10-Q 1 cwi2018q210-q.htm 10-Q Document


 

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
þ
 
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
 
 
 
 
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2018
 
 
 
or
 
 
 
o
 
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
 
 
 
 
For the transition period from                     to                       
Commission File Number: 000-54263
cwihighreslogo19.jpg
CAREY WATERMARK INVESTORS INCORPORATED
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Maryland
 
26-2145060
(State of incorporation)
 
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
 
 
 
50 Rockefeller Plaza
 
 
New York, New York
 
10020
(Address of principal executive office)
 
(Zip Code)
Investor Relations (212) 492-8920
(212) 492-1100
(Registrant’s telephone numbers, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o
Accelerated filer o
Non-accelerated filer þ
 
 
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
 
 
 
Smaller reporting company o
Emerging growth company o
 

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ

Registrant has 139,683,228 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value, outstanding at August 3, 2018.
 



INDEX

Forward-Looking Statements

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, or this Report, including Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, in Item 2 of Part I of this Report, contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. These forward-looking statements generally are identified by the words “believe,” “project,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “intend,” “strategy,” “plan,” “may,” “should,” “will,” “would,” “will be,” “will continue,” “will likely result” and similar expressions. These statements are based on the current expectations of our management. Forward-looking statements in this Report include, among others, statements about the impact of Hurricane Irma on certain hotels, including the condition of the properties, cost estimates and the timing of resumption of operations. It is important to note that our actual results could be materially different from those projected in such forward-looking statements. You should exercise caution in relying on forward-looking statements, as they involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors that may materially affect our future results, performance, achievements or transactions. Information on factors that could impact actual results and cause them to differ from what is anticipated in the forward-looking statements contained herein is included in this Report as well as in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, including but not limited to those described in Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017, as filed with the SEC on March 27, 2018, or the 2017 Annual Report. Except as required by federal securities laws and the rules and regulations of the SEC, we do not undertake to revise or update any forward-looking statements.

All references to “Notes” throughout the document refer to the footnotes to the consolidated financial statements of the registrant in Part I, Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited).



CWI 6/30/2018 10-Q – 1




PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements.

CAREY WATERMARK INVESTORS INCORPORATED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
 
June 30, 2018
 
December 31, 2017
Assets
 
 
 
Investments in real estate:
 
 
 
Hotels, at cost
$
2,192,709

 
$
2,172,740

Accumulated depreciation
(249,658
)
 
(227,616
)
Net investments in hotels
1,943,051

 
1,945,124

Assets held for sale (Note 4)
—

 
105,124

Equity investments in real estate
118,476

 
131,344

Cash and cash equivalents
85,606

 
47,994

Intangible assets, net
77,529

 
78,386

Restricted cash, inclusive of $0 and $3,293, respectively, attributable to Assets held for sale
64,077

 
84,382

Accounts receivable
42,157

 
38,359

Other assets
22,047

 
29,208

Total assets
$
2,352,943

 
$
2,459,921

Liabilities and Equity
 
 
 
Non-recourse debt, net, including debt attributable to Assets held for sale (Note 4)
$
1,347,542

 
$
1,420,913

WPC Credit Facility (Note 3)
41,637

 
68,637

Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities
136,768

 
136,343

Due to related parties and affiliates
4,493

 
3,611

Distributions payable
19,741

 
19,640

Other liabilities held for sale (Note 4)
—

 
2,889

Total liabilities
1,550,181

 
1,652,033

Commitments and contingencies (Note 10)

 


Common stock, $0.001 par value; 300,000,000 shares authorized; 138,539,759 and 137,826,503 shares, respectively, issued and outstanding
139

 
138

Additional paid-in capital
1,162,515

 
1,153,652

Distributions and accumulated losses
(417,555
)
 
(399,884
)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
(26
)
 
(455
)
Total stockholders’ equity
745,073

 
753,451

Noncontrolling interests
57,689

 
54,437

Total equity
802,762

 
807,888

Total liabilities and equity
$
2,352,943

 
$
2,459,921


See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


CWI 6/30/2018 10-Q – 2




CAREY WATERMARK INVESTORS INCORPORATED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (UNAUDITED)
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
2018
 
2017
 
2018
 
2017
Revenues
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Hotel Revenues
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rooms
$
100,775

 
$
112,901

 
$
192,566

 
$
217,252

Food and beverage
43,147

 
43,924

 
83,621

 
86,110

Other operating revenue
11,272

 
14,529

 
21,305

 
27,696

Business interruption income
12,065

 
—

 
12,198

 
—

Total Hotel Revenues
167,259

 
171,354

 
309,690

 
331,058

Operating Expenses
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Hotel Expenses
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rooms
22,229

 
24,302

 
44,043

 
47,819

Food and beverage
29,116

 
30,310

 
57,026

 
59,591

Other hotel operating expenses
6,517

 
7,784

 
12,782

 
14,927

Property taxes, insurance, rent and other
15,839

 
16,790

 
31,266

 
33,154

Sales and marketing
15,020

 
15,651

 
29,316

 
30,804

General and administrative
13,415

 
14,189

 
26,491

 
28,172

Repairs and maintenance
5,126

 
5,343

 
9,910

 
10,575

Management fees
4,788

 
4,704

 
9,461

 
10,269

Utilities
3,397

 
4,018

 
6,965

 
8,117

Depreciation and amortization
19,261

 
20,789

 
38,973

 
41,032

Total Hotel Expenses
134,708

 
143,880

 
266,233

 
284,460

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other Operating Expenses
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Asset management fees to affiliate and other expenses
3,836

 
3,972

 
7,755

 
8,018

Corporate general and administrative expenses
2,749

 
2,811

 
5,716

 
5,320

Gain on hurricane-related property damage
(496
)
 
—

 
(1,065
)
 
—

Total Other Operating Expenses, Net
6,089

 
6,783

 
12,406

 
13,338

Operating Income
26,462

 
20,691

 
31,051

 
33,260

Other Income and (Expenses)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest expense
(16,488
)
 
(16,557
)
 
(33,269
)
 
(32,863
)
Equity in earnings of equity method investments in real estate
1,075

 
1,551

 
51

 
4,536

Net loss on extinguishment of debt
(188
)
 
(84
)
 
(188
)
 
(225
)
Other income
244

 
34

 
367

 
60

Total Other Income and (Expenses)
(15,357
)
 
(15,056
)
 
(33,039
)
 
(28,492
)
Income (Loss) from Operations Before Income Taxes and Net Gain on Sale of Real Estate
11,105

 
5,635

 
(1,988
)
 
4,768

Provision for income taxes
(3,238
)
 
(1,078
)
 
(2,531
)
 
(792
)
Income (Loss) from Operations Before Net Gain on Sale of Real Estate
7,867

 
4,557

 
(4,519
)
 
3,976

Net gain on sale of real estate, net of tax
—

 
5,516

 
31,929

 
5,164

Net Income
7,867

 
10,073

 
27,410

 
9,140

(Income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests (inclusive of Available Cash Distributions to a related party of $0, $1,544, $972, and $3,245, respectively)
(146
)
 
310

 
(5,503
)
 
(4,170
)
Net Income Attributable to CWI Stockholders
$
7,721

 
$
10,383

 
$
21,907

 
$
4,970

Basic and Diluted Income Per Share
$
0.06

 
$
0.08

 
$
0.16

 
$
0.04

Basic and Diluted Weighted-Average Shares Outstanding
139,297,483

 
136,621,135

 
139,040,428

 
136,471,543

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Distributions Declared Per Share
$
0.1425

 
$
0.1425

 
$
0.2850

 
$
0.2850


See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


CWI 6/30/2018 10-Q – 3




CAREY WATERMARK INVESTORS INCORPORATED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (UNAUDITED)
(in thousands)
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
2018
 
2017
 
2018
 
2017
Net Income
$
7,867

 
$
10,073

 
$
27,410

 
$
9,140

Other Comprehensive Income
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Unrealized gain on derivative instruments
110

 
232

 
425

 
337

Comprehensive Income
7,977

 
10,305

 
27,835

 
9,477

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Amounts Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net (income) loss
(146
)
 
310

 
(5,503
)
 
(4,170
)
Unrealized loss (gain) on derivative instruments
16

 
(3
)
 
4

 
(4
)
Comprehensive (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
(130
)
 
307

 
(5,499
)
 
(4,174
)
Comprehensive Income Attributable to CWI Stockholders
$
7,847

 
$
10,612

 
$
22,336

 
$
5,303


See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


CWI 6/30/2018 10-Q – 4




CAREY WATERMARK INVESTORS INCORPORATED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY (UNAUDITED)
Six Months Ended June 30, 2018 and 2017
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
 
CWI Stockholders
 
 
 
 
 
Shares
 
Common
Stock
 
Additional
Paid-In
Capital
 
Distributions
and Accumulated
Losses
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss
 
Total CWI
Stockholders
 
Noncontrolling
Interests
 
Total
Balance at January 1, 2018
137,826,503

 
$
138

 
$
1,153,652

 
$
(399,884
)
 
$
(455
)
 
$
753,451

 
$
54,437

 
$
807,888

Net income
 
 
 
 
 
 
21,907

 
 
 
21,907

 
5,503

 
27,410

Shares issued, net of offering costs
2,086,826

 
2

 
22,084

 
 
 
 
 
22,086

 
 
 
22,086

Shares issued to affiliates
677,424

 
1

 
7,183

 
 
 
 
 
7,184

 
 
 
7,184

Distributions to noncontrolling interests
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
—

 
(2,247
)
 
(2,247
)
Shares issued under share incentive plans
18,971

 
—

 
74

 
 
 
 
 
74

 
 
 
74

Stock-based compensation to directors
17,291

 
—

 
180

 
 
 
 
 
180

 
 
 
180

Distributions declared ($0.2850 per share)
 
 
 
 
 
 
(39,578
)
 
 
 
(39,578
)
 
 
 
(39,578
)
Other comprehensive income
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
429

 
429

 
(4
)
 
425

Repurchase of shares
(2,087,256
)
 
(2
)
 
(20,658
)
 
 
 
 
 
(20,660
)
 
 
 
(20,660
)
Balance at June 30, 2018
138,539,759

 
$
139

 
$
1,162,515

 
$
(417,555
)
 
$
(26
)
 
$
745,073

 
$
57,689

 
$
802,762

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balance at January 1, 2017
135,379,038

 
$
135

 
$
1,125,835

 
$
(326,748
)
 
$
(1,128
)
 
$
798,094

 
$
65,163

 
$
863,257

Net income
 
 
 
 
 
 
4,970

 
 
 
4,970

 
4,170

 
9,140

Shares issued, net of offering costs
2,131,969

 
2

 
22,872

 
 
 
 
 
22,874

 
 
 
22,874

Shares issued to affiliates
556,213

 
1

 
5,976

 
 
 
 
 
5,977

 
 
 
5,977

Distributions to noncontrolling interests
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
—

 
(5,553
)
 
(5,553
)
Shares issued under share incentive plans
23,710

 
 
 
72

 
 
 
 
 
72

 
 
 
72

Stock-based compensation to directors
16,667

 
 
 
180

 
 
 
 
 
180

 
 
 
180

Distributions declared ($0.2850 per share)
 
 
 
 
 
 
(38,900
)
 
 
 
(38,900
)
 
 
 
(38,900
)
Other comprehensive income
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
333

 
333

 
4

 
337

Repurchase of shares
(1,804,719
)
 
(2
)
 
(18,515
)
 
 
 
 
 
(18,517
)
 
 
 
(18,517
)
Balance at June 30, 2017
136,302,878

 
$
136

 
$
1,136,420

 
$
(360,678
)
 
$
(795
)
 
$
775,083

 
$
63,784

 
$
838,867


See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


CWI 6/30/2018 10-Q – 5




CAREY WATERMARK INVESTORS INCORPORATED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
(in thousands)
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
2018
 
2017
Cash Flows — Operating Activities
 
 
 
Net income
$
27,410

 
$
9,140

Adjustments to net income:
 
 
 
Depreciation and amortization
38,973

 
41,032

Net gain on sale of real estate (Note 4)
(31,929
)
 
(5,164
)
Business interruption income
(12,198
)
 
—

Asset management fees to affiliates settled in shares
7,095

 
7,198

Equity in losses (earnings) of equity method investments in real estate in excess of distributions received
2,860

 
(1,569
)
Straight-line rent adjustments
2,597

 
2,632

Amortization of deferred financing costs, ground lease intangible and other
1,568

 
1,535

Gain on hurricane-related property damage
(1,065
)
 
—

Amortization of stock-based compensation expense
353

 
377

Net loss on extinguishment of debt
188

 
222

Funding of hurricane/fire related remediation work
(10,201
)
 
—

Business interruption insurance proceeds
7,487

 
107

Insurance proceeds for remediation work due to hurricane damage

3,210

 
—

Net changes in other operating assets and liabilities
1,494

 
511

Increase (decrease) in due to related parties and affiliates
1,032

 
(679
)
Receipt of key money and other deferred incentive payments
—

 
66

Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
38,874

 
55,408

 
 
 
 
Cash Flows — Investing Activities
 
 
 
Proceeds from the sale of real estate investments (Note 4)
135,301

 
23,081

Capital expenditures
(35,993
)
 
(24,141
)
Hurricane/fire related property insurance proceeds
11,246

 
—

Distributions received from equity investments in excess of cumulative equity income
10,886

 
2,665

Capital contributions to equity investments in real estate
(732
)
 
—

Repayments of loan receivable
183

 
134

Net Cash Provided by Investing Activities
120,891

 
1,739

 
 
 
 
Cash Flows — Financing Activities
 
 
 
Scheduled payments and prepayments of mortgage principal
(147,950
)
 
(87,199
)
Proceeds from mortgage financing
75,250

 
83,500

Distributions paid
(39,477
)
 
(38,769
)
Repayment of note payable to affiliate
(37,000
)
 
—

Proceeds from issuance of shares, net of offering costs
22,092

 
22,874

Repurchase of shares
(20,639
)
 
(18,523
)
Proceeds from note payable to affiliate
10,000

 
22,835

Distributions to noncontrolling interests
(2,247
)
 
(5,553
)
Deferred financing costs
(1,679
)
 
(1,296
)
Scheduled payments of loan
(288
)
 
(155
)
Purchase of interest rate caps
(232
)
 
(11
)
Debt extinguishment costs
(188
)
 
—

Withholding on restricted stock units
(100
)
 
(126
)
Repayment of senior credit facility
—

 
(22,785
)
Deposits released for mortgage financing
—

 
1,610

Deposits for mortgage financing
—

 
(1,510
)
Net Cash Used In Financing Activities
(142,458
)
 
(45,108
)
 
 
 
 
Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash During the Period
 
 
 
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash
17,307

 
12,039

Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash, beginning of period
132,376

 
120,347

Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash, end of period
$
149,683

 
$
132,386


See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


CWI 6/30/2018 10-Q – 6




CAREY WATERMARK INVESTORS INCORPORATED
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

Note 1. Business

Organization

Carey Watermark Investors Incorporated, or CWI, together with its consolidated subsidiaries, is a publicly-owned, non-listed real estate investment trust, or REIT, that invests in, manages and seeks to enhance the value of, interests in lodging and lodging-related properties, in the United States. We conduct substantially all of our investment activities and own all of our assets through CWI OP, LP, or the Operating Partnership. We are a general partner and a limited partner of, and own a 99.985% capital interest in, the Operating Partnership. Carey Watermark Holdings, LLC, or Carey Watermark Holdings, which is owned indirectly by both W. P. Carey Inc., or WPC, and Watermark Capital Partners, LLC, or Watermark Capital Partners, holds a special general partner interest in the Operating Partnership.

