10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

 (Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15 (D) OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2012

o TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15 (D) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT

For the transition period from __________ to __________

COMMISSION FILE NUMBER:  333-150462

Pershing Gold Corporation

(Name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada	26-0657736
(State or other jurisdiction of	(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation of organization)	Identification No.)

1658 Cole Boulevard Building 6 Suite 210, Lakewood, CO

 (Address of principal executive office)

(877) 705-9357

 (Registrant’s telephone number)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes  x     Noo

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes  x     Noo

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer	o	Accelerated filer	o
Non-accelerated filer (Do not check if smaller reporting company)	o	Smaller reporting company	x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act) Yeso   Nox

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.  204,220,557 shares of common stock are issued and outstanding as of May 15, 2012.

1

PERSHING GOLD CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

(FORMERLY SAGEBRUSH GOLD LTD.)

(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

FORM 10-Q

FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED March 31, 2012

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page No.
PART I. - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2012 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2011	3
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 (Unaudited)	4
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Three months Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 (Unaudited)	5
	Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	6
Item 2.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.	47
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.	50
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures.	50
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings.	51
Item 1A.	Risk Factors.	51
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.	53
Item 3.	Default upon Senior Securities.	53
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures.	53
Item 5.	Other Information.	53
Item 6.	Exhibits.	54

2

PERSHING GOLD CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

(FORMERLY SAGEBRUSH GOLD LTD.)

(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

	March 31,			December 31,
	2012			2011
	(Unaudited)
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	2,592,035		$	3,670,567
Marketable securities - trading securities		119,702			100,000
Marketable securities - available for sale securities		4,650,000			-
Notes receivable, net		70,000			-
Other receivables		-			113,241
Prepaid expenses  - current portion		392,892			463,737
Deferred financing cost		-			50,919
Due from equity method investor (former Parent Company)		517,949			347,335
Assets of discontinued operations - current portion		-			61,050
Total Current Assets		8,342,578			4,806,849
OTHER ASSETS:
Prepaid expenses  - long-term portion		35,267			37,759
Property and equipment, net		7,887,493			8,031,103
Mineral rights		9,051,071			8,501,071
Reclamation bond deposit		4,557,629			4,557,629
Deposits		59,884			51,000
Total Other Assets - Net		21,591,344			21,178,562
Total Assets	$	29,933,922		$	25,985,411
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	869,598		$	821,111
Senior convertible promissory notes, net of debt discount		-			1,066,445
Convertible promissory note, net of debt discount		-			118,487
Note payable		500,000			-
Note payable - related party, net of debt discount		561,750			510,832
Deferred revenue		1,666,667			-
Derivative liability		-			6,295,400
Liabilities of discontinued operation		-			21,622
Total Liabilities		3,598,015			8,833,897
Commitments and Contingencies
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY :
Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value; 50,000,000 authorized
Convertible Series A Preferred stock ($.0001 Par Value; 2,250,000 Shares Authorized;          none issued and outstanding as of  March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively)		-			-
Convertible Series B Preferred stock ($.0001 Par Value; 8,000,000 Shares Authorized;          none issued and outstanding and 500,000 as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively)		-			50
Convertible Series C Preferred stock ($.0001 Par Value; 3,284,396 Shares Authorized;          3,284,396 outstanding as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011)		328			328
Convertible Series D Preferred stock ($.0001 Par Value; 7,500,000 Shares Authorized;          6,086,968 outstanding as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011)		609			-
Common stock ($.0001 Par Value; 500,000,000 Shares Authorized;         180,184,556 and 142,773,113  shares issued and outstanding as of            March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively)		18,019			14,277
Additional paid-in capital		80,849,995			47,114,351
Accumulated deficit		(14,901,794	)		(14,901,794	)
Accumulated deficit since inception of exploration stage (September 1, 2011)		(39,629,480	)		(15,074,534	)
Total Pershing Gold Corporation Equity		26,337,677			17,152,678
Non-Controlling Interest in Subsidiary		(1,770	)		(1,164	)
Total Stockholders' Equity		26,335,907			17,151,514
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity	$	29,933,922		$	25,985,411

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

3

PERSHING GOLD CORPORATION  AND SUBSIDIARIES

(FORMERLY SAGEBRUSH GOLD LTD.)

(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

	For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012			For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2011			For the Period from Inception of Exploration stage (September 1, 2011) through March 31, 2012
	(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)
Net revenues	$	-		$	-		$	-
Operating expenses:
Compensation and related taxes		6,490,733			105,000			7,572,812
Exploration cost		1,289,899			-			3,089,921
Consulting fees		918,624			187,860			6,489,803
General and administrative expenses		1,021,863			171,804			2,454,333
Total operating expenses		9,721,119			464,664			19,606,869
Operating loss from continuing operations		(9,721,119	)		(464,664	)		(19,606,869	)
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSES):
Loss from entinguishment of debts		(4,769,776	)		-			(4,769,776	)
Change in fair value of derivative liability		(1,454,889	)		-			5,447,917
Loss from disposal of assets		(9,434	)		-			(183,464	)
Other income		80,000			-			80,000
Settlement expense		-			-			(4,799,000	)
Realized loss - available for sale securities		(27,000	)		-			(27,000	)
Unrealized gain - trading securities		19,702			-			19,702
Other income pursuant to an option agreement		4,333,333			-			4,333,333
Interest expense, net of interest income		(11,330,418	)		-			(15,845,894	)
Total other expenses - net		(13,158,482	)		-			(15,744,182	)
Loss from continuing operations before provision for income taxes		(22,879,601	)		(464,664	)		(35,351,051	)
Provision for income taxes		-			-			-
Loss from continuing operations		(22,879,601	)		(464,664	)		(35,351,051	)
Discontinued operations:
(Loss) gain from discontinued operations, net of tax		(50,174	)		(823,698	)		802,491
Net loss		(22,929,775	)		(1,288,362	)		(34,548,560	)
Less: Net loss (income) attributable to non-controlling interest		606			-			(170,747	)
Net loss attributable to Pershing Gold Corporation		(22,929,169	)		(1,288,362	)		(34,719,307	)
Preferred deemed dividend		(1,616,777	)		-			(1,616,777	)
Preferred stock dividends		(9,000	)		-			(3,293,396	)
Net loss available to common stockholders	$	(24,554,946	)	$	(1,288,362	)	$	(39,629,480	)
Loss per common share, basic and diluted:
Loss from continuing operations	$	(0.15	)	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.25	)
(Loss) income from discontinued operations	$	0.00		$	(0.04	)	$	0.01
WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES    OUTSTANDING - Basic and Diluted		152,753,739			22,718,027			139,030,857

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

4

PERSHING GOLD CORPORATION  AND SUBSIDIARIES

(FORMERLY SAGEBRUSH GOLD LTD.)

(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

							For the Period from  Inception of  Exploration stage
	For the Three Months Ended			For the Three Months Ended			(September 1, 2011) through
	March 31, 2012			March 31, 2011			March 31, 2012
	(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss attributable to Pershing Gold Corporation	$	(22,929,169	)	$	(1,288,362	)		(34,719,307	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash    (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation		241,794			1,960			567,722
Bad debts		13,333			-			513,333
Bad debts in connection with discontinued operations		61,050			60,794			98,800
Amortization of promotional advances		-			8,643			-
Amortization of debt discounts and deferred financing cost		8,100,450			385,479			12,049,972
Amortization of prepaid expense in connection    with the issuance of common stock issued for prepaid services		-			46,666			116,669
Loss from extinguishment of debts		4,769,776			-			4,769,776
Change in fair value of derivative liability		1,454,889			-			(5,447,917	)
Interest expense in connection with the note modification		3,022,186			-			3,022,186
Interest expense in connection with the conversion of notes payable		-			-			230,192
Gain from disposal of discontinued operations		-			-			(1,134,448	)
Loss from disposal of assets		9,434			-			183,464
Non-controlling interest		(606	)		-			170,141
Realized loss - available for sale securities		27,000			-			27,000
Unrealized gain - trading securities		(19,702	)		-			(19,702	)
Common stock issued for services		239,028			-			1,076,528
Common stock issued in connection with an employment agreement		694,167			-			694,167
Common stock issued and included in settlement expense		-			-			4,761,500
Stock-based compensation		5,436,870			176,250			7,921,337
Other income pursuant to an option agreement		(4,333,333	)		-			(4,333,333	)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Restricted cash - current portion		-			(3,135,568	)		1,320,817
Note receivable		-			-			-
Other receivables		99,908			-			86,575
Prepaid expenses - current portion and other current assets		70,845			(7,924	)		1,940,167
Assets of discontinued operations - current portion		-			325,357			141,378
Prepaid expenses - long-term portion		2,492			-			6,645
Restricted cash - long-term portion		-			-			500,000
Deposits		(8,884	)		-			(8,884	)
Assets of discontinued operations - long term portion		-			30,000			40,556
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		88,451			-			451,834
Liabilities of discontinued operation		(21,622	)		55,264			28,730
NET CASH USED IN  OPERATING ACTIVITIES		(2,981,643	)		(3,341,441	)		(4,944,102	)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Advances on note and loan receivable		-			(2,177,628	)		-
Acquisition of mining rights		(550,000	)		-			(550,000	)
Payment received on note receivable		930,000			25,000			930,000
Proceeds received from the sale of marketable securities		323,000			-			323,000
Proceeds from disposal of assets		70,875			-			204,306
Purchase of property and equipment		(178,493	)		(3,972	)		(244,741	)
NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES		595,382			(2,156,600	)		(1,053,064	)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from sale of common stock, net of issuance cost		847,500			-			4,024,916
Proceeds from sale of preferred stock		1,000,000			-			4,284,396
Proceeds from note payable - related party		-			2,250,000			-
Proceeds from note payable		500,000			2,250,000			500,000
Proceeds from convertible promissory note - related party		-			100,000			-
Proceeds from convertible promissory notes		-			650,000			1,715,604
Payments on notes payable		(1,039,771	)		-			(2,906,493	)
Advances to parent company		-			-			48,745
NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES		1,307,729			5,250,000			7,667,168
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE ON CASH		-			-			1,649
NET (DECREASE) INCREASE  IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		(1,078,532	)		(248,041	)		1,671,651
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS- beginning of period		3,670,567			509,550			920,384
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS- end of period	$	2,592,035		$	261,509		$	2,592,035
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid for:
Interest	$	71,817		$	4,771		$	404,308
Income taxes	$	-		$	-		$	-
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Issuance of common stock for payment of loans payable	$	-		$	360,000		$	-
Issuance of common stock for payment of notes payable and accrued interest	$	8,315,258		$	-		$	9,323,005
Issuance of common stock in connection with the conversion of a promissory note   into a current private placement	$	-		$	-		$	611,750
Carrying value of assumed assets, liabilities and certain promotion   rights agreement contributed from Golden Empire, LLC	$	-		$	(30,551	)	$	-
Common stock issued for prepaid services	$	-		$	280,000		$	-
Issuance of additional notes payable upon assignment of debt	$	294,285		$	-		$	294,285
Beneficial conversion feature and debt discount in connection with     the issuance of convertible promissory notes	$	168,163		$	750,000		$	1,883,767
Debt discount in connection with the issuance of the credit facility    agreement and notes payable	$	-		$	1,800,000		$	-
Deferred financing cost in connection with the issuance of the credit facility     agreement and notes payable	$	-		$	900,000		$	-
Preferred stock deemed dividend	$	1,616,777		$	-		$	4,901,173
Issuance of common stock for payment of Continental's accrued legal fees	$	170,614		$	-		$	170,614
Issuance of common stock for payment of accrued dividend	$	3,601		$	-		$	3,601
Reclassification of derivative liability to equity	$	7,750,289		$	-		$	7,750,289
Issuance of a note receivable pursuant to an option agreement	$	1,000,000		$	-		$	1,000,000

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

5

PERSHING GOLD CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

(FORMERLY SAGEBRUSH GOLD LTD.)

(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

March 31, 2012

NOTE 1 – ORGANIZATION AND DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

Organization

Pershing Gold Corporation  (the “Company”), formerly Sagebrush Gold Ltd., formerly The Empire Sports & Entertainment Holdings Co., formerly Excel Global, Inc. (the “Shell”), was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on August 2, 2007.In September 2010, the Company changed its name to The Empire Sports & Entertainment Holdings Co, which was subsequently changed to Sagebrush Gold Ltd. on May 16, 2011. On February 27, 2012, the Company changed its name to Pershing Gold Corporation.

On September 29, 2010, the Company entered into a Share Exchange Agreement (the “Exchange Agreement”) with The Empire Sports & Entertainment, Co. (“Empire”), a privately held Nevada corporation incorporated on February 10, 2010, and the shareholders of Empire (the “Empire Shareholders”). Upon closing of the transaction contemplated under the Exchange Agreement (the “Exchange”), the Empire Shareholders transferred all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Empire to the Company in exchange for shares of common stock of the Company.  Such Exchange caused Empire to become a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company.

Prior to the Exchange, the Company was a shell company with no business operations.

The Exchange was accounted for as a reverse-merger and recapitalization. Empire was the acquirer for financial reporting purposes and the Company was the acquired company. Consequently, the assets and liabilities and the operations reflected in the historical financial statements prior to the Exchange were those of Empire and was recorded at the historical cost basis of Empire, and the consolidated financial statements after completion of the Exchange included the assets and liabilities of the Company and Empire, historical operations of Empire and operations of the Company from the closing date of the Exchange.

Empire was incorporated in Nevada on February 10, 2010 to succeed to the business of its predecessor company, Golden Empire, LLC (“Golden Empire”), which was formed and commenced operations on November 30, 2009. Empire was principally engaged in the production and promotion of music and sporting events. The Company had assumed all assets, liabilities and certain promotion rights agreements entered into by Golden Empire at carrying value of ($30,551) which approximated fair value on February 10, 2010. Golden Empire ceased operations on that date. As a result of the Exchange, Empire became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company and the Company succeeded to the business of Empire as its sole line of business.

A newly-formed wholly-owned subsidiary, EXCX Funding Corp., a Nevada corporation was formed in January 2011 for the purpose of entering into a Credit Facility Agreement in February 2011 (see Note 9).

On April 26, 2011, a shareholder agreement (the “Shareholder Agreement”) was executed and entered into between Empire, Concert International Inc. (“CII”) and Capital Hoedown Inc.  (“Capital Hoedown”). Pursuant to the Shareholder Agreement, Empire has the right to select two directors, and CII has the right to select one director of Capital Hoedown. Based on the Shareholder Agreement, Empire had owned 66.67% and CII had owned 33.33% of the corporate joint venture. Contemporaneously with the execution of the Shareholder Agreement, Empire issued a revolving demand loan to CII and Denis Benoit, up to a maximum amount of $500,000.  Additionally, Empire issued a revolving demand loan to the Company’s former majority owned subsidiary, Capital Hoedown Inc., up to a maximum amount of $4,000,000 which bears 10% interest per annum and payable on the earlier of the termination date on January 15, 2012 or upon demand by Empire. On September 1, 2011, the Company exited the sports and entertainment business and disposed of its Empire subsidiary pursuant to a Stock Purchase Agreement (the “SPA”) by and between the Company, Empire and CII.  Prior to the purchase, CII was the owner of a 33 1/3% minority interest with Empire in Capital Hoedown, Inc., an Ontario corporation, formed to undertake an event held during August 2011.   Pursuant to the SPA, the Company agreed to sell to CII its Empire subsidiary, including the 66.67% equity ownership interest in Capital Hoedown, for $500,000 payable on March 31, 2012 pursuant to a Senior Promissory Note issued by CII to the Company which bears interest at 8% per annum (see Note 3). As a result, on September 1, 2011, Empire and Capital Hoedown are no longer considered a subsidiary of the Company.

6

PERSHING GOLD CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

(FORMERLY SAGEBRUSH GOLD LTD.)

(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

March 31, 2012

NOTE 1 – ORGANIZATION AND DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS (continued)

On May 24, 2011, the Company entered into four limited liability company membership interests purchase agreements (the “Agreements”) with the owners of Arttor Gold LLC (“Arttor Gold”).  Each of the owners of Arttor Gold, (the “Members”) sold their interests in Arttor Gold in privately negotiated sales resulting in the Company acquiring 100% of Arttor Gold.  Pursuant to the Agreements, the Company issued 8,000,000 shares of preferred stock, designated Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.0001 per share (the “Series B Preferred Stock”) and 13,000,000 shares of Common Stock in exchange for 100% membership interests in Arttor Gold.  Each share of Series B Preferred Stock is convertible into one share each of the Company’s common stock. Assuming the conversion into Common Stock of the Series B Preferred Stock, the Company had an additional 21,000,000 shares of its Common Stock, on a fully-diluted basis, outstanding following the transaction. As a result of this transaction, on May 24, 2011, Arttor Gold became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. Arttor Gold (an exploration stage company), a Nevada limited liability company, was formed and organized on April 28, 2011. Arttor Gold operates as a U.S. based junior gold exploration and mining company.

A newly-formed wholly-owned subsidiary, Noble Effort Gold, LLC, a Nevada corporation was formed in June 2011. A newly-formed wholly-owned subsidiary, Continental Resources Acquisition Sub, Inc., a Florida corporation was formed in July 2011. A newly-formed wholly-owned subsidiary, Gold Acquisition Corp., a Nevada corporation was formed in August 2011.

On July 22, 2011, the Company, Continental Resources Acquisition Sub, Inc., the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary (“Acquisition Sub”), and Continental Resources Group, Inc. (“Continental”), entered into an asset purchase agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) and, through the Acquisition Sub, closed on the purchase of substantially all of the assets of Continental (the “Asset Sale”) in consideration for (i) shares of the Company’s common stock (the “Shares”) which was equal to eight Shares for every 10 shares of Continental’s common stock outstanding; (ii) the assumption of the outstanding warrants to purchase shares of Continental’s common stock and (iii)  the assumption of Continental’s 2010 Equity Incentive Plan and all options granted and issued thereunder (see Note 4). After giving effect to the foregoing, the Company issued 76,095,214 shares of its Common Stock, 41,566,999 warrants, and 2,248,000 stock options following the transaction.

Consequently, the issuance of 76,095,214 shares of the Company’s common stock to Continental accounted for approximately 67% of the total issued and outstanding stocks of the Company as of July 22, 2011 and the Company had become a majority owned subsidiary of Continental. As of March 31, 2012, Continental holds 42.23% of interest in the outstanding common stock of the Company.  Effective February 2012, the Company is considered to be an equity method investee as a result of the decrease in Continental’s ownership interest of less than 50% which is accounted for under equity method of accounting.

On August 30, 2011, the Company, through its newly-formed wholly owned subsidiary, Gold Acquisition Corp. (“Gold Acquisition”) acquired the Relief Canyon Mine (“Relief Canyon”) located in Pershing County, near Lovelock, Nevada, for an aggregate purchase price consisting of: (i) $12,000,000 cash and (ii) $8,000,000 of senior secured convertible promissory notes issued to Platinum Long Term Growth LLC (“Platinum”) and Lakewood Group LLC (“Lakewood”). Gold Acquisition, a Nevada corporation was formed in August 2011.

7

PERSHING GOLD CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

(FORMERLY SAGEBRUSH GOLD LTD.)

(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

March 31, 2012

NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of presentation

The condensed consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America ("US GAAP") and present the condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries as of March 31, 2012. In the preparation of condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company, intercompany transactions and balances are eliminated and net earnings are reduced by the portion of the net earnings of subsidiaries applicable to non-controlling interests. All adjustments (consisting of normal recurring items) necessary to present fairly the Company's financial position as of March 31, 2012, and the results of operations and cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2012 have been included. The results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. The accounting policies and procedures employed in the preparation of these condensed consolidated financial statements have been derived from the audited financial statements of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2011, which are contained in Form 10-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 16, 2012. The consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2011 was derived from those financial statements.

As reflected in the accompanying consolidated financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2012, the Company had a net loss of $ 22,929,169 and $2,981,643 of net cash used in operations. At March 31, 2012, the Company had a working capital of $4,744,563. Additionally, at March 31, 2011, the Company had an accumulated deficit of approximately $54.5 million. However, of the $22,929,169 net loss for the three months ended March 31, 2012, $19,716,336 consisted of non cash expenses such as stock based compensation to certain employees and consultants, change in fair value of derivative liability, amortization of debt discount, non- cash interest and loss from extinguishment of debts. As of March 31, 2012, the Company has cash and cash equivalents for a total of approximately $2.6 million. In April 2012, the Company sold 4,385,716 shares of common stock to certain investors for an aggregate purchase price of $1,535,000. The Company anticipates selling the remaining shares (option consideration) received in January 2012 pursuant to an Option Agreement for the remainder of 2012 to increase the Company’s working capital (see Note 5). Based on the Company’s historical use of cash and other mitigating factors, management believes that the Company has met its expected needs required to support its operations for the next 12 months.

Exploration stage company

On September 1, 2011, the Company exited the sports and entertainment business and disposed of its Empire subsidiary pursuant to a Stock Purchase Agreement. The Company will no longer be engaged in or pursue agreements with artists or athletes for sports and entertainment promotion and events, and will focus its activities exclusively on its new business segment, gold exploration as a junior exploration company. As a result of the Company's focus on gold exploration, the Company is considered an exploration stage company effective September 1, 2011. Accordingly, the Company is an exploration stage company as defined in ASC 915 “Development Stage Entities”.

Use of estimates

In preparing the condensed consolidated financial statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the consolidated balance sheet, and revenues and expenses for the period then ended.  Actual results may differ significantly from those estimates. Significant estimates made by management include, but are not limited to, allowance for bad debts, the useful life of property and equipment, the fair values of certain promotional contracts and the assumptions used to calculate fair value of options granted and derivative liability, beneficial conversion on convertible notes payable, capitalized mineral rights, asset valuations, common stock issued for services, common stock issued for conversion of notes and common stock issued in connection with an acquisition.

8

PERSHING GOLD CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

(FORMERLY SAGEBRUSH GOLD LTD.)

(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

March 31, 2012

NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

Non-controlling interests in consolidated financial statements

In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 810-10-65, “Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an amendment of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51,” (“SFAS No. 160”).  This statement clarifies that a non-controlling (minority) interest in a subsidiary is an ownership interest in the entity that should be reported as equity in the consolidated financial statements. It also requires consolidated net income to include the amounts attributable to both the parent and non-controlling interest, with disclosure on the face of the consolidated income statement of the amounts attributed to the parent and to the non-controlling interest. In accordance with ASC 810-10-45-21, those losses attributable to the parent and the non-controlling interest in subsidiary may exceed their interests in the subsidiary’s equity. The excess and any further losses attributable to the parent and the non-controlling interest shall be attributed to those interests even if that attribution results in a deficit non-controlling interest balance. As of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company recorded a deficit non-controlling interest balance of $ 1,770 and $1,164, respectively, in connection with a majority-owned subsidiary of ND Energy, Inc. and Green Energy, Inc. (Secure Energy LLC), as reflected in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when acquired to be cash equivalents. The Company places its cash with a high credit quality financial institution. The Company’s account at this institution is insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC") up to $250,000. In addition to the basic insurance deposit coverage, the FDIC is providing temporary unlimited coverage for non-interest bearing transaction accounts through December 31, 2012. At March 31, 2012, the Company has not reached bank balances exceeding the FDIC insurance limit on interest bearing accounts. To reduce its risk associated with the failure of such financial institution, the Company evaluates at least annually the rating of the financial institution in which it holds deposits.

Marketable securities

Marketable securities that the Company invests in publicly traded equity securities and are generally restricted for sale under Federal securities laws. The Company’s policy is to liquidate securities received when market conditions are favorable for sale. Since these securities are often restricted, the Company is unable to liquidate them until the restriction is removed. Marketable securities that are bought and held principally for the purpose of selling them in the near term are to be classified as trading securities and reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses included in earnings. Pursuant to ASC Topic 320, “Investments –Debt and Equity Securities” the Company’s marketable securities have a readily determinable and active quoted price, such as from NASDAQ, NYSE Euronext, the Over the Counter Bulletin Board, and the OTC Markets Group (formerly known as the Pink Sheets).

Trading securities are carried at fair value, with changes in unrealized holding gains and losses included in income and classified within interest and other income, net, in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

Available for sale securities are carried at fair value, with changes in unrealized gains or losses are recognized as an element of comprehensive income based on changes in the fair value of the security.  Once liquidated, realized gains or losses on the sale of marketable securities available for sale are reflected in the net income (loss) for the period in which the security was liquidated.

 

9

PERSHING GOLD CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

(FORMERLY SAGEBRUSH GOLD LTD.)

(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

March 31, 2012

NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

Comprehensive income

Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2011-05 amends FASB Codification Topic 220 on comprehensive income (1) to eliminate the current option to present the components of other comprehensive income in the statement of changes in equity, and (2) to require presentation of net income and other comprehensive income (and their respective components) either in a single continuous statement or in two separate but consecutive statements. These amendments do not alter any current recognition or measurement requirements in respect of items of other comprehensive income. The amendments in this Update are to be applied prospectively.

Fair value of financial instruments

The Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” (“ASC 820”), for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis. ASC 820 establishes a common definition for fair value to be applied to existing generally accepted accounting principles that require the use of fair value measurements, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure about such fair value measurements. The adoption of ASC 820 did not have an impact on the Company’s financial position or operating results, but did expand certain disclosures.

ASC 820 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Additionally, ASC 820 requires the use of valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. These inputs are prioritized below:

Level 1:	Observable inputs such as quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
Level 2:	Observable market-based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data
Level 3:	Unobservable inputs for which there is little or no market data, which require the use of the reporting entity’s own assumptions.

The Company analyzes all financial instruments with features of both liabilities and equity under the FASB’s accounting standard for such instruments. Under this standard, financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Depending on the product and the terms of the transaction, the fair value of notes payable and derivative liabilities were modeled using a series of techniques, including closed-form analytic formula, such as the Black-Scholes option-pricing model.

10

PERSHING GOLD CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

(FORMERLY SAGEBRUSH GOLD LTD.)

(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

March 31, 2012

NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

The following table presents a reconciliation of the derivative liability measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable input (Level 3) from January 1, 2012 to March 31, 2012:

	Conversion feature derivative liability
Balance at January 1, 2012	$	6,295,400
Reclassification of derivative liability to equity		(7,750,289)
Change in fair value included in earnings		1,454,889
Balance at March 31, 2012	$	-

Investment measured at fair value on a recurring basis:

	Fair Value Measurements Using:
	Quoted Prices in Active Markets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Marketable securities –trading	$	119,702	$	-	$	-
Marketable securities – available for sale, net of discount for effect of restriction	$	-	$	-	$	4,650,000

The Company classifies the trading securities as Level 1 assets as their fair values are readily determinable and based on quoted market prices. Unrealized gains or losses on marketable securities -trading are included in earnings.  

The Company classifies the investments in marketable securities available for sale as Level 3, adjusted for the effect of restriction. The securities are restricted and cannot be readily resold by the Company absent a registration of those securities under the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) or the availabilities of an exemption from the registration requirements under the Securities Act. As these securities are often restricted, the Company is unable to liquidate them until the restriction is removed. Unrealized gains or losses on marketable securities available for sale are recognized as an element of comprehensive income based on changes in the fair value of the security. Once liquidated, realized gains or losses on the sale of marketable securities available for sale are reflected in our net income for the period in which the security was liquidated.

The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet for cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, other receivables, prepaid expenses, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate their estimated fair market value based on the short-term maturity of these instruments. The carrying amount of the note payable at March 31, 2012, approximate their respective fair value based on the Company’s incremental borrowing rate. The Company did not identify any other assets or liabilities that are required to be presented on the consolidated balance sheets at fair value in accordance with the accounting guidance.

 

11

PERSHING GOLD CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

(FORMERLY SAGEBRUSH GOLD LTD.)

(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

March 31, 2012

NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

Prepaid expenses

Prepaid expenses – current portion of $392,892 and $463,737 at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively, consist primarily of costs paid for future services which will occur within a year. Prepaid expenses include prepayments (in cash and common stock) of public relation services, consulting and business advisory services, and prepaid insurance and mineral lease which are being amortized over the terms of their respective agreements. Prepaid expenses – long term portion of $35,267 and $37,759 at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively, consist primarily of costs paid for future mineral lease payments after one year.

Mineral property acquisition and exploration costs

Costs of lease, exploration, carrying and retaining unproven mineral lease properties are expensed as incurred. The Company has chosen to expense all mineral exploration costs as incurred given that it is still in the exploration stage. Once the Company has identified proven and probable reserves in its investigation of its properties and upon development of a plan for operating a mine, it would enter the development stage and capitalize future costs until production is established. When a property reaches the production stage, the related capitalized costs will be amortized, using the units-of-production method over the estimated life of the probable-proven reserves. When the Company has capitalized mineral properties, these properties will be periodically assessed for impairment of value and any diminution in value. To date, the Company has not established the commercial feasibility of any exploration prospects; therefore, all costs are being expensed. During the three months ended March 31, 2012, the Company incurred exploration cost of $1,289,899.

ASC 930-805, states that mineral rights consist of the legal right to explore, extract, and retain at least a portion of the benefits from mineral deposits. Mining assets include mineral rights. Acquired mineral rights are considered tangible assets under ASC 805. ASC 805 requires that mineral rights be recognized at fair value as of the acquisition date. As a result, the direct costs to acquire mineral rights are initially capitalized as tangible assets. Mineral rights include costs associated with acquiring patented and unpatented mining claims. ASC 930-805-30-1 and 30-2 provides that in fair valuing mineral assets, an acquirer should take into account both:

· The value beyond proven and probable reserves ("VBPP") to the extent that a market participant would include VBPP in determining the fair value of the assets.

· The effects of anticipated fluctuations in the future market price of minerals in a manner that is consistent with the expectations of market participants.

In order to fair value the mineral rights acquired, management utilized a compilation and review report prepared by a third-party which documented the estimated, indicated and inferred mineral resources related to the Relief Canyon Mine property. Based on these findings, management determined that the fair value of the acquired mineral right amounted to $8,501,071 in connection with the acquisition of the Relief Canyon Mine Property (see Note 4). In addition, in February 2012, the Company acquired certain unpatented mining claims from Silver Scott Mines Inc. for a purchase price of $550,000.The Company has recorded the acquired mineral right’s fair value as mineral rights on the condensed consolidated balance sheet as a separate component of property, plant and equipment. If proven and probable reserves are established for the property and it has been determined that a mineral property can be economically developed, costs will be amortized using the units-of-production method over the estimated life of the probable reserve. For mineral rights in which proven and probable reserves have not yet been established, the Company assesses the carrying values for impairment at the end of each reporting period and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. 

On March 31, 2012, based on managements’ review of the carrying value of mineral rights related to the acquisition of such mineral rights, management determined that there is no evidence that these acquired mineral rights will not be fully recovered and accordingly, the Company has determined that no adjustment to the carrying value of mineral rights was required.

12

PERSHING GOLD CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

(FORMERLY SAGEBRUSH GOLD LTD.)

(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

March 31, 2012

NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

As of the date of these consolidated financial statements, the Company has not established any proven or probable reserves on its mineral properties and incurred only acquisition and exploration costs.

Property and equipment

Property and equipment are carried at cost. The cost of repairs and maintenance is expensed as incurred; major replacements and improvements are capitalized. When assets are retired or disposed of, the cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts, and any resulting gains or losses are included in income in the year of disposition. Depreciation is calculated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the assets, generally one to twenty five years.

Impairment of long-lived assets

The Company accounts for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets according to the ASC 360 “Property, Plant and Equipment”.  The Company continually monitors events and changes in circumstances that could indicate that the carrying amounts of long-lived assets, including mineral rights, may not be recoverable.  Long-lived assets in the exploration stage are monitored for impairment based on factors such as the Company's continued right to explore the area, exploration reports, assays, technical reports, drill results and the Company's continued plans to fund exploration programs on the property, whether sufficient work has been performed to indicate that the carrying amount of the mineral property cost carried forward as an asset will not be fully recovered, even though a viable mine has been discovered. The tests for long-lived assets in the exploration stage would be monitored for impairment based on factors such as current market value of the long-lived assets and results of exploration, future asset utilization, business climate, mineral prices and future undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use of the related assets. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to the estimated future net undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. When necessary, impaired assets are written down to estimated fair value based on the best information available. Estimated fair value is generally based on either appraised value or measured by discounting estimated future cash flows. Considerable management judgment is necessary to estimate discounted future cash flows. Accordingly, actual results could vary significantly from such estimates. The Company recognizes an impairment loss when the sum of expected undiscounted future cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the asset. The Company did not consider it necessary to record any impairment charges of long-lived assets at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.

Goodwill and other intangible assets

In accordance with ASC 350- 30-65, the Company assesses the impairment of identifiable intangibles whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Factors the Company considers to be important which could trigger an impairment review include the following:

1.	Significant underperformance relative to expected historical or projected future operating results;
2.	Significant changes in the manner of use of the acquired assets or the strategy for the overall business; and
3.	Significant negative industry or economic trends.

13

PERSHING GOLD CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

(FORMERLY SAGEBRUSH GOLD LTD.)

(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

March 31, 2012

NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

When the Company determines that the carrying value of intangibles may not be recoverable based upon the existence of one or more of the above indicators of impairment and the carrying value of the asset cannot be recovered from projected undiscounted cash flows, the Company records an impairment charge. The Company measures any impairment based on a projected discounted cash flow method using a discount rate determined by management to be commensurate with the risk inherent in the current business model. Significant management judgment is required in determining whether an indicator of impairment exists and in projecting cash flows.

Environmental remediation liability

The Company has posted bonds with the United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”) as required by the State of Nevada in an amount equal to the maximum cost to reclaim land disturbed in its mining process. The Company posted a reclamation bond deposit of $4,557,629 to provide surface reclamation coverage for the Relief Canyon Mine, as required by the BLM to secure remediation costs if the project is abandoned or closed. Due to its investment in the bond and the close monitoring of the BLM Nevada State Office, the Company believes that it has adequately mitigated any liability that could be incurred by the Company to reclaim lands disturbed in its mining process. The Company also posted a surface management bond with BLM for a total of $50,000 for its two wholly owned subsidiaries, Arttor Gold and Noble Effort Gold LLC and was included in deposits as reflected in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes.   Under ASC Topic 740, deferred tax assets are recognized for future deductible temporary differences and for tax net operating loss and tax credit carry-forwards, and deferred tax liabilities are recognized for temporary differences that will result in taxable amounts in future years. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using the enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the periods in which the deferred tax asset or liability is expected to be realized or settled. A valuation allowance is provided to offset the net deferred tax asset if, based upon the available evidence, management determines that it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized.

ASC Topic 740 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. ASC Topic 740, also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. The Company may, from time to time, be assessed interest and/or penalties by taxing jurisdictions, although any such assessments historically have been minimal and immaterial to its financial results. In the event the Company has received an assessment for interest and/or penalties, it has been classified in the statements of operations as other general and administrative costs.

14

PERSHING GOLD CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

(FORMERLY SAGEBRUSH GOLD LTD.)

(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

March 31, 2012

NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

Basic and Diluted Net Loss per Share

Net loss per common share is calculated in accordance with ASC Topic 260: Earnings Per Share (“ASC 260”). Basic loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. The computation of diluted net loss per share does not include dilutive common stock equivalents in the weighted average shares outstanding as they would be anti-dilutive. The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted loss per share:

	For the Three Months ended March 31, 2012		For the Three Months ended March 31, 2011
Numerator:
Loss from continuing operations	$	(22,879,601)	$	(464,664)
Loss from discontinued operations	$	(50,174)	$	(823,698)
Denominator:
Denominator for basic and diluted loss per share
(weighted-average shares)		152,753,739		22,718,027
Loss per common share, basic and diluted:
Loss from continuing operations	$	(0.15)	$	( 0.02)
Loss from discontinued operations	$	(0.00)	$	( 0.04)

The following were excluded from the computation of diluted shares outstanding as they would have had an anti-dilutive impact on our loss from continuing operations and loss from discontinued operations. In periods where the Company has a net loss, all dilutive securities are excluded.

	March 31, 2012		March 31, 2011
Common stock equivalents:
Stock options		14,148,000		2,600,000
Stock warrants		39,653,142		-
Convertible preferred stock		26,775,326		2,250,000
Convertible promissory notes embedded conversion feature		-		750,000
Total		80,576,468		5,600,000

15

PERSHING GOLD CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

(FORMERLY SAGEBRUSH GOLD LTD.)

(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

March 31, 2012

NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

Stock-based compensation

Stock-based compensation is accounted for based on the requirements of the Share-Based Payment Topic of ASC 718 which requires recognition in the consolidated financial statements of the cost of employee and director services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments over the period the employee or director is required to perform the services in exchange for the award (presumptively, the vesting period). The ASC also requires measurement of the cost of employee and director services received in exchange for an award based on the grant-date fair value of the award.

Pursuant to ASC Topic 505-50, for share-based payments to consultants and other third-parties, compensation expense is determined at the “measurement date.” The expense is recognized over the vesting period of the award. Until the measurement date is reached, the total amount of compensation expense remains uncertain. The Company initially records compensation expense based on the fair value of the award at the reporting date.

Related parties

Parties are considered to be related to the Company if the parties, directly or indirectly, through one or more intermediaries, control, are controlled by, or are under common control with the Company. Related parties also include principal owners of the Company, its management, members of the immediate families of principal owners of the Company and its management and other parties with which the Company may deal if one party controls or can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the other to an extent that one of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests. The Company discloses all related party transactions.

Recent accounting pronouncements

Accounting standards that have been issued or proposed by the FASB that do not require adoption until a future date are not expected to have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements upon adoption.

NOTE 3 – DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

In September 2011, the Company decided to discontinue its sports and entertainment business and prior periods have been restated in the Company’s consolidated financial statements and related footnotes to conform to this presentation.. On September 1, 2011, the Company disposed its Empire subsidiary pursuant to a Stock Purchase Agreement (the “SPA”) by and between the Company, Empire and CII. Prior to the purchase, CII was the owner of a 33 1/3% minority interest with Empire in Capital Hoedown, Inc., an Ontario corporation, formed to undertake an event held during August 2011. Pursuant to the SPA, the Company agreed to sell Empire to CII its Empire subsidiary, including the 66.67% equity ownership interest in Capital Hoedown, for $500,000 payable on March 31, 2012 pursuant to a Senior Promissory Note issued by CII to the Company which bears interest at 8% per annum. As a result, on September 1, 2011, Empire and Capital Hoedown are no longer considered a subsidiary of the Company. As of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, this note receivable, net of allowance for bad debt of $500,000, amounted to $0.

16

PERSHING GOLD CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

(FORMERLY SAGEBRUSH GOLD LTD.)

(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

March 31, 2012

NOTE 3 – DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS (continued)

The remaining assets and liabilities of discontinued operations are presented in the balance sheet under the caption “Assets and Liabilities of discontinued operation" and relates to the discontinued operations of the sports and entertainment business.  The carrying amounts of the major classes of these assets and liabilities are summarized as follows: 

	March 31, 2012		December 31, 2011
Assets:
Accounts receivable, net	$	-	$	44,300
Notes and loan receivable		-		16,750
Assets of discontinued operations		-		61,050
Liabilities:
Accounts payables and accrued expenses	$	-	$	21,622
Liabilities of discontinued operations	$	-	$	21,622

The following table sets forth for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 indicated selected financial data of the Company’s discontinued operations of its sports and entertainment business.

	March 31, 2012			March 31, 2011
Revenues	$	-		$	291,200
Cost of sales		-			189,916
Gross profit (loss)		-			101,284
Operating and other non-operating expenses		(50,174	)		(924,982	)
Loss from discontinued operations	$	(50,174	)	$	(823,698	)

17

PERSHING GOLD CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

(FORMERLY SAGEBRUSH GOLD LTD.)

(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

March 31, 2012

NOTE 4 – ACQUISITION AND DECONSOLIDATION

Continental Resources Group, Inc.

