UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14-A

(RULE 14a-101)

INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of

the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.        )

Filed by the Registrant þ

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ¨

Check the appropriate box:

¨ Preliminary Proxy Statement

¨ Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

þ Definitive Proxy Statement

¨ Definitive Additional Materials

¨ Soliciting Materials Pursuant to §240.14a-12

BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON HOLDING CORPORATION

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

þ No fee required.

¨ Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

¨ Fee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

Notice of 2022

Annual Meeting

of Stockholders

and Proxy Statement

July 27, 2022

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation

8283 Greensboro Drive

McLean, Virginia 22102

June 16, 2022

Dear Fellow Stockholder: I am pleased to invite you to join our Board of Directors, senior leadership, and fellow stockholders at our Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held at 8:00 a.m. (EDT) on July 27, 2022. Enclosed with this proxy statement are your proxy card and our 2022 annual report to stockholders.

Items of business to be transacted at our Annual Meeting are:

1.Election of seven directors;

2.Ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2023;

3.A non-binding advisory vote on the compensation program for the Company’s named executive officers, as disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of the proxy statement;

4.Approval of the adoption of the Sixth Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to permit stockholders who hold not less than 25% of the outstanding shares of common stock of the Company to call special meetings;

5.If properly presented at the Annual Meeting, a non-binding advisory vote on a stockholder proposal; and

6.Consideration of any other business that may properly be brought before the Annual Meeting.

The Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR Proposals 1, 2, 3, and 4 and AGAINST Proposal 5.

Our 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders will be a virtual meeting conducted solely online and can be attended by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/BAH2022. To participate in the Annual Meeting, you will need the control number located on your proxy card or the instructions that accompanied your proxy materials.

Your vote is important. Whether or not you plan to virtually attend the Annual Meeting, you may access electronic voting via the Internet or the automated telephone voting feature, both of which are described on your enclosed proxy card. You may also sign, date, and return the proxy card in the envelope provided.

On behalf of Booz Allen, thank you for your continued support and investment.

Sincerely,

Horacio D. Rozanski

President and Chief Executive Officer

NOTICE OF BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON HOLDING CORPORATION'S 2022 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

Time and Date:	8:00 a.m. (EDT), July 27, 2022
Place:*	Virtual meeting at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/BAH2022
Agenda:	1. The election of seven director nominees named in the proxy statement;
	2. The ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the Company’s fiscal year 2023;
	3. A non-binding advisory vote on the compensation program for the Company’s named executive officers, as disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of the proxy statement;
	4. Approval of the adoption of the Sixth Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to permit stockholders who hold not less than 25% of the outstanding shares of common stock of the Company to call special meetings;
	5. If properly presented at the Annual Meeting, a non-binding advisory vote on a stockholder proposal; and
	6. The transaction of any other business that may properly be brought before the Annual Meeting.
	The Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR Proposals 1, 2, 3 and 4 and AGAINST Proposal 5.
Record Date:	Only holders of record of the Company’s Class A common stock on June 6, 2022 will be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.
Date of Distribution:	The proxy materials or a Notice of Internet Availability were sent to stockholders on or about June 16, 2022.
Proxy Voting:	Your vote is important. Whether or not you plan to virtually attend the Annual Meeting, you may access electronic voting via the Internet or the automated telephone voting feature, both of which are described on your enclosed proxy card, or you may sign, date, and return the proxy card in the envelope provided.

* Our 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders will be a virtual meeting conducted solely online and can be attended by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/BAH2022. To participate in the Annual Meeting, you will need the control number located on your proxy card or the instructions that accompanied your proxy materials. If you plan to participate in the virtual meeting, please see “Important Information About Annual Meeting and Proxy Procedures.”

    On Behalf of the Board of Directors,

Jacob D. Bernstein

Secretary

June 16, 2022

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on July 27, 2022: This Notice of Annual Meeting, accompanying Proxy Statement, and our 2022 Annual Report are available at www.proxyvote.com.

TABLE OF CONTENTS TO PROXY STATEMENT

PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY	1
PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS	8
Board Structure	8
Class II and III Election	8
Class II and III Nominees	9
NON-CONTINUING DIRECTORS	13
CONTINUING DIRECTORS	14
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND GENERAL INFORMATION CONCERNING THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND ITS COMMITTEES	16
Our Board of Directors	16
Corporate Governance Guidelines	16
Codes of Conduct and Ethics	16
Board Meetings and Attendance	16
Board Leadership Structure	16
Succession Planning and Talent Reviews	17
Risk Oversight	17
Annual Board Performance Assessment	18
Board Independence	18
Selection of Nominees for Election to the Board	18
Director Orientation and Continuing Education	19
Communications with the Board	19
Board Committees	20
Director Compensation	22
Director Ownership Guidelines	24
Policy on Hedging, Short Sales, and Speculative Transactions	24
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION	25
SECURITY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION	26
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS	28
Policies and Procedures for Related Person Transactions	28
Related Person Transactions	28
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS	30
Executive Summary	31
Setting Executive Compensation and Peer Group	34
Compensation Elements	35
Executive Ownership Requirements	39

Risk Assessment	39
Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation	40
Government Limitations on Reimbursement of Compensation Costs	40
Compensation Recovery Provisions (Clawbacks) in Incentive Plans	40
Certain Change in Control Provisions	40
Policies on Timing of Equity Grants	41
Effect on Accounting and Tax Treatment on Compensation Decisions	41
Compensation Tables and Disclosures	43
Pay Ratio	51
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT	52
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT	53
PRE-APPROVAL OF SERVICES BY INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM	54
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FEES	55
PROPOSAL 2: RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF ACCOUNTANTS	56
PROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY VOTE ON COMPANY'S EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION	57
PROPOSAL 4: ADOPTION OF THE SIXTH AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION	58
PROPOSAL 5: STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL	61
OTHER BUSINESS	64
IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT ANNUAL MEETING AND PROXY PROCEDURES	65
Appendix A	A - 1
Appendix B	B - 1

PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

This summary highlights certain information contained elsewhere in this proxy statement. The summary does not contain all of the information that you should consider, and you should review our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2022 and the entire proxy statement carefully before voting.

Unless the context otherwise indicates or requires, as used in this proxy statement, references to: (i) the “Company,” “we,” “us,” “our,” or our “company” refer to Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation, its consolidated subsidiaries and predecessors; (ii) “Booz Allen Holding” or "Booz Allen" refers to Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation exclusive of its subsidiaries; (iii) “Booz Allen Hamilton” refers to Booz Allen Hamilton Inc., our primary operating company and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Booz Allen Holding; (iv) “our Board” or “the Board” means the Board of Directors of the Company; (v) “stockholder” means holders of our Class A common stock; (vi) “fiscal,” refers to our fiscal years ended March 31; and (vii) “you,” “your,” “yours,” or other words of similar import in this proxy statement refers to stockholders entitled to vote on the matters to be presented at the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the "Annual Meeting").

2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

Date and Time:      July 27, 2022 at 8:00 a.m. (EDT)

Place:      Virtual meeting at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/BAH2022

Record date:      June 6, 2022

Admission:    Our 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders will be a virtual meeting conducted solely online and can be attended by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/BAH2022. To participate in the Annual Meeting, you will need the control number located on your proxy card or the instructions that accompanied your proxy materials. If you plan to participate in the virtual meeting, please see "Important Information about Annual Meeting and Proxy Procedures."

Voting Matters and Board Recommendations

Stockholders are being asked to vote on the following matters at the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders:

Proposal	Description	Board's Voting Recommendation	Page Reference
No. 1	Election of seven director nominees	FOReach nominee	8
No. 2	Ratification of appointment of Ernst & Young LLP ("E&Y") as the Company's independent registered accounting firm for fiscal year 2023	FOR	56
No. 3	A non-binding advisory vote on the compensation program for the Company’s named executive officers, as disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis ("CD&A") of the proxy statement	FOR	57
No. 4	Approval of the adoption of the Sixth Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to permit stockholders who hold not less than 25% of the outstanding shares of common stock to call special meetings	FOR	58
No. 5	If properly presented at the Annual Meeting, a non-binding advisory vote on a stockholder proposal	AGAINST	61

1

How to Vote

Stockholders as of the record date may vote electronically at the virtual meeting or vote in advance by submitting a proxy by Internet, telephone, or mail as follows:

Vote by Internet	Vote by Telephone	Vote by Mail
Visit proxyvote.com	Call the phone number located on the top of your proxy card.	Complete, sign, date and return your proxy card in envelope provided.

Company Performance and Highlights

•During fiscal year 2022, we returned $628.4 million to stockholders in the form of:

◦$209.1 million in quarterly dividends — three regular dividends of $0.37 per share and one regular dividend of $0.43 per share; and

◦$419.3 million through the repurchase of 5.1 million shares of Class A common stock (which includes 4.7 million of open market share repurchases, as well as 0.3 million shares to cover the minimum statutory withholding taxes on restricted stock units that vested on various dates during the period).

•The Board increased the quarterly dividend 16% for performance in the third quarter of fiscal year 2022, payable in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2022.

•During fiscal year 2022, our stock price increased by approximately 9%, with a total stockholder return of approximately 11%.

Total Stockholder Return

As of March 31, 2022

Note: Total stockholder return assumes dividends are reinvested.

2

Our Board of Directors

This year's Board nominees include three Class II directors—Horacio D. Rozanski, Mark E. Gaumond, and Gretchen W. McClain—and four Class III directors—Melody C. Barnes, Ellen Jewett, Arthur E. Johnson, and Charles O. Rossotti. A fourth current Class II director, Ian Fujiyama, notified the Board of Directors of his intention to not stand for re-election once his term expires at the Annual Meeting, although he intends to remain a director, Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and a member of the Executive Committee and Compensation, Culture and People Committee until the time of the Annual Meeting. Each nominee is listed below, along with the continuing directors, and you can find additional information under "Proposal 1: Election of Directors" beginning on page 8.

3

Current Board Composition and Diversity

Director Independence	Tenure
Age Mix	Diversity
	73% of our Directors (8 of 11) are Women, Asian, Hispanic, and/or African-American and 45% (5 out of 11) are Women

4

Corporate Governance Highlights

•Ten of our 11 current directors are independent, and the Audit, Compensation, Culture and People, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees are 100% independent.

•We provide for a majority voting standard in our bylaws for the election of directors in uncontested elections, with the requirement that any incumbent director nominee who does not receive a majority of the votes validly cast in an uncontested election tender his or her resignation, subject to acceptance by the Board of Directors.

•We have a diverse Board of Directors in terms of gender, ethnicity, experience, tenure, and skills, and 73% of our Board of Directors is gender and/or racially diverse.

•Effective as of the 2023 annual meeting of stockholders, our Board of Directors will be fully declassified and each of our directors will be elected annually.

•Our Board of Directors and senior leadership exercise oversight in respect of Environmental, Social, and Governance (“ESG") matters, as further described on page 6.

•Our directors attended 95% of the total aggregate number of Board of Directors and committee meetings.

•The Board of Directors holds regular executive sessions of non-management directors.

•The Board of Directors conducts an annual discussion on management succession planning, with support provided by the Compensation, Culture and People Committee.

•We prohibit short sales and derivative transactions in our equity, and hedging and pledging of our stock.

•Our equity awards include a provision for the recoupment of equity-based compensation in the event of misconduct leading to a financial restatement.

•Our Investor Relations team and management regularly engage with current and potential stockholders.

•We do not have a poison pill in place.

•We adhere to robust executive officer and director stock ownership guidelines.

•We conduct annual Board and committee evaluations and self-assessments.

•We adhere to a sound policy on public company board service to ensure a director's ability to devote necessary time to serve on our Board.

Executive Compensation Highlights

•We continue to utilize a partnership-style compensation model that fosters a culture of collaboration and long-term ownership mindset that encourages our executives to think and act in the best interests of the Company. The spirit of collective ingenuity is paramount to our success and underscores our commitment to inclusion, collaboration, and service.

•We are a values-driven organization with a guiding purpose to empower people to change the world. Our executives are committed to bold thinking, holding themselves and those around them accountable to act with integrity, and realizing positive change in all the work we do. Our executive compensation program is intrinsically tied to our purpose and values. We believe our executives are motivated to act in the best interests of the Company with an emphasis on problem solving, passionate service, and collective ingenuity across markets, clients, and opportunities.

•Together with our Compensation, Culture and People Committee, we are committed to designing a compensation program that aligns the interests of our executives with the long-term interests of our stockholders. We continuously seek to evolve our approach and stay connected with the views of our stockholders. Our compensation program links our executive rewards packages with the long-term interests of our stockholders and includes a long-term performance-based component to our program, where a portion of our executives’ compensation is tied to the achievement of multi-year performance goals. For more details on our compensation program, please see our discussion in the CD&A beginning with the Executive Summary on page 31.

5

Environmental, Social, and Governance Discussion and Highlights

ESG Governance Structure

We continue to integrate ESG principles into our business operations, guided by our corporate values and purpose to “empower people to change the world.” Our ESG initiatives are driven by our global ESG strategy, as developed and directed by the following:

•Board of Directors: Our Board of Directors, through the authority of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, provides oversight of and engages with management on our ESG strategy, including our approach to ESG-related risks, opportunities, disclosure, operations, and management.

•ESG Committee: The executive management-level ESG Committee operates with the Board of Directors’ authority to execute ESG matters. Chaired by our Chief Legal Officer and comprised of senior executives, including our President and Chief Executive Officer, the ESG Committee uses its deep knowledge of our business, business strategies, and ESG priorities, goals, and strategies to champion our ongoing commitment to our ESG strategy and integration of ESG principles into our business strategy, facilitated by the ESG Function of our Office of the Corporate Secretary (the "ESG Function"), as described below.

•ESG Council: The management-level ESG Council leverages the collective ingenuity of key functional and business leaders across the Company, each holding operational or policy-level responsibility for an area of our performance or practices that relates to our ESG priorities. The ESG Council seeks to achieve a consistent and collaborative firmwide approach to our ESG priorities both through the Council's day-to-day work and cross-functional initiatives.

•ESG Function: The ESG Function drives our global ESG strategy and supports our Board of Directors, ESG Committee, and ESG Council by providing relevant information and data-driven guidance for strategic decision-making, enhancing transparency through internal accountability and external reporting channels, advocating for integration of ESG principles into business strategy, and coordinating and evolving the integration of ESG initiatives into our business operations to reflect business, regulatory, and market imperatives.

ESG Priorities and ESG Reporting

•The six priority areas of focus for our ESG strategy are Ethics & Integrity, Mission & Innovation, Employee Experience, Community Engagement, Global Resilience, and Information Security. We have identified these six areas to be of particular relevance to our employees, potential talent, clients, regulators, suppliers, investors, and communities in which we conduct business.

•The six priority areas provide an organizing principle for the more granular ESG topics that may represent drivers of long-term positive ESG impact across our value chain. We explore our management and performance of specific aspects of these six areas in our 2021 ESG Impact Report, which is available on our website, www.boozallen.com. Topics that may be priorities for our 2021 ESG Impact Report are not necessarily material for purposes of the U.S. federal securities laws or for other purposes.

•We plan to release our 2022 ESG Impact Report later this calendar year. Our 2021 ESG Impact Report was built on the foundation of the Global Reporting Initiative’s (GRI) Sustainability Reporting Standards (Core Option), and includes indices from the following reporting frameworks and standards: the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) standard for our industry, the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures’ (TCFD) recommendations, the World Economic Forum Core Stakeholder Capitalism Metrics, and the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. Our ESG initiatives evolve as we implement changes to our business and operations. We monitor regulations and the markets for relevant guidelines and reporting frameworks useful to our company and our industry.

•In our 2021 ESG Impact Report, we committed to a long-term target of net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by no later than 2050. In furtherance of this commitment, we plan to set verifiable targets for the reduction of relevant Scope 1, 2, and 3 greenhouse gas emissions through the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) to ensure our targets are aligned with climate science on meeting the Paris Agreement’s goals, with our fiscal year 2020 emissions as our baseline.

•For fiscal year 2022, the Compensation, Culture and People Committee, with guidance from Korn Ferry and management, introduced non-financial strategic metrics as part of the goals for our performance-based restricted stock units. For fiscal year 2022, the Compensation, Culture and People Committee approved two goals associated

6

with our commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion, as further described under "Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Compensation Elements—Long-Term Equity Incentives—Fiscal Year 2022 Annual Grants."

•We are certified ISO 22301 compliant and have established our Business Continuity Program Office as an exemplary operation that focuses on protecting and recovering the business operations of Booz Allen and our clients.

ESG Awards

For detail regarding our fiscal year 2021 ESG performance, please see our 2021 ESG Impact Report, which is available on our website. Our fiscal year 2022 ESG performance will be detailed in our 2022 ESG Impact Report, which will be available later this calendar year.

Below are select award designations Booz Allen has received in the past year:

•Recognized as one of the “World’s Most Ethical Companies” by Ethisphere for the third consecutive year

•Received a perfect score on the Corporate Equality Index for the twelfth consecutive year and designated as a “Best Place to Work for LGBTQ Equality”

•Received a perfect score on the Disability Equality Index for the seventh consecutive year, named a “Best Place to Work for Disability Inclusion,” and named Private Sector Employer of the Year by CAREERS & the disABLED

•Named by Forbes as the #1 “Best Employer for Women” and among America's “Best Management Consulting Firms,” “Best Employers for Diversity,” “Best Employers for Veterans,” and “Best Large Employers”

•Recognized by Military Spouse as “Top 10 Military Spouse Friendly Employers” and by Military Times as “Best for Vets”

•Recognized by Working Mother as one of the “100 Best Companies” for 23 consecutive years

•Included in Fortune Magazine’s “World’s Most Admired Companies” for the eleventh consecutive year

•Recipient of the Washington Business Journal’s “Corporate Philanthropy Award” and the U.S. Small Business Association’s Dwight D. Eisenhower “Award for Excellence”

7

PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Board Structure

The Company currently has eleven directors divided into three classes: three in Class I, four in Class II, and four in Class III. The terms of office of the Class II and Class III directors expire at the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Class II and III Election

The seven nominees for election as directors are listed below. If elected, the nominees for election as Class II and Class III directors will serve for one-year terms and until their successors are elected and qualify. Unless you instruct us on the proxy card to vote differently, we will vote signed, returned proxies FOR the election of such nominees. If for any reason any nominee cannot or will not serve as a director, we may vote such proxies for the election of a substitute nominee designated by the Board. Mr. Fujiyama, a current Class II director, has notified the Board of Directors of his intention to not stand for re-election at the Annual Meeting. Mr. Fujiyama's decision to not stand for re-election was not the result of any disagreement with the Company relating to any of our operations, policies, or practices.

8

Class II and Class III Nominees

To be elected in an uncontested election, a nominee must receive a majority of the votes validly cast with respect to that nominee’s electionat the annual meeting represented either in person or by proxy at the annual meeting. To be elected in a contested election, a nominee must receive the vote of a plurality of the votes validly cast at the annual meeting represented either in person or by proxy at the annual meeting. Any nominee who is an incumbent director and does not receive a majority of the votes cast in an uncontested election must promptly tender his or her resignation, contingent on the acceptance of that resignation by the Board, to the chair of the Board following certification of the election results. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board believe that each director nominee brings a strong and diverse set of skills and experiences to the Company, including significant government, public company, financial, and strategic experience, that will strengthen our Board's independent leadership and effectiveness with respect to our business and long-term strategy. The Class II and Class III nominees are as follows:

Director	Principal Occupation, Business Experience and Other Directorships Held
Horacio D. Rozanski (Class II)	Mr. Rozanski is our President and Chief Executive Officer. A respected authority and leader in the consulting industry, Mr. Rozanski has expertise in business strategy, technology and operations, talent and diversity, and the future of consulting. He joined Booz Allen in 1992 as a consultant to commercial clients, was elected vice president in 1999, and served as our Chief Personnel Officer, Chief Strategy and Talent Officer, Chief Operating Officer, and President before becoming Chief Executive Officer in 2015. He also is a member of our Board of Directors. Mr. Rozanski currently serves as Chair of the board of directors for Children’s National Medical Center and is a member of the board of directors at Marriott International, Inc. (NASDAQ: MAR) and CARE. He is also a member of the Business Roundtable and the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum’s Committee on Conscience, and Vice Chair of the Kennedy Center Corporate Fund Board.
Age: 54 Director since: 2014 Committee:  • Executive	Specific qualifications, experience, skills, and expertise include: • Operating and management experience; • Understanding of government contracting; • Core business skills, including financial and strategic planning; and • Deep understanding of our Company, its history, and culture.

Mark E. Gaumond (Class II)	Mr. Gaumond has over 35 years of experience working with senior management and audit committees of public and privately-held companies. He held senior positions with E&Y from 2002 to 2010, retiring from the firm as Senior Vice Chair for the Americas, and previously was a partner with a 27-year career at Andersen LLP. Mr. Gaumond has a BA from Georgetown University and an MBA from New York University. He is a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. He has served as a director of First American Funds since January 2016. Mr. Gaumond formerly served as a director of Cliff's Natural Resources, Inc. from July 2013 to September 2014, Rayonier, Inc. from November 2010 to June 2014, and Rayonier Advanced Materials, Inc. from July 2014 to May 2020, and is a former trustee of The California Academy of Sciences.
Age: 71 Director since: 2011 Independent Committees:  • Audit (Chair)  • Executive	Specific qualifications, experience, skills, and expertise include: • Expertise in finance, financial planning, and compliance and controls; • Core business skills, including financial and strategic planning; and • Public company audit committee experience.

9

Director	Principal Occupation, Business Experience and Other Directorships Held
Gretchen W. McClain (Class II)	Ms. McClain has served as the Chief Executive Officer of J.M. Huber Corporation (a family-owned business) since April 2022. She previously served as an Operating Executive for the Carlyle Group from July 2019 to March 2022. Prior to Carlyle, she was the founding President and Chief Executive Officer of Xylem, Inc. from October 2011 to September 2013. She joined Xylem as the founding CEO in 2011 when it was formed and taken public from a spinoff of the water business of ITT Corporation. She joined ITT in 2005 as the President of its residential and commercial water business, and served as the SVP and President of ITT's commercial businesses from 2008 to 2011. Ms. McClain has served in a number of senior executive positions at Honeywell Aerospace (formerly AlliedSignal), including VP and General Manager of the Business, General Aviation and Helicopters Electronics division, and VP for Engineering and Technology, as well as for Program Management in Honeywell Aerospace's Engines, Systems and Services Division. She also spent nine years with NASA and served as Deputy Associate Administrator for Space Development, where she played a pivotal role in the successful development and launch of the International Space Station Program as Chief Director of the Space Station and Deputy Director for Space Flight. Ms. McClain graduated from the University of Utah with a BS in Mechanical Engineering. She currently serves as a director of AMETEK, Inc. (NYSE: AME) and J.M. Huber Corporation, and previously served as a director of Hennessy Capital Acquisition Corp. IV from 2018 to 2020, Xylem, Inc. from 2011 to 2013, Con-Way Inc. from June 2015 to October 2015, Boart Longyear Limited from November 2015 to August 2019, and Faradyne Motors from 2009 to 2013.
Age: 59 Director since: 2014 Independent Committees:  • Compensation, Culture and People (Chair)  • Nominating and Corporate Governance  • Executive	Specific qualifications, experience, skills, and expertise include: • Operating and management experience; • Core business skills, including financial and strategic planning; and • Public company directorship and audit committee experience.

