0001193125-12-298160.txt : 20120710 0001193125-12-298160.hdr.sgml : 20120710 20120710080437 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0001193125-12-298160 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: SC TO-T PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 17 FILED AS OF DATE: 20120710 DATE AS OF CHANGE: 20120710 GROUP MEMBERS: B&R ACQUISITION CO SUBJECT COMPANY: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: AMYLIN PHARMACEUTICALS INC CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0000881464 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS [2834] IRS NUMBER: 330266089 STATE OF INCORPORATION: DE FISCAL YEAR END: 1231 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: SC TO-T SEC ACT: 1934 Act SEC FILE NUMBER: 005-42168 FILM NUMBER: 12954494 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 9360 TOWNE CENTRE DR STREET 2: SUITE 110 CITY: SAN DIEGO STATE: CA ZIP: 92121 BUSINESS PHONE: 6195522200 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: 9360 TOWNE CENTRE DR STREET 2: SUITE 110 CITY: SAN DIEGO STATE: CA ZIP: 92121 FILED BY: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: BRISTOL MYERS SQUIBB CO CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0000014272 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS [2834] IRS NUMBER: 220790350 STATE OF INCORPORATION: DE FISCAL YEAR END: 1231 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: SC TO-T BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 345 PARK AVE CITY: NEW YORK STATE: NY ZIP: 10154 BUSINESS PHONE: 2125464000 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: 345 PARK AVE CITY: NEW YORK STATE: NY ZIP: 10154 FORMER COMPANY: FORMER CONFORMED NAME: BRISTOL MYERS CO DATE OF NAME CHANGE: 19891012 SC TO-T 1 d376793dsctot.htm SCHEDULE TO SCHEDULE TO

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

SCHEDULE TO

TENDER OFFER STATEMENT UNDER SECTION 14(d)(1) OR 13(e)(1)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

 

AMYLIN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

(Name of Subject Company (Issuer))

B&R ACQUISITION COMPANY

(Offeror)

BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY

(Offeror)

 

 

COMMON STOCK, PAR VALUE $0.001 PER SHARE

(Title of Class of Securities)

032346108

(CUSIP Number of Class of Securities)

Sandra Leung, Esq.

General Counsel & Corporate Secretary

P. Joseph Campisi, Jr., Esq.

Vice President & Associate General Counsel

Bristol-Myers Squibb Company

345 Park Avenue

New York, New York 10154

(212) 546-4000

(Name, address, and telephone numbers of person authorized to receive notices and communications on behalf of filing persons)

 

 

Copies to:

David Fox, Esq.

Daniel Wolf, Esq.

Kirkland & Ellis LLP

601 Lexington Avenue

New York, NY 10022

(212) 446-4800

CALCULATION OF FILING FEE

 

 

Transaction Valuation(1)   Amount of Filing Fee(2)
$5,309,403,868.82   $608,457.68

 

 

(1) Calculated solely for purposes of determining the filing fee. The calculation assumes the purchase of 163,768,702 shares of voting common stock, par value $0.001 per share. The transaction value also includes the aggregate offer price for (i) 1,552,376 shares issuable pursuant to the vesting of restricted stock units and (ii) 5,950,014 shares issuable pursuant to outstanding options with an exercise price less than $31.00 per share, which is calculated by (x) multiplying the number of shares underlying an outstanding option with an exercise price less than $31.00 by an amount equal to $31.00 minus the exercise price for such option and (y) dividing such product by $31.00.
(2) The amount of the filing fee was calculated in accordance with Rule 0-11 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Fee Rate Advisory #3 for fiscal year 2012, issued September 29, 2011, by multiplying the transaction value by 0.0001146.

 

¨ Check the box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing with which the offsetting fee was previously paid. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the form or schedule and the date of its filing.

 

Amount Previously Paid: N/A

   Filing Party: N/A

Form of Registration No.: N/A

   Date Filed: N/A

 

¨ Check the box if the filing relates solely to preliminary communications made before the commencement of a tender offer.

 

     Check the appropriate boxes below to designate any transactions to which the statement relates:

 

  x Third-party tender offer subject to Rule 14d-1.
  ¨ Issuer tender offer subject to Rule 13e-4.
  ¨ Going-private transaction subject to Rule 13e-3.
  ¨ Amendment to Schedule 13D under Rule 13d-2.

Check the following box if the filing is a final amendment reporting the results of the tender offer.  ¨

If applicable, check the appropriate box(es) below to designate the appropriate rule provision(s) relied upon:

 

  ¨ Rule 13e-4(i) (Cross-Border Issuer Tender Offer)

 

  ¨ Rule 14d-1(d) (Cross-Border Third-Party Tender Offer)

 

 

 


This Tender Offer Statement on Schedule TO (together with any amendments and supplements hereto, this “Schedule TO”) is filed by (i) B&R Acquisition Company, a Delaware corporation (“Purchaser”) and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, a Delaware corporation (“Parent”) and (ii) Parent. This Schedule TO relates to the tender offer for all of the outstanding shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Shares”), of Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), at a price of $31.00 per Share net to the seller in cash without interest and less any applicable withholding taxes, upon the terms and conditions set forth in the offer to purchase dated July 10, 2012 (the “Offer to Purchase”), a copy of which is attached as Exhibit (a)(1)(A), and in the related letter of transmittal (the “Letter of Transmittal”), a copy of which is attached as Exhibit (a)(1)(B), which, together with any amendments or supplements, collectively constitute the “Offer.”

All the information set forth in the Offer to Purchase is incorporated by reference herein in response to Items 1 through 9 and Item 11 in this Schedule TO, and is supplemented by the information specifically provided in this Schedule TO.

 

Item 1. Summary Term Sheet.

Regulation M-A Item 1001

The information set forth in the Offer to Purchase under the caption SUMMARY TERM SHEET is incorporated herein by reference.

 

Item 2. Subject Company Information.

Regulation M-A Item 1002

(a) Name and Address. The name, address, and telephone number of the subject company’s principal executive offices are as follows:

Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

9360 Towne Centre Drive

San Diego, California 92121

(858) 552-2200

(b) Securities. This Schedule TO relates to the Offer by Purchaser to purchase all issued and outstanding Shares. The Company has advised Parent that, as of the close of business on July 5, 2012, (i) 163,768,702 Shares were issued and outstanding, (ii) zero Shares were held by the Company as treasury shares or held by subsidiaries of the Company (iii) 17,752,529 Shares were reserved for issuance upon exercise of outstanding Company stock options pursuant to the Company’s equity compensation plans (of which 12,320,526 Shares were reserved for issuance upon exercise of outstanding Company stock options that are currently vested and exercisable), (iv) 1,552,376 Shares were reserved for issuance upon settlement of outstanding restricted stock units pursuant to the Company’s equity compensation plans and (v) 9,415,425 Shares were reserved for issuance upon conversion of the Company’s 3.00% Convertible Notes due 2014. The information set forth on the cover page and in the INTRODUCTION of the Offer to Purchase is incorporated herein by reference.

(c) Trading Market and Price. The information set forth under the caption THE TENDER OFFER—Section 6 (“Price Range of Shares; Dividends”) of the Offer to Purchase is incorporated herein by reference.

 

1


Item 3. Identity and Background of Filing Person.

Regulation M-A Item 1003

(a)-(c) Name and Address; Business and Background of Entities; and Business and Background of Natural Persons. The information set forth in the Offer to Purchase under the following captions is incorporated herein by reference:

SUMMARY TERM SHEET

THE TENDER OFFER—Section 8 (“Certain Information Concerning Parent and Purchaser”) and Schedule I attached thereto.

 

Item 4. Terms of the Transaction.

Regulation M-A Item 1004

(a) Material Terms. The information set forth in the Offer to Purchase is incorporated herein by reference.

 

Item 5. Past Contacts, Transactions, Negotiations and Agreements.

Regulation M-A Item 1005

(a) Transactions. The information set forth in the Offer to Purchase under the following captions is incorporated herein by reference:

SUMMARY TERM SHEET

THE TENDER OFFER—Section 8 (“Certain Information Concerning Parent and Purchaser”)

THE TENDER OFFER—Section 10 (“Background of the Offer; Past Contacts or Negotiations with the Company”)

(b) Significant Corporate Events. The information set forth in the Offer to Purchase under the following captions is incorporated herein by reference:

SUMMARY TERM SHEET

THE TENDER OFFER—Section 8 (“Certain Information Concerning Parent and Purchaser”)

THE TENDER OFFER—Section 10 (“Background of the Offer; Past Contacts or Negotiations with the Company”)

THE TENDER OFFER—Section 11 (“The Merger Agreement”)

THE TENDER OFFER—Section 12 (“Purpose of the Offer; Plans for the Company”)

 

Item 6. Purposes of the Transaction and Plans or Proposals.

Regulation M-A Item 1006

(a) Purposes. The information set forth in the Offer to Purchase under the following caption is incorporated herein by reference:

THE TENDER OFFER—Section 12 (“Purpose of the Offer; Plans for the Company”)

(c) (1)-(7) Plans. The information set forth in the Offer to Purchase under the following captions is incorporated herein by reference:

SUMMARY TERM SHEET

 

2


THE TENDER OFFER—Section 9 (“Source and Amount of Funds”)

THE TENDER OFFER—Section 10 (“Background of the Offer; Past Contacts or Negotiations with the Company”)

THE TENDER OFFER—Section 11 (“The Merger Agreement”)

THE TENDER OFFER—Section 12 (“Purpose of the Offer; Plans for the Company”)

THE TENDER OFFER—Section 13 (“Certain Effects of the Offer”)

THE TENDER OFFER—Section 14 (“Dividends and Distributions”)

 

Item 7. Source and Amount of Funds or Other Consideration.

Regulation M-A Item 1007

(a) Source of Funds. The information set forth in the Offer to Purchase under the following captions is incorporated herein by reference:

SUMMARY TERM SHEET

THE TENDER OFFER—Section 9 (“Source and Amount of Funds”)

THE TENDER OFFER—Section 10 (“Background of the Offer; Past Contacts or Negotiations with the Company”)

(b) Conditions. The Offer is not subject to a financing condition.

(d) Borrowed Funds. The information set forth in the Offer to Purchase under the caption THE TENDER OFFER—Section 9 (“Source and Amount of Funds”) is incorporated herein by reference.

 

Item 8. Interest in Securities of the Subject Company.

Regulation M-A Item 1008

(a) Securities Ownership. The information set forth in the Offer to Purchase under the following captions is incorporated herein by reference:

THE TENDER OFFER—Section 8 (“Certain Information Concerning Parent and Purchaser”) and Schedule I attached thereto

THE TENDER OFFER—Section 11 (“The Merger Agreement”)

THE TENDER OFFER—Section 12 (“Purpose of the Offer; Plans for the Company”)

(b) Securities Transactions. The information set forth in the Offer to Purchase under the caption THE TENDER OFFER—Section 8 (“Certain Information Concerning Parent and Purchaser”) is incorporated herein by reference.

 

Item 9. Persons/Assets, Retained, Employed, Compensated or Used.

Regulation M-A Item 1009

(a) Solicitations or Recommendations. The information set forth in the Offer to Purchase under the following captions is incorporated herein by reference:

SUMMARY TERM SHEET

THE TENDER OFFER—Section 3 (“Procedures for Accepting the Offer and Tendering Shares”)

 

3


THE TENDER OFFER—Section 10 (“Background of the Offer; Past Contacts or Negotiations with the Company”)

THE TENDER OFFER—Section 17 (“Fees and Expenses”)

 

Item 10. Financial Statements.

Regulation M-A Item 1010

(a) Financial Information. Not applicable.

(b) Pro Forma Information. Not applicable.

 

Item 11. Additional Information.

Regulation M-A Item 1011

(a) Agreements, Regulatory Requirements and Legal Proceedings. The information set forth in the Offer to Purchase under the following captions is incorporated herein by reference:

SUMMARY TERM SHEET

THE TENDER OFFER—Section 10 (“Background of the Offer; Past Contacts or Negotiations with the Company”)

THE TENDER OFFER—Section 11 (“The Merger Agreement”)

THE TENDER OFFER—Section 12 (“Purpose of the Offer; Plans for the Company”)

THE TENDER OFFER—Section 13 (“Certain Effects of the Offer”)

THE TENDER OFFER—Section 16 (“Certain Legal Matters; Regulatory Approvals”)

(b) Other Material Information. The information set forth in the Offer to Purchase and the Letter of Transmittal is incorporated herein by reference.

 

4


Item 12. Exhibits.

Regulation M-A Item 1016

 

    Exhibit
    No.
   
(a)(1)(A)   Offer to Purchase, dated July 10, 2012.
(a)(1)(B)   Letter of Transmittal (including Substitute Form W-9).
(a)(1)(C)   Notice of Guaranteed Delivery.
(a)(1)(D)   Letter from the Information Agent to Brokers, Dealers, Commercial Banks, Trust Companies and Nominees.
(a)(1)(E)   Letter to Clients for Use by Brokers, Dealers, Commercial Banks, Trust Companies and Nominees.
(a)(1)(F)   Instruction Form to be Used with the Letter of Transmittal.
(a)(1)(G)   Summary Advertisement as published in the Wall Street Journal on July 10, 2012.
(a)(5)(A)   Joint Press Release of Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, dated June 29, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Bristol-Myers Squibb Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 2, 2012).
(a)(5)(B)   Press Release issued by Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, dated July 10, 2012.
(a)(5)(C)   Class Action Complaint dated July 3, 2012 (Maxine Phillips v. Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al.)
(a)(5)(D)   Class Action Complaint dated July 3, 2012 (Douglas Peterson v. Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al.)
(b)   None.
(d)(1)   Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated June 29, 2012, by and among Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, and B&R Acquisition Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Bristol-Myers Squibb Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 3, 2012).
(d)(2)   Tender and Support Agreement, by and among Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, B&R Acquisition Company and certain stockholders of Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc., dated June 29, 2012.
(g)   None.
(h)   None.

 

Item 13. Information Required by Schedule 13E-3.

Not applicable.

 

5


SIGNATURE

After due inquiry and to the best of my knowledge and belief, I certify that the information set forth in this statement is true, complete and correct.

 

B&R ACQUISITION COMPANY

By  

/s/    Demetrios Kydonieus

Name:   Demetrios Kydonieus
Title:   Vice President
Date:   July 10, 2012

BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY

By  

/s/    Demetrios Kydonieus

Name:   Demetrios Kydonieus
Title:   Vice President, Strategy, Alliances & Technology
Date:   July 10, 2012

 

6


EXHIBIT INDEX

 

Exhibit
No.
   
(a)(1)(A)   Offer to Purchase, dated July 10, 2012.
(a)(1)(B)   Letter of Transmittal (including Substitute Form W-9).
(a)(1)(C)   Notice of Guaranteed Delivery.
(a)(1)(D)   Letter from the Information Agent to Brokers, Dealers, Commercial Banks, Trust Companies and Nominees.
(a)(1)(E)   Letter to Clients for Use by Brokers, Dealers, Commercial Banks, Trust Companies and Nominees.
(a)(1)(F)   Instruction Form to be Used with the Letter of Transmittal.
(a)(1)(G)   Summary Advertisement as published in the Wall Street Journal on July 10, 2012.
(a)(5)(A)   Joint Press Release of Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, dated June 29, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Bristol-Myers Squibb Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 2, 2012).
(a)(5)(B)   Press Release issued by Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, dated July 10, 2012.
(a)(5)(C)   Class Action Complaint dated July 3, 2012 (Maxine Phillips v. Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al.)
(a)(5)(D)   Class Action Complaint dated July 3, 2012 (Douglas Peterson v. Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al.)
(b)   None.
(d)(1)   Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated June 29, 2012, by and among Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, and B&R Acquisition Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Bristol-Myers Squibb Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 3, 2012).
(d)(2)   Tender and Support Agreement, by and among Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, B&R Acquisition Company and certain stockholders of Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc., dated June 29, 2012.
(g)   None.
(h)   None.

 

7

EX-99.(A)(1)(A) 2 d376793dex99a1a.htm OFFER TO PURCHASE Offer to Purchase
Table of Contents

Exhibit (a)(1)(A)

Offer to Purchase for Cash

All Outstanding Shares of Common Stock

of

AMYLIN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

at

$31.00 Net Per Share

by

B&R ACQUISITION COMPANY,

a wholly–owned subsidiary of

BRISTOL–MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY

 

THE OFFER AND WITHDRAWAL RIGHTS WILL EXPIRE AT 5:00 PM, NEW YORK CITY TIME, ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 7, 2012, UNLESS THE OFFER IS EXTENDED.

The Offer (as defined below) is being made pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of June 29, 2012 (the “Merger Agreement”), by and among Bristol–Myers Squibb Company, a Delaware corporation (“Parent”), B&R Acquisition Company, a Delaware corporation and a wholly–owned subsidiary of Parent (“Purchaser”), and Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”). Purchaser is offering to purchase all of the outstanding shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Shares”), of the Company at a price of $31.00 per Share, net to the seller in cash, without interest, less any applicable withholding taxes (the “Offer Price”), upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in this offer to purchase (this “Offer to Purchase”) and the related letter of transmittal (the “Letter of Transmittal”), which, together with any amendments or supplements, collectively constitute the “Offer.” Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, following the consummation of the Offer and the satisfaction or waiver of each of the applicable conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, Purchaser and the Company will merge (the “Merger”), with the Company as the surviving corporation in the Merger continuing as a wholly–owned subsidiary of Parent (the “Surviving Company”). As a result of the Merger, each Share (other than Shares owned by Parent, Purchaser or the Company, or by any stockholder of the Company who or which is entitled to and properly exercises appraisal rights under Delaware law) will at the effective time of the Merger be converted into the right to receive the Offer Price.

After careful consideration, the board of directors of the Company (the “Company Board”), has unanimously determined that the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the Offer, the Top-Up Option (as defined below) and the Merger, are advisable, fair to and in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. Accordingly, the Company Board recommends that the Company’s stockholders accept the Offer and tender their Shares to Purchaser in the Offer and vote in favor of the adoption and approval of the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the Merger if required by applicable law.

The Offer is not subject to a financing condition. The Offer is conditioned upon, among other things, there being validly tendered in accordance with the terms of the Offer and not validly withdrawn (not counting as validly tendered any Shares tendered in the Offer pursuant to procedures for guaranteed delivery and not actually delivered) prior to 5:00 PM, New York City time, on Tuesday, August 7, 2012 (the “Expiration Date,” unless the period during which the Offer is open is extended in accordance with the Merger Agreement, in which event “Expiration Date” will mean the latest time and date at which the Offer, as so extended by Purchaser, will expire), a number of Shares which, together with Shares then beneficially owned by Parent and Purchaser (if any), represents at least a majority of the total number of then outstanding Shares on a fully diluted basis (which total number shall be the number of Shares issued and outstanding plus the number of Shares which the Company would be required to issue pursuant to any then outstanding warrants, options, benefit plans or


Table of Contents

obligations or securities convertible or exchangeable into Shares or otherwise, but only to the extent then so exercisable, convertible or exchangeable or exercisable, convertible or exchangeable as a result of the consummation of the Offer). The foregoing condition is referred to as the “Minimum Condition.” The Minimum Condition may be waived by Parent and Purchaser only with the prior written consent of the Company. Based on information provided to Purchaser and Parent by the Company, and assuming no additional Shares are issued or stock options or other rights to acquire Shares are issued, vest or become exercisable after July 5, 2012, the aggregate number of Shares that Purchaser must acquire in the Offer in order to satisfy the Minimum Condition equals approximately 93,030,828 Shares, which is approximately 56.81% of the outstanding Shares as of July 5, 2012. The Offer is also subject to other conditions described in Section 15—“Certain Conditions of the Offer.”

A summary of the principal terms of the Offer appears below. You should read this entire Offer to Purchase and the Letter of Transmittal carefully before deciding whether to tender your Shares in the Offer.

IMPORTANT

If you desire to tender all or any portion of your Shares to Purchaser pursuant to the Offer, you should either (a) complete and sign the Letter of Transmittal for the Offer, which is enclosed with this Offer to Purchase, in accordance with the instructions contained in the Letter of Transmittal, and mail or deliver the Letter of Transmittal (or a manually executed facsimile thereof) and any other required documents to Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., in its capacity as depositary for the Offer (the “Depositary”), and either deliver the certificates for your Shares to the Depositary along with the Letter of Transmittal (or a manually executed facsimile thereof) or tender your Shares by book–entry transfer by following the procedures described in Section 3—“Procedures for Accepting the Offer and Tendering Shares,” in each case prior to the Expiration Date, or (b) request that your broker, dealer, commercial bank, trust company or other nominee effect the transaction for you. If you hold Shares registered in the name of a broker, dealer, commercial bank, trust company or other nominee, you must contact that institution in order to tender your Shares to Purchaser pursuant to the Offer.

If you desire to tender your Shares pursuant to the Offer and the certificates representing your Shares are not immediately available, you cannot comply in a timely manner with the procedures for tendering your Shares by book–entry transfer, or you cannot deliver all required documents to the Depositary prior to the Expiration Date, you may be able to tender your Shares to Purchaser pursuant to the Offer by following the procedures for guaranteed delivery described in Section 3—“Procedures for Accepting the Offer and Tendering Shares.”

* * * * *

Questions and requests for assistance regarding the Offer or any of the terms thereof may be directed to Georgeson, Inc., as information agent for the Offer (the “Information Agent”), at the address and telephone number set forth for the Information Agent on the back cover of this Offer to Purchase. Requests for additional copies of this Offer to Purchase, the Letter of Transmittal, the notice of guaranteed delivery and other tender offer materials may be directed to the Information Agent. You may also contact your broker, dealer, commercial bank, trust company or other nominee for assistance.

This Offer to Purchase and the Letter of Transmittal contain important information, and you should read both carefully and in their entirety before making a decision with respect to the Offer.

This transaction has not been approved or disapproved by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) or any state securities commission nor has the SEC or any state securities commission passed upon the fairness or merits of this transaction or upon the accuracy or adequacy of the information contained in this Offer to Purchase or the Letter of Transmittal. Any representation to the contrary is unlawful.

 

2


Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

SUMMARY TERM SHEET

     4   

INTRODUCTION

     10   

THE TENDER OFFER

     13   

1. Terms of the Offer.

     13   

2. Acceptance for Payment and Payment for Shares.

     15   

3. Procedures for Accepting the Offer and Tendering Shares.

     16   

4. Withdrawal Rights.

     18   

5. Material United States Federal Income Tax Consequences.

     19   

6. Price Range of Shares; Dividends.

     22   

7. Certain Information Concerning the Company.

     22   

8. Certain Information Concerning Parent and Purchaser.

     23   

9. Source and Amount of Funds.

     24   

10. Background of the Offer; Past Contacts or Negotiations with the Company.

     25   

11. The Merger Agreement.

     31   

12. Purpose of the Offer; Plans for the Company.

     46   

13. Certain Effects of the Offer.

     48   

14. Dividends and Distributions.

     49   

15. Certain Conditions of the Offer.

     49   

16. Certain Legal Matters; Regulatory Approvals.

     50   

17. Fees and Expenses.

     52   

18. Miscellaneous

     53   

SCHEDULE I

     54   

 

3


Table of Contents

SUMMARY TERM SHEET

Purchaser, a wholly–owned subsidiary of Parent, is offering to purchase all of the outstanding shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, of the Company at a price of $31.00 net per Share in cash (less any applicable withholding taxes and without interest), as further described herein, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in this Offer to Purchase and the Letter of Transmittal.

The following are some questions that you, as a stockholder of the Company, may have and answers to those questions. This summary term sheet highlights selected information from this Offer to Purchase and may not contain all of the information that is important to you and is qualified in its entirety by the more detailed descriptions and explanations contained in this Offer to Purchase and the Letter of Transmittal. To better understand the Offer and for a complete description of the legal terms of the Offer, you should read this Offer to Purchase and the Letter of Transmittal carefully and in their entirety. Questions or requests for assistance may be directed to the Information Agent at the address and telephone numbers available on the back cover of this Offer to Purchase. Unless otherwise indicated in this Offer to Purchase or the context otherwise requires, all references in this Offer to Purchase to “we,” “our” or “us” refer to Purchaser.

Who is offering to buy my Shares?

B&R Acquisition Company, a wholly–owned subsidiary of Bristol–Myers Squibb Company, a Delaware corporation, is offering to purchase all of the outstanding Shares. Purchaser is a Delaware corporation which was formed for the sole purpose of making the Offer and completing the process by which the Company will become a subsidiary of Parent through a merger transaction. See the “Introduction” and Section 8—“Certain Information Concerning Parent and Purchaser.”

How many Shares are you offering to purchase in the Offer?

We are making an offer to purchase all of the outstanding Shares on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in this Offer to Purchase. See the “Introduction” and Section 1—“Terms of the Offer.”

Why are you making the Offer?

We are making the Offer because we want to acquire control of, and ultimately the entire equity interest in, the Company. If the Offer is consummated, Parent intends, as soon as practicable after consummation of the Offer, to cause Purchaser to consummate the Merger. Upon consummation of the Merger, the Surviving Company would be a wholly–owned subsidiary of Parent.

How much are you offering to pay and what is the form of payment? Will I have to pay any fees or commissions?

We are offering to pay $31.00 per Share, net to you in cash, without interest and less any applicable withholding taxes. If you are the record owner of your Shares and you directly tender your Shares to us in the Offer, you will not have to pay brokerage fees, commissions or similar expenses. If you own your Shares through a broker or other nominee, and your broker tenders your Shares on your behalf, your broker or nominee may charge you a fee for doing so. You should consult with your broker or nominee to determine whether any charges will apply. See the “Introduction,” Section 1—“Terms of the Offer,” and Section 2—“Acceptance for Payment and Payment for Shares.”

How long do I have to decide whether to tender my Shares in the Offer?

You will have until 5:00 PM, New York City time, on Tuesday, August 7, 2012, to tender your Shares in the Offer, subject to extension of the Offer in accordance with the terms of the Merger Agreement (as the date of the expiration of the Offer may be extended, the “Expiration Date”). Furthermore, if you cannot deliver everything that is required in order to make a valid tender by that time, you may be able to use a guaranteed delivery procedure by which a broker, a bank, or any other fiduciary that is an eligible institution may guarantee that the

 

4


Table of Contents

missing items will be received by the Depositary within three Nasdaq (as defined below) trading days. For the tender to be valid, however, the Depositary must receive the missing items within such three-trading-day period. See Section 1—“Terms of the Offer” and Section 3—“Procedures for Accepting the Offer and Tendering Shares.”

Is there an agreement governing the Offer?

Yes. The Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of June 29, 2012, provides, among other things, for the terms and conditions of the Offer and the Merger. See Section 11—“The Merger Agreement” and Section 15—“Certain Conditions of the Offer.”

What are the most significant conditions to the Offer?

We are not obligated to purchase any Shares unless, prior to the Expiration Date:

 

   

there has been validly tendered and not properly withdrawn (not counting as validly tendered any Shares tendered pursuant to guaranteed delivery and not actually delivered) a number of Shares that, together with Shares beneficially owned by Parent and Purchaser (if any) constitute at least a majority of the total number of then outstanding Shares on a fully diluted basis (which total number shall be the number of Shares issued and outstanding plus the number of Shares which the Company would be required to issue pursuant to any then outstanding options, benefit plans or obligations or securities convertible or exchangeable into Shares or otherwise, but only to the extent then so exercisable, convertible or exchangeable or exercisable, convertible or exchangeable as a result of the consummation of the Offer). The foregoing condition is referred to as the “Minimum Condition”;

 

   

any applicable waiting period under the Hart–Scott–Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended (the “HSR Act”) shall have expired or been terminated; and

 

   

we are not prohibited from consummating the Offer or the Merger by any applicable law or court order.

The Company has advised Parent that, as of the close of business on July 5, 2012, (i) 163,768,702 Shares were issued and outstanding, (ii) zero Shares were held by the Company as treasury shares or held by subsidiaries of the Company (iii) 17,752,529 Shares were reserved for issuance upon exercise of outstanding Company stock options pursuant to the Company’s equity compensation plans (of which 12,320,526 Shares were reserved for issuance upon exercise of outstanding Company stock options that are currently vested and exercisable), (iv) 1,552,376 Shares were reserved for issuance upon settlement of outstanding restricted stock units pursuant to the Company’s equity compensation plans and (v) 9,415,425 Shares were reserved for issuance upon conversion of the Company’s 3.00% Convertible Notes due 2014. Based on information provided to Purchaser and Parent by the Company, and assuming no additional Shares are issued or, stock options or other rights to acquire Shares are issued, vest or become exercisable after July 5, 2012, the aggregate number of Shares that Purchaser must acquire in the Offer in order to satisfy the Minimum Condition equals approximately 93,030,828 Shares, which is approximately 56.81% of the outstanding Shares as of July 5, 2012.

The Offer is also subject to a number of other conditions. We can waive some of the conditions to the Offer without the consent of the Company. We cannot, however, waive the Minimum Condition without the consent of the Company. See Section 15—“Certain Conditions of the Offer.”

Do you have the financial resources to pay for all of the Shares that you are offering to purchase in the Offer?

Yes. If the conditions to the Offer are satisfied, Parent will provide us with sufficient funds to acquire all of the Shares validly tendered in the Offer and not validly withdrawn and to complete the Merger. Parent expects to obtain the necessary funds from existing cash balances and borrowings, including from expansion of existing credit lines, money markets and/or capital markets transactions. Parent is still evaluating these financing transactions and, as of the date of this Offer to Purchase, no definitive arrangements have been entered into with respect to any expansion of credit lines, money markets and/or capital markets transactions. The Offer is not conditioned on any financing arrangement. See Section 9—“Source and Amount of Funds.”

 

5


Table of Contents

Is your financial condition relevant to my decision to tender my Shares in the Offer?

We do not think that our financial condition is relevant to your decision whether to tender Shares and accept the Offer because:

 

   

the Offer is being made for all outstanding Shares solely for cash;

 

   

the Offer is not subject to any financing condition;

 

   

we, through our parent company (Parent), will have sufficient funds available to purchase all Shares validly tendered in the Offer and not validly withdrawn in light of Parent’s financial capacity in relation to the amount of consideration payable; and

 

   

if we consummate the Offer, we will acquire all remaining Shares for the same cash price in the Merger and we, through our parent company (Parent), will have sufficient funds available to consummate the Merger in light of Parent’s financial capacity in relation to the amount of consideration payable.

See Section 9—“Source and Amount of Funds.”

Can the Offer be extended and under what circumstances can or will the Offer be extended?

Yes. In some cases, we are required to extend the Offer beyond its initial Expiration Date, but in no event will we be required to extend the Offer beyond the Outside Date (as defined below). We have agreed in the Merger Agreement that so long as neither the Company nor Parent terminates the Merger Agreement in accordance with its terms, we are required to extend our Offer beyond its initial Expiration Date for any period required by any rule or regulation of the SEC or its staff or The Nasdaq Stock Market (“Nasdaq”). Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, so long as the Merger Agreement has not been terminated in accordance with its terms, Purchaser may extend the Offer for one or more successive periods of up to 10 business days if any conditions to the Offer have not been satisfied or waived. In addition, if any conditions to the Offer have not been satisfied or waived, Purchaser will also be required to extend the Offer until the Outside Date in the same way if requested by the Company.

Following our acceptance of Shares tendered in the Offer, we may, without the consent of the Company, provide a subsequent offering period in accordance with Rule 14d–11 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).

If requested by the Company, Purchaser will, and Parent will cause Purchaser to, make available a subsequent offering period of not less than 5 business days and extend such subsequent offering period for an additional 5 business days; provided that Purchaser will not be required to make available such subsequent offering period or extend such subsequent offering period if Parent and Purchaser, directly or indirectly, own at least 90% of the outstanding Shares prior to the commencement of such subsequent offering period (after taking into account the exercise of the Top-Up Option (as defined below)).

We are not required to extend the Offer or the Expiration Date beyond the Outside Date. The Outside Date depends on the reason for the extension of the Offer. The “Outside Date” means December 31, 2012, unless the only condition to the Offer that has not been satisfied is that relating to required antitrust approvals, in which case the “Outside Date” will automatically be extended until March 31, 2013.

If we extend the time period of this Offer, this extension will extend the time that you will have to tender your Shares. See Section 1—“Terms of the Offer” for more details on our ability to extend the Offer.

How will I be notified if the Offer is extended?

If we extend the Offer, we will inform the Depositary of that fact and will make a public announcement of the extension not later than 9:00 AM, New York City time, on the next business day after the day on which the Offer was scheduled to expire. See Section 1—“Terms of the Offer.”