On July 22, 2011, the Company, Acquisition Sub, and Continental, entered into a Purchase Agreement and, through Acquisition Sub, closed on the purchase of substantially all of the assets of Continental (the “Asset Sale”) in consideration for (i) shares of the Company’s common stock (the “Shares”) which was equal to eight Shares for every 10 shares of Continental’s common stock outstanding; (ii) the assumption of the outstanding warrants to purchase shares of Continental’s common stock equal to one warrant to purchase eight shares of the Company’s common stock for every warrant to purchase ten shares Continental’s common stock outstanding at an exercise price equal to such amount as is required pursuant to the terms of the outstanding warrants, and (iii)  the assumption of Continental’s 2010 Equity Incentive Plan and all options granted and issued was equal to one option to purchase eight shares of the Company’s common stock for every option to purchase 10 shares of Continental’s common stock outstanding with a strike price equal to such amount as is required pursuant to the terms of the outstanding option.  Upon the closing of the Asset Sale, Acquisition Sub assumed the Assumed Liabilities (as defined in the Purchase Agreement) of Continental.  Under the terms of the Purchase Agreement, the Company purchased from Continental substantially all of its assets, including, but not limited to, 100% of the outstanding shares of common stock of the Continental’s wholly-owned subsidiaries (Green Energy Fields, Inc., and ND Energy, Inc.) After giving effect to the foregoing, the Company issued 76,095,214 shares of its common stock, 41,566,999 stock warrants, and 2,248,000 stock options following the transaction. Consequently, the issuance of 76,095,214 shares of the Company’s common stock to Continental accounted for approximately 67% of the total issued and outstanding stocks of the Company as of July 22, 2011 and the Company had become a majority owned subsidiary of Continental. As of March 31, 2012, Continental holds 42.23% of interest in the Company.  Effective February 2012, the Company is considered to be an equity method investee as a result of the decrease in Continental’s ownership interest of less than 50% which is accounted for under equity method of accounting.

The issuance of 76,095,214 shares of common stock including the issuance of 41,566,999 stock warrants and 2,248,000 stock options were valued at $14,857,676 which primarily represents the fair value of the net asset acquired  from Continental of cash of $11,164,514, a note receivable of $2,000,000, prepaid expenses and other current assets of $1,904,997 and assumed liabilities of $293,659. The Company accounted the value under ASC 805-50-30-2 “Business Combinations” whereby if the consideration is not in the form of cash, the measurement is based on either the cost which shall be measured based on the fair value of the consideration given or the fair value of the assets (or net assets) acquired, whichever is more clearly evident and thus more reliably measurable. The Company deemed that the fair value of the net asset of Continental amounting to $14,857,676 is more clearly evident and more reliable measurement basis.

Prior to the asset purchase agreement, Barry Honig, our then Chairman and the Company’s current director, held 2,685,000 shares of Continental directly and certain entities under Mr. Honig’s control and family members held 3,075,838 shares of Continental. Additionally, one of the shareholders of the Company held 4,569,252 shares of Continental prior to such agreement. Though there were common ownership between the Company and Continental, through the Company's Board Member and a stockholder, both interest in the Company only accounted for a total of 15% upon the consummation of the asset purchase agreement.

18

PERSHING GOLD CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

(FORMERLY SAGEBRUSH GOLD LTD.)

(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

March 31, 2012

NOTE 4 – ACQUISITION AND DECONSOLIDATION (continued)

Accordingly, pursuant to ASC 805 “Business Combinations”, the Company applied push–down accounting and adjusted to fair value all of the assets and liabilities directly on the financial statements of the subsidiary, Acquisition Sub. The net purchase price paid by the Company was allocated to assets acquired and liabilities assumed on the records of the Company as follows:

Current assets (including cash of $11,164,514)	$	13,069,511
Note receivable		2,000,000
Prepaid expenses – long term portion		41,912
Property and equipment		39,912
Liabilities assumed (including a 12% note payable of $50,000)		(293,659	)
Net purchase price	$	14,857,676

On July 18, 2011, the Company borrowed $2,000,000 from Continental, and issued it an unsecured 6% promissory note. On July 22, 2011, in connection with the Purchase agreement, the Company acquired the note receivable which was payable to Continental and included the acquisition of the $2,000,000 note receivable as part of the purchase price allocation. Accordingly, the acquired note receivable was eliminated against the note payable on the Company’s financial statements. 

Unaudited pro forma results of operations data as if the Company and the subsidiaries of Continental had occurred are as follows: 

	For the Three Months ended March 31, 2012			For the Three Months ended March 31, 2011
Pro forma revenues	$	-		$	-
Pro forma loss from operations		(9,721,119	)		(2,785,605	)
Pro forma net loss		(22,929,775	)		(3,619,837	)
Pro forma loss per share – basic and diluted	$	(0.15	)	$	(0.16	)

19

PERSHING GOLD CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

(FORMERLY SAGEBRUSH GOLD LTD.)

(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

March 31, 2012

NOTE 5 – MARKETABLE SECURITIES

Marketable securities at March 31, 2012 consisted of the following:

	Cost			Gross Unrealized Gains			Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
Publicly traded equity securities - trading		$	100,000		$	19,702		$	—		$	119,702
Publicly traded equity securities – available for sale			4,650,000			—			—			4,650,000
Total		$	4,750,000		$	19,702		$	—		$	4,769,702

Trading securities are carried at fair value, with changes in unrealized holding gains and losses included in income and classified within interest and other income, net, in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations. Unrealized gains or losses on marketable securities available for sale are recognized on a periodic basis as an element of comprehensive income based on changes in the fair value of the security. Once liquidated, realized gains or losses on the sale of marketable securities available for sale will be reflected in the Company’s net loss for the period in which the security are liquidated.

In April 2012, the Company sold its marketable securities – trading generating proceeds of $119,702. The increase in fair value of $19,702 has been recorded as unrealized gain in the statement of operations as of March 31, 2012.

In January 2012, the Company received 10 million restricted shares pursuant to an option agreement (see Note 13). At the time of issuance, the Company recorded the cost of investment at the fair market value (based on the recent selling price of the Investee’s common stock at a private placement) of the shares at $0.50 per share or $5 million. Between February 2012 and March 2012, the Company sold 700,000 shares of the Investee’s common stock under a private transaction and generated net proceeds of $323,000 and has recorded a realized loss of $27,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2012.

NOTE 6 – PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

Property and equipment consisted of the following:

	Estimated Life	March 31, 2012			December 31, 2011
Furniture and fixtures	5 years	$	45,085		$	20,000
Office and computer equipments	1 - 5 years		131,704			26,606
Land	-		266,977			266,977
Building and improvements	5 - 25 years		727,965			727,965
Site costs	10 years		1,272,732			1,272,732
Crushing system	20 years		2,256,943			2,256,943
Process plant and equipments	10 years		3,161,583			3,115,266
Vehicles and mining equipments	5 - 10 years		577,110			659,622
			8,440,099			8,346,111
Less: accumulated depreciation			(552,606	)		(315,008	)
		$	7,887,493		$	8,031,103

20

PERSHING GOLD CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

(FORMERLY SAGEBRUSH GOLD LTD.)

(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

March 31, 2012

NOTE 6 – PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT (continued)

For the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, depreciation expense amounted to $241,794 and $1,960, respectively.

Between February 2012 and March 2012, the Company sold mining and drilling equipments with a net book value worth $80,309 to third parties for a sales price of $70,875 realizing a loss on sale of assets of $9,434. The depreciation expense during the period, prior to the sale of such mining and drilling equipments amounted to $4,196 which is included in the $241,794 depreciation above.

NOTE 7 – SENIOR CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTES

On August 30, 2011, the Company, through Gold Acquisition acquired the Relief Canyon Mine for an aggregate purchase price consisting of: (i) $12,000,000 cash and (ii) $8,000,000 of senior secured convertible promissory notes (collectively, the “Notes”) issued to Platinum and Lakewood.

The Notes are joint and several obligations of the Company and Gold Acquisition and bore interest at a rate of 9% per annum with principal and interest payable on the first business day of each month commencing on the earlier of: (i) 3 months after the Company or Gold Acquisition begins producing or extracting gold from the Relief Canyon Mine or (ii) 18 months after the original date of issuance of the Note (the “Commencement Date”). The principal amount shall be paid in 12 equal monthly installments, with the initial payment due on the Commencement Date.   The Notes were convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock, at a price per share equal to $0.55, subject to adjustment in the event of mergers, recapitalizations, dividends and distributions applicable to shareholders generally and are further subject to full-ratchet anti-dilution protection.  In October 2011, the conversion price of the senior convertible promissory notes had been adjusted to $0.40 per share as a result of certain anti-dilution provisions contained therein due to the sale of common stock at $0.40 per share.

Between January 5, 2012 and February 23, 2012, the Company prepaid a total of $1,039,771 towards the senior secured convertible promissory note to Platinum and Lakewood.

The Assignment and Assumption Agreement dated February 23, 2012

On February 23, 2012, pursuant to a certain assignment and assumption agreement (the “Assignment and Assumption Agreement”), with certain assignees (collectively, the “Assignees”) acquired an aggregate of $4.0 million of the outstanding principal amount of the Notes (the “Acquired Notes”) from Platinum and Lakewood (collectively, the “Assignors”). After giving effect to the transactions contemplated pursuant to the Assignment and Assumption Agreement and the prepayment of the Notes, Platinum retained $2,368,183 and Lakewood retained $592,046 of the Original Notes (the “Remainder Notes,” and together with the Acquired Notes, the “New Notes”). The principal amount of Acquired Note issued to one of the assignees is $2,400,000 and the principal amount of the Acquired Note issued to the other assignee is $1,600,000 and bore interest at 9% per annum. The note holders waived any prepayment penalty in connection with the prepayment and assignment.

On February 23, 2012, the Company had entered into those certain Note Modification Agreements, (the “Note Modification Agreements”) with the Assignees and Assignors, respectively, to extend the Maturity Date (as defined in each of the New Notes) to February 23, 2014, the definition of Commencement Date (as defined in each of the New Notes) to February 23, 2013 and to eliminate the prepayment penalty. The Notes were convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock, at a price per share equal to $0.40, subject to adjustment in the event of mergers, recapitalizations, dividends and distributions applicable to shareholders generally and are further subject to full-ratchet anti-dilution protection.  

21

PERSHING GOLD CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

(FORMERLY SAGEBRUSH GOLD LTD.)

(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

March 31, 2012

NOTE 7 – SENIOR CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTES (continued)

The Assignors entered into their Note Modification Agreement in exchange for (i) the issuance to Platinum of warrants to purchase an aggregate of 4,144,320 shares of Common Stock, (ii) the issuance to Lakewood of warrants to purchase an aggregate of 1,036,080 shares of Common Stock, (iii) the issuance of 1,600,000 shares of the Common Stock to Platinum, and (iv) the issuance of 400,000 shares of Common Stock to Lakewood. The warrants may be exercised at any time, in whole or in part, at an exercise price of $0.40 per share.  The warrants may be exercised until the fifth anniversary of their issuance. The warrants may be exercised on a cashless basis at any time. On March 29, 2012, such warrants were exercised on a cashless basis (see Note 12).

Accordingly, the Company valued the 2 million common shares at the fair market value on the date of grant at $0.489 per share or $978,000. The 5,180,400 warrants were valued on the grant date at approximately $0.394 per warrant or a total of $2,044,186 using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: stock price of $0.489 per share, volatility of 110%, expected term of 5 years, and a risk free interest rate of 0.88%. The Company recognized a total interest expense of $3,022,186 during the three months ended March 31, 2012 in connection with the Note Modification Agreement.

The Note Assignment and Assumption Agreement dated March 30, 2012

On March 30, 2012, the Company, Platinum and Lakewood, the original holders of the Company’s Amended and Restated Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Notes, originally issued by the Company on August 30, 2011, and amended and restated on February 23, 2012 (the “Notes”), with a current outstanding principal balance of $2,960,229, entered into agreements to amend the Notes (the “Note Amendments”).  Under the Note Amendments, the Notes were amended to provide a $0.35 Conversion Price. The original holders of the notes agreed to convert $262,500 of the Notes in exchange for an aggregate of 750,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The Company accounted the reduction of the conversion price from $0.40 to $0.35 per share and such conversion under ASC 470-20-40 “Debt with Conversion and Other Options” and accordingly recorded loss from extinguishment of debts of $51,563 which is equal to the fair value of shares issued in excess of the fair value issuable pursuant to the original conversion terms.

The Company also entered into a Note Assignment and Assumption Agreement on March 30, 2012 (the “Note Assignment and Assumption Agreement”) pursuant to which the original holders assigned the remaining principal amount $2,697,729 (after such conversion discussed above) of the Notes to various assignees and such assignees agreed to fully convert the acquired Notes into the Company’s Common Stock in consideration for an aggregate purchase price of $3,256,252. A total of $2,992,014 was assigned to various assignees and the original holders waived $264,238 of the aggregate purchase price payable by the assignees for the Notes under the Note Assignment and Assumption Agreement at an amended conversion price of $0.35 per share. The Company recorded loss from extinguishment of debt of $294,285 which represents the excess of the purchase price over the remaining principal. Such additional principal of $294,285 was considered to have an embedded beneficial conversion feature because the effective conversion price was less than the fair value of the Company’s common stock and as such were treated as a discount and were valued at $168,163 which was fully amortized upon the conversion of the Notes and was included in interest expense.

22

PERSHING GOLD CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

(FORMERLY SAGEBRUSH GOLD LTD.)

(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

March 31, 2012

NOTE 7 – SENIOR CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTES (continued)

In connection with this Note Assignment and Assumption Agreement, the Company accounted the reduction of the conversion price from $0.40 to $0.35 per share and such conversion discussed below under ASC 470-20-40 “Debt with Conversion and Other Options” and accordingly recorded loss from extinguishment of debts of $529,911 which is equal to the fair value of shares issued in excess of the fair value issuable pursuant to the original conversion terms.

These various assignees agreed to convert an aggregate principal amount of $1,892,014 into 5,405,754 shares of the Company’s Common Stock at a conversion price of $0.35 per share. Such various assignees received an additional 1,118,432 shares of the Company’s Common Stock as consideration for the note conversion and were valued at the fair market value on the date of grant at $0.55 per share or $615,138 and have been included in loss from extinguishment of debts.

The remaining assigned amount of $1,100,000 was amended to allow for its conversion into the Company’s Series D Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock equivalent to the stated value of the Series D Preferred Stock which is $1.00 per share. Each share of Series D Preferred Stock is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at an effective conversion price of $0.35 per share subject to anti-dilution provisions. As such, the Company issued a total of 1,100,000 shares of Series D Preferred Stock and an additional 227,586 shares of Series D Preferred Stock in consideration for the conversion of this convertible promissory note into shares of Series D Preferred Stock. The Company recorded a loss from extinguishment of debts of $357,635 and preferred deemed dividend of $130,049 in connection with the issuance of the additional 227,586 shares of Series D Preferred Stock.

On March 30, 2012, the Company also amended the $2.4 million note assigned to FGIT to allow for the conversion of this note into the Company’s Series D Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock at $1.00 per share. The holder of this note agreed to fully convert this note (together with accrued and unpaid interest of $21,600) into 2,421,600 shares of Series D Preferred Stock and an additional 501,021 shares of Series D Preferred Stock in consideration for the conversion of this note into shares of Series D Preferred Stock. The Company accounted the reduction of the conversion price from $0.40 to $0.35 per share and such conversion under ASC 470-20-40 “Debt with Conversion and Other Options” and accordingly recorded loss from extinguishment of debts of $475,671 which is equal to the fair value of shares issued in excess of the fair value issuable pursuant to the original conversion terms. The Company recorded a loss from extinguishment of debts of $787,319 and preferred deemed dividend of $286,298 in connection with the issuance of the additional 501,021 shares of Series D Preferred Stock.

On March 30, 2012, one of the assignees, agreed to convert the assigned $1.6 million note (together with accrued and unpaid interest of $14,400) into 4,612,571 shares of Common Stock at a conversion price of $0.35 per share and an additional 954,325 shares of the Company’s Common Stock as consideration for the note conversion. The Company accounted the reduction of the conversion price from $0.40 to $0.35 per share and such conversion under ASC 470-20-40 “Debt with Conversion and Other Options” and accordingly recorded loss from extinguishment of debts of $317,114 which is equal to the fair value of shares issued in excess of the fair value issuable pursuant to the original conversion terms.  The additional 954,325 shares of common stock were valued at the fair market value on the date of grant at $0.55 per share or $524,878 and have been included in loss from extinguishment of debts.

As a result of the conversion of the senior secured convertible promissory notes, the Company fully amortized the remaining unamortized debt discount of $6,933,333 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and was included in interest expense. Accrued interest as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, amounted to $123,669 and $45,999, respectively and was included in accounts payable and accrued expenses.

23

PERSHING GOLD CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

(FORMERLY SAGEBRUSH GOLD LTD.)

(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

March 31, 2012

NOTE 7 – SENIOR CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTES (continued)

Senior convertible promissory notes consisted of the following:

	March 31, 2012		December 31, 2011
Senior convertible promissory notes	$	-	$	7,999,778
Less: debt discount		-		(6,933,333	)
Senior convertible promissory notes, net	$	-	$	1,066,445

NOTE 8 – CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTES

On September 14, 2011, the Company sold $1,715,604 of its 9% secured promissory note (the “Note”). The Note was acquired by FGIT. The proceeds of the Note have been used to post additional bonds with the BLM (the “Additional Bond”) in order to advance certain exploration and Phase One drilling activities at the Company’s Relief Canyon Mining property. The Note was a joint and several obligation of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Gold Acquisition Corp. Principal and interest under the Note was payable on the first business day of each month commencing on the later of (i) thirty (30) months from the original date of issuance and (ii) ten (10) days following the payment and/or conversion in full of the senior secured promissory notes dated as of August 30, 2011, issued to Platinum and Lakewood. The Note may be pre-paid, in full or in part at a price equal to 105% of the aggregate principal amount of the Note plus all accrued and unpaid interest thereon at the election of the Company. The Note was convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price equal to $0.50 per share, subject to adjustment in the event of mergers, recapitalizations, dividends and distributions applicable to shareholders generally. The Note was subordinated to the payment in full and satisfaction of all obligations owed to Platinum and Lakewood other than the Additional Bond and proceeds of the Additional Bond, in which Frost Gamma is intended to have a first priority senior security interest. The Note was also secured by a pledge of 100% of the stock of Gold Acquisition Corp. held by the Company. The Note may be prepaid upon the occurrence of a Qualified Financing, as defined in the Note, of at least $1,715,604. Certain holders of senior secured indebtedness of the Company (Barry Honig, a Member of the Company’s Board of Directors) agreed to subordinate certain senior obligations of the Company to the prior payment of all obligations under the Note. The Company concluded that since this convertible promissory note does not include a down-round provision under which the conversion price could be affected by future equity offerings, this convertible promissory note was not considered a derivative.

Pursuant to the terms of the Note, the Company was required to prepay the principal amount of the Note in full upon the occurrence of a Qualified Financing in which the Company receives from one or more investors, net proceeds of at least $1,715,604 (not including any outstanding debt conversion or investments made by the note holder).  The Company has determined that the sale of the Units that occurred between September 2011 and October 2011, in the aggregate, constituted a “Qualified Financing” under the terms of the Note and accordingly, the Company was required to prepay the outstanding principal value of the Note.  On October 31, 2011, the Company and Note holder entered into a Waiver Agreement pursuant to which the Company and the Note holder agreed that the Company would prepay $700,000 principal of the Note and would waive (i) prepayment of the balance of the principal of the Note and (ii) any default under the Note arising solely from the Company’s partial prepayment of the Note upon the occurrence of the Qualified Financing.

24

PERSHING GOLD CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

(FORMERLY SAGEBRUSH GOLD LTD.)

(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

March 31, 2012

NOTE 8 – CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTES (continued)

On March 30, 2012, the Company amended this Note to allow for the conversion of such Note into the Company’s Series D Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock at $1.00 per share. The holder of this Note agreed to fully convert the remaining note of $1,015,604 (together with accrued and unpaid interest $9,140) into 1,024,744 shares of Series D Preferred Stock and an additional 212,017 shares of Series D Preferred Stock in consideration for the conversion of this Note into shares of Series D Preferred Stock. The Company accounted the reduction of the conversion price from $0.40 to $0.35 per share and such conversion under ASC 470-20-40 “Debt with Conversion and Other Options” and accordingly recorded loss from extinguishment of debts of $483,094 which is equal to the fair value of shares issued in excess of the fair value issuable pursuant to the original conversion terms. The Company recorded a loss from extinguishment of debts of $333,168 and preferred deemed dividend of $121,152 in connection with the issuance of the additional 212,017 shares of Series D Preferred Stock.

As a result of the conversion of this Note, the Company fully amortized the remaining unamortized debt discount of $897,117 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and was included in interest expense. Accrued interest as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, amounted to $0 and $7,882, respectively and was included in accounts payable and accrued expenses.

At March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, convertible promissory notes consisted of the following:
 

	March 31, 2012		December 31, 2011
Convertible promissory notes	$	-	$	1,015,604
Less: debt discount		-		(897,117	)
Convertible promissory notes, net	$	-	$	118,487

NOTE 9 – NOTES PAYABLE

In February 2011, the Company, Empire and its wholly-owned subsidiary, EXCX Funding Corp. (collectively the “Borrowers”), entered into a credit facility agreement (the “Credit Facility Agreement”) with two lenders, whereby one of the lenders is a member of the Company’s Board of Directors. The credit facility consists of a loan pursuant to which $4.5 million can be borrowed on a senior secured basis. The indebtedness under the loan facility was evidenced by a promissory note payable to the order of the lenders. The loan was used exclusively to fund the costs and expenses of certain music and sporting events (the “Events”) as agreed to by the parties. The notes bear interest at 6% per annum and matured on January 31, 2012, subject to acceleration in the event the Borrowers undertake third party financing. In addition to the 6% interest, the Borrower shall also pay all interest, fees, costs and expenses incurred by lenders in connection with the issuance of this loan facility. Pursuant to the Credit Facility Agreement, the Borrowers entered into a Master Security Agreement, Collateral Assignment and Equity Pledge with the lenders whereby the Borrowers collaterally assigned and pledged to lenders, and granted to lenders a present, absolute, unconditional and continuing security interest in, all of the property, assets and equity interests of the Company as defined in such agreement. Furthermore, in connection with the Credit Facility Agreement, the Lenders entered into a Contribution and Security Agreement (the “Contribution Agreement”) with the Company’s former Chief Executive Officer, Sheldon Finkel (See Note 11). As consideration for the extension of credit pursuant to the Credit Facility Agreement, the Borrowers are obligated to pay a fee equal to 15% of the initial loan commitment of $4.5 million (the “Preferred Return Fee”) of which Sheldon Finkel, shall receive a pro-rata portion (1/3). The Preferred Return Fee shall be payable if at all, only out of the net profits from the Events.  Accordingly, the Company shall record the Preferred Return Fee upon attaining net profits from the Events. The Company issued to the lenders and Sheldon Finkel an aggregate of 2,250,000 shares of the Company’s newly designated Series A Preferred Stock, convertible into one share each of the Company’s common stock.
 

25

PERSHING GOLD CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

(FORMERLY SAGEBRUSH GOLD LTD.)

(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

March 31, 2012

NOTE 9 – NOTES PAYABLE (continued)

The Company valued the 2,250,000 Series A Preferred Stock at the fair market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant at $1.20 per share or $2,700,000 and recorded a debt discount of $1,800,000 and deferred financing cost of $900,000 which are being amortized over the term of these notes. Such deferred financing cost represents the 750,000 Series A Preferred Stock issued to Sheldon Finkel for guaranteeing one-third of the net losses and assignment of that certain irrevocable letter of credit, as described above. Between May 2011 and December 2011, 2,250,000 of these preferred shares were converted into common stock. During August 2011, the revenues from the Events did not exceed its costs and accordingly the Company is indebted to the lenders, including a Board Member of the Company, and the Credit Facility Agreement may be in default after accounting for the revenues from the Events.  As a result, the obligations under the Contribution Agreements became obligations of the parties thereto to each other. Between August 2011 and December 2011, the Company paid a total of $3,326,500 to the lenders and such amount reduced the principal balance of these notes. On November 29, 2011, the holder of this note payable, converted $611,750 principal balance of this note into an aggregate of 1,529,375 of Units offered in a private placement. Each Unit was sold for a purchase price of $0.40 per Unit and consists of: (i) one share of Common Stock and (ii) a two-year warrant to purchase fifty (50%) percent of the number of shares of Common Stock purchased at an exercise price of $0.60 per share, subject to adjustment upon the occurrence of certain events.

In March 2012, the Board Member agreed to extend the maturity date of such note up to February 1, 2013.

As of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, accrued interest and fees on this note payable – related party amounted to $117,896 and $109,493, respectively. For the three months ended March 31, 2012, amortization of debt discount and deferred financing cost amounted to $101,836 and was included in interest expense.

As of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, note payable – related party consisted of the following:

	March 31, 2012		December 31, 2011
Note payable - related party	$	561,750	$	561,750
Less: debt discount - related party		-		(50,918	)
Note payable - related party, net	$	561,750	$	510,832

On March 17, 2011, in connection with the asset purchase agreement with Continental, the Company assumed a 12% $50,000 due on demand note from Prospect Uranium Inc. (see Note 3). In August 2011, the Company paid off the principal balance of $50,000 plus accrued interest of $8,000.

In March 2012, the Company received $500,000 in connection with a 5% secured promissory note (the “Bridge Note”), which is secured by certain assets of the Company’s wholly owned subsidiaries, Arttor Gold, LLC and Noble Effort Gold LLC. The Company administratively issued such Bridge Note on April 10, 2012.  The full amount of principal and accrued interest under the Bridge Note will be due and payable on a date that shall be the earlier to occur of: (x) the sale of Noble Effort Gold LLC and Arttor Gold LLC, the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiaries (the “Gold Subsidiaries”) (or the sale of all or substantially all of the assets collectively contained in the Gold Subsidiaries) to a third party purchaser or (y) October 10, 2012. As of March 31, 2012, accrued interest on this note amounted to $616 and recorded in accounts payable and accrued expenses.

26

PERSHING GOLD CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

(FORMERLY SAGEBRUSH GOLD LTD.)

(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

March 31, 2012

NOTE 10 – DERIVATIVE LIABILITY

In connection with the issuance of the 9% senior convertible promissory notes dated August 30, 2011, the Company has determined that the terms of the convertible notes include a down-round provision under which the conversion price could be affected by future equity offerings undertaken by the Company. Accordingly, under the provisions of FASB ASC Topic No. 815-40, Derivatives and Hedging – Contracts in an Entity’s Own Stock, the convertible instrument was accounted for as a derivative liability at the date of issuance and adjusted to fair value through earnings at each reporting date. The Company has recognized a derivative liability of $0 and $6,295,400 at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. Loss resulting from the increase in fair value of this convertible instrument was $1,454,889 and $0 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 respectively. During the three months ended March 31, 2012, the Company reclassified $7,750,289 of the derivative liability to paid-in capital due to the conversion of the senior convertible promissory note into common stock on March 30, 2012 (see Note 7).

The Company used the following assumptions for determining the fair value of the convertible instruments under the Black-Scholes option pricing model:

	For the three months ended March 31, 2012
Expected volatility	1036% - 110%
Expected term	2.00 - 2.17 Years
Risk-free interest rate	0.27% - 0.33%
Expected dividend yield	0%

NOTE 11 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Note payable - related party

In connection with the Credit Facility Agreement as discussed in Note 9, the Company’s Board Member funded $2,250,000 to the Company under this Credit Facility Agreement . Furthermore, in connection with the Credit Facility Agreement, the lenders entered into a Contribution Agreement with the Company’s former Chief Executive Officer, Sheldon Finkel, pursuant to which Sheldon Finkel agreed to pay or reimburse the lenders the pro rata portion (1/3) of any net losses from Events and irrevocably pledged to lenders a certain irrevocable letter of credit dated in June 2010 in favor of Sheldon Finkel. The Company also issued to Sheldon Finkel and the Company’s Board Member 750,000 shares each of the Company’s newly designated Series A Preferred Stock, convertible into one share each of the Company’s common stock. As consideration for the extension of credit pursuant to the Credit Facility Agreement, the borrowers are obligated to pay a fee equal to 15% of the initial loan commitment of $4.5 million of which Sheldon Finkel, shall receive a pro-rata portion (1/3). The Preferred Return Fee shall be payable if at all, only out of the net profits from the Events. On May 4, 2011, Sheldon Finkel and the Company’s Board Member had converted their shares into 1,500,000 shares of Common Stock. Between August 2011 and December 2011, the Company paid a total of $1,688,250 to the Company’s Board Member and such amount reduced the principal balance of his note. At March 31, 2012, principal amount of the note payable – related party amounted to $561,750

27

PERSHING GOLD CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

(FORMERLY SAGEBRUSH GOLD LTD.)

(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

March 31, 2012

NOTE 11 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS (continued)

Member of the board of directors

As of March 31, 2012, a Member of the Company's Board of Directors, Barry Honig holds 5,121,619 shares of Continental, directly or indirectly.  In addition, family members, including trusts for the benefit of Mr. Honig's minor children, currently own 3,635,000 shares of Continental of which Mr. Honig disclaims beneficial ownership.  Accordingly, as one of the largest shareholder of Continental, Mr. Honig may be deemed to be in control of Continental and accordingly there may exist certain conflicts of interest as a result.  On November 14, 2011, Mr. Honig filed a Schedule 13D with the Securities and Exchange Commission voluntarily disclosing his positions.  Furthermore, in connection with the asset purchase agreement with Continental, entities controlled by Mr. Honig were granted 4.5-year-warrants to purchase an aggregate of 2,050,666 shares of the Company's common stock at $2.835 per share upon assumption of the outstanding warrants of Continental.

Continental Resources Group, Inc.

As of March 31, 2012, Continental holds 42.23% of interest in the Company.  Effective in February 2012, the Company is considered to be an equity method investee as a result of the decrease in Continental’s ownership interest of less than 50% which is accounted for under equity method of accounting. In March 2012, the Company issued 250,000 shares of its common stock to a third party for the payment of Continental’s accrued legal fees of $170,614 (see Note 12) and considered as an advance to Continental. At March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company has a receivable from Continental amounting to $517,949 and $347,335 respectively. These advances are short-term in nature and non-interest bearing and have been recorded as due from equity method investor as reflected in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.

NOTE 12 – STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Preferred Stock

The Company is authorized within the limitations and restrictions stated in the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company, to provide by resolution or resolutions for the issuance of 50,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock, par value $0.0001 per share in such series and with such designations, preferences and relative, participating, optional or other special rights and qualifications, limitations or restrictions as the Company’s Board of Directors shall fix by resolution or resolutions providing for the issuance thereof duly adopted by the Board of Directors.

Series B Convertible Preferred Stock

Each share of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock is convertible into one share each of the Company’s common stock. The holders of the Company’s Series B Preferred Stock are entitled to the same number of votes per share of common stock that the holder of the Series B Preferred Stock may convert into at the time of the vote. In the event of a liquidation preferences upon the liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the business of the Company, the holder of the Series B Preferred Stock would have preferential payment and distribution rights over any other class or series of capital stock that provide for Series B Preferred Stock’s preferential payment and over the Company’s Common Stock. Between October 2011 and December 2011, 7,500,000 Series B Preferred Stock were converted into 7,500,000 shares of common stock. On February 3, 2012, 500,000 Series B Preferred Stock were converted into 500,000 shares of common stock.
 The Company valued these common shares at par value. The Series B Preferred stock does not include any mandatory redeemable provisions. The Series B Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value, 8,000,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2012.

28

PERSHING GOLD CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

(FORMERLY SAGEBRUSH GOLD LTD.)

(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

March 31, 2012

NOTE 12 – STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (continued)

Series C Convertible Preferred Stock

 On September 29, 2011, the Company sold 3,284,396 shares of designated Series C Convertible Preferred Stock and two-year warrants (the “Preferred Warrants”) to purchase 9,853,188 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.60 per share for an aggregate purchase price of $3,284,396. Each share of preferred stock is convertible into shares of common stock at a conversion price of $0.50 per share, subject to adjustment in the event the Company issues common stock or securities convertible into or exercisable for shares of common stock at a price lower than the conversion price then in effect, but not less than $0.30 per share. The preferred stock has a stated value of $1.50 per share. In the event of the liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the business of the Company, each share of Preferred Stock shall be entitled to receive, a preferential amount in cash equal to the Stated Value. The Preferred Warrants may be exercised until the second anniversary of issuance at a cash exercise price of $0.60 per share, subject to adjustment. The Preferred Warrants may be exercised on a cashless basis at any time after the original date of issuance. On September 29, 2011, the Company issued 4,429,415 shares of common stock in connection with the exercise of the 9,853,188 Preferred Warrants on a cashless basis. In March 2012, the conversion price of the Company’s Series C Convertible Preferred Stock was adjusted to $0.35 per share as a result of certain anti-dilution provisions contained therein due to the conversion of notes into common stock at $0.35 per share.

The Series C Preferred stock does not include any mandatory redeemable provisions. There were 3,284,396 shares of Series C Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value authorized and 3,284,396 shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2012.

Series D Convertible Preferred Stock

On February 21, 2012, the Company designated 1,000,000 shares of 9.0% Series D Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock. Each share of Series D Preferred Stock is convertible (together with accrued and unpaid dividends thereon) into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion price of $0.40 per share, subject to equitable adjustments after such events as stock dividends, stock splits or fundamental corporate transactions, and subject to anti-dilution provisions. The holders of the Company’s Series D Convertible Preferred Stock do not have voting rights.  Upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company’s business, each holder of Series D Preferred Stock shall be entitled to receive, for each share thereof a preferential amount in cash equal to $1.00.  All preferential amounts to be paid to the holders of Series D Preferred Stock in connection with such liquidation, dissolution or winding up shall be paid before the payment or distribution of any assets to the holders of (i) any other class or series of capital stock and (ii) of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.0001 per share. The Company is required to redeem in cash all or portion of the Series D Preferred Stock upon the occurrence of a major transactions such as a consolidation, merger or other business combination, sale and transfer of more than 50% of any of the Company’s assets, closing of a purchase with more than 50% of the outstanding shares of stock were tendered and the inability of the Company to convert any portion of the Series D Preferred stock due to insufficient authorized number of shares of common stock as defined in the certificate of designation. The redemption price is equivalent to the sum of (i) the greater of (A) 110% of the aggregate stated value of the outstanding shares of the Series D Preferred Stock plus all accrued dividends and (B) the aggregate stated value of the outstanding shares of the Series D Preferred Stock plus all accrued dividends divided by the conversion price on the date of the major transaction redemption price is demanded or the date the major transaction redemption price is paid in full whichever is less multiplied by the volume weighted average price on (x) the date of the major transaction redemption price is demanded and (y) the date the major transaction redemption price is paid in full whichever is greater and (ii) all other amounts, costs, expenses and liquidated damages. The Company believes that the occurrence of the major transactions as defined in the certificate of designations are considered conditional events and as a result the instrument does not meet the definition of mandatorily redeemable financial instrument based from ASC 480-10-25 “Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity”. However, this financial instrument would be assessed at each reporting period to determine whether circumstances have changed such that the instrument now meets the definition of a mandatorily redeemable instrument (that is, the event is no longer conditional). If the event has occurred, the condition is resolved, or the event has become certain to occur, the financial instrument will be reclassified as a liability.

29

PERSHING GOLD CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

(FORMERLY SAGEBRUSH GOLD LTD.)

(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

March 31, 2012

NOTE 12 – STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (continued)

On April 11, 2012, the Company filed an amendment to the Certificate of Designation for the Series D Preferred Stock (the “Certificate Amendment”) with the Secretary of State of the State of Nevada to increase the number of authorized shares of Series D Preferred Stock that may be issued by the Company to 7,500,000. In March 2012, the conversion price of the Company’s Series D Convertible Preferred Stock was adjusted to $0.35 per share as a result of certain anti-dilution provisions contained therein due to the conversion of notes into common stock at $0.35 per share.

On February 23, 2012, the Company entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement with two subscribers (the “Purchase Agreement”) and sold 1,000,000 shares of the Series D Preferred Stock and an aggregate of 8,750,000 warrants to acquire shares of  Common Stock for an aggregate purchase price of $1,000,000 (the “Preferred Stock Purchase Price”).

All of the proceeds from the Preferred Stock Purchase Price were used to prepay (i) $800,000 of that certain senior secured convertible promissory note to Platinum and (ii) $200,000 of that certain senior secured convertible promissory note to Lakewood (see Note 7).

In accordance with ASC 505 (“Equity - Dividends and Stock Splits”), the Series D Preferred Stock was considered to have an embedded beneficial conversion feature (ECF) because the conversion price was less than the fair value of the Company’s common stock. This Series D Preferred Stock was fully convertible at the issuance date, therefore a portion of proceeds allocated to the Series D Preferred Stock of $1,000,000 was determined to be the value of the beneficial conversion feature and was recorded as a preferred deemed dividend. In connection with the initial sales of the Series D Preferred Stock, the initial estimated fair values allocated to the ECF were $226,629 and the fair value allocated to the warrants of $773,371was recorded as a preferred deemed dividend on February 23, 2012.

The assumptions used valuing the warrants include:

Risk free interest rate (annual)	0.88%
Expected volatility	110%
Expected life	5 Years
Assumed dividends	none

In connection with the Note Assignment and Assumption Agreement dated March 30, 2012, $1,100,000 was amended to allow for its conversion into the Company’s Series D Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock equivalent to the stated value of the Series D Preferred Stock. As such, the Company issued a total of 1,100,000 shares of Series D Preferred Stock and an additional 227,586 shares of Series D Preferred Stock in consideration for the conversion of this convertible promissory note into shares of Series D Preferred Stock (see Note 7).

On March 30, 2012, the Company also amended the $2.4 million note assigned to FGIT to allow for the conversion of this note into the Company’s Series D Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock at $1.00 per share. The holder of this note agreed to fully convert this note (together with accrued and unpaid interest thereon) into 2,421,600 shares of Series D Preferred Stock and an additional 501,021 shares of Series D Preferred Stock in consideration for the conversion of this note into shares of Series D Preferred Stock (see Note 7).

30

PERSHING GOLD CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

(FORMERLY SAGEBRUSH GOLD LTD.)

(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

March 31, 2012

NOTE 12 – STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (continued)

On March 30, 2012, the Company amended a convertible promissory note to allow for the conversion of such note into the Company’s Series D Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock at $1.00 per share. The holder of this note agreed to fully convert this note (together with accrued and unpaid interest thereon) into 1,024,744 shares of Series D Preferred Stock and an additional 212,017 shares of Series D Preferred Stock in consideration for the conversion of this Note into shares of Series D Preferred Stock (see Note 8).

In connection with the Note Assignment and Assumption Agreement dated March 30, 2012, $1,100,000 was amended to allow for its conversion into the Company’s Series D Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock equivalent to the stated value of the Series D Preferred Stock. As such, the Company issued a total of 1,100,000 shares of Series D Preferred Stock and an additional 227,586 shares of Series D Preferred Stock in consideration for the conversion of this convertible promissory note into shares of Series D Preferred Stock (see Note 7).

On March 30, 2012, the Company also amended the $2.4 million note assigned to FGIT to allow for the conversion of this note into the Company’s Series D Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock at $1.00 per share. The holder of this note agreed to fully convert this note (together with accrued and unpaid interest thereon) into 2,421,600 shares of Series D Preferred Stock and an additional 501,021 shares of Series D Preferred Stock in consideration for the conversion of this note into shares of Series D Preferred Stock (see Note 7).

On March 30, 2012, the Company amended a convertible promissory note to allow for the conversion of such note into the Company’s Series D Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock at $1.00 per share. The holder of this note agreed to fully convert this note (together with accrued and unpaid interest thereon) into 1,024,744 shares of Series D Preferred Stock and an additional 212,017 shares of Series D Preferred Stock in consideration for the conversion of this Note into shares of Series D Preferred Stock (see Note 8).

Vesting of restricted stock grant is as follows:

i.

6,000,000 shares of restricted common stock (less any shares sooner vested upon registration of 3,000,000 shares of the restricted common stock with the Securities Exchange Commission) shall vest on the earlier of (a) such date that the Company consummates a secondary public offering of its securities in which the Company receives gross proceeds of at least $7,000,000 or (b) one (1)year from the Effective Date of this Agreement;

ii.

3,000,000 shares of restricted common stock shall vest two (2) years from the effective date of this agreement; and

iii. 3,000,000 shares of restricted common stock shall vest three (3) years from the effective date of this agreement.

Additionally, the Company recorded stock-based compensation expense of $694,167 in connection with the vested restricted stock grants. At March 31, 2012, there was a total of $5,185,833 of unrecognized compensation expense related to these non-vested restricted stock grants arrangement.

On February 3, 2012, 500,000 Series B Preferred Stock were converted into 500,000 shares of common stock.
 The Company valued these common shares at par value.

