XML 18 R8.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.19.2
Overview and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2019
Organization Consolidation And Presentation Of Financial Statements [Abstract]  
Overview and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

1. Overview and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Organization and Description of Business

Zynga Inc. (“Zynga,” “we” or the “Company”) is a leading provider of social game services. We develop, market and operate social games as live services played on mobile platforms, such as iOS and Android, and social networking sites such as Facebook. Generally, all of our games are free to play, and we generate substantially all of our revenue through the sale of in-game virtual items and advertising services. Our operations are headquartered in San Francisco, California, and we have several operating locations in the U.S. as well as various international office locations in North America, Asia and Europe.

We completed our initial public offering in December 2011 and our Class A common stock is listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “ZNGA.”

Basis of Presentation and Consolidation

The accompanying interim consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”). The interim consolidated financial statements include the operations of the Company and its owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in the consolidation.

The accompanying interim consolidated financial statements and these related notes should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018.

Unaudited Interim Financial Information

The accompanying interim consolidated balance sheets as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the interim consolidated statements of operations, statements of comprehensive income (loss) and statements of stockholders’ equity for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, the statements of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 and the notes to interim consolidated financial statements are unaudited. These unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. In management’s opinion, the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements include all adjustments of a normal recurring nature necessary for the fair presentation of the Company’s statement of financial position and operating results for the periods presented. The results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for the full fiscal year or any other future period.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts in the interim consolidated financial statements and notes thereto. Significant estimates and assumptions reflected in the financial statements include, but are not limited to, the estimated average playing period of payers that we use for revenue recognition, useful lives of property and equipment and intangible assets, accrued liabilities, income taxes, the fair value of assets and liabilities acquired through business combinations, contingent consideration obligations, the discount rate used in discounting our operating lease liabilities, the interest rate used in present valuing the initial liability component of our convertible notes, stock-based compensation expense and evaluation of recoverability of goodwill, intangible assets, and long-lived assets. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates. 

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2019, there was no significant impact from discontinued games or from changes in our estimated average playing period of payers that required adjusting the recognition period of deferred revenue generated in prior periods.

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, we recognized $0.5 million and $0.9 million, respectively, of online game revenue and income from operations from games that have been discontinued as there is no further performance obligation. This change in estimate did not impact our reported earnings per share in three months ended June 30, 2018 but had a $0.01 per share impact on our reported earnings per share in the six months ended June 30, 2018. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, there were no changes in our estimated average playing period of payers that required adjusting the recognition period of deferred revenue generated in prior periods.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Issued But Not Yet Adopted

In August 2018, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2018-15, “Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract”, which aligns the accounting for implementation costs incurred with a cloud computing arrangement accounted for as a service arrangement with the guidance in ASC Topic 350-40, Internal-Use Software to determine which implementation costs should be capitalized. The ASU permits either a prospective or retrospective transition approach and is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently assessing this standard’s impact on its consolidated financial statements.

Issued And Adopted

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842)” (“ASC Topic 842”) which requires a lessee to recognize assets and liabilities on the balance sheet for leases with lease terms greater than 12 months. For lessors, accounting for leases remains substantially the same as in prior periods. We adopted ASC Topic 842 on January 1, 2019 using the alternative transition approach provided in ASU 2018-11, “Leases (Topic 842) – Targeted Improvements”, which allows initial application of the new standard by recognizing a cumulative-effect adjustment on the adoption date.

Adoption Impact – Lessee Accounting

The adoption of ASC Topic 842 on January 1, 2019 resulted in the recognition of right-of-use assets of $9.1 million, which includes the elimination of our remaining prepaid rent and deferred rent balances, current operating lease liabilities of $7.6 million and non-current operating lease liabilities of $12.4 million. The adoption of ASC Topic 842 did not impact our consolidated statement of operations or consolidated statement of cash flows.

ASC Topic 842 also amends the provisions of ASC Topic 420 – Exit or Disposal Obligations to eliminate the concept of cease-use lease liabilities and instead, requires companies to evaluate leases for impairment in accordance ASC 360 – Property, Plant, and Equipment. Accordingly, upon adoption, we derecognized our $10.9 million restructuring cease-use liability related to our Q2 2015 restructuring plan and simultaneously recognized an operating lease liability for an equal amount, with no associated right-of-use asset.

As part of the adoption, the new standard allows a number of practical expedients and exemptions. At transition, we elected the following:

 

The package of practical expedients, which allows us to carryforward our historical lease classification, assessment of whether a contract is or contains a lease and initial direct costs for any leases that exist prior to adoption of the new standard;

 

 

The practical expedient to not separate non-lease components from the related lease components; and

 

 

The exemption to not apply the balance sheet recognition requirements for leases with a lease term of 12 months or less and instead, expense those costs on a straight-line basis over the lease term, or in the period in which the obligation is incurred, if such costs are variable.

Adoption Impact – Lessor Accounting

There was no impact to our financial statements as a result of adopting ASC Topic 842. ASU 2018-11, “Leases (Topic 842) – Targeted Improvements” also provides lessors with a practical expedient to not separate nonlease components from the associated lease component, similar to the expedient provided for lessees. However, the lessor practical expedient is limited to circumstances in which the nonlease component or components otherwise would be accounted for under the new revenue guidance and both (i) the timing and pattern of transfer are the same for the nonlease component(s) and associated lease component and (ii) the lease component, if accounted for separately, would be classified as an operating lease. We have elected this practical expedient.

Refer to Note 6 – “Leases” for further details on our lease arrangements as a lessee and lessor.