Melody C. Barnes (Class III)	Ms. Barnes is the executive director of the Karsh Institute of Democracy at the University of Virginia, where she also serves as the W.L. Lyons Brown Family Director for Policy and Public Engagement at the Democracy Initiative, the J. Wilson Newman Professor of Governance at the Miller Center of Public Policy, and a distinguished fellow at the School of Law. She is a co-founder of MB Squared Solutions, LLC and serves as Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance committee of Ventas Inc. (NYSE: VTR), a real estate investment trust. From January 2009 to January 2012, Ms. Barnes served in the White House as Director of the Domestic Policy Council. In this role, she provided policy and strategic advice to President Obama and coordinated the domestic policy-making process for his administration. Before joining the White House, she served as the senior domestic policy advisor for then-Senator Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign. Ms. Barnes was the Executive Vice President for Policy at the Center for American Progress from 2005 to 2008 and Senior Fellow from 2003 to 2005. Prior to her tenure at the Center, Ms. Barnes was a principal in the Raben Group LLC. She also served as Chief Counsel to Senator Edward M. Kennedy on the Senate Judiciary Committee from 1998 to 2003, and General Counsel for Senator Kennedy from 1995 to 1998.
Age: 58 Director since: 2015 Independent Committees:  • Compensation, Culture and People  • Nominating and Corporate Governance	Specific qualifications, experience, skills, and expertise include: • Significant government experience and strong skills in public policy; • Public company directorship; and • Core business skills, including financial and strategic planning, as well as leading not-for-profit organizations.

10

Director	Principal Occupation, Business Experience and Other Directorships Held
Ellen Jewett (Class III)	Ms. Jewett has served as managing partner at Canoe Point Capital LLC, an investment firm focusing on early stage social ventures, since 2015. Prior to that position, she served as managing director and head of U.S. Government and Infrastructure for BMO Capital Markets, covering airports and infrastructure banking, from 2010 to 2015. Prior to that, Ms. Jewett spent more than 20 years at Goldman Sachs specializing in airport infrastructure financing, most recently serving as head of the public sector transportation group, and previously as head of the airport finance group. Ms. Jewett has served on the boards of directors of JetBlue (NASDAQ: JBLU) since 2011, where she chairs the Governance and Nominating Committee, Foundation Credit Opportunities (FCO) U.S. and Offshore Feeder Funds since 2016, and the nonprofit board of trustees of Children's Aid since 2019. She currently serves as emerita trustee of Wesleyan University and the Brearley School, having previously served in leadership positions on the boards of trustees of both academic institutions.
Age: 63 Director since: 2018 Independent Committee:  • Audit	Specific qualifications, experience, skills, and expertise include: • Public company directorship and audit committee experience; • Experience in domestic and international finance and talent management; and • Core business skills, including financial and strategic planning.

Arthur E. Johnson (Class III)	Mr. Johnson retired as Senior Vice President, Corporate Strategic Development of Lockheed Martin Corp. in 2009, a position he held since 1999. Mr. Johnson has over 20 years of senior leadership experience in the information technology and defense businesses. Mr. Johnson brings extensive IT management experience to the Board, having held senior positions at IBM, Loral Corporation, and Lockheed Martin. He has served as an independent trustee of the Fixed Income and Asset Allocation funds of Fidelity Investments since 2008. Mr. Johnson served as a director of Delta Airlines from 2005 to 2007, IKON Office Solutions Corporation from 1999 to 2008, AGL Resources from 2002 to 2016, and Eaton Corporation, plc from 2009 to 2019.
Age: 75 Director since: 2011 Independent Committee:  • Audit	Specific qualifications, experience, skills, and expertise include: • Public company directorship and audit committee experience; • Operating and management experience; • Understanding of government contracting; and • Core business skills, including financial and strategic planning.

11

Director	Principal Occupation, Business Experience and Other Directorships Held
Charles O. Rossotti (Class III)	Mr. Rossotti has served as a Senior Advisor to The Carlyle Group since June 2003. Prior to this position, Mr. Rossotti served as the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service from 1997 to 2002. Mr. Rossotti co-founded American Management Systems, Inc., an international business and information technology consulting firm in 1970, where he served at various times as President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chairman of the Board until 1997. Mr. Rossotti has served as a director for Accelerated Learning Inc. since December 2018, Unison Corporation since April 2020, and Abrigo Corporation since July 2021 where he chairs the Audit Committee. Mr. Rossotti formerly served as a director of Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. from 2004 to 2008, Bank of America Corporation from 2009 to 2013, Compusearch Software Systems from 2005 to 2010, Wall Street Institute from 2005 to 2010, Apollo Global from 2006 to 2012, Quorum Management Solutions from 2010 to 2014, Carlyle Select Trust from 2014 to 2015, Primatics Financial from 2011 to 2015, ECi Software Solutions from 2014 to April 2017, The AES Corporation from 2003 to April 2018, where he served as Chairman of the board from 2013 to April 2018, Coalfire Systems Inc. from November 2015 until July 2019, and Novetta Solutions LLC from March 2016 until 2021. Mr. Rossotti also serves as a director of Capital Partners for Education where he chairs the Development Committee.
Age: 81 Director since: 2008 Independent Committee:  • Audit	Specific qualifications, experience, skills, and expertise include: • Public company directorship and audit committee experience; • Operating and management experience; • Understanding of government contracting; • Core business skills, including financial and strategic planning; and • Expertise in finance, financial reporting, compliance and controls, and global businesses.

The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR

each of the Class II and Class III nominees.

12

NON-CONTINUING DIRECTORS

The one director whose term will not continue after the Annual Meeting (Class II) is listed below.

Director	Principal Occupation, Business Experience  and Other Directorships Held
Ian Fujiyama (Class II)	Mr. Fujiyama is a Managing Director of The Carlyle Group, a private equity firm, as well as head of the firm's Global Aerospace, Defense, and Government Services team. Mr. Fujiyama joined Carlyle in 1997, and in 1999 he spent two years in Hong Kong and Seoul working with Carlyle's Asia buyout fund, Carlyle Asia Partners. Mr. Fujiyama has led all of Carlyle's recent investments in the federal services sector and previously served as Chairman of Carlyle's Diversity and Inclusion Committee. Prior to joining Carlyle, Mr. Fujiyama was an associate at Donaldson Lufkin and Jenrette Securities Corp., with a focus on high yield and merchant banking transactions. He currently serves as a member of the board of directors of Dynamic Precision Group, KLDiscovery, Two Six Technologies, and StandardAero. He previously served on the board of directors of ARINC Incorporated from 2007 to 2013 and Novetta Solutions LLC from 2016 to 2021. Mr. Fujiyama received his Bachelor of Science in economics, summa cum laude, from the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania with a concentration in finance.
Age: 49 Director since: 2008 Independent Committees:  • Executive  • Compensation, Culture and People  • Nominating and Corporate Governance (Chair)	Specific qualifications, experience, skills, and expertise include: • Operating experience; • Understanding of government contracting; • Core business skills, including financial and strategic planning; • Experience in mergers and acquisitions; and • Expertise in finance, financial reporting, compliance and controls, and global businesses.

13

CONTINUING DIRECTORS

The three directors whose terms will continue after the Annual Meeting and will expire at the 2023 Annual Meeting (Class I) are listed below.

Director	Principal Occupation, Business Experience  and Other Directorships Held
Ralph W. Shrader (Class I)	Dr. Shrader is our Chair and has served in this position since 2008. He previously served as our Chief Executive Officer from 2008 to December 31, 2014 and as our President from 2008 to December 31, 2013. He has also served as Chair of Booz Allen Hamilton since 1999 and as Chief Executive Officer of Booz Allen Hamilton from 1999 to December 31, 2014. Dr. Shrader has been an employee of our Company since 1974. He is the seventh chair since our Company's founding in 1914 and has led our Company through a significant period of growth and strategic realignment. Dr. Shrader is active in professional and charitable organizations and was previously Chairman of the Armed Forces Communications and Electronics Association.
Age: 77 Director since: 2008 Chair, Independent Committee:  • Executive (Chair)	Specific qualifications, experience, skills, and expertise include: • Operating and management experience; • Understanding of government contracting; • Core business skills, including financial and strategic planning; and • Deep understanding of our Company, its history, and culture.

Joan Lordi C. Amble (Class I)	Ms. Amble was the Executive Vice President, Finance for the American Express Company from May 2011 to December 2011, and also served as its Executive Vice President and Corporate Comptroller from December 2003 until May 2011. Prior to joining American Express, Ms. Amble served as Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer of GE Capital Markets, a service business within GE Capital Services, Inc., overseeing securitizations, debt placement, and syndication, as well as structured equity transactions. From 1994 to March 2003, Ms. Amble served as vice president and controller for GE Capital and GE Financial Services. Ms. Amble is the President of JCA Consulting, LLC, and she has served on the boards of directors of Zurich Insurance Group since April 2015 and BuzzFeed, Inc. (NASDAQ: BZFD) since August 2021. In addition, she has served as an independent advisor to the Control and Risk Committee of the Executive Committee of the U.S. affiliate of Société Général, S.A. since October 2016. Ms. Amble served as a member of the Standing Advisory Group for the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board from 2014 to 2020 and as a director at Broadcom Corporation from 2009 to 2011, Brown-Forman Corporation from 2011 to June 2016, XM Radio from 2006 to 2008, and Sirius XM Holdings Inc. from 2008 until June 2021.
Age: 69 Director since: 2012 Independent Committee:  • Audit	Specific qualifications, experience, skills, and expertise include: • Public company directorship and audit committee experience; • Operating and management experience; • Core business skills, including financial and strategic planning; and • Expertise in finance, financial reporting, compliance and controls, and global businesses.

14

Director	Principal Occupation, Business Experience and Other Directorships Held
Michèle A. Flournoy (Class I)	Ms. Flournoy is co-founder and managing partner of WestExec Advisors, a strategic advisory firm founded in 2017.Prior to her position, she served as the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy from 2009 to 2012. Ms. Flournoy serves as Chair of the board of Amida Technology Solutions and has served on the board of Astra Space, Inc., a space-launch company (NASDAQ: ASTR), since August 2021. She also serves on the nonprofit boards of the Center for a New American Security (CNAS), a bipartisan think tank which she co-founded in 2007 and served as its Chief Executive Officer from 2014 to 2016, The Mission Continues, CARE, and The War Horse. Previously, Ms. Flournoy served on the boards of directors of CSRA Inc. from 2015 to 2018, The MITRE Corporation from 2013 to 2017, and Rolls Royce North America, Inc. from 2012 to 2015, and was a senior advisor at Boston Consulting Group from 2012 to 2017. Ms. Flournoy previously served as a member of the Defense Policy Board, the President's Intelligence Advisory Board, and the CIA Director's External Advisory Board. She remains a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and the Aspen Strategy Group, and is a non-resident Senior Fellow at Harvard University’s Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs.
Age: 61 Director since: 2018 Independent Committees:  • Compensation, Culture and People  • Nominating and Corporate Governance	Specific qualifications, experience, skills, and expertise include: • Significant government experience, particularly in national security and defense policies; • Public company directorship and committee experience; and • Core business skills, including financial and strategic planning as well as leading not-for-profit organizations.

15

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND GENERAL INFORMATION CONCERNING THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND ITS COMMITTEES

Our Board of Directors

The Board is responsible for providing governance and oversight over the strategy, risk, operations, and management of the Company. The primary focus of the Board is promoting stockholder value by fostering the long-term success of the Company. The Board is responsible for supporting and overseeing management, to which the Board has delegated the responsibility to manage the day-to-day strategy and operations of the Company.

The Board generally holds four regular meetings per year, and special meetings as necessary. The Board meets in executive session during each regular meeting; non-management directors also typically meet in executive sessions during each regular meeting. Consistent with the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, Mark E. Gaumond was appointed by the non-management directors to serve as the Presiding Director. The Presiding Director presides over executive sessions at which the Chair is not present. At least annually, independent directors also meet in executive session during a regular Board meeting.

The Board and its committees establish annual calendars of activities to guide the development of their agendas during the year. All directors are invited to propose agenda topics when the annual calendars are established, as well as in advance of each regular Board meeting. In addition, directors are encouraged to raise topics that are not on a meeting agenda or suggest topics for future agendas. Each director is provided written materials in advance of each meeting, and the Board and its committees provide feedback to, and make requests of, management at each of their meetings.

Corporate Governance Guidelines

As noted above, the Board has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines. The Board and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are responsible for reviewing and amending these guidelines as they deem necessary and appropriate. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for overseeing the system of corporate governance of the Company. The Corporate Governance Guidelines are available without charge on the Investor Relations portion of our website, www.boozallen.com.

Codes of Conduct and Ethics

Our website also includes the Company’s Code of Business Ethics and Conduct, which is applicable to our directors and all employees, and the Company's Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers, which is applicable to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer, Controller, and any other persons performing similar functions. Each such code was adopted by the Board and may be accessed without charge on the Investor Relations portion of our website, www.boozallen.com. We will disclose on the Investor Relations portion of our website any amendments to the Code of Business Ethics and Conduct or Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers and any waiver granted to an executive officer or director under these codes. In fiscal year 2022, no such waivers were sought or granted. The information found on the Company's website is not part of this proxy statement nor is it incorporated into any other filings the Company makes with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC").

Board Meetings and Attendance

Directors are expected to attend each Board meeting, each meeting of the committees on which they serve, and the Annual Meeting of Stockholders. During fiscal year 2022, the Board held seven meetings and acted by written consent. Each of our directors who served as a director during fiscal year 2022 attended at least 75 percent of the aggregate total number of Board and committee meetings to which they were assigned, and overall attendance was 95 percent. All directors who served at the time of our 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders attended that meeting.

Board Leadership Structure

As noted in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Board has no policy with respect to the separation of the offices of Chair and Chief Executive Officer. The Board believes that it is important to retain its flexibility to allocate the responsibilities of the offices of the Chair and Chief Executive Officer in any way that is in the best interests of the Company at a given point in time. The Board has concluded that it is currently in the best interest of the stockholders for Dr. Shrader to continue his service as Chair, retaining his four decades of experience at the Company with a focus on continuing to build stockholder value, managing risk, and supporting the Company's executive management. In his role as President and Chief Executive

16

Officer, Mr. Rozanski will continue to work closely with the Board in establishing the overall strategy and direction of the Company, and to effectively communicate our strategy to our stockholders, clients, and employees.

Succession Planning and Talent Reviews

The Board believes that executive management succession planning is one of its most important responsibilities. Accordingly, the Board regularly undertakes executive management succession planning and talent reviews, with support provided by the Compensation, Culture and People Committee. On an annual basis, the Chair leads the Board in an in-depth discussion concerning Chief Executive Officer succession and the Chief Executive Officer leads the Board in a discussion concerning senior management succession. Chief Executive Officer succession is also discussed by the Board in an executive session outside the presence of any management directors. Management also updates the Board on key talent indicators, such as recruiting and retention for the overall employee population, throughout the year.

Risk Oversight

The Board and its committees play an important role in overseeing the Company's risk management processes, and risk management considerations form a regular element of the Board's dialogue with management. Risk oversight by the Board and its committees includes oversight of ESG-related risks. One of the primary tools that facilitates the Board’s oversight of risk (and actions being taken to mitigate it) is the Company’s Enterprise Risk Management Framework (the " ERM Framework"). Under the leadership of our President and Chief Executive Officer, the ERM Framework is designed to enable effective and efficient identification of risks and facilitate the evaluation of risks as an integral part of decision making. As part of the ERM Framework, the Company:

•Identifies and classifies into tiers the top risks facing the business;

•Discusses and evaluates the Company’s risk appetite with respect to different types of operational risk; and

•Develops action plans to mitigate and monitor risk.

The process for regularly updating the ERM Framework enables effective and efficient identification of risks and facilitates the evaluation of risks as an integral part of decision making. Under the ERM Framework, our President and Chief Executive Officer leads an annual risk identification, analysis, and mitigation discussion with the Board and prepares a quarterly update for the Board of our enterprise risks. In addition to updates provided through the ERM Framework, the Board receives other information and briefings as part of its risk oversight role. During the course of the year, the lead management official with responsibility for each of our major markets provides a comprehensive overview of the market, including risks and challenges. The Board is also regularly updated by other elements of management, including the Chief Financial Officer, Chief Legal Officer, and Chief Information Officer, concerning significant risks facing the Company and processes that have been implemented to mitigate these risks.

During fiscal year 2022, as we continued to navigate COVID-19, the Board received frequent management updates on the impact to our employees, operations, and clients, and reviewed with management the various measures being taken to protect our people’s health and maintain continuity of service for our clients. The Board provided oversight and guidance to management on the implementation and execution of the Company’s crisis management plan, which includes plans to ensure the health and safety of our employees, as well as support for our clients and the communities affected.

In addition to this dialogue between management and the entire Board, the Board's committees have more specific roles concerning elements of the Company's risk management processes.

•Audit Committee: The Audit Committee is regularly updated by the Chief Legal Officer, Chief Ethics and Compliance Officer, Director of Internal Audit, and Chief Information Officer, and receives regular reports concerning the status of the Company's ethics and compliance program, internal controls over financial reporting and other operational compliance areas, and significant communications from the Company's regulators. The Audit Committee also leads the Board's efforts with respect to the oversight of cybersecurity risk.

•Compensation, Culture and People Committee: The Compensation, Culture and People Committee is responsible for overseeing risks related to the Company's human capital management and executive compensation policies and practices.

•Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee: The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee oversees risks arising from the Company's governance processes and practices related to ESG.

17

Annual Board Performance Assessment

The Board and each of the Audit, Compensation, Culture and People, and Nominating and Corporate Governance committees perform an annual assessment of their operations and effectiveness, and set goals for the future. The core of this process involves our Chief Legal Officer interviewing each director individually. The comments of the directors are compiled and presented, as applicable, to the Chair, the applicable committee Chair, and the full Board, with further discussion with the appropriate committee as needed. The key matters to be addressed are identified, and these matters become part of future agendas for the Board and its committees.

Board Independence

Ten of our eleven current directors are independent under our Corporate Governance Guidelines and applicable New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") listing standards. For a director to be considered independent, the Board must determine, after consideration of all relevant facts and circumstances, that the director has no material relationship with the Company directly or as a partner, stockholder, or officer of an organization that has a relationship with the Company. The independence criteria adopted by the Board are set forth in the Company's Corporate Governance Guidelines.

The Board has determined that Messrs. Fujiyama, Gaumond, Johnson, Rossotti, and Shrader, and Mses. Amble, Barnes, Flournoy, Jewett, and McClain are independent under the independence criteria for directors established by the NYSE and the independence criteria adopted by the Board. As a result, we currently have a majority of independent directors and satisfy the applicable rule of the NYSE. Mr. Rozanski is an employee of the Company and is not independent under the NYSE listing standards or our Corporate Governance Guidelines, which can be found in the Investor Relations portion of our website, www.boozallen.com.

Selection of Nominees for Election to the Board

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee recommends to the Board appropriate criteria for the selection of new directors based on the strategic needs of the Company and the Board, and periodically reviews the criteria adopted by the Board and, if deemed desirable, recommends to the Board changes to such criteria. The Board seeks members from diverse professional backgrounds who combine a broad spectrum of experience and expertise with a reputation for integrity. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee defines diversity in an expansive manner to be reflective of the diversity of the Company and representative of its clients and other stakeholders, including, without limitation, race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, age, disability, history of military service, geography, and areas of expertise and opinion. Accordingly, it is the policy of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee to include, and have any search firm that it engages include, diverse representation in the pool from which the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee selects director candidates. In addition, directors should have experience in positions with a high degree of responsibility, be, or have been, leaders in the companies or institutions with which they are, or were, affiliated, and be selected based upon the contributions they can make. Exceptional candidates who meet alternative criteria may also be considered.

Our Commitment to Board Diversity

Consistent with the Company's long-standing commitment in this regard, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is focused on ensuring the diversity of the Board, as reflected below for fiscal year 2022:

	Women	Hispanic	African-American	Asian
No. of Directors	5	1	2	1
% of Directors	45%	9%	18%	9%

18

Board Tenure

We believe that Board tenure diversity is important and directors with many years of service provide the Board with a deep knowledge of our Company, while newer directors lend fresh perspectives. The chart below reflects the Board tenure of our current directors, which on average is approximately 9.2 years.

Board Tenure is Diversified

Process for Stockholders to Recommend Director Nominees

Stockholders wishing to nominate a candidate for director must provide written notice, in care of the Secretary, to 8283 Greensboro Drive, McLean, Virginia 22102, not fewer than 90 days nor more than 120 days prior to the first anniversary of the preceding year's annual meeting. Our bylaws set forth the requirements for direct nomination of an individual by a stockholder for election to the Board.

There is no difference in the manner in which the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee evaluates a nominee for director designated by our Chief Executive Officer or recommended by a stockholder.

Director Orientation and Continuing Education

New directors are provided a multi-phase orientation generally timed to coincide with our Board meetings as part of our effort to integrate them into their role as directors and familiarize them with the Company. Orientation sessions are led by members of management and are focused on various elements of our business strategy, client service offerings, internal business operations, and corporate governance, among other areas. During the course of the year, representatives of management brief the Board on topics designed to provide directors a deeper understanding of various aspects of our business, such as applicable legal developments, ethics and compliance programs, and the evolving regulatory environment. In addition, the Board holds an annual business strategy session with management. Directors are also encouraged to participate in continuing education programs to better understand and execute their duties and responsibilities.

Communications with the Board

Stockholders, or other interested third parties, who wish to contact our Board may send written correspondence, in care of the Secretary, to 8283 Greensboro Drive, McLean, Virginia 22102. Communications may be addressed to an individual director, to the non-management directors as a group, or to the Board as a whole, marked as confidential or otherwise. Communications not submitted confidentially, which are addressed to directors that discuss business or other matters relevant to the activities of our Board, will be preliminarily reviewed by the office of the Secretary and then distributed either in summary form or by delivering a copy of the communication. Communications marked as confidential will be distributed, without review by the office of the Secretary, to the director, or group of directors, to whom they are addressed. With respect to other correspondence received by the Company that is addressed to one or more directors, the Board has requested that the following items not be distributed to directors because they generally fall into the purview of management, rather than the Board: junk mail and mass mailings, service complaints and inquiries, résumés and other forms of job inquiries, solicitations for charitable donations, surveys, business solicitations, and advertisements.

19

Board Committees

Our Board has four standing committees: an Executive Committee, an Audit Committee, a Compensation, Culture and People Committee, and a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The charter of each committee is available without charge on the Investor Relations portion of our website, www.boozallen.com.

The following chart identifies the members and chair of each standing committee, as well as related information. Once Mr. Fujiyama's term as director expires at the Annual Meeting, he will resign from his positions on our Executive Committee, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and Compensation, Culture and People Committee.

The following is a brief description of our committees.

The Executive Committee

Our Executive Committee is responsible, among its other duties and responsibilities, for assisting our Board in fulfilling its responsibilities. Our Executive Committee is responsible for approving certain corporate actions and transactions, including acquisitions of assets other than in the ordinary course of business. The current members of our Executive Committee are Dr. Shrader (Chair), Messrs. Fujiyama, Gaumond, and Rozanski, and Ms. McClain. The Executive Committee met once during fiscal year 2022 and acted by written consent.

The Audit Committee

Our Audit Committee is responsible, among its other duties and responsibilities, for overseeing our accounting and financial reporting processes, the audits of our financial statements, the qualifications and independence of our independent registered public accounting firm, the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, and the performance of our internal audit function and independent registered public accounting firm. Our Audit Committee reviews and assesses the qualitative aspects of our financial reporting, our processes to manage business and financial risks, and our compliance with significant applicable legal, ethical, and regulatory requirements. Our Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention, and oversight of our independent registered public accounting firm.

The members of our Audit Committee are Messrs. Gaumond (Chair), Johnson, and Rossotti, and Mses. Amble and Jewett, each of whom is an independent director as required by NYSE listing standards and Rule 10A-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). The Board has determined that each member of our Audit Committee is financially literate and that Messrs. Gaumond and Rossotti and Mses. Amble and Jewett are each an “audit committee financial expert”

20

as such term is defined under Item 407(d)(5) of Regulation S-K promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act").

The Audit Committee met four times during fiscal year 2022.

