XML 59 R16.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.1.9
LIABILITY FOR EQUITY-LINKED FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
9 Months Ended 12 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2014
Dec. 31, 2013
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities Disclosure [Abstract]    
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities Disclosure [Text Block]

NOTE 8 — LIABILITY FOR EQUITY-LINKED FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The Company adopted ASC 815- Derivatives and Hedging (“ASC 815”) on January 1, 2009. ASC 815 mandates a two-step process for evaluating whether an equity-linked financial instrument or embedded feature is indexed to the entity's own stock. It was effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years, which was the Company's first quarter of 2009. Many of the warrants issued by the Company contain a strike price adjustment feature, which upon adoption of ASC 815, changed the classification (from equity to liability) and the related accounting for warrants with a $479,910 estimated fair value of as of January 1, 2009. An adjustment was made to remove $486,564 from paid-in capital (the cumulative values of the warrants on their grant dates), a positive adjustment of $6,654 was made to accumulated deficit, representing the gain on valuation from the grant date to January 1, 2009, and $479,910 was booked as a liability. The warrants issued in 2011 do not contain a strike price adjustment feature and, therefore, are not treated as a liability.
The January 1, 2009 valuation was computed using the Black-Scholes valuation model based upon a 2.5-year expected term, an expected volatility of 63%, an exercise price of $34.50 per share, a stock price of $26.25, a zero dividend rate and a 1.37% risk free interest rate. Subsequent to January 1, 2009 these warrants were re-valued at the end of each quarter and a gain or loss was recorded based upon their increase or decrease in value during the quarter. Likewise, new warrants that were issued during 2009 and 2010 were valued, using the Black-Scholes valuation model on their date of grant and an entry was made to reduce paid-in capital and increase the liability for equity-linked financial instruments. These warrants were also re-valued at the end of each quarter based upon their expected life, the stock price, the exercise price, assumed dividend rate, expected volatility and risk free interest rate. A significant reduction in the liability was realized in 2010 primarily due to a reduction from $37.50 to $16.50 per share in the underlying stock price. The Company realized a slight increase in the liability for existing warrants during the first quarter of 2012. In 2013 there was a significant decrease in the liability primarily due to current expirations and the amount of warrants reaching expiration in the near term. In 2014, all warrants expired and the liability was reduced to zero.
The inputs to the Black-Scholes model during 2009 through 2014 were as follows:
 
 
 
Stock price
 
 
$4.50 to $37.50
 
Exercise price
 
 
$.75 to $24.38
 
Expected life
 
 
2.0 to 6.5 years
 
Expected volatility
 
 
59%
 
Assumed dividend rate
 
 
—%
 
Risk-free interest rate
 
 
.13% to 2.97%
 
The original valuations, annual gain/(loss) and end of year valuations are shown below:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial Value
 
Annual
Gain
(Loss)
 
Value at
12/31/09
 
2010 Gain
(Loss)
 
Value at
12/31/10
 
2011 Gain
(Loss)
 
Value at
12/31/2011
 
2012 Gain
(Loss)
 
Value at
12/31/2012
 
2013 Gain
(Loss)
 
Value at
12/31/2013
 
2014 Gain
(Loss)
 
Value at
9/30/2014
January 1, 2009 adoption
 
$
479,910
 
 
$
(390,368
 
$
870,278
 
 
$
868,772
 
 
$
1,506
 
 
$
(88,290
 
$
89,796
 
 
$
(21,856
 
$
111,652
 
 
$
100,053
 
 
$
11,599
 
 
$
11,599
 
 
$
 
Warrants issued in quarter ended 6/30/2009
 
 
169,854
 
 
 
20,847
 
 
 
149,007
 
 
 
147,403
 
 
 
1,604
 
 
 
(4,689
 
 
6,293
 
 
 
6,293
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Warrants issued in quarter ended 9/30/2009
 
 
39,743
 
 
 
(738
 
 
40,481
 
 
 
40,419
 
 
 
62
 
 
 
(1,562
 
 
1,624
 
 
 
910
 
 
 
714
 
 
 
714
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Warrants issued in quarter ended 12/31/2009
 
 
12,698
 
 
 
617
 
 
 
12,081
 
 
 
12,053
 
 
 
28
 
 
 
(724
 
 
752
 
 
 
415
 
 
 
337
 
 
 
337
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Subtotal
 
 
702,205
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
1,071,847
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
  
 
Warrants issued in quarter ended 3/31/2010
 
 
25,553
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
25,014
 
 
 
539
 
 
 
(5,570
 
 
6,109
 
 
 
3,701
 
 
 
2,408
 
 
 
2,408
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Warrants issued in quarter ended 6/30/2010
 
 
31,332
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
30,740
 
 
 
592
 
 
 
(6,122
 
 
6,714
 
 
 
6,083
 
 
 
631
 
 
 
631
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Warrants issued in quarter ended 9/30/2010
 
 
31,506
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
20,891
 
 
 
10,615
 
 
 
(44,160
 
 
54,775
 
 
 
1,338
 
 
 
53,437
 
 
 