We are managed by Carey Lodging Advisors, LLC, or our Advisor, an indirect subsidiary of WPC. Our Advisor manages our overall portfolio, including providing oversight and strategic guidance to the independent hotel operators that manage our hotels. CWA, LLC, a subsidiary of Watermark Capital Partners, or the Subadvisor, provides services to our Advisor, primarily relating to acquiring, managing, financing and disposing of our hotels and overseeing the independent operators that manage the day-to-day operations of our hotels. In addition, the Subadvisor provides us with the services of Mr. Michael G. Medzigian, our Chief Executive Officer, subject to the approval of our independent directors.

We held ownership interests in 28 hotels at June 30, 2018, including 24 hotels that we consolidate, or our Consolidated Hotels, and four hotels that we record as equity investments, or our Unconsolidated Hotels.

Public Offerings

We raised $575.8 million through our initial public offering, which ran from September 15, 2010 through September 15, 2013, and $577.4 million through our follow-on offering, which ran from December 20, 2013 through December 31, 2014. In addition, from inception through June 30, 2018, $191.9 million of distributions were reinvested in our common stock as a result of our distribution reinvestment plan, or DRIP. We have fully invested the proceeds from both our initial public offering and follow-on offering.

Note 2. Basis of Presentation

Basis of Presentation

Our interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and, therefore, do not necessarily include all information and footnotes necessary for a fair statement of our consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States, or GAAP.

In the opinion of management, the unaudited financial information for the interim periods presented in this Report reflects all normal and recurring adjustments necessary for a fair statement of financial position, results of operations and cash flows. Our interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes for the year ended December 31, 2017, which are included in our 2017 Annual Report, as certain disclosures that would substantially duplicate those contained in the audited consolidated financial statements have not been included in this Report. Operating results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of operating results for an entire year.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and the disclosure of contingent amounts in our consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.



CWI 6/30/2018 10-Q – 7



Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Basis of Consolidation

Our consolidated financial statements reflect all of our accounts, including those of our controlled subsidiaries. The portions of equity in consolidated subsidiaries that are not attributable, directly or indirectly, to us are presented as noncontrolling interests. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

When we obtain an economic interest in an entity, we evaluate the entity to determine if it should be deemed a variable interest entity, or VIE, and, if so, whether we are the primary beneficiary and are therefore required to consolidate the entity. We apply accounting guidance for consolidation of VIEs to certain entities in which the equity investors do not have the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties. Certain decision-making rights within a loan or joint-venture agreement can cause us to consider an entity a VIE. Limited partnerships and other similar entities which operate as a partnership will be considered a VIE unless the limited partners hold substantive kick-out rights or participation rights. Significant judgment is required to determine whether a VIE should be consolidated. We review the contractual arrangements provided for in the partnership agreement or other related contracts to determine whether the entity is considered a VIE, and to establish whether we have any variable interests in the VIE. We then compare our variable interests, if any, to those of the other variable interest holders to determine which party is the primary beneficiary of the VIE based on whether the entity (i) has the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of the VIE and (ii) has the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. The liabilities of these VIEs are non-recourse to us and can only be satisfied from each VIE’s respective assets.

At both June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, we considered five entities to be VIEs, four of which we consolidated as we are considered the primary beneficiary. The following table presents a summary of selected financial data of consolidated VIEs included in the consolidated balance sheets (in thousands):
 
June 30, 2018
 
December 31, 2017
Net investments in hotels
$
499,685

 
$
501,287

Intangible assets, net
38,248

 
38,649

Total assets
583,832

 
579,807

 
 
 
 
Non-recourse debt, net
$
345,336

 
$
341,563

Total liabilities
371,297

 
373,548


Accounting Policy Update

Distributions from Equity Method Investments — We classify distributions received from equity method investments using the cumulative earnings approach. Distributions received are considered returns on the investment and classified as cash inflows from operating activities. If, however, the investor’s cumulative distributions received, less distributions received in prior periods determined to be returns of investment, exceeds cumulative equity in earnings recognized, the excess is considered a return of investment and is classified as cash inflows from investing activities.

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). ASU 2014-09 supersedes or replaces nearly all GAAP revenue recognition guidance. The new guidance establishes a new control-based revenue recognition model that changes the basis for deciding when revenue is recognized over time or at a point in time and expands the disclosures about revenue. The new guidance also applies to sales of real estate and the new principles-based approach is largely based on the transfer of control of the real estate to the buyer. We adopted this guidance for our interim and annual periods beginning January 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective method. We performed a comprehensive evaluation of the impact of the new standard across our revenue streams and determined that the timing of revenue recognition and its classification in our consolidated financial statements will remain substantially unchanged. The adoption of ASU 2014-09 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Revenue consists of amounts derived from hotel operations, including the sale of rooms, food and beverage and revenue from other operating departments, such as parking, spa, resort fees and gift shops, and are presented on a disaggregated basis on the consolidated statements of operations. These revenues are recorded net of any sales or occupancy taxes, which are collected from our guests as earned. All rebates or discounts are recorded as a reduction in revenue and there are no material contingent obligations with respect to rebates or discounts offered by us.


CWI 6/30/2018 10-Q – 8



Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)


We recognize revenue when control of the promised good or service is transferred to the guest, in an amount that reflects the consideration we expect to receive in exchange for the promised good or service. Room revenue is generated through contracts with guests whereby the guest agrees to pay a daily rate for the right to use a hotel room for an agreed upon length of stay. Our contract performance obligations are fulfilled at the end of the day that the guest is provided the room and revenue is recognized daily at the contract rate. Food and beverage revenue, including restaurant and banquet and catering services, are recognized at a point in time once food and beverage has been provided. Other operating department revenue for services such as parking, spa and other ancillary services, is recognized at a point in time when the goods and services are provided to the guest. We may engage third parties to provide certain services at the hotel, for example, audiovisual services. We evaluate each of these contracts to determine if the hotel is the principal or the agent in the transaction, and record the revenues as appropriate (i.e. gross vs. net).

Payment is due at the time that goods or services are rendered or billed. For room revenue, payment is typically due and paid in full at the end of the stay with some guests prepaying for their rooms prior to the stay. For package revenue, where ancillary guest services are included with the guests’ hotel reservations in a package arrangement, we allocate revenue based on the stand-alone selling price for each of the components of the package. We applied a practical expedient to not disclose the value of unsatisfied performance obligations for contracts that have an original expected length of one year or less. Any contracts that have an original expected length of greater than one year are insignificant.

Reclassifications

Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.

Restricted Cash — In connection with our adoption of Accounting Standards Update, or ASU, 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash, as described below, we revised our consolidated statements of cash flows to include restricted cash when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period cash amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. As a result, we retrospectively revised prior periods presented to conform to the current period presentation. Restricted cash consists primarily of amounts escrowed pursuant to the terms of our mortgage debt to fund planned renovations and improvements (including at hotels damaged by Hurricane Irma), property taxes, insurance, and normal replacement of furniture, fixtures and equipment at our hotels. The following table provides a reconciliation of cash and restricted cash reported within the consolidated balance sheets to the consolidated statements of cash flows (in thousands):
 
June 30, 2018
 
December 31, 2017
Cash and cash equivalents
$
85,606

 
$
47,994

Restricted cash
64,077

 
84,382

Total cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash
$
149,683

 
$
132,376


Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Pronouncements Adopted as of June 30, 2018

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments. ASU 2016-15 intends to reduce diversity in practice for certain cash flow classifications, including, but not limited to (i) debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs, (ii) contingent consideration payments made after a business combination, (iii) proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims, (iv) distributions received from equity method investees and (v) separately identifiable cash flows and application of the predominance principle. We retrospectively adopted this guidance for our interim and annual periods beginning January 1, 2018. As a result, we reclassified distributions received from equity method investments of $0.5 million from net cash provided by operating activities to net cash used in investing activities on the consolidated statement of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2017. The adoption of ASU 2016-15 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.


CWI 6/30/2018 10-Q – 9



Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)


In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash. ASU 2016-18 intends to reduce diversity in practice for the classification and presentation of changes in restricted cash on the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-18 requires that a statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. Therefore, amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents should be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. We retrospectively adopted this guidance for our interim and annual periods beginning January 1, 2018. See Restricted Cash above for additional information.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business. ASU 2017-01 clarifies the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist companies and other reporting organizations with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. The changes to the definition of a business will likely result in more acquisitions being accounted for as asset acquisitions across all industries. The guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and the interim periods within those annual periods. We adopted this guidance for our interim and annual periods beginning January 1, 2018. We have had no hotel acquisitions since the adoption of this guidance; however, we expect that certain future hotel acquisitions may be considered asset acquisitions rather than business combinations, which would affect the capitalization of acquisition costs (such costs are expensed for business combinations and capitalized for asset acquisitions).

In February 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-05, Other Income — Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets (Subtopic 610-20). ASU 2017-05 clarifies that a financial asset is within the scope of Subtopic 610-20 if it meets the definition of an in substance nonfinancial asset. The amendments define the term “in substance nonfinancial asset,” in part, as a financial asset promised to a counterparty in a contract if substantially all of the fair value of the assets (recognized and unrecognized) that are promised to the counterparty in the contract is concentrated in nonfinancial assets. If substantially all of the fair value of the assets that are promised to the counterparty in a contract is concentrated in nonfinancial assets, then all of the financial assets promised to the counterparty are in substance nonfinancial assets within the scope of Subtopic 610-20. This amendment also clarifies that nonfinancial assets within the scope of Subtopic 610-20 may include nonfinancial assets transferred within a legal entity to a counterparty. For example, a parent company may transfer control of nonfinancial assets by transferring ownership interests in a consolidated subsidiary. We adopted this guidance for our interim and annual periods beginning January 1, 2018. The adoption of ASU 2017-05 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Pronouncements to be Adopted after June 30, 2018

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). ASU 2016-02 modifies the principles for the recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of leases for both parties to a contract, the lessee and the lessor. ASU 2016-02 provides new guidelines that change the accounting for leasing arrangements for lessees, whereby their rights and obligations under substantially all leases, existing and new, would be capitalized and recorded on the balance sheet. For lessors, however, the accounting remains largely equivalent to the current model, with the distinction between operating, sales-type and direct financing leases retained, but updated to align with certain changes to the lessee model and the new revenue recognition standard. Additionally, the new standard requires extensive quantitative and qualitative disclosures.

Early application is permitted for all entities. ASU 2016-02 provides two transition methods. The first transition method allows for application of the new model at the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented. Under the second transition method, comparative periods would not be restated, with any cumulative effect adjustments recognized in the opening balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption. We will adopt this guidance for our interim and annual periods beginning January 1, 2019 and expect to use the second transition method. We are evaluating the impact of ASU 2016-02 and have not yet determined if it will have a material impact on our business or our consolidated financial statements, but the application of the new standard will result in the recording of a right-of-use asset and a lease liability on the consolidated balance sheet for each of our ground leases.

In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities. ASU 2017-12 will make more financial and nonfinancial hedging strategies eligible for hedge accounting. It also amends the presentation and disclosure requirements and changes how companies assess hedge effectiveness. It is intended to more closely align hedge accounting with companies’ risk management strategies, simplify the application of hedge accounting, and increase transparency as to the scope and results of hedging programs. ASU 2017-12 will be effective in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years, with early


CWI 6/30/2018 10-Q – 10



Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

adoption permitted. We are in the process of evaluating the impact of adopting ASU 2017-12 on our consolidated financial statements and will adopt the standard for the fiscal year beginning January 1, 2019.

Note 3. Agreements and Transactions with Related Parties

Agreements with our Advisor and Affiliates

We have an advisory agreement with our Advisor, which we refer to herein as the Advisory Agreement, to perform certain services for us under a fee arrangement, including managing our overall business, our investments and certain administrative duties. The Advisory Agreement has a term of one year and may be renewed for successive one-year periods. Our Advisor also has a subadvisory agreement with the Subadvisor, which we refer to herein as the Subadvisory Agreement, whereby our Advisor pays 20% of its fees earned under the Advisory Agreement to the Subadvisor in return for certain personnel services.

The following tables present a summary of fees we paid; expenses we reimbursed; and distributions we made to our Advisor, the Subadvisor and other affiliates, as described below, in accordance with the terms of those agreements (in thousands):
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
2018
 
2017
 
2018
 
2017
Amounts Included in the Consolidated Statements of Income
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Asset management fees
$
3,535

 
$
3,585

 
$
7,095

 
$
7,198

Personnel and overhead reimbursements
1,465

 
1,486

 
2,903

 
2,909

Available Cash Distributions
—

 
1,544

 
972

 
3,245

Interest expense
311

 
117

 
690

 
128

Disposition fees (Note 4)
—

 
143

 
190

 
225

 
$
5,311

 
$
6,875

 
$
11,850

 
$
13,705

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other Transaction Fees Incurred
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Capitalized loan refinancing fees
$
263

 
$
340

 
$
653

 
$
340

 
$
263

 
$
340

 
$
653

 
$
340


The following table presents a summary of the amounts included in Due to related parties and affiliates in the consolidated financial statements (in thousands):
 
June 30, 2018
 
December 31, 2017
Amounts Due to Related Parties and Affiliates
 
 
 
Accrued interest on WPC Credit Facility
$
1,405

 
$
715

Reimbursable costs
1,284

 
1,239

Other amounts due to our Advisor
1,192

 
1,282

Due to other affiliates
612

 
375

 
$
4,493

 
$
3,611


Asset Management Fees, Dispositions Fees and Loan Refinancing Fees

We pay our Advisor an annual asset management fee equal to 0.5% of the aggregate Average Market Value of our Investments, (as defined in the Advisory Agreement). Our Advisor is also entitled to receive disposition fees of up to 1.5% of the contract sales price of a property, as well as a loan refinancing fee of up to 1.0% of the principal amount of a refinanced loan, if certain conditions described in the Advisory Agreement are met. If our Advisor elects to receive all or a portion of its fees in shares of our common stock, the number of shares issued is determined by dividing the dollar amount of fees by our most recently published estimated net asset value per share, or NAV. For the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, we settled $7.2 million and $6.0 million, respectively, of asset management fees in shares of our common stock at our Advisor’s election. At June 30, 2018, our Advisor owned 3,597,692 shares (2.6%) of our outstanding common stock. Asset management fees are included in Asset management fees to affiliate and other expenses in the consolidated financial statements.



CWI 6/30/2018 10-Q – 11



Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Available Cash Distributions

Carey Watermark Holdings’ special general partner interest entitles it to receive distributions of 10% of Available Cash (as defined in the limited partnership agreement of the Operating Partnership), or Available Cash Distributions, generated by the Operating Partnership, subject to certain limitations. In addition, in the event of the dissolution of the Operating Partnership, Carey Watermark Holdings will be entitled to receive distributions of up to 15% of net proceeds, provided certain return thresholds are met for the initial investors in the Operating Partnership. Available Cash Distributions are included in Income attributable to noncontrolling interests in the consolidated financial statements.

Personnel and Overhead Reimbursements/Reimbursable Costs

Under the terms of the Advisory Agreement, our Advisor generally allocates expenses of dedicated and shared resources, including the cost of personnel, rent and related office expenses, between us and our affiliate, Carey Watermark Investors 2 Incorporated, or CWI 2, based on total pro rata hotel revenues on a quarterly basis. CWI 2 is a publicly owned, non-listed REIT that is also advised by our Advisor and invests in lodging and lodging-related properties. Pursuant to the Subadvisory Agreement, after we reimburse our Advisor, it will subsequently reimburse the Subadvisor for personnel costs and other charges, including the services of our Chief Executive Officer, subject to the approval of our board of directors. We have also granted restricted stock units to employees of the Subadvisor pursuant to our 2010 Equity Incentive Plan. These reimbursements are included in Corporate general and administrative expenses and Due to related parties and affiliates in the consolidated financial statements.

Other Amounts Due to our Advisor

This balance primarily represented asset management fees payable to our Advisor.