The Compensation, Culture and People Committee

Our Compensation, Culture and People Committee is responsible, among its other duties and responsibilities, for reviewing and approving all forms of compensation to be provided to, and employment letter agreements with, the executives and directors of our Company and its subsidiaries (including the Chief Executive Officer), establishing and reviewing the general compensation philosophy of our Company and its subsidiaries, reviewing, approving, and overseeing the administration of the employee benefits plans of our Company and its subsidiaries, assisting the Board in overseeing succession planning of the Chief Executive Officer and key management positions, and overseeing programmatic matters relating to human capital management and culture, including relating to diversity, equity, and inclusion. In fiscal year 2022, to reflect the Committee's expanded roles related to succession planning and human capital management matters, and to provide clarity to investors, our Board updated the name of the Committee from the “Compensation Committee” to the “Compensation, Culture and People Committee.”

The current members of our Compensation, Culture and People Committee are Mr. Fujiyama, and Mses. Barnes, Flournoy, and McClain (Chair), each of whom is an independent director as required by NYSE listing standards. The Compensation, Culture and People Committee charter requires that at least two members of the Compensation, Culture and People Committee must satisfy the requirements of “non-employee director” for purposes of Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act. Each of the members of the Compensation, Culture and People Committee currently satisfies these requirements.

The Compensation, Culture and People Committee has the authority to delegate any of its responsibilities to subcommittees as the Compensation, Culture and People Committee may deem appropriate, provided that the subcommittees are composed entirely of directors satisfying the independence standards then applicable to the Compensation, Culture and People Committee generally.

The Compensation, Culture and People Committee has not engaged a compensation consultant; however, the Compensation, Culture and People Committee is briefed by management, which consults with Korn Ferry. The Company engaged Korn Ferry to provide market assessments and recommendations on the Company’s director compensation and assist management with compensation decisions regarding our named executive officers, executive compensation philosophy and strategy, and other matters related to the Company’s long-term performance plan as well as insight related to the Company’s compensation disclosure in the proxy statement. In addition, Korn Ferry provided other consulting services. The aggregate fees paid to Korn Ferry for services related to executive compensation and other consulting services were $191,817 and $280,100, respectively, for fiscal year 2022. The Compensation, Culture and People Committee assessed the independence of Korn Ferry and concluded that Korn Ferry's work for the Company did not raise any conflicts of interest.

Each of our executive officers, who collectively comprise our Leadership Team, participates in the discussion and consideration of compensation to be awarded to all executives. Our Leadership Team does not participate in the discussions or provide any recommendations to the Compensation, Culture and People Committee regarding their own compensation. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Setting Executive Compensation and Peer Group.”

The Compensation, Culture and People Committee met five times during fiscal year 2022.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for, among its other duties and responsibilities, identifying and recommending candidates to the Board for election to our Board (including candidates proposed by stockholders), reviewing the composition of the Board and its committees, developing and recommending to the Board corporate governance guidelines that are applicable to us, overseeing Board and Board committee evaluations, and overseeing practices related to corporate governance, corporate citizenship, and ESG matters.

The current members of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are Mr. Fujiyama (Chair), and Mses. Barnes, Flournoy, and McClain, each of whom is an independent director as required by NYSE listing standards.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee met four times during fiscal year 2022.

21

Director Compensation

Directors who are employed by us do not receive any additional compensation for their services as directors. The Compensation, Culture and People Committee reviews director compensation on an annual basis. In July 2021, with assistance from Korn Ferry, the Committee reviewed director compensation data for the peer group used for benchmarking executive compensation and the general market. Based on that review, the Compensation, Culture and People Committee approved a $20,000 increase in the annual retainer (Chair and non-Chair) and a $50,000 increase in the annual equity award. Additionally, the Compensation, Culture and People Committee approved a $5,000 increase in the additional retainer for the Compensation, Culture and People Committee Chair. The changes to the compensation levels for directors apply for their service from August 2021 to July 2022.

Director compensation included the following:

Component	Annual Amount
Annual Board Chair Retainer	$320,000
Annual Board Retainer (non-Chair)	$120,000
Annual Equity Award	$200,000
Audit Committee Chair Additional Retainer	$30,000
Compensation, Culture and People Committee Chair Additional Retainer	$20,000
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Chair Additional Retainer	$15,000

The annual equity awards are granted in the form of restricted stock under our Equity Incentive Plan, as amended and restated from time to time. Half of the annual award vests approximately six months from the date of grant on January 31 of the following year, and the other half vests on July 31 following the first vesting date. Directors may also elect to receive all or a portion of their annual retainer and any additional payments for service as a committee chair in the form of restricted stock. Our directors do not receive additional fees for attending Board or committee meetings.

Director Compensation Table

Name	Fees Earned ($)	Stock Awards ($)(1)(12)	Total ($)
Joan Lordi C. Amble	120,000(2)	200,004(2)	320,004
Melody C. Barnes	120,000(3)	200,031(3)	320,031
Michèle A. Flournoy	120,000(4)	200,031(4)	320,031
Ian Fujiyama	135,000(5)	200,012(5)	335,012
Mark E. Gaumond	150,000(6)	200,073(6)	350,073
Ellen Jewett	120,000(7)	200,031(7)	320,031
Arthur E. Johnson	120,000(8)	200,031(8)	320,031
Gretchen W. McClain	140,000(9)	200,059(9)	340,059
Charles O. Rossotti	120,000(10)	200,033(10)	320,033
Ralph W. Shrader	320,000(11)	200,031(11)	520,031

(1)This column represents the grant date fair value of the stock awards granted to our directors in fiscal year 2022. Where the stock awards were the result of voluntary elections to receive cash retainers in stock, the value reflected in the Stock Awards column represents only the excess of the fair market value of the stock awards over the cash retainer amount paid if in the form of stock. The aggregate fair value of the awards was computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 using the valuation methodology and assumptions set forth in Note 18 to our financial statements for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2022, which are incorporated by reference herein, modified to exclude any forfeiture assumptions related to service-based vesting conditions. The amounts in this column do not reflect the value, if any, that ultimately may be realized by the director.

(2)Ms. Amble elected to receive her annual retainer in a combination of cash and restricted stock, and was granted a total of 2,900 shares of restricted stock in lieu of the annual retainer and for her annual equity grant. The grant date fair market value of the shares was $240,004, based on the $82.76 closing price of our stock on the August 3, 2021 grant date.

(3)Ms. Barnes elected to receive her annual retainer in the form of cash, and was granted a total of 2,417 shares of restricted stock for her annual equity grant. The grant date fair market value of the shares was $200,031, based on the $82.76 closing price of our stock on the August 3, 2021 grant date.

22

(4)Ms. Flournoy elected to receive her annual retainer in the form of cash, and was granted a total of 2,417 shares of restricted stock for her annual equity grant. The grant date fair market value of the shares was $200,031, based on the $82.76 closing price of our stock on the August 3, 2021 grant date.

(5)Mr. Fujiyama elected to receive his annual retainer and his additional payment for service as the chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee in the form of restricted stock, and was granted a total of 4,048 shares of restricted stock for his annual equity grant and in lieu of the annual retainer and $15,000 for the chair retainer. The grant date fair market value of the shares was $335,012, based on the $82.76 closing price of our stock on the August 3, 2021 grant date.

(6)Mr. Gaumond elected to receive his annual retainer in the form of cash and his additional payment for service as the chair of the Audit Committee in the form of restricted stock, and was awarded a total of 2,780 shares of restricted stock in lieu of $30,000 for the chair retainer and for his annual equity grant. The grant date fair market value of the shares was $230,073, based on the $82.76 closing price of our stock on the August 3, 2021 grant date.

(7)Ms. Jewett elected to receive her annual retainer in the form of cash, and was granted a total of 2,417 shares of restricted stock for her annual equity grant. The grant date fair market value of the shares was $200,031, based on the $82.76 closing price of our stock on the August 3, 2021 grant date.

(8)Mr. Johnson elected to receive his annual retainer in the form of cash, and was granted a total of 2,417 shares of restricted stock for his annual equity grant. The grant date fair market value of the shares was $200,031, based on the $82.76 closing price of our stock on the August 3, 2021 grant date.

(9)Ms. McClain elected to receive her annual retainer in the form of cash and her additional payment for service as the chair of the Compensation, Culture and People Committee in the form of restricted stock, and was granted a total 2,659 shares of restricted stock in lieu of $20,000 for the chair retainer and for her annual equity grant. The grant date fair market value of the shares was $220,059, based on the $82.76 closing price of our stock on the August 3, 2021 grant date.

(10)Mr. Rossotti elected to receive his annual retainer in the form of restricted stock, and was granted a total of 3,867 shares of restricted stock in lieu of the annual retainer and for his annual equity grant. The grant date fair market value of the shares was $320,033, based on the $82.76 closing price of our stock on the August 3, 2021 grant date.

(11)Dr. Shrader elected to receive his annual retainer as Chair in the form of cash, and was granted 2,417 shares of restricted stock for his annual equity grant. The grant date fair market value of the shares was $200,031, based on the $82.76 closing price of our stock on the August 3, 2021 grant date.

(12)The following table sets forth the aggregate number of equity awards outstanding at the end of fiscal year 2022.

Equity Awards for Service as a Director

Name	Unvested Restricted Stock(a)
Joan Lordi C. Amble	1,450
Melody C. Barnes	1,208
Michèle A. Flournoy	1,208
Ian Fujiyama	2,024
Mark E. Gaumond	1,390
Ellen Jewett	1,208
Arthur E. Johnson	1,208
Gretchen W. McClain	1,329
Charles O. Rossotti	1,933
Ralph W. Shrader	1,208

(a)The shares of restricted stock reported in this column vest on July 31, 2022.

23

Director Ownership Guidelines

Equity ownership guidelines for all of our non-employee directors are in place to further align their interests to those of our stockholders. Each of our non-employee directors has five years from the date of commencement of his/her service on the Board to achieve equity ownership with a value equivalent to five times his/her annual retainer. In calculating a director’s ownership, Class A common stock, vested in-the-money options, and vested and unvested restricted stock issued under the Equity Incentive Plan will be considered owned by the non-employee director. Each of our directors who has served on the Board for five years or more has regularly exceeded and currently exceeds the equity ownership guidelines. For a description of the guidelines applicable to executive officers, see our CD&A beginning on page 30.

Policy on Hedging, Short Sales, and Speculative Transactions

The Company’s personnel, including directors, officers, and employees, and their immediate family members and other persons living in their households are prohibited under the Company's Insider Trading Policy from engaging in (i) short sales of securities of the Company, (ii) transactions in puts, calls, or other derivative securities with respect to securities of the Company, (iii) hedging transactions with respect to securities of the Company, (iv) holding securities of the Company in a margin account, and (v) pledging securities of the Company as collateral for a loan.

24

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS

AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

The current members of our Compensation, Culture and People Committee are Mr. Fujiyama, and Mses. Barnes, Flournoy, and McClain. No member of our Compensation, Culture and People Committee serves as a member of the Board or compensation committee of any other entity that has one or more executive officers serving as a member of our Board or Compensation, Culture and People Committee.

25

SECURITY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION

Security Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers

The following table indicates information as of May 23, 2022 regarding the beneficial ownership of our Class A common stock by each of our directors, each of the named executive officers, and all of our directors and executive officers as a group. 

The percentages shown are based on 132,296,220 shares of Class A common stock outstanding as of May 23, 2022. Class A common stock is entitled to one vote per share on all matters voted on by our stockholders.

The amounts and percentages owned are reported on the basis of the SEC’s rules governing the determination of beneficial ownership of securities. The SEC’s rules generally attribute beneficial ownership of securities to each person who possesses, either solely or shared with others, the voting power or investment power, which includes the power to dispose of those securities. The rules also treat as outstanding all shares of capital stock that a person would receive upon exercise of stock options or warrants held by that person that are immediately exercisable or exercisable within 60 days. These shares are deemed to be outstanding and to be beneficially owned by the person holding those options for the purpose of computing the number of shares beneficially owned and the percentage ownership of that person, but they are not treated as outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. Under these rules, one or more persons may be a deemed beneficial owner of the same securities and a person may be deemed a beneficial owner of securities to which such person has no economic interest. Unless otherwise indicated, the persons or entities identified in this table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares shown as beneficially owned by them, subject to applicable community property laws.

Name	Shares Beneficially Owned	Percentage of Class
Directors and nominees
Joan Lordi C. Amble	45,582	*
Melody C. Barnes	16,515	*
Michèle A. Flournoy	8,800	*
Ian Fujiyama	39,601	*
Mark E. Gaumond	54,322	*
Ellen Jewett	8,792	*
Arthur E. Johnson	34,082	*
Gretchen W. McClain	24,131	*
Charles O. Rossotti	69,955	*
Horacio D. Rozanski	735,132(1)	*
Dr. Ralph W. Shrader	1,022,488(2)	*
Other named executive officers
Karen M. Dahut	292,597(3)	*
Lloyd W. Howell, Jr.	211,734(4)	*
Nancy J. Laben	58,084(5)	*
Susan L. Penfield	74,939(6)	*
All directors and executive officers as a group (19 persons)(7)	2,943,660	2.23%

*    Represents beneficial ownership of less than 1%.

(1)Includes 89,380 shares that Mr. Rozanski has the right to acquire through the exercise of options.

(2)Dr. Shrader shares investment power and voting power with his wife, Mrs. Janice W. Shrader, for 1,011,090 shares in the Ralph W. Shrader Revocable Trust.

(3)Includes 97,761 shares that Ms. Dahut has the right to acquire through the exercise of options.

(4)Includes 21,105 shares that Mr. Howell has the right to acquire through the exercise of options.

(5)Includes 34,642 shares that Ms. Laben has the right to acquire through the exercise of options.

(6)Includes 52,761 shares that Ms. Penfield has the right to acquire through the exercise of options.

(7)Includes 435,761 shares that the directors and executive officers, in aggregate, have the right to acquire through the exercise of options. Does not include shares held by Richard Crowe, who was promoted to Executive Vice President and President of the Civil Sector of the Company, effective June 1, 2022.

26

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners

The following table sets forth information as to any person known to us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our Class A common stock. 

Name and Address	Shares Beneficially Owned	Percentage of Class
T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. (1) 100 E. Pratt Street Baltimore, Maryland 21202	18,092,670	13.68%
The Vanguard Group (2) 100 Vanguard Boulevard Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355	12,940,621	9.78%
Blackrock, Inc. (3) 55 East 52nd Street New York, NY 10055	10,038,798	7.59%

(1)T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. has filed with the SEC a Schedule 13G/A dated February 14, 2022, which reports the beneficial ownership of 18,092,670 shares of Class A common stock by it as of December 31, 2021. As reported in the Schedule 13G/A, (i) T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. had sole voting power with respect to 3,125,828 shares of our Class A common stock and T. Rowe Price New Horizons Fund, Inc. had sole voting power with respect to 13,098,221 shares of our Class A common stock, and (ii) T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. had sole dispositive power with respect to 18,092,670 shares of our Class A common stock.

(2)The Vanguard Group has filed with the SEC a Schedule 13G/A dated February 9, 2022, which reports the beneficial ownership of 12,940,621 shares of Class A common stock by it as of December 31, 2021. As reported in the Schedule 13G/A, The Vanguard Group had sole voting power with respect to 0 shares of our Class A common stock, sole dispositive power with respect to 12,748,807 shares of our Class A common stock, shared voting power with respect to 108,645 shares of our Class A common stock, and shared dispositive power with respect to 191,814 shares of our Class A common stock.

(3)Blackrock, Inc. has filed with the SEC a Schedule 13G/A dated February 2, 2022, which reports the beneficial ownership of 10,038,798 shares of Class A common stock by it as of December 31, 2021. As reported in the Schedule 13G/A, Blackrock, Inc. had sole voting power with respect to 9,206,188 shares of our Class A common stock, and sole dispositive power with respect to 10,038,798 shares of our Class A common stock.

27

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Policies and Procedures for Related Person Transactions

We adopted a written related person transactions policy pursuant to which related persons, namely our executive officers, directors, and principal stockholders, and their immediate family members, are not permitted to enter into certain transactions, or materially modify or amend an ongoing transaction, with us, in which the amount involved exceeds $120,000, without the consent of our Audit Committee or any other body of the Board of Directors comprised solely of independent directors. Any request for us to enter into or materially modify or amend certain such transactions is required to be presented to our Audit Committee for review, consideration, and approval. All of our directors and executive officers are required to report to our Secretary any such proposed related person transaction, who is required to provide notice of such proposed related person transaction to the Audit Committee. In approving or rejecting the proposed transaction, our Audit Committee will take into account, among other factors it deems appropriate, whether the proposed related person transaction is on terms at least as favorable as terms generally available to an unaffiliated third party under the same or similar circumstances, the extent of the related person’s interest in the transaction and, if applicable, the impact on a director’s independence. Under the policy, if we should discover related person transactions that have not been approved, our Audit Committee will be notified and will determine the appropriate action, including ratification, rescission, or amendment of the transaction.

Related Person Transactions

Indemnification Agreements

We have entered into indemnification agreements with each of our directors and executive officers pursuant to which we have agreed to indemnify such individuals against certain liabilities arising out of service as a director or officer of the Company and its subsidiaries. The indemnification agreements provide our directors and executive officers with contractual rights to the indemnification and expense advancement rights provided under our Fifth Amended and Restated Bylaws, as well as contractual rights to additional indemnification as provided in the indemnification agreements.

Other Relationships

Bryan E. Shrader, a Senior Vice President at the Company, is the son of Dr. Ralph Shrader, our former Chief Executive Officer and current Chair of the Board. In fiscal year 2022, Mr. Shrader received a base salary of $275,000, a cash bonus of $225,000, and retirement contributions of $36,000. He received a grant of 972 time-based restricted stock units with a grant date fair value of $80,054.Mr. Shrader also participates in the Company’s other benefit programs on the same basis as other employees at the same level.

Ian Penfield, a Lead Associate at the Company, is the nephew of Susan L. Penfield, an Executive Vice President and our Chief Technology Officer. His annual base salary is $146,020. In fiscal year 2022, Mr. Penfield received $142,039 in base salary, retirement contributions of $8,443, and $4,059 through our paid time off (PTO) sell program. Mr. Penfield also participates in the Company’s other benefit programs on the same basis as other employees at the same level.

Jeremy Penfield, a Lead Associate at the Company, is the nephew of Susan L. Penfield, an Executive Vice President and our Chief Technology Officer. His annual base salary is $147,321. In fiscal year 2022, Mr. Penfield received $141,276 in base salary, retirement contributions of $8,356, and an award of $100. Mr. Penfield also participates in the Company’s other benefit programs on the same basis as other employees at the same level.

Leslie Melton, an Associate at the Company, is the sister-in-law of Lloyd W. Howell, Jr., an Executive Vice President and our Chief Financial Officer. Her annual base salary is $124,157. In fiscal year 2022, Ms. Melton received $120,772 in base salary, retirement contributions of $7,179, and $4,602 through our PTO sell program. Ms. Melton also participates in the Company’s other benefit programs on the same basis as other employees at the same level.

Bradley Dotson, an Associate at the Company during fiscal year 2022, is the son of Judi Dotson, an Executive Vice President and President of the Company's National Security sector. His annual base salary was $112,790. In fiscal year 2022, Mr. Dotson received $104,642 in base salary, retirement contributions of $5,977, and an award of $200. Mr. Dotson also participated in the Company’s other benefit programs on the same basis as other employees at the same level.

Mitchell Thompson, an Associate at the Company, is the son of Elizabeth Thompson, an Executive Vice President and our Chief People Officer. His annual base salary is $107,145. In fiscal year 2022, Mr. Thompson received $104,036 in base salary, and retirement contributions of $6,180. Mr. Thompson also participates in the Company’s other benefit programs on the same basis as other employees at the same level.

28

Megen Jackson, an Associate at the Company, is the niece of Judi Dotson, Executive Vice President and President of the Company's National Security sector. Her annual base salary is $116,374. In fiscal year 2022, Ms. Jackson received $103,831 in base salary, retirement contributions of $5,846, and an award of $2,000. Ms. Jackson also participates in the Company’s other benefit programs on the same basis as other employees at the same level.

29

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

The Compensation Discussion and Analysis (CD&A), together with the compensation tables and related disclosures, provides a narrative of our executive compensation philosophy and programs as reviewed and determined by the Compensation, Culture and People Committee of the Board of Directors.

At Booz Allen, our purpose is to empower people to change the world. Our leadership philosophy and partnership culture are foundational to how we drive transformation and guide our people to solve our client's toughest challenges.

Our executive compensation strategy is uniquely designed to:

•Deliver competitive compensation tied to long-term stockholder value creation;

•Attract and retain top talent from across the global marketplace who will continue to propel us forward for the future;

•Motivate and reward executives with exceptional ability to meet and exceed the demands of our clients;

•Infuse an ownership mindset to build sustainable growth and value; and

•Reinforce our partnership-style culture which differentiates our ability to come to market as an institution rather than as individuals, foster a culture of collaboration among our leaders, and encourage rapid and efficient deployment of our people across clients and opportunities.

The tenure of our executives is a testament to the team's long-standing commitment to the Company and its long-term business goals. Our named executive officers for fiscal year 2022 were:

Horacio D. Rozanski	Lloyd W. Howell, Jr.	Karen M. Dahut	Nancy J. Laben	Susan L. Penfield
President and Chief Executive Officer	Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer	Executive Vice President, President of Global Defense Sector	Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer	Executive Vice President, Chief Technology Officer
Executive Tenure: 22 years Total Tenure: 29 years	Executive Tenure: 21 years Total Tenure: 33 years	Executive Tenure: 17 years Total Tenure: 19 years	Executive Tenure: 8 years Total Tenure: 8 years	Executive Tenure: 19 years Total Tenure: 27 years

(Tenure as executive and total tenure calculated as number of full years completed as of the last day of fiscal year 2022.)

30

Executive Summary

Company Performance and Highlights

Delivering Significant Returns to Stockholders

Amid the unprecedented environment caused by COVID-19, our leaders continued to execute upon the Company’s crisis management plan, which included plans to ensure the health and safety of our employees, as well as support our clients and the communities affected. In fiscal year 2022, our staff and leaders led the Company to deliver record performance for fiscal year revenue and earnings, increased headcount by over five percent, and generated solid backlog growth. This strong performance has resulted in significant returns to our stockholders through appreciation in our stock price, the payment of regular dividends, and share repurchases.

Total Stockholder Return

As of March 31, 2022

Note: Total stockholder return assumes dividends are reinvested.

•Our stock price increased by approximately 9% and total stockholder return was approximately 11% during fiscal year 2022.

•During fiscal year 2022, we declared and paid $209.1 million in recurring dividends to stockholders—three regular dividends of $0.37 per share and one regular dividend of $0.43 per share.

•We devoted $865.5 million through strategic minority investments and acquisitions.

•The Board increased the quarterly dividend by 16% for performance in the third quarter of fiscal year 2022, payable in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2022. The total dividends paid in fiscal year 2022 grew 15% compared to fiscal year 2021.

•We expect to declare and pay regular quarterly cash dividends in the future. However, the actual declaration of any such future dividends and the establishment of the per share amounts, record dates, and payment dates are subject to the discretion of the Board, which will take into consideration future earnings, cash flows, financial requirements, and other factors.

•During fiscal year 2022, we repurchased 5.1 million shares for $419.3 million (which includes 4.7 million of open market share repurchases as well as 0.3 million shares to cover the minimum statutory withholding taxes on restricted stock units that vested on various dates during the period).

•On January 26, 2022, the Board of Directors approved an additional increase to our share repurchase authorization of $450.0 million, for a total capacity of $2,160.0 million under the share repurchase program. As of March 31, 2022, the Company had approximately $651.6 million of unused capacity to repurchase shares of common stock under the share repurchase program.

31

Fiscal Year 2022 Company Performance

Net Income and Net Income Margin		Adj. EBITDA and Adj. EBITDA Margin on Revenue
Net Income ($ millions)	Margin (%)	Adj. EBITDA ($ millions)	Margin (%)

•Fiscal year 2022 marked the seventh consecutive year of top-line revenue growth.

