10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x  QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2012

o  TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _______________  to  _______________

Commission file number  333-152050

VIRTUAL PIGGY, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Delaware	35-2327649
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

15 West Highland Avenue

Philadelphia, PA 19118-3322

(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)

(215) 247-5500

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

_______________________________________________

(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal year, if Changed Since Last Report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days).   YES x  NO o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulations S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  YES x NO o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer   ¨                                                                                     Accelerated filer                     ¨

Non-accelerated filer     ¨                                                                                     Smaller reporting company    x

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). YES o  NO x          

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date:  88,024,935 shares of common stock outstanding at May 15, 2012.

TABLE OF CONTENTS		Page No.
PART I	FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1.	Financial Statements	2
ITEM 2.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	22
ITEM 4.	Controls and Procedures	27
PART II	OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	28
ITEM 6.	Exhibits	28

1

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

Virtual Piggy, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Balance Sheets

		March 31, 2012			December 31, 2011
		(Unaudited)			(Audited)
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS
	Cash and cash equivalents	$	1,514,154		$	186,159
	Accounts Receivable		2,748			2,500
	Prepaid expenses		36,354			1,765
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS			1,553,256			190,424
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
	Computer equipment		30,891			15,679
	Less:  accumulated depreciation		7,425			6,244
			23,466			9,435
OTHER ASSETS
	Deposit		28,211			2,667
	Patents and trademarks, net of accumulated amoritization of
	$2,676 and $1,622		151,917			78,013
			180,128			80,680
TOTAL ASSETS		$	1,756,850		$	280,539
	LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
CURRENT LIABILITIES
	Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	684,993		$	358,513
	Notes payable, net of discount of $28,454 and $65,560		171,546			284,440
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES			856,539			642,953
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
	Preferred stock, $.0001 par value; 2,000,000 shares authorized;
	none issued and outstanding at March 31, 2012 and
	December 31, 2011		-			-
	Common stock, $ .0001 par value; 150,000,000 shares authorized;
	74,894,709 and 66,871,422 shares issued and outstanding at
	March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011		7,489			6,687
	Additional paid in capital		9,872,081			7,065,247
	Deficit accumulated during the development stage		(8,979,259	)		(7,434,348	)
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)			900,311			(362,414	)
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)		$	1,756,850		$	280,539

See accompanying notes to these financial statements.

2

Virtual Piggy, Inc.

 (A Development Stage Company)

Statements of Operations

For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 and

For the period February 11, 2008 (Date of Inception) to March 31, 2012

(Unaudited)

				Three Months			Three Months
	Cumulative			Ended			Ended
	Since			March 31,			March 31,
	Inception			2012			2011
SALES	$	5,094		$	1,168		$	326
OPERATING EXPENSES
General and administrative		1,090,851			341,178			125,945
Consulting (a)		3,754,081			641,849			328,095
Payroll (b)		640,870			206,976			16,733
Professional fees		1,170,171			144,913			103,449
Research and development		913,690			86,606			77,726
Travel		939,578			87,768			70,927
Total operating expenses		8,509,241			1,509,290			722,875
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)
Interest income		3,268			317			1,045
Interest expense (c)		(478,380	)		(37,106	)		-
		(475,112	)		(36,789	)		1,045
NET LOSS	$	(8,979,259	)	$	(1,544,911	)	$	(721,504	)
BASIC AND DILUTED NET LOSS PER
COMMON SHARE				$	(0.02	)	$	(0.01	)
BASIC AND DILUTED WEIGHTED AVERAGE
COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING					70,042,470			65,371,422

(a)	-	includes share-based compensation of $2,146,794 cumulative $348,836 ($297,500 accrued for consultant settlement) and $117,993 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011.
(b)	-	includes share-based compensation of $468,713 cumulative, $38,650 and $16,733 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011.
(c)	-	includes amortization of deferred costs of $78,243 cumulative, and $0 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011. Also includes $397,639 accretion of discount on notes payable cumulative, and $37,104 and $0 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011.

See accompanying notes to these financial statements.

3

Virtual Piggy, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)

For the Period February 11, 2008 (Date of Inception)

								Deficit
	Common							Accumulated
	Stock				Additional			During the
	Number of				Paid-In			Development
	Shares		Amount		Capital			Stage			Total
Issuance of initial 19,000,000 shares on February 11, 2008 at $.001 per share		19,000,000	$	1,900	$	17,100		$	-		$	19,000
Issuance of shares of common stock and 14,285,716 warrants in February 2008 through private placement at $.035 per unit		7,142,858		714		249,286			-			250,000
Employee options issued for services on March 3, 2008, vested immediately and valued at $.02 per share		-		-		8,825			-			8,825
Nonemployee options issued for services on March 3,2008, vested immediately and valued at $.02 per share		-		-		107,859			-			107,859
Exercise of options on May 8, 2008 at $.04 per share		500,000		50		19,950			-			20,000
Issuance of shares of common stock and 614,286 warrants in May and September 2008 through private placement at $.75 per unit		6,642,858		665		231,835			-			232,500
Options issued for services in June 2008, vested immediately and valued at $.07 per share		-		-		395,467			-			395,467
Nonemployee options issued for services in June 19, 2008, vested immediately and valued at $.01 per share		-		-		918			-			918
Issuance of shares of common stock to investors in August 2008 at $1.00 per share		2,560		-		2,560			-			2,560
Exercise of options in September 2008 at $.04 per share		1,750,000		175		69,825			-			70,000
Exercise of warrants in September 2008 at $.04 per share		250,000		25		9,975			-			10,000
Net loss		-		-		-			(983,886	)		(983,886	)
Balance, December 31, 2008		35,288,276		3,529		1,113,600			(983,886	)		133,243
Exercise of options on January 26, 2009 at $.04 per share		1,000,000		100		39,900			-			40,000
Issuance of shares of common stock on April 7, 2009 at $1.00 per share		400,000		40		399,960			-			400,000
Issuance of shares of common stock on June 29, 2009 valued at $2.00 per share		100,000		10		199,990			-			200,000
Exercise of options on July 30, 2009 at $.04 per share		1,000,000		100		39,900			-			40,000
Nonemployee options issued for services on August 18, 2009, vested immediately and valued at $.31 per share		-		-		10,462			-			10,462
Exercise of warrants on August 21, 2009 at $.04 per share		1,000,000		100		39,900			-			40,000
Exercise of options on September 2, 2009 at $.04 per share		500,000		50		19,950			-			20,000
Issuance of shares of common stock on September 17, 2009 at $1.00 per share		100,000		10		99,990			-			100,000
Issuance of shares of common stock for future services on October 9, 2009 valued at $1.00 per share		1,080,427		108		1,080,319			-			1,080,427
Issuance of shares of common stock on October 16, 2009 at $1.00 per share		100,000		10		99,990			-			100,000
Exercise of warrants on October 22, 2009 at $.04 per share		1,000,000		100		39,900			-			40,000
Exercise of warrants on December 2, 2009 at $.04 per share		1,000,000		100		39,900			-			40,000
Exercise of options on December 10, 2009 at $.04 per share		250,000		25		9,975			-			10,000
Exercise of warrants on December 31, 2009 at $.04 per share		1,000,000		100		39,900			-			40,000
Stock issuance costs		-		-		(65,000	)		-			(65,000	)
Nonemployee options issued for services on March 3,2008, vested immediately and valued at $.02 per share		-		-		37,506			-			37,506
Nonemployee options issued for services in June 19, 2008, vested immediately and valued at $.01 per share		-		-		636			-			636
Net loss		-		-		-			(2,236,476	)		(2,236,476	)
Balance, December 31, 2009		43,818,703		4,382		3,246,778			(3,220,362	)		30,798

See accompanying notes to these financial statements.

4

Virtual Piggy, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)

For the Period February 11, 2008 (Date of Inception)

								Deficit
	Common							Accumulated
	Stock				Additional			During the
	Number of				Paid-In			Development
	Shares		Amount		Capital			Stage			Total
Exercise of options on January 5, 2010 at $.04 per share		1,000,000		100		39,900			-			40,000
Exercise of warrant on February 22, 2010 at $.04 per share		892,858		89		35,624			-			35,713
Exercise of warrants in March 2010 at $.04 per share		1,000,000		100		39,900			-			40,000
Exercise of warrants in April 2010 at $.04 per share		2,500,000		250		99,750			-			100,000
Issuance of shares of common stock in conjunction with notes payable in May through August 2010		483,750		48		400,694			-			400,742
Issuance of shares of common stock for retirement of 400,000 options at $.25 per share		65,000		6		(6	)		-			-
Issuance of share of common stock from August through December 2010 through private placement at $.20 per share		9,625,000		963		1,924,037			-			1,925,000
Issuance of shares of common stock on November 1, 2010 for the conversion of notes payable at $.20 per share		375,000		38		74,962			-			75,000
Issuance of shares of common stock on November 19, 2010 for future services valued at $.90 per share		111,111		11		99,989			-			100,000
Exercise of options on December 2, 2010 at $.04 per share		3,000,000		300		119,700			-			120,000
Exercise of warrants in December 2010 at $.04 per share		2,500,000		250		99,750			-			100,000
Nonemployee options issued for services from August through November 2010, vested immediately and valued at $.01 per share		-		-		13,816			-			13,816
Nonemployee options issued for services on August 18, 2009, vested immediately and valued at $.31 per share		-		-		27,899			-			27,899
Net loss		-		-		-			(1,489,190	)		(1,489,190	)
Balance, December 31, 2010		65,371,422		6,537		6,222,793			(4,709,552	)		1,519,778
Issuance of shares of common stock for future services on June 1, 2011 valued at $.49 per share		100,000		10		48,990			-			49,000
Issuance of shares of common stock in conjunction with notes payable from September through December 2011		150,000		15		82,650			-			82,665
Issuance of shares of common stock and 625,000 warrants on December 20, 2011 through private placement at $.80 per unit		1,250,000		125		499,875			-			500,000
Issuance of warrants in conjunction with notes payable from September through December 2011		-		-		20,930			-			20,930
Fair value of revalued warrants at $.09 to $.76 per share		-		-		88,601			-			88,601
Nonemployee options issued for services from August through November 2010, vested immediately and valued at $.01 per share		-		-		3,146			-			3,146
Nonemployee options issued for services on January 24, 2011, vested immediately and valued at $.20 per share		-		-		46,019			-			46,019
Nonemployee options issued for services from July through August 2011, vested immediately and valued from $.10 to $.19 per share		-		-		52,243			-			52,243
Net loss		-		-		-			(2,724,796	)		(2,724,796	)
Balance December 31, 2011 (Audited)		66,871,422		6,687		7,065,247			(7,434,348	)		(362,414	)

See accompanying notes to these financial statements.

5

Virtual Piggy, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)

For the Period February 11, 2008 (Date of Inception)

								Deficit
	Common							Accumulated
	Stock				Additional			During the
	Number of				Paid-In			Development
	Shares		Amount		Capital			Stage			Total
Issuance of shares of common stock and 4,011,644 warrants through March 31, 2012 through private placement at $.70 per unit		8,023,287		802		2,744,848			-			2,745,650
Nonemployee options issued for services from July through August 2011, vested immediately and valued from $.10 to $.19 per share		-		-		951			-			951
Nonemployee options issued for services from January 17, 2012 through March 31, 2012, vested immediately and valued from $.16 to $.19 per share		-		-		50,385			-			50,385
Employee options issued for services on January 1, 2012 through March 31, 2012, vesting over three years and valued at $.11 to $.21 per share		-		-		38,650			-			38,650
Stock issuance costs		-		-		(28,000	)		-			(28,000	)
Net loss		-		-		-			(1,544,911	)		(1,544,911	)
Balance March 31, 2012 (Unaudited)		74,894,709		7,489		9,872,081			(8,979,259	)		900,311

See accompanying notes to these financial statements.

6

Virtual Piggy, Inc.

 (A Development Stage Company)

Statements of Cash Flows

For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 and

For the period February 11, 2008 (Date of Inception) to March 31, 2012

				Three Months			Three Months
	Cumulative			Ended			Ended
	Since			March 31,			March 31,
	Inception			2012			2011
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net loss	$	(8,979,259	)	$	(1,544,911	)	$	(721,504	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash
used in operating activities
Fair value of warrants issued in exchange for services		88,601			-			88,601
Fair value of options issued in exchange for services		794,783			89,986			46,125
Fair value of stock issued in exchange for services		1,429,427			-			-
Amortization of deferred costs		78,243			-			-
Accretion of discount on notes payable		397,640			37,105			-
Depreciation and amortization		10,101			2,235			649
Provision for bad debt		42,768			-			-
(Increase) decrease in assets
Accounts receivable		(2,748	)		(248	)		(326	)
Other receivable		(42,768	)		-			-
Prepaid expenses		(36,354	)		(34,589	)		5,294
Deposits		(28,211	)		(25,544	)		-
Increase (decrease) in liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		684,993			326,480			13,635
Net cash used in operating activities		(5,562,784	)		(1,149,486	)		(567,526	)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Purchase of equipment		(30,890	)		(15,212	)		-
Patent and Trademark costs		(154,593	)		(74,957	)		-
Net cash used  in investing activities		(185,483	)		(90,169	)		-
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from note payable - stockholders		747,500			-			-
Repayment of note payable - stockholders		(547,500	)		(150,000	)		-
Proceeds from notes payable		75,000			-			-
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		6,274,707			2,745,650			-
Proceeds from exercise of options		360,000			-			-
Proceeds from exercise of warrants		445,714			-			-
Stock issuance costs		(93,000	)		(28,000	)		-
Net cash provided by financing activities		7,262,421			2,567,650			-
NET INCREASE IN CASH AND
CASH EQUIVALENTS		1,514,154			1,327,995			(567,526	)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS - BEGINNING OF PERIOD		-			186,159			1,574,448
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS - END OF PERIOD	$	1,514,154		$	1,514,154		$	1,006,922
SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULE OF NON-CASH FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Fair value of common stock issued as discount for notes payable	$	400,744		$	-		$	-
Conversion of notes payable into common stock	$	75,000		$	-		$	-
Fair value of warrants issued as discount for notes payable	$	20,930		$	-		$	-

See accompanying notes to these financial statements.

7

Virtual Piggy, Inc.

 (A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Financial Statements

NOTE 1 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Nature of the Business

Virtual Piggy, Inc. (“the Company”) is a development stage enterprise incorporated in the state of Delaware on February 11, 2008.  The Company initially concentrated its efforts on developing a business plan which was designed to allow it to create the massive multiplayer online gaming platform (the “Platform”) and massive multiplayer online games (“MMOGs”) for use on its Platform. Those activities included, but were not limited to, securing initial capital in order to fund the development of a demonstration model for portions of the Platform and working capital, securing a board of directors, management personnel and consultants who the Company believes will assist in developing the Platform and meet the business goals, conducting market research regarding the MMOG industry and the Platform and planned MMOGs, and other pre-marketing activities. Commencing in the fourth quarter of 2010, in light of the Company’s belief that  increased market interest towards the security aspects of online gaming and social networking have emerged, the Company  has refocused its efforts towards delivering a platform technology designed to manage the under 18 age group’s online experience in a secure manner.  The Company has developed and introduced the Virtual Piggy product to the marketplace and is attempting to develop and introduce the ParentMatch product to the marketplace in 2013 to 2014.