Other Transactions with Affiliates

WPC Credit Facility

During the third quarter of 2017, our board of directors and the board of directors of WPC approved secured loans from WPC to us of up to $100.0 million for acquisition funding purposes and $25.0 million for working capital purposes. On September 26, 2017, we entered into a secured credit facility, or the WPC Credit Facility, with our Operating Partnership as borrower and WPC as lender. The WPC Credit Facility consists of (i) a bridge term loan of $75.0 million, or the Bridge Loan, for the purpose of acquiring an interest in the Ritz-Carlton Bacara, Santa Barbara Venture and (ii) a $25.0 million revolving working capital facility, or the Working Capital Facility, to be used for our working capital needs. The Bridge Loan was scheduled to mature on June 30, 2018; however, we requested and were granted an extension by WPC to September 30, 2018. The Working Capital Facility is currently scheduled to mature on December 31, 2018. If the Advisory Agreement expires or is terminated, both the Bridge Loan and the Working Capital Facility would mature at that time. Both loans bear interest at the London Interbank Offered Rate, or LIBOR, plus 1.0%; provided however, that upon the occurrence of certain events of default (as defined in the loan agreement), all outstanding amounts will be subject to a 2% annual interest rate increase. We serve as guarantor of the WPC Credit Facility and have pledged our unencumbered equity interests in certain properties as collateral, as further described in the pledge and security agreement entered into between the borrower and lender. At December 31, 2017, the outstanding balances under the Bridge Loan and Working Capital Facility were $60.8 million and $7.8 million, respectively. At June 30, 2018, the outstanding balances under the Bridge Loan and Working Capital Facility were $40.8 million and $0.8 million, respectively, with $24.2 million available to be drawn under the Working Capital Facility.

The WPC Credit Facility includes various customary affirmative and negative covenants. We were in compliance with all applicable covenants at June 30, 2018.

Jointly Owned Investments

At June 30, 2018, we owned interests in three ventures with CWI 2: the Ritz-Carlton Key Biscayne, a Consolidated Hotel, and the Marriott Sawgrass Golf Resort & Spa and the Ritz-Carlton Bacara, Santa Barbara, both Unconsolidated Hotels. A third-party also owns an interest in the Ritz-Carlton Key Biscayne.



CWI 6/30/2018 10-Q – 12



Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Note 4. Net Investments in Hotels

Net investments in hotels are summarized as follows (in thousands):
 
June 30, 2018
 
December 31, 2017
Buildings
$
1,550,262

 
$
1,554,798

Land
359,383

 
359,383

Furniture, fixtures and equipment
113,257

 
123,595

Building and site improvements
129,626

 
122,273

Construction in progress
40,181

 
12,691

Hotels, at cost
2,192,709

 
2,172,740

Less: Accumulated depreciation
(249,658
)
 
(227,616
)
Net investments in hotels
$
1,943,051

 
$
1,945,124


During the six months ended June 30, 2018, we retired fully depreciated furniture, fixtures and equipment aggregating $15.9 million.

Hurricane/Fire Related Disruption

Hurricane Irma made landfall in September 2017, impacting five of our Consolidated Hotels: Hawks Cay Resort, Marriott Boca Raton at Boca Center, Ritz-Carlton Key Biscayne, Ritz-Carlton Fort Lauderdale and Staybridge Suites Savannah Historic District. All five hotels sustained damage and were forced to close for a period of time, except for Marriott Boca Raton at Boca Center, which was sold during the first quarter of 2018. All hotels reopened shortly after Hurricane Irma, with varying degrees of damage, with the exception of the Hawks Cay Resort, which is expected to fully reopen by the end of August 2018. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, we recognized gains of $0.5 million and $1.1 million, respectively, resulting from changes in our estimates of the total aggregate damage incurred at the properties, comprised of the following (in thousands):
 
Three Months Ended June 30, 2018
 
Six Months Ended June 30, 2018
Net (write-up) write-off of fixed assets
$
(198
)
 
$
5,460

Remediation work performed
709

 
6,506

Property damage insurance receivables
(1,007
)
 
(13,031
)
 
$
(496
)
 
$
(1,065
)

As of June 30, 2018, we have received business interruption insurance proceeds related to the Hawks Cay Resort of $14.9 million, of which we recorded $10.5 million in the consolidated financial statements as Business interruption income during both the three and six months ended June 30, 2018.

Additionally, as of June 30, 2018, we have received business interruption insurance proceeds related to the Fairmont Sonoma Mission Inn & Spa, resulting from lost revenue caused by wildfires in Northern California during 2017, of $1.5 million, all of which we recorded in the consolidated financial statements as Business interruption income during both the three and six months ended June 30, 2018.

We are still assessing the impact of the hurricane on our hotels; the final net book value write-offs could vary significantly from our estimates and additional remediation work may be performed. Any changes to property damage estimates will be recorded in the periods in which they are determined and any additional remediation work will be recorded in the periods in which it is performed. 

Property Dispositions and Assets and Liabilities Held for Sale

On January 25, 2018, we sold our 100% ownership interest in the Marriott Boca Raton at Boca Center to an unaffiliated third‑party for a contractual sales price of $76.0 million, with net proceeds after the repayment of debt of approximately $35.4 million, including the release of $1.4 million of restricted cash. We recognized a gain on sale of $12.3 million during the first quarter of 2018 in connection with this transaction. This property was classified as held for sale at December 31, 2017.



CWI 6/30/2018 10-Q – 13



Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

On February 5, 2018, we sold our 100% ownership interests in the Hampton Inn Memphis Beale Street and Hampton Inn Atlanta Downtown to an unaffiliated third-party for a contractual sales price totaling $63.0 million, with net proceeds after the repayment of debt of approximately $31.8 million, including the release of $2.0 million of restricted cash. We recognized a gain on sale totaling $19.6 million during the first quarter of 2018 in connection with this transaction. These properties were classified as held for sale at December 31, 2017.

At June 30, 2018, no properties were classified as held for sale.

Below is a summary of our assets and liabilities held for sale (in thousands):
 
June 30, 2018
 
December 31, 2017
Net investments in hotels
$
—

 
$
104,062

Accounts receivable
—

 
681

Other assets
—

 
377

Intangible assets, net
—

 
4

Assets held for sale
$
—

 
$
105,124

 
 
 
 
Non-recourse debt, net attributable to Assets held for sale
$
—

 
$
71,887

 
 
 
 
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities
$
—

 
$
2,889

Due to related parties and affiliates
—

 
—

Other liabilities held for sale
$
—

 
$
2,889


Construction in Progress

At June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, construction in progress, recorded at cost, was $40.2 million and $12.7 million, respectively, and related primarily to the restoration of the Hawks Cay Resort as a result of the damage caused by Hurricane Irma and renovations at the Marriott Raleigh City Center at June 30, 2018, and renovations at the Marriott Raleigh City Center, the Equinox, a Luxury Collection Golf Resort & Spa, the Sheraton Austin Hotel at the Capitol and the Ritz-Carlton Fort Lauderdale at December 31, 2017. We capitalize interest expense and certain other costs, such as property taxes, property insurance, utilities expense and hotel incremental labor costs, related to hotels undergoing major renovations. We capitalized $0.9 million and $0.2 million of such costs during the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and $1.5 million and $0.7 million during the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. At June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, accrued capital expenditures were $11.8 million and $6.0 million, respectively, representing non-cash investing activity.

Note 5. Equity Investments in Real Estate

At June 30, 2018, we owned equity interests in four Unconsolidated Hotels, two with unrelated third parties and two with CWI 2. We do not control the ventures that own these hotels, but we exercise significant influence over them. We account for these investments under the equity method of accounting (i.e., at cost, increased or decreased by our share of earnings or losses, less distributions, plus contributions and other adjustments required by equity method accounting, such as basis differences from acquisition costs paid to our Advisor that we incur and other-than-temporary impairment charges, if any).

Under the conventional approach of accounting for equity method investments, an investor applies its percentage ownership interest to the venture’s net income to determine the investor’s share of the earnings or losses of the venture. This approach is inappropriate if the venture’s capital structure gives different rights and priorities to its investors. We have priority returns on several of our equity method investments. Therefore, we follow the hypothetical liquidation at book value method in determining our share of these ventures’ earnings or losses for the reporting period, as this method better reflects our claim on the ventures’ book value at the end of each reporting period. Earnings for our equity method investments are recognized in accordance with each respective investment agreement and, where applicable, based upon the allocation of the investment’s net assets at book value as if the investment were hypothetically liquidated at the end of each reporting period.



CWI 6/30/2018 10-Q – 14



Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Hurricane-Related Disruption

The Marriott Sawgrass Golf Resort & Spa was impacted by Hurricane Irma when it made landfall in September 2017. The hotel sustained damage and was forced to close for a short period of time. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, the venture recognized losses on hurricane-related property damage of $0.9 million and $0.6 million, respectively.

(in thousands)
Three Months Ended June 30, 2018
 
Six Months Ended June 30, 2018
Net write-off (write-up) of fixed assets
$
150

 
$
(426
)
Remediation work performed
486

 
110

Decrease in property damage insurance receivables
265

 
905

 
$
901

 
$
589


We are still assessing the impact of the hurricane on the venture, and the final net book value write-offs could vary significantly from our estimate and additional remediation work may be performed. Any changes to the estimates for property damage will be recorded by the venture in the periods in which they are determined, and any additional remediation work will be recorded by the venture in the periods in which it is performed. 

The following table sets forth our ownership interests in our equity investments in real estate and their respective carrying values. The carrying values of these ventures are affected by the timing and nature of distributions (dollars in thousands):
Unconsolidated Hotels
 
State
 
Number
of Rooms
 
% Owned
 
Acquisition Date
 
Hotel Type
 
Carrying Value at
 
 
 
 
 
 
June 30, 2018
 
December 31, 2017
Ritz-Carlton Bacara, Santa Barbara Venture (a) (b)
 
CA
 
358

 
40%
 
9/28/2017
 
Resort
 
$
59,454

 
$
65,126

Ritz-Carlton Philadelphia Venture (c)
 
PA
 
301

 
60%
 
5/15/2015
 
Full-service
 
32,050

 
38,469

Marriott Sawgrass Golf Resort & Spa Venture (d) (e)
 
FL
 
514

 
50%
 
4/1/2015
 
Resort
 
26,423

 
27,162

Hyatt Centric French Quarter Venture (f)
 
LA
 
254

 
80%
 
9/6/2011
 
Full-service
 
549

 
587

 
 
 
 
1,427

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
118,476

 
$
131,344

___________
(a)
This investment represents a tenancy-in-common interest; the remaining 60% interest is owned by CWI 2.
(b)
We received net cash distributions of $3.3 million and $3.0 million from this investment during the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively.
(c)
We received cash distributions of $0.3 million and $1.6 million from this investment during the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively. During the first quarter of 2018, we also received a distribution of $4.4 million representing our share of proceeds from a mortgage refinancing in January 2018. We capitalized the refinancing fee paid to the Advisor totaling $0.4 million.
(d)
We received cash distributions of $2.1 million and $2.9 million from this investment during the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively.
(e)
This investment is considered a VIE (Note 2). We do not consolidate this entity because we are not the primary beneficiary and the nature of our involvement in the activities of the entity allows us to exercise significant influence, but does not give us power over decisions that significantly affect the economic performance of the entity.
(f)
We received cash distributions of $0.7 million and $1.1 million from this investment during the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively.



CWI 6/30/2018 10-Q – 15



Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

The following table sets forth our share of equity in earnings (losses) from our Unconsolidated Hotels, which are based on the hypothetical liquidation at book value model, as well as certain amortization adjustments related to basis differentials from acquisitions of investments (in thousands):
 
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
Venture
 
2018
 
2017
 
2018
 
2017
Ritz-Carlton Bacara, Santa Barbara Venture
 
$
(889
)
 
$
—

 
$
(2,838
)
 
$
—

Marriott Sawgrass Golf Resort & Spa Venture
 
488

 
320

 
2,111

 
1,706

Hyatt Centric French Quarter Venture
 
669

 
254

 
1,056

 
729

Ritz-Carlton Philadelphia Venture
 
693

 
824

 
(783
)
 
1,629

Westin Atlanta Venture (a)
 
114

 
153

 
505

 
472

Total equity in earnings of equity method investments in real estate
 
$
1,075

 
$
1,551

 
$
51

 
$
4,536

___________
(a)
On October 19, 2017, the venture sold the Westin Atlanta Perimeter North to an unaffiliated third-party.

No other-than-temporary impairment charges related to our investments in these ventures were recognized during the three or six months ended June 30, 2018 or 2017.

At June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the unamortized basis differences on our equity investments were $7.5 million and $7.2 million, respectively. Net amortization of the basis differences reduced the carrying values of our equity investments by $0.1 million during both the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, and by $0.2 million and $0.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

The following tables present combined summarized financial information of our Marriott Sawgrass Golf Resort & Spa Venture and Ritz-Carlton Philadelphia Venture. Amounts provided are the total amounts attributable to the ventures and does not represent our proportionate share (in thousands):
 
 
June 30, 2018
 
December 31, 2017
Real estate, net
 
$
224,769

 
$
229,356

Other assets
 
23,958

 
20,839

Total assets
 
248,727

 
250,195

Debt
 
142,110

 
135,705

Other liabilities
 
23,770

 
23,399

Total liabilities
 
165,880

 
159,104

Members’ equity
 
$
82,847

 
$
91,091

 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
2018
 
2017
 
2018
 
2017
Revenues
$
27,842

 
$
25,157

 
$
53,994

 
$
49,831

Expenses
(25,252
)
 
(24,137
)
 
(49,740
)
 
(48,588
)
Loss on hurricane-related property damage
(901
)
 
—

 
(589
)
 
—

Net income attributable to equity method investments
$
1,689

 
$
1,020

 
$
3,665

 
$
1,243




CWI 6/30/2018 10-Q – 16



Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Note 6. Intangible Assets and Liabilities

Intangible assets and liabilities, included in Intangible assets, net and Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities, respectively, in the consolidated financial statements, are summarized as follows (dollars in thousands):
 
 
 
June 30, 2018
 
December 31, 2017
 
Amortization Period (Years)
 
Gross Carrying Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Net Carrying
Amount
 
Gross Carrying Amount
 
Accumulated Amortization
 
Net Carrying Amount
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Villa/condo rental programs
45 - 55
 
$
72,400

 
$
(5,767
)
 
$
66,633

 
$
72,400

 
$
(5,015
)
 
$
67,385

Below-market hotel ground leases and parking garage lease
10 - 93
 
11,656

 
(824
)
 
10,832

 
11,655

 
(726
)
 
10,929

In-place leases
8 - 15
 
135

 
(71
)
 
64

 
135

 
(63
)
 
72

Total intangible assets, net
 
 
$
84,191

 
$
(6,662
)
 
$
77,529

 
$
84,190

 
$
(5,804
)
 
$
78,386

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Finite-Lived Intangible Liability
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Above-market hotel ground lease
85
 
$
(2,100
)
 
$
101

 
$
(1,999
)
 
$
(2,100
)
 
$
89

 
$
(2,011
)

Net amortization of intangibles was $0.4 million for both the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, and $0.8 million and $0.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Amortization of the villa/condo rental programs and in-place lease intangibles are included in Depreciation and amortization, and amortization of below-market hotel ground lease, below-market hotel parking garage lease and above-market hotel ground lease intangibles are included in Property taxes, insurance, rent and other in the consolidated financial statements.

Note 7. Fair Value Measurements

The fair value of an asset is defined as the exit price, which is the amount that would either be received when an asset is sold or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The guidance establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy based on the inputs used in measuring fair value. These tiers are: Level 1, for which quoted market prices for identical instruments are available in active markets, such as money market funds, equity securities and U.S. Treasury securities; Level 2, for which there are inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the instrument, such as certain derivative instruments, including interest rate caps and swaps; and Level 3, for securities that do not fall into Level 1 or Level 2 and for which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring us to develop our own assumptions.

Items Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

Derivative Assets and Liabilities — Our derivative assets and liabilities are comprised of interest rate swaps and caps that were measured at fair value using readily observable market inputs, such as quotations on interest rates. These derivative instruments were classified as Level 2 as these instruments are custom, over-the-counter contracts with various bank counterparties that are not traded in an active market (Note 8).