•Continued focus on investments in markets, capabilities, and people is positioning Booz Allen to deliver near-term and long-term stockholder value.

•Full year revenue increased 6.4% to $8,363.7 million.

•Net income decreased 23.4% to $466.6 million.

•Adjusted EBITDA increased 11.3% to $934.9 million.

•Diluted EPS decreased 21.3% to $3.44.

•Adjusted Diluted EPS increased 8.0% to $4.21.

•Total backlog increased 21.7% to $29.2 billion.

•Net cash provided by operating activities increased 2.5% to $736.5 million.

•Free cash flow increased 4.0% to $656.6 million in fiscal year 2022.

Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA Margin on Revenue, Adjusted Diluted Earnings Per Share, and Free Cash Flow may differ from similarly titled measures presented by other companies in our industry and are not recognized measures under U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, or GAAP. A reconciliation between these non-GAAP financial measures and the most directly comparable financial measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP can be found in Appendix A to this proxy statement.

32

Compensation Philosophy

    We are a values-driven organization where our partnership culture motivates our executives, who we define as our named executive officers, Executive Vice Presidents, and Senior Vice Presidents, to consistently act in the best interests of the Company. Our executive compensation program is intrinsically tied to our purpose and values.

Our Philosophy

What Our Philosophy Achieves

- Guides executives to live the Company's purpose and values in their client work and internal interactions - Aligns executives' compensation with Company performance, strategic objectives, and the creation of long-term sustainable stockholder value - Attracts, motivates, and retains executives of exceptional ability to meet and exceed the demands of our clients - Creates appropriate rewards and penalties for exceeding or falling short of Company-level performance targets

- Empowers executives to think and act in the best interests of the Company - Focuses on optimizing stockholder value and fostering an ownership culture - Engages and incentivizes our executives to effectively execute our business strategy - Creates and enables agility within our leadership and the Company overall, allowing us to quickly adjust, align, and advance in an ever-changing global marketplace

Key Executive Compensation Practices

To ensure strong corporate governance, our compensation program incorporates the following key practices:

At Booz Allen, We:		At Booz Allen, We Don't:
ü	Require our executives and directors to satisfy meaningful stock ownership requirements	û	Reprice underwater stock options
ü	Include compensation recovery provisions (clawbacks) in our incentive plans	û	Offer individual supplemental executive retirement plans
ü	Perform annual review of appropriate peer group to benchmark executive compensation	û	Grant discounted stock options
ü	Conduct annual risk assessment of incentive-based compensation to identify any issues that could have a material, adverse impact on the Company	û	Provide tax gross-ups on golden parachute payments for CEO or other officers following a change in control
ü	Review on a regular basis our executive talent, performance, deployments, and succession	û	Allow for change in control agreements for named executive officers
ü	Align executive pay with short- and long-term performance	û	Allow employees or directors to engage in hedging transactions in accordance with our insider trading policy
ü	Hold annual advisory vote on executive compensation	û	Allow pledging of our shares

33

Setting Executive Compensation and Peer Group

We evaluate our named executive officers' compensation relative to the compensation of publicly traded peer companies that are similar in size, industry, and operations. The Compensation, Culture and People Committee reviews the peer group regularly and adjusts as necessary due to changes at a peer company's operations or changes in comparability (e.g., due to bankruptcy or mergers and acquisitions) to the Company. The peer group is used by the Compensation, Culture and People Committee as a point of reference in determining pay within a competitive range without targeting a specific benchmark when making executive pay decisions.

For setting fiscal year 2022 executive compensation, the Compensation, Culture and People Committee requested that outside compensation consultant Korn Ferry perform a comprehensive review of the peer companies used for evaluating our named executive officers' compensation. Korn Ferry evaluated companies that are similar in size, industry, and operations, using specific review criteria, as described below:

•Company size: Organizations with revenues approximately 0.33x to 3.00x of our revenue, with peer median revenue approximating Company revenue, and with flexibility outside of this range to accommodate organizations that are a good match from a business perspective.

•Industry: Includes government services organizations and other "comparables" that our Investor Relations department tracks, and other organizations that benchmark to our Company.

As a result of this review, the Compensation, Culture and People Committee approved the peer group set forth below for benchmarking and setting compensation of our named executive officers for fiscal year 2022.

Fiscal Year 2022 Peer Group
- CACI International, Inc.  - CGI Group, Inc.  - Cognizant Technology Solutions  - Conduent Incorporated  - DXC Technology  - FISERV, Inc.  - FTI Consulting, Inc.  - Jacobs Engineering  - KBR Inc.	- L3Harris Technologies, Inc.  - Leidos Holdings, Inc.  - ManTech International Corporation  - Maximus, Inc.  - Parsons Corporation  - Perspecta, Inc.  - Science Applications International Corporation  - Unisys Corporation

The Compensation, Culture and People Committee established fiscal year 2022 target compensation for the named executive officers by taking into consideration the peer group benchmarking analysis and input from Korn Ferry, along with feedback from the CEO (in the case of named executive officers who are direct reports to the CEO), and the Committee's collective judgment and discretion. The target executive compensation includes the fiscal year salary amount, target short-term annual cash incentive, and long-term equity incentive. Additional information on each of these items can be found below under "Compensation Elements."

Additionally, effective for fiscal year 2023, based on our established peer review selection criteria, as described above, the Compensation, Culture and People Committee approved a revised peer group. The Compensation, Culture and People Committee, taking into consideration the revised peer group benchmarking analysis, the Company's sustained out-performance and growth, input from Korn Ferry, along with feedback from the CEO (in the case of named executive officers who are direct reports to the CEO), and the Committee's collective judgment and discretion, approved the fiscal year 2023 compensation for our named executive officers.

The Compensation, Culture and People Committee considers peer group benchmarking and other market compensation data as critical inputs but not the sole factors in the overall assessment of competitiveness of our executive compensation. The Compensation, Culture and People Committee also considers other components such as performance, contributions, internal equity, and experience of each named executive officer in determining target and actual compensation amounts.

In fiscal year 2022, Korn Ferry was also engaged to:

•Review and provide advice on our Compensation Discussion and Analysis

•Conduct a compensation risk assessment

•Perform benchmarking and analysis of our Board of Directors' compensation

•Provide counsel regarding the development of non-financial strategic metrics in the Equity Incentive Plan

34

Compensation Elements

The primary components of our executive compensation program include:

Element	Objective
Base Salary	Provides a regular income at competitive market level and reflects each executive's skills, experience, and responsibilities
Annual Cash Incentive	Motivates our executives to achieve our annual operational and financial goals
Long-Term Equity Incentives	Reward sustained performance and align executives' interests with our stockholders
Benefits	Provide for the health and welfare of our executives, including retirement benefits to promote long-term commitment of our executives to the Company

We believe that a significant portion of our named executive officers' compensation should be tied to the Company's success and the long-term returns of our stockholders. Consistent with this approach and as shown in the charts below for fiscal year 2022, more than half of our CEO's and other named executive officers' target compensation is delivered in the form of variable "at risk" compensation opportunities that are tied to the achievement of pre-set financial performance metrics and our stock price performance.

Base Salary

Base salary represents a relatively small portion of the total target executive compensation opportunities and provides the fixed component necessary to attract and retain executive talent. The salary earned for each of our named executive officers in fiscal year 2022 is set forth in the table below. No changes were made to the annual salary amounts for our named executive officers in fiscal year 2022.

Name	FY22 Base Salary	Change from FY21 Base Salary
Horacio D. Rozanski	$1,500,000	0%
Lloyd W. Howell, Jr.	$1,025,000	0%
Karen M. Dahut	$1,025,000	0%
Nancy J. Laben	$650,000	0%
Susan L. Penfield	$800,000	0%

Annual Cash Incentive

The annual cash incentive portion of our executives' compensation is provided through our annual bonus program. The target annual incentive amount for our named executive officers is determined each year by the Compensation, Culture and People Committee based on the market analysis and recommendation of our compensation consultant, as well as of the CEO (in the case of named executive officers who are direct reports to the CEO).

The annual incentive payment is determined using a point model, where a certain number of points is assigned to each named executive officer and such number is then multiplied by a dollar value per point, as approved by the Compensation, Culture and People Committee. Based on the Company's performance at the end of the fiscal year, as discussed below, the Compensation, Culture and People Committee approves the final dollar value per point, which is used to determine each named executive officer's actual annual incentive payment. Executives who retire, or terminate employment under our transition policy, before the end of the fiscal year are generally eligible to receive a prorated incentive payment.

35

The annual incentive is based on achievement of the Company's performance against a target Adjusted EBITDA range with upward or downward adjustments for performance in comparison to the range. The performance range is generally determined at or near the beginning of each fiscal year by the Compensation, Culture and People Committee. Payment of the annual incentive approximating target levels would generally occur when actual Adjusted EBITDA is within the established Adjusted EBITDA range. A portion of any variance between the established range and actual Adjusted EBITDA is reflected as an adjustment to the pool of funds available for the annual incentive payment, or the bonus pool. The amount of the adjustment is determined by the Compensation, Culture and People Committee in its sole discretion. A positive variance between the range and actual Adjusted EBITDA would generally result in an increase in the bonus pool and a negative variance would generally result in a decrease in the bonus pool.

Adjusted EBITDA represents net income before income taxes, net interest and other expense and depreciation and amortization, and before certain other items, including transaction costs, fees, losses, and expenses, including fees associated with debt prepayments. We base the annual incentive portion of our executives' compensation on Adjusted EBITDA because we believe it is a direct reflection of the cash flow and operating profitability of our business and represents the element of our performance that executives can most directly impact through their management of the business.

Our Compensation, Culture and People Committee reviews and approves the Adjusted EBITDA result and any adjustments to the plan bonus pool based on year-end operating results. The final bonus pool as approved by our Compensation, Culture and People Committee is distributed to our executives on a consistent per point basis.

	Adjusted EBITDA1	Executive Bonus Pool
FY22 Target	Range: $896 million - $916 million	$25.6 million
FY22 Actual	$935 million	$26.7 million

(1). See Appendix A to this proxy statement for a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to the most directly comparable financial measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP.

For fiscal year 2022, the Company's performance exceeded the top-end of the fiscal year 2022 target Adjusted EBITDA range. Revenue growth and Adjusted EBITDA Margin were in-line with our revised guidance expectations for the year. Adjusted EPS exceeded the top-end of our increased guidance. Based on these results, the Compensation, Culture and People Committee determined that bonus payouts should be above target to appropriately recognize and reward the Company’s leadership. Accordingly, the Compensation, Culture and People Committee approved the executive bonus payout equal to approximately 5% above the target. The short-term incentive target opportunities and cash payments received by each of our named executive officers for fiscal year 2022 are presented in the table below.

Name	FY22 Annual Cash Incentive Target	Annual Cash Incentive Payout	Annual Cash Incentive Paid
Horacio D. Rozanski	$1,500,000	105%	$1,578,000
Lloyd W. Howell, Jr.	$500,000	105%	$526,000
Karen M. Dahut	$500,000	105%	$526,000
Nancy J. Laben	$475,000	105%	$499,700
Susan L. Penfield 1	$425,000	105%	$449,700

(1) Ms. Penfield’s FY22 annual cash incentive payout is calculated on a per point basis as if her target bonus was $475,000 with the final payment reduced by $50,000 to reflect her actual incentive target of $425,000.

Long-Term Equity Incentives

It is our philosophy that executives should hold meaningful amounts of long-term equity compensation to align the personal financial interests of our executives with the interests of long-term stockholders and to encourage a long-term perspective with regard to Company performance and growth. The equity compensation for our executives is delivered in the following manner, which is further described below.

•Annual Grants

•New Hire / Advancement Grants

36

Fiscal Year 2022 Annual Grants

Our named executive officers receive long-term equity incentive grants as part of their annual compensation that have two components: time-based restricted stock units (RSUs) and performance-based RSUs.

•Time-Based RSUs: Settle into shares of Class A common stock in three equal installments over three years.

•Performance-Based RSUs: Settle into shares of Class A common stock at the end of a three-year performance period. For fiscal year 2022, the performance-based RSU goals were set on the Company's cumulative performance against two internal financial metrics — Adjusted Diluted Earnings Per Share (ADEPS) and Value Added Revenue (VAR or Revenue, Excluding Billable Expenses, as defined in Appendix A), and two internal non-financial metrics related to the firm’s commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion, as described below.

Fiscal Year 2022 Performance Metrics	Weighting	Performance Metric Description
Cumulative Adjusted Diluted Earnings Per Share (ADEPS)	75%	Three-year cumulative diluted earnings per share calculated using adjusted net income and measured against performance targets set at the start of the performance period
Cumulative Value Added Revenue (VAR)	25%	Three-year cumulative revenue less billable expenses measured against performance targets set at the start of the performance period
Non-Financial Goals	10% Upside	Two internal non-financial metrics related to the firm's diversity, equity, and inclusion goals measured against performance targets set at the start of the performance period

These internal financial metrics were selected as a representation of organic revenue growth and bottom-line Company performance. The Company believes that the combination and weighting of each metric drive towards the goal of sustainable quality growth, with heavier weighting placed on ADEPS to further emphasize profitability and volume of revenue. The number of performance-based RSUs that vest at the end of the three-year performance cycle may range from zero percent for performance that falls below the minimum performance threshold and up to 200 percent for maximum performance.

For fiscal year 2022, the Compensation, Culture and People Committee, with guidance from Korn Ferry and management, introduced non-financial strategic metrics as part of the performance-based RSU goals. For fiscal year 2022, the Committee approved two goals associated with our commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion. Successful achievement of each non-financial goal by the end of the three-year performance period could result in additional 5% upside vest opportunity for each non-financial goal, respectively, after performance for the financial metrics has been approved and certified. The non-financial strategic metrics were designed to support the organization’s overall strategy, purpose, and values and we anticipate such metrics will evolve over time consistent with our business strategy.

At the start of the three-year performance cycle, the Compensation, Culture and People Committee sets the threshold, target and maximum performance levels, and corresponding payouts. When establishing these performance levels, the Compensation, Culture and People Committee considers, among other things, projected Company performance and long-term strategic growth objectives, business outlook, and market growth forecasts. Since the goals are established for future performance over a three-year period, outcomes are by definition uncertain. Due to the proprietary and competitive nature of the Company's business strategy and internal budgets that inform the three-year performance program targets, the Compensation, Culture and People Committee discloses the long-term performance levels for each of the performance goals following the completion of the performance period.

For fiscal year 2022, the target annual equity mix for our CEO was approximately 72 percent aligned to performance-based RSUs and 28 percent aligned to time-based RSUs. The average target annualized equity mix for all other named executive officers was approximately 60 percent aligned to performance-based RSUs and approximately 40 percent aligned to time-based RSUs.

The Compensation, Culture and People Committee, with guidance from Korn Ferry, peer benchmarking data, and the CEO (in the case of named executive officers who are direct reports to the CEO), increased the long-term equity incentive grant values for fiscal year 2022 for the named executive officers to further align the compensation of our named executive officers with long-term Company performance. The CEO has the highest allocation of performance-based RSUs based on his role as the overall steward of the Company and to tie a significant portion of his compensation to the Company's performance. The performance-based RSUs allow for additional rewards based on over-achievement against our long-term performance goals, while also penalizing for under-performance. The time-based RSUs encourage retention and provide for incremental recognition of equity compensation over the vest cycle.

37

Name	FY22 Target Performance-Based RSU Grant 1	FY22 Target Time-Based RSU Grant 1
Horacio D. Rozanski	$6,120,033	$2,380,068
Lloyd W. Howell, Jr.	$1,245,069	$830,037
Karen M. Dahut	$1,245,069	$830,037
Nancy J. Laben	$675,056	$450,017
Susan L. Penfield	$615,083	$410,054

(1) Grant date fair value of equity issued under the fiscal year 2022 executive annual compensation structure in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718.

Effective for fiscal year 2022, the Compensation, Culture and People Committee approved an increase of $375,000 to the target annual incentive compensation amount for Mr. Rozanski, as well as an increase of approximately $3.5 million to the total annual long-term equity incentive amount. Additionally, effective for fiscal year 2022, the Compensation, Culture and People Committee approved increases of approximately $200,000 to the total annual long-term equity incentive amounts for each of Mr. Howell and Ms. Dahut, respectively, as well as increases of approximately $150,000 to the total annual long-term equity incentive amounts for each of Mses. Laben and Penfield, respectively. These changes were made by the Compensation, Culture and People Committee in consideration of the Company's sustained out-performance and growth, using benchmarking analysis and input from Korn Ferry, along with feedback from the CEO (in the case of named executive officers who are direct reports to the CEO), to further increase the competitiveness of executive pay with continued focus on short-term and long-term Company performance and stockholder interests.

Fiscal Year 2020 Performance-Based RSU Awards

In May 2022, the Compensation, Culture and People Committee reviewed and certified the Cumulative ADEPS and Cumulative VAR performance results of the fiscal years 2020-2022 performance period applicable to the performance-based RSU awards granted in May 2019 against the targets set at the beginning of the three-year period. Based on this assessment, the Compensation, Culture and People Committee approved a final payout percentage for the May 2019 performance-based RSU awards (fiscal years 2020-2022 performance period) of 179% of target, with actual results and threshold, target, above target, and maximum goals presented below.

Performance Measures	Weighting	Threshold 50% Payout	Target 100% Payout	Above Target 120% Payout	Above Target 150% Payout	Maximum 200% Payout	Actual 1	% of Target Achieved	Payout Factor
Cumulative Three-Year ADEPS	75%	$9.38	$9.88	$10.28	$10.47	$10.76	$11.15	113%	200%
Cumulative Three-Year VAR	25%	$15,843M	$16,166M	$16,489M	$16,813M	$17,136M	$16,450M	102%	118%
Total Payout									179%2

(1) See Appendix A to this proxy statement for a reconciliation between each non-GAAP financial measure and the most directly comparable financial measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP.

(2) The Total Payout Factor has been rounded to the nearest whole percentage.

Benefits and Perquisites

Our employees are eligible to participate in a full complement of benefit plans. Our named executive officers also participate in enhanced medical and dental plans, life insurance, accidental death and dismemberment, and personal liability coverage at the Company's expense. During fiscal year 2022, our named executive officers were eligible to receive perquisites, including up to $15,000 per year for financial counseling, up to $7,500 every three years to update an estate plan, up to $3,000 for preparation of estate plans following relocation to a new tax jurisdiction, and a one-time reimbursement of up to $5,000 for retirement financial planning. In addition, to protect our executives from various risks, we maintain an executive protection program that provides our executives with a security assessment for their primary residence and security service for foreign or domestic travel. We believe that our executive benefit and perquisite programs are reasonable and necessary to provide for the well-being of our executives. For more detail on the perquisites that our named executive officers receive, see footnote 5 to the Summary Compensation Table.

Retirement Benefits

We provide retirement benefits to our executives, including our named executive officers, to help them build financial security for retirement, while allowing them to direct the investment of their retirement savings as they choose.

38

Employees’ Capital Accumulation Plan

All eligible employees, which includes our named executive officers, may participate in the tax-qualified Employees' Capital Accumulation Plan, or ECAP. Under this plan, eligible employees, including our named executive officers, receive an annual matching contribution based on their voluntary contributions up to 6% of their eligible annual income, as determined by the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"). Each executive is also eligible to receive a payment that is equivalent to the annual tax-deferred contribution he or she is permitted to make to ECAP under the Code. Executives may elect to have these funds deposited into a pre-tax or Roth 401(k), or the executive may simply receive the funds as a cash payment and be taxed accordingly.

Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan

As part of our executive compensation program, we offer a non-qualified deferred compensation plan for our executives to encourage employees to save for their retirement. Eligible employees, which include all named executive officers, may elect to contribute up to 100% of their annual cash bonus to this plan. None of our named executive officers enrolled for the fiscal year 2022 deferral.

Additional Retirement Benefits

We provide additional retirement benefits to our executives, including our named executive officers, in order to provide them with additional security in retirement and promote a long-term career with our Company. Our executives participate in the Officers' Retirement Plan, under which the executive may retire with full benefits after a minimum of either (a) age 60 with five years of service as an executive, or (b) age 50 with 10 years of service as an executive. An eligible executive who retires and does not receive severance benefits is entitled to receive a single lump-sum retirement payment equal to $10,000 for each year of service as an executive, pro-rated as appropriate, and an annual allowance of $4,000 for financial counseling and tax preparation assistance. Our retirees are also eligible to receive comprehensive coverage for medical, pharmacy, and dental healthcare. The premiums for this healthcare coverage are paid by the Company.

Executive Ownership Requirements

Equity ownership requirements are in place for our executives, including our named executive officers, to further align their interests to those of our stockholders. Our ownership requirements extend beyond market expectations. Our named executive officers have regularly exceeded our equity ownership guidelines and demonstrate a commitment to the Company's long-term value by owning equity well above their requirements. Until an executive has satisfied the ownership requirements set forth below, the executive cannot sell any equity granted as executive equity compensation by the Company. Each executive’s required equity ownership amount is determined as a multiple of his or her base salary. The applicable multiples for our named executive officers for fiscal year 2022 are set forth in the table below, as well as a comparison of their approximate actual equity ownership as of the end of the fiscal year:

Named Executive Officers	Ownership Requirement	Actual Ownership 1
Chief Executive Officer	7x base salary	45x base salary
Other named executive officers	4x base salary	15x base salary

(1) Ownership for the other named executive officers is an average of their equity holdings compared to their respective base pay amounts as of fiscal year-end 2022.

In calculating an executive's ownership, Class A Common Stock, vested in-the-money stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units, and performance stock units at target, issued under the Equity Incentive Plan are considered as owned by the executive. Each of our named executive officers has satisfied his or her individual stock ownership requirement.

Risk Assessment

We engaged Korn Ferry to conduct a risk assessment of our compensation programs for fiscal year 2022, which was completed in May 2021. Based on our approach of compensating our executives to foster the financial success of the Company as a whole and other elements of our compensation system, as well as the results of Korn Ferry's review, the Compensation, Culture and People Committee concluded that our executive compensation program does not encourage undue risk-taking and the risks arising from our compensation policies and practices for our employees are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

39

Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation

At the 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, approximately 96% of the votes cast were in favor of our executive compensation structure. The Board and Compensation, Culture and People Committee viewed this strong support as an indicator of general approval of our approach to executive compensation. In 2017, the Company’s stockholders approved holding the say-on-pay vote annually. The next advisory vote for the frequency of holding the say-on-pay vote is scheduled for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in 2023.

We continue to engage with our stockholders and welcome feedback regarding our executive compensation programs.

Government Limitations on Reimbursement of Compensation Costs

As a government contractor, we are subject to applicable federal statutes and the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), which govern the reimbursement of costs by our government clients. Pursuant to the FAR our contracts limit the allowability of reimbursement for compensation to certain, or in some cases all, employees, including our named executive officers, to a benchmark compensation cap established each year by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). When comparing compensation to the benchmark cap, all wages, salary, bonuses, deferred compensation, and employer contributions to defined contribution pension plans, if any, for the year, as recorded in our books and records, must be included. Any amounts over the cap are considered unallowable and are therefore not recoverable under our government contracts. The compensation cap established by the OMB, which is applicable to a portion of our contracts for the 2022 calendar year, is $589,000. Other contracts have higher caps and/or limit the allowable compensation of fewer employees.

Compensation Recovery Provisions (Clawbacks) in Incentive Plans

We have provisions in our incentive plans that provide us with the ability to impose the forfeiture of bonuses and equity compensation and the recovery of certain bonus amounts and gains from equity compensation awarded under those plans. Such forfeitures and recoveries may occur:

•in the event of an accounting restatement due to material non-compliance with any financial reporting requirements under the securities laws with respect to individuals who engage in misconduct or gross negligence that results in a restatement of our financial statements,

•with respect to individuals subject to automatic forfeiture under Section 304 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and,

•to the extent that, based on erroneous data, any award or payment is in excess of what would have been paid under the accounting restatement during the three-year period preceding the date on which a financial restatement is required, current or former executives, or as otherwise required under applicable laws or regulations.

