10-K

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012

OR

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _______to_______

Commission file number 000-53149

SERVISFIRST BANCSHARES, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Delaware	26-0734029
(State or Other Jurisdiction of	(I.R.S. Employer
Incorporation or Organization)	Identification No.)

850 Shades Creek Parkway, Birmingham, Alabama	35209
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)	(Zip Code)

(205) 949-0302

(Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

NONE

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Common Stock, par value $.001 per share

(Titles of Class)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yes ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.

Yes ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.                       Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the  preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definition of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”, and small reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one):

   Large accelerated filer ¨ Accelerated filer x Non-accelerated filer ¨ Smaller reporting company ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ¨ No x

As of June 30, 2012, the aggregate market value of the voting common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant, based on a stock price of $30.00 per share of Common Stock, was $159,534,480.

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Class	Outstanding as of February 28, 2013
Common stock, $.001 par value	6,268,812

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the registrant’s definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with its 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by reference into Part III of this annual report on Form 10-K.

SERVISFIRST BANCSHARE, INC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

FORM 10-K

DECEMBER 31, 2012

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS		3
PART I.		4
ITEM 1.	BUSINESS	4
ITEM 1A.	RISK FACTORS	22
ITEM 1B.	UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS	30
ITEM 2.	PROPERTIES	31
ITEM 3.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS	31
ITEM 4.	MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES	31
PART II.		32
ITEM 5	MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES	32
ITEM 6.	SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA	34
ITEM 7.	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS	36
ITEM 7A.	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK	55
ITEM 8.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA	57
ITEM 9.	CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES	99
ITEM 9A.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	99
ITEM 9B.	OTHER INFORMATION	100
PART III.		100
ITEM 10.	DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE	100
ITEM 11.	EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION	100
ITEM 12.	SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS	100
ITEM 13.	CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE	100
ITEM 14.	PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES	100
PART IV.		101
ITEM 15.	EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES	101
SIGNATURES		103
EXHIBIT INDEX		104

2

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Some of our statements contained in this Form 10-K, including matters discussed under the caption “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”, are “forward-looking statements” that are based upon our current expectations and projections about future events. Forward-looking statements relate to future events or our future financial performance and include statements about the competitiveness of the banking industry, potential regulatory obligations, our entrance and expansion into other markets, our other business strategies and other statements that are not historical facts. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of performance or results. When we use words like “may,” “plan,” “contemplate,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “intend,” “continue,” “expect,” “project,” “predict,” “estimate,” “could,” “should,” “would,” “will,” and similar expressions, you should consider them as identifying forward-looking statements, although we may use other phrasing. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties and are based on our beliefs and assumptions, and on the information available to us at the time that these disclosures were prepared and may not be realized due to a variety of factors, including, but not limited to, the following:

· the effects of the continued slow economic recovery and high unemployment;

· the effects of continued deleveraging of United States citizens and businesses;

· the effects of potential federal spending cuts due to the United States debt ceiling crisis;

· the effects of continued depression of residential housing values and the slow market for sales and resales;

· credit risks, including credit risks resulting from the devaluation of collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) and/or structured investment vehicles to which we currently have no direct exposure;

· the effects of governmental monetary and fiscal policies and legislative and regulatory changes;

· the effect of changes in interest rates on the level and composition of deposits, loan demand and the values of loan collateral, securities and interest sensitive assets and liabilities;

· the effects of terrorism and efforts to combat it;

· the effects of hazardous weather such as the tornados that struck the state of Alabama in April 2011 and January 2012;

· the effects of competition from other commercial banks, thrifts, mortgage banking firms, consumer finance companies, credit unions, securities brokerage firms, insurance companies, money market and other mutual funds and other financial institutions operating in our market area and elsewhere, including institutions operating regionally, nationally and internationally, together with competitors offering banking products and services by mail, telephone and the internet;

· the effect of any merger, acquisition or other transaction to which we or our subsidiary may from time to time be a party, including our ability to successfully integrate any business that we acquire; and

· the effect of inaccuracies in our assumptions underlying the establishment of our loan loss reserves.

All written or oral forward-looking statements attributable to us are expressly qualified in their entirety by this Cautionary Note. Our actual results may differ significantly from those we discuss in these forward-looking statements. For certain other factors, risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from estimates and projections contained in these forward-looking statements, please read the “Risk Factors” in Item 1A.

3

PART I

Unless this Form 10-K indicates otherwise, the terms “we,” ”our,” “us,” “the Company,” “ServisFirst Bancshares” or “ServisFirst” as used herein refer to ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc., and its subsidiaries, including ServisFirst Bank, which sometimes is referred to as “our bank subsidiary” or “the Bank” and its other subsidiaries. References herein to the fiscal years 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012 mean our fiscal years ended December 31, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012, respectively.

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

Overview

We are a bank holding company within the meaning of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 and are headquartered in Birmingham, Alabama. Through our wholly-owned subsidiary bank, we operate 11 full-service banking offices located in Jefferson, Shelby, Madison, Montgomery and Houston Counties of Alabama and in Escambia County Florida in the metropolitan statistical areas (“MSAs”) of Birmingham-Hoover, Huntsville, Montgomery and Dothan, Alabama, and Pensacola-Ferry Pass-Brent, Florida. Additionally, we operate a loan production office in Mobile County of Alabama in the Mobile MSA. As of December 31, 2012, we had total assets of approximately $2.9 billion, total loans of approximately $2.4 billion, total deposits of approximately $2.5 billion and total stockholders’ equity of approximately $233 million.

In January 2012, we formed SF Holding 1, Inc., an Alabama corporation, and its subsidiary, SF Realty 1, Inc., an Alabama corporation. SF Realty 1 elected to be treated as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) for U.S. income tax purposes. SF Realty 1 holds and manages participations in residential mortgages and commercial real estate loans originated by ServisFirst Bank. SF Holding 1, Inc. and SF Realty 1, Inc. are both consolidated into the Company.

We were originally incorporated as a Delaware corporation in August 2007 for the purpose of acquiring all of the common stock of ServisFirst Bank, an Alabama banking corporation (separately referred to herein as the “Bank”), which started operations on May 2, 2005. On November 29, 2007, we became the sole shareholder of the Bank by virtue of a plan of reorganization and agreement of merger pursuant to which (i) a wholly-owned subsidiary formed for the purpose of the reorganization was merged with and into the Bank, with the Bank surviving, and (ii) each shareholder of the Bank exchanged their shares of the Bank’s common stock for an equal number of shares of our common stock.

The holding company structure provides flexibility for expansion of our banking business through the possible acquisition of other financial institutions, the provision of additional banking-related services which the traditional commercial bank may not provide under current law, and additional financing alternatives such as the issuance of trust preferred securities. We have no current plans to acquire any operating subsidiaries in addition to the Bank, but we may make acquisitions in the future if we deem them to be in the best interest of our stockholders. Any such acquisitions would be subject to applicable regulatory approvals and requirements.

Our principal business is to accept deposits from the public and to make loans and other investments. Our principal sources of funds for loans and investments are demand, time, savings and other deposits (including negotiable orders of withdrawal, or NOW accounts) and the amortization and prepayment of loans and borrowings. Our principal sources of income are interest and fees collected on loans, interest and dividends collected on other investments, and service charges. Our principal expenses are interest paid on savings and other deposits (including NOW accounts), interest paid on our other borrowings, employee compensation, office expenses and other overhead expenses.

Market Growth and Competition

The markets in which we operate enjoyed steady expansion in their deposit base until being negatively affected by the recession and credit crisis beginning in 2008. We believe that the long-term growth potential of each of our markets is substantial, and further believe that many local affluent professionals and small business owners will do their banking with local, autonomous institutions that offer a higher level of personalized service. According to FDIC reports, total deposits in each of our market areas have expanded from 2002 to 2012 (deposit data reflects totals as reported by financial institutions as of June 30^th of each year) as follows:

4

	2012		2002		Compound Annual Growth Rate
	(Dollars in Billions)
Jefferson/Shelby County, Alabama	$	26.6	$	15.1		5.83	%
Madison County, Alabama		5.9		3.4		5.67	%
Montgomery County, Alabama		6.6		3.2		7.51	%
Houston County, Alabama		2.1		1.3		4.91	%
Escambia County, Florida		3.5		2.6		3.02	%

The Bank is subject to intense competition from various financial institutions and other financial service providers.  The Bank competes for deposits with other local and regional commercial banks, savings and loan associations, credit unions and issuers of commercial paper and other securities, such as money-market and mutual funds.  In making loans, the Bank competes with other commercial banks, savings and loan associations, consumer finance companies, credit unions, leasing companies and other lenders.

The following table illustrates our market share, by insured deposits, in our primary service areas at June 30, 2012, as reported by the FDIC:

Market	Number of Branches		Our Market Deposits		Total Market Deposits		Ranking		Market Share Percentage
	(Dollars in Millions)
Alabama:
Birmingham-Hoover MSA		3	$	975.2	$	29,406.0		6		3.32	%
Huntsville MSA		2		500.5		6,606.7		5		7.58	%
Montgomery MSA		2		376.9		7,909.1		6		4.76	%
Dothan MSA		2		249.9		2,800.0		3		8.92	%
Florida:
Pensacola-Ferry Pass-Brent MSA		1		140.8		4,686.3		11		3.00	%

Together, deposits for all institutions in Jefferson, Shelby, Montgomery, Madison, and Houston Counties represented approximately 48.75% of all the deposits in the State of Alabama at June 30, 2012. Deposits for all institutions in Escambia County represent approximately 0.82% of all the deposits in the state of Florida at June 30, 2012.

Our retail and commercial divisions operate in highly competitive markets. We compete directly in retail and commercial banking markets with other commercial banks, savings and loan associations, credit unions, mortgage brokers and mortgage companies, mutual funds, securities brokers, consumer finance companies, other lenders and insurance companies, locally, regionally and nationally. Many of our competitors compete by using offerings by mail, telephone, computer and/or the Internet. Interest rates, both on loans and deposits, and prices of services are significant competitive factors among financial institutions generally. Providing convenient locations, desired financial products and services, convenient office hours, quality customer service, quick local decision making, a strong community reputation and long-term personal relationships are all important competitive factors that we emphasize.

In our primary service areas, our five largest competitors are Regions Bank, Wells Fargo Bank, Compass Bank, BB&T and PNC Bank, NA. These institutions, as well as other competitors of ours, have greater resources, serve broader geographic markets, have higher lending limits, offer various services that we do not offer and can better afford, and make broader use of, media advertising, support services, and electronic technology than we can. To offset these competitive disadvantages, we depend on our reputation for greater personal service, consistency, and flexibility and the ability to make credit and other business decisions quickly.

Business Strategy

Management Philosophy

Our philosophy is to operate as an urban community bank emphasizing prompt, personalized customer service to the individuals and businesses located in our primary service areas. We believe this philosophy has attracted and will continue to attract customers and capture market share historically controlled by other financial institutions operating in our market. Our management and employees focus on recognizing customers’ needs and delivering products and services to meet those needs. We aggressively market to businesses, professionals and affluent consumers that may be underserved by the large regional banks that operate in their service areas. We believe that local ownership and control allows us to serve customers more efficiently and effectively and will aid in our growth and success.

5

Operating Strategy

In order for us to achieve the level of prompt, responsive service necessary to attract customers and to develop our desired reputation as an urban bank with a community focus, we have employed the following operating strategies:

· Quality Employees. We strive to hire a highly trained and experienced staff. Employees are trained to answer questions about all of our products and services, so that the first employee the customer encounters can usually resolve most questions the customer may have.

· Experienced Senior Management. Our senior management has extensive experience in the banking industry and substantial business and banking contacts in our markets.

· Relationship Banking. We focus on cross-selling financial products and services to our customers. Our customer-contact employees are highly trained to recognize customer needs and to meet those needs with a sophisticated array of products and services. We view cross-selling as a means to leverage relationships and help provide useful financial services to retain customers, attract new customers and remain competitive.

· Community-Oriented Directors. The boards of directors for the holding company and the Bank currently consist of residents of Birmingham, but we also have a non-voting advisory board of directors in each of the Huntsville, Montgomery, Dothan and Pensacola markets. These advisory directors represent a broad spectrum of business experience and community involvement in the service areas where they live. As residents of our primary service areas, they are sensitive and responsive to the needs of our customers and prospects in their respective areas. In addition, our directors and advisory directors bring substantial business and banking contacts to us.

· Highly Visible Offices. Our local headquarters buildings are highly visible in Birmingham’s south Jefferson County, and in the metropolitan areas of Huntsville, Montgomery, Dothan and Pensacola. We believe that a highly visible headquarters building gives us a powerful presence in each local market.

· Individual Customer Focus. We focus on providing individual service and attention to our target customers, which include privately held businesses with $2 million to $250 million in sales, professionals, and affluent consumers. As our officers and directors become familiar with our customers on an individual basis, they are able to respond to credit requests quickly.

· Market Segmentation and Advertising. We utilize traditional advertising media, such as local periodicals and event sponsorships, to increase our public visibility. The majority of our marketing and advertising efforts, however, are focused on leveraging our management’s, directors’, advisory directors’ and stockholders’ existing relationship networks.

· Telephone and Internet Banking Services. We offer various banking services by telephone through 24-hour voice response and through internet banking.

Growth Strategy

Because we believe that growth and expansion of our operations are significant factors in our success, we have implemented the following growth strategies:

· Capitalize on Community Orientation. We seek to capitalize on the extensive relationships that our management, directors, advisory directors and stockholders have with businesses and professionals in our markets. We believe that these market sectors are not adequately served by the existing banks in such areas.

· Emphasize Local Decision-Making. We emphasize local decision-making by experienced bankers. We believe this helps us attract local businesses and service-minded customers.

· Offer Fee-Generating Products and Services. Our range of services, pricing strategies, interest rates paid and charged, and hours of operation are structured to attract our target customers and increase our market share. We strive to offer the businessperson, professional, entrepreneur and consumer the best loan services available while pricing these services competitively.

6

· Office Location Strategy. We located our offices within each of our local markets in areas that we believe provide visibility, convenience and access to our target customers.

Lending Services

Lending Policy

Our lending policies are established to support the credit needs of our primary market areas. Consequently, we aggressively seek high-quality borrowers within a limited geographic area and in competition with other well-established financial institutions in our primary service areas that have greater resources and lending limits than we have.

Loan Approval and Review

Our loan approval policies set various levels of officer lending authority. When the total amount of loans to a single borrower exceeds an individual officer’s lending authority, further approval must be obtained from the Regional CEO and/or our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Risk Officer or Chief Credit Officer, based on our loan policies.

Commercial Loans

Our commercial lending activity is directed principally toward businesses and professional service firms whose demand for funds fall within our legal lending limits. We make loans to small- and medium-sized businesses in our primary service areas for the purpose of upgrading plant and equipment, buying inventory and for general working capital. Typically, targeted business borrowers have annual sales between $2 million and $250 million. This category of loans includes loans made to individual, partnership or corporate borrowers, and such loans are obtained for a variety of business purposes. We offer a variety of commercial lending products to meet the needs of business and professional service firms in our service areas. These commercial lending products include seasonal loans, bridge loans and term loans for working capital, expansion of the business, or acquisition of property, plant and equipment. We also offer commercial lines of credit. The repayment terms of our commercial loans will vary according to the needs of each customer.

Our commercial loans usually will be collateralized. Generally, collateral consists of business assets, including any or all of general intangibles, accounts receivables, inventory, equipment, or real estate. Collateral is subject to the risk that we may have difficulty converting it to a liquid asset if necessary, as well as risks associated with degree of specialization, mobility and general collectability in a default situation. To mitigate this risk, we underwrite collateral to strict standards, including valuations and general acceptability based on our ability to monitor its ongoing condition and value.

We underwrite our commercial loans primarily on the basis of the borrower’s cash flow, ability to service debt, and degree of management expertise. As a general practice, we take as collateral a security interest in any available real estate, equipment or personal property. Under limited circumstances, we may make commercial loans on an unsecured basis. This type loan may be subject to many different types of risks, including fraud, bankruptcy, economic downturn, deteriorated or non-existent collateral, and changes in interest rates such as have occurred in the recent economic recession and credit market crisis. Perceived risks may differ depending on the particular industry in which a borrower operates. General risks to an industry, such as the recent economic recession and credit market crisis, or to a particular segment of an industry are monitored by senior management on an ongoing basis. When warranted, loans to individual borrowers who may be at risk due to an industry condition may be more closely analyzed and reviewed by the credit review committee or board of directors. Commercial and industrial borrowers are required to submit financial statements to us on a regular basis. We analyze these statements, looking for weaknesses and trends, and will assign the loan a risk grade accordingly. Based on this risk grade, the loan may receive an increased degree of scrutiny by management, up to and including additional loss reserves being required.

Real Estate Loans

We make commercial real estate loans, construction and development loans and residential real estate loans.

Commercial Real Estate. Commercial real estate loans are generally limited to terms of five years or less, although payments are usually structured on the basis of a longer amortization. Interest rates may be fixed or adjustable, although rates generally will not be fixed for a period exceeding five years. In addition, we generally will require personal guarantees from the principal owners of the property supported by a review by our management of the principal owners’ personal financial statements.

7

Commercial real estate lending presents risks not found in traditional residential real estate lending. Repayment is dependent upon successful management and marketing of properties and on the level of expense necessary to maintain the property. Repayment of these loans may be adversely affected by conditions in the real estate market or the general economy. Also, commercial real estate loans typically involve relatively large loan balances to a single borrower. To mitigate these risks, we closely monitor our borrower concentration. These loans generally have shorter maturities than other loans, giving us an opportunity to reprice, restructure or decline renewal. As with other loans, all commercial real estate loans are graded depending upon strength of credit and performance. A higher risk grade will bring increased scrutiny by our management, the credit review committee and the board of directors.

Construction and Development Loans. We make construction and development loans both on a pre-sold and speculative basis. If the borrower has entered into an agreement to sell the property prior to beginning construction, then the loan is considered to be on a pre-sold basis. If the borrower has not entered into an agreement to sell the property prior to beginning construction, then the loan is considered to be on a speculative basis. Construction and development loans are generally made with a term of 12 to 24 months, and interest is paid monthly. The ratio of the loan principal to the value of the collateral as established by independent appraisal typically will not exceed 80% of residential construction loans. Speculative construction loans will be based on the borrower’s financial strength and cash flow position. Development loans are generally limited to 75% of appraised value. Loan proceeds will be disbursed based on the percentage of completion and only after the project has been inspected by an experienced construction lender or third-party inspector. During times of economic stress, this type loan has typically had a greater degree of risk than other loan types, as has been evident in the recent credit crisis.

Beginning in 2008, there have been numerous construction loan defaults among many commercial bank loan portfolios, including a number of Alabama-based banks. To mitigate the risk of such defaults in our portfolio, the board of directors and management tracks and monitors these loans closely. Total construction loans increased $7.1 million in 2012. We maintained our allocation of loan loss reserve for these loans at approximately $6.5 million, the same amount as allocated at the end 2011. Charge-offs for construction loans increased from $2.6 million for 2011 to $3.1 million for 2012, but the overall quality of the construction loan portfolio has improved with $14.4 million rated as substandard at December 31, 2012 compared to $19.5 million at December 31, 2011.

Residential Real Estate Loans. Our residential real estate loans consist primarily of residential second mortgage loans, residential construction loans and traditional mortgage lending for one-to-four family residences. We will originate fixed-rate mortgages with long-term maturities and balloon payments generally not exceeding five years. The majority of our fixed-rate loans are sold in the secondary mortgage market. All loans are made in accordance with our appraisal policy, with the ratio of the loan principal to the value of collateral as established by independent appraisal generally not exceeding 80%. Risks associated with these loans are generally less significant than those of other loans and involve fluctuations in the value of real estate, bankruptcies, economic downturn and customer financial problems. Real estate has recently experienced a period of declining prices which negatively affects real estate collateralized loans, but this negative effect has to date been more prevalent in regions of the United States other than our primary service areas; however, homes in our primary service areas may experience significant price declines in the future. We have not made and do not expect to make any “Alt-A” or subprime loans.

Consumer Loans

We offer a variety of loans to retail customers in the communities we serve. Consumer loans in general carry a moderate degree of risk compared to other loans. They are generally more risky than traditional residential real estate loans but less risky than commercial loans. Risk of default is usually determined by the well-being of the local economies. During times of economic stress, there is usually some level of job loss both nationally and locally, which directly affects the ability of the consumer to repay debt. Risk on consumer-type loans is generally managed though policy limitations on debt levels consumer borrowers may carry and limitations on loan terms and amounts depending upon collateral type.

Our consumer loans include home equity loans (open- and closed-end); vehicle financing; loans secured by deposits; and secured and unsecured personal loans. These various types of consumer loans all carry varying degrees of risk.

Commitments and Contingencies

As of December 31, 2012, we had commitments to extend credit beyond current fundings of approximately $860.4 million, had issued standby letters of credit in the amount of approximately $36.4 million, and had commitments for credit card arrangements of approximately $25.7 million.

8

Policy for Determining the Loan Loss Allowance

The allowance for loan losses represents our management’s assessment of the risk associated with extending credit and its evaluation of the quality of the loan portfolio. In calculating the adequacy of the loan loss allowance, our management evaluates the following factors:

· the asset quality of individual loans;

· changes in the national and local economy and business conditions/development, including underwriting standards, collections, and charge-off and recovery practices;

· changes in the nature and volume of the loan portfolio;

· changes in the experience, ability and depth of our lending staff and management;

· changes in the trend of the volume and severity of past-due loans and classified loans, and trends in the volume of non-accrual loans, troubled debt restructurings and other modifications, as has occurred in the residential mortgage markets and particularly for residential construction and development loans;

· possible deterioration in collateral segments or other portfolio concentrations;

· historical loss experience (when available) used for pools of loans (i.e. collateral types, borrowers, purposes, etc.);

· changes in the quality of our loan review system and the degree of oversight by our board of directors; and

· the effect of external factors such as competition and the legal and regulatory requirement on the level of estimated credit losses in our current loan portfolio.

These factors are evaluated monthly, and changes in the asset quality of individual loans are evaluated as needed.

We assign all of our loans individual risk grades when they are underwritten. We have established minimum general reserves based on the asset quality grade of the loan. We also apply general reserve factors based on historical losses, management’s experience and common industry and regulatory guidelines.

After a loan is underwritten and booked, it is monitored or reviewed by the account officer, management, internal loan review, and external loan review personnel during the life of the loan. Payment performance is monitored monthly for the entire loan portfolio; account officers contact customers during the regular course of business and may be able to ascertain if weaknesses are developing with the borrower; independent loan consultants perform a review annually; and federal and state banking regulators perform annual reviews of the loan portfolio. If we detect weaknesses that have developed in an individual loan relationship, we downgrade the loan and assign higher reserves based upon management’s assessment of the weaknesses in the loan that may affect full collection of the debt. We have established a policy to discontinue accrual of interest (non-accrual status) after the loan has become 90 days delinquent as to payment of principal or interest unless the loan is considered to be well collateralized and is actively in process of collection. In addition, a loan will be placed on non-accrual status before it becomes 90 days delinquent if management believes that the borrower’s financial condition is such that the collection of interest or principal is doubtful. Interest previously accrued but uncollected on such loans is reversed and charged against current income when the receivable is determined to be uncollectible. Interest income on non-accrual loans is recognized only as received. If a loan will not be collected in full, we increase the allowance for loan losses to reflect our management’s estimate of any potential exposure or loss.

Our net loan losses to average total loans decreased to 0.24% for the year ended December 31, 2012 from 0.32% for the year ended December 31, 2011, which was down from 0.55% for the year ended December 31, 2010. Historical performance, however, is not an indicator of future performance, and our future results could differ materially. As of December 31, 2012, we had $10.4 million of non-accrual loans, of which 96% are secured real estate loans. We have allocated approximately $6.5 million of our allowance for loan losses to real estate construction, acquisition and development, and lot loans and $8.2 million to commercial and industrial loans, and have a total loan loss reserve as of December 31, 2012 allocable to specific loan types of $19.9 million. We also currently maintain a portion of the allowance for loan losses which is management’s evaluation of potential future losses that would arise in the loan portfolio should management’s assumption about qualitative and environmental conditions materialize. The qualitative factor portion of the allowance for loan losses is based on management’s judgment regarding various external and internal factors including macroeconomic trends, management’s assessment of the Company’s loan growth prospects and evaluations of internal risk controls. This qualitative factor portion of the allowance for loan losses totaled $6.4 million, resulting in a total allowance for loan losses of $26.3 million at December 31, 2012. Our management believes, based upon historical performance, known factors, overall judgment, and regulatory methodologies, that the current methodology used to determine the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses is reasonable, including after considering the effect of the current residential housing market defaults and business failures (particularly of real estate developers) plaguing financial institutions in general.

9

Our allowance for loan losses is also subject to regulatory examinations and determinations as to adequacy, which may take into account such factors as the methodology used to calculate the allowance for loan losses and the size of the allowance for loan losses in comparison to a group of peer banks identified by the regulators. During their routine examinations of banks, regulatory agencies may require a bank to make additional provisions to its allowance for loan losses when, in the opinion of the regulators, credit evaluations and allowance for loan loss methodology differ materially from those of management.

While it is our policy to charge off in the current period loans for which a loss is considered probable, there are additional risks of future losses that cannot be quantified precisely or attributed to particular loans or classes of loans. Because these risks include the state of the economy, our management’s judgment as to the adequacy of the allowance is necessarily approximate and imprecise.

Investments

In addition to loans, we purchase investments in securities, primarily in mortgage-backed securities and state and municipal securities. No investment in any of those instruments will exceed any applicable limitation imposed by law or regulation. Our board of directors reviews the investment portfolio on an ongoing basis in order to ensure that the investments conform to the policy as set by the board of directors. Our investment policy provides that no more than 50% of our total investment portfolio may be composed of municipal securities. All securities held are traded in liquid markets, and we have no auction-rate securities. We had no investments in any one security, restricted or liquid, in excess of 10% of our stockholders’ equity at December 31, 2012.

Deposit Services

We seek to establish solid core deposits, including checking accounts, money market accounts, savings accounts and a variety of certificates of deposit and IRA accounts. We currently have no brokered deposits. To attract deposits, we employ an aggressive marketing plan throughout our service areas that features a broad product line and competitive services. The primary sources of core deposits are residents of, and businesses and their employees located in, our market areas. We have obtained deposits primarily through personal solicitation by our officers and directors, through reinvestment in the community, and through our stockholders, who have been a substantial source of deposits and referrals. We make deposit services accessible to customers by offering direct deposit, wire transfer, night depository, banking-by-mail and remote capture for non-cash items. The Bank is a member of the FDIC, and thus our deposits are FDIC-insured. The FDIC’s full guarantee of noninterest-bearing transaction accounts, as provided for by The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, expired on December 31, 2012.

Other Banking Services

Given client demand for increased convenience and account access, we offer a range of products and services, including 24-hour telephone banking, direct deposit, Internet banking, mobile banking, traveler’s checks, safe deposit boxes, attorney trust accounts and automatic account transfers. We also participate in a shared network of automated teller machines and a debit card system that our customers are able to use throughout Alabama and in other states and, in certain accounts subject to certain conditions, we rebate to the customer the ATM fees automatically after each business day. Additionally, we offer Visa^® credit cards.

Asset, Liability and Risk Management

We manage our assets and liabilities with the aim of providing an optimum and stable net interest margin, a profitable after-tax return on assets and return on equity, and adequate liquidity. These management functions are conducted within the framework of written loan and investment policies. To monitor and manage the interest rate margin and related interest rate risk, we have established policies and procedures to monitor and report on interest rate risk, devise strategies to manage interest rate risk, monitor loan originations and deposit activity and approve all pricing strategies. We attempt to maintain a balanced position between rate-sensitive assets and rate-sensitive liabilities. Specifically, we chart assets and liabilities on a matrix by maturity, effective duration, and interest adjustment period, and endeavor to manage any gaps in maturity ranges.

10

Seasonality and Cycles

We do not consider our commercial banking business to be seasonal.

Employees

We had 234 full-time equivalent employees as of December 31, 2012. We consider our employee relations to be good, and we have no collective bargaining agreements with any employees.

Supervision and Regulation

Both we and the Bank are subject to extensive state and federal banking regulations that impose restrictions on and provide for general regulatory oversight of our operations. These regulations require compliance with various consumer protection provisions applicable to lending, deposits, brokerage and fiduciary activities. These guidelines also impose capital adequacy requirements and restrict our ability to repurchase our stock and receive dividends from the Bank. These laws generally are intended to protect depositors and not stockholders. The following discussion describes the material elements of the regulatory framework that applies to us.

Bank Holding Company Regulation

Since we own all of the capital stock of the Bank, we are a bank holding company under the federal Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (the “BHC Act”). As a result, we are primarily subject to the supervision, examination and reporting requirements of the BHC Act and the regulations of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “Federal Reserve”).

Acquisition of Banks

The BHC Act requires every bank holding company to obtain the Federal Reserve’s prior approval before:

· acquiring direct or indirect ownership or control of any voting shares of any bank if, after the acquisition, the bank holding company will, directly or indirectly, own or control more than 5% of the bank’s voting shares;

· acquiring all or substantially all of the assets of any bank; or

· merging or consolidating with any other bank holding company.

Additionally, the BHC Act provides that the Federal Reserve may not approve any of these transactions if such transaction would result in or tend to create a monopoly or substantially lessen competition or otherwise function as a restraint of trade, unless the anti-competitive effects of the proposed transaction are clearly outweighed by the public interest in meeting the convenience and needs of the community to be served. The Federal Reserve is also required to consider the financial and managerial resources and future prospects of the bank holding companies and banks concerned and the convenience and needs of the community to be served. The Federal Reserve’s consideration of financial resources generally focuses on capital adequacy, which is discussed below.

Under the BHC Act, if adequately capitalized and adequately managed, we or any other bank holding company located in Alabama may purchase a bank located outside of Alabama. Conversely, an adequately capitalized and adequately managed bank holding company located outside of Alabama may purchase a bank located inside Alabama. In each case, however, restrictions may be placed on the acquisition of a bank that has only been in existence for a limited amount of time or will result in specified concentrations of deposits.

Change in Bank Control.

Subject to various exceptions, the BHC Act and the Change in Bank Control Act, together with related regulations, require Federal Reserve approval prior to any person’s or company’s acquiring “control” of a bank holding company. Under a rebuttable presumption established by the Federal Reserve, the acquisition of 10% or more of a class of voting stock of a bank holding company with a class of securities registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act would, under the circumstances set forth in the presumption, constitute acquisition of control of the bank holding company. In addition, any person or group of persons must obtain the approval of the Federal Reserve under the BHC Act before acquiring 25% (5% in the case of an acquirer that is already a bank holding company) or more of the outstanding common stock of a bank holding company, or otherwise obtaining control or a “controlling influence” over the bank holding company.

11

Permitted Activities

Under the BHC Act, a bank holding company is generally permitted to engage in or acquire direct or indirect control of more than 5% of the voting shares of any company engaged in the following activities:

· banking or managing or controlling banks; and

· any activity that the Federal Reserve determines to be so closely related to banking as to be a proper incident to the business of banking.

Activities that the Federal Reserve has found to be so closely related to banking as to be a proper incident to the business of banking include:

· factoring accounts receivable;

· making, acquiring, brokering or servicing loans and usual related activities;

· leasing personal or real property;

· operating a non-bank depository institution, such as a savings association;

· trust company functions;

· financial and investment advisory activities;

· discount securities brokerage activities;

· underwriting and dealing in government obligations and money market instruments;

· providing specified management consulting and counseling activities;

· performing selected data processing services and support services;

· acting as an agent or broker in selling credit life insurance and other types of insurance in connection with credit transactions; and

· performing selected insurance underwriting activities.

Despite prior approval, the Federal Reserve may order a bank holding company or its subsidiaries to terminate any of these activities or to terminate its ownership or control of any subsidiary when it has reasonable cause to believe that the bank holding company’s continued ownership, activity or control constitutes a serious risk to the financial safety, soundness, or stability of it or any of its bank subsidiaries.

In addition to the permissible bank holding company activities listed above, a bank holding company may qualify and elect to become a financial holding company, permitting the bank holding company to engage in activities that are financial in nature or incidental or complementary to financial activity. The BHC Act expressly lists the following activities as financial in nature:

· lending, trust and other banking activities;

· insuring, guaranteeing, or indemnifying against loss or harm, or providing and issuing annuities, and acting as principal, agent, or broker for these purposes, in any state;

· providing financial, investment, or advisory services;

· issuing or selling instruments representing interests in pools of assets permissible for a bank to hold directly;

12

· underwriting, dealing in or making a market in securities;

· other activities that the Federal Reserve may determine to be so closely related to banking or managing or controlling banks as to be a proper incident to managing or controlling banks;

· foreign activities permitted outside of the United States if the Federal Reserve has determined them to be usual in connection with banking operations abroad;

· merchant banking through securities or insurance affiliates; and

· insurance company portfolio investments.

For us to qualify to become a financial holding company, the Bank and any other depository institution subsidiary of ours must be well-capitalized and well-managed and must have a Community Reinvestment Act rating of at least “satisfactory”. Additionally, we must file an election with the Federal Reserve to become a financial holding company and must provide the Federal Reserve with 30 days’ written notice prior to engaging in a permitted financial activity. We have not elected to become a financial holding company at this time.

Support of Subsidiary Institutions

The Federal Deposit Insurance Act and Federal Reserve policy require a bank holding company to act as a source of financial and managerial strength to its bank subsidiaries and to take measures to preserve and protect its bank subsidiaries in situations where additional investments in a troubled bank may not otherwise be warranted. In addition, where a bank holding company has more than one bank or thrift subsidiary, each of the bank holding company’s subsidiary depository institutions are responsible for any losses to the FDIC as a result of an affiliated depository institution’s failure. As a result, a bank holding company may be required to loan money to a bank subsidiary in the form of subordinate capital notes or other instruments which qualify as capital under bank regulatory rules. However, any loans from the holding company to such subsidiary banks likely will be unsecured and subordinated to such bank’s depositors and perhaps to other creditors of the bank.

Bank Regulation and Supervision

The Bank is subject to extensive state and federal banking laws and regulations that impose restrictions on and provide for general regulatory oversight of our operations. These laws and regulations are generally intended to protect depositors and not stockholders. The following discussion describes the material elements of the regulatory framework that applies to the Bank.

Since the Bank is a commercial bank chartered under the laws of the State of Alabama, it is primarily subject to the supervision, examination and reporting requirements of the FDIC and the Alabama Department of Banking (the “Alabama Banking Department”). The FDIC and the Alabama Banking Department regularly examine the Bank’s operations and have the authority to approve or disapprove mergers, the establishment of branches and similar corporate actions. Both regulatory agencies have the power to prevent the development or continuance of unsafe or unsound banking practices or other violations of law. Additionally, the Bank’s deposits are insured by the FDIC to the maximum extent provided by law. The Bank is also subject to numerous state and federal statutes and regulations that affect its business, activities and operations.

Branching

Under current Alabama law, the Bank may open branch offices throughout Alabama with the prior approval of the Alabama Banking Department. In addition, with prior regulatory approval, the Bank may acquire branches of existing banks located in Alabama. While prior law imposed various limits on the ability of banks to establish new branches in states other than their home state, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act allows a bank to branch into a new state by acquiring a branch of an existing institution or by setting up a new branch, without merging with an existing institution in the target state, if, under the laws of the state in which the branch is to be located, a state bank chartered by that state would be permitted to establish the branch. This makes it much simpler for banks to open de novo branches in other states. We opened our Pensacola, Florida branch using this mechanism.

13

Prompt Corrective Action

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 establishes a system of “prompt corrective action” to resolve the problems of undercapitalized financial institutions. Under this system, the federal banking regulators have established five capital categories (well capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized and critically undercapitalized) into which all institutions are placed. The federal banking agencies have also specified by regulation the relevant capital levels for each of the other categories. At December 31, 2012, the Bank qualified for the well-capitalized category.

Federal banking regulators are required to take various mandatory supervisory actions and are authorized to take other discretionary actions with respect to institutions in the three undercapitalized categories. The severity of the action depends upon the capital category in which the institution is placed. Generally, subject to a narrow exception, the banking regulator must appoint a receiver or conservator for an institution that is critically undercapitalized.

An institution that is categorized as undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized, or critically undercapitalized is required to submit an acceptable capital restoration plan to its appropriate federal banking agency. A bank holding company must guarantee that a subsidiary depository institution meets its capital restoration plan, subject to various limitations. The controlling holding company’s obligation to fund a capital restoration plan is limited to the lesser of (i) 5% of an undercapitalized subsidiary’s assets at the time it became undercapitalized and (ii) the amount required to meet regulatory capital requirements. An undercapitalized institution is also generally prohibited from increasing its average total assets, making acquisitions, establishing any branches or engaging in any new line of business, except under an accepted capital restoration plan or with FDIC approval. The regulations also establish procedures for downgrading an institution to a lower capital category based on supervisory factors other than capital.

FDIC Insurance Assessments

The Bank is subject to risk-based deposit insurance premium assessments imposed by the FDIC upon Deposit Insurance Fund members. Under the FDIC’s assessment system, an insured institution’s deposit insurance premium is computed by multiplying the institution’s assessment base by the institution’s assessment rate. The following information applies to an institution’s assessment base and assessment rate:

· Assessment Base. An institution’s assessment base equals the institution’s average consolidated total assets during a particular assessment period, minus the institution’s average tangible equity capital (i.e., Tier 1 capital) during such period.

· Assessment Rate. An institution’s assessment rate is assigned by the FDIC on a quarterly basis. To assign an assessment rate, the FDIC designates an institution as falling into one of four risk categories, or as being a large and highly complex financial institution. The FDIC determines an institution’s risk category based on the level of the institution’s capitalization and on supervisory evaluations provided to the FDIC by the institution’s primary federal regulator. Each risk category designation contains upward and downward adjustment factors based on long-term unsecured debt and brokered deposits. Assessment rates currently range from 0.025% per annum for an institution in the lowest risk category with the maximum downward adjustment, to 0.45% per annum for an institution in the highest risk category with the maximum upward adjustment. For the fourth quarter of 2012, the Bank’s assessment rate was set at $0.0142, or $0.0568 annually, per $100 of assessment base.

The FDIC’s current risk-based assessment system went into effect in 2011 and represents a major shift from the prior assessment system. Under the prior system, an institution’s assessment base was based on the institution’s deposits, rather than on the institution’s assets minus its tangible equity capital. The prior system also involved assessment rate adjustments on account of an institution’s secured liabilities, and somewhat different adjustment methodologies than the new system for long-term unsecured debt and brokered deposits.

In addition to its risk-based insurance assessments, the FDIC also imposes Financing Corporation (“FICO”) assessments to help pay the $780 million in annual interest payments on the $8 billion of bonds issued in the late 1980s as part of the government rescue of the savings and loan industry. For the fourth quarter of 2012, the FICO assessment was equal to $0.0016, or $0.0064 annually, per $100 of assessment base. These assessments will continue until the bonds mature in 2019.

We note that the FDIC has taken several actions in recent years to supplement the revenues received from its annual deposit insurance premium assessments. On May 22, 2009, the FDIC adopted a final rule imposing a 5 basis point special assessment on each insured depository institution’s assets minus Tier 1 capital as of June 30, 2009, subject to a cap of 10 basis points times the institution’s assessment base for the second quarter 2009. That special assessment was collected on September 30, 2009. In addition, on November 17, 2009, the FDIC adopted a final rule that required all institutions to prepay their estimated risk-based assessments for the fourth quarter of 2009 and for all of 2010, 2011, and 2012. The prepayment was collected on December 30, 2009, and was mandatory for all banks except for those exempt under certain circumstances. The FDIC’s possible need to further increase assessment rates and charge additional one-time assessment fees is generally considered to be greater in the current economic climate. If the FDIC were to take additional action in the future to supplement its assessment revenues, such actions could have a negative impact on the Bank’s earnings in certain cases.

14

Termination of Deposit Insurance

The FDIC may terminate its insurance of deposits of a bank if it finds that the bank has engaged in unsafe or unsound practices, is in an unsafe or unsound condition to continue operations, or has violated any applicable law, regulation, rule, order or condition imposed by the FDIC.

Liability of Commonly Controlled Depository Institutions

Under the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, an FDIC-insured depository institution can be held liable for any loss incurred by, or reasonably expected, to be incurred by, the FDIC in connection with (1) the default of a commonly controlled FDIC-insured depository institution or (2) any assistance provided by the FDIC to any commonly controlled FDIC-insured depository institution in danger of default. “Default” is defined generally as the appointment of a conservator or receiver, and “in danger of default” is defined generally as the existence of certain conditions indicating that a default is likely to occur in the absence of regulatory assistance. The FDIC’s claim for damage is superior to claims of stockholders of the insured depository institution but is subordinate to claims of depositors, secured creditors, other general and senior creditors, and holders of subordinated debt (other than affiliates) of the institution.

Community Reinvestment Act

The Community Reinvestment Act (“CRA”) requires that, in connection with examinations of financial institutions within their respective jurisdictions, the Federal Reserve or the FDIC will evaluate the record of each financial institution in meeting the credit needs of its local community, including low and moderate-income neighborhoods. These factors are also considered in evaluating mergers, acquisitions, and applications to open an office or facility. Failure to adequately meet these criteria could impose additional requirements and limitations on the Bank. Additionally, we must publicly disclose the terms of various CRA-related agreements.

Other Regulations

Interest and other charges collected or contracted for by the Bank are subject to state usury laws and federal laws concerning interest rates.

Federal Laws Applicable to Credit Transactions

The Bank’s loan operations are subject to federal laws applicable to credit transactions, including:

· the Federal Truth-In-Lending Act, governing disclosures of credit terms to consumer borrowers;

· the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, requiring financial institutions to provide information to enable the public and public officials to determine whether a financial institution is fulfilling its obligation to help meet the housing needs of the community it serves;

· the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, prohibiting discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, marital status or certain other prohibited factors in extending credit;

· the Fair Credit Reporting Act, governing the use and provision of information to credit reporting agencies;

· the Fair Debt Collection Act, governing the manner in which consumer debts may be collected by collection agencies;

· the Servicemembers’ Civil Relief Act, governing the repayment terms of, and property rights underlying, secured obligations of persons in military service; and

· Rules and regulations of the various federal agencies charged with the responsibility of implementing these federal laws.

15

Federal Laws Applicable to Deposit Transactions

The deposit operations of the Bank are subject to:

· the Right to Financial Privacy Act, which imposes a duty to maintain confidentiality of consumer financial records and prescribes procedures for complying with administrative subpoenas of financial records; and

· the Electronic Funds Transfer Act and Regulation E issued by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau to implement that act, which govern automatic deposits to and withdrawals from deposit accounts and customers’ rights and liabilities arising from the use of automated teller machines and other electronic banking services.

Capital Adequacy

We and the Bank are required to comply with the capital adequacy standards established by the Federal Reserve (in the case of the holding company) and the FDIC and the Alabama Banking Department (in the case of the Bank). The Federal Reserve has established a risk-based and a leverage measure of capital adequacy for bank holding companies. The FDIC has established substantially similar measures for banks.

The risk-based capital standards are designed to make regulatory capital requirements more sensitive to differences in risk profiles among banks and bank holding companies, to account for off-balance-sheet exposure, and to minimize disincentives for holding liquid assets. Assets and off-balance-sheet items, such as letters of credit and unfunded loan commitments, are assigned to broad risk categories, each with appropriate risk weights. The resulting capital ratios represent capital as a percentage of total risk-weighted assets and off-balance-sheet items.

The minimum guideline for the ratio of total capital to risk-weighted assets is 8%. Total capital consists of two components, Tier 1 capital and Tier 2 capital. Tier 1 capital generally consists of common stock, minority interests in the equity accounts of consolidated subsidiaries, noncumulative perpetual preferred stock, and a limited amount of qualifying cumulative perpetual preferred stock, less goodwill and other specified intangible assets. Tier 1 capital must equal at least 4% of risk-weighted assets. Tier 2 Capital generally consists of subordinated debt, other preferred stock, and a limited amount of loan loss reserves. The total amount of Tier 2 capital is limited to 100% of Tier 1 capital. At December 31, 2012, our consolidated ratio of total capital to risk-weighted assets was 11.78%, and our ratio of Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets was 9.89%.

In addition, the Federal Reserve has established minimum leverage ratio guidelines for bank holding companies. These guidelines provide for a minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to average assets, less goodwill and other specified intangible assets, of 3% for bank holding companies that meet specified criteria, including having the highest regulatory rating and implementing the Federal Reserve’s risk-based capital measure for market risk. All other bank holding companies generally are required to maintain a leverage ratio of at least 4%. At December 31, 2012, our leverage ratio was 8.43%. The guidelines also provide that bank holding companies experiencing internal growth or making acquisitions will be expected to maintain strong capital positions substantially above the minimum supervisory levels without reliance on intangible assets. The Federal Reserve considers the leverage ratio and other indicators of capital strength in evaluating proposals for expansion or new activities.

Failure to meet capital guidelines could subject a bank or bank holding company to a variety of enforcement remedies, including issuance of a capital directive, the termination of deposit insurance by the FDIC, a prohibition on accepting brokered deposits, and certain other restrictions on its business. As described above, significant additional restrictions can be imposed on FDIC-insured depository institutions that fail to meet applicable capital requirements.

As of December 31, 2012, the Bank’s most recent notification from the FDIC categorized the Bank as well-capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To remain categorized as well-capitalized, the Bank must maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier 1 risk-based, and Tier 1 leverage ratios of 10%, 6% and 5%, respectively. Our Bank was well-capitalized under the prompt corrective action provisions as of December 31, 2012.

In addition to the foregoing federal requirements, the Bank is subject to a requirement of the Alabama Banking Department that the Bank maintain a leverage ratio of 8%. At December 31, 2012, the Bank’s leverage ratio was 9.03%.

Potential Changes in Capital Adequacy Requirements

In December 2010, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, a group representing the central banking authorities of 27 nations that formulates recommendations on banking supervisory policy, released its final framework for strengthening international capital and liquidity regulation, known as “Basel III”. Although the Basel III framework is not directly binding on the U.S. bank regulatory agencies, in June 2012 the agencies circulated proposed regulations that, once finalized, would implement Basel III standards for U.S. insured depository institutions and their holding companies.

16

Basel III places more emphasis than current capital adequacy requirements on “Common Equity Tier 1” capital, or “CET1”, which is predominantly made up of retained earnings and common stock instruments. The following represent important requirements currently under consideration by U.S. bank regulatory agencies in response to Basel III:

· Institutions must maintain CET1 equal to 4.5% of risk-weighted assets;

· Institutions must maintain Tier 1 capital (i.e., CET1 and other forms of Tier 1 capital) equal to 6.0% of risk-weighted assets;

· Institutions must maintain total capital (i.e., Tier 1 capital and Tier 2 capital) equal to 8.0% of risk-weighted assets;

· Institutions must maintain an additional “capital conservation buffer” of CET1 equal to 2.5% of risk-weighted assets;

· Institutions must maintain Tier 1 capital equal to 4.0% of total assets;

· Certain large or internationally-exposed institutions must comply with supplementary leverage ratio requirements that take into account both on- and off-balance sheet exposures;

· During periods of excessive credit growth that pose systemic risks in the national and international banking system, certain large or internationally-exposed institutions could become subject to a “countercyclical buffer”, which could require additional CET1 equal to 2.5% of risk-weighted assets;

· Certain instruments that have counted as Tier 1 capital in the past, including certain types of cumulative perpetual preferred stock and trust preferred instruments, no longer will count as Tier 1 capital;

· Regulatory deductions from and adjustments to capital largely will apply to CET1 (instead of Tier 1 or total capital);

· Unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale debt securities, which are not currently counted for regulatory capital purposes, will be counted for those purposes, which may result in increased volatility of regulatory capital for financial institutions; and

· In determining an institution’s risk-weighted assets, higher risk weights may be attributed to certain types of residential mortgage loans and commercial real estate loans.

Initially, the U.S. bank regulatory agencies hoped to adopt final rules implementing Basel III by January 1, 2013. However, final rules have not yet been issued. It is anticipated that, once final rules are issued, the Basel III requirements will be implemented over time so that full implementation is achieved by January 2019. Ultimately, through the future implementation of Basel III or other capital adequacy requirements, it is likely that the Company and the Bank will have to maintain higher capital levels than financial institutions are required to maintain today.

17

Liquidity

Financial institutions are subject to significant regulatory scrutiny regarding their liquidity positions. Various bank regulatory publications, including FDIC Financial Institution Letter FIL-13-2010 (Funding and Liquidity Risk Management) and FDIC Financial Institution Letter FIL-84-2008 (Liquidity Risk Management), address the identification, measurement, monitoring and control of funding and liquidity risk by financial institutions. Regulatory scrutiny regarding liquidity has increased during recent years, as the economic downturn that began in the late 2000s has added pressure to the liquidity of many financial institutions.

In addition to addressing capital objectives, Basel III establishes two new liquidity metrics for financial institutions. The first metric is the “Liquidity Coverage Ratio”, and it aims to require a financial institution to maintain sufficient high quality liquid resources to survive an acute stress scenario that lasts for one month. The second metric is the “Net Stable Funding Ratio”, and its objective is to require a financial institution to maintain a minimum amount of stable sources relative to the liquidity profiles of the institution’s assets, as well as the potential for contingent liquidity needs arising from off-balance sheet commitments, over a one-year horizon.

The Liquidity Coverage Ratio and the Net Stable Funding Ratio are currently being monitored for implementation, with the view that they will be introduced as requirements in 2015 and 2018, respectively. We cannot yet provide concrete estimates as to how those requirements, or any other regulatory positions regarding liquidity and funding, might affect the Company or the Bank. However, we note that increased liquidity requirements generally would be expected to cause the Bank to invest its assets more conservatively—and therefore at lower yields—than it otherwise might invest. Such lower-yield investments likely would reduce the Bank’s revenue stream, and in turn its earnings potential.

Payment of Dividends

We are a legal entity separate and distinct from the Bank. Our principal source of cash flow, including cash flow to pay dividends to our stockholders, is dividends the Bank pays to us as the Bank’s sole stockholder. Statutory and regulatory limitations apply to the Bank’s payment of dividends to us as well as to our payment of dividends to our stockholders. The requirement that a bank holding company must serve as a source of strength to its subsidiary banks also results in the position of the Federal Reserve that a bank holding company should not maintain a level of cash dividends to its stockholders that places undue pressure on the capital of its bank subsidiaries or that can be funded only through additional borrowings or other arrangements that may undermine the bank holding company’s ability to serve as such a source of strength. Our ability to pay dividends is also subject to the provisions of Delaware corporate law.

The Alabama Banking Department also regulates the Bank’s dividend payments. Under Alabama law, a state-chartered bank may not pay a dividend in excess of 90% of its net earnings until the bank’s surplus is equal to at least 20% of its capital (the Bank’s surplus currently exceeds 20% of its capital). Moreover, the Bank is also required by Alabama law to obtain the prior approval of the Superintendent of Banks (the “Superintendent”) for its payment of dividends if the total of all dividends declared by the Bank in any calendar year will exceed the total of (1) the Bank’s net earnings (as defined by statute) for that year, plus (2) its retained net earnings for the preceding two years, less any required transfers to surplus. Based on this, the Bank would be limited to paying $90.1 million in dividends as of December 31, 2012. In addition, no dividends, withdrawals or transfers may be made from the Bank’s surplus without the prior written approval of the Superintendent.

The Bank’s payment of dividends may also be affected or limited by other factors, such as the requirement to maintain adequate capital above regulatory guidelines. The federal banking agencies have indicated that paying dividends that deplete a depository institution’s capital base to an inadequate level would be an unsafe and unsound banking practice. Under the FDIC Improvement Act of 1991, a depository institution may not pay any dividends if payment would cause it to become undercapitalized or if it already is undercapitalized. Moreover, the federal agencies have issued policy statements that provide that bank holding companies and insured banks should generally only pay dividends out of current operating earnings. If, in the opinion of the federal banking regulators, the Bank were engaged in or about to engage in an unsafe or unsound practice, the federal banking regulators could require, after notice and a hearing, that the Bank stop or refrain from engaging in the questioned practice.

Restrictions on Transactions with Affiliates

We are subject to Section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act, which places limits on the amount of:

· a bank’s loans or extensions of credit to affiliates;

· a bank’s investment in affiliates;

18

· assets a bank may purchase from affiliates, except for real and personal property exempted by the Federal Reserve;

· loans or extensions of credit made by a bank to third parties collateralized by the securities or obligations of affiliates; and

· a bank’s guarantee, acceptance or letter of credit issued on behalf of an affiliate.

The total amount of the above transactions is limited in amount, as to any one affiliate, to 10% of a bank’s capital and surplus and, as to all affiliates combined, to 20% of a bank’s capital and surplus. In addition to the limitation on the amount of these transactions, each of the above transactions must also meet specified collateral requirements. The Bank must also comply with other provisions designed to avoid the taking of low-quality assets.

We are also subject to Section 23B of the Federal Reserve Act, which, among other things, prohibits an institution from engaging in the above transactions with affiliates unless the transactions are on terms substantially the same, or at least as favorable to the institution or its subsidiaries, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with nonaffiliated companies.

The Bank is also subject to restrictions on extensions of credit to its executive officers, directors, principal shareholders and their related interests. These extensions of credit (1) must be made on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with third parties and (2) must not involve more than the normal risk of repayment or present other unfavorable features. There is also an aggregate limitation on all loans to insiders and their related interests. These loans cannot exceed the institution’s total unimpaired capital and surplus, and the FDIC may determine that a lesser amount is appropriate. Insiders are subject to enforcement actions for knowingly accepting loans in violation of applicable restrictions. Alabama state banking laws also have similar provisions.

Lending Limits

Under Alabama law, the amount of loans which may be made by a bank in the aggregate to one person is limited. Alabama law provides that unsecured loans by a bank to one person may not exceed an amount equal to 10% of the capital and unimpaired surplus of the bank or 20% in the case of secured loans. For purposes of calculating these limits, loans to various business interests of the borrower, including companies in which a substantial portion of the stock is owned or partnerships in which a person is a partner, must be aggregated with those made to the borrower individually. Loans secured by certain readily marketable collateral are exempt from these limitations, as are loans secured by deposits and certain government securities.

Commercial Real Estate Concentration Limits

On December 12, 2006, the U.S. bank regulatory agencies issued guidance entitled “Concentrations in Commercial Real Estate Lending, Sound Risk Management Practices” (the “Guidance”) to address increased concentrations in commercial real estate (“CRE”) loans. The Guidance describes the criteria the Agencies will use as indicators to indentify institutions potentially exposed to CRE concentration risk. An institution that has (1) experienced rapid growth in CRE lending, (2) notable exposure to a specific type of CRE, (3) total reported loans for construction, land development, and other land representing 100% or more of the institution’s capital, or (4) total CRE loans representing 300% or more of the institution’s capital, and the outstanding balance of the institutions CRE portfolio has increased by 50% or more in the prior 36 months, may be identified for further supervisory analysis of the level and nature of its CRE concentration risk.

Privacy

Financial institutions are required to disclose their policies for collecting and protecting confidential information of customers. Customers generally may prevent financial institutions from sharing nonpublic personal financial information with nonaffiliated third parties except under certain circumstances, such as the processing of transactions requested by the consumer or when the financial institution is jointly sponsoring a product or service with certain nonaffiliated third parties. Additionally, financial institutions generally may not disclose consumer account numbers to any nonaffiliated third party for use in telemarketing, direct mail marketing or other marketing to consumers.

19

Consumer Credit Reporting

The Fair Credit Reporting Act (the “FCRA”) imposes, among other things:

· requirements for financial institutions to develop policies and procedures to identify potential identity theft and, upon the request of a consumer, place a fraud alert in the consumer’s credit file stating that the consumer may be the victim of identity theft or other fraud;

· requirements for entities that furnish information to consumer reporting agencies (which would include the Bank) to implement procedures and policies regarding the accuracy and integrity of the furnished information and regarding the correction of previously furnished information that is later determined to be inaccurate; and

· requirements for mortgage lenders to disclose credit scores to consumers.

The FCRA also prohibits a business that receives consumer information from an affiliate from using that information for marketing purposes unless the consumer is first provided notice and an opportunity to direct the business not to use the information for such marketing purposes (the “opt-out”), subject to certain exceptions. We do not share consumer information between us and the Bank for marketing purposes, except as allowed under exceptions to the notice and opt-out requirements. Since we do not share consumer information between us and the Bank, the limitations on sharing of information for marketing purposes do not have a significant impact on us.

Anti-Terrorism and Money Laundering Legislation

The Bank is subject to the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act (the “USA PATRIOT Act”), the Bank Secrecy Act, and the requirements of the Office of Foreign Assets Control (the “OFAC”). These statutes and related rules and regulations impose requirements and limitations on specified financial transactions and account and other relationships intended to guard against money laundering and terrorism financing. The Bank has established a customer identification program pursuant to Section 326 of the USA PATRIOT Act and the Bank Secrecy Act, and otherwise has implemented policies and procedures to comply with the foregoing requirements.

Proposed Legislation and Regulatory Action

New regulations and statutes are regularly proposed that contain wide-ranging proposals for altering the structures, regulations and competitive relationships of financial institutions operating or doing business in the United States. We cannot predict whether or in what form any proposed regulation or statute will be adopted or the extent to which our business may be affected by any new regulation or statute.

Effect of Governmental Monetary Policies

The Bank’s earnings are affected by domestic economic conditions and the monetary and fiscal policies of the United States government and its agencies. The Federal Reserve’s monetary policies have had, and are likely to continue to have, an important impact on the operating results of commercial banks through its power to implement national monetary policy in order, among other things, to curb inflation or combat a recession. The monetary policies of the Federal Reserve affect the levels of bank loans, investments and deposits through its control over the issuance of United States government securities, its regulation of the discount rate applicable to member banks and its influence over reserve requirements to which member banks are subject. We cannot predict, and have no control over, the nature or impact of future changes in monetary and fiscal policies.

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 represents a comprehensive revision of laws affecting corporate governance, accounting obligations and corporate reporting. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act is applicable to all companies with equity securities registered, or that file reports, under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. In particular, the act established (i) requirements for audit committees, including independence, expertise and responsibilities; (ii) responsibilities regarding financial statements for the chief executive officer and chief financial officer of the reporting company and new requirements for them to certify the accuracy of periodic reports; (iii) standards for auditors and regulation of audits; (iv) disclosure and reporting obligations for the reporting company and its directors and executive officers; and (v) civil and criminal penalties for violations of the federal securities laws. The legislation also established a new accounting oversight board to enforce auditing standards and restrict the scope of services that accounting firms may provide to their public company audit clients.

20

Recent Federal Legislation relating to Financial Institutions

On July 21, 2010, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) was signed into law. As final rules and regulations implementing the Dodd-Frank Act are adopted, this new law is significantly changing the bank regulatory structure and affecting the lending, deposit, investment, trading and operating activities of financial institutions and their holding companies. The Dodd-Frank Act requires various federal agencies to adopt a broad range of new implementing rules and regulations and to prepare numerous studies and reports for Congress. The federal agencies are given significant discretion in drafting the implementing rules and regulations, and consequently, many of the details and much of the impact of the Dodd-Frank Act may not be known for many years.

The Dodd-Frank Act eliminated the federal prohibitions on paying interest on demand deposits effective one year after the date of its enactment, thus allowing businesses to have interest-bearing checking accounts. Depending on competitive responses, this significant change to existing law could have an adverse impact on our interest expense.

The Dodd-Frank Act also broadens the base for FDIC insurance assessments. Assessments will now be based on the average consolidated total assets less tangible equity capital of a financial institution. The Dodd-Frank Act permanently increases the maximum amount of deposit insurance for banks, savings institutions and credit unions to $250,000 per depositor. Noninterest-bearing transaction accounts and certain attorney’s trust accounts had unlimited deposit insurance through December 31, 2012.