53,437
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total
 
$
790,596
 
 
$
(369,642
 
$
1,071,847
 
 
$
1,145,292
 
 
$
14,946
 
 
$
(151,117
 
$
166,063
 
 
$
(3,116
 
$
169,179
 
 
$
157,580
 
 
$
11,599
 
 
$
11,599
 
 
$
 

NOTE 8 — LIABILITY FOR EQUITY-LINKED FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The Company adopted ASC 815 —  Derivatives and Hedging (“ASC 815”) on January 1, 2009. ASC 815 mandates a two-step process for evaluating whether an equity-linked financial instrument or embedded feature is indexed to the entity's own stock. It was effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years, which was the Company's first quarter of 2009. Many of the warrants issued by the Company contain a strike price adjustment feature, which upon adoption of ASC 815, changed the classification (from equity to liability) and the related accounting for warrants with a $479,910 estimated fair value of as of January 1, 2009. An adjustment was made to remove $486,564 from paid-in capital (the cumulative values of the warrants on their grant dates), a positive adjustment of $6,654 was made to accumulated deficit, representing the gain on valuation from the grant date to January 1, 2009, and $479,910 was booked as a liability. The warrants issued in 2012 and 2011 do not contain a strike price adjustment feature and, therefore, are not treated as a liability.
The January 1, 2009 valuation was computed using the Black-Scholes valuation model based upon a 2.5-year expected term, an expected volatility of 63%, an exercise price of $34.50 per share, a stock price of $26.25, a zero dividend rate and a 1.37% risk free interest rate. Subsequent to January 1, 2009 these warrants were re-valued at the end of each quarter and a gain or loss was recorded based upon their increase or decrease in value during the quarter. Likewise, new warrants that were issued during 2009 and 2010 were valued, using the Black-Scholes valuation model on their date of grant and an entry was made to reduce paid-in capital and increase the liability for equity-linked financial instruments. These warrants were also re-valued at the end of each quarter based upon their expected life, the stock price, the exercise price, assumed dividend rate, expected volatility and risk free interest rate. A significant reduction in the liability was realized in 2010 primarily due to a reduction from $37.50 to $16.50 per share in the underlying stock price. The Company realized an increase in the liability for existing warrants during 2011 primarily due to a reduction in the spread between the exercise price and the market price of the underlying shares. In 2012, there was a slight increase to the liability due to the extension of warrants. In 2013 there was a significant decrease as a result of the older warrants expiring or getting exercised.
The inputs to the Black-Scholes model during 2009 through 2013 were as follows:
 
 
Stock price
 
 
$26.25
 
Exercise price
 
 
$57.68
 
Expected life
 
 
.50 years
 
Expected volatility
 
 
54%
 
Assumed dividend rate
 
 
—%
 
Risk-free interest rate
 
 
.13% to 2.97%
 
The original valuations, annual gain (loss) and end of year valuations are shown below:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Initial
Value
 
Annual Gain (Loss)
 
Value at
12/31/09
 
2010
Gain (Loss)
 
Value at
12/31/10
 
2011
Gain (Loss)
 
Value at
12/31/2011
 
2012
Gain (Loss)
 
Value at
12/31/2012
 
2013
Gain (Loss)
 
Value at
12/31/2013
January 1 2009 adoption
 
$
479,910
 
 
$
(390,368
 
$
870,278
 
 
$
868,772
 
 
$
1,506
 
 
$
(88,290
 
$
89,796
 
 
$
(21,856
 
$
111,652
 
 
$
100,053
 
 
$
11,599
 
Warrants issued in quarter ended 6/30/2009
 
 
169,854
 
 
 
20,847
 
 
 
149,007
 
 
 
147,403
 
 
 
1,604
 
 
 
(4,689
 
 
6,293
 
 
 
6,293
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Warrants issued in quarter ended 9/30/2009
 
 
39,743
 
 
 
(738
 
 
40,481
 
 
 
40,419
 
 
 
62
 
 
 
(1,562
 
 
1,624
 
 
 
910
 
 
 
714
 
 
 
714
 
 
 
 
Warrants issued in quarter ended 12/31/2009
 
 
12,698
 
 
 
617
 
 
 
12,081
 
 
 
12,053
 
 
 
28
 
 
 
(724
 
 
752
 
 
 
415
 
 
 
337
 
 
 
337
 
 
 
 
Subtotal
 
 
702,205
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
1,071,847
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
  
 
Warrants issued in quarter ended 3/31/2010
 
 
25,553
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
25,014
 
 
 
539
 
 
 
(5,570
 
 
6,109
 
 
 
3,701
 
 
 
2,408
 
 
 
2,408
 
 
 
 
Warrants issued in quarter ended 6/30/2010
 
 
31,332
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
30,740
 
 
 
592
 
 
 
(6,122
 
 
6,714
 
 
 
6,083
 
 
 
631
 
 
 
631
 
 
 
 
Warrants issued in quarter ended 9/30/2010
 
 
31,506
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
20,891
 
 
 
10,615
 
 
 
(44,160
 
 
54,775
 
 
 
1,338
 
 
 
53,437
 
 
 
53,437
 
 
 
 
Total
 
$
790,596
 
 
$
(369,642
 
$
1,071,847
 
 
$
1,145,292
 
 
$
14,946
 
 
$
(151,117
 
$
166,063
 
 
$
(3,116
 
$
169,179
 
 
$
157,580
 
 
$
11,599