In addition, if an individual engages in certain other misconduct, the Company has the discretion to suspend vesting of all or a portion of any award and/or require the forfeiture or disgorgement to the Company of any equity award (including gains on the sale of the stock, if any) that vested, was paid, or settled in the 12 months prior to or any time after the individual engaged in such misconduct. Our Equity Incentive Plan and Annual Incentive Plan also permit the Company to subject awards to forfeiture, disgorgement, and recoupment under any applicable claw-back policies that may be adopted by the Board or our Compensation, Culture and People Committee.

Certain Change in Control Provisions

Prior to May 2022, the Equity Incentive Plan provided that, in the event of a change in control, unless the plan administrator determined otherwise or as otherwise provided in an award agreement, all service-based awards under the Equity Incentive Plan, including time-based options and time-based restricted stock units, would fully vest. In May 2022, our Compensation, Culture and People Committee, based on benchmarking analysis of market practices and input from Korn Ferry, approved revisions to the vesting terms in the award agreements governing the options and time-based restricted stock units to provide that, in the event of a change in control, all such options and time-based restricted stock units shall remain outstanding and vest on the applicable vesting date, subject to the continued employment or service of the participant by the Company or any subsidiary thereof through such vesting date; provided, that, if the participant’s employment or service is terminated by the Company without “cause” or for “good reason” (in each case, as defined in the applicable award agreement) within two years following the effective date of the change in control, such outstanding options and time-based restricted stock units will vest as of the date of such termination.

40

In the event of a change in control, unvested performance-based restricted stock units will remain outstanding at target levels and will vest on the original vesting date, subject to the continued employment or service of the participant by the Company or any subsidiary thereof through such vesting date, but without regard to achievement of any performance goals; however, if the participant’s employment or service is terminated by the Company without “cause” or for “good reason” (in each case, as defined in the applicable award agreement) within two years following the effective date of the change in control, such outstanding performance-based restricted stock units will vest as of the date of such termination. Under the Equity Incentive Plan, “change in control” is generally defined as the acquisition by any person of 50% or more of the combined voting power of our Company's then outstanding voting securities, the merger of our Company if our stockholders immediately prior to the merger do not own more than 50% of the combined voting power of the merged entity, the liquidation or dissolution of our Company (other than in a bankruptcy proceeding or for the purposes of effecting a corporate restructuring or reorganization), or the sale of all or substantially all the assets of our Company to non-affiliates.

In addition, if, during the five-year period after a change in control, our executives' retiree medical plan is terminated or modified in a manner that is materially adverse to our executives, each of our executives, including our named executive officers, will be guaranteed their existing benefits under the plan through the fifth anniversary of the change in control and receive at the end of the five-year period a cash payment equal to the excess of the actuarial cost of the executive's benefits under the plan that would be accrued on the Company's financial statements on the fifth anniversary of the change in control in the absence of the termination or modification over the amount that is accrued on our financial statements on the fifth anniversary of the change in control giving effect to the termination or modification (but excluding the accrual on the payment itself).

Policies on Timing of Equity Grants

It is our policy not to time the granting of equity awards in relation to the release of material, non-public information. Accordingly, regularly scheduled awards are permitted to be granted at times when there is material non-public information. Annual equity awards to all officers, including the named executive officers, are typically granted by the Compensation, Culture and People Committee meeting in May of each fiscal year. We generally grant equity awards to newly hired and promoted executive officers at the subsequently scheduled Compensation, Culture and People Committee or Board meeting following the respective effective date of the hire or promotion.

Effect of Accounting and Tax Treatment on Compensation Decisions

The Compensation, Culture and People Committee has from time to time considered the potential impact of Section 162(m) of the Code, or Section 162(m), on elements of our compensation program. Section 162(m) imposes a limit on the amount of compensation that we may deduct in any one year with respect to certain “covered employees.” The 2017 Tax Act made certain changes to Section 162(m), including repealing the performance-based compensation exception and expanding the scope of persons covered by the limitations on deductibility under Section 162(m). Accordingly, compensation paid after March 31, 2018 to our covered employees in excess of $1 million will not be deductible unless it qualifies for transition relief applicable to certain arrangements in place as of November 2, 2017 that are not modified in any material respect after that date.

In prior years, we sought to structure our annual incentive compensation and long-term equity incentive compensation paid to our “covered employees” to be deductible under Section 162(m) to the extent possible. However, our Compensation, Culture and People Committee considers it important to retain the flexibility to design compensation programs that are in the best long-term interests of our Company and our stockholders and does not have a policy requiring compensation to be fully deductible under Section 162(m). While we intend to rely on the transition relief included in the 2017 Tax Act to the extent practicable and consistent with our business needs, as a result of the elimination of the exemption for qualified performance-based compensation, our Compensation, Culture and People Committee expects to pay compensation at levels that are not deductible under Section 162(m).

Other provisions of the Code can also affect compensation decisions. Section 409A of the Code, or Section 409A, which governs the form and timing of payment of deferred compensation, imposes sanctions, including a 20% penalty and an interest penalty, on a recipient of deferred compensation that does not comply with Section 409A. Our Compensation, Culture and People Committee takes into account the potential implications of Section 409A in determining the form and timing of compensation awarded to our executives and strives to structure its nonqualified deferred compensation plans to meet these requirements.

Section 280G of the Code, or Section 280G, disallows a company's tax deduction for payments received by certain individuals in connection with a change in control to the extent that the payments exceed an amount approximately three times their average annual compensation and Section 4999 of the Code imposes a 20% excise tax on those payments. As

41

described above, awards under our Equity Incentive Plan contain provisions that, in certain circumstances, accelerate vesting of all or a portion of the awards in connection with a change in control. To the extent that payments upon a change in control are classified as excess parachute payments, our Company's tax deduction would be disallowed under Section 280G.

42

Compensation Tables and Disclosures

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
Name and Principal Position	Fiscal Year 1	Salary	Bonus	Stock Awards 2	Option Awards	Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation 3	Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings 4	All Other Compensation 5	Total
		($)	($)	($)	($)	($)	($)	($)	($)
Horacio D. Rozanski President & Chief Executive Officer	2022	1,500,000	—	8,500,101	—	1,578,000	10,000	278,236	11,866,337
	2021	1,500,000	—	5,000,076	—	1,687,500	10,000	157,833	8,355,409
	2020	1,500,000	—	4,999,977	—	1,305,000	10,000	280,457	8,095,434
Lloyd W. Howell, Jr. Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer	2022	1,025,000	—	2,075,106	—	526,000	10,000	162,539	3,798,645
	2021	1,025,000	—	1,875,075	—	750,000	10,000	142,370	3,802,445
	2020	1,025,000	—	1,874,968	—	580,000	10,000	164,968	3,654,936
Karen M. Dahut Executive Vice President, President of Global Defense Sector	2022	1,025,000	—	2,075,106	—	526,000	10,000	171,902	3,808,008
	2021	1,025,000	—	1,875,075	—	750,000	10,000	143,954	3,804,029
	2020	1,025,000	—	1,874,968	—	580,000	10,000	186,693	3,676,661
Nancy J. Laben Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer	2022	650,000	—	1,125,073	—	499,700	11,490	149,880	2,436,143
	2021	650,000	—	975,063	—	712,500	12,086	142,719	2,492,368
	2020	650,000	—	974,973	—	551,000	11,880	170,018	2,357,871
Susan L. Penfield Executive Vice President, Chief Technology Officer	2022	800,000	—	1,025,137	—	449,700	10,000	171,737	2,456,574
	2021	800,000	—	875,070	—	662,500	10,000	143,494	2,491,064
	2020	800,000	—	874,960	—	501,000	10,000	146,157	2,332,117

(1)Compensation is provided only for fiscal years for which each individual qualified as a named executive officer. The fiscal year runs from April 1 through March 31 of the subsequent year.

(2)This column reflects the aggregate grant date fair value of the annual time- and performance-based restricted stock units computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 using the valuation methodology and assumptions set forth in Note 18 to our financial statements for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2022, which are incorporated by reference herein, modified to exclude any forfeiture assumptions related to service-based vesting conditions. The amounts in this column do not reflect the value, if any, that ultimately may be realized by the executive. Values for the performance-based restricted stock units are computed based on the target number of shares. Assuming the maximum level of performance is achieved, the value of the fiscal year 2022 performance-based restricted stock units reflected in this column would be as follows: Mr. Rozanski, $13,173,101; Mr. Howell, $2,679,911; Ms. Dahut, $2,679,911; Ms. Laben $1,452,961; and Ms. Penfield, $1,323,924.

(3)This column reflects the fiscal year 2022 annual cash incentive bonus program, which provides awards based on the achievement of corporate performance objectives. The amounts reported in this column relate to the year in which such bonuses were earned by each of our named executive officers. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Compensation Elements—Annual Cash Incentive” for additional detail regarding the annual performance bonus program.

(4)This column reflects the change in the actuarial present value of the cash retirement benefit accrued under the Officers' Retirement Plan for each of our named executive officers from fiscal year-end 2021 to fiscal year-end 2022.

(5)The table below describes the elements included in All Other Compensation for fiscal year 2022.

OTHER COMPENSATION TABLE
Name	Financial Counseling	Qualified Company Contributions to 401(k)	Company Non- Qualified Retirement Contributions to Employees a	Executive Medical and Retiree Plan Contributions	Life Insurance	Other b	Total
	($)	($)	($)	($)	($)	($)	($)
Horacio D. Rozanski	12,000	17,400	26,000	62,965	4,116	155,755	278,236
Lloyd W. Howell, Jr.	15,000	17,400	26,000	62,965	5,070	36,104	162,539
Karen M. Dahut	15,000	17,400	26,000	62,965	7,218	43,319	171,902
Nancy J. Laben	12,000	17,400	26,000	62,965	9,096	22,419	149,880
Susan L. Penfield	12,500	17,400	26,000	62,965	9,096	43,776	171,737

(a)Represents retirement plan contributions paid by the Company to the named executive officers as described above under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Compensation Elements—Retirement Benefits.”

(b)This column includes dental, supplemental medical, accident insurance, personal excess liability coverage, and vehicle parking. This column also includes security services for Mr. Rozanski ($130,346), which increased during fiscal year 2022 as compared to fiscal year 2021 primarily due to easing COVID-19 restrictions.

43

GRANTS OF PLAN BASED AWARDS TABLE
			Estimated Possible Payouts  Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards 1			Estimated Future and Possible Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards 2			All Other Stock Awards; Number of Shares or Stock Units 3	Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards 4  ($)
			Threshold	Target	Max	Threshold	Target	Max
Name	Grant Date	Approval Date	($)	($)	($)	(#)	(#)	(#)
Horacio D. Rozanski
Annual Incentive Plan		5/18/2021	—	1,500,000	—	—	—	—	—	—
Equity Incentive Plan	7/27/2021	7/27/2021	—	—	—	2,993,851	6,120,033	13,173,101	—	6,120,033
Equity Incentive Plan	5/20/2021	5/18/2021	—	—	—	—	—	—	2,380,068	2,380,068
Lloyd W. Howell, Jr.
Annual Incentive Plan		5/18/2021	—	500,000	—	—	—	—	—	—
Equity Incentive Plan	7/27/2021	7/27/2021	—	—	—	609,083	1,245,069	2,679,911	—	1,245,069
Equity Incentive Plan	5/20/2021	5/18/2021	—	—	—	—	—	—	830,037	830,037
Karen M. Dahut
Annual Incentive Plan		5/18/2021	—	500,000	—	—	—	—	—	—
Equity Incentive Plan	7/27/2021	7/27/2021	—	—	—	609,083	1,245,069	2,679,911	—	1,245,069
Equity Incentive Plan	5/20/2021	5/18/2021	—	—	—	—	—	—	830,037	830,037
Nancy J. Laben
Annual Incentive Plan		5/18/2021	—	475,000	—	—	—	—	—	—
Equity Incentive Plan	7/27/2021	7/27/2021	—	—	—	330,191	675,056	1,452,961	—	675,056
Equity Incentive Plan	5/20/2021	5/18/2021	—	—	—	—	—	—	450,017	450,017
Susan L. Penfield
Annual Incentive Plan		5/18/2021	—	425,000	—	—	—	—	—	—
Equity Incentive Plan	7/27/2021	7/27/2021	—	—	—	300,852	615,083	1,323,924	—	615,083
Equity Incentive Plan	5/20/2021	5/18/2021	—	—	—	—	—	—	410,054	410,054

(1)Reflects the target bonus for fiscal year 2022 under our Annual Incentive Plan, which provides awards based on the achievement of corporate performance objectives, payable in cash. The Annual Incentive Plan is described more fully under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Compensation Elements—Annual Cash Incentive.” Non-equity incentive plan awards have no minimum threshold or maximum payouts, although our plan does limit the annual amount of bonus an individual can earn to $5,000,000. The actual cash bonuses paid for fiscal year 2022 are reflected in the Summary Compensation Table.

(2)Reflects the target number of performance-based restricted stock units granted pursuant to the Equity Incentive Plan on July 27, 2021. The performance-based restricted stock units are based on the Company's performance against ADEPS (75% weighting) and VAR (25% weighting) and two non-financial metrics (10% upside) based on cumulative performance over a three-year period. The maximum payout for the performance-based restricted stock units is equal to 220% of target, and threshold payout is 50% of target. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Compensation Elements—Long-Term Equity Incentives" for details regarding these grants.

(3)Reflects the time-based restricted stock units granted pursuant to the Equity Incentive Plan on May 20, 2021, which vest in equal annual installments over three years based on the continued employment of the named executive officer. See "Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Compensation Elements—Long-Term Equity Incentives" for details regarding these grants.

(4)This column reflects the aggregate grant date fair value of the awards granted under our Equity Incentive Plan, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 using the valuation methodology and assumptions set forth in Note 18 to our financial statements for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2022, which are incorporated by reference herein.

44

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END TABLE
		Option Awards					Stock Awards
Name	Grant Date	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Exercisable (#)	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Unexercisable (#)1	Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options (#)	Option Exercise  Price ($)	Option Expiration Date	Number of  Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#) 2	Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($) 3	Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights that Have Not Vested (#) 4	Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights that Have Not Vested ($) 5
Horacio D. Rozanski	07/27/21						—	—	37,491	3,293,209
	05/20/21						19,336	1,698,474	—	—
	07/28/20						—	—	95,860	8,420,342
	05/20/20						6,258	549,703	—	—
	04/01/15	89,380	—	—	29.08	04/01/25	—	—	—	—
Lloyd W. Howell, Jr.	07/27/21						—	—	7,627	669,956
	05/20/21						6,744	592,393	—	—
	07/28/20						—	—	29,958	2,631,511
	05/20/20						3,353	294,528	—	—
	05/19/17	21,105	—	—	35.95	05/19/27	—	—	—	—
Karen M. Dahut	07/27/21						—	—	7,627	669,956
	05/20/21						6,744	592,393	—	—
	07/28/20						—	—	29,958	2,631,511
	05/20/20						3,353	294,528	—	—
	05/19/17	52,761	—	—	35.95	05/19/27	—	—	—	—
	05/23/13	45,000	—	—	18.35	05/23/23	—	—	—	—
Nancy J. Laben	07/27/21						—	—	4,135	363,218
	05/20/21						3,656	321,143	—	—
	07/28/20						—	—	15,578	1,368,372
	05/20/20						1,743	153,105	—	—
	11/14/18	18,552	4,641	—	51.22	11/14/28	—	—	—	—
	05/17/17	16,090	—		35.63	05/17/27	—	—	—	—
Susan L. Penfield	07/27/21						—	—	3,768	330,981
	05/20/21						3,332	292,683	—	—
	07/28/20						—	—	13,980	1,228,003
	05/20/20						1,565	137,470	—	—
	05/19/17	52,761	—	—	35.95	05/19/27	—	—	—	—

(1)The options were granted pursuant to the Equity Incentive Plan and will vest and become exercisable, subject to the continued employment of the named executive officer, on the dates set forth in the table below:

Name	Option Exercise Price	March 31, 2023	Total
Nancy J. Laben	51.22	4,641	4,641

Such options become fully vested and exercisable immediately prior to the effective date of certain change in control events.

(2)    The restricted stock units granted to the named executive officers will vest on the dates set forth in the table below:

Name	March 31, 2023	March 31, 2024	Total
Horacio D. Rozanski	15,926	9,668	25,594
Lloyd W. Howell, Jr.	6,724	3,373	10,097
Karen M. Dahut	6,724	3,373	10,097
Nancy J. Laben	3,571	1,828	5,399
Susan L. Penfield	3,230	1,667	4,897

Such restricted stock units become fully vested upon certain change in control events, unless otherwise determined by our Compensation, Culture and People Committee.

(3)    The market value reported in this column has been determined based on the fair market value of our common stock on March 31, 2022 of $87.84.

(4)    This column reflects the number of performance-based restricted stock units based on achievement of maximum performance, which is 200% of the target grant amount for fiscal year 2021, and for fiscal year 2022, threshold performance for the financial goals and target performance for the non-financial strategic goals, which is 55% of the total target grant amount, rounded down to the nearest whole share. The table below reflects the vesting opportunity for fiscal year 2021 and fiscal year 2022 performance-based restricted stock unit grants assuming achievement of target performance for the named executive officers.

45

Name	March 31, 2023	March 31, 2024	Total
Horacio D. Rozanski	47,930	68,167	116,097
Lloyd W. Howell, Jr.	14,979	13,868	28,847
Karen M. Dahut	14,979	13,868	28,847
Nancy J. Laben	7,789	7,519	15,308
Susan L. Penfield	6,990	6,851	13,841

    For fiscal year 2022 performance-based restricted stock unit grants, vesting opportunity ranges from 0-220% based on actual performance during the three-year performance period compared to the three-year cumulative ADEPS and VAR performance financial goals and two non-financial goals. Upon a change in control, the performance-based restricted stock units will remain outstanding and will vest on the vesting date at target performance levels, subject to the continued employment or service of the participant by the Company or any subsidiary thereof through such date, but without regard to achievement of any Performance Goals; provided, that, if the participant’s employment or service is terminated by the Company without cause or for good reason within two years following the effective date of the change in control, such outstanding restricted stock units will vest as of the date of termination.

(5)    The market value reported in this column has been determined based on maximum performance which is 200% of the target grant amount for fiscal year 2021, and for fiscal year 2022, threshold performance for the financial goals and target performance for the non-financial strategic goals, which is 55% of the total target grant amount, rounded down to the nearest whole share, using the fair market value of our common stock on March 31, 2022 of $87.84.

Option Exercises and Stock Vested Table

The table below provides information on vesting of the restricted stock units and exercise of the stock options of each of our named executive officers during fiscal year 2022:

OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED TABLE
	Option Awards		Stock Awards
Name	Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#)	Value Realized on Exercise 1 ($)	Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting 2 (#)	Value Realized on Vesting 3 ($)
Horacio D. Rozanski	—	—	127,171	10,708,047
Lloyd W. Howell, Jr.	—	—	43,163	3,646,863
Karen M. Dahut	45,000	3,546,859	43,163	3,646,863
Nancy J. Laben	8,103	506,300	22,521	1,903,067
Susan L. Penfield	—	—	20,234	1,709,888

(1)The value realized upon exercise is calculated based on the fair market value of our common stock at exercise less the exercise price of the option.

(2)Includes performance-based RSUs earned by our named executive officers in connection with the fiscal years 2020-2022 performance period that vested on March 31, 2022, and a portion of the time-based RSUs granted in previous fiscal years that vested on March 31, 2022.

(3)The value realized on vesting is calculated based on fair market value on the applicable vesting date of March 31, 2022 for time-based RSUs and May 17, 2022 for performance-based RSUs, respectively, multiplied by the number of shares of our common stock underlying such award.

Pension Benefits Table

The Officers’ Retirement Plan is an unfunded defined benefit retirement plan that we maintain for our executives. Under the Officers’ Retirement Plan, if an executive retires of his or her own volition (and is not entitled to severance) after a minimum of either (a) age 60 with five years of service as an executive, or (b) age 50 with 10 years of service as an executive, such executive will be entitled to receive a single lump sum retirement payment equal to $10,000 for each year of service as an executive, pro-rated as appropriate. As of fiscal year-end 2022, Messrs. Rozanski and Howell and Mses. Dahut, Laben, and Penfield are eligible to receive benefits under the Officers’ Retirement Plan upon retirement.

PENSION BENEFITS TABLE
Name	Plan Name	Number of Years Credited Service (#)	Present Value of Accumulated Benefits 1 ($)	Payments During  Last Fiscal Year ($)
Horacio D. Rozanski	Officers’ Retirement Plan	22.5	225,000	—
Lloyd W. Howell, Jr.	Officers’ Retirement Plan	21.5	215,000	—
Karen M. Dahut	Officers’ Retirement Plan	17.5	175,000	—
Nancy J. Laben	Officers’ Retirement Plan	8.5	85,000	—
Susan L. Penfield	Officers’ Retirement Plan	19.5	195,000	—

(1)The present value of accumulated benefits has been calculated in a manner consistent with our reporting of the Retired Officers’ Bonus Plan under FASB ASC 715-30, using the Accumulated Benefit Obligation with the exception of the retirement rate assumptions, as set forth in Note 14 to our financial statements for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2022, which are incorporated by reference herein. The amounts shown above reflect an assumption that each participant collects his or her benefit at the earliest age at which an unreduced benefit is available.

46

Potential Payments upon Termination or a Change in Control

Transition Pay

Consistent with our Transition Policy, which deals with departures other than retirement, resignation, death, disability, and terminations for cause, each named executive officer is eligible for transition pay equal to four months of base pay, plus one additional month for each year of service as an executive, up to a maximum of 12 months’ base pay. Under the terms of our Transition Policy and Retirement Policy, all departure payments and benefits are contingent upon the executives’ signing of a general release.

Retirement Benefits

Under our Officers' Retirement Plan, if our named executive officers retire, they will each be entitled to receive a single lump sum retirement payment equal to $10,000 for each year of service as an executive, pro-rated as appropriate, and an annual allowance of $4,000 for financial counseling and tax preparation assistance. They are also eligible for a one-time payment of $5,000 upon entering retirement for financial counseling expenses associated with developing a retirement financial strategy. In addition, each of our named executive officers and their eligible dependents will be entitled to receive the benefit of Company-paid retiree medical and dental coverage for life.

Treatment of Equity Awards

In addition, our Equity Incentive Plan and the award agreements governing the equity awards held by our named executive officers include provisions related to the treatment of the awards upon a termination of employment:

Death

In the event of a named executive officer’s termination of employment due to death, (i) unvested options immediately vest and remain outstanding until the first anniversary of the termination date, or if earlier, the option’s expiration date, (ii) unvested time-based restricted stock units and restricted stock immediately vest, and (iii) unvested performance-based restricted stock units immediately vest at target award levels.

Disability

In the event of a named executive officer’s termination of employment due to disability, (i) unvested options continue to vest on the normal schedule, and vested options will remain outstanding until the first anniversary of the termination date (or for options vesting after the termination date, the first anniversary of the vesting date), or if earlier, the option’s expiration date, (ii) unvested time-based restricted stock units and restricted stock continue to vest on the normal schedule, and (iii) unvested performance-based restricted stock units vest on the normal vesting date in a pro rata amount of the units that would have been earned and vested based on the actual achievement of the performance goals as if employment had not terminated (with the amount prorated based on the portion of the performance period that lapsed prior to the termination date).