The Dodd-Frank Act requires publicly traded companies to give stockholders a non-binding vote on executive compensation and golden parachute payments. In addition, the Dodd-Frank Act authorizes the Securities and Exchange Commission to promulgate rules that would allow stockholders to nominate their own candidates using a company’s proxy materials and directs the federal banking regulators to issue rules prohibiting incentive compensation that encourages inappropriate risks.

The Dodd-Frank Act created a new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau with broad powers to supervise and enforce consumer protection laws. The Bureau now has broad rule-making authority for a wide range of consumer protection laws that apply to all banks, including the authority to prohibit “unfair, deceptive or abusive” acts and practices. The Bureau has examination and enforcement authority over all banks with more than $10 billion in assets. Institutions with less than $10 billion in assets will continue to be examined for compliance with consumer laws by their primary bank regulator.

The Dodd-Frank Act imposed new requirements regarding the origination and servicing of residential mortgage loans. The law created a variety of new consumer protections, including limitations on the manner by which loan originators may be compensated and an obligation on the part of lenders to verify a borrower’s “ability to repay” a residential mortgage loan. Final rules implementing these latter statutory requirements have been released and will be generally effective in 2014.

As noted above, many aspects of the Dodd-Frank Act are subject to rulemaking and will take effect over several years, making it difficult to anticipate the overall financial impact on us. However, compliance with this new law and its implementing regulations clearly will result in additional operating and compliance costs that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Recent government efforts to strengthen the U.S. financial system, including the implementation of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (“ARRA”), the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act (“EESA”), the Dodd-Frank Act, and special assessments imposed by the FDIC, subject us, to the extent applicable, to additional regulatory fees, corporate governance requirements, restrictions on executive compensation, restrictions on declaring or paying dividends, restrictions on stock repurchases, limits on tax deductions for executive compensation and prohibitions against golden parachute payments. These fees, requirements and restrictions, as well as any others that may be imposed in the future, may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Available Information

Our corporate website is www.servisfirstbank.com. We have direct links on this website to our Code of Ethics and the charters for our Audit, Compensation and Corporate Governance and Nominations Committees by clicking on the “Investor Relations” tab. We also have direct links to our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), including, but not limited to, our annual reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, proxy statements and any amendments to these filings. You may also obtain a copy of any such report from us free of charge by requesting such copy in writing to 850 Shades Creek Parkway, Suite 200, Birmingham, Alabama 35209, Attention: Chief Financial Officer. This annual report and accompanying exhibits and all other reports and filings that we file with the SEC will be available for the public to view and copy (at prescribed rates) at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, Washington, D.C. 20549. You may also obtain copies of such information at the prescribed rates from the SEC’s Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC also maintains a website that contains such reports, proxy and information statements, and other information we file electronically with the SEC. You may access this website by clicking on http://www.sec.gov.

21

Executive Officers of the Registrant

The business experience of our executive officers who are not also directors is set forth below.

William M. Foshee (58) – Mr. Foshee has served as our Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary since 2007 and as Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary of the Bank since 2005. Mr. Foshee served as the Chief Financial Officer of Heritage Financial Holding Corporation from 2002 until it was acquired in 2005. Mr. Foshee is a Certified Public Accountant.

Clarence C. Pouncey, III (56) – Mr. Pouncey has served as our Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer since 2007 and Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of the Bank since November 2006 and also served as Chief Risk Officer of the Bank from March 2006 until November 2006. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Pouncey was employed by SouthTrust Bank (now Wells Fargo Bank) in various capacities from 1978 to 2006, most recently as the Senior Vice President and Regional Manager of Real Estate Financial Services.

Andrew N. Kattos (43) – Mr. Kattos has served as Executive Vice President and Huntsville President and Chief Executive Officer of the Bank since April 2006. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Kattos was employed by First Commercial Bank for 14 years, most recently as an Executive Vice President and Senior Lender in the Commercial Lending Department. Mr. Kattos also serves on the advisory council of the University of Alabama in Huntsville School of Business.

G. Carlton Barker (64) – Mr. Barker has served as Executive Vice President and Montgomery President and Chief Executive Officer of the Bank since February 1, 2007. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Barker was employed by Regions Bank for 19 years in various capacities, most recently as the Regional President for the Southeast Alabama Region. Mr. Barker serves on the Huntingdon College Board of Trustee.

Ronald A. DeVane (61) – Mr. DeVane has served as Executive Vice President and Dothan President and Chief Executive Officer of the Bank since August 2008. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. DeVane held various positions with Wachovia Bank and SouthTrust Bank until his retirement in 2006, including CEO for the Wachovia Midsouth Region, which encompassed Alabama, Tennessee, Mississippi and the Florida panhandle, from September 2004 until 2006, CEO of the Community Bank Division of SouthTrust from January 2004 until September 2004, and CEO for SouthTrust Bank of Atlanta and North Georgia from July 2002 until December 2003. Mr. DeVane is a Trustee at Samford University, a member of the Troy University Foundation Board, a Trustee of the Southeast Alabama Medical Center Foundation Board, and a Board Member of the National Peanut Festival Association.

Rex D. McKinney (50) – Mr. McKinney has served as Executive Vice President and Pensacola President and Chief Executive Officer of the Bank since January 2011. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. McKinney held several leadership positions at First American Bank/Coastal Bank and Trust (owned by Synovus Financial Corporation) starting in 1997. Mr. McKinney is on the Membership Committee and a Past Board Member of the Rotary Club of Pensacola. He is Past President of the Pensacola Sports Association, Board Member and Finance Committee Member for the United Way of Escambia County, Finance Committee Member for Christ Episcopal Church, Finance Committee Member for the Pensacola Country Club, Member of the Irish Politicians Club, and Board Member of the Order of Tristan.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.

An investment in our common stock involves risks. Before deciding to invest in our common stock, you should carefully consider the risks described below, together with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes and the other information included in this annual report. The discussion below presents material risks associated with an investment in our common stock. Our business, financial condition and results of operation could be harmed by any of the following risks or by other risks identified in this annual report, as well as by other risks we may not have anticipated or viewed as material. In such a case, the value of our common stock could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment. The risks discussed below also include forward-looking statements, and our actual results may differ substantially from those discussed in these forward-looking statements. See also “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements”.

22

Risks Related to Our Industry

Financial reform legislation will, among other things, tighten capital standards, create a new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and result in new regulations that are likely to increase our costs of operations.

On July 21, 2010, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) was signed into law. As final rules and regulations implementing the Dodd-Frank Act are adopted, this law is significantly changing the current bank regulatory structure and affecting the lending, deposit, investment, trading and operating activities of financial institutions and their holding companies. The Dodd-Frank Act requires various federal agencies to adopt a broad range of new implementing rules and regulations and to prepare numerous studies and reports for Congress. The federal agencies are given significant discretion in drafting the implementing rules and regulations, and consequently, many of the details and much of the impact of the Dodd-Frank Act may not be known for many years.

The Dodd-Frank Act eliminated the federal prohibitions on paying interest on demand deposits effective one year after the date of its enactment, thus allowing businesses to have interest-bearing checking accounts. Depending on competitive responses, this significant change to existing law could have an adverse impact on our interest expense.

The Dodd-Frank Act also broadens the base for FDIC insurance assessments. Assessments are now based on the average consolidated total assets less tangible equity capital of a financial institution. The Dodd-Frank Act permanently increases the maximum amount of deposit insurance for banks, savings institutions and credit unions to $250,000 per depositor. Noninterest-bearing transaction accounts and certain attorney’s trust accounts had unlimited deposit insurance through December 31, 2012.

The Dodd-Frank Act requires publicly traded companies to give stockholders a non-binding vote on executive compensation and golden parachute payments. In addition, the Dodd-Frank Act authorizes the Securities and Exchange Commission to promulgate rules that would allow stockholders to nominate their own candidates using a company’s proxy materials and directs the federal banking regulators to issue rules prohibiting incentive compensation that encourages inappropriate risks.

The Dodd-Frank Act created a new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau with broad powers to supervise and enforce consumer protection laws. The Bureau now has broad rule-making authority for a wide range of consumer protection laws that apply to all banks, including the authority to prohibit “unfair, deceptive or abusive” acts and practices. The Bureau has examination and enforcement authority over all banks with more than $10 billion in assets. Institutions with less than $10 billion in assets will continue to be examined for compliance with consumer laws by their primary bank regulator.

As noted above, many aspects of the Dodd-Frank Act are subject to rulemaking and will take effect over several years, making it difficult to anticipate the overall financial impact on us. However, compliance with this new law and its implementing regulations clearly will result in additional operating and compliance costs that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Additional regulatory requirements especially those imposed under ARRA, EESA or other legislation intended to strengthen the U.S. financial system, could adversely affect us.

Recent government efforts to strengthen the U.S. financial system, including the implementation of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (“ARRA”), the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act (“EESA”), the Dodd-Frank Act, and special assessments imposed by the FDIC, subject us, to the extent applicable, to additional regulatory fees, corporate governance requirements, restrictions on executive compensation, restrictions on declaring or paying dividends, restrictions on stock repurchases, limits on tax deductions for executive compensation and prohibitions against golden parachute payments. These fees, requirements and restrictions, as well as any others that may be imposed in the future, may have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Recent market conditions have adversely affected, and may continue to adversely affect, us, our customers and our industry.

Because our business is focused exclusively in the southeastern United States, we are particularly exposed to downturns in the U.S. economy in general and in the southeastern economy in particular. Beginning with the economic recession in 2008 and continuing through 2010, falling home prices, increasing foreclosures, unemployment and under-employment, have negatively impacted the credit performance of mortgage loans and resulted in significant write-downs of asset values by financial institutions, including government-sponsored entities as well as major commercial and investment banks. These write-downs, initially of mortgage-backed securities but spreading to credit default swaps and other derivative and cash securities, in turn, have caused many financial institutions to seek additional capital, to merge with larger and stronger institutions and, in some cases, to fail. Reflecting concern about the stability of the financial markets generally and the strength of counterparties, many lenders and institutional investors have reduced or ceased providing funding to borrowers, including to other financial institutions. This market turmoil and tightening of credit has led to an increased level of commercial and consumer delinquencies, lack of consumer confidence, increased market volatility and widespread reduction of business activity generally. The resulting economic pressure on consumers and businesses and lack of confidence in the financial markets may adversely affect our customers and thus our business, financial condition, and results of operations. A return of these conditions in the near future would likely exacerbate the adverse effects of these difficult market conditions on us and others in the financial institutions industry.

23

Current market volatility and industry developments may adversely affect our business and financial results.

The volatility in the capital and credit markets, along with the housing declines over the past four years, has resulted in significant pressure on the financial services industry. We have experienced a higher level of foreclosures and higher losses upon foreclosure than we have historically. If current volatility and market conditions continue or worsen, there can be no assurance that our industry, results of operations or our business will not be significantly adversely impacted. We may have further increases in loan losses, deterioration of capital or limitations on our access to funding or capital, if needed.

Further, if other, particularly larger, financial institutions continue to fail to be adequately capitalized or funded, it may negatively impact our business and financial results. We routinely interact with numerous financial institutions in the ordinary course of business and are therefore exposed to operational and credit risk to those institutions. Failures of such institutions may significantly adversely impact our operations.

Our profitability is vulnerable to interest rate fluctuations.

As a financial institution, our earnings can be significantly affected by changes in interest rates, particularly our net interest income, the rate of loan prepayments, the volume and type of loans originated or produced, the sales of loans on the secondary market and the value of our mortgage servicing rights. Our profitability is dependent to a large extent on our net interest income, which is the difference between our income on interest-earning assets and our expense on interest-bearing liabilities. We are affected by changes in general interest rate levels and by other economic factors beyond our control.

Changes in interest rates also affect the average life of loans and mortgage-backed securities. The relatively lower interest rates in recent periods have resulted in increased prepayments of loans and mortgage-backed securities as borrowers have refinanced their mortgages to reduce their borrowing costs. Under these circumstances, we are subject to reinvestment risk to the extent that we are not able to reinvest such prepayments at rates which are comparable to the rates on the prepaid loans or securities.

We are subject to extensive regulation that could limit or restrict our activities and impose financial requirements or limitations on the conduct of our business, which limitations or restrictions could have a material adverse effect on our profitability.

We operate in a highly regulated industry and are subject to examination, supervision and comprehensive regulation by various federal and state agencies including the Federal Reserve, the FDIC and the Alabama Banking Department. Regulatory compliance is costly and restricts certain of our activities, including payment of dividends, mergers and acquisitions, investments, loans and interest rates charged, and interest rates paid on deposits. We are also subject to capitalization guidelines established by our regulators, which require us to maintain adequate capital to support our growth. Violations of various laws, even if unintentional, may result in significant fines or other penalties, including restrictions on branching or bank acquisitions. Recently, banks generally have faced increased regulatory sanctions and scrutiny particularly with respect to the USA Patriot Act and other statutes relating to anti-money laundering compliance and customer privacy. The recent recession had major adverse effects on the banking and financial industry, during which time many institutions saw a significant amount of their market capitalization erode as they charged off loans and wrote down the value of other assets. As described above, recent legislation has substantially changed, and increased, federal regulation of financial institutions, and there may be significant future legislation (and regulations under existing legislation) that could have a further material effect on banks and bank holding companies like us.

The laws and regulations applicable to the banking industry could change at any time, and we cannot predict the effects of these changes on our business and profitability. Because government regulation greatly affects the business and financial results of all commercial banks and bank holding companies, our cost of compliance could adversely affect our ability to operate profitably. We are subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Sarbanes-Oxley Act”), and the related rules and regulations promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. These laws and regulations increase the scope, complexity and cost of corporate governance, reporting and disclosure practices over those of non-public companies. Despite our conducting business in a highly regulated environment, these laws and regulations have different requirements for compliance than we experienced prior to becoming a public company. Our expenses related to services rendered by our accountants, legal counsel and consultants will increase in order to ensure compliance with these laws and regulations that we will be subject to as a public company and may increase further as we grow in size.

24

Changes in monetary policies may have a material adverse effect on our business.

Like all regulated financial institutions, we are affected by monetary policies implemented by the Federal Reserve and other federal instrumentalities. A primary instrument of monetary policy employed by the Federal Reserve is the restriction or expansion of the money supply through open market operations. This instrument of monetary policy frequently causes volatile fluctuations in interest rates, and it can have a direct, material adverse effect on the operating results of financial institutions including our business. Borrowings by the United States government to finance government debt may also cause fluctuations in interest rates and have similar effects on the operating results of such institutions.

Risks Related To Our Business

Our construction and land development loan portfolio and commercial and industrial loan portfolio are both subject to unique risks that could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

The severity of the decline in the U.S. economy has adversely affected the performance and market value of many of our loans. Several years of decline and stagnation in the residential housing market have directly affected our construction and land development loans, while unemployment and general economic weakness have adversely affected parts of our commercial and industrial loan portfolio. Our construction and land development loan portfolio was $158.4 million at December 31, 2012, comprising 6.7% of our total loans. Our commercial and industrial loans were $1,031.0 million at December 31, 2012, comprising 43.6% of our total loans. Construction loans are often riskier than home equity loans or residential mortgage loans to individuals. In the event of a general economic slowdown like the one we are currently experiencing, these loans sometimes represent higher risk due to slower sales and reduced cash flow that could negatively affect the borrowers’ ability to repay on a timely basis. We, as well as our competitors, have experienced a significant increase in impaired and non-accrual construction and land development loans and commercial and industrial loans. We believe we have established adequate reserves with respect to such loans, although there can be no assurance that our actual loan losses will not be greater or less than we have anticipated in establishing such reserves. At December 31, 2012, we had an allowance for loan losses of $26.3 million, of which $6.5 million, or 24.7%, was allocated to real estate construction loans, and $8.2 million, or 31.2%, was allocated to commercial and industrial loans.

In addition, although regulations and regulatory policies affecting banks and financial services companies undergo continuous change and we cannot predict when changes will occur or the ultimate effect of any changes, there has been recent regulatory focus on construction, development and other commercial real estate lending. Recent changes in the federal policies applicable to construction, development or other commercial real estate loans subject us to substantial limitations with respect to making such loans, increase the costs of making such loans, and require us to have a greater amount of capital to support this kind of lending, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Our decisions regarding credit risk could be inaccurate and our allowance for loan losses may be inadequate, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and future prospects.

Our earnings are affected by our ability to make loans, and thus we could sustain significant loan losses and consequently significant net losses if we incorrectly assess either the creditworthiness of our borrowers resulting in loans to borrowers who fail to repay their loans in accordance with the loan terms or the value of the collateral securing the repayment of their loans, or we fail to detect or respond to a deterioration in our loan quality in a timely manner. Management makes various assumptions and judgments about the collectability of our loan portfolio, including the creditworthiness of our borrowers and the value of the real estate and other assets serving as collateral for the repayment of many of our loans. We maintain an allowance for loan losses that we consider adequate to absorb losses inherent in the loan portfolio based on our assessment of the information available. In determining the size of our allowance for loan losses, we rely on an analysis of our loan portfolio based on historical loss experience, volume and types of loans, trends in classification, volume and trends in delinquencies and non-accruals, national and local economic conditions and other pertinent information. We target small and medium-sized businesses as loan customers. Because of their size, these borrowers may be less able to withstand competitive or economic pressures than larger borrowers in periods of economic weakness. Also, as we expand into new markets, our determination of the size of the allowance could be understated due to our lack of familiarity with market-specific factors. Despite the effects of the ongoing economic decline, we believe our allowance for loan losses is adequate. Our allowance for loan losses as of December 31, 2012 was $26.3 million, or 1.11% of total gross loans as of year-end.

25

If our assumptions are inaccurate, we may incur loan losses in excess of our current allowance for loan losses and be required to make material additions to our allowance for loan losses which could consequently materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and future prospects.

However, even if our assumptions are accurate, federal and state regulators periodically review our allowance for loan losses and could require us to materially increase our allowance for loan losses or recognize further loan charge-offs based on judgments different than those of our management. Any material increase in our allowance for loan losses or loan charge-offs as required by these regulatory agencies could consequently materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and future prospects.

If we fail to maintain effective internal controls over financial reporting or remediate any future material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting, we may be unable to accurately report our financial results or prevent fraud, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Our internal controls over financial reporting are designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of the financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Effective internal controls over financial reporting are necessary for us to provide reliable reports and prevent fraud.

We believe that a control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within a company have been detected. We cannot guarantee that we will not identify significant deficiencies and/or material weaknesses in our internal controls in the future, and our failure to maintain effective internal controls over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Our business strategy includes the continuation of our growth plans, and our financial condition and results of operations could be negatively affected if we fail to grow or fail to manage our growth effectively.

We intend to continue pursuing our growth strategy for our business through organic growth of our loan portfolio. Our prospects must be considered in light of the risks, expenses and difficulties that can be encountered by financial service companies in rapid growth stages, which include the risks associated with the following:

· maintaining loan quality;

· maintaining adequate management personnel and information systems to oversee such growth;

· maintaining adequate control and compliance functions; and

· securing capital and liquidity needed to support anticipated growth.

We may not be able to expand our presence in our existing markets or successfully enter new markets, and any expansion could adversely affect our results of operations. Failure to manage our growth effectively could have a material adverse effect on our business, future prospects, financial condition or results of operations, and could adversely affect our ability to successfully implement our business strategy. Our ability to grow successfully will depend on a variety of factors, including the continued availability of desirable business opportunities, the competitive responses from other financial institutions in our market areas and our ability to manage our growth.

Our continued pace of growth will require us to raise additional capital in the future to fund such growth, and the unavailability of additional capital or on terms acceptable to us could adversely affect our growth and/or our financial condition and results of operations.

We are required by federal and state regulatory authorities to maintain adequate levels of capital to support our operations. To support our recent and ongoing growth, we have completed a series of capital transactions during the past three years, including:

· the sale of $15,000,000 in 6.0% Mandatory Convertible Trust Preferred Securities by our second statutory trust, ServisFirst Capital Trust II, on March 15, 2010;

26

· the sale of an aggregate of 340,000 shares of our common stock at $30 per share, or $10,200,000, in a private placement completed on June 30, 2011; and

· the sale of $20,000,000 in 5.5% Subordinated Notes due November 9, 2022 to accredited investor purchasers, the proceeds of which were used to pay off $15,000,000 in 8.5% subordinated debentures.

After giving effect to these transactions, we believe that we will have sufficient capital to meet our capital needs for our immediate growth plans. However, we will continue to need capital to support our longer-term growth plans. If capital is not available on favorable terms when we need it, we will have to either issue common stock or other securities on less than desirable terms or reduce our rate of growth until market conditions become more favorable. In either of such events, our financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected.

Competition from financial institutions and other financial service providers may adversely affect our profitability.

The banking business is highly competitive, and we experience competition in our markets from many other financial institutions. We compete with commercial banks, credit unions, savings and loan associations, mortgage banking firms, consumer finance companies, securities brokerage firms, insurance companies, money market funds, and other mutual funds, as well as other community banks and super-regional and national financial institutions that operate offices in our service areas.

Additionally, we face competition in our service areas from de novo community banks, including those with senior management who were previously affiliated with other local or regional banks or those controlled by investor groups with strong local business and community ties. These new, smaller competitors are likely to cater to the same small and medium-size business clientele and with similar relationship-based approaches as we do. Moreover, with their initial capital base to deploy, they could seek to rapidly gain market share by under-pricing the current market rates for loans and paying higher rates for deposits. These de novo community banks may offer higher deposit rates or lower cost loans in an effort to attract our customers, and may attempt to hire our management and employees.

We compete with these other financial institutions both in attracting deposits and in making loans. In addition, we must attract our customer base from other existing financial institutions and from new residents. We expect competition to increase in the future as a result of legislative, regulatory and technological changes and the continuing trend of consolidation in the financial services industry. Our profitability depends upon our continued ability to successfully compete with an array of financial institutions in our service areas.

Unpredictable economic conditions or a natural disaster in the State of Alabama or the panhandle of the State of Florida, particularly the Birmingham-Hoover, Huntsville, Montgomery and Dothan, Alabama MSAs or the Pensacola-Ferry Pass-Brent, Florida MSA, may have a material adverse effect on our financial performance.

Substantially all of our borrowers and depositors are individuals and businesses located and doing business in our primary service areas within the state of Alabama and the panhandle of the state of Florida. Therefore, our success will depend on the general economic conditions in Alabama and Florida, and more particularly in Jefferson, Shelby, Madison, Houston and Montgomery Counties in Alabama and Escambia and Santa Rosa Counties in Florida, which we cannot predict with certainty. Unlike with many of our larger competitors, the majority of our borrowers are commercial firms, professionals and affluent consumers located and doing business in such local markets. As a result, our operations and profitability may be more adversely affected by a local economic downturn or natural disaster in Alabama or Florida, particularly in such markets, than those of larger, more geographically diverse competitors. For example, a downturn in the economy of any of our MSAs could make it more difficult for our borrowers in those markets to repay their loans and may lead to loan losses that we cannot offset through operations in other markets until we can expand our markets further. Our entry into the Pensacola market increased our exposure to potential losses associated with hurricanes and similar natural disasters that are more common on the Gulf Coast than in our historical markets.

We encounter technological change continually and have fewer resources than many of our competitors to invest in technological improvements.

The financial services industry is undergoing rapid technological changes, with frequent introductions of new technology-driven products and services. In addition to serving customers better, the effective use of technology increases efficiency and enables financial institutions to reduce costs. Our success will depend in part on our ability to address our customers’ needs by using technology to provide products and services that will satisfy customer demands for convenience, as well as to create additional efficiencies in our operations. Many of our competitors have substantially greater resources to invest in technological improvements than we have. We may not be able to implement new technology-driven products and services effectively or be successful in marketing these products and services to our customers. As these technologies are improved in the future, we may, in order to remain competitive, be required to make significant capital expenditures, which may increase our overall expenses and have a material adverse effect on our net income.

27

We may encounter system failure or breaches of our network security, which could subject us to increased operating costs as well as litigation and other liabilities.

The computer systems and network infrastructure we use could be vulnerable to unforeseen problems. Our operations are dependent upon our ability to protect our computer equipment against physical damage or loss, as well as from security breaches, denial of service attacks, viruses, worms and other disruptive problems caused by hackers. Computer break-ins, phishing and other disruptions could also jeopardize the security of information stored in and transmitted through our computer systems and network infrastructure, which may result in significant liability to us. While we, with the help of third party service providers, intend to continue to implement security systems and establish operational procedures designed to detect and prevent such break-ins, phishing and other disruptions, there can be no assurance that these systems and procedures will be successful.

Lower lending limits than many of our competitors may limit our ability to attract borrowers.

During our early years of operation, and likely for many years thereafter, our legally mandated lending limits will be lower than those of many of our competitors because we will have less capital than such competitors. Our lower lending limits may discourage borrowers with lending needs that exceed those limits from doing business with us. While we may try to serve these borrowers by selling loan participations to other financial institutions, this strategy may not succeed.

We may not be able to successfully expand into new markets.

We have opened new offices and operations in three primary markets (Dothan and Mobile, Alabama and Pensacola, Florida) in the past four years. We may not be able to successfully manage this growth with sufficient human resources, training and operational, financial and technological resources. Any such failure could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition and our ability to expand into new markets.

Our recent results may not be indicative of our future results, and may not provide guidance to assess the risk of an investment in our common stock.

We may not be able to sustain our historical rate of growth and may not even be able to expand our business at all. In addition, our recent growth may distort some of our historical financial ratios and statistics. In the future, we may not have the benefit of several factors that were favorable until late 2008, such as a rising interest rate environment, a strong residential housing market or the ability to find suitable expansion opportunities. Various factors, such as economic conditions, regulatory and legislative considerations and competition, may also impede or prohibit our ability to expand our market presence. As a small commercial bank, we have different lending risks than larger banks. We provide services to our local communities; thus, our ability to diversify our economic risks is limited by our own local markets and economies. We lend primarily to small to medium-sized businesses, which may expose us to greater lending risks than those faced by banks lending to larger, better-capitalized businesses with longer operating histories. We manage our credit exposure through careful monitoring of loan applicants and loan concentrations in particular industries, and through our loan approval and review procedures. Our use of historical and objective information in determining and managing credit exposure may not be accurate in assessing our risk.

We are dependent on the services of our management team and board of directors, and the unexpected loss of key officers or directors may adversely affect our operations.

If any of our or the Bank’s executive officers, other key personnel, or directors leaves us or the Bank, our operations may be adversely affected. In particular, we believe that Thomas A. Broughton III is extremely important to our success and the Bank. Mr. Broughton has extensive executive-level banking experience and is the President and Chief Executive Officer of us and the Bank. If he leaves his position for any reason, our financial condition and results of operations may suffer. The Bank is the beneficiary of a key man life insurance policy on the life of Mr. Broughton in the amount of $5 million. Also, we have hired key officers to run our banking offices in each of the Huntsville, Montgomery and Dothan, Alabama markets and the Pensacola, Florida market, who are extremely important to our success in such markets. If any of them leaves for any reason, our results of operations could suffer in such markets. With the exception of the key officers in charge of our Huntsville, Montgomery and Dothan banking offices, we do not have employment agreements or non-competition agreements with any of our executive officers, including Mr. Broughton. In the absence of these types of agreements, our executive officers are free to resign their employment at any time and accept an offer of employment from another company, including a competitor. Additionally, our directors’ and advisory board members’ community involvement and diverse and extensive local business relationships are important to our success. If the composition of our board of directors changes materially, our business may also suffer. Similarly, if the composition of the respective advisory boards of the Bank change materially, our business may suffer in such markets.

28

Our directors and executive officers own a significant portion of our common stock and can exert influence over our business and corporate affairs.

Our directors and executive officers, as a group, beneficially owned approximately 16.26% of our outstanding common stock as of December 31, 2012. As a result of their ownership, the directors and executive officers will have the ability, by voting their shares in concert, to influence the outcome of all matters submitted to our stockholders for approval, including the election of directors.

We engage in lending secured by real estate and may be forced to foreclose on the collateral and own the underlying real estate, subjecting us to the costs associated with the ownership of the real property.

Since we originate loans secured by real estate, we may have to foreclose on the collateral property to protect our investment and may thereafter own and operate such property, in which case we are exposed to the risks inherent in the ownership of real estate.

The amount that we, as a mortgagee, may realize after a default is dependent upon factors outside of our control, including, but not limited to:

· general or local economic conditions;

· environmental cleanup liability;

· neighborhood assessments;

· interest rates;

· real estate tax rates;

· operating expenses of the mortgaged properties;

· supply of and demand for rental units or properties;

· ability to obtain and maintain adequate occupancy of the properties;

· zoning laws;

· governmental and regulatory rules;

· fiscal policies; and

· natural disasters.

Risks Related to Our Common Stock

We have no current plans to pay dividends on our common stock.

We paid a cash dividend of $0.50 per common share on December 31, 2012. This was our first dividend and we have no current intentions to pay dividends in the near future. In addition, our ability to pay dividends is subject to regulatory limitations.

29

Under Alabama law, a state bank may not pay a dividend in excess of 90% of its net earnings until the bank’s surplus is equal to at least 20% of its capital. As of December 31, 2012, the Bank’s surplus was equal to 50.1% of the Bank’s capital. The Bank is also required by Alabama law to obtain the prior approval of the Alabama Superintendent of Banks (the “Superintendent”) for its payment of dividends if the total of all dividends declared by the Bank in any calendar year will exceed the total of (1) the Bank’s net earnings (as defined by statute) for that year, plus (2) its retained net earnings for the preceding two years, less any required transfers to surplus. In addition, no dividends, withdrawals or transfers may be made from the Bank’s surplus without the prior written approval of the Superintendent.

There are limitations on your ability to transfer your common stock.

There is no public trading market for the shares of our common stock, and we have no current plans to list our common stock on any exchange. However, a brokerage firm may create a market for our common stock on the OTC/Bulletin Board or Pink Sheets without our participation or approval upon the filing and approval by the FINRA OTC Compliance Unit of a Form 211. As a result, unless a Form 211 is filed and approved, stockholders who may wish or need to dispose of all or part of their investment in our common stock may not be able to do so effectively except by private direct negotiations with third parties, assuming that third parties are willing to purchase our common stock.

Alabama and Delaware law limit the ability of others to acquire the Bank, which may restrict your ability to fully realize the value of your common stock.

In many cases, stockholders receive a premium for their shares when one company purchases another. Alabama and Delaware law makes it difficult for anyone to purchase the Bank or us without approval of our board of directors. Thus, your ability to realize the potential benefits of any sale by us may be limited, even if such sale would represent a greater value for stockholders than our continued independent operation.

Our Certificate of Incorporation authorizes the issuance of preferred stock which could adversely affect holders of our common stock and discourage a takeover of us by a third party.

Our Certificate of Incorporation authorizes the board of directors to issue up to 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock without any further action on the part of our stockholders. In 2011, we issued 40,000 shares of Senior Non-cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock with certain rights and preferences set forth in the Certificate of Designation for such preferred stock. Our board of directors also has the power, without stockholder approval, to set the terms of any series of preferred stock that may be issued, including voting rights, dividend rights, and preferences over our common stock with respect to dividends or in the event of a dissolution, liquidation or winding up and other terms. In the event that we issue preferred stock in the future that has preference over our common stock with respect to payment of dividends or upon our liquidation, dissolution or winding up, or if we issue preferred stock with voting rights that dilute the voting power of our common stock, the rights of the holders of our common stock or the market price of our common stock could be adversely affected. In addition, the ability of our board of directors to issue shares of preferred stock without any action on the part of the stockholders may impede a takeover of us and prevent a transaction favorable to our stockholders.

An investment in our common stock is not an insured deposit.

Our common stock is not a bank deposit and, therefore, is not insured against loss by the FDIC, any deposit insurance fund or by any other public or private entity. Investment in our common stock is inherently risky for the reasons described in this “Risk Factors” section and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K (including the documents incorporated herein by reference) and is subject to the same market forces that affect the price of common stock in any company. As a result, an investor may lose some or all of such investor’s investment in our common stock.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.

None.

30

ITEM 2.   PROPERTIES.

We operate through 11 banking offices. Our Shades Creek Parkway office also includes our corporate headquarters. We believe that our banking offices are in good condition, are suitable to our needs and, for the most part, are relatively new. The following table gives pertinent details about our banking offices.

State
MSA
Office Address	City	Zip Code	Owned or Leased	Date Opened
Alabama:
Birmingham-Hoover:
850 Shades Creek Parkway, Suite 200 (1)	Birmingham	35209	Leased	3/2/2005
324 Richard Arrington Jr. Boulevard North	Birmingham	35203	Leased	12/19/2005
5403 Highway 280, Suite 401	Birmingham	35242	Leased	8/15/2006
Total		3 Offices
Huntsville:
401 Meridian Street, Suite 100	Huntsville	35801	Leased	11/21/2006
1267 Enterprise Way, Suite A (1)	Huntsville	35806	Leased	8/21/2006
Total		2 Offices
Montgomery:
1 Commerce Street, Suite 200	Montgomery	36104	Leased	6/4/2007
8117 Vaughn Road, Unit 20	Montgomery	36116	Leased	9/26/2007
Total		2 Offices
Dothan:
4801 West Main Street (1)	Dothan	36305	Leased	10/17/2008
1640 Ross Clark Circle	Dothan	36301		2/1/2011
Total		2 Offices
Mobile:
64 North Royal Street (2)	Mobile	36602	Leased	7/9/2012
Total Offices in Alabama		9 Offices
Florida:
Pensacola-Ferry Pass-Brent:
316 South Balen Street	Pensacola	32502	Leased	4/1/2011
4980 North 12th Avenue	Pensacola	32504	Owned	8/27/2012
Total		2 Offices

(1) Offices relocated to this address. Original offices opened on date indicated.

(2) Office is a loan production office only.

ITEM 3.    LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

Neither we nor the Bank is currently subject to any material legal proceedings. In the ordinary course of business, the Bank is involved in routine litigation, such as claims to enforce liens, claims involving the making and servicing of real property loans, and other issues incident to the Bank’s business. Management does not believe that there are any threatened proceedings against us or the Bank which, if determined adversely, would have a material effect on our or the Bank’s business, financial position or results of operations.

ITEM 4.  MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE

Not applicable.

31

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.

There is no public market for our common stock, and we have no current plans to list our common stock on any public market. Consequently, we have infrequent secondary trades in our common stock. The most recent sale of our common stock was at $30.84 per share on February 7, 2013. As of December 31, 2012, we had approximately 1,258 stockholders of record holding 6,268,812 outstanding shares of our common stock. Also as of December 31, 2012, we had 778,500 shares of our common stock currently subject to outstanding options to purchase such shares under the 2005 Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan and the 2009 Stock Incentive Plan, 20,500 shares issued with restrictions under our 2009 Stock Incentive Plan, 50,000 shares of common stock subject to other outstanding options, 85,500 shares subject to warrants granted to investors in debt issued by us, and 600,000 shares of common stock reserved for issuance upon conversion of outstanding mandatory convertible trust preferred securities.

Dividends

We paid a cash dividend of $0.50 per common share on December 31, 2012. This was our first dividend, and we have no plans to pay additional dividends in the near future. We anticipate that our future earnings, if any, will be retained for purposes of enhancing our capital. Our payment of cash dividends to common stockholders is subject to the discretion of our Board of Directors and the Bank’s ability to pay dividends.  The principal source of our cash flow, including cash flow to pay dividends, comes from dividends that the Bank pays to us as its sole shareholder. Statutory and regulatory limitations apply to the Bank’s payment of dividends to us, as well as our payment of dividends to our stockholders. For a more complete discussion on the restrictions on dividends, see “Supervision and Regulation - Payment of Dividends” in Item 1. We do pay quarterly dividends on our 40,000 shares of outstanding Non-cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock pursuant to its Certificate of Designation.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

We had no sales of unregistered securities in 2012 other than those previously reported in our reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Purchases of Equity Securities by the Registrant and Affiliated Purchasers

We made no repurchases of our equity securities, and no “affiliated purchasers” (as defined in Rule 10b-18(a) (3) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) purchased any shares of our equity securities during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table sets forth certain information as of December 31, 2012 relating to stock options granted under our 2005 Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan and our 2009 Stock Incentive Plan and other options or warrants issued outside of such plans.

Plan Category	Number of Securities Issued/To Be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Awards		Weighted-average Exercise Price of Outstanding Awards		Number of Securities Remaining Available For Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
Equity Compensation Award-Plans Approved by Security Holders		799,000	$	21.26		257,000
Equity Compensation Awards-Plans Not Approved by Security Holders		50,000		17.50		-
Total		849,000	$	21.04		257,000

We grant stock options as incentive to employees, officers, directors and consultants to attract or retain these individuals, to maintain and enhance our long-term performance and profitability, and to allow these individuals to acquire an ownership interest in our Company. Our compensation committee administers this program, making all decisions regarding grants and amendments to these awards. An incentive stock option may not be exercised later than 90 days after an option holder terminates his or her employment with us unless such termination is a consequence of such option holder’s death or disability, in which case the option period may be extended for up to one year after termination of employment. All of our issued options will vest immediately upon a transaction in which we merge or consolidate with or into any other corporation (unless we are the surviving corporation), or sell or otherwise transfer our property, assets or business substantially in its entirety to a successor corporation. At that time, upon the exercise of an option, the option holder will receive the number of shares of stock or other securities or property, including cash, to which the holder of a like number of shares of common stock would have been entitled upon the merger, consolidation, sale or transfer if such option had been exercised in full immediately prior thereto. All of our issued options have a term of 10 years. This means the options must be exercised within 10 years from the date of the grant.

32

On September 2, 2008, we granted warrants to purchase up to 75,000 shares of our common stock with a price of $25.00 per share in connection with the issuance of our Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debentures.

On June 23, 2009, we granted warrants to purchase up to 15,000 shares of our common stock with an exercise price of $25.00 per share in connection with the issuance of our Subordinated Note due June 1, 2016.

On September 21, 2006, we granted non-plan stock options to persons representing certain key business relationships to purchase up to an aggregate of 30,000 shares of our common stock with an exercise price of $15.00 per share. On November 2, 2007, we granted non-plan stock options to persons representing certain key business relationships to purchase up to an aggregate of 25,000 shares of our common stock with an exercise price of $20.00 per share. These stock options are non-qualified and are not part of either of our stock incentive plans. They vest 100% in a lump sum five years after their date of grant and expire 10 years after their date of grant.

On October 26, 2009, we made a restricted stock award under the 2009 Stock Incentive Plan of 20,000 shares of common stock to Thomas A. Broughton III, President and Chief Executive Officer. These shares vest in five equal installments commencing on the first anniversary of the grant date, subject to earlier vesting in the event of a merger, consolidation, sale or transfer as described in the first paragraph under the table above.

We have granted restricted stock awards under the 2009 Stock Incentive Plan of 12,500 shares of common stock to six employees. These shares vest five years from the date of grant, subject to earlier vesting in the event of a merger, consolidation, sale or transfer as described in the first paragraph under the table above.

On November 28, 2011, we granted 10,000 non-qualified stock options to each Company director, or a total of 60,000 options, to purchase shares with an exercise price of $30.00 per share. The options vest 100% at the end of five years.

Performance Graph

The information included under the caption “Performance Graph” in this Item 5 of this Form 10-K is not deemed to be “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the SEC or subject to Regulation 14A or 14C under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or the liabilities of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filings we make under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent we specifically incorporate it by reference into such a filing.

The following graph compares the change in cumulative total stockholder return on our common stock with the cumulative total return of the NASDAQ Banks Index and the S&P Stock Index from December 31, 2007 through December 31, 2012. This comparison assumes $100 invested on December 31, 2007 in (a) our common stock, (b) the NASDAQ Banks Index, and (c) the NASDAQ Composite Stock Index. Our common stock is not traded on any exchange or national market system, and prices for our stock are determined based on actual prices at which our stock has been sold in arm’s-length private placements completed prior to each point in time represented in the graph. Such prices are not necessarily indicative of the prices that would result from transactions conducted on an exchange.

33

	Date
Index:	12/31/2007		12/31/2008		12/31/2009		12/31/2010		12/31/2011		12/31/2012
ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc.		100.00		125.00		125.00		125.00		150.00		154.00
NASDAQ Composite		100.00		59.46		85.55		100.02		98.22		113.85
NASDAQ Bank		100.00		76.08		62.00		69.37		60.75		70.34

ITEM 6.  SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.

The following table sets forth selected historical consolidated financial data from our consolidated financial statements and should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements including the related notes and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” which are included below. Except for the data under “Selected Performance Ratios”, “Asset Quality Ratios”, “Liquidity Ratios”, “Capital Adequacy Ratios” and “Growth Ratios”, the selected historical consolidated financial data as of December 31, 2012, 2011, 2010, 2009 and 2008 and for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011, 2010, 2009 and 2008 are derived from our audited consolidated financial statements and related notes.

34

	As of and for the years ended December 31,
	2012			2011			2010			2009			2008
	(Dollars in thousands except for share and per share data)
Selected Balance Sheet Data:
Total Assets	$	2,906,314		$	2,460,785		$	1,935,166		$	1,573,497		$	1,162,272
Total Loans		2,363,182			1,830,742			1,394,818			1,207,084			968,233
Loans, net		2,336,924			1,808,712			1,376,741			1,192,173			957,631
Securities available for sale		233,877			293,809			276,959			255,453			102,339
Securities held to maturity		25,967			15,209			5,234			645			-
Cash and due from banks		58,031			43,018			27,454			26,982			22,844
Interest-bearing balances with banks		119,423			99,350			204,278			48,544			30,774
Fed funds sold		3,291			100,565			346			680			19,300
Mortgage loans held for sale		25,826			17,859			7,875			6,202			3,320
Restricted equity securities		3,941			3,501			3,510			3,241			2,659
Premises and equipment, net		8,847			4,591			4,450			5,088			3,884
Deposits		2,511,572			2,143,887			1,758,716			1,432,355			1,037,319
Other borrowings		136,982			84,219			24,937			24,922			20,000
Subordinated debentures		15,050			30,514			30,420			15,228			15,087
Other liabilities		9,453			5,873			3,993			3,370			3,082
Stockholders Equity		233,257			196,292			117,100			97,622			86,784
Selected income Statement Data:
Interest income	$	109,023		$	91,411		$	78,146		$	62,197		$	55,450
Interest expense		14,901			16,080			15,260			18,337			20,474
Net interest income		94,122			75,331			62,886			43,860			34,976
Provision for loan losses		9,100			8,972			10,350			10,685			6,274
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		85,022			66,359			52,536			33,175			28,702
Noninterest income		9,643			6,926			5,169			4,413			2,704
Noninterest expense		43,100			37,458			30,969			28,930			20,576
Income before income taxes		51,565			35,827			26,736			8,658			10,830
Income taxes expenses		17,120			12,389			9,358			2,780			3,825
Net income		34,445			23,438			17,378			5,878			7,005
Per common Share Data:
Net income, basic	$	5.68		$	4.03		$	3.15		$	1.07		$	1.37
Net income, diluted		4.99			3.53			2.84			1.02			1.31
Book value		30.84			26.35			21.19			17.71			16.15
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic		5,996,437			5,759,524			5,519,151			5,485,972			5,114,194
Diluted		6,941,752			6,749,163			6,294,604			5,787,643			5,338,883
Actual shares outstanding		6,268,812			5,932,182			5,527,482			5,513,482			5,374,022
Selected Performance Ratios:
Return on average assets		1.30	%		1.11	%		1.04	%		0.43	%		0.71	%
Return on average stockholders' equity		15.81	%		14.73	%		15.86	%		6.33	%		9.28	%
Net interest margin (1)		3.80	%		3.79	%		3.94	%		3.31	%		3.70	%
Efficiency ratio (2)		41.54	%		45.54	%		45.51	%		59.57	%		54.61	%
Asset quality Ratios:
Net charge-offs to average loans outstanding		0.24	%		0.32	%		0.55	%		0.60	%		0.41	%
Non-performing loans to totals loans		0.44	%		0.75	%		1.03	%		1.01	%		1.02	%
Non-performing assets to total assets		0.69	%		1.06	%		1.10	%		1.57	%		1.74	%
Allowance for loan losses to total gross loans		1.11	%		1.20	%		1.30	%		1.24	%		1.09	%
Allowance for loan losses to totalnon-performing loans		253.50	%		159.96	%		126.00	%		122.34	%		108.17	%
Liquidity Ratios:
Net loans to total deposits		93.05	%		84.37	%		78.28	%		83.23	%		92.32	%
Net average loans to averageearning assets		79.82	%		76.71	%		78.04	%		80.06	%		85.84	%
Noninterest-bearing deposits tototal deposits		21.71	%		16.96	%		14.24	%		14.75	%		11.71	%
Capital Adequacy Ratios:
Stockholders Equity to total assets		8.03	%		7.97	%		6.05	%		6.20	%		7.47	%
Total risked-based capital (3)		11.78	%		12.79	%		11.82	%		10.48	%		11.25	%
Tier 1 capital (4)		9.89	%		11.39	%		10.22	%		8.89	%		10.18	%
Leverage ratio (5)		8.43	%		9.17	%		7.77	%		6.97	%		9.01	%
Growth Ratios:
Percentage change in net income		46.96	%		34.87	%		195.64	%		(16.10	)%		27.43	%
Percentage change in diluted netincome per share		41.36	%		24.30	%		178.43	%		(22.14	)%		12.93	%
Percentage change in assets		18.11	%		27.16	%		22.99	%		35.38	%		38.65	%
Percentage change in net loans		29.20	%		31.38	%		15.48	%		24.49	%		45.45	%
Percentage change in deposits		17.15	%		21.90	%		22.78	%		38.08	%		36.00	%
Percentage change in equity		18.83	%		67.63	%		19.95	%		12.49	%		20.12	%

35

(1) Net interest margin is the net yield on interest earning assets and is the difference between the interest yield earned on interest-earning assets and interest rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities, divided by average earning assets.

(2) Efficiency ratio is the result of noninterest expense divided by the sum of net interest income and noninterest income

(3) Total stockholders' equity excluding unrealized gains/(losses) on securities available for sale, net of taxes, and intangible assets plus allowance for loan losses (limited to 1.25% of risk-weighted assets) divided by total risk-weighted assets. The FDIC required minimum to be well capitalized is 10%.

(4)Total stockholders' equity excluding unrealized gains/(losses) on securities available for sale, net of taxes, and intangible assets divided by total risk-weighted assets. The FDIC required minimum to be well-capitalized is 6%.

(5) Total stockholders' equity excluding unrealized losses on securities available for sale, net of taxes, and intangible assets divided by average assets less intangible assets. The FDIC required minimum to be well-capitalized is 5%; however, the Alabama Banking Department has required that the Bank maintain a Tier 1 capital leverage ratio of 7%.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following is a narrative discussion and analysis of significant changes in our results of operations and financial condition. The purpose of this discussion is to focus on information about our financial condition and results of operations that is not otherwise apparent from the audited financial statements. Analysis of the results presented should be made in the context of our relatively short history. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and selected financial data included elsewhere in this document.

Overview

We are a bank holding company within the meaning of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 headquartered in Birmingham, Alabama. Through our wholly-owned subsidiary bank, we operate 11 full service banking offices located in Jefferson, Shelby, Madison, Montgomery and Houston Counties in Alabama, and in Escambia County in Florida. These offices operate in the Birmingham-Hoover, Huntsville, Montgomery and Dothan, Alabama MSAs, and in the Pensacola-Ferry Pass-Brent, Florida MSA. Additionally, we opened a loan production office in Mobile, Alabama in July 2012. Our principal business is to accept deposits from the public and to make loans and other investments. Our principal source of funds for loans and investments are demand, time, savings, and other deposits and the amortization and prepayment of loans and borrowings. Our principal sources of income are interest and fees collected on loans, interest and dividends collected on other investments and service charges. Our principal expenses are interest paid on savings and other deposits, interest paid on our other borrowings, employee compensation, office expenses and other overhead expenses.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our consolidated financial statements are prepared based on the application of certain accounting policies, the most significant of which are described in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Certain of these policies require numerous estimates and strategic or economic assumptions that may prove inaccurate or subject to variation and may significantly affect our reported results and financial position for the current period or in future periods. The use of estimates, assumptions, and judgments are necessary when financial assets and liabilities are required to be recorded at, or adjusted to reflect, fair value. Assets carried at fair value inherently result in more financial statement volatility. Fair values and information used to record valuation adjustments for certain assets and liabilities are based on either quoted market prices or are provided by other independent third-party sources, when available. When such information is not available, management estimates valuation adjustments. Changes in underlying factors, assumptions or estimates in any of these areas could have a material impact on our future financial condition and results of operations.

Allowance for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan losses, sometimes referred to as the “ALLL”, is established through periodic charges to income. Loan losses are charged against the ALLL when management believes that the future collection of principal is unlikely. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the ALLL. If the ALLL is considered inadequate to absorb future loan losses on existing loans for any reason, including but not limited to, increases in the size of the loan portfolio, increases in charge-offs or changes in the risk characteristics of the loan portfolio, then the provision for loan losses is increased.

36

Loans are considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Bank will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the original terms of the loan agreement. The collection of all amounts due according to contractual terms means that both the contractual interest and principal payments of a loan will be collected as scheduled in the loan agreement. Impaired loans are measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, or, as a practical expedient, at the loan’s observable market price, or the fair value of the underlying collateral. The fair value of collateral, reduced by costs to sell on a discounted basis, is used if a loan is collateral-dependent.

Investment Securities Impairment

Periodically, we may need to assess whether there have been any events or economic circumstances to indicate that a security on which there is an unrealized loss is impaired on an other-than-temporary basis. In any such instance, we would consider many factors, including the severity and duration of the impairment, our intent and ability to hold the security for a period of time sufficient for a recovery in value, recent events specific to the issuer or industry, and for debt securities, external credit ratings and recent downgrades. Securities on which there is an unrealized loss that is deemed to be other-than-temporary are written down to fair value, with the write-down recorded as a realized loss in securities gains (losses).

Other Real Estate Owned

Other real estate owned (“OREO”), consisting of assets that have been acquired through foreclosure, is recorded at the lower of cost or estimated fair value less the estimated cost of disposition. Fair value is based on independent appraisals and other relevant factors. Other real estate owned is revalued on an annual basis or more often if market conditions necessitate. Valuation adjustments required at foreclosure are charged to the allowance for loan losses. Subsequent to foreclosure, losses on the periodic revaluation of the property are charged to net income as OREO expense. Significant judgments and complex estimates are required in estimating the fair value of other real estate, and the period of time within which such estimates can be considered current is significantly shortened during periods of market volatility, as experienced in recent years. As a result, the net proceeds realized from sales transactions could differ significantly from appraisals, comparable sales, and other estimates used to determine the fair value of other real estate.

Results of Operations

Net Income

Net income for the year ended December 31, 2012 was $34.4 million, compared to net income of $23.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. This increase in net income is primarily attributable to an increase in net interest income, which increased $18.8 million, or 24.9%, to $94.1 million in 2012 from $75.3 million in 2011. Noninterest income increased $2.7 million, or 39.1%, to $9.6 million in 2012 from $6.9 million in 2011. Noninterest expense increased by $5.6 million, or 14.9%, to $43.1 million in 2012 from $37.5 million in 2011. Basic and diluted net income per common share were $5.68 and $4.99, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2012, compared to $4.03 and $3.53, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2011. Return on average assets was 1.30% in 2012, compared to 1.11% in 2011, and return on average stockholders’ equity was 15.81% in 2012, compared to 14.73% in 2011.

Net income for the year ended December 31, 2011 was $23.4 million, compared to net income of $17.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. This increase in net income is primarily attributable to an increase in net interest income, which increased $12.4 million, or 19.8%, to $75.3 million in 2011 from $62.9 million in 2010. Noninterest income increased $1.7 million, or 32.7%, to $6.9 million in 2011 from $5.2 million in 2010. Noninterest expense increased by $6.5 million, or 21.0%, to $37.5 million in 2011 from $31.0 million in 2010. Basic and diluted net income per common share were $4.03 and $3.53, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2011, compared to $3.15 and $2.84, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2010. Return on average assets was 1.11% in 2011, compared to 1.04% in 2010, and return on average stockholders’ equity was 14.73% in 2011, compared to 15.86% in 2010.

	Year Ended December 31,
	2012		2011		Change from the Prior Year
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Interest income	$	109,023	$	91,411		19.27	%
Interest expense		14,901		16,080		-7.33	%
Net interest income		94,122		75,331		24.94	%
Provision for loan losses		9,100		8,972		1.43	%
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		85,022		66,359		28.12	%
Noninterest income		9,643		6,926		39.23	%
Noninterest expense		43,100		37,458		15.06	%
Net income before taxes		51,565		35,827		43.93	%
Taxes		17,120		12,389		38.19	%
Net income		34,445		23,438		46.96	%
Dividends on preferred stock		400		200		100.00
Net income available to common stockholders	$	34,045	$	23,238		46.51	%

37

	Year Ended December 31,
	2011		2010		Change from the Prior Year
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Interest income	$	91,411	$	78,146		16.97	%
Interest expense		16,080		15,260		5.37	%
Net interest income		75,331		62,886		19.79	%
Provision for loan losses		8,972		10,350		-13.31	%
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		66,359		52,536		26.31	%
Noninterest income		6,926		5,169		33.99	%
Noninterest expense		37,458		30,969		20.95	%
Net income before taxes		35,827		26,736		34.00	%
Taxes		12,389		9,358		32.39	%
Net income		23,438		17,378		34.87	%
Dividends on preferred stock		200		-		NM
Net income available to common stockholders	$	23,238	$	17,378		33.72	%

Net Interest Income

Net interest income is the difference between the income earned on interest-earning assets and interest paid on interest-bearing liabilities used to support such assets. The major factors which affect net interest income are changes in volumes, the yield on interest-earning assets and the cost of interest-bearing liabilities. Our management’s ability to respond to changes in interest rates by effective asset-liability management techniques is critical to maintaining the stability of the net interest margin and the momentum of our primary source of earnings.

Net interest income increased $18.8 million, or 24.9%, to $94.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 from $75.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. This was due to an increase in total interest income of $17.6 million, or 19.3%, and a decrease in total interest expense of $1.2 million, or a 7.3% reduction. The increase in total interest income was primarily attributable to a 29.30% increase in average loans outstanding from 2011 to 2012, which was the result of growth in all of our markets, including in Pensacola, Florida, and Mobile, Alabama, our newer markets entered during 2011 and 2012, respectively.

Net interest income increased $12.4 million, or 19.8%, to $75.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 from $62.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. This was due to an increase in total interest income of $13.3 million, or 17.0%, and an increase in total interest expense of $0.8, or 5.4%. The increase in total interest income was primarily attributable to a 22.62% increase in average loans outstanding from 2010 to 2011, which was the result of growth in all of our markets, including in Pensacola, Florida, our newest market entrance in 2011.

Investments

We view the investment portfolio as a source of income and liquidity. Our investment strategy is to accept a lower immediate yield in the investment portfolio by targeting shorter term investments. Our investment policy provides that no more than 40% of our total investment portfolio should be composed of municipal securities.

38

The investment portfolio at December 31, 2012 was $260 million, compared to $309 million at December 31, 2011. The interest earned on investments decreased from $8.7 million in 2011 to $8.1 million in 2012. The lower income was a result of lower yields on new securities purchased during 2012. The average taxable-equivalent yield on the investment portfolio decreased from 3.69% in 2011 to 3.33% in 2012, or 36 basis points.

The investment portfolio at December 31, 2011 was $309 million, compared to $ 282 million at December 31, 2010. The interest earned on investments decreased slightly, from $8.8 million in 2010 to $8.7 million in 2011. The lower income was the result of lower yields on new securities purchased during 2011. The average taxable-equivalent yield on the investment portfolio decreased from 4.08% in 2010 to 3.69% in 2011, or 39 basis points.

Net Interest Margin Analysis

The net interest margin is impacted by the average volumes of interest-sensitive assets and interest-sensitive liabilities and by the difference between the yield on interest-sensitive assets and the cost of interest-sensitive liabilities (spread). Loan fees collected at origination represent an additional adjustment to the yield on loans. Our spread can be affected by economic conditions, the competitive environment, loan demand, and deposit flows. The net yield on earning assets is an indicator of effectiveness of our ability to manage the net interest margin by managing the overall yield on assets and cost of funding those assets.

The following table shows, for the twelve months ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, the average balances of each principal category of our assets, liabilities and stockholders’ equity, and an analysis of net interest revenue, and the change in interest income and interest expense segregated into amounts attributable to changes in volume and changes in rates. This table is presented on a taxable equivalent basis, if applicable.

39

Average Balance Sheets and Net Interest Analysis

On a Fully Taxable-Equivalent Basis

For the Year Ended December 31,

(In thousands, except Average Yields and Rates)

	2012							2011							2010
	Average Balance		Interest Earned / Paid		Average Yield / Rate			Average Balance		Interest Earned / Paid		Average Yield / Rate			Average Balance		Interest Earned / Paid		Average Yield / Rate
Assets:
Interest-earning assets:
Loans, net of unearned income
Taxable (1)	$	2,034,478	$	100,143		4.92	%	$	1,573,500	$	82,083		5.22	%	$	1,283,204	$	68,889		5.37	%
Tax-exempt(2)		1,631		95		5.82			-		-		-			-		-		-
Mortgage loans held for sale		17,905		349		1.95			7,556		211		2.79			6,275		226		3.60
Securities:
Taxable		184,174		4,815		2.61			188,315		5,721		3.04			180,045		6,482		3.60
Tax-exempt(2)		100,926		4,683		4.64			82,239		4,275		5.20			59,812		3,314		5.72
Total securities (3)		285,100		9,498		3.33			270,554		9,996		3.69			239,857		9,796		4.08
Federal funds sold		94,425		196		0.21			85,825		176		0.21			47,581		104		0.22
Restricted equity securities		4,434		104		2.35			4,259		74		1.74			3,448		56		1.62
Interest-bearing balances with banks		80,170		200		0.25			83,152		203		0.24			42,675		115		0.27
Total interest-earning assets	$	2,518,143	$	110,585		4.39	%	$	2,024,846	$	92,743		4.58	%	$	1,623,040	$	79,186		4.88	%
Non-interest-earning assets:
Cash and due from banks		38,467							28,304							24,837
Net premises and equipment		6,074							4,813							4,914
Allowance for loan losses, accrued interest and other assets		65,504							29,094							23,087
Total assets	$	2,628,188						$	2,087,057						$	1,675,878
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest-bearing deposits:
Checking	$	351,975	$	1,075		0.31	%	$	303,165	$	1,134		0.37	%	$	264,591	$	1,253		0.47	%
Savings		17,081		48		0.28			10,088		47		0.47			2,978		15		0.50
Money market		1,042,870		5,820		0.56			902,290		6,675		0.74			775,544		5,994		0.77
Time deposits		398,552		5,307		1.33			330,221		5,192		1.57			255,326		4,679		1.83
Federal funds purchased		88,732		222		0.25			19,335		49		0.25			4,901		31		0.63
Other borrowings		33,126		2,431		7.34			41,866		2,983		7.13			52,186		3,288		6.30
Total interest-bearing liabilities	$	1,932,336	$	14,903		0.77	%	$	1,606,965	$	16,080		1.00	%	$	1,355,526	$	15,260		1.13	%
Non-interest-bearing liabilities:
Non-interest-bearing checking		474,284							315,781							207,399
Other liabilities		6,201							6,580							3,412
Stockholders' equity		207,656							145,050							105,156
Unrealized gains on securities and derivatives		7,712							12,681							4,385
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	2,628,188						$	2,087,057						$	1,675,878
Net interest spread						3.62	%						3.58	%						3.75	%
Net interest margin						3.80	%						3.79	%						3.94	%

(1) Non-accrual loans are included in average loan balances in all periods. Loan fees of $372,000, $538,000 and $750,000 are included in interest income in 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

(2) Interest income and yields are presented on a fully taxable equivalent basis using a tax rate of 35%.