On February 23, 2012, the Company issued 2 million common shares to the the original holders of the senior secured promissory note in connection with a Note Modification Agreement (see Note 7). Accordingly, the Company valued the 2 million common shares at the fair market value on the date of grant at $0.489 per share or $978,000 and was recognized as interest expense during the three months ended March 31, 2012 in connection with the Note Modification Agreement.

31

PERSHING GOLD CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

(FORMERLY SAGEBRUSH GOLD LTD.)

(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

March 31, 2012

NOTE 12 – STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (continued)

On March 30, 2012, in connection with the Note Assignment and Assumption Agreement (see Note 7), the various assignees agreed to convert an aggregate principal amount of $1,892,014 into 5,405,754 shares of the Company’s Common Stock at a conversion price of $0.35 per share. Such various assignees received an additional 1,118,432 shares of the Company’s Common Stock as consideration for the note conversion and were valued at the fair market value on the date of grant at $0.55 per share or $615,138 and have been included in loss from extinguishment of debts.

On March 30, 2012, the original holders of the senior secured notes agreed to convert $262,500 of the notes in exchange for an aggregate of 750,000 shares of the Company’s common stock(see Note 7). The Company accounted the reduction of the conversion price from $0.40 to $0.35 per share and such conversion under ASC 470-20-40 “Debt with Conversion and Other Options” and accordingly recorded loss from extinguishment of debts of $51,563 which is equal to the fair value of shares issued in excess of the fair value issuable pursuant to the original conversion terms.

On March 30, 2012, the holder of the assigned $1.6 million note (together with accrued and unpaid interest of $14,400) agreed to convert such note into 4,612,571 shares of Common Stock at a conversion price of $0.35 per share and an additional 954,325 shares of the Company’s Common Stock as consideration for the note conversion. The Company accounted the reduction of the conversion price from $0.40 to $0.35 per share and such conversion under ASC 470-20-40 “Debt with Conversion and Other Options” and accordingly recorded loss from extinguishment of debts of $317,114 which is equal to the fair value of shares issued in excess of the fair value issuable pursuant to the original conversion terms.  The additional 954,325 shares of common stock were valued at the fair market value on the date of grant at $0.55 per share or $524,878 and have been included in loss from extinguishment of debts.

On March 30, 2012, the holder of the 400,000 shares of the Company’s Series D Preferred Stock converted his shares of Series D Preferred Stock into 1,153,143 shares of the Company’s Common Stock (which included accrued and unpaid dividends thereon).

On March 20, 2012, the Company issued 250,000 shares of common stock to a third party in consideration for payment of legal services rendered of $129,028 and Continental’s accrued legal fees of $170,614 for a total amount of $299,642.  The Company valued these common shares for $299,642 (see Note 11).

In March 2012, the Company issued 200,000 shares of common stock to a consultant in consideration for payment of public relations services rendered.  The Company valued these common shares at the fair market value on the date of grants at approximately $0.55 per share or $110,000.

In March 2012, the Company issued an aggregate of 6,229,718 shares of common stock in connection with the exercise of the 11,399,150 stock warrants on a cashless basis. The Company valued these common shares at par value.

On February 23, 2012, a majority of the Company’s outstanding voting capital stock have authorized by written consent, in lieu of a special meeting of the Company’s stockholders, that the Company effect a reverse stock split at a ratio not less than two-for-one and not greater than fifteen-for-one, with the exact ratio to be set and the amendment to the Company’s Articles of Incorporation to be filed at the discretion of the Company’s Board of Directors.  Currently, the Company’s stockholders have not set an exact ratio for the reverse stock split.

32

PERSHING GOLD CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

(FORMERLY SAGEBRUSH GOLD LTD.)

(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

March 31, 2012

NOTE 12 – STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (continued)

Common Stock Options

On September 29, 2010, the Company’s Board of Directors and stockholders adopted the 2010 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2010 Plan”). The 2010 Plan reserved 2,800,000 shares of common stock for issuance. Upon the closing of the Exchange, the Company had outstanding options to purchase 2,800,000 shares of the Company’s common stock under the 2010 Plan which represents an exchange of 2,800,000 options previously granted with similar terms  on June 1, 2010, prior to the reverse merger and recapitalization.  In connection with these options,for the three months ended March 31, 2012, the Company recorded stock-based compensation expense of $23,270.

At March 31, 2012, there was a total of $109,388 of unrecognized compensation expense related to these non-vested option-based compensation arrangements under the 2010 Plan.

On July 22, 2011, the Company granted 2,248,000 stock options and warrants to purchase 41,566,999 shares of common stock pursuant to an asset purchase agreement entered into between the Company, Acquisition Sub and Continental (see Note 4). The 2,248,000 9-year options to purchase shares of common stock at $1.423 per share are subject to a vesting schedule based on the stock option holder's continued employment and services. For the three months ended March 31, 2012, the Company recognized stock based compensation of $407,498 which represents the portion of the vested replacement option awards attributable to post-combination services due to the assumption of the stock options of Continental which was accounted for under ASC 805-30-30-9 (“Acquirer Share-Based Payment Awards Exchanged for Awards Held by the Acquiree’s Employees). These options were valued on the grant date at $1.11 per option using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: stock price of $1.10 per share, volatility of 196%, expected term of 10 years, and a risk free interest rate of 2.99%. At March 31, 2012, there was a total of $880,785 of unrecognized compensation expense related to these non-vested replacement option awards.

During the three months ended March 31, 2012, 500,000 options were forfeited in accordance with the termination of employee relationships.

On February 9, 2012, the holders of approximately 53% of the outstanding shares of the Company's common stock voted in favor of the adoption of the Company's 2012 Equity Incentive Plan (the " 2012 Plan").  The Board approved the 2012 Plan on February 9, 2012, which reserves 40,000,000 shares of common stock for issuance thereunder in the form of incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options and restricted stock grants, issuable to the Company's officers, directors, employees and consultants.

10,000,000 options were valued on the grant date (February 9, 2012) at approximately $0.45 per option or a total of $4,537,000 using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: stock price of 0.49 per share, volatility of 110%, expected term of 10 years, and a risk free interest rate of 2.04%. For the three months ended March 31, 2012, the Company recorded stock-based compensation expense of $4,537,000 in connection with the fully vested options.

On March 6, 2012, the Company granted an aggregate of 1,100,000 10-year options to purchase shares of common stock at $0.45 per share, the market price on the date of issuance, which vests 25% on date of issuance; 25% on each of December 31, 2012; December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2014 to two employees and a consultant of the Company. The 1,100,000 options were valued on the grant date at approximately $0.41 per option or a total of $448,690 using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: stock price of $0.45 per share, volatility of 103%, expected term of 10 years, and a risk free interest rate of 1.98%. For the three months ended March 31, 2012, the Company recorded stock-based compensation and stock-based consulting expense of $89,228 and 50,988 respectively.

At March 31, 2012, there was a total of $308,474 of unrecognized compensation expense related to these non-vested option-based compensation arrangements under the 2012 Plan.

33

PERSHING GOLD CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

(FORMERLY SAGEBRUSH GOLD LTD.)

(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

March 31, 2012

NOTE 12 – STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (continued)

A summary of the stock options and changes during the period are presented below:

	Number of Options and Warrants			Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)
Balance at December 31, 2011		3,548,000		$	1.11		8.45
Granted		11,100,000			0.49		10
Exercised		-			-		-
Forfeited		(500,000	)		0.81		8.59
Cancelled		-			-		-
Balance outstanding at March 31, 2012		14,148,000		$	0.63		9.46
Options exercisable at March 31, 2012		-		$	-
Options expected to vest		1,827,667
Weighted average fair value of options granted during the period				$	0.45

Stock options outstanding at March 31, 2012 as disclosed in the above table have $710,000 intrinsic value at the end of the period.

Common Stock Warrants

On July 22, 2011, the Company granted 2,248,000 stock options and warrants to purchase 41,566,999 shares of common stock pursuant to an asset purchase agreement entered into between the Company, Acquisition Sub, and Continental (see Note 4). The assumption of stock warrants was replaced with the Company’s 3,200,000 4.5-year warrants to purchase shares of common stock at $2.835 per share granted to an affiliated company and its assignees which are subject to a vesting schedule based on the warrant holder's continued services and the Company’s 38,366,999 (ranging from 5 months to 4.60 years) warrants to purchase shares of common stock at an exercise price of $2.835 which were related to private placement sale of the Company’s common stock. For the three months ended March 31, 2012, the Company recognized stock based compensation of $165,730 which represents the portion of the vested replacement warrants awards attributable to post-combination services due to the assumption of the stock warrants of Continental which was accounted for under ASC 805-30-30-9 (“Acquirer Share-Based Payment Awards Exchanged for Awards Held by the Acquiree’s Employees). These warrants were valued on the grant date at $1.11 per option using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: stock price of $1.10 per share, volatility of 193%, expected term of 10 years, and a risk free interest rate of 1.56%. At December 31, 2011, there was $0 of unrecognized compensation expense related to these replacement warrant awards.

Out of the warrants to purchase 41,566,999 shares of common stock discussed above, a total of 2,050,666 4.5-year warrants were granted to an affiliated company, whereby a Member of the Company’s Board of directors is the President of the affiliated company. 

 

34

PERSHING GOLD CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

(FORMERLY SAGEBRUSH GOLD LTD.)

(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

March 31, 2012

NOTE 12 – STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (continued)

Between January 2012 and February 2012, the Company sold an aggregate of 2,237,500 units with net proceeds to the Company of $847,500.Each Unit was sold for a purchase price of $0.40 per Unit and consists of: (i) one share of Common Stock and (ii) a two-year warrant to purchase fifty percent (1,118,750 warrants) of the number of shares of Common Stock purchased at an exercise price of $0.60 per share, subject to adjustment upon the occurrence of certain events. The warrants may be exercised at any time on a cashless basis at 100% of the closing price for the Common Stock on the business day immediately prior to the date of exercise. In March 2012, the Company issued 336,974 shares of common stock in connection with the exercise of these 968,750 stock warrants on a cashless basis.

On February 23, 2012, the Company entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement with two subscribers and sold 1,000,000 shares of the Series D Preferred Stock and an aggregate of 8,750,000 warrants to acquire shares of Common Stock for an aggregate purchase price of $1,000,000 (see Note 12 – Preferred Stock). On March 29, 2012, the Company issued 2,967,143 shares of common stock in connection with the exercise of these 5,250,000 stock warrants on a cashless basis.

On February 23, 2012, in connection with a Note Modification Agreement, the Company issued warrants to purchase an aggregate of 4,144,320 shares of Common Stock to Platinum and warrants to purchase an aggregate of 1,036,080 shares of Common Stock to Lakewood (see Note 7). The warrants may be exercised at any time, in whole or in part, at an exercise price of $0.40 per share until the fifth anniversary of their issuance.   The warrants may be exercised on a cashless basis at any time. In February 2012, the Company issued 2,925,601 shares of common stock in connection with the exercise of these 5,180,400 stock warrants on a cashless basis.

On March 6, 2012, the Company issued a warrant to purchase 400,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price equal to the market price of the Company’s common stock on the date of issuance or at $0.45 per share to a consultant in consideration for services rendered. The 400,000 warrants were valued on the grant date at approximately $0.41 per option or a total of $163,155 using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: stock price of $0.45 per share, volatility of 110%, expected term of 10 years, and a risk free interest rate of 1.98%. For the three months ended March 31, 2012, the Company recognized stock based consulting of $163,155.

A summary of the status of the Company's outstanding stock warrants and changes during the period then ended is as follows:

	Number of Warrants		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)
Balance at December 31, 2011		35,603,142	$	2.64	3.94
Granted		15,449,150		0.42	4.81
Cancelled		-		-	-
Forfeited		-		-	-
Exercised		(11,399,150)		0.42	4.64
Balance at March 31, 2012		39,653,142	$	2.41	3.85
Warrants exercisable at March 31, 2012		39,653,142	$	2.41	3.85
Weighted average fair value of options granted during the three months ended March 31, 2012			$	0.40

35

PERSHING GOLD CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

(FORMERLY SAGEBRUSH GOLD LTD.)

(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

March 31, 2012

NOTE 13 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Royalty Agreement - F.R.O.G. Consulting, LLC

On May 24, 2011, the Company, through its subsidiary, Arttor Gold, entered into two lease agreements with F.R.O.G. Consulting, LLC, an affiliate of one of the former members of Arttor Gold, for the Red Rock Mineral Property and the North Battle Mountain Mineral Prospect.  The leases grant the exclusive right to explore, mine and develop gold, silver, palladium, platinum and other minerals on the properties for a term of ten (10) years and may be renewed in ten (10) year increments.  The terms of the Leases may not exceed ninety-nine (99) years. The Company may terminate these leases at any time.

The Company is required under the terms of the property lease to make annual lease payments. The Company is also required to make annual claim maintenance payments to Federal Bureau of Land Management and to the county in which its property is located in order to maintain its rights to explore and, if warranted, to develop its property. If the Company fails to meet these obligations, it will lose the right to explore for gold on its property.

Until production is achieved, the Company’s lease payments (deemed “advance minimum royalties”) consist of an initial payment of $5,000 upon signing of each lease, followed by annual payments according to the following schedule for each lease:

Due Date of Advance Minimum Royalty Payment	Amount of Advance Minimum Royalty Payment
1st Anniversary	$	15,000
2nd Anniversary	$	35,000
3rd Anniversary	$	45,000
4th Anniversary	$	80,000
5th Anniversary and annually thereafter during the term of the lease	The greater of $100,000 or the U.S. dollar equivalent of 90 ounces of gold

In the event that the Company produces gold or other minerals from these leases, the Company’s lease payments will be the greater of (i) the advance minimum royalty payments according to the table above, or (ii) a production royalty equal to 3% of the gross sales price of any gold, silver, platinum or palladium that the Company recovers and 1% of the gross sales price of any other minerals that the Company recovers. The Company has the right to buy down the production royalties on gold, silver, platinum and palladium by payment of $2,000,000 for the first one percent (1%). All advance minimum royalty payments constitute prepayment of production royalties to FROG, on an annual basis.  If the total dollar amount of production royalties due within a calendar year exceed the dollar amount of the advance minimum royalty payments due within that year, the Company may credit all uncredited advance minimum royalty payments made in previous years against fifty percent (50%) of the production royalties due within that year. The Leases also requires the Company to spend a total of $100,000 on work expenditures on each property for the period from lease signing until December 31, 2012 and $200,000 on work expenditures on each property per year in 2013 and annually thereafter. 

The Company is required to make annual claim maintenance payments to the Bureau of Land Management and to the counties in which its property is located. If the Company fails to make these payments, it will lose its rights to the property. As of the date of this Report, the annual maintenance payments are approximately $151 per claim, consisting of payments to the Bureau of Land Management and to the counties in which the Company’s properties are located. The Company’s property consists of an aggregate of 305 lode claims. The aggregate annual claim maintenance costs are currently approximately $46,000.

36

PERSHING GOLD CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

(FORMERLY SAGEBRUSH GOLD LTD.)

(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

March 31, 2012

NOTE 13 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (continued)

On July 15, 2011, the Company (the “Lessee”) entered into amended and restated lease agreements for the Red Rock Mineral Property and the North Battle Mountain Mineral Prospect by and among Arthur Leger (the “Lessor”) and F.R.O.G. Consulting, LLC (the “Payment Agent”) (collectively the “Parties”) in order to carry out the original intentions of the Parties and to correct the omissions and errors in the original lease, dated May 24, 2011. In the original lease, the Parties intended to identify Arthur Leger as the owner and lessor of the Red Rock Mineral Property and the North Battle Mountain Mineral Prospect and to designate the Payment Agent as the entity responsible for collecting and receiving all payments on behalf of Lessor. Lessor is the sole member of the Payment Agent and owns 100% of the outstanding membership interests of the Payment Agent. All other terms and conditions of the original lease remain in full force and effect.  Lessor is the former Chief Geologist of Arttor Gold.

Royalty Agreement – Centerra (U.S.) Inc.

In August 2011, the Company and its subsidiary, Arttor Gold, entered into lease agreements with Centerra (U.S.) Inc. (“Centerra”). The leases grant the exclusive right to explore, mine and develop any and all metals, ores and other minerals on the properties which consist of 24 unpatented mining claims located Lander County, Nevada for a term of ten (10) years and may be renewed in ten (10) year increments. The Company may terminate these leases at any time.

The Company is required under the terms of our property lease to make annual lease payments. The Company is also required to make annual claim maintenance payments to Federal Bureau of Land Management and to the county in which its property is located in order to maintain its rights to explore and, if warranted, to develop its property. If the Company fails to meet these obligations, it will lose the right to explore for gold on its property. 

Until production is achieved, the Company’s lease payments (deemed “advance minimum royalties”) consist of an initial payment of $13,616 upon signing of the lease, followed by annual payments according to the following schedule for each lease:

Due Date of Advance Minimum Royalty Payment	Amount of Advance Minimum Royalty Payment
1st Anniversary	$	12,000
On or before each of the 2nd and 3rd  Anniversary		15,000
On or before each of the 4th and 5th  Anniversary		20,000
On or before each of the 6th and 7th  Anniversary		25,000
On or before each of the 8th and 9th  Anniversary		30,000
10th Anniversary  and subsequent anniversaries so long the agreement shall remain in effect	40,000

In the event that the Company produces gold or other minerals from these leases, the Company agrees to pay lessor a production royalty of equal to 4% of net smelter returns for all products extracted, produced and sold from this property after recoupment of the advance minimum royalty payments previously made to lessor pursuant to the payment table above. No production royalty shall be payable on rock, dirt, limestone, or similar materials used by lessee in its operations. The Company has the right to buy down the production royalties by payment of $1,500,000 for the first one percent (1%) on or before completion of a positive feasibility study and another one percent (1%) by making cash payment of $2,500,000 on or before achievement of commercial production. The Leases also requires the Company to spend a total of $100,000 on work expenditures on this property for the period from lease signing until 5th anniversary, $150,000 on work expenditures on this property for the period from the 6th anniversary until 10th anniversary and $200,000 on work expenditures on this property per year on the 11th anniversary and annually thereafter. The Company is required to make annual claim maintenance payments to the Bureau of Land Management and to the counties in which its property is located. If the Company fails to make these payments, it will lose its rights to the property.

37

PERSHING GOLD CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

(FORMERLY SAGEBRUSH GOLD LTD.)

(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

March 31, 2012

NOTE 13 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (continued)

Agreements Purchased from Continental Resources Group, Inc.

The Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, Continental Resources Acquisition Sub, Inc. was formed in July 2011 to purchase substantially all of the assets of Continental, which assets included 100% of the outstanding shares of common stock of Green Energy Fields, Inc. and ND Energy Inc. (see Note 4).  The purchased assets include certain agreements in uranium mining claims in Arizona, California and North Dakota.

Uranium Lease Agreements

In connection with the execution of the Membership Interests Sale Agreements of Secure Energy LLC, a majority-owned subsidiary of ND Energy, Inc. and Green Energy, Inc., the Company acquired the following Uranium lease agreements:

1) Slope County, North Dakota, Lease 1 and 2

On June 28, 2007, Secure Energy, LLC, signed a 20 year mining lease to develop and operate 472.8 acres of uranium mining properties in the Slope County, North Dakota. The Company prepaid the annual payment of $10 per net acre for eight years amounting to $36,717 at the date of signing. The Company will pay a production royalty of $0.75 per pound of all uranium sales.

2) Slope County, North Dakota, Lease 3

On November 23, 2007, Secure Energy, LLC signed a 10 year mining lease, with right to extend an additional 10 years to develop and operate 554.24 acres of uranium mining properties in the Slope County, North Dakota. The Company prepaid the annual payment of $10 per net acre for ten years amounting to $53,775 at the date of signing. The Company will pay a production royalty of $0.75 per pound of all uranium sales or 5% of net proceeds from the sale of uranium bearing ores.

Royalty agreements

On July 22, 2011, through the acquisition of Continental’s assets, the Company had purchased a 100% interest in certain 86 unpatented lode mining claims located in Mohave County, Arizona. The Company will pay a 3% net smelter returns royalty on all uranium sales. The Company shall have the right to reduce the royalty from 3% to 0% by paying the aggregate sum of $1,500,000 ($500,000 for each 1%).

On July 22, 2011, through the acquisition of Continental’s assets, the Company assumed the purchase and sale agreement with Absaroka Stone LLC to purchase certain unpatented mining claims commonly known as the “Uinta County (Carnotite) Uranium Prospect” located in the Uinta County of Wyoming.  Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, Absaroka Stone LLC agreed not to stake for its own account any additional mining claims within a 15 mile radius of the property.  Any additional mining claims to be located within a 15 mile radius of the property (the “Claim Body”) were to be located, staked and filed by the Company, at its expense and held in its name.   Such agreement requires a minimum of $200,000 relating to location, maintenance, exploration, development or equipping any one or more of the mining claims that comprise the Claim Body for commercial production within 24 months from the date of the agreement.  If the Company fails to incur a minimum of $200,000 in expenses related to the foregoing within 24 months, the Company shall pay an aggregate sum of $50,000 to Absaroka Stone LLC. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, the Company would pay a 1% gross royalty to Absaroka Stone LLC on any revenues derived from the sale of all uranium-vanadium, gold, silver, copper and rare earth ores or concentrates produced from the Claim Body, up to an aggregate of $1,000,000.  The Company has the option to eliminate the royalty obligations by paying Absaroka Stone LLC an aggregate payment of $1,000,000.

38

PERSHING GOLD CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

(FORMERLY SAGEBRUSH GOLD LTD.)

(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

March 31, 2012

NOTE 13 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (continued)

Litigation

On February 7, 2012, the Company obtained a copy of  a complaint filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (the “Complaint”) entitled Relief Gold Group, Inc., v Sagebrush Gold Ltd, Gold Acquisition Corp., Barry C. Honig, and David S. Rector (12 civ 0952).  Relief Gold alleges various causes of action including breach of contract, intentional interference with contract, intentional interference with prospective business relationship/economic relations, misappropriation of trade secrets and unjust enrichment, related to the Company’s acquisition on August 30, 2011 of the assets of the Relief Canyon Mine pursuant to Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code.  Plaintiff served an amended complaint on May 10, 2012.  The Company’s time to answer or move with respect to the amended complaint expires on May 24, 2012.

Further, on or about February 29, 2012, Gold Acquisition Corp. (“GAC”) commenced an adversary proceeding in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nevada against Firstgold, Terence Lynch and Relief Gold Group Case No. 12-05013-GWZ.  Through the adversary proceeding, GAC is seeking confirmation that all information, intellectual property and know how related to Relief Canyon was property of Firstgold that was sold to GAC.  In addition, GAC moved for a preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order staying the prosecution of the above-referenced action pending in the Southern District.  The motion for a preliminary injunction was denied on or about March 15, 2012.  Firstgold filed a motion to dismiss the complaint on April 23, 2012; GAC’s response is due by June 6, 2012. GAC has attempted to start the discovery process and filed a motion to compel on May 11, 2012.  A hearing date has not yet been set, but GAC has requested that it be heard on shortened time.  A scheduling conference in this matter has been set for June 13, 2012.

GAC also filed a Motion for Order to Show Cause in Firstgold’s main bankruptcy action Case No. 10-50215-GWZ requesting that the court require Firstgold to complete documentation for conveyance of property.   That motion was granted on or about February 28, 2012.

Option Agreement

On January 26, 2012, the Company entered into an Option Agreement (the “Option Agreement”) with American Strategic Minerals Corporation, a Colorado corporation (“Amicor”), pursuant to which Amicor obtained the option  to acquire certain uranium exploration rights and properties held by the Company (the “Uranium Properties”), as further described herein.  In consideration for issuance of the option, Amicor issued to the Company (i) a $1,000,000 promissory note payable in installments upon satisfaction of certain conditions (the “Note”), expiring six months following issuance and (ii) 10,000,000 shares of Amicor’s common stock (collectively, the “Option Consideration”).  Pursuant to the terms of the Note, upon the closing of a private placement in which Amicor receives gross proceeds of at least $5,000,000 (within six months of the closing of the Option Agreement), then Amicor shall repay $500,000 under the Note.  Additionally, upon the closing of a private placement in which Amicor receives gross proceeds of at least an additional $1,000,000 (within six months of the closing of the Option Agreement), Amicor shall pay the outstanding balance under the Note.  The Note does not bear interest.  The option was exercisable for a period of 90 days following the closing of the Option Agreement, in whole or in part, at an exercise price of Ten Dollars ($10.00) for any or all of the Uranium Properties.  In the event Amicor does not exercise the option, the Company will retain all of the Option Consideration. Between January 2012 and February 2012, the Company collected $930,000 of the Note. On the date of the Option Agreement, the Company recorded the Option Consideration as deferred revenue to be amortized over the term of the Option Agreement. The Company recorded the 10 million shares of Amicor’s common stock at the fair market value (based on the recent selling price of Amicor’s common stock at a private placement) of the shares at $0.50 per share or $5 million. During the three months ended March 31, 2012, the Company recognized other income of $4,333,333 which represents the earned income pursuant to the terms of this Option Agreement. Note receivable from Amicor at March 31, 2012 amounted to $70,000.  David Rector, a member of the Company's Board of Directors, is a director of Amicor. Joshua Bleak, Continental's chief executive officer, is a director of Amicor.

In April 2012, the Company and Amicor extended the expiration date to May 15, 2012 and subsequently on May 7, 2012, both parties agreed to extend the expiration date of the option to June 15, 2012.

39

PERSHING GOLD CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

(FORMERLY SAGEBRUSH GOLD LTD.)

(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

March 31, 2012

NOTE 13 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (continued)

Operating Lease

In February 2012, the Company signed a three year lease agreement for office space located in Lakewood, Colorado containing approximately 2,390 net rentable square feet and such lease will start in March 2012 and expires in April 2015. The lease requires the Company to pay an annual base rent of $18.50 per rentable square feet or $44,215 plus a pro rata share of operating expenses. The base rent is subject to annual increases beginning on May 1, 2013 as defined in the lease agreement. Future minimum rental payments required under these operating leases are as follows:

Years ending December 31:
2012		33,161
2013		45,111
2014		46,306
2015 and thereafter		11,651
	$	136,229

NOTE 14 – MINERAL PROPERTIES

North Battle Mountain and Red Rock Mineral Prospects

Through the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Arttor Gold LLC, the Company has the rights to explore the North Battle Mountain Mineral Prospect located in Lander County, Nevada.

The North Battle Mountain Mineral Prospect is located in Lander County, Nevada, 18 kilometers north of the town of Battle Mountain in north central Nevada.  The property consists of 36 unpatented lode mining claims and encompasses approximately 700 acres.  The North Battle Mountain Mineral Prospect can be accessed from Battle Mountain by a paved county road for about 5.5 miles to the North Battle Mountain rail siding, and then by a graded gravel road from which an unimproved dirt road leads east to the north-central part of the property.

The Red Rock Mineral Prospect is located in Lander County, Nevada, 26 miles south of the town of Battle Mountain.  The property consists of five groups of unpatented lode mining claims, totaling 269 claims and encompassing approximately 5,600 acres.  The Red Rock Mineral Prospect can be accessed from Nevada State Highway 305, traveled south from Battle Mountain approximately 26 miles to the Carico Lake Valley/Red Rock Canyon turn-off, then east along an improved gravel road less than a mile to the western claim boundary.  Most of the property is accessible by secondary gravel and unimproved dirt roads.

The exploration rights to these properties are held through two amended and restated mining leases dated July 15, 2011 (the “Leger Leases”) between Arttor Gold LLC and Art Leger, formerly the Company’s Chief Geologist, who located the mining claims in 2004, and an additional mining lease dated August 22, 2011 (the “Centerra Lease”) between Arttor Gold LLC and Centerra (US) Inc. (see Note 13).  The Leger Leases grant us the exclusive right to explore, mine and develop gold, silver, palladium, platinum and other minerals on the properties for a term of ten years, and may be renewed in ten year increments.  The terms of the Leger Leases may not exceed 99 years.

The North Battle Mountain and Red Rock Mineral Prospects properties do not currently have any reserves and all activities undertaken and currently proposed are exploratory in nature.

40

PERSHING GOLD CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

(FORMERLY SAGEBRUSH GOLD LTD.)

(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

March 31, 2012

NOTE 14 – MINERAL PROPERTIES (continued)

Relief Canyon Properties

The  Relief Canyon properties, which include the Relief Canyon Mine property owned by Gold Acquisition Corp., and the Pershing Pass Property held directly by the Company.

The Relief Canyon properties are located about 100 miles northeast of Reno, Nevada. The nearest town is Lovelock, Nevada, approximately 15 miles west-southwest from the Relief Canyon Mine property, which can be reached from both Reno and Lovelock on U.S. Interstate 80.  The Relief Canyon Mine property is reached from Lovelock by travelling approximately seven miles northeast on I-80 to the Coal Canyon Exit (Exit No. 112), then about 10 miles southeast on Coal Canyon Road (State Route 857, a paved road maintained by Pershing County) to Packard Flat, and then north on a gravel road for two miles.  All of the Relief Canyon properties can be accessed by unpaved roads from the Relief Canyon Mine property. The Relief Canyon properties are located in Pershing County, Nevada at the southern end of the Humboldt Range.  The range is underlain by a sequence of late Paleozoic- to Mesozoic-age volcanic and sedimentary rocks.  Gold-bearing rocks at the Relief Canyon properties are primarily developed within breccia zones along the contact between the Grass Valley and Cane Springs Formations. The Relief Canyon properties do not currently have any reserves and all activities undertaken and currently proposed are exploratory in nature.

Relief Canyon Mine

Through the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Gold Acquisition Corp., the Company owns 58 unpatented lode mining claims and 118 unpatented millsites at the Relief Canyon Mine property.  The property includes the Relief Canyon Mine and gold processing facilities, currently on care and maintenance, which produced gold periodically from 1984 through 2008.  The Relief Canyon Mine includes three open pit mines, five heap leach pads, two solution ponds and a cement block constructed adsorption desorption-recovery (ADR) solution processing circuit. The ADR type process plant consists of four carbon columns, acid wash system, stripping vessel, electrolytic cells, a furnace and a retort for the production of gold doré.  The process facility was originally installed by Lacana Mining in 1985 and was updated in 1995 and again in 2007 by Firstgold Corp. The facilities are generally in good condition.

Adequate line power is available to the site to operate the existing process facility and ancillary facilities.  There is a generator onsite to provide power for the crusher and a backup generator that could provide 100% of the required power for process facility and heap leach operation in the event of power outages.  Sufficient water rights to operate the facility have been appropriated with two operating and permitted wells serving current needs.

The Relief Canyon Mine property was most recently owned and operated by Firstgold Corp.  Firstgold Corp. ceased operations at Relief Canyon in 2008 and filed for bankruptcy in January 2010.  On December 17, 2010, the Court entered its Order Authorizing And Approving: (1) Sale Of Real Property And Certain Personal Property Assets Pursuant To 11 U.S.C. §363 Free And Clear Of Liens, Claims, and Interests; and (2) Assumption and Assignment Of Executory Contracts and Unexpired Leases Under 11 U.S.C. § 365; and (3) Related Relief entered December 17, 2010 (the “Sale Order”), pursuant to which Platinum Long Term Growth LLC (“Platinum”) was approved as the successful “back up bidder” for certain assets including the Relief Canyon Mine.  On August 30, 2011, pursuant to the Sale Order, the Company (through a wholly owned subsidiary) purchased 100% of the Relief Canyon Mine property and related assets for an aggregate purchase price of $12.0 million cash paid at closing and $8.0 million of senior Notes issued to former creditors of Firstgold Corp.  The Relief Canyon Mine property is burdened by a production royalty equal to 2% of net smelter returns payable to Battle Mountain Gold Exploration LLC (now owned by Royal Gold).

Gold was first discovered on the property by the Duval Corp. in 1979.  Subsequent exploration was performed by various companies including Lacana Mining, Santa Fe Gold Corp., and Pegasus Gold Inc.  Firstgold Corp. acquired the property in 1995 and explored and produced gold periodically from 1995 until 2008.

41

PERSHING GOLD CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

(FORMERLY SAGEBRUSH GOLD LTD.)

(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

March 31, 2012

NOTE 14 – MINERAL PROPERTIES (continued)

Pershing Pass Property

The Company acquired the Pershing Pass property from Silver Scott Mines, Inc. in March 2012.  Pershing Pass consists of 489 unpatented lode mining claims (30 of which were acquired in February 2012) covering approximately 9,700 acres.  Silver Scott Mines, Inc. located the claims and was the sole owner of the Pershing Pass property prior to the Company’s purchase.   There is evidence of historic mining activity on the Pershing Pass property.

Uranium Exploration Properties

The Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, Continental Resources Acquisition Sub, Inc. was formed in July 2011 to purchase substantially all of the assets of Continental Resources Group, Inc., which assets included 100% of the outstanding shares of common stock of Green Energy Fields, Inc. and ND Energy Inc. The purchased assets include certain interests in uranium unpatented mining claims and leased mineral interests in Arizona, California and North Dakota totaling approximately 7,200 acres.  The Company entered into an option agreement on January 26, 2012 pursuant to which American Strategic Minerals Corporation has the right to acquire these uranium exploration properties (see Note 13).  The option, as amended, is exercisable until June 15, 2012, in whole or in part, at an exercise price of $10.00 for any or all of the uranium properties.  If the option is not exercised, the Company will retain all of the consideration for the option, and the Company plans to continue its efforts to divest these properties. These uranium exploration properties do not currently have any reserves and all activities undertaken and currently proposed are exploratory in nature.

The Coso property is located in Inyo County, California and consists of 169 unpatented lode mining claims on BLM land totaling 3,380 acres.  The property is burdened by a 3% royalty payable to NPX Metals, Inc.  Annual claim and lease maintenance costs for the Coso property are approximately $25,000.  The property is undeveloped, and there are no facilities or structures.  There are a number of adits, trenches and drill holes from previous exploration activities.

The Artillery Peak property is located in western north-central Arizona near the southern edge of Mohave County.  The property consists of a total of 86 unpatented lode mining claims and is burdened by a 4% royalty.  Annual claim maintenance costs for the Artillery Peak property total approximately $13,000.  Uranium exploration has been occurring in the Artillery Peak region since the 1950s by a number of exploration and mining entities.

The Blythe project is located in the southern McCoy Mountains in Riverside County, California approximately 15 miles west of the community of Blythe.  It consists of 66 unpatented lode mining claims covering 1,320 acres of BLM land and is burdened by a 3% royalty.  Annual claim maintenance costs for the claims at the Blythe property are approximately $10,000.  A number of companies have worked on the Blythe uranium property during the 1950s through the 1980s.

The Absaroka Stone project consists of one unpatented lode mining claim located in the Uinta County of southwestern Wyoming.

Prospect Uranium consists of private leases to 1,027 acres located in Slope County, in southwestern North Dakota.  Annual holding costs under these leases total about $7,100.

 

42

PERSHING GOLD CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

(FORMERLY SAGEBRUSH GOLD LTD.)

(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

March 31, 2012

NOTE 15 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On April 5, 2012, the Company purchase from Victoria Gold Corp.(“VGC”) and Victoria Resources (US) Inc. (“VRI” and collectively with VGC, the “Seller”) the Seller's interest in approximately 13,300 acres of mining claims and private lands adjacent to the Company’s landholdings at the Relief Canyon Mine in Pershing County, Nevada (the “Assets”).  The Company refers to these properties as the Relief Canyon Expansion properties.  Approximately 8,900 acres of the Relief Canyon Expansion properties are held under leases and subleases with Newmont USA Ltd., which the Company refers to as the Newmont Leased properties.  Victoria Gold has reserved a 2% net smelter return royalty from the production on 221 of the 283 unpatented mining claims that it owned directly.  

The Assets include (i) unpatented mining claims located in Pershing County, Nevada (the “Owned Claims”); (ii) the assumption by the Company of a leasehold interest in certain unpatented mining claims in Pershing County Nevada referred to as the “Newmont Claims” held by VRI under a Minerals Lease and Sublease dated June 15, 2006, as amended, between Newmont USA Limited, d/b/a in Nevada as Newmont Mining Corporation (“Newmont”) and VRI  (the “2006 Mineral Lease”); (iii) the assumption of the sublease, pursuant to the 2006 Mineral Lease, of an interest in certain fee minerals in Pershing County, Nevada in which Newmont holds a leasehold interest pursuant to that Minerals Lease SPL-6700, dated as of August 17, 1987 between Southern Pacific Land Company and SFP Minerals Corporation;  (iv) the assumption of the sublease, pursuant to the 2006 Mineral Lease, of an interest in certain fee lands in Pershing County, Nevada, in which Newmont holds a leasehold interest pursuant to a mining lease dated June 1, 1994 between The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company and Santa Fe Pacific Gold Corporation; and (v) the assumption of the sublease, pursuant to the 2006 Mineral Lease, of an interest in certain fee minerals in Pershing County, Nevada in which Newmont holds a leasehold interest pursuant to a minerals lease, dated as of March 23, 1999 between Nevada Land & Resource Company LLC and Santa Fe Pacific Gold Corporation.

In connection with the purchase of the Assets, the Company has agreed to purchase all of Seller’s data, information and records related to the Assets, including all internal analyses and reports prepared by third party consultants or contractors, and to assume all liabilities and obligations of the Sellers arising after the closing of the transaction, including additional expenditures to be made in accordance with the 2006 Mineral Lease in the amount of  approximately $750,000 by June 15, 2012.

The closing of the acquisition of the Assets was subject to the satisfaction by the parties of certain obligations, including, among other things, the transfer of title to the Company of the Owned Claims, the assignment of Seller’s leasehold interests to the Company and the payment of consideration by the Company for the Assets (the “Closing Conditions”). On April 5, 2012, the parties satisfied the Closing Conditions and the Company issued to VGC 10,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, and a 2 year warrant to purchase 5,000,000 shares of Common Stock at a purchase price of $0.60 per share.  The Company also granted a 2% net smelter returns royalty on production from the Owned Claims which are not encumbered by production royalties payable to Newmont under the 2006 Mineral Lease.  The Company also paid the Seller $2,000,000 cash.

The Warrant may be exercised in whole, or in part, at any time by mean s of a “cashless” exercise.  In the event of an “Organic Change”, as defined in the Warrant, the Company may elect to: (i) require the holder to exercise the Warrant prior to the consummation of such Organic Change or (ii) secure from the person or entity purchasing such assets or the successor resulting from such Organic Change, a written agreement to deliver to the holder, in exchange for the Warrant, a warrant of such acquiring or successor entity.

On April 2, 2012, the Company sold 4,300,002 shares of common stock to certain investors for an aggregate purchase price of $1,505,000 or a purchase price of $0.35 per share.

On April 17, 2012, the Company sold 85,714 shares of common stock to certain investors for an aggregate purchase price of $30,000 or a purchase price of $0.35 per share.

43

PERSHING GOLD CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

(FORMERLY SAGEBRUSH GOLD LTD.)

(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

March 31, 2012

NOTE 15 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS (continued)

On April 6, 2012, the Company and its director, Barry Honig, entered into a consulting agreement (the “Consulting Agreement”) pursuant to which Mr. Honig would provide certain consulting services relating to business development, corporate structure, strategic and business planning, selecting management and other functions reasonably necessary for advancing the business of the Company (the “Services”).  The Consulting Agreement has an initial term of three years, subject to renewal.  In consideration for the Services, the Company agreed to pay Mr. Honig the following consideration:

·   A ten-year option (the “Option”) to purchase 12,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, exercisable at $0.35 per share which shall be vested in full on the date of issuance;

·   On such date that the Company receives minimum gross proceeds of at least $5,000,000 due to the occurrence of a Triggering Event (as defined in the Consulting Agreement) or the combination of multiple Triggering Events, Mr. Honig shall receive a one -time payment of $200,000; and

·   Upon a Change in Control (as defined in the Consulting Agreement) of the Company, Mr. Honig shall receive a one-time payment of $500,000.

The 12,000,000 options were valued on the grant date at approximately $0.43 per option or a total of $5,102,400 using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: stock price of $0.46 per share, volatility of 105%, expected term of 10 years, and a risk free interest rate of 2.07%.  In April 2012, the Company paid the one-time payment of $200,000 to Mr. Honig pursuant to the Consulting Agreement.