We did not have any transfers into or out of Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3 category of measurements during the three or six months ended June 30, 2018 or 2017. Gains and losses (realized and unrealized) recognized on items measured at fair value on a recurring basis included in earnings are reported in Other income and (expenses) in the consolidated financial statements.

Our non-recourse debt, net, which we have classified as Level 3, had a carrying value of $1.3 billion and $1.4 billion, and an estimated fair value of $1.3 billion and $1.4 billion at June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively. We determined the estimated fair value using a discounted cash flow model with rates that take into account the interest rate risk. We also considered the value of the underlying collateral, taking into account the quality of the collateral and the then-current interest rate.



CWI 6/30/2018 10-Q – 17



Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

We estimated that our other financial assets and liabilities had fair values that approximated their carrying values at both June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017.

Items Measured at Fair Value on a Non-Recurring Basis (Including Impairment Charges)

We periodically assess whether there are any indicators that the value of our real estate investments may be impaired or that their carrying value may not be recoverable. Where the undiscounted cash flows for an asset are less than the asset’s carrying value when considering and evaluating the various alternative courses of action that may occur, we recognize an impairment charge to reduce the carrying value of the asset to its estimated fair value. Further, when we classify an asset as held for sale, we carry the asset at the lower of its current carrying value or its fair value, less estimated cost to sell. We did not recognize any impairment charges during the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 or 2017.

Note 8. Risk Management and Use of Derivative Financial Instruments

Risk Management

In the normal course of our ongoing business operations, we encounter economic risk. There are two main components of economic risk that impact us: interest rate risk and market risk. We are primarily subject to interest rate risk on our interest-bearing assets and liabilities. Market risk includes changes in the value of our properties and related loans.

Derivative Financial Instruments

When we use derivative instruments, it is generally to reduce our exposure to fluctuations in interest rates. We have not entered into, and do not plan to enter into, financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. In addition to entering into derivative instruments on our own behalf, we may also be a party to derivative instruments that are embedded in other contracts, which are considered to be derivative instruments. The primary risks related to our use of derivative instruments include: (i) a counterparty to a hedging arrangement defaulting on its obligation and (ii) a downgrade in the credit quality of a counterparty to such an extent that our ability to sell or assign our side of the hedging transaction is impaired. While we seek to mitigate these risks by entering into hedging arrangements with large financial institutions that we deem to be creditworthy, it is possible that our hedging transactions, which are intended to limit losses, could adversely affect our earnings. Furthermore, if we terminate a hedging arrangement, we may be obligated to pay certain costs, such as transaction or breakage fees. We have established policies and procedures for risk assessment, as well as the approval, reporting and monitoring of derivative financial instrument activities.

We measure derivative instruments at fair value and record them as assets or liabilities, depending on our rights or obligations under the applicable derivative contract. Derivatives that are not designated as hedges must be adjusted to fair value through earnings. For a derivative designated, and that qualified, as a cash flow hedge, the effective portion of the change in fair value of the derivative is recognized in Other comprehensive income until the hedged item is recognized in earnings. The ineffective portion of the change in fair value of any derivative is immediately recognized in earnings.

The following table sets forth certain information regarding our derivative instruments on our Consolidated Hotels (in thousands):
Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments 
 
 
 
Asset Derivatives Fair Value at
 
Liability Derivatives Fair Value at
 
Balance Sheet Location
 
June 30, 2018
 
December 31, 2017
 
June 30, 2018
 
December 31, 2017
Interest rate caps
 
Other assets
 
$
115

 
$
1

 
$
—

 
$
—

Interest rate swap
 
Other assets
 
18

 
—

 
—

 
—

Interest rate swap
 
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
(2
)
 
 
 
 
$
133

 
$
1

 
$
—

 
$
(2
)

All derivative transactions with an individual counterparty are governed by a master International Swap and Derivatives Association agreement, which can be considered as a master netting arrangement; however, we report all our derivative instruments on a gross basis in our consolidated financial statements. At both June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, no cash collateral had been posted nor received for any of our derivative positions.



CWI 6/30/2018 10-Q – 18



Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

We recognized unrealized losses of $0.1 million and less than $0.1 million in Other comprehensive income on derivatives in connection with our interest rate swaps and caps during the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and unrealized gains of less than $0.1 million and unrealized losses of $0.2 million during the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

We reclassified $0.2 million from Other comprehensive income on derivatives into Interest expense during both the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, and $0.4 million during both the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017.

Amounts reported in Other comprehensive income related to interest rate swaps and caps will be reclassified to Interest expense as interest expense is incurred on our variable-rate debt. At June 30, 2018, we estimated that an additional $0.1 million will be reclassified as Interest expense during the next 12 months related to our interest rate swaps and caps.

Interest Rate Swaps and Caps

We are exposed to the impact of interest rate changes primarily through our borrowing activities. To limit this exposure, we attempt to obtain mortgage financing on a long-term, fixed-rate basis. However, from time to time, we or our investment partners may obtain variable-rate non-recourse mortgage loans and, as a result, may enter into interest rate swap or cap agreements with counterparties. Interest rate swaps, which effectively convert the variable-rate debt service obligations of a loan to a fixed rate, are agreements in which one party exchanges a stream of interest payments for a counterparty’s stream of cash flow over a specific period. The notional, or face, amount on which the swaps are based is not exchanged. An interest rate cap limits the effective borrowing rate of variable-rate debt obligations while allowing participants to share in downward shifts in interest rates. Our objective in using these derivatives is to limit our exposure to interest rate movements.

The interest rate swaps and caps that we had outstanding on our Consolidated Hotels at June 30, 2018 were designated as cash flow hedges and are summarized as follows (dollars in thousands): 
 
 
Number of
 Instruments
 
 
 
Fair Value at
Interest Rate Derivatives
 
 
Notional Amount
 
June 30, 2018
Interest rate caps
 
7
 
$
315,200

 
$
115

Interest rate swap
 
1
 
46,910

 
18

 
 
 
 
 
 
$
133


Credit Risk-Related Contingent Features

We measure our credit exposure on a counterparty basis as the net positive aggregate estimated fair value of our derivatives, net of any collateral received. No collateral was received as of June 30, 2018. At June 30, 2018, both our total credit exposure and the maximum exposure to any single counterparty were $0.1 million.

Some of the agreements we have with our derivative counterparties contain cross-default provisions that could trigger a declaration of default on our derivative obligations if we default, or are capable of being declared in default, on certain of our indebtedness. At June 30, 2018, we had not been declared in default on any of our derivative obligations. At June 30, 2018, we had no derivatives that were in a net liability position. At December 31, 2017, the estimated fair value of our derivatives in a net liability position was less than $0.1 million, which included accrued interest and any nonperformance risk adjustments. If we had breached any of these provisions at December 31, 2017, we could have been required to settle our obligations under these agreements at their aggregate termination value of less than $0.1 million.



CWI 6/30/2018 10-Q – 19



Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Note 9. Debt

Non-Recourse Debt

Our non-recourse debt consists of mortgage notes payable, which are collateralized by the assignment of hotel properties. The following table presents the non-recourse debt, net on our Consolidated Hotel investments (dollars in thousands):
 
 
 
 
 
 
Carrying Amount at
 
 
Interest Rate Range
 
Current Maturity Date Range (a)
 
June 30, 2018
 
December 31, 2017
Fixed rate
 
3.6% – 6.5%
 
6/2019 – 4/2024
 
$
1,046,121

 
$
1,082,367

Variable rate (b)
 
4.2% – 7.9%
 
6/2018 (c) – 6/2021
 
301,421

 
338,546

 
 
 
 
 
 
$
1,347,542

 
$
1,420,913

___________
(a)
Many of our mortgage loans have extension options, which are subject to certain conditions. The maturity dates in the table do not reflect the extension options.
(b)
The interest rate range presented for these mortgage loans reflect the rates in effect at June 30, 2018 through the use of an interest rate cap or swap, when applicable.
(c)
See discussion below on the Lake Arrowhead Resort and Spa mortgage loan, which matured on June 23, 2018.

Most of our mortgage loan agreements contain “lock-box” provisions, which permit the lender to access or sweep a hotel’s excess cash flow and would be triggered under limited circumstances, including the failure to maintain minimum debt service coverage ratios. If a provision were triggered, we would generally be permitted to spend an amount equal to our budgeted hotel operating expenses, taxes, insurance and capital expenditure reserves for the relevant hotel. The lender would then hold all excess cash flow after the payment of debt service in an escrow account until certain performance hurdles are met.

Lake Arrowhead Resort and Spa

The $15.0 million outstanding mortgage on Lake Arrowhead Resort and Spa matured on June 23, 2018; we have not paid off the outstanding principal balance, although all required debt service through the date of this Report has continued to be paid on time. As of the date of this Report, the $0.5 million that we were previously required to fund into a lender-held reserve account (as a result of the minimum debt service coverage ratio on the loan not being met) remains with the lender. We are currently in discussions with the lender to amend the terms of the loan agreement, including, but not limited to, extending the maturity date to February 2019, although there can be no assurance that we will be able to do so on favorable terms, if at all.

Courtyard Pittsburgh Shadyside

At March 31, 2018, the minimum debt service coverage ratio for the Courtyard Pittsburgh Shadyside was not met; therefore, we entered into a cash management agreement that permits the lender to sweep the hotel’s excess cash flow. As of June 30, 2018, this ratio was still not met and the cash management agreement remained in effect.

Covenants

Pursuant to our mortgage loan agreements, our consolidated subsidiaries are subject to various operational and financial covenants, including minimum debt service coverage ratios. Except as discussed above, at June 30, 2018, we were in compliance with the applicable covenants for each of our mortgage loans.

WPC Credit Facility

At June 30, 2018, we had outstanding balances under the Bridge Loan and Working Capital Facility of $40.8 million and $0.8 million, respectively, with $24.2 million available to be drawn on the Working Capital Facility. These loans are described in Note 3.

Financing Activity During 2018

During the six months ended June 30, 2018, we refinanced the Ritz-Carlton Fort Lauderdale senior mortgage loan and mezzanine loan totaling $49.0 million and $21.0 million, respectively, with a new senior mortgage loan and new mezzanine loan totaling $47.0 million and $28.3 million, respectively, which have floating annual interest rates of LIBOR plus 2.3% and


CWI 6/30/2018 10-Q – 20



Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

LIBOR plus 5.8%, respectively, although we have entered into interest rate cap agreements with respect to each of these loans. Both loans have terms of three years. We recognized a net loss on extinguishment of debt of $0.2 million on these refinancings.

Scheduled Debt Principal Payments

Scheduled debt principal payments during the remainder of 2018, each of the next four calendar years following December 31, 2018 and thereafter are as follows (in thousands):
Years Ending December 31,
 
Total
2018 (remainder) (a) (b)
 
$
110,351

2019
 
109,626

2020
 
222,362

2021
 
533,503

2022
 
244,104

Thereafter through 2024
 
176,870

 
 
1,396,816

Unamortized deferred financing costs
 
(7,637
)
Total
 
$
1,389,179

___________
(a)
Balance includes a total of $61.1 million of scheduled balloon payments on two consolidated mortgage loans. We currently intend to refinance these mortgage loans, although there can be no assurance that we will be able to do so on favorable terms, if at all.
(b)
Includes $40.8 million and $0.8 million of scheduled payments from the Bridge Loan and Working Capital Facility, respectively, from WPC (Note 3).

Note 10. Commitments and Contingencies

At June 30, 2018, we were not involved in any material litigation. Various claims and lawsuits arising in the normal course of business are pending against us, including liens for which we may obtain a bond, provide collateral or provide an indemnity, but we do not expect the results of such proceedings to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Hotel Management Agreements

As of June 30, 2018, our Consolidated Hotel properties were operated pursuant to long-term management agreements with 12 different management companies, with initial terms ranging from five to 30 years. For hotels operated with separate franchise agreements, each management company receives a base management fee, generally ranging from 1.5% to 3.5% of hotel revenues. Four of our management agreements contain the right and license to operate the hotels under specified brands; no separate franchise agreements exist and no separate franchise fee is required for these hotels. The management agreements that include the benefit of a franchise agreement incur a base management fee ranging from 3.0% to 3.5% of hotel revenues. The management companies are generally also eligible to receive an incentive management fee, which is typically calculated as a percentage of operating profit, either (i) in excess of projections with a cap or (ii) after the owner has received a priority return on its investment in the hotel. We incurred management fee expense, including amortization of deferred management fees, of $4.8 million and $4.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and $9.5 million and $10.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

Franchise Agreements

As of June 30, 2018, we had 11 franchise agreements with Marriott-owned brands, three with Hilton-owned brands, two with InterContinental Hotels-owned brands and one with a Hyatt-owned brand related to our Consolidated Hotels. The franchise agreements have initial terms ranging from 15 to 25 years (excluding four hotels that receive the benefits of a franchise agreement pursuant to management agreements, as discussed above). Also, three of our Consolidated Hotels are independent and not subject to franchise agreements. Our franchise agreements grant us the right to the use of the brand name, systems and marks with respect to specified hotels and establish various management, operational, record-keeping, accounting, reporting and marketing standards and procedures that the licensed hotel must comply with. In addition, the franchisor establishes


CWI 6/30/2018 10-Q – 21



Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

requirements for the quality and condition of the hotel and its furniture, fixtures and equipment, and we are obligated to expend such funds as may be required to maintain the hotel in compliance with those requirements. Typically, our franchise agreements provide for a license fee, or royalty, of 3.0% to 7.0% of room revenues and, if applicable, 2.0% to 3.0% of food and beverage revenue. In addition, we generally pay 1.0% to 4.5% of room revenues as marketing and reservation system contributions for the system-wide benefit of brand hotels. Franchise fees are included in sales and marketing expense in our consolidated financial statements. We incurred franchise fee expense, including amortization of deferred franchise fees, of $4.4 million and $5.1 million three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and $8.4 million and $9.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

Capital Expenditures and Reserve Funds

With respect to our hotels that are operated under management or franchise agreements with major international hotel brands and for most of our hotels subject to mortgage loans, we are obligated to maintain furniture, fixtures and equipment reserve accounts for future capital expenditures at these hotels, sufficient to cover the cost of routine improvements and alterations at the hotels. The amount funded into each of these reserve accounts is generally determined pursuant to the management agreements, franchise agreements and/or mortgage loan documents for each of the respective hotels and typically ranges between 3% and 5% of the respective hotel’s total gross revenue. As of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, $36.8 million and $32.9 million, respectively, was held in furniture, fixtures and equipment reserve accounts for future capital expenditures, and is included in Restricted cash in the consolidated financial statements.

Renovation Commitments

Certain of our hotel franchise and loan agreements require us to make planned renovations to our hotels. Additionally, from time to time, certain of our hotels may undergo renovations as a result of our decision to upgrade portions of the hotels, such as guestrooms, public space, meeting space, and/or restaurants, in order to better compete with other hotels and alternative lodging options in our markets. At June 30, 2018, we had various contracts outstanding with third parties in connection with the renovation of certain of our hotels. The remaining commitments under these contracts at June 30, 2018 totaled $25.6 million. Funding for a renovation will first come from our furniture, fixtures and equipment reserve accounts, to the extent permitted by the terms of the management agreement. Should these reserves be unavailable or insufficient to cover the cost of the renovation, we will fund all or the remaining portion of the renovation with existing cash resources, proceeds available under our Working Capital Facility and/or other sources of available capital.

