Variable Interest Entities and Other Consolidation Matters	12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2012
Variable Interest Entities [Abstract]
Variable Interest Entities [Text Block]	Note 6 – Variable Interest Entities and Other Consolidation Matters For Augusta and Hillsboro, the Company’s initial contributions into the managing member LLCs were funded through loans from an affiliate; however, on June 29, 2012 and March 30, 2012, respectively, the loans were repaid and the managing member LLCs were no longer considered VIEs. The Company then analyzed the managing member LLCs under a voting interest model and determined that the investments in the unconsolidated joint ventures should be accounted for under the equity method as each member of the managing member LLC had an equal voting interest. For Springhouse and Creekside, the Company’s initial contributions into the managing member LLCs were funded through loans to our investing subsidiaries from an affiliate and accounted for as discussed above, however on March 30, 2012 and September 28, 2010, respectively, the loans were repaid and the managing member LLCs were no longer considered VIEs. In June 2012, the Company acquired an additional 1.0% and 2.0% joint venture equity interest, respectively, in the managing member LLCs. Also, at this time, the managing member agreements were amended to allow the Company to control the decision making of the managing member LLC. The Company analyzed the managing member LLCs under a voting interest model and determined the Company should be consolidated under the voting interests model for both properties, as the Company has the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of the managing member LLCs and is considered to be the investor that is most closely associated with the entity among the related party investors. The Springhouse and Creekside investments are consolidated within the Company’s financial statements. For Enders and MDA, the Company’s initial contributions into the managing member LLCs were funded through our corporate working line of capital from two affiliates, one of which is an investor in the Enders managing member LLC. The managing member LLCs are not considered VIEs. The Company analyzed the managing member LLCs under a voting interest model and determined the Company should be consolidated under the voting interests model for both properties, as the Company has the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of the managing member LLCs and is considered to be the investor that is most closely associated with the entity among the related party investors. The Enders and MDA investments are consolidated within the Company’s financial statements. For Berry Hill, the Company’s initial contribution into the managing member LLC was funded from a working capital line of credit from an affiliate, which is also an investor in the managing member LLC and is considered a VIE. The Company is considered the primary beneficiary at it has both the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact economic performance of the VIE and the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits that could potentially be significant to the VIE. The Berry Hill investment has been consolidated within the Company’s financial statements.

Variable Interest Entities and Other Consolidation Matters

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Variable Interest Entities [Abstract]

Note 6 – Variable Interest Entities and Other Consolidation Matters

For Augusta and Hillsboro, the Company’s initial contributions into the managing member LLCs were funded through loans from an affiliate; however, on June 29, 2012 and March 30, 2012, respectively, the loans were repaid and the managing member LLCs were no longer considered VIEs. The Company then analyzed the managing member LLCs under a voting interest model and determined that the investments in the unconsolidated joint ventures should be accounted for under the equity method as each member of the managing member LLC had an equal voting interest.

For Springhouse and Creekside, the Company’s initial contributions into the managing member LLCs were funded through loans to our investing subsidiaries from an affiliate and accounted for as discussed above, however on March 30, 2012 and September 28, 2010, respectively, the loans were repaid and the managing member LLCs were no longer considered VIEs. In June 2012, the Company acquired an additional 1.0% and 2.0% joint venture equity interest, respectively, in the managing member LLCs. Also, at this time, the managing member agreements were amended to allow the Company to control the decision making of the managing member LLC. The Company analyzed the managing member LLCs under a voting interest model and determined the Company should be consolidated under the voting interests model for both properties, as the Company has the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of the managing member LLCs and is considered to be the investor that is most closely associated with the entity among the related party investors. The Springhouse and Creekside investments are consolidated within the Company’s financial statements.

For Enders and MDA, the Company’s initial contributions into the managing member LLCs were funded through our corporate working line of capital from two affiliates, one of which is an investor in the Enders managing member LLC. The managing member LLCs are not considered VIEs. The Company analyzed the managing member LLCs under a voting interest model and determined the Company should be consolidated under the voting interests model for both properties, as the Company has the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of the managing member LLCs and is considered to be the investor that is most closely associated with the entity among the related party investors. The Enders and MDA investments are consolidated within the Company’s financial statements.

For Berry Hill, the Company’s initial contribution into the managing member LLC was funded from a working capital line of credit from an affiliate, which is also an investor in the managing member LLC and is considered a VIE. The Company is considered the primary beneficiary at it has both the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact economic performance of the VIE and the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits that could potentially be significant to the VIE. The Berry Hill investment has been consolidated within the Company’s financial statements.

- Definition

The entire disclosure of the significant judgments and assumptions made in determining whether a variable interest (as defined) held by the entity requires the variable interest entity (VIE) (as defined) to be consolidated and (or) disclose information about its involvement with the VIE, individually or in aggregate (as applicable); the nature of restrictions, if any, on the consolidated VIE's assets and on the settlement of its liabilities reported by an entity in its statement of financial position, including the carrying amounts of such assets and liabilities; the nature of, and changes in, the risks associated with involvement in the VIE; how involvement with the VIE affects the entity's financial position, financial performance, and cash flows; the lack of recourse if creditors (or beneficial interest holders) of the consolidated VIE have no recourse to the general credit of the primary beneficiary (if applicable); the terms of arrangements, giving consideration to both explicit arrangements and implicit variable interests, if any, that could require the entity to provide financial support to the VIE, including events or circumstances that could expose the entity to a loss; the methodology used by the entity for determining whether or not it is the primary beneficiary of the variable interest entity; the significant factors considered and judgments made in determining that the power to direct the activities of a VIE that most significantly impact the VIE's economic performance are shared (as defined); the carrying amounts and classification of assets and liabilities of the VIE included in the statement of financial position; the entity's maximum exposure to loss, if any, as a result of its involvement with the VIE, including how the maximum exposure is determined and significant sources of the entity's exposure to the VIE; a comparison of the carrying amounts of the assets and liabilities and the entity's maximum exposure to loss; information about any liquidity arrangements, guarantees, and (or) other commitments by third parties that may affect the fair value or risk of the entity's variable interest in the VIE; whether or not the entity has provided financial support or other support (explicitly or implicitly) to the VIE that it was not previously contractually required to provide or whether the entity intends to provide that support, including the type and amount of the support and the primary reasons for providing the support; and supplemental information the entity determines necessary to provide.

+ References+ Details