(3) Unrealized gains of $11,998,000, $7,624,000 and $6,717,000 are excluded from the yield calculation in 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

40

The following table reflects changes in our net interest margin as a result of changes in the volume and rate of our interest-bearing assets and liabilities.

	For the Year Ended December 31,
	2012 Compared to 2011 Increase (Decrease) in Interest Income and Expense Due to Changes in:									2011 Compared to 2010 Increase (Decrease) in Interest Income and Expense Due to Changes in:
	Volume			Rate			Total			Volume			Rate			Total
Interest-earning assets:
Loans, net of unearned income
Taxable	$	22,910		$	(4,850	)	$	18,060		$	15,193		$	(1,999	)	$	13,194
Tax-exempt		95			-			95			-			-			-
Mortgages held for sale		218			(80	)		138			41			(56	)		(15	)
Taxable		(124	)		(782	)		(906	)		287			(1,048	)		(761	)
Tax-exempt		900			(492	)		408			1,177			(216	)		961
Federal funds sold		18			2			20			78			(6	)		72
Restricted equity securities		3			27			30			14			4			18
with banks		(7	)		4			(3	)		100			(12	)		88
Total interest-earning assets		24,013			(6,171	)		17,842			16,890			(3,333	)		13,557
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest-bearing demand deposits		167			(226	)		(59	)		166			(285	)		(119	)
Savings		25			(24	)		1			33			(1	)		32
Money market		941			(1,796	)		(855	)		947			(266	)		681
Time deposits		980			(865	)		115			1,242			(729	)		513
Federal funds purchased		174			(1	)		173			47			(29	)		18
Other borrowed funds		(639	)		87			(552	)		(701	)		396			(305	)
liabilities		1,648			(2,825	)		(1,177	)		1,734			(914	)		820
Increase in net interest income	$	22,365		$	(3,346	)	$	19,019		$	15,156		$	(2,419	)	$	12,737

In the table above, changes in net interest income are attributable to (a) changes in average balances (volume variance), (b) changes in rates (rate variance), or (c) changes in rate and average balances (rate/volume variance). The volume variance is calculated as the change in average balances times the old rate. The rate variance is calculated as the change in rates times the old average balance. The rate/volume variance is calculated as the change in rates times the change in average balances. The rate/volume variance is allocated on a pro rata basis between the volume variance and the rate variance in the table above.

The two primary factors that make up the spread are the interest rates received on loans and the interest rates paid on deposits. We have been disciplined in raising interest rates on deposits only as the market demanded and thereby managing our cost of funds. Also, we have not competed for new loans on interest rate alone, but rather we have relied significantly on effective marketing to business customers.

Our net interest spread and net interest margin were 3.62% and 3.80%, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2012, compared to 3.58% and 3.79%, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2011. Our average interest-earning assets for the year ended December 31, 2012 increased $493.3 million, or 24.4%, to $2.5 billion from $2.0 billion for the year ended December 31, 2011. This increase in our average interest-earning assets was due to continued core growth in all of our markets, increased loan production and increases in investment securities, federal funds sold and interest-bearing balances with other banks. Our average interest-bearing liabilities increased $325.4 million, or 20.2%, to $1.9 billion for the year ended December 31, 2012 from $1.6 billion for the year ended December 31, 2011. This increase in our average interest-bearing liabilities was primarily due to an increase in interest-bearing deposits in all our markets. We prepaid our $5 million 8.25% subordinated note on June 2, 2012 and our $15 million 8.5% subordinated debenture on November 8, 2012. We issued $20 million in 5.5% subordinated notes due in November 9, 2022 in a private placement with accredited investors. The ratio of our average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities was 130.3% and 126.0% for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

41

Our average interest-earning assets produced a taxable equivalent yield of 4.39% for the year ended December 31, 2012, compared to 4.58% for the year ended December 31, 2011. The average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities was 0.77% for the year ended December 31, 2012, compared to 1.00% for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Our net interest spread and net interest margin were 3.58% and 3.79%, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2011, compared to 3.75% and 3.94%, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2010. Our average interest-earning assets for the year ended December 31, 2011 increased $401.8 million, or 24.8%, to $2.0 billion from $1.6 billion for the year ended December 31, 2010. This increase in our average interest-earning assets was due to continued core growth in all of our markets, increased loan production and increases in investment securities, federal funds sold and interest-bearing balances with other banks. Our average interest-bearing liabilities increased $251.4 million, or 18.5%, to $1.6 billion for the year ended December 31, 2011 from $1.4 billion for the year ended December 31, 2010. This increase in our average interest-bearing liabilities was primarily due to an increase in interest-bearing deposits in all our markets. We paid off two advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank totaling $20 million during the first half of 2011. The average rate paid on these advances was 3.13%. The ratio of our average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities was 130.3% and 126.0% for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Our average interest-earning assets produced a taxable equivalent yield of 4.58% for the year ended December 31, 2011, compared to 4.88% for the year ended December 31, 2010. The average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities was 1.00% for the year ended December 31, 2011, compared to 1.13% for the year ended December 31, 2010.

Provision for Loan Losses

The provision for loan losses represents the amount determined by management to be necessary to maintain the allowance for loan losses at a level capable of absorbing inherent losses in the loan portfolio. Our management reviews the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses on a quarterly basis. The allowance for loan losses calculation is segregated into various segments that include classified loans, loans with specific allocations and pass rated loans. A pass rated loan is generally characterized by a very low to average risk of default and in which management perceives there is a minimal risk of loss. Loans are rated using a nine-point risk grade scale with loan officers having the primary responsibility for assigning risk grades and for the timely reporting of changes in the risk grades. Based on these processes, and the assigned risk grades, the criticized and classified loans in the portfolio are segregated into the following regulatory classifications: Special Mention, Substandard, Doubtful or Loss, with some general allocation of reserve based on these grades. At December 31, 2012, total loans rated Special Mention, Substandard, and Doubtful were $100.7 million, or 4.3% of total loans, compared to $88.9 million, or 5.2% of total loans, at December 31, 2011. Impaired loans are reviewed specifically and separately under FASB ASC 310-30-35, Subsequent Measurement of Impaired Loans, to determine the appropriate reserve allocation. Our management compares the investment in an impaired loan with the present value of expected future cash flow discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s observable market price or the fair value of the collateral, if the loan is collateral-dependent, to determine the specific reserve allowance. Reserve percentages assigned to non-impaired loans are based on historical charge-off experience adjusted for other risk factors. To evaluate the overall adequacy of the allowance to absorb losses inherent in our loan portfolio, our management considers historical loss experience based on volume and types of loans, trends in classifications, volume and trends in delinquencies and nonaccruals, economic conditions and other pertinent information. Based on future evaluations, additional provisions for loan losses may be necessary to maintain the allowance for loan losses at an appropriate level.

The provision expense for loan losses was $9.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, an increase of $0.1 million from $9.0 million in 2011.Also, nonperforming loans decreased to $10.4 million, or 0.44%, of total loans at December 31, 2012 from $13.8 million, or 0.75%, of total loans at December 31, 2011. During 2012, we had net charged-off loans totaling $4.9 million, compared to net charged-off loans of $5.0 million for 2011. The ratio of net charged-off loans to average loans was 0.24% for 2012 compared to 0.32% for 2011. The allowance for loan losses totaled $26.3 million, or 1.11% of loans, net of unearned income, at December 31, 2012, compared to $22.0 million, or 1.20% of loans, net of unearned income, at December 31, 2011.

The provision expense for loan losses was $9.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2011, a decrease of $1.4 million from $10.4 million in 2010.Also, nonperforming loans decreased to $13.8 million, or 0.75% of total loans, at December 31, 2011, from $14.3 million, or 1.03% of total loans, at December 31, 2010. During 2011, we had net charged-off loans totaling $5.0 million, compared to net charged-off loans of $7.0 million for 2010. The ratio of net charged-off loans to average loans was 0.32% for 2011 compared to 0.55% for 2010. The allowance for loan losses totaled $22.0 million, or 1.20% of loans, net of unearned income, at December 31, 2011, compared to $18.1 million, or 1.30% of loans, net of unearned income, at December 31, 2010.

42

Noninterest Income

Noninterest income increased $2.7 million, or 39.2%, to $9.6 million in 2012 from $6.9 million in 2011. Noninterest income increased $1.7 million, or 34.0%, to $6.9 million in 2011 from $5.2 million in 2010. Increases in the cash surrender value of bank-owned life insurance contracts of $1.6 million in 2012, compared to $0.4 million in 2011, was a major component of the increase in noninterest income from 2011 to 2012. Interchange income from credit card activity increased from $0.5 million in 2011 to $1.0 million in 2012, resulting from increases in the number of cards sold, and from increased spending on existing cards. There were no gains on the sale of available-for-sale securities during 2012, compared to $0.7 million during 2011, and $108,000 during 2010.

Income from mortgage banking operations continued to be bolstered by refinancing activity in 2012 as the result of low interest rates. For the year ended December 31, 2012, mortgage banking income increased $1.2 million, or 50.0%, to $3.6 million from $2.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. Income from mortgage banking operations for the year ended December 31, 2011 increased $0.2 million from the year ended December 31, 2010. Income from service charges on deposit accounts for the year ended December 31, 2012 increased $0.5 million, or 21.7%, from $2.3 million in 2011 to $2.8 million in 2012, and was flat at $2.3 million when comparing 2011 to 2010. The average balances on transaction deposit accounts, from which service fees are derived, were up $354.9 million, or 23.2%, from 2011 to 2012. We also dropped our earnings credit rate paid on deposits in April 2012 from 0.50% to 0.35%, which contributed to somewhat higher service fee income. Despite the fact that average balances in transaction accounts increased by approximately $280.8 million, or 22.5%, there was minimal growth in the balances in accounts that are tied to analysis fees. We also had a flat earnings credit rate of 0.50% during all of 2010 and 2011. Our management is currently pursuing new accounts and customers through direct marketing and other promotional efforts to increase this source of revenue.

Noninterest Expense

Noninterest expense increased $5.6 million, or 15.1%, to $43.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 from $37.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. This increase is largely attributable to increased salary and employee benefits expense, which is a result of staff additions related to our expansion. We had 234 full-time equivalent employees at December 31, 2012 compared to 210 at December 31, 2011. Equipment and occupancy expense increased $0.3 million, or 8.1% as a result of the opening of a new office in our Pensacola, Florida market. This office is housed in an owned facility. FDIC assessments expensed during 2012 were down $0.2 million, or 11.1%, from $1.8 million in 2011 to $1.6 million in 2012. This was the result of changes by the FDIC, under the Dodd-Frank Act, in how the assessment base is determined, and at what rates assessments are charged. These changes took effect during the second quarter of 2011. OREO expense increased $1.9 million, or 237.5%, from $0.8 million in 2011 to $2.7 million in 2012. This increase was the result of increased write-downs in the value of residential development properties in various stages of completion. Other noninterest expenses increased $0.3 million, or 2.9%, to $10.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 from $10.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. Other expenses in 2011 included $738,000 in prepayment penalties incurred as a result of our prepayment of FHLB debt. Offsetting this during 2012 were increases in credit card processing expenses and other loan expenses.

Noninterest expense increased $6.5 million, or 21.0%, to $37.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 from $31.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. This increase is largely attributable to increased salary and employee benefits expense, which is a result of staff additions related to our expansion. We had 210 full-time equivalent employees at December 31, 2011 compared to 170 at December 31, 2010. Equipment and occupancy expense also increased, from $3.2 million in 2010 to $3.7 in 2011, as a result of our expansion into Pensacola, Florida and the expansion of existing offices to accommodate new staff. FDIC insurance assessments decreased from $2.9 million in 2010 to $1.8 million in 2011 due to the changes in the assessment base and rates under the Dodd-Frank Act, as discussed above. OREO expenses decreased from $2.0 million in 2010 to $0.8 million in 2011 due to the completion of construction projects in 2010, and the sale of several pieces of OREO during 2010 and 2011. Other noninterest expenses increased $3.1 million, or 43.0%, to $10.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 from $7.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2010. A large part of this increase was the $738,000 in prepayment penalties incurred when we paid off our advances to the FHLB in 2011. Recording fees and bank-paid loan expenses increased during 2011 as a result of loan growth and a greater proportion of loans for which the Bank agreed to pay various expenses related to closing. More details of changes in other noninterest expenses can be seen in Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

43

Income Tax Expense

Income tax expense was $17.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to $12.4 million in 2011 and $9.4 million in 2010. Our effective tax rates for 2012, 2011 and 2010 were 33.20%, 34.58% and 35.00%, respectively. Our primary permanent differences are related to incentive stock option expenses and tax-free income.

We invested in bank-owned life insurance for certain named officers of the Bank in September 2011, and again in October 2012. The periodic increases in cash surrender value of those policies are tax exempt and therefore contribute to a larger permanent difference between book income and taxable income.

We created a real estate investment trust in the first quarter of 2012 for the purposes of isolating certain real estate loans for tracking purposes. The trust is a wholly-owned subsidiary of a trust holding company, which in turn is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Bank. The trust dividends its net earnings, primarily interest income derived from the loans it holds, to the Bank, which receives a deduction for Alabama income tax.

Financial Condition

Assets

Total assets at December 31, 2012, were $2.9 billion, an increase of $0.4 billion, or 16.0% over total assets of $2.5 billion at December 31, 2011. Average assets for the year ended December 31, 2012 were $2.6 billion, an increase of $0.5 billion, or 29.4%, over average assets of $2.1 billion for the year ended December 31, 2011. Loan growth was the primary reason for the increase. Year-end 2012 loans were $2.4 billion, up $0.5 billion, or 27.8%, over year-end 2011 total loans of $1.8 billion.

Total assets at December 31, 2011, were $2.5 billion, an increase of $0.5 billion, or 26.3% over total assets of $1.9 billion at December 31, 2010. Average assets for the year ended December 31, 2011 were $2.1 billion, an increase of $0.4 billion, or 23.5%, over average assets of $1.7 billion for the year ended December 31, 2010. Loan growth was the primary reason for the increase. Year-end 2011 loans were $1.8 billion, up $0.4 billion, or 28.6%, over year-end 2010 total loans of $1.4 billion.

Earning assets include loans, securities, short-term investments and bank-owned life insurance contracts.  We maintain a higher level of earning assets in our business model than do our peers because we allocate fewer of our resources to facilities, ATMs, cash and due-from-bank accounts used for transaction processing. Earning assets at December 31, 2012 were $2.8 billion, or 97.5% of total assets of $2.9 billion. Earning assets at December 31, 2011 were $2.4 billion, or 97.6% of total assets of $2.5 billion. We believe this ratio is expected to generally continue at these levels, although it may be affected by economic factors beyond our control.

Investment Portfolio

We view the investment portfolio as a source of income and liquidity. Our investment strategy is to accept a lower immediate yield in the investment portfolio by targeting shorter-term investments. Our investment policy provides that no more than 50% of our total investment portfolio should be composed of municipal securities. At December 31, 2012, mortgage-backed securities represented 36% of the investment portfolio, state and municipal securities represented 48% of the investment portfolio, U.S. Treasury and government agencies represented 11% of the investment portfolio, and corporate debt represented 5% of the investment portfolio.

All of our investments in mortgage-backed securities are pass-through mortgage-backed securities. We do not currently, and did not have at December 31, 2012, any structured investment vehicles or any private-label mortgage-backed securities. The amortized cost of securities in our portfolio totaled $248.6 million at December 31, 2012, compared to $297.9 million at December 31, 2011. The following table provides the amortized cost of our securities as of December 31, 2012 by their stated maturities (this maturity schedule excludes security prepayment and call features), as well as the taxable equivalent yields for each maturity range. All such securities held are traded in liquid markets.

44

Maturity of Investment Securities - Amortized Cost

	Less Than One Year			One Year throught Five Years			Six Years through Ten Years			More Than Ten Years			Total
	(In Thousands)
At December 31, 2012:
Securities Available for Sale:
U.S. Treasury and government agencies	$	10,003		$	15,304		$	2,053		$	-		$	27,360
Mortgage-backed securities		-			69,298			-			-			69,298
State and municipal securities		1,968			51,250			56,733			2,368			112,319
Corporate debt		-			12,638			1,039			-			13,677
Total	$	11,971		$	148,490		$	59,825		$	2,368		$	222,654
Tax-equivalent Yield
U.S. Treasury and government agencies		1.90	%		2.37	%		4.88	%		-	%		2.39	%
Mortgage-backed securities		-			3.63			-			-			3.63
State and municipal securities		3.90			3.70			4.80			6.04			4.31
Corporate debt		-			1.29			7.07			-			1.73
Weighted average yield		2.23	%		3.33	%		4.84	%		6.04	%		3.70	%
Securities Held to Maturity:
Mortgage-backed securities	$	-		$	14,735		$	4,479		$	1,215		$	20,429
State and municipal securities		-			-			-			5,538			5,538
Total	$	-		$	14,735		$	4,479		$	6,753		$	25,967
Tax-equivalent Yield
Mortgage-backed securities		-	%		2.90	%		1.69	%		3.00	%		2.64	%
State and municipal securities		-			-			-			6.08			6.08
Weighted average yield		-	%		2.90	%		1.69	%		5.53	%		3.37	%

At December 31, 2012, we had $3.3 million in federal funds sold, compared with $100.6 million at December 31, 2011. We shifted balances held at correspondent banks to our reserve account at the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta to gain favorable capital treatment at December 31, 2012.

The objective of our investment policy is to invest funds not otherwise needed to meet our loan demand to earn the maximum return, yet still maintain sufficient liquidity to meet fluctuations in our loan demand and deposit structure. In doing so, we balance the market and credit risks against the potential investment return, make investments compatible with the pledge requirements of any deposits of public funds, maintain compliance with regulatory investment requirements, and assist certain public entities with their financial needs. The investment committee has full authority over the investment portfolio and makes decisions on purchases and sales of securities. The entire portfolio, along with all investment transactions occurring since the previous board of directors meeting, is reviewed by the board at each monthly meeting. The investment policy allows portfolio holdings to include short-term securities purchased to provide us with needed liquidity and longer term securities purchased to generate level income for us over periods of interest rate fluctuations.

Loan Portfolio

We had total loans of approximately $2.363 billion at December 31, 2012. The following table shows the percentage of our total loan portfolio by MSA. With our loan portfolio concentrated in a limited number of markets, there is a risk that our borrowers’ ability to repay their loans from us could be affected by changes in local and regional economic conditions.

	Percentage of Total Loans in MSA
Birmingham-Hoover, AL MSA		53	%
Huntsville, AL MSA		17	%
Montgomery, AL MSA		11	%
Dothan, AL MSA		13	%
Total Alabama MSAs		93	%
Pensacola, FL MSA		7	%

45

The following table details our loans at December 31, 2012, 2011, 2010, 2009 and 2008:

	2012			2011			2010			2009			2008
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Commercial, financial and agricultural	$	1,030,990		$	799,464		$	536,620		$	461,088		$	325,968
Real estate - construction		158,361			151,218			172,055			224,178			235,162
Real estate - mortgage:
Owner-occupied commercial		568,041			398,601			270,767			203,983			147,197
1-4 family mortgage		235,909			205,182			199,236			165,512			137,019
Other mortgage		323,599			235,251			178,793			119,749			93,412
Total real estate - mortgage		1,127,549			839,034			648,796			489,244			377,628
Consumer		46,282			41,026			37,347			32,574			29,475
Total Loans		2,363,182			1,830,742			1,394,818			1,207,084			968,233
Less: Allowance for loan losses		(26,258	)		(22,030	)		(18,077	)		(14,737	)		(10,602	)
Net Loans	$	2,336,924		$	1,808,712		$	1,376,741		$	1,192,347		$	957,631

The following table details the percentage composition of our loan portfolio by type at December 31, 2012, 2011, 2010, 2009 and 2008:

	2012			2011			2010			2009			2008
Commercial, financial and agricultural		43.63	%		43.67	%		38.47	%		38.20	%		33.67	%
Real estate - construction		6.70			8.26			12.34			18.57			24.29
Real estate - mortgage:
Owner-occupied commercial		24.04			21.77			19.41			16.90			15.20
1-4 family mortgage		9.98			11.21			14.28			13.71			14.15
Other mortgage		13.69			12.85			12.82			9.92			9.65
Total real estate - mortgage		47.71			45.83			46.51			40.53			39.00
Consumer		1.96			2.24			2.68			2.70			3.04
Total Loans		100.00	%		100.00	%		100.00	%		100.00	%		100.00	%

The following table details maturities and sensitivity to interest rate changes for our loan portfolio at December 31, 2012:

	Due in 1		Due in 1 to 5		Due after 5
	year or less		years		years		Total
	(in Thousands)
Commercial, financial and agricultural	$	602,364	$	360,172	$	68,454	$	1,030,990
Real estate - construction		98,472		57,257		2,632		158,361
Real estate - mortgage:
Owner-occupied commercial		76,396		342,170		149,475		568,041
1-4 family mortgage		39,038		149,004		47,867		235,909
Other mortgage		80,292		203,032		40,275		323,599
Total Real estate - mortgage		195,726		694,206		237,617		1,127,549
Consumer		32,108		13,794		380		46,282
Total Loans	$	928,670	$	1,125,429	$	309,083	$	2,363,182
Less: Allowance for loan losses								(26,258	)
Net Loans							$	2,336,924
Interest rate sensitivity:
Fixed interest rates	$	213,714	$	656,735	$	175,608	$	1,046,057
Floating or adjustable rates		714,956		468,694		133,475		1,317,125
Total	$	928,670	$	1,125,429	$	309,083	$	2,363,182

(1) includes nonaccrual loans

46

Asset Quality

The following table presents a summary of changes in the allowance for loan losses over the past five fiscal years. Our net charge-offs as a percentage of average loans for 2012 was 0.24%, compared to 0.32% for 2011. The largest balance of our charge-offs is on real estate construction loans. Real estate construction loans represent 6.70% of our loan portfolio.

	2012			2011			2010			2009			2008
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Allowance for loan losses:
Beginning of year	$	22,030		$	18,077		$	14,737		$	10,602		$	7,732
Charge-offs:
Commercial, financial and agricultural		(1,106	)		(1,096	)		(1,667	)		(2,616	)		(545	)
Real estate - construction		(3,088	)		(2,594	)		(3,488	)		(3,322	)		(2,264	)
Real estate - mortgage:
Owner occupied commercial		(250	)		-			(548	)		-			-
1-4 family mortgage		(311	)		(1,096	)		(1,227	)		(522	)		(480	)
Other mortgage		(99	)		-			-			(9	)		(459	)
Total real estate mortgage		(660	)		(1,096	)		(1,775	)		(531	)		(939	)
Consumer		(901	)		(867	)		(278	)		(207	)		(118	)
Total charge-offs		(5,755	)		(5,653	)		(7,208	)		(6,676	)		(3,866	)
Recoveries:
Commercial, financial and agricultural		125			361			97			-			264
Real estate - construction		58			180			53			108			-
Real estate - mortgage:
Owner occupied commercial		-			12			12			-			-
1-4 family mortgage		692			-			20			3			-
Other mortgage		-			-			-			-			-
Total real estate mortgage		692			12			32			3			-
Consumer		8			81			16			15			198
Total recoveries		883			634			198			126			462
Net charge-offs		(4,872	)		(5,019	)		(7,010	)		(6,550	)		(3,404	)
Provision for loan losses charged to expense		9,100			8,972			10,350			10,685			6,274
Allowance for loan losses at end of period	$	26,258		$	22,030		$	18,077		$	14,737		$	10,602
As a percent of year to date average loans:
Net charge-offs		0.24	%		0.32	%		0.55	%		0.60	%		0.41	%
Provision for loan losses		0.45	%		0.57	%		0.81	%		1.00	%		0.76	%
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of:
Year-end loans		1.11	%		1.20	%		1.30	%		1.24	%		1.09	%
Nonperforming assets		130.77	%		84.48	%		84.82	%		60.34	%		52.68	%

The allowance for loan losses is established and maintained at levels needed to absorb anticipated credit losses from identified and otherwise inherent risks in the loan portfolio as of the balance sheet date. In assessing the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, management considers its evaluation of the loan portfolio, past due loan experience, collateral values, current economic conditions and other factors considered necessary to maintain the allowance at an adequate level. Our management feels that the allowance was adequate at December 31, 2012.

47

The following table presents the allocation of the allowance for loan losses for each respective loan category with the corresponding percent of loans in each category to total loans.

	For the Years Ended December 31,
	2012					2011					2010					2009					2008
			Percentage					Percentage					Percentage					Percentage					Percentage
			of loans in					of loans in					of loans in					of loans in					of loans in
			each					each					each					each					each
			category to					category to					category to					category to					category to
	Amount		total loans			Amount		total loans			Amount		total loans			Amount		total loans			Amount		total loans
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Commercial, financial and agricultural	$	8,233		43.63	%	$	6,627		43.67	%	$	5,348		38.47	%	$	3,135		38.20	%	$	1,489		33.67	%
Real estate - construction		6,511		6.70			6,542		8.26			6,373		12.34			6,295		18.57			5,473		24.29
Real estate - mortgage		4,912		47.71			3,295		45.83			2,443		46.51			2,102		40.53			40		39.00
Consumer		199		1.96			531		2.24			749		2.68			115		2.70			5		3.04
Qualitative factors		6,403		-			5,035		-			3,164		-			3,090		-			3,595		-
Total	$	26,258		100.00	%	$	22,030		100.00	%	$	18,077		100.00	%	$	14,737		100.00	%	$	10,602		100.00	%

We target small and medium-sized businesses as loan customers. Because of their size, these borrowers may be less able to withstand competitive or economic pressures than larger borrowers in periods of economic weakness. If loan losses occur at a level where the loan loss reserve is not sufficient to cover actual loan losses, our earnings will decrease. We use an independent consulting firm to review our loans annually for quality in addition to the reviews that may be conducted by bank regulatory agencies as part of their usual examination process.

As of December 31, 2012, we had impaired loans of $37.4 million inclusive of nonaccrual loans, an increase of $0.1 million from $37.3 million as of December 31, 2011. We allocated $3.5 million of our allowance for loan losses at December 31, 2012 to these impaired loans. We had previous write-downs against impaired loans of $2.6 million at December 31, 2012, compared to $1.2 million at December 31, 2011. The average balance for 2012 of loans impaired as of December 31, 2012 was $37.9 million. Interest income foregone on these impaired loans was $850,000 for the year ended December 31, 2012, and we recognized $1.3 million of interest income on these impaired loans for the year ended December 31, 2012. A loan is considered impaired, based on current information and events, if it is probable that we will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the original loan agreement. Impairment does not always indicate credit loss, but provides an indication of collateral exposure based on prevailing market conditions and third-party valuations. Impaired loans are measured by either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s obtainable market price, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral-dependent. The amount of any initial impairment and subsequent changes in impairment are included in the allowance for loan losses. Interest on accruing impaired loans is recognized as long as such loans do not meet the criteria for nonaccrual status. Our credit administration group performs verification and testing to ensure appropriate identification of impaired loans and that proper reserves are allocated to these loans.

Of the $37.4 million of impaired loans reported as of December 31, 2012, $14.4 million were real estate construction loans, $6.2 million were residential real estate loans, $3.9 million were commercial and industrial loans, $8.3 million were commercial real estate loans and $4.5 million were other mortgage loans. Of the $14.4 million of impaired real estate construction loans, $6.9 million (a total of 17 loans with seven builders) were residential construction loans, and $4.1 million consisted of various residential lot loans to three builders.

The Bank has procedures and processes in place intended to ensure that losses do not exceed the potential amounts documented in the Bank’s impairment analyses and reduce potential losses in the remaining performing loans within our real estate construction portfolio. These include the following:

· We closely monitor the past due and overdraft reports on a weekly basis to identify deterioration as early as possible and the placement of identified loans on the watch list.

· We perform extensive monthly credit review for all watch list/classified loans, including formulation of aggressive workout or action plans. When a workout is not achievable, we move to collection/foreclosure proceedings to obtain control of the underlying collateral as rapidly as possible to minimize the deterioration of collateral and/or the loss of its value.

48

· We require updated financial information, global inventory aging and interest carry analysis for existing builders to help identify potential future loan payment problems.

· We generally limit loans for new construction to established builders and developers that have an established record of turning their inventories, and we restrict our funding of undeveloped lots and land.

Nonperforming Assets

The table below summarizes our nonperforming assets at December 31, 2012, 2011, 2010, 2009 and 2008:

	2012					2011					2010					2009					2008
				Number					Number					Number					Number					Number
	Balance			of Loans		Balance			of Loans		Balance			of Loans		Balance			of Loans		Balance			of Loans
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Nonaccrual loans:
Commercial, financial and agricultural	$	276			2	$	1,179			7	$	2,164			8	$	2,032			2	$	-			-
Real estate - construction		6,460			19		10,063			21		10,722			24		8,100			13		5,035			22
Real estate - mortgage:
Owner-occupied commercial		2,786			3		792			2		635			1		909			2		237			2
1-4 family mortgage		453			2		670			4		202			1		265			2		558			1
Other mortgage		240			1		693			1		-			-		615			1		1,883			1
Total real estate - mortgage		3,479			6		2,155			7		837			2		1,789			5		2,678			4
Consumer		135			2		375			1		624			1		-			-		-			-
Total nonaccrual loans	$	10,350			29	$	13,772			36	$	14,347			35	$	11,921			20	$	7,713			26
90+ days past due and accruing:
Commercial, financial and agricultural	$	-			-	$	-			-	$	-			-	$	14			1	$	1,939			1
Real estate - construction		-			-		-			-		-			-		-			-		-			-
Real estate - mortgage:
Owner-occupied commercial		-			-		-			-		-			-		-			-		-			-
1-4 family mortgage		-			-		-			-		-			-		253			1		-			-
Other mortgage		-			-		-			-		-			-		-			-		-			-
Total real estate mortgage		-			-		-			-		-			-		253			1		-			-
Consumer		8			4		-			-		-			-		-			-		-			-
Total 90+ days past due and accruing	$	8			4	$	-			-	$	-			-	$	267			2	$	1,939			1
Total nonperforming loans	$	10,358			33	$	13,772			36	$	14,347			35	$	12,188			22	$	9,652			27
Plus: Other real estate owned and repossessions		9,721			38		12,305			39		6,966			39		12,525			51		10,473			25
Total nonperforming assets	$	20,079			71	$	26,077			75	$	21,313			74	$	24,713			73	$	20,125			52
Restructured accruing loans:
Commercial, financial and agricultural	$	1,168			2	$	1,369			2	$	2,398			9	$	-			-	$	-			-
Real estate - construction		3,213			15		-			-		-			-		-			-		-			-
Real estate - mortgage:
Owner-occupied commercial		3,121			3		2,785			3		-			-		845			1		-			-
1-4 family mortgage		1,709			5		-			-		-			-		-			-		-			-
Other mortgage		302			1		331			1		-			-		-			-		-			-
Total real estate -mortgage		5,132			9		3,116			4		-			-		845			1		-			-
Consumer		-			-		-			-		-			-		-			-		-			-
Total restructured accruing loans	$	9,513			26	$	4,485			6	$	2,398			9	$	845			1	$	-			-
Total nonperforming assets and restructured accruing loans	$	29,592			97	$	30,562			81	$	23,711			83	$	25,558			74	$	20,125			52
Gross interest income foregone on nonaccrual loans througout year	$	850				$	1,371				$	510				$	647				$	735
Interest income recognized on nonaccrual loans througout year	$	155				$	263				$	418				$	310				$	287
Ratios:
Nonperforming loans to total loans		0.44	%				0.75	%				1.03	%				1.01	%				1.02	%
Nonperforming assets to total loans plus other real estate owned		0.85	%				1.41	%				1.52	%				2.02	%				2.07	%
Nonperforming loans plus restructured accruing loans to total loans plus other real estate owned and repossessions		0.84	%				0.99	%				1.19	%				1.06	%				1.00	%

49

The balance of nonperforming assets can fluctuate due to changes in economic conditions. We have established a policy to discontinue accruing interest on a loan (i.e., place the loan on nonaccrual status) after it has become 90 days delinquent as to payment of principal or interest, unless the loan is considered to be well-collateralized and is actively in the process of collection. In addition, a loan will be placed on nonaccrual status before it becomes 90 days delinquent unless management believes that the collection of interest is expected. Interest previously accrued but uncollected on such loans is reversed and charged against current income when the receivable is determined to be uncollectible. Interest income on nonaccrual loans is recognized only as received. If we believe that a loan will not be collected in full, we will increase the allowance for loan losses to reflect management’s estimate of any potential exposure or loss. Generally, payments received on nonaccrual loans are applied directly to principal.

Deposits

We rely on increasing our deposit base to fund loan and other asset growth. Each of our markets is highly competitive. We compete for local deposits by offering attractive products with premium rates.  We expect to have a higher average cost of funds for local deposits than competitor banks due to our lack of an extensive branch network.  Our management’s strategy is to offset the higher cost of funding with a lower level of operating expense and firm pricing discipline for loan products.  We have promoted electronic banking services by providing them without charge and by offering in-bank customer training. The following table presents the average balance and average rate paid on each of the following deposit categories at the Bank level for years ended 2012, 2011 and 2010:

50

	Average Deposits
	Average for Years Ended December 31,
	2012					2011					2010
	Average Balance		Average Rate Paid			Average Balance		Average Rate Paid			Average Balance		Average Rate Paid
Types of Deposits:	(Dollars in Thousands)
Non-interest-bearing demand deposits	$	474,284		-	%	$	315,781		-	%	$	207,399		-	%
Interest-bearing demand deposits		351,975		0.31	%		303,165		0.37	%		264,591		0.47	%
Money market accounts		1,042,870		0.56	%		902,290		0.74	%		775,544		0.77	%
Savings accounts		17,081		0.28	%		10,088		0.47	%		2,978		0.50	%
Time deposits		69,906		1.24	%		65,484		1.44	%		47,026		1.76	%
Time deposits, $100,000 and over		328,646		1.35	%		264,737		1.60	%		208,300		1.85	%
Total deposits	$	2,284,762				$	1,861,545				$	1,505,838

At December 31, 2012	$100,000 or more		Less than $100,000		Total
Maturity	(In Thousands)
Three months or less	$	81,299	$	20,910	$	102,209
Over three through six months		33,712		9,351		43,063
Over six months through one year		89,215		17,236		106,451
Over one year		122,275		21,682		143,957
Total	$	326,501	$	69,179	$	395,680

Total average deposits for the year ended December 31, 2012 were $2.3 billion, an increase of $0.4 billion, or 21.1%, over total average deposits of $1.9 billion for the year ended December 31, 2011. Average noninterest-bearing deposits increased by $0.2 billion, or 66.7%, from $0.3 billion for the year ended December 31, 2011 to $0.5 billion for the year ended December 31, 2012.

Total average deposits for the year ended December 31, 2011 were $1.9 billion, an increase of $0.4 billion, or 26.7%, over total average deposits of $1.5 billion for the year ended December 31, 2010. Average noninterest-bearing deposits increased by $0.1 billion, or 50.0%, from $0.2 billion for the year ended December 31, 2010 to $0.3 billion for the year ended December 31, 2011.

We have never had brokered deposits.

Borrowed Funds

We had available approximately $130 million in unused federal funds lines of credit with regional banks as of December 31, 2012, compared to $140 million as of December 31, 2011. These lines are subject to certain restrictions and collateral requirements.

Stockholders’ Equity

Stockholders’ equity increased $37.0 million during 2012, to $233.3 million at December 31, 2012 from $196.3 million at December 31, 2011. The increase in stockholders’ equity resulted primarily from net income of $34.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2012 and contributed capital from the exercise of stock options during 2012.

We issued to each of our directors upon the formation of the Bank in May 2005 warrants to purchase up to 10,000 shares of our common stock, or 60,000 in the aggregate, for a purchase price of $10.00 per share, expiring in ten years. These warrants became fully vested in May 2008.

We issued warrants to purchase 75,000 shares of our common stock with an exercise price of $25.00 per share in the third quarter of 2008. These warrants were issued in connection with our 8.5% trust preferred securities, which were redeemed on November 8, 2012.

We issued warrants to purchase 15,000 shares of our common stock with an exercise price of $25.00 per share in the second quarter of 2009. These warrants were issued in connection with the sale of a $5,000,000 subordinated note of the Bank, which was paid off on June 1, 2012.

51

On September 21, 2006, we granted non-plan stock options to persons representing certain key business relationships to purchase up to an aggregate of 30,000 shares of our common stock with an exercise price of $15.00 per share. On November 2, 2007, we granted non-plan stock options to persons representing certain key business relationships to purchase up to an aggregate of 25,000 shares of our common stock with an exercise price of $20.00 per share. These stock options are non-qualified and are not part of either of our stock incentive plans. They are fully vested and expire 10 years after their date of grant.

On December 20, 2007, we granted 10,000 stock options to purchase shares of our common stock to each of our directors, or 60,000 in the aggregate, with an exercise price of $20.00 per share, expiring in ten years. These are non-qualified stock options that become fully vested on December 19, 2012.

We have granted 32,500 shares of restricted stock under the 2009 Stock Incentive Plan. These share generally vest five years from the date of grant, subject to earlier vesting in the event of a merger, consolidation, sale or transfer of the Company or substantially all of its assets and business.

On November 28, 2011, we granted 10,000 non-qualified stock options to each Company director, or a total of 60,000 options, to purchase shares with an exercise price of $30.00 per share. The options vest 100% at the end of five years.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

In the normal course of business, we are a party to financial credit arrangements with off-balance sheet risk to meet the financing needs of our customers.  These financial credit arrangements include commitments to extend credit beyond current fundings, credit card arrangements, standby letters of credit and financial guarantees.  Those credit arrangements involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk in excess of the amount recognized in the balance sheet.  The contract or notional amounts of those instruments reflect the extent of involvement we have in those particular financial credit arrangements. All such credit arrangements bear interest at variable rates and we have no such credit arrangements which bear interest at fixed rates.

Our exposure to credit loss in the event of non-performance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit, credit card arrangements and standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual or notional amount of those instruments.  We use the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as we do for on-balance sheet instruments.

The following table sets forth our credit arrangements and financial instruments whose contract amounts represent credit risk as of December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010:

	2012		2011		2010
	(In Thousands)
Commitments to extend credit	$	860,421	$	697,939	$	538,719
Credit card arrangements		25,699		19,686		17,601
Standby letters of credit and financial guarantees		36,374		42,937		47,103
Total	$	922,494	$	760,562	$	603,423

Commitments to extend credit beyond current fundings are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract.  Such commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee.  Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements.  We evaluate each customer’s creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis.  The amount of collateral obtained if deemed necessary by us upon extension of credit is based on our management’s credit evaluation. Collateral held varies but may include accounts receivable, inventory, property, plant and equipment, and income-producing commercial properties.

Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by us to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party.  Those guarantees are primarily issued to support public and private borrowing arrangements, including commercial paper, bond financing, and similar transactions.  All letters of credit are due within one year or less of the original commitment date.  The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers.

52

Derivatives

During 2008, the Bank entered into interest rate swaps (“swaps”) to facilitate customer transactions and meet their financing needs. Upon entering into these swaps, the Bank entered into offsetting positions with a regional correspondent bank in order to minimize the risk to the Bank. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Bank was party to two swaps with notional amounts totaling approximately $11.1 million with customers, and two swaps with notional amounts totaling approximately $11.1 million with a regional correspondent bank. These swaps qualify as derivatives, but are not designated as hedging instruments.

The Bank has entered into agreements with secondary market investors to deliver loans on a “best efforts delivery” basis. When a rate is committed to a borrower, it is based on the best price that day and locked with our investor for our customer for a 30-day period. In the event the loan is not delivered to the investor, the Bank has no risk or exposure with the investor. The interest rate lock commitments related to loans that are originated for later sale are classified as derivatives. The fair values of our agreements with investors and rate lock commitments to customers as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 were not material.

Asset and Liability Management

The matching of assets and liabilities may be analyzed by examining the extent to which such assets and liabilities are “interest rate sensitive” and by monitoring an institution’s interest rate sensitivity “gap.” An asset or liability is said to be interest rate sensitive within a specific time period if it will mature or reprice within that time period. The interest rate sensitivity gap is defined as the difference between the dollar amount of rate-sensitive assets repricing during a period and the volume of rate-sensitive liabilities repricing during the same period. A gap is considered positive when the amount of interest rate-sensitive assets exceeds the amount of interest rate-sensitive liabilities. A gap is considered negative when the amount of interest rate-sensitive liabilities exceeds the amount of interest rate-sensitive assets. During a period of rising interest rates, a negative gap would tend to adversely affect net interest income while a positive gap would tend to result in an increase in net interest income. During a period of falling interest rates, a negative gap would tend to result in an increase in net interest income while a positive gap would tend to adversely affect net interest income.

Our asset liability and investment committee is charged with monitoring our liquidity and funds position. The committee regularly reviews the rate sensitivity position on a three-month, six-month and one-year time horizon; loans-to-deposits ratios; and average maturities for certain categories of liabilities. The asset liability committee uses a computer model to analyze the maturities of rate-sensitive assets and liabilities. The model measures the “gap” which is defined as the difference between the dollar amount of rate-sensitive assets repricing during a period and the volume of rate-sensitive liabilities repricing during the same period. Gap is also expressed as the ratio of rate-sensitive assets divided by rate-sensitive liabilities. If the ratio is greater than “one,” then the dollar value of assets exceeds the dollar value of liabilities and the balance sheet is “asset sensitive.” Conversely, if the value of liabilities exceeds the dollar value of assets, then the ratio is less than one and the balance sheet is “liability sensitive.” Our internal policy requires our management to maintain the gap such that net interest margins will not change more than 10% if interest rates change by 100 basis points or more than 15% if interest rates change by 200 basis points. As of December 31, 2012, our gap was within such ranges. See “—Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of Market Risk” below in Item 7A for additional information.

Liquidity and Capital Adequacy

Liquidity

Liquidity is defined as our ability to generate sufficient cash to fund current loan demand, deposit withdrawals, or other cash demands and disbursement needs, and otherwise to operate on an ongoing basis.

Liquidity is managed at two levels. The first is the liquidity of the Company. The second is the liquidity of the Bank. The management of liquidity at both levels is critical, because the Company and the Bank have different funding needs and sources, and each are subject to regulatory guidelines and requirements. We are subject to general FDIC guidelines which require a minimum level of liquidity. Management believes our liquidity ratios meet or exceed these guidelines. Our management is not currently aware of any trends or demands that are reasonably likely to result in liquidity increasing or decreasing in any material manner.

53

The retention of existing deposits and attraction of new deposit sources through new and existing customers is critical to our liquidity position. In the event of compression in liquidity due to a run-off in deposits, we have a liquidity policy and procedure that provides for certain actions under varying liquidity conditions. These actions include borrowing from existing correspondent banks, selling or participating loans and the curtailment of loan commitments and funding. At December 31, 2012, our liquid assets, represented by cash and due from banks, federal funds sold and available-for-sale securities, totaled $414.6 million. Additionally, at such date we had available to us approximately $130.0 million in unused federal funds lines of credit with regional banks, subject to certain restrictions and collateral requirements, to meet short term funding needs. We believe these sources of funding are adequate to meet immediate anticipated funding needs, but we will need additional capital to maintain our current growth. Our management meets on a weekly basis to review sources and uses of funding to determine the appropriate strategy to ensure an appropriate level of liquidity, and we have increased our focus on the generation of core deposit funding to supplement our liquidity position. At the current time, our long-term liquidity needs primarily relate to funds required to support loan originations and commitments and deposit withdrawals.

To help finance our continued growth and planned expansion activities, we completed a private placement of stock pursuant to subscription agreements effective December 31, 2008 and issued and sold 139,460 shares of our common stock for $25.00 per share in January 2009 for an aggregate purchase price of $3.5 million. In addition, on March 15, 2010, we completed a private placement of $15.0 million in 6.0% Mandatory Convertible Trust Preferred Securities which convert into shares of our common stock on March 15, 2013. In June 2011, we completed a private placement of 340,000 shares of our common stock at an offering price of $30 per share. Also in 2011, we completed a private placement of 40,000 shares of our Non-cumulative Perpetual Senior Preferred Stock for an aggregate purchase price of $40.0 million. Also, on November 9, 2012, we completed the private placement of $20.0 million in 5.50% Subordinated Notes due November 9, 2022. The proceeds from these notes were used to pay off our 8.50% subordinated debentures. Our regular sources of funding are from the growth of our deposit base, repayment of principal and interest on loans, the sale of loans and the renewal of time deposits.

The following table reflects the contractual maturities of our term liabilities as of December 31, 2012. The amounts shown do not reflect any early withdrawal or prepayment assumptions.

	Payments due by Period
					Over 1 - 3		Over 3 - 5
	Total		1 year or less		years		years		Over 5 years
	(In Thousands)
Contractual Obligations (1)
Deposits without a stated maturity	$	2,115,892	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-
Certificates of deposit (2)		395,680		247,482		108,600		39,598		-
Federal funds purchased		117,065		117,065		-		-		-
Other borrowings		20,000		-		-		-		20,000
Subordinated debentures		15,000		15,000		-		-		-
Operating lease commitments		13,606		1,972		3,919		3,660		4,055
Total	$	2,677,243	$	381,519	$	112,519	$	43,258	$	24,055

(1) Excludes interest

(2) Certificates of deposit give customers the right to early withdrawal. Early withdrawals may be subject to penalties.

The penalty amount depends on the remaining time to maturity at the time of early withdrawal.

Capital Adequacy

As of December 31, 2012, our most recent notification from the FDIC categorized us as well-capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To remain categorized as well-capitalized, we must maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier 1 risk-based, and Tier 1 leverage ratios as disclosed in the table below. Our management believes that we are well-capitalized under the prompt corrective action provisions as of December 31, 2012. In addition, the Alabama Banking Department has required that the Bank maintain a leverage ratio of 8.00%.

The following table sets forth (i) the capital ratios required by the FDIC and the Alabama Banking Department’s leverage ratio requirement to be maintained by the Bank in order to maintain “well-capitalized” status and (ii) our actual ratios of capital to total regulatory or risk-weighted assets, as of December 31, 2012.

	Well- Capitalized			Actual at December 31, 2012
Total risk-based capital		10.00	%		11.78	%
Tier 1 capital		6.00	%		9.89	%
Leverage ratio		5.00	%		8.43	%

54

For a description of capital ratios see Note 15 to “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements”.

Impact of Inflation

Our consolidated financial statements and related data presented herein have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles which require the measure of financial position and operating results in terms of historic dollars, without considering changes in the relative purchasing power of money over time due to inflation.

Inflation generally increases the costs of funds and operating overhead, and to the extent loans and other assets bear variable rates, the yields on such assets. Unlike most industrial companies, virtually all of the assets and liabilities of a financial institution are monetary in nature. As a result, interest rates generally have a more significant effect on the performance of a financial institution than the effects of general levels of inflation. In addition, inflation affects financial institutions’ cost of goods and services purchased, the cost of salaries and benefits, occupancy expense, and similar items. Inflation and related increases in interest rates generally decrease the market value of investments and loans held and may adversely affect liquidity, earnings and stockholders’ equity. Mortgage originations and refinancing tend to slow as interest rates increase, and likely will reduce our volume of such activities and the income from the sale of residential mortgage loans in the secondary market.

Adoption of Recent Accounting Pronouncements

New accounting standards are discussed in Note 1 to “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements”.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

Like all financial institutions, we are subject to market risk from changes in interest rates. Interest rate risk is inherent in the balance sheet due to the mismatch between the maturities of rate-sensitive assets and rate-sensitive liabilities. If rates are rising, and the level of rate-sensitive liabilities exceeds the level of rate-sensitive assets, the net interest margin will be negatively impacted. Conversely, if rates are falling, and the level of rate-sensitive liabilities is greater than the level of rate-sensitive assets, the impact on the net interest margin will be favorable. Managing interest rate risk is further complicated by the fact that all rates do not change at the same pace; in other words, short term rates may be rising while longer term rates remain stable. In addition, different types of rate-sensitive assets and rate-sensitive liabilities react differently to changes in rates.

To manage interest rate risk, we must take a position on the expected future trend of interest rates. Rates may rise, fall, or remain the same. Our asset liability committee develops its view of future rate trends and strives to manage rate risk within a targeted range by monitoring economic indicators, examining the views of economists and other experts, and understanding the current status of our balance sheet. Our annual budget reflects the anticipated rate environment for the next twelve months. The asset liability committee conducts a quarterly analysis of the rate sensitivity position and reports its results to our board of directors.

The asset liability committee employs multiple modeling scenarios to analyze the maturities of rate-sensitive assets and liabilities. The model measures the “gap” which is defined as the difference between the dollar amount of rate-sensitive assets repricing during a period and the volume of rate-sensitive liabilities repricing during the same period. The gap is also expressed as the ratio of rate-sensitive assets divided by rate-sensitive liabilities. If the ratio is greater than “one”, the dollar value of assets exceeds the dollar value of liabilities; the balance sheet is “asset sensitive”. Conversely, if the value of liabilities exceeds the value of assets, the ratio is less than one and the balance sheet is “liability sensitive”. Our internal policy requires management to maintain the gap such that net interest margins will not change more than 10% if interest rates change 100 basis points or more than 15% if interest rates change 200 basis points. As of December 31, 2012, our gap was within such ranges.

The model measures scheduled maturities in periods of three months, four to twelve months, one to five years and over five years. The chart below illustrates our rate-sensitive position at December 31, 2012. Management uses the one year gap as the appropriate time period for setting strategy.

55

Rate Sensitive Gap Analysis
	1-3 Months			4-12 Months			1-5 Years			Over 5 Years			Total
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Interest-earning assets:
Loans, including mortgages held for sale	$	1,471,421		$	235,343		$	587,217		$	95,026		$	2,389,007
Securities		27,139			35,428			129,440			71,778			263,785
Federal funds sold		3,291			-			-			-			3,291
Interest bearing balances with banks		117,218			-			2,205			-			119,423
Total interest-earning assets	$	1,619,069		$	270,771		$	718,862		$	166,804		$	2,775,506
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Deposits:
Interest-bearing checking	$	449,373		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	449,373
Money market and savings		1,121,343			-			-			-			1,121,343
Time deposits		82,771			164,738			148,198			(25	)		395,682
Federal funds purchased		117,065			-			-			-			117,065
Other borrowings		-			-			-			19,917			19,917
Trust preferred securities		15,050			-			-			-			15,050
Total interest-bearing liabilities	$	1,785,602		$	164,738		$	148,198		$	19,892		$	2,118,430
Interest sensitivity gap	$	(166,533	)	$	106,033		$	570,664		$	146,912		$	657,076
Cumulative sensitivity gap	$	(166,533	)	$	(60,500	)	$	510,164		$	657,076			-
Percent of cumulative sensitivity Gap to total interest-earning assets		(6.0	)%		(2.2	)%		18.4	%		23.7	%

The interest rate risk model that defines the gap position also performs a “rate shock” test of the balance sheet.  The rate shock procedure measures the impact on the economic value of equity (EVE) which is a measure of long term interest rate risk. EVE is the difference between the market value of our assets and the liabilities and is our liquidation value. In this analysis, the model calculates the discounted cash flow or market value of each category on the balance sheet. The percent change in EVE is a measure of the volatility of risk. Regulatory guidelines specify a maximum change of 30% for a 200 basis points rate change. Short term rates dropped to historically low levels during 2009 and have remained at those low levels. We could not assume further drops in interest rates in our model, and as a result feel the down rate shock scenarios are not meaningful. At December 31, 2012, the 5.10% change for a 200 basis points rate change is well within the regulatory guidance range.

The chart below identifies the EVE impact of an upward shift in rates of 100 and 200 basis points.

Economic Value of Equity Under Rate Shock
At December 31, 2012
	0 bps		+100 bps			+200 bps
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Economic value of equity	$	233,257	$	239,088		$	245,153
Actual dollar change			$	5,831		$	11,896
Percent change				2.50	%		5.10	%

The one year gap ratio of negative 2.2% indicates that we would show a small decrease in net interest income in a rising rate environment, and the EVE rate shock shows that the EVE would increase in a rising rate environment. The EVE simulation model is a static model which provides information only at a certain point in time. For example, in a rising rate environment, the model does not take into account actions which management might take to change the impact of rising rates on us. Given that limitation, it is still useful in assessing the impact of an unanticipated movement in interest rates.

The above analysis may not on its own be an entirely accurate indicator of how net interest income or EVE will be affected by changes in interest rates. Income associated with interest earning assets and costs associated with interest bearing liabilities may not be affected uniformly by changes in interest rates. In addition, the magnitude and duration of changes in interest rates may have a significant impact on net interest income. Interest rates on certain types of assets and liabilities fluctuate in advance of changes in general market rates, while interest rates on other types may lag behind changes in general market rates. Our asset liability committee develops its view of future rate trends by monitoring economic indicators, examining the views of economists and other experts, and understanding the current status of our balance sheet and conducts a quarterly analysis of the rate sensitivity position.  The results of the analysis are reported to our board of directors.

56

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

The financial statements and supplementary data required by Regulations S-X and by Item 302 of Regulation S-K are set forth in the pages listed below.

	Page
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Consolidated Financial Statements	58
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Consolidated Financial Statements	59
Report of Management on Internal Control over Financial Reporting	60
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control over Financial Reporting	61
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2012 and 2011	62
Consolidated Statements of Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010	63
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010	64
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for Years Ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010	65
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010	66
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	67

57

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Shareholders
ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), ServisFirst Banchsares, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated March 12, 2013 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Birmingham, Alabama

March 12, 2013

58

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC

ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors

ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc.

Birmingham, Alabama

We have audited the accompanying consolidated statement of income, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2010. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the results of their operations and their cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2010, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Birmingham, Alabama

March 8, 2011

59

REPORT OF MANAGEMENT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

We, as members of the Management of ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”), are responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting. The Company’s internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance to the Company’s management and Board of Directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation of the Company’s financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Internal control over financial reporting includes self-monitoring mechanisms, and actions are taken to correct deficiencies as they are identified.

All internal controls systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations and may not prevent or detect misstatements in the Company’s financial statements, including the possibility of circumvention or overriding of controls. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

The Company’s management assessed the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012. In making this assessment, we used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in its Internal Control—Integrated Framework. Based on this assessment, management determined that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012, based on these criteria.

The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm has issued an audit report on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. This report appears on the following page.

	SERVISFIRST BANCSHARES, INC.
by	/s/THOMAS A. BROUGHTON, III
	THOMAS A. BROUGHTON, III
	President and Chief Executive Officer
by	/s/WILLIAM M. FOSHEE
	WILLIAM M. FOSHEE
	Chief Financial Officer

60

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Shareholders
ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc.:

We have audited ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc.’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Report of Management on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. as of December 31, 2012, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year then ended, and our report dated March 12, 2013 expressed an unqualified opinion on these consolidated financial statements.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Birmingham, Alabama

March 12, 2013

61

SERVISFIRST BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

	December 31, 2012			December 31, 2011
ASSETS
Cash and due from banks	$	58,031		$	43,018
Interest-bearing balances due from depository institutions		119,423			99,350
Federal funds sold		3,291			100,565
Cash and cash equivalents		180,745			242,933
Available for sale debt securities, at fair value		233,877			293,809
Held to maturity debt securities (fair value of $27,350 and $15,999 at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively)		25,967			15,209
Restricted equity securities		3,941			3,501
Mortgage loans held for sale		25,826			17,859
Loans		2,363,182			1,830,742
Less allowance for loan losses		(26,258	)		(22,030	)
Loans, net		2,336,924			1,808,712
Premises and equipment, net		8,847			4,591
Accrued interest and dividends receivable		9,158			8,192
Deferred tax asset, net		7,386			4,914
Other real estate owned		9,685			12,275
Bank owned life insurance contracts		57,014			40,390
Other assets		6,944			8,400
Total assets	$	2,906,314		$	2,460,785
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Liabilities:
Deposits:
Noninterest-bearing	$	545,174		$	418,810
Interest-bearing		1,966,398			1,725,077
Total deposits		2,511,572			2,143,887
Federal funds purchased		117,065			79,265
Other borrowings		19,917			4,954
Subordinated debentures		15,050			30,514
Accrued interest payable		942			945
Other liabilities		8,511			4,928
Total liabilities		2,673,057			2,264,493
Stockholders' equity:
Preferred stock, Series A Senior Non-Cumulative Perpetual, par value $0.001 (liquidation preference $1,000), net of discount; 40,000 shares authorized, 40,000 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2012 and at December 31, 2011		39,958			39,958
Preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share; 1,000,000 authorized and 960,000 currently undesignated		-			-
Common stock, par value $0.001 per share; 50,000,000 shares authorized; 6,268,812 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2012 and 5,932,182 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2011		6			6
Additional paid-in capital		93,505			87,805
Retained earnings		92,492			61,581
Accumulated other comprehensive income		7,296			6,942
Total stockholders' equity		233,257			196,292
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	2,906,314		$	2,460,785

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

62

SERVISFIRST BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

	Year Ended December 31,
	2012		2011		2010
Interest income:
Interest and fees on loans	$	100,462	$	82,294	$	69,115
Taxable securities		4,814		5,721		6,482
Nontaxable securities		3,246		2,943		2,274
Federal funds sold		196		176		104
Other interest and dividends		305		277		171
Total interest income		109,023		91,411		78,146
Interest expense:
Deposits		12,249		13,047		11,941
Borrowed funds		2,652		3,033		3,319
Total interest expense		14,901		16,080		15,260
Net interest income		94,122		75,331		62,886
Provision for loan losses		9,100		8,972		10,350
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		85,022		66,359		52,536
Noninterest income:
Service charges on deposit accounts		2,756		2,290		2,316
Mortgage banking		3,560		2,373		2,174
Securities gains		-		666		108
Increase in cash surrender value life insurance		1,624		390		-
Other operating income		1,703		1,207		571
Total noninterest income		9,643		6,926		5,169
Noninterest expenses:
Salaries and employee benefits		22,587		19,518		14,669
Equipment and occupancy expense		4,014		3,697		3,184
Professional services		1,455		1,213		925
FDIC and other regulatory assessments		1,595		1,796		2,944
Other real estate owned expense		2,727		820		1,964
Other operating expenses		10,722		10,414		7,283
Total noninterest expenses		43,100		37,458		30,969
Income before income taxes		51,565		35,827		26,736
Provision for income taxes		17,120		12,389		9,358
Net income		34,445		23,438		17,378
Dividends on preferred stock		400		200		-
Net income available to common stockholders	$	34,045	$	23,238	$	17,378
Basic earnings per common share	$	5.68	$	4.03	$	3.15
Diluted earnings per common share	$	4.99	$	3.53	$	2.84

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

63

SERVISFIRST BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012, 2011 AND 2010

(In thousands)

	2012		2011			2010
Net income	$	34,445	$	23,438		$	17,378
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
Unrealized holding gains arising during period from securities available for sale, net of tax of $191, $2,944 and $755 for 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively		354		4,519			1,334
Reclassification adjustment for net gains on sale of securities in net income, net of tax benefit of $252 and $39 for 2011 and 2010, respectively		-		(414	)		(70	)
Other comprehensive income, net of tax		354		4,105			1,264
Comprehensive income	$	34,799	$	27,543		$	18,642

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

64

SERVISFIRST BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012, 2011 AND 2010

(In thousands, except share amounts)

(Unaudited)

	Preferred Stock		Common Stock		Additional Paid-in Capital		Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income		Total Stockholders' Equity
Balance, December 31, 2009	$	-	$	6	$	75,078	$	20,965		$	1,573	$	97,622
Exercise 10,000 stock options, including tax benefit		-		-		123		-			-		123
Stock-based compensation expense		-		-		713		-			-		713
Other comprehensive income		-		-		-		-			1,264		1,264
Net income		-		-		-		17,378			-		17,378
Balance, December 31, 2010		-		6		75,914		38,343			2,837		117,100
Sale of 340,000 shares of common stock		-		-		10,159		-			-		10,159
Sale of 40,000 shares of preferred stock, net		39,958		-		-		-			-		39,958
Preferred dividends paid		-		-		-		(200	)		-		(200	)
Exercise 64,700 stock options, including tax benefit		-		-		757		-			-		757
Stock-based compensation expense		-		-		975		-			-		975
Other comprehensive income		-		-		-		-			4,105		4,105
Net income		-		-		-		23,438			-		23,438
Balance, December 31, 2011		39,958		6		87,805		61,581			6,942		196,292
Dividends paid		-		-		-		(3,134	)		-		(3,134	)
Preferred dividends paid		-		-		-		(400	)		-		(400	)
Exercise 332,630 stock options and warrants, including tax benefit		-		-		4,651		-			-		4,651
Stock-based compensation expense		-		-		1,049		-			-		1,049
Other comprehensive income		-		-		-		-			354		354
Net income		-		-		-		34,445			-		34,445
Balance, December 31, 2012	$	39,958	$	6	$	93,505	$	92,492		$	7,296	$	233,257

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

65

SERVISFIRST BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012, 2011 AND 2010

(In thousands) (Unaudited)

	2012			2011			2010
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income	$	34,445		$	23,438		$	17,378
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
Deferred tax benefit		(2,181	)		(1,240	)		(2,212	)
Provision for loan losses		9,100			8,972			10,350
Depreciation and amortization		1,218			1,173			1,066
Net amortization of investments		1,079			958			823
Market value adjustment of interest rate cap		9			106			45
Increase in accrued interest and dividends receivable		(966	)		(1,202	)		(790	)
Stock-based compensation expense		1,049			975			713
(Decrease) increase in accrued interest payable		(3	)		47			(128	)
Proceeds from sale of mortgage loans held for sale		239,292			169,172			174,760
Originations of mortgage loans held for sale		(243,699	)		(177,200	)		(175,046	)
Gain on sale of securities available for sale		-			(666	)		(108	)
Gain on sale of mortgage loans held for sale		(3,560	)		(2,373	)		(2,174	)
Net loss (gain) on sale of other real estate owned		105			(76	)		203
Write down of other real estate owned		2,189			326			1,051
Decrease in special prepaid FDIC insurance assessments		1,322			1,492			2,538
Increase in cash surrender value of life insurance contracts		(1,624	)		(390	)		-
Loss on prepayment of other borrowings		-			738			-
Excess tax benefits from the exercise of warrants		(381	)		(127	)		-
Net change in other assets, liabilities, and other operating activities		3,790			200			1,106
Net cash provided by operating activities		41,184			24,323			29,575
INVESTMENT ACTIVITIES
Purchase of securities available for sale		(47,867	)		(102,190	)		(84,425	)
Proceeds from maturities, calls and paydowns of securities
available for sale		106,783			28,575			31,889
Purchase of securities held to maturity		(11,701	)		(15,441	)		(4,589	)
Proceeds from maturities, calls and paydowns of securities
held to maturity		943			5,466			-
Increase in loans		(540,019	)		(449,449	)		(197,572	)
Purchase of premises and equipment		(5,474	)		(1,314	)		(428	)
Purchase of restricted equity securities		(787	)		(543	)		(269	)
Purchase of interest rate cap		-			-			(160	)
Purchase of bank-owned life insurance contracts		(15,000	)		(40,000	)		-
Proceeds from sale of securities available for sale		-			63,270			32,297
Proceeds from sale of restricted equity securities		347			552			-
Proceeds from sale of other real estate owned		2,967			3,334			7,995
Additions to other real estate owned		-			-			(75	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(509,808	)		(507,740	)		(215,337	)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Net increase in noninterest-bearing deposits		126,364			168,320			39,183
Net increase in interest-bearing deposits		241,321			216,851			287,178
Net increase in federal funds purchased		37,800			79,265			-
Proceeds from other borrowings		19,917			-			-
Proceeds from issuance of subordinated debentures		-			-			15,050
Redemption of subordinated debentures		(15,464	)		-			-
Proceeds from sale of common stock, net		-			10,032			-
Proceeds from sale of preferred stock, net		-			39,958			-
Proceeds from exercise of stock options and warrants		4,651			757			123
Excess tax benefits from exercise of stock options and warrants		381			127			-
Repayment of other borrowings		(5,000	)		(20,738	)		-
Dividends on common stock		(3,134	)		-			-
Dividends on preferred stock		(400	)		(200	)		-
Net cash provided by financing activities		406,436			494,372			341,534
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents		(62,188	)		10,955			155,772
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year		242,933			231,978			76,206
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year	$	180,745		$	242,933		$	231,978
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE
Cash paid for:
Interest	$	14,904		$	16,033		$	15,388
Income taxes		13,134			15,837			6,958
NONCASH TRANSACTIONS
Transfers of loans from held for sale to held for investment	$	-		$	417		$	787
Other real estate acquired in settlement of loans		2,695			9,029			5,372
Internally financed sales of other real estate owned		24			136			1,757

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

66

SERVISFIRST BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1.               SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Nature of Operations

ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) was formed on August 16, 2007 and is a bank holding company whose business is conducted by its wholly-owned subsidiary ServisFirst Bank (the “Bank”). The Bank is headquartered in Birmingham, Alabama, and provides a full range of banking services to individual and corporate customers throughout the Birmingham market since opening for business in May 2005. The Bank has since expanded into the Huntsville, Montgomery and Dothan, Alabama markets, and most recently into the Mobile, Alabama and Pensacola, Florida markets. The Bank has a subsidiary, SF Holding 1, Inc., which has a subsidiary, SF Realty 1, Inc., which operates as a real estate investment trust. More details about SF Holding 1, Inc. and SF Realty 1, Inc. are included in Note 10.