As previously disclosed, on July 22, 2011, the Company purchased substantially all of the assets of Continental in consideration for (i) 8 shares of the Company’s common stock for every 10 shares of Common Stock of Continental outstanding; (ii) the assumption by the Company of the outstanding warrants to purchase shares of Continental’s common stock at a ratio of one warrant (the “Company Warrants”) to purchase 8 shares of the Company’s Common Stock for every Continental Warrant to purchase 10 shares of Continental’s common stock; and (iii)  the assumption of Continental’s 2010 Equity Incentive Plan and all options granted and issued thereunder at a ratio of one option to purchase 8 shares of the Company Common Stock for every option to purchase 10 shares of Continental’s common stock outstanding. On April 9, 2012, the Company issued an aggregate of 9,576,285 shares of its common stock, to holders of Company Warrants in consideration for the cancellation of such Company Warrants.  Additionally, such holders agreed to the elimination of certain most favored nations provisions or price protection associated with the shares of Continental’s common stock issued in connection with the Continental Warrants (the “Warrant Cancellation Transaction”). The Company issued 9,576,285 shares of the Company’s common stock at a ratio of 300 shares for every 1,000 Company Warrants held.  An aggregate of 31,920,953 Company Warrants were cancelled as a result of the Warrant Cancellation Transaction. Accordingly, the Company valued the 9,576,285 common shares at the fair market value on the date of grant at $0.505 per share or $4,836,024.  On April 27, 2012, the Company issued an additional 24,000 shares of common stock in consideration for the cancellation of 80,000 Company Warrants and the elimination of certain most favored nation provisions or price protection associated with the shares of Continental's common stock issued in connection with the Continental Warrants.   The Company values the 24,000 common shares at the fair market value on the date of the grant at $0.31 per share or $7,440.

On May 7, 2012, the Company and Amicor agreed to extend the expiration date to June 15, 2012 in connection with the right to exercise pursuant to an Option Agreement (see Note 13).

On April 27, 2012, the Company issued 50,000 shares of common stock to a consultant in consideration for certain consulting services rendered. The Company has accrued such consulting expense as of March 31, 2012 amounting to $45,000.

44

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

Pershing Gold Corporation (“Pershing Gold”; the “Company” or “we”) is a gold and precious metals exploration company pursuing exploration and development opportunities primarily in Nevada.  We are currently focused on exploration at our Relief Canyon properties in Pershing County in northwestern Nevada.

This discussion should be read in conjunction with Management’s Discussion and Analysis included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011.

Overview

During the first quarter our management decided to focus on exploration at our Relief Canyon properties and to reduce our interests in or divest our other exploration properties.  An overview of our progress during the first quarter 2012 is provided below.

Relief Canyon property acquisitions.  We significantly increased our property position at Relief Canyon with two acquisitions.  On March 1, 2012, we purchased approximately 9,700 acres of unpatented mining claims, located to the south of the Relief Canyon Mine property from Silver Scott Mines, Inc. for $550,000.  On April 5, 2012, we acquired from Victoria Gold Corporation rights to approximately 13,300 acres of unpatented mining claims and private lands adjacent to the Relief Canyon Mine property.  We refer to these properties as the Relief Canyon Expansion properties.  Approximately 9,600 acres of the Relief Canyon Expansion properties are held under leases and subleases with Newmont USA Ltd.   Victoria Gold has reserved a 2% net smelter return royalty from the production on the 3,800 acres of 283 unpatented mining claims that it owned directly.  To acquire the Relief Canyon Expansion properties, we paid Victoria Gold $2.0 million in cash, 10 million shares of our common stock, warrants to purchase 5 million shares of our common stock at $0.60 per share, exercisable at any time on or prior to April 5, 2014, and the 2% net smelter return royalty.

Option on uranium properties.  On January 26, 2012, we entered into an agreement under which American Strategic Minerals Corporation (“Amicor”) has the option to acquire certain uranium exploration rights and properties held by us. As consideration for the option, Amicor issued to us a $1,000,000 non interest bearing promissory note payable in installments upon satisfaction of certain conditions, expiring six months following issuance, and 10 million shares of its common stock. The option, which has been extended until June 15, 2012, is exercisable, in whole or in part, at an exercise price of Ten Dollars ($10.00) for any or all of the uranium properties. If Amicor does not exercise the option, we will retain the option consideration.  As of March 31, 2012, $930,000 of the principal amount of note has been paid and 700,000 shares of Amicor common stock were sold for net proceeds of approximately $0.3 million. Under the terms of the note, Amicor is required to pay the balance of the note upon completion of a private placement totaling $1 million or more on or before July 26, 2012. If a $1.0 million private placement is not completed by that date, Amicor is not required to pay us the final $70,000 due under the note.

Financing.  In the first quarter, we raised $1,847,500 through the sale of our securities, net of placement agent fees.  These transactions included $847,500 from the sale of units at $0.40 per unit, comprised of one share of common stock and a two year warrant to purchase half a share of common stock at $0.60 per share, $1.0 million from the sale of 1.0 million shares of Series D Convertible Preferred Stock and five year warrants to acquire 8.75 million shares at an exercise price of $0.40 per share, and $0.5 million received in March 2012 in connection with a 5% secured promissory note which was administratively issued on April 10, 2012.  In April 2012, we raised approximately $1,535,000 through the sale of our common stock at a purchase price of $0.35 per share.

Debt Repayment.  In January and February 2012, we prepaid approximately $1.0 million of our $8.0 million senior secured notes issued in connection with the acquisition of the Relief Canyon Mine property in August 2011.  On March 30, 2012 the outstanding balance of the note was fully paid by conversion into 12,841,082 shares of common stock at a conversion price of $0.35 per share and 3,749,186 shares of Series D Convertible Preferred Stock. Additionally on March 30, 2012, we converted the remaining balance of $1,015,604 plus accrued interest on the 9% secured promissory note issued on September 19, 2011 into 1,024,744 shares of Series D Convertible Preferred Stock.

Conversion of preferred stock.  We issued 500,000 shares of common stock upon the conversion of 500,000 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, and 1,153,143 shares of common stock upon the conversion of 400,000 shares of Series D Convertible Preferred Stock.

45

Warrants.  On April 9, 2012, the Company issued 9,576,285 shares of its common stock to holders of the Company’s warrants to purchase 31,902,953 shares of common stock, originally issued to Continental warrant holders in connection with the acquisition of the Relief Canyon Mine property in exchange for cancellation of the warrants at a ratio of 300 shares for every 1,000 warrants held. The warrant holders also agreed to the elimination of certain price protection provisions related to the warrants. During the first quarter, we also issued 6,229,718 shares of common stock upon the cashless exercise of 11,399,150 warrants that were granted previously to investors and debt holders.

At May 15, 2012, following the transactions discussed above, we had 204,220,557 shares of common stock outstanding, 7,652,190 warrants to acquire common stock at an average exercise prices of $0.46 per share oustanding, no shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock outstanding, 3,284,396 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock outstanding, 6,086,968 shares of Series D Convertible Preferred Stock outstanding and approximately $1.1 million of notes outstanding.

Results of Operations

Our business began on November 30, 2009. We were incorporated in Nevada on February 10, 2010 to succeed to the business of the predecessor company, Golden Empire, LLC (“Golden Empire”), which was formed and commenced operations on November 30, 2009. We assumed all assets, liabilities and certain promotion rights agreements entered into by Golden Empire at carrying value which approximated fair value on February 10, 2010. Golden Empire ceased operations on that date. The results of operations for the period from January 1, 2010 to February 9, 2010 of Golden Empire were not material. In September 2011, we decided to discontinue our sports and entertainment business and to focus on gold exploration. Prior periods have been restated in the Company’s consolidated financial statements and related footnotes to conform to this presentation, and all transactions relating to our sports and entertainment business are included in discontinued operations.

For the results of continuing operations discussed below, we compare the results from operations for the three month period ended March 31, 2012 to the results of operations for the three month period ended March 31, 2011.

For the three months ended March 31, 2012 and the three months ended March 31, 2011.

Net Revenues

We are an exploration stage company with no operations and generated no revenues in the three months ended March 31, 2012.  For the three months ended March 31, 2011, there are no continuing operations.

Operating Expenses

Total operating expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2012 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2011, were approximately $9.7 million and $0.5 million respectively.  The $9.2 million increase in operating expenses for the 2012 period includes approximately$6.5 million of compensation expense, related primarily to stock based compensation expense of $5.0 million and other expenses for hiring our executive and management employees and support staff; $1.3 million in exploration expense on our Relief Canyon Mine, North Battle Mountain and Red Rock properties, $0.8 million in general and administrative expenses primarily for public company expenses and litigation and $0.6 million in consulting fees primarily related to financing and investor relations matters.

Operating Loss from Continuing Operations

We reported an operating loss from continuing operations of approximately $9.7 million and $0.5 million, respectively, for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011.  The increase in operating loss was due to the increase in operating expenses described above.

46

Other Income (Expenses)

Total other expense was approximately $13.2 million and $0 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The increase is primarily attributable to $11.3 million in interest expense primarily attributable to the amortization of debt discounts and deferred financing cost on the notes of approximately $8.0 million of convertible notes converted on March 30, 2012 and interest expense in connection with the issuance of common stock and warrants pursuant to a note modification agreement; $1.5 million increase in fair value of derivative liability on the $8 million senior convertible notes; and $4.8 million due to the conversion of the $8.0 million senior convertible notes to our common stock and Series D Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock; offset in part by $4.3 million income resulting from the consideration paid by Amicor in its option to acquire our uranium exploration properties.

Discontinued Operations

In September 2011, we decided to discontinue our sports and entertainment business, and all results of operations relating to our sports and entertainment business are included in discontinued operations.

The following table sets forth for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 indicated selected financial data of the Company’s discontinued operations of its sports and entertainment business.

	March 31, 2012			March 31, 2011
Revenues	$	-		$	291,200
Cost of sales		-			189,916
Gross profit (loss)		-			101,284
Operating and other non-operating expenses		(50,174	)		(924,982	)
Loss from discontinued operations	$	(50,174	)	$	(823,698	)

Net Loss

As a result of the operating expense and other expense discussed above, we reported a net loss of approximately $22.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012 as compared to a net loss of $1.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At December 31, 2011, our cash and cash equivalents totaled $3.7 million compared to $2.6 million at March 31, 2012. During the three months ended March 31, 2012, we received proceeds of approximately $0.5 million from issuance of a note payable and gross proceeds of $1.8 million from the sale of common and preferred stock.  These increases were more than offset by approximately $1.3 million in exploration costs, and $1 million general and administrative expenses.  We also reduced our debt from approximately $9.3 million to approximately $1.1 million, due to conversion of our $8.0 million senior convertible notes and $1million secured convertible note to common stock and Series D Convertible Preferred Stock, partially offset by issuance of a $0.5 million note. Additionally in April 2012, we raised approximately $1,535,000 of gross proceeds through the sale of our common stock at a purchase price of $0.35 per share.

In the remaining 9 months of 2012, we plan to spend approximately $1.1 million on a Phase II 15,000 foot drill program on the Relief Canyon mine property, approximately $0.9 million on initial drilling and general reconnaissance, rock sampling and baseline geophysical surveys on the property we acquired from Victoria Gold, and approximately $2 million on general and administrative expenses.  We plan to fund these expenditures from existing cash, and to expand our exploration program if additional external funding becomes available.

The actual amount that we spend through year-end 2012 may vary significantly from the amounts stated above.  We currently have no material commitments for capital expenditures or exploration expenses.  However, we have no revenues and do not expect to have revenues for at least the remainder of 2012.  Therefore our future operations are dependent on our ability to secure additional external funding, through financing activities or the sale of our uranium or gold exploration properties other than Relief Canyon.  Funding may not be available on acceptable terms or at all.  If financing is not available, we would be required to preserve our cash be reducing exploration activities and general and administrative expenses.

Significant Accounting Policies

We did not adopt any new accounting standards during the quarter ended March 31, 2012 nor were there any new accounting pronouncements during the period that would have an impact on our financial position or results of operation.

47

Forward-Looking Statements

This Report on Form 10-Q and other written and oral statements made from time to time by us may contain so-called “forward-looking statements,” all of which are subject to risks and uncertainties.  Forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words such as “expects,” “plans,” “will,” “forecasts,” “projects,” “intends,” “estimates,” and other words of similar meaning. Forward looking statements include, without limitation, statements relating to our business goals, planned exploration, business strategy, planned divestment of our uranium properties, future operating results, and our liquidity and capital resources outlook.  Forward –looking statements are based on our current expectations and assumptions regarding our business, the economy and other future conditions.  Our actual results may differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements, which are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties, some of which cannot be predicted or quantified.   Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated in forward- looking statements include  without limitation results for future exploration at our Relief Canyon and other projects; our ability to raise necessary capital to conduct our exploration activities and do so on acceptable terms, problems or delays in permitting or other government approvals. These statements are likely to address our growth strategy, financial results and product and development programs.  One must carefully consider any such statement and should understand that many factors could cause actual results to differ from our forward looking statements.  These factors may include inaccurate assumptions and a broad variety of other risks and uncertainties, including some that are known and some that are not.  No forward looking statement can be guaranteed and actual future results may vary materially.

ITEM 3.  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

Not applicable.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

We maintain “disclosure controls and procedures,” as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the disclosure controls and procedures are met. Additionally, in designing disclosure controls and procedures, our management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible disclosure controls and procedures. The design of any disclosure controls and procedures also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions.

With respect to the quarterly period ended March 31, 2012, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operations of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon this evaluation, the Company’s management has concluded that certain disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of March 31, 2012 and that the failure to have multiple levels of transaction review due to limited personnel constitutes a significant deficiency in internal controls. However, to the extent possible, we plan to implement procedures to assure that the initiation of transactions, the custody of assets and the recording of transactions will be performed by separate individuals. We believe that the foregoing steps will remediate the significant deficiency identified above, and we will continue to monitor the effectiveness of these steps and make any changes that our management deems appropriate.

Changes in Internal Controls.

There have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the nine months ended March 31, 2012 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting.

48

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

On February 7, 2012, the Company obtained a copy of  a complaint filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (the “Complaint”) entitled Relief Gold Group, Inc., v Sagebrush Gold Ltd, Gold Acquisition Corp., Barry C. Honig, and David S. Rector (12 civ 0952).  Relief Gold alleges various causes of action including breach of contract, intentional interference with contract, intentional interference with prospective business relationship/economic relations, misappropriation of trade secrets and unjust enrichment, related to the Company’s acquisition on August 30, 2011 of the assets of the Relief Canyon Mine pursuant to Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. The Company disputes the allegations in the Complaint and believes the Complaint to be wholly without merit and intends vigorously to defend the claims.  Plaintiff served an amended complaint on May 10, 2012.  The Company’s time to answer or move with respect to the amended complaint expires on May 24, 2012.

Further, on or about February 29, 2012, Gold Acquisition Corp. (“GAC”) commenced an adversary proceeding in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nevada against Firstgold, Terence Lynch and Relief Gold Group Case No. 12-05013-GWZ.  Through the adversary proceeding, GAC is seeking confirmation that all information, intellectual property and know how related to Relief Canyon was property of Firstgold that was sold to GAC.  In addition, GAC moved for a preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order staying the prosecution of the above-referenced action pending in the Southern District.  The motion for a preliminary injunction was denied on or about March 15, 2012.  Firstgold filed a motion to dismiss the complaint on April 23, 2012; GAC’s response is due by June 6, 2012. GAC has attempted to start the discovery process and filed a motion to compel on May 11, 2012.  A hearing date has not yet been set, but GAC has requested that it be heard on shortened time.  A scheduling conference in this matter has been set for June 13, 2012.

GAC also filed a Motion for Order to Show Cause in Firstgold’s main bankruptcy action Case No. 10-50215-GWZ requesting that the court require Firstgold to complete documentation for conveyance of property.  That motion was granted on or about February 28, 2012.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.

Not applicable.

ITEM 2.  UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.

On January 11, 2012, the Company issued 100,000 shares of common stock upon the conversion of 100,000 shares of Series B Preferred Stock. The transaction did not involve any underwriters, underwriting discounts or commissions, or any public offering. The issuance of these securities was deemed to be exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, by virtue of Section 4(2) thereof, as a transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering.

On January 27, 2012, the Company sold an aggregate of 1,376,250 Units with gross proceeds to the Company of $550,500.  Each Unit was sold for a purchase price of $0.40 per Unit and consists of: (i) one share of Common Stock and (ii) a two-year warrant to purchase fifty (50%) percent of the number of shares of Common Stock purchased at an exercise price of $0.60 per share, subject to adjustment upon the occurrence of certain events. On February 7, 2012, the Company sold an additional 1,500,000 Units for gross proceeds to the Company of $49,500.  On February 21, 2012, the Company sold an additional 437,500 Units with gross proceeds to the Company of $175,000.  The Warrants may be exercised at any time on a cashless basis at 100% of the closing price for the Common Stock on the business day immediately prior to the date of exercise.  The Company paid placement agent fees of $30,000 cash in connection with the sale of the Units. The transaction did not involve any underwriters, underwriting discounts or commissions, or any public offering. The issuance of these securities was deemed to be exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, by virtue of Section 4(2) thereof, as a transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering.

 On February 1, 2012, the Company issued an aggregate of 4,400,000 shares of common stock upon the conversion of 4,400,000 shares of Series B Preferred Stock. The transaction did not involve any underwriters, underwriting discounts or commissions, or any public offering. The issuance of these securities was deemed to be exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, by virtue of Section 4(2) thereof, as a transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering.

On February 9, 2012, the Company entered into an employment agreement with its Chief Executive Officer, Stephen Alfers, pursuant to which Mr. Alfers shall serve as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company until December 31, 2015, subject to renewal.  Pursuant to the terms of his Employment Agreement, Mr. Alfers was issued (i) 12,000,000 shares of the Company’s restricted common stock and (ii) an option to purchase 10,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock with a term of ten years and an exercise price equal to the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the trading day immediately prior to the date of issuance of such grant.  The issuance of these securities was deemed to be exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, by virtue of Section 4(2) thereof, as a transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering.

49

On February 23, 2012, the Company entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement with two subscribers and sold 1,000,000 shares of its Series D Preferred Stock and an aggregate of 8,750,000 warrants to acquire shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.40 per share for an aggregate purchase price of $1,000,000. The transaction did not involve any underwriters, underwriting discounts or commissions, or any public offering. The issuance of these securities was deemed to be exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, by virtue of Section 4(2) thereof, as a transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering.

On February 23, 2012, the Company entered into a Note Modification Agreement with certain noteholders to extend the maturity date of such notes.  In consideration for entering into the Modification Agreements, the Company issued (i) warrants to purchase an aggregate of 5,180,400 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.40 per share and (ii) an aggregate of 2,000,000 shares of common stock to the noteholders. The transaction did not involve any underwriters, underwriting discounts or commissions, or any public offering. The issuance of these securities was deemed to be exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, by virtue of Section 4(2) thereof, as a transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering.

On March 6, 2012, the Company authorized the issuance of options to purchase an aggregate of 1,100,000 shares of the Company’s common stock pursuant to the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan.  Such grants of restricted stock shall vest as follows: 25% on the date of issuance and 25% on December 31 of each of 2012, 2013 and 2014.  The issuance of these securities was deemed to be exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, by virtue of Section 4(2) thereof, as a transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering. 

On March 7, 2012, the Company issued an aggregate of 500,000 shares of common stock upon the conversion of 500,000 shares of Series B Preferred Stock.  The transaction did not involve any underwriters, underwriting discounts or commissions, or any public offering. The issuance of these securities was deemed to be exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, by virtue of Section 4(2) thereof, as a transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering.

On March 6, 2012, the Company issued a warrant to purchase 400,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price equal to the market price of the Company’s common stock on the date of issuance to a consultant in consideration for services rendered. The transaction did not involve any underwriters, underwriting discounts or commissions, or any public offering. The issuance of these securities was deemed to be exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, by virtue of Section 4(2) thereof, as a transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering.

On March 20, 2012, the Company issued 250,000 shares of common stock to a third party in consideration for legal services rendered.  The issuance of these securities was deemed to be exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, by virtue of Section 4(2) thereof, as a transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering.

On March 30, 2012, the Company issued an aggregate of 10,768,331 shares of common stock upon conversion of outstanding convertible promissory notes. The transaction did not involve any underwriters, underwriting discounts or commissions, or any public offering. The issuance of these securities was deemed to be exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, by virtue of Section 4(2) thereof, as a transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering.

On March 30, 2012, the Company issued an aggregate of 2,072,758 shares of common stock to holders of certain convertible promissory notes in consideration for the full conversion of such notes. The transaction did not involve any underwriters, underwriting discounts or commissions, or any public offering. The issuance of these securities was deemed to be exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, by virtue of Section 4(2) thereof, as a transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering.

 On March 30, 2012, the Company issued 1,153,143 shares of common stock in consideration for the conversion of Series D Preferred Stock and all accrued but unpaid dividends thereon.  The transaction did not involve any underwriters, underwriting discounts or commissions, or any public offering. The issuance of these securities was deemed to be exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 by virtue of Section 4(2) thereof, as a transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering.

50

On March 30, 2012, the Company issued an aggregate of 5,892,744 shares of common stock upon exercise of outstanding warrants. The transaction did not involve any underwriters, underwriting discounts or commissions, or any public offering. The issuance of these securities was deemed to be exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, by virtue of Section 4(2) thereof, as a transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering.

ITEM 3.  DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.

                 None.

ITEM 4.  MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.

  None.

ITEM 5.  OTHER INFORMATION.

                None.

ITEM 6.  EXHIBITS

10.1	Form of Note Purchase Agreement
10.2	Form of Note
10.3	Form of Security Agreement
31.1	Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2	Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101.ins	XBRL Instance Document
101.sch	XBRL Taxonomy Schema Document
101.cal	XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Document
101.def	XBRL Taxonomy Linkbase Document
101.lab	XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document
101.pre	XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document

51

SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	Pershing Gold Corporation
Date: May 15, 2012	By:	/s/ Stephen Alfers
		Stephen Alfers
		President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
Date: May 15, 2012	By:	/s/ Adam Wasserman
		Adam Wasserman
		Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

 52

EX-10.1

Exhibit 10.1

NOTE PURCHASE AGREEMENT

NOTE PURCHASE AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”), dated as of April 10, 2012, by and between Pershing Gold Corporation, a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), and each of the lender entities whose names appear on the signature pages hereof.  Such lender entities are each referred to herein as a “Lender” and, collectively, as the “Lenders”.

W I T N E S S E T H:

WHEREAS, the Company wishes to sell to each Lender, and each Lender wishes to purchase, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in this Agreement, a Secured Promissory Note, which shall accrue interest at the rate of 5% per annum, substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A annexed hereto (a “Note” and, collectively with other Notes issued hereunder, the “Notes”).

WHEREAS, the Company’s obligations under the Notes, including without limitation its obligation to make payments of principal thereof and interest thereon, are secured by certain assets of the Company’s wholly owned subsidiaries, Arttor Gold LLC and Noble Effort Gold LLC, as more fully described in and pursuant to, the terms of a Security Agreement substantially in the forms attached hereto as Exhibit B (the “Security Agreement”).

NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties to this Agreement hereby agree as follows:

1.Certain Definitions.

(a)When used herein, the following terms shall have the respective meanings indicated:

“Board of Directors” means the Company’s board of directors.

“Business Day” means any day other than a Saturday, a Sunday or a day on which the New York Stock Exchange is closed or on which banks in the City of New York are required or authorized by law to be closed.

“Closing” and “Closing Date” have the respective meanings specified in Section 2 of this Agreement.

“Commission” means the Securities and Exchange Commission, and any successor regulatory agency.

“Common Stock” means the common stock of the Company, outstanding on the date hereof

“Event of Default” has the meaning specified in the Notes.

“Exchange Act” means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.

“Execution Date” means the date of this Agreement.

“GAAP” means U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, applied on a consistent basis.  Accounting principles are applied on a “consistent basis” when the accounting principles applied in a current period are comparable in all material respects to those accounting principles applied in a preceding period.

1

“Governmental Authority” means any nation or government, any state, provincial or political subdivision thereof and any entity exercising executive, legislative, judicial, regulatory or administrative functions of or pertaining to government, including, without limitation, any stock exchange, securities market or self-regulatory organization.

 “Maturity Date” has the meaning specified in the Notes.

“Material Adverse Effect” means an effect that is material and adverse to (i) the consolidated business, properties, assets, operations, results of operations, financial condition, credit worthiness or prospects of the Company taken as a whole, (ii) the ability of the Company to perform its material obligations under this Agreement or the other Transaction Documents or (iii) the rights and benefits to which an Lender is entitled under this Agreement or any of the other Transaction Documents.

 “Purchase Price” means, with respect to the Notes purchased at the Closing, the original principal amount of the Note purchased at the Closing.

“Securities Act” means the Securities Act of 1933 Act, as amended, and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.

 “Transaction Documents” means (i) this Agreement, (ii) the Notes, (iii) the Security Agreement, and (iv) all other agreements, documents and other instruments executed and delivered by or on behalf of the Company or any of its officers at the Closing.

(b)           Other Definitional Provisions.  All definitions contained in this Agreement are equally applicable to the singular and plural forms of the terms defined.  The words “hereof”, “herein” and “hereunder” and words of similar import contained in this Agreement refer to this Agreement as a whole and not to any particular provision of this Agreement.

2.   Closing.

Upon the terms and subject to the satisfaction or waiver of the conditions set forth herein, the Company agrees to sell and each Lender agrees to purchase a Note with a principal amount equal to the amount set forth below such Lender’s name on the signature pages hereof.  The date on which the closing of such purchase and sale occurs (the “Closing”) is hereinafter referred to as the “Closing Date”. The Closing will be deemed to occur at the offices of Sichenzia Ross Friedman Ference LLP, or such other place as the parties mutually agree upon, when (A) this Agreement and the other Transaction Documents (as defined below) have been executed and delivered by the Company and each Lender, (B) each of the conditions to the Closing described in this Agreement has been satisfied or waived as specified therein and (C) payment of each Lender’s Purchase Price payable with respect to the Note being purchased by such Lender at the Closing has been made by wire transfer of immediately available funds.  At the Closing, the Company shall deliver to each Lender a duly executed instrument representing the Note purchased by such Lender.

3.Representations and Warranties of the Company.  The Company represents and warrants to each Lender as follows, in each case as of the date hereof:

(a)The Company is duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the jurisdiction of its organization with full power and authority to own, lease, license and use its properties and assets and to carry out the business in which it proposes to engage.

(b)The Company has the requisite corporate power and authority to execute, deliver and perform its obligations under this Agreement and to issue and sell the Notes. All necessary proceedings of the Company have been duly taken to authorize the execution, delivery, and performance of the Transaction Documents.  The Transaction Documents have been duly authorized by the Company and, when executed and delivered by the Company, will constitute the legal, valid and binding obligation of the Company enforceable against the Company in accordance with their terms, except as such enforceability may be limited by general principles of equity or to applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium, liquidation and other similar laws relating to, or affecting generally, the enforcement of applicable creditors' rights and remedies.

2

(c)Except as set forth on the Disclosure Schedules, attached hereto, no consent of any party to any contract, agreement, instrument, lease or license to which the Company is a party or to which any of its properties or assets are subject is required for the execution, delivery or performance by the Company of any of the Transaction Documents or the issuance and sale of the Notes.

(d)The execution, delivery and performance by Company of the Transaction Documents to which it is a party have been duly authorized, and do not (i) conflict with any of its organizational documents, (ii) contravene, conflict with, constitute a default under or violate any material statute, law, rule, regulation or court decree binding upon or applicable to the Company, or its assets or properties, (iii) contravene, conflict or violate any applicable order, writ, judgment, injunction, decree, determination or award of any Governmental Authority by which the Company or any of its subsidiaries or any of their property or assets may be bound or affected, (iv) require any action by, filing, registration, or qualification with, or governmental approval from, any Governmental Authority (except such governmental approvals which have already been obtained and are in full force and effect) or (v) constitute an event of default or give rise to a right to terminate under any material agreement by which the Company or any of its subsidiaries is bound.

(e)Each Note has been duly authorized and, when issued and paid for in accordance with the terms of the applicable Transaction Documents, will be duly and validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable, and free and clear of all liens other than restrictions on transfer provided for in the Transaction Documents.

(f)Except as set forth in the Company’s filing with the Commission, there is no action, suit, inquiry, notice of violation, proceeding or investigation pending or, to the knowledge of the Company, threatened against or affecting the Company before or by any court, arbitrator, governmental or administrative agency or regulatory authority (federal, state, county, local or foreign) (collectively, an “Action”) which (i) adversely affects or challenges the legality, validity or enforceability of any of the Transaction Documents or the issuance of the Notes or (ii) could, if there were an unfavorable decision, have or reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect. Neither the Company nor any director or officer thereof, is or has been the subject of any Action involving a claim of violation of or liability under federal or state securities laws or a claim of breach of fiduciary duty.

(g)The Company possesses all certificates, authorizations and permits issued by the appropriate federal, state, local or foreign regulatory authorities necessary to conduct its businesses as currently conducted or as contemplated to be conducted, except where the failure to possess such permits could not reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect (“Material Permits”), and the Company has not received any notice of proceedings relating to the revocation or modification of any Material Permit.

(h)Assuming the accuracy of Lender’s representations and warranties set forth herein, no registration under the Securities Act is required for the offer and sale of the Notes by the Company to Lender as contemplated hereby.

(i)Neither the Company nor any person acting on behalf of the Company has offered or sold any of the Notes by any form of general solicitation or general advertising. The Company has offered the Notes for sale only to Lenders.

(j)The Company acknowledges and agrees that Lenders are acting solely in the capacity of an arm’s length purchasers with respect to the Transaction Documents and the transactions contemplated thereby. The Company further acknowledges that Lender is not acting as a financial advisor or fiduciary of the Company (or in any similar capacity) with respect to the Transaction Documents and the transactions contemplated thereby and any advice given by Lenders or any of its or their representatives or agents in connection with the Transaction Documents and the transactions contemplated thereby is merely incidental to the Lender’s purchase of the Notes. The Company further represents to each Lender that the Company’s decision to enter into this Agreement has been based solely on the independent evaluation of the transactions contemplated hereby by the Company and its representatives.

(k)No material labor dispute exists or, to the knowledge of the Company, is imminent with respect to any of the employees of the Company which could reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect. None of the Company’s employees is a member of a union that relates to such employee’s relationship with the Company, and the Company is not a party to a collective bargaining agreement, and the Company believes that their relationships with their employees are good. No executive officer, to the knowledge of the Company, is, or is now expected to be, in violation of any material term of any employment contract, confidentiality, disclosure or proprietary information agreement or non-competition agreement, or any other contract or agreement or any restrictive covenant in favor of any third party, and the continued employment of each such executive officer does not subject the Company to any liability with respect to any of the foregoing matters. The Company is  in compliance with all U.S. federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations relating to employment and employment practices, terms and conditions of employment and wages and hours, except where the failure to be in compliance could not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect.

3

(l)The Company: (i) is not in violation of any order of any court, arbitrator or governmental body or (ii) is not or has not been in violation of any statute, rule or regulation of any governmental authority, including without limitation all foreign, federal, state and local laws applicable to its business, except in each case as could not have or reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect.

(m)The Company is insured by insurers of recognized financial responsibility against such losses and risks and in such amounts as management of the Company believes to be prudent and customary in the businesses in which the Company is engaged. The Company does not have any reason to believe that it will not be able to renew its existing insurance coverage as and when such coverage expires or to obtain similar coverage from similar insurers as may be necessary to continue its business at a cost that would not have a Material Adverse Effect.

(n)No brokerage or finder’s fees or commissions are or will be payable by the Company to any broker, financial advisor or consultant, finder, placement agent, investment banker, bank or other person with respect to the transactions contemplated by the Transaction Documents. Lender shall have no obligation with respect to any fees or with respect to any claims made by or on behalf of other persons for fees of a type contemplated in this Section that may be due in connection with the transactions contemplated by the Transaction Documents.

(o)The Company is not, and is not an Affiliate of, and immediately after receipt of payment for the Notes, will not be or be an affiliate of, an “investment company” within the meaning of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended.

(p)Except for matters that would not, individually or in the aggregate, have or reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect, the Company has filed all necessary federal, state and foreign income and franchise tax returns and has paid or accrued all taxes shown as due thereon, and the Company has no knowledge of a tax deficiency which has been asserted or threatened against the Company.

(q)None of the Company, or to the knowledge of the Company, any agent or other person acting on behalf of the Company, has: (i) directly or indirectly, used any funds for unlawful contributions, gifts, entertainment or other unlawful expenses related to foreign or domestic political activity, (ii) made any unlawful payment to foreign or domestic government officials or employees or to any foreign or domestic political parties or campaigns from corporate funds, (iii) failed to disclose fully any contribution made by the Company (or made by any person acting on its behalf of which the Company is aware) which is in violation of law or (iv) violated in any material respect any provision of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, as amended.

(r)There are no disagreements of any kind presently existing, or reasonably anticipated by the Company to arise, between the Company and the accountants and lawyers formerly or presently employed by the Company which could affect the Company’s ability to perform any of its obligations under any of the Transaction Documents.

4.Representations, Warranties and Covenants of Lender.  Lender hereby represents and warrants to, and agrees with, the Company as follows:

(a)Lender is an “Accredited Investor” as such term is defined in Rule 501(a) promulgated under the Securities Act.

(b)Each of the Transaction Documents to which Lender is party has been duly executed and delivered by Lender and constitutes the legal, valid and binding obligation of Lender, enforceable against Lender in accordance with its terms except as such enforceability may be limited by general principles of equity or to applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium, liquidation and other similar laws relating to, or affecting generally, the enforcement of applicable creditors' rights and remedies.

(c)The execution, delivery and performance by Lender of the Transaction Documents to which it is a party have been duly authorized, and do not (i) conflict with any of Lender’s organizational documents, (ii) contravene, conflict with, constitute a default under or violate any material statute, law, rule, regulation or court decree binding upon or applicable to Lender or its assets or properties, (iii) contravene, conflict or violate any applicable order, writ, judgment, injunction, decree, determination or award of any Governmental Authority by which Lender or any of its property or assets may be bound or affected, (iv) require any action by, filing, registration, or qualification with, or governmental approval from, any Governmental Authority (except such governmental approvals which have already been obtained and are in full force and effect) or (v) constitute an event of default or give rise to a right to terminate under any material agreement by which Lender is bound.

4

(d)Lender is familiar with the business, plans and financial condition of the Company; Lender has received all materials that have been requested by Lender; Lender has had a reasonable opportunity to ask questions of the Company and its representatives, and the Company has answered to the satisfaction of Lender all inquiries that Lender or Lender’s representatives have put to it. Lender has had access to all additional information that Lender has deemed necessary to verify the accuracy of the information set forth in this Agreement, and has taken all the steps necessary to evaluate the merits and risks of an investment as proposed under this Agreement.

(e)Lender hereby acknowledges and represents that Lender is able to bear the economic risk which Lender hereby assumes.

(f)Lender understands the various risks of an investment in the Company as proposed herein and can afford to bear such risks, including, without limitation, the risks of losing the entire investment.

(g)Lender acknowledges that Lender has been informed by the Company of, or is otherwise familiar with, the nature of the limitations imposed by the Securities Act and the rules and regulations thereunder on the transfer of the Notes. In particular, Lender agrees that no sale, assignment or transfer of any of the Notes acquired by Lender shall be valid or effective, and the Company shall not be required to give any effect to such a sale, assignment or transfer, unless (a) the sale, assignment or transfer of such Notes is registered under the Securities Act, it being understood that the Notes are not currently registered for sale and that the Company has no obligation to so register the Notes; or (b) the Notes are sold, assigned or transferred in accordance with all the requirements and limitations of an exemption from registration under the Securities Act. Lender further understands that an opinion of counsel satisfactory to the Company and other documents may be required to transfer the Notes.

(h)Lender acknowledges that the Notes to be acquired will be subject to a stop transfer order and any certificate or certificates evidencing any Notes shall bear the following or a substantially similar legend and such other legends as may be required by state blue sky laws:

“THE SECURITIES REPRESENTED HEREBY HAVE NOT BEEN REGISTERED UNDER THE UNITED STATES SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED (THE “SECURITIES ACT”), OR ANY STATE SECURITIES LAWS.  SUCH SECURITIES MAY NOT BE SOLD, OFFERED FOR SALE, PLEDGED OR HYPOTHECATED OR OTHERWISE TRANSFERRED IN THE ABSENCE OF A REGISTRATION STATEMENT IN EFFECT WITH RESPECT TO SUCH SECURITIES UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OR AN AVAILABLE EXEMPTION FROM THE REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS OF THE SECURITIES ACT.  ANY SUCH TRANSFER MAY ALSO BE SUBJECT TO COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE STATE SECURITIES LAWS.”

(i)Lender will acquire the Notes for Lender’s own account (or, if such individual is married, for the joint account of Lender and Lender’s spouse either in joint tenancy, tenancy by the entirety or tenancy in common) for investment and not with a view to the sale or distribution thereof or the granting of any participation therein in violation of the securities laws, and has no present intention of distributing or selling to others any of such interest or granting any participation therein in violation of the securities laws.

(j)Lender is not entering into this Agreement or purchasing the Notes as a result of or subsequent to any advertisement, article, notice or other communication published in any newspaper, magazine or similar media or broadcast over television or radio, or presented at any seminar or meeting, or any solicitation by a person other than a representative of the Company with which Lender had a pre-existing relationship.

5.         Additional Covenants of the Company.

(a)Certain Covenants of the Company.  Until such time as the Notes or any accrued fees or interest remain unpaid or outstanding, the Company shall comply and operate in accordance with all of the following covenants and agreements:

Conduct of Business and Maintenance.  The Company will continue to engage in business of the same general type as now conducted by it and to preserve, renew and keep in full force and effect, its corporate existence and its assets, rights, privileges and franchises to the extent necessary or desirable in the normal conduct of business or to preserve the Collateral.  The Company shall conduct its business in a manner so that it will not become subject to the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended.

5

Compliance with Laws.  The Company will comply in all material respects with all applicable laws, ordinances, rules, regulations, decisions, orders and requirements of governmental authorities.

Notice of Legal Matters.  The Company shall notify Lenders promptly after the Company shall obtain knowledge of any written notice of any legal or arbitral proceedings, and of all proceedings by or before any governmental authority, and each material development in respect of such legal or other proceeding affecting the Company, except proceedings which, if adversely determined, would not reasonably be likely to have a Material Adverse Effect.

               Notice of Other Material Events.  Until such time as the Notes or any accrued fees or interest remain unpaid or outstanding, the Company shall provide notice of the following:

The Company shall furnish to Lender prompt (but in no event more than five (5) business days after the relevant occurrence) written notice of the occurrence of any Event of Default or any other event or circumstance that results in, or could reasonably be expected to result in, a Material Adverse Effect.

The Company shall furnish to Lender written notice of the following not less than thirty (30) days prior to the occurrence thereof:  (A) any change of the Company’s corporate name or of any trade name used to identify it in the conduct of its business or in the ownership of its properties, (B) any change of the state in which the Company is organized or conducts business, (C) any change of the Company’s principal place of business, or (D) any change of the Company’s identity or corporate structure.

Each notice delivered under this Section shall be accompanied by a statement of the Company setting forth the details of the event or development requiring such notice and any action taken or proposed to be taken with respect thereto.

Further Assurances.  At any time or from time to time after the execution hereof, the Company will promptly execute, deliver, verify, acknowledge, record and/or file any and all further documents and instruments (including financing statements and continuation statements), and promptly take any and all such other and further actions, as Lender may request in order to evidence or more fully effectuate the transactions and security arrangements contemplated hereby and to otherwise carry out the terms hereof.

(b)           Existing Secured Lenders; Effectiveness of the Security Documents.  The Company acknowledges that the Lenders’ have a security interest in the Company. The Company and the Lenders hereby agree that the Security Documents (as defined below) shall be deemed executed, delivered and in effect, without any further action by any party, effective as of the date (the “Release Date”) hereof. As used herein, the term “Security Documents” means the Security Agreement.