Virtual Piggy is designed to provide an online piggy bank security service that allows parents to setup and control their children’s spending online. Parents and guardians will be able to determine who is allowed to contribute to their child’s account as well as provide notification mechanisms back to the contributors when the funds are spent. The parent can establish how much a child can spend in a single transaction and how much they can spend over time. The Virtual Piggy service tracks all spending and the parent can receive alerts and reports on spending patterns. A third-party site would prompt a child to enter their VirtualPiggy ID – when they attempt to make a transaction. This ID along with category, pricing and descriptive information about the purchase would be sent to the VirtualPiggy webservice. Based on the rules set out by the parent, VirtualPiggy would send back a Yes/No signal to the requesting service and either allow or prohibit the transaction.

ParentMatch, and its companion product, ParentPlayback, will be designed to provide the parent/guardian with a higher level of control than is currently provided by ‘nanny’ type services. In addition the ID follows the child whenever they are on a computer as opposed to traditional controls which are resident on a PC by PC basis.  ParentMatch provides filtering for the parent to be able to control such areas as (i) sites a child may access; (ii) types of content they may view and (iii) who they can interact with online. ParentPlayback will provide the parent with a video transcript of their child’s online session.  Since inception, substantially all of the efforts of the Company have been developing technologies for multiplayer online role playing games and the Virtual Piggy, ParentMatch and ParentPlayback platforms.  The Company is in the development stage of raising capital, financial planning, establishing sources of supply, and acquiring property and equipment.  The Company anticipates establishing global markets for its services.

Basis of Presentation

The financial statements are presented in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification (“FASB ASC”) 915 for development stage entities.  The accompanying unaudited financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions for Form 10-Q and Rule 8-03 of Regulation S-X.  Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements.  In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. The financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.  Operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ended December 31, 2012.

8

Virtual Piggy, Inc.

 (A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Financial Statements

NOTE 1 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  Actual results could differ from these estimates.

Comprehensive Income

The Company follows FASB ASC 220 in reporting comprehensive income.  Comprehensive income is a more inclusive financial reporting methodology that includes disclosure of certain financial information that historically has not been recognized in the calculation of net income.  Since the Company has no items of other comprehensive income (loss), comprehensive income (loss) is equal to net income (loss).

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company’s financial instruments consist of cash, accounts receivable, notes payable and accounts payable.  The carrying value of cash, accounts receivable, notes payable and accounts payable approximate fair value, because of their short maturity.

Concentration of Credit Risk Involving Cash

The Company may have deposits with a financial institution which at times exceed Federal Depository Insurance coverage of $250,000.  

Cash and Cash Equivalents

For purposes of reporting cash flows, the Company considers all cash accounts, which are not subject to withdrawal restrictions or penalties, and certificates of deposit and commercial paper with original maturities of 90 days or less to be cash or cash equivalents.

Revenue Recognition

In accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 104, Revenue Recognition (Codified in FASB ASC 605), the Company will recognize revenue when (i) persuasive evidence of a customer or distributor arrangement exists or acceptance occurs, (ii) a retailer, distributor or wholesaler receives the goods, (iii) the price is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability of the sales revenues is reasonably assured. Subject to these criteria, the Company will generally recognize revenue from Virtual Piggy and Virtual Parent at the time of the sale of the associated product.

Income Taxes

The Company follows FASB ASC 740 when accounting for income taxes, which requires an asset and liability approach to financial accounting and reporting for income taxes.  Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are computed annually for temporary differences between the financial statements and tax bases of assets and liabilities that will result in taxable or deductible amounts in the future based on enacted tax laws and rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income.  Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.  Income tax expense is the tax payable or refundable for the period plus or minus the change during the period in deferred tax assets and liabilities.  Tax years from 2008 through 2011 remain subject to examination by major tax jurisdictions.

Loss Per Share

The Company follows FASB ASC 260 when reporting Earnings Per Share resulting in the presentation of basic and diluted earnings per share.  Because the Company reported a net loss for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, common stock equivalents, including stock options and warrants were anti-dilutive; therefore, the amounts reported for basic and dilutive loss per share were the same.

9

Virtual Piggy, Inc.

 (A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Financial Statements

NOTE 1 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

Start-up Costs

In accordance with FASB ASC 720, start-up costs are expensed as incurred.

Research and  Development Costs

In accordance with FASB ASC 730, research and development costs are expensed when incurred.  

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

As of March 31, 2012 and for the period then ended, there were no recently adopted accounting pronouncements that had a material effect on the Company’s financial statements.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted

As of March 31, 2012, there are no recently issued accounting standards not yet adopted which would have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements.

NOTE 2 – GOING CONCERN

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern.  The Company has incurred significant losses and experienced negative cash flow from operations during the development stage.  These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.  The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Since our inception, the Company has focused on developing and implementing our business plan.  The Company has begun to pay salaries to management and has utilized offshore programmers on a work for hire basis to assist in developing the demonstration model. The Company believes that its existing cash resources will not be sufficient to sustain operations during the next twelve months. The Company is currently in need of approximately $2.7 million of additional capital aside from what has been raised through March 31, 2012 to enable it to pay ongoing costs and expenses as they are incurred, finance the continued development of our Platform, and execute the business plan.  The Company intends to raise such financing through the sale of debt and equity securities.  The issuance of additional equity would result in dilution to existing shareholders.  If the Company is unable to obtain additional funds when they are needed, or if such funds cannot be obtained on terms acceptable to the Company, the Company may be unable to execute upon the business plan or pay costs and expenses as they are incurred, which could have a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition and results of operations.

The Company’s current monetization model is to derive a percentage of all revenues generated by online merchants using the Virtual Piggy service. Merchants are billed at the end of each month for all transactions that have been processed by the Company on their behalf in the prior month.  As the merchant base and consumer base grows, and as the trend to higher online spending levels continues, the Company expects to see significant revenue generated through this approach. Based on current rollout plans and projections, the Company expects to see significant revenue generated by this model by late 2013 or early 2014 and to be supplemented by the addition of new revenue models planned for late 2013.  Even if the Company is successful in raising sufficient capital to complete the development of the Virtual Piggy and ParentMatch products, the Company’s ability to continue in business as a viable going concern can only be achieved when revenues reach a level that sustains the business operations.  

10

Virtual Piggy, Inc.

 (A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Financial Statements

If sufficient funding cannot be obtained in the short term, the Company will need to reduce monthly expenditures to a level that will enable the Company to continue until such funds can be obtained.  The Company has raised $2,717,650, net of stock issuance costs of $28,000 through a private placement from December 31, 2011 through March 31, 2012.  The Company also raised $3,727,579 through an additional private placement from April 5, 2012 through May 14, 2012.  In addition, on May 2, 2012, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement with a non-U.S. person, pursuant to which such person committed to purchase $1 million of the Company's securities. An initial funding of $150,000 occurred on May 2, 2012 and the remaining $850,000 will be funded in a series of six closings, which will occur on the 1st day of each month commencing on June1, 2012 and continuing until November 1, 2012.

The Company is in the development stage at March 31, 2012.  Successful completion of the Company’s development program, and the attainment of profitable operations are dependent upon future events, including obtaining adequate financing to fulfill its development activities and achieving a level of sales adequate to support the Company’s cost structure.  However, there can be no assurances that the Company will be able to secure additional equity investment or achieve an adequate sales level.

NOTE 3 – PATENTS

The Company continues to apply for patents.  Accordingly, costs associated with the registration of these patents have been capitalized and are amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated lives of the patents (20 years).  During the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, there were capitalized patent costs of $74,957 and $0.  Amortization expense for patents was $1,054 and $0 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011.

NOTE 4 – NOTES PAYABLE

In September 2011, the Company commenced a private placement of up to 10 units at a price of $50,000 per unit to accredited investors.  One unit consists of a non interest bearing demand note payable in the amount of $50,000 due November 12, 2012, warrants to purchase 15,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $.50 per share and a term expiring November 12, 2012, and 15,000 shares of common stock.  In December 2011, the Company completed the private placement and raised $500,000.  The warrants were valued at $20,930, fair value, using the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the grant-date fair value of the options, with the following assumptions: no dividend yield, expected volatility of 39.8% to 62.8%, risk free interest rate of .1% and expected option life of 1.2 years.  The shares of common stock were valued at $82,655 or $.45 to $.70 per share, fair value.  Both the warrant value and the shares of common stock were treated as a discount to the value of the note payable in accordance with FASB ASC 835-30-25, Recognition and are being accreted over the term of the note payable for financial statement purposes.  During the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, $37,106 and $0 of interest was accreted on the notes payable.

On February 8, 2012, February 27, 2012, and April 10, 2012, $100,000, $50,000, and $25,000 respectively, of the notes payable was repaid.

On April 26, 2012, the remaining balance of the notes payable of $175,000 was converted into 564,516 shares of the Company’s common stock and warrants to purchase 282,258 shares of the Company’s common stock.

NOTE 5 - INCOME TAXES

Income tax expense was $0 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011.

As of January 1, 2012, the Company had no unrecognized tax benefits, and accordingly, the Company did not recognize interest or penalties during 2012 related to unrecognized tax benefits.  There has been no change in unrecognized tax benefits during the three months ended March 31, 2012, and there was no accrual for uncertain tax positions as of March 31, 2012.  Tax years from 2008 through 2011 remain subject to examination by major tax jurisdictions.

11

Virtual Piggy, Inc.

 (A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Financial Statements

NOTE 5 - INCOME TAXES (Continued)

There is no income tax benefit for the losses for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, since management has determined that the realization of the net tax deferred asset is not assured and has created a valuation allowance for the entire amount of such benefits.

NOTE 6 – STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

In February 2008, the Company issued 19,000,000 founders shares at $.001 per share or $19,000.

In February 2008, the Company commenced a private placement of up to 7 million units at a price of $.035 per unit to accredited investors.  One unit consisted of one share of the Company’s common stock and two warrants.  Each warrant entitles the holder to purchase one additional share of common stock at a price of $.04 per share and is exercisable for a three year period.  From February through June 2008, 7,142,858 units were sold, raising $250,000 in proceeds and resulting in 14,285,716 warrants being issued.

On May 8, 2008, 500,000 options were exercised, which raised proceeds $20,000.  During the three months ended September 30, 2008, 1,750,000 options were exercised, which raised proceeds of $70,000.

On May 27, 2008, the Company commenced a private placement of up to 6 million units at a price of $.035 per unit to accredited investors.  One unit consisted of one share of the Company’s common stock and one warrant. Ten of these warrants entitle the holder to purchase one additional share of common stock at a price of $.75 per share and are exercisable for a three year period.  During the three months ended June 30, 2008, 6,142,858 units were sold with warrants exercisable at a price of $.75 per share, raising $215,000 in proceeds and resulting in 614,286 warrants being issued.  During the three months ended September 30, 2008, 500,000 units were sold with warrants at a price of $.75, raising $17,500 and resulting in 50,000 warrants being issued.

During the three months ended September 30, 2008, the Company sold 2,560 shares, which raised proceeds of $2,560.  The Company filed a registration statement to register 2,560 shares of the Company which became effective on September 3, 2008.

During the three months ended September 30, 2008, 250,000 warrants were exercised which raised proceeds of $10,000.

During the three months ended March 31, 2009, 1 million options were exercised which raised proceeds of $40,000.

During the three months ended March 31, 2009, the Company issued 100,000 shares of common stock which were valued at the fair market value of $200,000 for consulting services.

During the three months ended June 30, 2009, the Company sold 400,000 shares which raised proceeds of $348,000, net of commissions of $52,000.

During the three months ended September 30, 2009, 1 million warrants and 1.5 million options were exercised which raised proceeds of $100,000.  In addition, the Company sold 100,000 shares which raised proceeds of $87,000, net of commissions of $13,000.

On October 9, 2009, the Company was listed on the German stock exchange.  As a result, the Company was required to issue 1,080,427 shares of common stock under a consulting agreement.  These shares were valued at the fair market value of $1,080,427.

On October 21, 2009, the Company sold 100,000 shares to an investor which raised proceeds of $100,000.

On October 22, 2009, an investor exercised 1,000,000 warrants which raised proceeds of $40,000.

12

Virtual Piggy, Inc.

 (A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Financial Statements

NOTE 6 – STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (Continued)

On December 2, 2009, two investors exercised 500,000 warrants each (total of 1,000,000 warrants) which raised total proceeds of $40,000.

On December 10, 2009 and December 31, 2009 an investor exercised 250,000 options and 1,000,000 warrants, respectively, which raised total proceeds of $50,000.

On January 5, 2010 an investor exercised 1,000,000 options which raised proceeds of $40,000.

On February 22, 2010 an investor exercised 892,858 warrants which raised proceeds of $35,714.

On March 5, 2010 an investor exercised 500,000 warrants which raised proceeds of $20,000.

On March 8, 2010 an investor exercised 500,000 warrants which raised proceeds of $20,000.

On April 13, 2010 an investor exercised 1,000,000 warrants which raised proceeds of $40,000.

On April 16, 2010 an investor exercised 1,500,000 warrants which raised proceeds of $60,000.

In August 2010, the Company retired 400,000 non-employee options with exercise prices of $.04 in exchange for the issuance of 65,000 shares to the option holders.  No additional compensation expense was recorded as the fair value of the options exceeded the value of the stock that was issued.

On August 17, 2010, the Company sold 2,000,000 shares of common stock to investors which raised proceeds of $400,000.

During November and December 2010, the Company sold 7,625,000 shares of common stock to investors which raised proceeds of $1,525,000.

On November 19, 2010, the Company issued 111,111 shares of common stock which were valued at the fair market value of $100,000, for consulting services.

On December 2, 2010, an investor exercised 3 million options which raised proceeds of $120,000.

In December 2010, two investors exercised a total of 2.5 million warrants which raised proceeds of $100,000.

During the three months ended June 30, 2011, the Company issued 100,000 shares of common stock which were valued at the fair market value of $49,000, for consulting services.

In December 2011, the Company commenced a private placement of up to $5,000,000 consisting of up to 12,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock and warrants to purchase up to 6,250,000 shares of the Company’s common stock.  The shares and warrants were sold in units with each unit comprised of two shares and one warrant at a purchase price of $.80 per unit.  During December 2011, the Company sold 625,000 units and raised $500,000.  On January 11, 2012, the Company amended the Securities Purchase Agreement dated December 1, 2011, by reducing the price of one unit from $.80 to $.70.  This increased the number of units to be sold from 6,250,000 units to 7,142,858 units.  It also required the Company to issue to one investor an additional 89,286 units, consisting of 178,572 shares common stock and warrants to purchase an additional 89,286 shares of common stock.  

During the three months ended March 31, 2012, the Company issued an additional 3,922,356 units and raised $2,717,650, net of stock issuance costs of $28,000.

13

Virtual Piggy, Inc.