Basis of Presentation and Accounting Estimates

To prepare consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, management makes estimates and assumptions based on available information. These estimates and assumptions affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and the disclosures provided, and future results could differ. The allowance for loan losses, valuation of foreclosed real estate, deferred taxes, and fair values of financial instruments are particularly subject to change. All numbers are in thousands except share and per share data.

Cash, Due from Banks, Interest-Bearing Balances due from Financial Institutions

Cash and due from banks includes cash on hand, cash items in process of collection, amounts due from banks and interest bearing balances due from financial institutions. For purposes of cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include cash and due from banks and federal funds sold. Generally, federal funds are purchased and sold for one-day periods. Cash flows from loans, mortgage loans held for sale, federal funds sold, and deposits are reported net.

The Bank is required to maintain reserve balances in cash or on deposit with the Federal Reserve Bank based on a percentage of deposits. The total of those reserve balances was approximately $16.0 million at December 31, 2012 and $7.5 million at December 31, 2011.

Debt Securities

Securities are classified as available-for-sale when they might be sold before maturity. Unrealized holding gains and losses, net of tax, on securities available for sale are reported as a net amount in a separate component of stockholders’ equity until realized. Gains and losses on the sale of securities available for sale are determined using the specific-identification method. The amortization of premiums and the accretion of discounts are recognized in interest income using methods approximating the interest method over the period to maturity.

Declines in the fair value of available-for-sale securities below their cost that are deemed to be other than temporary are reflected in earnings as realized losses. Securities are classified as held-to-maturity when the Company has the positive intent and ability to hold the securities to maturity. Held-to-maturity securities are reported at amortized cost. In determining the existence of other-than-temporary impairment losses, management considers (1) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, and (3) the intent and ability of the Company to retain its investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value.

Investments in Restricted Equity Securities Carried at Cost

Investments in restricted equity securities without a readily determinable market value are carried at cost.

67

Mortgage Loans Held for Sale

The Company classifies certain residential mortgage loans as held for sale. Typically mortgage loans held for sale are sold to a third party investor within a very short time period. The loans are sold without recourse and servicing is not retained. Net fees earned from this banking service are recorded in noninterest income.

In the course of originating mortgage loans and selling those loans in the secondary market, the Company makes various representations and warranties to the purchaser of the mortgage loans. Every loan closed by the Bank’s mortgage center is run through a government agency automated underwriting system. Any exceptions noted during this process are remedied prior to sale. These representations and warranties also apply to underwriting the real estate appraisal opinion of value for the collateral securing these loans. Under the representations and warranties, failure by the Company to comply with the underwriting and/or appraisal standards could result in the Company being required to repurchase the mortgage loan or to reimburse the investor for losses incurred (make whole requests) if such failure cannot be cured by the Company within the specified period following discovery. The Company continues to experience a manageable level of investor repurchase demands. There were no expenses incurred as part of these buyback obligations for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011.

Loans

Loans are reported at unpaid principal balances, less unearned fees and the allowance for loan losses. Interest on all loans is recognized as income based upon the applicable rate applied to the daily outstanding principal balance of the loans. Interest income on nonaccrual loans is recognized on a cash basis or cost recovery basis until the loan is returned to accrual status. Loan fees, net of direct costs, are reflected as an adjustment to the yield of the related loan over the term of the loan. The Company does not have a concentration of loans to any one industry or geographic market.

The accrual of interest on loans is discontinued when there is a significant deterioration in the financial condition of the borrower and full repayment of principal and interest is not expected or the principal or interest is more than 90 days past due, unless the loan is both well-collateralized and in the process of collection. Generally, all interest accrued but not collected for loans that are placed on nonaccrual status are reversed against current interest income. Interest collections on nonaccrual loans are generally applied as principal reductions. The Company determines past due or delinquency status of a loan based on contractual payment terms.

A loan is considered impaired when it is probable the Company will be unable to collect all principal and interest payments due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Individually identified impaired loans are measured based on the present value of expected payments using the loan’s original effective rate as the discount rate, the loan’s observable market price, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. If the recorded investment in the impaired loan exceeds the measure of fair value, a valuation allowance may be established as part of the allowance for loan losses. Changes to the valuation allowance are recorded as a component of the provision for loan losses.

Impaired loans also include troubled debt restructurings (“TDRs”). In the normal course of business management grants concessions to borrowers, which would not otherwise be considered, where the borrowers are experiencing financial difficulty. The concessions granted most frequently for TDRs involve reductions or delays in required payments of principal and interest for a specified time, the rescheduling of payments in accordance with a bankruptcy plan or the charge-off of a portion of the loan. In some cases, the conditions of the credit also warrant nonaccrual status, even after the restructure occurs. As part of the credit approval process, the restructured loans are evaluated for adequate collateral protection in determining the appropriate accrual status at the time of restructure. TDR loans may be returned to accrual status if there has been at least a six month sustained period of repayment performance by the borrower.

Allowance for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level which, in management’s judgment, is adequate to absorb credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio. The amount of the allowance is based on management’s evaluation of the collectability of the loan portfolio, including the nature of the portfolio, credit concentrations, trends in historical loss experience, specific impaired loans, economic conditions, and other risks inherent in the portfolio. Allowances for impaired loans are generally determined based on collateral values or the present value of the estimated cash flows. The allowance is increased by a provision for loan losses, which is charged to expense, and reduced by charge-offs, net of recoveries. In addition, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the allowance for losses on loans. Such agencies may require the Company to recognize adjustments to the allowance based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examination.

68

Foreclosed Real Estate

Foreclosed real estate includes both formally foreclosed property and in-substance foreclosed property. At the time of foreclosure, foreclosed real estate is recorded at fair value less cost to sell, which becomes the property’s new basis. Any write downs based on the asset’s fair value at date of acquisition are charged to the allowance for loan losses. After foreclosure, these assets are carried at the lower of their new cost basis or fair value less cost to sell. Costs incurred in maintaining foreclosed real estate and subsequent adjustments to the carrying amount of the property are included in other operating expenses.

Premises and Equipment

Premises and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Expenditures for additions and major improvements that significantly extend the useful lives of the assets are capitalized. Expenditures for repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as incurred. Assets which are disposed of are removed from the accounts and the resulting gains or losses are recorded in operations. Depreciation is calculated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the related assets (3 to 10 years).

Leasehold improvements are amortized on a straight-line basis over the lesser of the lease terms or the estimated useful lives of the improvements.

Derivatives and Hedging Activities

As part of its overall interest rate risk management, the Company uses derivative instruments, which can include interest rate swaps, caps, and floors. Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) ASC 815-10, Derivatives and Hedging, requires all derivative instruments to be carried at fair value on the balance sheet. This accounting standard provides special accounting provisions for derivative instruments that qualify for hedge accounting. To be eligible, the Company must specifically identify a derivative as a hedging instrument and identify the risk being hedged. The derivative instrument must be shown to meet specific requirements under this accounting standard.

The Company designates the derivative on the date the derivative contract is entered into as (1) a hedge of the fair value of a recognized asset or liability or of an unrecognized firm commitment (a “fair-value” hedge) or (2) a hedge of a forecasted transaction of the variability of cash flows to be received or paid related to a recognized asset or liability (a “cash-flow” hedge). Changes in the fair value of a derivative that is highly effective as a fair-value hedge, and that is designated and qualifies as a fair-value hedge, along with the loss or gain on the hedged asset or liability that is attributable to the hedged risk (including losses or gains on firm commitments), are recorded in current-period earnings. The effective portion of the changes in the fair value of a derivative that is highly effective and that is designated and qualifies as a cash-flow hedge is recorded in other comprehensive income, until earnings are affected by the variability of cash flows (e.g., when periodic settlements on a variable-rate asset or liability are recorded in earnings). The remaining gain or loss on the derivative, if any, in excess of the cumulative change in the present value of future cash flows of the hedged item is recognized in earnings.

The Company formally documents all relationships between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as its risk-management objective and strategy for undertaking various hedge transactions. This process includes linking all derivatives that are designated as fair-value or cash-flow hedges to specific assets and liabilities on the balance sheet or to specific firm commitments or forecasted transactions. The Company also formally assessed, both at the hedge’s inception and on an ongoing basis (if the hedges do not qualify for short-cut accounting), whether the derivatives that are used in hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting changes in fair values or cash flows of hedged items. When it is determined that a derivative is not highly effective as a hedge or that it has ceased to be a highly effective hedge, the Company discontinues hedge accounting prospectively, as discussed below. The Company discontinues hedge accounting prospectively when: (1) it is determined that the derivative is no longer effective in offsetting changes in the fair value or cash flows of a hedged item (including firm commitments or forecasted transactions); (2) the derivative expires or is sold, terminated, or exercised; (3) the derivative is re-designated as a hedge instrument, because it is unlikely that a forecasted transaction will occur; (4) a hedged firm commitment no longer meets the definition of a firm commitment; or (5) management determines that designation of the derivative as a hedge instrument is no longer appropriate.

When hedge accounting is discontinued because it is determined that the derivative no longer qualifies as an effective fair-value hedge, hedge accounting is discontinued prospectively and the derivative will continue to be carried on the balance sheet at its fair value with all changes in fair value being recorded in earnings but with no offsetting being recorded on the hedged item or in other comprehensive income for cash flow hedges.

69

The Company uses derivatives to hedge interest rate exposures associated with mortgage loans held for sale and mortgage loans in process. The Company regularly enters into derivative financial instruments in the form of forward contracts, as part of its normal asset/liability management strategies. The Company’s obligations under forward contracts consist of “best effort” commitments to deliver mortgage loans originated in the secondary market at a future date. Interest rate lock commitments related to loans that are originated for later sale are classified as derivatives. In the normal course of business, the Company regularly extends these rate lock commitments to customers during the loan origination process. The fair values of the Company’s forward contract and rate lock commitments to customers as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 were not material and have not been recorded.

During 2008 the Company entered into interest rate swaps (“swaps”) to facilitate customer transactions and meet their financing needs. Upon entering into these swaps, the Company entered into offsetting positions with a regional correspondent bank in order to minimize the risk to the Company. As of December 31, 2012, the Company was party to two swaps with notional amounts totaling approximately $11.1 million with customers, and two swaps with notional amounts totaling approximately $11.1 million with a regional correspondent bank. These swaps qualify as derivatives, but are not designated as hedging instruments.

Income Taxes

Income tax expense is the total of the current year income tax due or refundable and the change in deferred tax assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are the expected future tax amounts for the temporary differences between carrying amounts and tax bases of assets and liabilities, computed using enacted tax rates. A valuation allowance, if needed, reduces deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.

Stock-Based Compensation

At December 31, 2012, the Company had two stock-based employee compensation plans for grants of equity compensation to key employees. These plans have been accounted for under the provisions of FASB ASC 718-10, Compensation – Stock Compensation. The stock-based employee compensation plans are more fully described in Note 13.

Earnings per Common Share

Basic earnings per common share are computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per common share include the dilutive effect of additional potential common shares issuable under stock options and warrants.

Loan Commitments and Related Financial Instruments

Financial instruments, which include credit card arrangements, commitments to make loans and standby letters of credit, are issued to meet customer financing needs. The face amount for these items represents the exposure to loss before considering customer collateral or ability to repay. Such financial instruments are recorded when they are funded. Instruments such as stand-by letters of credit are considered financial guarantees in accordance with FASB ASC 460-10. The fair value of these financial guarantees is not material.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Fair values of financial instruments are estimated using relevant market information and other assumptions, as more fully disclosed in Note 22. Fair value estimates involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment regarding interest rates, credit risk, prepayments, and other factors, especially in the absence of broad markets for particular items. Changes in assumptions or in market conditions could significantly affect the estimates.

Comprehensive Income

Comprehensive income consists of net income and other comprehensive income. Accumulated comprehensive income, which is recognized as a separate component of equity, includes unrealized gains and losses on securities available for sale.

Advertising

Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. Advertising expense for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 was $454,000, $406,000 and $313,000, respectively. Advertising typically consists of local print media aimed at businesses that the Company targets as well as sponsorships of local events that the Company’s clients and prospects are involved with.

70

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In April 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-03, Transfers and Servicing (Topic 860): Reconsideration of Effective Control for Repurchase Agreements, which removed from the assessment of effective control the criterion relating to the transferor’s ability to repurchase or redeem financial assets on substantially the agreed-upon terms, even in the event of default by the transferee. The amendments in this update also eliminated the requirement to demonstrate that the transferor possesses adequate collateral to fund substantially all the cost of purchasing replacement assets. The amendments in this update were effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 31, 2011, with prospective application to transactions or modifications of existing transactions that occur on or after the effective date. Early adoption was not permitted. The Company adopted these amendments when required, and they did not have any effect on its financial position or results of operations.

In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRS, which outlined the collaborative effort of the FASB and the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”) to consistently define fair value and to come up with a set of consistent disclosures for fair value. The amendments in this update explain how to measure fair value. They do not require additional fair value measurements and are not intended to establish valuation standards or affect valuation practices outside of financial reporting. The amendments in this update were to be applied prospectively. For public entities, the amendments were effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 31, 2011. Early application was not permitted. The Company adopted these amendments when required, and they did not have a material effect on its financial position or results of operations.

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income, which amended existing standards to allow an entity the option to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. Under both options, an entity is required to present each component of net income along with total net income, each component of other comprehensive income along with a total for other comprehensive income, and a total amount for comprehensive income. Any changes pursuant to the options allowed in the amendments were to be applied retrospectively. For public entities, the amendments were effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption was permitted. This update had no impact on financial reporting of the Company.

In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-12, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in ASU No. 2011-05, which deferred the effective date pertaining to reclassification adjustments out of other accumulated comprehensive income in ASU 2011-05, until the FASB was able to reconsider those requirements. All other requirements of ASU 2011-05 were not affected by this update, including the requirement to report comprehensive income either in a single continuous financial statement or in two separate but consecutive financial statements. Public entities were to apply these requirements for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011, which coincide with the effective dates of the requirements in ASU 2011-05 amended by this update. This update, like ASU No. 2011-05, had no impact on financial reporting of the Company.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-11, Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities, which amends disclosures by requiring improved information about financial instruments and derivative instruments that are either offset on the balance sheet or subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement or similar agreement, irrespective of whether they are offset on the balance sheet. Reporting entities are required to provide both net and gross information for these assets and liabilities in order to enhance comparability between those entities that prepare their financial statements on the basis of U.S. GAAP and those entities that prepare their financial statements on the basis of international financial reporting standards (“IFRS”). Companies are required to apply the amendments for fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those years. Retrospective disclosures are required. The Company does not believe this update will have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations.

71

NOTE 2.               DEBT SECURITIES

The amortized cost and fair value of available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities at December 31, 2012 and 2011 are summarized as follows:

			Gross		Gross
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized			Market
	Cost		Gain		Loss			Value
	(In Thousands)
December 31, 2012
Securities Available for Sale
U.S. Treasury and government sponsored agencies	$	27,360	$	1,026	$	-		$	28,386
Mortgage-backed securities		69,298		4,168		-			73,466
State and municipal securities		112,319		5,941		(83	)		118,177
Corporate debt		13,677		210		(39	)		13,848
Total		222,654		11,345		(122	)		233,877
Securities Held to Maturity
Mortgage-backed securities		20,429		768		(40	)		21,157
State and municipal securities		5,538		655		-			6,193
Total	$	25,967	$	1,423	$	(40	)	$	27,350
December 31, 2011
Securities Available for Sale
U.S. Treasury and government sponsored agencies	$	98,169	$	1,512	$	(59	)	$	99,622
Mortgage-backed securities		88,118		4,462		-			92,580
State and municipal securities		95,331		5,230		(35	)		100,526
Corporate debt		1,030		51		-			1,081
Total		282,648		11,255		(94	)		293,809
Securities Held to Maturity
Mortgage-backed securities		9,676		410		-			10,086
State and municipal securities		5,533		380		-			5,913
Total	$	15,209	$	790	$	-		$	15,999

All mortgage-backed securities are with government sponsored enterprises (GSEs) such as Federal National Mortgage Association, Government National Mortgage Association, Federal Home Loan Bank, and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation.

At year-end 2012 and 2011, there were no holdings of securities of any issuer, other than the U.S. government and its agencies, in an amount greater than 10% of stockholders’ equity.

The amortized cost and fair value of securities as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 by contractual maturity are shown below. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because the issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

	December 31, 2012				December 31, 2011
	Amortized Cost		Market Value		Amortized Cost		Market Value
	(In Thousands)
Securities available for sale
Due within one year	$	11,971	$	12,052	$	10,664	$	10,762
Due from one to five years		79,192		81,940		112,488		114,227
Due from five to ten years		59,825		63,801		65,509		69,864
Due after ten years		2,368		2,618		5,868		6,376
Mortgage-backed securities		69,298		73,466		88,118		92,580
	$	222,654	$	233,877	$	282,647	$	293,809
Securities held to maturity
Due after ten years	$	5,538	$	6,193	$	5,533	$	5,913
Mortgage-backed securities		20,429		21,157		9,676		10,086
	$	25,967	$	27,350	$	15,209	$	15,999

72

The following table shows the gross unrealized losses and fair value of securities, aggregated by category and length of time that securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at December 31, 2012 and 2011. In estimating other-than-temporary impairment losses, management considers, among other things, the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer and the intent and ability of the Company to hold the security for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value. The unrealized losses shown in the following table are primarily due to increases in market rates over the yields available at the time of purchase of the underlying securities and not credit quality. Because the Company does not intend to sell these securities and it is more likely than not that the Company will not be required to sell the securities before recovery of their amortized cost basis, which may be maturity, the Company does not consider these securities to be other-than-temporarily impaired at December 31, 2012. There were no other-than-temporary impairments for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010.

	Less Than Twelve Months					Twelve Months or More				Total
	Gross					Gross				Gross
	Unrealized					Unrealized				Unrealized
	Losses			Fair Value		Losses		Fair Value		Losses			Fair Value
	(In Thousands)
December 31, 2012
U.S. Treasury and government sponsored agencies	$	-		$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-		$	-
Mortgage-backed securities		(40	)		4,439		-		-		(40	)		4,439
State and municipal securities		(83	)		8,801		-		166		(83	)		8,967
Corporate debt		(39	)		4,882		-		-		(39	)		4,882
Total	$	(162	)	$	18,122	$	-	$	166	$	(162	)	$	18,288
December 31, 2011
U.S. Treasury and government sponsored agencies	$	(59	)	$	15,074	$	-	$	-	$	(59	)	$	15,074
Mortgage-backed securities		-			-		-		-		-			-
State and municipal securities		(35	)		4,559		-		-		(35	)		4,559
Corporate debt		-			-		-		-		-			-
Total	$	(94	)	$	19,633	$	-	$	-	$	(94	)	$	19,633

At December 31, 2012, only one of the Company’s 572 debt securities was in an unrealized loss position for more than 12 months.

During 2012, 10 government agency sponsored mortgage-backed securities with an amortized cost of $23.6 million and one government agency bond with an amortized cost of $1.5 million were bought. 15 government agency securities with a total amortized cost of $61.0 million were called during 2012, three U.S. Treasury securities with an amortized cost of $10.0 million matured. During 2011, 16 government agency bonds with an amortized cost of $63.2 million and 20 government agency sponsored mortgage-backed securities with an amortized cost of $29.9 million were bought. Nine U.S. Treasury notes, six government agency bonds and five government agency sponsored mortgage-backed securities were sold with an amortized cost of $56.1 million and a net gain on sale in the amount of $992,000. There were no sales of securities during 2012. During 2011, Losses on sales of securities of $326,000, netted against the gains above, resulted in net gain on sales of securities of $666,000 for the year. During 2010, bonds with a total amortized cost of $32.2 million were sold with total gains recognized in the amount of $108,000.

The carrying value of investment securities pledged to secure public funds on deposits and for other purposes as required by law as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 was $210.0 million and $197.9 million, respectively.

Restricted equity securities include (1) a restricted investment in Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta stock for membership requirement and to secure available lines of credit, and (2) an investment in First National Bankers Bank stock. The amount of investment in the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta stock was $3.7 million and $3.3 million at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The amount of investment in the First National Bankers Bank stock was $250,000 at December 31, 2012 and 2011.

73

NOTE 3. LOANS

The composition of loans at December 31, 2012 and 2011 is summarized as follows:

	December 31,
	2012			2011
	(In Thousands)
Commercial, financial and agricultural	$	1,030,990		$	799,464
Real estate - construction		158,361			151,218
Real estate - mortgage:
Owner-occupied commercial		568,041			398,601
1-4 family mortgage		235,909			205,182
Other mortgage		323,599			235,251
Total real estate - mortgage		1,127,549			839,034
Consumer		46,282			41,026
Total Loans		2,363,182			1,830,742
Less: Allowance for loan losses		(26,258	)		(22,030	)
Net Loans	$	2,336,924		$	1,808,712

Changes in the allowance for loan losses during the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively are as follows:

	Years Ended December 31,
	2012			2011			2010
	(In Thousands)
Balance, beginning of year	$	22,030		$	18,077		$	14,737
Loans charged off		(5,755	)		(5,653	)		(7,208	)
Recoveries		883			634			198
Provision for loan losses		9,100			8,972			10,350
Balance, end of year	$	26,258		$	22,030		$	18,077

The Company assesses the adequacy of its allowance for loan losses prior to the end of each calendar quarter. The level of the allowance is based on management’s evaluation of the loan portfolios, past loan loss experience, current asset quality trends, known and inherent risks in the portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay (including the timing of future payment), the estimated value of any underlying collateral, composition of the loan portfolio, economic conditions, industry and peer bank loan quality indications and other pertinent factors, including regulatory recommendations. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires material estimates including the amounts and timing of future cash flows expected to be received on impaired loans that may be susceptible to significant change. Loan losses are charged off when management believes that the full collectability of the loan is unlikely. A loan may be partially charged-off after a “confirming event” has occurred which serves to validate that full repayment pursuant to the terms of the loan is unlikely. Allocation of the allowance is made for specific loans, but the entire allowance is available for any loan that in management’s judgment deteriorates and is uncollectible. The portion of the reserve classified as qualitative factors, is management’s evaluation of potential future losses that would arise in the loan portfolio should management’s assumption about qualitative and environmental conditions materialize. This qualitative factor portion of the allowance for loan losses is based on management’s judgment regarding various external and internal factors including macroeconomic trends, management’s assessment of the Company’s loan growth prospects, and evaluations of internal risk controls.

The following table presents an analysis of the allowance for loan losses by portfolio segment as of December 31, 2012 and 2011. The total allowance for loan losses is disaggregated into those amounts associated with loans individually evaluated and those associated with loans collectively evaluated. 

Changes in the allowance for loan losses, segregated by loan type, during the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, are as follows:

74

	Commercial,
	financial and			Real estate -			Real estate -						Qualitative
	agricultural			construction			mortgage			Consumer			Factors		Total
	(In Thousands)
	Year Ended December 31, 2012
Allowance for loan losses:
Balance at December 31, 2011	$	6,627		$	6,542		$	3,295		$	531		$	5,035	$	22,030
Chargeoffs		(1,106	)		(3,088	)		(660	)		(901	)		-		(5,755	)
Recoveries		125			58			692			8			-		883
Provision		2,587			2,999			1,585			561			1,368		9,100
Balance at December 31, 2012	$	8,233		$	6,511		$	4,912		$	199		$	6,403	$	26,258

	December 31, 2012
Individually Evaluated for Impairment	$	577	$	1,013	$	1,921	$	-	$	-	$	3,511
Collectively Evaluated for Impairment		7,656		5,498		2,991		199		6,403		22,747
Loans:
Ending Balance	$	1,030,990	$	158,361	$	1,127,549	$	46,282	$	-	$	2,363,182
Individually Evaluated for Impairment		3,910		14,422		18,927		135		-		37,394
Collectively Evaluated for Impairment		1,027,080		143,939		1,108,622		46,147		-		2,325,788

	Year Ended December 31, 2011
Allowance for loan losses:
Balance at December 31, 2010	$	5,348		$	6,373		$	2,443		$	749		$	3,164	$	18,077
Chargeoffs		(1,096	)		(2,594	)		(1,096	)		(867	)		-		(5,653	)
Recoveries		361			180			12			81			-		634
Provision		2,014			2,583			1,936			568			1,871		8,972
Balance at December 31, 2011	$	6,627		$	6,542		$	3,295		$	531		$	5,035	$	22,030

	December 31, 2011
Individually Evaluated for Impairment	$	1,382	$	1,533	$	941	$	325	$	-	$	4,181
Collectively Evaluated for Impairment		5,245		5,009		2,354		206		5,035		17,849
Loans:
Ending Balance	$	799,464	$	151,218	$	839,034	$	41,026	$	-	$	1,830,742
Individually Evaluated for Impairment		5,578		16,262		14,866		547		-		37,253
Collectively Evaluated for Impairment		793,886		134,956		824,168		40,479		-		1,793,489

The credit quality of the loan portfolio is summarized no less frequently than quarterly using categories similar to the standard asset classification system used by the federal banking agencies. The following table presents credit quality indicators for the loan loss portfolio segments and classes. These categories are utilized to develop the associated allowance for loan losses using historical losses adjusted for current economic conditions defined as follows:

· Pass – loans which are well protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor (or obligors, if any) or by the fair value, less cost to acquire and sell, of any underlying collateral.

· Special Mention – loans with potential weakness that may, if not reversed or corrected, weaken the credit or inadequately protect the Company’s position at some future date. These loans are not adversely classified and do not expose an institution to sufficient risk to warrant an adverse classification.

· Substandard – loans that exhibit well-defined weakness or weaknesses that presently jeopardize debt repayment. These loans are characterized by the distinct possibility that the institution will sustain some loss if the weaknesses are not corrected.

· Doubtful – loans that have all the weaknesses inherent in loans classified substandard, plus the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values highly questionable and improbable.

75

Loans by credit quality indicator as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 were as follows: 

			Special
December 31, 2012	Pass		Mention		Substandard		Doubtful		Total
	(In Thousands)
Commercial, financialand agricultural	$	1,004,043	$	19,172	$	7,775	$	-	$	1,030,990
Real estate - construction		121,168		22,771		14,422		-		158,361
Real estate - mortgage:
Owner-occupied commercial		555,536		4,142		8,363		-		568,041
1-4 family mortgage		223,152		6,379		6,378		-		235,909
Other mortgage		312,473		6,674		4,452		-		323,599
Total real estate mortgage		1,091,161		17,195		19,193		-		1,127,549
Consumer		46,076		71		135		-		46,282
Total	$	2,262,448	$	59,209	$	41,525	$	-	$	2,363,182

			Special
December 31, 2011	Pass		Mention		Substandard		Doubtful		Total
	(In Thousands)
Commercial, financialand agricultural	$	780,270	$	11,775	$	7,419	$	-	$	799,464
Real estate - construction		117,244		14,472		19,502		-		151,218
Real estate - mortgage:
Owner-occupied commercial		385,084		7,333		6,184		-		398,601
1-4 family mortgage		194,447		4,835		5,900		-		205,182
Other mortgage		224,807		7,034		3,410		-		235,251
Total real estate mortgage		804,338		19,202		15,494		-		839,034
Consumer		40,353		96		577		-		41,026
Total	$	1,742,205	$	45,545	$	42,992	$	-	$	1,830,742

76

Loans by performance status as of December 31, 2012 and 2011are as follows:

December 31, 2012	Performing		Nonperforming		Total
	(In Thousands)
Commercial, financial and agricultural	$	1,030,714	$	276	$	1,030,990
Real estate - construction		151,901		6,460		158,361
Real estate - mortgage:
Owner-occupied commercial		565,255		2,786		568,041
1-4 family mortgage		235,456		453		235,909
Other mortgage		323,359		240		323,599
Total real estate mortgage		1,124,070		3,479		1,127,549
Consumer		46,139		143		46,282
Total	$	2,352,824	$	10,358	$	2,363,182

December 31, 2011	Performing		Nonperforming		Total
	(In Thousands)
Commercial, financial and agricultural	$	798,285	$	1,179	$	799,464
Real estate - construction		141,155		10,063		151,218
Real estate - mortgage:
Owner-occupied commercial		397,809		792		398,601
1-4 family mortgage		204,512		670		205,182
Other mortgage		234,558		693		235,251
Total real estate mortgage		836,879		2,155		839,034
Consumer		40,651		375		41,026
Total	$	1,816,970	$	13,772	$	1,830,742

77

Loans by past due status as of December 31, 2012 and 2011are as follows: 

December 31, 2012	Past Due Status (Accruing Loans)
							Total Past
	30-59 Days		60-89 Days		90+ Days		Due		Non-Accrual		Current		Total Loans
	(In Thousands)
Commercial, financial and agricultural	$	1,699	$	385	$	-	$	2,084	$	276	$	1,028,630	$	1,030,990
Real estate - construction		-		-		-		-		6,460		151,901		158,361
Real estate - mortgage:
Owner-occupied commercial		1,480		10		-		1,490		2,786		563,765		568,041
1-4 family mortgage		420		16		-		436		453		235,020		235,909
Other mortgage		516		-		-		516		240		322,843		323,599
Total real estate -
mortgage		2,416		26		-		2,442		3,479		1,121,628		1,127,549
Consumer		108		-		8		116		135		46,031		46,282
Total	$	4,223	$	411	$	8	$	4,642	$	10,350	$	2,348,190	$	2,363,182

December 31, 2011	Past Due Status (Accruing Loans)
							Total Past
	30-59 Days		60-89 Days		90+ Days		Due		Non-Accrual		Current		Total Loans
	(In Thousands)
Commercial, financial and agricultural	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	1,179	$	798,285	$	799,464
Real estate - construction		2,234		-		-		2,234		10,063		138,921		151,218
Real estate - mortgage:
Owner-occupied commercial		-		-		-		-		792		397,809		398,601
1-4 family mortgage		2,107		-		-		2,107		670		202,405		205,182
Other mortgage		-		-		-		-		693		234,558		235,251
Total real estate - mortgage		2,107		-		-		2,107		2,155		834,772		839,034
Consumer		-		84		-		84		375		40,567		41,026
Total	$	4,341	$	84	$	-	$	4,425	$	13,772	$	1,812,545	$	1,830,742

78

The following table presents details of the Company’s impaired loans as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Loans which have been fully charged off do not appear in the tables.

December 31, 2012
			Unpaid				Average		Interest Income
	Recorded		Principal		Related		Recorded		Recognized
	Investment		Balance		Allowance		Investment		in Period
	(In Thousands)
With no allowance recorded:
Commercial, financial and agricultural	$	2,602	$	2,856	$	-	$	2,313	$	105
Real estate - construction		6,872		7,894		-		7,631		188
Real estate - mortgage:
Owner-occupied commercial		5,111		5,361		-		5,411		145
1-4 family mortgage		2,166		2,388		-		2,177		108
Other mortgage		4,151		4,249		-		4,206		275
Total real estate - mortgage		11,428		11,998		-		11,794		528
Consumer		135		344		-		296		6
Total with no allowance recorded		21,037		23,092		-		22,034		827
With an allowance recorded:
Commercial, financial and agricultural		1,308		1,308		577		1,325		90
Real estate - construction		7,550		8,137		1,013		6,961		154
Real estate - mortgage:
Owner-occupied commercial		3,195		3,195		779		3,277		77
1-4 family mortgage		4,002		4,002		1,007		4,001		139
Other mortgage		302		302		135		307		20
Total real estate - mortgage		7,499		7,499		1,921		7,585		236
Consumer		-		-		-		-		-
Total with allowance recorded		16,357		16,944		3,511		15,871		480
Total Impaired Loans:
Commercial, financial and agricultural		3,910		4,164		577		3,638		195
Real estate - construction		14,422		16,031		1,013		14,592		342
Real estate - mortgage:
Owner-occupied commercial		8,306		8,556		779		8,688		222
1-4 family mortgage		6,168		6,390		1,007		6,178		247
Other mortgage		4,453		4,551		135		4,513		295
Total real estate - mortgage		18,927		19,497		1,921		19,379		764
Consumer		135		344		-		296		6
Total impaired loans	$	37,394	$	40,036	$	3,511	$	37,905	$	1,307

79

December 31, 2011
			Unpaid				Average		Interest Income
	Recorded		Principal		Related		Recorded		Recognized in
	Investment		Balance		Allowance		Investment		Period
	(In Thousands)
With no allowance recorded:
Commercial, financial and agricultural	$	1,264	$	1,264	$	-	$	1,501	$	74
Real estate - construction		11,583		12,573		-		10,406		226
Owner-occupied commercial		2,493		2,493		-		2,523		153
1-4 family mortgage		1,293		1,293		-		1,241		44
Other mortgage		2,837		2,837		-		2,746		162
Total real estate - mortgage		6,623		6,623		-		6,510		359
Consumer		173		173		-		173		6
Total with no allowance recorded		19,643		20,633		-		18,590		665
With an allowance recorded:
Commercial, financial and agricultural		4,314		4,314		1,382		4,156		226
Real estate - construction		4,679		4,679		1,482		3,987		94
Real estate - mortgage:
Owner-occupied commercial		3,515		3,515		88		3,504		365
1-4 family mortgage		4,397		4,397		904		4,484		198
Other mortgage		331		331		-		337		22
Total real estate - mortgage		8,243		8,243		992		8,325		585
Consumer		374		624		325		425		-
Total with allowance recorded		17,610		17,860		4,181		16,893		905
Total Impaired Loans:
Commercial, financial and agricultural		5,578		5,578		1,382		5,657		300
Real estate - construction		16,262		17,252		1,482		14,393		320
Real estate - mortgage:
Owner-occupied commercial		6,008		6,008		88		6,027		518
1-4 family mortgage		5,690		5,690		904		5,725		242
Other mortgage		3,168		3,168		-		3,083		184
Total real estate - mortgage		14,866		14,866		992		14,835		944
Consumer		547		797		325		598		6
Total impaired loans	$	37,253	$	38,493	$	4,181	$	35,483	$	1,570

Troubled Debt Restructurings (“TDR”) at December 31, 2012 and 2011 totaled $12.3 million and $4.5 million, respectively. The increase for the year primarily consists of two relationships that were added in the first and third quarters of 2012. At December 31, 2012, the Company had a related allowance for loan losses of $1,442,000 allocated to these TDRs, compared to $439,000 at December 31, 2011. The Company had three TDR loans to one borrower in the amount of $2.8 million enter into payment default status during the first quarter of 2012. The assets securing these loans are under a letter of intent to sell at a purchase price that is expected to be sufficient to pay the full principal owed. The final contract is still in negotiation. All other loans classified as TDRs as of December 31, 2012 are performing as agreed under the terms of their restructured plans. The following table presents an analysis of TDRs as of December 31, 2012 and 2011.

80

	December 31, 2012						December 31, 2011
			Pre-		Post-				Pre-		Post-
			Modification		Modification				Modification		Modification
			Outstanding		Outstanding				Outstanding		Outstanding
	Number of		Recorded		Recorded		Number of		Recorded		Recorded
	Contracts		Investment		Investment		Contracts		Investment		Investment
	(In Thousands)
Troubled Debt Restructurings
Commercial, financial and agricultural		2	$	1,168	$	1,168		2	$	1,369	$	1,369
Real estate - construction		15		3,213		3,213		-		-		-
Real estate - mortgage:
Owner-occupied commercial		3		3,121		3,121		3		2,785		2,785
1-4 family mortgage		5		1,709		1,709		-		-		-
Other mortgage		1		302		302		1		331		331
Total real estate mortgage		9		5,132		5,132		4		3,116		3,116
Consumer		-		-		-		-		-		-
		26	$	9,513	$	9,513		6	$	4,485	$	4,485

	Number of		Recorded		Number of		Recorded
	Contracts		Investment		Contracts		Investment
Troubled Debt Restructurings
That Subsequently Defaulted Commercial, financial and agricultural		-	$	-		-	$	-
Real estate - construction		-		-		-		-
Real estate - mortgage:
Owner-occupied commercial		3		2,786		-		-
1-4 family mortgage		-		-		-		-
Other mortgage		-		-		-		-
Total real estate - mortgage		3		2,786		-		-
Consumer		-		-		-		-
		3	$	2,786		-	$	-

In the ordinary course of business, the Company has granted loans to certain related parties, including directors, and their affiliates. The interest rates on these loans were substantially the same as rates prevailing at the time of the transaction and repayment terms are customary for the type of loan. Changes in related party loans for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 are as follows:

	Years Ended December 31,
	2012			2011
	(In Thousands)
Balance, beginning of year	$	9,047		$	6,825
Advances		7,630			7,926
Repayments		(8,096	)		(4,204	)
Participations		3,819			(1,500	)
Balance, end of year	$	12,400		$	9,047

NOTE 4. FORECLOSED PROPERTIES

Other real estate and certain other assets acquired in foreclosure are carried at the lower of the recorded investment in the loan or fair value less estimated costs to sell the property.

81

An analysis of foreclosed properties for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 follows:

	2012			2011			2010
Balance at beginning of year	$	12,275		$	6,966		$	12,525
Transfers from loans and capitalized expenses		2,695			9,029			5,447
Foreclosed properties sold		(2,967	)		(3,334	)		(7,995	)
Writedowns and partial liquidations		(2,318	)		(386	)		(3,011	)
Balance at end of year	$	9,685		$	12,275		$	6,966

NOTE 5. PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT

Premises and equipment are summarized as follows:

	December 31,
	2012			2011
	(In Thousands)
Land and building	$	1,724		$	-
Furniture and equipment		8,642			5,224
Leasehold improvements		4,742			4,436
		15,108			9,660
Accumulated depreciation		(6,261	)		(5,069	)
	$	8,847		$	4,591

The provisions for depreciation charged to occupancy and equipment expense for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 were $1,218,000, $1,173,000 and $1,066,000, respectively.

The Company leases land and building space under non-cancellable operating leases. Future minimum lease payments under non-cancellable operating leases are summarized as follows:

	(In Thousands)
2012	$	2,068
2013		1,955
2014		1,945
2015		1,974
2016		1,934
Thereafter		7,201
	$	17,077

For the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, annual rental expense on operating leases was $2,195,000, $2,060,000 and $1,734,000, respectively.

NOTE 6. VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES (VIEs)

The Company utilizes special purpose entities (SPEs) that constitute investments in limited partnerships that undertake certain development projects to achieve federal and state tax credits. These SPEs are typically structured as VIEs and are thus subject to consolidation by the reporting enterprise that absorbs the majority of the economic risks and rewards of the VIE. To determine whether it must consolidate a VIE, the Company analyzes the design of the VIE to identify the sources of variability within the VIE, including an assessment of the nature of risks created by the assets and other contractual obligations of the VIE, and determines whether it will absorb a majority of that variability.

The Company has invested in a limited partnership for which it determined it is not the primary beneficiary, and which thus is not subject to consolidation by the Company. The Company reports its investment in this partnership at its net realizable value, estimated to be the discounted value of the remaining amount of tax credits to be received. The amount recorded as investment in this partnership at December 31, 2012 and 2011 was $313,000 and $504,000, respectively, and is included in other assets.

82

On December 31, 2009, the Company entered into a limited partnership as funding investor. The partnership is a single purpose entity that is lending money to a real estate investor for the purpose of acquiring and operating a multi-tenant office building. The investment qualifies for New Market Tax Credits under Internal Revenue Code Section 45D, as amended. The Company has determined that it is the primary beneficiary of the economic risks and rewards of the VIE, and thus has consolidated the partnership’s assets and liabilities into its consolidated financial statements. The amount recorded as an investment in this partnership at December 31, 2012 and 2011 was $3,192,000 and $3,403,000, respectively, of which $2,270,000 in 2012 and 2011 is included in loans of the Company. The remaining amounts are included in other assets.

NOTE 7. DEPOSITS

Deposits at December 31, 2012 and 2011 were as follows:

	December 31,
	2012		2011
	(In Thousands)
Noninterest-bearing demand	$	545,174	$	418,810
Interest-bearing checking		1,551,158		1,325,451
Savings		19,560		15,638
Time		69,179		71,368
Time, $100,000 and over		326,501		312,620
	$	2,511,572	$	2,143,887

The scheduled maturities of time deposits at December 31, 2012 were as follows:

	(In Thousands)
2013	$	247,482
2014		87,433
2015		21,167
2016		26,437
2017		13,161
	$	395,680

At December 31, 2012 and 2011, overdraft deposits reclassified to loans were $3,860,000 and $876,000, respectively.

NOTE 8. FEDERAL FUNDS PURCHASED

At December 31, 2012, The Company had $117.1 million in federal funds purchased from its respondent banks that are clients of its correspondent banking unit, compared to $79.3 million at December 31, 2011. The Company was paying an interest rate of 0.25% on these balances at December 31, 2012.

At December 31, 2012, the Company had available lines of credit totaling approximately $130 million with various financial institutions for borrowing on a short-term basis, with no amount outstanding. Available lines with these same banks totaled approximately $140 million at December 31, 2011. These lines are subject to annual renewals with varying interest rates.

NOTE 9. OTHER BORROWINGS

Other borrowings of $19.9 million are comprised of the Company’s 5.5% Subordinated Notes due November 9, 2022, which were issued in a private placement in November 2012. The notes pay interest semi-annually.

On June 1, 2012, the Company paid off its 8.25% Subordinated Note due June 1, 2016 in the aggregate principal amount of $5 million. This note was payable to one accredited investor and was issued on June 23, 2009.

On November 8, 2012, the Company redeemed all of its outstanding 8.5% Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debentures due 2038, which were held by ServisFirst Capital Trust I. As a result, all of the outstanding 8.5% Trust Preferred Securities and 8.5% Common Securities of the Trust were redeemed. The redemption price for the Trust Preferred Securities was $1,000 per security, for a total principal amount of $15 million, plus accrued distributions up to the redemption date. The Junior Subordinated Debentures were originally issued on September 2, 2008, and in accordance with their terms, were subject to option redemption by the Company on or after September 1, 2011. Pursuant to the terms of its Amended and Restated Trust Agreement, ServisFirst Capital Trust I is required to use the proceeds it receives from the redemption of the Junior Subordinated Debentures to redeem its Trust Preferred Securities and 8.5% Common Securities on the same day.

83

The Company prepaid both of its advances from Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) during 2011, one in March and the other in June. Prepayment penalties of $738,000 were paid to the FHLB as part of these prepayments, and is included in other operating expenses.

NOTE 10. SF HOLDING 1, INC. AND SF REALTY 1, INC.

In January 2012, the Company formed SF Holding 1, Inc., an Alabama corporation, and its subsidiary, SF Realty 1, Inc., an Alabama corporation. SF Realty 1 elected to be treated as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) for U.S. income tax purposes. SF Realty 1 holds and manages participations in residential mortgages and commercial real estate loans originated by ServisFirst Bank. SF Holding 1, Inc. and SF Realty 1, Inc. are both consolidated into the Company.

NOTE 11. PARTICIPATION IN THE SMALL BUSINESS LENDING FUND OF THE U.S. TREASURY DEPARTMENT

On June 21, 2011, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with the Secretary of the Treasury, pursuant to which the Company issued and sold to the Treasury 40,000 shares of its Senior Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series A, having a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share (the “Series A Preferred Stock”), for aggregate proceeds of $40,000,000. The issuance was pursuant to the Treasury’s Small Business Lending Fund program, a $30 billion fund established under the Small Business Jobs Act of 2010, which encourages lending to small businesses by providing capital to qualified community banks with assets of less than $10 billion. The Series A Preferred Stock is entitled to receive non-cumulative dividends payable quarterly on each January 1, April 1, July 1 and October 1, commencing October 1, 2011. The dividend rate, which is calculated on the aggregate Liquidation Amount, has been initially set at 1% per annum based upon the current level of “Qualified Small Business Lending” (“QSBL”) by the Bank. The dividend rate for future dividend periods will be set based upon the percentage change in qualified lending between each dividend period and the baseline QSBL level established at the time the Agreement was entered into. Such dividend rate may vary from 1% per annum to 5% per annum for the second through tenth dividend periods, and from 1% per annum to 7% per annum for the eleventh through the first half of the nineteenth dividend periods.  If the Series A Preferred Stock remains outstanding for more than four-and-one-half years, the dividend rate will be fixed at 9%.  Prior to that time, in general, the dividend rate decreases as the level of the Bank’s QSBL increases.  Such dividends are not cumulative, but the Company may only declare and pay dividends on its common stock (or any other equity securities junior to the Series A Preferred Stock) if it has declared and paid dividends for the current dividend period on the Series A Preferred Stock, and will be subject to other restrictions on its ability to repurchase or redeem other securities.  In addition, if (i) the Company has not timely declared and paid dividends on the Series A Preferred Stock for six dividend periods or more, whether or not consecutive, and (ii) shares of Series A Preferred Stock with an aggregate liquidation preference of at least $25,000,000 are still outstanding, the Treasury (or any successor holder of Series A Preferred Stock) may designate two additional directors to be elected to the Company’s Board of Directors.

As is more completely described in the Certificate of Designation, holders of the Series A Preferred Stock have the right to vote as a separate class on certain matters relating to the rights of holders of Series A Preferred Stock and on certain corporate transactions.  Except with respect to such matters and, if applicable, the election of the additional directors described above, the Series A Preferred Stock does not have voting rights.

The Company may redeem the shares of Series A Preferred Stock, in whole or in part, at any time at a redemption price equal to the sum of the Liquidation Amount per share and the per-share amount of any unpaid dividends for the then-current period, subject to any required prior approval by the Company’s primary federal banking regulator.

NOTE 12. DERIVATIVES

During 2008, the Company entered into interest rate swaps (“swaps”) to facilitate customer transactions and meet customer financing needs. Upon entering into these swaps, the Company entered into offsetting positions with a regional correspondent bank in order to minimize the risk to the Company. As of December 31, 2012, the Company was party to two swaps with notional amounts totaling approximately $11.1 million with customers and two swaps with notional amounts totaling approximately $11.1 million with a regional correspondent bank. These swaps qualify as derivatives, but are not designated as hedging instruments. The Company has recorded the value of these swaps at $490,000 in offsetting entries in other assets and other liabilities.

84

The Company has entered into agreements with secondary market investors to deliver loans on a “best efforts delivery” basis. When a rate is committed to a borrower, it is based on the best price that day and locked with the investor for the customer for a 30-day period. In the event the loan is not delivered to the investor, the Company has no risk or exposure with the investor. The interest rate lock commitments related to loans that are originated for later sale are classified as derivatives. The fair values of the Company’s agreements with investors and rate lock commitments to customers as of December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 were not material.

NOTE 13. EMPLOYEE AND DIRECTOR BENEFITS

At December 31, 2012, the Company has two stock-based compensation plans, which are described below. The compensation cost that has been charged against income for the plans was approximately $1,049,000, $975,000 and $713,000 for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Stock Incentive Plans

The Company’s 2005 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2005 Plan”), originally permitted the grant of stock options to its officers, employees, directors and organizers of the Company for up to 525,000 shares of common stock. However, upon stockholder approval during 2006, the 2005 Plan was amended in order to allow the Company to grant stock options for up to 1,025,000 shares of common stock. Both incentive stock options and non-qualified stock options may be granted under the 2005 Plan. Option awards are generally granted with an exercise price equal to the estimated fair market value of the Company’s stock at the date of grant; those option awards vest in varying amounts from 2007 through 2015 and are based on continuous service during that vesting period and have a ten-year contractual term. Dividends are not paid on unexercised options and dividends are not subject to vesting. The 2005 Plan provides for accelerated vesting if there is a change in control (as defined in the 2005 Plan).

On March 23, 2009, the Company’s board of directors adopted the 2009 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2009 Plan”), which was effective upon approval by the stockholders at the 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The 2009 Plan authorizes the grant of stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, stock options, non-stock share equivalents, performance shares or performance units and other equity-based awards.

Both incentive stock options and non-qualified stock options may be granted under the 2009 Plan. Option awards are generally granted with an exercise price equal to the estimated fair market value of the Company’s stock at the date of grant. Up to 425,000 shares of common stock of the Company are available for awards under the 2009 Plan.

As of December 31, 2012, there are a total of 257,000 shares available to be granted under both of these plans.

On September 21, 2006, we granted non-plan stock options to persons representing certain key business relationships to purchase up to an aggregate of 30,000 shares of our common stock for a purchase price of $15.00 per share. On November 2, 2007, we granted non-plan stock options to persons representing certain key business relationships to purchase up to an aggregate of 25,000 shares of our common stock for a purchase price of $20.00 per share. These stock options are non-qualified and are not part of either of our stock incentive plans. They vested 100% in a lump sum five years after their date of grant and expire 10 years after their date of grant.

The fair value of each stock option award is estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes-Merton valuation model that uses the assumptions noted in the following table. Expected volatilities are based on an index of approximately 79 publicly traded banks in the southeast United States. The expected term of options granted is based on the short-cut method and represents the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding. The risk-free rate for periods within the contractual life of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant.

	2012			2011			2010
Expected volatility		19.80	%		26.50	%		26.00	%
Expected dividends		-	%		0.37	%		-	%
Expected term (in years)		6.5			6.5			7.0
Risk-free rate		1.05	%		2.21	%		2.10	%

85

The weighted average grant-date fair value of options granted during the years ended December 31, 2012, December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was $6.59, $7.82 and $7.91, respectively.

The following tables summarize stock option activity.:

	Shares			Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (years)		Aggregate Intrinsic Value
								(In Thousands)
Year Ended December 31, 2012:
Outstanding at beginning of year		1,073,800		$	18.33		6.0	$	12,508
Granted		45,500			30.00		9.3		130
Exercised		(288,130	)		12.71		2.4		5,846
Forfeited		(14,670	)		24.54		-		-
Outstanding at end of year		816,500		$	20.87		5.8	$	9,905
Exercisable at December 31, 2012		412,825		$	14.03		3.6	$	7,831
Year Ended December 31, 2011:
Outstanding at beginning of year		881,000		$	15.65		6.9	$	8,238
Granted		233,500			27.16		9.3		-
Exercised		(40,700	)		10.53		3.8		792
Forfeited		-			15.00		-		-
Outstanding at end of year		1,073,800		$	18.33		6.0	$	12,508
Exercisable at December 31, 2011		442,940		$	13.19		4.4	$	7,447
Year Ended December 31, 2010:
Outstanding at beginning of year		863,500		$	15.17		6.8	$	8,483
Granted		37,500			25.00		9.4		-
Exercised		(10,000	)		10.00		-		150
Forfeited		(10,000	)		15.00		-		-
Outstanding at end of year		881,000		$	15.65		6.9	$	8,238
Exercisable at December 31, 2010		272,627		$	11.96		5.1	$	3,555

Exercisable options at December 31, 2012 were as follows:

Range of Exercise Price		Shares		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (years)		Aggregate Intrinsic Value
								(In Thousands)
$	10.00		106,500	$	10.00		2.4	$	2,450
	11.00		119,500		11.00		3.3		2,629
	15.00		101,830		15.00		3.9		1,833
	20.00		47,995		20.00		4.8		624
	25.00		37,000		25.00		5.7		296
			412,825	$	14.03		3.6	$	7,832

86

As of December 31, 2012, there was $1,795,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock options. The cost is expected to be recognized on the straight-line method over the next 2.1 years. The total fair value of shares vested during the year ended December 31, 2012 was $404,000.

Restricted Stock

The Company has issued restricted stock, and currently has 20,500 non-vested shares issued. The value of restricted stock awards is determined to be the current value of the Company’s stock, and this total value will be recognized as compensation expense over the vesting period, which is five years from the date of grant. As of December 31, 2012, there was $360,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested restricted stock. The cost is expected to be recognized evenly over the remaining 1.7 years of the restricted stock’s vesting period.

Stock Warrants

In recognition of the efforts and financial risks undertaken by the organizers of ServisFirst Bank (the “Bank”) in 2005, the Bank granted warrants to organizers to purchase a total of 60,000 shares of Bank common stock at a price of $10, which was the fair market value of the Bank’s common stock at the date of the grant. The warrants became warrants to purchase a like number of shares of the Company’s common stock upon the formation of the Company as a holding company for the Bank. The warrants vest in equal annual increments over a three-year period commencing on the first anniversary date of the Bank’s incorporation and will terminate on the tenth anniversary of the incorporation date. All of these warrants were exercised as of December 31, 2012 and there were 20,000 outstanding as of December 31, 2011.

The Company issued warrants for 75,000 shares of common stock with an exercise price of $25 per share in the third quarter of 2008. These warrants were issued in connection with trust preferred securities. There were 70,500 warrants outstanding as of December 31, 2012 and 75,000 warrants were outstanding as of December 31, 2011.

The Company issued warrants for 15,000 shares of common stock with an exercise price of $25 per share in the second quarter of 2009. These warrants were issued in connection with the issuance of the Company’s 8.25% Subordinated Note.

As of December 31, 2012, all warrants were fully vested.

Retirement Plans

The Company has a retirement savings 401(k) and profit-sharing plan in which all employees age 21 and older may participate after completion of one year of service. For employees in service with the Bank at June 15, 2005, the length of service and age requirements were waived. The Company matches employees’ contributions based on a percentage of salary contributed by participants and may make additional discretionary profit sharing contributions. The Company’s expense for the plan was $1,167,000, $946,000 and $377,000 for 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The Company’s board of directors approved additional discretionary matches for 2012 and 2011 based on the profits of the Company during those years. The additional matches were 4% and 3%, respectively, and amounted to $576,000 and $432,000, respectively, and are included in the expenses above.

NOTE 14. COMMON STOCK

During 2011, the Company completed private placements of 340,000 shares of common stock. The shares were issued and sold at $30 per share to 105 accredited investors, of which approximately 33,900 shares were purchased by directors, officers and their families, and 20 non-accredited investors. This sale of stock resulted in net proceeds of $10,159,000. This includes stock offering expenses of $33,000.

NOTE 15. REGULATORY MATTERS

The Bank is subject to dividend restrictions set forth in the Alabama Banking Code and by the Alabama State Banking Department. Under such restrictions, the Bank may not, without the prior approval of the Alabama State Banking Department, declare dividends in excess of the sum of the current year’s earnings plus the retained earnings from the prior two years. Based on these restrictions, the Bank would be limited to paying $90.1 million in dividends as of December 31, 2012.

87

The Bank is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the state and federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possible additional discretionary actions by regulators that if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Bank and the financial statements. Under regulatory capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines involving quantitative measures of the Bank’s assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Bank’s capital amounts and classification under the prompt corrective guidelines are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors.

Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the table below) of total risk-based capital and Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets (as defined in the regulations), and Tier 1 capital to adjusted total assets (as defined). Management believes, as of December 31, 2012, that the Bank meets all capital adequacy requirements to which it is subject.

As of December 31, 2012, the most recent notification from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation categorized ServisFirst Bank as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To remain categorized as well capitalized, the Bank will have to maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier 1 risk-based, and Tier 1 leverage ratios as disclosed in the table below. Management believes that it is well capitalized under the prompt corrective action provisions as of December 31, 2012.

The Company’s and Bank’s actual capital amounts and ratios are presented in the following table:

	Actual					For Capital Adequacy Purposes					To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions
	Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio
As of December 31, 2012:
Total Capital to Risk Weighted Assets:
Consolidated	$	287,136		11.78	%	$	194,943		8.00	%		N/A		N/A
ServisFirst Bank		284,141		11.66	%		194,942		8.00	%	$	243,678		10.00	%
Tier I Capital to Risk Weighted Assets:
Consolidated		240,961		9.89	%		97,472		4.00	%		N/A		N/A
ServisFirst Bank		257,883		10.58	%		97,471		4.00	%		146,207		6.00	%
Tier I Capital to Average Assets:
Consolidated		240,961		8.43	%		114,323		4.00	%		N/A		N/A
ServisFirst Bank		257,883		9.03	%		114,227		4.00	%		142,784		5.00	%
As of December 31, 2011:
Total Capital to Risk Weighted Assets:
Consolidated	$	246,334		12.79	%	$	154,094		8.00	%		N/A		N/A
ServisFirst Bank		243,279		12.63	%		154,070		8.00	%	$	192,588		10.00	%
Tier I Capital to Risk Weighted Assets:
Consolidated		219,350		11.39	%		77,047		4.00	%		N/A		N/A
ServisFirst Bank		216,295		11.23	%		77,035		4.00	%		115,553		6.00	%
Tier I Capital to Average Assets:
Consolidated		219,350		9.17	%		95,642		4.00	%		N/A		N/A
ServisFirst Bank		216,295		9.06	%		95,481		4.00	%		119,352		5.00	%

88

NOTE 16.             OTHER OPERATING INCOME AND EXPENSES

The major components of other operating income and expense included in noninterest income and noninterest expense are as follows:

	Years Ended December 31,
	2012			2011		2010
	(In Thousands)
Other Operating Income
(Loss) gain on sale of other real estate owned	$	(105	)	$	76	$	(203	)
Credit card income		1,064			481		30
Other		744			650		744
	$	1,703		$	1,207	$	571
Other Operating Expenses
Postage	$	159		$	194	$	173
Telephone		385			409		358
Data processing		2,202			2,023		1,983
Other loan expenses		2,836			2,406		1,027
Supplies		320			356		263
Customer and public relations		791			689		477
Marketing		454			406		313
Sales and use tax		198			208		141
Donations and contributions		482			437		261
Directors fees		286			235		216
Prepayment penalties FHLB advances		-			738		-
Other		2,609			2,313		2,071
	$	10,722		$	10,414	$	7,283

NOTE 17.             INCOME TAXES

The components of income tax expense are as follows:

	Year Ended December 31,
	2012			2011			2010
	(In Thousands)
Current	$	19,301		$	13,629		$	11,570
Deferred		(2,181	)		(1,240	)		(2,212	)
Income tax expense	$	17,120		$	12,389		$	9,358

The Company’s total income tax expense differs from the amounts computed by applying the Federal income tax statutory rates to income before income taxes. A reconciliation of the differences is as follows:

	Year Ended December 31, 2012
	Amount			% of Pre-tax Earnings
	(In Thousands)
Income tax at statutory federal rate	$	18,047			35.00	%
Effect on rate of:
State income tax, net of federal tax effect		709			1.37	%
Tax-exempt income, net of expenses		(1,007	)		(1.95	)%
Bank owned life insurance contracts		(568	)		(1.10	)%
Incentive stock option expense		121			0.23	%
Other		(182	)		(0.35	)%
Effective income tax and rate	$	17,120			33.20	%

	Year Ended December 31, 2011
	Amount			% of Pre-tax Earnings
	(In Thousands)
Income tax at statutory federal rate	$	12,540			35.00	%
Effect on rate of:
State income tax, net of federal tax effect		967			2.70	%
Tax-exempt income, net of expenses		(875	)		(2.44	)%
Bank owned life insurance contracts		(137	)		(0.38	)%
Incentive stock option expense		128			0.36	%
Other		(234	)		(0.65	)%
Effective income tax and rate	$	12,389			34.59	%

89

	Year Ended December 31, 2010
	Amount			% of Pre-tax Earnings
	(In Thousands)
Income tax at statutory federal rate	$	9,358			35.00	%
Effect on rate of:
State income tax, net of federal tax effect		715			2.67	%
Tax-exempt income, net of expenses		(773	)		(2.89	)%
Incentive stock option expense		144			0.54	%
Other		(86	)		(0.32	)%
Effective income tax and rate	$	9,358			35.00	%

The components of net deferred tax asset are as follows:

	December 31,
	2012			2011			2010
	(In Thousands)
Other real estate	$	1,064		$	452		$	646
Start-up costs		101			115			127
Net unrealized (gains) losses on securities available for sale		(3,929	)		(4,220	)		(1,528	)
Depreciation		(509	)		(489	)		(206	)
Deferred loan fees		(237	)		(176	)		(72	)
Allowance for loan losses		10,142			8,509			6,974
Nonqualified equity awards		583			436			194
Other		171			287			231
Net deferred income tax assets	$	7,386		$	4,914		$	6,366

The Company believes its net deferred tax asset is recoverable as of December 31, 2012 based on the expectation of future taxable income and other relevant considerations.

Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 740 defines the threshold for recognizing the benefits of tax return positions in the financial statements as “more-likely-than-not” to be sustained by the taxing authority. This section also provides guidance on derecognition, measurement and classification of income tax uncertainties in interim periods. As of December 31, 2012, the Company had no unrecognized tax benefits related to federal or state income tax matters. The Company does not anticipate any material increase or decrease in unrecognized tax benefits during 2012 related to any tax positions taken prior to December 31, 2012. As of December 31, 2012, the Company has accrued no interest or penalties related to uncertain tax positions. It is the Company’s policy to recognize interest and penalties, if any, related to income tax matters in income tax expense.

The Company and its subsidiaries file consolidated U.S. Federal, State of Alabama and State of Florida income tax returns. The Company is currently open to audit under the statute of limitations by the Internal Revenue Service for the years ended December 31, 2010 through 2012. The Company is also currently open to audit by the State of Alabama for the years ended December 31, 2010 through 2012, and open to audit by the state of Florida for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2012, as we opened our first office in the State of Florida in 2011.

NOTE 18.             COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Loan Commitments

The Company is a party to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit, credit card arrangements, and standby letters of credit. Such commitments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the balance sheets. A summary of the Company’s approximate commitments and contingent liabilities is as follows:

	2012		2011		2010
	(In Thousands)
Commitments to extend credit	$	860,421	$	697,939	$	538,719
Credit card arrangements		25,699		19,686		17,601
Standby letters of credit and financial guarantees		36,374		42,937		47,103
Total	$	922,494	$	760,562	$	603,423

90

Commitments to extend credit, credit card arrangements, commercial letters of credit and standby letters of credit all include exposure to some credit loss in the event of nonperformance of the customer. The Company uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance sheet financial instruments. Because these instruments have fixed maturity dates, and because many of them expire without being drawn upon, they do not generally present any significant liquidity risk to the Company.

NOTE 19.             CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT

The Company originates primarily commercial, residential, and consumer loans to customers in the Company’s market area. The ability of the majority of the Company’s customers to honor their contractual loan obligations is dependent on the economy in the market area.

The Company’s loan portfolio is concentrated primarily in loans secured by real estate, of which 54% is secured by real estate in the Company’s primary market areas. In addition, a substantial portion of the other real estate owned is located in that same market. Accordingly, the ultimate collectability of the loan portfolio and the recovery of the carrying amount of other real estate owned are susceptible to changes in market conditions in the Company’s primary market area.

NOTE 20.             EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

Basic earnings per common share are computed by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per common share include the dilutive effect of additional potential common shares issuable under stock options and warrants, as well as the common shares issuable upon conversion of the Company’s 6% Mandatory Convertible Trust Preferred Securities due March 15, 2040.

91

	Years Ended December 31,
	2012		2011		2010
	(Dollar Amounts In Thousands Except Per Share Amounts)
Earnings Per Share
Weighted average common shares outstanding		5,996,437		5,759,524		5,519,151
Net income available to common stockholders	$	34,045	$	23,238	$	17,378
Basic earnings per common share	$	5.68		4.03	$	3.15
Weighted average common shares outstanding		5,996,437		5,759,524		5,519,151
Dilutive effects of assumed conversions and exercise of stock options and warrants		945,315		989,639		775,453
Weighted average common and dilutive potential common shares outstanding		6,941,752		6,749,163		6,294,604
Net income available to common stockholders	$	34,045	$	23,238	$	17,378
Effect of interest expense on convertible debt, net of tax and discretionary expenditures related to conversion	$	569	$	568	$	473
Net income available to common stockholders, adjusted for effect of debt conversion	$	34,614	$	23,806	$	17,851
Diluted earnings per common share	$	4.99	$	3.53	$	2.84

NOTE 21.             RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Loans

As more fully described in Note 3, the Company had outstanding loan balances to related parties as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 in the amount of $12.4 million and $9.0 million, respectively.

NOTE 22.             FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT

Measurement of fair value under U.S. GAAP establishes a hierarchy that prioritizes observable and unobservable inputs used to measure fair value, as of the measurement date, into three broad levels, which are described below:

Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for assets or liabilities. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to Level 1 inputs.

Level 2: Observable prices that are based on inputs not quoted on active markets, but corroborated by market data.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs are used when little or no market data is available. The fair value hierarchy gives the lowest priority to Level 3 inputs.

In determining fair value, the Company utilizes valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs to the extent possible and also considers counterparty credit risk in its assessment of fair value.

Debt Securities. Where quoted prices are available in an active market, securities are classified within Level 1 of the hierarchy. Level 1 securities include highly liquid government securities such as U.S. treasuries and exchange-traded equity securities. For securities traded in secondary markets for which quoted market prices are not available, the Company generally relies on prices obtained from independent vendors. Such independent pricing services are to advise the Company on the carrying value of the securities available for sale portfolio. As part of the Company’s procedures, the price provided from the service is evaluated for reasonableness given market changes. When a questionable price exists, the Company investigates further to determine if the price is valid. If needed, other market participants may be utilized to determine the correct fair value. The Company has also reviewed and confirmed its determinations in discussions with the pricing service regarding their methods of price discovery. Securities measured with these techniques are classified within Level 2 of the hierarchy and often involve using quoted market prices for similar securities, pricing models or discounted cash flow calculations using inputs observable in the market where available. Examples include U.S. government agency securities, mortgage-backed securities, obligations of states and political subdivisions, and certain corporate, asset-backed and other securities. In cases where Level 1 or Level 2 inputs are not available, securities are classified in Level 3 of the hierarchy.

92

Interest Rate Swap Agreements. The fair value is estimated by a third party using inputs that are observable or that can be corroborated by observable market data and, therefore, are classified within Level 2 of the hierarchy. These fair value estimations include primarily market observable inputs such as yield curves and option volatilities, and include the value associated with counterparty credit risk.

Impaired Loans. Impaired loans are measured and reported at fair value when full payment under the loan terms is not probable. Impaired loans are carried at the present value of expected future cash flows using the loan’s existing rate in a discounted cash flow calculation, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral-dependent. Expected cash flows are based on internal inputs reflecting expected default rates on contractual cash flows. This method of estimating cash flows does not incorporate the exit-price concept of fair value described in ASC 820-10 and would generally result in a higher value than the exit-price approach. For loans measured using the estimated fair value of collateral less costs to sell, fair value is generally determined based on appraisals performed by certified and licensed appraisers using inputs such as absorption rates, capitalization rates and market comparables, adjusted for estimated costs to sell. Management modifies the appraised values, if needed, to take into account recent developments in the market or other factors, such as changes in absorption rates or market conditions from the time of valuation, and anticipated sales values considering management’s plans for disposition. Such modifications to the appraised values could result in lower valuations of such collateral. Estimated costs to sell are based on current amounts of disposal costs for similar assets. These measurements are classified as Level 3 within the valuation hierarchy. Impaired loans are subject to nonrecurring fair value adjustment upon initial recognition or subsequent impairment. A portion of the allowance for loan losses is allocated to impaired loans if the value of such loans is deemed to be less than the unpaid balance. Impaired loans are reviewed and evaluated on at least a quarterly basis for additional impairment and adjusted accordingly based on the same factors identified above. The amount recognized as an impairment charge related to impaired loans that are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis was $4,586,000 and $5,419,000 during the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Impaired loans measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis are classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy.

Other Real Estate Owned. Other real estate owned (“OREO”) acquired through, or in lieu of, foreclosure are held for sale and are initially recorded at the lower of cost or fair value, less selling costs. Any write-downs to fair value at the time of transfer to OREO are charged to the allowance for loan losses subsequent to foreclosure. Values are derived from appraisals of underlying collateral and discounted cash flow analysis. A net loss on the sale and write-downs of OREO of $2,166,000 and $266,000 was recognized during the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011. These charges were for write-downs in the value of OREO subsequent to foreclosure and losses on the disposal of OREO. OREO is classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy.

93

The following table presents the Company’s financial assets and financial liabilities carried at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011:

			Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2012 Using
	Quoted Prices in
	Active Markets		Significant Other		Significant
	for Identical		Observable Inputs		Unobservable
	Assets (Level 1)		(Level 2)		Inputs (Level 3)		Total
Assets Measured on a Recurring Basis:	(In Thousands)
Available-for-sale securities:
U.S. Treasury and government sponsored agencies	$	-	$	28,386	$	-	$	28,386
Mortgage-backed securities		-		73,466		-		73,466
State and municipal securities		-		118,177		-		118,177
Corporate debt		-		13,848		-		13,848
Interest rate swap agreements		-		389		-		389
Liabilities Measured on a Recurring Basis:
Interest rate swap agreements	$	-	$	389	$	-	$	389

			Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2011 Using
	Quoted Prices in
	Active Markets		Significant Other		Significant
	for Identical		Observable Inputs		Unobservable
	Assets (Level 1)		(Level 2)		Inputs (Level 3)		Total
Assets Measured on a Recurring Basis:	(In Thousands)
Available-for-sale securities
U.S. Treasury and government sponsored agencies	$	-	$	99,622	$	-	$	99,622
Mortgage-backed securities		-		92,580		-		92,580
State and municipal securities		-		100,526		-		100,526
Corporate debt		-		1,081		-		1,081
Interest rate swap agreements		-		617		-		617
Interest rate cap		-		9		-		9
Total assets at fair value	$	-	$	294,435	$	-	$	294,435
Liabilities Measured on a Recurring Basis:
Interest rate swap agreements	$	-	$	617	$	-	$	617

94

The carrying amount and estimated fair value of the Company’s financial instruments were as follows::

			Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2012 Using
	Quoted Prices in
	Active Markets		Significant Other		Significant
	for Identical		Observable		Unobservable
	Assets (Level 1)		Inputs (Level 2)		Inputs (Level 3)		Total
Assets Measured on a Nonrecurring Basis:	(In Thousands)
Impaired loans, net of related allowance	$	-		-	$	33,883	$	33,883
Other real estate owned and repossessed assets		-		-		9,685		9,685
Total assets at fair value		-		-	$	43,568	$	43,568

			Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2011 Using
	Quoted Prices in
	Active Markets		Significant Other		Significant
	for Identical		Observable		Unobservable
	Assets (Level 1)		Inputs (Level 2)		Inputs (Level 3)		Total
Assets Measured on a Nonrecurring Basis:	(In Thousands)
Impaired loans, net of related allowance	$	-	$	-	$	33,072	$	33,072
Other real estate owned		-		-		12,275		12,275
Total assets at fair value	$	-	$	-	$	45,347	$	45,347

The fair value of a financial instrument is the current amount that would be exchanged in a sale between willing parties, other than in a forced liquidation. Fair value is best determined based upon quoted market prices. However, in many instances, there are no quoted market prices for the Company’s various financial instruments. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques. Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimates of future cash flows. Accordingly, the fair value estimates may not be realized in an immediate settlement of the instrument. Current U.S. GAAP excludes certain financial instruments and all nonfinancial instruments from its fair value disclosure requirements. Accordingly, the aggregate fair value amounts presented may not necessarily represent the underlying fair value of the Company.

The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating its fair value disclosures for financial instruments.

Debt securities: Where quoted prices are available in an active market, securities are classified within Level 1 of the hierarchy. Level 1 securities include highly liquid government securities such as U.S. treasuries and exchange-traded equity securities. For securities traded in secondary markets for which quoted market prices are not available, the Company generally relies on prices obtained from independent vendors. Such independent pricing services are to advise the Company on the carrying value of the securities available for sale portfolio. As part of the Company’s procedures, the price provided from the service is evaluated for reasonableness given market changes. When a questionable price exists, the Company investigates further to determine if the price is valid. If needed, other market participants may be utilized to determine the correct fair value. The Company has also reviewed and confirmed its determinations in discussions with the pricing service regarding their methods of price discovery. Securities measured with these techniques are classified within Level 2 of the hierarchy and often involve using quoted market prices for similar securities, pricing models or discounted cash flow calculations using inputs observable in the market where available. Examples include U.S. government agency securities, mortgage-backed securities, obligations of states and political subdivisions, and certain corporate, asset-backed and other securities. In cases where Level 1 or Level 2 inputs are not available, securities are classified in Level 3 of the hierarchy.

Restricted equity securities: Fair values for other investments are considered to be their cost as they are redeemed at par value.

Loans: For variable-rate loans that re-price frequently and with no significant change in credit risk, fair value is based on carrying amounts. The fair value of other loans (for example, fixed-rate commercial real estate loans, mortgage loans, and industrial loans) is estimated using discounted cash flow analysis, based on interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality. Loan fair value estimates include judgments regarding future expected loss experience and risk characteristics. The method of estimating fair value does not incorporate the exit-price concept of fair value as prescribed by ASC 820 and generally produces a higher value than an exit-price approach. The measurement of the fair value of loans is classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

95

Mortgage loans held for sale: Loans are committed to be delivered to investors on a “best efforts delivery” basis within 30 days of origination. Due to this short turn-around time, the carrying amounts of the Company’s loan purchase agreements with investors approximate their fair values.

Derivatives: The fair value of the derivative agreements are estimated by a third party using inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data. As part of the Company’s procedures, the price provided from the third party is evaluated for reasonableness given market changes. These measurements are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

Deposits: The fair value disclosed for demand deposits is, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date (that is, their carrying amounts). The carrying amounts of variable-rate, fixed-term money market accounts and certificates of deposit approximate their fair values. Fair values for fixed-rate certificates of deposit are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation using interest rates currently offered for deposits with similar remaining maturities. The fair value of the Company’s time deposits do not take into consideration the value of the Company’s long-term relationships with depositors, which may have significant value. Measurements of the fair value of certificates of deposit are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

Other borrowings: The fair value of other borrowings are estimated using discounted cash flow analysis, based on interest rates currently being offered by the Federal Home Loan Bank for borrowings of similar terms as those being valued. These measurements are classified within Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.

Subordinated debentures: The fair value of subordinated debentures are estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis, based on interest rates currently being offered on the best alternative debt available at the measurement date. These measurements are classified within Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.

Loan commitments: The fair values of the Company’s off-balance sheet financial instruments are based on fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements. Since the majority of the Company’s other off-balance-sheet instruments consist of non-fee-producing, variable-rate commitments, the Company has determined they do not have a distinguishable fair value.

The carrying amount, estimated fair value and placement in the fair value hierarchy of the Company’s financial instruments as of December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 are presented in the following table. This table includes those financial assets and liabilities that are not measured and reported at fair value on a recurring basis or nonrecurring basis.

96

The Company’s financial assets and financial liabilities which are carried at fair value were as follows:.

	December 31,
	2012				2011
	Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Fair Value
	(In Thousands)
Financial Assets:
Level 2 Inputs:
Debt securities available for sale	$	233,877	$	233,877	$	293,809	$	293,809
Debt securities held to maturity		25,967		27,350		15,209		15,999
Restricted equity securities		3,941		3,941		3,501		3,501
Mortgage loans held for sale		25,826		25,826		17,859		17,859
Bank owned life insurance contracts		57,014		57,014		40,390		40,390
Derivatives		389		389		626		626
Level 3 Inputs:
Loans, net	$	2,336,924	$	2,327,780	$	1,808,712	$	1,811,612
Financial Liabilities:
Level 2 Inputs:
Deposits	$	2,511,572	$	2,516,320	$	2,143,887	$	2,150,308
Other borrowings		19,917		19,917		4,954		5,377
Subordinated debentures		15,050		15,050		30,514		27,402
Derivatives		389		389		617		617

NOTE 23.             PARENT COMPANY FINANCIAL INFORMATION

The following information presents the condensed balance sheet of the Company as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 and the condensed statements of income and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010.

BALANCE SHEETS DECEMBER 31, 2012 AND 2011

(In Thousands)

	2012		2011
ASSETS
Cash and due from banks	$	3,264	$	2,908
Investment in subsidiary		265,229		223,753
Other assets		18		293
Total assets	$	268,511	$	226,954
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Liabilities:
Other borrowings	$	19,917	$	-
Subordinated debentures		15,050		30,514
Other liabilities		287		148
Total liabilities		35,254		30,662
Stockholders' equity:
Preferred stock, Series A Senior Non-Cumulative Perpetual, par value $.001 (liquidation preference $1,000), net of discount; 40,000 shares authorized, 40,000 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2012 and no shares authorized, issued and outstanding at December 31, 2011		39,958		39,958
Common stock, par value $.001 per share; 50,000,000 shares authorized; 6,268,812 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2012 and 5,932,182 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2011		6		6
Additional paid-in capital		93,505		87,805
Retained earnings		92,492		61,581
Accumulated other comprehensive income		7,296		6,942
Total stockholders' equity		233,257		196,292
Total liabilites and stockholders' equity	$	268,511	$	226,954

97

STATEMENTS OF INCOME

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,

(In Thousands)

	2012			2011			2010
Income:
Dividends received from subsidiary	$	-		$	800		$	1,230
Other income		41			43			42
Total income		41			843			1,272
Interest on borrowings		2,213			2,345			2,236
Other operating expenses		325			291			295
Total expenses		2,538			2,636			2,531
undistributed earnings of subsidiary		(2,497	)		(1,793	)		(1,259	)
Income tax benefit		(944	)		(976	)		(924	)
earnings of subsidiary		(1,553	)		(817	)		(335	)
Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiary		35,998			24,255			17,713
Net income		34,445			23,438			17,378
Dividends on preferred stock		400			200			-
Net income available to common stockholders	$	34,045		$	23,238		$	17,378

STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,

(In Thousands)

	2012			2011			2010
Operating activities
Net income	$	34,445		$	23,438		$	17,378
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used in operating activities:
Other		878			(50	)		241
Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiary		(35,998	)		(24,255	)		(17,713	)
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities		(675	)		(867	)		(94	)
Investing activities
Investment in subsidiary		-			(46,200	)		(15,000	)
Net cash used in investing activities		-			(46,200	)		(15,000	)
Financing activities
Proceeds from other borrowings		19,917			-			-
Repayment of subordinated debentures		(15,464	)		-			-
Proceeds from issuance of subordinated debentures		-			-			15,050
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock		-			39,958			-
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		112			10,166			-
Dividends on preferred stock		(400	)		(200	)		-
Dividends on common stock		(3,134	)		-			-
Net cash provided by financing activities		1,031			49,924			15,050
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents	$	356		$	2,857		$	(44	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year		2,908			51			95
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year	$	3,264		$	2,908		$	51

QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)

The following table sets forth certain unaudited quarterly financial data derived from our consolidated financial statements. Such data is only a summary and should be read in conjunction with our historical consolidated financial statements and related notes continued in this annual report on Form 10-K.

98

	2012 Quarter Ended
	(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
	March 31		June 30		September 30		December 31
Interest income	$	25,571	$	26,654	$	27,743	$	29,055
Interest expense		3,833		3,749		3,695		3,624
Net interest income		21,738		22,905		24,048		25,431
Provision for loan losses		2,383		3,083		1,185		2,449
Net income available to common stockholders		8,155		8,231		9,202		8,457
Net income per common share, basic	$	1.37	$	1.38	$	1.53	$	1.40
Net income per common share, diluted	$	1.20	$	1.21	$	1.35	$	1.23

	2011 Quarter Ended
	(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
	March 31		June 30		September 30		December 31
Interest income	$	20,961	$	22,080	$	23,312	$	25,058
Interest expense		3,985		4,032		4,093		3,970
Net interest income		16,976		18,048		19,219		21,088
Provision for loan losses		2,231		1,494		2,740		2,507
Net income available to common stockholders		4,871		5,845		6,035		6,487
Net income per common share, basic	$	0.88	$	1.02	$	1.03	$	1.10
Net income per common share, diluted	$	0.77	$	0.89	$	0.90	$	0.97

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.

There were no changes in or disagreements with accountants regarding accounting and financial disclosure matters during the year ended December 31, 2012.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, under supervision and with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined under Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e). Based upon that evaluation of these disclosure controls and procedures, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2012.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

The Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in the evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures that occurred during the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2012, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined under Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 14d-14(f). Our internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

As of December 31, 2012, management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting established in “Internal Control – Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (COSO) of the Treadway Commission. Based on the assessment, management determined that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012, based on those criteria.

99

The effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012, has been audited by KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report herein — “Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.”

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION.

None.

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.

We respond to this Item by incorporating by reference the material responsive to this Item in our definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with our 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Information regarding the Company’s executive officers is provided in Part I, Item 1 of the Form 10-K.

Code of Ethics

Our Board of Directors has adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to all of our employees, officers and directors. The Code of Ethics covers compliance with law; fair and honest dealings with us, with competitors and with others; fair and honest disclosure to the public; and procedures for compliance with the Code of Ethics. A copy of the Code of Ethics is included as Exhibit 14 to this Form 10-K.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

We respond to this Item by incorporating by reference the material responsive to this Item in our definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with our 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.

We respond to this Item by incorporating by reference the material responsive to this Item in our definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with our 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The information called for by this item relating to “Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans” is provided in Part II, Item 5 of this Form 10-K.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE.

We respond to this Item by incorporating by reference the material responsive to this Item in our definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with our 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES.

We respond to this Item by incorporating by reference the material responsive to this Item in our definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with our 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

100

PART IV

ITEM 15. FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND EXHIBITS

(a) The following statements are filed as a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K

	Page
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Consolidated Financial Statements	58
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Consolidated Financial Statements	59
Report of Management on Internal Control over Financial Reporting	60
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control over Financial Reporting	61
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2012 and 2011	62
Consolidated Statements of Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010	63
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010	64
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010	65
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010	66
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	67

(b) The following exhibits are furnished with this Annual Report on Form 10-K

EXHIBIT NO.	NAME OF EXHIBIT
2.1	Plan of Reorganization and Agreement of Merger dated August 29, 2007 (1)
3.1	Certificate of Incorporation, as amended (2)
3.2	Bylaws (1)
4.1	Form of Common Stock Certificate (1)
4.2	Revised Form of Common Stock Certificate (3)
4.3	Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant dated September 2, 2008 (4)
4.4	Warrant to Purchase Share of Common Stock dated June 23, 2009 (7)
4.5	Amended and Restated Trust Agreement of ServisFirst Capital Trust II, dated March 15, 2010 (8)
4.6	Indenture dated March 15, 2010, by and between ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. and Wilmington Trust Company (8)
4.7	Preferred Securities Guaranty Agreement, dated March 15, 2010, by and between ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. and Wilmington Trust Company (8)
4.8	Small Business Fund - Securities Purchase Agreement dated June 21, 2011 between the Secretary of the Treasury and ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. (9)
4.9	Certificate of Designation of Senior Non-cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series A of ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. (9)
4.1	Note Purchase Agreement, dated November 9, 2012, between ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. and certain accredited investors (10)
4.11	Form of 5.50% Subordinated Note due November 9, 2022 (10)

101

10.1	2005 Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan (1)*
10.2	Change in Control Agreement with William M. Foshee date May 20, 2005 (1)*
10.3	Change in Control Agreement with Clarence C. Pouncey III date June 6, 2006 (1)*
10.4	Employment Agreement of Andrew N. Kattos dated April 27, 2006 (1)*
10.5	Employment Agreement of G. Carlton Barker dated February 1, 2007 (1)*
10.6	2009 Stock Incentive Plan (5)*
11	Statement Regarding Computation of Earnings Per Share is included herein at Note 20 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8.
14	Code of Ethics for Principal Financial Officers (6)
21	List of Subsidiaries
23.1	Consent of KPMG LLP
23.2	Consent of Mauldin & Jenkins
24	Power of Attorney
31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)
32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
101.INS	XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH	XBRL Schema Documents
101.CAL	XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document
101.LAB	XBRL Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE	XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document
101.DEF	XBRL Definition Linkbase Document

(1) Previously filed as an exhibit to ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc.'s Registration Statement on Form 10, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 28, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.

(2) Previously filed as Exhibit 3.01 of ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2012, and incorporated herein by reference.

(3) Previously filed as an exhibit to ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 15, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.

(4) Previously filed as an exhibit to ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 2, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.

(5) Previously filed as an exhibit to ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc.'s Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A relating to the 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and incorporated herein by reference.

(6) Previously filed as an exhibit to ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.

102

(7) Previously filed as an exhibit to ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference.

(8) Previously filed as an exhibit to ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 15, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference.

(9) Previously filed as an exhibit to ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 21, 2011, and incorporated herein by reference.

(10) Previously filed as an exhibit to ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 8, 2012, and incorporated herein by reference.

* Management contract or compensatory plan arrangements.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

SERVISFIRST BANCSHARES, INC.
By:	/s/Thomas A. Broughton, III
	Thomas A. Broughton, III
	President and Chief Executive Officer

Dated: March 12, 2013

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.

Signature	Title	Date
/s/Thomas A. Broughton, III	President, Chief Executive	March 12, 2013
Thomas A. Broughton, III	Officer and Director (Principal
	Executive Officer)
/s/ William M. Foshee	Executive Vice President	March 12, 2013
William M. Foshee	and Chief Financial Officer
	(Principal Financial Officer and
	Principal Accounting Officer)
*	Chairman of the Board	March 12, 2013
Stanley M. Brock
*	Director	March 12, 2013
Michael D. Fuller
*	Director	March 12, 2013
James J. Filler
*	Director	March 12, 2013
Joseph R. Cashio
*	Director	March 12, 2013
Hatton C. V. Smith

________________

*The undersigned, acting pursuant to a Power of Attorney, has signed this Annual Report on Form 10-K for and on behalf of the persons indicated above as such persons’ true and lawful attorney-in-fact and in their names, places and stated, in the capacities indicated above and on the date indicated below.

103

/s/ William M. Foshee

William M. Foshee

Attorney-in-Fact

March 12, 2013

EXHIBIT INDEX 

(b) The following exhibits are furnished with this Annual Report on Form 10-K

EXHIBIT NO.	NAME OF EXHIBIT
21	List of Subsidiaries
23.1	Consent of KPMG LLP
23.2	Consent of Mauldin & Jenkins
24	Power of Attorney
31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)
32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
101.INS	XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH	XBRL Schema Documents
101.CAL	XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document
101.LAB	XBRL Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE	XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document
101.DEF	XBRL Definition Linkbase Document

104

EX-21

List of Subsidiaries

Subsidiaries	Jurisdiction or State of Incorporation
ServisFirst Bank (1)	Alabama
ServisFirst Capital Trust II (2)	Delaware
SF Holding 1, Inc. (3)	Alabama
SF Realty 1, Inc. (4)	Alabama

(1) ServisFirst Bank is organized under the laws of the State of Alabama and is a wholly-owned subsidiary of ServisFirst

Bancshares, Inc.

(2) ServisFirst Capital Trust II is a statutory business trust which was established to issue capital trust preferred securities and is a

wholly-owned subsidiary of ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc.

(3) SF Holding 1, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of ServisFirst Bank

(4) SF Realty 1, Inc. is a wholly owned-subsidiary of SF Holding 1, Inc.

EX-23.1

Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-170507) on Form S-8 of ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. of our reports dated March 12, 2013, with respect to the consolidated Balance Sheets of ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years then ended, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012, which reports appear in the December 31, 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K of ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Birmingham, Alabama

March 12, 2013

EX-23.2

Exhibit 23.2

Exhibit 23: Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-170507) of ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. of our report dated March 8, 2011, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

Birmingham, Alabama

March 12, 2013

EX-24

EXHIBIT 24

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes Thomas A. Broughton III and William M. Foshee, and each of them, his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities to sign on his behalf the ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.

Hereby executed by the following persons in the capacities indicated on February 28, 2013, in Birmingham, Alabama.

Name	Title
/s/ Stanley M. Brock	Chairman of the Board
Stanley M. Brock
/s/ Joseph R. Cashio	Director
Joseph R. Cashio
/s/ James J. Filler	Director
James J. Filler
/s/ Michael D. Fuller	Director
Michael D. Fuller
/s/ Hatton C.V. Smith	Director
Hatton C.V. Smith

EX-31.1

Exhibit 31.1

Section 302 Certification of the CEO

I, Thomas A. Broughton III, certify that:

1.                I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc.;

2.                Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.                Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this report fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.                The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for the registrant and have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report, based on such evaluation; and

(d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.                The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or person’s performing the equivalent functions):

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 12, 2013

/s/ Thomas A. Broughton III

Thomas A. Broughton III

President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

EX-31.2

Exhibit 31.2

Section 302 Certification of the CFO

I, William M. Foshee, certify that:

1.                I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc.;

2.                Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.                Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this report fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.                The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for the registrant and have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report, based on such evaluation; and

(d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.                The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 12, 2013

/s/William M. Foshee

William M. Foshee

Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request

EX-32.1

Exhibit 32.1

Section 906 Certification of the CEO

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) certifies that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

Date: March 12, 2013	/s/Thomas A. Broughton III
	Thomas A. Broughton III
	President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

EX-32.2

Exhibit 32.2

Section 906 Certification of the CFO

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) certifies that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

Date: March 12, 2013	/s/William M. Foshee
	William M. Foshee
	Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

XML

EMPLOYEE AND DIRECTOR BENEFITS (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Assumptions Used To Estimates Fair Value Of Stock Option Award Using Black Scholes Merton Valuation Model

2012		2011		2010
Expected volatility	19.80	%	26.50	%	26.00	%
Expected dividends	-	%	0.37	%	-	%
Expected term (in years)	6.5		6.5		7.0
Risk-free rate	1.05	%	2.21	%	2.10	%

Summary Of Stock Option Activity

The following tables summarize stock option activity.:

	Shares			Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (years)		Aggregate Intrinsic Value
								(In Thousands)
Year Ended December 31, 2012:
Outstanding at beginning of year		1,073,800		$	18.33		6.0	$	12,508
Granted		45,500			30.00		9.3		130
Exercised		(288,130	)		12.71		2.4		5,846
Forfeited		(14,670	)		24.54		-		-
Outstanding at end of year		816,500		$	20.87		5.8	$	9,905
Exercisable at December 31, 2012		412,825		$	14.03		3.6	$	7,831
Year Ended December 31, 2011:
Outstanding at beginning of year		881,000		$	15.65		6.9	$	8,238
Granted		233,500			27.16		9.3		-
Exercised		(40,700	)		10.53		3.8		792
Forfeited		-			15.00		-		-
Outstanding at end of year		1,073,800		$	18.33		6.0	$	12,508
Exercisable at December 31, 2011		442,940		$	13.19		4.4	$	7,447
Year Ended December 31, 2010:
Outstanding at beginning of year		863,500		$	15.17		6.8	$	8,483
Granted		37,500			25.00		9.4		-
Exercised		(10,000	)		10.00		-		150
Forfeited		(10,000	)		15.00		-		-
Outstanding at end of year		881,000		$	15.65		6.9	$	8,238
Exercisable at December 31, 2010		272,627		$	11.96		5.1	$	3,555

Summary Of Stock Option Exercisable

Exercisable options at December 31, 2012 were as follows:

Range of Exercise Price		Shares		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (years)		Aggregate Intrinsic Value
								(In Thousands)
$	10.00		106,500	$	10.00		2.4	$	2,450
	11.00		119,500		11.00		3.3		2,629
	15.00		101,830		15.00		3.9		1,833
	20.00		47,995		20.00		4.8		624
	25.00		37,000		25.00		5.7		296
			412,825	$	14.03		3.6	$	7,832

XML

Analysis of Allowance For Loan Losses By Portfolio Segment (Detail) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	12 Months Ended						12 Months Ended			12 Months Ended			12 Months Ended			12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010	Dec. 31, 2012 Commercial Financial and Agricultural Financing Receivable [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Commercial Financial and Agricultural Financing Receivable [Member]	Dec. 31, 2009 Commercial Financial and Agricultural Financing Receivable [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Commercial Real Estate Construction Financing Receivable [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Commercial Real Estate Construction Financing Receivable [Member]	Dec. 31, 2009 Commercial Real Estate Construction Financing Receivable [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Residential Real Estate Mortgage Loans [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Residential Real Estate Mortgage Loans [Member]	Dec. 31, 2009 Residential Real Estate Mortgage Loans [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Consumer Portfolio Segment [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Consumer Portfolio Segment [Member]	Dec. 31, 2009 Consumer Portfolio Segment [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Qualitative Factors (Member)	Dec. 31, 2011 Qualitative Factors (Member)
Allowance for loan losses:
Balance, beginning of year	$ 22,030	$ 18,077	$ 14,737	$ 6,627	$ 5,348	$ 3,135	$ 6,542	$ 6,373	$ 6,295	$ 3,295	$ 2,443	$ 2,102	$ 531	$ 749	$ 115	$ 5,035	$ 3,164
Chargeoffs	(5,755)	(5,653)	(7,208)	(1,106)	(1,096)		(3,088)	(2,594)		(660)	(1,096)		(901)	(867)		0	0
Recoveries	883	634	198	125	361		58	180		692	12		8	81		0	0
Provision	9,100	8,972	10,350	2,587	2,014		2,999	2,583		1,585	1,936		561	568		1,368	1,871
Balance, end of year	26,258	22,030	18,077	8,233	6,627	3,135	6,511	6,542	6,295	4,912	3,295	2,102	199	531	115	6,403	5,035
Individually Evaluated for Impairment	3,511	4,181		577	1,382		1,013	1,533		1,921	941		0	325		0	0
Collectively Evaluated for Impairment	22,747	17,849		7,656	5,245		5,498	5,009		2,991	2,354		199	206		6,403	5,035
Ending Balance	2,363,182	1,830,742		1,030,990	799,464		158,361	151,218		1,127,549	839,034		46,282	41,026		0	0
Individually Evaluated for Impairment	37,394	37,253		3,910	5,578		14,422	16,262		18,927	14,866		135	547		0	0
Collectively Evaluated for Impairment	$ 2,325,788	$ 1,793,489		$ 1,027,080	$ 793,886		$ 143,939	$ 134,956		$ 1,108,622	$ 824,168		$ 46,147	$ 40,479		$ 0	$ 0

XML

Amortized Cost And Fair Value Of Available For Sale And Held To Maturity Securities (Detail) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Securities available for sale
Amortized Cost	$ 222,654	$ 282,648
Gross Unrealized Gain	11,345	11,255
Gross Unrealized Loss	(122)	(94)
Market Value	233,877	293,809
Securities held to maturity
Amortized Cost	25,967	15,209
Gross Unrealized Gain	1,423	790
Gross Unrealized Loss	(40)	0
Market Value	27,350	15,999
Us Treasury and Government [Member]
Securities available for sale
Amortized Cost	27,360	98,169
Gross Unrealized Gain	1,026	1,512
Gross Unrealized Loss	0	(59)
Market Value	28,386	99,622
Collateralized Mortgage Backed Securities [Member]
Securities available for sale
Amortized Cost	69,298	88,118
Gross Unrealized Gain	4,168	4,462
Gross Unrealized Loss	0	0
Market Value	73,466	92,580
Securities held to maturity
Amortized Cost	20,429	9,676
Gross Unrealized Gain	768	410
Gross Unrealized Loss	(40)	0
Market Value	21,157	10,086
Us States and Political Subdivisions Debt Securities [Member]
Securities available for sale
Amortized Cost	112,319	95,331
Gross Unrealized Gain	5,941	5,230
Gross Unrealized Loss	(83)	(35)
Market Value	118,177	100,526
Securities held to maturity
Amortized Cost	5,538	5,533
Gross Unrealized Gain	655	380
Gross Unrealized Loss	0	0
Market Value	6,193	5,913
Corporate Debt Securities [Member]
Securities available for sale
Amortized Cost	13,677	1,030
Gross Unrealized Gain	210	51
Gross Unrealized Loss	(39)	0
Market Value	$ 13,848	$ 1,081

XML

FEDERAL FUNDS PURCHASED - Additional Information (Detail) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	Nov. 08, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Dec. 31, 2012 Federal Funds Purchased [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Federal Funds Purchased [Member]
Short-term Debt			$ 117.1	$ 79.3
Debt Instrument, Interest Rate, Stated Percentage	8.50%		0.25%
Line of Credit, Current		$ 140	$ 130

XML

Loans By Credit Quality Indicator (Detail) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Statement [Line Items]
Loans	$ 2,363,182	$ 1,830,742
Commercial Financial and Agricultural Financing Receivable [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Loans	1,030,990	799,464
Commercial Real Estate Construction Financing Receivable [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Loans	158,361	151,218
Commercial Mortgage Loans Owner Occupied [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Loans	568,041	398,601
One To Four Family Mortgage Loans [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Loans	235,909	205,182
Other Real Estate Mortgage Loans [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Loans	323,599	235,251
Residential Real Estate Mortgage Loans [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Loans	1,127,549	839,034
Consumer Portfolio Segment [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Loans	46,282	41,026
Pass [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Loans	2,262,448	1,742,205
Pass [Member] | Commercial Financial and Agricultural Financing Receivable [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Loans	1,004,043	780,270
Pass [Member] | Commercial Real Estate Construction Financing Receivable [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Loans	121,168	117,244
Pass [Member] | Commercial Mortgage Loans Owner Occupied [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Loans	555,536	385,084
Pass [Member] | One To Four Family Mortgage Loans [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Loans	223,152	194,447
Pass [Member] | Other Real Estate Mortgage Loans [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Loans	312,473	224,807
Pass [Member] | Residential Real Estate Mortgage Loans [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Loans	1,091,161	804,338
Pass [Member] | Consumer Portfolio Segment [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Loans	46,076	40,353
Special Mention [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Loans	59,209	45,545
Special Mention [Member] | Commercial Financial and Agricultural Financing Receivable [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Loans	19,172	11,775
Special Mention [Member] | Commercial Real Estate Construction Financing Receivable [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Loans	22,771	14,472
Special Mention [Member] | Commercial Mortgage Loans Owner Occupied [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Loans	4,142	7,333
Special Mention [Member] | One To Four Family Mortgage Loans [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Loans	6,379	4,835
Special Mention [Member] | Other Real Estate Mortgage Loans [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Loans	6,674	7,034
Special Mention [Member] | Residential Real Estate Mortgage Loans [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Loans	17,195	19,202
Special Mention [Member] | Consumer Portfolio Segment [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Loans	71	96
Substandard [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Loans	41,525	42,992
Substandard [Member] | Commercial Financial and Agricultural Financing Receivable [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Loans	7,775	7,419
Substandard [Member] | Commercial Real Estate Construction Financing Receivable [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Loans	14,422	19,502
Substandard [Member] | Commercial Mortgage Loans Owner Occupied [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Loans	8,363	6,184
Substandard [Member] | One To Four Family Mortgage Loans [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Loans	6,378	5,900
Substandard [Member] | Other Real Estate Mortgage Loans [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Loans	4,452	3,410
Substandard [Member] | Residential Real Estate Mortgage Loans [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Loans	19,193	15,494
Substandard [Member] | Consumer Portfolio Segment [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Loans	135	577
Doubtful [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Loans	0	0
Doubtful [Member] | Commercial Financial and Agricultural Financing Receivable [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Loans	0	0
Doubtful [Member] | Commercial Real Estate Construction Financing Receivable [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Loans	0	0
Doubtful [Member] | Commercial Mortgage Loans Owner Occupied [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Loans	0	0
Doubtful [Member] | One To Four Family Mortgage Loans [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Loans	0	0
Doubtful [Member] | Other Real Estate Mortgage Loans [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Loans	0	0
Doubtful [Member] | Residential Real Estate Mortgage Loans [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Loans	0	0
Doubtful [Member] | Consumer Portfolio Segment [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Loans	$ 0	$ 0

XML

COMMON STOCK - Additional Information (Detail) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2011
Stock Issued During Period, Shares, New Issues	340,000
Proceeds from Issuance of Private Placement	$ 10,159,000
Stock Offering Cost	$ 33,000
Director [Member]
Stock Issued During Period, Shares, New Issues	33,900
Private Placement [Member]
Stock Issued During Period, Shares, New Issues	340,000
Share Price	$ 30

XML

PARENT COMPANY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Condensed Financial Information Of Parent Company Only Disclosure [Abstract]

Balance Sheet

BALANCE SHEETS DECEMBER 31, 2012 AND 2011

(In Thousands)

	2012		2011
ASSETS
Cash and due from banks	$	3,264	$	2,908
Investment in subsidiary		265,229		223,753
Other assets		18		293
Total assets	$	268,511	$	226,954
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Liabilities:
Other borrowings	$	19,917	$	-
Subordinated debentures		15,050		30,514
Other liabilities		287		148
Total liabilities		35,254		30,662
Stockholders' equity:
Preferred stock, Series A Senior Non-Cumulative Perpetual, par value $.001 (liquidation preference $1,000), net of discount; 40,000 shares authorized, 40,000 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2012 and no shares authorized, issued and outstanding at December 31, 2011		39,958		39,958
Common stock, par value $.001 per share; 50,000,000 shares authorized; 6,268,812 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2012 and 5,932,182 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2011		6		6
Additional paid-in capital		93,505		87,805
Retained earnings		92,492		61,581
Accumulated other comprehensive income		7,296		6,942
Total stockholders' equity		233,257		196,292
Total liabilites and stockholders' equity	$	268,511	$	226,954

Statements Of Income

STATEMENTS OF INCOME

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,

(In Thousands)

	2012			2011			2010
Income:
Dividends received from subsidiary	$	-		$	800		$	1,230
Other income		41			43			42
Total income		41			843			1,272
Interest on borrowings		2,213			2,345			2,236
Other operating expenses		325			291			295
Total expenses		2,538			2,636			2,531
undistributed earnings of subsidiary		(2,497	)		(1,793	)		(1,259	)
Income tax benefit		(944	)		(976	)		(924	)
earnings of subsidiary		(1,553	)		(817	)		(335	)
Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiary		35,998			24,255			17,713
Net income		34,445			23,438			17,378
Dividends on preferred stock		400			200			-
Net income available to common stockholders	$	34,045		$	23,238		$	17,378

Statement Of Cash Flows

STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,

(In Thousands)

	2012			2011			2010
Operating activities
Net income	$	34,445		$	23,438		$	17,378
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used in operating activities:
Other		878			(50	)		241
Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiary		(35,998	)		(24,255	)		(17,713	)
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities		(675	)		(867	)		(94	)
Investing activities
Investment in subsidiary		-			(46,200	)		(15,000	)
Net cash used in investing activities		-			(46,200	)		(15,000	)
Financing activities
Proceeds from other borrowings		19,917			-			-
Repayment of subordinated debentures		(15,464	)		-			-
Proceeds from issuance of subordinated debentures		-			-			15,050
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock		-			39,958			-
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		112			10,166			-
Dividends on preferred stock		(400	)		(200	)		-
Dividends on common stock		(3,134	)		-			-
Net cash provided by financing activities		1,031			49,924			15,050
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents	$	356		$	2,857		$	(44	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year		2,908			51			95
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year	$	3,264		$	2,908		$	51

Schedule of Quarterly Financial Information

QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)

The following table sets forth certain unaudited quarterly financial data derived from our consolidated financial statements. Such data is only a summary and should be read in conjunction with our historical consolidated financial statements and related notes continued in this annual report on Form 10-K.

	2012 Quarter Ended
	(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
	March 31		June 30		September 30		December 31
Interest income	$	25,571	$	26,654	$	27,743	$	29,055
Interest expense		3,833		3,749		3,695		3,624
Net interest income		21,738		22,905		24,048		25,431
Provision for loan losses		2,383		3,083		1,185		2,449
Net income available to common stockholders		8,155		8,231		9,202		8,457
Net income per common share, basic	$	1.37	$	1.38	$	1.53	$	1.40
Net income per common share, diluted	$	1.20	$	1.21	$	1.35	$	1.23

	2011 Quarter Ended
	(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
	March 31		June 30		September 30		December 31
Interest income	$	20,961	$	22,080	$	23,312	$	25,058
Interest expense		3,985		4,032		4,093		3,970
Net interest income		16,976		18,048		19,219		21,088
Provision for loan losses		2,231		1,494		2,740		2,507
Net income available to common stockholders		4,871		5,845		6,035		6,487
Net income per common share, basic	$	0.88	$	1.02	$	1.03	$	1.10
Net income per common share, diluted	$	0.77	$	0.89	$	0.90	$	0.97

XML

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Policies)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Summaryofsignificantaccountingpoliciespolicies [Abstract]

Nature of Operations

Nature of Operations

ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) was formed on August 16, 2007 and is a bank holding company whose business is conducted by its wholly-owned subsidiary ServisFirst Bank (the “Bank”). The Bank is headquartered in Birmingham, Alabama, and provides a full range of banking services to individual and corporate customers throughout the Birmingham market since opening for business in May 2005. The Bank has since expanded into the Huntsville, Montgomery and Dothan, Alabama markets, and most recently into the Mobile, Alabama and Pensacola, Florida markets. The Bank has a subsidiary, SF Holding 1, Inc., which has a subsidiary, SF Realty 1, Inc., which operates as a real estate investment trust. More details about SF Holding 1, Inc. and SF Realty 1, Inc. are included in Note 10.

Basis of Presentation and Accounting Estimates

Basis of Presentation and Accounting Estimates

To prepare consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, management makes estimates and assumptions based on available information. These estimates and assumptions affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and the disclosures provided, and future results could differ. The allowance for loan losses, valuation of foreclosed real estate, deferred taxes, and fair values of financial instruments are particularly subject to change. All numbers are in thousands except share and per share data.

Cash, Due from Banks, Interest-Bearing Balances due from Financial Institutions

Cash, Due from Banks, Interest-Bearing Balances due from Financial Institutions

Cash and due from banks includes cash on hand, cash items in process of collection, amounts due from banks and interest bearing balances due from financial institutions. For purposes of cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include cash and due from banks and federal funds sold. Generally, federal funds are purchased and sold for one-day periods. Cash flows from loans, mortgage loans held for sale, federal funds sold, and deposits are reported net.

The Bank is required to maintain reserve balances in cash or on deposit with the Federal Reserve Bank based on a percentage of deposits. The total of those reserve balances was approximately $16.0 million at December 31, 2012 and $7.5 million at December 31, 2011.

Debt Securities

Debt Securities

Securities are classified as available-for-sale when they might be sold before maturity. Unrealized holding gains and losses, net of tax, on securities available for sale are reported as a net amount in a separate component of stockholders’ equity until realized. Gains and losses on the sale of securities available for sale are determined using the specific-identification method. The amortization of premiums and the accretion of discounts are recognized in interest income using methods approximating the interest method over the period to maturity.

Declines in the fair value of available-for-sale securities below their cost that are deemed to be other than temporary are reflected in earnings as realized losses. Securities are classified as held-to-maturity when the Company has the positive intent and ability to hold the securities to maturity. Held-to-maturity securities are reported at amortized cost. In determining the existence of other-than-temporary impairment losses, management considers (1) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, and (3) the intent and ability of the Company to retain its investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value.

Investments in Restricted Equity Securities Carried at Cost

Investments in Restricted Equity Securities Carried at Cost

Investments in restricted equity securities without a readily determinable market value are carried at cost.

Mortgage Loans Held for Sale

Mortgage Loans Held for Sale

The Company classifies certain residential mortgage loans as held for sale. Typically mortgage loans held for sale are sold to a third party investor within a very short time period. The loans are sold without recourse and servicing is not retained. Net fees earned from this banking service are recorded in noninterest income.

In the course of originating mortgage loans and selling those loans in the secondary market, the Company makes various representations and warranties to the purchaser of the mortgage loans. Every loan closed by the Bank’s mortgage center is run through a government agency automated underwriting system. Any exceptions noted during this process are remedied prior to sale. These representations and warranties also apply to underwriting the real estate appraisal opinion of value for the collateral securing these loans. Under the representations and warranties, failure by the Company to comply with the underwriting and/or appraisal standards could result in the Company being required to repurchase the mortgage loan or to reimburse the investor for losses incurred (make whole requests) if such failure cannot be cured by the Company within the specified period following discovery. The Company continues to experience a manageable level of investor repurchase demands. There were no expenses incurred as part of these buyback obligations for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011.

Loans

Loans

Loans are reported at unpaid principal balances, less unearned fees and the allowance for loan losses. Interest on all loans is recognized as income based upon the applicable rate applied to the daily outstanding principal balance of the loans. Interest income on nonaccrual loans is recognized on a cash basis or cost recovery basis until the loan is returned to accrual status. Loan fees, net of direct costs, are reflected as an adjustment to the yield of the related loan over the term of the loan. The Company does not have a concentration of loans to any one industry or geographic market.

The accrual of interest on loans is discontinued when there is a significant deterioration in the financial condition of the borrower and full repayment of principal and interest is not expected or the principal or interest is more than 90 days past due, unless the loan is both well-collateralized and in the process of collection. Generally, all interest accrued but not collected for loans that are placed on nonaccrual status are reversed against current interest income. Interest collections on nonaccrual loans are generally applied as principal reductions. The Company determines past due or delinquency status of a loan based on contractual payment terms.

A loan is considered impaired when it is probable the Company will be unable to collect all principal and interest payments due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Individually identified impaired loans are measured based on the present value of expected payments using the loan’s original effective rate as the discount rate, the loan’s observable market price, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. If the recorded investment in the impaired loan exceeds the measure of fair value, a valuation allowance may be established as part of the allowance for loan losses. Changes to the valuation allowance are recorded as a component of the provision for loan losses.

Impaired loans also include troubled debt restructurings (“TDRs”). In the normal course of business management grants concessions to borrowers, which would not otherwise be considered, where the borrowers are experiencing financial difficulty. The concessions granted most frequently for TDRs involve reductions or delays in required payments of principal and interest for a specified time, the rescheduling of payments in accordance with a bankruptcy plan or the charge-off of a portion of the loan. In some cases, the conditions of the credit also warrant nonaccrual status, even after the restructure occurs. As part of the credit approval process, the restructured loans are evaluated for adequate collateral protection in determining the appropriate accrual status at the time of restructure. TDR loans may be returned to accrual status if there has been at least a six month sustained period of repayment performance by the borrower.

Allowance for Loan Losses

Allowance for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level which, in management’s judgment, is adequate to absorb credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio. The amount of the allowance is based on management’s evaluation of the collectability of the loan portfolio, including the nature of the portfolio, credit concentrations, trends in historical loss experience, specific impaired loans, economic conditions, and other risks inherent in the portfolio. Allowances for impaired loans are generally determined based on collateral values or the present value of the estimated cash flows. The allowance is increased by a provision for loan losses, which is charged to expense, and reduced by charge-offs, net of recoveries. In addition, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the allowance for losses on loans. Such agencies may require the Company to recognize adjustments to the allowance based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examination.

Foreclosed Real Estate

Foreclosed Real Estate

Foreclosed real estate includes both formally foreclosed property and in-substance foreclosed property. At the time of foreclosure, foreclosed real estate is recorded at fair value less cost to sell, which becomes the property’s new basis. Any write downs based on the asset’s fair value at date of acquisition are charged to the allowance for loan losses. After foreclosure, these assets are carried at the lower of their new cost basis or fair value less cost to sell. Costs incurred in maintaining foreclosed real estate and subsequent adjustments to the carrying amount of the property are included in other operating expenses.

Premises and Equipment

Premises and Equipment

Premises and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Expenditures for additions and major improvements that significantly extend the useful lives of the assets are capitalized. Expenditures for repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as incurred. Assets which are disposed of are removed from the accounts and the resulting gains or losses are recorded in operations. Depreciation is calculated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the related assets (3 to 10 years).

Leasehold improvements are amortized on a straight-line basis over the lesser of the lease terms or the estimated useful lives of the improvements.

Derivatives and Hedging Activities

Derivatives and Hedging Activities

As part of its overall interest rate risk management, the Company uses derivative instruments, which can include interest rate swaps, caps, and floors. Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) ASC 815-10, Derivatives and Hedging, requires all derivative instruments to be carried at fair value on the balance sheet. This accounting standard provides special accounting provisions for derivative instruments that qualify for hedge accounting. To be eligible, the Company must specifically identify a derivative as a hedging instrument and identify the risk being hedged. The derivative instrument must be shown to meet specific requirements under this accounting standard.

The Company designates the derivative on the date the derivative contract is entered into as (1) a hedge of the fair value of a recognized asset or liability or of an unrecognized firm commitment (a “fair-value” hedge) or (2) a hedge of a forecasted transaction of the variability of cash flows to be received or paid related to a recognized asset or liability (a “cash-flow” hedge). Changes in the fair value of a derivative that is highly effective as a fair-value hedge, and that is designated and qualifies as a fair-value hedge, along with the loss or gain on the hedged asset or liability that is attributable to the hedged risk (including losses or gains on firm commitments), are recorded in current-period earnings. The effective portion of the changes in the fair value of a derivative that is highly effective and that is designated and qualifies as a cash-flow hedge is recorded in other comprehensive income, until earnings are affected by the variability of cash flows (e.g., when periodic settlements on a variable-rate asset or liability are recorded in earnings). The remaining gain or loss on the derivative, if any, in excess of the cumulative change in the present value of future cash flows of the hedged item is recognized in earnings.

The Company formally documents all relationships between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as its risk-management objective and strategy for undertaking various hedge transactions. This process includes linking all derivatives that are designated as fair-value or cash-flow hedges to specific assets and liabilities on the balance sheet or to specific firm commitments or forecasted transactions. The Company also formally assessed, both at the hedge’s inception and on an ongoing basis (if the hedges do not qualify for short-cut accounting), whether the derivatives that are used in hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting changes in fair values or cash flows of hedged items. When it is determined that a derivative is not highly effective as a hedge or that it has ceased to be a highly effective hedge, the Company discontinues hedge accounting prospectively, as discussed below. The Company discontinues hedge accounting prospectively when: (1) it is determined that the derivative is no longer effective in offsetting changes in the fair value or cash flows of a hedged item (including firm commitments or forecasted transactions); (2) the derivative expires or is sold, terminated, or exercised; (3) the derivative is re-designated as a hedge instrument, because it is unlikely that a forecasted transaction will occur; (4) a hedged firm commitment no longer meets the definition of a firm commitment; or (5) management determines that designation of the derivative as a hedge instrument is no longer appropriate.

When hedge accounting is discontinued because it is determined that the derivative no longer qualifies as an effective fair-value hedge, hedge accounting is discontinued prospectively and the derivative will continue to be carried on the balance sheet at its fair value with all changes in fair value being recorded in earnings but with no offsetting being recorded on the hedged item or in other comprehensive income for cash flow hedges.