 

6


Table of Contents

How do I tender my Shares?

To tender your Shares, you must deliver the certificates representing your Shares or confirmation of a book–entry transfer of such Shares into the account of the Depositary at The Depository Trust Company (“DTC”), together with a completed Letter of Transmittal (or a facsimile thereof) or an Agent’s Message (as defined in Section 3—“Procedures for Accepting the Offer and Tendering Shares”) and any other documents required by the Letter of Transmittal, to the Depositary, prior to the Expiration Date. If your Shares are held in street name (that is, through a broker, dealer or other nominee), they can be tendered by your nominee through DTC. If you are unable to deliver any required document or instrument to the Depositary by the Expiration Date, you may gain some extra time by having a broker, a bank or any other fiduciary that is an eligible institution guarantee that the missing items will be received by the Depositary within three Nasdaq trading days. For the tender to be valid, however, the Depositary must receive the missing items within that three-trading-day period. See Section 3—“Procedures for Accepting the Offer and Tendering Shares.”

Until what time may I withdraw previously tendered Shares?

You may withdraw previously tendered Shares any time prior to the Expiration Date by following the procedures for withdrawing your Shares in a timely manner. If you tendered your Shares by giving instructions to a broker or other nominee, you must instruct your broker or nominee prior to the Expiration Date to arrange for the withdrawal of your Shares in a timely manner. However, Shares tendered during a subsequent offering period, if any, may not be withdrawn. See Section 4—“Withdrawal Rights.”

How do I withdraw previously tendered Shares?

To validly withdraw any of your previously tendered Shares, you must deliver a written notice of withdrawal, or a facsimile of a notice of withdrawal (with original delivered via overnight courier), with the required information to the Depositary while you still have the right to withdraw such Shares. If you tendered your Shares by giving instructions to a broker, banker or other nominee, you must instruct your broker, banker or other nominee to arrange for the withdrawal of your Shares and such broker, banker or other nominee must effectively withdraw such Shares while you still have the right to withdraw Shares. See Section 4—“Withdrawal Rights.”

What does the board of directors of the Company think of the Offer?

We are making the Offer pursuant to the Merger Agreement, which has been approved by the Company Board. The Company Board has:

 

   

determined that the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the Top-Up Option, the Offer and the Merger, are advisable, fair to and in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders; and

 

   

recommended that the Company’s stockholders accept the Offer and tender their Shares to Purchaser in the Offer and, if required by applicable law, adopt and approve the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the Merger.

A more complete description of the Company Board’s reasons for authorizing and approving the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the Offer and the Merger, is set forth in the Company’s Solicitation/Recommendation Statement on Schedule 14D–9 under the Exchange Act, that will be mailed to the stockholders of the Company. See the “Introduction” and Section 10—“Background of the Offer; Past Contacts or Negotiations with the Company.”

If a majority of the Shares are tendered and accepted for payment, will the Company continue as a public company?

No. Following the purchase of Shares in the Offer, we expect to consummate the Merger. As a result of the Merger, each Share (other than Shares owned by Parent, Purchaser or the Company, or by any stockholder of the Company who or which is entitled to and properly exercises appraisal rights under Delaware law) will at the

 

7


Table of Contents

effective time of the Merger be converted into the right to receive the Offer Price. If the Merger takes place, the Company will no longer be publicly-owned. Even if for some reason the Merger does not take place but we purchase all of the tendered Shares, there may be so few remaining stockholders and publicly-held Shares that the Company’s common stock will no longer be eligible to be traded on Nasdaq or any other securities exchange, there may not be a public trading market for the common stock of the Company, and the Company may no longer be required to make filings with the SEC or otherwise comply with the rules of the SEC relating to publicly-held companies. See Section 13—“Certain Effects of the Offer.”

If I object to the price being offered, will I have appraisal rights?

Appraisal rights are not available as a result of the Offer. However, if the Merger takes place, stockholders who have not tendered their Shares in the Offer and who properly comply with all of the applicable legal requirements will be entitled to appraisal rights under Delaware law. If you choose to exercise your appraisal rights in connection with the Merger and you comply with the applicable legal requirements under Delaware law, you will be entitled to payment for your Shares based on a judicial determination of the fair value of your Shares. This value may be more than, less than or equal to the price that we are offering to pay you for your Shares in the Offer. See Section 12—“Purpose of the Offer; Plans for the Company.”

If I decide not to tender, how will the Offer affect my Shares?

If the Offer is consummated and certain other conditions are met, the Merger will occur and all of the then outstanding Shares (other than Shares held by Parent, Purchaser or the Company, or by any stockholder of the Company who is entitled to and properly exercises appraisal rights) will be converted into the right to receive an amount in cash equal to the Offer Price without interest and less any applicable withholding taxes. Therefore, if the Merger takes place, the only difference to you between tendering your Shares and not tendering your Shares is that you will be paid earlier if you tender your Shares and that no appraisal rights will be available in the Offer. Even if the Merger for some reason does not take place but we purchase all of the tendered Shares, the number of stockholders and the number of Shares that are still in the hands of the public may be so small that there no longer will be an active public trading market (or, possibly, there may not be any public trading market) for the Shares. Also, as described above, the Company may no longer be required to make filings with the SEC or otherwise comply with the rules of the SEC relating to publicly-held companies. See the “Introduction” and Section 13—“Certain Effects of the Offer.”

What is the market value of my Shares as of a recent date?

On June 29, 2012, the last trading day before we announced the transaction, the last sale price of the common stock of the Company reported on Nasdaq was $28.20 per Share. On July 9, 2012, the last trading day prior to the original printing of this Offer to Purchase, the last sale price of the Shares reported on Nasdaq was $30.74. We encourage you to obtain a recent quotation for Shares in deciding whether to tender your Shares. See Section 6—“Price Range of Shares; Dividends.”

Have any stockholders already agreed to tender their Shares in the Offer or to otherwise support the Offer?

Yes. On June 29, 2012, concurrently with the execution of the Merger Agreement, each of Daniel M. Bradbury, Mark G. Foletta, Orville G. Kolterman and Mark J. Gergen entered into a Tender and Support Agreement (the “Support Agreement”) with the Parent, Purchaser and, solely with respect to certain sections thereof, the Company. Collectively, these stockholders have beneficial ownership of an aggregate of 4,823,527 Shares (including Shares represented by vested and unvested options they hold), or approximately 3% of the Shares (taking into account, for purposes of determining the aggregate Shares, the Company’s currently outstanding Shares and assuming the exercise of only the vested and unvested options held by the stockholders who entered into the Support Agreement). See Section 11—“The Merger Agreement.”

 

8


Table of Contents

If I tender my Shares, when and how will I get paid?

If the conditions to the Offer as set forth in Section 15—“Certain Conditions of the Offer” are satisfied or waived and we consummate the Offer and accept your Shares for payment, we will pay you an amount equal to the number of Shares you tendered multiplied by $31.00 in cash without interest (and less any applicable withholding taxes) promptly following the Expiration Date. See Section 1—“Terms of the Offer” and Section 2—“Acceptance for Payment and Payment of Shares.”

What is the Top–Up Option and when could it be exercised?

The Company has granted, subject to certain conditions, Purchaser an irrevocable option to purchase (the “Top–Up Option”), at any time prior to the effective time of the Merger, a number of newly-issued Shares (the “Top-Up Shares”) equal to the number of Shares that, when added to the number of Shares held by Parent and Purchaser at the time of such exercise, constitutes one Share more than the number of Shares necessary for Purchaser to be merged into the Company pursuant to Section 253 of the DGCL (after giving effect to the issuance of Shares pursuant to the exercise of the Top-Up Option). The Top–Up Option is intended to expedite the timing of the completion of the Merger by permitting Purchaser to effect a “short–form” merger pursuant to applicable Delaware law at a time when the approval of the Merger at a meeting of the Company’s stockholders would be assured because of Parent’s and Purchaser’s ownership of a majority of the Shares following completion of the Offer. The Top-Up Option is not exercisable if the number of Shares issuable upon exercise of the Top-Up Option would exceed the number of authorized but unissued and unreserved Shares. See Section 11—“The Merger Agreement” and Section 16—“Certain Legal Matters; Regulatory Approvals.”

What are the United States Federal income tax consequences of the Offer and the Merger?

The receipt of cash by you in exchange for your Shares pursuant to the Offer or the Merger will be a taxable transaction for United States Federal income tax purposes. In general, if you are a United States Holder (as defined in Section 5—“Material United States Federal Income Tax Consequences”), you will recognize gain or loss equal to the difference, if any, between your adjusted tax basis in the Shares you tender pursuant to the Offer or exchange pursuant to the Merger and the amount of cash you receive for those Shares. If you are a United States Holder and you hold your Shares as capital assets for United States Federal income tax purposes, the gain or loss that you recognize will be a capital gain or loss and will be treated as a long–term capital gain or loss if you have held the Shares for more than one year at the time of disposition pursuant to the Offer or the Merger. Gain or loss will be determined separately for each block of Shares (i.e., Shares acquired at the same cost in a single transaction) tendered pursuant to the Offer or exchanged pursuant to the Merger. See Section 5—“Material United States Federal Income Tax Consequences” for a summary of the material United States Federal income tax consequences of tendering Shares pursuant to the Offer or exchanging Shares pursuant to the Merger.

You are urged to consult your own tax advisers to determine the particular tax consequences to you of the Offer and the Merger (including the application and effect of any state, local or non-United States income and other tax laws).

Who should I talk to if I have additional questions about the Offer?

You may call Georgeson, Inc. toll–free at 888-663-7851 or Citigroup Global Markets Inc. (“Citi”) at 212-816-7837. Georgeson, Inc. is acting as the information agent and Citi is acting as the dealer manager for the Offer. See the back cover of this Offer to Purchase.

 

9


Table of Contents

INTRODUCTION

B&R Acquisition Company (“Purchaser”), a Delaware corporation and a wholly–owned subsidiary of Bristol–Myers Squibb Company, a Delaware corporation (“Parent”), hereby offers to purchase for cash all outstanding shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share (“Shares”), of Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), at a price of $31.00 per Share, net to the seller in cash, without interest thereon and less any applicable withholding taxes (such amount per Share, or any different amount per Share that may be paid pursuant to the Offer (as defined below) in accordance with the terms of the Merger Agreement (as defined below), the “Offer Price”), upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in this offer to purchase (this “Offer to Purchase”) and in the related letter of transmittal (the “Letter of Transmittal”) (which, together with any amendments or supplements hereto or thereto, collectively constitute the “Offer”). The Offer and the withdrawal rights will expire at 5:00 PM, New York City time, on Tuesday, August 7, 2012, unless the Offer is extended in accordance with the terms of the Merger Agreement (as the date of the expiration of the Offer may be extended, the “Expiration Date”).

The Offer is being made pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of June 29, 2012 (the “Merger Agreement”), by and among Parent, Purchaser and the Company. The Merger Agreement provides that after the purchase of Shares in the Offer, Purchaser and the Company will merge (the “Merger”), with the Company as the surviving Company in the Merger continuing as a wholly–owned subsidiary of Parent (the “Surviving Company”). According to the Merger Agreement, at the effective time of the Merger (the “Effective Time”), each Share issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time (other than Shares directly owned by Parent or Purchaser or held by the Company, all of which will be cancelled, and other than Shares that are held by stockholders, if any, who are entitled to and have properly exercised their appraisal rights under Section 262 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the “DGCL”)) will be automatically converted into the right to receive the Offer Price in cash (the “Merger Consideration”). The Merger Agreement is more fully described in Section 11—“The Merger Agreement,” which also contains a discussion of the treatment of options and other equity securities of the Company.

Tendering stockholders who are record owners of their Shares and tender directly to the Depositary (as defined below) will not be obligated to pay brokerage fees or commissions or, except as otherwise provided in Instruction 6 to the Letter of Transmittal, stock transfer taxes with respect to the purchase of Shares by Purchaser pursuant to the Offer. Stockholders who hold their Shares through a broker or bank should consult such institution as to whether it charges any brokerage or other service fees. Parent or Purchaser will pay all charges and expenses of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as depositary for the Offer (the “Depositary”), Georgeson, Inc., as information agent for the Offer (the “Information Agent”), and Citigroup Global Markets Inc., as dealer manager for the Offer (the “Dealer Manager”), incurred in connection with the Offer. See Section 17—“Fees and Expenses.”

After careful consideration, the board of directors of the Company (the “Company Board”), has unanimously determined that the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the Offer, the Top-Up Option (as defined below), and the Merger, are advisable, fair to and in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. Accordingly, the Company Board recommends that the Company’s stockholders accept the Offer and tender their Shares to Purchaser in the Offer and vote in favor of the adoption and approval of the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the Merger if required by applicable laws (the “Company Board Recommendation”).

A more complete description of the Company Board’s reasons for authorizing and approving the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the Offer and the Merger, is set forth in the Company’s Solicitation/Recommendation Statement on Schedule 14D–9 (the “Schedule 14D–9”) under the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), that will be mailed to the stockholders of the Company.

 

10


Table of Contents

The Offer is not subject to a financing condition. The Offer is conditioned upon, among other things, there having been validly tendered in accordance with the terms of the Offer, and not validly withdrawn (not counting as validly tendered any Shares tendered in the Offer pursuant to procedures for guaranteed delivery and not actually delivered) prior to the Expiration Date a number of Shares which, together with Shares then owned by Parent and Purchaser (if any), represents a majority of the total number of then outstanding Shares on a fully diluted basis (which total number shall be the number of Shares issued and outstanding plus the number of Shares which the Company would be required to issue pursuant to any then outstanding options, benefit plans or obligations or securities convertible or exchangeable into Shares or otherwise, but only to the extent then so exercisable, convertible or exchangeable or exercisable, convertible or exchangeable as a result of the consummation of the Offer). The foregoing condition is referred to as the “Minimum Condition.” The Offer is also conditioned on the expiration or termination prior to the expiration of the Offer of any waiting period (and any extension thereof) applicable to the Offer or the Merger under the Hart–Scott–Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended (the “HSR Act”), and Purchaser not being prohibited from consummating the Offer or the Merger by any applicable law or court order. The Offer is also subject to a number of other conditions. We can waive some of the conditions to the Offer without the consent of the Company. We cannot, however, waive the Minimum Condition without the consent of the Company. See Section 15—“Certain Conditions of the Offer.”

The Company has advised Parent that, as of the close of business on July 5, 2012, (i) 163,768,702 Shares were issued and outstanding, (ii) zero Shares were held by the Company as treasury shares or held by subsidiaries of the Company (iii) 17,752,529 Shares were reserved for issuance upon exercise of outstanding Company stock options pursuant to the Company’s equity compensation plans (of which 12,320,526 Shares were reserved for issuance upon exercise of outstanding Company stock options that are currently vested and exercisable), (iv) 1,552,376 Shares were reserved for issuance upon settlement of outstanding restricted stock units pursuant to the Company’s equity compensation plans and (v) 9,415,425 Shares were reserved for issuance upon conversion of the Company’s 3.00% Convertible Notes due 2014. As of the date of this Offer to Purchase, none of Parent, Purchaser, or any person listed on Schedule I beneficially owns any Shares. Based on information provided to Purchaser and Parent by the Company, and assuming no additional Shares are issued or, stock options or other rights to acquire Shares are issued, vest or become exercisable after July 5, 2012, the aggregate number of Shares that Purchaser must acquire in the Offer in order to satisfy the Minimum Condition equals approximately 93,030,828 Shares, which is approximately 56.81% of the outstanding Shares as of July 5, 2012.

The Merger Agreement provides that, promptly after the initial acceptance for payment by Purchaser of the Shares tendered pursuant to the Offer (the “Acceptance Time”), Parent is entitled to designate a number of directors, rounded up to the next whole number, on the Company Board as is equal to the product of the total number of directors on the Company Board (giving effect to any increase in the number of directors pursuant to the next sentence) multiplied by the percentage that the aggregate number of Shares beneficially owned by Parent and Purchaser at such time (including Shares so accepted for payment and, if the Top-Up Option is exercised, the Shares purchased upon the exercise of the Top-Up Option) represents as a fraction of the total number of Shares then outstanding on a fully diluted basis; provided that the Company Board will have at least three directors who were members of the Company Board on the date of the Merger Agreement and who are independent directors (“Independent Directors”). The Company will, upon request of Parent, use its reasonable best efforts to cause Parent’s designees to be so elected or appointed, including increasing the size of the Company Board and/or seeking the resignations of one or more incumbent directors as appropriate. The Company will also cause (a) each committee of the Company Board (other than the audit committee, which shall consist solely of Independent Directors), (b) the board of directors of each of its subsidiaries and (c) each committee of such board of directors of each of its subsidiaries to include persons designated by Parent constituting the same percentage of each such committee or board as Parent’s designees constitute on the Company Board. The Company’s obligations with respect to Parent’s designees to the Company Board is subject to Section 14(f) of the Exchange Act and Rule 14f-1 promulgated thereunder.

The Merger is subject to the satisfaction or waiver of certain conditions, including, if required, the adoption of the Merger Agreement by the affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority of the then outstanding Shares entitled to vote thereon. If the Minimum Condition is satisfied, Purchaser would have sufficient voting

 

11


Table of Contents

power after the Acceptance Time to approve the Merger without the affirmative vote of any other stockholder of the Company. The Company has agreed, if required, to cause a meeting of its stockholders to be held as promptly as practicable following the Acceptance Time for the purposes of considering and taking action upon the approval of the Merger Agreement and the Merger. This Offer to Purchase does not constitute a solicitation of proxies, and Purchaser is not soliciting proxies at this time. If Purchaser acquires at least 90% of the Shares in the Offer and pursuant to the Top–Up Option (as defined below), if applicable, Purchaser and the Company will take such necessary and appropriate actions in order to consummate the Merger under the DGCL without a stockholders’ meeting and without the approval of the Company’s stockholders. See Section 11—“The Merger Agreement.”

The material United States Federal income tax consequences of the tender of Shares pursuant to the Offer and the exchange of Shares pursuant to the Merger are summarized in Section 5—“Material United States Federal Income Tax Consequences.”

This Offer to Purchase and the Letter of Transmittal contain important information that should be read carefully before any decision is made with respect to the Offer.

 

12


Table of Contents

THE TENDER OFFER

1. Terms of the Offer.

Upon the terms and subject to the conditions of the Offer (including, if the Offer is extended or amended, the terms and conditions of such extension or amendment), Purchaser will accept for payment and pay for all Shares validly tendered prior to the Expiration Date and not validly withdrawn as permitted under Section 4—“Withdrawal Rights.” The term “Expiration Date” means 5:00 PM, New York City time, on Tuesday, August 7, 2012, unless Purchaser, in accordance with the Merger Agreement, extends the period during which the Offer is open, in which event the term “Expiration Date” means the latest time and date on which the Offer, as so extended (other than any extension with respect to a Subsequent Offering Period described below), expires; provided, however, that we are not required to extend the Expiration Date beyond the Outside Date. The Outside Date depends on the reason for the extension of the Offer. The “Outside Date” means December 31, 2012, unless the only condition to the Offer that has not been satisfied is that relating to antitrust approvals, in which case the “Outside Date” will automatically be extended until March 31, 2013.

The Offer is conditioned upon the satisfaction of the Minimum Condition and certain other conditions set forth in Section 15—“Certain Conditions of the Offer” (each, an “Offer Condition”). Subject to the provisions of the Merger Agreement, Purchaser may waive any or all of the Offer Conditions (other than the Minimum Condition) without the written consent of the Company.

The Merger Agreement provides that Purchaser will, so long as neither the Company nor Parent terminates the Merger Agreement in accordance with its terms, extend the Offer for any period required by any rule, regulation, interpretation or position of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) or its staff or The Nasdaq Stock Market (“Nasdaq”), that is applicable to the Offer. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, so long as the Merger Agreement has not been terminated in accordance with its terms, Purchaser may extend the Offer for one or more successive periods of up to 10 business days if any conditions to the Offer have not been satisfied or waived. In addition, if any conditions to the Offer have not been satisfied or waived, Purchaser will also be required to extend the Offer until the Outside Date in the same way if requested by the Company.

Following Purchaser’s acceptance of Shares tendered in the Offer, Purchaser may, without the consent of the Company, provide a subsequent offering period in accordance with Rule 14d-11 of the Exchange Act (a “Subsequent Offering Period”). If requested by the Company, Purchaser will, and Parent will cause Purchaser to, make available a Subsequent Offering Period of not less than five business days and extend such Subsequent Offering Period for an additional five business days; provided that Purchaser will not be required to make available such Subsequent Offering Period or extend such Subsequent Offering Period if Parent and Purchaser, directly or indirectly, own at least 90% of the outstanding Shares prior to the commencement of such Subsequent Offering Period (after taking into account the exercise of the Top-Up Option). A Subsequent Offering Period is an additional period of time of not less than three nor more than 20 business days in length, beginning after Purchaser initially accepts for purchase Shares tendered in the Offer, during which time stockholders may validly tender, but not withdraw, their Shares and receive the Offer Price. Rule 14d–11 under the Exchange Act provides that Purchaser may provide for a Subsequent Offering Period so long as, among other things, (i) the initial offering period remained open for a minimum of 20 business days and has expired, (ii) the Offer is for all outstanding shares, (iii) Purchaser accepts and promptly pays for all Shares validly tendered during the Offer prior to the Expiration Date, (iv) Purchaser announces the results of the Offer, including the approximate number and percentage of Shares deposited in the Offer, no later than 9:00 AM, New York City time, on the next business day after the Expiration Date and immediately begins a Subsequent Offering Period, (v) Purchaser immediately accepts and promptly pays for Shares as they are validly tendered during a Subsequent Offering Period, and (vi) Purchaser offers the same form and amount of consideration to holders of Shares in both the initial offering period and a Subsequent Offering Period. If Purchaser elects to or is required to provide for a Subsequent Offering Period, it will announce the Subsequent Offering Period by issuing a press release to a national news service prior to 9:00 AM, New York City time, on the next business day after the Expiration Date.

 

13


Table of Contents

Subject to the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC and Nasdaq and the provisions of the Merger Agreement, Purchaser expressly reserves the right, in its sole discretion, at any time or from time to time, (i) to extend the Offer if any of the Offer Conditions have not occurred, (ii) to waive any of the Offer Conditions (other than the Minimum Condition), or (iii) to otherwise amend the Offer in any respect (except with respect to certain terms and conditions of the Offer, as provided in the Merger Agreement; See Section 11—“The Merger Agreement”), in each case by giving oral or written notice of such extension, termination, waiver or amendment to the Depositary and by making a public announcement thereof.

The rights reserved by Purchaser in the preceding paragraph are in addition to Purchaser’s rights described under Section 15—“Certain Conditions of the Offer.” Any extension, delay, termination, waiver or amendment will be followed as promptly as practicable by public announcement thereof, such announcement in the case of an extension to be made no later than 9:00 AM, New York City time, on the next business day after the previously scheduled Expiration Date, in accordance with the public announcement requirements of Rule 14e–1(d) under the Exchange Act. Subject to applicable law (including Rules 14d–4(d) and 14d–6(c) under the Exchange Act, which requires that material changes be promptly disseminated to stockholders in a manner reasonably designed to inform them of such changes) and without limiting the manner in which Purchaser may choose to make any public announcement, Purchaser has no obligation to publish, advertise or otherwise communicate any such public announcement other than by issuing a press release to a national news service. As used in this Offer to Purchase, “business day” means any day other than Saturday, Sunday or a federal holiday, and will consist of the time period from 12:01 AM through 12:00 midnight, New York City time.

If Purchaser extends the Offer or if Purchaser (whether before or after its acceptance for payment of Shares) is delayed in its acceptance of or payment for Shares or it is unable to pay for Shares pursuant to the Offer for any reason, then, without prejudice to Purchaser’s rights under the Offer, the Depositary may retain tendered Shares on behalf of Purchaser, and such Shares may not be validly withdrawn except to the extent tendering stockholders are entitled to withdrawal rights as described herein under Section 4—“Withdrawal Rights.” However, the ability of Purchaser to delay the payment for Shares that Purchaser has accepted for payment is limited by Rule 14e–1(c) under the Exchange Act, which requires that a purchaser making a tender offer pay the consideration offered. Alternatively, if the Offer is not consummated, the Shares are not accepted for payment or the Shares are validly withdrawn, Purchaser is obligated to return the securities deposited by or on behalf of stockholders promptly after the termination of the Offer or withdrawal of such Shares.

If Purchaser makes a material change in the terms of the Offer or the information concerning the Offer, or if it waives a material condition of the Offer, Purchaser will disseminate additional Offer materials and extend the Offer to the extent required by Rules 14d–4(d), 14d–6(c) and 14e–1 under the Exchange Act. The minimum period during which an Offer must remain open following material changes in the terms of the Offer, other than a change in price, percentage of securities sought, or inclusion of or changes to a dealer’s soliciting fee, will depend upon the facts and circumstances, including the materiality, of the changes. In the SEC’s view, an offer to purchase should remain open for a minimum of five business days from the date the material change is first published, sent or given to stockholders and, if material changes are made with respect to information that approaches the significance of price and share levels, a minimum of ten business days may be required to allow for adequate dissemination and investor response. Accordingly, if prior to the Expiration Date, Purchaser decreases the number of Shares being sought or increases the consideration offered pursuant to the Offer, and if the Offer is scheduled to expire at any time earlier than the 10th business day from the date that notice of such increase or decrease is first published, sent or given to stockholders, the Offer will be extended at least until the expiration of such 10th business day.

The Company has provided Purchaser with the Company’s stockholder list and security position listings for the purpose of disseminating the Offer to holders of Shares. This Offer to Purchase and the Letter of Transmittal will be mailed to record holders of Shares whose names appear on the Company’s stockholder list and will be furnished, for subsequent transmittal to beneficial owners of Shares, to brokers, dealers, commercial banks, trust

 

14


Table of Contents

companies and similar persons whose names, or the names of whose nominees, appear on the stockholder list or, if applicable, who are listed as participants in a clearing agency’s security position listing.

2. Acceptance for Payment and Payment for Shares.

Upon the terms and subject to the conditions of the Offer (including, if the Offer is extended or amended, the terms and conditions of any such extension or amendment) and the satisfaction or earlier waiver of all the Offer Conditions set forth in Section 15—“Certain Conditions of the Offer,” Purchaser will accept for payment and will pay for all Shares validly tendered and not validly withdrawn prior to the Expiration Date pursuant to the Offer promptly after the Expiration Date. Subject to the Merger Agreement and in compliance with Rule 14e–1(c) under the Exchange Act, Purchaser expressly reserves the right to delay payment for Shares pending receipt of regulatory or government approvals. Rule 14e–1(c) under the Exchange Act relates to the obligation of Purchaser to pay for or return tendered Shares promptly after the termination or withdrawal of the Offer. See Section 16—“Certain Legal Matters; Regulatory Approvals.”

In all cases, payment for Shares accepted for payment pursuant to the Offer will be made only after timely receipt by the Depositary of (i) the certificates evidencing such Shares (the “Share Certificates”) or confirmation (a “Book–Entry Confirmation”) of a book–entry transfer of such Shares into the Depositary’s account at The Depository Trust Company (the “Book–Entry Transfer Facility”) pursuant to the procedures set forth in Section 3—“Procedures for Accepting the Offer and Tendering Shares,” (ii) the Letter of Transmittal (or a manually signed facsimile thereof), properly completed and duly executed, with any required signature guarantees or, in the case of a book–entry transfer, an Agent’s Message (as defined below) in lieu of the Letter of Transmittal, and (iii) any other documents required by the Letter of Transmittal. Accordingly, tendering stockholders may be paid at different times depending upon when Share Certificates or Book–Entry Confirmations with respect to Shares are actually received by the Depositary.

For purposes of the Offer, Purchaser will be deemed to have accepted for payment, and thereby purchased, Shares validly tendered and not validly withdrawn, if and when Purchaser gives oral or written notice to the Depositary of Purchaser’s acceptance for payment of such Shares pursuant to the Offer. Upon the terms and subject to the conditions of the Offer, payment for Shares accepted for payment pursuant to the Offer will be made by deposit of the Offer Price therefor with the Depositary, which will act as agent for tendering stockholders for the purpose of receiving payments from Purchaser and transmitting such payments to tendering stockholders whose Shares have been accepted for payment. If, for any reason whatsoever, acceptance for payment of any Shares tendered pursuant to the Offer is delayed, or Purchaser is unable to accept for payment Shares tendered pursuant to the Offer, then, without prejudice to Purchaser’s rights under the Offer hereof, the Depositary may, nevertheless, on behalf of Purchaser, retain tendered Shares, and such Shares may not be withdrawn, except to the extent that the tendering stockholders are entitled to withdrawal rights as described in Section 4—“Withdrawal Rights” and as otherwise required by Rule 14e–1(c) under the Exchange Act.

Under no circumstances will interest on the Offer Price for Shares be paid, regardless of any delay in payment for such Shares.

If any tendered Shares are not accepted for payment for any reason pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Offer, or if Share Certificates are submitted evidencing more Shares than are tendered, Share Certificates evidencing unpurchased or untendered Shares will be returned, without expense to the tendering stockholder (or, in the case of Shares tendered by book–entry transfer into the Depositary’s account at the Book–Entry Transfer Facility pursuant to the procedure set forth in Section 3—“Procedures for Accepting the Offer and Tendering Shares,” such Shares will be credited to an account maintained at the Book–Entry Transfer Facility), promptly following the expiration or termination of the Offer.

If, prior to the Expiration Date, Purchaser increases the price being paid for Shares, Purchaser will pay the increased consideration for all Shares purchased pursuant to the Offer, whether or not those Shares were tendered prior to the increase in consideration.

 

15


Table of Contents

3. Procedures for Accepting the Offer and Tendering Shares.

Valid Tenders. In order for a stockholder to validly tender Shares pursuant to the Offer, either (i) the Letter of Transmittal (or a manually signed facsimile thereof), properly completed and duly executed, together with any required signature guarantees (or, in the case of a book–entry transfer, an Agent’s Message in lieu of the Letter of Transmittal), and any other documents required by the Letter of Transmittal must be received by the Depositary at one of its addresses set forth on the back cover of this Offer to Purchase and either the Share Certificates evidencing tendered Shares must be received by the Depositary at such address or such Shares must be tendered pursuant to the procedure for book–entry transfer described below and a Book–Entry Confirmation must be received by the Depositary, in each case prior to the Expiration Date (except with respect to a Subsequent Offering Period, if it is provided), or (ii) the tendering stockholder must comply with the guaranteed delivery procedures described below. No alternative, conditional or contingent tenders will be accepted.

Book–Entry Transfer. The Depositary will establish an account with respect to the Shares at the Book–Entry Transfer Facility for purposes of the Offer within two business days after the date of this Offer to Purchase. Any financial institution that is a participant in the system of the Book–Entry Transfer Facility may make a book–entry delivery of Shares by causing the Book–Entry Transfer Facility to transfer such Shares into the Depositary’s account at the Book–Entry Transfer Facility in accordance with the Book–Entry Transfer Facility’s procedures for such transfer. However, although delivery of Shares may be effected through book–entry transfer at the Book–Entry Transfer Facility, either the Letter of Transmittal (or a manually signed facsimile thereof), properly completed and duly executed, together with any required signature guarantees, or an Agent’s Message in lieu of the Letter of Transmittal, and any other required documents, must, in any case, be received by the Depositary at one of its addresses listed on the back cover of this Offer to Purchase prior to the Expiration Date (except with respect to a Subsequent Offering Period, if it is provided), or the tendering stockholder must comply with the guaranteed delivery procedure described below. Delivery of documents to the Book–Entry Transfer Facility does not constitute delivery to the Depositary.

The term “Agent’s Message” means a message, transmitted by the Book–Entry Transfer Facility to, and received by, the Depositary and forming a part of a Book–Entry Confirmation, that states that the Book–Entry Transfer Facility has received an express acknowledgment from the participant in the Book–Entry Transfer Facility tendering the Shares that are the subject of such Book–Entry Confirmation, that such participant has received and agrees to be bound by the terms of the Letter of Transmittal and that Purchaser may enforce such agreement against such participant.

For Shares to be validly tendered during a Subsequent Offering Period, if it is provided, the tendering stockholder must comply with the foregoing procedures, except that required documents and certificates must be received during a Subsequent Offering Period.