 (A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Financial Statements

NOTE 7 – STOCK OPTIONS AND WARRANTS

During 2008, the Board of Directors (“Board”) of the Company adopted an Equity Incentive Plan (“Plan”).  Under the Plan, the Company is authorized to grant options to purchase up to 25,000,000 shares of common stock to any officer, other employee or director of, or any consultant or other independent contractor who provides services to the Company.  The Plan is intended to permit stock options granted to employees under the Plan to qualify as incentive stock options under Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (“Incentive Stock Options”).  All options granted under the Plan, which are not intended to qualify as Incentive Stock Options are deemed to be non-qualified options (“Non-Statutory Stock Options”).  As of March 31, 2012, 12,960,000 options have been issued and are unexercised, and 3,040,000 options that are available to be issued under the Plan.  Of the 12,960,000 options that have been issued and are unexercised, 10,415,000 options were granted to employees or persons who later became employees and 2,545,000 options were granted to non-employees.

The Plan is administered by the Board, which determines the persons to whom awards will be granted, the number of awards to be granted, and the specific terms of each grant, including the vesting thereof, subject to the terms of the Plan.

In connection with Incentive Stock Options, the exercise price of each option may not be less than 100% of the fair market value of the common stock on the date of the grant (or 110% of the fair market value in the case of a grantee holding more than 10% of the outstanding stock of the Company).

Volatility in all instances presented is the Company’s estimate of volatility that is based on the volatility of other public companies that are in closely related industries to the Company.

During 2008, the Company issued the Secretary of the Company options to purchase 500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $.04 per share which were valued at $8,825 and expensed immediately.  The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the grant-date fair value of the options, with the following assumptions: no dividend yield, expected volatility of 51.8%, risk free interest rate of 2.5%, and expected option life of 5 years.  The options expire five years from the date of issuance.

During 2008, the Company entered into an employment agreement with its President and Chief Executive Officer,  whereby, the President and Chief Executive Officer was issued options to purchase 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $.04 per share which were valued at $71,871 and expensed immediately. The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the grant-date fair value of the options, with the following assumptions: no dividend yield, expected volatility of 51.8%, risk free interest rate of 3.3%, and expected option life of 5 years.  The options expire five years from the date of issuance.

During 2008, the Company entered into an employment agreement with its Director of Corporate Development whereby the Director of Corporate Development was issued options to purchase 2,750,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $.04 per share which were valued at $197,645 and expensed immediately. The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the grant-date fair value of the options, with the following assumptions: no dividend yield, expected volatility of 51.8%, risk free interest rate of 3.3% and expected option life of 5 years.  The options expire five years from the date of issuance.

During 2008, the Company entered into an agreement with a member of the Company’s Board of Directors whereby the member of the Board of Directors was issued options to purchase 1,250,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $.04 per share which were valued at $89,838, fair value, and expensed immediately.  The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the grant-date fair value of the options, with the following assumptions: no dividend yield, expected volatility of 51.8%, risk free interest rate of 3.3%, and expected option life of 5 years.  The options expire five years from the date of issuance.

14

Virtual Piggy, Inc.

 (A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Financial Statements

NOTE 7 – STOCK OPTIONS AND WARRANTS (Continued)

On June 23, 2008, a member of the Board of Directors was issued 500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $.04 per share, which were valued at $36,113, fair value, and expensed immediately.  The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the grant-date fair value of the options, with the following assumptions: no dividend yield, expected volatility of 51.8%, risk free interest rate of 3.7% and expected option life of 5 years.  The options expire five years from the date of issuance.

On March 12, 2010 the Company entered into a three year employment agreement with the Senior Vice President of Marketing and Licensing for €150,000 annually.  The agreement also includes an option to purchase 2 million shares of the Company’s common stock at $1.00 per share.  These options were valued at $1,829,756, fair value.  The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the grant-date fair value of the options, with the following assumptions: no dividend yield, expected volatility of 41.6%, risk free interest rate of 2.4%, and expected option life of five years.  The options expire five years from the date of issuance.  Options granted under the agreements are expensed when the related service is provided.  In December 2010, this employment agreement was terminated, the options were terminated and any expense relative to the options that was previously recorded was reversed.

During November 2010, the Company issued two directors options to purchase an aggregate of 600,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $.90 per share.  These options have been valued at $5,207, fair value.  The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the grant-date fair value of the options, with the following assumptions: no dividend yield, expected volatility of 40.8%, risk free interest rate of 1.5%, and expected option life of five years.  The options expire five years from the date of issuance.  Options granted are expensed when the service is provided.

In 2008, the Company issued 14,950,002 warrants as part of the units included in the private placements, which were to expire three years from the date of issuance.  The expiration date for unexpired and unexercised warrants was extended on January 24, 2011 to six years from the date of issuance.  As of January 24, 2011, there were two directors that held an aggregate of warrants to purchase an aggregate of 3,142,858 shares of the Company’s common stock at $.04 per share and 100,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $.75 per share.  The warrants to purchase 3,242,858 shares of the Company’s common stock were reclassified from non-employee warrants to incentive stock warrants, because the recipients had become directors subsequent to the date of original issuance.  These warrants were revalued and the incremental cost charged to expense was $16,733.  There were also seven consultants that held warrants to purchase an aggregate of 564,286 shares of the Company’s common stock at $.75 per share.  These warrants were revalued, at fair value, and the incremental cost charged to expense was $71,868.  The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the grant-date fair value of the warrants, with the following assumptions: no dividend yield, expected volatility of 32.3%, risk free interest rate of 1.05% and expected warrant life of 3 to 3.5 years.  The warrants expire 6 years from date of original issuance.  The incremental fair value of the warrants was expensed immediately.

On January 2, 2012, the Company issued an employee an option to purchase 250,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $.50 per share.  These options have been valued at $51,692 fair value.  The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the grant-date fair value of the options, with the following assumptions: no dividend yield, expected volatility of 29.2%, risk free interest rate of 0.9% and expected option life of five years.  The options expire five years from the date of issuance.  Options granted are expensed over the three year vesting term.

On January 27, 2012, the Company issued an employee an option to purchase 30,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $.52 per share.  These options have been valued at $3,718, fair value.  The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the grant-date fair value of the options, with the following assumptions: no dividend yield, expected volatility of 25.4%, risk free interest rate of 0.8% and expected option life of five years.  The options expire five years from the date of issuance.  Options granted were expensed over the three year vesting term.

15

Virtual Piggy, Inc.

 (A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Financial Statements

NOTE 7 – STOCK OPTIONS AND WARRANTS (Continued)

On February 28, 2012, the Company issued an employee an option to purchase 25,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $.58 per share.  These options have been valued at $3,120, fair value.  The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the grant-date fair value of the options, with the following assumptions: no dividend yield, expected volatility of 25.0%, risk free interest rate of .8% and expected option life of five years.  The options expire five years from the date of issuance.  Options granted are expensed over the three year vesting term.

On March 2, 2012, the Company issued an employee an option to purchase 250,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $.58 per share.  These options have been valued at $33,975, fair value.  The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the grant-date fair value of the options, with the following assumptions: no dividend yield, expected volatility of 25.9%, risk free interest rate of .9% and expected option life of five years.  The options expire five years from the date of issuance.  Options granted are expensed immediately.

On March 5, 2012, the Company issued an employee an option to purchase 25,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $.58 per share.  These options have been valued at $2,680, fair value.  The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the grant-date fair value of the options, with the following assumptions: no dividend yield, expected volatility of 25.0%, risk free interest rate of .9% and expected option life of five years.  The options expire five years from the date of issuance.  Options granted are expensed over the three year vesting term.

On March 31, 2012, the Company issued options to purchase an aggregate of 4,010,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to seven employees at $.65 per share.  These options have been valued at $639,998, fair value.  The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the grant-date fair value of the options, with the following assumptions: no dividend yield, expected volatility of 26.8%, risk free interest rate of .51% and expected option life of five years.  The options expire five years from the date of issuance.  Options granted are expensed over the three year vesting term.

Cumulatively and for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company expensed $464,713, $38,650 and $16,733 relative to employee options/warrants granted.  As of March 31, 2012, there was $816,345 of unrecognized compensation expense related to employee non-vested market-based share awards.

16

Virtual Piggy, Inc.

 (A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Financial Statements

A summary of incentive stock option/warrant transactions for employees from February 11, 2008 (date of inception) to March 31, 2012 is as follows:

						Weighted Average
	Option/Warrants			Exercise		Exercise
	Shares			Price		Price
Outstanding, February 11, 2008 (Date of Inception)		-		$	-	$	-
Granted		6,000,000			0.04		0.04
Exercised		(1,750,000	)		0.04		0.04
Expired		-			-		-
Outstanding, December 31, 2008		4,250,000		$	0.04	$	0.04
Granted		-			-		-
Exercised		(2,750,000	)		0.04		0.04
Expired		-			-		-
Outstanding, December 31, 2009		1,500,000		$	0.04	$	0.04
Granted		2,600,000		$	.90 to $1.00	$	0.83
Exercised		(1,000,000	)		0.04		0.04
Terminated		(2,000,000	)		1.00		1.00
Outstanding, December 31, 2010		1,100,000		$	.04 to $.90	$	0.51
Granted		625,000		$	0.60	$	0.60
Reclassified from non-employee		7,742,858		.04 to .90			0.09
Exercised		-			-		-
Expired		-			-		-
Outstanding, December 31, 2011		9,467,858		$	.04 to .90	$	0.14
Granted		4,790,000		$	.50 to $.65	$	0.20
Reclassified from non-employee		25,000			0.60		-
Exercised		-			-		-
Expired		-			-		-
Outstanding, March 31, 2012		14,282,858		$	.04 to .90	$	0.33
Exercisable, March 31, 2012		9,942,858		$	.04 to $.90	$	0.20
Weighted Average Remaining Life,
Exercisable, March 31, 2012 (years)		1.9

17

Virtual Piggy, Inc.

 (A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Financial Statements

NOTE 7 – STOCK OPTIONS AND WARRANTS (Continued)

On August 18, 2009, options to purchase 100,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $2.30 were issued to a consultant, which were valued at $30,689, fair value.  Another consultant also received 25,000 options on August 18, 2009, which were valued at $7,672, fair value.  The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the grant-date fair value of the options, with the following assumptions: no dividend yield, expected volatility of 58.3%, risk free interest rate of 2.4%, and expected option life of 5 years.  The options expire five years from the date of issuance.  Options granted under the agreements were expensed when the related service or product was provided.

On August 20, 2010, the Company issued the Chief Financial Officer an option to purchase 250,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $.75 per share.  These options have been valued at $2,012, fair value.  The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the grant-date fair value of the options, with the following assumptions: no dividend yield, expected volatility of 36.7%, risk free interest rate of 1.5% and expected option life of five years.  The options expire five years from the date of issuance.  Options granted were expensed immediately.

On September 13, 2010, the Company issued the Chief Executive Officer an option to purchase 250,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $.75 per share.  These options have been valued at $1,676, fair value.  The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the grant-date fair value of the options, with the following assumptions: no dividend yield, expected volatility of 35.2%, risk free interest rate of 1.5% and expected option life of five years.  The options expire five years from the date of issuance.  Options granted were expensed immediately.

On September 13, 2010, the Company issued a consultant an option to purchase 100,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $.75 per share.  These options have been valued at $670, fair value.  The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the grant-date fair value of the options, with the following assumptions: no dividend yield, expected volatility of 35.2%, risk free interest rate of 1.5% and expected option life of five years.  The options expire five years from the date of issuance.  Options granted were expensed immediately.

During October and November 2010, the Company issued various consultant option to purchase an aggregate of 1,020,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $.75, $.78 and $.90 per share.  These options have been valued at $7,397, fair value.  The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the grant-date fair value of the options, with the following assumptions: no dividend yield, expected volatility of 34.2% to 40.8%, risk free interest rate of 1.1% to 1.5% and expected option life of five years.  The options expire five years from the date of issuance.  Options granted were expensed when the service was provided.

On January 24, 2011, the Company issued four consultants options to purchase an aggregate of 230,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $1.00 per share.  These options have been valued at $46,019, fair value.  The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the grant-date fair value of the options, with the following assumptions: no dividend yield, expected volatility of 33.5%, risk free interest rate of 2.03% and expected option life of five years.  The options expire five years from the date of issuance.  Options granted were expensed when the service was provided.

On July 1, 2011, the Company issued a consultant an option to purchase 200,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $.91 per share.  These options have been valued at $19,234, fair value.  The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the grant-date fair value of the options, with the following assumptions: no dividend yield, expected volatility of 39.8%, risk free interest rate of 1.80% and expected option life of five years.  The options expire five years from the date of issuance.  Options granted were expensed immediately.

18

Virtual Piggy, Inc.

 (A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Financial Statements

NOTE 7 – STOCK OPTIONS AND WARRANTS (Continued)

On July 22, 2011, the Company issued a consultant an option to purchase 25,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $.60 per share.  These options have been valued at $4,150, fair value.  The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the grant-date fair value of the options, with the following assumptions: no dividend yield, expected volatility of 38.0%, risk free interest rate of 1.53% and expected option life of five years.  The options expire five years from the date of issuance.  Options granted were expensed immediately.

On August 2, 2011, the Company issued a consultant an option to purchase 20,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $.60 per share.  These options have been valued at $3,803, fair value.  The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the grant-date fair value of the options, with the following assumptions: no dividend yield, expected volatility of 39.6%, risk free interest rate of 1.23% and expected option life of five years.  The options expire five years from the date of issuance.  Options granted are being expensed as the service is provided.

On August 15, 2011, the Company issued a consultant an option to purchase 150,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $.75 per share.  These options have been valued at $27,273, fair value.  The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the grant-date fair value of the options, with the following assumptions: no dividend yield, expected volatility of 55.8%, risk free interest rate of .99% and expected option life of five years.  The options expire five years from the date of issuance.  Options granted were expensed immediately.

On January 17, 2012, the Company issued a consultant an option to purchase 200,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $.50 per share.  These options have been valued at $31,437, fair value.  The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the grant-date fair value of the options, with the following assumptions: no dividend yield, expected volatility of 28.0%, risk free interest rate of 0.8% and expected option life of five years.  The options expire five years from the date of issuance.  Options granted are expensed immediately.

On March 31, 2012, the Company issued two consultants options to purchase an aggregate of 100,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $.65 per share.  These options have been valued at $18,947, fair value.  The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the grant-date fair value of the options, with the following assumptions: no dividend yield, expected volatility of 31.2%, risk free interest rate of 1.04% and expected option life of five years.  The options expire five years from the date of issuance.  Options granted are expensed immediately.

Cumulatively and for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company expensed $2,146,794, $348,836 and $117,993 relative to non-employee options granted.  As of March 31, 2012, there was $1,268 of unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested market-based share awards.

19

Virtual Piggy, Inc.

