt is alleviated as a result of consideration of management’s plans, (5) require an express statement and other disclosures when substantial doubt is not alleviated, and (6) require an assessment for a period of one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued). The updated standard was effective for the Company in the annual period ending December 31, 2016. The adoption of this updated standard did not have an impact on the consolidated financial statements. Recently Issued Accounting Standards—In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350). This update simplifies goodwill impairment testing by eliminating step two from the goodwill impairment test. Under the updated standard, the Company still has the option to perform its annual, or interim, goodwill impairment test using the qualitative assessment for a reporting unit to determine if the quantitative impairment test is necessary. The quantitative impairment test is to compare the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount and recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value; however, the loss recognized should not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. The updated standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed after January 1, 2017. The Company is currently evaluating the effect that the updated standard will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments. This update is intended to reduce diversity in practice in the classification of certain cash receipts and payments in the statement of cash flows. The updated standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the effect that the updated standard will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. This update simplifies several aspects of the accounting for share-based compensation arrangements, including accounting for income taxes, forfeitures and statutory tax withholding requirements as well as classification of related amounts on the statement of cash flows. The Company has evaluated the effect that the updated standard will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. The Company will recognize excess tax benefits within the consolidated statements of earnings. As this amount is currently recorded as a reduction to additional paid-in capital, this could potentially cause volatility in the Company’s earnings and calculation of effective tax rate going forward when employees exercise options and when stock units become vested. The Company will record the excess tax benefit within the operating activities in the statement of cash flows. These amendments will be adopted prospectively with no adjustment to prior periods required. Additionally, the Company will continue to present cash paid for tax withholdings under financing activities within the statements of cash flows and the Company has elected to continue to estimate for forfeitures and to not withhold more than the minimum statutory tax rate. The updated standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, with early adoption permitted. In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). The updated standard requires most leases to be reflected on the balance sheet. It also aligns many of the underlying principles of the new lessor model with those of ASC No. 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The updated standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the effect that the updated standard will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-11, Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory (Topic 330). This update simplifies the guidance on the subsequent measurement of inventory. GAAP currently requires an entity to measure inventory at the lower of cost or market. Previously, market could be replacement cost, net realizable value or net realizable value less an approximate normal profit margin. Under the new standard, inventory should be valued at the lower of cost or net realizable value. The updated standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, with early adoption permitted. The Company has evaluated the effect that the updated standard will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. The updated standard will be adopted prospectively. Given the Company has not experienced markdowns of inventory due to lower of cost or market considerations, the impact of implementing the updated standard is not expected to be material. In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). In 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-08, ASU 2016-10 and ASU 2016-12 to clarify, among other things, the implementation guidance related to principal versus agent considerations, identifying performance obligations, and accounting for licenses of intellectual property. The updated standard and related clarifications will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in GAAP when it becomes effective and permits the use of either the retrospective or cumulative effect transition method. The updated standard becomes effective for the Company in the first quarter of 2018. The Company is currently evaluating the effect that the updated standard will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. From the results of the preliminary review, the Company believes the impact of adopting the updated standard primarily relates to the timing of the recognition of variable consideration. Under current guidance, the Company accounts for sales incentives offered to its customers at the later of the date at which the Company has sold the product or the date at which the program is offered. The new guidance requires earlier recognition if the sales incentive is implied by the Company’s customary business practice, even if the Company has not yet explicitly communicated its intent to make the payment to the customer. Analysis of the Company’s historical and future trends and use of judgment are required. The Company is in the process of quantifying such impact. The Company anticipates using the modified retrospective adoption method.

ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation—The financial statements present the results of operations, financial position and cash flows of the Company and its majority-owned and controlled subsidiaries. Inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated. The Company prepared the accompanying consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”). These financial statements consider subsequent events through the date of filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Use of Estimates—The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires the use of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and accompanying disclosures. These estimates are based on management’s best knowledge of current events and actions the Company may undertake in the future. Significant estimates include sales rebates and return accruals, impairment testing of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets, impairment of long-lived assets, deferred tax assets and liabilities and income tax expense, as well as the accounting for stock-based compensation and retirement and post-employment benefits, including the actuarial assumptions. Actual results may or may not differ from estimated results.