Signature Guarantees. No signature guarantee is required on the Letter of Transmittal (i) if the Letter of Transmittal is signed by the registered holder (which term, for purposes of this Section 3, includes any participant in the Book–Entry Transfer Facility’s systems whose name appears on a security position listing as the owner of the Shares) of the Shares tendered therewith, unless such holder has completed either the box entitled “Special Delivery Instructions” or the box entitled “Special Payment Instructions” on the Letter of Transmittal or (ii) if the Shares are tendered for the account of a financial institution (including most commercial banks, savings and loan associations and brokerage houses) that is a member of or participant in a recognized “Medallion Program” approved by the Securities Transfer Association Inc., including the Security Transfer Agents Medallion Program (STAMP), the Stock Exchange Medallion Program (SEMP) and the New York Stock Exchange Medallion Signature Program (MSP), or any other “eligible guarantor institution,” as such term is defined in Rule 17Ad–15 of the Exchange Act (each, an “Eligible Institution” and collectively “Eligible Institutions”). In all other cases, all signatures on a Letter of Transmittal must be guaranteed by an Eligible Institution. See Instructions 1 and 5 of the Letter of Transmittal. If a Share Certificate is registered in the name of a person or persons other than the signer of the Letter of Transmittal, or if payment is to be made or delivered to,

 

16


Table of Contents

or a Share Certificate not accepted for payment or not tendered is to be issued in the name of or returned to, a person other than the registered holder(s), then the Share Certificate must be endorsed or accompanied by appropriate duly executed stock powers, in either case signed exactly as the name(s) of the registered holder(s) appears on the Share Certificate, with the signature(s) on such Share Certificate or stock powers guaranteed by an Eligible Institution as provided in the Letter of Transmittal. See Instructions 1 and 5 of the Letter of Transmittal.

Guaranteed Delivery. If a stockholder desires to tender Shares pursuant to the Offer and the Share Certificates evidencing such stockholder’s Shares are not immediately available or the stockholder cannot deliver the Share Certificates and all other required documents to the Depositary prior to the Expiration Date, or such stockholder cannot complete the procedure for delivery by book–entry transfer on a timely basis, the Shares may nevertheless be tendered if all of the following conditions are satisfied:

 

   

the tender is made by or through an Eligible Institution;

 

   

a properly completed and duly executed “Notice of Guaranteed Delivery,” substantially in the form made available by Purchaser, is received prior to the Expiration Date by the Depositary as provided below; and

 

   

the Share Certificates (or a Book–Entry Confirmation) evidencing all tendered Shares, in proper form for transfer, in each case together with the Letter of Transmittal (or a manually signed facsimile thereof), properly completed and duly executed, with any required signature guarantees (or, in the case of a book–entry transfer, an Agent’s Message), and any other documents required by the Letter of Transmittal are received by the Depositary within three trading days after the date of execution of such Notice of Guaranteed Delivery. As used in this Offer to Purchase, “trading day” means any day on which Nasdaq is open for business.

The Notice of Guaranteed Delivery may be delivered by overnight courier or transmitted by facsimile transmission or mailed to the Depositary and must include a guarantee by an Eligible Institution in the form set forth in the form of Notice of Guaranteed Delivery made available by Purchaser. In the case of Shares held through the Book–Entry Transfer Facility, the Notice of Guaranteed Delivery must be delivered to the Depositary by a participant by means of the confirmation system of the Book–Entry Transfer Facility. Shares delivered by a Notice of Guaranteed Delivery which are not actually delivered prior to the Expiration Date will not be counted by Purchaser toward the satisfaction of the Minimum Condition and therefore it is preferable for Shares to be tendered by the other methods described herein.

The method of delivery of Share Certificates, the Letter of Transmittal, and all other required documents, including delivery through the Book–Entry Transfer Facility, is at the option and risk of the tendering stockholder, and the delivery will be deemed made only when actually received by the Depositary (including, in the case of a book–entry transfer, receipt of a Book–Entry Confirmation). If delivery is by mail, then registered mail with return receipt requested, properly insured, is recommended. In all cases, sufficient time should be allowed to ensure timely delivery.

The tender of Shares pursuant to any one of the procedures described above will constitute the tendering stockholder’s acceptance of the Offer, as well as the tendering stockholder’s representation and warranty that such stockholder has the full power and authority to tender and assign the Shares tendered, as specified in the Letter of Transmittal, and that when Purchaser accepts the Shares for payment, it will acquire good and unencumbered title, free and clear of all liens, restrictions, charges and encumbrances and not subject to any adverse claims. Purchaser’s acceptance for payment of Shares tendered pursuant to the Offer will constitute a binding agreement between the tendering stockholder and Purchaser upon the terms and subject to the conditions of the Offer.

Determination of Validity. All questions as to the validity, form, eligibility (including, without limitation, time of receipt) and acceptance for payment of any tender of Shares will be determined by Purchaser in its reasonable discretion. Purchaser reserves the absolute right to reject any and all tenders it determines are not in

 

17


Table of Contents

proper form or the acceptance for payment of which may, in the opinion of its counsel, be unlawful. Purchaser also reserves the absolute right to waive any defect or irregularity in the tender of any Shares of any particular stockholder, whether or not similar defects or irregularities are waived in the case of other stockholders. No tender of Shares will be deemed to have been validly made until all defects and irregularities have been cured or waived to the satisfaction of Purchaser with respect to those Shares. None of Purchaser, the Dealer Manager, the Depositary, the Information Agent or any other person will be under any duty to give notification of any defects or irregularities in tenders or incur any liability for failure to give any such notification. Stockholders may challenge Purchaser’s interpretation of the terms and conditions of the Offer (including, without limitation, the Letter of Transmittal and the instructions thereto), and only a court of competent jurisdiction can make a determination that will be final and binding on all parties.

Appointment. By executing the Letter of Transmittal (or delivering an Agent’s Message) as set forth above, the tendering stockholder will irrevocably appoint designees of Purchaser, and each of them, as such stockholder’s attorneys–in–fact and proxies in the manner set forth in the Letter of Transmittal, each with full power of substitution, to the full extent of such stockholder’s rights with respect to the Shares tendered by such stockholder and accepted for payment by Purchaser and with respect to any and all other Shares or other securities or rights issued or issuable in respect of such Shares. All such proxies will be considered coupled with an interest in the tendered Shares. Such appointment will be effective when, and only to the extent that, Purchaser accepts for payment Shares tendered by such stockholder as provided herein. Upon such appointment, all prior powers of attorney, proxies and consents given by such stockholder with respect to such Shares or other securities or rights will, without further action, be revoked and no subsequent powers of attorney, proxies, consents or revocations may be given by such stockholder (and, if given, will not be deemed effective) with respect thereto. Each designee of Purchaser will thereby be empowered to exercise all voting and other rights with respect to such Shares and other securities or rights, including, without limitation, in respect of any annual, special or adjourned meeting of the Company’s stockholders, actions by written consent in lieu of any such meeting or otherwise, as such designee in its sole discretion deems proper. Purchaser reserves the right to require that, in order for Shares to be deemed validly tendered, immediately upon Purchaser’s acceptance for payment of such Shares, Purchaser must be able to exercise full voting, consent and other rights with respect to such Shares and other securities and rights, including voting at any meeting of stockholders.

4. Withdrawal Rights.

Except as otherwise provided in this Section 4, tenders of Shares made pursuant to the Offer are irrevocable. Shares tendered pursuant to the Offer may be withdrawn at any time prior to the Expiration Date.

For a withdrawal to be effective, a written or facsimile transmission notice of withdrawal must be received by the Depositary at one of its addresses listed on the back cover page of this Offer to Purchase prior to the Expiration Date. Any such notice of withdrawal must specify the name of the person who tendered the Shares to be withdrawn, the number of Shares to be withdrawn and the name of the registered holder of such Shares, if different from that of the person who tendered such Shares. If Share Certificates evidencing Shares to be withdrawn have been delivered or otherwise identified to the Depositary, then, prior to the physical release of such Share Certificates, the serial numbers shown on such Share Certificates must be submitted to the Depositary and the signature(s) on the notice of withdrawal must be guaranteed by an Eligible Institution, unless such Shares have been tendered for the account of an Eligible Institution. If Shares have been tendered pursuant to the procedure for book–entry transfer as set forth in Section 3—“Procedures for Accepting the Offer and Tendering Shares,” any notice of withdrawal must also specify the name and number of the account at the Book–Entry Transfer Facility to be credited with the withdrawn Shares.

If Purchaser extends the Offer, is delayed in its acceptance for payment of Shares or is unable to accept Shares for payment pursuant to the Offer for any reason then, without prejudice to Purchaser’s rights under the Offer, the Depositary may, nevertheless, on behalf of Purchaser, retain tendered Shares, and such Shares may not be withdrawn except to the extent that tendering stockholders are entitled to withdrawal rights as described herein.

 

18


Table of Contents

Withdrawals of Shares may not be rescinded. Any Shares validly withdrawn will thereafter be deemed not to have been validly tendered for purposes of the Offer. However, withdrawn Shares may be re–tendered at any time prior to the Expiration Date or during a Subsequent Offering Period (if any) by following one of the procedures described in Section 3—“Procedures for Accepting the Offer and Tendering Shares.”

No withdrawal rights will apply to Shares tendered during a Subsequent Offering Period, if it is provided, and no withdrawal rights apply during a Subsequent Offering Period with respect to Shares tendered in the Offer and accepted for payment. See Section 1—“Terms of the Offer.”

All questions as to the form and validity (including, without limitation, time of receipt) of any notice of withdrawal will be determined by Purchaser, in its reasonable discretion, whose determination will be final and binding, subject to the rights of the tendering holders of Shares to challenge our determination in a court of competent jurisdiction. None of Purchaser, the Depositary, the Information Agent, the Dealer Manager or any other person will be under duty to give notification of any defects or irregularities in any notice of withdrawal or incur any liability for failure to give any such notification.

5. Material United States Federal Income Tax Consequences.

The following is a summary of the material United States Federal income tax consequences to beneficial owners of Shares upon the tender of Shares for cash pursuant to the Offer or the exchange of Shares for cash pursuant to the Merger. This summary is general in nature and does not discuss all aspects of United States Federal income taxation that may be relevant to a holder of Shares in light of his, her or its particular circumstances. In addition, this summary does not describe any tax consequences arising under the laws of any state, local or non-United States jurisdiction or under any applicable tax treaty and does not consider any aspect of the United States Federal alternative minimum tax or any aspect of United States Federal tax law other than income taxation. This summary deals only with Shares held as capital assets within the meaning of Section 1221 of the United States Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), and does not address tax considerations applicable to any holder of Shares that may be subject to special treatment under the United States Federal income tax laws, including:

 

   

a bank or other financial institution;

 

   

a tax–exempt organization;

 

   

a retirement plan or other tax–deferred account;

 

   

a partnership, an S corporation or other pass–through entity (or an investor in a partnership, S corporation or other pass–through entity);

 

   

an insurance company;

 

   

a regulated investment company;

 

   

a real estate investment trust;

 

   

a dealer or broker in stocks, securities, currencies or notional principal contracts;

 

   

a trader in securities that elects mark–to–market treatment;

 

   

a holder of Shares subject to the alternative minimum tax provisions of the Code;

 

   

a holder of Shares that received the Shares through the exercise of an employee stock option, through a tax qualified retirement plan or otherwise as compensation;

 

   

a holder of Shares that has a functional currency other than the United States dollar;

 

   

a person that holds the Shares as part of a hedge, straddle, synthetic security, constructive sale, conversion or other integrated transaction;

 

19


Table of Contents
   

a United States expatriate;

 

   

a controlled foreign corporation;

 

   

a passive foreign investment company;

 

   

any holder of Shares that entered into the Support Agreement as part of the transactions described in this Offer to Purchase; or

 

   

a holder of Shares that owns or has owned 5% or more of the Shares (whether such ownership is actual or constructive).

If a partnership (including any entity or arrangement treated as a partnership for United States Federal income tax purposes) holds Shares, the tax treatment of a partner in the partnership generally will depend upon the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership. Partners in a partnership holding Shares should consult their own tax advisers regarding the tax consequences of tendering their Shares pursuant to the Offer or exchanging their Shares pursuant to the Merger.

For purposes of the following summary, the term “United States Holder” means a beneficial owner of Shares that is, for United States Federal income tax purposes:

 

   

a citizen or resident of the United States;

 

   

a corporation (or any other entity or arrangement treated as a corporation for United States Federal income tax purposes) organized in or under the laws of the United States or any state thereof or the District of Columbia;

 

   

an estate, the income of which is subject to United States Federal income taxation regardless of its source; or

 

   

a trust if (i) a court within the United States is able to exercise primary supervision over the administration of the trust, and one or more United States persons (as defined for United States Federal income tax purposes) have the authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust or (ii) the trust has validly elected to be treated as a United States person.

A “non-United States Holder” is generally a beneficial owner of Shares that is not a United States Holder.

This summary is based on the Code, the Treasury regulations promulgated under the Code, and administrative rulings and judicial decisions, all as in effect as of the date of this Offer to Purchase, and all of which are subject to change or differing interpretations at any time, with possible retroactive effect. We have not sought, and do not intend to seek, any ruling from the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) with respect to the matters discussed in the following summary, and no assurance can be given that the IRS will agree with the views expressed herein, or that a court will not sustain any challenge by the IRS in the event of litigation.

The discussion set out herein is intended only as a summary of the material United States Federal income tax consequences to a holder of Shares. We urge you to consult your own tax adviser with respect to the specific tax consequences to you in connection with the Offer and the Merger in light of your own particular circumstances, including Federal estate, gift and other non–income tax consequences, and tax consequences under state, local or non-United States tax laws.

Consequences of the Offer and the Merger to United States Holders

The exchange of Shares for cash pursuant to the Offer or pursuant to the Merger will be a taxable transaction for United States Federal income tax purposes. In general, a United States Holder who receives cash for Shares pursuant to the Offer or pursuant to the Merger will recognize gain or loss equal to the difference, if

 

20


Table of Contents

any, between the amount of cash received and the holder’s adjusted tax basis in the Shares exchanged therefor. Gain or loss will be determined separately for each block of Shares (i.e., Shares acquired at the same cost in a single transaction) tendered pursuant to the Offer or exchanged pursuant to the Merger. Such gain or loss will be capital gain or loss, and will be long–term capital gain or loss if such United States Holder’s holding period for the Shares is more than one year at the time of the disposition pursuant to the Offer or the Merger. Long–term capital gain recognized by certain non-corporate United States Holders generally is subject to tax at a lower rate than short–term capital gain or ordinary income. For both corporate and non-corporate United States Holders, there are limitations on the deductibility of capital losses.

Consequences of the Offer and the Merger to Non–United States Holders

A non–United States Holder generally will not be subject to United States Federal income tax on any gain realized on the exchange of Shares pursuant to the Offer or the Merger provided that (i) the gain is not effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business by the non-United States Holder in the United States and (ii) in the case of a non-United States Holder that is an individual, such non-United States Holder is not present in the United States for 183 days or more in the taxable year of the exchange and certain other conditions are met, or such non-United States Holder is eligible for relief under an applicable income tax treaty. If the gain is effectively connected with a non-United States Holder’s conduct of a trade or business within the United States, such gain will be subject to United States Federal income tax, net of certain deductions, at the same rates applicable to United States persons. For a non-United States Holder that is a corporation, such effectively connected gain may also be subject to a “branch profits tax” at a rate of 30% (or such lower rate as may be specified by an applicable income tax treaty). If the gain is effectively connected with a non-United States Holder’s conduct of a trade or business in the United States but, under an applicable income tax treaty, is not attributable to a permanent establishment maintained by such non-United States Holder in the United States, the gain may be exempt from United States Federal income tax under the income tax treaty. For a non-United States Holder described in (ii) above, the gain realized will be subject to United States Federal income tax at a rate of 30%, although the gain may be offset by certain United States-source capital losses realized during the same taxable year.

Backup Withholding

Under the “backup withholding” provisions of the Code, all payments to which any stockholder would be entitled pursuant to the Offer or the Merger will be subject to backup withholding, currently at a rate of 28%, unless the stockholder is (i) a corporation, a non-United States Holder or another exempt recipient or (ii) provides a taxpayer identification number (“TIN”) and certifies, under penalties of perjury, that (1) the TIN provided is correct, (2) the stockholder is not subject to backup withholding and (3) the stockholder is a United States person. Each United States Holder should complete and sign the Substitute Form W-9 that is included with the Letter of Transmittal in order to provide the information and certification necessary to avoid backup withholding, unless an applicable exception exists and is proven in a manner satisfactory to the Depositary. Each non-United States Holder must generally submit an IRS Form W-8BEN (or other applicable IRS Form W-8) attesting to such non-United States Holder’s exempt foreign status in order to qualify as an exempt recipient.

A stockholder’s failure to provide a correct TIN, if required, may subject the stockholder to penalties imposed by the IRS. Any amount paid as backup withholding does not constitute an additional tax and will be creditable against a stockholder’s United States Federal income tax liability, provided the required information is given to the IRS. If backup withholding results in an overpayment of tax for any stockholder, such stockholder may obtain a refund by filing a United States Federal income tax return. Each stockholder should consult its, his or her own tax advisers as to such stockholder’s qualification for exemption from backup withholding and the procedure for obtaining the exemption.

 

21


Table of Contents

6. Price Range of Shares; Dividends.

The Shares are listed on Nasdaq under the symbol “AMLN”. The Shares have been listed on Nasdaq since January 17, 1992. The following table sets forth for the indicated periods the high and low sales prices per Share as reported on Nasdaq since January 1, 2010.

 

     High      Low  

Year Ended 2010:

     

First Quarter

   $ 23.93       $ 14.13   

Second Quarter

   $ 24.21       $ 14.85   

Third Quarter

   $ 22.09       $ 17.81   

Fourth Quarter

   $ 21.95       $ 9.51   

Year Ended 2011:

     

First Quarter

   $ 16.65       $ 10.25   

Second Quarter

   $ 14.28       $ 11.00   

Third Quarter

   $ 14.60       $ 9.12   

Fourth Quarter

   $ 12.23       $ 8.03   

Year Ending 2012:

     

First Quarter

   $ 25.84       $ 10.68   

Second Quarter

   $ 28.49       $ 22.25   

Third Quarter (through July 9, 2012)

   $ 30.79       $ 30.64   

On June 29, 2012, the last trading day before Parent and the Company announced that they had entered into the Merger Agreement, the last sale price of Shares reported on Nasdaq was $28.20 per share; therefore, the Offer Price of $31.00 per share represents a premium of approximately 10% over such price. On July 9, 2012, the last trading day prior to the original printing of this Offer to Purchase, the last sale price of the Shares reported on Nasdaq was $30.74 per share.

Stockholders are urged to obtain current market quotations for Shares before making a decision with respect to the Offer.

The Company has never declared or paid any cash dividends on its capital stock. In addition, under the terms of the Merger Agreement, the Company is not permitted to declare or pay dividends in respect of Shares unless consented to by Parent in writing.

7. Certain Information Concerning the Company.

The following description of the Company and its business has been taken from the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10–K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such report.

General. The Company is a Delaware corporation with principal executive offices located at 9360 Towne Centre Drive, San Diego, CA 92121. The Company’s telephone number at its corporate headquarters is (858) 552-2200. The Company is a biopharmaceutical company committed to improving the lives of people with diabetes and other metabolic diseases through the discovery, development and commercialization of innovative medicines. It is marketing two first-in-class medicines to treat diabetes, BYETTA (exenatide) injection and SYMLIN (pramlintide acetate) injection. The Company is also marketing the first and only once-weekly diabetes treatment, BYDUREON™ (exenatide extended-release for injectable suspension). BYDUREON is an extended-release medication for type 2 diabetes that provides continuous glycemic control in a once-weekly dose.

Available Information. The Company is subject to the information and reporting requirements of the Exchange Act and in accordance therewith is obligated to file reports and other information with the SEC relating to its business, financial condition and other matters. Certain information, as of particular dates, concerning the

 

22


Table of Contents

Company’s business, principal physical properties, capital structure, material pending litigation, operating results, financial condition, directors and officers (including their remuneration and stock options granted to them), the principal holders of the Company’s securities, any material interests of such persons in transactions with the Company, and other matters are required to be disclosed in proxy statements and periodic reports distributed to the Company’s stockholders and filed with the SEC. Such reports, proxy statements and other information should be available for inspection at the public reference facilities maintained by the SEC at 100 F Street N.E., Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549. Copies of such materials may also be obtained by mail, upon payment of the SEC’s customary fees, by writing to its principal office at 100 F Street N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. The SEC also maintains electronic reading rooms on the Internet at http://www.sec.gov that contains reports and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. The Company also maintains a website at http://www.Amylin.com. The information contained in, accessible from or connected to the Company’s website is not incorporated into, or otherwise a part of, this Offer to Purchase or any of the Company’s filings with the SEC. The website addresses referred to in this paragraph are inactive text references and are not intended to be actual links to the websites.

Although Purchaser has no knowledge that any such information is untrue, Purchaser takes no responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this Offer to Purchase with respect to the Company or any of its subsidiaries or affiliates or for any failure by the Company to disclose any events which may have occurred or may affect the significance or accuracy of any such information.

8. Certain Information Concerning Parent and Purchaser.

General. Parent is a Delaware corporation with its principal executive offices located at 345 Park Avenue, New York, New York 10154–0037. The telephone number of Parent is (212) 546–4000. Parent is a global biopharmaceutical company whose mission is to discover, develop and deliver innovative medicines that help patients prevail over serious diseases. Parent is engaged in the discovery, development, licensing, manufacturing, marketing, distribution and sale of biopharmaceutical products on a global basis.

Purchaser is a Delaware corporation with its principal offices located at 345 Park Avenue, New York, New York 10154–0037. The telephone number of Purchaser is (212) 546–4000. Purchaser is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent. Purchaser was formed for the purpose of making a tender offer for all of the Shares of the Company and has not engaged, and does not expect to engage, in any business other than in connection with the Offer and the Merger.

The name, citizenship, business address, business phone number, present principal occupation or employment and past material occupation, positions, offices or employment for at least the last five years for each director of Parent and Purchaser and the name, citizenship, business address, business phone number, present principal occupation or employment and past material occupation, positions, offices or employment for at least the past five years of each of the executive officers of Parent and Purchaser and certain other information are set forth in Schedule I hereto.

Certain Relationships Between Parent, Purchaser and the Company. Except as described in this Offer to Purchase, (i) none of Parent, Purchaser nor, to the best knowledge of Parent or Purchaser, any of the persons listed in Schedule I to this Offer to Purchase or any associate or majority–owned subsidiary of Parent or Purchaser or any of the persons so listed beneficially owns or has any right to acquire, directly or indirectly, any Shares and (ii) none of Parent, Purchaser nor, to the best knowledge of Parent, any director, executive officer or subsidiary of any of the foregoing has effected any transaction in the Shares during the past 60 days.

Except as provided in the Merger Agreement and the Support Agreement or as otherwise described in this Offer to Purchase, none of Parent, Purchaser, or their subsidiaries, nor, to the best knowledge of Parent or Purchaser, any of the persons listed in Schedule I to this Offer to Purchase, has any present or proposed material agreement, arrangement, understanding or relationship with the Company or any of its executive officers, directors, controlling persons or subsidiaries.

 

23


Table of Contents

Except as set forth in this Offer to Purchase, none of Parent, Purchaser nor, to the best knowledge of Parent or Purchaser, any of the persons listed on Schedule I hereto, has had any business relationship or transaction with the Company or any of its executive officers, directors or affiliates that is required to be reported under the rules and regulations of the SEC applicable to the Offer.

Except as set forth in this Offer to Purchase, there have been no material contacts, negotiations or transactions between Parent or any of its subsidiaries or, to the best knowledge of Parent or Purchaser, any of the persons listed in Schedule I to this Offer to Purchase, on the one hand, and the Company or its affiliates, on the other hand, concerning a merger, consolidation or acquisition, tender offer or other acquisition of the Company’s securities, an election of the Company’s directors or a sale or other transfer of a material amount of the Company’s assets during the past two years.

None of the persons listed in Schedule I has, during the past five years, been convicted in a criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations or similar misdemeanors). None of the persons listed in Schedule I to this Offer to Purchase has, during the past five years, been a party to any judicial or administrative proceeding (except for matters that were dismissed without sanction or settlement) that resulted in a judgment, decree or final order enjoining the person from future violations of, or prohibiting activities subject to, federal or state securities laws, or a finding of any violation of federal or state securities laws.

Available Information. Pursuant to Rule 14d–3 under the Exchange Act, Parent and Purchaser filed with the SEC a Tender Offer Statement on Schedule TO (the “Schedule TO”), of which this Offer to Purchase forms a part, and exhibits to the Schedule TO. Additionally, Parent is subject to the information reporting requirements of the Exchange Act and, in accordance therewith, is required to file periodic reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC relating to its business, financial condition and other matters. The Schedule TO and the exhibits thereto, and such reports, proxy statements and other information, can be inspected and copied at the public reference facilities maintained by the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549–0213. Information regarding the public reference facilities may be obtained from the SEC by telephoning 1–800–SEC–0330. Parent filings are also available to the public on the SEC’s internet site (http://www.sec.gov). Copies of such materials may also be obtained by mail from the Public Reference Section of the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549–0213 at prescribed rates.

9. Source and Amount of Funds.

The Offer is not conditioned upon Parent’s or Purchaser’s ability to finance the purchase of Shares pursuant to the Offer. Parent and Purchaser estimate that the total amount of funds required to purchase all of the Shares pursuant to the Offer and to consummate the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement and the Assumption Agreement is approximately $7.3 billion, including related transaction fees and expenses. Parent will have sufficient funds to consummate the purchase of Shares in the Offer and the Merger and the other transactions described above and elsewhere in this Offer to Purchase, and will cause Purchaser to have sufficient funds available to consummate such transactions. Parent expects to obtain the necessary funds from existing cash balances and borrowings, including from expansion of existing credit lines, money markets and/or capital markets transactions. Parent is still evaluating these financing transactions and, as of the date of this Offer to Purchase, no definitive arrangements have been entered into with respect to any expansion of credit lines, money markets and/or capital markets transactions.

Purchaser does not think its financial condition is relevant to the decision of holders of Shares whether to tender Shares and accept the Offer because:

 

   

the Offer is being made for all outstanding Shares solely for cash;

 

   

the Offer is not subject to any financing condition;

 

   

Purchaser, through its parent company, Parent, will have sufficient funds available to purchase all Shares validly tendered in the Offer and not validly withdrawn in light of Parent’s financial capacity in relation to the amount of consideration payable; and

 

24


Table of Contents
   

if Purchaser consummates the Offer, Purchaser will acquire all remaining Shares for the same cash price in the Merger and Purchaser, through its parent company, Parent, will have sufficient funds available to consummate the Merger in light of Parent’s financial capacity in relation to the amount of consideration payable.

10. Background of the Offer; Past Contacts or Negotiations with the Company.

As part of Parent’s continuing transformation into a next generation biopharma leader, Parent is committed to implementing a strategy that it refers to as its “String of Pearls”. Pursuant to this strategy, Parent remains focused on entering into a series of transactions including acquisitions, collaborations, licensing agreements, joint ventures and other business arrangements that are intended to strengthen Parent’s pipeline, technology, capabilities and talent. Accordingly, Parent continues to search for opportunities to complement its internal capabilities with external innovation.

On November 11, 2011, representatives of Evercore Group L.L.C. (“Evercore”) contacted certain members of Parent’s Senior Management Team to discuss the possibility of Parent considering a potential acquisition of the Company. The discussion centered on the then recently public November 7, 2011 Settlement and Termination Agreement between the Company and Eli Lilly and Company (“Eli Lilly”) covering, among other things, the termination of the exenatide collaboration agreement between the parties, the January 28, 2012 FDA review date for Bydureon, and the Company’s commercial infrastructure and the potential U.S. launch of Bydureon. At the time, Evercore had not yet been retained as a financial adviser to Parent with respect to any potential transaction involving the Company.

In late November, 2011, Parent was contacted by representatives of the Company to inquire about whether Parent would be interested in participating in the process the Company was running to license the commercial rights to Byetta and Bydureon in all non-United States markets, and on December 6, 2011, Parent was provided with a draft confidentiality agreement relating to that process.

On December 6, 2011, at a regularly scheduled meeting of Parent’s board of directors, members of Parent’s Senior Management Team discussed with members of Parent’s board of directors senior management’s ongoing evaluation of the Company in connection with its “String of Pearls” strategy and the possibility of pursuing a transaction with the Company, including a potential acquisition of the Company.

During the period December 8, 2011, through January 5, 2012, representatives of Parent and the Company engaged in negotiations regarding the terms of the confidentiality agreement. On January 5, 2012, Parent informed the Company that it would not participate in the Company’s licensing process in non-United States markets given the inability of the parties to reach agreement on the terms of the standstill provision of the confidentiality agreement.

In early January, Evercore was retained by Parent to act as its financial adviser in connection with Parent’s consideration of a potential acquisition of the Company. In early February, 2012, Citigroup Global Markets Inc. (“Citi”) was also retained by Parent to act as its financial adviser in connection with Parent’s consideration of a potential acquisition of the Company.

On February 6, 2012, Mr. Lamberto Andreotti, Parent’s Chief Executive Officer, updated Parent’s board of directors regarding the status of the evaluation of the Company and the potential for Parent to seek to acquire the Company.

On February 15, 2012, Mr. Andreotti contacted Mr. Daniel M. Bradbury, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, to express Parent’s interest in the Company and its exenatide franchise and to ask Mr. Bradbury to consider entering into discussions with Parent regarding a potential acquisition of the Company by Parent. During the call, Mr. Andreotti proposed an all cash purchase price of $22.00 per share and added that the proposed price was based on publicly available information and had the potential to be modified following the

 

25


Table of Contents

conduct by Parent of a due diligence review of the Company. He also indicated that his proposal had the support of Parent’s Senior Management Team. Mr. Bradbury indicated that he appreciated Parent’s interest in the Company, that the Company was not for sale and that he would speak with members of the Company’s board of directors regarding Parent’s proposal.

Later on February 15, 2012, Parent submitted to Mr. Bradbury confidentially, a preliminary non-binding indication of interest to acquire the Company for a purchase price per share in cash of $22.00 subject to, among other things, the satisfactory completion by Parent of a due diligence review of the Company of the type that is customary in the context of an acquisition of a public company and the receipt by each of Parent and the Company of all requisite corporate and regulatory approvals. The closing price of the Company’s common stock on February 15, 2012, was $17.61 per share.

On February 25, 2012, Mr. Bradbury contacted Mr. Andreotti via e-mail and indicated that Parent’s proposal letter had been shared with the Company’s board of directors and was being considered. He also indicated that he would contact Mr. Andreotti in due course once the Company’s board of directors had completed its review process.

On March 6, 2012, Mr. Bradbury sent a letter to Mr. Andreotti stating that the Company’s board of directors had carefully considered Parent’s proposal and with the assistance of Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC (“Credit Suisse”), the Company’s financial adviser, and its external legal counsel, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP (“Skadden, Arps”), had concluded it was in the best interests of the stockholders for management to pursue the Company’s strategic plan. The letter went on to state that the Company’s board of directors had no interest in pursuing Parent’s unsolicited proposal.

Also on March 6, 2012, at a regularly scheduled meeting of Parent’s board of directors, Mr. Andreotti and other members of Parent’s Senior Management Team discussed with members of Parent’s board of directors the Company’s rejection of Parent’s proposal to acquire the Company. There was a discussion by Parent’s board of directors regarding the strategic value of Byetta and Bydureon to Parent. Following these discussions, Parent’s board of directors agreed that Parent’s Senior Management Team should continue to monitor the Company and its business and operations.

On March 15, 2012, Mr. Bradbury contacted Mr. Andreotti via telephone to reiterate the decision of the Company’s board of directors, and also indicated that the Company had received term sheets in connection with its ongoing European partnering process and asked if Parent would again consider joining that process.

On March 16, 2012, representatives of Parent contacted representatives of Credit Suisse regarding Parent’s proposal to acquire the Company. Representatives of Credit Suisse confirmed to Parent that the Company was not interested in pursuing a business combination transaction at that time. At the end of the call, Parent advised Credit Suisse that Parent would not continue discussions with the Company regarding a potential acquisition by Parent. The closing price of the Company’s common stock on March 27, 2012, was $15.39 per share. The following day, Bloomberg, citing unnamed sources, reported that the Company had rejected a $22.00 per share offer by Parent to acquire the Company. Neither the Company nor Parent commented on the report. The closing price on March 28, 2012, was $23.77 per share.

