XML 27 R16.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.24.3
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2024
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]  
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

10. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

 

Litigation and Claims

 

Leases

 

During the three months ended September 30, 2024, the Company executed an extension of its operating lease for the manufacturing facility in Santa Fe Springs, California. After adjusting for a weighted average discount rate, the Company recognized a right-of-use asset and lease liability of approximately $3,337 within the condensed consolidated balance sheets.

 

Litigation and Claims

 

From time to time, the Company is a defendant or plaintiff in various legal actions that arise in the normal course of business. Liabilities for loss contingencies arising from claims, assessments, litigation, fines and penalties and other sources are recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the assessment can be reasonably estimated.

 

On June 15, 2023, Terrence and Kay Mimick (the “Plaintiffs”) filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court, District of Nebraska naming the Company, its wholly-owned subsidiary, Pioneer Critical Power, Inc., and an individual acting in his capacity as an employee of the Company, collectively as defendants. Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint on July 7, 2023, alleging negligent driving, negligent entrustment, and negligent hiring, training and supervision, as a result of a car accident that occurred on September 9, 2019, and seeking special damages related to the injuries allegedly sustained by Plaintiffs. The amended complaint also named Titan Energy Systems, Inc. as a defendant instead of Pioneer Critical Power, Inc. On July 27, 2023, the defendants filed an Answer to Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint. On October 6, 2023, a mediation was held, but the parties did not reach a settlement. In June 2024, another mediation was held and the parties reached a settlement for all of the Plaintiffs’ claims. The case was dismissed with prejudice on July 23, 2024.

 

The Company is not aware of any material proceedings in which any of its directors, officers or affiliates or any registered or beneficial shareholder of more than 5% of the Company’s common stock is an adverse party or has a material interest adverse to the Company’s interest.