Ground Lease Commitments

Three of our hotels are subject to ground leases. Scheduled future minimum ground lease payments during the remainder of 2018, each of the next four calendar years following December 31, 2018 and thereafter are as follows (in thousands):
Years Ending December 31,
 
Total
2018 (remainder)
 
$
2,020

2019
 
4,111

2020
 
4,210

2021
 
4,312

2022
 
4,417

Thereafter through 2106
 
815,832

Total
 
$
834,902


For the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, we recorded rent expense of $1.1 million and $1.0 million respectively, inclusive of percentage rents of $0.3 million and $0.2 million respectively, related to these ground leases, which are included in Property taxes, insurance, rent and other in the consolidated financial statements. For the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, we recorded rent expense of $2.0 million and $1.9 million respectively, inclusive of percentage rents of $0.4 million and $0.3 million, respectively, related to these ground leases. Additionally, we recorded straight-line rent adjustment expense related to these ground leases of $1.3 million for both the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 and $2.6 million for both the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017.



CWI 6/30/2018 10-Q – 22



Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Note 11. Equity

Reclassifications Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

The following tables present a reconciliation of changes in Accumulated other comprehensive loss by component for the periods presented (in thousands):
 
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
Gains and Losses on Derivative Instruments
 
2018
 
2017
Beginning balance
 
$
(152
)
 
$
(1,024
)
Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications
 
(102
)
 
(14
)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss to:
 
 
 
 
Interest expense
 
212

 
182

Equity in earnings of equity method investments in real estate
 
—

 
64

Total
 
212

 
246

Net current period other comprehensive income
 
110

 
232

Net current period other comprehensive loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests
 
16

 
(3
)
Ending balance
 
$
(26
)
 
$
(795
)
 
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
Gains and Losses on Derivative Instruments
 
2018
 
2017
Beginning balance
 
$
(455
)
 
$
(1,128
)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications
 
45

 
(163
)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss to:
 
 
 
 
Interest expense
 
380

 
356

Equity in earnings of equity method investments in real estate
 
—

 
144

Total
 
380

 
500

Net current period other comprehensive income
 
425

 
337

Net current period other comprehensive loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests
 
4

 
(4
)
Ending balance
 
$
(26
)
 
$
(795
)

Distributions Declared

During the second quarter of 2018, our board of directors declared a quarterly distribution of $0.1425 per share, which was paid on July 16, 2018 to stockholders of record on June 29, 2018, in the aggregate amount of $19.7 million.

During the six months ended June 30, 2018, our board of directors declared distributions in the aggregate amount of $39.6 million, which equates to $0.2850 per share.

Note 12. Income Taxes

We elected to be treated as a REIT and believe that we have been organized and have operated in such a manner to maintain our qualification as a REIT for federal and state income tax purposes. As a REIT, we are generally not subject to corporate level federal income taxes on earnings distributed to our stockholders. Since inception, we have distributed at least 100% of our taxable income annually and intend to do so for the tax year ending December 31, 2018. Accordingly, we have not included any provisions for federal income taxes related to the REIT in the accompanying consolidated financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017. We conduct business in various states and municipalities within the United States, and, as a result, we or one or more of our subsidiaries file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various state jurisdictions. As a result, we are subject to certain state and local taxes and a provision for such taxes is included in the consolidated financial statements.



CWI 6/30/2018 10-Q – 23



Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Certain of our subsidiaries have elected taxable REIT subsidiary, or TRS, status. A TRS may provide certain services considered impermissible for REITs and may hold assets that REITs may not hold directly. The accompanying consolidated financial statements include an interim tax provision for our TRSs for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017. Current income tax expense was $1.3 million and $0.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and $2.2 million and $1.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

Our TRSs are subject to U.S. federal and state income taxes. As such, deferred tax assets and liabilities are established for temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and the tax basis of assets and liabilities at the enacted tax rates expected to be in effect when the temporary differences reverse. A valuation allowance for deferred tax assets is provided if we believe that it is more likely than not that we will not realize the tax benefit of deferred tax assets based on available evidence at the time the determination is made. A change in circumstances may cause us to change our judgment about whether a deferred tax asset will more likely than not be realized. We generally report any change in the valuation allowance through our income statement in the period in which such changes in circumstances occur. In December 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act was enacted, which reduced the federal corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21%, effective January 1, 2018. Tax reform also contained other provisions that may have an impact on the future realizability of our deferred tax assets. The majority of our deferred tax assets relate to net operating losses, interest expense limitation and accrued expenses. The majority of our deferred tax liabilities relate to differences between the tax basis and financial reporting basis of the villa/condo rental management agreements. Provision for income taxes included deferred income tax expense of $2.0 million and $0.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and a deferred income tax expense of $0.4 million and a deferred income tax benefit of $0.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.



CWI 6/30/2018 10-Q – 24




Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations is intended to provide the reader with information that will assist in understanding our financial statements and the reasons for changes in certain key components of our financial statements from period to period. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations also provides the reader with our perspective on our financial position and liquidity, as well as certain other factors that may affect our future results. Our Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should be read in conjunction with the 2017 Annual Report and subsequent reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act.

Business Overview

As described in more detail in Item 1 of the 2017 Annual Report, we are a publicly-owned, non-listed REIT that invests in, manages and seeks to enhance the value of interests in lodging and lodging-related properties. At June 30, 2018, we held ownership interests in 28 hotels, with a total of 7,819 rooms.

We have invested the proceeds from our initial public offering and follow-on offering in a diversified lodging portfolio, including full-service, select-service and resort hotels. Our results of operations are significantly impacted by seasonality and hotel renovations. We have invested and then initiated significant renovations at certain hotels. Generally, during the renovation period, a portion of total rooms are unavailable and hotel operations are often disrupted, negatively impacting our results of operations.

Significant Developments

Dispositions

On January 25, 2018, we sold our 100% ownership interest in the Marriott Boca Raton at Boca Center to an unaffiliated third‑party for a contractual sales price of $76.0 million, with net proceeds after the repayment of debt of approximately $35.4 million, including the release of $1.4 million of restricted cash. We recognized a gain on sale of $12.3 million during the first quarter of 2018 in connection with this transaction (Note 4).

On February 5, 2018, we sold our 100% ownership interests in the Hampton Inn Memphis Beale Street and Hampton Inn Atlanta Downtown to an unaffiliated third-party for a contractual sales price totaling $63.0 million, with net proceeds after the repayment of debt totaling approximately $31.8 million, including the release of $2.0 million of restricted cash. We recognized a gain on sale of $19.6 million during the first quarter of 2018 in connection with this transaction (Note 4).

WPC Credit Facility

During the six months ended June 30, 2018, our Operating Partnership drew down $10.0 million from the Working Capital Facility and repaid a total of $20.0 million towards the Bridge Loan and $17.0 million towards the Working Capital Facility.

At June 30, 2018, the outstanding balances under the Bridge Loan and Working Capital Facility were $40.8 million and $0.8 million, respectively, with $24.2 million available to be drawn on the Working Capital Facility (Note 3). The Bridge Loan was scheduled to mature on June 30, 2018; however, we requested and were granted a three month extension by WPC. The Working Capital Facility is currently scheduled to mature on December 31, 2018.



CWI 6/30/2018 10-Q – 25




Financial and Operating Highlights

(Dollars in thousands, except average daily rate, or ADR, and revenue per available room, or RevPAR)
 
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
 
2018
 
2017
 
2018
 
2017
Hotel revenues (a)
 
$
167,259

 
$
171,354

 
$
309,690

 
$
331,058

Gain on hurricane-related property damage (Note 4)
 
(496
)
 
—

 
(1,065
)
 
—

Net income attributable to CWI stockholders
 
7,721

 
10,383

 
21,907

 
4,970

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash distributions paid
 
19,835

 
19,477

 
39,477

 
38,769

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net cash provided by operating activities (b)
 
 
 
 
 
38,874

 
55,408

Net cash provided by investing activities (b)
 
 
 
 
 
120,891

 
1,739

Net cash used in financing activities
 
 
 
 
 
(142,458
)
 
(45,108
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Supplemental financial measures: (c)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
FFO attributable to CWI stockholders
 
26,680

 
24,766

 
29,649

 
39,256

MFFO attributable to CWI stockholders
 
28,153

 
26,216

 
31,902

 
42,174

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Consolidated Hotel Operating Statistics
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Occupancy
 
80.5
%
 
80.1
%
 
77.8
%
 
76.9
%
ADR
 
$
231.42

 
$
224.65

 
$
226.89

 
$
223.24

RevPAR
 
186.26

 
179.90

 
176.49

 
171.77

___________
(a)
Hotel revenues include business interruption income of $12.1 million and $12.2 million recognized during the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively, primarily related to Hurricane Irma.
(b)
On January 1, 2018, we adopted ASU 2016-15 and ASU 2016-18, which revised how certain items are presented in the consolidated statements of cash flows. As a result of adopting this guidance, we retrospectively revised Net cash provided by operating activities and Net cash provided by investing activities within our consolidated statements of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2017, as described in Note 2.
(c)
We consider the performance metrics listed above, including funds from operations, or FFO, and modified funds from operations, or MFFO, which are supplemental measures that are not defined by GAAP, referred to herein as non-GAAP measures, to be important measures in the evaluation of our results of operations and capital resources. We evaluate our results of operations with a primary focus on the ability to generate cash flow necessary to meet our objective of funding distributions to stockholders. See Supplemental Financial Measures below for our definitions of these non-GAAP measures and reconciliations to their most directly comparable GAAP measures.

The comparison of our results period over period is influenced by both the number and size of the hotels consolidated in each of the respective periods. At June 30, 2018, we owned 24 Consolidated Hotels, compared to 27 Consolidated Hotels at June 30, 2017. At December 31, 2017, we owned 27 Consolidated Hotels, compared to 31 Consolidated Hotels at December 31, 2016.



CWI 6/30/2018 10-Q – 26




Portfolio Overview

The following table sets forth certain information for each of our Consolidated Hotels and our Unconsolidated Hotels at June 30, 2018:
Hotels
 
State
 
Number
of Rooms
 
% Owned
 
Acquisition Date
 
Hotel Type
 
Renovation Status at June 30, 2018 (a)
Consolidated Hotels
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2012 Acquisitions
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Hilton Garden Inn New Orleans French Quarter/CBD
 
LA
 
155

 
88
%
 
6/8/2012
 
Select-service
 
Completed
Lake Arrowhead Resort and Spa
 
CA
 
173

 
97
%
 
7/9/2012
 
Resort
 
Completed
Courtyard San Diego Mission Valley
 
CA
 
317

 
100
%
 
12/6/2012
 
Select-service
 
Completed
2013 Acquisitions
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Courtyard Pittsburgh Shadyside
 
PA
 
132

 
100
%
 
3/12/2013
 
Select-service
 
Completed/ Planned future
Hutton Hotel Nashville
 
TN
 
250

 
100
%
 
5/29/2013
 
Full-service
 
Completed
Holiday Inn Manhattan 6th Avenue Chelsea
 
NY
 
226

 
100
%
 
6/6/2013
 
Full-service
 
Completed
Fairmont Sonoma Mission Inn & Spa
 
CA
 
226

 
100
%
 
7/10/2013
 
Resort
 
Completed/ In progress
Marriott Raleigh City Center
 
NC
 
400

 
100
%
 
8/13/2013
 
Full-service
 
Completed/ In progress
Hawks Cay Resort (b) (c)
 
FL
 
425

 
100
%
 
10/23/2013
 
Resort
 
Completed
Renaissance Chicago Downtown
 
IL
 
560

 
100
%
 
12/20/2013
 
Full-service
 
Completed/ Planned future
2014 Acquisitions
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Hyatt Place Austin Downtown
 
TX
 
296

 
100
%
 
4/1/2014
 
Select-service
 
None planned
Courtyard Times Square West
 
NY
 
224

 
100
%
 
5/27/2014
 
Select-service
 
None planned
Sheraton Austin Hotel at the Capitol
 
TX
 
367

 
80
%
 
5/28/2014
 
Full-service
 
Completed
Hampton Inn & Suites/Homewood Suites Denver Downtown Convention Center
 
CO
 
302

 
100
%
 
6/25/2014
 
Select-service
 
Planned future
Sanderling Resort
 
NC
 
125

 
100
%
 
10/28/2014
 
Resort
 
Completed/ In progress
Staybridge Suites Savannah Historic District
 
GA
 
104

 
100
%
 
10/30/2014
 
Select-service
 
Completed
Marriott Kansas City Country Club Plaza
 
MO
 
295

 
100
%
 
11/18/2014
 
Full-service
 
Completed
2015 Acquisitions
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Westin Minneapolis
 
MN
 
214

 
100
%
 
2/12/2015
 
Full-service
 
Completed
Westin Pasadena
 
CA
 
350

 
100
%
 
3/19/2015
 
Full-service
 
Completed
Hilton Garden Inn/Homewood Suites Atlanta Midtown
 
GA
 
228

 
100
%
 
4/29/2015
 
Select-service
 
None planned
Ritz-Carlton Key Biscayne (d)
 
FL
 
451

 
47
%
 
5/29/2015
 
Resort
 
Completed/ Planned future
Ritz-Carlton Fort Lauderdale (e)
 
FL
 
197

 
70
%
 
6/30/2015
 
Resort
 
Completed/ Planned future
Le Méridien Dallas, The Stoneleigh
 
TX
 
176

 
100
%
 
11/20/2015
 
Full-service
 
Completed
2016 Acquisition
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Equinox, a Luxury Collection Golf Resort & Spa
 
VT
 
199

 
100
%
 
2/17/2016
 
Resort
 
Completed
 
 
 
 
6,392

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Unconsolidated Hotels
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Hyatt Center New Orleans French Quarter
 
LA
 
254

 
80
%
 
9/6/2011
 
Full-service
 
Completed/ Planned future
Marriott Sawgrass Golf Resort & Spa (f)
 
FL
 
514

 
50
%
 
4/1/2015
 
Resort
 
Completed
Ritz-Carlton Philadelphia
 
PA
 
301

 
60
%
 
5/15/2015
 
Full-service
 
Completed
Ritz-Carlton Bacara, Santa Barbara (g)
 
CA
 
358

 
40
%
 
9/28/2017
 
Resort
 
Planned future
 
 
 
 
1,427

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
___________
(a)
Status excludes any remaining renovation work as a result of the damage sustained from Hurricane Irma.
(b)
As a result of damage sustained from Hurricane Irma, this hotel remains closed as of the date of this Report; it is currently expected to fully reopen by the end of August 2018.
(c)
Includes 248 privately owned villas that participate in the villa/condo rental program at June 30, 2018, of which only 175 were available for rent as a result of damage caused by Hurricane Irma.
(d)
CWI 2 owns an interest of approximately 19% in this venture. Also, the number of rooms presented includes 149 condo-hotel units that participate in the villa/condo rental program at June 30, 2018.
(e)
Includes 31 condo-hotel units that participate in the villa/condo rental program at June 30, 2018.


CWI 6/30/2018 10-Q – 27




(f)
On October 3, 2014, we acquired the Marriott Sawgrass Golf Resort & Spa as a Consolidated Hotel. On April 1, 2015, we sold a 50% controlling interest to CWI 2 and began accounting for our interest in the hotel as an equity method investment.
(g)
This investment represents a tenancy-in-common interest; the remaining 60% interest is owned by CWI 2.

Results of Operations

We evaluate our results of operations with a primary focus on our ability to generate cash flow necessary to meet our objectives of funding distributions to stockholders and increasing the value of our real estate investments. As a result, our assessment of operating results gives less emphasis to the effect of unrealized gains and losses, which may cause fluctuations in net income for comparable periods but have no impact on cash flows, and to other non-cash charges, such as depreciation and impairment charges.

In addition, we use other information that may not be financial in nature, including statistical information, to evaluate the operating performance of our business, such as occupancy rate, ADR or RevPAR. Occupancy rate, ADR and RevPAR are commonly used measures within the hotel industry to evaluate operating performance. RevPAR, which is calculated as the product of ADR and occupancy rate, is an important statistic for monitoring operating performance at our hotels. Our occupancy rate, ADR and RevPAR performance may be impacted by macroeconomic factors such as U.S. economic conditions, regional and local employment growth, personal income and corporate earnings, business relocation decisions, business and leisure travel, new hotel construction and the pricing strategies of competitors.