Following a public announcement that one of the Company’s large stockholders was seeking to force a sale of the Company, during the period April 10, 2012 through April 24, 2012, Parent discussed internally the opportunity presented by an acquisition of the Company. After consideration of the potential options, Parent’s Senior Management Team concluded that while an increased bid price for the Company could not be justified on a standalone basis, the incorporation of the Company’s products into its ongoing diabetes collaboration with AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP (“AstraZeneca”), a wholly owned subsidiary of AstraZeneca PLC, presented the ability to realize substantial synergies and capitalize on innovation opportunities that Parent could not achieve alone. Parent concluded that these substantial anticipated benefits could be reflected in an increased price per share offered to acquire the Company. During this same period, representatives of Parent discussed with representatives of AstraZeneca the benefits of expanding their ongoing diabetes collaboration by including the products of the Company.

 

26


Table of Contents

The closing price on Friday, April 20, 2012, was $22.92 per share. On Sunday, April 22, 2012, it was publicly reported that the Company had hired Credit Suisse and Goldman, Sachs & Co. (“Goldman Sachs”) as its financial advisers, and Skadden, Arps, as its legal adviser, with a view toward contacting potential buyers of the Company. The closing price on Monday, April 23, 2012, was $26.06 per share.

On April 23, 2012, Mr. Bradbury contacted Mr. Andreotti to inform him that the Company’s board of directors had decided to explore strategic alternatives for the Company including a potential sale, and to inquire as to whether Parent was interested in participating in the process. Mr. Andreotti indicated that he would need to consider a potential acquisition of the Company with the members of Parent’s Senior Management Team and Parent’s board of directors and would thereafter contact Mr. Bradbury to inform him whether Parent would participate in the process.

On May 1, 2012, representatives of Parent and AstraZeneca began to discuss the potential expansion of their ongoing diabetes collaboration through the proposed acquisition of the Company by Parent and began to negotiate the principal modifications that Parent and AstraZeneca would expect to make to the existing terms of that collaboration in the event that Parent were to be successful in its efforts to acquire the Company.

Mr. Andreotti contacted Mr. Bradbury on May 3, 2012 to inform him that Parent was interested in participating in the Company’s process and pursuing an acquisition of the Company. Mr. Andreotti also informed Mr. Bradbury that Parent had determined that the products of the Company would be most valuable if the framework of Parent’s ongoing collaboration with AstraZeneca were expanded to include the Company’s products following an acquisition of the Company by Parent. Mr. Bradbury did not express any objections to AstraZeneca’s working with Parent to assess the value that the Company’s products would add to the Parent/AstraZeneca collaboration. He also indicated that he would request that representatives of Credit Suisse and Goldman Sachs contact the appropriate person at Parent regarding the process.

Also on May 3, 2012, Mr. Charles Bancroft, Parent’s Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, and Mr. Demetrios Kydonieus, Parent’s Vice President, Strategy, Alliances and Transactions, spoke with representatives of Credit Suisse and Goldman Sachs regarding the Company’s sale process and Parent’s proposed arrangements with AstraZeneca.

On May 4, 2012, Parent was informed by Mr. David Brennan, the then Chief Executive Officer of AstraZeneca, that he had contacted Mr. Bradbury to confirm that AstraZeneca would be working with Parent regarding a collaboration to follow Parent’s proposed acquisition of the Company with Parent rather than participating directly in the Company’s sale process.

During the period May 4 through May 8, 2012, representatives of Parent and Skadden, Arps negotiated the terms of a confidentiality agreement between Parent and the Company, which was executed and delivered by each of the parties on May 8, 2012. AstraZeneca entered into a similar confidentiality agreement with the Company on the same date. During the process of negotiations, the parties agreed to certain provisions in the confidentiality agreement that would permit Parent to share information with AstraZeneca during the due diligence process.

On May 8, 2012, Mr. Kydonieus spoke with representatives of Credit Suisse regarding when a process letter would be made available to Parent and the expected timing for the submission of non-binding indications of interest. Mr. Kydonieus was informed that the targeted submission date was May 24, 2012. Later on May 8, 2012, the Company provided Parent with a process letter confirming the foregoing.

During the period May 8 through May 23, 2012, Parent’s representatives and representatives of Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Parent’s legal counsel, Citi and Evercore conducted detailed business, financial, scientific, technical, regulatory, environmental, intellectual property and legal due diligence investigations of the Company and its business and operations utilizing confidential non-public information provided by the Company during such

 

27


Table of Contents

time. In addition to the review of materials provided by the Company, Parent also engaged in discussions with members of the Company’s intellectual property, manufacturing, scientific and technical teams. In light of the anticipated collaboration, representatives of AstraZeneca and its financial adviser, Bank of America Merrill Lynch, and its legal counsel, Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, also engaged in due diligence. Representatives of Parent and AstraZeneca exchanged views regarding the results of their due diligence.

On May 22, 2012, during a telephonic information session of Parent’s board of directors, Mr. Andreotti and other members of Parent’s Senior Management Team discussed with members of Parent’s board of directors senior management’s continuing interest in pursuing a potential acquisition of the Company and subsequently entering into a collaboration agreement with AstraZeneca covering the Company’s products. There was a discussion by Parent’s board of directors regarding the strategic value to Parent of acquiring the Company, including the rights to Byetta and Bydureon, as well as a potential related collaboration with AstraZeneca. Following these discussions, Parent’s board of directors agreed that Parent’s Senior Management Team should continue to pursue an acquisition of the Company and simultaneously continue discussions with AstraZeneca regarding the related collaboration.

In accordance with the process letter provided by Credit Suisse and Goldman Sachs, Parent submitted on May 24, 2012, a non-binding written proposal regarding an acquisition of the Company for a price per share in the range of $25.00 to $27.00 in cash. The closing price of the Company’s common stock on May 24, 2012, was $25.80 per share. The letter noted Parent’s intention to collaborate with AstraZeneca following Parent’s acquisition of the Company.

On May 29, 2012, Mr. Kydonieus spoke with representatives of Credit Suisse regarding Parent’s proposal to acquire the Company, and was advised that the price range proposed by Parent was significantly lower than proposals received by the Company from other participants in the Company’s sale process. Credit Suisse proposed that a telephone call be scheduled for Mr. Bradbury to further discuss Parent’s proposal with Mr. Andreotti.

On May 30, 2012, Mr. Andreotti spoke with Mr. Bradbury regarding Parent’s proposal. Mr. Andreotti indicated that there remained some critical diligence materials that had not been provided in advance of the May 24th submission date that needed to be considered but that Parent remained serious in its efforts to acquire the Company and was committed to continuing its participation in the Company’s sale process.

During the period June 1 through June 27, 2012, Parent’s representatives and representatives of Kirkland & Ellis continued to conduct detailed business, financial, scientific, technical, regulatory, environmental, intellectual property and legal due diligence investigations of the Company and its business and operations utilizing additional confidential non-public information provided by the Company (some of which had been withheld during the first stage of the Company’s sale process). Parent also continued to engage in discussions with members of the Company’s management team and the Company’s advisers regarding various aspects of the Company’s business and operations. Also during this period, representatives of Parent and of its advisers reviewed the foregoing analysis with representatives of AstraZeneca and its advisers, and representatives of AstraZeneca and its advisers also continued to engage in due diligence. Additionally, Parent and its representatives continued their negotiations of the terms of the proposed collaboration with AstraZeneca and its representatives.

On June 4, 2012, representatives of Parent and Parent’s financial advisers, along with representatives of AstraZeneca and its financial advisers, attended a management presentation by Mr. Bradbury regarding the business and operations of the Company. Following the presentation by Mr. Bradbury, meetings between representatives of Parent and the Company and their respective advisers were held regarding intellectual property, research and development initiatives, finance, manufacturing, regulatory matters and other commercial matters.

On June 8, 2012, Mr. Kydonieus spoke with representatives of Credit Suisse regarding the status of the Company’s sale process. On June 11, 2012, Parent was provided with the Company’s second round process letter

 

28


Table of Contents

as well as an initial draft of a merger agreement. The process letter required comments to the draft merger agreement be submitted on or before June 24, 2012, followed by definitive offers to acquire the Company by June 27, 2012.

On June 20, 2012, members of Parent’s management presented to Parent’s Senior Management Team the findings of Parent’s due diligence investigation of the Company and its business and operations, including financial, scientific, technical, regulatory, manufacturing, intellectual property and legal matters. Following this presentation, Parent’s Senior Management Team carefully considered the due diligence findings, as well as the strategic value of acquiring the Company, including the rights to Byetta and Bydureon, and the effects of such an acquisition on Parent’s diabetes franchise and a potentially expanded relationship with AstraZeneca. Following these discussions, Parent’s Senior Management Team agreed to continue to pursue an acquisition of the Company. Also around this time, representatives of Parent and its advisers reviewed the foregoing analysis with representatives of AstraZeneca and its advisers. Parent and its representatives continued their negotiations of the terms of the proposed collaboration with AstraZeneca and its representatives.

On June 24, 2012, in accordance with the Company’s second round process letter, Kirkland & Ellis LLP submitted to Skadden, Arps, its comments to the draft merger agreement.

On June 25, 2012, Parent’s management presented the scientific and technical due diligence findings regarding the Company, including Byetta and Bydureon, to the Science & Technology Committee of Parent’s board of directors. The presentation included a review of Parent’s due diligence review of the Company and its products, the strategic rationale for the acquisition of the Company and its potential effects on Parent’s diabetes franchise. After careful consideration of the information presented, the members of the Science & Technology Committee of Parent’s board of directors expressed a positive opinion of the Company’s products from a scientific point of view.

On June 26, 2012, Parent convened and held a meeting of its board of directors. During the meeting, Mr. Andreotti and other members of Parent’s Senior Management Team provided Parent’s board of directors with an update on the proposed transactions. Following a careful review of Parent’s due diligence findings, the strategic value of acquiring the Company, and a discussion of the principal financial terms of the proposed acquisition and the subsequent collaboration with AstraZeneca, the board of directors of Parent unanimously approved the delivery to the Company of a definitive proposal to acquire the Company, and the execution, delivery and performance of a merger agreement and the completion of the transactions contemplated by such merger agreement, including the offer and the merger, on such terms as agreed to by Parent’s Senior Management Team.

In accordance with the Company’s second round process letter, on June 27, 2012, Parent submitted to Credit Suisse and Goldman Sachs its definitive proposal to acquire the Company for a price per share of $31.00 in cash. The closing price of the Company’s common stock on June 27, 2012, was $28.04 per share.

On June 27, 2012, following the submission of Parent’s definitive proposal, Mr. Kydonieus contacted representatives of Credit Suisse to confirm its receipt of Parent’s proposal letter. Also on June 27, 2012, Mr. Andreotti contacted Mr. Bradbury to reiterate Parent’s interest in acquiring the Company.

On June 28, 2012, Mr. Bradbury contacted Mr. Andreotti and indicated that the Company’s board of directors had reviewed the proposals that had been received from the participants in the Company’s sale process and were interested in progressing discussions; however, the Company’s board of directors wanted Parent to increase its offer price per share to $32.00 in cash. Mr. Andreotti indicated that the proposal submitted by Parent was fully priced but undertook to discuss Mr. Bradbury’s request with some of the members of Parent’s Senior Management Team and also to consider the effects on Parent’s planned collaboration with AstraZeneca. During this conversation, Mr. Andreotti also inquired about the willingness of the Company to grant exclusivity to Parent as well as to provide to Parent and its representatives access to certain technical diligence material that had not yet been provided for review.

 

29


Table of Contents

Later on June 28, 2012, Mr. Andreotti contacted Mr. Bradbury and informed him that discussions among members of Parent’s Senior Management Team were continuing, as was the consideration of the potential effects of Mr. Bradbury’s request on the post-acquisition collaboration between Parent and AstraZeneca. Mr. Andreotti also reiterated the need for Parent to complete its due diligence review and for Parent to be granted exclusivity should it decide to continue in negotiations with the Company.

Following Mr. Andreotti’s second call with Mr. Bradbury on June 28, 2012, Mr. Bancroft spoke with representatives of Credit Suisse and Goldman Sachs regarding the transaction process and Parent’s proposal to acquire the Company. Mr. Bancroft reiterated Parent’s view that its proposal of $31.00 per share in cash was fully priced but was informed by Credit Suisse and Goldman Sachs that the Company’s board of directors wanted Parent to increase the price to $32.00 per share.

Representatives of Citi and Evercore subsequently spoke with representatives of Credit Suisse and Goldman Sachs regarding the status of the Company’s sale process, and also were informed that the Company’s board of directors wanted Parent to increase the price to $32.00 per share.

Mr. Bradbury called Mr. Kydonieus reiterating the conversation Mr. Bradbury had with Mr. Andreotti earlier in the day, expressing that he had the support of the Company’s board of directors to sell the Company at $32.00 per share, that he could grant exclusivity at $32.00 per share and that his team would be available for an immediate phone call to finalize Parent’s due diligence review of technical diligence material that had not yet been provided for review.

During this period, Mr. Andreotti and then Dr. Elliot Sigal, Parent’s Executive Vice President, Chief Scientific Officer and President, R&D, and a member of Parent’s board of directors, contacted Mr. Simon Lowth, AstraZeneca’s Interim Chief Executive Officer, and Mr. Kydonieus contacted Mr. Shaun Grady, AstraZeneca’s Vice President, Strategic Partnering and Business Development, to discuss the potential effects on the planned collaboration of the Company’s proposal that Parent increase its offer price to $32.00 per share.

Following these discussions, later on June 28, 2012, at the request of Mr. Andreotti, Dr. Elliot Sigal contacted Mr. Bradbury and informed him that after careful consideration, Parent was not willing to increase its offer above $31.00 per share in cash. During the conversation, Dr. Sigal expressed Parent’s commitment to complete its due diligence investigation as soon as permitted by the Company and to finalize as soon as possible the terms of the merger agreement, subject to the Company’s agreement to a price per share of $31.00 in cash and the grant to Parent of exclusivity through 12:00 PM on July 2, 2012. Mr. Bradbury indicated that he would need to communicate with members of the Company’s board of directors before he could respond to Dr. Sigal’s proposal.

Later on June 28, 2012, Mr. Bradbury contacted Dr. Sigal to indicate that the Company’s board of directors had authorized him to continue negotiations with Parent based on a price of $31.00 per share, to grant exclusivity to Parent through 12:00 PM on July 2, 2012 and to provide the technical diligence material that had not yet been provided for review. Following this call, review of this technical due diligence information took place involving representatives of the Company, Parent and AstraZeneca.

Also, following the telephone call between Dr. Sigal and Mr. Bradbury, and subsequent telephone calls between representatives of Kirkland & Ellis and Skadden, Arps, Parent and the Company finalized the terms of the exclusivity agreement. The exclusivity agreement granting Parent an exclusive negotiation period until 12:00 PM on July 2, 2012, was executed by the Company and Parent during the evening of June 28, 2012.

During the evening of June 28, 2012, representatives of Kirkland & Ellis and Skadden, Arps met via teleconference to discuss and negotiate the terms and conditions of the merger agreement and related documents.

On the morning of June 29, 2012, Mr. Bradbury contacted both Mr. Andreotti and Dr. Sigal to inform them that the Company Board unanimously adopted resolutions (i) determining that the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the Offer, the Top-Up Option and the Merger, are advisable, fair to and in the best interests of the Company and the stockholders of the Company, (ii) approving and declaring advisable the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby and the Merger, on the terms and conditions set forth therein and in accordance with the requirements of the DGCL (such approval constituting approval of the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, for purposes of Section 203 of the DGCL), (iii) directing that the Merger Agreement be submitted to a vote at a meeting of the stockholders of the Company for adoption and approval, if required under applicable law, and (iv) subject to the no solicitation

 

30


Table of Contents

provisions of the Merger Agreement, recommending that the stockholders of the Company accept the Offer, tender their Shares pursuant to the Offer and vote in favor of the adoption and approval of the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the Merger if required by applicable law.

Following the meeting on June 29, 2012 of the Company’s board of directors, representatives of Parent, Kirkland & Ellis, the Company, and Skadden, Arps finalized the terms and conditions of the merger agreement and related documents. The closing price on June 29, 2012, was $28.20 per share.

At approximately 9:00 PM on June 29, 2012, the Company, Parent, and Purchaser executed and delivered the definitive merger agreement as of June 29, 2012.

Later on June 29, 2012, Parent and the Company issued a joint press release announcing the execution of the merger agreement. A copy of the joint press release is attached as an exhibit to the Schedule TO and is incorporated herein by reference.

11. The Merger Agreement.

The following is a summary of certain provisions of the Merger Agreement. This summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the Merger Agreement, a copy of which is filed as Exhibit 99(d)(1) to the Schedule TO and is incorporated herein by reference. Copies of the Merger Agreement, the Schedule TO and any other filings that we make with the SEC with respect to the Offer or the Merger, may be obtained in the manner set forth in Section 7—“Certain Information Concerning the Company.” Capitalized terms used but not defined herein will have the respective meanings given to them in the Merger Agreement. Stockholders and other interested parties should read the Merger Agreement for a more complete description of the provisions summarized below.

The Offer. The Merger Agreement provides that Purchaser will commence the Offer as promptly as practicable after the date of the Merger Agreement (but in no event later than the seventh business day following the execution of the Merger Agreement).

The obligations of Purchaser and of Parent to cause Purchaser to accept for payment and pay for any Shares validly tendered and not validly withdrawn pursuant to the Offer on or prior to the Expiration Date are subject only to the satisfaction of the Minimum Condition and the satisfaction or waiver of the other Offer Conditions. The Offer Conditions are for the sole benefit of Parent and Purchaser, and Parent or Purchaser may increase the Offer Price or waive or modify, in whole or in part, at any time or from time to time, in their sole discretion, the Offer Conditions, other than the Minimum Condition, which may be waived by Parent and Purchaser only with the prior written consent of the Company. However, without the prior written consent of the Company, neither Parent nor Purchaser may (i) reduce the Offer Price, (ii) change the form of consideration payable in the Offer, (iii) reduce the number of Shares to be purchased by Purchaser in the Offer, (iv) waive or amend the Minimum Condition, (v) add to the Offer Conditions or impose any other conditions to the Offer, (vi) extend the expiration of the Offer except as required or permitted by the Merger Agreement, (vii) otherwise amend, modify or supplement any Offer Condition or any term of the Offer set forth in the Merger Agreement, in each case in a manner adverse to the holders of Shares or (viii) abandon or terminate the Offer, except as expressly provided in the Merger Agreement.

The Merger Agreement provides that the Offer will initially expire at midnight, New York City time, on the 20th business day after the date the Offer is commenced unless the Expiration Date is extended.

Extensions of the Offer. Purchaser is required to extend the Offer for any period required by any rule, regulation, interpretation or position of the SEC or the staff thereof or Nasdaq that is applicable to the Offer. If the Merger Agreement has not otherwise been terminated, Purchaser may, without the consent of the Company, either extend the Offer for one or more consecutive increments of not more than 10 business days each, if at the then-scheduled Expiration Date any Offer Condition has not been satisfied or waived, and/or make available a Subsequent Offering Period under the Exchange Act.

 

31


Table of Contents

If at any then-scheduled Expiration date any Offer Condition has not been satisfied or waived, Purchaser will, and Parent will cause Purchaser to, extend the Offer at the request of the Company for one or more consecutive increments of not more than 10 business days each (except that the Company will not be obligated to extend the Offer beyond the earlier to occur of the termination of the Merger Agreement and the Outside Date).

If requested by the Company, Purchaser will, and Parent will cause Purchaser to, make available a Subsequent Offering Period of not less than 5 business days and extend such Subsequent Offering Period for an additional five business days; provided that Purchaser will not be required to make available such Subsequent Offering Period or extend such Subsequent Offering Period if Parent and Purchaser, directly or indirectly, own at least 90% of the outstanding Shares prior to the commencement of such Subsequent Offering Period (after taking into account the exercise of the Top-Up Option).

Purchaser will, subject to the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement, the Offer and the prior satisfaction or waiver of the Offer Conditions, accept for payment and pay for all tendered Shares as soon as practicable after the Expiration Date.

Recommendation. The Company has represented in the Merger Agreement that the Company Board, at a meeting duly called and held, unanimously adopted resolutions (i) determining that the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the Offer, the Top-Up Option and the Merger, are advisable, fair to and in the best interests of the Company and the stockholders of the Company, (ii) approving and declaring advisable the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the Offer, the Top-Up Option (including the issuance of the Top-Up Shares) and the Merger, on the terms and conditions set forth therein and in accordance with the requirements of the DGCL (such approval constituting approval of the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the Offer, the Top-Up Option and the Merger, for purposes of Section 203 of the DGCL), (iii) directing that the Merger Agreement be submitted to a vote at a meeting of the stockholders of the Company for adoption and approval (unless the Merger is consummated in accordance with Section 253 of the DGCL) and (iv) subject to the no solicitation provisions of the Merger Agreement, recommending that the stockholders of the Company accept the Offer, tender their Shares pursuant to the Offer and vote in favor of the adoption and approval of the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the Merger if required by applicable law (the “Company Board Recommendation”). The Company Board Recommendation constitutes a recommendation and approval of the Company Board for purposes of any Takeover Statutes (as defined below). As of the date of the Merger Agreement, none of the foregoing resolutions had been subsequently rescinded, modified or withdrawn. The Company also represented, assuming the accuracy of representations and warranties made by Parent and Purchaser relating to ownership of Shares, the Company Board has taken all actions necessary so that Parent and Purchaser will not be prohibited by any “fair price,” “moratorium,” “control share acquisition,” “business combination” or other similar takeover statute, including Section 203 of the DGCL (collectively, the “Takeover Statutes”), from consummating the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, including the Offer, the Top-Up Option and the Merger.

The Company Board. The Merger Agreement provides that, after the initial acceptance for payment by Purchaser of the tendered Shares pursuant to the Offer (the “Acceptance Time”), Parent will be entitled to elect or designate a number of directors to the Company Board, rounded up to the next whole number, that is equal to the total number of directors on the Company Board (giving effect to any increase described in the next sentence) multiplied by the percentage that the aggregate number of Shares beneficially owned by Parent or Purchaser (including shares accepted for payment and, if the Top-Up Option is exercised, the Shares purchased upon the exercise of the Top-Up Option) represents as a fraction of the total number of Shares then outstanding, on a fully diluted basis. Upon Parent’s request, the Company will use its reasonable best efforts to cause Parent’s designees to be elected or appointed to the Company Board, including by increasing the number of directors and/or seeking resignations from incumbent directors. The Company Board will have at least three Independent Directors. The Independent Directors who are members of the Company’s audit committee as of the date of the Merger Agreement will remain as the sole members of the audit committee. If any Independent Director is unable to serve, the remaining Independent Director(s) (or if no Independent Director is then in office, the members of the

 

32


Table of Contents

Company Board) will be entitled to elect or appoint an individual to fill such vacancy who is unaffiliated with Parent or Purchaser and whose appointment will otherwise satisfy all requirements of Federal Securities Laws and Nasdaq applicable to a member of an audit committee, subject to certain limitations in the Merger Agreement. From and after the time that Parent’s designees constitute a majority of the Company Board, the affirmative vote of a majority of the Independent Directors will be required to (i) amend the Merger Agreement on behalf of the Company or to amend or modify the terms or conditions of the Offer or the Merger, (ii) exercise or waive any of the Company’s rights or remedies under the Merger Agreement, (iii) extend the time for performance of Parent’s or Purchaser’s obligations under the Merger Agreement or (iv) enforce any obligation of Parent or Purchaser under the Merger Agreement.

Employee Matters. The Merger Agreement provides that from and after the Effective Time, Parent or the Surviving Company will honor any Company benefit plan and all obligations thereunder, each as in effect as of the date of the Merger Agreement; however, the Surviving Company may amend or terminate any Company benefit plan in accordance with its terms. During the period after the Effective Date and ending on the first anniversary thereof, Parent or the Surviving Company will provide to each person who is an employee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries immediately prior to the Effective Time and who continues as an employee of the Surviving Company or one of its Affiliates (i) base salary and non-equity based bonus opportunities that are no less favorable in the aggregate than those in effect immediately prior to the Effective Time, (ii) severance benefits that are no less favorable on an individual basis than those that would have been provided under the applicable severance benefit plans, programs, policies, agreements and arrangements as in effect on the date of the Merger Agreement taking into account such employee’s additional service and increased pay levels and (iii) employee benefit plans and arrangements (other than severance, base salary and bonus opportunities, defined benefit pension benefits and any equity-based plans) that are either substantially comparable in the aggregate to those plans or arrangements provided by the Company immediately prior to the Effective Time or the same as those provided to similarly situated employees of Parent. Nothing in the Merger Agreement limits the right of Parent or the Surviving Company, following the Effective Time, to terminate the employment of any employee of the Company or its Affiliates at any time and for any or no reason.

Support Agreement. Concurrently with the execution of the Merger Agreement, each of Daniel M. Bradbury, Mark G. Foletta, Orville G. Kolterman and Mark J. Gergen entered into a Support Agreement with Parent, Purchaser and solely with respect to certain sections thereof, the Company. Pursuant to the Support Agreement, each of these stockholders has agreed, (solely in their capacity as stockholders and, if applicable, holders of stock options) among other things, subject to the termination of the Support Agreement (i) to tender pursuant to the Offer (and not withdraw, except under certain circumstances) all Shares owned or thereafter acquired by such stockholder as promptly as practicable (but in no event later than 10 business days after the commencement of the Offer) and not to exercise any appraisal rights in connection with the Merger, (ii) not to transfer any of such stockholder’s equity interests in the Company, including any Shares, other than in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in the Support Agreement, (iii) not to take any action that would interfere with the performance of such stockholder’s obligations under, or the transactions contemplated by, the Support Agreement, (iv) to vote such stockholder’s Shares in support of the Merger in the event that stockholder approval is required to consummate the Merger, (v) to vote against any action or agreement that would materially impede, interfere with or prevent the Offer or the Merger, (vi) not to solicit, initiate, propose, knowingly encourage or facilitate, or participate in discussions with third parties regarding other proposals to acquire the Company, except as permitted by the Merger Agreement and (vii) to elect to exercise any of the stockholder’s vested options, on a net exercise basis, following the acceptance of the Offer and to transfer those newly-issued Shares to Purchaser. The Support Agreement will terminate upon the earliest of (i) the termination of the Merger Agreement, (ii) the Effective Time, (iii) the Offer having been terminated or the Expiration Date having occurred, in each case without acceptance for payment of the stockholder’s Shares pursuant to the Offer, (iv) the date of any material modification, waiver or amendment to any provision of the Merger Agreement that reduces the amount, changes the form or otherwise adversely affects the consideration payable to the stockholder pursuant to the Merger Agreement, and (v) the mutual written consent of the Company, Parent, Purchaser and the stockholders party thereto. Collectively, the stockholders party to the Support Agreement have ownership

 

33


Table of Contents

of an aggregate of 4,823,527 Shares (including Shares represented by vested and unvested options they hold), or approximately 3% of the Shares (taking into account, for purposes of determining the aggregate Shares, the Company’s outstanding shares and assuming the exercise of only the vested and unvested options held by the stockholders who entered into the Support Agreement).

Top–Up Option. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, the Company granted to Purchaser an irrevocable option (the “Top-Up Option”) to purchase a number of newly-issued Shares (the “Top-Up Shares”) equal to the number of Shares that, when added to the number of Shares held by Parent and Purchaser at the time of such exercise, will constitute one Share more than the number of Shares necessary for Purchaser to be merged into the Company pursuant to Section 253 of the DGCL (after giving effect to the issuance of Shares pursuant to the exercise of the Top-Up Option). The Top-Up Option is exercisable only once, in whole and not in part, at any time at or prior to the Effective Time, but the Top-Up Option is not exercisable and will terminate (1) at the Acceptance Time if the number of Top-Up Shares issuable upon exercise of the Top-Up Option would exceed the number of authorized but unissued and unreserved Shares (including as authorized and issued, any Shares held in treasury by the Company), (2) if any judgment, injunction, order or decree prohibits the exercise of the Top-Up Option or the delivery of the Top-Up Shares, or (3) upon the termination of the Merger Agreement. The aggregate amount payable to the Company for the Top-Up Shares shall be equal to the product of the number of Top-Up Shares and the Offer Price (the “Top-Up Consideration”). The Top-Up Consideration will consist of an amount equal to the par value of the Top-Up Shares, to be paid in cash and an amount equal to the balance of the Top-Up Consideration, which may be paid in the sole discretion of Parent and Purchaser in cash or by issuance of a promissory note or any combination thereof. Parent, Purchaser and the Company have agreed and acknowledged that in any appraisal proceeding under Section 262 of the DGCL with respect to any dissenting Shares, the Surviving Company will not assert that the Top-Up Option, the Top-Up Shares or any consideration delivered to the Company in payment for such Top-Up Shares should be considered in connection with the determination of fair value of such dissenting Shares.

Short–Form Merger. If, following the Acceptance Time, the expiration of any subsequent offering period and any exercise of the Top-Up Option, the number of Shares beneficially owned by Parent, Purchaser and their respective subsidiaries collectively represents at least 90% of the outstanding Shares, which is the number of Shares necessary for Purchaser to be merged into the Company pursuant to Section 253 of the DGCL without convening a stockholders’ meeting, Purchaser and the Company will take such necessary and appropriate actions in order to cause the “short-form” merger to be completed as promptly as reasonably practicable in accordance with Section 253 without convening a meeting of the Company’s stockholders.

The Merger. The Merger Agreement provides that, following completion of the Offer, subject to the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement, and in accordance with the DGCL, at the Effective Time:

 

   

Purchaser will be merged with and into the Company and, as a result of the Merger, the separate corporate existence of Purchaser will cease;

 

   

the Company will continue as the Surviving Company; and

 

   

the Surviving Company will possess all properties, rights, privileges, powers and franchises of the Company and Purchaser, and all of the claims, obligations, liabilities, debts and duties of the Company and Purchaser will become the claims, obligations, liabilities, debts and duties of the Surviving Company.

Certificate of Incorporation; By–laws; Directors and Officers of the Surviving Company. At the Effective Time, the Company’s certificate of incorporation will be amended and restated in its entirety to read identically to the certificate of incorporation attached to the Merger Agreement, and the by–laws of the Company will be amended and restated in their entirety to read identically to the by-laws of Purchaser as in effect immediately prior to the Effective Time. The directors of Purchaser immediately prior to the Effective Time will become the directors of the Surviving Company and the officers of the Company immediately prior to the Effective Time will become the officers of the Surviving Company.

 

34


Table of Contents

Merger Closing Conditions. The respective obligations of each party to effect the Merger is subject to the satisfaction or (to the extent permitted by law) waiver of the following conditions:

 

   

Purchaser having accepted for payment and purchased all Shares validly tendered and not withdrawn pursuant to the Offer;

 

   

the approval of the Merger, if required under the DGCL, by the requisite vote of the stockholders of the Company; and

 

   

the consummation of the Merger is not prohibited by law or order of any court of competent jurisdiction.

Merger Consideration. Each Share issued and outstanding immediately prior the Effective Time (other than Shares held by Parent or Purchaser or in the treasury of the Company which will be canceled and any Shares held by stockholders properly exercising their appraisal rights) will automatically be converted into the right to receive the Offer Price in cash, without interest. At the Effective Time, all Shares converted into the right to receive the Offer Price will automatically be cancelled and cease to exist. Thereafter, any Share certificate or uncertificated Shares represented by book entry will represent the right to receive the Merger Consideration.

Payment for Shares. Parent will designate a bank or trust company (the “Paying Agent”) that is reasonably acceptable to the Company to make payment of the Offer Price. At the Effective Time, Parent will deposit, or cause the Surviving Company to deposit, an amount of cash sufficient to pay the Merger Consideration to which the holders of Shares are entitled.

As soon as reasonably practicable after the Effective Time (and in any event within 3 business days), the Surviving Company will cause the Paying Agent to mail to each holder of Shares a Letter of Transmittal and instructions advising the stockholders how to surrender Share certificates or book entry Shares in exchange for the Merger Consideration. Upon surrender by a holder of a Share certificate to the Paying Agent, together with such validly executed Letter of Transmittal (or in the case of a book entry Share, upon delivery of such Letter of Transmittal or upon the entry through a book-entry transfer agent of the surrender of such book entry Shares on a book-entry account statement), the Paying Agent will, as promptly as practicable after the date of delivery, pay the Merger Consideration that such holder is entitled to receive in exchange therefor. Interest will not be paid or accrue in respect of the Merger Consideration.

