Commitments and contingencies

6 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2022

Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]

Commitments and contingencies

Note 12 – Commitments and contingencies

Legal Matters

From time to time, we may become involved in various lawsuits and legal proceedings which arise in the ordinary course of business. Litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties, and an adverse result in these or other matters may arise from time to time that may harm our business.

1)	Wearable Health Solutions, Inc. v. Barry Honig, GRQ Consultants Inc., Benza Pharma LLC and John Does 1-10, Supreme Court of the State of New York County of New York, July 22, 2021. Company is disputing the validity of Notes from 3/2016 and seeking damages, reparations, and related costs.
2)	GRQ Consultants, Inc. v. Wearable Health Solutions, Inc., Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York, August 26, 2021, Parties are seeking summary judgment of $50,000 plus accrued interest in response to lawsuit by Company regarding $50,000 loan from 11/2016.
3)	Benza Pharma LLC, Sandor Capital, LP, and John Lemak v. Wearable Health Solutions, Inc., District Court, Clark County, Nevada, Parties are seeking summary judgment of $3,000,000 plus accrued interest in regards to convertible notes payable from March, 2016. The Company believes that there is a very low probability that it will pay this amount and as a result has   not accrued for it on the Company’s balance sheet. (See Note 15)
4)	Medical Alarm Concepts LLC v. MCA Cure, LLC, Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Morris County. Company is seeking return of payments for non-performance plus attorney fees and court costs. A settlement was reached between the parties whereby MCA Cure will pay an initial $10,000 and $6,500 each month until debt is satisfied in 2023 (See Note 14).

Commitments and Contingencies. The Company follows subtopic 450-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report accounting for contingencies. Certain conditions may exist as of the date the financial statements are issued, which may result in a loss to the Company but which will only be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur. The Company assesses such contingent liabilities, and such assessment inherently involves an exercise of judgment. In assessing loss contingencies related to legal proceedings that are pending against the Company or unasserted claims that may result in such proceedings, the Company evaluates the perceived merits of any legal proceedings or unasserted claims as well as the perceived merits of the amount of relief sought or expected to be sought therein.

If the assessment of a contingency indicates that it is probable that a material loss has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be estimated, then the estimated liability would be accrued in the Company’s financial statements. If the assessment indicates that a potentially material loss contingency is not probable but is reasonably possible, or is probable but cannot be estimated, then the nature of the contingent liability, and an estimate of the range of possible losses, if determinable and material, would be disclosed. Loss contingencies considered remote are generally not disclosed unless they involve guarantees, in which case the guarantees would be disclosed. Management does not believe, based upon information available at this time that these matters will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows. However, there is no assurance that such matters will not materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, financial position, and results of operations or cash flows.