 (A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Financial Statements

NOTE 7 – STOCK OPTIONS AND WARRANTS (Continued)

The following table summarizes non-employee stock option/warrant of the Company from February 11, 2008 (date of inception) to March 31, 2012 as follows:

						Weighted Average
	Option/Warrant			Exercise		Exercise
	Shares			Price		Price
Outstanding, February 11, 2008 (Date of Inception		-		$	-	$	-
Granted		23,450,002		.04 to .75			0.07
Exercised		(750,000	)		0.04		0.04
Expired		-			-		-
Outstanding, December 31, 2008		22,700,002		$	.04 to $.75	$	0.07
Granted		125,000			2.30		0.01
Exercised		(4,000,000	)		0.04		0.04
Expired		-			-		-
Outstanding, December 31, 2009		18,825,002		$	0.04 to $2.30	$	0.09
Granted		1,620,000		.75 to .90			0.13
Exercised		(9,892,858	)		0.04		0.04
Retired		(400,000	)		0.04		0.04
Outstanding, December 31, 2010		10,152,144		$	0.04 to $2.30	$	0.25
Granted		775,000		.50 to 1.00		$	0.06
Reclassified from employee		(7,742,858	)	.04 to .90			0.09
Exercised		-			-		-
Expired		-			-		-
Outstanding, December 31, 2011		3,184,286		$	0.04 to $2.30	$	0.76
Granted		100,000		$	0.65	$	0.01
Reclassified to employee		(25,000	)		0.60		-
Exercised		-			-		-
Expired		-			-		-
Outstanding, March31, 2012		3,259,286			$0.04 to $2.30	$	0.76
Exercisable, March 31, 2012		3,259,286			$0.04 to $2.30	$	0.76
Weighted Average Remaining Life,
Exercisable, March 31, 2012 (years)		3.1

20

Virtual Piggy, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Financial Statements

NOTE 8 – OPERATING LEASES

For the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, total rent expense under leases amounted to $8,803 and $8,603.  At March 31, 2012, the Company was obligated under various non-cancelable operating lease arrangements for property as follows:

2012 $ 34,934

NOTE 9 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

From inception through December 1, 2010, the Company has utilized offices leased by affiliates of certain of the Company’s board members without charge.

During the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, the former manager of corporate development of the Company advanced expenses on behalf of the Company in connection with research and implementation of the Company’s business plans.  Expenses totaling $64,106 and $44,764 were incurred and reimbursed during the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011.

During the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, a marketing company owned by the Secretary and his spouse was paid $14,560 and $0.

During the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, the certified public accounting firm owned by the Chief Financial Officer was paid $16,750 and $23,425 for accounting services.

NOTE 10 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On April 1, 2012, the Company issued a company owned by the former manager of corporate development an option to purchase 250,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $.70 per share.  These options have been valued at $43,028, fair value.  The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the grant-date fair value of the options, with the following assumptions: no dividend yield, expected volatility 31.2%, risk free interest rate of 1.04% and expected option life of five years.  The options expire five years from the date of issuance. Options granted are expensed over one year.

On April 2, 2012, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with a former consultant of the Company. In connection with the settlement, the Company made a settlement payment to the consultant of $30,000 and issued the consultant 350,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, which were valued at $297,500, fair value.  These amounts were accrued as of March 31, 2012.

On April 5, 2012, the Company commenced a private placement of up to $3,500,000 consisting of up to 10,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock and warrants to purchase up to 5,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $.50 per share.  The shares and warrants will be sold in units with each unit comprised of two shares and one warrant at a purchase price of $.70 per unit.  In accordance with the terms of the offering documents, the offering amount was increased to $4 million.  From April 5, 2012 to May 15, 2012, the Company sold 5,325,113 units and raised $3,727,579.  

On April 10, 2012, a company owned by the Secretary and his wife exercised 250,000 options which raised proceeds of $10,000.

In April 2012, the Company issued six employees options to purchase an aggregate of 60,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at exercise prices ranging from $.65 to $.97 per share.  These options were valued at $12,635 fair value.  The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the grant-date fair value of the options, with the following assumptions: no dividend yield, expected volatility of 26.9% to 30.9%, risk free interest rate of .39% to .51% and expected option life of five years.  The options expire five years from the date of issuance.  Options granted will be expensed over the three year vesting term.

On May 2, 2012 the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement with a non-U.S. person, pursuant to which the Company issued and sold 187,500 units at a purchase price of $0.80 per unit, in consideration of gross proceeds of $150,000.  Each unit consisted of: (i) two shares of the Company’s common stock, (ii) a warrant to purchase one share of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.50 per share for a term of two years, and (iii) a warrant to purchase one half share of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $1.00 per share for a term of three years.  Pursuant to the securities purchase agreement, the purchaser also agreed to purchase an additional $850,000 of units by November 1, 2012.

21

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL

CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

Cautionary Statements Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This report contains "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act").  All statements other than statements of historical facts included or incorporated by reference in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, including without limitation, statements regarding our future financial position, business strategy, budgets, projected revenues, projected costs and plans and objective of management for future operations, are forward-looking statements.  In addition, forward-looking statements generally can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as "may," "will," "expects," "intends," "plans," "projects," "estimates," "anticipates," or "believes" or the negative thereof or any variation thereon or similar terminology or expressions.

We have based these forward-looking statements on our current expectations and projections about future events. These forward-looking statements are not guarantees and are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and assumptions about us that may cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations include, but are not limited to:  our ability to raise additional capital, the absence of any operating history or revenue, our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel, our dependence on third party developers who we cannot control, our ability to develop and introduce a new service to the market in a timely manner, market acceptance of our services, our limited experience in a relatively new industry, the ability to successfully develop licensing programs and generate business, rapid technological change in relevant markets, unexpected network interruptions or security breaches, changes in demand for current and future intellectual property rights, legislative, regulatory and competitive developments, intense competition with larger companies, general economic conditions, as well as other factors set forth under the caption "Risk Factors" in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and “Item 2 — Management’s Discussions and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation” below.

All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us, or persons acting on our behalf, are expressly qualified in their entirety by the foregoing.  Except as required by law, we assume no duty to update or revise our forward-looking statements.

Overview

We were incorporated in Delaware in February 2008. We are a development stage company and have had limited business operations. For the period from inception through March 31, 2012, we have concentrated our efforts on developing a business plan which is designed to allow us to create our Platform. Those activities included, but were not limited to, securing initial capital in order to fund the development of a demonstration model for portions of the Platform and working capital, securing a board of directors, management personnel and consultants who we believe will assist us in developing the Platform and meet our business goals, conducting market research regarding the industry and our Platform, and other pre-marketing activities.

We are a technology development company that delivers an online security platform, which we refer to as the “Platform.”  The Platform is currently composed of three separate products and is designed for the management of the “Under 18” age group’s online experience.  Our overarching mission is to deliver solutions to meet the exponential growth of the “Under 18” age group transacting in the global online market.  Our Platform is designed to enable online businesses to interact with “tweens” or children between the ages of 8-14 in compliance with the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (“COPPA”), and other similar international children’s privacy laws.  

22

Our Platform currently consists of three separate security management products targeted at the Under 18 market:

· Virtual Piggy;

· ParentMatch and ParentPlayback; and

· Age Verification Service

Our Virtual Piggy product, which has been launched in the market, enables online businesses to interact and transact with the “Under 18” market in a manner consistent with “COPPA” and other similar international children’s privacy laws.  Virtual Piggy provides an online payment profile that allows parents to set up, monitor and control their children’s online spending.  Parents can establish how much a child can spend in a single transaction, or over time, and also control the merchants with which the child can transact business.  Parents also have the ability to set up approval rules and notification methods.

Our ParentMatch and ParentPlayback products are currently under development and are designed to provide the parent/guardian with a higher level of control than is currently provided by ‘nanny’ type services.  In addition, the web service ID will follow the child whenever he or she is on a computer, unlike traditional controls that are resident on a PC by PC basis.

Age Check will be a persistent software system and service designed to provide a verification mechanism for the age of a person online. The system and service will provide a rapid secure checking mechanism to determine a person’s age. The main purpose of this system and service is to determine whether setup information supplied by a person to gain access to a social network or other online site is correct.

Our Plan of Operation

A phased approach to the introduction of our Platform is planned. 

As of the date of this report, we have completed the design and development of Virtual Piggy.  We announced the release of Virtual Piggy in January 2011 and commenced marketing and distribution efforts in February 2011.  We released our Virtual Piggy mobile application on the iOS platform in early 2012.  We are in discussions with several global merchants and we plan a market introduction of Virtual Piggy into Europe by early 2013. The Virtual Piggy service is running live and processing live transactions with real merchants and consumers.

We are planning the release of ParentMatch and Parent Playback in 2013-2014 to line up with our international marketing campaign of Virtual Piggy.  These technologies are currently in the design and prototyping phases, but we expect that they will be developed and released as a single application that provides both sets of functionality.  Our plan is to market this technology to customers of our Virtual Piggy platform and the mobile market.

The last component of our solution is Age Verification Service.  We expect to complete the design and development of Age Verification in 2014.  This service is still in the design phase and, therefore, our commercialization strategy for this service is still in the preliminary stages and has yet to be finalized.

We are seeking additional funds to help fund the operations and in particular the planned marketing programs.  We are relocating our headquarters to the Los Angeles, California area where a significant number of our merchants have their global headquarters.  We have retained a public relations agency in the Los Angeles area – Bender Helper Impact to help us with our public relations and consumer outreach campaigns.

As of May 15, 2012, we have approximately $4.1 million in cash on hand. Our ability to execute on our current plan was dependent on raising approximately $5,000,000 to $6,000,000 of additional capital, of which we have raised $7,070,229 net of stock issuance costs of $28,000 since December 16, 2011.  Even though we have raised the capital that we have projected we need to implement our plan, future unanticipated events may occur that require the Company to raise additional capital; and/or achieve profitable operations.  The foregoing projected implementation plan was prepared by us in good faith based upon assumptions that we believe to be reasonable.  No assurance can be given, however, regarding the attainability of the projections or the reliability of the assumptions on which they are based.

23

Strategic Outlook

We believe that the online gaming market and virtual goods market will continue to grow over the long term.  Within the market, we intend to provide services to the online industry to allow them to transact with children in compliance with COPPA and similar international privacy laws.  We believe that this particular opportunity is relatively untapped and expect to be a leading provider of online transactions for children.

The Company’s current monetization model is to derive a percentage of all revenues generated by online merchants using the Virtual Piggy service. Merchants are billed at the end of each month for all transactions that have been processed by the Company on their behalf in the prior month.  As the merchant base and consumer base grows, and as the trend to higher online spending levels continues, the Company expects to see significant revenue generated through this approach. Based on current rollout plans and projections, the Company expects to see significant revenue generated by this model by late 2013 or early 2014 and to be supplemented by the addition of new revenue models planned for late 2013.

Sustained spending on technology, our ability to raise additional financing, the continued growth of the online market, and compliance with regulatory and reporting requirements are all external conditions that may affect our ability to execute our business plan.  The online payment industry is intensely competitive, and most participants have longer operating histories, significantly greater financial, technical, marketing, customer service, other resources, and greater name recognition.  In addition, certain potential customers, particularly large organizations, may view our small size and limited financial resources as a negative even if they prefer our offering to those of our competitors.

Our primary strategic objective over the next 12-24 months, is to fully develop and implement our Platform and generate revenue that is sufficient to cover our operating expenses and support additional growth over the next several years.  We plan to achieve this objective by completing the development and implementation of the Platform in a timely and efficient manner and supplementing the roll-out of each phase of our service with an extensive, layered marketing approach.  As our service grows, we intend to hire additional information technology professionals to maintain our product offerings and develop new products to increase our market share.

We believe that our near-term success will depend particularly on our ability to develop customer awareness and confidence in our service.  Since we have limited capital resources, we will need to closely manage our expenses and conserve our cash by continually monitoring any increase in expenses and reducing or eliminating unnecessary expenditures. Our prospects must be considered in light of the risks, expenses and difficulties encountered by companies at an early stage of development, particularly given that we operate in new and rapidly evolving markets, that we have limited financial resources, and face an uncertain economic environment. We may not be successful in addressing such risks and difficulties.

Results of Operations

Comparison of the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011

The following discussion analyzes our results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011. The following information should be considered together with our financial statements for such period and the accompanying notes thereto.

Net Loss for Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011

Lack of Revenue:    We are a development stage company and have not generated any significant revenue since our inception.  For the three months March 31, 2012 and 2011, we generated revenues of $1,168 and $326, an increase of $842.  During such time we devoted our efforts to formalizing our business plan, and raising initial capital to commence our operations.  

Expenses:    The following amounts represent the most significant components of expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011:

24

a)  General and Administrative expenses: For the three months ended March 31, 2012 general and administrative expenses were $341,178, an increase of $215,233 from $125,945 for the three months ended March 31, 2011.  The increase resulted primarily from approximate increases in board fees of $25,000, employee benefits of $5,400, marketing of $132,900, meals and entertainment of $8,200, video and logo animation of $13,800, and website expense of $18,500.  The increases resulted from continued expenses related to the development of our Platform and marketing the Virtual Piggy product.

b) Consulting Expense: For the three months ended March 31, 2012, consulting expenses were $641,849, an increase of $313,754 from $328,095 for the three months ended March 31, 2011.  This increase resulted primarily from a settlement entered into with a former consultant and from an increase in payments to consultants related to marketing and infrastructure, as well as stock based compensation related to consultant agreements.

c)  Payroll Expenses: During the three months ended March 31, 2012, we incurred $206,796 of compensation expenses as compared to $16,733 for the three months ended March 31, 2011, an increase of $190,243.  The increase resulted from the hiring of eight employees as well as employee stock option grants during the three months ended March 31, 2011.

 d) Professional Fees: During the three months ended March 31, 2012, we incurred $144,913 of professional fees as compared to $103,449 for the three months ended March 31, 2011, an increase of $41,464.  The increase related primarily to legal and accounting fees associated with the private placements and option issuances.

e)  Research and Development:  During the three months ended March 31, 2012, we incurred $86,606 of research and development expenses as compared to $77,726 for the three months ended March 31, 2011, an increase of $8,880.  The increase was due to the development costs of our Virtual Piggy, ParentMatch and ParentPlayback applications.

f) Travel: For the three months ended March 31, 2012 travel expenses were $87,768, an increase of $16,841 from $70,927 for the three months ended March 31, 2011.  The expenses incurred were primarily associated with capital raising activities.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of the date of this report, we had cash on hand of approximately $4.1 million.

Net cash used in operating activities for the three months ended March 31, 2012 increased to $1,149,486 from $567,526 for the three months ended March 31, 2011 an increase of $581,960 as a result of expanded operations including marketing the Virtual Piggy product, hiring employees and establishing the infrastructure of the Company.

Net cash used in investing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2012 increased to $90,169 from $0 for the three months ended March 31, 2011.  The increase resulted from the purchase of computer equipment and costs of patents and trademarks.

Net cash provided by financing activities was $2,567,650 for the three months ended March 31, 2012, an increase of $2,567,650 from $0 for the three months ended March 31, 2011.  We repaid notes payable during the three months ended March 31, 2012, and completed one private placement.  Cash provided by investing activities during the three months ended March 31, 2012 consisted of the issuance of shares of commons stock and warrants.

As we have not generated any meaningful revenues since our inception, we have financed our operations through public and private offerings of debt and equity securities.  We do not currently maintain a line of credit or term loan with any commercial bank or other financial institution.  The following sets forth our primary sources of capital during the previous two years:

Between August 2010 and December 2010, we raised proceeds of $2,000,000 through the sale of 10,000,000 shares of common stock in a private placement transaction to accredited investors.