Any portion of the cash deposited with the Paying Agent that is not claimed within 12 months following the Effective Time will be returned to Parent upon demand. Any former stockholders will thereafter look only to Parent, and Parent will remain liable, for payment of their claims for the Merger Consideration.

Treatment of Options, RSUs, Deferred Compensation and Employee Stock Purchase Plan. At the Effective Time, each unexercised outstanding option to purchase Shares (a “Company Stock Option”), whether or not vested, will be cancelled in exchange for the right to receive, payable by the Surviving Company, a payment in cash equal to the product of (i) the excess, if any, of the Merger Consideration over the exercise price per Share of such Company Stock Option, multiplied by (ii) the total number of Shares underlying such Company Stock Option, less applicable taxes required to be withheld with respect to such payment. If the exercise price per Share of any Company Stock Option is equal to or greater than the Merger Consideration, such Company Stock Option will be canceled without payment.

At the Effective Time, each outstanding restricted stock unit that has either a time-based vesting schedule or performance-based vesting schedule, whether or not vested, will be cancelled in exchange for the right to receive a payment in cash equal to the product of the Merger Consideration and the number of Shares subject to such restricted stock unit (in the case of performance-based restricted stock units, determined as if the applicable performance objectives had been achieved at the target level), less any applicable withholding taxes.

Following the date of the Merger Agreement, no participant will be permitted to elect to participate in the Company’s 2001 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESPP”) nor increase their payroll deduction percentages or purchase elections from those in effect on the date of the Merger Agreement, and no purchase period under the

 

35


Table of Contents

ESPP will commence. Immediately prior to the Effective Time, the ESPP and the offering period then in progress under the ESPP shall terminate and each ESPP participant’s accumulated contributions under the ESPP shall be used to purchase Shares in accordance with the terms of the ESPP as of the end of the final offering period, and the funds, if any, that remain in the participants’ accounts after such purchase shall be returned to the participants.

Representations and Warranties. The Merger Agreement contains representations and warranties made by the Company to Parent and Purchaser and representations and warranties made by Parent and Purchaser to the Company. The purpose of this summary of the Merger Agreement is to provide the Company’s stockholders with information regarding the terms of the Merger Agreement and is not intended to modify or supplement any factual disclosures about the Company, Parent or Purchaser made in the Company’s public reports filed with the SEC. In particular, the assertions embodied in these representations and warranties are qualified by information in confidential disclosure schedules provided by the Company to Parent and Purchaser in connection with the signing of the Merger Agreement. These disclosure schedules contain information that modifies, qualifies and creates exceptions to the representations and warranties set forth in the Merger Agreement. Moreover, certain representations and warranties in the Merger Agreement were used for the purpose of allocating risk among the Company, Parent and Purchaser, rather than establishing matters of fact. Accordingly, the representations and warranties in the Merger Agreement may not represent the actual state of facts about the Company, Parent or Purchaser. The Company’s stockholders are not third-party beneficiaries of the Merger Agreement (except that prior to the Effective Time, the Company may pursue certain equitable remedies on their behalf, and after the Effective Time, the stockholders may enforce the provisions in the Merger Agreement relating to the payment of Merger Consideration) and should not rely on the representations, warranties and covenants or any descriptions thereof as characterizations of the actual state of facts or conditions of the Company, Parent, Purchaser or any of their respective subsidiaries or affiliates.

In the Merger Agreement, the Company has made customary representations and warranties to Parent and Purchaser with respect to, among other things:

 

   

corporate matters related to the Company, such as organization, standing and corporate power;

 

   

its subsidiaries;

 

   

its capital structure;

 

   

the inapplicability of Takeover Statutes to the Offer or the Merger;

 

   

authority to enter into, and the enforceability and fairness of, the Merger Agreement and the Company’s obligations thereunder;

 

   

required consents and approvals, and non-violation of agreements, governance documents and laws;

 

   

public SEC filings, internal controls and compliance with the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended;

 

   

financial statements; absence of certain undisclosed liabilities;

 

   

the accuracy of information supplied to the other party for inclusion in public SEC filings made in connection with the transaction;

 

   

the absence of certain changes or events;

 

   

the absence of litigation matters and other proceedings;

 

   

material contracts;

 

   

compliance with laws and regulations, and effectiveness of permits;

 

   

environmental matters;

 

   

benefit plans and employment matters;

 

   

tax matters;

 

36


Table of Contents
   

real property;

 

   

intellectual property;

 

   

voting requirements for the approval of the Merger Agreement and the Merger;

 

   

finders’ and brokers’ fees and expenses;

 

   

the expiration and non-renewal of the Company Rights Agreement;

 

   

the opinion of the Company’s financial adviser; and

 

   

regulatory compliance.

Some of the representations and warranties in the Merger Agreement made by the Company are qualified as to “materiality” or “Company Material Adverse Effect.” For purposes of the Merger Agreement, a “Company Material Adverse Effect” means any event, change, effect, development, state of facts, condition, circumstance or occurrence that, (i) has, or would reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on the business, assets, liabilities, results of operations or financial condition of the Company and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole or (ii) would prevent or materially impede, interfere with, hinder or delay the consummation by the Company of the Offer, the Merger or the other transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, except, with respect to the event, change, effect, development, state of facts, condition, circumstance or occurrence having the results described in the foregoing clause (i), to the extent that such material adverse effect results from or is attributable to any of the following: (A) any changes in general United States or global economic conditions; (B) any changes in conditions generally affecting the pharmaceutical or biotechnology industries; (C) any decline in the market price or trading volume of the Shares on Nasdaq (provided that the exception in this clause (C) shall not prevent or otherwise affect a determination that any change, effect, circumstance or development underlying such decline has resulted in or contributed to a Company Material Adverse Effect); (D) any regulatory, legislative or political conditions or securities, credit, financial or other capital markets conditions, in each case in the United States or any foreign jurisdiction; (E) any failure, in and of itself, by the Company or its subsidiaries to meet any internal or published projections, forecasts, estimates or predictions in respect of revenues, earnings or other financial or operating metrics for any period (provided that the exception in this clause (E) shall not prevent or otherwise affect a determination that any change, effect, circumstance or development underlying such failure has resulted in or contributed to a Company Material Adverse Effect); (F) the execution and delivery of the Merger Agreement, the performance by any party thereto of its obligations thereunder, or the public announcement or pendency of the Offer, the Merger or any of the other transactions contemplated thereby, including the impact thereof on the relationships, contractual or otherwise, of the Company with its employees or with any other third party, or the initiation of any proceedings against the Company as a result thereof (provided that the exceptions in this clause (F) shall not apply to any representation or warranty regarding the enforceability of the Company’s material contracts (or any portion thereof) to the extent the purpose of such representation or warranty (or any portion thereof) is to address the consequences resulting from the execution and delivery of the Merger Agreement or the performance by the Company of its obligations thereunder); (G) changes or proposed changes in GAAP or in laws applicable to the Company or the enforcement or interpretation thereof; (H) any geopolitical conditions, the outbreak or escalation of hostilities, any acts of war, sabotage, terrorism or military actions, or any escalation or worsening of any such hostilities, acts of war, sabotage, terrorism or military actions threatened or underway as of the date of the Merger Agreement; or (I) any action required to be taken pursuant to or in accordance with the Merger Agreement or taken at the written request of Parent or Purchaser; except if such event, change, effect, development, state of facts, condition, circumstance or occurrence results from, or is attributable to, any of the matters described in clauses (A), (B), (C), (D), (G) or (H) above and disproportionately affect the Company and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole, as compared to other companies that conduct business in the countries and regions in the world or in the industries in which the Company and its subsidiaries conduct business (in which case, only the incremental disproportionate effects (if any) may be taken into account when determining whether there has been, or is or would reasonably expected to be, a Company Material Adverse Effect).

 

37


Table of Contents

In the Merger Agreement, Parent and Purchaser have made customary representations and warranties to the Company with respect to, among other things:

 

   

corporate matters related to Parent and Purchaser, such as organization, standing and corporate power;

 

   

the capitalization and operations of Purchaser;

 

   

the authority to enter into, and the enforceability of, the Merger Agreement and the Company’s obligations thereunder;

 

   

required consents and approvals, and non-violation of agreements, governance documents or laws;

 

   

the accuracy of information supplied to the other party for inclusion in public SEC filings made in connection with the transaction;

 

   

Parent, Purchaser and their affiliates not being “interested stockholders” as such term is defined in Section 203 of the DGCL;

 

   

the sufficiency of funds to complete the Offer and the Merger;

 

   

the absence of litigation and other proceedings; and

 

   

finders’ and brokers’ fees and expenses.

Conduct of Business of the Company. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, except as expressly set forth in the disclosure schedules to the Merger Agreement, as expressly contemplated or permitted by the Merger Agreement, or as required by law or consented to in writing by Parent (which consent will not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed), during the period from the date of the Merger Agreement to the Acceptance Time, the Company has agreed to, and to cause each of its subsidiaries to:

 

   

conduct its business in the ordinary course consistent with past practice (including in respect of ongoing research, development and clinical trial activities);

 

   

use reasonable best efforts to preserve substantially intact its current business organization, to preserve its relationships with governmental authorities, customers, suppliers and other persons having material business dealings with the Company or its subsidiaries; and

 

   

use commercially reasonable efforts to keep available the services of its current officers and employees.

In addition, during that same period, except as expressly set forth in the disclosure schedules to the Merger Agreement, as expressly contemplated or permitted by the Merger Agreement, or as required by law or consented to in writing by Parent (which consent will not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed), the Company has agreed not to, and to not permit any of its subsidiaries to, take certain actions with respect to the following, subject to specified thresholds and exceptions:

 

   

dividends or distributions, stock splits or reclassifications, or purchases or redemptions of stock;

 

   

issuances of additional shares of stock or securities convertible into or exchangeable for, or options, warrants, calls, commitments or rights to acquire stock (other than the issuance of Shares upon the exercise of existing Company Stock Options or other settlement pursuant to existing Company benefit plans);

 

   

amendments to the organizational documents of the Company and its subsidiaries;

 

   

acquisitions or purchases (including by merger, consolidation, or acquisition of equity interests or assets);

 

   

incurrences or redemptions of indebtedness for borrowed money or the making of loans;

 

   

modifications, amendments, entrance into or waiver of material contracts;

 

38


Table of Contents
   

grants of equity based or other incentive awards, increases in salaries or bonuses (including pay related to retention, severance or termination), or modification of benefit plans;

 

   

changes in accounting methods, principles, policies, procedures or practices;

 

   

changes to tax elections or settlement of tax liabilities;

 

   

sales, transfers, leases or licenses of assets or grants of liens on any assets (other than permitted liens) other than in the ordinary course of business or in accordance with existing agreements;

 

   

certain material capital expenditures other than capital expenditures contemplated in the Company’s existing plan for annual capital expenditures for 2012;

 

   

payments, discharges, settlements or satisfactions of certain material claims or obligations other than in the ordinary course of business or in accordance with existing contracts;

 

   

settlements, releases, waivers or compromises of pending or threatened proceedings of or against the Company and its subsidiaries;

 

   

adoption or entry into a plan of complete or partial liquidation, dissolution, merger, consolidation, restructuring, recapitalization or other reorganization;

 

   

taking of actions that would result in the Offer Conditions not being satisfied or that would reasonably be expected to delay or impair the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement;

 

   

entry into a new line of business;

 

   

implementation of plant closings and layoffs that could implicate the U.S. Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act of 1988, as amended; or

 

   

authorizations or agreements to do any of the foregoing actions.

In addition, until the Effective Time, the Company will notify Parent of any significant data relating to Bydureon, Byetta, Symlin and any other product of the Company which contains exenatide as the sole active ingredient (the “Covered Products”), inform Parent and give Parent a reasonable opportunity to review material filings with governmental entities or material correspondence between certain governmental entities and the Company relating to the Covered Products and consult with Parent in connection with any meetings with certain governmental entities with respect to the Covered Products.

Parent and Purchaser have agreed not to consummate any purchase or other acquisition that is reasonably likely to (i) prevent or delay the parties from obtaining any required consents, approvals or similar authorizations from any governmental authority in connection with the consummation of the Offer, Merger or other transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, (ii) result in the imposition of a condition on any such consents, approvals or similar authorizations or (iii) otherwise prevent or delay any party to the Merger Agreement from performing its obligations under the Merger Agreement or consummating the Offer, the Merger or the other transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement.

No Solicitation.

The Company has agreed to immediately cease and cause to be terminated any discussions or negotiations pending as of the date of the Merger Agreement regarding any Competing Proposal (as defined below). Subject to the exceptions described below, the Company has agreed that it and its subsidiaries will not, and that it will instruct and use its reasonable best efforts to cause its subsidiaries and its and their respective representatives not to, directly or indirectly:

 

   

solicit, initiate or knowingly facilitate or encourage any inquiries or the making of any proposal or offer that constitutes, or may reasonably be expected to lead to, a Competing Proposal;

 

   

participate in any discussions or negotiations regarding, or furnish to any person (other than Parent, Purchaser or their respective representatives) any confidential information with respect to, any Competing

 

39


Table of Contents
 

Proposal or any inquiry, proposal or offer that could reasonably be expected to lead to a Competing Proposal, subject to certain exceptions as described below, and to notify such person of the existence of the restrictions described in this paragraph;

 

   

grant any waiver, amendment or release under any standstill or confidentiality agreement (or any standstill or confidentiality provision of any other contract) or Takeover Statutes for the purpose of allowing a third party to make a Competing Proposal; or

 

   

resolve or propose to do any of the foregoing.

Despite these restrictions, at any time before the Acceptance Time, the Company may, subject to compliance with the terms described in this paragraph and immediately below, provide confidential information in response to a request therefor by a person who has made after the date of the Merger Agreement an unsolicited bona fide written Competing Proposal and/or engage in any discussions or negotiations with any person who has made after the date of the Merger Agreement such a Competing Proposal, if prior to taking any such action:

 

   

the Company receives from such person an executed confidentiality and standstill agreement containing provisions that are no less favorable to the Company in any substantive respect than those contained in the existing confidentiality agreement between Parent and the Company,

 

   

the Company Board determines in good faith after consultation with its independent financial and outside legal advisers that such Competing Proposal either constitutes a Superior Proposal (as defined below) or would reasonably be expected to result in a Superior Proposal, and

 

   

the Company Board determines in good faith after consultation with its outside legal counsel that the failure to take such action would be inconsistent with the directors’ fiduciary duties under applicable law.

With respect to any non-public information regarding the Company provided to any other person pursuant to the foregoing exceptions that was not previously provided to Parent, the Company is required to provide such non-public information to Parent promptly (and in any event within 36 hours) following the date of provision of such information to such other person. The Company has agreed to keep Parent reasonably informed on a current basis of the status and terms of any Competing Proposal (including any material changes to the key terms thereof) and the general status of any discussions and negotiations regarding such Competing Proposal. The Company also agreed to provide Parent with any documents describing or evidencing any such Competing Proposal sent by or provided to the Company or any of its subsidiaries or representatives as promptly as reasonably practicable (and in any event within 24 hours after receipt or delivery thereof).

Change of Recommendation. The Company Board has agreed not to take any of the following actions (each, a “Change of Recommendation”):

 

   

withhold, withdraw, qualify or modify, in a manner adverse to Parent, the Company Board Recommendation (however, the parties have agreed that the Company Board may refrain from taking any position with respect to a Competing Proposal until the close of business on the 10th business day after the commencement of such Competing Proposal pursuant to Rule 14d-2 under the Exchange Act without such action being considered a Change of Recommendation);

 

   

approve, recommend, adopt or declare advisable any Competing Proposal, or propose publicly or otherwise to approve, recommend, adopt or declare advisable any Competing Proposal;

 

   

cause the Company to enter into any contract (other than a confidentiality agreement entered into in compliance with the Company’s obligations in the non-solicitation provisions of the Merger Agreement) concerning a Competing Proposal (an “Alternative Acquisition Agreement”);

 

   

within 10 business days after Parent so requests in writing, fail to publicly recommend against any Competing Proposal or fail to publicly reaffirm the Company Board Recommendation;

 

   

fail to recommend, in a Solicitation/Recommendation Statement on Schedule 14D-9, against any Competing Proposal subject to Regulation 14D under the Exchange Act within 10 business days after commencement of such Competing Proposal; or

 

40


Table of Contents
   

fail to include the Company Board Recommendation in the Schedule 14D-9 and the Proxy Statement (if applicable).

Despite these restrictions, at any time prior to the Acceptance Time, the Company Board may:

 

   

in response to an unsolicited bona fide written Competing Proposal that constitutes a Superior Proposal (which did not arise out of a breach of the non-solicitation provisions of the Merger Agreement) from any person that has not been withdrawn, the Company Board may effect a Change of Recommendation with respect to such Superior Proposal, and/or the Company may terminate the Merger Agreement to enter into an Alternative Acquisition Agreement with respect to such Superior Proposal if the Company Board concludes in good faith after consultation with its outside legal counsel that the failure to do so would be inconsistent with the directors’ fiduciary duties under applicable law .

 

   

in response to an Intervening Event (as defined below), if the Company Board determines in good faith, after consultation with its outside counsel that the failure to do so would be inconsistent with the directors’ fiduciary duties under applicable law, take any action specified in the first, fourth or sixth bullets contained under “Change of Recommendation” immediately above (each, an “Intervening Event Change of Recommendation”).

Provided, however, that:

 

   

the Company will not exercise its right to effect a Change of Recommendation or terminate the Merger Agreement to accept a Superior Proposal until after (i) a period of 3 business days after the Company provides to Parent a written notice (a “Determination Notice”) advising Parent that the Company has determined to effect a Change of Recommendation and/or to terminate the Merger Agreement, including a description of the material terms of the Superior Proposal and the identity of the person making the Superior Proposal and (ii) the Company has negotiated, and has caused its financial and legal advisers to negotiate, during such 3 business day notice period, with Parent and its representatives in good faith (to the extent Parent desires to so negotiate) to make such adjustments in the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement so that such Competing Proposal would cease to constitute a Superior Proposal; provided that, in the event of any subsequent material revisions to the Competing Proposal that the Company Board has determined to be a Superior Proposal, the Company is required to deliver a new Determination Notice to Parent and to comply with the foregoing requirements with respect to such new Determination Notice and the revised Superior Proposal contemplated thereby. Concurrently with any termination of the Merger Agreement to enter into a definitive agreement with respect to such Superior Proposal, the Company will pay to Parent, the Company Termination Fee (as defined below).

 

   

no Intervening Event Change of Recommendation may be made until after (i) a period of 3 business days after the Company provides to Parent a Determination Notice, which describes the Intervening Event in reasonable detail, (ii) the Company has negotiated with Parent to make such adjustments in the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement so that the Intervening Event no longer necessitates an Intervening Event Change of Recommendation, and (iii) following such 3 business day period, the Company Board concludes in good faith after consultation with its outside legal counsel that the failure to make an Intervening Event Change of Recommendation would be inconsistent with the directors’ fiduciary duties under applicable law (after taking into account any revisions to the Merger Agreement made or proposed in writing by Parent).

The Merger Agreement does not prohibit the Company or the Company Board from (i) disclosing to its stockholders a position contemplated by Rules 14d-9 and 14e-2(a) promulgated under the Exchange Act or (ii) issuing a “stop, look and listen” statement pending disclosure of its position thereunder; provided that the Company Board may only make a Change of Recommendation in connection with the provisions of the Merger Agreement governing such a change.

 

41


Table of Contents

For purposes of this Offer to Purchase and the Merger Agreement:

 

   

“Competing Proposal” means any inquiry, proposal or offer relating to (i) a merger, joint venture, partnership, consolidation, dissolution, liquidation, tender offer, exchange offer, recapitalization, reorganization, share exchange, business combination or similar transaction involving the Company; (ii) the acquisition or license of, or proposal or offer by any person to, acquire or license, 20% or more of the assets of the Company and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole; or (iii) the acquisition of, or proposal or offer by any person to, acquire, beneficial ownership of 20% or more of any class of issued and outstanding equity interests in the Company or any of its subsidiaries (by vote or value).

 

   

“Superior Proposal” means a bona fide written Competing Proposal for or in respect of the acquisition of 50% or more of the outstanding shares of common stock of the Company, which the Company Board determines in good faith, after consultation with the Company’s financial and legal advisers, and considering such factors as the legal, financial, regulatory and other aspects of such Competing Proposal and the Merger Agreement (in each case taking into account any revisions to the Merger Agreement made or proposed in writing by Parent prior to the time of determination) (i) is reasonably likely to be consummated in accordance with its terms without undue delay and (ii) would result in a transaction that is more favorable to holders of Shares from a financial point of view than the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement.

 

   

“Intervening Event” means a material event, development or change in circumstances with respect to the Company occurring or arising after the date of the Merger Agreement and prior to the Acceptance Time, and which was not known and would not reasonably be expected to have been known or foreseen, to or by the Company Board as of or prior to the date of the Merger Agreement and was not known by the Company’s management or reasonably foreseeable as of or prior to the date of the Merger Agreement; provided that in no event shall (1) the receipt, existence or terms of a Competing Proposal, (2) any events, developments or change in circumstances of Parent, (3) clearance of the Offer and the Merger under the HSR Act, or (4) any matter relating to the foregoing or consequence of the foregoing, constitute an Intervening Event.

Efforts to Close the Transaction. In the Merger Agreement, each of the Company, Parent and Purchaser agreed to use its reasonable best efforts to take, or cause to be taken and to do, or cause to be done and to assist and cooperate with the other parties in doing, all things reasonably necessary, proper or advisable under the Merger Agreement and applicable law to consummate and make effective the Offer, the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, including taking all acts necessary to cause the Offer Conditions and other conditions to the Merger to be satisfied as promptly as reasonably practicable, obtaining all necessary actions or nonactions, waivers, consents and approvals from governmental authorities, and making all necessary registrations and filings and taking all steps necessary to obtain an approval or waiver from, or to avoid a proceeding by, a governmental authority, and executing and delivering any additional instruments necessary to consummate the Offer, the Merger and other transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement.

As promptly as reasonably practicable, but no later than 10 business days from the date of the Merger Agreement, Parent, Purchaser and the Company will make required filings with the FTC and Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice (the “Antitrust Division”) under the HSR Act and no later than 5 business days from the date of the Merger Agreement duly file any other required filings with governmental authorities with respect to competition matters.

Takeover Provisions. Parent, the Company and their respective boards of directors have agreed to use reasonable best efforts to take all reasonable action necessary to ensure that no Takeover Statute is or becomes applicable to the Merger Agreement, the Support Agreement or the transactions provided for therein, including the Offer, the Top-Up Option and the Merger. If any Takeover Statute becomes applicable to the Merger Agreement, the Support Agreement or the transactions contemplated therein, Parent, the Company and their respective boards of directors will take all reasonable action necessary to ensure that the transactions provided for

 

42


Table of Contents

in the Merger Agreement or the Support Agreement may be consummated as promptly as practicable on the terms contemplated by the Merger Agreement and otherwise to minimize the effect of such Takeover Statute on Parent and Purchaser, the Merger Agreement and the transactions provided for therein.

Indemnification and Insurance. Parent and Purchaser have agreed that all rights to indemnification against and exculpation from liabilities for acts or omissions occurring at or prior to the Effective Time now existing in favor of the current or former directors or officers of the Company as provided in the Company’s certificate of incorporation, the Company’s bylaws, any resolution adopted by the Board of Directors of the Company or certain indemnification agreements, in each case, as in effect immediately prior to the execution and delivery of the Merger Agreement, will be assumed by the Surviving Company in the Merger and will continue in full force and effect in accordance with their terms. For a period of six years after the Effective Time, Parent has agreed to cause the certificate of incorporation and by–laws of the Surviving Company to contain provisions no less favorable with respect to indemnification, advancement of expenses and exculpation of the indemnified parties than are set forth as of the date of the Merger Agreement in the Company’s certificate of incorporation and by–laws.

In addition, for a period of six years from the Effective Time, Parent has agreed to and will cause the Surviving Company to indemnify and hold harmless each current and former director or officer of the Company or any of its subsidiaries against any losses, claims, damages, liabilities, reasonable and documented costs and expenses (including reasonable attorney’s fees and expenses in advance of the final disposition of such claim, action, suit, proceeding or investigation), judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement of or in connection with any threatened or actual claim, action, suit, proceeding or investigation based in whole or in part on the fact that he or she was a director or officer of the Company or its subsidiary or acts or omissions taken in his or her capacity as a director or officer or at the request of the Company or its subsidiary.

Prior to the Effective Time, the Company will use its reasonable best efforts to (and if the Company is unable to, Parent shall cause the Surviving Company as of the Effective Time to) obtain and fully pay for “tail” insurance policies with a claims period of at least six years from and after the Effective Time from an insurance carrier with the same or better credit rating as the Company’s current insurance carrier with respect to directors’ and officers’ liability insurance and fiduciary liability insurance with benefits and levels of coverage at least as favorable as the Company’s policies existing prior to the Effective Time; provided that such “tail” insurance policies shall not require the payment of an aggregate premium in excess of 300% of the aggregate annual premium most recently paid by the Company prior to the date of the Merger Agreement for such purpose. If the Company does not obtain such insurance policies at or prior to the Effective Time, then Parent has agreed that from the Effective Time through the sixth anniversary of the Effective Time, the Surviving Company will and the Parent will cause the Surviving Company to maintain in effect the Company’s current directors’ and officers’ liability insurance and fiduciary liability insurance or to purchase comparable directors’ and officers’ liability insurance and fiduciary liability insurance; provided that in no event will the aggregate annual premiums be in excess of 300% of the current aggregate annual premiums paid by the Company for such purpose.

Transaction Litigation. The Company and Parent will give each other the opportunity to participate in the defense, settlement and/or prosecution of any pending or threatened litigation related to the Merger Agreement or the transactions contemplated in the Merger Agreement. Neither the Company nor any of its subsidiaries or representatives may compromise or settle any such litigation without the prior written consent of Parent.

Other Covenants. The Merger Agreement contains other covenants, including covenants relating to calling the stockholders’ meeting to approve the Merger Agreement, if required, the allocation of fees and expenses, the modification or amendment of certain Company benefit plans after the Effective Time, public announcements, stock exchange de-listing, access and confidentiality.

Assumption Agreement. Concurrently with the execution and delivery of the Merger Agreement, the Company entered into an assumption agreement (the “Assumption Agreement”) with Parent. Pursuant to the terms of the Assumption Agreement, Parent agreed to assume, with effect at the Acceptance Time, the Company’s obligations under the Settlement and Termination Agreement, dated November 7, 2011, between the

 

43


Table of Contents

Company and Eli Lilly and certain agreements entered into by the Company in connection therewith, including a promissory note with Eli Lilly with respect to the Company’s revenue sharing obligation. Parent currently expects to repay the Company’s obligations with respect to the revenue sharing obligation in accordance with the terms of the Settlement and Termination Agreement following the Effective Time.

Repayment of Company Loan. At the Acceptance Time, the Company will pay all outstanding obligations owed pursuant to the Amended and Restated Loan Agreement, dated as of May 7, 2011, between the Company and Eli Lilly. If requested by the Company, Parent will contribute or, at Parent’s election, loan the funds necessary for the Company to repay such obligations. If Parent contributes any funds to the Company to repay Eli Lilly (other than pursuant to a loan), then the Company will issue to Parent a number of Shares equal to the amount contributed divided by the Offer Price.

Convertible Notes. The Company’s 3.00% Convertible Senior Notes due 2014 will be treated in accordance with the terms of its indenture and holders of these notes (the “3.00% Holders”) will be notified of their rights contained in the indenture, including their right to cause the Company to repurchase their notes following the consummation of each of the Offer and the Merger upon the terms and subject to the conditions of the indenture (the “Repurchase Right”). In the event that any 3.00% Holder exercises its Repurchase Right as a result of the consummation of the Offer, at the request of the Company, Parent will contribute or, at Parent’s election, loan the funds necessary for the Company to pay any 3.00% Holder as a result of the exercise of such Repurchase Right. If Parent contributes any such funds to the Company (other than pursuant to a loan), then the Company will issue to Parent a number of Shares equal to the amount contributed divided by the Offer Price.

Termination of the Merger Agreement. The Merger Agreement may be terminated and the Offer abandoned at any time:

 

   

prior to the Effective Time, by mutual written consent of Parent, Purchaser and the Company;

 

   

by either Parent or the Company:

 

   

prior to the Effective Time, if any restraint enjoining or otherwise prohibiting the consummation of the Offer or the Merger shall have become final and nonappealable; provided that the party seeking to terminate the Merger Agreement has complied with its obligations described in “Efforts to Close the Transaction” above.

 

   

prior to the Acceptance Time, if the Acceptance Time shall not have occurred by the Outside Date (as such date may be extended); provided that this right to terminate the Merger Agreement is not available to any party that has breached its obligations under the Merger Agreement in any manner that shall have been the primary cause of, or resulted in, the failure of the Acceptance Time to have occurred on or before the Outside Date;

 

   

prior to the Acceptance Time, by Parent, if the Company has breached any of its representations or warranties or failed to perform any of its covenants or agreements set forth in the Merger Agreement, which breach or failure to perform (i) would give rise to the failure of any Offer Condition and (ii) is incapable of being cured by the Outside Date or, if capable of being cured by the Company by the Outside Date, is not cured by the Company within 30 calendar days after the Company receives written notice of such breach from Parent or Purchaser;

 

   

prior to the Acceptance Time, by the Company, if (i) Parent or Purchaser has breached any of their respective representations or warranties set forth in the Merger Agreement, which breach would result in any such representations and warranties of Parent or Purchaser set forth in the Merger Agreement not being true and correct as of immediately prior to the Acceptance Time (except to the extent such representations and warranties expressly relate to an earlier date, in which case as of such earlier date), except where the failure of such representations and warranties to be so true and correct as of such dates, individually or in the aggregate, would not materially impede, interfere, hinder or delay the consummation by Parent or Purchaser of the Offer, the Merger of the other transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, or (ii) Parent or Purchaser has not in all material respects performed all

 

44


Table of Contents
 

covenants and agreements required to be performed by them under the Merger Agreement on or prior to the Acceptance Time, in each case which breach or failure to perform is incapable of being cured by Parent or Purchaser by the Outside Date or, if capable of being cured by Parent or Purchaser by the Outside Date, is not cured by Parent or Purchaser, as applicable, within 30 calendar days after Parent or Purchaser, as applicable, receives written notice of such breach from the Company;

 

   

prior to the Acceptance Time, by Parent, if (i) a Change of Recommendation shall have occurred, (ii) the Company (through its authorized directors or officers) shall have willfully breached or be deemed to have willfully breached in any material respect its obligations under the non-solicitation provisions of the Merger Agreement or (iii) if following the public announcement of a Competing Proposal the Company Board shall have failed to publicly confirm the Company Board Recommendation within 10 business days of its receipt of a written request by Parent that it do so; or

 

   

prior to the Acceptance Time, by the Company in accordance with the terms and subject to the conditions of its rights to accept a Superior Proposal; provided that this right to terminate the Merger Agreement is conditioned on the concurrent payment by the Company to Parent of the Company Termination Fee.

Effect of Termination. If the Merger Agreement is terminated by either the Company or Parent in accordance with its terms, subject to certain exceptions described below and in the Merger Agreement, the Merger Agreement will become void and have no effect, without any liability or obligation on the part of Parent, Purchaser or the Company; provided that, except as described below, nothing herein shall relieve the Company, Parent or Purchaser from liability for any willful and material breach of the Merger Agreement.

Company Termination Fee. For purposes of this Offer to Purchase and the Merger Agreement, the term “Company Termination Fee” means $160,000,000 (inclusive of Parent’s and Purchaser’s expenses), in cash, which amount may become payable by the Company to Parent in certain circumstances described below:

 

   

In the event the Merger Agreement is terminated by the Company to accept a Superior Proposal, then the Company will, concurrently with such termination immediately pay to Parent, the Company Termination Fee by wire transfer of same-day funds. In the event the Merger Agreement is terminated by Parent due to the occurrence of a Change of Recommendation, willful breach by the Company (through its authorized directors and officers) of the Company’s non-solicitation covenants or the Company’s failure to publicly confirm the Company Board Recommendation within 10 business days of Parent’s request, then the Company will, concurrently with such termination, pay to Parent, the Company Termination Fee.