Fair Value Measurements—The fair value of financial assets and liabilities are classified in the fair value hierarchy as follows: Level 1— unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities, Level 2—observable prices that are based on inputs not quoted on active markets and Level 3—unobservable inputs that reflect estimates about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.

Revenue Recognition—MJN recognizes revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the price is fixed or determinable, and collectibility is reasonably assured. Revenue is not recognized until title and risks of loss have transferred to the customer. The shipping terms for the majority of revenue arrangements are FOB destination. Provisions are estimated at the time of revenue recognition for returns and Women, Infants and Children (“WIC”) rebates based on historical experience, updated for changes in facts and circumstances, as appropriate. Such provisions are recorded as a reduction of revenue. The Company offers sales incentives to customers and consumers through various programs consisting primarily of sales discounts, trade promotional support and consumer coupons. Provisions are estimated for these sales incentives at the later of the date at which the Company has sold the product or the date at which the program is offered, based on historical experience, updated for changes in facts and circumstances, as appropriate. Such provisions are recorded as a reduction of revenue. Revenue is recorded net of taxes collected from customers that are remitted to governmental authorities, with the collected taxes recorded as current liabilities until remitted to the relevant government authority.

WIC rebate accruals were $212.5 million and $205.1 million at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and are included in accrued rebates and returns on the Company’s balance sheet. The Company participates on a competitive bidding basis in nutrition programs sponsored by states, tribal governments, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and U.S. territories for WIC. Under these programs, the Company reimburses these entities for the difference between the list price and the contract price on eligible products. The Company accounts for WIC rebates by establishing an accrual in an amount equal to the Company’s estimate of WIC rebate claims attributable to a sale. The Company determines its estimate of the WIC rebate accrual primarily based on historical experience regarding WIC rebates and current contract prices under the WIC programs. The Company considers levels of inventory in the distribution channel, new WIC contracts, terminated WIC contracts, changes in existing WIC contracts and WIC participation, and adjusts the accrual periodically throughout the year to reflect actual expense. Rebates under the WIC program reduced revenues by $751.5 million, $763.0 million, and $790.0 million in the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively.

Sales return accruals were $57.1 million and $52.6 million at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and are included in accrued rebates and returns on the Company’s balance sheet. The Company accounts for sales returns by establishing an accrual in an amount equal to its estimate of sales recorded for which the related products are expected to be returned. The Company determines its estimate of the sales return accrual primarily based on historical experience regarding sales returns, but also considers other factors that could impact sales returns such as discontinuations and new product introductions. Returns reduced sales by $94.2 million, $89.8 million, and $86.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

Income Taxes—The provision for income taxes has been determined using the asset and liability approach of accounting for income taxes. Under this approach, deferred taxes represent the future tax consequences expected to occur when the reported amounts of assets and liabilities are recovered or paid. The provision for income taxes represents income taxes paid or payable for the current year plus the change in deferred taxes during the year. Deferred taxes result from differences between the financial and tax basis of the Company’s assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using the currently enacted tax rates that apply to taxable earnings in effect for the years in which those tax attributes are expected to be recovered or paid, and are adjusted for changes in tax rates and tax laws when changes are enacted. The ultimate liability incurred by the Company may differ from the provision estimates based on a number of factors, including interpretations of tax laws and the resolution of examinations by the taxing authorities. United States federal income taxes are provided on foreign earnings that are not permanently invested offshore.

Valuation allowances are recorded to reduce deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that a tax benefit will not be realized. The assessment of whether or not a valuation allowance is required often requires significant judgment including the long-range forecast of future taxable earnings and the evaluation of tax planning initiatives. Adjustments to the deferred tax valuation allowances are made to earnings in the period when such assessments are made.

Uncertain tax positions that relate to deferred tax assets are recorded against deferred tax assets; otherwise, uncertain tax positions are recorded as either a current or noncurrent liability.

Cash and Cash Equivalents—Cash and cash equivalents consist of bank deposits, time deposits and money market funds. The Company maintains cash and cash equivalent balances in U.S. dollars and foreign currencies, which are subject to currency rate risk. Cash equivalents are primarily highly liquid investments with original maturities of 3 months or less at the time of purchase and are recorded at cost, which approximates fair value. Money market funds, which are all incorporated or domiciled outside the U.S., are not subject to the enactment of daily floating net asset value calculation, liquidity fees or redemption gates and continue to meet the classification of cash and cash equivalents. Money market funds totaled $1,022.0 million and $510.1 million at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, are classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.