Company Approved Departure

In the event of a named executive officer’s termination of employment by reason of a “Company approved departure” (as defined in the Equity Incentive Plan or applicable award agreement), (i) unvested options continue to vest on the normal schedule, and vested options remain outstanding until the 90th day following the termination date (or for options vesting after the termination date, the 90th day following the vesting date), or if earlier, the option’s expiration date, (ii) unvested time-based restricted stock units continue to vest on the normal schedule, and (iii) unvested performance-based restricted stock units vest on the normal vesting date in a pro rata amount of the units that would have been earned and vested based on the actual achievement of the performance goals as if employment had not terminated (with the amount prorated based on the portion of the performance period that lapsed prior to the termination date).

For Cause

In the event of a named executive officer’s termination of employment for cause (as defined in the applicable award agreement), all vested and unvested options, and all unvested time-based restricted stock units, restricted stock, and performance-based restricted stock units are immediately forfeited and canceled, effective as of the termination date.

47

Qualified Permanent Retirement

If a named executive officer’s employment is terminated by reason of a qualifying permanent retirement on or after March 31 of the first fiscal year of a performance period, unvested performance-based restricted stock units will continue to vest on the vesting date based on actual achievement of the performance goals as if employment had not terminated. In the event of a retirement occurring prior to March 31 of the first fiscal year of the performance period, or if at any time if the retirement is not a qualifying permanent retirement, all unvested performance-based restricted stock units will be immediately forfeited.

Any Other Termination

In the event of a named executive officer’s termination of employment for any reason other than death, disability, a Company approved departure, a qualified permanent retirement after the first fiscal year of a performance period (in the case of the performance-based restricted stock units), or cause, unvested options are immediately forfeited and canceled, and vested options remain outstanding until the 90th day following the termination date, or if earlier, the option’s expiration date, and unvested time-based restricted stock units and performance-based restricted stock units are immediately forfeited, in each case unless otherwise determined by our Compensation, Culture and People Committee.

Non-Competition Agreements

The named executive officers are party to agreements that include non-competition, non-solicitation, and non-recruitment covenants, which generally cover the period during which the executive is employed with us and for one year following termination of employment, along with perpetual confidentiality covenants. If the named executive officer breaches these agreements or otherwise engages in competitive activity as defined in the Equity Incentive Plan, the Company has the discretion to suspend vesting of all or a portion of any award and/or require the forfeiture or disgorgement to us of any equity award (including gains on the sale of the stock, if any) that vested, or was paid or settled, in the 12 months prior to, or any time after, such breach or the date the individual otherwise engaged in such competitive activity.

Change in Control Protections

We do not have change in control agreements with any of our employees.

Prior to May 2022, under the Equity Incentive Plan, and unless provided otherwise in an award agreement or determined by our Compensation, Culture and People Committee, if a change in control occurs, outstanding service-vesting options will vest immediately prior to the change in control and time-based restricted stock units will vest upon the change in control. In May 2022, our Compensation, Culture and People Committee, based on benchmarking analysis and input from Korn Ferry, approved revisions to the vesting terms in the prospective award agreements governing the options and time-based restricted stock units to provide that, in the event of a change in control, all such options and time-based restricted stock units shall remain outstanding and vest on the applicable vesting date, subject to the continued employment or service of the participant by the Company or any subsidiary thereof through such vesting date. If the participant’s employment or service is terminated by the Company without “cause” or for “good reason” (in each case, as defined in the applicable award agreement) within two years following the effective date of the change in control, then the outstanding options and time-based restricted stock units will vest as of the termination date.

With respect to performance-based restricted stock units, in the event of a change in control, an amount of restricted stock units equal to the target award will remain outstanding and will vest on the vesting date, subject to the continued employment or service of the participant but without regard to the achievement of any performance goals. If the participant's employment or service is terminated by the Company without “cause” or for “good reason” (in each case, as defined in the applicable award agreement) within two years following the effective date of the change in control, then the outstanding performance-based restricted stock units will vest (at target) as of the termination date.

In addition, if during the five-year period after a change in control our executives’ retiree medical plan is terminated or modified in a manner that is materially adverse to our executives, our executives, including our named executive officers, will be guaranteed their existing benefits under the plan during such five-year period and will receive a cash payment equal to the excess of the actuarial cost of the executive’s benefits under the plan that would be accrued on the Company’s financial statements on the fifth anniversary of the change in control in the absence of the termination or modification over the amount that is accrued on our financial statements on the fifth anniversary of the change in control after giving effect to the termination or modification (but excluding the accrual on the payment itself).

48

The following table presents potential payments to each named executive officer as if the named executive officer’s employment had been terminated or a change in control had occurred as of the last day of fiscal year 2022. If applicable, amounts in the table were calculated using $87.84, the closing fair market value of our common stock on March 31, 2022. The actual amounts that would be paid to any named executive officer can only be determined at the time of an actual termination of employment or change in control and would vary from those listed below. The estimated amounts listed below are in addition to any retirement, welfare, and other benefits that are available to our salaried employees generally.

	Severance Pay 1	Equity With Accelerated  Vesting 2	Retirement  Plan Benefits3	Death and Disability  Benefits		Continued Perquisites  and Benefits		Total
Name	($)	($)	($)	($)		($)		($)
Horacio D. Rozanski
Death	—	12,446,137	—	2,125,000	4	—		14,571,137
Disability	—	—	—	2,732,372	5	1,207,128	6	3,939,500
Involuntary Termination	1,500,000	—	—	—		30,000	7	1,530,000
Retirement 10	—	—	225,000	—		1,291,723	8	1,516,723
Voluntary Resignation	—	—	—	—		—		—
Termination for Cause	—	—	—	—		—		—
Change-In-Control	—	2,248,177	—	—		1,207,128	9	3,455,305
Involuntary Termination After Change-In-Control	—	10,197,960	—	—		—		10,197,960
Lloyd W. Howell, Jr.
Death	—	3,420,841	—	2,085,417	4	—		5,506,258
Disability	—	—	—	2,573,429	5	1,127,799	6	3,701,228
Involuntary Termination	1,025,000	—	—	—		30,000	7	1,055,000
Retirement 10	—	—	215,000	—		1,210,174	8	1,425,174
Voluntary Resignation	—	—	—	—		—		—
Termination for Cause	—	—	—	—		—		—
Change-In-Control	—	886,920	—	—		1,127,799	9	2,014,719
Involuntary Termination After Change-In-Control	—	2,533,920	—	—		—		2,533,920
Karen M. Dahut
Death	—	3,420,841	—	2,085,417	4	—		5,506,258
Disability	—	—	—	2,136,826	5	925,950	6	3,062,776
Involuntary Termination	1,025,000	—	—	—		30,000	7	1,055,000
Retirement 10	—	—	175,000	—		1,008,869	8	1,183,869
Voluntary Resignation	—	—	—	—		—		—
Termination for Cause	—	—	—	—		—		—
Change-In-Control	—	886,920	—	—		925,950	9	1,812,870
Involuntary Termination After Change-In-Control	—	2,533,920	—	—		—		2,533,920
Nancy J. Laben
Death	—	1,988,856	—	2,054,167	4	—		4,043,023
Disability	—	—	—	1,742,360	5	839,251	6	2,581,611
Involuntary Termination	650,000	—	—	—		30,000	7	680,000
Retirement 10	—	—	85,000	—		929,817	8	1,014,817
Voluntary Resignation	—	—	—	—		—		—
Termination for Cause	—	—	—	—		—		—
Change-In-Control	—	644,202	—	—		839,251	9	1,483,453
Involuntary Termination After Change-In-Control	—	1,344,655	—	—		—		1,344,655
Susan L. Penfield
Death	—	1,645,946	—	2,066,667	4	—		3,712,613
Disability	—	—	—	1,740,869	5	795,065	6	2,535,934
Involuntary Termination	800,000	—	—	—		30,000	7	830,000
Retirement 10	—	—	195,000	—		885,117	8	1,080,117
Voluntary Resignation	—	—	—	—		—		—
Termination for Cause	—	—	—	—		—		—
Change-In-Control	—	430,152	—	—		795,065	9	1,225,217
Involuntary Termination After Change-In-Control	—	1,215,793	—	—		—		1,215,793

(1)Each named executive officer is eligible for transition pay under our Transition Policy upon an involuntary termination equal to four months of base pay, plus one additional month for each year of service as an executive, up to a maximum of 12 months’ base pay.

(2)This column includes the value of the equity with accelerated vesting calculated using $87.84, the closing fair market value of our common stock on March 31, 2022. With respect to the performance-based restricted stock units, this column assumes the named executive officer was involuntarily terminated on the date of the change in control. The accelerated vesting for a change in control is described in more detail under “Change in Control Protections.” In the event of death, all outstanding service-vesting options and time-based restricted stock units immediately vest. Upon certain qualifying retirement events, the performance-based restricted stock units will be treated as described below in footnote 10 to this table.

(3)This column represents the benefits under the Officers’ Retirement Plan. The amounts have been calculated using the methodology and assumptions described in footnote 1 to the Pension Benefits Table above.

(4)Each named executive officer has a $2 million life insurance policy. If the death was accidental, an additional $1.5 million would be paid. Decedents' survivors also receive one month’s base pay.

49

(5)These amounts include the present value of disability insurance payments that cover up to 60% of base salary and bonus with a maximum benefit of $25,000 per month ($300,000 per year). These amounts were calculated by valuing the benefit as a standard annuity benefit based on the incidence of disability, using assumptions consistent with FASB ASC 715-30 and 715-60 accounting for our other benefit programs and, for the assumption of a rate of disability, the 1977 Social Security Disability Index table.

(6)These amounts include the actuarial present value of retiree medical benefits. The present value of accumulated benefits has been calculated in a manner consistent with our reporting of the Retired Officers’ Welfare Plan under FASB ASC 715-60, using the Accumulated Post-Retirement Benefit Obligation, with an adjustment made to retirement age assumptions as required by SEC regulations.

(7)These amounts include $30,000 in outplacement assistance.

(8)These amounts represent the actuarial present value of retiree medical benefits which were calculated as described in footnote 6 above. These amounts also include the actuarial present value of up to $4,000 per year for financial counseling assistance and were calculated with the same assumptions we use to disclose our Retired Officers’ Bonus Plan, consistent with FASB ASC 715-30, with an adjustment to the rate of retirement; the valuation is based on the discounted value of the full $4,000. These amounts also include a one-time retirement gift of $10,000, one-time reimbursement for $5,000 for retirement financial counseling for each named executive officer, as well as depreciated value of bestowed office furniture for Mses. Laben and Penfield.

(9)These amounts reflect the present value of the guaranteed benefits and cash payment of the actuarial cost of the executive’s benefits under the executives’ retiree medical plan, assuming that the plan was terminated during the five years following a change in control.

(10)If the named executive officer’s employment terminated on or after March 31, 2022 by reason of a “qualifying permanent retirement” (as defined in the applicable award agreement), outstanding unvested performance-based restricted stock units will be eligible to continue to vest on the vesting date, subject to and based on actual achievement of the performance goals. The estimated value of the continued vesting would be $10,197,960, $2,533,920, $2,533,920, $1,344,655, and $1,215,793 for Mr. Rozanski, Mr. Howell, Ms. Dahut, Ms. Laben, and Ms. Penfield, respectively, calculated based on the closing fair market value of our common stock on March 31, 2022 and assuming achievement of target performance levels. Upon retirement that at any time is not considered a qualifying permanent retirement, the outstanding unvested performance-based restricted stock units will be forfeited.

50

Pay Ratio

In accordance with Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K ("Item 402(u)"), we are providing the following estimated information for fiscal year 2022:

•the total annual compensation of the median employee was approximately $121,742, which we calculated using the same methodology we used to determine the annual total compensation of our named executive officers for fiscal year 2022 (as set forth in the Summary Compensation Table), and included base salary, employee bonuses and awards, the Company 401(k) plan match, and the Company-paid portion of the medical and dental benefits;

•the annual total compensation of our CEO, as reported in the Summary Compensation Table, was $11,866,337; and

•the ratio of the annual total compensation of our CEO to the median of the annual total compensation of all our employees (the "Pay Ratio") was approximately 98 to 1.

The Pay Ratio is a reasonable estimate calculated in a matter consistent with Item 402(u). Additionally, the rules for identifying the "median employee" and calculating the Pay Ratio allow companies to apply various methodologies and assumptions. As a result, the compensation for our median employee and the Pay Ratio reported by us should not be used as a comparison to the information reported by other companies.

Methodology for Identifying Our "Median Employee"

We determined that as of March 31, 2022 our total employee population consisted of approximately 29,540 individuals, including our CEO, and both full-time and part-time employees, of which approximately 28,559 were aligned to offices in the United States or U.S. jurisdictions, and 981 to offices in non-U.S. jurisdictions. As the population of employees located in non-U.S. jurisdictions accounts for less than 5% of our total workforce, we were able to rely on the de minimis exception permitted under Item 402(u) and exclude the non-U.S. population from our "median employee" calculation, which included employees located in Australia (2), Belgium (6), Costa Rica (1), Djibouti (3), Germany (400), Italy (21), Japan (101), Republic of Korea (74), Kosovo (1), Lebanon (9), Netherlands (12), Pakistan (39), Panama (1), Qatar (1), Romania (1), Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (9), Singapore (6), United Arab Emirates (118), and the United Kingdom (176). After excluding the non-U.S. population, our CEO, and employees on unpaid leave of absence for the full fiscal year 2022, the resulting adjusted employee population to be used for identifying our "median employee" was 28,497.

We compared the annual salary of our adjusted employee population as reflected in our human resources system of record. This measure was consistently applied to all individuals in the adjusted employee population. This analysis yielded our median salary which was common across 109 individuals. For these individuals, we performed a detailed analysis of the annual total compensation to identify our median employee, as discussed below.

Annual Total Compensation Determination

Upon identifying the 109 employees, we removed those who had compensation elements or employment events that were not representative of our broad employee population, such as tuition reimbursement, anniversary or recognition awards, and other unique forms of compensation, resulting in 71 employees. For the remaining population, we calculated annual total compensation using the same methodology we used for purposes of determining the annual total compensation of our named executive officers for fiscal year 2022 (as set forth in the Summary Compensation Table of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis). Specifically, in addition to the actual salary paid for fiscal year 2022, the calculation of total compensation for these employees also included Company-paid portions of health and wellness benefits and qualified retirement plan contributions. After reviewing these items, we sorted total compensation from low to high and selected the median employee.

51

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The Compensation, Culture and People Committee has reviewed and discussed the CD&A included in this proxy statement with members of management, and based on such review and discussions, the Compensation, Culture and People Committee recommended to the Board that the CD&A be included in this proxy statement.

THE COMPENSATION, CULTURE AND PEOPLE

COMMITTEE

Gretchen W. McClain (Chair)

Melody C. Barnes

Michèle A. Flournoy

Ian Fujiyama

52

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

The Audit Committee is composed of five directors identified below, each of whom is an independent director as defined by the applicable SEC rules and the NYSE listing standards. Four committee members, Mark E. Gaumond, Joan Amble, Ellen Jewett, and Charles O. Rossotti, have been designated by the Board as “audit committee financial experts” under applicable SEC rules. For further description of each committee member’s background and expertise, please refer to the director qualification section of our proxy statement beginning on page 8.

The Audit Committee is responsible for assisting the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities relating to, among other things, the Company’s accounting, auditing, and financial reporting processes, internal controls, compliance with legal and regulatory requirements and its code of ethics, and risk management, as discussed more fully in the Audit Committee charter, a copy of which is available on our website, www.boozallen.com. In accordance with its charter, the Audit Committee appoints the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, E&Y, subject to stockholder ratification, and conducts an annual review of its performance. In addition, the Audit Committee pre-approves all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by E&Y, and the fees for those services. The Audit Committee also oversees the Company’s internal audit function, including its annual audit plan, budget, and staffing. As part of its oversight role, the Audit Committee meets throughout the year, separately and together, with each of management, the Company's internal auditors, and E&Y.

Management has the primary responsibility for the Company's financial statements and accounting and reporting processes, including the systems of internal accounting control. E&Y is responsible for performing an independent audit of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”), and rendering opinions on whether the financial statements are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed with management of the Company and E&Y, the audited consolidated financial statements of the Company for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2022 (the “Audited Financial Statements”), and their assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. The Audit Committee also reviewed any significant audit findings identified by E&Y, and those identified by the Company's internal auditors as well as management's responses thereto. In addition, the Audit Committee discussed with E&Y the matters required to be discussed by the applicable requirements of the PCAOB and the SEC.

The Audit Committee has also: (i) considered whether non-audit services provided by E&Y are compatible with its independence; (ii) received the written disclosures and the letter from E&Y required by the applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding E&Y’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence; and (iii) discussed with E&Y its independence.

Based on the reviews and discussions described above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the Audited Financial Statements be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2022 for filing with the SEC.

THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

Mark E. Gaumond (Chair)

Joan Lordi C. Amble

Ellen Jewett

Arthur E. Johnson

Charles O. Rossotti

53

PRE-APPROVAL OF SERVICES BY
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Audit Committee pre-approves all audit, audit-related, tax, and other services performed by our independent auditors. The Audit Committee pre-approves specific categories of services up to pre-established fee thresholds. Unless the type of service had previously been pre-approved, the Audit Committee must approve that specific service before the independent auditors may perform it. In addition, separate approval is required if the amount of fees for any pre-approved category of service exceeds the fee thresholds established by the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee has delegated to the chair of the committee pre-approval authority with respect to permitted services, provided that the chair must report any pre-approval decisions to the Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting. All fees described below were pre-approved by the Audit Committee.

54

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FEES

The following table presents the Company’s fees for services performed by its principal accounting firm, E&Y, during fiscal years 2022 and 2021.

(Amounts in thousands)	2022		2021
Audit fees(1)	$	4,408	$	4,097
Audit-related fees(2)	104		223
Tax fees(3)	$	703	$	376
All other fees(4)	127		—
Total	$	5,342	$	4,696

(1)Audit fees principally include those for services related to the audit and quarterly reviews of the Company’s consolidated financial statements and consultation on accounting matters.

(2)Audit-related fees principally include those for services related to accounting consultations in connection with the Company’s implementation and operation of its new financial management systems.

(3)Tax fees principally include domestic and foreign tax compliance and advisory services.

(4)All other fees principally include non-audit services related to our implementation and operation of new financial management systems.

55

PROPOSAL 2: RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF ACCOUNTANTS

The Audit Committee has appointed E&Y as the independent auditors to perform an integrated audit of the Company for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2023. E&Y served as our independent auditors for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2022. Stockholder approval of the appointment is not required.

The Board believes that obtaining stockholder ratification of the appointment is a sound corporate governance practice. If the stockholders do not vote on an advisory basis in favor of E&Y, the Audit Committee will reconsider whether to hire the firm and may retain E&Y or hire another firm without resubmitting the matter for stockholders to approve. The Audit Committee retains the discretion at any time to appoint a different independent auditor.

Representatives of E&Y are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting, available to respond to appropriate questions, and will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire.

The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR ratification of the appointment of

Ernst & Young LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm

for the Company for fiscal year 2023.

56

PROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY VOTE ON COMPANY'S EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

As required by Section 14A of the Exchange Act, the Company is providing stockholders with a non-binding advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers, as disclosed in the CD&A, the accompanying compensation tables, and the related narrative disclosure in this proxy statement. Although this vote is advisory, the Board and the Compensation, Culture and People Committee value the opinions of our stockholders and will review and consider the voting results when making future compensation decisions for our named executive officers.

As described in detail in the CD&A, our compensation programs are designed to attract, motivate, and retain executives of outstanding ability to meet and exceed the demands of our clients, focus management on optimizing stockholder value and fostering an ownership culture, create appropriate rewards for outstanding performance and penalties for underperformance, and provide competitive rewards that foster collaboration by rewarding executives for their contribution to our overall performance and financial success while determining and allocating incentives based on our performance as a whole in recognition of the spirit and culture of collaboration that has defined us throughout our history. Accordingly, the Board submits the following resolution for a stockholder vote at the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders:

RESOLVED, that the stockholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers as disclosed in the CD&A, the accompanying compensation tables, and the related narrative disclosure in the Company’s proxy statement for the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the approval, on an advisory basis,

of the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in the

Compensation Discussion & Analysis of this proxy statement.

57

PROPOSAL 4: ADOPTION OF THE SIXTH AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

The Proposed Amendments

Our Board has authorized, and recommends for approval, the adoption of the Sixth Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to permit stockholders who hold not less than 25% of the outstanding shares of common stock of the Company to request that the Company call a special meeting of stockholders, subject to the requirements and procedures set forth in our bylaws (collectively, the “Amendments”).

In order for the proposal to be approved, it must receive the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Class A common stock entitled to vote. If the Sixth Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation is approved, the change will become effective upon the filing of an amendment and restatement to the Company’s certificate of incorporation with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware, in substantially the form of Appendix B attached hereto.

If the Amendments are adopted, our Fifth Amended and Restated Bylaws will also be amended to provide for additional requirements and limitations on the right of stockholders to request that a special meeting of stockholders be called, as described below. Stockholder approval is not required for the proposed amendments to our bylaws.

Reasons for the Proposed Amendments

Currently, under the Company’s Fifth Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, only the Board of Directors may call a special meeting of stockholders and stockholders are not permitted to request that a special meeting be called.

The Amendments, if approved by our stockholders, would provide that the Board of Directors is required to call a special meeting of the Company’s stockholders upon the written request of one or more stockholders who (i) own shares representing not less than 25% or more of the outstanding shares of common stock of the Company and (ii) satisfy the procedures for stockholder-requested special meetings, as set forth in our bylaws.

The ability of stockholders to call special meetings is increasingly considered an important aspect of good corporate governance. While the Board of Directors recognizes that providing a stockholder right to call special meetings is consistent with corporate governance best practices, the Board also believes that special meetings of stockholders should be extraordinary events that are held only when strategic concerns or other similar considerations require that the matters to be addressed not be delayed until the Company’s next annual meeting. Moreover, because special meetings are expensive and time-consuming for the Company and potentially disruptive to its normal business operations, the Board believes that a small percentage of stockholders should not be entitled to utilize the right to call a special meeting for their own interests, which may not be shared by a significant portion of the Company’s stockholders. Finally, the Company has an established process by which stockholders may communicate directly with the Board, including the non-management directors, throughout the year on any topics of interest to stockholders. The Board and the Company will continue to maintain existing governance mechanisms that afford management and the Board the ability to respond to the concerns of all stockholders, regardless of the level of stock ownership.

The Company also reminds stockholders that the power to call a special meeting of stockholders has historically been a tool for acquirers in the context of hostile mergers and acquisitions. Potential acquirers seeking to take over the Company for an inadequate price could use a special meeting of stockholders to increase their negotiating leverage or to avoid negotiating at all with the Board of Directors, which has the legal duty to protect the interests of all stockholders.

In light of these considerations, the Board of Directors believes that establishing an ownership threshold of not less than 25%, along with specified procedural requirements and limitations, for stockholders to call a special meeting achieves a reasonable balance between enhancing stockholder rights and adequately protecting the long-term interests of the Company and its stockholders. The Board believes that an ownership threshold of not less than 25% is appropriate based on the Company’s current size and stockholder composition, as it would provide the Company’s stockholders with a meaningful right to request a special meeting, while mitigating the risk that corporate resources are wasted to serve the narrow self-interests of a few minority stockholders. A special meeting threshold of not less than 25% is in line with market practice and, unlike a number of other companies, including some in our industry, stockholders would not be subject to a one-year holding period requirement with respect to ownership of their common stock in order to exercise this right.

Overview of Related Changes to the Bylaws

If the Amendments are approved, the Board of Directors expects to amend our bylaws to specify the procedures for and limitations on stockholder-requested special meetings. Set forth below is a summary of the amendments to our bylaws that the Board expects to adopt (the “Special Meeting Bylaw Provisions”).

58

Information Provisions

The Special Meeting Bylaw Provisions would require that any stockholder request to call a special meeting of stockholders must include certain specified information including, but not limited to, (i) a description of the business proposed to be conducted at the special meeting and the text of any such business or proposal, (ii) documentary evidence that such requesting stockholders own not less than 25% of the common stock of the Company as of the date of the request, and (iii) certain specified information, representations, and agreements required with respect to any director nominations or other business proposed to be presented at the special meeting.