 

   

If after the date of the Merger Agreement, a Competing Proposal (which, for purposes of this paragraph will have the meaning described above except that all references to “20%” will be deemed to be references to “50%”) shall have been announced, commenced, publicly disclosed or made known to the Company Board and shall not have been in good faith withdrawn prior to the termination of the Merger Agreement in accordance with its terms, (ii) thereafter, the Merger Agreement is terminated by (A) either Parent or the Company in the event the Acceptance Time does not occur prior to the Outside Date or (B) Parent following the Company’s breach of its representations and warranties or failure to perform any covenants that would give rise to a failure of the Offer Condition regarding the accuracy of such representations and warranties and the performance of such covenants, and such failure is not capable of being cured prior to the Outside Date or, if capable of being cured prior to the Outside Date, within thirty days after the Company receives notice of such breach and (iii) at any time after the date of the Merger Agreement and prior to the expiration of the 12th month after the termination of the Merger Agreement, the Company consummates any Competing Proposal or enters into a definitive agreement related to any Competing Proposal, then the Company will pay Parent the Company Termination Fee on the date of consummation of the transaction contemplated by any Competing Proposal referred to in clause (iii) above.

 

45


Table of Contents

Reimbursable Expenses. If after the date of the Merger Agreement (i) a Competing Proposal shall have been announced, commenced, publicly disclosed or made known to the Company Board and shall not have been in good faith withdrawn prior to the termination of the Merger Agreement in accordance with its terms, and (ii) thereafter, the Merger Agreement is terminated by Parent following the Company’s breach of its representations and warranties or failure to perform any covenants that would give rise to a failure of the Offer Condition regarding the accuracy of such representations and warranties and the performance of such covenants, and such failure is not capable of being cured prior to the Outside Date or, if capable of being cured prior to the Outside Date, within thirty days after the Company receives notice of such breach, the Company will pay to Parent all reasonable and documented out-of-pocket expenses of Parent and its affiliates in connection with the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, not to exceed $15 million (the “Reimbursable Expenses”

Specific Performance. Each party to the Merger Agreement is entitled to an injunction or injunctions to prevent breaches of the Merger Agreement or to enforce specifically the performance of the terms and provisions of the Merger Agreement, in addition to any other remedy to which such party is entitled at law or in equity.

Amendment. Subject to applicable law, the Merger Agreement may be amended by the parties at any time before the Effective Time pursuant to a written instrument signed by both parties; provided that from and after the time that Parent’s designees constitute a majority of the Company Board, the affirmative vote of a majority of the Independent Directors will be required to amend the Merger Agreement on behalf of the Company.

12. Purpose of the Offer; Plans for the Company.

Purpose of the Offer. The purpose of the Offer is to acquire control of, and the entire equity interest in, the Company. The purpose of the Merger is to acquire all outstanding Shares not tendered and purchased pursuant to the Offer. All Shares acquired by Purchaser pursuant to the Offer will be retained by Purchaser pending the Merger. After the Acceptance Time, Purchaser intends to consummate the Merger as promptly as practicable, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions.

If the Minimum Condition is satisfied, Purchaser will have sufficient voting power to approve the Merger at the Company’s stockholders’ meeting without the affirmative vote of any other stockholder. If Purchaser acquires at least 90% of the then outstanding Shares pursuant to the Offer, Purchaser and the Company will take such necessary and appropriate actions in order to consummate the Merger without a stockholders’ meeting and without the approval of the Company’s stockholders. The Merger Agreement provides that Purchaser will be merged with and into the Company, and, at the Effective Time, the Company’s certificate of incorporation will be amended and restated, to read in its entirety as set forth in a form attached to the Merger Agreement, and the by–laws of the Company will be amended and restated to read in their entirety in the form of the by–laws of Purchaser (except the name of the Surviving Company will be “Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc.”). The directors of Purchaser will become the directors of the Surviving Company and the officers of the Company will be the officers of the Surviving Company.

Appraisal Rights. Under the DGCL, holders of Shares do not have appraisal rights in connection with the Offer. In connection with the Merger, however, stockholders of the Company who comply with the applicable statutory procedures under the DGCL will be entitled to receive a judicial determination of the fair value of their Shares (exclusive of any element of value arising from accomplishment or expectation of the Merger and to receive payment of such fair value in cash). Any such judicial determination of the fair value of the Shares could be based upon considerations other than or in addition to the Offer Price and the market value of the Shares. The value so determined could be higher or lower than, or the same as, the Offer Price or the consideration paid in the Merger. Moreover, Purchaser could argue in an appraisal proceeding that, for purposes of which, the fair value of such Shares is less than the Offer Price. When the fair value has been determined, the Delaware Court of Chancery will direct the payment of such value upon surrender by those stockholders of the certificates representing their Shares. Unless such court, in its discretion, determines otherwise for good cause shown, interest from the Effective Time through the date of payment of the judgment will be compounded quarterly and

 

46


Table of Contents

will accrue at 5% over the Federal Reserve Board (as defined below) discount rate (including any surcharge) as established from time to time during the period between the Effective Time and the date of payment of the judgment.

In Weinberger v. UOP, Inc., the Delaware Supreme Court discussed the factors that could be considered in determining fair value in an appraisal proceeding, stating that “proof of value by any techniques or methods which are generally considered acceptable in the financial community and otherwise admissible in court” should be considered and that “[f]air price obviously requires consideration of all relevant factors involving the value of a company.” The Delaware Supreme Court has stated that in making this determination of fair value, the court must consider market value, asset value, dividends, earnings prospects, the nature of the enterprise and any other facts which could be ascertained as of the date of the merger which throw any light on future prospects of the merged corporation. Section 262 of the DGCL provides that fair value is to be “exclusive of any element of value arising from the accomplishment or expectation of the merger.” In Cede & Co. v. Technicolor, Inc., the Delaware Supreme Court stated that such exclusion is a “narrow exclusion [that] does not encompass known elements of value,” but which rather applies only to the speculative elements of value arising from such accomplishment or expectation. In Weinberger, the Delaware Supreme Court also stated that “elements of future value, including the nature of the enterprise, which are known or susceptible of proof as of the date of the merger and not the product of speculation, may be considered.” In addition, the Delaware courts have decided that the statutory appraisal remedy, depending on factual circumstances, may or may not be a dissenting stockholder’s exclusive remedy.

In the event that any holder of Shares who demands appraisal under Section 262 of the DGCL fails to perfect, or effectively withdraws or loses his rights to appraisal as provided in the DGCL, the Shares of such stockholder will be converted into the right to receive the Offer Price. Failure to follow the steps required by Section 262 of the DGCL for perfecting appraisal rights may result in the loss of such rights. The foregoing discussion is not a complete statement of the law relating to appraisal rights and is qualified in its entirety by Section 262 of the DGCL. In the event of the Merger, additional information regarding appraisal rights will be supplied to the stockholders. This discussion does not constitute the notice of appraisal rights required by Section 262 of the DGCL.

Going Private Transaction. The SEC has adopted Rule 13e–3 under the Exchange Act which is applicable to certain “going private” transactions and which may under certain circumstances be applicable to the Merger or another business combination following the purchase of Shares pursuant to the Offer in which Purchaser seeks to acquire the remaining Shares not held by it. Purchaser and the Company believe that Rule 13e–3 will not be applicable to the Merger because it is anticipated that the Merger will be effected within one year following the consummation of the Offer and, in the Merger, stockholders will receive the same price per Share as paid in the Offer. Rule 13e–3 requires, among other things, that certain financial information concerning the Company and certain information relating to the fairness of the proposed transaction and the consideration offered to minority stockholders be filed with the SEC and disclosed to stockholders prior to consummation of the transaction.

Plans for the Company. Pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, promptly upon the purchase of and payment for any Shares by Purchaser pursuant to the Offer, Parent currently intends to request that the Company take all necessary action to enable Parent’s designees to be elected or designated to the Company Board, subject to the requirement in the Merger Agreement regarding the presence of at least three Independent Directors until the Effective Time. Purchaser currently intends, as soon as practicable after consummation of the Offer, to consummate the Merger, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions.

Except as otherwise provided herein, it is currently expected that, initially following the Merger, the business and operations of the Company will, except as set forth in this Offer to Purchase, be continued substantially as they are currently being conducted. Parent will continue to evaluate the business and operations of the Company during the pendency of the Offer and after the consummation of the Offer and the Merger and will take such actions as it deems appropriate under the circumstances then existing.

Except as described above or elsewhere in this Offer to Purchase, Purchaser and Parent have no present plans or proposals that would relate to or result in (i) any extraordinary corporate transaction involving the

 

47


Table of Contents

Company or any of its subsidiaries (such as a merger, reorganization, liquidation, relocation of any operations or sale or other transfer of a material amount of assets), (ii) any sale or transfer of a material amount of assets of the Company or any of its subsidiaries, (iii) any change in the Company Board or management of the Company, (iv) any material change in the Company’ capitalization or dividend policy, (v) any other material change in the Company’ corporate structure or business, (vi) a class of securities of the Company being delisted from a national securities exchange or ceasing to be authorized to be quoted in an inter–dealer quotation system of a registered national securities association or (vii) a class of equity securities of the Company being eligible for termination of registration pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act.

Collaboration with AstraZeneca

Following the completion of the Merger, Parent and AstraZeneca will enter into collaboration arrangements, based on the framework of the existing diabetes alliance, regarding the development and commercialization of the Company’s portfolio of products. Under the collaboration arrangements, Parent and AstraZeneca will share ownership of the patents, trademarks and know-how of the Company. Following completion of the Merger, AstraZeneca will make a payment to the Company, as the Surviving Company, in the amount of approximately $3.4 billion in cash. Profits and losses arising from the collaboration will be shared equally. In addition, AstraZeneca has the option, exercisable at its sole discretion following the closing of the Merger, to establish equal governance rights over key strategic and financial decisions regarding the collaboration, upon the payment to Parent of an additional $135 million. These collaboration arrangements have been approved by the boards of directors of Parent and AstraZeneca PLC.

13. Certain Effects of the Offer.

Market for the Shares. The purchase of Shares by Purchaser pursuant to the Offer will reduce the number of holders of Shares and the number of Shares that might otherwise trade publicly, which could adversely affect the liquidity and market value of the remaining Shares held by stockholders other than Purchaser. Purchaser cannot predict whether the reduction in the number of Shares that might otherwise trade publicly would have an adverse or beneficial effect on the market price for, or marketability of, the Shares or whether such reduction would cause future market prices to be greater or less than the Offer Price.

Stock Quotation. The Shares are quoted on Nasdaq. According to the published guidelines of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, the Shares might no longer be eligible for continued inclusion in Nasdaq if, among other things, the number of publicly-held Shares falls below 750,000, the aggregate market value of the publicly-held Shares is less than $5 million, or there are fewer than two market makers for the Shares. Shares held by officers or directors of the Company or their immediate families, or by any beneficial owner of 10% or more of the Shares, ordinarily will not be considered to be publicly-held for this purpose.

If the Shares cease to be listed on the Nasdaq, the market for the Shares could be adversely affected. It is possible that the Shares would be traded on other securities exchanges (with trades published by such exchanges), the Nasdaq Capital Market, the OTC Bulletin Board or in a local or regional over–the–counter market. The extent of the public market for the Shares and the availability of such quotations would, however, depend upon the number of holders of Shares and the aggregate market value of the Shares remaining at such time, the interest in maintaining a market in the Shares on the part of securities firms, the possible termination of registration of the Shares under the Exchange Act and other factors.

Exchange Act Registration. The Shares currently are registered under the Exchange Act. The purchase of the Shares pursuant to the Offer may result in the Shares becoming eligible for deregistration under the Exchange Act. Registration of the Shares may be terminated by the Company upon application to the SEC if the outstanding Shares are not listed on a “national securities exchange” and if there are fewer than 300 holders of record of Shares.

 

48


Table of Contents

We intend to seek to cause the Company to apply for termination of registration of the Shares as soon as possible after consummation of the Offer if the requirements for termination of registration are met. Termination of registration of the Shares under the Exchange Act would reduce the information required to be furnished by the Company to its stockholders and to the SEC and would make certain provisions of the Exchange Act (such as the short–swing profit recovery provisions of Section 16(b), the requirement of furnishing a proxy statement or information statement in connection with stockholders’ meetings or actions in lieu of a stockholders’ meeting pursuant to Section 14(a) and 14(c) of the Exchange Act and the related requirement of furnishing an annual report to stockholders) no longer applicable with respect to the Shares. In addition, if the Shares are no longer registered under the Exchange Act, the requirements of Rule 13e–3 with respect to “going private” transactions would no longer be applicable to the Company. Furthermore, the ability of “affiliates” of the Company and persons holding “restricted securities” of the Company to dispose of such securities pursuant to Rule 144 under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended, may be impaired or eliminated. If registration of the Shares under the Exchange Act was terminated, the Shares would no longer be eligible for continued inclusion on the Federal Reserve Board’s list of “margin securities” or eligible for stock exchange listing.

If registration of the Shares is not terminated prior to the Merger, then the registration of the Shares under the Exchange Act will be terminated following completion of the Merger.

Margin Regulations. The Shares are currently “margin securities” under the regulations of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “Federal Reserve Board”), which has the effect, among other things, of allowing brokers to extend credit using such Shares as collateral. Depending upon factors similar to those described above regarding listing and market quotations, following the Offer, the Shares may no longer constitute “margin securities” for purposes of the margin regulations of the Federal Reserve Board, in which event the Shares would be ineligible as collateral for margin loans made by brokers.

14. Dividends and Distributions.

As discussed in Section 11—“The Merger Agreement,” the Merger Agreement provides that from the date of the Merger Agreement to the Effective Time, without the prior written approval of Parent, the Company will not, and will not allow its subsidiaries to, declare, set aside, establish a record date for, make or pay any dividends on or make any other distribution with respect to the outstanding Shares (other than dividends by a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company to the Company or another wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company).

15. Certain Conditions of the Offer.

Notwithstanding any other provisions of the Offer, subject to the provisions of the Merger Agreement, Purchaser will not be required to accept for payment or, subject to any applicable rules and regulations of the SEC (including those relating to the obligation of Purchaser to pay for, or return tendered Shares promptly after termination or withdrawal of the Offer), pay for any Shares pursuant to the Offer, and Purchaser may delay its acceptance for payment of any tendered Shares, if:

 

   

the Minimum Condition has not been satisfied;

 

   

any applicable waiting period or approval under the HSR Act (or any other required competition approval) has not expired or been terminated or has not been received;

 

   

there shall be in effect any order, decree, injunction or ruling by a governmental authority restraining or enjoining or preventing the acceptance for payment of, or the payment for the Shares or otherwise prohibiting consummation of the Offer or any statute, rule or regulation shall have been enacted by a governmental authority that prohibits or makes illegal the acceptance for payment of, or the payment for, the Shares;

 

   

the Merger Agreement has been terminated in accordance with its terms;

 

   

any Company Material Adverse Effect has occurred or existed following the execution of the Merger Agreement and is continuing;

 

49


Table of Contents
   

as of the date of the Merger Agreement and as of the Acceptance Time (in each case, except for any representation or warranty that is expressly made as of the specified date, in which case as of the specified date), (A) any representation or warranty of the Company regarding (i) its organization, standing and corporate power, (ii) subsidiaries, (iii) capital structure or (iv) authority to enter into the Agreement, the Company Board Recommendation and applicability of takeover statues to the Offer, Top-Up Option and the Merger Agreement, is not true and correct in all respects, or (B) any other representation or warranty of the Company contained in the Merger Agreement is not true and correct (without giving effect to any “materiality”, “Company Material Adverse Effect” or similar qualifiers set forth in such representation and warranty) except where the failure of such representations and warranties referred to in this clause (B) to be true and correct, individually or in the aggregate with other such failures, has not had, and would not reasonably be expected to have, a Company Material Adverse Effect;

 

   

the Company has not performed in all material respects those obligations under the Merger Agreement required to be performed prior to the Acceptance Time and such failure to perform has not been cured prior to the Acceptance Time; and

 

   

Parent has not received a certificate signed on behalf of the Company by the chief executive officer of the Company to the effect that none of the conditions in the two bullet points immediately above this one shall have occurred and be continuing.

For the purpose of determining whether the Minimum Condition has been satisfied, as described above, Shares tendered in the Offer pursuant to the guaranteed delivery procedures and not actually delivered prior to the Expiration Date are not included.

The Offer Conditions are for the sole benefit of Parent and Purchaser and may be asserted by Parent and Purchaser regardless of the circumstances (including action or inaction by Parent or Purchaser other than any action or inaction in breach of the Merger Agreement) giving rise to such condition, in whole or in part at any applicable time or from time to time in its sole discretion prior to the expiration of the Offer, and all conditions (except for the Minimum Condition, which may be waived by Parent and Purchaser only with the prior written consent of the Company) may be waived by Parent and Purchaser, in their sole discretion, in whole or in part at any applicable time or from time to time, in each case subject to the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement and the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC.

16. Certain Legal Matters; Regulatory Approvals.

General. Except as described in this Section 16, Purchaser is not aware of any pending legal proceeding relating to the Offer. Except as described in this Section 16, based on its examination of publicly available information filed by the Company with the SEC and other publicly available information concerning the Company, Purchaser is not aware of any governmental license or regulatory permit that appears to be material to the Company’s business that might be adversely affected by Purchaser’s acquisition of Shares as contemplated herein or of any approval or other action by any governmental, administrative or regulatory authority or agency, domestic or foreign, that would be required for the acquisition or ownership of Shares by Purchaser or Parent as contemplated herein. Should any such approval or other action be required, Purchaser currently contemplates that, except as described below under “State Takeover Statutes,” such approval or other action will be sought. While Purchaser does not currently intend to delay acceptance for payment of Shares tendered pursuant to the Offer pending the outcome of any such matter, there can be no assurance that any such approval or other action, if needed, would be obtained or would be obtained without substantial conditions or that if such approvals were not obtained or such other actions were not taken, adverse consequences might not result to the Company’s business, or certain parts of the Company’s business might not have to be disposed of, any of which could cause Purchaser to elect to terminate the Offer without the purchase of Shares thereunder under certain conditions. See Section 15—“Certain Conditions of the Offer.”

Stockholder Litigation. Following the announcement of the Merger Agreement, the following putative stockholder class action complaints relating to the Offer and the Merger were filed.

 

50


Table of Contents

Delaware Litigation

On July 3, 2012, a putative stockholder class action complaint was filed in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware, captioned Phillips v. Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Case No. 7673. The complaint names as defendants the Company, certain officers and directors of the Company Board (the “Individual Defendants”), the Parent and Purchaser. The complaint asserts two causes of action: breach of fiduciary duty against the Individual Defendants and aiding and abetting a breach of fiduciary duty against the Parent and Purchaser. The complaint includes allegations that the Individual Defendants breached their fiduciary duties by causing the Company to enter into the merger agreement, by agreeing to sell the Company at an inadequate price, by failing to maximize the value of the Company and by agreeing to preclusive deal protection devices that unduly restrict the ability of other potential acquirors to bid successfully for the Company. Plaintiff seeks an injunction prohibiting consummation of the proposed transaction, rescission and rescissory damages (to the extent the proposed transaction has already been consummated), and fees and costs associated with prosecuting the action. The Company, Parent and Purchaser believe the plaintiff’s allegations lack merit and will vigorously contest them. The foregoing description is qualified in its entirety by reference to the complaint which is filed as Exhibit 99(a)(5)(C).

California Litigation

On July 3, 2012, a putative stockholder class action complaint was filed in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Diego, captioned Peterson v. Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Case No. 37-2012-00100092-CU-BT-CTL. The complaint names as defendants the Company, the Individual Defendants, the Parent, Purchaser and Does 1-25. The complaint asserts three causes of action: breach of fiduciary duty against the Individual Defendants and Does 1-15, aiding and abetting a breach of fiduciary duty against the Company, and aiding and abetting a breach of fiduciary duty against Parent, Purchaser and Does 16-25. The complaint includes allegations that the Individual Defendants breached their fiduciary duties by causing the Company to enter into the merger agreement, by agreeing to sell the Company at an inadequate price, by failing to maximize the value of the Company and by agreeing to preclusive deal protection devices that unduly restrict the ability of other potential acquirors to bid successfully for the Company. Plaintiff seeks declaratory judgment, an injunction prohibiting consummation of the proposed transaction, rescission and rescissory damages (to the extent the proposed transaction has already been consummated), imposition of a constructive trust, and fees and costs associated with prosecuting the action. The Company, Parent and Purchaser believe the plaintiff’s allegations lack merit and will vigorously contest them. The foregoing description is qualified in its entirety by reference to the complaint which is filed as Exhibit 99(a)(5)(D).

State Takeover Statutes. A number of states (including Delaware, where the Company is incorporated) have adopted takeover laws and regulations which purport, to varying degrees, to be applicable to attempts to acquire securities of corporations which are incorporated in such states or which have substantial assets, stockholders, principal executive offices or principal places of business therein.

The company is incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware. In general, Section 203 of the DGCL prevents a Delaware corporation from engaging in a “business combination” (defined to include mergers and certain other actions) with an “interested stockholder” (including a person who owns or has the right to acquire 15% or more of a corporation’s outstanding voting stock) for a period of three years following the time such person became an “interested stockholder” unless, among other things, the “business combination” is approved by the board of directors of such corporation before such person became an “interested stockholder.” The Company Board has approved the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the Offer, the Top-Up Option, the Support Agreement and the Merger, for purposes of Section 203 of the DGCL.

Purchaser is not aware of any other state takeover laws or regulations which are applicable to the Offer or the Merger and has not attempted to comply with any state takeover laws or regulations. If any government official or third party should seek to apply any such state takeover law to the Offer or the Merger or other business combination between Purchaser or any of its affiliates and the Company, Purchaser will take such action

 

51


Table of Contents

as then appears desirable, which action may include challenging the applicability or validity of such statute in appropriate court proceedings. In the event it is asserted that one or more state Takeover Statutes is applicable to the Offer or the Merger and an appropriate court does not determine that it is inapplicable or invalid as applied to the Offer or the Merger, Purchaser might be required to file certain information with, or to receive approvals from, the relevant state authorities or holders of Shares, and Purchaser might be unable to accept for payment or pay for Shares tendered pursuant to the Offer, or be delayed in continuing or consummating the Offer or the Merger. In such case, Purchaser may not be obligated to accept for payment or pay for any tendered Shares. See Section 15—“Certain Conditions of the Offer.”

United States Antitrust Compliance. Under the HSR Act, and the related rules and regulations that have been issued by the Federal Trade Commission (the “FTC”), certain acquisition transactions may not be consummated until certain information and documentary material has been furnished for review to the FTC and the Antitrust Division and certain waiting period requirements have been satisfied. These requirements apply to Purchaser’s acquisition of the Shares in the Offer and the Merger.

Under the HSR Act, the purchase of Shares in the Offer may not be completed until the expiration of a 15–calendar day waiting period which begins after Parent files a Notification and Report Form under the HSR Act with the FTC and the Antitrust Division, unless such waiting period is earlier terminated by the FTC and the Antitrust Division or Parent receives a request for additional information or documentary material prior to that time. If the 15–calendar day waiting period expires on a federal holiday or weekend day, the waiting period is automatically extended until 11:59 PM, Eastern Time, the next business day. The Company must file a Notification and Report Form within 10 calendar days after Parent files its Notification and Report Form. Parent expects to file a Notification and Report Form under the HSR Act with the FTC and the Antitrust Division in connection with the purchase of Shares in the Offer and the Merger no later than Monday, July 16, 2012, and the required waiting period with respect to the Offer and the Merger will expire at 11:59 PM, Eastern Time, on the 15th calendar day after such filing, unless earlier terminated by the FTC and the Antitrust Division, or Parent receives a request for additional information or documentary material prior to that time. If within the 15–calendar day waiting period either the FTC or the Antitrust Division requests additional information or documentary material from Parent, the waiting period with respect to the Offer and the Merger would be extended for an additional period of 10–calendar days following the date of Parent’s substantial compliance with that request. Only one extension of the waiting period pursuant to a request for additional information is authorized by the HSR Act rules. After that time, the waiting period may be extended only by court order. The FTC or the Antitrust Division may terminate the additional 10–calendar day waiting period before its expiration. In practice, complying with a request for additional information and documentary material can take a significant period of time.

We believe that the only material regulatory filing that will be required to consummate the offer and the Merger is the filing of a Notification and Report Form pursuant to the HSR Act.

17. Fees and Expenses.

Citigroup Global Markets Inc. is acting as Dealer Manager in connection with the Offer and has provided certain financial advisory services to Parent in connection with the proposed acquisition of the Company, for which services it will receive customary compensation. Parent and Purchaser have agreed to reimburse the Dealer Manager for its reasonable costs and expenses incurred in connection with its engagement and to indemnify the Dealer Manager and certain related parties against certain liabilities and expenses in connection with its engagement, including certain liabilities under the federal securities laws. The Dealer Manager may contact holders of Shares by mail, telephone, telecopy and personal interview and may request brokers, bankers and other nominees to forward materials relating to the Offer to beneficial owners of Shares. In the ordinary course of business, including in their trading and brokerage operations and in a fiduciary capacity, the Dealer Manager and its affiliates may hold positions at any time, both long and short, and may trade or otherwise effect transactions for their own accounts and for those of their customers, in Parent and/or the Company’s securities,

 

52


Table of Contents

including the Shares. As a result, the Dealer Manager and its affiliates at any time may own certain of Parent and/or the Company’s equity securities, including the Shares. In addition, the Dealer Manager and its affiliates may tender Shares into the Offer for their own accounts.

Parent and Purchaser have retained Georgeson, Inc. to be the Information Agent and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. to be the Depositary in connection with the Offer. The Information Agent may contact holders of Shares by mail, telephone, telecopy and personal interview and may request brokers, bankers and other nominees to forward materials relating to the Offer to beneficial owners of Shares.

The Information Agent and the Depositary each will receive reasonable and customary compensation for their respective services in connection with the Offer, will be reimbursed for reasonable and customary expenses and will be indemnified against certain liabilities and expenses in connection therewith, including certain liabilities under federal securities laws.

Neither Parent nor Purchaser will pay any fees or commissions to any broker or dealer or to any other person (other than to the Depositary, the Dealer Manager and the Information Agent) in connection with the solicitation of tenders of Shares pursuant to the Offer. Brokers, bankers and other nominees will, upon request, be reimbursed by Purchaser for customary mailing and handling expenses incurred by them in forwarding offering materials to their customers.

18. Miscellaneous

The Offer is not being made to (nor will tenders be accepted from or on behalf of) holders of Shares in any jurisdiction in which the making of the Offer or the acceptance thereof would not be in compliance with the laws of such jurisdiction. However, Purchaser may, in its discretion, take such action as it may deem necessary to make the Offer in any such jurisdiction and to extend the Offer to holders of Shares in such jurisdiction.

No person has been authorized to give any information or to make any representation on behalf of Parent or Purchaser not contained herein or in the Letter of Transmittal and, if given or made, such information or representation must not be relied upon as having been authorized.

Purchaser has filed with the SEC a Tender Offer Statement on Schedule TO pursuant to Rule 14d–3 of the General Rules and Regulations under the Exchange Act, together with exhibits furnishing certain additional information with respect to the Offer, and may file amendments thereto. A copy of such documents, and any amendments thereto, may be examined at, and copies may be obtained from, the SEC in the manner set forth under Section 7—“Certain Information Concerning the Company.”

 

53


Table of Contents

SCHEDULE I

DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF PARENT, PURCHASER

Directors and Executive Officers of Parent. The following table sets forth the name, present principal occupation or employment and past material occupations, positions, offices or employment for at least the past five years for each director of Parent and the name, present principal occupation or employment and past material occupations, positions, offices or employment for at least the past five years for each executive officer of Parent. The current business address of each person is 345 Park Avenue, New York, New York 10154 and the current phone number is (212) 546–4000. Unless otherwise indicated, each such person is a citizen of the United States of America.

 

                      Present Principal Occupation or Employment;

Name

                 Material Positions Held During the Past Five Years

 

Lamberto Andreotti

Director of Parent since 2009.

 

  Chief Executive Officer of Parent since May 2010. President and Chief Operating Officer of Parent from March 2009 until May 2010. Mr. Andreotti has been with Parent for 14 years. From March 2008 to March 2009, Mr. Andreotti served as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Parent. From May 2007 until March 2008, he served as Executive Vice President of Parent and Chief Operating Officer of Worldwide Pharmaceuticals, a division of Parent. Mr. Andreotti served as Executive Vice President of Parent and President of Worldwide Pharmaceuticals, from 2005 to 2007 and as Senior Vice President and International President of Worldwide Pharmaceuticals from 2002 to 2005. Mr. Andreotti is a director of E.I. du Pont de Nemours During the last five years Mr. Andreotti served as Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors of Mead Johnson Nutrition Company. Mr. Andreotti is a citizen of Italy.

 

Lewis B. Campbell

Director of Parent since 1998.

 

  Retired Non–Executive Chairman of Textron Inc., a multi-industry company serving the aircraft, industrial products and components and financial industries. Served as Non-Executive Chairman of Textron Inc. from December 2009 until August 2010. Mr. Campbell served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Textron Inc. from February 1999 until his retirement as Chief Executive Officer in December 2009. Mr. Campbell is on the Board of Trustees of Noblis, Inc., is a Director of Sensata Technologies Holdings N.V., is an adviser to Caldera Ventures, LLC and is a member of The Business Council. During the last five years, he was the Chairman of the Board of Directors of Textron Inc. and a Director of Dow Jones & Co.

 

James M. Cornelius

Director of Parent since 2005.

 

 

Non-Executive Chairman of Parent since May 2010. Served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Parent from February 2008 to May 2010 and served as Chief Executive Officer from September 2006 to February 2008. From November 2005 to April 2006, Mr. Cornelius served as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer (interim) of Guidant Corporation. He served as Guidant’s Non-Executive Chairman of the Board from 2000 until 2005.

 

54


Table of Contents
 

Mr. Cornelius is the Chairman of the Board of Directors of Mead Johnson Nutrition Company and a Director of Given Imaging Ltd. During the last five years, Mr. Cornelius was Vice Chairman of the Board of SpringBoard Medical Innovations, LLC and a Director of DIRECTV Group.

 

Louis J. Freeh

Director of Parent since 2005.

 

  Mr. Freeh has served as Chairman and Treasurer of the Freeh Group International Solutions, LLC, a consulting firm, and Managing Partner, Freeh Sullivan Sporkin, LLP, a law firm, since 2007. Mr. Freeh served as Vice Chairman, General Counsel, Corporate Secretary and Ethics Officer to MBNA Corporation, a bank holding company, from 2001 until its acquisition by Bank of America in January 2006. He served as FBI Director from 1993 to 2001 and previously as a U.S. District Judge, Assistant U.S. Attorney and FBI Special Agent. Mr. Freeh currently serves as independent compliance monitor to Daimler AG and as Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Trustee for MF Global Holdings Ltd. Mr. Freeh is also an adviser to Millennium Partners, L.P. During the last five years, Mr. Freeh was a Director of Wilmington Trust Corporation, Fannie Mae, Visage Technology, Inc. and L–1 Identity Solutions.

 

Laurie H. Glimcher, M.D.

Director of Parent since 1997.

 

  Dr. Glimcher has served as the Stephen and Suzanne Weiss Dean of Weill Cornell Medical College and the Cornell University Provost for Medical Affairs since January 2012. Previously, she had been the Irene Heinz Given Professor of Immunology at the Harvard School of Public Health and Professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School from 1990 to December 2011. She is a Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, a Member of the National Academy of Sciences USA, and a Member of the Institutes of Medicine of the National Academy of Sciences. She is also a member of, and a past President of, the American Association of Immunologists. She was elected to the American Society of Clinical Investigation, the American Association of Physicians and the American Association for the Advancement of Science. She is also a Senior Physician and Rheumatologist at Brigham and Women’s Hospital. Dr. Glimcher serves on the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center Board of Scientific Consultants and on the Scientific Advisory Boards of the Burroughs-Wellcome Fund, Cancer Research Institute, Immune Disease Institute, Health Care Ventures, Inc., Nodality Inc., Abpro, Inc., Theraclone Sciences, Inc. and American Asthma Foundation. Dr. Glimcher is a Director of Waters Corporation.

 

Michael Grobstein

Director of Parent since 2007.