25

During 2010, we realized aggregate proceeds of $160,000 and $240,000 from the exercise of options and warrants to purchase an aggregate of 4,000,000 and 6,892,858 shares of our common stock, respectively.

During 2010, we issued a series of unsecured promissory notes to certain of our affiliates and other investors, in the aggregate principal amount of $342,500.  All of the notes were repaid in 2010 either with cash, shares of common stock, or a combination of cash and shares of common stock.

During 2011, we issued a series of unsecured promissory notes to certain investors, in the aggregate principal amount of $300,000.  None of the notes have been repaid in 2011.

During 2011, we commenced a private placement and raised $2,717,650 in proceeds, net of stock issuance costs of $28,000.

Since our inception, we have focused on developing and implementing our business plan.  We have not paid any salaries to management and have utilized offshore programmers on a work for hire basis to assist in developing the demonstration model. We believe that our existing cash resources will not be sufficient to sustain our operations during the next twelve months. The Company is currently in need of approximately $2.7 million of additional capital aside from what has been collected through March 31, 2012 to enable it to pay ongoing costs and expenses as they are incurred, finance the continued development of our Platform, and execute the business plan.  The Company intends to raise such financing through the sale of debt and equity securities.  The issuance of additional equity would result in dilution to existing shareholders.  If the Company is unable to obtain additional funds when they are needed or if such funds cannot be obtained on terms acceptable to the Company, the Company may be unable to execute upon the business plan or pay costs and expenses as they are incurred, which could have a material, adverse effect on the business, financial condition and results of operations.

Even if we are successful in raising sufficient capital in order to complete the marketing of our Virtual Piggy and development of our ParentMatch products, our ability to continue in business as a viable going concern can only be achieved when our revenues reach a level that sustains our business operations. We raised approximately $2.7 million during the year ended December 31, 2010.  The Virtual Piggy product  was introduced to the marketplace in the third quarter of 2011.   We do not project that significant revenue will be developed until late 2013. While it is impossible to predict the amount of revenues, if any, that we may receive from our Virtual Piggy product, we presently believe, based solely on our internal projections, that we will generate revenues sufficient to fund our planned business operations if the Virtual Piggy product is marketed effectively and the ParentMatch product is developed in accordance with our plans.  There can be no assurance that we will raise sufficient proceeds, or any proceeds, for us to implement fully our proposed business plan to aggressively develop, complete, and market our Virtual Piggy and ParentMatch products.  Moreover there can be no assurance that even if our Virtual Piggy product is marketed effectively and the ParentMatch product is developed, that we will generate revenues sufficient to fund our operations.  In either such situation, we may not be able to continue our operations and our business might fail.

The foregoing project implementation and projections were prepared by us in good faith based upon assumptions that we believe to be reasonable. No assurance can be given, however, regarding the attainability of the projections or the reliability of the assumptions on which they are based. The projections are subject to the uncertainties inherent in any attempt to predict the results of our operations, especially where new products and services are involved. Certain of the assumptions used will inevitably not materialize and unanticipated events will occur. Actual results of operations are, therefore, likely to vary from the projections and such variations may be material and adverse to us. Accordingly, no assurance can be given that such results will be achieved. Moreover due to changes in technology, new product announcements, competitive pressures, system design and/or other specifications we may be required to change the current plans for our Virtual Piggy and ParentMatch products.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of March 31, 2012, we did not have any relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partners, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities, established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes.  As such, we are not materially exposed to any financing, liquidity, market or credit risk that could arise if we had engaged in such relationships.

26

Critical Accounting Policies

Our financial statements are impacted by the accounting policies used and the estimates and assumptions made by management during their preparation. A complete summary of these policies is included in note 2 of the notes to our financial statements. We have identified below the accounting policies that are of particular importance in the presentation of our financial position, results of operations and cash flows and which require the application of significant judgment by management.

Stock-based Compensation

We have adopted the fair value recognition provisions Financial Accounting Standard Board Accounting Standards Codification (“FASB ASC”) 718. In addition, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 “ Share-Based Payment ” (“SAB 107”) in March, 2005, which provides supplemental FASB ASC 718 application guidance based on the views of the SEC. Under FASB ASC 718, compensation cost recognized includes compensation cost for all share-based payments granted beginning January 1, 2006, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of  FASB ASC 718.

We have used the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to estimate the option fair values. The option-pricing model requires a number of assumptions, of which the most significant are, expected stock price volatility, the expected pre-vesting forfeiture rate and the expected option term (the amount of time from the grant date until the options are exercised or expire).

Compensation expense for unvested options granted to non-employees in previous periods is being amortized over the vesting period of the options, or the term of the consulting agreement, whichever is longer.

Revenue Recognition

In accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Staff Accounting Bulletin) No. 104, Revenue Recognition (Codified in FASB ASC 605), we will recognize revenue when (i) persuasive evidence of a customer or distributor arrangement exists or acceptance occurs, (ii) a retailer, distributor or wholesaler receives the goods, (iii) the price is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability of the sales revenues is reasonably assured. Subject to these criteria, we will generally recognize revenue from Virtual Piggy and ParentMatch at the time of the sale of the associated product and will recognize revenue from the sale of role playing games when shipped.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

As of March 31, 2012, we carried out the evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures required by Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer.  Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of March 31, 2012, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is: (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and (ii) accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with this evaluation that occurred during our fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2012 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

27

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 2.       UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.

On March 31, 2012, the Company granted options to purchase an aggregate of 100,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to two consultants. The options are exercisable at $0.65 per share for a term of five years.

The foregoing securities were issued without registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), in reliance upon an exemption from registration provided by Section 4(2) under the Securities Act without payment of commissions to any person. The securities may not be transferred or sold absent registration under the Securities Act or the availability of an applicable exemption therefrom.
 

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS.

31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

28

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	VIRTUAL PIGGY, INC.
Date: May 16, 2012	By:	/s/ Jo Webber
		Jo Webber
		Chief Executive Officer

29 

EX-31.1

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO RULES 13a-14a AND 15d-14a

OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jo Webber, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Virtual Piggy, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 16, 2012	By:	/s/ Jo Webber
		Jo Webber
		Chief Executive Officer

EX-31.2

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO RULES 13a-14a AND 15d-14a

OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Scott McPherson, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Virtual Piggy, Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 16, 2012	By:	/s/ Scott McPherson
		Scott McPherson
		Chief Financial Officer

EX-32.1

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

OF VIRTUAL PIGGY, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Virtual Piggy, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended March 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Jo Webber, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 16, 2012	/s/ Jo Webber
	Jo Webber
	Chief Executive Officer

EX-32.2

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

OF VIRTUAL PIGGY, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Virtual Piggy, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended March 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Scott McPherson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 16, 2012	/s/ Scott McPherson
	Scott McPherson
	Chief Financial Officer

XML

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2012

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES [Abstract]

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Nature of the Business

Virtual Piggy, Inc. ("the Company") is a development stage enterprise incorporated in the state of Delaware on February 11, 2008.  The Company initially concentrated its efforts on developing a business plan which was designed to allow it to create the massive multiplayer online gaming platform (the "Platform") and massive multiplayer online games ("MMOGs") for use on its Platform. Those activities included, but were not limited to, securing initial capital in order to fund the development of a demonstration model for portions of the Platform and working capital, securing a board of directors, management personnel and consultants who the Company believes will assist in developing the Platform and meet the business goals, conducting market research regarding the MMOG industry and the Platform and planned MMOGs, and other pre-marketing activities. Commencing in the fourth quarter of 2010, in light of the Company's belief that  increased market interest towards the security aspects of online gaming and social networking have emerged, the Company  has refocused its efforts towards delivering a platform technology designed to manage the under 18 age group's online experience in a secure manner.  The Company has developed and introduced the Virtual Piggy product to the marketplace and is attempting to develop and introduce the ParentMatch product to the marketplace in 2013 to 2014.

Virtual Piggy is designed to provide an online piggy bank security service that allows parents to setup and control their children's spending online. Parents and guardians will be able to determine who is allowed to contribute to their child's account as well as provide notification mechanisms back to the contributors when the funds are spent. The parent can establish how much a child can spend in a single transaction and how much they can spend over time. The Virtual Piggy service tracks all spending and the parent can receive alerts and reports on spending patterns. A third-party site would prompt a child to enter their VirtualPiggy ID - when they attempt to make a transaction. This ID along with category, pricing and descriptive information about the purchase would be sent to the VirtualPiggy webservice. Based on the rules set out by the parent, VirtualPiggy would send back a Yes/No signal to the requesting service and either allow or prohibit the transaction.

ParentMatch, and its companion product, ParentPlayback, will be designed to provide the parent/guardian with a higher level of control than is currently provided by 'nanny' type services. In addition the ID follows the child whenever they are on a computer as opposed to traditional controls which are resident on a PC by PC basis.  ParentMatch provides filtering for the parent to be able to control such areas as (i) sites a child may access; (ii) types of content they may view and (iii) who they can interact with online. ParentPlayback will provide the parent with a video transcript of their child's online session.  Since inception, substantially all of the efforts of the Company have been developing technologies for multiplayer online role playing games and the Virtual Piggy, ParentMatch and ParentPlayback platforms.  The Company is in the development stage of raising capital, financial planning, establishing sources of supply, and acquiring property and equipment.  The Company anticipates establishing global markets for its services.

Basis of Presentation

The financial statements are presented in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification ("FASB ASC") 915 for development stage entities.  The accompanying unaudited financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions for Form 10-Q and Rule 8-03 of Regulation S-X.  Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements.  In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. The financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes included in the Company's Annual Report on form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.  Operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ended December 31, 2012.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  Actual results could differ from these estimates.

Comprehensive Income

The Company follows FASB ASC 220 in reporting comprehensive income.  Comprehensive income is a more inclusive financial reporting methodology that includes disclosure of certain financial information that historically has not been recognized in the calculation of net income.  Since the Company has no items of other comprehensive income (loss), comprehensive income (loss) is equal to net income (loss).

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company's financial instruments consist of cash, accounts receivable, notes payable and accounts payable.  The carrying value of cash, accounts receivable, notes payable and accounts payable approximate fair value, because of their short maturity.

Concentration of Credit Risk Involving Cash

The Company may have deposits with a financial institution which at times exceed Federal Depository Insurance coverage of $250,000.  

Cash and Cash Equivalents

For purposes of reporting cash flows, the Company considers all cash accounts, which are not subject to withdrawal restrictions or penalties, and certificates of deposit and commercial paper with original maturities of 90 days or less to be cash or cash equivalents.

Revenue Recognition

In accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") Staff Accounting Bulletin ("SAB") No. 104, Revenue Recognition (Codified in FASB ASC 605), the Company will recognize revenue when (i) persuasive evidence of a customer or distributor arrangement exists or acceptance occurs, (ii) a retailer, distributor or wholesaler receives the goods, (iii) the price is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability of the sales revenues is reasonably assured. Subject to these criteria, the Company will generally recognize revenue from Virtual Piggy and Virtual Parent at the time of the sale of the associated product.

Income Taxes

The Company follows FASB ASC 740 when accounting for income taxes, which requires an asset and liability approach to financial accounting and reporting for income taxes.  Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are computed annually for temporary differences between the financial statements and tax bases of assets and liabilities that will result in taxable or deductible amounts in the future based on enacted tax laws and rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income.  Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.  Income tax expense is the tax payable or refundable for the period plus or minus the change during the period in deferred tax assets and liabilities.  Tax years from 2008 through 2011 remain subject to examination by major tax jurisdictions.

Loss Per Share

The Company follows FASB ASC 260 when reporting Earnings Per Share resulting in the presentation of basic and diluted earnings per share.  Because the Company reported a net loss for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, common stock equivalents, including stock options and warrants were anti-dilutive; therefore, the amounts reported for basic and dilutive loss per share were the same.

Start-up Costs

In accordance with FASB ASC 720, start-up costs are expensed as incurred.

Research and  Development Costs

In accordance with FASB ASC 730, research and development costs are expensed when incurred.  

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

As of March 31, 2012 and for the period then ended, there were no recently adopted accounting pronouncements that had a material effect on the Company's financial statements.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted

As of March 31, 2012, there are no recently issued accounting standards not yet adopted which would have a material effect on the Company's financial statements.

XML

Statements of Cash Flows (USD $)	3 Months Ended		50 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2012	Mar. 31, 2011	Mar. 31, 2012
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net loss	$ (1,544,911)	$ (721,504)	$ (8,979,259)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities
Fair value of warrants issued in exchange for services		88,601	88,601
Fair value of options issued in exchange for services	89,986	46,125	794,783
Fair value of stock issued in exchange for services			1,429,427
Amortization of deferred costs	0	0	78,243
Accretion of discount on notes payable	37,105	0	397,640
Depreciation and amortization	2,235	649	10,101
Provision for bad debt			42,768
(Increase) decrease in assets
Accounts receivable	(248)	(326)	(2,748)
Other receivable			(42,768)
Prepaid expenses	(34,589)	5,294	(36,354)
Deposits	(25,544)		(28,211)
Increase (decrease) in liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	326,480	13,635	684,993
Net cash used in operating activities	(1,149,486)	(567,526)	(5,562,784)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Purchase of equipment	(15,212)		(30,890)
Patent and Trademark costs	(74,957)		(154,593)
Net cash used in investing activities	(90,169)		(185,483)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from note payable - stockholders			747,500
Repayment of note payable - stockholders	(150,000)		(547,500)
Proceeds from notes payable			75,000
Proceeds from issuance of common stock	2,745,650		6,274,707
Proceeds from exercise of options			360,000
Proceeds from exercise of warrants			445,714
Stock issuance costs	(28,000)		(93,000)
Net cash provided by financing activities	2,567,650		7,262,421
NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS	1,327,995	(567,526)	1,514,154
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS - BEGINNING OF PERIOD	186,159	1,574,448
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS - END OF PERIOD	1,514,154	1,006,922	1,514,154
SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULE OF NON-CASH FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Fair value of common stock issued as discount for notes payable			400,744
Conversion of notes payable into common stock			$ 75,000
Fair value of warrants issued as discount for notes payable			20,930

XML

Balance Sheets (USD $)	Mar. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$ 1,514,154	$ 186,159
Accounts Receivable	2,748	2,500
Prepaid expenses	36,354	1,765
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS	1,553,256	190,424
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Computer equipment	30,891	15,679
Less: accumulated depreciation	7,425	6,244
TOTAL PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT	23,466	9,435
OTHER ASSETS
Deposit	28,211	2,667
Patents and trademarks, net of accumulated amoritization of $2,676 and $1,622	151,917	78,013
TOTAL OTHER ASSETS	180,128	80,680
TOTAL ASSETS	1,756,850	280,539
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	684,993	358,513
Notes payable, net of discount of $28,454 and $65,560	171,546	284,440
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES	856,539	642,953
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Preferred stock, $.0001 par value; 2,000,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011
Common stock, $ .0001 par value; 150,000,000 shares authorized; 74,894,709 and 66,871,422 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011	7,489	6,687
Additional paid in capital	9,872,081	7,065,247
Deficit accumulated during the development stage	(8,979,259)	(7,434,348)
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)	900,311	(362,414)
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)	$ 1,756,850	$ 280,539