Ownership Provisions

The Special Meeting Bylaw Provisions would provide that, when determining the 25% ownership threshold, a stockholder will be deemed to own only those shares of common stock where such person possesses both (i) the full voting and investment rights pertaining to such shares and (ii) the full economic interest in such shares, less any shares (1) sold in a transaction that has not been settled or closed, (2) borrowed for any purposes or purchased pursuant to an agreement to resell, or (3) subject to a derivative or similar agreement that would have the purpose or effect of reducing the full voting rights of such shares or hedging, offsetting or altering the full economic ownership of such shares. The Board of Directors believes that this definition of ownership is appropriate so that only stockholders with full and continuing interests and rights in our common stock would be entitled to request that a special meeting be called.

Additional Provisions

The Special Meeting Bylaw Provisions would include certain procedural requirements that the Board of Directors believes are appropriate to avoid duplicative or unnecessary special meetings. Under these provisions, a special meeting request would not be valid if it (i) relates to any item of business that (1) is the same as, or substantially similar to, any item of business that stockholders of the Company voted on at a meeting of stockholders that occurred within 120 days preceding the date of the special meeting request, or (2) is not a proper subject for stockholder action under applicable law, (ii) is received by the Company less than 90 days before the earlier of (1) the date of the Company’s next annual meeting of stockholders, to the extent such date has been publicly announced by the Company prior to the date of the special meeting request, and (2) the first anniversary of the preceding year’s annual meeting of stockholders, or (iii) does not comply with the requirements pertaining to special meeting requests set forth in our bylaws.

The Special Meeting Bylaw Provisions would provide that, if stockholders who requested a special meeting revoke the request or cease to own 25% of the outstanding shares of common stock, then such stockholders will be deemed to have withdrawn such special meeting request and the Board of Directors will have the discretion to determine whether or not to proceed with the special meeting, and there will be no requirement for the Board to call, or for the Company to hold, such special meeting.

The Special Meeting Bylaw Provisions would require that the business to be transacted at a stockholder-requested special meeting be limited to the purpose(s) stated in the stockholder meeting request received by the Company and any additional matters that the Board of Directors determines to include in the Company’s notice for such special meeting.

The Stockholder Proposal

As described below in Proposal 5, we have been notified that a stockholder intends to present a proposal for consideration at the Annual Meeting that also addresses stockholders’ ability to call special meetings of stockholders. Although the Amendments and the stockholder proposal concern similar subject matter, the terms and effects of each proposal differ. Stockholders may vote on both Proposal 4 and Proposal 5, and approval of one proposal is not conditioned on approval or disapproval of the other proposal. If both Proposal 4 and Proposal 5 are approved, the Board of Directors will implement the Amendments and adopt the Special Meeting Bylaw Provisions and will not act on the Stockholder Proposal. The Board will consider approval of the Amendments as supporting the implementation of the stockholder proposal, even if Proposal 5 is approved.

Neither the Amendments nor the stockholder proposal affect the Board of Director’s existing authority to call special meetings of stockholders.

You should carefully read the descriptions of each proposal and the Company’s statement in opposition to the stockholder proposal, in considering both proposals.

59

Required Vote and Recommendation

Approval of this proposal requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Class A common stock entitled to vote. As a result, abstentions and broker non-votes will have the same effect as negative votes.

The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the adoption of the Sixth Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to permit stockholders who hold not less than 25% of the outstanding shares of common stock of the Company to call special meetings.

60

PROPOSAL 5: STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL

The Company has been informed that John Chevedden, 2215 Nelson Avenue, No. 205, Redondo Beach, CA, 90278, a beneficial owner of shares of our Class A common stock having a minimum value as set forth in Rule 14a-8 of the Exchange Act allowing submission of proposals by stockholders meeting certain requirements, intends to present the proposal set forth below at our Annual Meeting (the “Stockholder Proposal”). The Stockholder Proposal will be voted on at the Annual Meeting only if properly presented by or on behalf of Mr. Chevedden. In accordance with federal securities laws, the proposed stockholder proposal is presented verbatim from his submission. The Company disclaims all responsibility for the content of the resolution and the supporting statement, including other sources referenced in the supporting statement.

For the reasons stated in the Board of Directors’ Statement in Opposition, which follows the Stockholder Proposal, the Board recommends that you vote “AGAINST” the Stockholder Proposal and instead approve the Company’s special meeting right proposal outlined in Proposal 4.

Stockholder Proposal

Proposal 5 – Shareholder Right to Call for a Special Shareholder Meeting

Shareholders ask our board to take the steps necessary to amend the appropriate company governing documents to give the owners of a combined 10% of our outstanding common stock the power to call a special shareholder meeting.

One of the main purposes of this proposal is to give shareholders the right to formally participate in calling for a special shareholder meeting regardless of their length of stock ownership to the fullest extent possible.

Special meetings allow shareholders to vote on important matters, such as electing new directors with special expertise or independence that may be lacking in our current or future directors as was the case with the 3 new Exxon directors supported by the Engine No. 1 hedge fund at the 2021 Exxon annual meeting.

A right to call a special shareholder meeting can trigger better performance by our directors even if this right is not used because directors will know that this right can be used if their performance falters.

Our management is best served by providing the means for 10% of shareholders, who may have special expertise, to bring emerging opportunities or solutions to problems to the attention of management and all shareholders.

Please vote yes:

Shareholder Right to Call for a Special Shareholder Meeting – Proposal 5

Board of Directors’ Statement in Opposition

The Board of Directors has carefully considered the Stockholder Proposal and believes that it is not in the best interests of the Company’s stockholders for the reasons outlined below. Accordingly, the Board recommends a vote “AGAINST” the Stockholder Proposal and a vote “FOR” the Company’s special meeting right proposal outlined in Proposal 4.

The proposed Amendments in Proposal 4, as compared to the Stockholder Proposal in this Proposal 5, are more consistent with market practice.

The Board of Directors recommends that the Company’s stockholders approve the Amendments described in Proposal 4, which would permit stockholders who hold not less than 25% of the outstanding shares of common stock of the Company to call a special meeting of stockholders. A 25% ownership threshold is consistent with market practice. As of May 6, 2022, approximately 50% of the companies included in the S&P 500 and approximately 54% of the companies included in the Russell 1000 that afford stockholders the right to request a special meeting have set the ownership threshold for such a right at 25% or greater. The Stockholder Proposal, however, asks the Board to take steps to allow stockholders who hold at least 10% of our outstanding common stock to call a special meeting, which only approximately 24% of S&P 500 and approximately 26% of Russell 1000 companies that afford stockholders the right to request a special meeting have adopted. In addition, unlike a number of other companies, including some in our industry, under the proposed Amendments in Proposal 4, stockholders would not be subject to a one-year holding period requirement with respect to ownership of their common stock in order to exercise this right.

61

The Company’s special meeting right proposal outlined in Proposal 4, as compared to the Stockholder Proposal in this Proposal 5, better protects the long-term interests of the Company and its stockholders and provides a procedural safeguard against abuse, corporate waste, and investors with short-term goals.

The Board of Directors recognizes that providing stockholders the ability to request special meetings is viewed by some stockholders as an important corporate governance practice. However, special meetings of stockholders can be potentially disruptive to business operations and to long-term stockholder interests and can cause the Company to incur substantial expenses. Our Board members, management and employees must devote a significant amount of time and attention to preparing for a special meeting, which detracts from their primary focus of operating our business in the best interests of stockholders. In addition, with each special meeting, we must incur significant expenses in order to prepare the required disclosures, print and distribute materials, solicit proxies and tabulate votes. Accordingly, the Board believes that special meetings of the stockholders should be extraordinary events.

The Board of Directors believes that allowing stockholders who hold not less than 25% of the outstanding shares of common stock of the Company to call a special meeting of stockholders achieves a reasonable balance between enhancing stockholder rights and adequately protecting the long-term interests of the Company and its stockholders. A lower 10% ownership threshold will risk giving a stockholder or small group of stockholders a disproportionate amount of influence over the Company’s affairs. The proposed Amendments as set forth in Proposal 4 strike the appropriate balance between ensuring that stockholders have the ability to call a special meeting to act on extraordinary and urgent matters and adequately protecting against a misuse of this right by one stockholder or a small number of stockholders whose interests may not be aligned with the remaining 90% of our stockholders. Failure to aggregate sufficient stock ownership to reach the 25% ownership threshold is a strong indicator that sufficient interest among the majority of stockholders does not exist to call a special meeting.

The proposed Amendments also serve as a protective mechanism against investors with short-term goals. Event-driven hedge funds or other activists may pursue a special meeting with the goal of proposing matters that facilitate their own short-term exit strategies over the long-term interests of the rest of our stockholders. A 25% special meeting threshold ensures that a special meeting may only be called by a stockholder or group of stockholders with a substantial stake in our Company. The proposed Amendments appropriately safeguard stockholder interests and prevent corporate waste, while at the same time ensuring that stockholders have the ability to call special meetings when appropriate.

We are committed to strong and effective corporate governance policies and practices and provide sufficient avenues for stockholders to meaningfully engage in Company affairs.

Our existing governance policies and practices provide stockholders with numerous avenues to address and discuss our business and governance policies with the Board of Directors and ensure that our Board acts independently and maintains accountability to our stockholders. This includes the following:

•ten of our 11 directors are independent, and the Audit, Compensation, Culture and People, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees are 100% independent;

•we provide for a majority voting standard in our bylaws for the election of directors in uncontested elections, with the requirement that any incumbent director nominee who does not receive a majority of the votes validly cast in an uncontested election tender his or her resignation, subject to acceptance by the Board;

•our certificate of incorporation and bylaws do not contain provisions requiring more than a majority stockholder vote on any issue;

•we have a diverse Board in terms of gender, ethnicity, experience, tenure, and skills, and 73% of our Board of Directors is gender and/or racially diverse;

•effective as of the 2023 annual meeting of stockholders, our Board will be fully declassified and each of our directors will be elected annually;

•our Board and senior leadership exercise oversight in respect of ESG matters;

•the Board holds regular executive sessions of non-management directors;

•the Board conducts an annual discussion on management succession planning, with support provided by the Compensation, Culture and People Committee;

•our equity awards include a provision for the recoupment of equity-based compensation in the event of misconduct leading to a financial restatement;

62

•our Investor Relations team and management regularly engage with current and potential stockholders;

•we do not have a poison pill in place;

•we adhere to robust executive officer and director stock ownership guidelines;

•we conduct annual Board and committee evaluations and self-assessments; and

•we adhere to a sound policy on public company board service to ensure a director's ability to devote necessary time to serve on our Board.

In addition, we strive to maintain an open dialogue with our stockholders and believe investor input enables the Board of Directors to more effectively evaluate our governance practices. Our Board and management have found this engagement constructive and informative, and we plan to continue these engagement efforts.

Conclusion

In light of our existing policies and practices and the Company’s special meeting right proposal outlined in Proposal 4, the Board of Directors believes that the approval of the Stockholder Proposal is not consistent with market practice and will not make a meaningful difference in our stockholders’ ability to engage with the Board or influence our business or governance policies, but will risk giving a small group of stockholders a disproportionate amount of influence over the Company’s affairs. Accordingly, the Board does not believe that it is in the best interests of the Company or its stockholders to approve the Stockholder Proposal.

Required Vote and Recommendation

Approval of this proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting represented either in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting.

For these reasons, the Board of Directors recommends a vote AGAINST the Stockholder Proposal.

63

OTHER BUSINESS

The Board is not aware of any other matters to be presented at the Annual Meeting. If any other matter proper for action at the meeting should be presented, the holders of the accompanying proxy will vote the shares represented by the proxy on such matter in accordance with their best judgment. If any matter not proper for action at the meeting should be presented, the holders of the proxy will vote against consideration of the matter or the proposed action.

By order of the Board of Directors,

Jacob D. Bernstein

Secretary

McLean, Virginia

June 16, 2022

64

IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT ANNUAL MEETING AND PROXY PROCEDURES

The Board is soliciting proxies to be used at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held virtually on July 27, 2022, beginning at 8:00 a.m. (EDT) at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/BAH2022.

Why am I receiving these proxy materials?

You have received these proxy materials because our Board is soliciting your proxy to vote your shares at the Annual Meeting. As a stockholder, you are invited to attend the Annual Meeting and are requested to vote on the items of business described in this proxy statement. This proxy statement includes information that we are required to provide to you under SEC rules, and describes issues on which we would like you to vote at our Annual Meeting. It also gives you information on these issues so that you can make an informed decision. The proxy materials include our proxy statement for the Annual Meeting, our annual report to stockholders, which includes our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2022 and the proxy card, or a voting instruction card, for the Annual Meeting.

Our Board has made this proxy statement and proxy card available to you on the Internet because you own shares of Class A common stock of the Company.

If you submit a proxy by using the Internet, by calling, or by signing and returning the proxy card, you will appoint Horacio D. Rozanski, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Nancy J. Laben, Executive Vice President and Chief Legal Officer, (with full power of substitution) as your representatives at the Annual Meeting. He or she will vote your shares at the Annual Meeting as you have instructed them or, if an issue that is not on the proxy card comes up for vote, in accordance with his or her best judgment. By submitting a proxy, you can ensure your shares will be voted whether or not you attend the Annual Meeting. Even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we encourage you to submit a proxy in advance by using the Internet, by calling, or by signing and returning your proxy card. If you vote by Internet or by calling, you do not need to return your proxy card.

Why did I receive a one-page notice in the mail regarding the Internet availability of proxy materials instead of a full set of proxy materials?

Pursuant to the "Notice and Access" rules adopted by the SEC, we have elected to provide access to our proxy materials over the Internet at www.proxyvote.com. Accordingly, we are sending a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials to our stockholders. All stockholders will have the ability to access the proxy materials on the website referred to in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, or request to receive an electronic copy or printed set of the proxy materials. Instructions on how to access the proxy materials over the Internet or to request an electronic copy or printed copy may be found in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials. In addition, stockholders may request to receive proxy materials in printed form by mail or electronically by email on an ongoing basis by submitting a request in writing to our Secretary at Booz Allen Hamilton, 8283 Greensboro Drive, McLean, Virginia 22102. We encourage stockholders to take advantage of the availability of proxy materials on the Internet to help reduce the environmental impact and cost of the Annual Meeting.

How can I sign up for the electronic proxy delivery service?

You can elect to receive an email that provides a link to our future proxy materials on the Internet. The proxy card or the instructions that accompanied your proxy materials will contain instructions on how to request electronic delivery of future proxy materials. Choosing to receive your future proxy materials by email will eliminate the cost of printing and mailing documents and will reduce the associated environmental impact. If you choose to receive future proxy materials by email, you will receive an email next year with instructions containing a link to those materials and a link to the proxy voting site. Your election to receive proxy materials by email will remain in effect until you terminate it.

How do I attend and participate in the virtual Annual Meeting?

You will be able to virtually attend the Annual Meeting by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/BAH2022. Although it will be a virtual-only meeting, the Company wants to assure its stockholders of its commitment to ensuring that the Annual Meeting provides its stockholders with the same rights and opportunities to participate as in an in-person meeting, including the ability to ask questions of the Board and management.

To participate in the Annual Meeting, you will need the control number located on your proxy card or the instructions that accompanied your proxy materials. The Annual Meeting will begin promptly at 8:00 a.m. Eastern Time on July 27, 2022.

65

We encourage you to access the virtual meeting website prior to the start time. Online check-in will begin at 7:45 a.m. Eastern Time, and you should allow ample time to ensure your ability to access the meeting.

You may submit a question during the meeting by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/BAH2022 and following the instructions on the website. The Company will post responses to questions relevant to meeting matters that are not answered during the Annual Meeting due to time constraints on the Company's Investor Relations portion of its website, www.boozallen.com, as soon as practicable after the Annual Meeting. The Chair of the meeting has broad authority to conduct the Annual Meeting in an orderly manner, including establishing rules of conduct. A copy of the rules of conduct will be available online at the Annual Meeting.

In addition, the Company will have technicians ready beginning fifteen minutes prior to the meeting to assist participating stockholders with any technical difficulties they may have accessing the virtual meeting. If participating stockholders encounter any difficulties accessing the virtual meeting during check-in or the meeting, they may call the technical support number that will be posted on the virtual meeting platform log-in page.

Who is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting?

Holders of the Company’s Class A common stock are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. The Board has established the record date for the Annual Meeting as June 6, 2022. Only holders of record of the Company’s Class A common stock on the record date are entitled to receive notice of the meeting and to vote at the meeting.

How many shares must be present to hold the Annual Meeting?

In order for us to lawfully conduct business at the Annual Meeting, the holders of stock representing a majority of the voting power of all shares issued and outstanding and entitled to vote at the meeting must be present in person at the Annual Meeting or represented by proxy. This is referred to as a quorum. Stockholders who attend the Annual Meeting online at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/BAH2022 will be deemed to be in person attendees for purposes of determining if a quorum has been met. If a quorum is present, we can hold the Annual Meeting and conduct business.

How many shares may I vote?

On June 6, 2022, 132,359,541 shares of our Class A common stock were outstanding. Each share of Class A common stock is entitled to one vote, and stockholders do not have the right to cumulate their votes for the election of directors.

What am I voting on and what are the Board’s recommendations?

Proposal	Description	Board's Voting Recommendation	Page Reference
No. 1	Election of seven director nominees	FOR each nominee	8
No. 2	Ratification of appointment of E&Y as the Company's independent registered accounting firm for fiscal year 2023	FOR	56
No. 3	A non-binding advisory vote on the compensation program for the Company’s named executive officers, as disclosed in the CD&A of the proxy statement	FOR	57
No. 4	Approval of the adoption of the Sixth Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to permit stockholders who hold not less than 25% of the outstanding shares of common stock to call special meetings	FOR	58
No. 5	If properly presented at the Annual Meeting, a non-binding advisory vote on a stockholder proposal	AGAINST	61

What is the difference between holding shares as a stockholder of record and as a beneficial owner?

If your shares are registered directly in your name with the Company’s registrar and transfer agent, Computershare, you are considered a “stockholder of record” with respect to those shares. In this case, we are sending the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials to you directly.

If your shares are held in a brokerage account or bank, you are considered the “beneficial owner” of those shares, which are held in “street name.” In this case, the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials will be forwarded to you by your broker or bank. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker or bank how to vote your shares by following the voting instructions noted below.

66

What is the procedure for voting?

If you are a stockholder of record of Class A common stock, you can vote your shares at the Annual Meeting by attending the virtual meeting using the control number located on your proxy card, or the instructions that accompanied your proxy materials and submitting an electronic ballot, or you can give a proxy to be voted at the Annual Meeting in one of three ways: (1) over the telephone by calling a toll-free number provided on the enclosed proxy card, (2) electronically via the Internet as described in the enclosed proxy card, or (3) date, sign, and complete the proxy card and return it in the enclosed envelope, which requires no postage stamp if mailed in the United States.

If you are a beneficial owner of Class A common stock, you must obtain a proxy, executed in your favor, from the stockholder of record to be able to vote virtually at the Annual Meeting. You can vote your shares at the Annual Meeting by attending the virtual meeting using the control number located on your proxy card, or the instructions that accompanied your proxy materials and submitting an electronic ballot, or you can give a proxy to be voted at the Annual Meeting in one of three ways: (1) over the telephone by calling a toll-free number provided on the enclosed proxy card, (2) electronically via the Internet as described in the enclosed proxy card, or (3) date, sign, and complete the proxy card and return it in the enclosed envelope, which requires no postage stamp if mailed in the United States.

Can I change my proxy?

You may revoke your proxy before it is voted at the Annual Meeting by delivering a signed revocation letter to the Secretary of the Company at 8283 Greensboro Drive, McLean, Virginia 22102, or by submitting a new proxy, dated later than your first proxy, in one of the ways described in the answer to the previous question. If you are virtually attending the Annual Meeting, you may revoke your proxy by virtually attending the Annual Meeting and voting during the Annual Meeting. Virtual attendance at the Annual Meeting will not by itself revoke a proxy.

Can other matters be decided at the Annual Meeting?

The Board is not aware of any other matters to be presented at the Annual Meeting. If any other matter proper for action at the meeting should be presented, the holders of the accompanying proxy will vote the shares represented by the proxy on such matter in accordance with their best judgment. If any matter not proper for action at the meeting should be presented, the holders of the proxy will vote against consideration of the matter or the proposed action.

What is the vote required for each proposal?

For proposal 1, each of the directors shall be elected by a majority of the votes validly cast at the Annual Meeting. For proposals 2, 3, and 5, approval of the proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting represented either in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting. For proposal 4, approval requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Class A common stock entitled to vote.

What if I am a stockholder of record and do not provide voting instructions when returning a proxy?

Stockholders should specify their choice for each matter on the proxy card. Proxies that are signed and returned but do not contain voting instructions will be voted:

•FOR the election of all director nominees as set forth in this proxy statement;

•FOR the ratification of the appointment of E&Y as the Company's independent registered accounting firm for fiscal year 2023;

•FOR the approval, on a non-binding, advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers;

•FOR the approval of the adoption of the Sixth Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to permit stockholders who hold not less than 25% of the outstanding shares of common stock to call special meetings; and

•AGAINST the approval, on a non-binding, advisory basis, of the stockholder proposal.

What if I am a beneficial owner and do not give voting instructions to my broker?

If your shares are held by a broker in “street name,” your brokerage firm may vote your shares on certain “routine” matters if you do not provide voting instructions. The ratification of an independent registered public accounting firm is an example of a routine matter. If you do not provide voting instructions, your brokerage firm may either vote your shares on routine matters or leave your shares unvoted. When a brokerage firm votes its customers' shares on a routine matter without receiving voting instructions, these shares are counted both for establishing a quorum to conduct business at the meeting and

67

in determining the number of shares voted for or against the routine matter. A brokerage firm cannot vote your shares on non-routine matters, such as the election of directors, advisory vote on executive compensation, approval of the Sixth Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, and advisory vote on the stockholder proposal. If your brokerage firm has not received voting instructions on a non-routine matter, these shares will be considered “broker non-votes” to the extent that the brokerage firm submits a proxy.

How are abstentions and broker non-votes counted?

Abstentions will be treated as present for purposes of determining a quorum but will not be included in vote totals. Abstentions will have the effect of a vote “against” each of the proposals, other than for the election of directors whereby abstentions will not affect the outcome.

Broker non-votes are counted for purposes of establishing a quorum. Broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the non-routine proposals, except for the approval of the Sixth Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation whereby a broker non-vote would have the effect of a vote "against" the proposal. For the routine proposal, the ratification of an independent registered public accounting firm, discretionary voting by a broker is permitted.

Who will count the votes?

A representative from Broadridge Financial Services will tabulate the votes and the results will be certified by the inspector of election.

Who will bear the costs of soliciting votes for the Annual Meeting?

The Company will bear all costs of soliciting proxies. Pursuant to rules adopted by the SEC, we have elected to deliver a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials to you and make the proxy materials available via the Internet at www.proxyvote.com, which may be accessed using the control number located on each proxy card. We have retained the services of Morrow Sodali LLC to assist in the solicitation of proxies for the Annual Meeting. The estimated cost of such services is $12,500, plus reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in the process of soliciting proxies.

When will the Company announce the voting results?

The preliminary voting results will be announced at the Annual Meeting. The Company will report the final results on our website, www.boozallen.com, and in a Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC.

Can I receive a copy of the Annual Report?

The annual report of the Company on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2022 is being furnished concurrently with this proxy statement to persons who were stockholders of record as of June 6, 2022, the record date for the Annual Meeting.

What is “householding” and how does it affect me?