 

 

Mr. Grobstein is a retired Vice Chairman of Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm. Mr. Grobstein worked with Ernst & Young from 1964 to 1998, and was admitted as a partner in 1975. He served as Vice Chairman-International Operations

 

55


Table of Contents
 

from 1993 to 1998, as Vice Chairman-Planning, Marketing and Industry Services from 1987 to 1993, and Vice Chairman-Accounting and Auditing Services from 1984 to 1987. He serves on the Board of Trustees and Executive Committee and is the Treasurer of the Central Park Conservancy. Mr. Grobstein is a Director of Given Imaging Ltd. and Peer Health Exchange, Inc.

 

Alan J. Lacy

Director of Parent since 2008.

 

  Mr. Lacy has been a Senior Adviser to Oak Hill Capital Partners, L.P., a private equity investment firm, since 2007. From 1994 to 2006, he was employed by Sears, Roebuck and Co., a large retail company, and following its acquisition, Sears Holdings Corporation, a large broadline retailer. Mr. Lacy has held executive level positions in finance and operations, including his service as Chief Executive Officer from 2000 to 2005. He also served as Vice Chairman of Sears Holdings Corporation from 2005 to 2006. He is a former Chairman and current member of the Board of Trustees of the National Parks Conservation Association. Mr. Lacy is a Director of The Hillman Companies, Inc. and Dave & Buster’s Inc. Mr. Lacy is also a Trustee of Fidelity Funds. During the last five years, he was a Director of The Western Union Company.

 

Vicki L. Sato, Ph.D.

Director of Parent since 2006.

 

  Dr. Sato has been a professor of management practice at the Harvard Business School and Professor of the practice of molecular and cell biology at Harvard University since July 2005. In 2006, Dr. Sato became Special Advisor to Atlas Venture, a global venture capital firm. In 2005, Dr. Sato retired as President of Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated, a global biotechnology company, where she was responsible for research and development, business and corporate development, commercial operations, legal, and finance. Dr. Sato also served as Chief Scientific Officer, Senior Vice President of Research and Development, and Chair of the Scientific Advisory Board at Vertex before being named President in 2000. Dr. Sato is a Director of PerkinElmer Corporation and of Galapagos NV. During the last five years, she was a Director of Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Infinity Pharmaceuticals.

 

Elliott Sigal, M.D., Ph.D.

Director of Parent since 2011.

 

  Dr. Sigal has been Chief Scientific Officer and President of Research and Development at Parent since October 2004 and an Executive Vice President since November 2006. Dr. Sigal joined Parent in November of 1997 as Vice President of the newly created department of Applied Genomics. Dr. Sigal is a Director of Mead Johnson Nutrition Company.

 

56


Table of Contents

Gerald L. Storch

Director of Parent since 2012.

 

  Mr. Storch has been Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Toys’R’Us, Inc. since February 2006. Prior to joining Toys’R’Us, Inc., Mr. Storch served as Vice Chairman of Target Corporation. Prior to joining Target, Mr. Storch was a partner at McKinsey & Company. Mr. Storch is a member of the Committee Encouraging Corporate Philanthropy and is on the board of Toys’R’Us Children’s Fund. Mr. Storch previously served on the compensation committee of another public company.

 

Togo D. West, Jr.

Director of Parent since 2008.

 

  Secretary West has been Chairman of TLI Leadership Group, a strategic consulting firm since 2006 and Chairman of Noblis, Inc., a nonprofit science and technology company since 2001. From 2004 to 2006, Secretary West was the Chief Executive Officer of the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies, a nonprofit research and public policy institution. He served as Of Counsel to the Washington, D.C. based law firm of Covington & Burling LLP from 2000 to 2004. Secretary West was Secretary of Veterans Affairs from 1998 to 2000 and U.S. Secretary of the Army from 1993 to 1997. He was formerly a Director of FuelCell Energy, Inc., and Krispy Kreme Doughnuts. In the last five years he was a Director of AbitibiBowater Inc.

 

R. Sanders Williams, M.D.

Director of Parent since 2006.

 

  Dr. Williams has been President and Robert W. and Linda L. Mahley Distinguished Professor of The J. David Gladstone Institutes, a non-profit research enterprise since March 2010. From 2007 to 2010, Dr. Williams was the Senior Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs at Duke University Medical Center and Dean of Duke University School of Medicine from 2001 to 2007. Dr. Williams joined the Duke faculty in 1980 as an assistant professor of medicine, physiology and cell biology. Dr. Williams is a consultant to Phrixus, Inc and the Taylor Companies. Dr. Williams is a member of the Institute of Medicine of the National Academy of Sciences and a fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. Dr. Williams is a member of the American Association of Physicians, and has served on the Director’s Advisory Committee of the National Institutes of Health and the Board of External Advisors to the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute. Dr. Williams is a Director of Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings.

 

Charles Bancroft

Executive Vice President of Parent as of October 2011, Chief Financial Officer of Parent since April 2010 and a member of the Senior Management Team. Prior to his role as Acting Chief Financial Officer, Mr. Bancroft was Vice President, Finance, Worldwide Pharmaceuticals, a division of Parent.

 

Giovanni Caforio, M.D.

President, U.S. Pharmaceuticals of Parent and a member of the Senior Management Team. Mr. Caforio leads Parent’s pharmaceutical business in the U.S. He was previously Senior Vice President, Oncology and Immunoscience, Global Commercialization.

 

57


Table of Contents
  Giovanni joined Parent in 2000 as Vice President and General Manager, Italy, in the Worldwide Medicines Group. In 2001, he assumed added responsibility for Greece and Israel, and then all of South East Europe in 2003. In 2004, he was appointed Senior Vice President, European Marketing and Brand Commercialization. In 2007, he was named Senior Vice President, U.S. Oncology. Prior to joining Parent, Giovanni spent 12 years with Abbott Laboratories in a number of leadership positions. Mr. Caforio is a citizen of Italy.

 

Joseph C. Caldarella

Senior Vice President and Corporate Controller of Parent since 2010. Vice President and Corporate Controller of Parent since 2005.

 

Béatrice Cazala

Executive Vice President, Commercial Operations since October 2011 and a member of the Senior Management Team. Senior Vice President, Commercial Operations and President, Global Commercialization, Europe and Emerging Markets, of Parent since May 2010. President, Global Commercialization, and President, Europe, of Parent from March 2009 to May 2010 and a member of the Management Council. Ms. Cazala was previously President, EMEA and Asia Pacific, Worldwide Medicines International of Parent. From 1994 to 2000, she served as Vice President and General Manager of UPSA France. In 2000, she became Senior Vice President and General Manager, Pharma/UPSA France and, in 2002, she was appointed Senior Vice President, Northern Europe, based in the U.K. Ms. Cazala is a citizen of France.

 

John E. Celentano

Senior Vice President, Human Resources, Public Affairs and Philanthropy, of Parent since May 2010 and a member of the Senior Management Team. From 2009 until May 2010, Mr. Celentano served as President, Emerging Markets and Asia Pacific and a member of the Management Council. From March 2008 to March 2009, he served as Senior Vice President of Strategy & Productivity Transformation of Parent. Mr. Celentano was also President of Heath Care Group, a division of Parent, from 2005 until March 2008 and a Director of Parent from September 22, 2005 until May 2008. From 2002 to 2005, Mr. Celentano served as President, Latin America and Canada, Worldwide Medicines Group, a division of Parent.

 

Francis Cuss, MB BChir, FRCP

Senior Vice President, Research and Development, since May 2010 and a member of the Senior Management Team. From 2006 to May 2010, he served as Senior Vice President, Discovery and Exploratory Clinical Development, of Parent. Prior to 2006, served as Senior Vice President, Drug Discovery, of Parent. Mr. Cuss is a citizen of the U.K.

 

Brian Daniels, M.D.

Senior Vice President, Global Development and Medical Affairs, Research and Development, of Parent, since 2008 and a member of the Senior Management Team. Prior to 2008, served as Senior Vice President, Global Clinical Development, Research and Development, a division of Parent.

 

Sandra Leung

General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of Parent, since 2007 and a member of the Senior Management Team. From 2006 to 2007, she

 

58


Table of Contents
 

served as Vice President, Corporate Secretary and Acting General Counsel of Parent. Prior to 2006, she served as Vice President and Corporate Secretary, Corporate Staff of Parent.

 

Louis S. Schmukler

Mr. Schmukler joined the Parent in September 2011, as president of Technical Operations, overseeing global manufacturing.

 

  Before joining Parent, Mr. Schmukler led Pfizer’s worldwide biotech manufacturing operations as Senior Vice President, Specialty/Biotechnology Operating Unit. Prior to that, he oversaw global small molecule pharmaceutical manufacturing and Asia Pacific manufacturing for Wyeth, and held earlier leadership positions at Marion Merrell Dow, Hoffman-LaRoche and Novartis/Sandoz.

 

Paul von Autenried

Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer of Parent and a member of the Senior Management Team. From 2007 to 2011 served as Vice President and Chief Information Officer.

 

  Prior to joining Parent, Mr. von Autenried held positions with Kraft General Foods, Hewlett-Packard and IBM. He is a member of the Accenture CIO Council, Hewlett-Packard Board of Advisors, Microsoft Pharmaceutical Advisory Council and the Research Board.

Directors and Officers of Purchaser. The following table sets forth the name, present principal occupation or employment and past material occupations, positions, offices or employment for at least the past five years for each director of Purchaser and the name, citizenship, business address, business phone number, present principal occupation or employment and past material occupations, positions, offices or employment for at least the past five years for each executive officer of Purchaser. The current business address of each person is 345 Park Avenue, New York, New York 10154–0037 and the current phone number is (212) 546–4000. Unless otherwise indicated, each such person is a citizen of the United States of America.

 

Demetrios Kydonieus

Director of Purchaser. Vice President of Purchaser. Vice President, Strategy, Alliances and Transactions of Parent from May 2011 to present, Executive Director, Strategic Transactions Group of Parent from June 2009 until May 2011, and Senior Counsel, Corporate Development, of Parent from January 2008 until June 2009.

 

Jeffrey Galik

Director of Purchaser. Treasurer of Purchaser. Senior Vice President and Treasurer of Parent since August 2010, Vice President and Treasurer of Parent from January 2008 until August 2010, Vice President and Assistant Treasurer of Parent during January 2008, and Vice President, Finance, Latin America & Canada from July 2006 until January 2008.

 

John E. Celentano

Director of Purchaser. President of Purchaser. Senior Vice President, Human Resources, Public Affairs and Philanthropy of Parent since 2010, President of President, Emerging Markets and Asia Pacific of Parent from 2009 until 2010, Senior Vice President, Strategy and Productivity Transformation from 2008 until 2009, and President, Health Care Group, a division of Parent from 2005 until 2008.

 

59


Table of Contents

P. Joseph Campisi, Jr.

Director of Purchaser. Vice President of Purchaser. Vice President and Associate General Counsel, Transactional Practice Group, of Parent since February 2011. Vice President and Assistant General Counsel, Transactional Practice Group, of Parent from December 2009 until February 2011. Vice President and Senior Counsel, Corporate Development, of Parent from August 2003 to December 2009.

 

David T. Bonk

Vice President of Purchaser. Vice President and Associate General Counsel, Research & Development of Parent from February 2011 to present, Vice President and Associate General Counsel, Transactional Practice Group, of Parent from July 2006 until February 2011.

 

Katherine R. Kelly

Secretary of Purchaser. Vice President and Assistant General Counsel, Corporate Governance and Securities, of Parent since April 2011. Vice President and Assistant General Counsel, Securities Regulation and Disclosure, of Parent from February 2010 until April 2011. Assistant General Counsel of Parent from December 2009 to February 2010. Senior Counsel of Parent from March 2008 to December 2009. Counsel of Parent from April 2007 to March 2008. Associate Counsel of Parent from August 2005 to April 2007.

 

60


Table of Contents

The Letter of Transmittal, certificates for Shares and any other required documents should be sent by each stockholder of the Company or such stockholder’s broker, dealer, commercial bank, trust company or other nominee to the Depositary as follows:

The Depositary for the Offer is:

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

 

By Mail:    By Hand or Overnight Courier:

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Shareowner Services

Voluntary Corporate Actions

P.O. Box 64854

St. Paul, Minnesota 55164-0854

  

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Shareowner Services

Voluntary Corporate Actions

1110 Centre Pointe Curve, Suite 101

Mendota Heights, MN 55120

Other Information:

Questions or requests for assistance may be directed to the Information Agent at the telephone numbers and address set forth below. Questions or requests for assistance or additional copies of the Offer to Purchase, this Letter of Transmittal and the Notice of Guaranteed Delivery may be directed to the Information Agent at the address and telephone numbers set forth below. Stockholders may also contact their broker, dealer, commercial bank or trust company for assistance concerning the Offer.

The Information Agent for the Offer is:

 

LOGO

199 Water Street, 26th Floor

New York, NY 10038

Banks and Brokers Call: (212) 440-9800

Call Toll Free: (888) 663-7851

The Dealer Manager for the Offer is:

 

LOGO

Citigroup Global Markets Inc.

388 Greenwich Street

New York, New York 10013

Call: (212) 816-7837

EX-99.(A)(1)(B) 3 d376793dex99a1b.htm LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Letter of Transmittal

Exhibit No. (a)(1)(B)

LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL

To Tender Shares of Common Stock

of

AMYLIN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., a Delaware corporation

at

$31.00 NET PER SHARE

Pursuant to the Offer to Purchase dated July 10, 2012

by

B&R ACQUISITION COMPANY, a Delaware corporation

and a wholly-owned subsidiary of

BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, a Delaware corporation

 

THE OFFER AND WITHDRAWAL RIGHTS WILL EXPIRE AT 5:00 PM, NEW YORK CITY TIME, ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 7, 2012, UNLESS THE OFFER IS EXTENDED.

The Depositary for the Offer is:

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

 

By Mail:

 

By Hand or Overnight Courier:

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Shareowner Services

Voluntary Corporate Actions

P.O. Box 64854

St. Paul, Minnesota 55164-0854

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Shareowner Services

Voluntary Corporate Actions

1110 Centre Pointe Curve, Suite 101

Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55120

Delivery of this Letter of Transmittal to an address other than as set forth above will not constitute a valid delivery to the Depositary (as defined below). You must sign this Letter of Transmittal in the appropriate space provided therefor below, with signature guaranteed, if required, and complete the Substitute Form W-9 included in this Letter of Transmittal, or an applicable IRS Form W-8, if required. The instructions set forth in this Letter of Transmittal should be read carefully before this Letter of Transmittal is completed.

 

 

DESCRIPTION OF COMPANY SHARES TENDERED

Name(s) and Address(es) of Registered Holder(s)

(Please fill in, if blank, exactly as name(s) appear(s) on
Share Certificate(s))

 

Company Shares Tendered

(Attach additional signed list, if necessary)

    

Certificate

Number(s) and/or
indicate book-entry

  Total Number of
Company Shares
Represented by Share
Certificate(s)
  Total Number of
Company Shares
Tendered(1, 2)
             
             
             
             
   

Total Company Shares

   

(1)  If shares are held in book-entry form you must indicate the number of Company Shares you are tendering

(2)  Unless otherwise indicated, all Company Shares represented by Share Certificates delivered to the Depositary will be deemed to have been tendered. See Instruction 4.


The Offer (as defined below) is not being made to (nor will tender of Company Shares (as defined below) be accepted from or on behalf of) stockholders in any jurisdiction in which the making of the Offer or the acceptance thereof would not be in compliance with the laws of such jurisdiction.

This Letter of Transmittal is to be used by stockholders of Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) if certificates for Company Shares (“Share Certificates”) are to be forwarded herewith or, unless an Agent’s Message (as defined in the Offer to Purchase) is utilized, if Company Shares are held in book-entry form on the records of the Depositary (pursuant to the procedures set forth in Section 3 of the Offer to Purchase).

Stockholders whose Share Certificates are not immediately available, or who cannot complete the procedure for book-entry transfer on a timely basis, or who cannot deliver all other required documents to the Depositary prior to the Expiration Date (as defined in Section 1 of the Offer to Purchase), must tender their Company Shares according to the guaranteed delivery procedure set forth in Section 3 of the Offer to Purchase in order to participate in the Offer. See Instruction 2 below. Delivery of documents to the Depositary Trust Company does not constitute delivery to the Depositary.

If any Share Certificate(s) you are tendering with this Letter of Transmittal has been lost, stolen, destroyed or mutilated, then you should contact American Stock Transfer and Trust Company, as Transfer Agent (the “Transfer Agent”), at 1-800-937-5449, regarding the requirements for replacement. You may be required to post a bond to secure against the risk that the Share Certificate(s) may be subsequently recirculated. You are urged to contact the Transfer Agent immediately in order to receive further instructions, for a determination of whether you will need to post a bond and to permit timely processing of this documentation. See Instruction 11 below.

THE INSTRUCTIONS ACCOMPANYING THIS LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL SHOULD BE READ CAREFULLY BEFORE THIS LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL IS COMPLETED. REQUESTS FOR ASSISTANCE OR ADDITIONAL COPIES OF THE OFFER TO PURCHASE AND THIS LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL MAY BE MADE TO OR OBTAINED FROM THE INFORMATION AGENT AT THE ADDRESS OR TELEPHONE NUMBERS SET FORTH BELOW.

 

2


Ladies and Gentlemen:

The undersigned hereby tenders to B&R Acquisition Company, a Delaware corporation ( “Purchaser”) and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, a Delaware corporation (“Parent”), the above described shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share (“Company Shares”), of Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), pursuant to Purchaser’s offer to purchase all outstanding Company Shares, at a purchase price of $31.00 per share, net to the seller in cash, without interest and less any applicable withholding taxes (the “Offer Price”), upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Offer to Purchase dated July 10, 2012 (as it may be amended or supplemented from time to time, the “Offer to Purchase”), receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, and in this Letter of Transmittal (as it may be amended or supplemented from time to time, this “Letter of Transmittal” and, together with the Offer to Purchase, the “Offer”).

Upon the terms and subject to the conditions of the Offer (and if the Offer is extended or amended, the terms and conditions of any such extension or amendment) and subject to, and effective upon, acceptance for payment of Company Shares validly tendered herewith and not properly withdrawn prior to the Expiration Date in accordance with the terms of the Offer, the undersigned hereby sells, assigns and transfers to or upon the order of Purchaser all right, title and interest in and to all Company Shares that are being tendered hereby (and any and all dividends, distributions, rights, other Company Shares or other securities issued or issuable in respect thereof on or after July 10, 2012 (collectively, “Distributions”)) and irrevocably constitutes and appoints Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (the “Depositary”) the true and lawful agent and attorney-in-fact of the undersigned with respect to such Company Shares (and any and all Distributions), with full power of substitution (such power of attorney being deemed to be an irrevocable power coupled with an interest in the Company Shares tendered by this Letter of Transmittal), to (i) deliver Share Certificates for such Company Shares (and any and all Distributions) or transfer ownership of such Company Shares (and any and all Distributions) on the account books maintained by DTC, together, in any such case, with all accompanying evidences of transfer and authenticity, to or upon the order of Purchaser, (ii) present such Company Shares (and any and all Distributions) for transfer on the books of the Company and (iii) receive all benefits and otherwise exercise all rights of beneficial ownership of such Company Shares (and any and all Distributions), all in accordance with the terms and subject to the conditions of the Offer.

By executing this Letter of Transmittal, the undersigned hereby irrevocably appoints Joseph Campisi and Sandra Leung, and any other designees of Purchaser, as attorneys-in-fact and proxies of the undersigned, each with full power of substitution, (i) to vote at any annual or special meeting of the Company’s stockholders or any adjournment or postponement thereof or otherwise in such manner as each such attorney-in-fact and proxy or its, his or her substitute shall in its, his or her sole discretion deem proper with respect to, (ii) to execute any written consent concerning any matter as each such attorney-in-fact and proxy or its, his or her substitute shall in its, his or her sole discretion deem proper with respect to and (iii) to otherwise act as each such attorney-in-fact and proxy or its, his or her substitute shall in its, his or her sole discretion deem proper with respect to, all Company Shares (and any and all Distributions) tendered hereby and accepted for payment by Purchaser. This appointment will be effective if and when, and only to the extent that, Purchaser accepts such Company Shares for payment pursuant to the Offer. This power of attorney and proxy are irrevocable and are granted in consideration of the acceptance for payment of such Company Shares in accordance with the terms of the Offer. Such acceptance for payment shall, without further action, revoke any prior powers of attorney and proxies granted by the undersigned at any time with respect to such Company Shares (and any and all Distributions), and no subsequent powers of attorney, proxies, consents or revocations may be given by the undersigned with respect thereto (and, if given, will be deemed ineffective). Purchaser reserves the right to require that, in order for Company Shares to be deemed validly tendered, immediately upon Purchaser’s acceptance for payment of such Company Shares, Purchaser or its designees must be able to exercise full voting, consent and other rights with respect to such Company Shares (and any and all Distributions), including voting at any meeting of the Company’s stockholders.

The undersigned hereby represents and warrants that the undersigned has full power and authority to tender, sell, assign and transfer any and all Company Shares tendered hereby (and any and all Distributions) and that, when the same are accepted for payment by Purchaser, Purchaser will acquire good, marketable and unencumbered title to such Company Shares (and any and all Distributions), free and clear of all liens, restrictions, charges and

 

3


encumbrances, and the same will not be subject to any adverse claims. The undersigned hereby represents and warrants that the undersigned is the registered owner of the Company Shares, or the Share Certificate(s) have been endorsed to the undersigned in blank, or the undersigned is a participant in DTC whose name appears on a security position listing as the owner of the Company Shares. The undersigned will, upon request, execute and deliver any additional documents deemed by the Depositary or Purchaser to be necessary or desirable to complete the sale, assignment and transfer of any and all Company Shares tendered hereby (and any and all Distributions). In addition, the undersigned shall promptly remit and transfer to the Depositary for the account of Purchaser all Distributions in respect of any and all Company Shares tendered hereby, accompanied by appropriate documentation of transfer, and, pending such remittance and transfer or appropriate assurance thereof, Purchaser shall be entitled to all rights and privileges as owner of each such Distribution and may deduct from the purchase price of Company Shares tendered hereby the amount or value of such Distribution as determined by Purchaser in its sole discretion.

All authority herein conferred or agreed to be conferred shall not be affected by, and shall survive, the death or incapacity of the undersigned, and any obligation of the undersigned hereunder shall be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, personal representatives, trustees in bankruptcy, successors and assigns of the undersigned. Except as stated in the Offer to Purchase, this tender is irrevocable.

The undersigned hereby acknowledges that delivery of any Share Certificate shall be effected, and risk of loss and title to such Share Certificate shall pass, only upon the proper delivery of such Share Certificate to the Depositary.

The undersigned understands that the valid tender of Company Shares pursuant to any of the procedures described in the Offer to Purchase and in the Instructions hereto will constitute the undersigned’s acceptance of the terms and conditions of the Offer. Purchaser’s acceptance of such Company Shares for payment will constitute a binding agreement between the undersigned and Purchaser upon the terms and subject to the conditions of the Offer (and if the Offer is extended or amended, the terms of or the conditions of any such extension or amendment). Without limiting the foregoing, if the price to be paid in the Offer is amended in accordance with the terms of the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of June 29, 2012 among Parent, Purchaser and the Company pursuant to which the Offer is being made, the price to be paid to the undersigned will be the amended price notwithstanding the fact that a different price is stated in this Letter of Transmittal.

 

   

SPECIAL PAYMENT INSTRUCTIONS

(See Instructions 1, 5, 6 and 7)

   
   

 

To be completed ONLY if the check for the purchase price of Company Shares accepted for payment is to be issued in the name of someone other than the undersigned.

 

Issue to:

 

   
   
    Name         
      (Please Print)    
   
    Address         
   
         
   
         
   

(Taxpayer Identification or Social Security Number)

(Also Complete Substitute Form W-9 Included Herein or
an Applicable IRS Form W-8)

 

   
    SPECIAL DELIVERY INSTRUCTIONS    
   

 

To be completed ONLY if the check for the purchase price of Company Shares accepted for payment is to be sent to someone other than the undersigned or to the undersigned at an address other than that shown under “Description of Company Shares Tendered”.

 

Mail To:

 

   
   
    Name         
      (Please Print)    
   
    Address         
   
         
   
         
   

(Taxpayer Identification or Social Security Number)

(Also Complete Substitute Form W-9 Included Herein or
an Applicable IRS Form W-8)

 

   
 

 

4


 

 

IMPORTANT

STOCKHOLDER: SIGN HERE

(Please complete and return the Substitute Form W-9 included in this Letter of Transmittal

or an applicable IRS Form W-8)

 

 

 

Signature(s) of Holder(s) of Company Shares

 

Dated:                                       ,  2012

 

 
 

Name(s) 

     
  (Please Print)
 

Capacity (full title)

(See Instruction 5) 

     
 

 

 
  (Include Zip Code)
 

Address 

     
 

 

 

Taxpayer Identification or Social Security Number (See Substitute Form W-9 included herein or an applicable IRS
Form W-8)                                                                                                                                                                                                                       

 

Area Code and Telephone No. 

     
 

 

Must be signed by registered holder(s) exactly as name(s) appear(s) on Share Certificate(s) or on a security position listing or by person(s) authorized to become registered holder(s) by Share Certificates and documents transmitted herewith. If signature is by a trustee, executor, administrator, guardian, attorney-in-fact, agent, officer of a corporation or other person acting in a fiduciary or representative capacity, please set forth full title and see Instruction 5.

 

Guarantee of Signature(s)

(If Required—See Instructions 1 and 5)

 

APPLY MEDALLION GUARANTEE STAMP BELOW

 

 

 

5


INSTRUCTIONS

FORMING PART OF THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE OFFER

1. Guarantee of Signatures. No medallion signature guarantee is required on this Letter of Transmittal (i) if the Letter of Transmittal is signed by the registered holder(s) of the Company Shares tendered herewith, unless such registered holder(s) has completed either the box entitled “Special Delivery Instructions” or the box entitled “Special Payment Instructions” on this Letter of Transmittal or (ii) if the Shares are tendered for the account of a financial institution (including most commercial banks, savings and loan associations and brokerage houses) that is a member of or participant in a recognized “Medallion Program” approved by the Securities Transfer Association Inc., including the Security Transfer Agents Medallion Program (STAMP), the Stock Exchange Medallion Program (SEMP) and the New York Stock Exchange Medallion Signature Program (MSP), or any other “eligible guarantor institution,” as such term is defined in Rule 17Ad–15 of the Exchange Act (each, an “Eligible Institution”). In all other cases, all signatures on a Letter of Transmittal must be guaranteed by an Eligible Institution. See Instruction 5.

2. Requirements of Tender. This Letter of Transmittal is to be completed by stockholders if certificates are to be forwarded herewith or, unless an Agent’s Message is utilized, if Company Shares are held in book-entry form on the records of the Depositary. Share Certificates evidencing tendered Company Shares, as well as this Letter of Transmittal (or a manually signed facsimile hereof), properly completed and duly executed, with any required medallion signature guarantees, and any other documents required by this Letter of Transmittal, must be received by the Depositary at one of its addresses set forth herein prior to the Expiration Date. Alternatively, Company Shares must be tendered pursuant to the procedure for book-entry transfer described in the Offer to Purchase, in which case book-entry confirmation must be received by the depository and an Agent’s Message may be provided in lieu of this Letter of Transmittal. Stockholders whose Share Certificates are not immediately available, or who cannot complete the procedure for delivery by book-entry transfer on a timely basis or who cannot deliver all other required documents to the Depositary prior to the Expiration Date, may tender their Company Shares by properly completing and duly executing a Notice of Guaranteed Delivery pursuant to the guaranteed delivery procedure set forth in “The Offer—Procedure for Tendering” in the Offer to Purchase. Pursuant to such procedure: (i) such tender must be made by or through an Eligible Institution; (ii) a properly completed and duly executed Notice of Guaranteed Delivery, must be received by the Depositary prior to the Expiration Date; and (iii) the Share Certificates (or a book-entry confirmation) evidencing all tendered Company Shares, in proper form for transfer, in each case together with the Letter of Transmittal (or a manually signed facsimile thereof), properly completed and duly executed, with any required medallion signature guarantees (or, in the case of a book-entry transfer, an Agent’s Message) and any other documents required by this Letter of Transmittal, must be received by the Depositary within three (3) NASDAQ Stock Market trading days after the date of execution of such Notice of Guaranteed Delivery. If Share Certificates are forwarded separately to the Depositary, a properly completed and duly executed Letter of Transmittal must accompany each such delivery.

The method of delivery of this Letter of Transmittal, Share Certificates and all other required documents, including delivery through DTC, is at the election and the risk of the tendering stockholder and the delivery of all such documents will be deemed made (and the risk of loss and title to Share Certificates will pass) only when actually received by the Depositary (including, in the case of book-entry transfer, by book-entry confirmation). If delivery is by mail, registered mail with return receipt requested, properly insured, is recommended. In all cases, sufficient time should be allowed to ensure timely delivery prior to the expiration of the Offer.

Purchaser will not accept any alternative, conditional or contingent tenders, and no fractional Company Shares will be purchased. By executing this Letter of Transmittal (or manually signed facsimile thereof), the tendering stockholder waives any right to receive any notice of the acceptance for payment of Company Shares.

3. Inadequate Space. If the space provided herein is inadequate, Share Certificate numbers, the number of Company Shares represented by such Share Certificates and/or the number of Company Shares tendered should be listed on a signed separate schedule attached hereto.

 

6


4. Partial Tenders. If fewer than all of the Company Shares evidenced by any Share Certificate or book-entry position are to be tendered, fill in the number of Company Shares that are to be tendered in the box entitled “Number of Company Shares Tendered.” In this case, new Share Certificates or a new book-entry position for the Company Shares that were evidenced by your old Share Certificates or book entry position, but were not tendered by you, will be sent to you or established for you, as applicable, unless otherwise provided in the appropriate box on this Letter of Transmittal, as soon as practicable after the Expiration Date. All Company Shares represented by Share Certificates or book-entry position delivered to the Depositary will be deemed to have been tendered unless indicated.

5. Signatures on Letter of Transmittal; Stock Powers and Endorsements.

(a) Exact Signatures. If this Letter of Transmittal is signed by the registered holder(s) of Company Shares tendered hereby, then the signature(s) must correspond with the name(s) as written on the face of such Share Certificates for such Company Shares without alteration, enlargement or any change whatsoever.

(b) Holders. If any Company Shares tendered hereby are held of record by two or more persons, then all such persons must sign this Letter of Transmittal.

(c) Different Names on Share Certificates. If any Company Shares tendered hereby are registered in different names on different Share Certificates, then it will be necessary to complete, sign and submit as many separate Letters of Transmittal as there are different registrations of Share Certificates.

(d) Endorsements. If this Letter of Transmittal is signed by the registered holder(s) of Company Shares tendered hereby, then no endorsements of Share Certificates for such Company Shares or separate stock powers are required unless payment of the purchase price is to be made, or Company Shares not tendered or not purchased are to be returned, in the name of any person other than the registered holder(s). Signatures on any such Share Certificates or stock powers must be guaranteed by an Eligible Institution.

If this Letter of Transmittal is signed by a person other than the registered holder(s) of Company Shares tendered hereby, then such Share Certificates for such Company Shares must be endorsed or accompanied by appropriate stock powers, in either case, signed exactly as the name(s) of the registered holder(s) appear(s) on such Share Certificates for such Company Shares. Signature(s) on any such Share Certificates or stock powers must be guaranteed by an Eligible Institution. See Instruction 1.

If this Letter of Transmittal or any Share Certificate or stock power is signed by a trustee, executor, administrator, guardian, attorney-in-fact, officer of a corporation or other legal entity or other person acting in a fiduciary or representative capacity, then such person should so indicate when signing, and proper evidence satisfactory to the Depositary of the authority of such person so to act must be submitted.

6. Stock Transfer Taxes. Except as otherwise provided in this Instruction 6, Purchaser or any successor entity thereto will pay all stock transfer taxes with respect to the transfer and sale of any Company Shares to it or its order pursuant to the Offer (for the avoidance of doubt, transfer taxes do not include United States Federal income tax or backup withholding taxes). If, however, payment of the Offer Price is to be made to, or if Share Certificate(s) for Company Shares not tendered or not accepted for payment are to be registered in the name of, any person(s) other than the registered holder(s), or if tendered Share Certificate(s) are registered in the name of any person(s) other than the person(s) signing this Letter of Transmittal, then the amount of any stock transfer taxes (in each case whether imposed on the registered holder(s) or such other person(s)) payable on account of the transfer to such other person(s) will be deducted from the Offer Price of such Company Shares purchased unless evidence satisfactory to Purchaser of the payment of such taxes, or exemption therefrom, is submitted.