XML

Statement of Changes in Stockholders' Equity (Deficit) (USD $)	Total	Common Stock [Member]	Additional Paid-In Capital [Member]	Deficit Accumulated During the Development Stage [Member]
Balance, values at Feb. 10, 2008
Issuance of initial 19,000,000 shares on February 11, 2008 at $.001 per share, values	$ 19,000	$ 1,900	$ 17,100
Issuance of initial 19,000,000 shares on February 11, 2008 at $.001 per share, shares		19,000,000
Issuance of shares of common stock and 14,285,716 warrants in February 2008 through private placement at $.035 per unit, values	250,000	714	249,286
Issuance of shares of common stock and 14,285,716 warrants in February 2008 through private placement at $.035 per unit, shares		7,142,858
Employee options issued for services on March 3, 2008, vested immediately and valued at $.02 per share	8,825		8,825
Nonemployee options issued for services on March 3, 2008, vested immediately and valued at $.02 per share	107,859		107,859
Exercise of options on May 8, 2008 at $.04 per share, values	20,000	50	19,950
Exercise of options on May 8, 2008 at $.04 per share, shares		500,000
Issuance of shares of common stock and 614,286 warrants in May and September 2008 through private placement at $.75 per unit, values	232,500	665	231,835
Issuance of shares of common stock and 614,286 warrants in May and September 2008 through private placement at $.75 per unit, shares		6,642,858
Options issued for services in June 2008, vested immediately and valued at $.07 per share	395,467		395,467
Nonemployee options issued for services in June 19, 2008, vested immediately and valued at $.01 per share	918		918
Issuance of shares of common stock to investors in August 2008 at $1.00 per share, values	2,560		2,560
Issuance of shares of common stock to investors in August 2008 at $1.00 per share, shares		2,560
Exercise of options in September 2008 at $.04 per share, values	70,000	175	69,825
Exercise of options in September 2008 at $.04 per share, shares		1,750,000
Exercise of warrants in September 2008 at $.04 per share, values	10,000	25	9,975
Exercise of warrants in September 2008 at $.04 per share, shares		250,000
Net loss	(983,886)			(983,886)
Balance, values at Dec. 31, 2008	133,243	3,529	1,113,600	(983,886)
Balance, shares at Dec. 31, 2008		35,288,276
Nonemployee options issued for services on March 3, 2008, vested immediately and valued at $.02 per share	37,506		37,506
Nonemployee options issued for services in June 19, 2008, vested immediately and valued at $.01 per share	636		636
Exercise of options on January 26, 2009 at $.04 per share, values	40,000	100	39,900
Exercise of options on January 26, 2009 at $.04 per share, shares		1,000,000
Issuance of shares of common stock on April 7, 2009 at $1.00 per share, values	400,000	40	399,960
Issuance of shares of common stock on April 7, 2009 at $1.00 per share, shares		400,000
Issuance of shares of common stock on June 29, 2009 valued at $2.00 per share, values	200,000	10	199,990
Issuance of shares of common stock on June 29, 2009 valued at $2.00 per share, shares		100,000
Exercise of options on July 30, 2009 at $.04 per share, values	40,000	100	39,900
Exercise of options on July 30, 2009 at $.04 per share, shares		1,000,000
Nonemployee options issued for services on August 18, 2009, vested immediately and valued at $.31 per share	10,462		10,462
Exercise of warrants on August 21, 2009 at $.04 per share, values	40,000	100	39,900
Exercise of warrants on August 21, 2009 at $.04 per share, shares		1,000,000
Exercise of options on September 2, 2009 at $.04 per share, values	20,000	50	19,950
Exercise of options on September 2, 2009 at $.04 per share, shares		500,000
Issuance of shares of common stock on September 17, 2009 at $1.00 per share, values	100,000	10	99,990
Issuance of shares of common stock on September 17, 2009 at $1.00 per share, shares		100,000
Issuance of shares of common stock for future services on October 9, 2009 valued at $1.00 per share, values	1,080,427	108	1,080,319
Issuance of shares of common stock for future services on October 9, 2009 valued at $1.00 per share, shares		1,080,427
Issuance of shares of common stock on October 16, 2009 at $1.00 per share, values	100,000	10	99,990
Issuance of shares of common stock on October 16, 2009 at $1.00 per share, shares		100,000
Exercise of warrants on October 22, 2009 at $.04 per share, values	40,000	100	39,900
Exercise of warrants on October 22, 2009 at $.04 per share, shares		1,000,000
Exercise of warrants on December 2, 2009 at $.04 per share, values	40,000	100	39,900
Exercise of warrants on December 2, 2009 at $.04 per share, shares		1,000,000
Exercise of options on December 10, 2009 at $.04 per share, values	10,000	25	9,975
Exercise of options on December 10, 2009 at $.04 per share, shares		250,000
Exercise of warrants on December 31, 2009 at $.04 per share, values	40,000	100	39,900
Exercise of warrants on December 31, 2009 at $.04 per share, shares		1,000,000
Stock issuance costs	(65,000)		(65,000)
Net loss	(2,236,476)			(2,236,476)
Balance, values at Dec. 31, 2009	30,798	4,382	3,246,778	(3,220,362)
Balance, shares at Dec. 31, 2009		43,818,703
Nonemployee options issued for services on August 18, 2009, vested immediately and valued at $.31 per share	27,899		27,899
Exercise of options on January 5, 2010 at $.04 per share, values	40,000	100	39,900
Exercise of options on January 5, 2010 at $.04 per share, shares		1,000,000
Exercise of warrant on February 22, 2010 at $.04 per share, values	35,713	89	35,624
Exercise of warrant on February 22, 2010 at $.04 per share, shares		892,858
Exercise of warrants in March 2010 at $.04 per share, values	40,000	100	39,900
Exercise of warrants in March 2010 at $.04 per share, shares		1,000,000
Exercise of warrants in April 2010 at $.04 per share, values	100,000	250	99,750
Exercise of warrants in April 2010 at $.04 per share, shares		2,500,000
Issuance of shares of common stock in conjunction with notes payable in May through August 2010, values	400,742	48	400,694
Issuance of shares of common stock in conjunction with notes payable in May through August 2010, shares		483,750
Issuance of shares of common stock for retirement of 400,000 options at $.25 per share, values		6	(6)
Issuance of shares of common stock for retirement of 400,000 options at $.25 per share, shares		65,000
Issuance of share of common stock from August through December 2010 through private placement at $.20 per share, values	1,925,000	963	1,924,037
Issuance of share of common stock from August through December 2010 through private placement at $.20 per share, shares		9,625,000
Issuance of shares of common stock on November 1, 2010 for the conversion of notes payable at $.20 per share, values	75,000	38	74,962
Issuance of shares of common stock on November 1, 2010 for the conversion of notes payable at $.20 per share, shares		375,000
Issuance of shares of common stock on November 19, 2010 for future services valued at $.90 per share, values	100,000	11	99,989
Issuance of shares of common stock on November 19, 2010 for future services valued at $.90 per share, shares		111,111
Exercise of options on December 2, 2010 at $.04 per share, values	120,000	300	119,700
Exercise of options on December 2, 2010 at $.04 per share, shares		3,000,000
Exercise of warrants in December 2010 at $.04 per share, values	100,000	250	99,750
Exercise of warrants in December 2010 at $.04 per share, shares		2,500,000
Nonemployee options issued for services from August through November 2010, vested immediately and valued at $.01 per share	13,816		13,816
Net loss	(1,489,190)			(1,489,190)
Balance, values at Dec. 31, 2010	1,519,778	6,537	6,222,793	(4,709,552)
Balance, shares at Dec. 31, 2010		65,371,422
Issuance of shares of common stock and warrants through private placement	500,000	125	499,875
Issuance of shares of common stock and warrants through private placement, shares		1,250,000
Issuance of shares of common stock for future services on June 1, 2011 valued at $.49 per share, values	49,000	10	48,990
Issuance of shares of common stock for future services on June 1, 2011 valued at $.49 per share, shares		100,000
Issuance of shares of common stock in conjunction with notes payable from September through December 2011, value	82,665	15	82,650
Issuance of shares of common stock in conjunction with notes payable from September through December 2011, shares		150,000
Issuance of warrants in conjunction with notes payable from September through December 2011	20,930		20,930
Fair value of revalued warrants at $.09 to $.76 per share	88,601		88,601
Nonemployee options issued for services from August through November 2010, vested immediately and valued at $.01 per share	3,146		3,146
Nonemployee options issued for services on January 24, 2011, vested immediately and valued at $.20 per share	46,019		46,019
Nonemployee options issued for services from July through August 2011, vested immediately and valued from $.10 to $.19 per share	52,243		52,243
Net loss	(2,724,796)			(2,724,796)
Balance, values at Dec. 31, 2011	(362,414)	6,687	7,065,247	(7,434,348)
Balance, shares at Dec. 31, 2011	66,871,422	66,871,422
Issuance of shares of common stock and warrants through private placement	2,745,650	802	2,744,848
Issuance of shares of common stock and warrants through private placement, shares		8,023,287
Stock issuance costs	(28,000)		(28,000)
Nonemployee options issued for services from July through August 2011, vested immediately and valued from $.10 to $.19 per share	951		951
Nonemployee options issued for services from January 17, 2012 through March 31, 2012, vested immediately and valued from $.16 to $.19 per share	50,385		50,385
Employee options issued for services on January 1, 2012 through March 31, 2012, vesting over three years and valued at $.14 to $.40 per share	38,650		38,650
Net loss	(1,544,911)			(1,544,911)
Balance, values at Mar. 31, 2012	$ 900,311	$ 7,489	$ 9,872,081	$ (8,979,259)
Balance, shares at Mar. 31, 2012	74,894,709	74,894,709

XML

Statement of Changes in Stockholders' Equity (Deficit) (Parenthetical) (USD $)	Mar. 31, 2012	Dec. 20, 2011	Jun. 01, 2011	Jan. 24, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010	Dec. 02, 2010	Nov. 30, 2010	Nov. 19, 2010	Nov. 01, 2010	Apr. 30, 2010	Mar. 31, 2010	Feb. 22, 2010	Jan. 05, 2010	Dec. 31, 2009	Dec. 10, 2009	Dec. 02, 2009	Oct. 22, 2009	Oct. 16, 2009	Oct. 09, 2009	Sep. 17, 2009	Sep. 02, 2009	Aug. 21, 2009	Aug. 18, 2009	Jul. 30, 2009	Jun. 29, 2009	Apr. 07, 2009	Jan. 26, 2009	Sep. 30, 2008	Aug. 31, 2008	Jun. 30, 2008	Jun. 19, 2008	May 31, 2008	May 08, 2008	Mar. 03, 2008	Feb. 28, 2008	Feb. 12, 2008	Mar. 31, 2012 Minimum [Member]	Aug. 31, 2011 Minimum [Member]	Mar. 31, 2012 Maximum [Member]	Aug. 31, 2011 Maximum [Member]
Equity issuance, number securities issued for cash	4,011,644	625,000																														614,286			14,285,716	19,000,000
Equity issuance, price or exercise price per security issued	$ 0.7	$ 0.8	$ 0.49	$ 0.2	$ 0.2	$ 0.04	$ 0.01	$ 0.9	$ 0.2	$ 0.04	$ 0.04	$ 0.04	$ 0.04	$ 0.04	$ 0.04	$ 0.04	$ 0.04	$ 1.0	$ 1.0	$ 1.0	$ 0.04	$ 0.04	$ 0.31	$ 0.04	$ 2.0	$ 1.0	$ 0.04	$ 0.04	$ 1.0	$ 0.07	$ 0.01	$ 0.75	$ 0.04	$ 0.02	$ 0.035	$ 0.001	$ 0.16	$ 0.1	$ 0.19	$ 0.19
Additional equity issuance, price or exercise price per security issued																																					$ 0.11		$ 0.21

XML

Balance Sheets (Parenthetical) (USD $)	Mar. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Balance Sheets [Abstract]
Patents and trademarks, accumulated amoritization	$ 2,676	$ 1,622
Unamortized discount on notes payable	$ 28,454	$ 65,560
Preferred stock, par value per share	$ 0.0001	$ 0.0001
Preferred stock, shares authorized	2,000,000	2,000,000
Preferred stock, shares issued	0	0
Preferred stock, shares outstanding	0	0
Common stock, par value per share	$ 0.0001	$ 0.0001
Common stock, shares authorized	150,000,000	150,000,000
Common stock, shares issued	74,894,709	66,871,422
Common stock, shares outstanding	74,894,709	66,871,422

XML

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2012

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS [Abstract]

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

NOTE 9 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

From inception through December 1, 2010, the Company has utilized offices leased by affiliates of certain of the Company's board members without charge.

During the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, the former manager of corporate development of the Company advanced expenses on behalf of the Company in connection with research and implementation of the Company's business plans.  Expenses totaling $64,106 and $44,764 were incurred and reimbursed during the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011.

During the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, a marketing company owned by the Secretary and his spouse was paid $14,560 and $0.

During the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, the certified public accounting firm owned by the Chief Financial Officer was paid $16,750 and $23,425 for accounting services.

XML

Document and Entity Information	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2012	May 14, 2012
Document and Entity Information [Abstract]
Document Type	10-Q
Amendment Flag	false
Document Period End Date	Mar. 31, 2012
Entity Registrant Name	VIRTUAL PIGGY, INC.
Entity Central Index Key	0001437283
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--12-31
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2012
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q1
Entity Filer Category	Smaller Reporting Company
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding		97,408,032

XML

SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2012

SUBSEQUENT EVENTS [Abstract]

SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

NOTE 10 - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On April 1, 2012, the Company issued a company owned by the former manager of corporate development an option to purchase 250,000 shares of the Company's common stock at $.70 per share.  These options have been valued at $43,028, fair value.  The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the grant-date fair value of the options, with the following assumptions: no dividend yield, expected volatility 31.2%, risk free interest rate of 1.04% and expected option life of five years.  The options expire five years from the date of issuance. Options granted are expensed over one year.

On April 2, 2012, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with a former consultant of the Company. In connection with the settlement, the Company made a settlement payment to the consultant of $30,000 and issued the consultant 350,000 shares of the Company's common stock, which were valued at $297,500, fair value.  These amounts were accrued as of March 31, 2012.

On April 5, 2012, the Company commenced a private placement of up to $3,500,000 consisting of up to 10,000,000 shares of the Company's common stock and warrants to purchase up to 5,000,000 shares of the Company's common stock at an exercise price of $.50 per share.  The shares and warrants will be sold in units with each unit comprised of two shares and one warrant at a purchase price of $.70 per unit.  In accordance with the terms of the offering documents, the offering amount was increased to $4 million.  From April 5, 2012 to May 15, 2012, the Company sold 5,325,113 units and raised $3,727,579.  

On April 10, 2012, a company owned by the Secretary and his wife exercised 250,000 options which raised proceeds of $10,000.