Inventory Valuation—Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market. The Company determines cost on the basis of the average cost or first-in, first-out methods.

Property, Plant and Equipment—Expenditures for additions and improvements, including capitalized interest, are recorded at cost. Depreciation is computed on a straight-line method based on the estimated useful lives of the related assets. The estimated useful lives of the major classes of depreciable assets are up to 50 years for buildings and 3 to 40 years for machinery, equipment and fixtures. Maintenance and repair costs are expensed as incurred.

Capitalized Software—Certain costs to obtain internal-use software for significant systems projects are reflected in Other Intangible Assets - Net, and are amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the software, which ranges from 3 to 7 years. Costs to obtain software for projects that are not significant are expensed as incurred.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets—The Company periodically evaluates whether current facts or circumstances indicate that the carrying value of its depreciable assets to be held and used may not be recoverable. If such circumstances are determined to exist, an estimate of undiscounted future cash flows produced by the long-lived asset, or the appropriate grouping of assets, is compared to the carrying value to determine whether impairment exists. If an asset is determined to be impaired, the loss is measured based on the difference between the asset’s fair value and its carrying value. An estimate of the asset’s fair value is based on quoted market prices in active markets, if available. If quoted market prices are not available, the estimate of fair value is based on various valuation techniques, including a discounted value of estimated future cash flows. The Company reports an asset to be disposed of at the lower of its cost less accumulated depreciation or its estimated net realizable value.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets—The Company’s policy is to test goodwill for impairment on an annual basis or when current facts or circumstances indicate that a potential impairment may exist. Goodwill is tested for impairment at the reporting unit level. A reporting unit represents an operating segment or a component of an operating segment. Goodwill is tested for impairment by either performing a qualitative evaluation or a two-step quantitative test. The qualitative evaluation is an assessment of factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, including goodwill. The Company may elect not to perform the qualitative assessment for some or all reporting units and perform a two-step quantitative impairment test. The Company compares the carrying value of a reporting unit, including goodwill, to the fair value of the unit. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the Company revalues all assets and liabilities of the reporting unit, excluding goodwill, to determine if the fair value of the net assets is greater than the net assets including goodwill. If the fair value of the net assets is less than the carrying amount of net assets including goodwill, impairment has occurred. The Company’s estimates of fair value are primarily determined based on a discounted cash flow model. Growth rates for sales and profits are determined using inputs from the Company’s annual long-range planning process. The Company also makes estimates of discount rates, perpetuity growth assumptions, market comparables, and other factors. The Company completed its most recent annual goodwill impairment assessment during the third quarter of 2016. No impairment of goodwill was required in 2016, 2015 or 2014.

The Company evaluates the useful lives of its other intangible assets to determine if they are finite or indefinite-lived. Reaching a determination on useful life requires significant judgments and assumptions regarding the future effects of obsolescence, demand, competition, other economic factors (such as the stability of the industry, known technological advances, legislative action that results in an uncertain or changing regulatory environment, and expected changes in distribution channels), the level of required maintenance expenditures and the expected lives of other related groups of assets. Intangible assets that are deemed to have definite lives are amortized on a straight-line basis over their useful lives. Indefinite-lived intangible assets are tested for impairment at the reporting unit level. No impairment of indefinite-lived intangible assets was required in 2016, 2015 or 2014.

Contingencies—In the ordinary course of business, the Company is subject to loss contingencies such as lawsuits, investigations, government inquiries and claims including, but not limited to, product liability claims, advertising disputes and inquiries, consumer fraud suits, other commercial disputes, premises claims and employment and environmental, health, and safety matters. The Company records accruals for such loss contingencies when it is probable that a liability will be incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. The Company does not recognize gain contingencies until realized. Legal costs are expensed as incurred.

Derivatives—Derivatives are used by the Company principally in the management of its foreign currency, interest rate and commodity pricing exposures. The Company records all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. The Company does not hold or issue derivatives for speculative purposes.

The Company designates and assigns derivatives as hedges of forecasted transactions, specific assets or specific liabilities. When the hedged assets or liabilities are sold, extinguished or the forecasted transactions being hedged are no longer expected to occur, the Company immediately recognizes the gain or loss on the designated hedging financial instruments in the consolidated statements of earnings. The Company has elected to classify the cash flows from derivative instruments in the same category as the cash flows from the underlying hedged items.