The Company uses derivatives to hedge interest rate exposures associated with mortgage loans held for sale and mortgage loans in process. The Company regularly enters into derivative financial instruments in the form of forward contracts, as part of its normal asset/liability management strategies. The Company’s obligations under forward contracts consist of “best effort” commitments to deliver mortgage loans originated in the secondary market at a future date. Interest rate lock commitments related to loans that are originated for later sale are classified as derivatives. In the normal course of business, the Company regularly extends these rate lock commitments to customers during the loan origination process. The fair values of the Company’s forward contract and rate lock commitments to customers as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 were not material and have not been recorded.

During 2008 the Company entered into interest rate swaps (“swaps”) to facilitate customer transactions and meet their financing needs. Upon entering into these swaps, the Company entered into offsetting positions with a regional correspondent bank in order to minimize the risk to the Company. As of December 31, 2012, the Company was party to two swaps with notional amounts totaling approximately $11.1 million with customers, and two swaps with notional amounts totaling approximately $11.1 million with a regional correspondent bank. These swaps qualify as derivatives, but are not designated as hedging instruments.

Income Taxes

Income Taxes

Income tax expense is the total of the current year income tax due or refundable and the change in deferred tax assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are the expected future tax amounts for the temporary differences between carrying amounts and tax bases of assets and liabilities, computed using enacted tax rates. A valuation allowance, if needed, reduces deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.

Stock-Based Compensation

Stock-Based Compensation

At December 31, 2012, the Company had two stock-based employee compensation plans for grants of equity compensation to key employees. These plans have been accounted for under the provisions of FASB ASC 718-10, Compensation – Stock Compensation. The stock-based employee compensation plans are more fully described in Note 13.

Earnings per Common Share

Earnings per Common Share

Basic earnings per common share are computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per common share include the dilutive effect of additional potential common shares issuable under stock options and warrants.

Loan Commitments and Related Financial Instruments

Loan Commitments and Related Financial Instruments

Financial instruments, which include credit card arrangements, commitments to make loans and standby letters of credit, are issued to meet customer financing needs. The face amount for these items represents the exposure to loss before considering customer collateral or ability to repay. Such financial instruments are recorded when they are funded. Instruments such as stand-by letters of credit are considered financial guarantees in accordance with FASB ASC 460-10. The fair value of these financial guarantees is not material.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Fair values of financial instruments are estimated using relevant market information and other assumptions, as more fully disclosed in Note 22. Fair value estimates involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment regarding interest rates, credit risk, prepayments, and other factors, especially in the absence of broad markets for particular items. Changes in assumptions or in market conditions could significantly affect the estimates.

Comprehensive Income

Comprehensive Income

Comprehensive income consists of net income and other comprehensive income. Accumulated comprehensive income, which is recognized as a separate component of equity, includes unrealized gains and losses on securities available for sale.

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. Advertising expense for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 was $454,000, $406,000 and $313,000, respectively. Advertising typically consists of local print media aimed at businesses that the Company targets as well as sponsorships of local events that the Company’s clients and prospects are involved with.

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In April 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-03, Transfers and Servicing (Topic 860): Reconsideration of Effective Control for Repurchase Agreements, which removed from the assessment of effective control the criterion relating to the transferor’s ability to repurchase or redeem financial assets on substantially the agreed-upon terms, even in the event of default by the transferee. The amendments in this update also eliminated the requirement to demonstrate that the transferor possesses adequate collateral to fund substantially all the cost of purchasing replacement assets. The amendments in this update were effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 31, 2011, with prospective application to transactions or modifications of existing transactions that occur on or after the effective date. Early adoption was not permitted. The Company adopted these amendments when required, and they did not have any effect on its financial position or results of operations.

In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRS, which outlined the collaborative effort of the FASB and the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”) to consistently define fair value and to come up with a set of consistent disclosures for fair value. The amendments in this update explain how to measure fair value. They do not require additional fair value measurements and are not intended to establish valuation standards or affect valuation practices outside of financial reporting. The amendments in this update were to be applied prospectively. For public entities, the amendments were effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 31, 2011. Early application was not permitted. The Company adopted these amendments when required, and they did not have a material effect on its financial position or results of operations.

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income, which amended existing standards to allow an entity the option to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. Under both options, an entity is required to present each component of net income along with total net income, each component of other comprehensive income along with a total for other comprehensive income, and a total amount for comprehensive income. Any changes pursuant to the options allowed in the amendments were to be applied retrospectively. For public entities, the amendments were effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption was permitted. This update had no impact on financial reporting of the Company.

In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-12, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in ASU No. 2011-05, which deferred the effective date pertaining to reclassification adjustments out of other accumulated comprehensive income in ASU 2011-05, until the FASB was able to reconsider those requirements. All other requirements of ASU 2011-05 were not affected by this update, including the requirement to report comprehensive income either in a single continuous financial statement or in two separate but consecutive financial statements. Public entities were to apply these requirements for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011, which coincide with the effective dates of the requirements in ASU 2011-05 amended by this update. This update, like ASU No. 2011-05, had no impact on financial reporting of the Company.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-11, Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities, which amends disclosures by requiring improved information about financial instruments and derivative instruments that are either offset on the balance sheet or subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement or similar agreement, irrespective of whether they are offset on the balance sheet. Reporting entities are required to provide both net and gross information for these assets and liabilities in order to enhance comparability between those entities that prepare their financial statements on the basis of U.S. GAAP and those entities that prepare their financial statements on the basis of international financial reporting standards (“IFRS”). Companies are required to apply the amendments for fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those years. Retrospective disclosures are required. The Company does not believe this update will have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations.

XML

The Company's And Bank's Actual Capital Amounts And Ratios (Detail) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Servisfirst Bank [Member]
Total Capital to Risk Weighted Assets, Actual Amount	$ 284,141	$ 243,279
Total Capital to Risk Weighted Assets, Actual Ratio	11.66%	12.63%
Total Capital to Risk Weighted Assets, For Capital Adequacy Purposes, Amount	194,942	154,070
Total Capital to Risk Weighted Assets, For Capital Adequacy Purposes, Ratio	8.00%	8.00%
Total Capital to Risk Weighted Assets, To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions, Amount	243,678	192,588
Total Capital to Risk Weighted Assets, To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions, Ratio	10.00%	10.00%
Tier I Capital to Risk Weighted Assets, Actual Amount	257,883	216,295
Tier I Capital to Risk Weighted Assets, Actual Ratio	10.58%	11.23%
Tier I Capital to Risk Weighted Assets, For Capital Adequacy Purposes, Amount	97,471	77,035
Tier I Capital to Risk Weighted Assets, For Capital Adequacy Purposes, Ratio	4.00%	4.00%
Tier I Capital to Risk Weighted Assets, To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions, Amount	146,207	115,553
Tier I Capital to Risk Weighted Assets, To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions, Ratio	6.00%	6.00%
Tier I Capital to Average Assets, Actual Amount	257,883	216,295
Tier I Capital to Average Assets, Actual Ratio	9.03%	9.06%
Tier I Capital to Average Assets, For Capital Adequacy Purposes, Amount	114,227	95,481
Tier I Capital to Average Assets, For Capital Adequacy Purposes, Ratio	4.00%	4.00%
Tier I Capital to Average Assets, To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions, Amount	142,784	119,352
Tier I Capital to Average Assets, To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions, Ratio	5.00%	5.00%
Consolidated Entities [Member]
Total Capital to Risk Weighted Assets, Actual Amount	287,136	246,334
Total Capital to Risk Weighted Assets, Actual Ratio	11.78%	12.79%
Total Capital to Risk Weighted Assets, For Capital Adequacy Purposes, Amount	194,943	154,094
Total Capital to Risk Weighted Assets, For Capital Adequacy Purposes, Ratio	8.00%	8.00%
Total Capital to Risk Weighted Assets, To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions, Amount	0	0
Total Capital to Risk Weighted Assets, To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions, Ratio	0.00%	0.00%
Tier I Capital to Risk Weighted Assets, Actual Amount	240,961	219,350
Tier I Capital to Risk Weighted Assets, Actual Ratio	9.89%	11.39%
Tier I Capital to Risk Weighted Assets, For Capital Adequacy Purposes, Amount	97,472	77,047
Tier I Capital to Risk Weighted Assets, For Capital Adequacy Purposes, Ratio	4.00%	4.00%
Tier I Capital to Risk Weighted Assets, To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions, Amount	0	0
Tier I Capital to Risk Weighted Assets, To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions, Ratio	0.00%	0.00%
Tier I Capital to Average Assets, Actual Amount	240,961	219,350
Tier I Capital to Average Assets, Actual Ratio	8.43%	9.17%
Tier I Capital to Average Assets, For Capital Adequacy Purposes, Amount	114,323	95,642
Tier I Capital to Average Assets, For Capital Adequacy Purposes, Ratio	4.00%	4.00%
Tier I Capital to Average Assets, To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions, Amount	$ 0	$ 0
Tier I Capital to Average Assets, To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions, Ratio	0.00%	0.00%

XML

DERIVATIVES- Additional Information (Detail) (USD $)	Dec. 31, 2012
Derivatives	$ 490,000
Regional Correspondent Bank [Member] | Interest Rate Swap [Member]
Derivative, Notional Amount	11,100,000
Customers [Member] | Interest Rate Swap [Member]
Derivative, Notional Amount	$ 11,100,000

XML

Financial Assets And Financial Liabilities Carried At Fair Value On A Recurring Basis (Detail) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Available-for-sale securities:	$ 233,877	$ 293,809
Derivative assets	490
Fair Value Measurements Recurring [Member]
Total assets		294,435
Fair Value Measurements Recurring [Member] | Us Treasury and Government [Member]
Available-for-sale securities:	28,386	99,622
Fair Value Measurements Recurring [Member] | Collateralized Mortgage Backed Securities [Member]
Available-for-sale securities:	73,466	92,580
Fair Value Measurements Recurring [Member] | Us States and Political Subdivisions Debt Securities [Member]
Available-for-sale securities:	118,177	100,526
Fair Value Measurements Recurring [Member] | Corporate Debt Securities [Member]
Available-for-sale securities:	13,848	1,081
Fair Value Measurements Recurring [Member] | Interest Rate Swap [Member]
Derivative assets	389	617
Derivative liabilities	389	617
Fair Value Measurements Recurring [Member] | Interest Rate Cap [Member]
Derivative assets		9
Fair Value Measurements Recurring [Member] | Fair Value Inputs Level 2 [Member]
Total assets		294,435
Fair Value Measurements Recurring [Member] | Fair Value Inputs Level 2 [Member] | Us Treasury and Government [Member]
Available-for-sale securities:	28,386	99,622
Fair Value Measurements Recurring [Member] | Fair Value Inputs Level 2 [Member] | Collateralized Mortgage Backed Securities [Member]
Available-for-sale securities:	73,466	92,580
Fair Value Measurements Recurring [Member] | Fair Value Inputs Level 2 [Member] | Us States and Political Subdivisions Debt Securities [Member]
Available-for-sale securities:	118,177	100,526
Fair Value Measurements Recurring [Member] | Fair Value Inputs Level 2 [Member] | Corporate Debt Securities [Member]
Available-for-sale securities:	13,848	1,081
Fair Value Measurements Recurring [Member] | Fair Value Inputs Level 2 [Member] | Interest Rate Swap [Member]
Derivative assets	389	617
Derivative liabilities	389	617
Fair Value Measurements Recurring [Member] | Fair Value Inputs Level 2 [Member] | Interest Rate Cap [Member]
Derivative assets		$ 9

XML

Loans By Past Due Status (Detail) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Statement [Line Items]
Past Due Status (Accruing Loans) 30-59 Days	$ 4,223	$ 4,341
Past Due Status (Accruing Loans) 60-89 Days	411	84
Past Due Status (Accruing Loans) 90+ Days	8	0
Past Due Status (Accruing Loans) Total Past Due	4,642	4,425
Non-Accrual	10,350	13,772
Current	2,348,190	1,812,545
Total Loans	2,363,182	1,830,742
Commercial Financial and Agricultural Financing Receivable [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Past Due Status (Accruing Loans) 30-59 Days	1,699	0
Past Due Status (Accruing Loans) 60-89 Days	385	0
Past Due Status (Accruing Loans) 90+ Days	0	0
Past Due Status (Accruing Loans) Total Past Due	2,084	0
Non-Accrual	276	1,179
Current	1,028,630	798,285
Total Loans	1,030,990	799,464
Commercial Real Estate Construction Financing Receivable [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Past Due Status (Accruing Loans) 30-59 Days	0	2,234
Past Due Status (Accruing Loans) 60-89 Days	0	0
Past Due Status (Accruing Loans) 90+ Days	0	0
Past Due Status (Accruing Loans) Total Past Due	0	2,234
Non-Accrual	6,460	10,063
Current	151,901	138,921
Total Loans	158,361	151,218
Commercial Mortgage Loans Owner Occupied [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Past Due Status (Accruing Loans) 30-59 Days	1,480	0
Past Due Status (Accruing Loans) 60-89 Days	10	0
Past Due Status (Accruing Loans) 90+ Days	0	0
Past Due Status (Accruing Loans) Total Past Due	1,490	0
Non-Accrual	2,786	792
Current	563,765	397,809
Total Loans	568,041	398,601
One To Four Family Mortgage Loans [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Past Due Status (Accruing Loans) 30-59 Days	420	2,107
Past Due Status (Accruing Loans) 60-89 Days	16	0
Past Due Status (Accruing Loans) 90+ Days	0	0
Past Due Status (Accruing Loans) Total Past Due	436	2,107
Non-Accrual	453	670
Current	235,020	202,405
Total Loans	235,909	205,182
Other Real Estate Mortgage Loans [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Past Due Status (Accruing Loans) 30-59 Days	516	0
Past Due Status (Accruing Loans) 60-89 Days	0	0
Past Due Status (Accruing Loans) 90+ Days	0	0
Past Due Status (Accruing Loans) Total Past Due	516	0
Non-Accrual	240	693
Current	322,843	234,558
Total Loans	323,599	235,251
Residential Real Estate Mortgage Loans [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Past Due Status (Accruing Loans) 30-59 Days	2,416	2,107
Past Due Status (Accruing Loans) 60-89 Days	26	0
Past Due Status (Accruing Loans) 90+ Days	0	0
Past Due Status (Accruing Loans) Total Past Due	2,442	2,107
Non-Accrual	3,479	2,155
Current	1,121,628	834,772
Total Loans	1,127,549	839,034
Consumer Portfolio Segment [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Past Due Status (Accruing Loans) 30-59 Days	108	0
Past Due Status (Accruing Loans) 60-89 Days	0	84
Past Due Status (Accruing Loans) 90+ Days	8	0
Past Due Status (Accruing Loans) Total Past Due	116	84
Non-Accrual	135	375
Current	46,031	40,567
Total Loans	$ 46,282	$ 41,026

XML

Exercisable options (Detail) (USD $) In Thousands, except Share data, unless otherwise specified	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Shares	412,825	442,940	272,627
Weighted Average Exercise Price	$ 14.03	$ 13.19	$ 11.96
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (years)	3 years 7 months 6 days	4 years 4 months 24 days	6 years 10 months 24 days
Aggregate Intrinsic Value	$ 7,831	$ 7,447	$ 3,555
Exerciseprice 10 [Member]
Shares	106,500
Weighted Average Exercise Price	$ 10
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (years)	2 years 4 months 24 days
Aggregate Intrinsic Value	2,450
Exerciseprice 11 [Member]
Shares	119,500
Weighted Average Exercise Price	$ 11
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (years)	3 years 3 months 18 days
Aggregate Intrinsic Value	2,629
Exerciseprice 15 [Member]
Shares	101,830
Weighted Average Exercise Price	$ 15
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (years)	3 years 10 months 24 days
Aggregate Intrinsic Value	1,833
Exerciseprice 20 [Member]
Shares	47,995
Weighted Average Exercise Price	$ 20
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (years)	4 years 9 months 18 days
Aggregate Intrinsic Value	624
Exerciseprice 25 [Member]
Shares	37,000
Weighted Average Exercise Price	$ 25
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (years)	5 years 8 months 12 days
Aggregate Intrinsic Value	$ 296

XML

CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT - Additional Information (Detail)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012
Secured By Real Estate	54.00%

XML

Other Operating Income And Expense Included In Noninterest Income And Noninterest Expense (Detail) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Other Operating Income
(Loss) gain on sale of other real estate owned	$ (105)	$ 76	$ (203)
Credit card income	1,064	481	30
Other income	744	650	744
Other Operating Income	1,703	1,207	571
Other Operating Expenses
Postage	159	194	173
Telephone	385	409	358
Data processing	2,202	2,023	1,983
Other loan expenses	2,836	2,406	1,027
Supplies	320	356	263
Customer and public relations	791	689	477
Marketing	454	406	313
Sales and use tax	198	208	141
Donations and contributions	482	437	261
Directors fees	286	235	216
Prepayment penalties FHLB advances	0	738	0
Other	2,609	2,313	2,071
Other Operating Expenses	$ 10,722	$ 10,414	$ 7,283

XML

Earning Per Common share (Detail) (USD $) In Thousands, except Share data, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended								12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012	Sep. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2012	Mar. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Sep. 30, 2011	Jun. 30, 2011	Mar. 31, 2011	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Weighted average common shares outstanding									5,996,437	5,759,524	5,519,151
Net income available to common stockholders	$ 8,457	$ 9,202	$ 8,231	$ 8,155	$ 6,487	$ 6,035	$ 5,845	$ 4,871	$ 34,045	$ 23,238	$ 17,378
Net income per common share, basic	$ 1.40	$ 1.53	$ 1.38	$ 1.37	$ 1.10	$ 1.03	$ 1.02	$ 0.88	$ 5.68	$ 4.03	$ 3.15
Weighted average common shares outstanding									5,996,437	5,759,524	5,519,151
Dilutive effects of assumed conversions and exercise of stock options and warrants									945,315	989,639	775,453
Weighted average common and dilutive potential common shares outstanding									6,941,752	6,749,163	6,294,604
Net income available to common stockholders	8,457	9,202	8,231	8,155	6,487	6,035	5,845	4,871	34,045	23,238	17,378
Effect of interest expense on convertible debt, net of tax and discretionary expenditures related to conversion									569	568	473
Net income available to common stockholders, adjusted for effect of debt conversion									$ 34,614	$ 23,806	$ 17,851
Diluted earnings per common share									$ 4.99	$ 3.53	$ 2.84

XML

EMPLOYEE AND DIRECTOR BENEFITS - Additional Information (Detail) (USD $)	0 Months Ended	1 Months Ended	12 Months Ended							12 Months Ended							12 Months Ended
	Nov. 02, 2007	Sep. 21, 2006	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010	Dec. 31, 2009	May 02, 2008	Jun. 30, 2009 Trust Securities [Member]	Sep. 30, 2008 Preferred Securities [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Restricted Stock [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Plan 2005 [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Plan 2006 [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Plan 2009 [Member]	Nov. 02, 2007 Non Plan Stock Option [Member]	Sep. 21, 2006 Non Plan Stock Option [Member]	Feb. 28, 2010 Restricted Stock Awards [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Additional Contribution [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Additional Contribution [Member]
Share based compensation			$ 1,049,000	$ 975,000	$ 713,000
Shares available for grant			257,000								525,000	1,025,000	425,000	25,000	30,000
Share Price														$ 20	$ 15
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Options, Grants in Period, Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value			$ 6.59	$ 7.82	$ 7.91
Employee Service Share-based Compensation, Nonvested Awards, Total Compensation Cost Not yet Recognized			1,795,000							360,000
Employee Service Share-based Compensation, Nonvested Awards, Total Compensation Cost Not yet Recognized, Period for Recognition			2 years 1 month 6 days							1 year 8 months 12 days
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Equity Instruments Other than Options, Grants in Period										20,500
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Options, Vested in Period, Fair Value			404,000
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Options, Grants in Period, Gross	25,000	30,000
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Options, Outstanding, Number			816,500	1,073,800	881,000	863,500										30,000
Warrants and Rights Outstanding				20,000,000			60,000,000
Class of Warrant or Right, Exercise Price of Warrants or Rights							$ 10	$ 25	$ 25
Class of Warrant or Right, Number of Securities Called by Warrants or Rights								15,000	75,000
Postemployment Benefits, Period Expense			1,167,000	946,000	377,000												576,000	432,000
Additional Contribution			4.00%	3.00%
Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP), Compensation Expense			$ 1,049,000	$ 975,000	$ 713,000
Share Based Compensation Arrangement By Share Based Payment Award Purchase Price Of Common Stock	$ 2	$ 15
Percentage Of Non Qualified Vested Shares	100.00%
Expiration Period Of Non Qualified Stock Options	10 years
Class of Warrant or Right, Outstanding			70,500	75,000

XML

OTHER BORROWINGS - Additional Information (Detail) (USD $)	0 Months Ended		12 Months Ended
	Nov. 08, 2012	Jun. 05, 2012	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010	Nov. 30, 2012	Jun. 01, 2012
Other borrowings			$ 19,917,000	$ 4,954,000		$ 19,900,000
Other Borrowings To Subordinated Notes Percentage						5.50%
Subordinated Borrowing, Interest Rate		8.25%
Trust preferred securities			15,050,000	30,514,000			5,000,000
Debt Instrument, Interest Rate, Stated Percentage	8.50%
Preferred Stock, Redemption Price Per Share	$ 1,000
Payments for Repurchase of Trust Preferred Securities	15,000,000
Prepayment penalties FHLB advances			$ 0	$ 738,000	$ 0
Equipment Trust Certificate [Member]
Preferred Securities Interest Rate	8.50%
Junior Subordinated Debt [Member]
Debt Instrument, Interest Rate, Stated Percentage	8.50%

XML

OTHER OPERATING INCOME AND EXPENSES

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Other Operating Income and Expenses [Abstract]

OTHER OPERATING INCOME AND EXPENSES

NOTE 16.             OTHER OPERATING INCOME AND EXPENSES

The major components of other operating income and expense included in noninterest income and noninterest expense are as follows:

	Years Ended December 31,
	2012			2011		2010
	(In Thousands)
Other Operating Income
(Loss) gain on sale of other real estate owned	$	(105	)	$	76	$	(203	)
Credit card income		1,064			481		30
Other		744			650		744
	$	1,703		$	1,207	$	571
Other Operating Expenses
Postage	$	159		$	194	$	173
Telephone		385			409		358
Data processing		2,202			2,023		1,983
Other loan expenses		2,836			2,406		1,027
Supplies		320			356		263
Customer and public relations		791			689		477
Marketing		454			406		313
Sales and use tax		198			208		141
Donations and contributions		482			437		261
Directors fees		286			235		216
Prepayment penalties FHLB advances		-			738		-
Other		2,609			2,313		2,071
	$	10,722		$	10,414	$	7,283

XML

Investment Securities Continuous Unrealized Loss Position (Detail) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Unrealised Loss On Securities	$ (162)	$ (94)
Fair Value	18,288	19,633
Us Treasury and Government [Member]
Unrealised Loss On Securities		(59)
Fair Value		15,074
Collateralized Mortgage Backed Securities [Member]
Unrealised Loss On Securities	(40)
Fair Value	4,439
Us States and Political Subdivisions Debt Securities [Member]
Unrealised Loss On Securities	(83)	(35)
Fair Value	8,967	4,559
Corporate Debt Securities [Member]
Unrealised Loss On Securities	(39)
Fair Value	4,882
Less Than Twelve Months [Member]
Unrealised Loss On Securities	(162)	(94)
Fair Value	18,122	19,633
Less Than Twelve Months [Member] | Us Treasury and Government [Member]
Unrealised Loss On Securities		(59)
Fair Value		15,074
Less Than Twelve Months [Member] | Collateralized Mortgage Backed Securities [Member]
Unrealised Loss On Securities	(40)
Fair Value	4,439
Less Than Twelve Months [Member] | Us States and Political Subdivisions Debt Securities [Member]
Unrealised Loss On Securities	(83)	(35)
Fair Value	8,801	4,559
Less Than Twelve Months [Member] | Corporate Debt Securities [Member]
Unrealised Loss On Securities	(39)
Fair Value	4,882
Twelve Months Or More [Member]
Unrealised Loss On Securities
Fair Value	166
Twelve Months Or More [Member] | Us Treasury and Government [Member]
Unrealised Loss On Securities
Fair Value
Twelve Months Or More [Member] | Collateralized Mortgage Backed Securities [Member]
Unrealised Loss On Securities
Fair Value
Twelve Months Or More [Member] | Us States and Political Subdivisions Debt Securities [Member]
Unrealised Loss On Securities
Fair Value	166
Twelve Months Or More [Member] | Corporate Debt Securities [Member]
Unrealised Loss On Securities
Fair Value

XML

INCOME TAXES (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]

Components of Income Tax Expense (Benefit)

The components of income tax expense are as follows:

	Year Ended December 31,
	2012			2011			2010
	(In Thousands)
Current	$	19,301		$	13,629		$	11,570
Deferred		(2,181	)		(1,240	)		(2,212	)
Income tax expense	$	17,120		$	12,389		$	9,358

Effective Income Tax Rate Reconciliation

The Company’s total income tax expense differs from the amounts computed by applying the Federal income tax statutory rates to income before income taxes. A reconciliation of the differences is as follows:

	Year Ended December 31, 2012
	Amount			% of Pre-tax Earnings
	(In Thousands)
Income tax at statutory federal rate	$	18,047			35.00	%
Effect on rate of:
State income tax, net of federal tax effect		709			1.37	%
Tax-exempt income, net of expenses		(1,007	)		(1.95	)%
Bank owned life insurance contracts		(568	)		(1.10	)%
Incentive stock option expense		121			0.23	%
Other		(182	)		(0.35	)%
Effective income tax and rate	$	17,120			33.20	%

	Year Ended December 31, 2011
	Amount			% of Pre-tax Earnings
	(In Thousands)
Income tax at statutory federal rate	$	12,540			35.00	%
Effect on rate of:
State income tax, net of federal tax effect		967			2.70	%
Tax-exempt income, net of expenses		(875	)		(2.44	)%
Bank owned life insurance contracts		(137	)		(0.38	)%
Incentive stock option expense		128			0.36	%
Other		(234	)		(0.65	)%
Effective income tax and rate	$	12,389			34.59	%

	Year Ended December 31, 2010
	Amount			% of Pre-tax Earnings
	(In Thousands)
Income tax at statutory federal rate	$	9,358			35.00	%
Effect on rate of:
State income tax, net of federal tax effect		715			2.67	%
Tax-exempt income, net of expenses		(773	)		(2.89	)%
Incentive stock option expense		144			0.54	%
Other		(86	)		(0.32	)%
Effective income tax and rate	$	9,358			35.00	%

Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities

The components of net deferred tax asset are as follows:

	December 31,
	2012			2011			2010
	(In Thousands)
Other real estate	$	1,064		$	452		$	646
Start-up costs		101			115			127
Net unrealized (gains) losses on securities available for sale		(3,929	)		(4,220	)		(1,528	)
Depreciation		(509	)		(489	)		(206	)
Deferred loan fees		(237	)		(176	)		(72	)
Allowance for loan losses		10,142			8,509			6,974
Nonqualified equity awards		583			436			194
Other		171			287			231
Net deferred income tax assets	$	7,386		$	4,914		$	6,366

XML

Summary Of Stock Option Activity (Detail) (USD $) In Thousands, except Share data, unless otherwise specified	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010	Dec. 31, 2008
Shares, Outstanding at beginning of year	1,073,800	881,000	863,500
Shares, Granted	45,500	233,500	37,500
Shares, Exercised	(288,130)	(40,700)	(10,000)
Shares, Forfeited	(14,670)	0	(10,000)
Shares, Outstanding at end of year	816,500	1,073,800	881,000
Shares, Ending Exercisable	412,825	442,940	272,627
Weighted Average Exercise Price, Outstanding at beginning of year	$ 18.33	$ 15.65	$ 15.17	$ 14.70
Weighted Average Exercise Price, Granted	$ 30.00	$ 27.16	$ 25.00
Weighted Average Exercise Price, Exercised	$ 12.71	$ 10.53	$ 10.00
Weighted Average Exercise Price, Forfeited	$ 24.54	$ 15.00	$ 15.00
Weighted Average Exercise Price, Outstanding at end of year	$ 20.87	$ 18.33	$ 15.65	$ 14.70
Weighted Average Exercise Price, Ending Exercisable	$ 14.03	$ 13.19	$ 11.96
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (years), Outstanding at beginning of year	6 years	6 years 10 months 24 days	6 years 9 months 18 days	7 years 8 months 12 days
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (years), Granted	9 years 3 months 18 days	9 years 3 months 18 days	9 years 4 months 24 days
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (years), Exercised	2 years 4 months 24 days	3 years 9 months 18 days	0 years
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (years), Forfeited	0 years	0 years	0 years
Outstanding at end of year	5 years 9 months 18 days	6 years	6 years 10 months 24 days	7 years 8 months 12 days
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (years), Ending Exercisable	3 years 7 months 6 days	4 years 4 months 24 days	5 years 1 month 6 days
Aggregate Intrinsic Value, Outstanding at beginning of year	$ 12,508	$ 8,238	$ 8,483	$ 8,513
Aggregate Intrinsic Value, Granted	130	0	0
Aggregate Intrinsic Value, Exercised	5,846	792	150
Aggregate Intrinsic Value, Forfeited	0	0	0
Aggregate Intrinsic Value, Outstanding at end of year	9,905	12,508	8,238	8,513
Aggregate Intrinsic Value, Ending Exercisable	$ 7,831	$ 7,447	$ 3,555

XML

PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Property, Plant and Equipment [Abstract]

Schedule of Premises And Equipment

Premises and equipment are summarized as follows:

	December 31,
	2012			2011
	(In Thousands)
Land and building	$	1,724		$	-
Furniture and equipment		8,642			5,224
Leasehold improvements		4,742			4,436
		15,108			9,660
Accumulated depreciation		(6,261	)		(5,069	)
	$	8,847		$	4,591

Schedule of Future Minimum Lease Payments

The Company leases land and building space under non-cancellable operating leases. Future minimum lease payments under non-cancellable operating leases are summarized as follows:

	(In Thousands)
2012	$	2,068
2013		1,955
2014		1,945
2015		1,974
2016		1,934
Thereafter		7,201
	$	17,077

XML

Details Of Loans (Detail) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010	Dec. 31, 2009
Statement [Line Items]
Loans	$ 2,363,182	$ 1,830,742
Less allowance for loan losses	(26,258)	(22,030)	(18,077)	(14,737)
Net Loans	2,336,924	1,808,712
Commercial Financial and Agricultural Financing Receivable [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Loans	1,030,990	799,464
Less allowance for loan losses	(8,233)	(6,627)	(5,348)	(3,135)
Commercial Real Estate Construction Financing Receivable [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Loans	158,361	151,218
Less allowance for loan losses	(6,511)	(6,542)	(6,373)	(6,295)
Commercial Mortgage Loans Owner Occupied [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Loans	568,041	398,601
One To Four Family Mortgage Loans [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Loans	235,909	205,182
Other Real Estate Mortgage Loans [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Loans	323,599	235,251
Residential Real Estate Mortgage Loans [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Loans	1,127,549	839,034
Less allowance for loan losses	(4,912)	(3,295)	(2,443)	(2,102)
Consumer Portfolio Segment [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Loans	46,282	41,026
Less allowance for loan losses	$ (199)	$ (531)	$ (749)	$ (115)

XML

DEPOSITS (Detail) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Total deposits	$ 2,511,572	$ 2,143,887
Noninterest Bearing Demand [Member]
Total deposits	545,174	418,810
Interest Bearing Checking [Member]
Total deposits	1,551,158	1,325,451
Savings [Member]
Total deposits	19,560	15,638
Time [Member]
Total deposits	69,179	71,368
Time 1000,00 and Over [Member]
Total deposits	$ 326,501	$ 312,620

XML

LOANS - Additional Information (Detail) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Statement [Line Items]
Troubled Debt Restructurings	$ 9,513,000	$ 4,485,000
Financing Receivables, Impaired, Troubled Debt Restructuring, Write-down	$ 1,442,000	$ 439,000

XML

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES - Additional Information (Detail) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Advertising Expense	$ 454,000	$ 406,000	$ 313,000
Interest Rate Swap [Member] | Regional Correspondent Bank [Member]
Derivative, Notional Amount	11,100,000
Interest Rate Swap [Member] | Customers [Member]
Derivative, Notional Amount	11,100,000
Minimum [Member]
Property, Plant and Equipment, Useful Life			3 years
Maximum [Member]
Property, Plant and Equipment, Useful Life			10 years
Federal Reserve Bank [Member]
Cash Reserve Deposit Required and Made	$ 16,000,000	$ 7,500,000

XML

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income	$ 34,445	$ 23,438	$ 17,378
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
Deferred tax benefit	(2,181)	(1,240)	(2,212)
Provision for loan losses	9,100	8,972	10,350
Depreciation and amortization	1,218	1,173	1,066
Net amortization of investments	1,079	958	823
Market value adjustment of interest rate cap	9	106	45
Increase in accrued interest and dividends receivable	(966)	(1,202)	(790)
Stock-based compensation expense	1,049	975	713
(Decrease) increase in accrued interest payable	(3)	47	(128)
Proceeds from sale of mortgage loans held for sale	239,292	169,172	174,760
Originations of mortgage loans held for sale	(243,699)	(177,200)	(175,046)
Gain on sale of securities available for sale	0	(666)	(108)
Gain on sale of mortgage loans held for sale	(3,560)	(2,373)	(2,174)
Net loss (gain) on sale of other real estate owned	105	(76)	203
Write down of other real estate owned	2,189	326	1,051
Decrease in special prepaid FDIC insurance assessments	1,322	1,492	2,538
Increase in cash surrender value of life insurance contracts	(1,624)	(390)	0
Loss on prepayment of other borrowings	0	738	0
Excess tax benefits from the exercise of warrants	(381)	(127)	0
Net change in other assets, liabilities, and other operating activities	3,790	200	1,106
Net cash provided by operating activities	41,184	24,323	29,575
INVESTMENT ACTIVITIES
Purchase of securities available for sale	(47,867)	(102,190)	(84,425)
Proceeds from maturities, calls and paydowns of securities available for sale	106,783	28,575	31,889
Purchase of securities held to maturity	(11,701)	(15,441)	(4,589)
Proceeds from maturities, calls and paydowns of securities held to maturity	943	5,466	0
Increase in loans	(540,019)	(449,449)	(197,572)
Purchase of premises and equipment	(5,474)	(1,314)	(428)
Purchase of restricted equity securities	(787)	(543)	(269)
Purchase of interest rate cap	0	0	(160)
Purchase of bank-owned life insurance contracts	(15,000)	(40,000)	0
Proceeds from sale of securities available for sale	0	63,270	32,297
Proceeds from sale of restricted equity securities	347	552	0
Proceeds from sale of other real estate owned	2,967	3,334	7,995
Additions to other real estate owned	0	0	(75)
Net cash used in investing activities	(509,808)	(507,740)	(215,337)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Net increase in noninterest-bearing deposits	126,364	168,320	39,183
Net increase in interest-bearing deposits	241,321	216,851	287,178
Net increase in federal funds purchased	37,800	79,265	0
Proceeds from other borrowings	19,917	0	0
Proceeds from issuance of subordinated debentures	0	0	15,050
Repayment of subordinated debentures	(15,464)	0	0
Proceeds from sale of common stock, net	0	10,032	0
Proceeds from sale of preferred stock, net	0	39,958	0
Proceeds from exercise of stock options and warrants	4,651	757	123
Excess tax benefits from exercise of stock options and warrants	381	127	0
Repayment of other borrowings	(5,000)	(20,738)	0
Dividends on common stock	(3,134)	0	0
Dividends on preferred stock	(400)	(200)	0
Net cash provided by financing activities	406,436	494,372	341,534
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents	(62,188)	10,955	155,772
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year	242,933	231,978	76,206
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year	180,745	242,933	231,978
Cash paid for:
Interest	14,904	16,033	15,388
Income taxes	13,134	15,837	6,958
NONCASH TRANSACTIONS
Transfers of loans from held for sale to held for investment	0	417	787
Other real estate acquired in settlement of loans	2,695	9,029	5,372
Internally financed sales of other real estate owned	$ 24	$ 136	$ 1,757

XML

Foreclosed Properties (Detail) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Balance at beginning of year	$ 12,275	$ 6,966	$ 12,525
Transfers from loans and capitalized expenses	2,695	9,029	5,447
Foreclosed properties sold	(2,967)	(3,334)	(7,995)
Writedowns and partial liquidations	(2,318)	(386)	(3,011)
Balance at end of year	$ 9,685	$ 12,275	$ 6,966

XML

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]

Schedule Of Commitments And Contingent Liabilities

A summary of the Company’s approximate commitments and contingent liabilities is as follows:

	2012		2011		2010
	(In Thousands)
Commitments to extend credit	$	860,421	$	697,939	$	538,719
Credit card arrangements		25,699		19,686		17,601
Standby letters of credit and financial guarantees		36,374		42,937		47,103
Total	$	922,494	$	760,562	$	603,423

XML

EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Earnings Per Share [Abstract]

EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

NOTE 20.             EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

Basic earnings per common share are computed by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per common share include the dilutive effect of additional potential common shares issuable under stock options and warrants, as well as the common shares issuable upon conversion of the Company’s 6% Mandatory Convertible Trust Preferred Securities due March 15, 2040.

	Years Ended December 31,
	2012		2011		2010
	(Dollar Amounts In Thousands Except Per Share Amounts)
Earnings Per Share
Weighted average common shares outstanding		5,996,437		5,759,524		5,519,151
Net income available to common stockholders	$	34,045	$	23,238	$	17,378
Basic earnings per common share	$	5.68		4.03	$	3.15
Weighted average common shares outstanding		5,996,437		5,759,524		5,519,151
Dilutive effects of assumed conversions and exercise of stock options and warrants		945,315		989,639		775,453
Weighted average common and dilutive potential common shares outstanding		6,941,752		6,749,163		6,294,604
Net income available to common stockholders	$	34,045	$	23,238	$	17,378
Effect of interest expense on convertible debt, net of tax and discretionary expenditures related to conversion	$	569	$	568	$	473
Net income available to common stockholders, adjusted for effect of debt conversion	$	34,614	$	23,806	$	17,851
Diluted earnings per common share	$	4.99	$	3.53	$	2.84

XML

CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Risks and Uncertainties [Abstract]

CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT

NOTE 19.             CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT

The Company originates primarily commercial, residential, and consumer loans to customers in the Company’s market area. The ability of the majority of the Company’s customers to honor their contractual loan obligations is dependent on the economy in the market area.

The Company’s loan portfolio is concentrated primarily in loans secured by real estate, of which 54% is secured by real estate in the Company’s primary market areas. In addition, a substantial portion of the other real estate owned is located in that same market. Accordingly, the ultimate collectability of the loan portfolio and the recovery of the carrying amount of other real estate owned are susceptible to changes in market conditions in the Company’s primary market area.

XML

Loans By Performance Status (Detail) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Statement [Line Items]
Loans	$ 2,363,182	$ 1,830,742
Commercial Financial and Agricultural Financing Receivable [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Loans	1,030,990	799,464
Commercial Real Estate Construction Financing Receivable [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Loans	158,361	151,218
Commercial Mortgage Loans Owner Occupied [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Loans	568,041	398,601
One To Four Family Mortgage Loans [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Loans	235,909	205,182
Other Real Estate Mortgage Loans [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Loans	323,599	235,251
Residential Real Estate Mortgage Loans [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Loans	1,127,549	839,034
Consumer Portfolio Segment [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Loans	46,282	41,026
Performing Financing Receivable [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Loans	2,352,824	1,816,970
Performing Financing Receivable [Member] | Commercial Financial and Agricultural Financing Receivable [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Loans	1,030,714	798,285
Performing Financing Receivable [Member] | Commercial Real Estate Construction Financing Receivable [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Loans	151,901	141,155
Performing Financing Receivable [Member] | Commercial Mortgage Loans Owner Occupied [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Loans	565,255	397,809
Performing Financing Receivable [Member] | One To Four Family Mortgage Loans [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Loans	235,456	204,512
Performing Financing Receivable [Member] | Other Real Estate Mortgage Loans [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Loans	323,359	234,558
Performing Financing Receivable [Member] | Residential Real Estate Mortgage Loans [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Loans	1,124,070	836,879
Performing Financing Receivable [Member] | Consumer Portfolio Segment [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Loans	46,139	40,651
Nonperforming Financing Receivable [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Loans	10,358	13,772
Nonperforming Financing Receivable [Member] | Commercial Financial and Agricultural Financing Receivable [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Loans	276	1,179
Nonperforming Financing Receivable [Member] | Commercial Real Estate Construction Financing Receivable [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Loans	6,460	10,063
Nonperforming Financing Receivable [Member] | Commercial Mortgage Loans Owner Occupied [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Loans	2,786	792
Nonperforming Financing Receivable [Member] | One To Four Family Mortgage Loans [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Loans	453	670
Nonperforming Financing Receivable [Member] | Other Real Estate Mortgage Loans [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Loans	240	693
Nonperforming Financing Receivable [Member] | Residential Real Estate Mortgage Loans [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Loans	3,479	2,155
Nonperforming Financing Receivable [Member] | Consumer Portfolio Segment [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Loans	$ 143	$ 375

XML

EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Text Block [Abstract]

Basic And Diluted Earning Per Share

Diluted earnings per common share include the dilutive effect of additional potential common shares issuable under stock options and warrants, as well as the common shares issuable upon conversion of the Company’s 6% Mandatory Convertible Trust Preferred Securities due March 15, 2040.

	Years Ended December 31,
	2012		2011		2010
	(Dollar Amounts In Thousands Except Per Share Amounts)
Earnings Per Share
Weighted average common shares outstanding		5,996,437		5,759,524		5,519,151
Net income available to common stockholders	$	34,045	$	23,238	$	17,378
Basic earnings per common share	$	5.68		4.03	$	3.15
Weighted average common shares outstanding		5,996,437		5,759,524		5,519,151
Dilutive effects of assumed conversions and exercise of stock options and warrants		945,315		989,639		775,453
Weighted average common and dilutive potential common shares outstanding		6,941,752		6,749,163		6,294,604
Net income available to common stockholders	$	34,045	$	23,238	$	17,378
Effect of interest expense on convertible debt, net of tax and discretionary expenditures related to conversion	$	569	$	568	$	473
Net income available to common stockholders, adjusted for effect of debt conversion	$	34,614	$	23,806	$	17,851
Diluted earnings per common share	$	4.99	$	3.53	$	2.84

XML

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Related Party Transactions [Abstract]

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

NOTE 21.             RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Loans

As more fully described in Note 3, the Company had outstanding loan balances to related parties as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 in the amount of $12.4 million and $9.0 million, respectively.

XML

FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]

FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT

NOTE 22.             FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT

Measurement of fair value under U.S. GAAP establishes a hierarchy that prioritizes observable and unobservable inputs used to measure fair value, as of the measurement date, into three broad levels, which are described below:

Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for assets or liabilities. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to Level 1 inputs.

Level 2: Observable prices that are based on inputs not quoted on active markets, but corroborated by market data.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs are used when little or no market data is available. The fair value hierarchy gives the lowest priority to Level 3 inputs.

In determining fair value, the Company utilizes valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs to the extent possible and also considers counterparty credit risk in its assessment of fair value.

Debt Securities. Where quoted prices are available in an active market, securities are classified within Level 1 of the hierarchy. Level 1 securities include highly liquid government securities such as U.S. treasuries and exchange-traded equity securities. For securities traded in secondary markets for which quoted market prices are not available, the Company generally relies on prices obtained from independent vendors. Such independent pricing services are to advise the Company on the carrying value of the securities available for sale portfolio. As part of the Company’s procedures, the price provided from the service is evaluated for reasonableness given market changes. When a questionable price exists, the Company investigates further to determine if the price is valid. If needed, other market participants may be utilized to determine the correct fair value. The Company has also reviewed and confirmed its determinations in discussions with the pricing service regarding their methods of price discovery. Securities measured with these techniques are classified within Level 2 of the hierarchy and often involve using quoted market prices for similar securities, pricing models or discounted cash flow calculations using inputs observable in the market where available. Examples include U.S. government agency securities, mortgage-backed securities, obligations of states and political subdivisions, and certain corporate, asset-backed and other securities. In cases where Level 1 or Level 2 inputs are not available, securities are classified in Level 3 of the hierarchy.

Interest Rate Swap Agreements. The fair value is estimated by a third party using inputs that are observable or that can be corroborated by observable market data and, therefore, are classified within Level 2 of the hierarchy. These fair value estimations include primarily market observable inputs such as yield curves and option volatilities, and include the value associated with counterparty credit risk.

Impaired Loans. Impaired loans are measured and reported at fair value when full payment under the loan terms is not probable. Impaired loans are carried at the present value of expected future cash flows using the loan’s existing rate in a discounted cash flow calculation, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral-dependent. Expected cash flows are based on internal inputs reflecting expected default rates on contractual cash flows. This method of estimating cash flows does not incorporate the exit-price concept of fair value described in ASC 820-10 and would generally result in a higher value than the exit-price approach. For loans measured using the estimated fair value of collateral less costs to sell, fair value is generally determined based on appraisals performed by certified and licensed appraisers using inputs such as absorption rates, capitalization rates and market comparables, adjusted for estimated costs to sell. Management modifies the appraised values, if needed, to take into account recent developments in the market or other factors, such as changes in absorption rates or market conditions from the time of valuation, and anticipated sales values considering management’s plans for disposition. Such modifications to the appraised values could result in lower valuations of such collateral. Estimated costs to sell are based on current amounts of disposal costs for similar assets. These measurements are classified as Level 3 within the valuation hierarchy. Impaired loans are subject to nonrecurring fair value adjustment upon initial recognition or subsequent impairment. A portion of the allowance for loan losses is allocated to impaired loans if the value of such loans is deemed to be less than the unpaid balance. Impaired loans are reviewed and evaluated on at least a quarterly basis for additional impairment and adjusted accordingly based on the same factors identified above. The amount recognized as an impairment charge related to impaired loans that are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis was $4,586,000 and $5,419,000 during the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Impaired loans measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis are classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy.

Other Real Estate Owned. Other real estate owned (“OREO”) acquired through, or in lieu of, foreclosure are held for sale and are initially recorded at the lower of cost or fair value, less selling costs. Any write-downs to fair value at the time of transfer to OREO are charged to the allowance for loan losses subsequent to foreclosure. Values are derived from appraisals of underlying collateral and discounted cash flow analysis. A net loss on the sale and write-downs of OREO of $2,166,000 and $266,000 was recognized during the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011. These charges were for write-downs in the value of OREO subsequent to foreclosure and losses on the disposal of OREO. OREO is classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy.

The following table presents the Company’s financial assets and financial liabilities carried at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011:

			Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2012 Using
	Quoted Prices in
	Active Markets		Significant Other		Significant
	for Identical		Observable Inputs		Unobservable
	Assets (Level 1)		(Level 2)		Inputs (Level 3)		Total
Assets Measured on a Recurring Basis:	(In Thousands)
Available-for-sale securities:
U.S. Treasury and government sponsored agencies	$	-	$	28,386	$	-	$	28,386
Mortgage-backed securities		-		73,466		-		73,466
State and municipal securities		-		118,177		-		118,177
Corporate debt		-		13,848		-		13,848
Interest rate swap agreements		-		389		-		389
Liabilities Measured on a Recurring Basis:
Interest rate swap agreements	$	-	$	389	$	-	$	389

			Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2011 Using
	Quoted Prices in
	Active Markets		Significant Other		Significant
	for Identical		Observable Inputs		Unobservable
	Assets (Level 1)		(Level 2)		Inputs (Level 3)		Total
Assets Measured on a Recurring Basis:	(In Thousands)
Available-for-sale securities
U.S. Treasury and government sponsored agencies	$	-	$	99,622	$	-	$	99,622
Mortgage-backed securities		-		92,580		-		92,580
State and municipal securities		-		100,526		-		100,526
Corporate debt		-		1,081		-		1,081
Interest rate swap agreements		-		617		-		617
Interest rate cap		-		9		-		9
Total assets at fair value	$	-	$	294,435	$	-	$	294,435
Liabilities Measured on a Recurring Basis:
Interest rate swap agreements	$	-	$	617	$	-	$	617

The carrying amount and estimated fair value of the Company’s financial instruments were as follows::

			Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2012 Using
	Quoted Prices in
	Active Markets		Significant Other		Significant
	for Identical		Observable		Unobservable
	Assets (Level 1)		Inputs (Level 2)		Inputs (Level 3)		Total
Assets Measured on a Nonrecurring Basis:	(In Thousands)
Impaired loans, net of related allowance	$	-		-	$	33,883	$	33,883
Other real estate owned and repossessed assets		-		-		9,685		9,685
Total assets at fair value		-		-	$	43,568	$	43,568

			Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2011 Using
	Quoted Prices in
	Active Markets		Significant Other		Significant
	for Identical		Observable		Unobservable
	Assets (Level 1)		Inputs (Level 2)		Inputs (Level 3)		Total
Assets Measured on a Nonrecurring Basis:	(In Thousands)
Impaired loans, net of related allowance	$	-	$	-	$	33,072	$	33,072
Other real estate owned		-		-		12,275		12,275
Total assets at fair value	$	-	$	-	$	45,347	$	45,347

The fair value of a financial instrument is the current amount that would be exchanged in a sale between willing parties, other than in a forced liquidation. Fair value is best determined based upon quoted market prices. However, in many instances, there are no quoted market prices for the Company’s various financial instruments. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques. Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimates of future cash flows. Accordingly, the fair value estimates may not be realized in an immediate settlement of the instrument. Current U.S. GAAP excludes certain financial instruments and all nonfinancial instruments from its fair value disclosure requirements. Accordingly, the aggregate fair value amounts presented may not necessarily represent the underlying fair value of the Company.

The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating its fair value disclosures for financial instruments.

Debt securities: Where quoted prices are available in an active market, securities are classified within Level 1 of the hierarchy. Level 1 securities include highly liquid government securities such as U.S. treasuries and exchange-traded equity securities. For securities traded in secondary markets for which quoted market prices are not available, the Company generally relies on prices obtained from independent vendors. Such independent pricing services are to advise the Company on the carrying value of the securities available for sale portfolio. As part of the Company’s procedures, the price provided from the service is evaluated for reasonableness given market changes. When a questionable price exists, the Company investigates further to determine if the price is valid. If needed, other market participants may be utilized to determine the correct fair value. The Company has also reviewed and confirmed its determinations in discussions with the pricing service regarding their methods of price discovery. Securities measured with these techniques are classified within Level 2 of the hierarchy and often involve using quoted market prices for similar securities, pricing models or discounted cash flow calculations using inputs observable in the market where available. Examples include U.S. government agency securities, mortgage-backed securities, obligations of states and political subdivisions, and certain corporate, asset-backed and other securities. In cases where Level 1 or Level 2 inputs are not available, securities are classified in Level 3 of the hierarchy.

Restricted equity securities: Fair values for other investments are considered to be their cost as they are redeemed at par value.

Loans: For variable-rate loans that re-price frequently and with no significant change in credit risk, fair value is based on carrying amounts. The fair value of other loans (for example, fixed-rate commercial real estate loans, mortgage loans, and industrial loans) is estimated using discounted cash flow analysis, based on interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality. Loan fair value estimates include judgments regarding future expected loss experience and risk characteristics. The method of estimating fair value does not incorporate the exit-price concept of fair value as prescribed by ASC 820 and generally produces a higher value than an exit-price approach. The measurement of the fair value of loans is classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

Mortgage loans held for sale: Loans are committed to be delivered to investors on a “best efforts delivery” basis within 30 days of origination. Due to this short turn-around time, the carrying amounts of the Company’s loan purchase agreements with investors approximate their fair values.

Derivatives: The fair value of the derivative agreements are estimated by a third party using inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data. As part of the Company’s procedures, the price provided from the third party is evaluated for reasonableness given market changes. These measurements are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

Deposits: The fair value disclosed for demand deposits is, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date (that is, their carrying amounts). The carrying amounts of variable-rate, fixed-term money market accounts and certificates of deposit approximate their fair values. Fair values for fixed-rate certificates of deposit are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation using interest rates currently offered for deposits with similar remaining maturities. The fair value of the Company’s time deposits do not take into consideration the value of the Company’s long-term relationships with depositors, which may have significant value. Measurements of the fair value of certificates of deposit are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

Other borrowings: The fair value of other borrowings are estimated using discounted cash flow analysis, based on interest rates currently being offered by the Federal Home Loan Bank for borrowings of similar terms as those being valued. These measurements are classified within Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.

Subordinated debentures: The fair value of subordinated debentures are estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis, based on interest rates currently being offered on the best alternative debt available at the measurement date. These measurements are classified within Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.

Loan commitments: The fair values of the Company’s off-balance sheet financial instruments are based on fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements. Since the majority of the Company’s other off-balance-sheet instruments consist of non-fee-producing, variable-rate commitments, the Company has determined they do not have a distinguishable fair value.

The carrying amount, estimated fair value and placement in the fair value hierarchy of the Company’s financial instruments as of December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 are presented in the following table. This table includes those financial assets and liabilities that are not measured and reported at fair value on a recurring basis or nonrecurring basis.

The Company’s financial assets and financial liabilities which are carried at fair value were as follows:.

	December 31,
	2012				2011
	Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Fair Value
	(In Thousands)
Financial Assets:
Level 2 Inputs:
Debt securities available for sale	$	233,877	$	233,877	$	293,809	$	293,809
Debt securities held to maturity		25,967		27,350		15,209		15,999
Restricted equity securities		3,941		3,941		3,501		3,501
Mortgage loans held for sale		25,826		25,826		17,859		17,859
Bank owned life insurance contracts		57,014		57,014		40,390		40,390
Derivatives		389		389		626		626
Level 3 Inputs:
Loans, net	$	2,336,924	$	2,327,780	$	1,808,712	$	1,811,612
Financial Liabilities:
Level 2 Inputs:
Deposits	$	2,511,572	$	2,516,320	$	2,143,887	$	2,150,308
Other borrowings		19,917		19,917		4,954		5,377
Subordinated debentures		15,050		15,050		30,514		27,402
Derivatives		389		389		617		617

XML

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (Parenthetical)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Stock Issued During Period, Shares, New Issues		340,000
Stock Issued During Period Shares Preferred New Issues		40,000
Stock Options Exercised,Shares	332,630	64,700	10,000

XML

PARENT COMPANY FINANCIAL INFORMATION

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Condensed Financial Information Of Parent Company Only Disclosure [Abstract]

PARENT COMPANY FINANCIAL INFORMATION

NOTE 23.             PARENT COMPANY FINANCIAL INFORMATION

The following information presents the condensed balance sheet of the Company as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 and the condensed statements of income and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010.

BALANCE SHEETS DECEMBER 31, 2012 AND 2011

(In Thousands)

	2012		2011
ASSETS
Cash and due from banks	$	3,264	$	2,908
Investment in subsidiary		265,229		223,753
Other assets		18		293
Total assets	$	268,511	$	226,954
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Liabilities:
Other borrowings	$	19,917	$	-
Subordinated debentures		15,050		30,514
Other liabilities		287		148
Total liabilities		35,254		30,662
Stockholders' equity:
Preferred stock, Series A Senior Non-Cumulative Perpetual, par value $.001 (liquidation preference $1,000), net of discount; 40,000 shares authorized, 40,000 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2012 and no shares authorized, issued and outstanding at December 31, 2011		39,958		39,958
Common stock, par value $.001 per share; 50,000,000 shares authorized; 6,268,812 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2012 and 5,932,182 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2011		6		6
Additional paid-in capital		93,505		87,805
Retained earnings		92,492		61,581
Accumulated other comprehensive income		7,296		6,942
Total stockholders' equity		233,257		196,292
Total liabilites and stockholders' equity	$	268,511	$	226,954

STATEMENTS OF INCOME

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,

(In Thousands)

	2012			2011			2010
Income:
Dividends received from subsidiary	$	-		$	800		$	1,230
Other income		41			43			42
Total income		41			843			1,272
Interest on borrowings		2,213			2,345			2,236
Other operating expenses		325			291			295
Total expenses		2,538			2,636			2,531
undistributed earnings of subsidiary		(2,497	)		(1,793	)		(1,259	)
Income tax benefit		(944	)		(976	)		(924	)
earnings of subsidiary		(1,553	)		(817	)		(335	)
Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiary		35,998			24,255			17,713
Net income		34,445			23,438			17,378
Dividends on preferred stock		400			200			-
Net income available to common stockholders	$	34,045		$	23,238		$	17,378

STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,

(In Thousands)

	2012			2011			2010
Operating activities
Net income	$	34,445		$	23,438		$	17,378
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used in operating activities:
Other		878			(50	)		241
Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiary		(35,998	)		(24,255	)		(17,713	)
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities		(675	)		(867	)		(94	)
Investing activities
Investment in subsidiary		-			(46,200	)		(15,000	)
Net cash used in investing activities		-			(46,200	)		(15,000	)
Financing activities
Proceeds from other borrowings		19,917			-			-
Repayment of subordinated debentures		(15,464	)		-			-
Proceeds from issuance of subordinated debentures		-			-			15,050
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock		-			39,958			-
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		112			10,166			-
Dividends on preferred stock		(400	)		(200	)		-
Dividends on common stock		(3,134	)		-			-
Net cash provided by financing activities		1,031			49,924			15,050
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents	$	356		$	2,857		$	(44	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year		2,908			51			95
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year	$	3,264		$	2,908		$	51

QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)

The following table sets forth certain unaudited quarterly financial data derived from our consolidated financial statements. Such data is only a summary and should be read in conjunction with our historical consolidated financial statements and related notes continued in this annual report on Form 10-K.