In April 2012, the Company issued six employees options to purchase an aggregate of 60,000 shares of the Company's common stock at exercise prices ranging from $.65 to $.97 per share.  These options were valued at $12,635 fair value.  The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the grant-date fair value of the options, with the following assumptions: no dividend yield, expected volatility of 26.9% to 30.9%, risk free interest rate of .39% to .51% and expected option life of five years.  The options expire five years from the date of issuance.  Options granted will be expensed over the three year vesting term.

On May 2, 2012 the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement with a non-U.S. person, pursuant to which the Company issued and sold 187,500 units at a purchase price of $0.80 per unit, in consideration of gross proceeds of $150,000.  Each unit consisted of: (i) two shares of the Company's common stock, (ii) a warrant to purchase one share of the Company's common stock at an exercise price of $0.50 per share for a term of two years, and (iii) a warrant to purchase one half share of the Company's common stock at an exercise price of $1.00 per share for a term of three years.  Pursuant to the securities purchase agreement, the purchaser also agreed to purchase an additional $850,000 of units by November 1, 2012.

XML

Statements of Operations (USD $)	3 Months Ended				50 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2012		Mar. 31, 2011		Mar. 31, 2012
Statements of Operations [Abstract]
SALES	$ 1,168		$ 326		$ 5,094
OPERATING EXPENSES
General and administrative	341,178		125,945		1,090,851
Consulting	641,849	[1]	328,095	[1]	3,754,081	[1]
Payroll	206,976	[2]	16,733	[2]	640,870	[2]
Professional fees	144,913		103,449		1,170,171
Research and development	86,606		77,726		913,690
Travel	87,768		70,927		939,578
Total operating expenses	1,509,290		722,875		8,509,241
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)
Interest income	317		1,045		3,268
Interest expense	(37,106)	[3]		[3]	(478,380)	[3]
Total other income (expense)	(36,789)		1,045		(475,112)
NET LOSS	$ (1,544,911)		$ (721,504)		$ (8,979,259)
BASIC AND DILUTED NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE	$ (0.02)		$ (0.01)
BASIC AND DILUTED WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING	70,042,470		65,371,422

[1] includes share-based compensation of $2,146,794 cumulative $348,836 ($297,500 accrued for consultant settlement) and $117,993 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011.

[2] includes share-based compensation of $468,713 cumulative, $38,650 and $16,733 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011.

[3] includes amortization of deferred costs of $78,243 cumulative, and $0 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011. Also includes $397,639 accretion of discount on notes payable cumulative, and $37,104 and $0 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011.

XML

NOTES PAYABLE

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2012

NOTES PAYABLE [Abstract]

NOTES PAYABLE

NOTE 4 - NOTES PAYABLE

In September 2011, the Company commenced a private placement of up to 10 units at a price of $50,000 per unit to accredited investors.  One unit consists of a non interest bearing demand note payable in the amount of $50,000 due November 12, 2012, warrants to purchase 15,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $.50 per share and a term expiring November 12, 2012, and 15,000 shares of common stock.  In December 2011, the Company completed the private placement and raised $500,000.  The warrants were valued at $20,930, fair value, using the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the grant-date fair value of the options, with the following assumptions: no dividend yield, expected volatility of 39.8% to 62.8%, risk free interest rate of .1% and expected option life of 1.2 years.  The shares of common stock were valued at $82,655 or $.45 to $.70 per share, fair value.  Both the warrant value and the shares of common stock were treated as a discount to the value of the note payable in accordance with FASB ASC 835-30-25, Recognition and are being accreted over the term of the note payable for financial statement purposes.  During the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, $37,106 and $0 of interest was accreted on the notes payable.

On February 8, 2012, February 27, 2012, and April 10, 2012, $100,000, $50,000, and $25,000 respectively, of the notes payable was repaid.

On April 26, 2012, the remaining balance of the notes payable of $175,000 was converted into 564,516 shares of the Company's common stock and warrants to purchase 282,258 shares of the Company's common stock.

XML

PATENTS

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2012

PATENTS [Abstract]

PATENTS

NOTE 3 - PATENTS

The Company continues to apply for patents.  Accordingly, costs associated with the registration of these patents have been capitalized and are amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated lives of the patents (20 years).  During the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, there were capitalized patent costs of $74,957 and $0.  Amortization expense for patents was $1,054 and $0 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011.

XML

STOCK OPTIONS AND WARRANTS

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2012

STOCK OPTIONS AND WARRANTS [Abstract]

STOCK OPTIONS AND WARRANTS

NOTE 7 - STOCK OPTIONS AND WARRANTS

During 2008, the Board of Directors ("Board") of the Company adopted an Equity Incentive Plan ("Plan").  Under the Plan, the Company is authorized to grant options to purchase up to 25,000,000 shares of common stock to any officer, other employee or director of, or any consultant or other independent contractor who provides services to the Company.  The Plan is intended to permit stock options granted to employees under the Plan to qualify as incentive stock options under Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended ("Incentive Stock Options").  All options granted under the Plan, which are not intended to qualify as Incentive Stock Options are deemed to be non-qualified options ("Non-Statutory Stock Options").  As of March 31, 2012, 12,960,000 options have been issued and are unexercised, and 3,040,000 options that are available to be issued under the Plan.  Of the 12,960,000 options that have been issued and are unexercised, 10,415,000 options were granted to employees or persons who later became employees and 2,545,000 options were granted to non-employees.

The Plan is administered by the Board, which determines the persons to whom awards will be granted, the number of awards to be granted, and the specific terms of each grant, including the vesting thereof, subject to the terms of the Plan.

In connection with Incentive Stock Options, the exercise price of each option may not be less than 100% of the fair market value of the common stock on the date of the grant (or 110% of the fair market value in the case of a grantee holding more than 10% of the outstanding stock of the Company).

Volatility in all instances presented is the Company's estimate of volatility that is based on the volatility of other public companies that are in closely related industries to the Company.

During 2008, the Company issued the Secretary of the Company options to purchase 500,000 shares of the Company's common stock at $.04 per share which were valued at $8,825 and expensed immediately.  The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the grant-date fair value of the options, with the following assumptions: no dividend yield, expected volatility of 51.8%, risk free interest rate of 2.5%, and expected option life of 5 years.  The options expire five years from the date of issuance.

During 2008, the Company entered into an employment agreement with its President and Chief Executive Officer,  whereby, the President and Chief Executive Officer was issued options to purchase 1,000,000 shares of the Company's common stock at $.04 per share which were valued at $71,871 and expensed immediately. The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the grant-date fair value of the options, with the following assumptions: no dividend yield, expected volatility of 51.8%, risk free interest rate of 3.3%, and expected option life of 5 years.  The options expire five years from the date of issuance.

During 2008, the Company entered into an employment agreement with its Director of Corporate Development whereby the Director of Corporate Development was issued options to purchase 2,750,000 shares of the Company's common stock at $.04 per share which were valued at $197,645 and expensed immediately. The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the grant-date fair value of the options, with the following assumptions: no dividend yield, expected volatility of 51.8%, risk free interest rate of 3.3% and expected option life of 5 years.  The options expire five years from the date of issuance.

During 2008, the Company entered into an agreement with a member of the Company's Board of Directors whereby the member of the Board of Directors was issued options to purchase 1,250,000 shares of the Company's common stock at $.04 per share which were valued at $89,838, fair value, and expensed immediately.  The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the grant-date fair value of the options, with the following assumptions: no dividend yield, expected volatility of 51.8%, risk free interest rate of 3.3%, and expected option life of 5 years.  The options expire five years from the date of issuance.

On June 23, 2008, a member of the Board of Directors was issued 500,000 shares of the Company's common stock at $.04 per share, which were valued at $36,113, fair value, and expensed immediately.  The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the grant-date fair value of the options, with the following assumptions: no dividend yield, expected volatility of 51.8%, risk free interest rate of 3.7% and expected option life of 5 years.  The options expire five years from the date of issuance.

On March 12, 2010 the Company entered into a three year employment agreement with the Senior Vice President of Marketing and Licensing for €150,000 annually.  The agreement also includes an option to purchase 2 million shares of the Company's common stock at $1.00 per share.  These options were valued at $1,829,756, fair value.  The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the grant-date fair value of the options, with the following assumptions: no dividend yield, expected volatility of 41.6%, risk free interest rate of 2.4%, and expected option life of five years.  The options expire five years from the date of issuance.  Options granted under the agreements are expensed when the related service is provided.  In December 2010, this employment agreement was terminated, the options were terminated and any expense relative to the options that was previously recorded was reversed.

During November 2010, the Company issued two directors options to purchase an aggregate of 600,000 shares of the Company's common stock at $.90 per share.  These options have been valued at $5,207, fair value.  The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the grant-date fair value of the options, with the following assumptions: no dividend yield, expected volatility of 40.8%, risk free interest rate of 1.5%, and expected option life of five years.  The options expire five years from the date of issuance.  Options granted are expensed when the service is provided.

In 2008, the Company issued 14,950,002 warrants as part of the units included in the private placements, which were to expire three years from the date of issuance.  The expiration date for unexpired and unexercised warrants was extended on January 24, 2011 to six years from the date of issuance.  As of January 24, 2011, there were two directors that held an aggregate of warrants to purchase an aggregate of 3,142,858 shares of the Company's common stock at $.04 per share and 100,000 shares of the Company's common stock at $.75 per share.  The warrants to purchase 3,242,858 shares of the Company's common stock were reclassified from non-employee warrants to incentive stock warrants, because the recipients had become directors subsequent to the date of original issuance.  These warrants were revalued and the incremental cost charged to expense was $16,733.  There were also seven consultants that held warrants to purchase an aggregate of 564,286 shares of the Company's common stock at $.75 per share.  These warrants were revalued, at fair value, and the incremental cost charged to expense was $71,868.  The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the grant-date fair value of the warrants, with the following assumptions: no dividend yield, expected volatility of 32.3%, risk free interest rate of 1.05% and expected warrant life of 3 to 3.5 years.  The warrants expire 6 years from date of original issuance.  The incremental fair value of the warrants was expensed immediately.

On January 2, 2012, the Company issued an employee an option to purchase 250,000 shares of the Company's common stock at $.50 per share.  These options have been valued at $51,692 fair value.  The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the grant-date fair value of the options, with the following assumptions: no dividend yield, expected volatility of 29.2%, risk free interest rate of 0.9% and expected option life of five years.  The options expire five years from the date of issuance.  Options granted are expensed over the three year vesting term.

On January 27, 2012, the Company issued an employee an option to purchase 30,000 shares of the Company's common stock at $.52 per share.  These options have been valued at $3,718, fair value.  The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the grant-date fair value of the options, with the following assumptions: no dividend yield, expected volatility of 25.4%, risk free interest rate of 0.8% and expected option life of five years.  The options expire five years from the date of issuance.  Options granted were expensed over the three year vesting term.

On February 28, 2012, the Company issued an employee an option to purchase 25,000 shares of the Company's common stock at $.58 per share.  These options have been valued at $3,120, fair value.  The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the grant-date fair value of the options, with the following assumptions: no dividend yield, expected volatility of 25.0%, risk free interest rate of .8% and expected option life of five years.  The options expire five years from the date of issuance.  Options granted are expensed over the three year vesting term.

On March 2, 2012, the Company issued an employee an option to purchase 250,000 shares of the Company's common stock at $.58 per share.  These options have been valued at $33,975, fair value.  The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the grant-date fair value of the options, with the following assumptions: no dividend yield, expected volatility of 25.9%, risk free interest rate of .9% and expected option life of five years.  The options expire five years from the date of issuance.  Options granted are expensed immediately.

On March 5, 2012, the Company issued an employee an option to purchase 25,000 shares of the Company's common stock at $.58 per share.  These options have been valued at $2,680, fair value.  The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the grant-date fair value of the options, with the following assumptions: no dividend yield, expected volatility of 25.0%, risk free interest rate of .9% and expected option life of five years.  The options expire five years from the date of issuance.  Options granted are expensed over the three year vesting term.

On March 31, 2012, the Company issued options to purchase an aggregate of 4,010,000 shares of the Company's common stock to seven employees at $.65 per share.  These options have been valued at $639,998, fair value.  The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the grant-date fair value of the options, with the following assumptions: no dividend yield, expected volatility of 26.8%, risk free interest rate of .51% and expected option life of five years.  The options expire five years from the date of issuance.  Options granted are expensed over the three year vesting term.

Cumulatively and for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company expensed $464,713, $38,650 and $16,733 relative to employee options/warrants granted.  As of March 31, 2012, there was $816,345 of unrecognized compensation expense related to employee non-vested market-based share awards.

A summary of incentive stock option/warrant transactions for employees from February 11, 2008 (date of inception) to March 31, 2012 is as follows:

						Weighted Average
	Option/Warrants			Exercise		Exercise
	Shares			Price		Price
Outstanding, February 11, 2008 (Date of Inception)		-		$	-	$	-
Granted		6,000,000			0.04		0.04
Exercised		(1,750,000	)		0.04		0.04
Expired		-			-		-
Outstanding, December 31, 2008		4,250,000		$	0.04	$	0.04
Granted		-			-		-
Exercised		(2,750,000	)		0.04		0.04
Expired		-			-		-
Outstanding, December 31, 2009		1,500,000		$	0.04	$	0.04
Granted		2,600,000		$	.90 to $1.00	$	0.83
Exercised		(1,000,000	)		0.04		0.04
Terminated		(2,000,000	)		1.00		1.00
Outstanding, December 31, 2010		1,100,000		$	.04 to $.90	$	0.51
Granted		625,000		$	0.60	$	0.60
Reclassified from non-employee		7,742,858		.04 to .90			0.09
Exercised		-			-		-
Expired		-			-		-
Outstanding, December 31, 2011		9,467,858		$	.04 to .90	$	0.14
Granted		4,790,000		$	.50 to $.65	$	0.20
Reclassified from non-employee		25,000			0.60		-
Exercised		-			-		-
Expired		-			-		-
Outstanding, March 31, 2012		14,282,858		$	.04 to .90	$	0.33
Exercisable, March 31, 2012		9,942,858		$	.04 to $.90	$	0.20
Weighted Average Remaining Life,
Exercisable, March 31, 2012 (years)		1.9

On August 18, 2009, options to purchase 100,000 shares of the Company's common stock at $2.30 were issued to a consultant, which were valued at $30,689, fair value.  Another consultant also received 25,000 options on August 18, 2009, which were valued at $7,672, fair value.  The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the grant-date fair value of the options, with the following assumptions: no dividend yield, expected volatility of 58.3%, risk free interest rate of 2.4%, and expected option life of 5 years.  The options expire five years from the date of issuance.  Options granted under the agreements were expensed when the related service or product was provided.

On August 20, 2010, the Company issued the Chief Financial Officer an option to purchase 250,000 shares of the Company's common stock at $.75 per share.  These options have been valued at $2,012, fair value.  The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the grant-date fair value of the options, with the following assumptions: no dividend yield, expected volatility of 36.7%, risk free interest rate of 1.5% and expected option life of five years.  The options expire five years from the date of issuance.  Options granted were expensed immediately.