The comparability of our results year over year are impacted by, among other factors, the timing of acquisition and/or disposition activity and the timing of any renovation-related activity, including the restoration of hotels due to the impact of Hurricane Irma.



CWI 6/30/2018 10-Q – 28




The following table presents our comparative results of operations (in thousands):
 
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
 
2018
 
2017
 
Change
 
2018
 
2017
 
Change
Hotel Revenues
 
$
167,259

 
$
171,354

 
$
(4,095
)
 
$
309,690

 
$
331,058

 
$
(21,368
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Hotel Expenses
 
134,708

 
143,880

 
(9,172
)
 
266,233

 
284,460

 
(18,227
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other Operating Expenses
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Asset management fees to affiliate and other expenses
 
3,836

 
3,972

 
(136
)
 
7,755

 
8,018

 
(263
)
Corporate general and administrative expenses
 
2,749

 
2,811

 
(62
)
 
5,716

 
5,320

 
396

Gain on hurricane-related property damage
 
(496
)
 
—

 
(496
)
 
(1,065
)
 
—

 
(1,065
)
Total Other Operating Expenses, Net
 
6,089

 
6,783

 
(694
)
 
12,406

 
13,338

 
(932
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating Income
 
26,462

 
20,691

 
5,771

 
31,051

 
33,260

 
(2,209
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other Income and (Expenses)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest expense
 
(16,488
)
 
(16,557
)
 
69

 
(33,269
)
 
(32,863
)
 
(406
)
Equity in earnings of equity method investments in real estate
 
1,075

 
1,551

 
(476
)
 
51

 
4,536

 
(4,485
)
Net loss on extinguishment of debt (Note 9)
 
(188
)
 
(84
)
 
(104
)
 
(188
)
 
(225
)
 
37

Other income
 
244

 
34

 
210

 
367

 
60

 
307

Total Other Income and (Expenses)
 
(15,357
)
 
(15,056
)
 
(301
)
 
(33,039
)
 
(28,492
)
 
(4,547
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income (Loss) from Operations Before Income Taxes and Net Gain on Sale of Real Estate
 
11,105

 
5,635

 
5,470

 
(1,988
)
 
4,768

 
(6,756
)
Provision for income taxes
 
(3,238
)
 
(1,078
)
 
(2,160
)
 
(2,531
)
 
(792
)
 
(1,739
)
Income (Loss) from Operations Before Net Gain on Sale of Real Estate
 
7,867

 
4,557

 
3,310

 
(4,519
)
 
3,976

 
(8,495
)
Net gain on sale of real estate, net of tax
 
—

 
5,516

 
(5,516
)
 
31,929

 
5,164

 
26,765

Net Income
 
7,867

 
10,073

 
(2,206
)
 
27,410

 
9,140

 
18,270

(Income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
 
(146
)
 
310

 
(456
)
 
(5,503
)
 
(4,170
)
 
(1,333
)
Net Income Attributable to CWI Stockholders
 
$
7,721

 
$
10,383

 
$
(2,662
)
 
$
21,907

 
$
4,970

 
$
16,937

Supplemental Financial Measure:(a)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
MFFO Attributable to CWI Stockholders
 
$
28,153

 
$
26,216

 
$
1,937

 
$
31,902

 
$
42,174

 
$
(10,272
)
___________
(a)
We consider MFFO, a non-GAAP measure, to be an important metric in the evaluation of our results of operations and capital resources. We evaluate our results of operations with a primary focus on the ability to generate cash flow necessary to meet our objective of funding distributions to stockholders. See Supplemental Financial Measures below for our definition of non-GAAP measures and reconciliations to their most directly comparable GAAP measures.



CWI 6/30/2018 10-Q – 29




Our Same Store Hotels are comprised of our 2012 Acquisitions, 2013 Acquisitions, 2014 Acquisitions, 2015 Acquisitions and 2016 Acquisition, excluding the results of any of those hotels sold prior to June 30, 2018 (Note 4), as well as the results for the Hawks Cay Resort, which remains closed due to damage from Hurricane Irma as of the date of this Report (Note 4).

The following table sets forth the average occupancy rate, ADR and RevPAR of our Consolidated Hotels for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 for our Same Store Hotels.
 
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
Same Store Hotels
 
2018
 
2017
 
2018
 
2017
Occupancy Rate
 
80.4
%
 
80.5
%
 
77.7
%
 
76.9
%
ADR
 
$
230.77

 
$
222.57

 
$
227.15

 
$
221.11

RevPAR
 
185.50

 
179.09

 
176.52

 
169.99


Hotel Revenues

For the three months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period in 2017, hotel revenues decreased by $4.1 million, comprised of: a decrease in revenue from the Hawks Cay Resort of $4.8 million (representing the net impact to revenue after the recognition of business interruption income of $10.5 million) as a result of its closure due to hurricane-related damage in September 2017 and a decrease in revenue as a result of four properties sold since the second quarter of 2017 totaling $8.7 million, which was partially offset by a net increase in revenue from our Same Store Hotels totaling $9.4 million (representing the net impact to revenue after the recognition of business interruption income of $1.6 million). The net increase in revenue from our Same Store Hotels was largely attributable to an increase in revenue from the Ritz-Carlton Key Biscayne, driven by a strong market, impacted both by hurricane displacement and hotel supply, and the Renaissance Chicago Downtown, driven by stronger city-wide demand and in-house group events. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in revenue from our hotels in the Austin market, largely caused by an increase in hotel supply.

For the six months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period on 2017, hotel revenues decreased by $21.4 million, comprised of: a decrease in revenue from the Hawks Cay Resort of $20.6 million (representing the net impact to revenue after the recognition of business interruption income of $10.5 million) and a decrease in revenue as a result of seven properties sold since the first quarter of 2017 totaling $17.4 million, which was partially offset by a net increase in revenue from our Same Store Hotels totaling $16.6 million (representing the net impact to revenue after the recognition of business interruption income of $1.7 million). In addition to the factors discussed above, our revenue during the current year period was positively impacted by an increase in revenue from the Westin Pasadena resulting from the completion of renovations that were ongoing during the prior year period.

Hotel Expenses

For the three months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period in 2017, aggregate hotel operating expenses decreased by $9.2 million, comprised of: a decrease in expenses from the Hawks Cay Resort of $8.5 million and a decrease in expenses as a result of properties sold during 2017 and 2018 totaling $6.6 million, which was partially offset by a net increase in expenses from our Same Store Hotels totaling $5.9 million. The net increase in expenses from our Same Store Hotels was largely attributable to the increased hotel expenses at the Ritz-Carlton Key Biscayne and Renaissance Chicago Downtown, partially offset by a decrease in expenses from our hotels in the Austin market, consistent with the fluctuations in revenue discussed above. Additionally, we saw an increase in expenses at the Hutton Hotel, which was under renovation during 2017, resulting in lower expense in the prior year period. This renovation work included the opening of additional food and beverage outlets, which contributed to the increase in expenses during 2018.

For the six months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period in 2017, aggregate hotel operating expenses decreased by $18.2 million, comprised of: a decrease in expenses from the Hawks Cay Resort of $18.0 million and a decrease in expenses as a result of properties sold during 2017 and 2018 totaling $13.0 million, which was partially offset by a net increase in expenses from our Same Store Hotels totaling $12.8 million. The net increase in expenses from our Same Store Hotels was largely attributable to the Ritz-Carlton Key Biscayne and Renaissance Chicago Downtown, partially offset by a decrease in expenses from our hotels in the Austin market, consistent with the fluctuations in revenue discussed above. Additionally, we saw an increase in expenses as the Hutton Hotel and Westin Pasadena, which were under renovation during 2017, resulting in lower expense in the prior year period.



CWI 6/30/2018 10-Q – 30




Corporate General and Administrative Expenses

For the three months ended June 30, 2018 compared to the same period in 2017, corporate general and administrative expenses remained relatively flat, decreasing by less than $0.1 million.

For the six months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period in 2017, corporate general and administrative expenses increased by $0.4 million as a result of an increase in professional fees, primarily due to an increase in legal fees. Professional fees include legal, accounting and investor-related expenses incurred in the normal course of business.

Gain on Hurricane-Related Property Damage

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, we recognized gains of $0.5 million and $1.1 million, respectively, resulting from a change in our estimate of the total aggregate damage incurred at our properties attributable to Hurricane Irma. We and CWI 2 maintain insurance on all of our hotels, with an aggregate policy limit of $500.0 million for both property damage and business interruption. Our insurance policies are subject to various terms and conditions, including property damage and business interruption deductibles on each hotel, which range from 2% to 5% of the insured value. We currently estimate our aggregate casualty insurance claim to be in the range of $55.0 million to $65.0 million (which includes estimated clean up, repair and rebuilding costs) and our aggregate business interruption insurance claim to be in the range of $25.0 million to $35.0 million. We are continuing to assess the damage sustained, so these estimates are subject to change. We believe that we maintain adequate insurance coverage on each of our hotels and are working closely with the insurance carriers and claims adjusters to obtain the maximum amount of insurance recovery provided under the policies. However, we can give no assurances as to the amounts of such claims, the timing of payments or the ultimate resolution of the claims.

We experienced a reduction in revenues as a result of Hurricane Irma, as well as the wildfires in Northern California during 2017 that impacted the Fairmont Sonoma Mission Inn & Spa. Our business interruption insurance covers lost revenue through the period of property restoration and for up to 12 months after the hotels are back to full operations. We have retained consultants to assess our business interruption claims and are currently reviewing our losses with our insurance carriers. We recorded $10.5 million of revenue for covered business interruption related to Hurricane Irma during both the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, as well as $1.5 million of revenue for covered business interruption related to Fairmont Sonoma Mission Inn & Spa during both the three and six months ended June 30, 2018. We record revenue for covered business interruption when both the recovery is probable and contingencies have been resolved with the insurance carriers.

Interest Expense

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 compared to the same periods in 2017, interest expense remained relatively flat.

Equity in Earnings of Equity Method Investments in Real Estate

Equity in earnings (losses) of equity method investments in real estate represents earnings from our equity investments in Unconsolidated Hotels recognized in accordance with each investment agreement and based upon the allocation of the investment’s net assets at book value as if the investment were hypothetically liquidated at the end of each reporting period (Note 5). We are required to periodically compare an investment’s carrying value to its estimated fair value and recognize an impairment charge to the extent that the carrying value exceeds the estimated fair value and is determined to be other than temporary. No other-than-temporary impairment charges were recognized on our equity method investments in real estate during the six months ended June 30, 2018 or 2017.



CWI 6/30/2018 10-Q – 31




The following table sets forth our share of equity in earnings (losses) from our Unconsolidated Hotels, which are based on the hypothetical liquidation at book value model, as well as certain amortization adjustments related to basis differentials from acquisitions of investments (in thousands):
 
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
 
2018
 
2017
 
2018
 
2017
Ritz-Carlton Bacara, Santa Barbara Venture (a)
 
$
(889
)
 
$
—

 
$
(2,838
)
 
$
—

Marriott Sawgrass Golf Resort & Spa Venture (b)
 
488

 
320

 
2,111

 
1,706

Hyatt Centric French Quarter Venture (c)
 
669

 
254

 
1,056

 
729

Ritz-Carlton Philadelphia Venture (d)
 
693

 
824

 
(783
)
 
1,629

Westin Atlanta Venture (e)
 
114

 
153

 
505

 
472

Total equity in earnings of equity method investments in real estate
 
$
1,075

 
$
1,551

 
$
51

 
$
4,536

___________
(a)
We acquired our 40% tenancy-in-common interest in this venture on September 28, 2017.
(b)
The increase in our share of equity in earnings for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same periods in 2017 was primarily a result of the improvement in the operating results of the venture.
(c)
The increase in our share of equity in earnings for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same periods in 2017 is primarily a result of an increase in distributions to us by the venture.
(d)
During the six months ended June 30, 2018, our share of equity in losses included the full net loss of the venture as a result of the hypothetical liquidation at book value method.
(e)
On October 19, 2017, the venture sold the Westin Atlanta Perimeter North to an unaffiliated third party. Our share of equity in earnings during the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 is the result of additional cash distributions received in these periods in connection with the disposition.

Net Loss on Extinguishment of Debt

During the second quarter of 2018, we recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $0.2 million related to the refinancing of the Ritz-Carlton Fort Lauderdale senior mortgage and mezzanine loans (Note 9).

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, we recognized a net loss on extinguishment of debt of less than $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively, primarily related to the termination of a prior senior credit facility and the refinancing of two non-recourse mortgage loans.

Gain on Sale of Real Estate, Net of Tax

During the six months ended June 30, 2018, we recognized a gain on sale of real estate, net of tax of $31.9 million, comprised of (i) a gain of $12.3 million related to the sale of our 100% ownership interest in the Marriott Boca Raton at Boca Center to an unaffiliated third-party for a contractual sales price of $76.0 million during January 2018 and (ii) an aggregate gain of $19.6 million related to the sale of our 100% ownership interests in the Hampton Inn Memphis Beale Street and Hampton Inn Atlanta Downtown to an unaffiliated third-party for a contractual sales price totaling $63.0 million in February 2018 (Note 4).

During the six months ended June 30, 2017, we recognized a net gain on sale of real estate, net of tax of $5.2 million, comprised of (i) a gain of $5.5 million related to the sale of our 100% ownership interest in the Hampton Inn Boston Braintree to an unaffiliated third party for a contractual sales price of $19.0 million during the second quarter of 2017, partially offset by (ii) a loss of $0.4 million related to the sale of our 100% ownership interests in the Hampton Inn Frisco Legacy Park, the Hampton Inn Birmingham Colonnade and the Hilton Garden Inn Baton Rouge Airport to an unaffiliated third party for a contractual sales price of $33.0 million during the first quarter of 2017.



CWI 6/30/2018 10-Q – 32




(Income) Loss Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests

The following table sets forth our (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests (in thousands):
 
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
Venture
 
2018
 
2017
 
2018
 
2017
Ritz-Carlton Key Biscayne Venture (a)
 
$
(57
)
 
$
2,076

 
$
(3,636
)
 
$
67

Operating Partnership — Available Cash Distribution (Note 3)
 
—

 
(1,544
)
 
(972
)
 
(3,245
)
Ritz-Carlton Fort Lauderdale Venture
 
153

 
90

 
(383
)
 
(266
)
Sheraton Austin Hotel at the Capitol Venture (b)
 
(212
)
 
(278
)
 
(453
)
 
(654
)
Hilton Garden Inn New Orleans French Quarter/CBD Venture
 
(30
)
 
(34
)
 
(59
)
 
(72
)
 
 
$
(146
)
 
$
310

 
$
(5,503
)
 
$
(4,170
)
___________
(a)
The change for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same periods in 2017 is primarily a result of the improvements in the operating results of the venture, which was driven by a strong market, impacted both by hurricane displacement and hotel supply, resulting in our joint venture partner recognizing additional income.
(b)
The decrease in (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same periods in 2017 was primarily a result of the operating results of the venture. We saw a decrease in revenue from the Austin market, largely driven by an increase in hotel supply.

Modified Funds from Operations

MFFO is a non-GAAP measure that we use to evaluate our business. For a definition of MFFO and a reconciliation to net income attributable to CWI stockholders, see Supplemental Financial Measures below.

For the three months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period in 2017, MFFO increased by $1.9 million, primarily reflecting the impact of business interruption income recognized during the second quarter of 2018 and a decrease in the Available Cash Distribution when compared to the prior year period, partially offset by our 2017 and 2018 disposition activity.

For the six months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period in 2017, MFFO decreased by $10.3 million, primarily the result of our 2017 and 2018 disposition activity, hurricane-related disruption at the Hawks Cay Resort (net of business interruption income recognized during the second quarter of 2018) and a net decrease from hotel operations (largely the result of renovation-related disruption), partially offset by a decrease in Available Cash Distributions when compared to the prior year period.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our principal demands for funds will be for the payment of operating expenses, interest and principal on current and future indebtedness, including the WPC Credit Facility, and distributions to stockholders. Liquidity is affected adversely by unanticipated costs and greater-than-anticipated operating expenses. We expect to meet our liquidity requirements from cash generated from operations. To the extent that these funds are insufficient to satisfy our cash flow requirements, additional funds may be provided from asset sales, long- and/or short-term borrowings, proceeds from mortgage financings or refinancings.