	2012 Quarter Ended
	(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
	March 31		June 30		September 30		December 31
Interest income	$	25,571	$	26,654	$	27,743	$	29,055
Interest expense		3,833		3,749		3,695		3,624
Net interest income		21,738		22,905		24,048		25,431
Provision for loan losses		2,383		3,083		1,185		2,449
Net income available to common stockholders		8,155		8,231		9,202		8,457
Net income per common share, basic	$	1.37	$	1.38	$	1.53	$	1.40
Net income per common share, diluted	$	1.20	$	1.21	$	1.35	$	1.23

	2011 Quarter Ended
	(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
	March 31		June 30		September 30		December 31
Interest income	$	20,961	$	22,080	$	23,312	$	25,058
Interest expense		3,985		4,032		4,093		3,970
Net interest income		16,976		18,048		19,219		21,088
Provision for loan losses		2,231		1,494		2,740		2,507
Net income available to common stockholders		4,871		5,845		6,035		6,487
Net income per common share, basic	$	0.88	$	1.02	$	1.03	$	1.10
Net income per common share, diluted	$	0.77	$	0.89	$	0.90	$	0.97

XML

The Federal Income Tax Statutory Rates To Income Before Income Taxes (Detail) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Income tax at statutory federal rate, amount	$ 18,047	$ 12,540	$ 9,358
Income tax at statutory federal rate, rate	35.00%	35.00%	35.00%
State income tax, net of federal tax effect, amount	709	967	715
State income tax, net of federal tax effect, rate	1.37%	2.70%	2.67%
Tax-exempt income, net of expenses, amount	(1,007)	(875)	(773)
Tax-exempt income, net of expenses, rate	(1.95%)	(2.44%)	(2.89%)
Bank owned life insurance contracts, amount	(568)	(137)
Bank owned life insurance contracts, rate	(1.10%)	(0.38%)
Incentive stock option expense, amount	121	128	144
Incentive stock option expense, rate	0.23%	0.36%	0.54%
Other, amount	(182)	(234)	(86)
Other, rate	(0.35%)	(0.65%)	(0.32%)
Effective income tax and rate, Amount	$ (17,120)	$ (12,389)	$ (9,358)
Effective income tax rate	33.20%	34.59%	35.00%

XML

REGULATORY MATTERS (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Banking and Thrift [Abstract]

Summary Of Capital Adequacy Requirements

The Company’s and Bank’s actual capital amounts and ratios are presented in the following table:

	Actual					For Capital Adequacy Purposes					To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions
	Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio
As of December 31, 2012:
Total Capital to Risk Weighted Assets:
Consolidated	$	287,136		11.78	%	$	194,943		8.00	%		N/A		N/A
ServisFirst Bank		284,141		11.66	%		194,942		8.00	%	$	243,678		10.00	%
Tier I Capital to Risk Weighted Assets:
Consolidated		240,961		9.89	%		97,472		4.00	%		N/A		N/A
ServisFirst Bank		257,883		10.58	%		97,471		4.00	%		146,207		6.00	%
Tier I Capital to Average Assets:
Consolidated		240,961		8.43	%		114,323		4.00	%		N/A		N/A
ServisFirst Bank		257,883		9.03	%		114,227		4.00	%		142,784		5.00	%
As of December 31, 2011:
Total Capital to Risk Weighted Assets:
Consolidated	$	246,334		12.79	%	$	154,094		8.00	%		N/A		N/A
ServisFirst Bank		243,279		12.63	%		154,070		8.00	%	$	192,588		10.00	%
Tier I Capital to Risk Weighted Assets:
Consolidated		219,350		11.39	%		77,047		4.00	%		N/A		N/A
ServisFirst Bank		216,295		11.23	%		77,035		4.00	%		115,553		6.00	%
Tier I Capital to Average Assets:
Consolidated		219,350		9.17	%		95,642		4.00	%		N/A		N/A
ServisFirst Bank		216,295		9.06	%		95,481		4.00	%		119,352		5.00	%

XML

Allowance for loan losses (Detail) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Allowance for loan losses:
Balance, beginning of year	$ 22,030	$ 18,077	$ 14,737
Loans charged off	(5,755)	(5,653)	(7,208)
Recoveries	883	634	198
Provision for loan losses	9,100	8,972	10,350
Balance, end of year	$ 26,258	$ 22,030	$ 18,077

XML

PARTICIPATION IN THE SMALL BUSINESS LENDING FUND OF THE U.S. TREASURY DEPARTMENT - Additional Information (Detail) (USD $)							12 Months Ended
	Jun. 21, 2011	Jun. 21, 2011 Senior Non Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock [Member]	Mar. 15, 2013 Series Preferred Stock [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Series Preferred Stock [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Series Preferred Stock [Member]	Dec. 31, 2010 Series Preferred Stock [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Qualified Small Business Lending [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Second Through Tenth Dividend Periods [Member] Maximum [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Second Through Tenth Dividend Periods [Member] Minimum [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Eleventh Through First Half Of Nineteenth Dividend [Member] Maximum [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Eleventh Through First Half Of Nineteenth Dividend [Member] Minimum [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 More Than Four and One Half Years [Member] Fixed Rate [Member]
Preferred stock, shares issued		40,000		40,000	40,000	0
Preferred stock, liquidation preference		$ 1,000		$ 1,000	$ 1,000
Preferred Stock, Liquidation Preference, Value		$ 40,000,000	$ 25,000,000
Fund Established Under Small Business Job Act 2010	30,000,000,000
Qualified Community Banks	$ 10,000,000,000
Preferred Stock, Dividend Rate, Percentage							1.00%	5.00%	1.00%	7.00%	1.00%	9.00%

XML

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
ASSETS
Cash and due from banks	$ 58,031	$ 43,018
Interest-bearing balances due from depository institutions	119,423	99,350
Federal funds sold	3,291	100,565
Cash and cash equivalents	180,745	242,933
Available for sale debt securities, at fair value	233,877	293,809
Held to maturity debt securities (fair value of $27,350 and $15,999 at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively)	25,967	15,209
Restricted equity securities	3,941	3,501
Mortgage loans held for sale	25,826	17,859
Loans	2,363,182	1,830,742
Less allowance for loan losses	(26,258)	(22,030)
Loans, net	2,336,924	1,808,712
Premises and equipment, net	8,847	4,591
Accrued interest and dividends receivable	9,158	8,192
Deferred tax asset, net	7,386	4,914
Other real estate owned	9,685	12,275
Bank owned life insurance contracts	57,014	40,390
Other assets	6,944	8,400
Total assets	2,906,314	2,460,785
Deposits:
Noninterest-bearing	545,174	418,810
Interest-bearing	1,966,398	1,725,077
Total deposits	2,511,572	2,143,887
Federal funds purchased	117,065	79,265
Other borrowings	19,917	4,954
Subordinated debentures	15,050	30,514
Accrued interest payable	942	945
Other liabilities	8,511	4,928
Total liabilities	2,673,057	2,264,493
Stockholders' equity:
Preferred stock	0	0
Common stock, par value $0.001 per share; 50,000,000 shares authorized; 6,268,812 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2012 and 5,932,182 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2011	6	6
Additional paid-in capital	93,505	87,805
Retained earnings	92,492	61,581
Accumulated other comprehensive income	7,296	6,942
Total stockholders' equity	233,257	196,292
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	2,906,314	2,460,785
Series A Preferred Stock [Member]
Stockholders' equity:
Preferred stock	$ 39,958	$ 39,958

XML

FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Financial Assets And Liabilities Carried At Fair Value On Recurring Basis

The following table presents the Company’s financial assets and financial liabilities carried at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011:

			Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2012 Using
	Quoted Prices in
	Active Markets		Significant Other		Significant
	for Identical		Observable Inputs		Unobservable
	Assets (Level 1)		(Level 2)		Inputs (Level 3)		Total
Assets Measured on a Recurring Basis:	(In Thousands)
Available-for-sale securities:
U.S. Treasury and government sponsored agencies	$	-	$	28,386	$	-	$	28,386
Mortgage-backed securities		-		73,466		-		73,466
State and municipal securities		-		118,177		-		118,177
Corporate debt		-		13,848		-		13,848
Interest rate swap agreements		-		389		-		389
Liabilities Measured on a Recurring Basis:
Interest rate swap agreements	$	-	$	389	$	-	$	389

			Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2011 Using
	Quoted Prices in
	Active Markets		Significant Other		Significant
	for Identical		Observable Inputs		Unobservable
	Assets (Level 1)		(Level 2)		Inputs (Level 3)		Total
Assets Measured on a Recurring Basis:	(In Thousands)
Available-for-sale securities
U.S. Treasury and government sponsored agencies	$	-	$	99,622	$	-	$	99,622
Mortgage-backed securities		-		92,580		-		92,580
State and municipal securities		-		100,526		-		100,526
Corporate debt		-		1,081		-		1,081
Interest rate swap agreements		-		617		-		617
Interest rate cap		-		9		-		9
Total assets at fair value	$	-	$	294,435	$	-	$	294,435
Liabilities Measured on a Recurring Basis:
Interest rate swap agreements	$	-	$	617	$	-	$	617

Financial Assets And Liabilities Carried At Fair Value On Nonrecurring Basis

The carrying amount and estimated fair value of the Company’s financial instruments were as follows::

			Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2012 Using
	Quoted Prices in
	Active Markets		Significant Other		Significant
	for Identical		Observable		Unobservable
	Assets (Level 1)		Inputs (Level 2)		Inputs (Level 3)		Total
Assets Measured on a Nonrecurring Basis:	(In Thousands)
Impaired loans, net of related allowance	$	-		-	$	33,883	$	33,883
Other real estate owned and repossessed assets		-		-		9,685		9,685
Total assets at fair value		-		-	$	43,568	$	43,568

			Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2011 Using
	Quoted Prices in
	Active Markets		Significant Other		Significant
	for Identical		Observable		Unobservable
	Assets (Level 1)		Inputs (Level 2)		Inputs (Level 3)		Total
Assets Measured on a Nonrecurring Basis:	(In Thousands)
Impaired loans, net of related allowance	$	-	$	-	$	33,072	$	33,072
Other real estate owned		-		-		12,275		12,275
Total assets at fair value	$	-	$	-	$	45,347	$	45,347

Carrying Amount And Estimated Fair Value Of Financial Instruments

The Company’s financial assets and financial liabilities which are carried at fair value were as follows:.

	December 31,
	2012				2011
	Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Fair Value
	(In Thousands)
Financial Assets:
Level 2 Inputs:
Debt securities available for sale	$	233,877	$	233,877	$	293,809	$	293,809
Debt securities held to maturity		25,967		27,350		15,209		15,999
Restricted equity securities		3,941		3,941		3,501		3,501
Mortgage loans held for sale		25,826		25,826		17,859		17,859
Bank owned life insurance contracts		57,014		57,014		40,390		40,390
Derivatives		389		389		626		626
Level 3 Inputs:
Loans, net	$	2,336,924	$	2,327,780	$	1,808,712	$	1,811,612
Financial Liabilities:
Level 2 Inputs:
Deposits	$	2,511,572	$	2,516,320	$	2,143,887	$	2,150,308
Other borrowings		19,917		19,917		4,954		5,377
Subordinated debentures		15,050		15,050		30,514		27,402
Derivatives		389		389		617		617

XML

Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited) (Detail) (USD $) In Thousands, except Per Share data, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended								12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012	Sep. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2012	Mar. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Sep. 30, 2011	Jun. 30, 2011	Mar. 31, 2011	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Interest income	$ 29,055	$ 27,743	$ 26,654	$ 25,571	$ 25,058	$ 23,312	$ 22,080	$ 20,961	$ 109,023	$ 91,411	$ 78,146
Interest expense	3,624	3,695	3,749	3,833	3,970	4,093	4,032	3,985	14,901	16,080	15,260
Net interest income	25,431	24,048	22,905	21,738	21,088	19,219	18,048	16,976	94,122	75,331	62,886
Provision for loan losses	2,449	1,185	3,083	2,383	2,507	2,740	1,494	2,231	9,100	8,972	10,350
Net income available to common stockholders	$ 8,457	$ 9,202	$ 8,231	$ 8,155	$ 6,487	$ 6,035	$ 5,845	$ 4,871	$ 34,045	$ 23,238	$ 17,378
Net income per common share, basic	$ 1.40	$ 1.53	$ 1.38	$ 1.37	$ 1.10	$ 1.03	$ 1.02	$ 0.88	$ 5.68	$ 4.03	$ 3.15
Net income per common share, diluted	$ 1.23	$ 1.35	$ 1.21	$ 1.20	$ 0.97	$ 0.90	$ 0.89	$ 0.77	$ 4.99	$ 3.53	$ 2.84

XML

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (Parenthetical) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Unrealized holding gains arising during period from securities available for sale	$ 191	$ 2,944	$ 755
Reclassification adjustment for net gains on sale of securities in net income		$ 252	$ 39

XML

Statement Of Income (Detail) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended								12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012	Sep. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2012	Mar. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Sep. 30, 2011	Jun. 30, 2011	Mar. 31, 2011	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Income:
Other income									$ 744	$ 650	$ 744
Interest on borrowings									2,652	3,033	3,319
Income tax benefit									(17,120)	(12,389)	(9,358)
Net income									34,445	23,438	17,378
Dividends on preferred stock									400	200	0
Net income available to common stockholders	8,457	9,202	8,231	8,155	6,487	6,035	5,845	4,871	34,045	23,238	17,378
Parent [Member]
Income:
Dividends received from subsidiary									0	800	1,230
Other income									41	43	42
Total income									41	843	1,272
Interest on borrowings									2,213	2,345	2,236
Other operating expenses									325	291	295
Total expenses									2,538	2,636	2,531
undistributed earnings of subsidiary									(2,497)	(1,793)	(1,259)
Income tax benefit									(944)	(976)	(924)
earnings of subsidiary									(1,553)	(817)	(335)
Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiary									35,998	24,255	17,713
Net income									34,445	23,438	17,378
Dividends on preferred stock									400	200	0
Net income available to common stockholders									$ 34,045	$ 23,238	$ 17,378

XML

Analysis Of Troubled Debt Restructuring (Detail) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Statement [Line Items]
Number of Contracts	26	6
Pre- Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment	$ 9,513	$ 4,485
Post- Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment	9,513	4,485
Number of Contracts	3	0
Recorded Investment	2,786	0
Commercial Financial and Agricultural Financing Receivable [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Number of Contracts	2	2
Pre- Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment	1,168	1,369
Post- Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment	1,168	1,369
Number of Contracts	0	0
Recorded Investment	0	0
Commercial Real Estate Construction Financing Receivable [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Number of Contracts	15	0
Pre- Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment	3,213	0
Post- Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment	3,213	0
Number of Contracts	0	0
Recorded Investment	0	0
Commercial Mortgage Loans Owner Occupied [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Number of Contracts	3	3
Pre- Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment	3,121	2,785
Post- Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment	3,121	2,785
Number of Contracts	3	0
Recorded Investment	2,786	0
One To Four Family Mortgage Loans [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Number of Contracts	5	0
Pre- Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment	1,709	0
Post- Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment	1,709	0
Number of Contracts	0	0
Recorded Investment	0	0
Other Real Estate Mortgage Loans [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Number of Contracts	1	1
Pre- Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment	302	331
Post- Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment	302	331
Number of Contracts	0	0
Recorded Investment	0	0
Residential Real Estate Mortgage Loans [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Number of Contracts	9	4
Pre- Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment	5,132	3,116
Post- Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment	5,132	3,116
Number of Contracts	3	0
Recorded Investment	2,786	0
Consumer Portfolio Segment [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Number of Contracts	0	0
Pre- Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment	0	0
Post- Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment	0	0
Number of Contracts	0	0
Recorded Investment	$ 0	$ 0

XML

LOANS (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Text Block [Abstract]

Details Of Loans

The composition of loans at December 31, 2012 and 2011 is summarized as follows:

	December 31,
	2012			2011
	(In Thousands)
Commercial, financial and agricultural	$	1,030,990		$	799,464
Real estate - construction		158,361			151,218
Real estate - mortgage:
Owner-occupied commercial		568,041			398,601
1-4 family mortgage		235,909			205,182
Other mortgage		323,599			235,251
Total real estate - mortgage		1,127,549			839,034
Consumer		46,282			41,026
Total Loans		2,363,182			1,830,742
Less: Allowance for loan losses		(26,258	)		(22,030	)
Net Loans	$	2,336,924		$	1,808,712

Schedule Of Allowance For Loan Losses

Changes in the allowance for loan losses during the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively are as follows:

	Years Ended December 31,
	2012			2011			2010
	(In Thousands)
Balance, beginning of year	$	22,030		$	18,077		$	14,737
Loans charged off		(5,755	)		(5,653	)		(7,208	)
Recoveries		883			634			198
Provision for loan losses		9,100			8,972			10,350
Balance, end of year	$	26,258		$	22,030		$	18,077

Changes In Allowance For Loan Losses Segregated By Loan Type

Changes in the allowance for loan losses, segregated by loan type, during the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, are as follows:

	Commercial,
	financial and			Real estate -			Real estate -						Qualitative
	agricultural			construction			mortgage			Consumer			Factors		Total
	(In Thousands)
	Year Ended December 31, 2012
Allowance for loan losses:
Balance at December 31, 2011	$	6,627		$	6,542		$	3,295		$	531		$	5,035	$	22,030
Chargeoffs		(1,106	)		(3,088	)		(660	)		(901	)		-		(5,755	)
Recoveries		125			58			692			8			-		883
Provision		2,587			2,999			1,585			561			1,368		9,100
Balance at December 31, 2012	$	8,233		$	6,511		$	4,912		$	199		$	6,403	$	26,258

	December 31, 2012
Individually Evaluated for Impairment	$	577	$	1,013	$	1,921	$	-	$	-	$	3,511
Collectively Evaluated for Impairment		7,656		5,498		2,991		199		6,403		22,747
Loans:
Ending Balance	$	1,030,990	$	158,361	$	1,127,549	$	46,282	$	-	$	2,363,182
Individually Evaluated for Impairment		3,910		14,422		18,927		135		-		37,394
Collectively Evaluated for Impairment		1,027,080		143,939		1,108,622		46,147		-		2,325,788

	Year Ended December 31, 2011
Allowance for loan losses:
Balance at December 31, 2010	$	5,348		$	6,373		$	2,443		$	749		$	3,164	$	18,077
Chargeoffs		(1,096	)		(2,594	)		(1,096	)		(867	)		-		(5,653	)
Recoveries		361			180			12			81			-		634
Provision		2,014			2,583			1,936			568			1,871		8,972
Balance at December 31, 2011	$	6,627		$	6,542		$	3,295		$	531		$	5,035	$	22,030

	December 31, 2011
Individually Evaluated for Impairment	$	1,382	$	1,533	$	941	$	325	$	-	$	4,181
Collectively Evaluated for Impairment		5,245		5,009		2,354		206		5,035		17,849
Loans:
Ending Balance	$	799,464	$	151,218	$	839,034	$	41,026	$	-	$	1,830,742
Individually Evaluated for Impairment		5,578		16,262		14,866		547		-		37,253
Collectively Evaluated for Impairment		793,886		134,956		824,168		40,479		-		1,793,489

Loans By Credit Quality Indicator

Loans by credit quality indicator as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 were as follows: 

			Special
December 31, 2012	Pass		Mention		Substandard		Doubtful		Total
	(In Thousands)
Commercial, financialand agricultural	$	1,004,043	$	19,172	$	7,775	$	-	$	1,030,990
Real estate - construction		121,168		22,771		14,422		-		158,361
Real estate - mortgage:
Owner-occupied commercial		555,536		4,142		8,363		-		568,041
1-4 family mortgage		223,152		6,379		6,378		-		235,909
Other mortgage		312,473		6,674		4,452		-		323,599
Total real estate mortgage		1,091,161		17,195		19,193		-		1,127,549
Consumer		46,076		71		135		-		46,282
Total	$	2,262,448	$	59,209	$	41,525	$	-	$	2,363,182

			Special
December 31, 2011	Pass		Mention		Substandard		Doubtful		Total
	(In Thousands)
Commercial, financialand agricultural	$	780,270	$	11,775	$	7,419	$	-	$	799,464
Real estate - construction		117,244		14,472		19,502		-		151,218
Real estate - mortgage:
Owner-occupied commercial		385,084		7,333		6,184		-		398,601
1-4 family mortgage		194,447		4,835		5,900		-		205,182
Other mortgage		224,807		7,034		3,410		-		235,251
Total real estate mortgage		804,338		19,202		15,494		-		839,034
Consumer		40,353		96		577		-		41,026
Total	$	1,742,205	$	45,545	$	42,992	$	-	$	1,830,742

Loans By Performance Status

Loans by performance status as of December 31, 2012 and 2011are as follows:

December 31, 2012	Performing		Nonperforming		Total
	(In Thousands)
Commercial, financial and agricultural	$	1,030,714	$	276	$	1,030,990
Real estate - construction		151,901		6,460		158,361
Real estate - mortgage:
Owner-occupied commercial		565,255		2,786		568,041
1-4 family mortgage		235,456		453		235,909
Other mortgage		323,359		240		323,599
Total real estate mortgage		1,124,070		3,479		1,127,549
Consumer		46,139		143		46,282
Total	$	2,352,824	$	10,358	$	2,363,182

December 31, 2011	Performing		Nonperforming		Total
	(In Thousands)
Commercial, financial and agricultural	$	798,285	$	1,179	$	799,464
Real estate - construction		141,155		10,063		151,218
Real estate - mortgage:
Owner-occupied commercial		397,809		792		398,601
1-4 family mortgage		204,512		670		205,182
Other mortgage		234,558		693		235,251
Total real estate mortgage		836,879		2,155		839,034
Consumer		40,651		375		41,026
Total	$	1,816,970	$	13,772	$	1,830,742

Loans By Past Due Status

Loans by past due status as of December 31, 2012 and 2011are as follows: 

December 31, 2012	Past Due Status (Accruing Loans)
							Total Past
	30-59 Days		60-89 Days		90+ Days		Due		Non-Accrual		Current		Total Loans
	(In Thousands)
Commercial, financial and agricultural	$	1,699	$	385	$	-	$	2,084	$	276	$	1,028,630	$	1,030,990
Real estate - construction		-		-		-		-		6,460		151,901		158,361
Real estate - mortgage:
Owner-occupied commercial		1,480		10		-		1,490		2,786		563,765		568,041
1-4 family mortgage		420		16		-		436		453		235,020		235,909
Other mortgage		516		-		-		516		240		322,843		323,599
Total real estate -
mortgage		2,416		26		-		2,442		3,479		1,121,628		1,127,549
Consumer		108		-		8		116		135		46,031		46,282
Total	$	4,223	$	411	$	8	$	4,642	$	10,350	$	2,348,190	$	2,363,182

December 31, 2011	Past Due Status (Accruing Loans)
							Total Past
	30-59 Days		60-89 Days		90+ Days		Due		Non-Accrual		Current		Total Loans
	(In Thousands)
Commercial, financial and agricultural	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	1,179	$	798,285	$	799,464
Real estate - construction		2,234		-		-		2,234		10,063		138,921		151,218
Real estate - mortgage:
Owner-occupied commercial		-		-		-		-		792		397,809		398,601
1-4 family mortgage		2,107		-		-		2,107		670		202,405		205,182
Other mortgage		-		-		-		-		693		234,558		235,251
Total real estate - mortgage		2,107		-		-		2,107		2,155		834,772		839,034
Consumer		-		84		-		84		375		40,567		41,026
Total	$	4,341	$	84	$	-	$	4,425	$	13,772	$	1,812,545	$	1,830,742

Details Of Company's Impaired Loans

The following table presents details of the Company’s impaired loans as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Loans which have been fully charged off do not appear in the tables.

December 31, 2012
			Unpaid				Average		Interest Income
	Recorded		Principal		Related		Recorded		Recognized
	Investment		Balance		Allowance		Investment		in Period
	(In Thousands)
With no allowance recorded:
Commercial, financial and agricultural	$	2,602	$	2,856	$	-	$	2,313	$	105
Real estate - construction		6,872		7,894		-		7,631		188
Real estate - mortgage:
Owner-occupied commercial		5,111		5,361		-		5,411		145
1-4 family mortgage		2,166		2,388		-		2,177		108
Other mortgage		4,151		4,249		-		4,206		275
Total real estate - mortgage		11,428		11,998		-		11,794		528
Consumer		135		344		-		296		6
Total with no allowance recorded		21,037		23,092		-		22,034		827
With an allowance recorded:
Commercial, financial and agricultural		1,308		1,308		577		1,325		90
Real estate - construction		7,550		8,137		1,013		6,961		154
Real estate - mortgage:
Owner-occupied commercial		3,195		3,195		779		3,277		77
1-4 family mortgage		4,002		4,002		1,007		4,001		139
Other mortgage		302		302		135		307		20
Total real estate - mortgage		7,499		7,499		1,921		7,585		236
Consumer		-		-		-		-		-
Total with allowance recorded		16,357		16,944		3,511		15,871		480
Total Impaired Loans:
Commercial, financial and agricultural		3,910		4,164		577		3,638		195
Real estate - construction		14,422		16,031		1,013		14,592		342
Real estate - mortgage:
Owner-occupied commercial		8,306		8,556		779		8,688		222
1-4 family mortgage		6,168		6,390		1,007		6,178		247
Other mortgage		4,453		4,551		135		4,513		295
Total real estate - mortgage		18,927		19,497		1,921		19,379		764
Consumer		135		344		-		296		6
Total impaired loans	$	37,394	$	40,036	$	3,511	$	37,905	$	1,307

December 31, 2011
			Unpaid				Average		Interest Income
	Recorded		Principal		Related		Recorded		Recognized in
	Investment		Balance		Allowance		Investment		Period
	(In Thousands)
With no allowance recorded:
Commercial, financial and agricultural	$	1,264	$	1,264	$	-	$	1,501	$	74
Real estate - construction		11,583		12,573		-		10,406		226
Owner-occupied commercial		2,493		2,493		-		2,523		153
1-4 family mortgage		1,293		1,293		-		1,241		44
Other mortgage		2,837		2,837		-		2,746		162
Total real estate - mortgage		6,623		6,623		-		6,510		359
Consumer		173		173		-		173		6
Total with no allowance recorded		19,643		20,633		-		18,590		665
With an allowance recorded:
Commercial, financial and agricultural		4,314		4,314		1,382		4,156		226
Real estate - construction		4,679		4,679		1,482		3,987		94
Real estate - mortgage:
Owner-occupied commercial		3,515		3,515		88		3,504		365
1-4 family mortgage		4,397		4,397		904		4,484		198
Other mortgage		331		331		-		337		22
Total real estate - mortgage		8,243		8,243		992		8,325		585
Consumer		374		624		325		425		-
Total with allowance recorded		17,610		17,860		4,181		16,893		905
Total Impaired Loans:
Commercial, financial and agricultural		5,578		5,578		1,382		5,657		300
Real estate - construction		16,262		17,252		1,482		14,393		320
Real estate - mortgage:
Owner-occupied commercial		6,008		6,008		88		6,027		518
1-4 family mortgage		5,690		5,690		904		5,725		242
Other mortgage		3,168		3,168		-		3,083		184
Total real estate - mortgage		14,866		14,866		992		14,835		944
Consumer		547		797		325		598		6
Total impaired loans	$	37,253	$	38,493	$	4,181	$	35,483	$	1,570

Analysis Of Troubled Debt Restructuring

The following table presents an analysis of TDRs as of December 31, 2012 and 2011.

	December 31, 2012						December 31, 2011
			Pre-		Post-				Pre-		Post-
			Modification		Modification				Modification		Modification
			Outstanding		Outstanding				Outstanding		Outstanding
	Number of		Recorded		Recorded		Number of		Recorded		Recorded
	Contracts		Investment		Investment		Contracts		Investment		Investment
	(In Thousands)
Troubled Debt Restructurings
Commercial, financial and agricultural		2	$	1,168	$	1,168		2	$	1,369	$	1,369
Real estate - construction		15		3,213		3,213		-		-		-
Real estate - mortgage:
Owner-occupied commercial		3		3,121		3,121		3		2,785		2,785
1-4 family mortgage		5		1,709		1,709		-		-		-
Other mortgage		1		302		302		1		331		331
Total real estate mortgage		9		5,132		5,132		4		3,116		3,116
Consumer		-		-		-		-		-		-
		26	$	9,513	$	9,513		6	$	4,485	$	4,485

	Number of		Recorded		Number of		Recorded
	Contracts		Investment		Contracts		Investment
Troubled Debt Restructurings
That Subsequently Defaulted Commercial, financial and agricultural		-	$	-		-	$	-
Real estate - construction		-		-		-		-
Real estate - mortgage:
Owner-occupied commercial		3		2,786		-		-
1-4 family mortgage		-		-		-		-
Other mortgage		-		-		-		-
Total real estate - mortgage		3		2,786		-		-
Consumer		-		-		-		-
		3	$	2,786		-	$	-

Schedule Of Changes In Related Party Loans

Changes in related party loans for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 are as follows:

	Years Ended December 31,
	2012			2011
	(In Thousands)
Balance, beginning of year	$	9,047		$	6,825
Advances		7,630			7,926
Repayments		(8,096	)		(4,204	)
Participations		3,819			(1,500	)
Balance, end of year	$	12,400		$	9,047

XML

PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT - Additional Information (Detail) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Depreciation and amortization	$ 1,218	$ 1,173	$ 1,066
Operating Leases, Rent Expense	$ 2,195	$ 2,060	$ 1,734

XML

EMPLOYEE AND DIRECTOR BENEFITS

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Disclosure Of Compensation Related Costs, Share-Based Payments [Abstract]

EMPLOYEE AND DIRECTOR BENEFITS

NOTE 13. EMPLOYEE AND DIRECTOR BENEFITS

At December 31, 2012, the Company has two stock-based compensation plans, which are described below. The compensation cost that has been charged against income for the plans was approximately $1,049,000, $975,000 and $713,000 for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Stock Incentive Plans

The Company’s 2005 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2005 Plan”), originally permitted the grant of stock options to its officers, employees, directors and organizers of the Company for up to 525,000 shares of common stock. However, upon stockholder approval during 2006, the 2005 Plan was amended in order to allow the Company to grant stock options for up to 1,025,000 shares of common stock. Both incentive stock options and non-qualified stock options may be granted under the 2005 Plan. Option awards are generally granted with an exercise price equal to the estimated fair market value of the Company’s stock at the date of grant; those option awards vest in varying amounts from 2007 through 2015 and are based on continuous service during that vesting period and have a ten-year contractual term. Dividends are not paid on unexercised options and dividends are not subject to vesting. The 2005 Plan provides for accelerated vesting if there is a change in control (as defined in the 2005 Plan).

On March 23, 2009, the Company’s board of directors adopted the 2009 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2009 Plan”), which was effective upon approval by the stockholders at the 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The 2009 Plan authorizes the grant of stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, stock options, non-stock share equivalents, performance shares or performance units and other equity-based awards.

Both incentive stock options and non-qualified stock options may be granted under the 2009 Plan. Option awards are generally granted with an exercise price equal to the estimated fair market value of the Company’s stock at the date of grant. Up to 425,000 shares of common stock of the Company are available for awards under the 2009 Plan.

As of December 31, 2012, there are a total of 257,000 shares available to be granted under both of these plans.

On September 21, 2006, we granted non-plan stock options to persons representing certain key business relationships to purchase up to an aggregate of 30,000 shares of our common stock for a purchase price of $15.00 per share. On November 2, 2007, we granted non-plan stock options to persons representing certain key business relationships to purchase up to an aggregate of 25,000 shares of our common stock for a purchase price of $20.00 per share. These stock options are non-qualified and are not part of either of our stock incentive plans. They vested 100% in a lump sum five years after their date of grant and expire 10 years after their date of grant.

The fair value of each stock option award is estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes-Merton valuation model that uses the assumptions noted in the following table. Expected volatilities are based on an index of approximately 79 publicly traded banks in the southeast United States. The expected term of options granted is based on the short-cut method and represents the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding. The risk-free rate for periods within the contractual life of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant.

	2012			2011			2010
Expected volatility		19.80	%		26.50	%		26.00	%
Expected dividends		-	%		0.37	%		-	%
Expected term (in years)		6.5			6.5			7.0
Risk-free rate		1.05	%		2.21	%		2.10	%

The weighted average grant-date fair value of options granted during the years ended December 31, 2012, December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was $6.59, $7.82 and $7.91, respectively.

The following tables summarize stock option activity.:

	Shares			Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (years)		Aggregate Intrinsic Value
								(In Thousands)
Year Ended December 31, 2012:
Outstanding at beginning of year		1,073,800		$	18.33		6.0	$	12,508
Granted		45,500			30.00		9.3		130
Exercised		(288,130	)		12.71		2.4		5,846
Forfeited		(14,670	)		24.54		-		-
Outstanding at end of year		816,500		$	20.87		5.8	$	9,905
Exercisable at December 31, 2012		412,825		$	14.03		3.6	$	7,831
Year Ended December 31, 2011:
Outstanding at beginning of year		881,000		$	15.65		6.9	$	8,238
Granted		233,500			27.16		9.3		-
Exercised		(40,700	)		10.53		3.8		792
Forfeited		-			15.00		-		-
Outstanding at end of year		1,073,800		$	18.33		6.0	$	12,508
Exercisable at December 31, 2011		442,940		$	13.19		4.4	$	7,447
Year Ended December 31, 2010:
Outstanding at beginning of year		863,500		$	15.17		6.8	$	8,483
Granted		37,500			25.00		9.4		-
Exercised		(10,000	)		10.00		-		150
Forfeited		(10,000	)		15.00		-		-
Outstanding at end of year		881,000		$	15.65		6.9	$	8,238
Exercisable at December 31, 2010		272,627		$	11.96		5.1	$	3,555

Exercisable options at December 31, 2012 were as follows:

Range of Exercise Price		Shares		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (years)		Aggregate Intrinsic Value
								(In Thousands)
$	10.00		106,500	$	10.00		2.4	$	2,450
	11.00		119,500		11.00		3.3		2,629
	15.00		101,830		15.00		3.9		1,833
	20.00		47,995		20.00		4.8		624
	25.00		37,000		25.00		5.7		296
			412,825	$	14.03		3.6	$	7,832

As of December 31, 2012, there was $1,795,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock options. The cost is expected to be recognized on the straight-line method over the next 2.1 years. The total fair value of shares vested during the year ended December 31, 2012 was $404,000.

Restricted Stock

The Company has issued restricted stock, and currently has 20,500 non-vested shares issued. The value of restricted stock awards is determined to be the current value of the Company’s stock, and this total value will be recognized as compensation expense over the vesting period, which is five years from the date of grant. As of December 31, 2012, there was $360,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested restricted stock. The cost is expected to be recognized evenly over the remaining 1.7 years of the restricted stock’s vesting period.

Stock Warrants

In recognition of the efforts and financial risks undertaken by the organizers of ServisFirst Bank (the “Bank”) in 2005, the Bank granted warrants to organizers to purchase a total of 60,000 shares of Bank common stock at a price of $10, which was the fair market value of the Bank’s common stock at the date of the grant. The warrants became warrants to purchase a like number of shares of the Company’s common stock upon the formation of the Company as a holding company for the Bank. The warrants vest in equal annual increments over a three-year period commencing on the first anniversary date of the Bank’s incorporation and will terminate on the tenth anniversary of the incorporation date. All of these warrants were exercised as of December 31, 2012 and there were 20,000 outstanding as of December 31, 2011.

The Company issued warrants for 75,000 shares of common stock with an exercise price of $25 per share in the third quarter of 2008. These warrants were issued in connection with trust preferred securities. There were 70,500 warrants outstanding as of December 31, 2012 and 75,000 warrants were outstanding as of December 31, 2011.

The Company issued warrants for 15,000 shares of common stock with an exercise price of $25 per share in the second quarter of 2009. These warrants were issued in connection with the issuance of the Company’s 8.25% Subordinated Note.

As of December 31, 2012, all warrants were fully vested.

Retirement Plans

The Company has a retirement savings 401(k) and profit-sharing plan in which all employees age 21 and older may participate after completion of one year of service. For employees in service with the Bank at June 15, 2005, the length of service and age requirements were waived. The Company matches employees’ contributions based on a percentage of salary contributed by participants and may make additional discretionary profit sharing contributions. The Company’s expense for the plan was $1,167,000, $946,000 and $377,000 for 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The Company’s board of directors approved additional discretionary matches for 2012 and 2011 based on the profits of the Company during those years. The additional matches were 4% and 3%, respectively, and amounted to $576,000 and $432,000, respectively, and are included in the expenses above.

XML

FORECLOSED PROPERTIES (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Foreclosed Properties [Abstract]

Analysis of Foreclosed Properties

An analysis of foreclosed properties for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 follows:

	2012			2011			2010
Balance at beginning of year	$	12,275		$	6,966		$	12,525
Transfers from loans and capitalized expenses		2,695			9,029			5,447
Foreclosed properties sold		(2,967	)		(3,334	)		(7,995	)
Writedowns and partial liquidations		(2,318	)		(386	)		(3,011	)
Balance at end of year	$	9,685		$	12,275		$	6,966

XML

REGULATORY MATTERS

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Banking and Thrift [Abstract]

REGULATORY MATTERS

NOTE 15. REGULATORY MATTERS

The Bank is subject to dividend restrictions set forth in the Alabama Banking Code and by the Alabama State Banking Department. Under such restrictions, the Bank may not, without the prior approval of the Alabama State Banking Department, declare dividends in excess of the sum of the current year’s earnings plus the retained earnings from the prior two years. Based on these restrictions, the Bank would be limited to paying $90.1 million in dividends as of December 31, 2012.

The Bank is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the state and federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possible additional discretionary actions by regulators that if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Bank and the financial statements. Under regulatory capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines involving quantitative measures of the Bank’s assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Bank’s capital amounts and classification under the prompt corrective guidelines are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors.

Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the table below) of total risk-based capital and Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets (as defined in the regulations), and Tier 1 capital to adjusted total assets (as defined). Management believes, as of December 31, 2012, that the Bank meets all capital adequacy requirements to which it is subject.

As of December 31, 2012, the most recent notification from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation categorized ServisFirst Bank as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To remain categorized as well capitalized, the Bank will have to maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier 1 risk-based, and Tier 1 leverage ratios as disclosed in the table below. Management believes that it is well capitalized under the prompt corrective action provisions as of December 31, 2012.

The Company’s and Bank’s actual capital amounts and ratios are presented in the following table:

	Actual					For Capital Adequacy Purposes					To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions
	Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio
As of December 31, 2012:
Total Capital to Risk Weighted Assets:
Consolidated	$	287,136		11.78	%	$	194,943		8.00	%		N/A		N/A
ServisFirst Bank		284,141		11.66	%		194,942		8.00	%	$	243,678		10.00	%
Tier I Capital to Risk Weighted Assets:
Consolidated		240,961		9.89	%		97,472		4.00	%		N/A		N/A
ServisFirst Bank		257,883		10.58	%		97,471		4.00	%		146,207		6.00	%
Tier I Capital to Average Assets:
Consolidated		240,961		8.43	%		114,323		4.00	%		N/A		N/A
ServisFirst Bank		257,883		9.03	%		114,227		4.00	%		142,784		5.00	%
As of December 31, 2011:
Total Capital to Risk Weighted Assets:
Consolidated	$	246,334		12.79	%	$	154,094		8.00	%		N/A		N/A
ServisFirst Bank		243,279		12.63	%		154,070		8.00	%	$	192,588		10.00	%
Tier I Capital to Risk Weighted Assets:
Consolidated		219,350		11.39	%		77,047		4.00	%		N/A		N/A
ServisFirst Bank		216,295		11.23	%		77,035		4.00	%		115,553		6.00	%
Tier I Capital to Average Assets:
Consolidated		219,350		9.17	%		95,642		4.00	%		N/A		N/A
ServisFirst Bank		216,295		9.06	%		95,481		4.00	%		119,352		5.00	%

XML

Scheduled Maturities Of Time Deposits (Detail) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Dec. 31, 2012
2013	$ 247,482
2014	87,433
2015	21,167
2016	26,437
2017	13,161
Total time deposits	$ 395,680

XML

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (USD $) In Thousands	Total	Preferred Stock [Member]	Common Stock [Member]	Additional Paid In Capital [Member]	Retained Earnings [Member]	Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income [Member]
Beginning Balance at Dec. 31, 2009	$ 97,622	$ 0	$ 6	$ 75,078	$ 20,965	$ 1,573
Sale Of Shares		0
Other comprehensive income	1,264	0	0	0	0	1,264
Stock-based compensation expense	713	0	0	713	0	0
Net income	17,378	0	0	0	17,378	0
Exercise of stock options, including tax benefit	123	0	0	123	0	0
Sale of shares of preferred stock, net		0
Preferred dividends paid		0
Ending Balance at Dec. 31, 2010	117,100	0	6	75,914	38,343	2,837
Sale Of Shares	10,159	0	0	10,159	0	0
Other comprehensive income	4,105	0	0	0	0	4,105
Stock-based compensation expense	975	0	0	975	0	0
Net income	23,438	0	0	0	23,438	0
Exercise of stock options, including tax benefit	757	0	0	757	0	0
Sale of shares of preferred stock, net	39,958	39,958	0	0	0	0
Preferred dividends paid	(200)	0	0	0	(200)	0
Ending Balance at Dec. 31, 2011	196,292	39,958	6	87,805	61,581	6,942
Other comprehensive income	354	0	0	0	0	354
Stock-based compensation expense	1,049	0	0	1,049	0	0
Net income	34,445	0	0	0	34,445	0
Exercise of stock options, including tax benefit	4,651	0	0	4,651	0	0
Preferred dividends paid	(400)	0	0	0	(400)	0
Dividends paid	(3,134)	0	0	0	(3,134)	0
Ending Balance at Dec. 31, 2012	$ 233,257	$ 39,958	$ 6	$ 93,505	$ 92,492	$ 7,296

XML

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Parenthetical) (USD $) In Thousands, except Share data, unless otherwise specified	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Held to maturity debt securities, fair value	$ 27,350	$ 15,999
Common stock, par value	$ 0.001	$ 0.001
Common stock, shares authorized	50,000,000	50,000,000
Common stock, shares issued	6,268,812	5,932,182
Common stock, shares outstanding	6,268,812	5,932,182
Series Preferred Stock [Member]
Preferred stock, par value	$ 0.001	$ 0.001
Preferred stock, liquidation preference	$ 1,000	$ 1,000
Preferred stock, authorized	40,000	40,000
Preferred stock, shares issued	40,000	40,000
Preferred stock, shares outstanding	40,000	40,000
Preferred Stock [Member]
Preferred stock, par value	$ 0.001	$ 0.001
Preferred stock, authorized	1,000,000	1,000,000
Preferred stock, undesignated	960,000	960,000

XML

FEDERAL FUNDS PURCHASED

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Federal Funds Purchased [Abstract]

FEDERAL FUNDS PURCHASED

NOTE 8. FEDERAL FUNDS PURCHASED

At December 31, 2012, The Company had $117.1 million in federal funds purchased from its respondent banks that are clients of its correspondent banking unit, compared to $79.3 million at December 31, 2011. The Company was paying an interest rate of 0.25% on these balances at December 31, 2012.

At December 31, 2012, the Company had available lines of credit totaling approximately $130 million with various financial institutions for borrowing on a short-term basis, with no amount outstanding. Available lines with these same banks totaled approximately $140 million at December 31, 2011. These lines are subject to annual renewals with varying interest rates.

XML

Condensed Balance Sheet (Detail) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Dec. 31, 2012	Jun. 01, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
ASSETS
Cash and due from banks	$ 58,031		$ 43,018
Other assets	6,944		8,400
Total assets	2,906,314		2,460,785
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Subordinated debentures	15,050	5,000	30,514
Other liabilities	8,511		4,928
Total liabilities	2,673,057		2,264,493
Stockholders' equity:
Preferred stock	0		0
Common stock, par value $.001 per share; 50,000,000 shares authorized; 6,268,812 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2012 and 5,932,182 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2011	6		6
Additional paid-in capital	93,505		87,805
Retained earnings	92,492		61,581
Accumulated other comprehensive income	7,296		6,942
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	2,906,314		2,460,785
Parent [Member]
ASSETS
Cash and due from banks	3,264		2,908
Investment in subsidiary	265,229		223,753
Other assets	18		293
Total assets	268,511		226,954
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Other borrowings	19,917		0
Subordinated debentures	15,050		30,514
Other liabilities	287		148
Total liabilities	35,254		30,662
Stockholders' equity:
Preferred stock	39,958		39,958
Common stock, par value $.001 per share; 50,000,000 shares authorized; 6,268,812 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2012 and 5,932,182 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2011	6		6
Additional paid-in capital	93,505		87,805
Retained earnings	92,492		61,581
Accumulated other comprehensive income	7,296		6,942
Total stockholders' equity	233,257		196,292
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	268,511		226,954
Preferred Stock,Series Senior Non-Cumulative Perpetual [Member]
Stockholders' equity:
Preferred stock	$ 39,958		$ 39,958

XML

Financial Assets And Liabilities Carried At Fair Value On Nonrecurring Basis (Detail) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Dec. 31, 2012	Nov. 30, 2012	Jun. 01, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Financial Assets:
Debt securities available for sale	$ 233,877			$ 293,809
Debt securities held to maturity	25,967			15,209
Restricted equity securities	3,941			3,501
Mortgage loans held for sale	25,826			17,859
Bank owned life insurance contracts	57,014			40,390
Derivatives	490
Loans, net	2,336,924			1,808,712
Financial Liabilities:
Other borrowings	19,917	19,900		4,954
Trust preferred securities	15,050		5,000	30,514
Carrying Reported Amount Fair Value Disclosure [Member]
Financial Assets:
Debt securities available for sale	233,877			293,809
Debt securities held to maturity	25,967			15,209
Restricted equity securities	3,941			3,501
Mortgage loans held for sale	25,826			17,859
Bank owned life insurance contracts	57,014			40,390
Derivatives	389			626
Loans, net	2,336,924			1,808,712
Financial Liabilities:
Deposits	2,511,572			2,143,887
Other borrowings	19,917			4,954
Trust preferred securities	15,050			30,514
Derivatives	389			617
Portion At Fair Value Fair Value Disclosure [Member]
Financial Assets:
Debt securities available for sale	233,877			293,809
Debt securities held to maturity	27,350			15,999
Restricted equity securities	3,941			3,501
Mortgage loans held for sale	25,826			17,859
Bank owned life insurance contracts	57,014			40,390
Derivatives	389			626
Loans, net	2,327,780			1,811,612
Financial Liabilities:
Deposits	2,516,320			2,150,308
Other borrowings	19,917			5,377
Trust preferred securities	15,050			27,402
Derivatives	$ 389			$ 617

XML

Document and Entity Information (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012	Feb. 28, 2013	Jun. 30, 2012
Document Type	10-K
Amendment Flag	false
Document Period End Date	Dec. 31, 2012
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2012
Document Fiscal Period Focus	FY
Entity Registrant Name	SERVISFIRST BANCSHARES, INC.
Entity Central Index Key	0001430723
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--12-31
Entity Well-Known Seasoned Issuer	No
Entity Current Reporting Status	Yes
Entity Voluntary Filers	No
Entity Filer Category	Accelerated Filer
Entity Common Stock Shares Outstanding		6,268,812
Entity Public Float			$ 159,534,480

XML

OTHER BORROWINGS

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Debt Disclosure [Abstract]

OTHER BORROWINGS

NOTE 9. OTHER BORROWINGS

Other borrowings of $19.9 million are comprised of the Company’s 5.5% Subordinated Notes due November 9, 2022, which were issued in a private placement in November 2012. The notes pay interest semi-annually.

On June 1, 2012, the Company paid off its 8.25% Subordinated Note due June 1, 2016 in the aggregate principal amount of $5 million. This note was payable to one accredited investor and was issued on June 23, 2009.

On November 8, 2012, the Company redeemed all of its outstanding 8.5% Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debentures due 2038, which were held by ServisFirst Capital Trust I. As a result, all of the outstanding 8.5% Trust Preferred Securities and 8.5% Common Securities of the Trust were redeemed. The redemption price for the Trust Preferred Securities was $1,000 per security, for a total principal amount of $15 million, plus accrued distributions up to the redemption date. The Junior Subordinated Debentures were originally issued on September 2, 2008, and in accordance with their terms, were subject to option redemption by the Company on or after September 1, 2011. Pursuant to the terms of its Amended and Restated Trust Agreement, ServisFirst Capital Trust I is required to use the proceeds it receives from the redemption of the Junior Subordinated Debentures to redeem its Trust Preferred Securities and 8.5% Common Securities on the same day.

The Company prepaid both of its advances from Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) during 2011, one in March and the other in June. Prepayment penalties of $738,000 were paid to the FHLB as part of these prepayments, and is included in other operating expenses.

XML

REGULATORY MATTERS - Additional Information (Detail) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	Dec. 31, 2012
Cumulative Dividends	$ 90.1

XML

Carrying Amount And Estimated Fair Value Of Financial Instruments (Detail) (Fair Value Measurements Nonrecurring [Member], USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Impaired loans, net of related allowance	$ 33,883	$ 33,072
Other real estate owned	9,685	12,275
Total assets at fair value	43,568	45,347
Fair Value Inputs Level 3 [Member]
Impaired loans, net of related allowance	33,883	33,072
Other real estate owned	9,685	12,275
Total assets at fair value	$ 43,568	$ 45,347

XML

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (USD $) In Thousands, except Per Share data, unless otherwise specified	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Interest income:
Interest and fees on loans	$ 100,462	$ 82,294	$ 69,115
Taxable securities	4,814	5,721	6,482
Nontaxable securities	3,246	2,943	2,274
Federal funds sold	196	176	104
Other interest and dividends	305	277	171
Total interest income	109,023	91,411	78,146
Interest expense:
Deposits	12,249	13,047	11,941
Borrowed funds	2,652	3,033	3,319
Total interest expense	14,901	16,080	15,260
Net interest income	94,122	75,331	62,886
Provision for loan losses	9,100	8,972	10,350
Net interest income after provision for loan losses	85,022	66,359	52,536
Noninterest income:
Service charges on deposit accounts	2,756	2,290	2,316
Mortgage banking	3,560	2,373	2,174
Securities gains	0	666	108
Increase in cash surrender value life insurance	1,624	390	0
Other operating income	1,703	1,207	571
Total noninterest income	9,643	6,926	5,169
Noninterest expenses:
Salaries and employee benefits	22,587	19,518	14,669
Equipment and occupancy expense	4,014	3,697	3,184
Professional services	1,455	1,213	925
FDIC and other regulatory assessments	1,595	1,796	2,944
Other real estate owned expense	2,727	820	1,964
Other operating expenses	10,722	10,414	7,283
Total noninterest expenses	43,100	37,458	30,969
Income before income taxes	51,565	35,827	26,736
Provision for income taxes	17,120	12,389	9,358
Net income	34,445	23,438	17,378
Dividends on preferred stock	400	200	0
Net income available to common stockholders	$ 34,045	$ 23,238	$ 17,378
Basic earnings per common share	$ 5.68	$ 4.03	$ 3.15
Diluted earnings per common share	$ 4.99	$ 3.53	$ 2.84

XML

LOANS

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Receivables [Abstract]

LOANS

NOTE 3. LOANS

The composition of loans at December 31, 2012 and 2011 is summarized as follows:

	December 31,
	2012			2011
	(In Thousands)
Commercial, financial and agricultural	$	1,030,990		$	799,464
Real estate - construction		158,361			151,218
Real estate - mortgage:
Owner-occupied commercial		568,041			398,601
1-4 family mortgage		235,909			205,182
Other mortgage		323,599			235,251
Total real estate - mortgage		1,127,549			839,034
Consumer		46,282			41,026
Total Loans		2,363,182			1,830,742
Less: Allowance for loan losses		(26,258	)		(22,030	)
Net Loans	$	2,336,924		$	1,808,712

Changes in the allowance for loan losses during the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively are as follows:

	Years Ended December 31,
	2012			2011			2010
	(In Thousands)
Balance, beginning of year	$	22,030		$	18,077		$	14,737
Loans charged off		(5,755	)		(5,653	)		(7,208	)
Recoveries		883			634			198
Provision for loan losses		9,100			8,972			10,350
Balance, end of year	$	26,258		$	22,030		$	18,077

The Company assesses the adequacy of its allowance for loan losses prior to the end of each calendar quarter. The level of the allowance is based on management’s evaluation of the loan portfolios, past loan loss experience, current asset quality trends, known and inherent risks in the portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay (including the timing of future payment), the estimated value of any underlying collateral, composition of the loan portfolio, economic conditions, industry and peer bank loan quality indications and other pertinent factors, including regulatory recommendations. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires material estimates including the amounts and timing of future cash flows expected to be received on impaired loans that may be susceptible to significant change. Loan losses are charged off when management believes that the full collectability of the loan is unlikely. A loan may be partially charged-off after a “confirming event” has occurred which serves to validate that full repayment pursuant to the terms of the loan is unlikely. Allocation of the allowance is made for specific loans, but the entire allowance is available for any loan that in management’s judgment deteriorates and is uncollectible. The portion of the reserve classified as qualitative factors, is management’s evaluation of potential future losses that would arise in the loan portfolio should management’s assumption about qualitative and environmental conditions materialize. This qualitative factor portion of the allowance for loan losses is based on management’s judgment regarding various external and internal factors including macroeconomic trends, management’s assessment of the Company’s loan growth prospects, and evaluations of internal risk controls.

The following table presents an analysis of the allowance for loan losses by portfolio segment as of December 31, 2012 and 2011. The total allowance for loan losses is disaggregated into those amounts associated with loans individually evaluated and those associated with loans collectively evaluated. 

Changes in the allowance for loan losses, segregated by loan type, during the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, are as follows:

	Commercial,
	financial and			Real estate -			Real estate -						Qualitative
	agricultural			construction			mortgage			Consumer			Factors		Total
	(In Thousands)
	Year Ended December 31, 2012
Allowance for loan losses:
Balance at December 31, 2011	$	6,627		$	6,542		$	3,295		$	531		$	5,035	$	22,030
Chargeoffs		(1,106	)		(3,088	)		(660	)		(901	)		-		(5,755	)
Recoveries		125			58			692			8			-		883
Provision		2,587			2,999			1,585			561			1,368		9,100
Balance at December 31, 2012	$	8,233		$	6,511		$	4,912		$	199		$	6,403	$	26,258

	December 31, 2012
Individually Evaluated for Impairment	$	577	$	1,013	$	1,921	$	-	$	-	$	3,511
Collectively Evaluated for Impairment		7,656		5,498		2,991		199		6,403		22,747
Loans:
Ending Balance	$	1,030,990	$	158,361	$	1,127,549	$	46,282	$	-	$	2,363,182
Individually Evaluated for Impairment		3,910		14,422		18,927		135		-		37,394
Collectively Evaluated for Impairment		1,027,080		143,939		1,108,622		46,147		-		2,325,788

	Year Ended December 31, 2011
Allowance for loan losses:
Balance at December 31, 2010	$	5,348		$	6,373		$	2,443		$	749		$	3,164	$	18,077
Chargeoffs		(1,096	)		(2,594	)		(1,096	)		(867	)		-		(5,653	)
Recoveries		361			180			12			81			-		634
Provision		2,014			2,583			1,936			568			1,871		8,972
Balance at December 31, 2011	$	6,627		$	6,542		$	3,295		$	531		$	5,035	$	22,030

	December 31, 2011
Individually Evaluated for Impairment	$	1,382	$	1,533	$	941	$	325	$	-	$	4,181
Collectively Evaluated for Impairment		5,245		5,009		2,354		206		5,035		17,849
Loans:
Ending Balance	$	799,464	$	151,218	$	839,034	$	41,026	$	-	$	1,830,742
Individually Evaluated for Impairment		5,578		16,262		14,866		547		-		37,253
Collectively Evaluated for Impairment		793,886		134,956		824,168		40,479		-		1,793,489

The credit quality of the loan portfolio is summarized no less frequently than quarterly using categories similar to the standard asset classification system used by the federal banking agencies. The following table presents credit quality indicators for the loan loss portfolio segments and classes. These categories are utilized to develop the associated allowance for loan losses using historical losses adjusted for current economic conditions defined as follows:

· Pass – loans which are well protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor (or obligors, if any) or by the fair value, less cost to acquire and sell, of any underlying collateral.

· Special Mention – loans with potential weakness that may, if not reversed or corrected, weaken the credit or inadequately protect the Company’s position at some future date. These loans are not adversely classified and do not expose an institution to sufficient risk to warrant an adverse classification.

· Substandard – loans that exhibit well-defined weakness or weaknesses that presently jeopardize debt repayment. These loans are characterized by the distinct possibility that the institution will sustain some loss if the weaknesses are not corrected.

· Doubtful – loans that have all the weaknesses inherent in loans classified substandard, plus the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values highly questionable and improbable.

Loans by credit quality indicator as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 were as follows: 

			Special
December 31, 2012	Pass		Mention		Substandard		Doubtful		Total
	(In Thousands)
Commercial, financialand agricultural	$	1,004,043	$	19,172	$	7,775	$	-	$	1,030,990
Real estate - construction		121,168		22,771		14,422		-		158,361
Real estate - mortgage:
Owner-occupied commercial		555,536		4,142		8,363		-		568,041
1-4 family mortgage		223,152		6,379		6,378		-		235,909
Other mortgage		312,473		6,674		4,452		-		323,599
Total real estate mortgage		1,091,161		17,195		19,193		-		1,127,549
Consumer		46,076		71		135		-		46,282
Total	$	2,262,448	$	59,209	$	41,525	$	-	$	2,363,182

			Special
December 31, 2011	Pass		Mention		Substandard		Doubtful		Total
	(In Thousands)
Commercial, financialand agricultural	$	780,270	$	11,775	$	7,419	$	-	$	799,464
Real estate - construction		117,244		14,472		19,502		-		151,218
Real estate - mortgage:
Owner-occupied commercial		385,084		7,333		6,184		-		398,601
1-4 family mortgage		194,447		4,835		5,900		-		205,182
Other mortgage		224,807		7,034		3,410		-		235,251
Total real estate mortgage		804,338		19,202		15,494		-		839,034
Consumer		40,353		96		577		-		41,026
Total	$	1,742,205	$	45,545	$	42,992	$	-	$	1,830,742

Loans by performance status as of December 31, 2012 and 2011are as follows:

December 31, 2012	Performing		Nonperforming		Total
	(In Thousands)
Commercial, financial and agricultural	$	1,030,714	$	276	$	1,030,990
Real estate - construction		151,901		6,460		158,361
Real estate - mortgage:
Owner-occupied commercial		565,255		2,786		568,041
1-4 family mortgage		235,456		453		235,909
Other mortgage		323,359		240		323,599
Total real estate mortgage		1,124,070		3,479		1,127,549
Consumer		46,139		143		46,282
Total	$	2,352,824	$	10,358	$	2,363,182

December 31, 2011	Performing		Nonperforming		Total
	(In Thousands)
Commercial, financial and agricultural	$	798,285	$	1,179	$	799,464
Real estate - construction		141,155		10,063		151,218
Real estate - mortgage:
Owner-occupied commercial		397,809		792		398,601
1-4 family mortgage		204,512		670		205,182
Other mortgage		234,558		693		235,251
Total real estate mortgage		836,879		2,155		839,034
Consumer		40,651		375		41,026
Total	$	1,816,970	$	13,772	$	1,830,742

Loans by past due status as of December 31, 2012 and 2011are as follows: 

December 31, 2012	Past Due Status (Accruing Loans)
							Total Past
	30-59 Days		60-89 Days		90+ Days		Due		Non-Accrual		Current		Total Loans
	(In Thousands)
Commercial, financial and agricultural	$	1,699	$	385	$	-	$	2,084	$	276	$	1,028,630	$	1,030,990
Real estate - construction		-		-		-		-		6,460		151,901		158,361
Real estate - mortgage:
Owner-occupied commercial		1,480		10		-		1,490		2,786		563,765		568,041
1-4 family mortgage		420		16		-		436		453		235,020		235,909
Other mortgage		516		-		-		516		240		322,843		323,599
Total real estate -
mortgage		2,416		26		-		2,442		3,479		1,121,628		1,127,549
Consumer		108		-		8		116		135		46,031		46,282
Total	$	4,223	$	411	$	8	$	4,642	$	10,350	$	2,348,190	$	2,363,182

December 31, 2011	Past Due Status (Accruing Loans)
							Total Past
	30-59 Days		60-89 Days		90+ Days		Due		Non-Accrual		Current		Total Loans
	(In Thousands)
Commercial, financial and agricultural	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	1,179	$	798,285	$	799,464
Real estate - construction		2,234		-		-		2,234		10,063		138,921		151,218
Real estate - mortgage:
Owner-occupied commercial		-		-		-		-		792		397,809		398,601
1-4 family mortgage		2,107		-		-		2,107		670		202,405		205,182
Other mortgage		-		-		-		-		693		234,558		235,251
Total real estate - mortgage		2,107		-		-		2,107		2,155		834,772		839,034
Consumer		-		84		-		84		375		40,567		41,026
Total	$	4,341	$	84	$	-	$	4,425	$	13,772	$	1,812,545	$	1,830,742

The following table presents details of the Company’s impaired loans as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Loans which have been fully charged off do not appear in the tables.