If derivatives are designated as a cash flow hedge, the effective portion of changes in the fair value is temporarily reported in accumulated other comprehensive loss and is recognized in earnings when the hedged item affects earnings or is deemed ineffective; cash flows are classified consistent with the underlying hedged item. The Company assesses hedge effectiveness at inception and on a quarterly basis. These assessments determine whether derivatives designated as qualifying hedges continue to be highly effective in offsetting changes in the cash flows of hedged items. Any ineffective portion of the change in fair value is included in current period earnings. The Company will discontinue cash flow hedge accounting when the forecasted transaction is no longer probable of occurring on the originally forecasted date, or 60 days thereafter, or when the hedge is no longer effective.

If derivatives are designated as a fair value hedge, both the changes in the fair value of the derivatives and of the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk are recognized in the consolidated statements of earnings; cash flows are classified consistent with the underlying hedged item.

Pension and Other Post-employment Benefits—The funded status of the Company’s defined pension and other post-employment benefit plans is measured as the difference between the fair value of the plan assets and the benefit obligation. For the defined benefit plans, the benefit obligation is the projected benefit obligation; for any other defined benefit post-employment plans, the benefit obligation is the accumulated post-employment benefit obligation. The net over- or under-funded status is recognized as an asset or a liability on the balance sheet.

Changes in assets or liabilities are recognized in the consolidated statements of earnings upon plan remeasurement in the fourth quarter of each year, or more frequently if a remeasurement occurs. Certain of the Company’s pension plans allow participants the option of settling their vested benefits through the receipt of a lump-sum payment. In the period in which lump-sum payments exceed annual service and interest costs, the Company applies settlement accounting and remeasures the pension obligation, with the resulting gain or loss being recognized immediately.

During 2015, the Company changed the method used to estimate the interest cost components of net periodic benefit cost for defined benefit pension and other post-retirement benefit plans. Historically, the interest cost components were estimated using a single weighted-average discount rate derived from the yield curve used to measure the projected benefit obligation at the beginning of the period. The Company elected to use a full yield curve approach in the estimation of these components of benefit cost by applying the specific spot rates along the yield curve used in the determination of the projected benefit obligation to the relevant projected cash flows. The Company made this change to improve the correlation between projected benefit cash flows and the corresponding yield curve spot rates and to provide a more precise measurement of interest costs. This change does not affect the measurement of total benefit obligations as the change in interest cost is completely offset in the actuarial loss reported in the period. The Company accounted for this change as a change in estimate and, accordingly, accounted for it prospectively starting in the third quarter of 2015. The reduction in interest cost for the year ended December 31, 2015 associated with this change in estimate was approximately $2.0 million.

Shipping and Handling Costs—The Company typically does not charge customers for shipping and handling costs. Shipping and handling costs, including warehousing expenses, were $99.6 million, $114.1 million, and $118.2 million in the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively, and are included in selling, general and administrative expenses.

Advertising Costs—Advertising costs are expensed as incurred and were $223.8 million, $218.7 million, and $206.2 million in the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively.

Research and Development—Research and development costs are expensed as incurred.

Stock-Based Compensation—Stock-based compensation expense for stock options is measured based on the estimated grant date fair value and recognized over the vesting period for options that are expected to vest. The Company estimates forfeitures at the time of grant based on historical experience, updated for changes in facts and circumstances, as appropriate, and in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. The Company uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to value stock options granted. The expected volatility assumption is calculated based principally on the Company’s historical volatility, and to a lesser extent, on implied volatility from publicly-traded options on the Company’s stock. The historical volatility is calculated over a period of time commensurate with the expected term of the options being valued. The risk-free interest rate assumption is based upon the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. The dividend yield assumption is based on the Company’s expectation of dividend payouts. The Company has determined that it has enough historical option exercise information to be able to accurately compute an expected term for use as an assumption in the Black-Scholes option pricing model. As such, its computation of expected term was calculated using the Company’s historical data.

The Company also grants shares of restricted stock units and performance awards. Restricted stock units generally vest on the third or fourth anniversary of the grant date, and are entitled to dividend equivalent payments during the vesting period. Performance share awards vest based on varying performance, market and service conditions.