6.Conditions to Lenders’ Obligations at the Closing.  Each Lender’s obligations to effect the Closing, including without limitation its obligation to purchase its Note at the Closing, are conditioned upon the fulfillment (or waiver by such Lender in its sole and absolute discretion) of each of the following events as of the Closing Date, and the Company shall use commercially reasonable efforts to cause each of such conditions to be satisfied:

(a)the representations and warranties of the Company set forth in this Agreement and in the other Transaction Documents shall be true and correct in all material respects as of such date as if made on such date (except that to the extent that any such representation or warranty relates to a particular date, such representation or warranty shall be true and correct in all material respects as of that particular date);

(b)the Company shall have complied with or performed in all material respects all of the agreements, obligations and conditions set forth in this Agreement and in the other Transaction Documents that are required to be complied with or performed by the Company on or before the Closing;

(c)the Company shall have executed and delivered to such Lender the Note being purchased by such Lender at the Closing;

(d)the Company shall have delivered to such Lender resolutions passed by its Board of Directors to authorize the transactions contemplated hereby and by the other Transaction Documents;

6

(e)there shall be no injunction, restraining order or decree of any nature of any court or Governmental Authority of competent jurisdiction that is in effect that restrains or prohibits the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby and by the other Transaction Documents

7.Conditions to Company’s Obligations at the Closing.  The Company’s obligations to affect the Closing with Lenders are conditioned upon the fulfillment (or waiver by the Company in its sole and absolute discretion) of each of the following events as of the Closing Date:

(a)           the representations and warranties of such Lender set forth in this Agreement and in the other Transaction Documents to which it is a party shall be true and correct in all material respects as of such date as if made on such date (except that to the extent that any such representation or warranty relates to a particular date, such representation or warranty shall be true and correct in all material respects as of that date);

(b)           such Lender shall have complied with or performed all of the agreements, obligations and conditions set forth in this Agreement that are required to be complied with or performed by such Lender on or before the Closing;

(c)           there shall be no injunction, restraining order or decree of any nature of any court or Governmental Authority of competent jurisdiction that is in effect that restrains or prohibits the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby and by the other Transaction Documents;

(d)           such Lender shall have executed each Transaction Document to which it is a party and shall have delivered the same to the Company; and

(e)           Lender shall have tendered the Purchase Price for the Note being purchased by it at the Closing by wire transfer of immediately available funds pursuant to the wiring instructions provided by the Company.

8.           General Provisions.

a.Governing Law; Jurisdiction.  THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE GOVERNED IN ALL RESPECTS BY THE INTERNAL LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK WITHOUT REFERENCE TO PRINCIPLES OF CONFLICTS OF LAWS.  THE COMPANY CONSENTS TO THE EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION OF THE FEDERAL OR STATE COURT LOCATED IN NEW YORK, NEW YORK, WITH RESPECT TO ANY CLAIM OR CONTROVERSY RELATED TO THE ENFORCEMENT OR INTERPRETATION OF THIS NOTE.

b.Notices.  Any notice or other communication required or permitted to be given hereunder shall be in writing by mail, facsimile or personal delivery and shall be effective upon actual receipt of such notice.  The addresses for such communications shall be as set forth below until notice is received that any such address or contact information has been changed:

To the Company:	Pershing Gold Corporation
	1658 Cole Boulevard, Building 6, Ste 210 Lakewood, CO 80401
With a copy to:	Sichenzia Ross Friedman Ference LLP
	61 Broadway, 32nd Floor New York, NY10006 Attn: Harvey Kesner, Esq. T: 212.930.9700 F: 212.930.9725
To Lender:	To the address on the signature page attached
	hereto.

7

c.Entire Agreement.  Except as otherwise provided herein, this Agreement, the Note and the other documents delivered pursuant hereto constitute the full and entire understanding and agreement between the parties with regard to the subjects hereof and thereof.

d.Amendment.  This Agreement may only be amended, waived, discharged or terminated by a written instrument signed by the party against whom enforcement of any such amendment, waiver, discharge or termination is sought.

e.Successors and Assigns.  This Agreement and the Note may be transferred or assigned by Lender in whole or in part, in Lender’s sole and absolute discretion.  Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement, the provisions of this Agreement shall inure to the benefit of, and be binding upon, the successors, assigns, heirs, executors and administrators of the parties hereto.

f.Severability.  In case any provision of this Agreement shall be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, the validity, legality and enforceability of the remaining provisions shall not in any way be affected or impaired thereby.

g.Titles and Subtitles.  The titles of the Sections of this Agreement are for convenience of reference only and are not to be considered in construing this Agreement.

h.Expenses.  The Company and Lender shall each bear their own expenses incurred with respect to this transaction.

i.Counterparts.  This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be an original, but all of which together shall be deemed to constitute one instrument.

j.Counsel.  All parties hereto have been represented by counsel, and no inference shall be drawn in favor of or against any party by virtue of the fact that such party’s counsel was or was not the principal draftsman of this Agreement. Each of the parties has been provided the opportunity to be represented by counsel of its choice and has been encouraged to seek separate representation to the extent that it deems such desirable, but the absence of such shall not be asserted as a basis for the enforceability or interpretation of any of the terms or provisions of this Agreement, or as a reason to seek disqualification of the Company’s counsel in any controversy or proceeding.

[SIGNATURE PAGE TO FOLLOW]

8

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Agreement as of the date first-above written.

PERSHING GOLD CORPORATION
By:
	Stephen Alfers
	President and Chief Executive Officer

9

[SIGNATURE PAGE FOR NOTE PURCHASE AGREEMENT]

By:           _______________________________                                                                                     Dated: March __, 2012

Principal Amount of Note Purchased at Closing:                                                                                                $500,000

ADDRESS:

10

EX-10.2

Exhibit 10.2

NEITHER THIS SECURITY NOR THE SECURITIES FOR WHICH THIS SECURITY IS EXCHANGEABLE HAVE BEEN REGISTERED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR THE SECURITIES COMMISSION OF ANY STATE IN RELIANCE UPON AN EXEMPTION FROM REGISTRATION UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED (THE “SECURITIES ACT”), AND, ACCORDINGLY, MAY NOT BE OFFERED OR SOLD EXCEPT PURSUANT TO AN EFFECTIVE REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OR PURSUANT TO AN AVAILABLE EXEMPTION FROM, OR IN A TRANSACTION NOT SUBJECT TO, THE REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS OF THE SECURITIES ACT AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE STATE SECURITIES LAWS AS EVIDENCED BY A LEGAL OPINION OF COUNSEL TO THE TRANSFEROR TO SUCH EFFECT, THE SUBSTANCE OF WHICH SHALL BE REASONABLY ACCEPTABLE TO THE COMPANY. THIS SECURITY AND THE SECURITIES ISSUABLE UPON CONVERSION OF THIS SECURITY MAY BE PLEDGED IN CONNECTION WITH A BONA FIDE MARGIN ACCOUNT OR OTHER LOAN SECURED BY SUCH SECURITIES.

5% SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE

$500,000 April 10, 2012

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, Pershing Gold Corporation, a Nevada corporation (the “Maker”), with its primary offices located at 1658 Cole Boulevard, Building 6, Suite 210, Lakewood Co 80401, promises to pay to the order of Edward Karr (the “Payee”) or his or its registered assigns (with the Payee, the “Holder”), upon the terms set forth below, the principal sum of Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500,000) plus interest on the unpaid principal sum outstanding at the rate of 5% per annum (this “Note”).  Defined terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in that certain note purchase agreement of even date herewith among the Maker, the Holder (the “Purchase Agreement”).

1.Payments.

(a)Unless an Event of Default shall have previously occurred and be continuing, the full amount of principal and accrued interest under this Note shall be due and payable on a date (the “Maturity Date”) that shall be the earlier to occur of: (x) the sale of Noble Effort Gold LLC and Arttor Gold LLC, the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiaries (the “Gold Subsidiaries”) (or the sale of all or substantially all of the assets collectively contained in the Gold Subsidiaries) to a third party purchaser or (y) October 10, 2012.

(b)The Maker shall pay interest to the Holder on the aggregate and then outstanding principal amount of this Note at the rate of 5% per annum, payable in arrears on the earlier of (i) the Maturity Date or (ii) acceleration of this Note following an Event of Default pursuant to Section 3(b). Interest on this Note shall commence to accrue as of the date of acceptance by the Company of the Purchase Agreement as executed and delivered by the Payee and payment of the purchase price for this Note (the “Original Issue Date”).

(c)Interest shall be calculated on the basis of a 360-day year, consisting of twelve 30 calendar day periods, and shall accrue monthly commencing on the Original Issue Date until payment in full of the outstanding principal, together with all accrued and unpaid interest, and other amounts which may become due hereunder, has been made. Interest hereunder will be paid to the Person in whose name this Note is registered on the records of the Maker regarding registration and transfers of this Note.

(d)All overdue accrued and unpaid principal and interest to be paid hereunder shall entail a default rate of interest at the rate of 16% per annum (or such lower maximum amount of interest permitted to be charged under applicable law) which will accrue daily, from the date such principal and/or interest is due hereunder through and including the date of payment. Except as otherwise set forth in this Note, the Maker may prepay any portion of the principal amount of this Note upon written notice to the Holder.

2.Secured Obligation. The obligations of the Maker under this Note are secured by the assets of the Gold Subsidiaries, pursuant to a Security Agreement dated as of the date hereof, by and among the Maker, the Gold Subsidiaries and the Holder.

1

3.Events of Default.

(a)“Event of Default”, wherever used herein, means any one of the following events (whatever the reason and whether it shall be voluntary or involuntary or effected by operation of law or pursuant to any judgment, decree or order of any court, or any order, rule or regulation of any administrative or governmental body):

(i)any default in the payment of the principal of, or the interest on, this Note, as and when the same shall become due and payable;

(ii)Maker shall fail to observe or perform any obligation or shall breach any term or provision of this Note and such failure or breach shall not have been remedied within ten (10) Business Days after the date on which notice of such failure or breach shall have been delivered (other than those occurrences described in other provisions of this Section 3 for which a different grace or cure period is specified, or for which no cure period is specified and which constitute immediate Events of Default);

(iii)Maker shall fail to observe or perform any of its material obligations owed to the Holder or any other material covenant, agreement, representation or warranty contained in, or otherwise commit any material breach hereunder or in any other agreement executed in connection herewith, including the Purchase Agreement;

(iv)Maker shall commence, or there shall be commenced against the Maker a case under any applicable bankruptcy or insolvency laws as now or hereafter in effect or any successor thereto, or the Maker commences any other proceeding under any reorganization, arrangement, adjustment of debt, relief of debtors, dissolution, insolvency or liquidation or similar law of any jurisdiction whether now or hereafter in effect relating to the Maker, or there is commenced against the Maker any such bankruptcy, insolvency or other proceeding which remains undismissed for a period of sixty (60) days; or the Maker is adjudicated insolvent or bankrupt; or any order of relief or other order approving any such case or proceeding is entered; or the Maker suffers any appointment of any custodian or the like for it or any substantial part of its property which continues undischarged or unstayed for a period of 60 days; or the Maker makes a general assignment for the benefit of creditors; or the Maker shall fail to pay, or shall state that it is unable to pay, or shall be unable to pay, its debts generally as they become due; or the Maker shall call a meeting of its creditors with a view to arranging a composition, adjustment or restructuring of its debts; or the Maker shall by any act or failure to act expressly indicate its consent to, approval of or acquiescence in any of the foregoing; or any corporate or other action is taken by the Maker for the purpose of effecting any of the foregoing; or

(v)The occurrence of any event, whether or not such event could have been known through the exercise of due diligence or otherwise, which would reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on the business or prospects of the Maker.

(b)If any Event of Default occurs and shall be continuing, the full principal amount of this Note, together with all accrued interest thereon, shall become, at the Holder’s election, immediately due and payable in cash.

(c)The Holder need not provide and the Maker hereby waives any presentment, demand, protest or other notice of any kind. Such declaration may be rescinded and annulled by the Holder at any time prior to payment hereunder. No such rescission or annulment shall affect any subsequent Event of Default or impair any right consequent thereon.

4.Negative Covenants. So long as any portion of this Note is outstanding, the Maker will not directly or indirectly amend its articles of incorporation, bylaws or other charter documents so as to adversely affect any rights of the Holder;

5.No Waiver of the Holder’s Rights. All payments of principal and interest shall be made without setoff, deduction or counterclaim. No delay or failure on the part of the Holder in exercising any of its options, powers or rights, nor any partial or single exercise of its options, powers or rights shall constitute a waiver thereof or of any other option, power or right, and no waiver on the part of the Holder of any of its options, powers or rights shall constitute a waiver of any other option, power or right.  Maker hereby waives presentment of payment, protest, and all notices or demands in connection with the delivery, acceptance, performance, default or endorsement of this Note. Acceptance by the Holder of less than the full amount due and payable hereunder shall in no way limit the right of the Holder to require full payment of all sums due and payable hereunder in accordance with the terms hereof.

2

6.Modifications. No term or provision contained herein may be modified, amended or waived except by written agreement or consent signed by the party to be bound thereby.

7.Cumulative Rights and Remedies; Usury. The rights and remedies of the Holder expressed herein are cumulative and not exclusive of any rights and remedies otherwise available under this Note, or applicable law (including at equity). The election of the Holder to avail itself of any one or more remedies shall not be a bar to any other available remedies, which the Maker agrees the Holder may take from time to time. If it shall be found that any interest paid or payable hereunder violates applicable laws governing usury, the applicable rate of interest due hereunder shall be reduced to the maximum permitted rate of interest under such law, and any interest previously paid in excess of such legal limit shall be returned to the Company by the Holder.

8.Use of Proceeds. Maker shall use the proceeds from this Note hereunder for general working capital purposes.

9.Severability. If any provision of this Note is declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be in any way invalid, illegal or unenforceable, the balance of this Note shall remain in effect, and if any provision is inapplicable to any person or circumstance, it shall nevertheless remain applicable to all other persons and circumstances.

10.Successors and Assigns. This Note shall be binding upon the Maker and its successors and shall inure to the benefit of the Holder and its successors and assigns. The term “Holder” as used herein, shall also include any endorsee, assignee or other holder of this Note.

11.Lost or Stolen Promissory Note. If this Note is lost, stolen, mutilated or otherwise destroyed, the Maker shall execute and deliver to the Holder a new promissory note containing the same terms, and in the same form, as this Note. In such event, the Maker may require the Holder to deliver to the Maker an affidavit of lost instrument and customary indemnity in respect thereof as a condition to the delivery of any such new promissory note.

12.Governing Law. All questions concerning the construction, validity, enforcement and interpretation of this Note shall be governed by and construed and enforced in accordance with the internal laws of the State of New York, without regard to the principles of conflicts of law thereof. Each of the Maker and the Holder agree that all legal proceedings concerning the interpretations, enforcement and defense of this Note shall be commenced in the state and federal courts sitting in the City of New York, County of New York (the “New York Courts”). Each of the Maker and the Holder hereby irrevocably submits to the exclusive jurisdiction of the New York Courts for the adjudication of any dispute hereunder (including with respect to the enforcement of this Note), and hereby irrevocably waives, and agrees not to assert in any suit, action or proceeding, any claim that it is not personally subject to the jurisdiction of any such court, or that such suit, action or proceeding is brought in an inconvenient forum. Each of the Maker and the Holder hereby irrevocably waives personal service of process and consents to process being served in any such suit, action or proceeding by mailing a copy thereof via registered or certified mail or overnight delivery (with evidence of delivery) to the other at the address in effect for notices to it under the Purchase Agreement and agrees that such service shall constitute good and sufficient service of process and notice thereof. Nothing contained herein shall be deemed to limit in any way any right to serve process in any manner permitted by law. Each of the Maker and the Holder hereby irrevocably waives, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, any and all right to trial by jury in any legal proceeding arising out of or relating to this Note or the transactions contemplated hereby.

13.Notice. Any notice or other communication required or permitted to be given hereunder shall be in writing. The addresses for such communications shall be: (i) if to the Company to: Pershing Gold Corporation 1658 Cole Boulevard, Building 6, Suite 210, Lakewood Co 80401, with a copy to: Sichenzia Ross Friedman Ference LLP, 61 Broadway, New York, NY 10006, Attn: Harvey Kesner, Esq., facsimile: (212) 930-9725; and (ii) if to the Holder, to:.

14.Required Notice to the Holder. The Holder is to be notified by the Maker, within five (5), Business Days, in accordance with Section 13, of the existence or occurrence of any Event of Default.

[Signature page follows]

3

The undersigned has executed this Note as a maker and not as a surety or guarantor or in any other capacity.

PERSHING GOLD CORPORATION
By:
	Stephen Alfers
	President and Chief Executive Officer

 4

EX-10.3

Exhibit 10.3

SECURITY AGREEMENT

1.           Identification.

This Security Agreement (the “Agreement”), dated as of April 10, 2012, is entered into by and between Arttor Gold LLC (“Arttor”) and Noble Effort Gold LLC (“Noble Effort, and collectively with Arttor, “Debtor”), and the Lenders signatory hereto (the “Lenders”).

2.           Recitals.

2.1           At or about the date hereof, the Lender is making loans (the “Loan”) to Pershing Gold Corporation (“Pershing”), the parent of each of Arttor and Noble Effort. It is beneficial to Debtor that the Loan is made.

               2.2           The Loan will be evidenced by secured promissory note (“Note”) issued by Pershing on or about the date of this Agreement pursuant to a note purchase agreement dated as of the date hereof (the “Purchase Agreement”).  The Note is in the principal amount of to $500,000 and was or will be executed by Pershing as “Maker” or “Debtor” for the benefit of the Lender as the “Holder” or “Payee” thereof.

2.3           In consideration of the Loan made and to be made by Lenders to Pershing and for other good and valuable consideration, and as security for the performance by Pershing of its obligations under the Notes, and as security for the repayment of the Loan and all other sums due from Pershing to Lenders arising under the Transaction Documents (as defined in the Purchase Agreement) and any other agreement between or among them (collectively, the “Obligations”), Debtor, for good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is acknowledged, has agreed to grant to the Lenders a security interest in the Collateral (as such term is hereinafter defined), on the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth.  Obligations include all future advances and loans by Lender to Pershing that may be made pursuant to the Purchase Agreement or any other agreements.

2.4           The following defined terms which are defined in the Uniform Commercial Code in effect in the State of New York on the date hereof are used herein as so defined:  Accounts, Chattel Paper, Documents, General Intangibles, Instruments, Inventory and Proceeds.  Other capitalized terms employed herein shall have the meanings attributed to them in the Purchase Agreement.

3.           Grant of General Security Interest in Collateral.

3.1As security for the Obligations of Pershing, Debtor hereby grants the Lenders, a security interest in the Collateral.

3.2“Collateral” shall mean all of the following property of Debtor:

(A)           All now owned and hereafter acquired right, title and interest of Debtor in, to and in respect of all Accounts, Goods, real or personal property, all present and future books and records relating to the foregoing and all products and Proceeds of the foregoing, and as set forth below:

(i)           All now owned and hereafter acquired right, title and interest of Debtor in, to and in respect of all: Accounts, interests in goods represented by Accounts, returned, reclaimed or repossessed goods with respect thereto and rights as an unpaid vendor; contract rights; Chattel Paper; investment property; General Intangibles (including but not limited to, tax and duty claims and refunds, registered and unregistered patents, trademarks, service marks, certificates, copyrights trade names, applications for the foregoing, trade secrets, goodwill, processes, drawings, blueprints, customer lists, licenses, whether as licensor or licensee; Documents; Instruments; letters of credit, bankers’ acceptances or guaranties; cash moneys, deposits; securities, bank accounts, deposit accounts, credits and other property now or hereafter owned or held in any capacity by Debtor, as well as agreements or property securing or relating to any of the items referred to above;

1

                                     (ii)           Goods:  All now owned and hereafter acquired right, title and interest of Debtor in, to and in respect of goods, including, but not limited to:

(a)           All Inventory, wherever located, whether now owned or hereafter acquired, of whatever kind, nature or description, including all raw materials, work-in-process, finished goods, and materials to be used or consumed in Debtor’s business and all names or marks affixed to or to be affixed thereto for purposes of selling same by the seller, manufacturer, lessor or licensor thereof and all Inventory which may be returned to Debtor by its customers or repossessed by Debtor and all of Debtor’s right, title and interest in and to the foregoing (including all of Debtor’s rights as a seller of goods);

(iii)           Property:  All now owned and hereafter acquired right, title and interests of Debtor in, to and in respect of any other personal property in or upon which Debtor has or may hereafter have a security interest, lien or right of setoff;

                               (iv)           Books and Records:  All present and future books and records relating to any of the above including, without limitation, all computer programs, printed output and computer readable data in the possession or control of the Debtor, any computer service bureau or other third party; and

                               (v)           Products and Proceeds:  All products and Proceeds of the foregoing in whatever form and wherever located, including, without limitation, all insurance proceeds and all claims against third parties for loss or destruction of or damage to any of the foregoing.

3.3           The Lenders are hereby specifically authorized, after the Maturity Date (defined in the Notes) accelerated or otherwise, and after the occurrence of an Event of Default (as defined herein) and the expiration of any applicable cure period, to transfer any Collateral into the name of the Lenders and to take any and all action deemed advisable to the Lenders to remove any transfer restrictions affecting the Collateral.

4.           Perfection of Security Interest.

4.1           Debtor shall prepare, execute and deliver to the Lenders UCC-1 Financing Statements.  The Lenders are instructed to prepare and file at Debtor’s cost and expense, financing statements in such jurisdictions deemed advisable to Lenders, including but not limited to the State of Nevada.

4.2             All other certificates and instruments constituting Collateral from time to time required to be pledged to Lenders pursuant to the terms hereof (the “Additional Collateral”) shall be delivered to Lenders promptly upon receipt thereof by or on behalf of Debtor.  All such certificates and instruments shall be held by or on behalf of Lenders pursuant hereto and shall be delivered in suitable form for transfer by delivery, or shall be accompanied by duly executed instruments of transfer or assignment or undated stock powers executed in blank, all in form and substance satisfactory to Lenders.  If any Collateral consists of uncertificated securities, unless the immediately following sentence is applicable thereto, Debtor shall cause Lenders (or its custodian, nominee or other designee) to become the registered holder thereof, or cause each issuer of such securities to agree that it will comply with instructions originated by Lenders with respect to such securities without further consent by Debtor.  If any Collateral consists of security entitlements, Debtor shall transfer such security entitlements to Lenders (or its custodian, nominee or other designee) or cause the applicable securities intermediary to agree that it will comply with entitlement orders by Lenders without further consent by Debtor.

4.3           If Debtor shall receive, by virtue of Debtor being or having been an owner of any Collateral, any (i) stock certificate (including, without limitation, any certificate representing a stock dividend or distribution in connection with any increase or reduction of capital, reclassification, merger, consolidation, sale of assets, combination of shares, stock split, spin-off or split-off), promissory note or other instrument, (ii) option or right, whether as an addition to, substitution for, or in exchange for, any Collateral, or otherwise, (iii) dividends payable in cash (except such dividends permitted to be retained by Debtor pursuant to Section 5.2 hereof) or in securities or other property or (iv) dividends or other distributions in connection with a partial or total liquidation or dissolution or in connection with a reduction of capital, capital surplus or paid-in surplus, Debtor shall receive such stock certificate, promissory note, instrument, option, right, payment or distribution in trust for the benefit of Lenders, shall segregate it from Debtor’s other property and shall deliver it forthwith to Lenders, in the exact form received, with any necessary endorsement and/or appropriate stock powers duly executed in blank, to be held by Lenders as Collateral and as further collateral security for the Obligations.

2

5.           Distribution.

5.1           So long as an Event of Default does not exist, Debtor shall be entitled to exercise all voting power pertaining to any of the Collateral, provided such exercise is not contrary to the interests of the Lenders and does not impair the Collateral.

5.2.           At any time an Event of Default exists or has occurred and is continuing, all rights of Debtor, upon notice given by Lenders, to exercise the voting power and receive payments, which it would otherwise be entitled to pursuant to Section 5.1, shall cease and all such rights shall thereupon become vested in Lenders, which shall thereupon have the sole right to exercise such voting power and receive such payments.

5.3           All dividends, distributions, interest and other payments which are received by Debtor contrary to the provisions of Section 5.2 shall be received in trust for the benefit of Lenders as security and Collateral for payment of the Obligation, shall be segregated from other funds of Debtor, and shall be forthwith paid over to Lenders as Collateral in the exact form received with any necessary endorsement and/or appropriate stock powers duly executed in blank, to be held by Lenders as Collateral and as further collateral security for the Obligations.

6.           Further Action By Debtor; Covenants and Warranties.

6.1           Subject to the terms of this Agreement, Lenders at all times shall have a perfected security interest in the Collateral. Debtor represents that, other than the security interests described on Schedule 6.1, it has and will continue to have full title to the Collateral free from any liens, leases, encumbrances, judgments or other claims.  The Lenders’ security interest in the Collateral constitutes and will continue to constitute a first, prior and indefeasible security interest in favor of Lenders, subject only to the security interests described on Schedule 6.1.  Debtor will do all acts and things, and will execute and file all instruments (including, but not limited to, security agreements, financing statements, continuation statements, etc.) reasonably requested by Lenders to establish, maintain and continue the perfected security interest of Lenders in the perfected Collateral, and will promptly on demand, pay all costs and expenses of filing and recording, including the costs of any searches reasonably deemed necessary by Lenders from time to time to establish and determine the validity and the continuing priority of the security interest of Lenders, and also pay all other claims and charges that, in the opinion of Lenders are reasonably likely to materially prejudice, imperil or otherwise affect the Collateral or Lenders’ security interests therein.

6.2           Except (i) in connection with sales of Collateral, in the ordinary course of business, for fair value and in cash and (ii) for Collateral which is substituted by assets of identical or greater value (subject to the consent of the Lenders) or which is inconsequential in value, Debtor will not sell, transfer, assign or pledge those items of Collateral (or allow any such items to be sold, transferred, assigned or pledged), without the prior written consent of Lenders other than a transfer of the Collateral to a wholly-owned United States formed and located subsidiary on prior notice to Lenders, and provided the Collateral remains subject to the security interest herein described.  Although Proceeds of Collateral are covered by this Agreement, this shall not be construed to mean that Lenders consent to any sale of the Collateral, except as provided herein.  Sales of Collateral in the ordinary course of business and as described above shall be free of the security interest of Lenders and Lenders shall promptly execute such documents (including without limitation releases and termination statements) as may be required by Debtor to evidence or effectuate the same.

6.3           Debtor will, at all reasonable times during regular business hours and upon reasonable notice, allow Lenders or their representatives free and complete access to the Collateral and all of Debtor’s records that in any way relate to the Collateral, for such inspection and examination as Lenders reasonably deem necessary.

6.4           Debtor, at its sole cost and expense, will protect and defend this Security Agreement, all of the rights of Lenders hereunder, and the Collateral against the claims and demands of all other persons.

6.5           Debtor will promptly notify Lenders of any levy, distraint or other seizure by legal process or otherwise of any part of the Collateral, and of any threatened or filed claims or proceedings that are reasonably likely to affect or impair any of the rights of Lenders under this Security Agreement in any material respect.

3

6.6           Debtor, at its own expense, will obtain and maintain in force insurance policies covering losses or damage to those items of Collateral which constitute physical personal property, which insurance shall be of the types customarily insured against by companies in the same or similar business, similarly situated, in such amounts (with such deductible amounts) as is customary for such companies under the same or similar circumstances, similarly situated.  Debtor shall make the Lenders loss payee thereon to the extent of its interest in the Collateral. Lenders are hereby irrevocably (until the Obligations are indefeasibly paid in full) appointed Debtor’s attorney-in-fact to endorse any check or draft that may be payable to Debtor so that Lenders may collect the proceeds payable for any loss under such insurance.  The proceeds of such insurance, less any costs and expenses incurred or paid by Lenders in the collection thereof, shall be applied either toward the cost of the repair or replacement of the items damaged or destroyed, or on account of any sums secured hereby, whether or not then due or payable.

6.7           In order to protect the Collateral and Lenders’ interest therein, Lenders may, at Lenders’ option, and without any obligation to do so, pay, perform and discharge any and all amounts, costs, expenses and liabilities herein agreed to be paid or performed by Debtor upon Debtor’s failure to do so.  All amounts expended by Lenders in so doing shall become part of the Obligations secured hereby, and shall be immediately due and payable by Debtor to Lenders upon demand and shall bear interest at the lesser of 12% per annum or the highest legal amount allowed from the dates of such expenditures until paid.

6.8           Upon the request of Lenders, Debtor will furnish to Lenders within five (5) business days thereafter, or to any proposed assignee of this Security Agreement, a written statement in form reasonably satisfactory to Lenders, duly acknowledged, certifying the amount of the principal and interest and any other sum then owing under the Obligations, whether to its knowledge any claims, offsets or defenses exist against the Obligations or against this Security Agreement, or any of the terms and provisions of any other agreement of Debtor securing the Obligations.  In connection with any assignment by Lenders of this Security Agreement, Debtor hereby agrees to cause the insurance policies required hereby to be carried by Debtor, if any, to be endorsed in form satisfactory to Lenders or to such assignee, with loss payable clauses in favor of such assignee, and to cause such endorsements to be delivered to Lenders within ten (10) calendar days after request therefor by Lenders.

6.9           Debtor will, at its own expense, make, execute, endorse, acknowledge, file and/or deliver to the Lenders from time to time such vouchers, invoices, schedules, confirmatory assignments, conveyances, financing statements, transfer endorsements, powers of attorney, certificates, reports and other reasonable assurances or instruments and take further steps relating to the Collateral and other property or rights covered by the security interest hereby granted, as the Lenders may reasonably require to perfect their security interest hereunder.

6.10           Debtor represents and warrants that they are the true and lawful exclusive owners of the Collateral, free and clear of any liens, encumbrances and claims other than those listed on Schedule 6.1.

6.11           Debtor hereby agrees not to divest itself of any right under the Collateral except as permitted herein absent prior written approval of the Lenders, except to a subsidiary organized and located in the United States on prior notice to Lenders provided the Collateral remains subject to the security interest herein described.

6.12           Debtor will notify Lenders within ten (10) days of the occurrence of any change of Debtor’s name, domicile, address or jurisdiction of incorporation.  The timely giving of this notice is a material obligation of Debtor.

7.           Power of Attorney.

At any time an Event of Default has occurred, and only after the applicable cure period as set forth in this Agreement and the other Transaction Documents, and is continuing, Debtor hereby irrevocably constitutes and appoints Lenders as the true and lawful attorney of Debtor, with full power of substitution, in the place and stead of Debtor and in the name of Debtor or otherwise, at any time or times, in the discretion of the Lenders, to take any action and to execute any instrument or document which the Lenders may deem necessary or advisable to accomplish the purposes of this Agreement.  This power of attorney is coupled with an interest and is irrevocable until the Obligations are satisfied.

8.           Performance By The Lenders.

If Debtor fails to perform any material covenant, agreement, duty or obligation of Debtor under this Agreement, Lenders may, after any applicable cure period, at any time or times in its discretion, take action to effect performance of such obligation.  All reasonable expenses of the Lenders incurred in connection with the foregoing authorization shall be payable by Debtor as provided in Paragraph 12.1 hereof.  No discretionary right, remedy or power granted to the Lenders under any part of this Agreement shall be deemed to impose any obligation whatsoever on the Lenders with respect thereto, such rights, remedies and powers being solely for the protection of the Lenders.

4

9.           Event of Default.

An event of default (“Event of Default”) shall be deemed to have occurred hereunder upon the occurrence of any event of default as defined and described in this Agreement, in the Notes, the Purchase Agreement, Transaction Documents (as defined in the Purchase Agreement), and any other agreement to which Debtor, Pershing and Lenders are parties.   Upon and after any Event of Default, after the applicable cure period, if any, any or all of the Obligations shall become immediately due and payable at the option of the Lenders, and the Lenders may dispose of Collateral as provided below.  A default by Debtor of any of its material obligations pursuant to this Agreement and any of the Transaction Documents shall be an Event of Default hereunder and an “Event of Default” as defined in the Notes and Purchase Agreement.

10.           Disposition of Collateral.

Upon and after any Event of Default which is then continuing,

10.1           The Lenders may exercise their rights with respect to each and every component of the Collateral, without regard to the existence of any other security or source of payment for, in order to satisfy the Obligations.  In addition to other rights and remedies provided for herein or otherwise available to it, the Lenders shall have all of the rights and remedies of a lender on default under the Uniform Commercial Code then in effect in the State of New York.

10.2           If any notice to Debtor of the sale or other disposition of Collateral is required by then applicable law, five (5) business days prior written notice (which Debtor agrees is reasonable notice within the meaning of Section 9.612(a) of the Uniform Commercial Code) shall be given to Debtor of the time and place of any sale of Collateral which Debtor hereby agrees may be by private sale.  The rights granted in this Section are in addition to any and all rights available to Lenders under the Uniform Commercial Code.

10.3           The Lenders are authorized, at any such sale, if the Lenders deem it advisable to do so, in order to comply with any applicable securities laws, to restrict the prospective bidders or purchasers to persons who will represent and agree, among other things, that they are purchasing the Collateral for their own account for investment, and not with a view to the distribution or resale thereof, or otherwise to restrict such sale in such other manner as the Lenders deem advisable to ensure such compliance.  Sales made subject to such restrictions shall be deemed to have been made in a commercially reasonable manner.

10.4           All proceeds received by the Lenders in respect of any sale, collection or other enforcement or disposition of Collateral, shall be applied (after deduction of any amounts payable to the Lenders pursuant to Paragraph 12.1 hereof) against the Obligations.   Upon payment in full of all Obligations, Debtor shall be entitled to the return of all Collateral, including cash, which has not been used or applied toward the payment of Obligations or used or applied to any and all costs or expenses of the Lenders incurred in connection with the liquidation of the Collateral (unless another person is legally entitled thereto).  Any assignment of Collateral by the Lenders to Debtor shall be without representation or warranty of any nature whatsoever and wholly without recourse.  To the extent allowed by law, Lenders may purchase the Collateral and pay for such purchase by offsetting the purchase price with sums owed to Lenders by Debtor arising under the Obligations or any other source.

10.5           Rights of Lenders to Appoint Receiver.   Without limiting, and in addition to, any other rights, options and remedies Lenders have under the Transaction Documents, the UCC, at law or in equity, or otherwise, upon the occurrence and continuation of an Event of Default, Lenders shall have the right to apply for and have a receiver appointed by a court of competent jurisdiction.  Debtor expressly agrees that such a receiver will be able to manage, protect and preserve the Collateral and continue the operation of the business of Debtor to the extent necessary to collect all revenues and profits thereof and to apply the same to the payment of all expenses and other charges of such receivership, including the compensation of the receiver, until a sale or other disposition of such Collateral shall be finally made and consummated.  Debtor waives any right to require a bond to be posted by or on behalf of any such receiver.

5

11.           Waiver of Automatic Stay.   Debtor acknowledges and agrees that should a proceeding under any bankruptcy or insolvency law be commenced by or against Debtor, or if any of the Collateral should become the subject of any bankruptcy or insolvency proceeding, then the Lenders should be entitled to, among other relief to which the Lenders may be entitled under the Notes, Purchase Agreement, Transaction Documents, and any other agreement to which the Debtor and/or Pershing and Lenders are parties (collectively “Loan Documents”) and/or applicable law, an order from the court granting immediate relief from the automatic stay pursuant to 11 U.S.C. Section 362 to permit the Lenders to exercise all of their rights and remedies pursuant to the Loan Documents and/or applicable law.  DEBTOR EXPRESSLY WAIVES THE BENEFIT OF THE AUTOMATIC STAY IMPOSED BY 11 U.S.C. SECTION 362.  FURTHERMORE, DEBTOR EXPRESSLY ACKNOWLEDGES AND AGREES THAT NEITHER 11 U.S.C. SECTION 362 NOR ANY OTHER SECTION OF THE BANKRUPTCY CODE OR OTHER STATUTE OR RULE (INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, 11 U.S.C. SECTION 105) SHALL STAY, INTERDICT, CONDITION, REDUCE OR INHIBIT IN ANY WAY THE ABILITY OF THE LENDERS TO ENFORCE ANY OF ITS RIGHTS AND REMEDIES UNDER THE LOAN DOCUMENTS AND/OR APPLICABLE LAW.  Debtor hereby consents to any motion for relief from stay which may be filed by the Lenders in any bankruptcy or insolvency proceeding initiated by or against Debtor, and further agrees not to file any opposition to any motion for relief from stay filed by the Lenders.  Debtor represents, acknowledges and agrees that this provision is a specific and material aspect of this Agreement, and that the Lenders would not agree to the terms of this Agreement if this waiver were not a part of this Agreement.  Debtor further represents, acknowledges and agrees that this waiver is knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily made, that neither the Lenders nor any person acting on behalf of the Lenders has made any representations to induce this waiver, that Debtor has been represented (or has had the opportunity to be represented) in the signing of this Agreement and in the making of this waiver by independent legal counsel selected by Debtor and that Debtor has had the opportunity to discuss this waiver with counsel.   Debtor further agrees that any bankruptcy or insolvency proceeding initiated by Debtor will only be brought in the Federal Court within the Southern District of New York.

12.           Miscellaneous.

12.1           Expenses.  Debtor shall pay to the Lenders, on demand, the amount of any and all reasonable expenses, including, without limitation, attorneys’ fees, legal expenses and brokers’ fees, which the Lenders may incur in connection with (a) sale, collection or other enforcement or disposition of Collateral; (b) exercise or enforcement of any the rights, remedies or powers of the Lenders hereunder or with respect to any or all of the Obligations upon breach or threatened breach; or (c) failure by Debtor to perform and observe any agreements of Debtor contained herein which are performed by Lenders.

12.2           Waivers, Amendment and Remedies.  No course of dealing by the Lenders and no failure by the Lenders to exercise, or delay by the Lenders in exercising, any right, remedy or power hereunder shall operate as a waiver thereof, and no single or partial exercise thereof shall preclude any other or further exercise thereof or the exercise of any other right, remedy or power of the Lenders.  No amendment, modification or waiver of any provision of this Agreement and no consent to any departure by Debtor therefrom shall, in any event, be effective unless contained in a writing signed by the Lenders, and then such waiver or consent shall be effective only in the specific instance and for the specific purpose for which given. The rights, remedies and powers of the Lenders, not only hereunder, but also under any instruments and agreements evidencing or securing the Obligations and under applicable law are cumulative, and may be exercised by the Lenders from time to time in such order as the Lenders may elect.

12.3           Notices.  All notices or other communications given or made hereunder shall be in writing and shall be personally delivered or deemed delivered the first business day after being faxed (provided that a copy is delivered by first class mail) to the party to receive the same at its address set forth below or to such other address as either party shall hereafter give to the other by notice duly made under this Section:

To Debtor:	1640 Terrace Way
	Walnut Creek, CA 94597
To Lender:	To the address on the signature page attached
	hereto.
With a copy to:	Sichenzia Ross Friedman Ference LLP
	61 Broadway, 32nd Floor New York, NY10006 Attn: Harvey Kesner, Esq. T: 212.930.9700 F: 212.930.9725

Any party may change its address by written notice in accordance with this paragraph.

6

12.4           Term; Binding Effect.  This Agreement shall (a) remain in full force and effect until payment and satisfaction in full of all of the Obligations; (b) be binding upon Debtor, and its successors and permitted assigns; and (c) inure to the benefit of the Lenders and its successors and assigns.

12.5           Captions.  The captions of Paragraphs, Articles and Sections in this Agreement have been included for convenience of reference only, and shall not define or limit the provisions of this agreement and have no legal or other significance whatsoever.

12.6           Governing Law; Venue; Severability.  This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York without regard to conflicts of laws principles that would result in the application of the substantive laws of another jurisdiction, except to the extent that the perfection of the security interest granted hereby in respect of any item of Collateral may be governed by the law of another jurisdiction.  Any legal action or proceeding against Debtor with respect to this Agreement must be brought only in the courts in the State of New York or of the United States for the Southern District of New York, and, by execution and delivery of this Agreement, Debtor hereby irrevocably accepts for itself and in respect of its property, generally and unconditionally, the jurisdiction of the aforesaid courts. Debtor hereby irrevocably waives any objection which they may now or hereafter have to the laying of venue of any of the aforesaid actions or proceedings arising out of or in connection with this Agreement brought in the aforesaid courts and hereby further irrevocably waives and agrees not to plead or claim in any such court that any such action or proceeding brought in any such court has been brought in an inconvenient forum.  If any provision of this Agreement, or the application thereof to any person or circumstance, is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect any other provisions which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions hereof shall be severable and the remaining, valid provisions shall remain of full force and effect.

12.7           Entire Agreement.  This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the parties and supersedes all other agreements and understandings, oral or written, with respect to the matters contained herein.