December 31, 2012
			Unpaid				Average		Interest Income
	Recorded		Principal		Related		Recorded		Recognized
	Investment		Balance		Allowance		Investment		in Period
	(In Thousands)
With no allowance recorded:
Commercial, financial and agricultural	$	2,602	$	2,856	$	-	$	2,313	$	105
Real estate - construction		6,872		7,894		-		7,631		188
Real estate - mortgage:
Owner-occupied commercial		5,111		5,361		-		5,411		145
1-4 family mortgage		2,166		2,388		-		2,177		108
Other mortgage		4,151		4,249		-		4,206		275
Total real estate - mortgage		11,428		11,998		-		11,794		528
Consumer		135		344		-		296		6
Total with no allowance recorded		21,037		23,092		-		22,034		827
With an allowance recorded:
Commercial, financial and agricultural		1,308		1,308		577		1,325		90
Real estate - construction		7,550		8,137		1,013		6,961		154
Real estate - mortgage:
Owner-occupied commercial		3,195		3,195		779		3,277		77
1-4 family mortgage		4,002		4,002		1,007		4,001		139
Other mortgage		302		302		135		307		20
Total real estate - mortgage		7,499		7,499		1,921		7,585		236
Consumer		-		-		-		-		-
Total with allowance recorded		16,357		16,944		3,511		15,871		480
Total Impaired Loans:
Commercial, financial and agricultural		3,910		4,164		577		3,638		195
Real estate - construction		14,422		16,031		1,013		14,592		342
Real estate - mortgage:
Owner-occupied commercial		8,306		8,556		779		8,688		222
1-4 family mortgage		6,168		6,390		1,007		6,178		247
Other mortgage		4,453		4,551		135		4,513		295
Total real estate - mortgage		18,927		19,497		1,921		19,379		764
Consumer		135		344		-		296		6
Total impaired loans	$	37,394	$	40,036	$	3,511	$	37,905	$	1,307

December 31, 2011
			Unpaid				Average		Interest Income
	Recorded		Principal		Related		Recorded		Recognized in
	Investment		Balance		Allowance		Investment		Period
	(In Thousands)
With no allowance recorded:
Commercial, financial and agricultural	$	1,264	$	1,264	$	-	$	1,501	$	74
Real estate - construction		11,583		12,573		-		10,406		226
Owner-occupied commercial		2,493		2,493		-		2,523		153
1-4 family mortgage		1,293		1,293		-		1,241		44
Other mortgage		2,837		2,837		-		2,746		162
Total real estate - mortgage		6,623		6,623		-		6,510		359
Consumer		173		173		-		173		6
Total with no allowance recorded		19,643		20,633		-		18,590		665
With an allowance recorded:
Commercial, financial and agricultural		4,314		4,314		1,382		4,156		226
Real estate - construction		4,679		4,679		1,482		3,987		94
Real estate - mortgage:
Owner-occupied commercial		3,515		3,515		88		3,504		365
1-4 family mortgage		4,397		4,397		904		4,484		198
Other mortgage		331		331		-		337		22
Total real estate - mortgage		8,243		8,243		992		8,325		585
Consumer		374		624		325		425		-
Total with allowance recorded		17,610		17,860		4,181		16,893		905
Total Impaired Loans:
Commercial, financial and agricultural		5,578		5,578		1,382		5,657		300
Real estate - construction		16,262		17,252		1,482		14,393		320
Real estate - mortgage:
Owner-occupied commercial		6,008		6,008		88		6,027		518
1-4 family mortgage		5,690		5,690		904		5,725		242
Other mortgage		3,168		3,168		-		3,083		184
Total real estate - mortgage		14,866		14,866		992		14,835		944
Consumer		547		797		325		598		6
Total impaired loans	$	37,253	$	38,493	$	4,181	$	35,483	$	1,570

Troubled Debt Restructurings (“TDR”) at December 31, 2012 and 2011 totaled $12.3 million and $4.5 million, respectively. The increase for the year primarily consists of two relationships that were added in the first and third quarters of 2012. At December 31, 2012, the Company had a related allowance for loan losses of $1,442,000 allocated to these TDRs, compared to $439,000 at December 31, 2011. The Company had three TDR loans to one borrower in the amount of $2.8 million enter into payment default status during the first quarter of 2012. The assets securing these loans are under a letter of intent to sell at a purchase price that is expected to be sufficient to pay the full principal owed. The final contract is still in negotiation. All other loans classified as TDRs as of December 31, 2012 are performing as agreed under the terms of their restructured plans. The following table presents an analysis of TDRs as of December 31, 2012 and 2011.

	December 31, 2012						December 31, 2011
			Pre-		Post-				Pre-		Post-
			Modification		Modification				Modification		Modification
			Outstanding		Outstanding				Outstanding		Outstanding
	Number of		Recorded		Recorded		Number of		Recorded		Recorded
	Contracts		Investment		Investment		Contracts		Investment		Investment
	(In Thousands)
Troubled Debt Restructurings
Commercial, financial and agricultural		2	$	1,168	$	1,168		2	$	1,369	$	1,369
Real estate - construction		15		3,213		3,213		-		-		-
Real estate - mortgage:
Owner-occupied commercial		3		3,121		3,121		3		2,785		2,785
1-4 family mortgage		5		1,709		1,709		-		-		-
Other mortgage		1		302		302		1		331		331
Total real estate mortgage		9		5,132		5,132		4		3,116		3,116
Consumer		-		-		-		-		-		-
		26	$	9,513	$	9,513		6	$	4,485	$	4,485

	Number of		Recorded		Number of		Recorded
	Contracts		Investment		Contracts		Investment
Troubled Debt Restructurings
That Subsequently Defaulted Commercial, financial and agricultural		-	$	-		-	$	-
Real estate - construction		-		-		-		-
Real estate - mortgage:
Owner-occupied commercial		3		2,786		-		-
1-4 family mortgage		-		-		-		-
Other mortgage		-		-		-		-
Total real estate - mortgage		3		2,786		-		-
Consumer		-		-		-		-
		3	$	2,786		-	$	-

In the ordinary course of business, the Company has granted loans to certain related parties, including directors, and their affiliates. The interest rates on these loans were substantially the same as rates prevailing at the time of the transaction and repayment terms are customary for the type of loan. Changes in related party loans for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 are as follows:

	Years Ended December 31,
	2012			2011
	(In Thousands)
Balance, beginning of year	$	9,047		$	6,825
Advances		7,630			7,926
Repayments		(8,096	)		(4,204	)
Participations		3,819			(1,500	)
Balance, end of year	$	12,400		$	9,047

XML

DEBT SECURITIES

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Investments, Debt and Equity Securities [Abstract]

DEBT SECURITIES

NOTE 2.               DEBT SECURITIES

The amortized cost and fair value of available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities at December 31, 2012 and 2011 are summarized as follows:

			Gross		Gross
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized			Market
	Cost		Gain		Loss			Value
	(In Thousands)
December 31, 2012
Securities Available for Sale
U.S. Treasury and government sponsored agencies	$	27,360	$	1,026	$	-		$	28,386
Mortgage-backed securities		69,298		4,168		-			73,466
State and municipal securities		112,319		5,941		(83	)		118,177
Corporate debt		13,677		210		(39	)		13,848
Total		222,654		11,345		(122	)		233,877
Securities Held to Maturity
Mortgage-backed securities		20,429		768		(40	)		21,157
State and municipal securities		5,538		655		-			6,193
Total	$	25,967	$	1,423	$	(40	)	$	27,350
December 31, 2011
Securities Available for Sale
U.S. Treasury and government sponsored agencies	$	98,169	$	1,512	$	(59	)	$	99,622
Mortgage-backed securities		88,118		4,462		-			92,580
State and municipal securities		95,331		5,230		(35	)		100,526
Corporate debt		1,030		51		-			1,081
Total		282,648		11,255		(94	)		293,809
Securities Held to Maturity
Mortgage-backed securities		9,676		410		-			10,086
State and municipal securities		5,533		380		-			5,913
Total	$	15,209	$	790	$	-		$	15,999

All mortgage-backed securities are with government sponsored enterprises (GSEs) such as Federal National Mortgage Association, Government National Mortgage Association, Federal Home Loan Bank, and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation.

At year-end 2012 and 2011, there were no holdings of securities of any issuer, other than the U.S. government and its agencies, in an amount greater than 10% of stockholders’ equity.

The amortized cost and fair value of securities as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 by contractual maturity are shown below. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because the issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

	December 31, 2012				December 31, 2011
	Amortized Cost		Market Value		Amortized Cost		Market Value
	(In Thousands)
Securities available for sale
Due within one year	$	11,971	$	12,052	$	10,664	$	10,762
Due from one to five years		79,192		81,940		112,488		114,227
Due from five to ten years		59,825		63,801		65,509		69,864
Due after ten years		2,368		2,618		5,868		6,376
Mortgage-backed securities		69,298		73,466		88,118		92,580
	$	222,654	$	233,877	$	282,647	$	293,809
Securities held to maturity
Due after ten years	$	5,538	$	6,193	$	5,533	$	5,913
Mortgage-backed securities		20,429		21,157		9,676		10,086
	$	25,967	$	27,350	$	15,209	$	15,999

The following table shows the gross unrealized losses and fair value of securities, aggregated by category and length of time that securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at December 31, 2012 and 2011. In estimating other-than-temporary impairment losses, management considers, among other things, the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer and the intent and ability of the Company to hold the security for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value. The unrealized losses shown in the following table are primarily due to increases in market rates over the yields available at the time of purchase of the underlying securities and not credit quality. Because the Company does not intend to sell these securities and it is more likely than not that the Company will not be required to sell the securities before recovery of their amortized cost basis, which may be maturity, the Company does not consider these securities to be other-than-temporarily impaired at December 31, 2012. There were no other-than-temporary impairments for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010.

	Less Than Twelve Months					Twelve Months or More				Total
	Gross					Gross				Gross
	Unrealized					Unrealized				Unrealized
	Losses			Fair Value		Losses		Fair Value		Losses			Fair Value
	(In Thousands)
December 31, 2012
U.S. Treasury and government sponsored agencies	$	-		$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-		$	-
Mortgage-backed securities		(40	)		4,439		-		-		(40	)		4,439
State and municipal securities		(83	)		8,801		-		166		(83	)		8,967
Corporate debt		(39	)		4,882		-		-		(39	)		4,882
Total	$	(162	)	$	18,122	$	-	$	166	$	(162	)	$	18,288
December 31, 2011
U.S. Treasury and government sponsored agencies	$	(59	)	$	15,074	$	-	$	-	$	(59	)	$	15,074
Mortgage-backed securities		-			-		-		-		-			-
State and municipal securities		(35	)		4,559		-		-		(35	)		4,559
Corporate debt		-			-		-		-		-			-
Total	$	(94	)	$	19,633	$	-	$	-	$	(94	)	$	19,633

At December 31, 2012, only one of the Company’s 572 debt securities was in an unrealized loss position for more than 12 months.

During 2012, 10 government agency sponsored mortgage-backed securities with an amortized cost of $23.6 million and one government agency bond with an amortized cost of $1.5 million were bought. 15 government agency securities with a total amortized cost of $61.0 million were called during 2012, three U.S. Treasury securities with an amortized cost of $10.0 million matured. During 2011, 16 government agency bonds with an amortized cost of $63.2 million and 20 government agency sponsored mortgage-backed securities with an amortized cost of $29.9 million were bought. Nine U.S. Treasury notes, six government agency bonds and five government agency sponsored mortgage-backed securities were sold with an amortized cost of $56.1 million and a net gain on sale in the amount of $992,000. There were no sales of securities during 2012. During 2011, Losses on sales of securities of $326,000, netted against the gains above, resulted in net gain on sales of securities of $666,000 for the year. During 2010, bonds with a total amortized cost of $32.2 million were sold with total gains recognized in the amount of $108,000.

The carrying value of investment securities pledged to secure public funds on deposits and for other purposes as required by law as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 was $210.0 million and $197.9 million, respectively.

Restricted equity securities include (1) a restricted investment in Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta stock for membership requirement and to secure available lines of credit, and (2) an investment in First National Bankers Bank stock. The amount of investment in the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta stock was $3.7 million and $3.3 million at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The amount of investment in the First National Bankers Bank stock was $250,000 at December 31, 2012 and 2011.

XML

COMMON STOCK

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Equity [Abstract]

COMMON STOCK

NOTE 14. COMMON STOCK

During 2011, the Company completed private placements of 340,000 shares of common stock. The shares were issued and sold at $30 per share to 105 accredited investors, of which approximately 33,900 shares were purchased by directors, officers and their families, and 20 non-accredited investors. This sale of stock resulted in net proceeds of $10,159,000. This includes stock offering expenses of $33,000.

XML

SF HOLDING 1, INC. AND SF REALTY 1, INC

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Investments In Subsidiaries [Abstract]

SF HOLDING 1, INC. AND SF REALTY 1, INC.

NOTE 10. SF HOLDING 1, INC. AND SF REALTY 1, INC.

In January 2012, the Company formed SF Holding 1, Inc., an Alabama corporation, and its subsidiary, SF Realty 1, Inc., an Alabama corporation. SF Realty 1 elected to be treated as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) for U.S. income tax purposes. SF Realty 1 holds and manages participations in residential mortgages and commercial real estate loans originated by ServisFirst Bank. SF Holding 1, Inc. and SF Realty 1, Inc. are both consolidated into the Company.

XML

Components Of Net Deferred Tax Asset (Detail) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Other real estate	$ 1,064	$ 452	$ 646
Start-up costs	101	115	127
Net unrealized (gains) losses on securities available for sale	(3,929)	(4,220)	(1,528)
Depreciation	(509)	(489)	(206)
Deferred loan fees	(237)	(176)	(72)
Allowance for loan losses	10,142	8,509	6,974
Nonqualified equity awards	583	436	194
Other	171	287	231
Net deferred income tax assets	$ 7,386	$ 4,914	$ 6,366

XML

VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES (VIEs)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Variable Interest Entities [Abstract]

VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES (VIEs)

NOTE 6. VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES (VIEs)

The Company utilizes special purpose entities (SPEs) that constitute investments in limited partnerships that undertake certain development projects to achieve federal and state tax credits. These SPEs are typically structured as VIEs and are thus subject to consolidation by the reporting enterprise that absorbs the majority of the economic risks and rewards of the VIE. To determine whether it must consolidate a VIE, the Company analyzes the design of the VIE to identify the sources of variability within the VIE, including an assessment of the nature of risks created by the assets and other contractual obligations of the VIE, and determines whether it will absorb a majority of that variability.

The Company has invested in a limited partnership for which it determined it is not the primary beneficiary, and which thus is not subject to consolidation by the Company. The Company reports its investment in this partnership at its net realizable value, estimated to be the discounted value of the remaining amount of tax credits to be received. The amount recorded as investment in this partnership at December 31, 2012 and 2011 was $313,000 and $504,000, respectively, and is included in other assets.

On December 31, 2009, the Company entered into a limited partnership as funding investor. The partnership is a single purpose entity that is lending money to a real estate investor for the purpose of acquiring and operating a multi-tenant office building. The investment qualifies for New Market Tax Credits under Internal Revenue Code Section 45D, as amended. The Company has determined that it is the primary beneficiary of the economic risks and rewards of the VIE, and thus has consolidated the partnership’s assets and liabilities into its consolidated financial statements. The amount recorded as an investment in this partnership at December 31, 2012 and 2011 was $3,192,000 and $3,403,000, respectively, of which $2,270,000 in 2012 and 2011 is included in loans of the Company. The remaining amounts are included in other assets.

XML

Changes in related party loans (Detail) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Statement [Line Items]
Balance, beginning of year	$ 9,047	$ 6,825
Advances	7,630	7,926
Repayments	(8,096)	(4,204)
Participations	3,819	(1,500)
Balance, end of year	$ 12,400	$ 9,047

XML

FORECLOSED PROPERTIES

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Foreclosed Properties [Abstract]

FORECLOSED PROPERTIES

NOTE 4. FORECLOSED PROPERTIES

Other real estate and certain other assets acquired in foreclosure are carried at the lower of the recorded investment in the loan or fair value less estimated costs to sell the property.

An analysis of foreclosed properties for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 follows:

	2012			2011			2010
Balance at beginning of year	$	12,275		$	6,966		$	12,525
Transfers from loans and capitalized expenses		2,695			9,029			5,447
Foreclosed properties sold		(2,967	)		(3,334	)		(7,995	)
Writedowns and partial liquidations		(2,318	)		(386	)		(3,011	)
Balance at end of year	$	9,685		$	12,275		$	6,966

XML

PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Property, Plant and Equipment [Abstract]

PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT

NOTE 5. PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT

Premises and equipment are summarized as follows:

	December 31,
	2012			2011
	(In Thousands)
Land and building	$	1,724		$	-
Furniture and equipment		8,642			5,224
Leasehold improvements		4,742			4,436
		15,108			9,660
Accumulated depreciation		(6,261	)		(5,069	)
	$	8,847		$	4,591

The provisions for depreciation charged to occupancy and equipment expense for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 were $1,218,000, $1,173,000 and $1,066,000, respectively.

The Company leases land and building space under non-cancellable operating leases. Future minimum lease payments under non-cancellable operating leases are summarized as follows:

	(In Thousands)
2012	$	2,068
2013		1,955
2014		1,945
2015		1,974
2016		1,934
Thereafter		7,201
	$	17,077

For the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, annual rental expense on operating leases was $2,195,000, $2,060,000 and $1,734,000, respectively.

XML

DEPOSITS

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Deposits [Abstract]

DEPOSITS

NOTE 7. DEPOSITS

Deposits at December 31, 2012 and 2011 were as follows:

	December 31,
	2012		2011
	(In Thousands)
Noninterest-bearing demand	$	545,174	$	418,810
Interest-bearing checking		1,551,158		1,325,451
Savings		19,560		15,638
Time		69,179		71,368
Time, $100,000 and over		326,501		312,620
	$	2,511,572	$	2,143,887

The scheduled maturities of time deposits at December 31, 2012 were as follows:

	(In Thousands)
2013	$	247,482
2014		87,433
2015		21,167
2016		26,437
2017		13,161
	$	395,680

At December 31, 2012 and 2011, overdraft deposits reclassified to loans were $3,860,000 and $876,000, respectively.

XML

Future Minimum Lease Payments Under Non-Cancellable Operating Leases (Detail) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Dec. 31, 2012
2012	$ 2,068
2013	1,955
2014	1,945
2015	1,974
2016	1,934
Thereafter	7,201
Operating Leases, Future Minimum Payments Due	$ 17,077

XML

Commitments And Contingent Liabilities (Detail) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Commitments to extend credit	$ 860,421	$ 697,939	$ 538,719
Credit card arrangements	25,699	19,686	17,601
Standby letters of credit and financial guarantees	36,374	42,937	47,103
Total	$ 922,494	$ 760,562	$ 603,423

XML

VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES (VIEs) - Additional Information (Detail) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Other assets	$ 6,944	$ 8,400
Limited Partners' Capital Account	3,192	3,403
Loan [Member]
Limited Partners' Capital Account	2,270	2,270
Partnership Investment [Member]
Other assets	$ 313	$ 504

XML

Premises And Equipment (Detail) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Property, Plant and Equipment, Gross	$ 15,108	$ 9,660
Accumulated depreciation	(6,261)	(5,069)
Property, Plant and Equipment, Net	8,847	4,591
Furniture and Equipment [Member]
Property, Plant and Equipment, Gross	8,642	5,224
Leasehold Improvements [Member]
Property, Plant and Equipment, Gross	4,742	4,436
Land and Building [Member]
Property, Plant and Equipment, Gross	$ 1,724	$ 0

XML

FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT - Additional Information (Detail) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Asset Impairment Charges	$ 4,586,000	$ 5,419,000
Real Estate Owned, Amount of Loss at Acquisition	$ 2,166,000	$ 266,000

XML

DEBT SECURITIES (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Text Block [Abstract]

Amortized Cost and Fair Value of Available for Sale And Held to Maturity Securities

The amortized cost and fair value of available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities at December 31, 2012 and 2011 are summarized as follows:

			Gross		Gross
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized			Market
	Cost		Gain		Loss			Value
	(In Thousands)
December 31, 2012
Securities Available for Sale
U.S. Treasury and government sponsored agencies	$	27,360	$	1,026	$	-		$	28,386
Mortgage-backed securities		69,298		4,168		-			73,466
State and municipal securities		112,319		5,941		(83	)		118,177
Corporate debt		13,677		210		(39	)		13,848
Total		222,654		11,345		(122	)		233,877
Securities Held to Maturity
Mortgage-backed securities		20,429		768		(40	)		21,157
State and municipal securities		5,538		655		-			6,193
Total	$	25,967	$	1,423	$	(40	)	$	27,350
December 31, 2011
Securities Available for Sale
U.S. Treasury and government sponsored agencies	$	98,169	$	1,512	$	(59	)	$	99,622
Mortgage-backed securities		88,118		4,462		-			92,580
State and municipal securities		95,331		5,230		(35	)		100,526
Corporate debt		1,030		51		-			1,081
Total		282,648		11,255		(94	)		293,809
Securities Held to Maturity
Mortgage-backed securities		9,676		410		-			10,086
State and municipal securities		5,533		380		-			5,913
Total	$	15,209	$	790	$	-		$	15,999

Amortized Cost and Fair Value of Securities

The amortized cost and fair value of securities as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 by contractual maturity are shown below. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because the issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

	December 31, 2012				December 31, 2011
	Amortized Cost		Market Value		Amortized Cost		Market Value
	(In Thousands)
Securities available for sale
Due within one year	$	11,971	$	12,052	$	10,664	$	10,762
Due from one to five years		79,192		81,940		112,488		114,227
Due from five to ten years		59,825		63,801		65,509		69,864
Due after ten years		2,368		2,618		5,868		6,376
Mortgage-backed securities		69,298		73,466		88,118		92,580
	$	222,654	$	233,877	$	282,647	$	293,809
Securities held to maturity
Due after ten years	$	5,538	$	6,193	$	5,533	$	5,913
Mortgage-backed securities		20,429		21,157		9,676		10,086
	$	25,967	$	27,350	$	15,209	$	15,999

Investment Securities Continuous Unrealized Loss Position

	Less Than Twelve Months					Twelve Months or More				Total
	Gross					Gross				Gross
	Unrealized					Unrealized				Unrealized
	Losses			Fair Value		Losses		Fair Value		Losses			Fair Value
	(In Thousands)
December 31, 2012
U.S. Treasury and government sponsored agencies	$	-		$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-		$	-
Mortgage-backed securities		(40	)		4,439		-		-		(40	)		4,439
State and municipal securities		(83	)		8,801		-		166		(83	)		8,967
Corporate debt		(39	)		4,882		-		-		(39	)		4,882
Total	$	(162	)	$	18,122	$	-	$	166	$	(162	)	$	18,288
December 31, 2011
U.S. Treasury and government sponsored agencies	$	(59	)	$	15,074	$	-	$	-	$	(59	)	$	15,074
Mortgage-backed securities		-			-		-		-		-			-
State and municipal securities		(35	)		4,559		-		-		(35	)		4,559
Corporate debt		-			-		-		-		-			-
Total	$	(94	)	$	19,633	$	-	$	-	$	(94	)	$	19,633

XML

DEBT SECURITIES - Additional Information (Detail) (USD $)	12 Months Ended							12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2012 Federal Home Loan Bank Of Atlanta Stock [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Federal Home Loan Bank Of Atlanta Stock [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 First National Bankers Bank Stock [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 First National Bankers Bank Stock [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Nine Us Treasury Notes Six Government Agency Bonds and Five Government Agency Sponsored Mortgage Backed Securities [Member] Sale Of Securities [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Government Agency Bonds 15 [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Three U.S. Treasury Securities [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Purchase Of Securities [Member] Government Agency Bonds 16 [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Purchase Of Securities [Member] Government Agency Bonds 20 [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Purchase Of Securities [Member] Government Agency Bonds 10 [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Purchase Of Securities [Member] Government Agency Bonds One [Member]
Securities With Amortised Cost		$ 32,200,000						$ 56,100,000	$ 61,000,000	$ 10,000,000	$ 63,200,000	$ 29,900,000	$ 23,600,000	$ 1,500,000
Gain on Sale of Investments	666,000	108,000						992,000
Loss on Sale of Investments	326,000
Carrying Value Of Investment Securities Pledged	197,900,000		210,000,000
Restricted Investments				$ 3,700,000	$ 3,300,000	$ 250,000	$ 250,000
Description For Unrealised Loss Position			Only one of the Company's 572 debt securities was in an unrealized loss position for more than 12 months.

XML

DERIVATIVES

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities Disclosure [Abstract]

DERIVATIVES

NOTE 12. DERIVATIVES

During 2008, the Company entered into interest rate swaps (“swaps”) to facilitate customer transactions and meet customer financing needs. Upon entering into these swaps, the Company entered into offsetting positions with a regional correspondent bank in order to minimize the risk to the Company. As of December 31, 2012, the Company was party to two swaps with notional amounts totaling approximately $11.1 million with customers and two swaps with notional amounts totaling approximately $11.1 million with a regional correspondent bank. These swaps qualify as derivatives, but are not designated as hedging instruments. The Company has recorded the value of these swaps at $490,000 in offsetting entries in other assets and other liabilities.

The Company has entered into agreements with secondary market investors to deliver loans on a “best efforts delivery” basis. When a rate is committed to a borrower, it is based on the best price that day and locked with the investor for the customer for a 30-day period. In the event the loan is not delivered to the investor, the Company has no risk or exposure with the investor. The interest rate lock commitments related to loans that are originated for later sale are classified as derivatives. The fair values of the Company’s agreements with investors and rate lock commitments to customers as of December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 were not material.

XML

INCOME TAXES

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]

INCOME TAXES

NOTE 17.             INCOME TAXES

The components of income tax expense are as follows:

	Year Ended December 31,
	2012			2011			2010
	(In Thousands)
Current	$	19,301		$	13,629		$	11,570
Deferred		(2,181	)		(1,240	)		(2,212	)
Income tax expense	$	17,120		$	12,389		$	9,358

The Company’s total income tax expense differs from the amounts computed by applying the Federal income tax statutory rates to income before income taxes. A reconciliation of the differences is as follows:

	Year Ended December 31, 2012
	Amount			% of Pre-tax Earnings
	(In Thousands)
Income tax at statutory federal rate	$	18,047			35.00	%
Effect on rate of:
State income tax, net of federal tax effect		709			1.37	%
Tax-exempt income, net of expenses		(1,007	)		(1.95	)%
Bank owned life insurance contracts		(568	)		(1.10	)%
Incentive stock option expense		121			0.23	%
Other		(182	)		(0.35	)%
Effective income tax and rate	$	17,120			33.20	%

	Year Ended December 31, 2011
	Amount			% of Pre-tax Earnings
	(In Thousands)
Income tax at statutory federal rate	$	12,540			35.00	%
Effect on rate of:
State income tax, net of federal tax effect		967			2.70	%
Tax-exempt income, net of expenses		(875	)		(2.44	)%
Bank owned life insurance contracts		(137	)		(0.38	)%
Incentive stock option expense		128			0.36	%
Other		(234	)		(0.65	)%
Effective income tax and rate	$	12,389			34.59	%

	Year Ended December 31, 2010
	Amount			% of Pre-tax Earnings
	(In Thousands)
Income tax at statutory federal rate	$	9,358			35.00	%
Effect on rate of:
State income tax, net of federal tax effect		715			2.67	%
Tax-exempt income, net of expenses		(773	)		(2.89	)%
Incentive stock option expense		144			0.54	%
Other		(86	)		(0.32	)%
Effective income tax and rate	$	9,358			35.00	%

The components of net deferred tax asset are as follows:

	December 31,
	2012			2011			2010
	(In Thousands)
Other real estate	$	1,064		$	452		$	646
Start-up costs		101			115			127
Net unrealized (gains) losses on securities available for sale		(3,929	)		(4,220	)		(1,528	)
Depreciation		(509	)		(489	)		(206	)
Deferred loan fees		(237	)		(176	)		(72	)
Allowance for loan losses		10,142			8,509			6,974
Nonqualified equity awards		583			436			194
Other		171			287			231
Net deferred income tax assets	$	7,386		$	4,914		$	6,366

The Company believes its net deferred tax asset is recoverable as of December 31, 2012 based on the expectation of future taxable income and other relevant considerations.

Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 740 defines the threshold for recognizing the benefits of tax return positions in the financial statements as “more-likely-than-not” to be sustained by the taxing authority. This section also provides guidance on derecognition, measurement and classification of income tax uncertainties in interim periods. As of December 31, 2012, the Company had no unrecognized tax benefits related to federal or state income tax matters. The Company does not anticipate any material increase or decrease in unrecognized tax benefits during 2012 related to any tax positions taken prior to December 31, 2012. As of December 31, 2012, the Company has accrued no interest or penalties related to uncertain tax positions. It is the Company’s policy to recognize interest and penalties, if any, related to income tax matters in income tax expense.

The Company and its subsidiaries file consolidated U.S. Federal, State of Alabama and State of Florida income tax returns. The Company is currently open to audit under the statute of limitations by the Internal Revenue Service for the years ended December 31, 2010 through 2012. The Company is also currently open to audit by the State of Alabama for the years ended December 31, 2010 through 2012, and open to audit by the state of Florida for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2012, as we opened our first office in the State of Florida in 2011.

XML

Statement Of Cash Flows (Detail) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Operating activities
Net income	$ 34,445	$ 23,438	$ 17,378
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used in operating activities:
Net cash provided by operating activities	41,184	24,323	29,575
Investing activities
Net cash used in investing activities	(509,808)	(507,740)	(215,337)
Financing activities
Proceeds from other borrowings	19,917	0	0
Repayment of subordinated debentures	(15,464)	0	0
Proceeds from issuance of subordinated debentures	0	0	15,050
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock	0	39,958	0
Proceeds from issuance of common stock	0	10,032	0
Dividends on preferred stock	(400)	(200)	0
Dividends on common stock	(3,134)	0	0
Net cash provided by financing activities	406,436	494,372	341,534
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents	(62,188)	10,955	155,772
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year	242,933	231,978	76,206
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year	180,745	242,933	231,978
Parent [Member]
Operating activities
Net income	34,445	23,438	17,378
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used in operating activities:
Other	878	(50)	241
Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiary	(35,998)	(24,255)	(17,713)
Net cash provided by operating activities	(675)	(867)	(94)
Investing activities
Investment in subsidiary	0	(46,200)	(15,000)
Net cash used in investing activities	0	(46,200)	(15,000)
Financing activities
Proceeds from other borrowings	19,917	0	0
Repayment of subordinated debentures	(15,464)	0	0
Proceeds from issuance of subordinated debentures	0	0	15,050
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock	0	39,958	0
Proceeds from issuance of common stock	112	10,166	0
Dividends on preferred stock	(400)	(200)	0
Dividends on common stock	(3,134)	0	0
Net cash provided by financing activities	1,031	49,924	15,050
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents	356	2,857	(44)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year	2,908	51	95
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year	$ 3,264	$ 2,908	$ 51

XML

Amortized Cost And Fair Value Of Contractual Securities (Detail) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Securities available for sale
Amortized Cost	$ 222,654	$ 282,648
Market Value	233,877	293,809
Securities held to maturity
Amortized Cost	25,967	15,209
Market Value	27,350	15,999
Due Within One Year [Member]
Securities available for sale
Amortized Cost	11,971	10,664
Market Value	12,052	10,762
Due From One To Five Years [Member]
Securities available for sale
Amortized Cost	79,192	112,488
Market Value	81,940	114,227
Due From Five To Ten Years [Member]
Securities available for sale
Amortized Cost	59,825	65,509
Market Value	63,801	69,864
Due After Ten Years [Member]
Securities available for sale
Amortized Cost	2,368	5,868
Market Value	2,618	6,376
Securities held to maturity
Amortized Cost	5,538	5,533
Market Value	6,193	5,913
Collateralized Mortgage Backed Securities [Member]
Securities available for sale
Amortized Cost	69,298	88,118
Market Value	73,466	92,580
Securities held to maturity
Amortized Cost	20,429	9,676
Market Value	$ 21,157	$ 10,086

XML

OTHER OPERATING INCOME AND EXPENSES (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Other Operating Income Expenses [Abstract]

Components Of Other Operating Income And Expense

The major components of other operating income and expense included in noninterest income and noninterest expense are as follows:

	Years Ended December 31,
	2012			2011		2010
	(In Thousands)
Other Operating Income
(Loss) gain on sale of other real estate owned	$	(105	)	$	76	$	(203	)
Credit card income		1,064			481		30
Other		744			650		744
	$	1,703		$	1,207	$	571
Other Operating Expenses
Postage	$	159		$	194	$	173
Telephone		385			409		358
Data processing		2,202			2,023		1,983
Other loan expenses		2,836			2,406		1,027
Supplies		320			356		263
Customer and public relations		791			689		477
Marketing		454			406		313
Sales and use tax		198			208		141
Donations and contributions		482			437		261
Directors fees		286			235		216
Prepayment penalties FHLB advances		-			738		-
Other		2,609			2,313		2,071
	$	10,722		$	10,414	$	7,283

XML

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Net income	$ 34,445	$ 23,438	$ 17,378
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
Unrealized holding gains arising during period from securities available for sale, net of tax of $191, $2,944 and $755 for 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively	354	4,519	1,334
Reclassification adjustment for net gains on sale of securities in net income, net of tax benefit of $252 and $39 for 2011 and 2010, respectively	0	(414)	(70)
Other comprehensive income, net of tax	354	4,105	1,264
Comprehensive income	$ 34,799	$ 27,543	$ 18,642

XML

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS - Additional Information (Detail) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Loans	$ 2,363,182	$ 1,830,742
Related Party [Member]
Loans	$ 12,400	$ 9,000

XML

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Accounting Policies [Abstract]

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

NOTE 1.               SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Nature of Operations

ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) was formed on August 16, 2007 and is a bank holding company whose business is conducted by its wholly-owned subsidiary ServisFirst Bank (the “Bank”). The Bank is headquartered in Birmingham, Alabama, and provides a full range of banking services to individual and corporate customers throughout the Birmingham market since opening for business in May 2005. The Bank has since expanded into the Huntsville, Montgomery and Dothan, Alabama markets, and most recently into the Mobile, Alabama and Pensacola, Florida markets. The Bank has a subsidiary, SF Holding 1, Inc., which has a subsidiary, SF Realty 1, Inc., which operates as a real estate investment trust. More details about SF Holding 1, Inc. and SF Realty 1, Inc. are included in Note 10.

Basis of Presentation and Accounting Estimates

To prepare consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, management makes estimates and assumptions based on available information. These estimates and assumptions affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and the disclosures provided, and future results could differ. The allowance for loan losses, valuation of foreclosed real estate, deferred taxes, and fair values of financial instruments are particularly subject to change. All numbers are in thousands except share and per share data.

Cash, Due from Banks, Interest-Bearing Balances due from Financial Institutions

Cash and due from banks includes cash on hand, cash items in process of collection, amounts due from banks and interest bearing balances due from financial institutions. For purposes of cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include cash and due from banks and federal funds sold. Generally, federal funds are purchased and sold for one-day periods. Cash flows from loans, mortgage loans held for sale, federal funds sold, and deposits are reported net.

The Bank is required to maintain reserve balances in cash or on deposit with the Federal Reserve Bank based on a percentage of deposits. The total of those reserve balances was approximately $16.0 million at December 31, 2012 and $7.5 million at December 31, 2011.

Debt Securities

Securities are classified as available-for-sale when they might be sold before maturity. Unrealized holding gains and losses, net of tax, on securities available for sale are reported as a net amount in a separate component of stockholders’ equity until realized. Gains and losses on the sale of securities available for sale are determined using the specific-identification method. The amortization of premiums and the accretion of discounts are recognized in interest income using methods approximating the interest method over the period to maturity.

Declines in the fair value of available-for-sale securities below their cost that are deemed to be other than temporary are reflected in earnings as realized losses. Securities are classified as held-to-maturity when the Company has the positive intent and ability to hold the securities to maturity. Held-to-maturity securities are reported at amortized cost. In determining the existence of other-than-temporary impairment losses, management considers (1) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, and (3) the intent and ability of the Company to retain its investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value.

Investments in Restricted Equity Securities Carried at Cost

Investments in restricted equity securities without a readily determinable market value are carried at cost.

Mortgage Loans Held for Sale

The Company classifies certain residential mortgage loans as held for sale. Typically mortgage loans held for sale are sold to a third party investor within a very short time period. The loans are sold without recourse and servicing is not retained. Net fees earned from this banking service are recorded in noninterest income.

In the course of originating mortgage loans and selling those loans in the secondary market, the Company makes various representations and warranties to the purchaser of the mortgage loans. Every loan closed by the Bank’s mortgage center is run through a government agency automated underwriting system. Any exceptions noted during this process are remedied prior to sale. These representations and warranties also apply to underwriting the real estate appraisal opinion of value for the collateral securing these loans. Under the representations and warranties, failure by the Company to comply with the underwriting and/or appraisal standards could result in the Company being required to repurchase the mortgage loan or to reimburse the investor for losses incurred (make whole requests) if such failure cannot be cured by the Company within the specified period following discovery. The Company continues to experience a manageable level of investor repurchase demands. There were no expenses incurred as part of these buyback obligations for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011.

Loans

Loans are reported at unpaid principal balances, less unearned fees and the allowance for loan losses. Interest on all loans is recognized as income based upon the applicable rate applied to the daily outstanding principal balance of the loans. Interest income on nonaccrual loans is recognized on a cash basis or cost recovery basis until the loan is returned to accrual status. Loan fees, net of direct costs, are reflected as an adjustment to the yield of the related loan over the term of the loan. The Company does not have a concentration of loans to any one industry or geographic market.

The accrual of interest on loans is discontinued when there is a significant deterioration in the financial condition of the borrower and full repayment of principal and interest is not expected or the principal or interest is more than 90 days past due, unless the loan is both well-collateralized and in the process of collection. Generally, all interest accrued but not collected for loans that are placed on nonaccrual status are reversed against current interest income. Interest collections on nonaccrual loans are generally applied as principal reductions. The Company determines past due or delinquency status of a loan based on contractual payment terms.

A loan is considered impaired when it is probable the Company will be unable to collect all principal and interest payments due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Individually identified impaired loans are measured based on the present value of expected payments using the loan’s original effective rate as the discount rate, the loan’s observable market price, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. If the recorded investment in the impaired loan exceeds the measure of fair value, a valuation allowance may be established as part of the allowance for loan losses. Changes to the valuation allowance are recorded as a component of the provision for loan losses.

Impaired loans also include troubled debt restructurings (“TDRs”). In the normal course of business management grants concessions to borrowers, which would not otherwise be considered, where the borrowers are experiencing financial difficulty. The concessions granted most frequently for TDRs involve reductions or delays in required payments of principal and interest for a specified time, the rescheduling of payments in accordance with a bankruptcy plan or the charge-off of a portion of the loan. In some cases, the conditions of the credit also warrant nonaccrual status, even after the restructure occurs. As part of the credit approval process, the restructured loans are evaluated for adequate collateral protection in determining the appropriate accrual status at the time of restructure. TDR loans may be returned to accrual status if there has been at least a six month sustained period of repayment performance by the borrower.

Allowance for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level which, in management’s judgment, is adequate to absorb credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio. The amount of the allowance is based on management’s evaluation of the collectability of the loan portfolio, including the nature of the portfolio, credit concentrations, trends in historical loss experience, specific impaired loans, economic conditions, and other risks inherent in the portfolio. Allowances for impaired loans are generally determined based on collateral values or the present value of the estimated cash flows. The allowance is increased by a provision for loan losses, which is charged to expense, and reduced by charge-offs, net of recoveries. In addition, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the allowance for losses on loans. Such agencies may require the Company to recognize adjustments to the allowance based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examination.

Foreclosed Real Estate

Foreclosed real estate includes both formally foreclosed property and in-substance foreclosed property. At the time of foreclosure, foreclosed real estate is recorded at fair value less cost to sell, which becomes the property’s new basis. Any write downs based on the asset’s fair value at date of acquisition are charged to the allowance for loan losses. After foreclosure, these assets are carried at the lower of their new cost basis or fair value less cost to sell. Costs incurred in maintaining foreclosed real estate and subsequent adjustments to the carrying amount of the property are included in other operating expenses.

Premises and Equipment

Premises and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Expenditures for additions and major improvements that significantly extend the useful lives of the assets are capitalized. Expenditures for repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as incurred. Assets which are disposed of are removed from the accounts and the resulting gains or losses are recorded in operations. Depreciation is calculated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the related assets (3 to 10 years).

Leasehold improvements are amortized on a straight-line basis over the lesser of the lease terms or the estimated useful lives of the improvements.

Derivatives and Hedging Activities

As part of its overall interest rate risk management, the Company uses derivative instruments, which can include interest rate swaps, caps, and floors. Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) ASC 815-10, Derivatives and Hedging, requires all derivative instruments to be carried at fair value on the balance sheet. This accounting standard provides special accounting provisions for derivative instruments that qualify for hedge accounting. To be eligible, the Company must specifically identify a derivative as a hedging instrument and identify the risk being hedged. The derivative instrument must be shown to meet specific requirements under this accounting standard.

The Company designates the derivative on the date the derivative contract is entered into as (1) a hedge of the fair value of a recognized asset or liability or of an unrecognized firm commitment (a “fair-value” hedge) or (2) a hedge of a forecasted transaction of the variability of cash flows to be received or paid related to a recognized asset or liability (a “cash-flow” hedge). Changes in the fair value of a derivative that is highly effective as a fair-value hedge, and that is designated and qualifies as a fair-value hedge, along with the loss or gain on the hedged asset or liability that is attributable to the hedged risk (including losses or gains on firm commitments), are recorded in current-period earnings. The effective portion of the changes in the fair value of a derivative that is highly effective and that is designated and qualifies as a cash-flow hedge is recorded in other comprehensive income, until earnings are affected by the variability of cash flows (e.g., when periodic settlements on a variable-rate asset or liability are recorded in earnings). The remaining gain or loss on the derivative, if any, in excess of the cumulative change in the present value of future cash flows of the hedged item is recognized in earnings.

The Company formally documents all relationships between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as its risk-management objective and strategy for undertaking various hedge transactions. This process includes linking all derivatives that are designated as fair-value or cash-flow hedges to specific assets and liabilities on the balance sheet or to specific firm commitments or forecasted transactions. The Company also formally assessed, both at the hedge’s inception and on an ongoing basis (if the hedges do not qualify for short-cut accounting), whether the derivatives that are used in hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting changes in fair values or cash flows of hedged items. When it is determined that a derivative is not highly effective as a hedge or that it has ceased to be a highly effective hedge, the Company discontinues hedge accounting prospectively, as discussed below. The Company discontinues hedge accounting prospectively when: (1) it is determined that the derivative is no longer effective in offsetting changes in the fair value or cash flows of a hedged item (including firm commitments or forecasted transactions); (2) the derivative expires or is sold, terminated, or exercised; (3) the derivative is re-designated as a hedge instrument, because it is unlikely that a forecasted transaction will occur; (4) a hedged firm commitment no longer meets the definition of a firm commitment; or (5) management determines that designation of the derivative as a hedge instrument is no longer appropriate.

When hedge accounting is discontinued because it is determined that the derivative no longer qualifies as an effective fair-value hedge, hedge accounting is discontinued prospectively and the derivative will continue to be carried on the balance sheet at its fair value with all changes in fair value being recorded in earnings but with no offsetting being recorded on the hedged item or in other comprehensive income for cash flow hedges.

The Company uses derivatives to hedge interest rate exposures associated with mortgage loans held for sale and mortgage loans in process. The Company regularly enters into derivative financial instruments in the form of forward contracts, as part of its normal asset/liability management strategies. The Company’s obligations under forward contracts consist of “best effort” commitments to deliver mortgage loans originated in the secondary market at a future date. Interest rate lock commitments related to loans that are originated for later sale are classified as derivatives. In the normal course of business, the Company regularly extends these rate lock commitments to customers during the loan origination process. The fair values of the Company’s forward contract and rate lock commitments to customers as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 were not material and have not been recorded.

During 2008 the Company entered into interest rate swaps (“swaps”) to facilitate customer transactions and meet their financing needs. Upon entering into these swaps, the Company entered into offsetting positions with a regional correspondent bank in order to minimize the risk to the Company. As of December 31, 2012, the Company was party to two swaps with notional amounts totaling approximately $11.1 million with customers, and two swaps with notional amounts totaling approximately $11.1 million with a regional correspondent bank. These swaps qualify as derivatives, but are not designated as hedging instruments.

Income Taxes

Income tax expense is the total of the current year income tax due or refundable and the change in deferred tax assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are the expected future tax amounts for the temporary differences between carrying amounts and tax bases of assets and liabilities, computed using enacted tax rates. A valuation allowance, if needed, reduces deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.

Stock-Based Compensation

At December 31, 2012, the Company had two stock-based employee compensation plans for grants of equity compensation to key employees. These plans have been accounted for under the provisions of FASB ASC 718-10, Compensation – Stock Compensation. The stock-based employee compensation plans are more fully described in Note 13.

Earnings per Common Share

Basic earnings per common share are computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per common share include the dilutive effect of additional potential common shares issuable under stock options and warrants.

Loan Commitments and Related Financial Instruments

Financial instruments, which include credit card arrangements, commitments to make loans and standby letters of credit, are issued to meet customer financing needs. The face amount for these items represents the exposure to loss before considering customer collateral or ability to repay. Such financial instruments are recorded when they are funded. Instruments such as stand-by letters of credit are considered financial guarantees in accordance with FASB ASC 460-10. The fair value of these financial guarantees is not material.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Fair values of financial instruments are estimated using relevant market information and other assumptions, as more fully disclosed in Note 22. Fair value estimates involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment regarding interest rates, credit risk, prepayments, and other factors, especially in the absence of broad markets for particular items. Changes in assumptions or in market conditions could significantly affect the estimates.

Comprehensive Income

Comprehensive income consists of net income and other comprehensive income. Accumulated comprehensive income, which is recognized as a separate component of equity, includes unrealized gains and losses on securities available for sale.

Advertising

Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. Advertising expense for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 was $454,000, $406,000 and $313,000, respectively. Advertising typically consists of local print media aimed at businesses that the Company targets as well as sponsorships of local events that the Company’s clients and prospects are involved with.

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In April 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-03, Transfers and Servicing (Topic 860): Reconsideration of Effective Control for Repurchase Agreements, which removed from the assessment of effective control the criterion relating to the transferor’s ability to repurchase or redeem financial assets on substantially the agreed-upon terms, even in the event of default by the transferee. The amendments in this update also eliminated the requirement to demonstrate that the transferor possesses adequate collateral to fund substantially all the cost of purchasing replacement assets. The amendments in this update were effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 31, 2011, with prospective application to transactions or modifications of existing transactions that occur on or after the effective date. Early adoption was not permitted. The Company adopted these amendments when required, and they did not have any effect on its financial position or results of operations.

In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRS, which outlined the collaborative effort of the FASB and the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”) to consistently define fair value and to come up with a set of consistent disclosures for fair value. The amendments in this update explain how to measure fair value. They do not require additional fair value measurements and are not intended to establish valuation standards or affect valuation practices outside of financial reporting. The amendments in this update were to be applied prospectively. For public entities, the amendments were effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 31, 2011. Early application was not permitted. The Company adopted these amendments when required, and they did not have a material effect on its financial position or results of operations.

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income, which amended existing standards to allow an entity the option to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. Under both options, an entity is required to present each component of net income along with total net income, each component of other comprehensive income along with a total for other comprehensive income, and a total amount for comprehensive income. Any changes pursuant to the options allowed in the amendments were to be applied retrospectively. For public entities, the amendments were effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption was permitted. This update had no impact on financial reporting of the Company.

In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-12, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in ASU No. 2011-05, which deferred the effective date pertaining to reclassification adjustments out of other accumulated comprehensive income in ASU 2011-05, until the FASB was able to reconsider those requirements. All other requirements of ASU 2011-05 were not affected by this update, including the requirement to report comprehensive income either in a single continuous financial statement or in two separate but consecutive financial statements. Public entities were to apply these requirements for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011, which coincide with the effective dates of the requirements in ASU 2011-05 amended by this update. This update, like ASU No. 2011-05, had no impact on financial reporting of the Company.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-11, Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities, which amends disclosures by requiring improved information about financial instruments and derivative instruments that are either offset on the balance sheet or subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement or similar agreement, irrespective of whether they are offset on the balance sheet. Reporting entities are required to provide both net and gross information for these assets and liabilities in order to enhance comparability between those entities that prepare their financial statements on the basis of U.S. GAAP and those entities that prepare their financial statements on the basis of international financial reporting standards (“IFRS”). Companies are required to apply the amendments for fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those years. Retrospective disclosures are required. The Company does not believe this update will have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations.

XML

Details Of Company's Impaired Loans (Detail) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Statement [Line Items]
Recorded Investment, with no allowance recorded	$ 21,037	$ 19,643
Unpaid Principal Balance, with no allowance recorded	23,092	20,633
Related Allowance, with no allowance recorded	0	0
Average Recorded Investment , with no allowance recorded	22,034	18,590
Interest Income Recognized in Period, with no allowance recorded	827	665
Recorded Investment, with allowance recorded	16,357	17,610
Unpaid Principal Balance, with allowance recorded	16,944	17,860
Related Allowance, with allowance recorded	3,511	4,181
Average Recorded Investment , with allowance recorded	15,871	16,893
Interest Income Recognized in Period, with allowance recorded	480	905
Recorded Investment	37,394	37,253
Unpaid Principal Balance	40,036	38,493
Related Allowance	3,511	4,181
Average Recorded Investment	37,905	35,483
Interest Income Recognized in Period	1,307	1,570
Commercial Financial and Agricultural Financing Receivable [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Recorded Investment, with no allowance recorded	2,602	1,264
Unpaid Principal Balance, with no allowance recorded	2,856	1,264
Related Allowance, with no allowance recorded	0	0
Average Recorded Investment , with no allowance recorded	2,313	1,501
Interest Income Recognized in Period, with no allowance recorded	105	74
Recorded Investment, with allowance recorded	1,308	4,314
Unpaid Principal Balance, with allowance recorded	1,308	4,314
Related Allowance, with allowance recorded	577	1,382
Average Recorded Investment , with allowance recorded	1,325	4,156
Interest Income Recognized in Period, with allowance recorded	90	226
Recorded Investment	3,910	5,578
Unpaid Principal Balance	4,164	5,578
Related Allowance	577	1,382
Average Recorded Investment	3,638	5,657
Interest Income Recognized in Period	195	300
Commercial Real Estate Construction Financing Receivable [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Recorded Investment, with no allowance recorded	6,872	11,583
Unpaid Principal Balance, with no allowance recorded	7,894	12,573
Related Allowance, with no allowance recorded	0	0
Average Recorded Investment , with no allowance recorded	7,631	10,406
Interest Income Recognized in Period, with no allowance recorded	188	226
Recorded Investment, with allowance recorded	7,550	4,679
Unpaid Principal Balance, with allowance recorded	8,137	4,679
Related Allowance, with allowance recorded	1,013	1,482
Average Recorded Investment , with allowance recorded	6,961	3,987
Interest Income Recognized in Period, with allowance recorded	154	94
Recorded Investment	14,422	16,262
Unpaid Principal Balance	16,031	17,252
Related Allowance	1,013	1,482
Average Recorded Investment	14,592	14,393
Interest Income Recognized in Period	342	320
Commercial Mortgage Loans Owner Occupied [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Recorded Investment, with no allowance recorded	5,111	2,493
Unpaid Principal Balance, with no allowance recorded	5,361	2,493
Related Allowance, with no allowance recorded	0	0
Average Recorded Investment , with no allowance recorded	5,411	2,523
Interest Income Recognized in Period, with no allowance recorded	145	153
Recorded Investment, with allowance recorded	3,195	3,515
Unpaid Principal Balance, with allowance recorded	3,195	3,515
Related Allowance, with allowance recorded	779	88
Average Recorded Investment , with allowance recorded	3,277	3,504
Interest Income Recognized in Period, with allowance recorded	77	365
Recorded Investment	8,306	6,008
Unpaid Principal Balance	8,556	6,008
Related Allowance	779	88
Average Recorded Investment	8,688	6,027
Interest Income Recognized in Period	222	518
One To Four Family Mortgage Loans [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Recorded Investment, with no allowance recorded	2,166	1,293
Unpaid Principal Balance, with no allowance recorded	2,388	1,293
Related Allowance, with no allowance recorded	0	0
Average Recorded Investment , with no allowance recorded	2,177	1,241
Interest Income Recognized in Period, with no allowance recorded	108	44
Recorded Investment, with allowance recorded	4,002	4,397
Unpaid Principal Balance, with allowance recorded	4,002	4,397
Related Allowance, with allowance recorded	1,007	904
Average Recorded Investment , with allowance recorded	4,001	4,484
Interest Income Recognized in Period, with allowance recorded	139	198
Recorded Investment	6,168	5,690
Unpaid Principal Balance	6,390	5,690
Related Allowance	1,007	904
Average Recorded Investment	6,178	5,725
Interest Income Recognized in Period	247	242
Other Real Estate Mortgage Loans [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Recorded Investment, with no allowance recorded	4,151	2,837
Unpaid Principal Balance, with no allowance recorded	4,249	2,837
Related Allowance, with no allowance recorded	0	0
Average Recorded Investment , with no allowance recorded	4,206	2,746
Interest Income Recognized in Period, with no allowance recorded	275	162
Recorded Investment, with allowance recorded	302	331
Unpaid Principal Balance, with allowance recorded	302	331
Related Allowance, with allowance recorded	135	0
Average Recorded Investment , with allowance recorded	307	337
Interest Income Recognized in Period, with allowance recorded	20	22
Recorded Investment	4,453	3,168
Unpaid Principal Balance	4,551	3,168
Related Allowance	135	0
Average Recorded Investment	4,513	3,083
Interest Income Recognized in Period	295	184
Residential Real Estate Mortgage Loans [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Recorded Investment, with no allowance recorded	11,428	6,623
Unpaid Principal Balance, with no allowance recorded	11,998	6,623
Related Allowance, with no allowance recorded	0	0
Average Recorded Investment , with no allowance recorded	11,794	6,510
Interest Income Recognized in Period, with no allowance recorded	528	359
Recorded Investment, with allowance recorded	7,499	8,243
Unpaid Principal Balance, with allowance recorded	7,499	8,243
Related Allowance, with allowance recorded	1,921	992
Average Recorded Investment , with allowance recorded	7,585	8,325
Interest Income Recognized in Period, with allowance recorded	236	585
Recorded Investment	18,927	14,866
Unpaid Principal Balance	19,497	14,866
Related Allowance	1,921	992
Average Recorded Investment	19,379	14,835
Interest Income Recognized in Period	764	944
Consumer Portfolio Segment [Member]
Statement [Line Items]
Recorded Investment, with no allowance recorded	135	173
Unpaid Principal Balance, with no allowance recorded	344	173
Related Allowance, with no allowance recorded	0	0
Average Recorded Investment , with no allowance recorded	296	173
Interest Income Recognized in Period, with no allowance recorded	6	6
Recorded Investment, with allowance recorded	0	374
Unpaid Principal Balance, with allowance recorded	0	624
Related Allowance, with allowance recorded	0	325
Average Recorded Investment , with allowance recorded	0	425
Interest Income Recognized in Period, with allowance recorded	0	0
Recorded Investment	135	547
Unpaid Principal Balance	344	797
Related Allowance	0	325
Average Recorded Investment	296	598
Interest Income Recognized in Period	$ 6	$ 6

XML

Income Tax Expense (Detail) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Current	$ 19,301	$ 13,629	$ 11,570
Deferred	(2,181)	(1,240)	(2,212)
Income tax expense	$ 17,120	$ 12,389	$ 9,358

XML

DEPOSITS - Additional Information (Detail) (USD $)	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Overdraft Deposit Reclassification	$ 3,860,000	$ 876,000

XML

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

NOTE 18.             COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Loan Commitments

The Company is a party to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit, credit card arrangements, and standby letters of credit. Such commitments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the balance sheets. A summary of the Company’s approximate commitments and contingent liabilities is as follows:

	2012		2011		2010
	(In Thousands)
Commitments to extend credit	$	860,421	$	697,939	$	538,719
Credit card arrangements		25,699		19,686		17,601
Standby letters of credit and financial guarantees		36,374		42,937		47,103
Total	$	922,494	$	760,562	$	603,423

Commitments to extend credit, credit card arrangements, commercial letters of credit and standby letters of credit all include exposure to some credit loss in the event of nonperformance of the customer. The Company uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance sheet financial instruments. Because these instruments have fixed maturity dates, and because many of them expire without being drawn upon, they do not generally present any significant liquidity risk to the Company.

XML

Assumptions Used To Estimates Fair Value Of Stock Option Award Using Black Scholes Merton Valuation Model (Detail)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Expected volatility	19.80%	26.50%	26.00%
Expected dividends	0.00%	0.37%	0.00%
Expected term (in years)	6 years 6 months	6 years 6 months	7 years
Risk-free rate	1.05%	2.21%	2.10%

XML

DEPOSITS (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Deposits [Abstract]

Schedule Of Deposits

Deposits at December 31, 2012 and 2011 were as follows:

	December 31,
	2012		2011
	(In Thousands)
Noninterest-bearing demand	$	545,174	$	418,810
Interest-bearing checking		1,551,158		1,325,451
Savings		19,560		15,638
Time		69,179		71,368
Time, $100,000 and over		326,501		312,620
	$	2,511,572	$	2,143,887

Schedule Of Maturities Of Deposits

The scheduled maturities of time deposits at December 31, 2012 were as follows:

	(In Thousands)
2013	$	247,482
2014		87,433
2015		21,167
2016		26,437
2017		13,161
	$	395,680

XML

PARTICIPATION IN THE SMALL BUSINESS LENDING FUND OF THE U.S. TREASURY DEPARTMENT

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Banking and Thrift [Abstract]

PARTICIPATION IN THE SMALL BUSINESS LENDING FUND OF THE U.S. TREASURY DEPARTMENT

NOTE 11. PARTICIPATION IN THE SMALL BUSINESS LENDING FUND OF THE U.S. TREASURY DEPARTMENT

On June 21, 2011, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with the Secretary of the Treasury, pursuant to which the Company issued and sold to the Treasury 40,000 shares of its Senior Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series A, having a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share (the “Series A Preferred Stock”), for aggregate proceeds of $40,000,000. The issuance was pursuant to the Treasury’s Small Business Lending Fund program, a $30 billion fund established under the Small Business Jobs Act of 2010, which encourages lending to small businesses by providing capital to qualified community banks with assets of less than $10 billion. The Series A Preferred Stock is entitled to receive non-cumulative dividends payable quarterly on each January 1, April 1, July 1 and October 1, commencing October 1, 2011. The dividend rate, which is calculated on the aggregate Liquidation Amount, has been initially set at 1% per annum based upon the current level of “Qualified Small Business Lending” (“QSBL”) by the Bank. The dividend rate for future dividend periods will be set based upon the percentage change in qualified lending between each dividend period and the baseline QSBL level established at the time the Agreement was entered into. Such dividend rate may vary from 1% per annum to 5% per annum for the second through tenth dividend periods, and from 1% per annum to 7% per annum for the eleventh through the first half of the nineteenth dividend periods.  If the Series A Preferred Stock remains outstanding for more than four-and-one-half years, the dividend rate will be fixed at 9%.  Prior to that time, in general, the dividend rate decreases as the level of the Bank’s QSBL increases.  Such dividends are not cumulative, but the Company may only declare and pay dividends on its common stock (or any other equity securities junior to the Series A Preferred Stock) if it has declared and paid dividends for the current dividend period on the Series A Preferred Stock, and will be subject to other restrictions on its ability to repurchase or redeem other securities.  In addition, if (i) the Company has not timely declared and paid dividends on the Series A Preferred Stock for six dividend periods or more, whether or not consecutive, and (ii) shares of Series A Preferred Stock with an aggregate liquidation preference of at least $25,000,000 are still outstanding, the Treasury (or any successor holder of Series A Preferred Stock) may designate two additional directors to be elected to the Company’s Board of Directors.

As is more completely described in the Certificate of Designation, holders of the Series A Preferred Stock have the right to vote as a separate class on certain matters relating to the rights of holders of Series A Preferred Stock and on certain corporate transactions.  Except with respect to such matters and, if applicable, the election of the additional directors described above, the Series A Preferred Stock does not have voting rights.

The Company may redeem the shares of Series A Preferred Stock, in whole or in part, at any time at a redemption price equal to the sum of the Liquidation Amount per share and the per-share amount of any unpaid dividends for the then-current period, subject to any required prior approval by the Company’s primary federal banking regulator.