Foreign Currency Translation—The statements of earnings of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries whose functional currencies are other than the U.S. dollar are translated into U.S. dollars using average exchange rates for the period. The net assets of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries whose functional currencies are other than the U.S. dollar are translated into U.S. dollars using exchange rates as of the balance sheet date. The U.S. dollar effects that arise from translating the net assets of these subsidiaries at changing rates are recorded in the foreign currency translation adjustment account, which is included in accumulated other comprehensive loss.

Recently Adopted Accounting Standards—In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statement-Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40). This update requires management to assess the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern by incorporating and expanding upon certain principles that are currently in U.S. auditing standards. Specifically, the amendments (1) provide a

definition of the term substantial doubt, (2) require an evaluation every reporting period including interim periods, (3) provide principles for considering the mitigating effect of management’s plans, (4) require certain disclosures when substantial doubt is alleviated as a result of consideration of management’s plans, (5) require an express statement and other disclosures when substantial doubt is not alleviated, and (6) require an assessment for a period of one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued). The updated standard was effective for the Company in the annual period ending December 31, 2016. The adoption of this updated standard did not have an impact on the consolidated financial statements.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards—In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350). This update simplifies goodwill impairment testing by eliminating step two from the goodwill impairment test. Under the updated standard, the Company still has the option to perform its annual, or interim, goodwill impairment test using the qualitative assessment for a reporting unit to determine if the quantitative impairment test is necessary. The quantitative impairment test is to compare the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount and recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value; however, the loss recognized should not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. The updated standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed after January 1, 2017. The Company is currently evaluating the effect that the updated standard will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments. This update is intended to reduce diversity in practice in the classification of certain cash receipts and payments in the statement of cash flows. The updated standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the effect that the updated standard will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. This update simplifies several aspects of the accounting for share-based compensation arrangements, including accounting for income taxes, forfeitures and statutory tax withholding requirements as well as classification of related amounts on the statement of cash flows. The Company has evaluated the effect that the updated standard will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. The Company will recognize excess tax benefits within the consolidated statements of earnings. As this amount is currently recorded as a reduction to additional paid-in capital, this could potentially cause volatility in the Company’s earnings and calculation of effective tax rate going forward when employees exercise options and when stock units become vested. The Company will record the excess tax benefit within the operating activities in the statement of cash flows. These amendments will be adopted prospectively with no adjustment to prior periods required. Additionally, the Company will continue to present cash paid for tax withholdings under financing activities within the statements of cash flows and the Company has elected to continue to estimate for forfeitures and to not withhold more than the minimum statutory tax rate. The updated standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, with early adoption permitted.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). The updated standard requires most leases to be reflected on the balance sheet. It also aligns many of the underlying principles of the new lessor model with those of ASC No. 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The updated standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the effect that the updated standard will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-11, Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory (Topic 330). This update simplifies the guidance on the subsequent measurement of inventory. GAAP currently requires an entity to measure inventory at the lower of cost or market. Previously, market could be replacement cost, net realizable value or net realizable value less an approximate normal profit margin. Under the new standard, inventory should be valued at the lower of cost or net realizable value. The updated standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, with early adoption permitted. The Company has evaluated the effect that the updated standard will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. The updated standard will be adopted prospectively. Given the Company has not experienced markdowns of inventory due to lower of cost or market considerations, the impact of implementing the updated standard is not expected to be material.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). In 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-08, ASU 2016-10 and ASU 2016-12 to clarify, among other things, the implementation guidance related to principal versus agent considerations, identifying performance obligations, and accounting for licenses of intellectual property. The updated standard and related clarifications will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in GAAP when it becomes effective and permits the use of either the retrospective or cumulative effect transition method. The updated standard becomes effective for the Company in the first quarter of 2018. The Company is currently evaluating the effect that the updated standard will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. From the results of the preliminary review, the Company believes the impact of adopting the updated standard primarily relates to the timing of the recognition of variable consideration. Under current guidance, the Company accounts for sales incentives offered to its customers at the later of the date at which the Company has sold the product or the date at which the program is offered. The new guidance requires earlier recognition if the sales incentive is implied by the Company’s customary business practice, even if the Company has not yet explicitly communicated its intent to make the payment to the customer. Analysis of the Company’s historical and future trends and use of judgment are required. The Company is in the process of quantifying such impact. The Company anticipates using the modified retrospective adoption method.