12.8           Counterparts/Execution.  This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts and by the different signatories hereto on separate counterparts, each of which, when so executed, shall be deemed an original, but all such counterparts shall constitute but one and the same instrument.  This Agreement may be executed by facsimile signature and delivered by electronic transmission.

13.           Termination; Release.  When the Obligations have been indefeasibly paid and performed in full, this Agreement shall be terminated, and the Lenders, at the request and sole expense of the Debtor, will execute and deliver to the Debtor the proper instruments (including UCC termination statements) acknowledging the termination of the Security Agreement, and duly assign, transfer and deliver to the Debtor, without recourse, representation or warranty of any kind whatsoever, such of the Collateral,  as may be in the possession of the Lenders.

14.           Lenders Powers.

14.1           Lenders Powers.  The powers conferred on the Lenders hereunder are solely to protect Lenders’ interest in the Collateral and shall not impose any duty on it to exercise any such powers.

14.2           Reasonable Care.  The Lenders are required to exercise reasonable care in the custody and preservation of any Collateral in its possession; provided, however, that the Lenders shall be deemed to have exercised reasonable care in the custody and preservation of any of the Collateral if it takes such action for that purposes as any owner thereof reasonably requests in writing at times other than upon the occurrence and during the continuance of any Event of Default, but failure of the Lenders to comply with any such request at any time shall not in itself be deemed a failure to exercise reasonable care.

14.3           Majority in Interest.   The rights of the Lenders hereunder, except as otherwise set forth herein shall be exercised upon the approval of Lenders holding 70% of the outstanding Obligations (“Majority in Interest”) at the time such approval is sought or given.

[THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]

7

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed and delivered this Security Agreement, as of the date first written above.

“DEBTOR”

ARTTOR GOLD LLC

 By: 

 Name:  

 Title:   

NOBLE EFFORT GOLD LLC

 By: 

 Name: 

 Title:  

This Security Agreement may be signed by facsimile signature and

delivered by confirmed facsimile transmission.

8

LENDERS

Address of Lender:
	By:                                                          Title:

9

EX-31.1

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Stephen Alfers, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Pershing Gold Corporation;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a)	designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly for the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
b)	designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c)	evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;

d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;

 5.    The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls which are reasonably likely to  adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.   

Dated:  May 15, 2012	By:	/s/ Stephen Alfers
		Stephen Alfers President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

EX-31.2

 Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Adam Wasserman, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Pershing Gold Corporation;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a)	designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly for the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
b)	designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c)	evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
d)	disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;

          5.    The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.     

Dated:  May 15, 2012	By:	/s/ Adam Wasserman
		Adam Wasserman Chief Financial Officer( Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

EX-32.1

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pershing Gold Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2012  as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Stephen Alfers, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  May 15, 2012	/s/ Stephen Alfers
	Stephen Alfers President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

EX-32.2

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pershing Gold Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Adam Wasserman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  May 15, 2012	By:	/s/ Adam Wasserman
		Adam Wasserman Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

XML

ACQUISITIONS AND DECONSOLIDATION

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2012

ACQUISITIONS [Abstract]

ACQUISITIONS

  

NOTE 4 - ACQUISITION AND DECONSOLIDATION

Continental Resources Group, Inc.

On July 22, 2011, the Company, Acquisition Sub, and Continental, entered into a Purchase Agreement and, through Acquisition Sub, closed on the purchase of substantially all of the assets of Continental (the "Asset Sale") in consideration for (i) shares of the Company's common stock (the "Shares") which was equal to eight Shares for every 10 shares of Continental's common stock outstanding; (ii) the assumption of the outstanding warrants to purchase shares of Continental's common stock equal to one warrant to purchase eight shares of the Company's common stock for every warrant to purchase ten shares Continental's common stock outstanding at an exercise price equal to such amount as is required pursuant to the terms of the outstanding warrants, and (iii)  the assumption of Continental's 2010 Equity Incentive Plan and all options granted and issued was equal to one option to purchase eight shares of the Company's common stock for every option to purchase 10 shares of Continental's common stock outstanding with a strike price equal to such amount as is required pursuant to the terms of the outstanding option.  Upon the closing of the Asset Sale, Acquisition Sub assumed the Assumed Liabilities (as defined in the Purchase Agreement) of Continental.  Under the terms of the Purchase Agreement, the Company purchased from Continental substantially all of its assets, including, but not limited to, 100% of the outstanding shares of common stock of the Continental's wholly-owned subsidiaries (Green Energy Fields, Inc., and ND Energy, Inc.) After giving effect to the foregoing, the Company issued 76,095,214 shares of its common stock, 41,566,999 stock warrants, and 2,248,000 stock options following the transaction. Consequently, the issuance of 76,095,214 shares of the Company's common stock to Continental accounted for approximately 67% of the total issued and outstanding stocks of the Company as of July 22, 2011 and the Company had become a majority owned subsidiary of Continental. As of March 31, 2012, Continental holds 42.23% of interest in the Company.  Effective February 2012, the Company is considered to be an equity method investee as a result of the decrease in Continental's ownership interest of less than 50% which is accounted for under equity method of accounting.

The issuance of 76,095,214 shares of common stock including the issuance of 41,566,999 stock warrants and 2,248,000 stock options were valued at $14,857,676 which primarily represents the fair value of the net asset acquired  from Continental of cash of $11,164,514, a note receivable of $2,000,000, prepaid expenses and other current assets of $1,904,997 and assumed liabilities of $293,659. The Company accounted the value under ASC 805-50-30-2 "Business Combinations" whereby if the consideration is not in the form of cash, the measurement is based on either the cost which shall be measured based on the fair value of the consideration given or the fair value of the assets (or net assets) acquired, whichever is more clearly evident and thus more reliably measurable. The Company deemed that the fair value of the net asset of Continental amounting to $14,857,676 is more clearly evident and more reliable measurement basis.

Prior to the asset purchase agreement, Barry Honig, our then Chairman and the Company's current director, held 2,685,000 shares of Continental directly and certain entities under Mr. Honig's control and family members held 3,075,838 shares of Continental. Additionally, one of the shareholders of the Company held 4,569,252 shares of Continental prior to such agreement. Though there were common ownership between the Company and Continental, through the Company's Board Member and a stockholder, both interest in the Company only accounted for a total of 15% upon the consummation of the asset purchase agreement.

Accordingly, pursuant to ASC 805 "Business Combinations", the Company applied push-down accounting and adjusted to fair value all of the assets and liabilities directly on the financial statements of the subsidiary, Acquisition Sub. The net purchase price paid by the Company was allocated to assets acquired and liabilities assumed on the records of the Company as follows:

Current assets (including cash of $11,164,514)	$	13,069,511
Note receivable		2,000,000
Prepaid expenses - long term portion		41,912
Property and equipment		39,912
Liabilities assumed (including a 12% note payable of $50,000)		(293,659	)
Net purchase price	$	14,857,676

On July 18, 2011, the Company borrowed $2,000,000 from Continental, and issued it an unsecured 6% promissory note. On July 22, 2011, in connection with the Purchase agreement, the Company acquired the note receivable which was payable to Continental and included the acquisition of the $2,000,000 note receivable as part of the purchase price allocation. Accordingly, the acquired note receivable was eliminated against the note payable on the Company's financial statements. 

Unaudited pro forma results of operations data as if the Company and the subsidiaries of Continental had occurred are as follows: 

	For the Three Months ended March 31, 2012			For the Three Months ended March 31, 2011
Pro forma revenues	$	-		$	-
Pro forma loss from operations		(9,721,119	)		(2,785,605	)
Pro forma net loss		(22,929,775	)		(3,619,837	)
Pro forma loss per share - basic and diluted	$	(0.15	)	$	(0.16	)

XML

DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2012

DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS [Abstract]

DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

 

 

NOTE 3 - DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

In September 2011, the Company decided to discontinue its sports and entertainment business and prior periods have been restated in the Company's consolidated financial statements and related footnotes to conform to this presentation.. On September 1, 2011, the Company disposed its Empire subsidiary pursuant to a Stock Purchase Agreement (the "SPA") by and between the Company, Empire and CII. Prior to the purchase, CII was the owner of a 33 1/3% minority interest with Empire in Capital Hoedown, Inc., an Ontario corporation, formed to undertake an event held during August 2011. Pursuant to the SPA, the Company agreed to sell Empire to CII its Empire subsidiary, including the 66.67% equity ownership interest in Capital Hoedown, for $500,000 payable on March 31, 2012 pursuant to a Senior Promissory Note issued by CII to the Company which bears interest at 8% per annum. As a result, on September 1, 2011, Empire and Capital Hoedown are no longer considered a subsidiary of the Company. As of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, this note receivable, net of allowance for bad debt of $500,000, amounted to $0.

The remaining assets and liabilities of discontinued operations are presented in the balance sheet under the caption "Assets and Liabilities of discontinued operation" and relates to the discontinued operations of the sports and entertainment business.  The carrying amounts of the major classes of these assets and liabilities are summarized as follows: 

	March 31, 2012		December 31, 2011
Assets:
Accounts receivable, net	$	-	$	44,300
Notes and loan receivable		-		16,750
Assets of discontinued operations		-		61,050
Liabilities:
Accounts payables and accrued expenses	$	-	$	21,622
Liabilities of discontinued operations	$	-	$	21,622

The following table sets forth for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 indicated selected financial data of the Company's discontinued operations of its sports and entertainment business.

	March 31, 2012			March 31, 2011
Revenues	$	-		$	291,200
Cost of sales		-			189,916
Gross profit (loss)		-			101,284
Operating and other non-operating expenses		(50,174	)		(924,982	)
Loss from discontinued operations	$	(50,174	)	$	(823,698	)

XML

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Unaudited) (USD $)	Mar. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents	$ 2,592,035	$ 3,670,567
Marketable securities - trading securities	119,702	100,000
Marketable securities - available for sale securities	4,650,000	0
Notes receivable, net	70,000	0
Other receivables	0	113,241
Prepaid expenses - current portion	392,892	463,737
Deferred financing cost	0	50,919
Assets of discontinued operations - current portion	0	61,050
Due from equity method investor (former Parent Company)	517,949	347,335
Total Current Assets	8,342,578	4,806,849
OTHER ASSETS:
Prepaid expenses - long-term portion	35,267	37,759
Property and equipment, net	7,887,493	8,031,103
Mineral rights	9,051,071	8,501,071
Reclamation bond deposit	4,557,629	4,557,629
Deposits	59,884	51,000
Total Other Assets - Net	21,591,344	21,178,562
Total Assets	29,933,922	25,985,411
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	869,598	821,111
Senior convertible promissory notes, net of debt discount	0	1,066,445
Convertible promissory note, net of debt discount	0	118,487
Note payable	500,000	0
Note payable - related party, net of debt discount	561,750	510,832
Deferred revenue	1,666,667	0
Derivative liability	0	6,295,400
Liabilities of discontinued operation	0	21,622
Total Liabilities	3,598,015	8,833,897
Commitments and Contingencies
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY :
Preferred stock	0	0
Common stock ($.0001 Par Value; 500,000,000 Shares Authorized; 180,184,556 and 142,773,113 shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively)	18,019	14,277
Additional paid-in capital	80,849,995	47,114,351
Accumulated deficit	(14,901,794)	(14,901,794)
Accumulated deficit since inception of exploration stage (September 1, 2011)	(39,629,480)	(15,074,534)
Total Pershing Gold Corporation Equity	26,337,677	17,152,678
Non-Controlling Interest in Subsidiary	(1,770)	(1,164)
Total Stockholders' Equity	26,335,907	17,151,514
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity	29,933,922	25,985,411
Convertible Series A Preferred Stock [Member]
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY :
Preferred stock	0	0
Convertible Series B Preferred Stock [Member]
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY :
Preferred stock	0	50
Convertible Series C Preferred Stock [Member]
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY :
Preferred stock	328	328
Convertible Series D Preferred Stock [Member]
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY :
Preferred stock	$ 609	$ 0

XML

ORGANIZATION AND DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2012

ORGANIZATION AND DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS [Abstract]

ORGANIZATION AND DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

 

 

NOTE 1 - ORGANIZATION AND DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

Organization

Pershing Gold Corporation  (the "Company"), formerly Sagebrush Gold Ltd., formerly The Empire Sports & Entertainment Holdings Co., formerly Excel Global, Inc. (the "Shell"), was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on August 2, 2007.In September 2010, the Company changed its name to The Empire Sports & Entertainment Holdings Co, which was subsequently changed to Sagebrush Gold Ltd. on May 16, 2011. On February 27, 2012, the Company changed its name to Pershing Gold Corporation.

On September 29, 2010, the Company entered into a Share Exchange Agreement (the "Exchange Agreement") with The Empire Sports & Entertainment, Co. ("Empire"), a privately held Nevada corporation incorporated on February 10, 2010, and the shareholders of Empire (the "Empire Shareholders"). Upon closing of the transaction contemplated under the Exchange Agreement (the "Exchange"), the Empire Shareholders transferred all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Empire to the Company in exchange for shares of common stock of the Company.  Such Exchange caused Empire to become a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company.

Prior to the Exchange, the Company was a shell company with no business operations.

The Exchange was accounted for as a reverse-merger and recapitalization. Empire was the acquirer for financial reporting purposes and the Company was the acquired company. Consequently, the assets and liabilities and the operations reflected in the historical financial statements prior to the Exchange were those of Empire and was recorded at the historical cost basis of Empire, and the consolidated financial statements after completion of the Exchange included the assets and liabilities of the Company and Empire, historical operations of Empire and operations of the Company from the closing date of the Exchange.

Empire was incorporated in Nevada on February 10, 2010 to succeed to the business of its predecessor company, Golden Empire, LLC ("Golden Empire"), which was formed and commenced operations on November 30, 2009. Empire was principally engaged in the production and promotion of music and sporting events. The Company had assumed all assets, liabilities and certain promotion rights agreements entered into by Golden Empire at carrying value of ($30,551) which approximated fair value on February 10, 2010. Golden Empire ceased operations on that date. As a result of the Exchange, Empire became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company and the Company succeeded to the business of Empire as its sole line of business.

A newly-formed wholly-owned subsidiary, EXCX Funding Corp., a Nevada corporation was formed in January 2011 for the purpose of entering into a Credit Facility Agreement in February 2011 (see Note 9).

On April 26, 2011, a shareholder agreement (the "Shareholder Agreement") was executed and entered into between Empire, Concert International Inc. ("CII") and Capital Hoedown Inc.  ("Capital Hoedown"). Pursuant to the Shareholder Agreement, Empire has the right to select two directors, and CII has the right to select one director of Capital Hoedown. Based on the Shareholder Agreement, Empire had owned 66.67% and CII had owned 33.33% of the corporate joint venture. Contemporaneously with the execution of the Shareholder Agreement, Empire issued a revolving demand loan to CII and Denis Benoit, up to a maximum amount of $500,000.  Additionally, Empire issued a revolving demand loan to the Company's former majority owned subsidiary, Capital Hoedown Inc., up to a maximum amount of $4,000,000 which bears 10% interest per annum and payable on the earlier of the termination date on January 15, 2012 or upon demand by Empire. On September 1, 2011, the Company exited the sports and entertainment business and disposed of its Empire subsidiary pursuant to a Stock Purchase Agreement (the "SPA") by and between the Company, Empire and CII.  Prior to the purchase, CII was the owner of a 33 1/3% minority interest with Empire in Capital Hoedown, Inc., an Ontario corporation, formed to undertake an event held during August 2011.   Pursuant to the SPA, the Company agreed to sell to CII its Empire subsidiary, including the 66.67% equity ownership interest in Capital Hoedown, for $500,000 payable on March 31, 2012 pursuant to a Senior Promissory Note issued by CII to the Company which bears interest at 8% per annum (see Note 3). As a result, on September 1, 2011, Empire and Capital Hoedown are no longer considered a subsidiary of the Company.

On May 24, 2011, the Company entered into four limited liability company membership interests purchase agreements (the "Agreements") with the owners of Arttor Gold LLC ("Arttor Gold").  Each of the owners of Arttor Gold, (the "Members") sold their interests in Arttor Gold in privately negotiated sales resulting in the Company acquiring 100% of Arttor Gold.  Pursuant to the Agreements, the Company issued 8,000,000 shares of preferred stock, designated Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.0001 per share (the "Series B Preferred Stock") and 13,000,000 shares of Common Stock in exchange for 100% membership interests in Arttor Gold.  Each share of Series B Preferred Stock is convertible into one share each of the Company's common stock. Assuming the conversion into Common Stock of the Series B Preferred Stock, the Company had an additional 21,000,000 shares of its Common Stock, on a fully-diluted basis, outstanding following the transaction. As a result of this transaction, on May 24, 2011, Arttor Gold became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. Arttor Gold (an exploration stage company), a Nevada limited liability company, was formed and organized on April 28, 2011. Arttor Gold operates as a U.S. based junior gold exploration and mining company.

A newly-formed wholly-owned subsidiary, Noble Effort Gold, LLC, a Nevada corporation was formed in June 2011. A newly-formed wholly-owned subsidiary, Continental Resources Acquisition Sub, Inc., a Florida corporation was formed in July 2011. A newly-formed wholly-owned subsidiary, Gold Acquisition Corp., a Nevada corporation was formed in August 2011.

On July 22, 2011, the Company, Continental Resources Acquisition Sub, Inc., the Company's wholly-owned subsidiary ("Acquisition Sub"), and Continental Resources Group, Inc. ("Continental"), entered into an asset purchase agreement (the "Purchase Agreement") and, through the Acquisition Sub, closed on the purchase of substantially all of the assets of Continental (the "Asset Sale") in consideration for (i) shares of the Company's common stock (the "Shares") which was equal to eight Shares for every 10 shares of Continental's common stock outstanding; (ii) the assumption of the outstanding warrants to purchase shares of Continental's common stock and (iii)  the assumption of Continental's 2010 Equity Incentive Plan and all options granted and issued thereunder (see Note 4). After giving effect to the foregoing, the Company issued 76,095,214 shares of its Common Stock, 41,566,999 warrants, and 2,248,000 stock options following the transaction.

Consequently, the issuance of 76,095,214 shares of the Company's common stock to Continental accounted for approximately 67% of the total issued and outstanding stocks of the Company as of July 22, 2011 and the Company had become a majority owned subsidiary of Continental. As of March 31, 2012, Continental holds 42.23% of interest in the outstanding common stock of the Company.  Effective February 2012, the Company is considered to be an equity method investee as a result of the decrease in Continental's ownership interest of less than 50% which is accounted for under equity method of accounting.

On August 30, 2011, the Company, through its newly-formed wholly owned subsidiary, Gold Acquisition Corp. ("Gold Acquisition") acquired the Relief Canyon Mine ("Relief Canyon") located in Pershing County, near Lovelock, Nevada, for an aggregate purchase price consisting of: (i) $12,000,000 cash and (ii) $8,000,000 of senior secured convertible promissory notes issued to Platinum Long Term Growth LLC ("Platinum") and Lakewood Group LLC ("Lakewood"). Gold Acquisition, a Nevada corporation was formed in August 2011.

XML

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2012

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES [Abstract]

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

  

NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of presentation

The condensed consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America ("US GAAP") and present the condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries as of March 31, 2012. In the preparation of condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company, intercompany transactions and balances are eliminated and net earnings are reduced by the portion of the net earnings of subsidiaries applicable to non-controlling interests. All adjustments (consisting of normal recurring items) necessary to present fairly the Company's financial position as of March 31, 2012, and the results of operations and cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2012 have been included. The results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. The accounting policies and procedures employed in the preparation of these condensed consolidated financial statements have been derived from the audited financial statements of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2011, which are contained in Form 10-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 16, 2012. The consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2011 was derived from those financial statements.

As reflected in the accompanying consolidated financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2012, the Company had a net loss of $ 22,929,169 and $2,981,643 of net cash used in operations. At March 31, 2012, the Company had a working capital of $4,744,563. Additionally, at March 31, 2011, the Company had an accumulated deficit of approximately $54.5 million. However, of the $22,929,169 net loss for the three months ended March 31, 2012, $19,716,336 consisted of non cash expenses such as stock based compensation to certain employees and consultants, change in fair value of derivative liability, amortization of debt discount, non- cash interest and loss from extinguishment of debts. As of March 31, 2012, the Company has cash and cash equivalents for a total of approximately $2.6 million. In April 2012, the Company sold 4,385,716 shares of common stock to certain investors for an aggregate purchase price of $1,535,000. The Company anticipates selling the remaining shares (option consideration) received in January 2012 pursuant to an Option Agreement for the remainder of 2012 to increase the Company's working capital (see Note 5). Based on the Company's historical use of cash and other mitigating factors, management believes that the Company has met its expected needs required to support its operations for the next 12 months.

Exploration stage company

On September 1, 2011, the Company exited the sports and entertainment business and disposed of its Empire subsidiary pursuant to a Stock Purchase Agreement. The Company will no longer be engaged in or pursue agreements with artists or athletes for sports and entertainment promotion and events, and will focus its activities exclusively on its new business segment, gold exploration as a junior exploration company. As a result of the Company's focus on gold exploration, the Company is considered an exploration stage company effective September 1, 2011. Accordingly, the Company is an exploration stage company as defined in ASC 915 "Development Stage Entities".

Use of estimates

In preparing the condensed consolidated financial statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the consolidated balance sheet, and revenues and expenses for the period then ended.  Actual results may differ significantly from those estimates. Significant estimates made by management include, but are not limited to, allowance for bad debts, the useful life of property and equipment, the fair values of certain promotional contracts and the assumptions used to calculate fair value of options granted and derivative liability, beneficial conversion on convertible notes payable, capitalized mineral rights, asset valuations, common stock issued for services, common stock issued for conversion of notes and common stock issued in connection with an acquisition.

Non-controlling interests in consolidated financial statements

In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 810-10-65, "Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an amendment of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51," ("SFAS No. 160").  This statement clarifies that a non-controlling (minority) interest in a subsidiary is an ownership interest in the entity that should be reported as equity in the consolidated financial statements. It also requires consolidated net income to include the amounts attributable to both the parent and non-controlling interest, with disclosure on the face of the consolidated income statement of the amounts attributed to the parent and to the non-controlling interest. In accordance with ASC 810-10-45-21, those losses attributable to the parent and the non-controlling interest in subsidiary may exceed their interests in the subsidiary's equity. The excess and any further losses attributable to the parent and the non-controlling interest shall be attributed to those interests even if that attribution results in a deficit non-controlling interest balance. As of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company recorded a deficit non-controlling interest balance of $ 1,770 and $1,164, respectively, in connection with a majority-owned subsidiary of ND Energy, Inc. and Green Energy, Inc. (Secure Energy LLC), as reflected in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when acquired to be cash equivalents. The Company places its cash with a high credit quality financial institution. The Company's account at this institution is insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC") up to $250,000. In addition to the basic insurance deposit coverage, the FDIC is providing temporary unlimited coverage for non-interest bearing transaction accounts through December 31, 2012. At March 31, 2012, the Company has not reached bank balances exceeding the FDIC insurance limit on interest bearing accounts. To reduce its risk associated with the failure of such financial institution, the Company evaluates at least annually the rating of the financial institution in which it holds deposits.

Marketable securities

Marketable securities that the Company invests in publicly traded equity securities and are generally restricted for sale under Federal securities laws. The Company's policy is to liquidate securities received when market conditions are favorable for sale. Since these securities are often restricted, the Company is unable to liquidate them until the restriction is removed. Marketable securities that are bought and held principally for the purpose of selling them in the near term are to be classified as trading securities and reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses included in earnings. Pursuant to ASC Topic 320, "Investments -Debt and Equity Securities" the Company's marketable securities have a readily determinable and active quoted price, such as from NASDAQ, NYSE Euronext, the Over the Counter Bulletin Board, and the OTC Markets Group (formerly known as the Pink Sheets).

Trading securities are carried at fair value, with changes in unrealized holding gains and losses included in income and classified within interest and other income, net, in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

Available for sale securities are carried at fair value, with changes in unrealized gains or losses are recognized as an element of comprehensive income based on changes in the fair value of the security.  Once liquidated, realized gains or losses on the sale of marketable securities available for sale are reflected in the net income (loss) for the period in which the security was liquidated.

 

Comprehensive income

Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2011-05 amends FASB Codification Topic 220 on comprehensive income (1) to eliminate the current option to present the components of other comprehensive income in the statement of changes in equity, and (2) to require presentation of net income and other comprehensive income (and their respective components) either in a single continuous statement or in two separate but consecutive statements. These amendments do not alter any current recognition or measurement requirements in respect of items of other comprehensive income. The amendments in this Update are to be applied prospectively.

Fair value of financial instruments

The Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") ASC 820, "Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures" ("ASC 820"), for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis. ASC 820 establishes a common definition for fair value to be applied to existing generally accepted accounting principles that require the use of fair value measurements, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure about such fair value measurements. The adoption of ASC 820 did not have an impact on the Company's financial position or operating results, but did expand certain disclosures.

ASC 820 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Additionally, ASC 820 requires the use of valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. These inputs are prioritized below:

Level 1:	Observable inputs such as quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
Level 2:	Observable market-based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data
Level 3:	Unobservable inputs for which there is little or no market data, which require the use of the reporting entity's own assumptions.

The Company analyzes all financial instruments with features of both liabilities and equity under the FASB's accounting standard for such instruments. Under this standard, financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Depending on the product and the terms of the transaction, the fair value of notes payable and derivative liabilities were modeled using a series of techniques, including closed-form analytic formula, such as the Black-Scholes option-pricing model.

The following table presents a reconciliation of the derivative liability measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable input (Level 3) from January 1, 2012 to March 31, 2012:

	Conversion feature derivative liability
Balance at January 1, 2012	$	6,295,400
Reclassification of derivative liability to equity		(7,750,289)
Change in fair value included in earnings		1,454,889
Balance at March 31, 2012	$	-

Investment measured at fair value on a recurring basis:

	Fair Value Measurements Using:
	Quoted Prices in Active Markets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Marketable securities -trading	$	119,702	$	-	$	-
Marketable securities - available for sale, net of discount for effect of restriction	$	-	$	-	$	4,650,000

The Company classifies the trading securities as Level 1 assets as their fair values are readily determinable and based on quoted market prices. Unrealized gains or losses on marketable securities -trading are included in earnings.  

The Company classifies the investments in marketable securities available for sale as Level 3, adjusted for the effect of restriction. The securities are restricted and cannot be readily resold by the Company absent a registration of those securities under the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Securities Act") or the availabilities of an exemption from the registration requirements under the Securities Act. As these securities are often restricted, the Company is unable to liquidate them until the restriction is removed. Unrealized gains or losses on marketable securities available for sale are recognized as an element of comprehensive income based on changes in the fair value of the security. Once liquidated, realized gains or losses on the sale of marketable securities available for sale are reflected in our net income for the period in which the security was liquidated.

The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet for cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, other receivables, prepaid expenses, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate their estimated fair market value based on the short-term maturity of these instruments. The carrying amount of the note payable at March 31, 2012, approximate their respective fair value based on the Company's incremental borrowing rate. The Company did not identify any other assets or liabilities that are required to be presented on the consolidated balance sheets at fair value in accordance with the accounting guidance.

Prepaid expenses

Prepaid expenses - current portion of $392,892 and $463,737 at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively, consist primarily of costs paid for future services which will occur within a year. Prepaid expenses include prepayments (in cash and common stock) of public relation services, consulting and business advisory services, and prepaid insurance and mineral lease which are being amortized over the terms of their respective agreements. Prepaid expenses - long term portion of $35,267 and $37,759 at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively, consist primarily of costs paid for future mineral lease payments after one year.

Mineral property acquisition and exploration costs

Costs of lease, exploration, carrying and retaining unproven mineral lease properties are expensed as incurred. The Company has chosen to expense all mineral exploration costs as incurred given that it is still in the exploration stage. Once the Company has identified proven and probable reserves in its investigation of its properties and upon development of a plan for operating a mine, it would enter the development stage and capitalize future costs until production is established. When a property reaches the production stage, the related capitalized costs will be amortized, using the units-of-production method over the estimated life of the probable-proven reserves. When the Company has capitalized mineral properties, these properties will be periodically assessed for impairment of value and any diminution in value. To date, the Company has not established the commercial feasibility of any exploration prospects; therefore, all costs are being expensed. During the three months ended March 31, 2012, the Company incurred exploration cost of $1,289,899.

ASC 930-805, states that mineral rights consist of the legal right to explore, extract, and retain at least a portion of the benefits from mineral deposits. Mining assets include mineral rights. Acquired mineral rights are considered tangible assets under ASC 805. ASC 805 requires that mineral rights be recognized at fair value as of the acquisition date. As a result, the direct costs to acquire mineral rights are initially capitalized as tangible assets. Mineral rights include costs associated with acquiring patented and unpatented mining claims. ASC 930-805-30-1 and 30-2 provides that in fair valuing mineral assets, an acquirer should take into account both:

· The value beyond proven and probable reserves ("VBPP") to the extent that a market participant would include VBPP in determining the fair value of the assets.

· The effects of anticipated fluctuations in the future market price of minerals in a manner that is consistent with the expectations of market participants.

In order to fair value the mineral rights acquired, management utilized a compilation and review report prepared by a third-party which documented the estimated, indicated and inferred mineral resources related to the Relief Canyon Mine property. Based on these findings, management determined that the fair value of the acquired mineral right amounted to $8,501,071 in connection with the acquisition of the Relief Canyon Mine Property (see Note 4). In addition, in February 2012, the Company acquired certain unpatented mining claims from Silver Scott Mines Inc. for a purchase price of $550,000.The Company has recorded the acquired mineral right's fair value as mineral rights on the condensed consolidated balance sheet as a separate component of property, plant and equipment. If proven and probable reserves are established for the property and it has been determined that a mineral property can be economically developed, costs will be amortized using the units-of-production method over the estimated life of the probable reserve. For mineral rights in which proven and probable reserves have not yet been established, the Company assesses the carrying values for impairment at the end of each reporting period and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. 

On March 31, 2012, based on managements' review of the carrying value of mineral rights related to the acquisition of such mineral rights, management determined that there is no evidence that these acquired mineral rights will not be fully recovered and accordingly, the Company has determined that no adjustment to the carrying value of mineral rights was required.

As of the date of these consolidated financial statements, the Company has not established any proven or probable reserves on its mineral properties and incurred only acquisition and exploration costs.

Property and equipment

Property and equipment are carried at cost. The cost of repairs and maintenance is expensed as incurred; major replacements and improvements are capitalized. When assets are retired or disposed of, the cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts, and any resulting gains or losses are included in income in the year of disposition. Depreciation is calculated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the assets, generally one to twenty five years.

Impairment of long-lived assets

The Company accounts for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets according to the ASC 360 "Property, Plant and Equipment".  The Company continually monitors events and changes in circumstances that could indicate that the carrying amounts of long-lived assets, including mineral rights, may not be recoverable.  Long-lived assets in the exploration stage are monitored for impairment based on factors such as the Company's continued right to explore the area, exploration reports, assays, technical reports, drill results and the Company's continued plans to fund exploration programs on the property, whether sufficient work has been performed to indicate that the carrying amount of the mineral property cost carried forward as an asset will not be fully recovered, even though a viable mine has been discovered. The tests for long-lived assets in the exploration stage would be monitored for impairment based on factors such as current market value of the long-lived assets and results of exploration, future asset utilization, business climate, mineral prices and future undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use of the related assets. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to the estimated future net undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. When necessary, impaired assets are written down to estimated fair value based on the best information available. Estimated fair value is generally based on either appraised value or measured by discounting estimated future cash flows. Considerable management judgment is necessary to estimate discounted future cash flows. Accordingly, actual results could vary significantly from such estimates. The Company recognizes an impairment loss when the sum of expected undiscounted future cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the asset. The Company did not consider it necessary to record any impairment charges of long-lived assets at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.

Goodwill and other intangible assets

In accordance with ASC 350- 30-65, the Company assesses the impairment of identifiable intangibles whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Factors the Company considers to be important which could trigger an impairment review include the following:

1.	Significant underperformance relative to expected historical or projected future operating results;
2.	Significant changes in the manner of use of the acquired assets or the strategy for the overall business; and
3.	Significant negative industry or economic trends.

When the Company determines that the carrying value of intangibles may not be recoverable based upon the existence of one or more of the above indicators of impairment and the carrying value of the asset cannot be recovered from projected undiscounted cash flows, the Company records an impairment charge. The Company measures any impairment based on a projected discounted cash flow method using a discount rate determined by management to be commensurate with the risk inherent in the current business model. Significant management judgment is required in determining whether an indicator of impairment exists and in projecting cash flows.

Environmental remediation liability

The Company has posted bonds with the United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management ("BLM") as required by the State of Nevada in an amount equal to the maximum cost to reclaim land disturbed in its mining process. The Company posted a reclamation bond deposit of $4,557,629 to provide surface reclamation coverage for the Relief Canyon Mine, as required by the BLM to secure remediation costs if the project is abandoned or closed. Due to its investment in the bond and the close monitoring of the BLM Nevada State Office, the Company believes that it has adequately mitigated any liability that could be incurred by the Company to reclaim lands disturbed in its mining process. The Company also posted a surface management bond with BLM for a total of $50,000 for its two wholly owned subsidiaries, Arttor Gold and Noble Effort Gold LLC and was included in deposits as reflected in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes.   Under ASC Topic 740, deferred tax assets are recognized for future deductible temporary differences and for tax net operating loss and tax credit carry-forwards, and deferred tax liabilities are recognized for temporary differences that will result in taxable amounts in future years. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using the enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the periods in which the deferred tax asset or liability is expected to be realized or settled. A valuation allowance is provided to offset the net deferred tax asset if, based upon the available evidence, management determines that it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized.

ASC Topic 740 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. ASC Topic 740, also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. The Company may, from time to time, be assessed interest and/or penalties by taxing jurisdictions, although any such assessments historically have been minimal and immaterial to its financial results. In the event the Company has received an assessment for interest and/or penalties, it has been classified in the statements of operations as other general and administrative costs.

Basic and Diluted Net Loss per Share

Net loss per common share is calculated in accordance with ASC Topic 260: Earnings Per Share ("ASC 260"). Basic loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. The computation of diluted net loss per share does not include dilutive common stock equivalents in the weighted average shares outstanding as they would be anti-dilutive. The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted loss per share:

	For the Three Months ended March 31, 2012		For the Three Months ended March 31, 2011
Numerator:
Loss from continuing operations	$	(22,879,601)	$	(464,664)
Loss from discontinued operations	$	(50,174)	$	(823,698)
Denominator:
Denominator for basic and diluted loss per share
(weighted-average shares)		152,753,739		22,718,027
Loss per common share, basic and diluted:
Loss from continuing operations	$	(0.15)	$	( 0.02)
Loss from discontinued operations	$	(0.00)	$	( 0.04)

The following were excluded from the computation of diluted shares outstanding as they would have had an anti-dilutive impact on our loss from continuing operations and loss from discontinued operations. In periods where the Company has a net loss, all dilutive securities are excluded.

	March 31, 2012		March 31, 2011
Common stock equivalents:
Stock options		14,148,000		2,600,000
Stock warrants		39,653,142		-
Convertible preferred stock		26,775,326		2,250,000
Convertible promissory notes embedded conversion feature		-		750,000
Total		80,576,468		5,600,000

Stock-based compensation

Stock-based compensation is accounted for based on the requirements of the Share-Based Payment Topic of ASC 718 which requires recognition in the consolidated financial statements of the cost of employee and director services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments over the period the employee or director is required to perform the services in exchange for the award (presumptively, the vesting period). The ASC also requires measurement of the cost of employee and director services received in exchange for an award based on the grant-date fair value of the award.

Pursuant to ASC Topic 505-50, for share-based payments to consultants and other third-parties, compensation expense is determined at the "measurement date." The expense is recognized over the vesting period of the award. Until the measurement date is reached, the total amount of compensation expense remains uncertain. The Company initially records compensation expense based on the fair value of the award at the reporting date.

Related parties

Parties are considered to be related to the Company if the parties, directly or indirectly, through one or more intermediaries, control, are controlled by, or are under common control with the Company. Related parties also include principal owners of the Company, its management, members of the immediate families of principal owners of the Company and its management and other parties with which the Company may deal if one party controls or can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the other to an extent that one of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests. The Company discloses all related party transactions.

Recent accounting pronouncements

Accounting standards that have been issued or proposed by the FASB that do not require adoption until a future date are not expected to have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements upon adoption.

XML

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Unaudited) (Parenthetical) (USD $)	Mar. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY :
Preferred stock, Par Value (in dollars per share)	$ 0.0001	$ 0.0001
Preferred stock, Authorized (in shares)	50,000,000	50,000,000
Common stock, Par Value (in dollars per share)	$ 0.0001	$ 0.0001
Common stock, Authorized (in shares)	500,000,000	500,000,000
Common stock, issued (in shares)	180,184,556	142,773,113
Common stock, Outstanding (in shares)	180,184,556	142,773,113
Convertible Series A Preferred Stock [Member]
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY :
Preferred stock, Par Value (in dollars per share)	$ 0.0001	$ 0.0001
Preferred stock, Authorized (in shares)	2,250,000	2,250,000
Preferred stock, Issued (in shares)	0	0
Preferred stock, Outstanding (in shares)	0	0
Convertible Series B Preferred Stock [Member]
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY :
Preferred stock, Par Value (in dollars per share)	$ 0.0001	$ 0.0001
Preferred stock, Authorized (in shares)	8,000,000	8,000,000
Preferred stock, Issued (in shares)	0	0
Preferred stock, Outstanding (in shares)	500,000	500,000
Convertible Series C Preferred Stock [Member]
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY :
Preferred stock, Par Value (in dollars per share)	$ 0.0001	$ 0.0001
Preferred stock, Authorized (in shares)	3,284,396	3,284,396
Preferred stock, Outstanding (in shares)	3,284,396	3,284,396
Convertible Series D Preferred Stock [Member]
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY :
Preferred stock, Par Value (in dollars per share)	$ 0.0001	$ 0.0001
Preferred stock, Authorized (in shares)	7,500,000	7,500,000
Preferred stock, Outstanding (in shares)	6,086,968	6,086,968

XML

STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2012

STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY [Abstract]

STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

 

 

NOTE 12 - STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

Preferred Stock

The Company is authorized within the limitations and restrictions stated in the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company, to provide by resolution or resolutions for the issuance of 50,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock, par value $0.0001 per share in such series and with such designations, preferences and relative, participating, optional or other special rights and qualifications, limitations or restrictions as the Company's Board of Directors shall fix by resolution or resolutions providing for the issuance thereof duly adopted by the Board of Directors.

Series B Convertible Preferred Stock

Each share of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock is convertible into one share each of the Company's common stock. The holders of the Company's Series B Preferred Stock are entitled to the same number of votes per share of common stock that the holder of the Series B Preferred Stock may convert into at the time of the vote. In the event of a liquidation preferences upon the liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the business of the Company, the holder of the Series B Preferred Stock would have preferential payment and distribution rights over any other class or series of capital stock that provide for Series B Preferred Stock's preferential payment and over the Company's Common Stock. Between October 2011 and December 2011, 7,500,000 Series B Preferred Stock were converted into 7,500,000 shares of common stock. On February 3, 2012, 500,000 Series B Preferred Stock were converted into 500,000 shares of common stock.
 The Company valued these common shares at par value. The Series B Preferred stock does not include any mandatory redeemable provisions. The Series B Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value, 8,000,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2012.

Series C Convertible Preferred Stock

 On September 29, 2011, the Company sold 3,284,396 shares of designated Series C Convertible Preferred Stock and two-year warrants (the "Preferred Warrants") to purchase 9,853,188 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.60 per share for an aggregate purchase price of $3,284,396. Each share of preferred stock is convertible into shares of common stock at a conversion price of $0.50 per share, subject to adjustment in the event the Company issues common stock or securities convertible into or exercisable for shares of common stock at a price lower than the conversion price then in effect, but not less than $0.30 per share. The preferred stock has a stated value of $1.50 per share. In the event of the liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the business of the Company, each share of Preferred Stock shall be entitled to receive, a preferential amount in cash equal to the Stated Value. The Preferred Warrants may be exercised until the second anniversary of issuance at a cash exercise price of $0.60 per share, subject to adjustment. The Preferred Warrants may be exercised on a cashless basis at any time after the original date of issuance. On September 29, 2011, the Company issued 4,429,415 shares of common stock in connection with the exercise of the 9,853,188 Preferred Warrants on a cashless basis. In March 2012, the conversion price of the Company's Series C Convertible Preferred Stock was adjusted to $0.35 per share as a result of certain anti-dilution provisions contained therein due to the conversion of notes into common stock at $0.35 per share.