Sources and Uses of Cash During the Period

We have fully invested the proceeds from both our initial public offering and follow-on offering. We use the cash flow generated from hotel operations to meet our normal recurring operating expenses, service debt and fund distributions to our shareholders. Our cash flows fluctuate from period to period due to a number of factors, including the financial and operating performance of our hotels, the timing of purchases or dispositions of hotels, the timing and characterization of distributions from equity method investments in hotels and the seasonality in the demand for our hotels. Also, hotels we invest in may undergo renovations, during which they may experience disruptions, possibly resulting in reduced revenue and operating income. Despite these fluctuations, we believe that we will continue to generate sufficient cash from operations and from our equity method investments to meet our normal recurring short-term and long-term liquidity needs. We may also use existing


CWI 6/30/2018 10-Q – 33




cash resources, proceeds available under our Working Capital Facility, the proceeds of mortgage loans, sales of assets or distributions reinvested in our common stock through our DRIP. We assess our ability to access capital on an ongoing basis. Our sources and uses of cash during the period are described below.

Operating Activities

For the six months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period in 2017, net cash provided by operating activities decreased by $16.5 million, largely attributable to a decrease in cash flow from hotel operations due to the closure of the Hawks Cay Resort as a result of Hurricane Irma, the funding of remediation work to repair properties damaged by the hurricane and the impact of the disposition of hotels during 2017 and 2018.

Investing Activities

Net cash provided by investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2018 was $120.9 million, primarily as a result of aggregate proceeds of $135.3 million from the sale of three properties, comprised of (i) $73.5 million of proceeds received from the sale of our 100% ownership interest in the Marriott Boca Raton at Boca Center and (ii) $61.8 million of total proceeds received from the sale of our 100% ownership interests in the Hampton Inn Memphis Beale Street and Hampton Inn Atlanta Downtown (Note 4), $11.2 million of insurance proceeds received primarily related to damage sustained by Hurricane Irma at the Hawks Cay Resort and distributions received from equity investments in excess of equity income totaling $10.9 million, partially offset by the funding of $36.0 million of capital expenditures for our Consolidated Hotels.

Financing Activities

Net cash used in financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2018 was $142.5 million, primarily as a result of: scheduled payments and prepayments of mortgage financing totaling $148.0 million, including prepayments totaling $141.9 million in connection with the hotels sold during the first quarter of 2018 and the refinancing of two loans related to the Ritz-Carlton Fort Lauderdale during the second quarter of 2018; cash distributions paid to stockholders aggregating $39.5 million; repayments towards the WPC Credit Facility totaling $37.0 million; and redemptions of our common stock pursuant to our redemption plan totaling $20.6 million, partially offset by proceeds of $75.3 million from the refinancing of the Ritz-Carlton Fort Lauderdale loans, the reinvestment of distributions in shares of our common stock through our DRIP totaling $22.1 million, and borrowings under the WPC Credit Facility of $10.0 million.

Distributions

Our objectives are to generate sufficient cash flow over time to provide stockholders with distributions and to seek investments with potential for capital appreciation throughout varying economic cycles. For the six months ended June 30, 2018, we paid distributions to stockholders totaling $39.5 million, which were comprised of cash distributions of $17.4 million and distributions that were reinvested in shares of our common stock by stockholders through our DRIP of $22.1 million. From inception through June 30, 2018, we declared distributions, excluding distributions paid in shares of our common stock, to stockholders totaling $341.5 million, which were comprised of cash distributions of $138.7 million and $202.8 million of distributions that were reinvested by stockholders in shares of our common stock pursuant to our DRIP.

We believe that FFO, a non-GAAP measure, is the most appropriate metric to evaluate our ability to fund distributions to stockholders. For a discussion of FFO, see Supplemental Financial Measures below. Over the life of our company, the regular quarterly cash distributions we pay are expected to be principally sourced from our FFO or our Cash flow from operations. However, we have funded a portion of our cash distributions to date using net proceeds from our public offerings and there can be no assurance that our FFO or our Cash flow from operations will be sufficient to cover our future distributions. Our distribution coverage using FFO and Cash flow from operations was approximately 75% and 98%, respectively, of total distributions declared for the six months ended June 30, 2018, with the balance funded with proceeds from other sources of cash, such as financings, borrowings or the sales of assets.



CWI 6/30/2018 10-Q – 34




Redemptions

We maintain a quarterly redemption program pursuant to which we may, at the discretion of our board of directors, redeem shares of our common stock from stockholders seeking liquidity. During the six months ended June 30, 2018, we redeemed 2,087,256 shares of our common stock pursuant to our redemption plan (representing 532 requests), at an average price per share of $9.90. As of the date of this Report, we have fulfilled all of the valid redemption requests that we received during the six months ended June 30, 2018. We funded all share redemptions during the six months ended June 30, 2018 with proceeds from the sale of shares of our common stock pursuant to our DRIP.

Summary of Financing

The table below summarizes our non-recourse debt, net and WPC Credit Facility (dollars in thousands):
 
June 30, 2018
 
December 31, 2017
Carrying Value
 
 
 
Fixed rate (a)
$
1,046,121

 
$
1,082,367

Variable rate:
 
 
 
WPC Credit Facility — Bridge Loan (Note 3)
40,802

 
60,802

WPC Credit Facility — Working Capital Facility (Note 3)
835

 
7,835

Non-recourse debt (a):
 
 
 
Amount subject to interest rate cap, if applicable
254,838

 
265,954

Amount subject to interest rate swap
46,583

 
47,148

Amount subject to floating interest rate
—

 
25,444

 
343,058

 
407,183

 
$
1,389,179

 
$
1,489,550

Percent of Total Debt
 
 
 
Fixed rate
75
%
 
73
%
Variable rate
25
%
 
27
%
 
100
%
 
100
%
Weighted-Average Interest Rate at End of Period
 
 
 
Fixed rate
4.3
%
 
4.3
%
Variable rate (b)
5.1
%
 
4.3
%
___________
(a)
Aggregate debt balance includes deferred financing costs totaling $7.6 million and $7.3 million as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively.
(b)
The impact of our derivative instruments is reflected in the weighted-average interest rates.

Most of our mortgage loan agreements contain “lock-box” provisions, which permit the lender to access or sweep a hotel’s excess cash flow and would be triggered under limited circumstances, including the failure to maintain minimum debt service coverage ratios. If a provision were triggered, we would generally be permitted to spend an amount equal to our budgeted hotel operating expenses, taxes, insurance and capital expenditure reserves for the relevant hotel. The lender would then retain all excess cash flow after the payment of debt service in an escrow account until certain performance hurdles are met.

Lake Arrowhead Resort and Spa

The $15.0 million outstanding mortgage on the Lake Arrowhead Resort and Spa matured on June 23, 2018; we have not paid off the outstanding principal balance, although all required debt service through the date of this Report has continued to be paid on time. As of the date of this Report, the $0.5 million that we were previously required to fund into a lender-held reserve account (as a result of the minimum debt service coverage ratio on the loan not being met) remains with the lender. We are currently in discussions with the lender to amend the terms of the loan agreement, including, but not limited to, extending the maturity date to February 2019, although there can be no assurance that we will be able to do so on favorable terms, if at all.



CWI 6/30/2018 10-Q – 35




Courtyard Pittsburgh Shadyside

At March 31, 2018, the minimum debt service coverage ratio for the Courtyard Pittsburgh Shadyside was not met; therefore, we entered into a cash management agreement that permits the lender to sweep the hotel’s excess cash flow. As of June 30, 2018, this ratio was still not met and the cash management agreement remained in effect.

Cash Resources

At June 30, 2018, our cash resources consisted of cash and cash equivalents totaling $85.6 million, of which $31.7 million was designated as hotel operating cash. We also had the $25.0 million Working Capital Facility, of which $24.2 million remained available to be drawn at June 30, 2018. Our cash resources may be used to fund future investments and can be used for working capital needs, debt service and other commitments, such as the renovation commitments noted below.

Cash Requirements

During the next 12 months, we expect that our cash requirements will include (i) paying distributions to our stockholders, (ii) fulfilling our renovation commitments (Note 10), (iii) funding hurricane-related repair and remediation costs in excess of insurance proceeds received, (iv) funding lease commitments, (v) making scheduled mortgage loan principal payments, including (a) scheduled balloon payments totaling $128.1 million on three mortgage loans on our Consolidated Hotels and (b) our share of a balloon payment scheduled for one Unconsolidated Hotel totaling $24.7 million, and (vi) paydown of the Bridge Loan, as well as other normal recurring operating expenses. We currently intend to refinance the scheduled balloon payments, although there can be no assurance that we will be able to do so on favorable terms, if at all.

We expect to use cash generated from operations, the Working Capital Facility, mortgage financing and cash received from dispositions of properties to fund these cash requirements in addition to amounts held in escrow to fund our renovation commitments.

Capital Expenditures and Reserve Funds

With respect to our hotels that are operated under management or franchise agreements with major international hotel brands and for most of our hotels subject to mortgage loans, we are obligated to maintain furniture, fixtures and equipment reserve accounts for future capital expenditures at these hotels, sufficient to cover the cost of routine improvements and alterations at the hotels. The amount funded into each of these reserve accounts is generally determined pursuant to the management agreements, franchise agreements and/or mortgage loan documents for each of the respective hotels and typically ranges between 3% and 5% of the respective hotel’s total gross revenue. At June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, $36.8 million and $32.9 million, respectively, was held in furniture, fixtures and equipment reserve accounts for future capital expenditures.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations

The table below summarizes our debt, off-balance sheet arrangements and other contractual obligations (primarily our capital commitments and lease obligations) at June 30, 2018 and the effect that these arrangements and obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flow in the specified future periods (in thousands):
 
Total
 
Less than
1 year
 
1-3 years
 
3-5 years
 
More than
5 years
Non-recourse debt — Principal (a) (b)
$
1,355,179

 
$
144,250

 
$
518,968

 
$
641,169

 
$
50,792

Interest on borrowings (c)
185,946

 
60,857

 
95,666

 
27,341

 
2,082

WPC Credit Facility (Bridge Loan) — Principal
40,802

 
40,802

 
—

 
—

 
—

WPC Credit Facility (Working Capital Facility) — Principal
835

 
835

 
—

 
—

 
—

Operating and other lease commitments (d)
837,062

 
4,898

 
9,745

 
8,835

 
813,584

Contractual capital commitments (e)
25,586

 
20,371

 
5,215

 
—

 
—

Asset retirement obligation, net (f)
1,505

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
1,505

 
$
2,446,915

 
$
272,013

 
$
629,594

 
$
677,345

 
$
867,963

___________
(a)
Excludes deferred financing costs totaling $7.6 million.


CWI 6/30/2018 10-Q – 36




(b)
Total Non-recourse debt — Principal due in less than one year includes $128.1 million of scheduled balloon payments on three consolidated mortgage loans. We currently intend to refinance these mortgage loans, although there can be no assurance that we will be able to do so on favorable terms, if at all.
(c)
For variable-rate debt, interest on borrowings is calculated using the swapped or capped interest rate, when in effect.
(d)
Operating and other lease commitments consist of rent obligations under ground leases and our share of future rents payable pursuant to the Advisory Agreement for the purpose of leasing office space used for the administration of real estate entities. At June 30, 2018, this balance primarily related to our commitments on ground leases for two hotels, which expire in 2087 and 2099 and have rent obligations consistently increasing throughout their respective terms; therefore, the most significant commitments occur near the conclusion of the leases.
(e)
Capital commitments represent our remaining contractual renovation commitments at our Consolidated Hotels, which does not reflect any remaining renovation work as a result of Hurricane Irma (Note 10).
(f)
Represents the estimated future obligation for the removal of asbestos and environmental waste in connection with three of our hotels upon the retirement of the asset.

Supplemental Financial Measures

In the real estate industry, analysts and investors employ certain non-GAAP supplemental financial measures in order to facilitate meaningful comparisons between periods and among peer companies. Additionally, in the formulation of our goals and in the evaluation of the effectiveness of our strategies, we use FFO and MFFO, which are non-GAAP measures defined by our management. We believe that these measures are useful to investors to consider because they may assist them to better understand and measure the performance of our business over time and against similar companies. A description of FFO and MFFO, and reconciliations of these non-GAAP measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measures, are provided below.

FFO and MFFO

Due to certain unique operating characteristics of real estate companies, as discussed below, the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, or NAREIT, an industry trade group, has promulgated a non-GAAP measure known as FFO, which we believe to be an appropriate supplemental measure, when used in addition to and in conjunction with results presented in accordance with GAAP, to reflect the operating performance of a REIT. The use of FFO is recommended by the REIT industry as a supplemental non-GAAP measure. FFO is not equivalent to nor a substitute for net income or loss as determined under GAAP.

We define FFO, a non-GAAP measure, consistent with the standards established by the White Paper on FFO approved by the Board of Governors of NAREIT, as revised in February 2004. The White Paper defines FFO as net income or loss computed in accordance with GAAP, excluding gains or losses from sales of property, impairment charges on real estate, and depreciation and amortization from real estate assets; and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and jointly owned investments. Adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and jointly owned investments are calculated to reflect FFO. NAREIT’s definition of FFO does not distinguish between the conventional method of equity accounting and the hypothetical liquidation at book value method of accounting for unconsolidated partnerships and jointly owned investments.

The historical accounting convention used for real estate assets requires straight-line depreciation of buildings and improvements, which implies that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time, especially if such assets are not adequately maintained or repaired and renovated as required by relevant circumstances in order to maintain the value disclosed. We believe that, since real estate values historically rise and fall with market conditions, including inflation, interest rates, the business cycle, unemployment and consumer spending, presentations of operating results for a REIT using historical accounting for depreciation may be less informative. Historical accounting for real estate involves the use of GAAP. Any other method of accounting for real estate such as the fair value method cannot be construed to be any more accurate or relevant than the comparable methodologies of real estate valuation found in GAAP. Nevertheless, we believe that the use of FFO, which excludes the impact of real estate-related depreciation and amortization, as well as impairment charges of real estate-related assets, provides a more complete understanding of our performance to investors and to management; and when compared year over year, reflects the impact on our operations from trends in occupancy rates, operating costs, general and administrative expenses, and interest costs, which may not be immediately apparent from net income. In particular, we believe it is appropriate to disregard impairment charges, as this is a fair value adjustment that is largely based on market fluctuations and assessments regarding general market conditions, which can change over time. An asset will only be evaluated for impairment if certain impairment indicators exist. For real estate assets held for investment and related intangible assets in which an impairment indicator is identified, we follow a two-step process to determine whether an asset is impaired and to determine the amount of the charge. First, we compare the carrying value of the property’s asset group to the estimated future net undiscounted cash flow that we expect the property’s asset group will generate, including any estimated proceeds from the eventual sale of the


CWI 6/30/2018 10-Q – 37




property’s asset group. It should be noted, however, the property’s asset group’s estimated fair value is primarily determined using market information from outside sources such as broker quotes or recent comparable sales. In cases where the available market information is not deemed appropriate, we perform a future net cash flow analysis discounted for inherent risk associated with each asset to determine an estimated fair value. While impairment charges are excluded from the calculation of FFO described above due to the fact that impairments are based on estimated future undiscounted cash flows, it could be difficult to recover any impairment charges. However, FFO and MFFO, as described below, should not be construed to be more relevant or accurate than the current GAAP methodology in calculating net income or in its applicability in evaluating the operating performance of the company. The method utilized to evaluate the value and performance of real estate under GAAP should be construed as a more relevant measure of operational performance and considered more prominently than the non-GAAP measures FFO and MFFO and the adjustments to GAAP in calculating FFO and MFFO.

