XML 45 R13.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2013
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures
8. Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures

On October 1, 2012, the FASB issued ASU 2012-04, “Technical Corrections and Improvements”, which makes minor technical corrections and clarifications to Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures”. When the FASB issued Statement 157 (codified in ASC 820), it conformed the use of the term “fair value” in certain pre-Codification standards but not others. ASU 2012-04 conforms the term’s use throughout the ASC “to fully reflect the fair value measurement and disclosure requirements” of ASC 820. The ASU also amends the requirements that must be met for an investment company to qualify for the exemption from presenting a statement of cash flows. Specifically, it eliminates the requirements that substantially all of an entity’s investments be carried at “market value” and that the investments be highly liquid. Instead, it requires substantially all of the entity’s investments to be carried at “fair value” and classified as Level 1 or Level 2 measurements under ASC 820.
 
Financial instruments are carried at fair value, which is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants.  Assets and liabilities carried at fair value are classified and disclosed in the following three levels: Level 1 — unadjusted quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities; Level 2 — inputs other than unadjusted quoted market prices that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly (including unadjusted quoted market prices for similar investments, interest rates, and credit risk); and Level 3 — unobservable inputs for the asset or liability (including the Partnership’s own assumptions used in determining the fair value of investments).

In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, an investment’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.  The Partnership’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and consideration of the factors specific to the investment.
 
The Partnership’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized in the following tables by the type of inputs applicable to the fair value measurements.
 
Assets
 
Unadjusted
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
  
Significant Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
  
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
  
 
 
Total
 
December 31, 2013
 
$
  
$
  
$
  
$
 
Investment in TT II, LLC
  
—
   
6,221,176
   
—
   
6,221,176
 
Investment in Augustus I, LLC
  
—
   
4,318,716
   
—
   
4,318,716
 
Investment in Rotella I, LLC
  
—
   
4,039,384
   
—
   
4,039,384
 
Investment in WNT I, LLC
  
—
   
3,816,627
   
—
   
3,816,627
 
Investment in Boronia I, LLC
  
—
   
2,237,602
   
—
   
2,237,602
 
Investment in Kaiser I, LLC
  
—
   
1,861,138
   
—
   
1,861,138
 
 
                
December 31, 2012
                
Investment in TT II, LLC
  
—
   
12,246,448
   
—
   
12,246,448
 
Investment in WNT I, LLC
  
—
   
7,072,401
   
—
   
7,072,401
 
Investment in Chesapeake I, LLC
  
—
   
4,408,930
   
—
   
4,408,930
 
Investment in Rotella I, LLC
  
—
   
3,383,788
   
—
   
3,383,788
 
Investment in Kaiser I, LLC
  
—
   
3,186,918
   
—
   
3,186,918
 
Investment in Augustus I, LLC
  
—
   
2,433,314
   
—
   
2,433,314
 
Investment in GLC I, LLC
  
—
   
2,359,140
   
—
   
2,359,140
 

At December 31, 2013, the Partnership’s investment in the Trading Companies represented approximately: TT II, LLC 27.65%; WNT I, LLC 16.95%; Kaiser I, LLC 8.30%; Rotella I, LLC 17.95%; Augustus I, LLC 19.20%; and Boronia I, LLC 9.95% of the total investments of the Partnership, respectively.

At December 31, 2012, the Partnership’s investment in the Trading Companies represented approximately: TT II, LLC 34.90%; WNT I, LLC 20.15%; Kaiser I, LLC 9.10%; Rotella I, LLC 9.65%; Augustus I, LLC 6.95%; GLC I, LLC 6.70%; and Chesapeake I, LLC 12.55% of the total investments of the Partnership, respectively.