The Series C Preferred stock does not include any mandatory redeemable provisions. There were 3,284,396 shares of Series C Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value authorized and 3,284,396 shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2012.

Series D Convertible Preferred Stock

On February 21, 2012, the Company designated 1,000,000 shares of 9.0% Series D Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock. Each share of Series D Preferred Stock is convertible (together with accrued and unpaid dividends thereon) into shares of the Company's common stock at a conversion price of $0.40 per share, subject to equitable adjustments after such events as stock dividends, stock splits or fundamental corporate transactions, and subject to anti-dilution provisions. The holders of the Company's Series D Convertible Preferred Stock do not have voting rights.  Upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company's business, each holder of Series D Preferred Stock shall be entitled to receive, for each share thereof a preferential amount in cash equal to $1.00.  All preferential amounts to be paid to the holders of Series D Preferred Stock in connection with such liquidation, dissolution or winding up shall be paid before the payment or distribution of any assets to the holders of (i) any other class or series of capital stock and (ii) of the Company's common stock, par value $0.0001 per share. The Company is required to redeem in cash all or portion of the Series D Preferred Stock upon the occurrence of a major transactions such as a consolidation, merger or other business combination, sale and transfer of more than 50% of any of the Company's assets, closing of a purchase with more than 50% of the outstanding shares of stock were tendered and the inability of the Company to convert any portion of the Series D Preferred stock due to insufficient authorized number of shares of common stock as defined in the certificate of designation. The redemption price is equivalent to the sum of (i) the greater of (A) 110% of the aggregate stated value of the outstanding shares of the Series D Preferred Stock plus all accrued dividends and (B) the aggregate stated value of the outstanding shares of the Series D Preferred Stock plus all accrued dividends divided by the conversion price on the date of the major transaction redemption price is demanded or the date the major transaction redemption price is paid in full whichever is less multiplied by the volume weighted average price on (x) the date of the major transaction redemption price is demanded and (y) the date the major transaction redemption price is paid in full whichever is greater and (ii) all other amounts, costs, expenses and liquidated damages. The Company believes that the occurrence of the major transactions as defined in the certificate of designations are considered conditional events and as a result the instrument does not meet the definition of mandatorily redeemable financial instrument based from ASC 480-10-25 "Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity". However, this financial instrument would be assessed at each reporting period to determine whether circumstances have changed such that the instrument now meets the definition of a mandatorily redeemable instrument (that is, the event is no longer conditional). If the event has occurred, the condition is resolved, or the event has become certain to occur, the financial instrument will be reclassified as a liability.

On April 11, 2012, the Company filed an amendment to the Certificate of Designation for the Series D Preferred Stock (the "Certificate Amendment") with the Secretary of State of the State of Nevada to increase the number of authorized shares of Series D Preferred Stock that may be issued by the Company to 7,500,000. In March 2012, the conversion price of the Company's Series D Convertible Preferred Stock was adjusted to $0.35 per share as a result of certain anti-dilution provisions contained therein due to the conversion of notes into common stock at $0.35 per share.

On February 23, 2012, the Company entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement with two subscribers (the "Purchase Agreement") and sold 1,000,000 shares of the Series D Preferred Stock and an aggregate of 8,750,000 warrants to acquire shares of  Common Stock for an aggregate purchase price of $1,000,000 (the "Preferred Stock Purchase Price").

All of the proceeds from the Preferred Stock Purchase Price were used to prepay (i) $800,000 of that certain senior secured convertible promissory note to Platinum and (ii) $200,000 of that certain senior secured convertible promissory note to Lakewood (see Note 7).

In accordance with ASC 505 ("Equity - Dividends and Stock Splits"), the Series D Preferred Stock was considered to have an embedded beneficial conversion feature (ECF) because the conversion price was less than the fair value of the Company's common stock. This Series D Preferred Stock was fully convertible at the issuance date, therefore a portion of proceeds allocated to the Series D Preferred Stock of $1,000,000 was determined to be the value of the beneficial conversion feature and was recorded as a preferred deemed dividend. In connection with the initial sales of the Series D Preferred Stock, the initial estimated fair values allocated to the ECF were $226,629 and the fair value allocated to the warrants of $773,371was recorded as a preferred deemed dividend on February 23, 2012.

The assumptions used valuing the warrants include:

Risk free interest rate (annual)	0.88%
Expected volatility	110%
Expected life	5 Years
Assumed dividends	none

In connection with the Note Assignment and Assumption Agreement dated March 30, 2012, $1,100,000 was amended to allow for its conversion into the Company's Series D Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock equivalent to the stated value of the Series D Preferred Stock. As such, the Company issued a total of 1,100,000 shares of Series D Preferred Stock and an additional 227,586 shares of Series D Preferred Stock in consideration for the conversion of this convertible promissory note into shares of Series D Preferred Stock (see Note 7).

On March 30, 2012, the Company also amended the $2.4 million note assigned to FGIT to allow for the conversion of this note into the Company's Series D Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock at $1.00 per share. The holder of this note agreed to fully convert this note (together with accrued and unpaid interest thereon) into 2,421,600 shares of Series D Preferred Stock and an additional 501,021 shares of Series D Preferred Stock in consideration for the conversion of this note into shares of Series D Preferred Stock (see Note 7).

On March 30, 2012, the Company amended a convertible promissory note to allow for the conversion of such note into the Company's Series D Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock at $1.00 per share. The holder of this note agreed to fully convert this note (together with accrued and unpaid interest thereon) into 1,024,744 shares of Series D Preferred Stock and an additional 212,017 shares of Series D Preferred Stock in consideration for the conversion of this Note into shares of Series D Preferred Stock (see Note 8).

In connection with the Note Assignment and Assumption Agreement dated March 30, 2012, $1,100,000 was amended to allow for its conversion into the Company's Series D Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock equivalent to the stated value of the Series D Preferred Stock. As such, the Company issued a total of 1,100,000 shares of Series D Preferred Stock and an additional 227,586 shares of Series D Preferred Stock in consideration for the conversion of this convertible promissory note into shares of Series D Preferred Stock (see Note 7).

On March 30, 2012, the Company also amended the $2.4 million note assigned to FGIT to allow for the conversion of this note into the Company's Series D Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock at $1.00 per share. The holder of this note agreed to fully convert this note (together with accrued and unpaid interest thereon) into 2,421,600 shares of Series D Preferred Stock and an additional 501,021 shares of Series D Preferred Stock in consideration for the conversion of this note into shares of Series D Preferred Stock (see Note 7).

On March 30, 2012, the Company amended a convertible promissory note to allow for the conversion of such note into the Company's Series D Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock at $1.00 per share. The holder of this note agreed to fully convert this note (together with accrued and unpaid interest thereon) into 1,024,744 shares of Series D Preferred Stock and an additional 212,017 shares of Series D Preferred Stock in consideration for the conversion of this Note into shares of Series D Preferred Stock (see Note 8).

Vesting of restricted stock grant is as follows:

i.

6,000,000 shares of restricted common stock (less any shares sooner vested upon registration of 3,000,000 shares of the restricted common stock with the Securities Exchange Commission) shall vest on the earlier of (a) such date that the Company consummates a secondary public offering of its securities in which the Company receives gross proceeds of at least $7,000,000 or (b) one (1)year from the Effective Date of this Agreement;

ii.

3,000,000 shares of restricted common stock shall vest two (2) years from the effective date of this agreement; and

iii. 3,000,000 shares of restricted common stock shall vest three (3) years from the effective date of this agreement.

Additionally, the Company recorded stock-based compensation expense of $694,167 in connection with the vested restricted stock grants. At March 31, 2012, there was a total of $5,185,833 of unrecognized compensation expense related to these non-vested restricted stock grants arrangement.

On February 3, 2012, 500,000 Series B Preferred Stock were converted into 500,000 shares of common stock.
 The Company valued these common shares at par value.

On February 23, 2012, the Company issued 2 million common shares to the the original holders of the senior secured promissory note in connection with a Note Modification Agreement (see Note 7). Accordingly, the Company valued the 2 million common shares at the fair market value on the date of grant at $0.489 per share or $978,000 and was recognized as interest expense during the three months ended March 31, 2012 in connection with the Note Modification Agreement.

On March 30, 2012, in connection with the Note Assignment and Assumption Agreement (see Note 7), the various assignees agreed to convert an aggregate principal amount of $1,892,014 into 5,405,754 shares of the Company's Common Stock at a conversion price of $0.35 per share. Such various assignees received an additional 1,118,432 shares of the Company's Common Stock as consideration for the note conversion and were valued at the fair market value on the date of grant at $0.55 per share or $615,138 and have been included in loss from extinguishment of debts.

On March 30, 2012, the original holders of the senior secured notes agreed to convert $262,500 of the notes in exchange for an aggregate of 750,000 shares of the Company's common stock(see Note 7). The Company accounted the reduction of the conversion price from $0.40 to $0.35 per share and such conversion under ASC 470-20-40 "Debt with Conversion and Other Options" and accordingly recorded loss from extinguishment of debts of $51,563 which is equal to the fair value of shares issued in excess of the fair value issuable pursuant to the original conversion terms.

On March 30, 2012, the holder of the assigned $1.6 million note (together with accrued and unpaid interest of $14,400) agreed to convert such note into 4,612,571 shares of Common Stock at a conversion price of $0.35 per share and an additional 954,325 shares of the Company's Common Stock as consideration for the note conversion. The Company accounted the reduction of the conversion price from $0.40 to $0.35 per share and such conversion under ASC 470-20-40 "Debt with Conversion and Other Options" and accordingly recorded loss from extinguishment of debts of $317,114 which is equal to the fair value of shares issued in excess of the fair value issuable pursuant to the original conversion terms.  The additional 954,325 shares of common stock were valued at the fair market value on the date of grant at $0.55 per share or $524,878 and have been included in loss from extinguishment of debts.

On March 30, 2012, the holder of the 400,000 shares of the Company's Series D Preferred Stock converted his shares of Series D Preferred Stock into 1,153,143 shares of the Company's Common Stock (which included accrued and unpaid dividends thereon).

On March 20, 2012, the Company issued 250,000 shares of common stock to a third party in consideration for payment of legal services rendered of $129,028 and Continental's accrued legal fees of $170,614 for a total amount of $299,642.  The Company valued these common shares for $299,642 (see Note 11).

In March 2012, the Company issued 200,000 shares of common stock to a consultant in consideration for payment of public relations services rendered.  The Company valued these common shares at the fair market value on the date of grants at approximately $0.55 per share or $110,000.

In March 2012, the Company issued an aggregate of 6,229,718 shares of common stock in connection with the exercise of the 11,399,150 stock warrants on a cashless basis. The Company valued these common shares at par value.

On February 23, 2012, a majority of the Company's outstanding voting capital stock have authorized by written consent, in lieu of a special meeting of the Company's stockholders, that the Company effect a reverse stock split at a ratio not less than two-for-one and not greater than fifteen-for-one, with the exact ratio to be set and the amendment to the Company's Articles of Incorporation to be filed at the discretion of the Company's Board of Directors.  Currently, the Company's stockholders have not set an exact ratio for the reverse stock split.

Common Stock Options

On September 29, 2010, the Company's Board of Directors and stockholders adopted the 2010 Stock Incentive Plan (the "2010 Plan"). The 2010 Plan reserved 2,800,000 shares of common stock for issuance. Upon the closing of the Exchange, the Company had outstanding options to purchase 2,800,000 shares of the Company's common stock under the 2010 Plan which represents an exchange of 2,800,000 options previously granted with similar terms  on June 1, 2010, prior to the reverse merger and recapitalization.  In connection with these options,for the three months ended March 31, 2012, the Company recorded stock-based compensation expense of $23,270.

At March 31, 2012, there was a total of $109,388 of unrecognized compensation expense related to these non-vested option-based compensation arrangements under the 2010 Plan.

On July 22, 2011, the Company granted 2,248,000 stock options and warrants to purchase 41,566,999 shares of common stock pursuant to an asset purchase agreement entered into between the Company, Acquisition Sub and Continental (see Note 4). The 2,248,000 9-year options to purchase shares of common stock at $1.423 per share are subject to a vesting schedule based on the stock option holder's continued employment and services. For the three months ended March 31, 2012, the Company recognized stock based compensation of $407,498 which represents the portion of the vested replacement option awards attributable to post-combination services due to the assumption of the stock options of Continental which was accounted for under ASC 805-30-30-9 ("Acquirer Share-Based Payment Awards Exchanged for Awards Held by the Acquiree's Employees). These options were valued on the grant date at $1.11 per option using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: stock price of $1.10 per share, volatility of 196%, expected term of 10 years, and a risk free interest rate of 2.99%. At March 31, 2012, there was a total of $880,785 of unrecognized compensation expense related to these non-vested replacement option awards.

During the three months ended March 31, 2012, 500,000 options were forfeited in accordance with the termination of employee relationships.

On February 9, 2012, the holders of approximately 53% of the outstanding shares of the Company's common stock voted in favor of the adoption of the Company's 2012 Equity Incentive Plan (the " 2012 Plan").  The Board approved the 2012 Plan on February 9, 2012, which reserves 40,000,000 shares of common stock for issuance thereunder in the form of incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options and restricted stock grants, issuable to the Company's officers, directors, employees and consultants.

10,000,000 options were valued on the grant date (February 9, 2012) at approximately $0.45 per option or a total of $4,537,000 using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: stock price of 0.49 per share, volatility of 110%, expected term of 10 years, and a risk free interest rate of 2.04%. For the three months ended March 31, 2012, the Company recorded stock-based compensation expense of $4,537,000 in connection with the fully vested options.

On March 6, 2012, the Company granted an aggregate of 1,100,000 10-year options to purchase shares of common stock at $0.45 per share, the market price on the date of issuance, which vests 25% on date of issuance; 25% on each of December 31, 2012; December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2014 to two employees and a consultant of the Company. The 1,100,000 options were valued on the grant date at approximately $0.41 per option or a total of $448,690 using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: stock price of $0.45 per share, volatility of 103%, expected term of 10 years, and a risk free interest rate of 1.98%. For the three months ended March 31, 2012, the Company recorded stock-based compensation and stock-based consulting expense of $89,228 and 50,988 respectively.

At March 31, 2012, there was a total of $308,474 of unrecognized compensation expense related to these non-vested option-based compensation arrangements under the 2012 Plan.

A summary of the stock options and changes during the period are presented below:

	Number of Options and Warrants			Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)
Balance at December 31, 2011		3,548,000		$	1.11		8.45
Granted		11,100,000			0.49		10
Exercised		-			-		-
Forfeited		(500,000	)		0.81		8.59
Cancelled		-			-		-
Balance outstanding at March 31, 2012		14,148,000		$	0.63		9.46
Options exercisable at March 31, 2012		-		$	-
Options expected to vest		1,827,667
Weighted average fair value of options granted during the period				$	0.45

Stock options outstanding at March 31, 2012 as disclosed in the above table have $710,000 intrinsic value at the end of the period.

Common Stock Warrants

On July 22, 2011, the Company granted 2,248,000 stock options and warrants to purchase 41,566,999 shares of common stock pursuant to an asset purchase agreement entered into between the Company, Acquisition Sub, and Continental (see Note 4). The assumption of stock warrants was replaced with the Company's 3,200,000 4.5-year warrants to purchase shares of common stock at $2.835 per share granted to an affiliated company and its assignees which are subject to a vesting schedule based on the warrant holder's continued services and the Company's 38,366,999 (ranging from 5 months to 4.60 years) warrants to purchase shares of common stock at an exercise price of $2.835 which were related to private placement sale of the Company's common stock. For the three months ended March 31, 2012, the Company recognized stock based compensation of $165,730 which represents the portion of the vested replacement warrants awards attributable to post-combination services due to the assumption of the stock warrants of Continental which was accounted for under ASC 805-30-30-9 ("Acquirer Share-Based Payment Awards Exchanged for Awards Held by the Acquiree's Employees). These warrants were valued on the grant date at $1.11 per option using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: stock price of $1.10 per share, volatility of 193%, expected term of 10 years, and a risk free interest rate of 1.56%. At December 31, 2011, there was $0 of unrecognized compensation expense related to these replacement warrant awards.

Out of the warrants to purchase 41,566,999 shares of common stock discussed above, a total of 2,050,666 4.5-year warrants were granted to an affiliated company, whereby a Member of the Company's Board of directors is the President of the affiliated company. 

 

Between January 2012 and February 2012, the Company sold an aggregate of 2,237,500 units with net proceeds to the Company of $847,500.Each Unit was sold for a purchase price of $0.40 per Unit and consists of: (i) one share of Common Stock and (ii) a two-year warrant to purchase fifty percent (1,118,750 warrants) of the number of shares of Common Stock purchased at an exercise price of $0.60 per share, subject to adjustment upon the occurrence of certain events. The warrants may be exercised at any time on a cashless basis at 100% of the closing price for the Common Stock on the business day immediately prior to the date of exercise. In March 2012, the Company issued 336,974 shares of common stock in connection with the exercise of these 968,750 stock warrants on a cashless basis.

On February 23, 2012, the Company entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement with two subscribers and sold 1,000,000 shares of the Series D Preferred Stock and an aggregate of 8,750,000 warrants to acquire shares of Common Stock for an aggregate purchase price of $1,000,000 (see Note 12 - Preferred Stock). On March 29, 2012, the Company issued 2,967,143 shares of common stock in connection with the exercise of these 5,250,000 stock warrants on a cashless basis.

On February 23, 2012, in connection with a Note Modification Agreement, the Company issued warrants to purchase an aggregate of 4,144,320 shares of Common Stock to Platinum and warrants to purchase an aggregate of 1,036,080 shares of Common Stock to Lakewood (see Note 7). The warrants may be exercised at any time, in whole or in part, at an exercise price of $0.40 per share until the fifth anniversary of their issuance.   The warrants may be exercised on a cashless basis at any time. In February 2012, the Company issued 2,925,601 shares of common stock in connection with the exercise of these 5,180,400 stock warrants on a cashless basis.

On March 6, 2012, the Company issued a warrant to purchase 400,000 shares of the Company's common stock at an exercise price equal to the market price of the Company's common stock on the date of issuance or at $0.45 per share to a consultant in consideration for services rendered. The 400,000 warrants were valued on the grant date at approximately $0.41 per option or a total of $163,155 using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: stock price of $0.45 per share, volatility of 110%, expected term of 10 years, and a risk free interest rate of 1.98%. For the three months ended March 31, 2012, the Company recognized stock based consulting of $163,155.

A summary of the status of the Company's outstanding stock warrants and changes during the period then ended is as follows:

	Number of Warrants		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)
Balance at December 31, 2011		35,603,142	$	2.64	3.94
Granted		15,449,150		0.42	4.81
Cancelled		-		-	-
Forfeited		-		-	-
Exercised		(11,399,150)		0.42	4.64
Balance at March 31, 2012		39,653,142	$	2.41	3.85
Warrants exercisable at March 31, 2012		39,653,142	$	2.41	3.85
Weighted average fair value of options granted during the three months ended March 31, 2012			$	0.40

XML

Document and Entity Information	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2012	May 15, 2012
Document and Entity Information [Abstract]
Entity Registrant Name	Pershing Gold Corp.
Entity Central Index Key	0001432196
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--12-31
Entity Well-known Seasoned Issuer	No
Entity Voluntary Filers	No
Entity Current Reporting Status	Yes
Entity Filer Category	Smaller Reporting Company
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding		204,220,557
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2012
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q1
Document Type	10-Q
Amendment Flag	false
Document Period End Date	Mar. 31, 2012

XML

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2012

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES [Abstract]

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

  

NOTE 13 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Royalty Agreement - F.R.O.G. Consulting, LLC

On May 24, 2011, the Company, through its subsidiary, Arttor Gold, entered into two lease agreements with F.R.O.G. Consulting, LLC, an affiliate of one of the former members of Arttor Gold, for the Red Rock Mineral Property and the North Battle Mountain Mineral Prospect.  The leases grant the exclusive right to explore, mine and develop gold, silver, palladium, platinum and other minerals on the properties for a term of ten (10) years and may be renewed in ten (10) year increments.  The terms of the Leases may not exceed ninety-nine (99) years. The Company may terminate these leases at any time.

The Company is required under the terms of the property lease to make annual lease payments. The Company is also required to make annual claim maintenance payments to Federal Bureau of Land Management and to the county in which its property is located in order to maintain its rights to explore and, if warranted, to develop its property. If the Company fails to meet these obligations, it will lose the right to explore for gold on its property.

Until production is achieved, the Company's lease payments (deemed "advance minimum royalties") consist of an initial payment of $5,000 upon signing of each lease, followed by annual payments according to the following schedule for each lease:

Due Date of Advance Minimum Royalty Payment	Amount of Advance Minimum Royalty Payment
1st Anniversary	$	15,000
2nd Anniversary	$	35,000
3rd Anniversary	$	45,000
4th Anniversary	$	80,000
5th Anniversary and annually thereafter during the term of the lease	The greater of $100,000 or the U.S. dollar equivalent of 90 ounces of gold

In the event that the Company produces gold or other minerals from these leases, the Company's lease payments will be the greater of (i) the advance minimum royalty payments according to the table above, or (ii) a production royalty equal to 3% of the gross sales price of any gold, silver, platinum or palladium that the Company recovers and 1% of the gross sales price of any other minerals that the Company recovers. The Company has the right to buy down the production royalties on gold, silver, platinum and palladium by payment of $2,000,000 for the first one percent (1%). All advance minimum royalty payments constitute prepayment of production royalties to FROG, on an annual basis.  If the total dollar amount of production royalties due within a calendar year exceed the dollar amount of the advance minimum royalty payments due within that year, the Company may credit all uncredited advance minimum royalty payments made in previous years against fifty percent (50%) of the production royalties due within that year. The Leases also requires the Company to spend a total of $100,000 on work expenditures on each property for the period from lease signing until December 31, 2012 and $200,000 on work expenditures on each property per year in 2013 and annually thereafter. 

The Company is required to make annual claim maintenance payments to the Bureau of Land Management and to the counties in which its property is located. If the Company fails to make these payments, it will lose its rights to the property. As of the date of this Report, the annual maintenance payments are approximately $151 per claim, consisting of payments to the Bureau of Land Management and to the counties in which the Company's properties are located. The Company's property consists of an aggregate of 305 lode claims. The aggregate annual claim maintenance costs are currently approximately $46,000.

On July 15, 2011, the Company (the "Lessee") entered into amended and restated lease agreements for the Red Rock Mineral Property and the North Battle Mountain Mineral Prospect by and among Arthur Leger (the "Lessor") and F.R.O.G. Consulting, LLC (the "Payment Agent") (collectively the "Parties") in order to carry out the original intentions of the Parties and to correct the omissions and errors in the original lease, dated May 24, 2011. In the original lease, the Parties intended to identify Arthur Leger as the owner and lessor of the Red Rock Mineral Property and the North Battle Mountain Mineral Prospect and to designate the Payment Agent as the entity responsible for collecting and receiving all payments on behalf of Lessor. Lessor is the sole member of the Payment Agent and owns 100% of the outstanding membership interests of the Payment Agent. All other terms and conditions of the original lease remain in full force and effect.  Lessor is the former Chief Geologist of Arttor Gold.

Royalty Agreement - Centerra (U.S.) Inc.

In August 2011, the Company and its subsidiary, Arttor Gold, entered into lease agreements with Centerra (U.S.) Inc. ("Centerra"). The leases grant the exclusive right to explore, mine and develop any and all metals, ores and other minerals on the properties which consist of 24 unpatented mining claims located Lander County, Nevada for a term of ten (10) years and may be renewed in ten (10) year increments. The Company may terminate these leases at any time.

The Company is required under the terms of our property lease to make annual lease payments. The Company is also required to make annual claim maintenance payments to Federal Bureau of Land Management and to the county in which its property is located in order to maintain its rights to explore and, if warranted, to develop its property. If the Company fails to meet these obligations, it will lose the right to explore for gold on its property. 

Until production is achieved, the Company's lease payments (deemed "advance minimum royalties") consist of an initial payment of $13,616 upon signing of the lease, followed by annual payments according to the following schedule for each lease:

Due Date of Advance Minimum Royalty Payment	Amount of Advance Minimum Royalty Payment
1st Anniversary	$	12,000
On or before each of the 2nd and 3rd  Anniversary		15,000
On or before each of the 4th and 5th  Anniversary		20,000
On or before each of the 6th and 7th  Anniversary		25,000
On or before each of the 8th and 9th  Anniversary		30,000
10th Anniversary  and subsequent anniversaries so long the agreement shall remain in effect	40,000

In the event that the Company produces gold or other minerals from these leases, the Company agrees to pay lessor a production royalty of equal to 4% of net smelter returns for all products extracted, produced and sold from this property after recoupment of the advance minimum royalty payments previously made to lessor pursuant to the payment table above. No production royalty shall be payable on rock, dirt, limestone, or similar materials used by lessee in its operations. The Company has the right to buy down the production royalties by payment of $1,500,000 for the first one percent (1%) on or before completion of a positive feasibility study and another one percent (1%) by making cash payment of $2,500,000 on or before achievement of commercial production. The Leases also requires the Company to spend a total of $100,000 on work expenditures on this property for the period from lease signing until 5th anniversary, $150,000 on work expenditures on this property for the period from the 6th anniversary until 10th anniversary and $200,000 on work expenditures on this property per year on the 11th anniversary and annually thereafter. The Company is required to make annual claim maintenance payments to the Bureau of Land Management and to the counties in which its property is located. If the Company fails to make these payments, it will lose its rights to the property.

Agreements Purchased from Continental Resources Group, Inc.

The Company's wholly owned subsidiary, Continental Resources Acquisition Sub, Inc. was formed in July 2011 to purchase substantially all of the assets of Continental, which assets included 100% of the outstanding shares of common stock of Green Energy Fields, Inc. and ND Energy Inc. (see Note 4).  The purchased assets include certain agreements in uranium mining claims in Arizona, California and North Dakota.

Uranium Lease Agreements

In connection with the execution of the Membership Interests Sale Agreements of Secure Energy LLC, a majority-owned subsidiary of ND Energy, Inc. and Green Energy, Inc., the Company acquired the following Uranium lease agreements:

1) Slope County, North Dakota, Lease 1 and 2

On June 28, 2007, Secure Energy, LLC, signed a 20 year mining lease to develop and operate 472.8 acres of uranium mining properties in the Slope County, North Dakota. The Company prepaid the annual payment of $10 per net acre for eight years amounting to $36,717 at the date of signing. The Company will pay a production royalty of $0.75 per pound of all uranium sales.

2) Slope County, North Dakota, Lease 3

On November 23, 2007, Secure Energy, LLC signed a 10 year mining lease, with right to extend an additional 10 years to develop and operate 554.24 acres of uranium mining properties in the Slope County, North Dakota. The Company prepaid the annual payment of $10 per net acre for ten years amounting to $53,775 at the date of signing. The Company will pay a production royalty of $0.75 per pound of all uranium sales or 5% of net proceeds from the sale of uranium bearing ores.

Royalty agreements

On July 22, 2011, through the acquisition of Continental's assets, the Company had purchased a 100% interest in certain 86 unpatented lode mining claims located in Mohave County, Arizona. The Company will pay a 3% net smelter returns royalty on all uranium sales. The Company shall have the right to reduce the royalty from 3% to 0% by paying the aggregate sum of $1,500,000 ($500,000 for each 1%).

On July 22, 2011, through the acquisition of Continental's assets, the Company assumed the purchase and sale agreement with Absaroka Stone LLC to purchase certain unpatented mining claims commonly known as the "Uinta County (Carnotite) Uranium Prospect" located in the Uinta County of Wyoming.  Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, Absaroka Stone LLC agreed not to stake for its own account any additional mining claims within a 15 mile radius of the property.  Any additional mining claims to be located within a 15 mile radius of the property (the "Claim Body") were to be located, staked and filed by the Company, at its expense and held in its name.   Such agreement requires a minimum of $200,000 relating to location, maintenance, exploration, development or equipping any one or more of the mining claims that comprise the Claim Body for commercial production within 24 months from the date of the agreement.  If the Company fails to incur a minimum of $200,000 in expenses related to the foregoing within 24 months, the Company shall pay an aggregate sum of $50,000 to Absaroka Stone LLC. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, the Company would pay a 1% gross royalty to Absaroka Stone LLC on any revenues derived from the sale of all uranium-vanadium, gold, silver, copper and rare earth ores or concentrates produced from the Claim Body, up to an aggregate of $1,000,000.  The Company has the option to eliminate the royalty obligations by paying Absaroka Stone LLC an aggregate payment of $1,000,000.

Litigation

On February 7, 2012, the Company obtained a copy of  a complaint filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (the "Complaint") entitled Relief Gold Group, Inc., v Sagebrush Gold Ltd, Gold Acquisition Corp., Barry C. Honig, and David S. Rector (12 civ 0952).  Relief Gold alleges various causes of action including breach of contract, intentional interference with contract, intentional interference with prospective business relationship/economic relations, misappropriation of trade secrets and unjust enrichment, related to the Company's acquisition on August 30, 2011 of the assets of the Relief Canyon Mine pursuant to Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code.  Plaintiff served an amended complaint on May 10, 2012.  The Company's time to answer or move with respect to the amended complaint expires on May 24, 2012.

Further, on or about February 29, 2012, Gold Acquisition Corp. ("GAC")commenced an adversary proceeding in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nevada against Firstgold, Terence Lynch and Relief Gold Group Case No. 12-05013-GWZ.  Through the adversary proceeding, GAC is seeking confirmation that all information, intellectual property and know how related to Relief Canyon was property of Firstgold that was sold to GAC.  In addition, GAC moved for a preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order staying the prosecution of the above-referenced action pending in the Southern District.  The motion for a preliminary injunction was denied on or about March 15, 2012.  Firstgold filed a motion to dismiss the complaint on April 23, 2012; GAC's response is due by June 6, 2012.  Pursuant to court rules, GAC has attempted to start the discovery process and filed a motion to compel on May 11, 2012.  A hearing date has not yet been set, but GAC has requested that it be heard on shortened time.  A scheduling conference in this matter has been set for June 13, 2012.

GAC also filed a Motion for Order to Show Cause in Firstgold's main bankruptcy action Case No. 10-50215-GWZ requesting that the court require Firstgold to complete documentation for conveyance of property.   That motion was granted on or about February 28, 2012.

Option Agreement

On January 26, 2012, the Company entered into an Option Agreement (the "Option Agreement") with American Strategic Minerals Corporation, a Colorado corporation ("Amicor"), pursuant to which Amicor obtained the option  to acquire certain uranium exploration rights and properties held by the Company (the "Uranium Properties"), as further described herein.  In consideration for issuance of the option, Amicor issued to the Company (i) a $1,000,000 promissory note payable in installments upon satisfaction of certain conditions (the "Note"), expiring six months following issuance and (ii) 10,000,000 shares of Amicor's common stock (collectively, the "Option Consideration").  Pursuant to the terms of the Note, upon the closing of a private placement in which Amicor receives gross proceeds of at least $5,000,000 (within six months of the closing of the Option Agreement), then Amicor shall repay $500,000 under the Note.  Additionally, upon the closing of a private placement in which Amicor receives gross proceeds of at least an additional $1,000,000 (within six months of the closing of the Option Agreement), Amicor shall pay the outstanding balance under the Note.  The Note does not bear interest.  The option was exercisable for a period of 90 days following the closing of the Option Agreement, in whole or in part, at an exercise price of Ten Dollars ($10.00) for any or all of the Uranium Properties.  In the event Amicor does not exercise the option, the Company will retain all of the Option Consideration. Between January 2012 and February 2012, the Company collected $930,000 of the Note. On the date of the Option Agreement, the Company recorded the Option Consideration as deferred revenue to be amortized over the term of the Option Agreement. The Company recorded the 10 million shares of Amicor's common stock at the fair market value (based on the recent selling price of Amicor's common stock at a private placement) of the shares at $0.50 per share or $5 million. During the three months ended March 31, 2012, the Company recognized other income of $4,333,333 which represents the earned income pursuant to the terms of this Option Agreement. Note receivable from Amicor at March 31, 2012 amounted to $70,000.  David Rector, a member of the Company's Board of Directors, is a director of Amicor. Joshua Bleak, Continental's chief executive officer, is a director of Amicor.

In April 2012, the Company and Amicor extended the expiration date to May 15, 2012 and subsequently on May 7, 2012, both parties agreed to extend the expiration date of the option to June 15, 2012.

Operating Lease

In February 2012, the Company signed a three year lease agreement for office space located in Lakewood, Colorado containing approximately 2,390 net rentable square feet and such lease will start in March 2012 and expires in April 2015. The lease requires the Company to pay an annual base rent of $18.50 per rentable square feet or $44,215 plus a pro rata share of operating expenses. The base rent is subject to annual increases beginning on May 1, 2013 as defined in the lease agreement. Future minimum rental payments required under these operating leases are as follows:

Years ending December 31:
2012		33,161
2013		45,111
2014		46,306
2015 and thereafter		11,651
	$	136,229

XML

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited) (USD $)	3 Months Ended		7 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2012	Mar. 31, 2011	Mar. 31, 2012
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited) [Abstract]
Net revenues	$ 0	$ 0	$ 0
Operating expenses:
Compensation and related taxes	6,490,733	105,000	7,572,812
Exploration cost	1,289,899	0	3,089,921
Consulting fees	918,624	187,860	6,489,803
General and administrative expenses	1,021,863	171,804	2,454,333
Total operating expenses	9,721,119	464,664	19,606,869
Operating loss from continuing operations	(9,721,119)	(464,664)	(19,606,869)
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSES):
Loss from entinguishment of debts	(4,769,776)	0	(4,769,776)
Change in fair value of derivative liability	(1,454,889)	0	5,447,917
Loss from disposal of assets	(9,434)	0	(183,464)
Other income	80,000	0	80,000
Settlement expense	0	0	(4,799,000)
Realized loss - available for sale securities	(27,000)	0	(27,000)
Unrealized gain - trading securities	19,702	0	19,702
Other income pursuant to an option agreement	4,333,333	0	4,333,333
Interest expense, net of interest income	(11,330,418)	0	(15,845,894)
Total other expenses - net	(13,158,482)	0	(15,744,182)
Loss from continuing operations before provision for income taxes	(22,879,601)	(464,664)	(35,351,051)
Provision for income taxes	0	0	0
Loss from continuing operations	(22,879,601)	(464,664)	(35,351,051)
Discontinued operations:
Loss (gain) from discontinued operations, net of tax	(50,174)	(823,698)	802,491
Net loss	(22,929,775)	(1,288,362)	(34,548,560)
Less: Net loss (income) attributable to non-controlling interest	606	0	(170,747)
Net loss attributable to Pershing Gold Corporation	(22,929,169)	(1,288,362)	(34,719,307)
Preferred deemed dividend	(1,616,777)	0	(1,616,777)
Preferred stock dividends	(9,000)	0	(3,293,396)
Net loss available to common stockholders	$ (24,554,946)	$ (1,288,362)	$ (39,629,480)
Loss per common share, basic and diluted:
Loss from continuing operations (in dollars per share)	$ (0.15)	$ (0.02)	$ (0.25)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations (in dollars per share)	$ 0	$ (0.04)	$ 0.01
WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING - Basic and Diluted (in shares)	152,753,739	22,718,027	139,030,857

XML

SENIOR CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTES

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2012

Senior Convertible Promissory Notes [Abstract]

SENIOR CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTES

 

NOTE 7 - SENIOR CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTES

On August 30, 2011, the Company, through Gold Acquisition acquired the Relief Canyon Mine for an aggregate purchase price consisting of: (i) $12,000,000 cash and (ii) $8,000,000 of senior secured convertible promissory notes (collectively, the "Notes") issued to Platinum and Lakewood.

The Notes are joint and several obligations of the Company and Gold Acquisition and bore interest at a rate of 9% per annum with principal and interest payable on the first business day of each month commencing on the earlier of: (i) 3 months after the Company or Gold Acquisition begins producing or extracting gold from the Relief Canyon Mine or (ii) 18 months after the original date of issuance of the Note (the "Commencement Date"). The principal amount shall be paid in 12 equal monthly installments, with the initial payment due on the Commencement Date.   The Notes were convertible into shares of the Company's common stock, at a price per share equal to $0.55, subject to adjustment in the event of mergers, recapitalizations, dividends and distributions applicable to shareholders generally and are further subject to full-ratchet anti-dilution protection.  In October 2011, the conversion price of the senior convertible promissory notes had been adjusted to $0.40 per share as a result of certain anti-dilution provisions contained therein due to the sale of common stock at $0.40 per share.

Between January 5, 2012 and February 23, 2012, the Company prepaid a total of $1,039,771 towards the senior secured convertible promissory note to Platinum and Lakewood.

The Assignment and Assumption Agreement dated February 23, 2012

On February 23, 2012, pursuant to a certain assignment and assumption agreement (the "Assignment and Assumption Agreement"), with certain assignees (collectively, the "Assignees") acquired an aggregate of $4.0 million of the outstanding principal amount of the Notes (the "Acquired Notes") from Platinum and Lakewood (collectively, the "Assignors"). After giving effect to the transactions contemplated pursuant to the Assignment and Assumption Agreement and the prepayment of the Notes, Platinum retained $2,368,183 and Lakewood retained $592,046 of the Original Notes (the "Remainder Notes," and together with the Acquired Notes, the "New Notes"). The principal amount of Acquired Note issued to one of the assignees is $2,400,000 and the principal amount of the Acquired Note issued to the other assignee is $1,600,000 and bore interest at 9% per annum. The note holders waived any prepayment penalty in connection with the prepayment and assignment.

On February 23, 2012, the Company had entered into those certain Note Modification Agreements, (the "Note Modification Agreements") with the Assignees and Assignors, respectively, to extend the Maturity Date (as defined in each of the New Notes) to February 23, 2014, the definition of Commencement Date (as defined in each of the New Notes) to February 23, 2013 and to eliminate the prepayment penalty. The Notes were convertible into shares of the Company's common stock, at a price per share equal to $0.40, subject to adjustment in the event of mergers, recapitalizations, dividends and distributions applicable to shareholders generally and are further subject to full-ratchet anti-dilution protection.  

The Assignors entered into their Note Modification Agreement in exchange for (i) the issuance to Platinum of warrants to purchase an aggregate of 4,144,320 shares of Common Stock, (ii) the issuance to Lakewood of warrants to purchase an aggregate of 1,036,080 shares of Common Stock, (iii) the issuance of 1,600,000 shares of the Common Stock to Platinum, and (iv) the issuance of 400,000 shares of Common Stock to Lakewood. The warrants may be exercised at any time, in whole or in part, at an exercise price of $0.40 per share.  The warrants may be exercised until the fifth anniversary of their issuance. The warrants may be exercised on a cashless basis at any time. On March 29, 2012, such warrants were exercised on a cashless basis (see Note 12).

Accordingly, the Company valued the 2 million common shares at the fair market value on the date of grant at $0.489 per share or $978,000. The 5,180,400 warrants were valued on the grant date at approximately $0.394 per warrant or a total of $2,044,186 using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: stock price of $0.489 per share, volatility of 110%, expected term of 5 years, and a risk free interest rate of 0.88%. The Company recognized a total interest expense of $3,022,186 during the three months ended March 31, 2012 in connection with the Note Modification Agreement.

The Note Assignment and Assumption Agreement dated March 30, 2012

On March 30, 2012, the Company, Platinum and Lakewood, the original holders of the Company's Amended and Restated Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Notes, originally issued by the Company on August 30, 2011, and amended and restated on February 23, 2012 (the "Notes"), with a current outstanding principal balance of $2,960,229, entered into agreements to amend the Notes (the "Note Amendments").  Under the Note Amendments, the Notes were amended to provide a $0.35 Conversion Price. The original holders of the notes agreed to convert $262,500 of the Notes in exchange for an aggregate of 750,000 shares of the Company's common stock. The Company accounted the reduction of the conversion price from $0.40 to $0.35 per share and such conversion under ASC 470-20-40 "Debt with Conversion and Other Options" and accordingly recorded loss from extinguishment of debts of $51,563 which is equal to the fair value of shares issued in excess of the fair value issuable pursuant to the original conversion terms.