Changes in the accounting and reporting promulgations under GAAP (for acquisition fees and expenses from a capitalization/depreciation model to an expensed-as-incurred model) were put into effect in 2009. These changes to GAAP accounting for real estate subsequent to the establishment of NAREIT’s definition of FFO have prompted an increase in cash-settled expenses, such as acquisition fees that are typically accounted for as operating expenses. Management believes these fees and expenses do not affect our overall long-term operating performance. Publicly registered, non-listed REITs typically have a significant amount of acquisition activity and are substantially more dynamic during their initial years of investment and operation. While other start-up entities may also experience significant acquisition activity during their initial years, we believe that non-listed REITs are unique in that they have a limited life with targeted exit strategies within a relatively limited time frame after acquisition activity ceases. We intend to begin the process of achieving a liquidity event (i.e., listing of our common stock on a national exchange, a merger or sale of our assets or another similar transaction) not later than six years following the conclusion of our initial public offering, which occurred on September 15, 2013. Thus, we intend to have a limited life. Due to the above factors and other unique features of publicly registered, non-listed REITs, the Institute for Portfolio Alternatives (formerly known as the Investment Program Association), or IPA, an industry trade group, has standardized a measure known as MFFO, which the IPA has recommended as a supplemental measure for publicly registered non-listed REITs and which we believe to be another appropriate non-GAAP measure to reflect the operating performance of a non-listed REIT having the characteristics described above. MFFO is not equivalent to our net income or loss as determined under GAAP, and MFFO may not be a useful measure of the impact of long-term operating performance on value if we do not continue to operate with a limited life and targeted exit strategy, as currently intended. We believe that, because MFFO excludes costs that we consider more reflective of investing activities and other non-operating items included in FFO and also excludes acquisition fees and expenses that affect our operations only in periods in which properties are acquired, MFFO can provide, on a going forward basis, an indication of the sustainability (that is, the capacity to continue to be maintained) of our operating performance after the period in which we are acquiring properties and once our portfolio is in place. By providing MFFO, we believe we are presenting useful information that assists investors and analysts to better assess the sustainability of our operating performance now that our offering has been completed and once essentially all of our properties have been acquired. We also believe that MFFO is a recognized measure of sustainable operating performance by the non-listed REIT industry. Further, we believe MFFO is useful in comparing the sustainability of our operating performance, with the sustainability of the operating performance of other real estate companies that are not as involved in acquisition activities. MFFO should only be used to assess the sustainability of a company’s operating performance after a company’s offering has been completed and properties have been acquired, as it excludes acquisition costs that have a negative effect on a company’s operating performance during the periods in which properties are acquired.

We define MFFO consistent with the IPA’s Practice Guideline 2010-01, Supplemental Performance Measure for Publicly Registered, Non-Listed REITs: Modified Funds from Operations, or the Practice Guideline, issued by the IPA in November 2010. This Practice Guideline defines MFFO as FFO further adjusted for the following items included in the determination of GAAP net income, as applicable: acquisition fees and expenses; accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums on debt investments; where applicable, payments of loan principal made by our equity investees accounted for under the hypothetical liquidation model where such payments reduce our equity in earnings of equity method investments in real estate, nonrecurring impairments of real estate-related investments (i.e., infrequent or unusual, not reasonably likely to recur in the ordinary course of business); mark-to-market adjustments included in net income; nonrecurring gains or losses included in net income from the extinguishment or sale of debt, hedges, derivatives or securities holdings, where trading of such holdings is not a fundamental attribute of the business plan, unrealized gains or losses resulting from consolidation from, or deconsolidation to, equity accounting, and after adjustments for Consolidated and Unconsolidated Hotels, with such adjustments calculated to reflect MFFO on the same basis. The accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums on debt investments, unrealized gains and losses on hedges, derivatives or securities holdings, unrealized gains and losses resulting from consolidations, as well as other listed cash flow adjustments are adjustments made to net income in calculating the cash flows provided by operating activities and, in some cases, reflect gains or losses that are unrealized and may not ultimately be realized.



CWI 6/30/2018 10-Q – 38




Our MFFO calculation complies with the IPA’s Practice Guideline described above. In calculating MFFO, we exclude acquisition-related expenses, fair value adjustments of derivative financial instruments and the adjustments of such items related to noncontrolling interests. Under GAAP, acquisition fees and expenses are characterized as operating expenses in determining operating net income. These expenses are paid in cash by a company. All paid and accrued acquisition fees and expenses will have negative effects on returns to investors, the potential for future distributions, and cash flows generated by the company, unless earnings from operations or net sales proceeds from the disposition of other properties are generated to cover the purchase price of the property, these fees and expenses and other costs related to such property. Further, under GAAP, certain contemplated non-cash fair value and other non-cash adjustments are considered operating non-cash adjustments to net income in determining cash flow from operating activities. We account for certain of our equity investments using the hypothetical liquidation model which is based on distributable cash as defined in the operating agreement.

Our management uses MFFO and the adjustments used to calculate it in order to evaluate our performance against other non-listed REITs, which have limited lives with short and defined acquisition periods and targeted exit strategies shortly thereafter. As noted above, MFFO may not be a useful measure of the impact of long-term operating performance on value if we do not continue to operate in this manner. We believe that MFFO and the adjustments used to calculate it allow us to present our performance in a manner that takes into account certain characteristics unique to non-listed REITs, such as their limited life, defined acquisition period and targeted exit strategy, and is therefore a useful measure for investors. For example, acquisition costs are generally funded from the proceeds of our offering and other financing sources and not from operations. By excluding expensed acquisition costs, the use of MFFO provides information consistent with management’s analysis of the operating performance of the properties. Additionally, fair value adjustments, which are based on the impact of current market fluctuations and underlying assessments of general market conditions, but can also result from operational factors such as occupancy rates, may not be directly related or attributable to our current operating performance. By excluding such changes that may reflect anticipated and unrealized gains or losses, we believe MFFO provides useful supplemental information.

Presentation of this information is intended to provide useful information to investors as they compare the operating performance of different REITs, although it should be noted that not all REITs calculate FFO and MFFO the same way, so comparisons with other REITs may not be meaningful. Furthermore, FFO and MFFO are not necessarily indicative of cash flow available to fund cash needs and should not be considered as an alternative to net income as an indication of our performance, as an alternative to cash flows from operations as an indication of our liquidity, or indicative of funds available to fund our cash needs including our ability to make distributions to our stockholders. FFO and MFFO should be reviewed in conjunction with other GAAP measurements as an indication of our performance.

Neither the SEC, NAREIT nor any other regulatory body has passed judgment on the acceptability of the adjustments that we use to calculate FFO or MFFO. In the future, the SEC, NAREIT or another regulatory body may decide to standardize the allowable adjustments across the non-listed REIT industry and we would have to adjust our calculation and characterization of FFO and MFFO accordingly.



CWI 6/30/2018 10-Q – 39




FFO and MFFO were as follows (in thousands):
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
2018
 
2017
 
2018
 
2017
Net income attributable to CWI stockholders
$
7,721

 
$
10,383

 
$
21,907

 
$
4,970

Adjustments:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Depreciation and amortization of real property
19,327

 
20,852

 
39,130

 
41,158

Net gain on sale of real estate
—

 
(5,516
)
 
(31,929
)
 
(5,164
)
Proportionate share of adjustments for partially-owned entities — FFO adjustments
(368
)
 
(953
)
 
541

 
(1,708
)
Total adjustments
18,959

 
14,383

 
7,742

 
34,286

FFO attributable to CWI stockholders (as defined by NAREIT)
26,680

 
24,766

 
29,649

 
39,256

Adjustments:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Straight-line and other rent adjustments
1,356

 
1,368

 
2,682

 
2,717

Gain on hurricane-related property damage (a)
(496
)
 
—

 
(1,065
)
 
—

Net loss on extinguishment of debt
188

 
84

 
188

 
225

Proportionate share of adjustments for partially-owned entities — MFFO adjustments
425

 
(2
)
 
448

 
(24
)
Total adjustments
1,473

 
1,450

 
2,253

 
2,918

MFFO attributable to CWI stockholders
$
28,153

 
$
26,216

 
$
31,902

 
$
42,174

___________
(a)
We excluded the hurricane gain (which does not include business interruption income) because of the non-recurring nature of the adjustment.



CWI 6/30/2018 10-Q – 40




Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Market Risk

We currently have limited exposure to financial market risks, including changes in interest rates. We currently have no foreign operations and are not exposed to foreign currency fluctuations.

Interest Rate Risk

The values of our real estate and related fixed-rate debt obligations are subject to fluctuations based on changes in interest rates. The value of our real estate is also subject to fluctuations based on local and regional economic conditions, which may affect our ability to refinance property-level mortgage debt when balloon payments are scheduled (if we do not choose to repay the debt when due). Interest rates are highly sensitive to many factors, including governmental monetary and tax policies, domestic and international economic and political conditions, and other factors beyond our control. An increase in interest rates would likely cause the fair value of our assets to decrease.

We are exposed to the impact of interest rate changes primarily through our borrowing activities. To limit this exposure, we have attempted to obtain mortgage financing on a long-term, fixed-rate basis. However, from time to time, we or our joint investment partners have obtained, and may in the future obtain, variable-rate mortgage loans, and, as a result, we have entered into, and may continue to enter into, interest rate swap agreements or interest rate cap agreements with counterparties. See Note 8 for additional information on our interest rate swaps and caps.

At June 30, 2018, all of our debt bore interest at fixed rates, was swapped to a fixed rate or was subject to an interest rate cap, with the exception of the Bridge Loan and Working Capital Facility, which had outstanding balances of $40.8 million and $0.8 million, respectively. Our debt obligations are more fully described in Note 9 and Summary of Financing in Item 2 above. The following table presents principal cash outflows for our Consolidated Hotels based upon expected maturity dates of our long-term debt obligations outstanding at June 30, 2018 and excludes deferred financing costs (in thousands):
 
2018 (Remainder)
 
2019
 
2020
 
2021
 
2022
 
Thereafter
 
Total
 
Fair Value
Fixed-rate debt
$
5,934

 
$
106,555

 
$
58,623

 
$
458,253

 
$
244,104

 
$
176,870

 
$
1,050,339

 
$
1,032,959

Variable-rate debt (a)
$
62,780

 
$
3,071

 
$
163,739

 
$
75,250

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
304,840

 
$
304,675

___________
(a)
Excludes $40.8 million and $0.8 million outstanding under the Bridge Loan and Working Capital Facility, respectively, from WPC (Note 3). Unless the Advisory Agreement expires or is terminated, the Bridge Loan and Working Capital Facility are currently scheduled to mature on September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2018, respectively.

The estimated fair value of our fixed-rate debt and our variable-rate debt that currently bears interest at fixed rates or has effectively been converted to a fixed rate through the use of interest rate swaps, or that has been subject to an interest rate cap, is affected by changes in interest rates. A decrease or increase in interest rates of 1.0% would change the estimated fair value of this debt at June 30, 2018 by an aggregate increase of $36.6 million or an aggregate decrease of $36.4 million, respectively. Annual interest expense on our variable-rate debt that is subject to an interest rate cap at June 30, 2018 would increase or decrease by $2.5 million for each respective 1.0% change in annual interest rates.


CWI 6/30/2018 10-Q – 41




Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our disclosure controls and procedures include internal controls and other procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in this and other reports filed under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the required time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms; and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. It should be noted that no system of controls can provide complete assurance of achieving a company’s objectives and that future events may impact the effectiveness of a system of controls.

Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, after conducting an evaluation, together with members of our management, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2018, have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) were effective as of June 30, 2018 at a reasonable level of assurance.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during our most recently completed fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.



CWI 6/30/2018 10-Q – 42




PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities
 
During the three months ended June 30, 2018, we issued 340,394 shares of common stock to our Advisor as consideration for asset management fees. These shares were issued at our most recently published NAV of $10.41 per share. Since none of these transactions were considered to have involved a “public offering” within the meaning of Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act, the shares issued were deemed to be exempt from registration. In acquiring our shares, our Advisor represented that such interests were being acquired by it for investment purposes and not with a view to the distribution thereof.

All prior sales of unregistered securities have been reported in our previously filed quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and annual reports on Form 10-K.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

The following table provides information with respect to repurchases of our common stock during the three months ended June 30, 2018:
2018 Period
 
Total number of shares purchased (a)
 
Average price paid per share
 
Total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs
 
Maximum number (or approximate dollar value) of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs
April (b)
 
999,910

 
$
9.89

 
N/A
 
N/A
May
 
—

 
—

 
N/A
 
N/A
June
 
1,087,346

 
9.90

 
N/A
 
N/A
Total
 
2,087,256

 
 
 
 
 
 
___________
(a)
Represents shares of our common stock repurchased under our redemption plan, pursuant to which we may elect to redeem shares at the request of our stockholders, subject to certain exceptions, conditions and limitations. The maximum amount of shares purchasable by us in any period depends on a number of factors and is at the discretion of our board of directors. We generally receive fees in connection with share redemptions. The average price paid per share will vary depending on the number of redemption requests that were made during the period, the number of redemption requests that qualify for special circumstances and the most recently published NAV.
(b)
The requests for these redemptions were received during the three months ended March 31, 2018 and were deferred by our board of directors to April 2018 in order to correspond with the announcement of our updated NAV as of December 31, 2017, which serves as the basis for the redemption price under the program.



CWI 6/30/2018 10-Q – 43




Item 6. Exhibits.

The following exhibits are filed with this Report, expect where indicated.
Exhibit No.

 
Description
 
Method of Filing
10.1

 
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Carey Watermark Investors 2 Incorporated
 
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on June 27, 2018
 
 
 
 
 
10.2

 
First Amendment to Loan Agreement, dated as of June 26, 2018, between W. P. Carey Inc. as Lender, and CWI OP, LP as Borrower
 
Filed herewith
 
 
 
 
 
31.1

 
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
Filed herewith
 
 
 
 
 
31.2

 
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
Filed herewith
 
 
 
 
 
32

 
Certifications pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
Filed herewith
 
 
 
 
 
101.INS

 
XBRL Instance Document
 
Filed herewith
 
 
 
 
 
101.SCH

 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
 
Filed herewith
 
 
 
 
 
101.CAL

 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
 
Filed herewith
 
 
 
 
 
101.DEF

 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
 
Filed herewith
 
 
 
 
 
101.LAB

 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
 
Filed herewith
 
 
 
 
 
101.PRE

 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
 
Filed herewith



CWI 6/30/2018 10-Q – 44




SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 
 
 
Carey Watermark Investors Incorporated
Date:
August 14, 2018
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Mallika Sinha
 
 
 
Mallika Sinha
 
 
 
Chief Financial Officer
 
 
 
(Principal Financial Officer)
 
 
 
 
Date:
August 14, 2018
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Noah K. Carter
 
 
 
Noah K. Carter
 
 
 
Chief Accounting Officer
 
 
 
(Principal Accounting Officer)




CWI 6/30/2018 10-Q – 45



EXHIBIT INDEX

The following exhibits are filed with this Report, except where indicated.
Exhibit No.

 
Description
 
Method of Filing
10.1

 
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Carey Watermark Investors 2 Incorporated
 
 
 
 
 
 
10.2


First Amendment to Loan Agreement, dated as of June 26, 2018, between W. P. Carey Inc. as Lender, and CWI OP, LP as Borrower

 
 
 
 
 
31.1

 
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 
 
 
 
31.2

 
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 
 
 
 
32

 
Certifications pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 
 
 
 
101.INS

 
XBRL Instance Document
 
Filed herewith
 
 
 
 
 
101.SCH

 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
 
Filed herewith
 
 
 
 
 
101.CAL

 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
 
Filed herewith
 
 
 
 
 
101.DEF

 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
 
Filed herewith
 
 
 
 
 
101.LAB

 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
 
Filed herewith
 
 
 
 
 
101.PRE

 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
 
Filed herewith