On September 13, 2010, the Company issued the Chief Executive Officer an option to purchase 250,000 shares of the Company's common stock at $.75 per share.  These options have been valued at $1,676, fair value.  The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the grant-date fair value of the options, with the following assumptions: no dividend yield, expected volatility of 35.2%, risk free interest rate of 1.5% and expected option life of five years.  The options expire five years from the date of issuance.  Options granted were expensed immediately.

On September 13, 2010, the Company issued a consultant an option to purchase 100,000 shares of the Company's common stock at $.75 per share.  These options have been valued at $670, fair value.  The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the grant-date fair value of the options, with the following assumptions: no dividend yield, expected volatility of 35.2%, risk free interest rate of 1.5% and expected option life of five years.  The options expire five years from the date of issuance.  Options granted were expensed immediately.

During October and November 2010, the Company issued various consultant option to purchase an aggregate of 1,020,000 shares of the Company's common stock at $.75, $.78 and $.90 per share.  These options have been valued at $7,397, fair value.  The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the grant-date fair value of the options, with the following assumptions: no dividend yield, expected volatility of 34.2% to 40.8%, risk free interest rate of 1.1% to 1.5% and expected option life of five years.  The options expire five years from the date of issuance.  Options granted were expensed when the service was provided.

On January 24, 2011, the Company issued four consultants options to purchase an aggregate of 230,000 shares of the Company's common stock at $1.00 per share.  These options have been valued at $46,019, fair value.  The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the grant-date fair value of the options, with the following assumptions: no dividend yield, expected volatility of 33.5%, risk free interest rate of 2.03% and expected option life of five years.  The options expire five years from the date of issuance.  Options granted were expensed when the service was provided.

On July 1, 2011, the Company issued a consultant an option to purchase 200,000 shares of the Company's common stock at $.91 per share.  These options have been valued at $19,234, fair value.  The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the grant-date fair value of the options, with the following assumptions: no dividend yield, expected volatility of 39.8%, risk free interest rate of 1.80% and expected option life of five years.  The options expire five years from the date of issuance.  Options granted were expensed immediately.

On July 22, 2011, the Company issued a consultant an option to purchase 25,000 shares of the Company's common stock at $.60 per share.  These options have been valued at $4,150, fair value.  The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the grant-date fair value of the options, with the following assumptions: no dividend yield, expected volatility of 38.0%, risk free interest rate of 1.53% and expected option life of five years.  The options expire five years from the date of issuance.  Options granted were expensed immediately.

On August 2, 2011, the Company issued a consultant an option to purchase 20,000 shares of the Company's common stock at $.60 per share.  These options have been valued at $3,803, fair value.  The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the grant-date fair value of the options, with the following assumptions: no dividend yield, expected volatility of 39.6%, risk free interest rate of 1.23% and expected option life of five years.  The options expire five years from the date of issuance.  Options granted are being expensed as the service is provided.

On August 15, 2011, the Company issued a consultant an option to purchase 150,000 shares of the Company's common stock at $.75 per share.  These options have been valued at $27,273, fair value.  The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the grant-date fair value of the options, with the following assumptions: no dividend yield, expected volatility of 55.8%, risk free interest rate of .99% and expected option life of five years.  The options expire five years from the date of issuance.  Options granted were expensed immediately.

On January 17, 2012, the Company issued a consultant an option to purchase 200,000 shares of the Company's common stock at $.50 per share.  These options have been valued at $31,437, fair value.  The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the grant-date fair value of the options, with the following assumptions: no dividend yield, expected volatility of 28.0%, risk free interest rate of 0.8% and expected option life of five years.  The options expire five years from the date of issuance.  Options granted are expensed immediately.

On March 31, 2012, the Company issued two consultants options to purchase an aggregate of 100,000 shares of the Company's common stock at $.65 per share.  These options have been valued at $18,947, fair value.  The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the grant-date fair value of the options, with the following assumptions: no dividend yield, expected volatility of 31.2%, risk free interest rate of 1.04% and expected option life of five years.  The options expire five years from the date of issuance.  Options granted are expensed immediately.

Cumulatively and for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company expensed $2,146,794, $348,836 and $117,993 relative to non-employee options granted.  As of March 31, 2012, there was $1,268 of unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested market-based share awards.

The following table summarizes non-employee stock option/warrant of the Company from February 11, 2008 (date of inception) to March 31, 2012 as follows:

						Weighted Average
	Option/Warrant			Exercise		Exercise
	Shares			Price		Price
Outstanding, February 11, 2008 (Date of Inception		-		$	-	$	-
Granted		23,450,002		.04 to .75			0.07
Exercised		(750,000	)		0.04		0.04
Expired		-			-		-
Outstanding, December 31, 2008		22,700,002		$	.04 to $.75	$	0.07
Granted		125,000			2.30		0.01
Exercised		(4,000,000	)		0.04		0.04
Expired		-			-		-
Outstanding, December 31, 2009		18,825,002		$	0.04 to $2.30	$	0.09
Granted		1,620,000		.75 to .90			0.13
Exercised		(9,892,858	)		0.04		0.04
Retired		(400,000	)		0.04		0.04
Outstanding, December 31, 2010		10,152,144		$	0.04 to $2.30	$	0.25
Granted		775,000		.50 to 1.00		$	0.06
Reclassified from employee		(7,742,858	)	.04 to .90			0.09
Exercised		-			-		-
Expired		-			-		-
Outstanding, December 31, 2011		3,184,286		$	0.04 to $2.30	$	0.76
Granted		100,000		$	0.65	$	0.01
Reclassified to employee		(25,000	)		0.60		-
Exercised		-			-		-
Expired		-			-		-
Outstanding, March31, 2012		3,259,286			$0.04 to $2.30	$	0.76
Exercisable, March 31, 2012		3,259,286			$0.04 to $2.30	$	0.76
Weighted Average Remaining Life,
Exercisable, March 31, 2012 (years)		3.1

XML

INCOME TAXES

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2012

INCOME TAXES [Abstract]

INCOME TAXES

NOTE 5 - INCOME TAXES

Income tax expense was $0 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011.

As of January 1, 2012, the Company had no unrecognized tax benefits, and accordingly, the Company did not recognize interest or penalties during 2012 related to unrecognized tax benefits.  There has been no change in unrecognized tax benefits during the three months ended March 31, 2012, and there was no accrual for uncertain tax positions as of March 31, 2012.  Tax years from 2008 through 2011 remain subject to examination by major tax jurisdictions.

There is no income tax benefit for the losses for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, since management has determined that the realization of the net tax deferred asset is not assured and has created a valuation allowance for the entire amount of such benefits.

XML

STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2012

STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY [Abstract]

STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

NOTE 6 - STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

In February 2008, the Company issued 19,000,000 founders shares at $.001 per share or $19,000.

In February 2008, the Company commenced a private placement of up to 7 million units at a price of $.035 per unit to accredited investors.  One unit consisted of one share of the Company's common stock and two warrants.  Each warrant entitles the holder to purchase one additional share of common stock at a price of $.04 per share and is exercisable for a three year period.  From February through June 2008, 7,142,858 units were sold, raising $250,000 in proceeds and resulting in 14,285,716 warrants being issued.

On May 8, 2008, 500,000 options were exercised, which raised proceeds $20,000.  During the three months ended September 30, 2008, 1,750,000 options were exercised, which raised proceeds of $70,000.

On May 27, 2008, the Company commenced a private placement of up to 6 million units at a price of $.035 per unit to accredited investors.  One unit consisted of one share of the Company's common stock and one warrant. Ten of these warrants entitle the holder to purchase one additional share of common stock at a price of $.75 per share and are exercisable for a three year period.  During the three months ended June 30, 2008, 6,142,858 units were sold with warrants exercisable at a price of $.75 per share, raising $215,000 in proceeds and resulting in 614,286 warrants being issued.  During the three months ended September 30, 2008, 500,000 units were sold with warrants at a price of $.75, raising $17,500 and resulting in 50,000 warrants being issued.

During the three months ended September 30, 2008, the Company sold 2,560 shares, which raised proceeds of $2,560.  The Company filed a registration statement to register 2,560 shares of the Company which became effective on September 3, 2008.

During the three months ended September 30, 2008, 250,000 warrants were exercised which raised proceeds of $10,000.

During the three months ended March 31, 2009, 1 million options were exercised which raised proceeds of $40,000.

During the three months ended March 31, 2009, the Company issued 100,000 shares of common stock which were valued at the fair market value of $200,000 for consulting services.

During the three months ended June 30, 2009, the Company sold 400,000 shares which raised proceeds of $348,000, net of commissions of $52,000.

During the three months ended September 30, 2009, 1 million warrants and 1.5 million options were exercised which raised proceeds of $100,000.  In addition, the Company sold 100,000 shares which raised proceeds of $87,000, net of commissions of $13,000.

On October 9, 2009, the Company was listed on the German stock exchange.  As a result, the Company was required to issue 1,080,427 shares of common stock under a consulting agreement.  These shares were valued at the fair market value of $1,080,427.

On October 21, 2009, the Company sold 100,000 shares to an investor which raised proceeds of $100,000.

On October 22, 2009, an investor exercised 1,000,000 warrants which raised proceeds of $40,000.

On December 2, 2009, two investors exercised 500,000 warrants each (total of 1,000,000 warrants) which raised total proceeds of $40,000.

On December 10, 2009 and December 31, 2009 an investor exercised 250,000 options and 1,000,000 warrants, respectively, which raised total proceeds of $50,000.

On January 5, 2010 an investor exercised 1,000,000 options which raised proceeds of $40,000.

On February 22, 2010 an investor exercised 892,858 warrants which raised proceeds of $35,714.

On March 5, 2010 an investor exercised 500,000 warrants which raised proceeds of $20,000.

On March 8, 2010 an investor exercised 500,000 warrants which raised proceeds of $20,000.

On April 13, 2010 an investor exercised 1,000,000 warrants which raised proceeds of $40,000.

On April 16, 2010 an investor exercised 1,500,000 warrants which raised proceeds of $60,000.

In August 2010, the Company retired 400,000 non-employee options with exercise prices of $.04 in exchange for the issuance of 65,000 shares to the option holders.  No additional compensation expense was recorded as the fair value of the options exceeded the value of the stock that was issued.

On August 17, 2010, the Company sold 2,000,000 shares of common stock to investors which raised proceeds of $400,000.

During November and December 2010, the Company sold 7,625,000 shares of common stock to investors which raised proceeds of $1,525,000.

On November 19, 2010, the Company issued 111,111 shares of common stock which were valued at the fair market value of $100,000, for consulting services.

On December 2, 2010, an investor exercised 3 million options which raised proceeds of $120,000.

In December 2010, two investors exercised a total of 2.5 million warrants which raised proceeds of $100,000.

During the three months ended June 30, 2011, the Company issued 100,000 shares of common stock which were valued at the fair market value of $49,000, for consulting services.

In December 2011, the Company commenced a private placement of up to $5,000,000 consisting of up to 12,500,000 shares of the Company's common stock and warrants to purchase up to 6,250,000 shares of the Company's common stock.  The shares and warrants were sold in units with each unit comprised of two shares and one warrant at a purchase price of $.80 per unit.  During December 2011, the Company sold 625,000 units and raised $500,000.  On January 11, 2012, the Company amended the Securities Purchase Agreement dated December 1, 2011, by reducing the price of one unit from $.80 to $.70.  This increased the number of units to be sold from 6,250,000 units to 7,142,858 units.  It also required the Company to issue to one investor an additional 89,286 units, consisting of 178,572 shares common stock and warrants to purchase an additional 89,286 shares of common stock.  

During the three months ended March 31, 2012, the Company issued an additional 3,922,356 units and raised $2,717,650, net of stock issuance costs of $28,000.

XML

OPERATING LEASES

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2012

OPERATING LEASES [Abstract]

OPERATING LEASES

NOTE 8 - OPERATING LEASES

For the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, total rent expense under leases amounted to $8,803 and $8,603.  At March 31, 2012, the Company was obligated under various non-cancelable operating lease arrangements for property as follows:

2012 $ 34,934

XML

Statements of Operations (Parenthetical) (USD $)	3 Months Ended		50 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2012	Mar. 31, 2011	Mar. 31, 2012
Accrued consultant fees	$ 297,500		$ 297,500
Amortization of deferred costs	0	0	78,243
Accretion of discount on notes payable	37,105	0	397,640
Consulting [Member]
Share-based compensation	348,836	117,993	2,146,794
Payroll [Member]
Share-based compensation	$ 38,650	$ 16,733	$ 468,713

XML

GOING CONCERN

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2012

GOING CONCERN [Abstract]

GOING CONCERN

NOTE 2 - GOING CONCERN

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern.  The Company has incurred significant losses and experienced negative cash flow from operations during the development stage.  These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.  The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Since our inception, the Company has focused on developing and implementing our business plan.  The Company has begun to pay salaries to management and has utilized offshore programmers on a work for hire basis to assist in developing the demonstration model. The Company believes that its existing cash resources will not be sufficient to sustain operations during the next twelve months. The Company is currently in need of approximately $2.7 million of additional capital aside from what has been raised through March 31, 2012 to enable it to pay ongoing costs and expenses as they are incurred, finance the continued development of our Platform, and execute the business plan.  The Company intends to raise such financing through the sale of debt and equity securities.  The issuance of additional equity would result in dilution to existing shareholders.  If the Company is unable to obtain additional funds when they are needed, or if such funds cannot be obtained on terms acceptable to the Company, the Company may be unable to execute upon the business plan or pay costs and expenses as they are incurred, which could have a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition and results of operations.

The Company's current monetization model is to derive a percentage of all revenues generated by online merchants using the Virtual Piggy service. Merchants are billed at the end of each month for all transactions that have been processed by the Company on their behalf in the prior month.  As the merchant base and consumer base grows, and as the trend to higher online spending levels continues, the Company expects to see significant revenue generated through this approach. Based on current rollout plans and projections, the Company expects to see significant revenue generated by this model by late 2013 or early 2014 and to be supplemented by the addition of new revenue models planned for late 2013.  Even if the Company is successful in raising sufficient capital to complete the development of the Virtual Piggy and ParentMatch products, the Company's ability to continue in business as a viable going concern can only be achieved when revenues reach a level that sustains the business operations.  

If sufficient funding cannot be obtained in the short term, the Company will need to reduce monthly expenditures to a level that will enable the Company to continue until such funds can be obtained.  The Company has raised $2,717,650, net of stock issuance costs of $28,000 through a private placement from December 31, 2011 through March 31, 2012.  The Company also raised $3,727,579 through an additional private placement from April 5, 2012 through May 14, 2012.  In addition, on May 2, 2012, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement with a non-U.S. person, pursuant to which such person committed to purchase $1 million of the Company's securities. An initial funding of $150,000 occurred on May 2, 2012 and the remaining $850,000 will be funded in a series of six closings, which will occur on the 1st day of each month commencing on June1, 2012 and continuing until November 1, 2012.

The Company is in the development stage at March 31, 2012.  Successful completion of the Company's development program, and the attainment of profitable operations are dependent upon future events, including obtaining adequate financing to fulfill its development activities and achieving a level of sales adequate to support the Company's cost structure.  However, there can be no assurances that the Company will be able to secure additional equity investment or achieve an adequate sales level.