The Company also entered into a Note Assignment and Assumption Agreement on March 30, 2012 (the "Note Assignment and Assumption Agreement") pursuant to which the original holders assigned the remaining principal amount $2,697,729 (after such conversion discussed above) of the Notes to various assignees and such assignees agreed to fully convert the acquired Notes into the Company's Common Stock in consideration for an aggregate purchase price of $3,256,252. A total of $2,992,014 was assigned to various assignees and the original holders waived $264,238 of the aggregate purchase price payable by the assignees for the Notes under the Note Assignment and Assumption Agreement at an amended conversion price of $0.35 per share. The Company recorded loss from extinguishment of debt of $294,285 which represents the excess of the purchase price over the remaining principal. Such additional principal of $294,285 was considered to have an embedded beneficial conversion feature because the effective conversion price was less than the fair value of the Company's common stock and as such were treated as a discount and were valued at $168,163 which was fully amortized upon the conversion of the Notes and was included in interest expense.

In connection with this Note Assignment and Assumption Agreement, the Company accounted the reduction of the conversion price from $0.40 to $0.35 per share and such conversion discussed below under ASC 470-20-40 "Debt with Conversion and Other Options" and accordingly recorded loss from extinguishment of debts of $529,911 which is equal to the fair value of shares issued in excess of the fair value issuable pursuant to the original conversion terms.

These various assignees agreed to convert an aggregate principal amount of $1,892,014 into 5,405,754 shares of the Company's Common Stock at a conversion price of $0.35 per share. Such various assignees received an additional 1,118,432 shares of the Company's Common Stock as consideration for the note conversion and were valued at the fair market value on the date of grant at $0.55 per share or $615,138 and have been included in loss from extinguishment of debts.

The remaining assigned amount of $1,100,000 was amended to allow for its conversion into the Company's Series D Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock equivalent to the stated value of the Series D Preferred Stock which is $1.00 per share. Each share of Series D Preferred Stock is convertible into shares of the Company's common stock at an effective conversion price of $0.35 per share subject to anti-dilution provisions. As such, the Company issued a total of 1,100,000 shares of Series D Preferred Stock and an additional 227,586 shares of Series D Preferred Stock in consideration for the conversion of this convertible promissory note into shares of Series D Preferred Stock. The Company recorded a loss from extinguishment of debts of $357,635 and preferred deemed dividend of $130,049 in connection with the issuance of the additional 227,586 shares of Series D Preferred Stock.

On March 30, 2012, the Company also amended the $2.4 million note assigned to FGIT to allow for the conversion of this note into the Company's Series D Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock at $1.00 per share. The holder of this note agreed to fully convert this note (together with accrued and unpaid interest of $21,600) into 2,421,600 shares of Series D Preferred Stock and an additional 501,021 shares of Series D Preferred Stock in consideration for the conversion of this note into shares of Series D Preferred Stock. The Company accounted the reduction of the conversion price from $0.40 to $0.35 per share and such conversion under ASC 470-20-40 "Debt with Conversion and Other Options" and accordingly recorded loss from extinguishment of debts of $475,671 which is equal to the fair value of shares issued in excess of the fair value issuable pursuant to the original conversion terms. The Company recorded a loss from extinguishment of debts of $787,319 and preferred deemed dividend of $286,298 in connection with the issuance of the additional 501,021 shares of Series D Preferred Stock.

On March 30, 2012, one of the assignees, agreed to convert the assigned $1.6 million note (together with accrued and unpaid interest of $14,400) into 4,612,571 shares of Common Stock at a conversion price of $0.35 per share and an additional 954,325 shares of the Company's Common Stock as consideration for the note conversion. The Company accounted the reduction of the conversion price from $0.40 to $0.35 per share and such conversion under ASC 470-20-40 "Debt with Conversion and Other Options" and accordingly recorded loss from extinguishment of debts of $317,114 which is equal to the fair value of shares issued in excess of the fair value issuable pursuant to the original conversion terms.  The additional 954,325 shares of common stock were valued at the fair market value on the date of grant at $0.55 per share or $524,878 and have been included in loss from extinguishment of debts.

As a result of the conversion of the senior secured convertible promissory notes, the Company fully amortized the remaining unamortized debt discount of $6,933,333 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and was included in interest expense. Accrued interest as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, amounted to $123,669 and $45,999, respectively and was included in accounts payable and accrued expenses.

Senior convertible promissory notes consisted of the following:

	March 31, 2012		December 31, 2011
Senior convertible promissory notes	$	-	$	7,999,778
Less: debt discount		-		(6,933,333	)
Senior convertible promissory notes, net	$	-	$	1,066,445

XML

PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2012

PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT [Abstract]

PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

 

NOTE 6 - PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

Property and equipment consisted of the following:

	Estimated Life	March 31, 2012			December 31, 2011
Furniture and fixtures	5 years	$	45,085		$	20,000
Office and computer equipments	1 - 5 years		131,704			26,606
Land	-		266,977			266,977
Building and improvements	5 - 25 years		727,965			727,965
Site costs	10 years		1,272,732			1,272,732
Crushing system	20 years		2,256,943			2,256,943
Process plant and equipments	10 years		3,161,583			3,115,266
Vehicles and mining equipments	5 - 10 years		577,110			659,622
			8,440,099			8,346,111
Less: accumulated depreciation			(552,606	)		(315,008	)
		$	7,887,493		$	8,031,103

 

For the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, depreciation expense amounted to $241,794 and $1,960, respectively.

Between February 2012 and March 2012, the Company sold mining and drilling equipments with a net book value worth $80,309 to third parties for a sales price of $70,875 realizing a loss on sale of assets of $9,434. The depreciation expense during the period, prior to the sale of such mining and drilling equipments amounted to $4,196 which is included in the $241,794 depreciation above.

XML

MINERAL PROPERTIES

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2012

MINERAL PROPERTIES [Abstract]

MINERAL PROPERTIES

 

 

NOTE 14 - MINERAL PROPERTIES

North Battle Mountain and Red Rock Mineral Prospects

Through the Company's wholly-owned subsidiary, Arttor Gold LLC, the Company has the rights to explore the North Battle Mountain Mineral Prospect located in Lander County, Nevada.

The North Battle Mountain Mineral Prospect is located in Lander County, Nevada, 18 kilometers north of the town of Battle Mountain in north central Nevada.  The property consists of 36 unpatented lode mining claims and encompasses approximately 700 acres.  The North Battle Mountain Mineral Prospect can be accessed from Battle Mountain by a paved county road for about 5.5 miles to the North Battle Mountain rail siding, and then by a graded gravel road from which an unimproved dirt road leads east to the north-central part of the property.

The Red Rock Mineral Prospect is located in Lander County, Nevada, 26 miles south of the town of Battle Mountain.  The property consists of five groups of unpatented lode mining claims, totaling 269 claims and encompassing approximately 5,600 acres.  The Red Rock Mineral Prospect can be accessed from Nevada State Highway 305, traveled south from Battle Mountain approximately 26 miles to the Carico Lake Valley/Red Rock Canyon turn-off, then east along an improved gravel road less than a mile to the western claim boundary.  Most of the property is accessible by secondary gravel and unimproved dirt roads.

The exploration rights to these properties are held through two amended and restated mining leases dated July 15, 2011 (the "Leger Leases") between Arttor Gold LLC and Art Leger, formerly the Company's Chief Geologist, who located the mining claims in 2004, and an additional mining lease dated August 22, 2011 (the "Centerra Lease") between Arttor Gold LLC and Centerra (US) Inc. (see Note 13).  The Leger Leases grant us the exclusive right to explore, mine and develop gold, silver, palladium, platinum and other minerals on the properties for a term of ten years, and may be renewed in ten year increments.  The terms of the Leger Leases may not exceed 99 years.

The North Battle Mountain and Red Rock Mineral Prospects properties do not currently have any reserves and all activities undertaken and currently proposed are exploratory in nature.

Relief Canyon Properties

The  Relief Canyon properties, which include the Relief Canyon Mine property owned by Gold Acquisition Corp., and the Pershing Pass Property held directly by the Company.

The Relief Canyon properties are located about 100 miles northeast of Reno, Nevada. The nearest town is Lovelock, Nevada, approximately 15 miles west-southwest from the Relief Canyon Mine property, which can be reached from both Reno and Lovelock on U.S. Interstate 80.  The Relief Canyon Mine property is reached from Lovelock by travelling approximately seven miles northeast on I-80 to the Coal Canyon Exit (Exit No. 112), then about 10 miles southeast on Coal Canyon Road (State Route 857, a paved road maintained by Pershing County) to Packard Flat, and then north on a gravel road for two miles.  All of the Relief Canyon properties can be accessed by unpaved roads from the Relief Canyon Mine property. The Relief Canyon properties are located in Pershing County, Nevada at the southern end of the Humboldt Range.  The range is underlain by a sequence of late Paleozoic- to Mesozoic-age volcanic and sedimentary rocks.  Gold-bearing rocks at the Relief Canyon properties are primarily developed within breccia zones along the contact between the Grass Valley and Cane Springs Formations. The Relief Canyon properties do not currently have any reserves and all activities undertaken and currently proposed are exploratory in nature.

Relief Canyon Mine

Through the Company's wholly-owned subsidiary, Gold Acquisition Corp., the Company owns 58 unpatented lode mining claims and 118 unpatented millsites at the Relief Canyon Mine property.  The property includes the Relief Canyon Mine and gold processing facilities, currently on care and maintenance, which produced gold periodically from 1984 through 2008.  The Relief Canyon Mine includes three open pit mines, five heap leach pads, two solution ponds and a cement block constructed adsorption desorption-recovery (ADR) solution processing circuit. The ADR type process plant consists of four carbon columns, acid wash system, stripping vessel, electrolytic cells, a furnace and a retort for the production of gold doré.  The process facility was originally installed by Lacana Mining in 1985 and was updated in 1995 and again in 2007 by Firstgold Corp. The facilities are generally in good condition.

Adequate line power is available to the site to operate the existing process facility and ancillary facilities.  There is a generator onsite to provide power for the crusher and a backup generator that could provide 100% of the required power for process facility and heap leach operation in the event of power outages.  Sufficient water rights to operate the facility have been appropriated with two operating and permitted wells serving current needs.

The Relief Canyon Mine property was most recently owned and operated by Firstgold Corp.  Firstgold Corp. ceased operations at Relief Canyon in 2008 and filed for bankruptcy in January 2010.  On December 17, 2010, the Court entered its Order Authorizing And Approving: (1) Sale Of Real Property And Certain Personal Property Assets Pursuant To 11 U.S.C. §363 Free And Clear Of Liens, Claims, and Interests; and (2) Assumption and Assignment Of Executory Contracts and Unexpired Leases Under 11 U.S.C. § 365; and (3) Related Relief entered December 17, 2010 (the "Sale Order"), pursuant to which Platinum Long Term Growth LLC ("Platinum") was approved as the successful "back up bidder" for certain assets including the Relief Canyon Mine.  On August 30, 2011, pursuant to the Sale Order, the Company (through a wholly owned subsidiary) purchased 100% of the Relief Canyon Mine property and related assets for an aggregate purchase price of $12.0 million cash paid at closing and $8.0 million of senior Notes issued to former creditors of Firstgold Corp.  The Relief Canyon Mine property is burdened by a production royalty equal to 2% of net smelter returns payable to Battle Mountain Gold Exploration LLC (now owned by Royal Gold).

Gold was first discovered on the property by the Duval Corp. in 1979.  Subsequent exploration was performed by various companies including Lacana Mining, Santa Fe Gold Corp., and Pegasus Gold Inc.  Firstgold Corp. acquired the property in 1995 and explored and produced gold periodically from 1995 until 2008.

Pershing Pass Property

The Company acquired the Pershing Pass property from Silver Scott Mines, Inc. in March 2012.  Pershing Pass consists of 489 unpatented lode mining claims (30 of which were acquired in February 2012) covering approximately 9,700 acres.  Silver Scott Mines, Inc. located the claims and was the sole owner of the Pershing Pass property prior to the Company's purchase.   There is evidence of historic mining activity on the Pershing Pass property.

Uranium Exploration Properties

The Company's wholly owned subsidiary, Continental Resources Acquisition Sub, Inc. was formed in July 2011 to purchase substantially all of the assets of Continental Resources Group, Inc., which assets included 100% of the outstanding shares of common stock of Green Energy Fields, Inc. and ND Energy Inc. The purchased assets include certain interests in uranium unpatented mining claims and leased mineral interests in Arizona, California and North Dakota totaling approximately 7,200 acres.  The Company entered into an option agreement on January 26, 2012 pursuant to which American Strategic Minerals Corporation has the right to acquire these uranium exploration properties (see Note 13).  The option, as amended, is exercisable until June 15, 2012, in whole or in part, at an exercise price of $10.00 for any or all of the uranium properties.  If the option is not exercised, the Company will retain all of the consideration for the option, and the Company plans to continue its efforts to divest these properties. These uranium exploration properties do not currently have any reserves and all activities undertaken and currently proposed are exploratory in nature.

The Coso property is located in Inyo County, California and consists of 169 unpatented lode mining claims on BLM land totaling 3,380 acres.  The property is burdened by a 3% royalty payable to NPX Metals, Inc.  Annual claim and lease maintenance costs for the Coso property are approximately $25,000.  The property is undeveloped, and there are no facilities or structures.  There are a number of adits, trenches and drill holes from previous exploration activities.

The Artillery Peak property is located in western north-central Arizona near the southern edge of Mohave County.  The property consists of a total of 86 unpatented lode mining claims and is burdened by a 4% royalty.  Annual claim maintenance costs for the Artillery Peak property total approximately $13,000.  Uranium exploration has been occurring in the Artillery Peak region since the 1950s by a number of exploration and mining entities.

The Blythe project is located in the southern McCoy Mountains in Riverside County, California approximately 15 miles west of the community of Blythe.  It consists of 66 unpatented lode mining claims covering 1,320 acres of BLM land and is burdened by a 3% royalty.  Annual claim maintenance costs for the claims at the Blythe property are approximately $10,000.  A number of companies have worked on the Blythe uranium property during the 1950s through the 1980s.

The Absaroka Stone project consists of one unpatented lode mining claim located in the Uinta County of southwestern Wyoming.

Prospect Uranium consists of private leases to 1,027 acres located in Slope County, in southwestern North Dakota.  Annual holding costs under these leases total about $7,100.

XML

DERIVATIVE LIABILITY

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2012

DERIVATIVE LIABILITY [Abstract]

DERIVATIVE LIABILITY

  

NOTE 10 - DERIVATIVE LIABILITY

In connection with the issuance of the 9% senior convertible promissory notes dated August 30, 2011, the Company has determined that the terms of the convertible notes include a down-round provision under which the conversion price could be affected by future equity offerings undertaken by the Company. Accordingly, under the provisions of FASB ASC Topic No. 815-40, Derivatives and Hedging - Contracts in an Entity's Own Stock, the convertible instrument was accounted for as a derivative liability at the date of issuance and adjusted to fair value through earnings at each reporting date. The Company has recognized a derivative liability of $0 and $6,295,400 at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. Loss resulting from the increase in fair value of this convertible instrument was $1,454,889 and $0 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 respectively. During the three months ended March 31, 2012, the Company reclassified $7,750,289 of the derivative liability to paid-in capital due to the conversion of the senior convertible promissory note into common stock on March 30, 2012 (see Note 7).

The Company used the following assumptions for determining the fair value of the convertible instruments under the Black-Scholes option pricing model:

	For the three months ended March 31, 2012
Expected volatility	1036% - 110%
Expected term	2.00 - 2.17 Years
Risk-free interest rate	0.27% - 0.33%
Expected dividend yield	0%

XML

CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTES

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2012

CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTES [Abstract]

CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTES

  

NOTE 8 - CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTES

On September 14, 2011, the Company sold $1,715,604 of its 9% secured promissory note (the "Note"). The Note was acquired by FGIT. The proceeds of the Note have been used to post additional bonds with the BLM (the "Additional Bond") in order to advance certain exploration and Phase One drilling activities at the Company's Relief Canyon Mining property. The Note was a joint and several obligation of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Gold Acquisition Corp. Principal and interest under the Note was payable on the first business day of each month commencing on the later of (i) thirty (30) months from the original date of issuance and (ii) ten (10) days following the payment and/or conversion in full of the senior secured promissory notes dated as of August 30, 2011, issued to Platinum and Lakewood. The Note may be pre-paid, in full or in part at a price equal to 105% of the aggregate principal amount of the Note plus all accrued and unpaid interest thereon at the election of the Company. The Note was convertible into shares of the Company's common stock at a price equal to $0.50 per share, subject to adjustment in the event of mergers, recapitalizations, dividends and distributions applicable to shareholders generally. The Note was subordinated to the payment in full and satisfaction of all obligations owed to Platinum and Lakewood other than the Additional Bond and proceeds of the Additional Bond, in which Frost Gamma is intended to have a first priority senior security interest. The Note was also secured by a pledge of 100% of the stock of Gold Acquisition Corp. held by the Company. The Note may be prepaid upon the occurrence of a Qualified Financing, as defined in the Note, of at least $1,715,604. Certain holders of senior secured indebtedness of the Company (Barry Honig, a Member of the Company's Board of Directors) agreed to subordinate certain senior obligations of the Company to the prior payment of all obligations under the Note. The Company concluded that since this convertible promissory note does not include a down-round provision under which the conversion price could be affected by future equity offerings, this convertible promissory note was not considered a derivative.

Pursuant to the terms of the Note, the Company was required to prepay the principal amount of the Note in full upon the occurrence of a Qualified Financing in which the Company receives from one or more investors, net proceeds of at least $1,715,604 (not including any outstanding debt conversion or investments made by the note holder).  The Company has determined that the sale of the Units that occurred between September 2011 and October 2011, in the aggregate, constituted a "Qualified Financing" under the terms of the Note and accordingly, the Company was required to prepay the outstanding principal value of the Note.  On October 31, 2011, the Company and Note holder entered into a Waiver Agreement pursuant to which the Company and the Note holder agreed that the Company would prepay $700,000 principal of the Note and would waive (i) prepayment of the balance of the principal of the Note and (ii) any default under the Note arising solely from the Company's partial prepayment of the Note upon the occurrence of the Qualified Financing.

On March 30, 2012, the Company amended this Note to allow for the conversion of such Note into the Company's Series D Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock at $1.00 per share. The holder of this Note agreed to fully convert the remaining note of $1,015,604 (together with accrued and unpaid interest $9,140) into 1,024,744 shares of Series D Preferred Stock and an additional 212,017 shares of Series D Preferred Stock in consideration for the conversion of this Note into shares of Series D Preferred Stock. The Company accounted the reduction of the conversion price from $0.40 to $0.35 per share and such conversion under ASC 470-20-40 "Debt with Conversion and Other Options" and accordingly recorded loss from extinguishment of debts of $483,094 which is equal to the fair value of shares issued in excess of the fair value issuable pursuant to the original conversion terms. The Company recorded a loss from extinguishment of debts of $333,168 and preferred deemed dividend of $121,152 in connection with the issuance of the additional 212,017 shares of Series D Preferred Stock.

As a result of the conversion of this Note, the Company fully amortized the remaining unamortized debt discount of $897,117 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and was included in interest expense. Accrued interest as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, amounted to $0 and $7,882, respectively and was included in accounts payable and accrued expenses.

At March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, convertible promissory notes consisted of the following:
 

	March 31, 2012		December 31, 2011
Convertible promissory notes	$	-	$	1,015,604
Less: debt discount		-		(897,117	)
Convertible promissory notes, net	$	-	$	118,487

XML

NOTES PAYABLE

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2012

NOTES PAYABLE [Abstract]

NOTES PAYABLE

 

NOTE 9 - NOTES PAYABLE

In February 2011, the Company, Empire and its wholly-owned subsidiary, EXCX Funding Corp. (collectively the "Borrowers"), entered into a credit facility agreement (the "Credit Facility Agreement") with two lenders, whereby one of the lenders is a member of the Company's Board of Directors. The credit facility consists of a loan pursuant to which $4.5 million can be borrowed on a senior secured basis. The indebtedness under the loan facility was evidenced by a promissory note payable to the order of the lenders. The loan was used exclusively to fund the costs and expenses of certain music and sporting events (the "Events") as agreed to by the parties. The notes bear interest at 6% per annum and matured on January 31, 2012, subject to acceleration in the event the Borrowers undertake third party financing. In addition to the 6% interest, the Borrower shall also pay all interest, fees, costs and expenses incurred by lenders in connection with the issuance of this loan facility. Pursuant to the Credit Facility Agreement, the Borrowers entered into a Master Security Agreement, Collateral Assignment and Equity Pledge with the lenders whereby the Borrowers collaterally assigned and pledged to lenders, and granted to lenders a present, absolute, unconditional and continuing security interest in, all of the property, assets and equity interests of the Company as defined in such agreement. Furthermore, in connection with the Credit Facility Agreement, the Lenders entered into a Contribution and Security Agreement (the "Contribution Agreement") with the Company's former Chief Executive Officer, Sheldon Finkel (See Note 11). As consideration for the extension of credit pursuant to the Credit Facility Agreement, the Borrowers are obligated to pay a fee equal to 15% of the initial loan commitment of $4.5 million (the "Preferred Return Fee") of which Sheldon Finkel, shall receive a pro-rata portion (1/3). The Preferred Return Fee shall be payable if at all, only out of the net profits from the Events.  Accordingly, the Company shall record the Preferred Return Fee upon attaining net profits from the Events. The Company issued to the lenders and Sheldon Finkel an aggregate of 2,250,000 shares of the Company's newly designated Series A Preferred Stock, convertible into one share each of the Company's common stock.

The Company valued the 2,250,000 Series A Preferred Stock at the fair market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant at $1.20 per share or $2,700,000 and recorded a debt discount of $1,800,000 and deferred financing cost of $900,000 which are being amortized over the term of these notes. Such deferred financing cost represents the 750,000 Series A Preferred Stock issued to Sheldon Finkel for guaranteeing one-third of the net losses and assignment of that certain irrevocable letter of credit, as described above. Between May 2011 and December 2011, 2,250,000 of these preferred shares were converted into common stock. During August 2011, the revenues from the Events did not exceed its costs and accordingly the Company is indebted to the lenders, including a Board Member of the Company, and the Credit Facility Agreement may be in default after accounting for the revenues from the Events.  As a result, the obligations under the Contribution Agreements became obligations of the parties thereto to each other. Between August 2011 and December 2011, the Company paid a total of $3,326,500 to the lenders and such amount reduced the principal balance of these notes. On November 29, 2011, the holder of this note payable, converted $611,750 principal balance of this note into an aggregate of 1,529,375 of Units offered in a private placement. Each Unit was sold for a purchase price of $0.40 per Unit and consists of: (i) one share of Common Stock and (ii) a two-year warrant to purchase fifty (50%) percent of the number of shares of Common Stock purchased at an exercise price of $0.60 per share, subject to adjustment upon the occurrence of certain events.

In March 2012, the Board Member agreed to extend the maturity date of such note up to February 1, 2013.

As of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, accrued interest and fees on this note payable - related party amounted to $117,896 and $109,493, respectively. For the three months ended March 31, 2012, amortization of debt discount and deferred financing cost amounted to $101,836 and was included in interest expense.

As of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, note payable - related party consisted of the following:

	March 31, 2012		December 31, 2011
Note payable - related party	$	561,750	$	561,750
Less: debt discount - related party		-		(50,918	)
Note payable - related party, net	$	561,750	$	510,832

On March 17, 2011, in connection with the asset purchase agreement with Continental, the Company assumed a 12% $50,000 due on demand note from Prospect Uranium Inc. (see Note 3). In August 2011, the Company paid off the principal balance of $50,000 plus accrued interest of $8,000.

In March 2012, the Company received $500,000 in connection with a 5% secured promissory note (the "Bridge Note"), which is secured by certain assets of the Company's wholly owned subsidiaries, Arttor Gold, LLC and Noble Effort Gold LLC. The Company administratively issued such Bridge Note on April 10, 2012.  The full amount of principal and accrued interest under the Bridge Note will be due and payable on a date that shall be the earlier to occur of: (x) the sale of Noble Effort Gold LLC and Arttor Gold LLC, the Company's wholly-owned subsidiaries (the "Gold Subsidiaries") (or the sale of all or substantially all of the assets collectively contained in the Gold Subsidiaries) to a third party purchaser or (y) October 10, 2012. As of March 31, 2012, accrued interest on this note amounted to $616 and recorded in accounts payable and accrued expenses.

XML

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2012

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS [Abstract]

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

 

NOTE 11 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Note payable - related party

In connection with the Credit Facility Agreement as discussed in Note 9, the Company's Board Member funded $2,250,000 to the Company under this Credit Facility Agreement . Furthermore, in connection with the Credit Facility Agreement, the lenders entered into a Contribution Agreement with the Company's former Chief Executive Officer, Sheldon Finkel, pursuant to which Sheldon Finkel agreed to pay or reimburse the lenders the pro rata portion (1/3) of any net losses from Events and irrevocably pledged to lenders a certain irrevocable letter of credit dated in June 2010 in favor of Sheldon Finkel. The Company also issued to Sheldon Finkel and the Company's Board Member 750,000 shares each of the Company's newly designated Series A Preferred Stock, convertible into one share each of the Company's common stock. As consideration for the extension of credit pursuant to the Credit Facility Agreement, the borrowers are obligated to pay a fee equal to 15% of the initial loan commitment of $4.5 million of which Sheldon Finkel, shall receive a pro-rata portion (1/3). The Preferred Return Fee shall be payable if at all, only out of the net profits from the Events. On May 4, 2011, Sheldon Finkel and the Company's Board Member had converted their shares into 1,500,000 shares of Common Stock. Between August 2011 and December 2011, the Company paid a total of $1,688,250 to the Company's Board Member and such amount reduced the principal balance of his note. At March 31, 2012, principal amount of the note payable - related party amounted to $561,750.

Member of the board of directors

As of March 31, 2012, a Member of the Company's Board of Directors, Barry Honig holds 5,121,619 shares of Continental, directly or indirectly.  In addition, family members, including trusts for the benefit of Mr. Honig's minor children, currently own 3,635,000 shares of Continental of which Mr. Honig disclaims beneficial ownership.  Accordingly, as one of the largest shareholder of Continental, Mr. Honig may be deemed to be in control of Continental and accordingly there may exist certain conflicts of interest as a result.  On November 14, 2011, Mr. Honig filed a Schedule 13D with the Securities and Exchange Commission voluntarily disclosing his positions.  Furthermore, in connection with the asset purchase agreement with Continental, entities controlled by Mr. Honig were granted 4.5-year-warrants to purchase an aggregate of 2,050,666 shares of the Company's common stock at $2.835 per share upon assumption of the outstanding warrants of Continental.

Continental Resources Group, Inc.

As of March 31, 2012, Continental holds 42.23% of interest in the Company.  Effective in February 2012, the Company is considered to be an equity method investee as a result of the decrease in Continental's ownership interest of less than 50% which is accounted for under equity method of accounting. In March 2012, the Company issued 250,000 shares of its common stock to a third party for the payment of Continental's accrued legal fees of $170,614 (see Note 12) and considered as an advance to Continental. At March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company has a receivable from Continental amounting to $517,949 and $347,335 respectively. These advances are short-term in nature and non-interest bearing and have been recorded as due from equity method investor as reflected in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.

XML

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited) (USD $)	3 Months Ended		7 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2012	Mar. 31, 2011	Mar. 31, 2012
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss attributable to Pershing Gold Corporation	$ (22,929,169)	$ (1,288,362)	$ (34,719,307)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation	241,794	1,960	567,722
Bad debts	13,333	0	513,333
Bad debts in connection with discontinued operations	61,050	60,794	98,800
Amortization of promotional advances	0	8,643	0
Amortization of debt discounts and deferred financing cost	8,100,450	385,479	12,049,972
Amortization of prepaid expense in connection with the issuance of common stock issued for prepaid services	0	46,666	116,669
Loss from entinguishment of debts	4,769,776	0	4,769,776
Change in fair value of derivative liability	1,454,889	0	(5,447,917)
Interest expense in connection with the note modification	3,022,186	0	3,022,186
Interest expense in connection with the conversion of notes payable	0	0	230,192
Gain from disposal of discontinued operations	0	0	(1,134,448)
Loss from disposal of assets	9,434	0	183,464
Non-controlling interest	(606)	0	170,141
Realized loss - available for sale securities	27,000	0	27,000
Unrealized gain - trading securities	(19,702)	0	(19,702)
Common stock issued for services	239,028	0	1,076,528
Common stock issued in connection with an employment agreement	694,167	0	694,167
Common stock issued and included in settlement expense	0	0	4,761,500
Stock-based compensation	5,436,870	176,250	7,921,337
Other income pursuant to an option agreement	(4,333,333)	0	(4,333,333)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Restricted cash - current portion	0	(3,135,568)	1,320,817
Note receivable	0	0	0
Other receivables	99,908	0	86,575
Prepaid expenses - current portion and other current assets	70,845	(7,924)	1,940,167
Assets of discontinued operations - current portion	0	325,357	141,378
Prepaid expenses - long-term portion	2,492	0	6,645
Restricted cash - long-term portion	0	0	500,000
Deposits	(8,884)	0	(8,884)
Assets of discontinued operations - long term portion	0	30,000	40,556
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	88,451	0	451,834
Liabilities of discontinued operation	(21,622)	55,264	28,730
NET CASH USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES	(2,981,643)	(3,341,441)	(4,944,102)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Advances on note and loan receivable	0	(2,177,628)	0
Acquisition of mining rights	(550,000)	0	(550,000)
Payment received on note receivable	930,000	25,000	930,000
Proceeds received from the sale of marketable securities	323,000	0	323,000
Proceeds from disposal of assets	70,875	0	204,306
Purchase of property and equipment	(178,493)	(3,972)	(244,741)
NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES	595,382	(2,156,600)	(1,053,064)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from sale of common stock, net of issuance cost	847,500	0	4,024,916
Proceeds from sale of preferred stock	1,000,000	0	4,284,396
Proceeds from note payable - related party	0	2,250,000	0
Proceeds from note payable	500,000	2,250,000	500,000
Proceeds from convertible promissory note - related party	0	100,000	0
Proceeds from convertible promissory notes	0	650,000	1,715,604
Payments on notes payable	(1,039,771)	0	(2,906,493)
Advances to parent company	0	0	48,745
NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES	1,307,729	5,250,000	7,667,168
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE ON CASH	0	0	1,649
NET (DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS	(1,078,532)	(248,041)	1,671,651
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS- beginning of period	3,670,567	509,550	920,384
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS- end of period	2,592,035	261,509	2,592,035
Cash paid for:
Interest	71,817	4,771	404,308
Income taxes	0	0	0
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Issuance of common stock for payment of loans payable	0	360,000	0
Issuance of common stock for payment of notes payable and accrued interest	8,315,258	0	9,323,005
Issuance of common stock in connection with the conversion of a promissory note into a current private placement	0	0	611,750
Carrying value of assumed assets, liabilities and certain promotion rights agreement contributed from Golden Empire, LLC	0	(30,551)	0
Common stock issued for prepaid services	0	280,000	0
Issuance of additional notes payable upon assignment of debt	294,285	0	294,285
Beneficial conversion feature and debt discount in connection with the issuance of convertible promissory notes	168,163	750,000	1,883,767
Debt discount in connection with the issuance of the credit facility agreement and notes payable	0	1,800,000	0
Deferred financing cost in connection with the issuance of the credit facility agreement and notes payable	0	900,000	0
Preferred stock deemed dividend	1,616,777	0	4,901,173
Issuance of common stock for Expenses adjustment	170,614	0	170,614
Issuance of common stock for payment of accrued dividend	3,601	0	3,601
Reclassification of derivative liability to equity	7,750,289	0	7,750,289
Issuance of a note receivable pursuant to an option agreement	$ 1,000,000	$ 0	$ 1,000,000

XML

MARKETABLE SECURITIES

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2012

MARKETABLE SECURITIES [Abstract]

MARKETABLE SECURITIES

  

NOTE 5 - MARKETABLE SECURITIES

Marketable securities at March 31, 2012 consisted of the following:

	Cost			Gross Unrealized Gains			Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
Publicly traded equity securities - trading		$	100,000		$	19,702		$	-		$	119,702
Publicly traded equity securities - available for sale			4,650,000			-			-			4,650,000
Total		$	4,750,000		$	19,702		$	-		$	4,769,702

Trading securities are carried at fair value, with changes in unrealized holding gains and losses included in income and classified within interest and other income, net, in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations. Unrealized gains or losses on marketable securities available for sale are recognized on a periodic basis as an element of comprehensive income based on changes in the fair value of the security. Once liquidated, realized gains or losses on the sale of marketable securities available for sale will be reflected in the Company's net loss for the period in which the security are liquidated.

In April 2012, the Company sold its marketable securities - trading generating proceeds of $119,702. The increase in fair value of $19,702 has been recorded as unrealized gain in the statement of operations as of March 31, 2012.

In January 2012, the Company received 10 million restricted shares pursuant to an option agreement (see Note 13). At the time of issuance, the Company recorded the cost of investment at the fair market value (based on the recent selling price of the Investee's common stock at a private placement) of the shares at $0.50 per share or $5 million. Between February 2012 and March 2012, the Company sold 700,000 shares of the Investee's common stock under a private transaction and generated net proceeds of $323,000 and has recorded a realized loss of $27,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2012.

XML

SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2012

SUBSEQUENT EVENTS [Abstract]

SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

NOTE 15 - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On April 5, 2012, the Company purchase from Victoria Gold Corp.("VGC") and Victoria Resources (US) Inc. ("VRI" and collectively with VGC, the "Seller") the Seller's interest in approximately 13,300 acres of mining claims and private lands adjacent to the Company's landholdings at the Relief Canyon Mine in Pershing County, Nevada (the "Assets").  The Company refers to these properties as the Relief Canyon Expansion properties.  Approximately 8,900 acres of the Relief Canyon Expansion properties are held under leases and subleases with Newmont USA Ltd., which the Company refers to as the Newmont Leased properties.  Victoria Gold has reserved a 2% net smelter return royalty from the production on 221 of the 283 unpatented mining claims that it owned directly.  

The Assets include (i) unpatented mining claims located in Pershing County, Nevada (the "Owned Claims"); (ii) the assumption by the Company of a leasehold interest in certain unpatented mining claims in Pershing County Nevada referred to as the "Newmont Claims" held by VRI under a Minerals Lease and Sublease dated June 15, 2006, as amended, between Newmont USA Limited, d/b/a in Nevada as Newmont Mining Corporation ("Newmont") and VRI  (the "2006 Mineral Lease"); (iii) the assumption of the sublease, pursuant to the 2006 Mineral Lease, of an interest in certain fee minerals in Pershing County, Nevada in which Newmont holds a leasehold interest pursuant to that Minerals Lease SPL-6700, dated as of August 17, 1987 between Southern Pacific Land Company and SFP Minerals Corporation;  (iv) the assumption of the sublease, pursuant to the 2006 Mineral Lease, of an interest in certain fee lands in Pershing County, Nevada, in which Newmont holds a leasehold interest pursuant to a mining lease dated June 1, 1994 between The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company and Santa Fe Pacific Gold Corporation; and (v) the assumption of the sublease, pursuant to the 2006 Mineral Lease, of an interest in certain fee minerals in Pershing County, Nevada in which Newmont holds a leasehold interest pursuant to a minerals lease, dated as of March 23, 1999 between Nevada Land & Resource Company LLC and Santa Fe Pacific Gold Corporation.

In connection with the purchase of the Assets, the Company has agreed to purchase all of Seller's data, information and records related to the Assets, including all internal analyses and reports prepared by third party consultants or contractors, and to assume all liabilities and obligations of the Sellers arising after the closing of the transaction, including additional expenditures to be made in accordance with the 2006 Mineral Lease in the amount of  approximately $750,000 by June 15, 2012.

The closing of the acquisition of the Assets was subject to the satisfaction by the parties of certain obligations, including, among other things, the transfer of title to the Company of the Owned Claims, the assignment of Seller's leasehold interests to the Company and the payment of consideration by the Company for the Assets (the "Closing Conditions"). On April 5, 2012, the parties satisfied the Closing Conditions and the Company issued to VGC 10,000,000 shares of the Company's common stock, and a 2 year warrant to purchase 5,000,000 shares of Common Stock at a purchase price of $0.60 per share.  The Company also granted a 2% net smelter returns royalty on production from the Owned Claims which are not encumbered by production royalties payable to Newmont under the 2006 Mineral Lease.  The Company also paid the Seller $2,000,000 cash.

The Warrant may be exercised in whole, or in part, at any time by mean s of a "cashless" exercise.  In the event of an "Organic Change", as defined in the Warrant, the Company may elect to: (i) require the holder to exercise the Warrant prior to the consummation of such Organic Change or (ii) secure from the person or entity purchasing such assets or the successor resulting from such Organic Change, a written agreement to deliver to the holder, in exchange for the Warrant, a warrant of such acquiring or successor entity.

On April 2, 2012, the Company sold 4,300,002 shares of common stock to certain investors for an aggregate purchase price of $1,505,000 or a purchase price of $0.35 per share.

On April 17, 2012, the Company sold 85,714 shares of common stock to certain investors for an aggregate purchase price of $30,000 or a purchase price of $0.35 per share.

On April 6, 2012, the Company and its director, Barry Honig, entered into a consulting agreement (the "Consulting Agreement") pursuant to which Mr. Honig would provide certain consulting services relating to business development, corporate structure, strategic and business planning, selecting management and other functions reasonably necessary for advancing the business of the Company (the "Services").  The Consulting Agreement has an initial term of three years, subject to renewal.  In consideration for the Services, the Company agreed to pay Mr. Honig the following consideration:

·   A ten-year option (the "Option") to purchase 12,000,000 shares of the Company's common stock, exercisable at $0.35 per share which shall be vested in full on the date of issuance;

·   On such date that the Company receives minimum gross proceeds of at least $5,000,000 due to the occurrence of a Triggering Event (as defined in the Consulting Agreement) or the combination of multiple Triggering Events, Mr. Honig shall receive a one -time payment of $200,000; and

·   Upon a Change in Control (as defined in the Consulting Agreement) of the Company, Mr. Honig shall receive a one-time payment of $500,000.

The 12,000,000 options were valued on the grant date at approximately $0.43 per option or a total of $5,102,400 using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: stock price of $0.46 per share, volatility of 105%, expected term of 10 years, and a risk free interest rate of 2.07%.  In April 2012, the Company paid the one-time payment of $200,000 to Mr. Honig pursuant to the Consulting Agreement.

As previously disclosed, on July 22, 2011, the Company purchased substantially all of the assets of Continental in consideration for (i) 8 shares of the Company's common stock for every 10 shares of Common Stock of Continental outstanding; (ii) the assumption by the Company of the outstanding warrants to purchase shares of Continental's common stock at a ratio of one warrant (the "Company Warrants") to purchase 8 shares of the Company's Common Stock for every Continental Warrant to purchase 10 shares of Continental's common stock; and (iii)  the assumption of Continental's 2010 Equity Incentive Plan and all options granted and issued thereunder at a ratio of one option to purchase 8 shares of the Company Common Stock for every option to purchase 10 shares of Continental's common stock outstanding. On April 9, 2012, the Company issued an aggregate of 9,576,285 shares of its common stock, to holders of Company Warrants in consideration for the cancellation of such Company Warrants.  Additionally, such holders agreed to the elimination of certain most favored nations provisions or price protection associated with the shares of Continental's common stock issued in connection with the Continental Warrants (the "Warrant Cancellation Transaction"). The Company issued 9,576,285 shares of the Company's common stock at a ratio of 300 shares for every 1,000 Company Warrants held.  An aggregate of 31,920,953 Company Warrants were cancelled as a result of the Warrant Cancellation Transaction. Accordingly, the Company valued the 9,576,285 common shares at the fair market value on the date of grant at $0.505 per share or $4,836,024.  On April 27, 2012, the Company issued an additional 24,000 shares of common stock in consideration for the cancellation of 80,000 Company Warrants and the elimination of certain most favored nation provisions or price protection associated with the shares of Continental's common stock issued in connection with the Continental Warrants.   The Company values the 24,000 common shares at the fair market value on the date of the grant at $0.31 per share or $7,440.

On May 7, 2012, the Company and Amicor agreed to extend the expiration date to June 15, 2012 in connection with the right to exercise pursuant to an Option Agreement (see Note 13).

On April 27, 2012, the Company issued 50,000 shares of common stock to a consultant in consideration for certain consulting services rendered. The Company has accrued such consulting expense as of March 31, 2012 amounting to $45,000.