In some cases, stockholders holding their shares in a brokerage or bank account who share the same surname and address and have not given contrary instructions are receiving only one copy of our annual report on Form 10-K and this proxy statement. This reduces the volume of duplicate information received at your household and helps to reduce the environmental impact and cost of our Annual Meeting. If you would like to have additional copies of these documents mailed to you, please write or call our Secretary at 8283 Greensboro Drive, McLean, Virginia 22102, telephone: (703) 902-5000. If you want to receive separate copies of the proxy statement, annual report on Form 10-K, or Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, as applicable, in the future, or if you are receiving multiple copies and would like to receive only one copy per household, you should contact your bank, broker, or other nominee record holder.

How do I submit a proposal for action at the annual of meeting of stockholders in 2023?

Under applicable SEC rules and regulations (including SEC Rule 14a-8), the Company will review for inclusion in next year’s proxy statement stockholder proposals received by February 16, 2023. Proposals should be sent to the Secretary of the Company at 8283 Greensboro Drive, McLean, Virginia 22102.

Pursuant to our Fifth Amended and Restated Bylaws, stockholder proposals not included in next year’s proxy statement may be brought before the 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders by a stockholder of the Company who is entitled to vote at the meeting, who has given a written notice to the Secretary of the Company at 8283 Greensboro Drive, McLean, Virginia 22102 containing certain information specified in the bylaws and who was a stockholder of record at the time such notice was given and at the date of the 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Such notice must be delivered to or mailed and received at

68

the address in the preceding paragraph no earlier than March 30, 2023 and no later than April 29, 2023, except that if the date of the 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is changed, and the meeting is held before June 27, 2023 or after October 5, 2023, such notice must be delivered at the address in the preceding paragraph no earlier than 120 days prior to the new date of such annual meeting and not later than the close of business on the later of (i) the ninetieth day prior to the new date of such annual meeting and (ii) the tenth day following the day on which a public announcement of the new date of such annual meeting is first made.

69

Appendix A

Non-GAAP Measures

We publicly disclose certain non-GAAP financial measurements, including Revenue, Excluding Billable Expenses, Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA Margin on Revenue, Adjusted EBITDA Margin on Revenue, Excluding Billable Expenses, Adjusted Net Income, and Adjusted Diluted Earnings Per Share, or Adjusted Diluted EPS, because management uses these measures for business planning purposes, including to manage our business against internal projected results of operations and measure our performance. We view Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA Margin on Revenue, Adjusted EBITDA Margin on Revenue, Excluding Billable Expenses, Adjusted Net Income, and Adjusted Diluted EPS as measures of our core operating business, which exclude the impact of the items detailed below, as these items are generally not operational in nature. These non-GAAP measures also provide another basis for comparing period to period results by excluding potential differences caused by non-operational and unusual or non-recurring items. In addition, we use Revenue, Excluding Billable Expenses because it provides management useful information about the Company's operating performance by excluding the impact of costs that are not indicative of the level of productivity of our consulting staff headcount and our overall direct labor, which management believes provides useful information to our investors about our core operations. We also utilize and discuss Free Cash Flow because management uses this measure for business planning purposes, measuring the cash generating ability of the operating business, and measuring liquidity generally. We present these supplemental measures because we believe that these measures provide investors and securities analysts with important supplemental information with which to evaluate our performance, long term earnings potential, or liquidity, as applicable, and to enable them to assess our performance on the same basis as management. These supplemental performance measurements may vary from and may not be comparable to similarly titled measures by other companies in our industry. Revenue, Excluding Billable Expenses, Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA Margin on Revenue, Adjusted EBITDA Margin on Revenue, Excluding Billable Expenses, Adjusted Net Income, Adjusted Diluted EPS, and Free Cash Flow are not recognized measurements under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, or GAAP, and when analyzing our performance or liquidity, as applicable, investors should (i) evaluate each adjustment in our reconciliation of revenue to Revenue, Excluding Billable Expenses, net income to Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA Margin on Revenue, Adjusted EBITDA Margin on Revenue, Excluding Billable Expenses, Adjusted Net Income, and Adjusted Diluted EPS, and net cash provided by operating activities to Free Cash Flow, and the explanatory footnotes regarding those adjustments, each as defined under GAAP, (ii) use Revenue, Excluding Billable Expenses, Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA Margin on Revenue, Adjusted EBITDA Margin on Revenue, Excluding Billable Expenses, Adjusted Net Income, and Adjusted Diluted EPS in addition to, and not as an alternative to, revenue, net income, or diluted EPS, as measures of operating results, and (iii) use Free Cash Flow in addition to, and not as an alternative to, net cash provided by operating activities as a measure of liquidity, each as defined under GAAP. We have defined the aforementioned non-GAAP measures as follows:

•"Revenue, Excluding Billable Expenses" represents revenue less billable expenses. We use Revenue, Excluding Billable Expenses because it provides management useful information about the Company's operating performance by excluding the impact of costs that are not indicative of the level of productivity of our consulting staff headcount and our overall direct labor, which management believes provides useful information to our investors about our core operations.

•"Adjusted EBITDA" represents net income before income taxes, net interest and other expense and depreciation and amortization and before certain other items, including acquisition and divestiture costs, financing transaction costs, supplemental employee benefits due to COVID-19, and restructuring costs. “Adjusted EBITDA Margin on Revenue” is calculated as Adjusted EBITDA divided by revenue. "Adjusted EBITDA Margin on Revenue, Excluding Billable Expenses" is calculated as Adjusted EBITDA divided by Revenue, Excluding Billable Expenses. The Company prepares Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA Margin on Revenue, and Adjusted EBITDA Margin on Revenue, Excluding Billable Expenses to eliminate the impact of items it does not consider indicative of ongoing operating performance due to their inherent unusual, extraordinary or non-recurring nature or because they result from an event of a similar nature.

•"Adjusted Net Income" as presented herein, represents net income before: (i) acquisition and divestiture costs, (ii) financing transaction costs, (iii) supplemental employee benefits due to COVID-19, (iv) significant acquisition amortization, (v) restructuring costs, (vi) gain associated with equity method investment activity, (vii) research and development tax credits, (viii) release of income tax reserves, (ix) loss on debt extinguishment, (x) remeasurement of deferred tax assets/liabilities, and (xi) amortization or write-off of debt issuance costs and debt discount, in each case net of the tax effect where appropriate calculated using an assumed effective tax rate. We prepare Adjusted Net Income to eliminate the impact of items, net of tax, we do not consider indicative of ongoing operating performance due to their inherent unusual, extraordinary, or non-recurring nature or because they result from an event of a

A - 1

similar nature. We view net income excluding the impact of the re-measurement of the Company's deferred tax assets and liabilities as an important indicator of performance consistent with the manner in which management measures and forecasts the Company's performance and the way in which management is incentivized to perform.

•“Adjusted Diluted EPS” as presented herein, represents diluted EPS calculated using Adjusted Net Income, as presented herein, as opposed to net income. Additionally, Adjusted Diluted EPS does not contemplate any adjustments to net income as required under the two-class method as disclosed in the footnotes to the consolidated financial statements.

•“Free Cash Flow” represents the net cash generated from operating activities less the impact of purchases of property, equipment, and software.

A - 2

Below is a reconciliation of Revenue, Excluding Billable Expenses, Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA Margin on Revenue, Adjusted EBITDA Margin on Revenue, Excluding Billable Expenses, Adjusted Net Income, Adjusted Diluted EPS, and Free Cash Flow to the most directly comparable financial measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP.

	Fiscal Year Ended March 31,
(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)	2022				2021			2020
	(Unaudited)
Revenue, Excluding Billable Expenses
Revenue	$	8,363,700			$	7,858,938		$	7,463,841
Billable Expenses	2,474,163				2,325,888			2,298,413
Revenue, Excluding Billable Expenses	$	5,889,537			$	5,533,050		$	5,165,428
EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA Margin on Revenue & Adjusted EBITDA Margin on Revenue, Excluding Billable Expenses
Net income	$	466,577			$	608,958		$	482,603
Income tax expense	137,466				53,481			96,831
Interest and other, net (a)	81,138				91,932			89,768
Depreciation and amortization	145,747				84,315			81,081
EBITDA	830,928			830928000	838,686			750,283
Acquisition and divestiture costs (b)	97,485				411			—
Financing transaction costs (c)	2,348				—			1,069
COVID-19 supplemental employee benefits (d)	—				577			2,722
Restructuring costs (e)	4,164				—			—
Adjusted EBITDA	$	934,925			$	839,674		$	754,074
Adjusted EBITDA Margin on Revenue	11.2		%		10.7		%	10.1		%
Adjusted EBITDA Margin on Revenue, Excluding Billable Expenses	15.9		%		15.2		%	14.6		%
Adjusted Net Income
Net income	$	466,577			$	608,958		$	482,603
Acquisition and divestiture costs (b)	97,485				411			—
Financing transaction costs (c)	2,348				—			1,069
COVID-19 supplemental employee benefits (d)	—				577			2,722
Significant acquisition amortization (f)	38,295				—			—
Restructuring costs (e)	4,164				—			—
Gain associated with equity method investment activities (g)	(12,761)				—			—
Research and development tax credits (h)	—				(2,928)			(38,395)
Release of income tax reserves (i)	—				(29)			(68)
Loss on debt extinguishment (j)	—				13,239			—
Remeasurement of deferred tax assets/liabilities (k)	—				(76,767)			—
Amortization or write-off of debt issuance costs and debt discount	3,340				2,402			2,395
Adjustments for tax effect (l)	(31,399)				(4,324)			(1,608)
Adjusted Net Income	$	568,049			$	541,539		$	448,718
Adjusted Diluted Earnings Per Share
Weighted-average number of diluted shares outstanding	134,850,808				138,703,220			141,238,135
Adjusted Net Income Per Diluted Share (m)	$	4.21			$	3.90		$	3.18
Free Cash Flow
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	736,526			$	718,684		$	551,428
Less: Purchases of property, equipment and software	(79,964)				(87,210)			(128,079)
Free Cash Flow	$	656,562			$	631,474		$	423,349

(a)Reflects the combination of Interest expense and Other income (expense), net from the consolidated statement of operations.

(b)Represents costs associated with the acquisition and divestiture efforts of the Company related to transactions for which the Company has entered into a letter of intent to either acquire a controlling financial interest in the target entity or divest a portion of our business. Acquisition and divestiture costs primarily include costs associated with (i) buy-side and sell-side due diligence activities, (ii) compensation expenses associated with employee retention, and (iii) legal and advisory fees, primarily associated with the acquisitions of Liberty IT Solutions, LLC ("Liberty"), Tracepoint Holdings, LLC ("Tracepoint") and EverWatch Corp, as well as the planned divestiture of our management consulting business serving the Middle East and North Africa.

(c)Reflects expenses associated with debt financing activities incurred during the first quarter of fiscal 2022.

(d)Represents the supplemental contribution to employees' dependent care FSA accounts in response to COVID-19.

A - 3

(e)Represents restructuring charges of $8.3 million incurred during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2022, net of approximately $4.2 million of revenue recognized on recoverable expenses, associated with severance costs of a restructuring plan to reduce certain executive administrative personnel costs.

(f)Amortization expense associated with acquired intangibles from significant acquisitions. Significant acquisitions include acquisitions which the Company considers to be beyond the scope of our normal operations. Significant acquisition amortization includes amortization expense associated with the acquisition of Liberty in the first quarter of fiscal 2022.

(g)Represents (i) a gain in the second quarter of fiscal 2022 associated with the Company's previously held equity method investment in Tracepoint and (ii) a gain in the third quarter of fiscal 2022 associated with the divestiture of a controlling financial interest of a certain product offering.

(h)Reflects tax credits, net of reserves for uncertain tax positions, recognized in fiscal 2021 and 2020 related to an increase in research and development credits available for fiscal years 2016 to 2019 and fiscal years 2016 to 2020, respectively.

(i)Reflects the income tax benefit associated with tax losses generated during fiscal 2021 as a result of a change in certain tax methods of accounting. The Company intends to carry these losses back to fiscal 2016 and subsequent periods under the Coronavirus Aid Relief and Economic Security Act and has re-measured the fiscal 2021 loss accordingly.

(j)Reflects the loss on debt extinguishment resulting from the redemption of Booz Allen Hamilton Inc.'s 5.125% Senior Notes due 2025, including $9.0 million of the premium paid at redemption, and write-off of the unamortized debt issuance cost.

(k)Reflects the income tax benefit associated with tax losses generated during fiscal 2021 as a result of a change in certain tax methods of accounting. The Company intends to carry these losses back to fiscal 2016 and subsequent periods under the Coronavirus Aid Relief and Economic Security Act and has re-measured the fiscal 2021 loss accordingly.

(l)Reflects the tax effect of adjustments at an assumed effective tax rate of 26%, which approximates the blended federal and state tax rates, and consistently excludes the impact of other tax credits and incentive benefits realized.

(m)Excludes an adjustment of approximately $3.1 million, $3.5 million, and $1.6 million of net earnings for fiscal 2022, 2021, and 2020, respectively, associated with the application of the two-class method for computing diluted earnings per share.

A - 4

Appendix B

SIXTH AMENDED AND RESTATED

CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

OF

BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON HOLDING CORPORATION

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware (the “Corporation”), hereby certifies as follows:

1.The name of the Corporation is Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation.

2.The Corporation was incorporated under the name Explorer Holding Corporation by the filing of its original Certificate of Incorporation with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware (the “Secretary of State”) on May 12, 2008. An Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation was filed with the Secretary of State on July 30, 2008. A Certificate of Amendment, changing the name of the Corporation from Explorer Holding Corporation to Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation, was filed with the Secretary of State on September 25, 2009. A Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation was filed with the Secretary of State on November 8, 2010. A Third Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation was filed with the Secretary of State on August 13, 2014. A Fourth Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation was filed with the Secretary of State on July 26, 2019. A Fifth Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation was filed with the Secretary of State on August 5, 2020.

3.The Corporation’s Fifth Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation is hereby amended and restated pursuant to Sections 242 and 245 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, so as to read in its entirety in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference (Exhibit A and this Certificate collectively constituting the Corporation’s Sixth Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation).

4.The amendment and restatement of the Fifth Amended and Restated Certification of Incorporation of the Corporation has been duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of Sections 228, 242 and 245 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, the Board of Directors of the Corporation having adopted resolutions setting forth such amendment and restatement, declaring its advisability, and directing that it be submitted to the stockholders of the Corporation for their approval; and the holders of outstanding stock having not less than the minimum number of votes that would be necessary to authorize or take such action at a meeting at which all shares entitled to vote thereon were present and voted having consented in writing to the adoption of such amendment and restatement.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned officer of the Corporation has executed this Sixth Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation on the _____ day of _____, 2022.

BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON HOLDING CORPORATION

By: _________________________________

Name: Jacob D. Bernstein

Title: Deputy General Counsel and Secretary

B - 1

EXHIBIT A

SIXTH AMENDED AND RESTATED

CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

OF

BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON HOLDING CORPORATION

FIRST.Name. The name of the Corporation is Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (the “Corporation”).

SECOND.Registered Office. The Corporation’s registered office in the State of Delaware is located at Corporation Trust Center, 1209 Orange Street in the City of Wilmington, County of New Castle 19801. The name of its registered agent at such address is The Corporation Trust Company.

THIRD.Purpose. The purpose of the Corporation is to engage in any lawful act or activity for which corporations may be organized under the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

FOURTH.Capital Stock. The total number of shares of capital stock which the Corporation shall have authority to issue is 654,000,000, consisting of:

a.600,000,000 shares of Class A Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share; and

b.54,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share.

The stock described in subparagraph (a) above is hereinafter referred to as the “Common Stock” and the stock described in subparagraph (b) above is hereinafter referred to as the “Preferred Stock”.

FIFTH. Common Stock. The Common Stock shall have the following rights, powers and preferences:

a.Voting Rights of Common Stock. Except as otherwise provided by (i) the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, or (ii) Article Sixth or any resolution of the Board of Directors fixing the relative powers (including voting powers, if any), preferences and rights of any series of Preferred Stock, and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof, the entire voting power of the shares of the Corporation for the election of directors and for all other purposes shall be vested exclusively in the Common Stock.

b.Dividend and Liquidation Rights of Common Stock. Except as otherwise provided by (x) the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, or (y) Article Sixth or any resolution of the Board of Directors fixing the relative powers (including voting powers, if any), preferences and rights of any series of Preferred Stock, and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof, (i) each share of Common Stock shall be entitled to participate equally in all dividends or other distributions declared on and payable with respect to the Common Stock, (ii) each share of Common Stock shall be entitled to share ratably, in proportion to its par value, until such time as there shall have been distributed an amount equal to each share’s par value, in the distribution of assets of the Corporation in the event of any voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the affairs of the Corporation, or upon any distribution of all or substantially all of the assets of the Corporation, and (iii) each share of Common Stock shall be entitled to share equally in the distribution of assets of the Corporation remaining after the distribution described in clause (ii) above in the event of any voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the affairs of the Corporation, or upon any distribution of all or substantially all of the assets of the Corporation. Upon any merger, recapitalization or like transaction, each share of Common Stock shall receive either the same consideration as each other such share.

SIXTH.Preferred Stock. The Preferred Stock may be issued, from time to time, in one or more series as authorized by the Board of Directors. Prior to issuance of a series of Preferred Stock, the Board of Directors by resolution shall designate that series to distinguish it from other series and classes of stock of the Corporation, shall specify the number of shares to be included in the series, and shall fix the voting powers (full, limited or no voting powers) and the designations, preferences and relative participating, optional or other special rights of that series, and the qualifications limitations or restrictions thereof, including, without limitation any dividend rights and redemption, sinking fund and conversion rights. Subject to the express terms of any other series of Preferred Stock outstanding at the time, the Board of Directors may increase or decrease the number of shares or alter the designation or classify or reclassify any unissued shares of a particular series of Preferred Stock by fixing or altering in any one or more respects from time to time before issuing the shares any terms, rights, restrictions and qualifications of the shares.

B - 2

SEVENTH.Management of Corporation. The following provisions are inserted for the management of the business and for the conduct of the affairs of the Corporation and for the purpose of creating, defining, limiting and regulating the powers of the Corporation and its directors and stockholders:

a.Prior to the annual meeting of the stockholders to be held in 2023, each director elected to the Board of Directors shall serve the remainder of the term for which such director was elected, such that: (i) each director elected at the annual meeting of stockholders held in 2020 shall be elected for a term expiring at the annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 2023; (ii) each director whose term expires at the annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 2021 shall be elected for a term expiring at the annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 2022; and (iii) each director whose term expires at the annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 2022 shall be elected for a term expiring at the annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 2023. Commencing with the annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 2023, the Board of Directors will no longer be classified under Section 141(d) of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware and directors shall be elected for one-year terms expiring at the next succeeding annual meeting of stockholders. Each director shall hold office until his or her term expires and his or her successor is duly elected and qualified, or until such director’s earlier death, resignation, retirement, disqualification or removal.

b.Subject to any special rights of any holders of any class or series of Preferred Stock to elect directors, the precise number of directors of the Corporation shall be fixed, and may be altered from time to time, only by resolution of the Board of Directors.

c.Subject to this Article Seventh, the election of directors may be conducted in any manner approved by the person presiding at a meeting of the stockholders or the directors, as the case may be, at the time when the election is held and need not be by written ballot.

d.Subject to any rights of the holders of shares of any class or series of Preferred Stock, if any, to elect additional directors under specified circumstances, (i) until the election of directors at the annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 2023, a director may be removed from office only for cause and only by the affirmative vote of holders of at least a majority of the votes to which all the stockholders of the Corporation would be entitled to cast in any election of directors and (ii) thereafter, a director may be removed from office at any time, either for or without cause, by the affirmative vote of holders of at least a majority of the votes to which all the stockholders of the Corporation would be entitled to cast in any election of directors.

e.Subject to any rights of the holders of shares of any class or series of Preferred Stock, if any, to elect additional directors under specified circumstances, and except as otherwise provided by law, any vacancy in the Board of Directors that results from an increase in the number of directors, from the death, disability, resignation, disqualification, removal of any director or from any other cause shall be filled solely by a majority of the total number of directors then in office, even if less than a quorum, or by a sole remaining director. Until the election of directors at the annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 2023, a director elected to fill a vacancy or a newly created directorship shall hold office for the remainder of the term of his or her predecessor or, in the case of a newly created directorship, for the remainder of the term of the class of directors to which he or she is elected and until his or her successor has been elected and qualified or until his or her death, disability, resignation, disqualification or removal. Thereafter, a director elected to fill a vacancy or a newly created directorship shall hold office until the next succeeding annual meeting of stockholders and until his or her successor has been elected and qualified or until his or her death, disability, resignation, disqualification or removal.

f.All corporate powers and authority of the Corporation (except as at the time otherwise provided by law, by this Sixth Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation or by the Bylaws of the Corporation) shall be vested in and exercised by the Board of Directors.

g.The Board of Directors shall have the power without the consent or vote of the stockholders to adopt, amend, alter or repeal the Bylaws of the Corporation, except to the extent that this Sixth Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation otherwise provide.

h.No director of the Corporation shall be liable to the Corporation or its stockholders for monetary damages for breach of his or her fiduciary duty as a director, provided that nothing contained in this Article Seventh shall eliminate or limit the liability of a director (i) for any breach of the director’s duty of loyalty to the Corporation or its stockholders, (ii) for acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of the law, (iii) under Section 174 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware or (iv) for any transaction from which the director derived an improper personal benefit. If the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware is amended after the filing of this Sixth Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to authorize corporate action further eliminating or limiting the personal liability of directors, then the liability of a

B - 3

director of the Corporation shall be eliminated or limited to the fullest extent permitted by the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, as so amended.

i.The Corporation shall, through its Bylaws or otherwise, indemnify to the fullest extent permitted under the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, as it now exists or as amended from time to time, any person who is or was a director or officer of the Corporation or its subsidiaries. The Corporation may, by action of its Board of Directors, provide rights to indemnification and to advancement of expenses to such other employees or agents of the Corporation or its subsidiaries to such extent and to such effect as the Board of Directors shall determine to be appropriate and authorized by Delaware Law.

EIGHTH. Stockholder Action by Written Consent. Any action required or permitted to be taken at any annual or special meeting of stockholders of the Corporation may be taken only upon the vote of the stockholders at an annual or special meeting duly called and may not be taken by written consent of the stockholders. The Bylaws may establish procedures regulating the submission by stockholders of nominations and proposals for consideration at meetings of stockholders of the Corporation.

NINTH.Special Meetings. A special meeting of the stockholders of the Corporation may be called only by or at the direction of the Board of Directors (i) pursuant to a resolution adopted by a majority of the total number of directors then in office or (ii) upon written request to the Secretary of the Corporation, which satisfies the requirements set forth in the Bylaws, of holders of not less than 25% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock, as calculated and determined in the manner specified, and with any limitations as may be set forth, in the Bylaws.

TENTH. [Reserved]

ELEVENTH. [Reserved]

TWELFTH.Forum. The Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware shall be the sole and exclusive forum for (i) any derivative action or proceeding brought on behalf of the Corporation, (ii) any action asserting a claim of breach of a fiduciary duty owed by any director or officer of the Corporation to the Corporation or the Corporation’s stockholders, (iii) any action asserting a claim against the Corporation arising pursuant to any provision of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware or the Corporation’s Sixth Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation or Bylaws, or (iv) any action asserting a claim against the Corporation governed by the internal affairs doctrine.

THIRTEENTH.Amendment. The Corporation reserves the right to amend, alter or repeal any provision contained in this Sixth Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation in the manner now or hereafter prescribed by the laws of the State of Delaware, and all rights herein conferred upon stockholders or directors are granted subject to this reservation, provided, however, that any amendment, alteration or repeal of Article Seventh, Section (h) shall not adversely affect any right or protection existing under this Sixth Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation immediately prior to such amendment, alteration or repeal, including any right or protection of a director or officer thereunder in respect of any act or omission occurring prior to the time of such amendment, modification or repeal.

B - 4

[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]