XML 74 R19.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.3.0.814
Related Party Transactions
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2015
Related Party Transactions [Abstract]  
Related Party Transactions
RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The following represent our significant related-party transactions.

•
TCEH's retail operations pay Oncor for services it provides, principally the delivery of electricity. Expenses recorded for these services, reported in fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees, totaled $279 million and $281 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and $739 million and $746 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The fees are based on rates regulated by the PUCT that apply to all REPs. The condensed consolidated balance sheets at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 reflect amounts due currently to Oncor totaling $156 million and $118 million, respectively, (included in trade accounts and other payables to affiliates) largely related to these electricity delivery fees.

•
EFCH (parent entity) has a demand note payable to EFH Corp., the proceeds from which were used to repay outstanding debt. The note totaled $107 million at both September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 and carried interest at a rate based on the one-month LIBOR rate plus 5.00%. Interest expense related to this note totaled $2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. At September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the $107 million note payable as of the Petition Date is classified as a liability subject to compromise (LSTC), and interest expense on the note has not been recorded since the Petition Date.

In the first quarter of 2014, a cash contribution totaling $84 million was made to the EFH Corp. retirement plan, of which $64 million was contributed by Oncor and $20 million was contributed by TCEH, which resulted in the EFH Corp. retirement plan being fully funded as calculated under the provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended. As a result of the Bankruptcy Filing, participants in the EFH Corp. retirement plan who choose to retire would not be eligible for the lump sum payout option under the retirement plan unless the EFH Corp. retirement plan was fully funded. The payment by TCEH was accounted for as an advance to EFH Corp. that will be settled as pension and other postretirement employee benefits expenses are allocated to TCEH in the normal course. The balance of the advance totaled $9 million at September 30, 2015, with $6 million recorded as a current asset and $3 million recorded as a noncurrent asset.

Receivables from affiliates are measured at historical cost and primarily have consisted of notes receivable for cash loaned to EFH Corp. for debt principal and interest payments and other general corporate purposes of EFH Corp. as discussed above. EFCH reviews economic conditions, counterparty credit scores and historical payment activity to assess the overall collectability of its affiliated receivables. There were no credit loss allowances at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

•
A subsidiary of EFH Corp. bills our subsidiaries for information technology, financial, accounting and other administrative services at cost. These charges, which are largely settled in cash and primarily reported in SG&A expenses, totaled $52 million and $47 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and totaled $151 million and $147 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. These amounts include allocated expense, which totaled zero and $10 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 for management fees owed and paid by EFH Corp. to the Sponsor Group. Effective with the Petition Date, EFH Corp. suspended allocations of such fees to EFCH. Fees accrued as of the Petition Date are classified as LSTC.

See Note 9 for discussion of a letter of credit issued by TCEH in 2014 to a subsidiary of EFH Corp. to secure its amounts payable to the subsidiary arising from recurring transactions in the normal course.

•
In the three months ended March 31, 2015, TCEH settled a $15 million payable related to information technology assets purchased from a subsidiary of EFH Corp. in 2014. In the three months ended June 30, 2015, TCEH purchased and settled $12 million of additional assets. In April 2014, prior to the Bankruptcy Filing, a subsidiary of EFH Corp. sold information technology assets to TCEH totaling $24 million. TCEH cash settled these transactions in April 2014. In the third quarter of 2014, additional information technology assets totaling $7 million were sold to TCEH, and a subsidiary of EFH Corp. settled this obligation by drawing on the letter of credit issued by TCEH. The assets are substantially for the use of TCEH and its subsidiaries.

•
Under Texas regulatory provisions, the trust fund for decommissioning the Comanche Peak nuclear generation facility is funded by a delivery fee surcharge billed to REPs by Oncor, as collection agent, and remitted monthly to TCEH for contribution to the trust fund with the intent that the trust fund assets, reported in investments in our condensed consolidated balance sheets, will ultimately be sufficient to fund the future decommissioning liability, reported in noncurrent liabilities in our condensed consolidated balance sheets. The delivery fee surcharges remitted to TCEH totaled $5 million for both the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 and $13 million for both the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014. Income and expenses associated with the trust fund and the decommissioning liability incurred by TCEH are offset by a net change in a receivable/payable that ultimately will be settled through changes in Oncor's delivery fee rates. At September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the excess of the trust fund balance over the decommissioning liability resulted in a payable totaling $372 million and $479 million, respectively, and is reported in other noncurrent liabilities. In June 2015, Luminant filed an updated nuclear decommissioning cost study and funding analysis with the PUCT.

•
EFH Corp. files consolidated federal income tax and Texas state margin tax returns that include our results; however, under a Federal and State Income Tax Allocation Agreement, our federal income tax and Texas margin tax expense and related balance sheet amounts, including income taxes payable to or receivable from EFH Corp., are recorded as if we file our own corporate income tax return. As of September 30, 2015, we had current income tax liabilities of zero and $607 million in noncurrent income tax liabilities payable to EFH Corp. reported as LSTC. As of December 31, 2014, we had current income tax liabilities of $16 million and noncurrent income tax liabilities of $626 million payable to EFH Corp. We made tax payments of $26 million and $33 million to EFH Corp. for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

•
Certain transmission and distribution utilities in Texas have requirements in place to assure adequate creditworthiness of any REP to support the REP's obligation to collect securitization bond-related (transition) charges on behalf of the utility. Under these requirements, as a result of TCEH's credit rating being below investment grade, TCEH is required to post collateral support in an amount equal to estimated transition charges over specified time periods. Accordingly, at both September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, TCEH had posted letters of credit and/or cash in the amount of $9 million for the benefit of Oncor.

•
Oncor and Texas Holdings agreed to the terms of a stipulation with major interested parties to resolve all outstanding issues in the PUCT review related to the Merger. As part of this stipulation, TCEH would be required to post a letter of credit in an amount equal to $170 million to secure its payment obligations to Oncor in the event, which has not occurred, two or more rating agencies downgrade Oncor's credit rating below investment grade.

•
In 2007, TCEH entered into the TCEH Senior Secured Facilities with syndicates of financial institutions and other lenders. These syndicates included affiliates of GS Capital Partners, which is a member of the Sponsor Group. Affiliates of each member of the Sponsor Group have from time to time engaged in commercial banking transactions with us and/or provided financial advisory services to us, in each case in the normal course of business.

•
Affiliates of GS Capital Partners were parties to certain commodity and interest rate hedging transactions with us in the normal course of business.

•
Affiliates of the Sponsor Group have sold or acquired, and in the future may sell or acquire, debt or debt securities issued by us in open market transactions or through loan syndications.

•
As a result of debt repurchase and exchange transactions in 2009 through 2011, EFH Corp. and EFIH held TCEH debt securities at both September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 as shown below (principal amounts). At September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the $382 million in notes payable as of the Petition Date is classified as LSTC.
 
Principal Amount
TCEH Senior Notes:
 
Held by EFH Corp.
$
284

Held by EFIH
79

TCEH Term Loan Facilities:
 
Held by EFH Corp.
19

Total
$
382



Interest expense on the notes totaled zero for both the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, and $1 million and $13 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Contractual interest, not paid or recorded, totaled $9 million for both the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, and $28 million and $16 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. See Note 6.

See Notes 8 and 9 for discussion of guarantees and push down of certain EFH Corp. debt.