Except as provided in this Instruction 6, it will not be necessary for transfer tax stamps to be affixed to Share Certificate(s) evidencing the Company Shares tendered hereby.

7. Special Payment. If a check is to be issued in the name of a person other than the signer of this Letter of Transmittal the appropriate boxes on this Letter of Transmittal must be completed.

 

7


8. Substitute Form W-9; Backup Withholding; Taxpayer Identification Number. To avoid backup withholding, currently at a rate of 28%, a tendering stockholder that is a United States person (as defined for United States Federal income tax purposes) is required to provide the Depositary with a correct Taxpayer Identification Number (“TIN”) on Substitute Form W-9, which is included herein following “Important Tax Information” below, and to certify, under penalties of perjury, that such number is correct, that such stockholder is not subject to backup withholding of Federal income tax and that such stockholder is a United States person. If the tendering stockholder has been notified by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) that such stockholder is subject to backup withholding, such stockholder must cross out item (2) of the Certification section of the Substitute Form W-9 and place a check mark on the line under the heading “Notification of Backup Withholding”, unless such stockholder has since been notified by the IRS that such stockholder is no longer subject to backup withholding.

If the tendering stockholder has not been issued a TIN and has applied for one or intends to apply for one in the near future, such stockholder should sign and date the Substitute Form W-9 and sign and date the Certificate of Awaiting Taxpayer Identification Number, which appears in a separate box below the Substitute Form W-9. If the Certificate of Awaiting Taxpayer Identification Number is completed, and the Depositary is not provided with a TIN by the time of payment, the Depositary will withhold on all reportable payments made to such stockholder pursuant to the Offer until a TIN is provided to the Depositary or such stockholder has otherwise established an exemption from backup withholding.

Certain stockholders may not be subject to backup withholding. Foreign stockholders should submit an appropriate and properly completed applicable IRS Form W-8, a copy of which may be obtained from the Depositary or from the IRS at its website (www.irs.gov), in order to avoid backup withholding. Such stockholders should consult a tax adviser to determine which Form W-8 is appropriate.

Backup withholding is not an additional tax. A tendering stockholder may credit any amount withheld against its, his or her regular United States Federal income tax liability or, if backup withholding results in an overpayment of taxes, claim a refund from the IRS.

If a tendering stockholder fails to furnish its, his or her correct TIN to the Depositary, such stockholder will be subject to a penalty of $50.00 for each such failure unless the failure is due to reasonable cause and not to willful neglect. If a tendering stockholder makes a false statement with no reasonable basis that results in no backup withholding, such stockholder is subject to a $500.00 penalty. Willfully falsifying certifications or affirmations may subject a stockholder to criminal penalties, including fines and/or imprisonment.

9. Irregularities. All questions as to validity, form and eligibility (including, without limitation, time of receipt) and acceptance for payment of any tender of Company Shares will be determined by Purchaser in its reasonable discretion. Purchaser reserves the absolute right to reject any or all tenders of Company Shares it determines not to be in proper form or the acceptance of which or payment for which may, in the opinion of Purchaser, be unlawful. Purchaser also reserves the absolute right to waive any of the conditions of the Offer (other than the Minimum Condition (as defined in the Offer to Purchase), which may only be waived with the consent of the Company) and any defect or irregularity in the tender of any particular Company Shares, and Purchaser’s interpretation of the terms of the Offer (including, without limitation, these instructions). No tender of Company Shares will be deemed to be properly made until all defects and irregularities have been cured or waived. Unless waived, any defects or irregularities in connection with tenders must be cured within such time as Purchaser shall determine. None of Purchaser, the Dealer Manager, the Depositary, the Information Agent (as the foregoing are defined in the Offer to Purchase) or any other person is or will be obligated to give notice of any defects or irregularities in tenders, and none of them will incur any liability for failure to give any such notice. Stockholders may challenge Purchaser’s interpretation of the terms and conditions of the Offer (including, without limitation, the Letter of Transmittal and the instructions hereto), and only a court of competent jurisdiction can make a determination that will be final and binding on all parties.

 

8


10. Requests for Additional Copies. Questions or requests for assistance may be directed to the Information Agent at its address and telephone number set forth below or to your broker, dealer, commercial bank or trust company. Additional copies of the Offer to Purchase, this Letter of Transmittal, the Notice of Guaranteed Delivery and other tender offer materials may be obtained from the Information Agent as set forth below, and will be furnished at Purchaser’s expense.

11. Lost, Destroyed or Stolen Certificates. If any Share Certificate representing Company Shares has been mutilated, lost, destroyed or stolen, then the stockholder should promptly notify the Company’s Transfer Agent at 1-800-937-5449. The stockholder will then be instructed as to the steps that must be taken in order to replace such Share Certificate(s). This Letter of Transmittal and related documents cannot be processed until the procedures for replacing lost, destroyed or stolen Share Certificates have been followed.

This Letter of Transmittal, properly completed and duly executed, together with Share Certificates representing Company Shares being tendered (if applicable) and all other required documents, must be received before 5:00 PM, New York City time, on the Expiration Date, or the tendering stockholder must comply with the procedures for guaranteed delivery.

IMPORTANT TAX INFORMATION

Under United States Federal income tax law, a stockholder who is a United States person (as defined for United States Federal income tax purposes) surrendering Company Shares must, unless an exemption applies, provide the Depositary (as payer) with the stockholder’s correct TIN on Substitute Form W-9, a copy of which is included in this Letter of Transmittal. If the stockholder is an individual, then the stockholder’s TIN is such stockholder’s Social Security number. If the correct TIN is not provided, then the stockholder may be subject to a $50.00 penalty imposed by the IRS, and payments of cash to the stockholder (or other payee) pursuant to the Offer may be subject to backup withholding.

Certain stockholders may not be subject to backup withholding and reporting requirements. In order for an exempt foreign stockholder to avoid backup withholding, such person should complete, sign and submit an appropriate IRS Form W-8, signed under penalties of perjury, attesting to his, her or its exempt status. An IRS Form W-8 can be obtained from the Depositary or from the IRS at its website (www.irs.gov). Such stockholders should consult a tax adviser to determine which IRS Form W-8 is appropriate. Exempt stockholders, other than foreign stockholders, should furnish their TIN, check the “Exempt payee” box of the Substitute Form W-9 and sign, date and return the Substitute Form W-9 to the Depositary in order to avoid erroneous backup withholding. A stockholder should consult its, his or her tax adviser as to such stockholder’s qualification for an exemption from backup withholding and the procedure for such exemption.

If backup withholding applies, the Depositary is required to withhold and pay over to the IRS a portion (currently, 28%) of any reportable payment made to a stockholder pursuant to the Offer. Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Rather, the United States Federal income tax liability of persons subject to backup withholding will be reduced by the amount of tax withheld. If backup withholding results in an overpayment of taxes, a refund may be obtained from the IRS if required information is timely furnished to the IRS.

Purpose of Substitute Form W-9

To prevent backup withholding on payments that are made to a stockholder that is a United States person with respect to Company Shares purchased pursuant to the Offer, the stockholder is required to notify the Depositary of the stockholder’s correct TIN by completing the Substitute Form W-9 included in this Letter of Transmittal and certifying, under penalties of perjury, that (1) the TIN provided on the Substitute Form W-9 is correct (or that such stockholder is awaiting a TIN), (2) the stockholder is not subject to backup withholding

 

9


because (i) the stockholder is exempt from backup withholding, (ii) the stockholder has not been notified by the IRS that the stockholder is subject to backup withholding as a result of a failure to report all interest and dividends or (iii) the IRS has notified the stockholder that the stockholder is no longer subject to backup withholding, and (3) the stockholder is a United States person.

The following section, entitled “What Number to Give the Depositary,” is applicable only to stockholders that are United States persons.

What Number to Give the Depositary

The tendering stockholder is required to give the Depositary the TIN, generally the Social Security number or employer identification number, of the record holder of all Company Shares tendered hereby. If such Company Shares are in more than one name or are not in the name of the actual owner, consult the instructions enclosed with the Substitute Form W-9 included in this Letter of Transmittal for additional guidance on which number to report. If the tendering stockholder has not been issued a TIN and has applied for one or intends to apply for one in the near future, such stockholder should sign and date the Substitute Form W-9 and sign and date the Certificate of Awaiting Taxpayer Identification Number. If the tendering stockholder completes the Certificate of Awaiting Taxpayer Identification Number and the Depositary is not provided with a TIN by the time of payment, the Depositary will withhold on all reportable payments pursuant to the Offer, which will be refunded if a TIN is provided to the Depositary within sixty (60) days of the Depositary’s receipt of the Certificate of Awaiting Taxpayer Identification Number. If the Depositary is provided with an incorrect TIN in connection with such payments, then the stockholder may be subject to a $50.00 penalty imposed by the IRS.

 

NOTE: FAILURE TO COMPLETE AND RETURN THE SUBSTITUTE FORM W-9 INCLUDED IN THIS LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL MAY RESULT IN BACKUP WITHHOLDING ON ANY REPORTABLE PAYMENTS MADE TO YOU PURSUANT TO THE OFFER. PLEASE REVIEW THE INSTRUCTIONS ENCLOSED WITH THE SUBSTITUTE FORM W-9 INCLUDED IN THIS LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS. YOU MUST COMPLETE THE CERTIFICATE OF AWAITING TAXPAYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER IF YOU HAVE NOT BEEN ISSUED A TIN AND HAVE APPLIED FOR ONE OR INTEND TO APPLY FOR ONE IN THE NEAR FUTURE.

 

10


Request for Taxpayer Identification Number and Certification – Substitute Form W-9
      

Name:                                                                                                                             

    
   

Address:                                                                                                                         

    
   

Certification: Under penalties of perjury, I certify that:

   Social Security Number
   

1. The number shown on this form is my correct taxpayer identification number (or I am waiting for a number to be issued to me), and

   ¨¨¨ -   ¨¨ -   ¨¨¨¨
   

2. I am not subject to backup withholding because: (a) I am exempt from backup withholding, (b) I have not been notified by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) that I am subject to backup withholding as a result of a failure to report all interest or dividends, or (c) the IRS has notified me that I am no longer subject to backup withholding, and

  

Employer Identification Number

 

¨¨ /  ¨¨¨¨¨¨¨

   

3. I am a U.S. citizen or other U.S. person (including a U.S. resident alien).

    
   

Notification  of Backup Withholding

    
 
         I have been notified by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) that I am currently subject to backup withholding as a result of a failure to report all interest and dividends on my tax return. I understand that marking this box will result in backup withholding on any disbursements made to this account. You must also cross out item 2 above.
 
Required: Check appropriate box for federal tax classification:

¨  Individual/sole proprietor    ¨  C Corporation    ¨  S Corporation    ¨  Partnership Trust/estate

 

¨  Limited liability company. Enter tax classification (C=C corporation, S=S corporation, P=partnership):

 
Exempt Payee

¨  Exempt Payee

 
“The Internal Revenue Service does not require your consent to any provision of this document other than the certifications required to avoid backup withholding.”
 
Signature:                                                                                                                                        Date:                    
 
NOTE: FAILURE TO COMPLETE AND RETURN THIS FORM MAY RESULT IN BACKUP WITHHOLDING OF A PORTION OF ANY PAYMENTS MADE TO YOU PURSUANT TO THE OFFER. PLEASE REVIEW THE ENCLOSED GUIDELINES FOR CERTIFICATION OF TAXPAYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER ON SUBSTITUTE FORM W-9 AND CONTACT YOUR TAX ADVISER FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS.
 

YOU MUST COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING CERTIFICATE IF YOU ARE WAITING FOR A TAXPAYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER TO BE ISSUED TO YOU.

 

 

CERTIFICATE OF AWAITING TAXPAYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER

I certify under penalties of perjury that a Taxpayer Identification Number has not been issued to me, and either (1) I have mailed or delivered an application to receive a Taxpayer Identification Number to the appropriate IRS Center or Social Security Administration Office, or (2) I intend to mail or deliver an application in the near future. I understand that if I do not provide a Taxpayer Identification Number by the time of payment, a portion of all reportable payments made to me will be withheld, but that such amounts will be refunded to me if I then provide a Taxpayer Identification Number within sixty (60) days.

 

 

 

  

 

Signature    Date

 

11


GUIDELINES FOR CERTIFICATION OF TAXPAYER IDENTIFICATION

NUMBER ON SUBSTITUTE FORM W-9

Guidelines for Determining the Proper Identification Number to Give the Payer—Social Security Numbers have nine digits separated by two hyphens: i.e., 000-00-0000. Identity identification numbers have nine digits separated by only one hyphen, i.e. 00-0000000. The table below will help determine the number to give the payer.

 

For this type of account:   

Give the Name and

SOCIAL SECURITY

number of--

  

For this type of account:

  

Give the IDENTITY
IDENTIFICATION

number of--

1. An individual’s account

   The individual    8. Sole proprietorship    The owner

2. Two or more individuals (joint account)

   Either of the individuals (please identify which)    9. A valid trust, estate, or pension trust    The legal entity’s TIN (not an individual SSN)

3. Husband and wife (joint account)

   Either of the individuals (please identify which)    10. Corporate or LLC account    The corporation or LLC EIN

4. Custodian account of a minor

   The minor (circle the minor’s name)    11. Religious, charitable, or educational account    The EIN of the organization/identity

5. Adult and minor (joint account)

   Either of the individuals (please identify which)    12. Partnership   

The partnership

6. Account in the name of guardian

   Either of the individuals (please identify which)    13. Broker or registered nominee    The broker or nominee EIN

7. Trust account that is not a valid trust under state law

   The grantor-trustee or actual owner    14. Government agency or tax-exempt entity    The public/private entity’s EIN

Obtaining a Number:

If you don’t have a taxpayer identification number or you don’t know your number, please contact the Social Security administration or Internal Revenue Service @ 800-829-1040 or IRS website www.irs.gov.

Payees Exempt from Backup Withholding:

Payees specifically exempted from backup withholding may include the following: (i) a corporation, (ii) a financial institution, (iii) an organization exempt from tax under Section 501(a) or an individual retirement plan, (iv) the United States or any agency or instrumentality thereof, (v) a state, the District of Columbia, a possession of the United States or any subdivision or instrumentality thereof, (vi) a foreign government, a political subdivision of a foreign government or any agency or instrumentality thereof, (vii) an international organization, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, (viii) a registered dealer in securities or commodities registered in the United States or a possession of the United States and (ix) a real estate investment trust.

Exempt payees described above should file Substitute Form W-9 to avoid possible erroneous backup withholding. FILE THIS FORM WITH THE PAYER, FURNISH YOUR TAXPAYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER, CHECK THE “EXEMPT PAYEE” BOX ON THE FACE OF THE FORM, SIGN AND DATE THE FORM AND RETURN IT TO THE PAYER. IF YOU ARE A NONRESIDENT ALIEN OR A FOREIGN ENTITY NOT SUBJECT TO BACKUP WITHHOLDING, FILE WITH PAYER AN APPLICABLE IRS FORM W-8.

 

12


Penalties:

Failure to Furnish TIN—If you fail to furnish your correct TIN to a requestor, you are subject to a penalty of $50 for each such failure, unless your failure is due to reasonable cause and not to willful neglect.

Civil Penalty for False Information With Respect to Withholding—If you make a false statement with no reasonable basis that results in no backup withholding, you are subject to a $500 penalty.

Criminal Penalty for Falsifying Information—Willfully falsifying certifications or affirmations may subject you to criminal penalties including fines and/or imprisonment.

Misuse of TINs—If the requestor discloses or uses TINs in violation of Federal law, the requestor may be subject to civil and criminal penalties.

Privacy Act Notice:

Section 6109 requires most recipients of dividend, interest, or other payments to give taxpayer identification numbers to payers who must report the payments to the IRS. The IRS uses the numbers for identification purposes. The IRS may also provide this information to the Department of Justice for civil and criminal litigation and to cities, states and the District of Columbia to carry out their tax laws. Payers must be given the numbers whether or not recipients are required to file tax returns.

FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CONTACT YOUR TAX ADVISER OR THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE @ www.irs.gov or 800-829-1040

 


The Depositary for the Offer is:

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

 

By Mail:

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Shareowner Services

Voluntary Corporate Actions

P.O. Box 64854

St. Paul, Minnesota 55164-0854

  

By Hand or Overnight Courier:

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Shareowner Services

Voluntary Corporate Actions

1110 Centre Pointe Curve, Suite 101

Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55120

Questions or requests for assistance may be directed to the Information Agent at the telephone numbers and address set forth below. Questions or requests for assistance or additional copies of the Offer to Purchase, this Letter of Transmittal and the Notice of Guaranteed Delivery may be directed to the Information Agent at the address and telephone numbers set forth below. Stockholders may also contact their broker, dealer, commercial bank or trust company for assistance concerning the Offer.

The Information Agent for the Offer is:

 

LOGO

199 Water Street, 26th Floor

New York, NY 10038

Banks and Brokers Call: (212) 440-9800

Call Toll Free: (866) 219-9786

The Dealer Manager for the Offer is:

 

LOGO

Citigroup Global Markets Inc.

388 Greenwich Street

New York, New York 10013

(212) 816–7837

 

 

EX-99.(A)(1)(C) 4 d376793dex99a1c.htm NOTICE OF GUARANTEED DELIVERY Notice of Guaranteed Delivery

Exhibit No. (a)(1)(C)

NOTICE OF GUARANTEED DELIVERY

For Tender of Shares of Common Stock

of

AMYLIN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., a Delaware corporation

at

$31.00 NET PER SHARE

Pursuant to the Offer to Purchase dated July 10, 2012

by

B&R ACQUISITION COMPANY, a Delaware corporation

and a wholly-owned subsidiary of

BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, a Delaware corporation.

 

THE OFFER AND WITHDRAWAL RIGHTS WILL EXPIRE AT 5:00 PM,

NEW YORK CITY TIME, ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 7, 2012, UNLESS THE

OFFER IS EXTENDED.

This Notice of Guaranteed Delivery, or one substantially in the form hereof, must be used to accept the Offer (as defined below) if (i) certificates representing shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Shares”), of Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Delaware corporation, are not immediately available, (ii) the procedure for book-entry transfer cannot be completed prior to the expiration of the Offer or (iii) time will not permit all required documents to reach Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (the “Depositary”) prior to the expiration of the Offer. This Notice of Guaranteed Delivery may be delivered by mail, facsimile transmission or overnight courier to the Depositary. See Section 3 of the Offer to Purchase (as defined below).

The Depositary for the Offer is:

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

 

By Mail:

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Shareowner Services

Voluntary Corporate Actions

P.O. Box 64854

St. Paul, Minnesota 55164-0854

  

By Facsimile Transmission:

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Shareowner Services

Voluntary Corporate Actions

(866) 734-9952 (fax)

(800) 380-1372 (phone to
confirm receipt only)

 

By Hand or Overnight Courier:

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Shareowner Services

Voluntary Corporate Actions

1110 Centre Pointe Curve, Suite 101

Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55120

DELIVERY OF THIS INSTRUMENT TO AN ADDRESS, OR TRANSMISSION OF INSTRUCTIONS VIA FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION, OTHER THAN AS SET FORTH ABOVE WILL NOT CONSTITUTE A VALID DELIVERY.

THIS FORM IS NOT TO BE USED TO GUARANTEE SIGNATURES. IF A SIGNATURE ON A LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL IS REQUIRED TO BE GUARANTEED BY AN “ELIGIBLE INSTITUTION” UNDER THE INSTRUCTIONS THERETO, SUCH SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MUST APPEAR IN THE APPLICABLE SPACE PROVIDED IN THE SIGNATURE BOX ON THE APPROPRIATE LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL.

The Eligible Institution (as defined in the Offer to Purchase) that completes this form must communicate the guarantee to the Depositary and must deliver the Letter of Transmittal or an Agent’s Message (as defined in the Offer to Purchase) and certificates for Shares to the Depositary within the time period shown herein. Failure to do so could result in a financial loss to such Eligible Institution.


Ladies and Gentlemen:

The undersigned hereby tenders to B&R Acquisition Company, a Delaware corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, a Delaware corporation, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the offer to purchase, dated July 10, 2012 (as it may be amended or supplemented from time to time, the “Offer to Purchase”), and the related Letter of Transmittal (as it may be amended or supplemented from time to time, the “Letter of Transmittal” and, together with the Offer to Purchase, the “Offer”), receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the number of shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Shares”), of Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Delaware corporation, specified below, pursuant to the guaranteed delivery procedure set forth in Section 3 of the Offer to Purchase.

 

   

 

Number of Shares and Certificate No(s)
(if available)

   
       
   
         
   
    Check here if Shares will be tendered by book entry transfer.    
   
    Name of Tendering Institution:         
   
    DTC Account Number:         
   
    Dated:                     , 2012    
   
       
   
         

 

   

 

Name(s) of Record Holder(s):

   
       
   
         
    (Please type or print)    
   
    Address(es):         
   
         
    (zip code)    
   
    Area Code and Tel. No         
      (Daytime telephone number)    
   
    Signature(s):         
   
         
   
         
 

 

2


GUARANTEE

(Not to be used for signature guarantee)

The undersigned, an Eligible Institution (defined in Section 3 of the Offer to Purchase), hereby (i) represents that the tender of Shares effected hereby complies with Rule 14e-4 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and (ii) guarantees delivery to the Depositary, at one of its addresses set forth above, of certificates representing the Shares tendered hereby, in proper form for transfer, or a confirmation of a book-entry transfer of such Shares into the Depositary’s account at DTC (pursuant to the procedures set forth in Section 3 of the Offer to Purchase), in either case together with a properly completed and duly executed Letter of Transmittal (or a manually signed facsimile thereof) or, in the case of a book-entry transfer, an Agent’s Message (defined in Section 3 of the Offer to Purchase), together with any other documents required by the Letter of Transmittal, all within three (3) Nasdaq Capital Market trading days after the date hereof.

 

  Name of Firm:     
   
  Address:     
   
   
  (Zip Code)
  Area Code and Tel. No.:       

 

 
(Authorized Signature)
Name:     
(Please type or print)
Title:     
Date:     

 

 

 

  NOTE: DO NOT SEND CERTIFICATES REPRESENTING TENDERED SHARES WITH THIS NOTICE. CERTIFICATES REPRESENTING TENDERED SHARES SHOULD BE SENT WITH YOUR LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL.  

 

3

EX-99.(A)(1)(D) 5 d376793dex99a1d.htm LETTER FROM THE INFORMATION AGENT Letter from the Information Agent

Exhibit No. (a)(1)(D)

Offer To Purchase For Cash

All Outstanding Shares of Common Stock

of

AMYLIN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., a Delaware corporation

at

$31.00 NET PER SHARE

Pursuant to the Offer to Purchase dated July 10, 2012

by

B&R ACQUISITION COMPANY, a Delaware corporation

and a wholly-owned subsidiary of

BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, a Delaware corporation.

 

THE OFFER AND WITHDRAWAL RIGHTS WILL EXPIRE AT 5:00 PM,

NEW YORK CITY TIME, ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 7, 2012, UNLESS THE

OFFER IS EXTENDED.

July 10, 2012

To Brokers, Dealers, Commercial Banks, Trust Companies and Other Nominees:

We have been engaged by B&R Acquisition Company, a Delaware corporation (“Purchaser”) and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, a Delaware corporation, to act as Information Agent in connection with Purchaser’s offer to purchase all outstanding shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Shares”), of Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), at a purchase price of $31.00 per Share, net to the seller in cash without interest and less any applicable withholding taxes, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Offer to Purchase, dated July 10, 2012 (as it may be amended or supplemented from time to time, the “Offer to Purchase”), and the related Letter of Transmittal (as it may be amended or supplemented from time to time, the “Letter of Transmittal” and, together with the Offer to Purchase, the “Offer”) enclosed herewith. Please furnish copies of the enclosed materials to those of your clients for whom you hold Shares registered in your name or in the name of your nominee.

For your information and for forwarding to your clients for whom you hold Shares registered in your name or in the name of your nominee, we are enclosing the following documents:

 

  1. The Offer to Purchase;

 

  2. The Letter of Transmittal for your use in accepting the Offer and tendering Shares and for the information of your clients, which includes a Substitute Form W-9 relating to backup Federal income tax withholding;

 

  3. A Notice of Guaranteed Delivery to be used to accept the Offer if the Shares and all other required documents cannot be delivered to Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (the “Depositary”) by the expiration of the Offer or if the procedure for book-entry transfer cannot be completed by the expiration of the Offer;

 

  4. A form of letter which may be sent to your clients for whose accounts you hold Shares registered in your name or in the name of your nominee, with space provided for obtaining such clients’ instructions with regard to the Offer; and

 

  5. A letter to stockholders of the Company from the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, accompanied by the Company’s Solicitation/Recommendation Statement on Schedule 14D-9.

Certain conditions to the Offer are described in Section 15 of the Offer to Purchase.


We urge you to contact your clients as promptly as possible. Please note that the Offer and withdrawal rights will expire at 5:00 PM, New York City time, on Tuesday, August 7, 2012, unless the Offer is extended. Previously tendered Shares may be withdrawn at any time until the Offer has expired.

For Shares to be properly tendered pursuant to the Offer, (a) the share certificates or confirmation of receipt of such Shares under the procedure for book-entry transfer, together with a properly completed and duly executed Letter of Transmittal, including any required medallion signature guarantees, or an “Agent’s Message” (as defined in Section 3 of the Offer to Purchase) in the case of book-entry transfer, and any other documents required in the Letter of Transmittal, must be timely received by the Depositary or (b) the tendering stockholder must comply with the guaranteed delivery procedures, all in accordance with the Offer to Purchase and the Letter of Transmittal.

Purchaser will not pay any fees or commissions to any broker or dealer or other person (other than the Dealer Manager, Depositary and the Information Agent as described in the Offer to Purchase) for soliciting tenders of Shares pursuant to the Offer. Purchaser will, however, upon request, reimburse brokers, dealers, commercial banks and trust companies for reasonable and necessary costs and expenses incurred by them in forwarding materials to their customers. Purchaser will pay all stock transfer taxes applicable to its purchase of Shares pursuant to the Offer, subject to Instruction 6 of the Letter of Transmittal.

Any inquiries you may have with respect to the Offer should be addressed to, and additional copies of the enclosed materials may be obtained from, the Dealer Manager or the undersigned at the addresses and telephone numbers set forth on the back cover of the Offer to Purchase.

Very truly yours,

GEORGESON INC.

Nothing contained herein or in the enclosed documents shall render you the agent of Purchaser, the Dealer Manager, the Information Agent or the Depositary or any affiliate of any of them or authorize you or any other person to use any document or make any statement on behalf of any of them in connection with the Offer other than the enclosed documents and the statements contained therein.

 

2

EX-99.(A)(1)(E) 6 d376793dex99a1e.htm LETTER TO CLIENTS Letter to Clients

Exhibit No. (a)(1)(E)

Offer To Purchase For Cash

All Outstanding of Shares of Common Stock

of

AMYLIN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., a Delaware corporation

at

$31.00 NET PER SHARE

Pursuant to the Offer to Purchase dated July 10, 2012

by

B&R ACQUISITION COMPANY, a Delaware corporation

and a wholly-owned subsidiary of

BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, a Delaware corporation.

 

THE OFFER AND WITHDRAWAL RIGHTS WILL EXPIRE AT 5:00 PM,

NEW YORK CITY TIME, ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 7, 2012, UNLESS THE

OFFER IS EXTENDED.

July 10, 2012

To Our Clients:

Enclosed for your consideration are the Offer to Purchase, dated July 10, 2012 (as it may be amended or supplemented from time to time, the “Offer to Purchase”), and the related Letter of Transmittal (as it may be amended or supplemented from time to time, the “Letter of Transmittal” and, together with the Offer to Purchase, the “Offer”) in connection with the offer by B&R Acquisition Company, a Delaware corporation (“Purchaser”) and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, a Delaware corporation (“Parent”), to purchase all outstanding shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Shares”), of Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), at a purchase price of $31.00 per Share, net to the seller in cash without interest, less any applicable withholding taxes, upon the terms and subject to the conditions of the Offer.

Also enclosed is a letter to stockholders of the Company from the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, accompanied by the Company’s Solicitation/Recommendation Statement on Schedule 14D-9.

We or our nominees are the holder of record of Shares held for your account. A tender of such Shares can be made only by us as the holder of record and pursuant to your instructions.

We request instructions as to whether you wish us to tender any or all of the Shares held by us for your account, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the enclosed Offer to Purchase and the Letter of Transmittal.

Please note carefully the following:

 

  1. The offer price for the Offer is $31.00 per Share, net to you in cash without interest, less any applicable withholding taxes.

 

  2. The Offer is being made for all outstanding Shares.

 

  3. The Offer is being made in connection with the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of June 29, 2012 (together with any amendments or supplements thereto, the “Merger Agreement”), among Parent, Purchaser and the Company, pursuant to which, after the completion of the Offer and the satisfaction or waiver of the conditions set forth therein, Purchaser and Company will merge (the “Merger”).


  4. The board of directors of the Company (the “Company Board”), has determined that the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the Offer, the Top-Up Option (as defined in the Offer to Purchase), and the Merger, are advisable, fair to and in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. Accordingly, the Company Board recommends that the Company’s stockholders accept the Offer and tender their Shares to Purchaser in the Offer and vote in favor of the adoption and approval of the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the Merger if required by applicable law (the “Company Board Recommendation”).

 

  5. The Offer and withdrawal rights will expire at 5:00 PM, New York City time, on Tuesday, August 7, 2012, unless the Offer is extended by Purchaser. Previously tendered Shares may be withdrawn at any time until the Offer has expired.

 

  6. The Offer is subject to certain conditions described in Section 15 of the Offer to Purchase.

 

  7. Any stock transfer taxes applicable to the sale of Shares to Purchaser pursuant to the Offer will be paid by Purchaser, except as otherwise provided in Instruction 6 to the Letter of Transmittal.

If you wish to have us tender any or all of your Shares, then please so instruct us by completing, executing, detaching and returning to us the Instruction Form on the detachable part hereof. An envelope to return your instructions to us is enclosed. If you authorize tender of your Shares, then all such Shares will be tendered unless otherwise specified on the Instruction Form.

Your prompt action is requested. Your Instruction Form should be forwarded to us in ample time to permit us to submit the tender on your behalf before the expiration of the Offer.

The Offer is not being made to, nor will tenders be accepted from or on behalf of, holders of Shares in any jurisdiction in which the making of the Offer or acceptance thereof would not be in compliance with the laws of such jurisdiction.

 

2

EX-99.(A)(1)(F) 7 d376793dex99a1f.htm INSTRUCTION FORM TO BE USED WITH THE LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Instruction Form to be Used with the Letter of Transmittal

Exhibit No. (a)(1)(F)

INSTRUCTION FORM

With Respect to the Offer To Purchase For Cash

All Outstanding of Shares of Common Stock

of

AMYLIN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., a Delaware corporation

at

$31.00 NET PER SHARE

Pursuant to the Offer to Purchase dated July 10, 2012

by

B&R ACQUISITION COMPANY, a Delaware corporation

and a wholly-owned subsidiary of

BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, a Delaware corporation.

The undersigned acknowledge(s) receipt of your letter and the enclosed Offer to Purchase, dated July 10, 2012 (as it may be amended or supplemented from time to time, the “Offer to Purchase”), and the related Letter of Transmittal (as it may be amended or supplemented from time to time, the “Letter of Transmittal” and, together with the Offer to Purchase, the “Offer”), in connection with the offer by B&R Acquisition Company, a Delaware corporation (the “Purchaser”) and a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, a Delaware corporation (“Parent”), to purchase all outstanding shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Shares”), of Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Delaware corporation, at a purchase price of $31.00 per Share, net to the seller in cash without interest, less any applicable withholding taxes, upon the terms and subject to the conditions of the Offer.

The undersigned hereby instruct(s) you to tender to the Purchaser the number of Shares indicated below or, if no number is indicated, all Shares held by you for the account of the undersigned, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Offer.

ACCOUNT NUMBER:                                                                                           

NUMBER OF SHARES BEING TENDERED HEREBY:             SHARES*

The method of delivery of this document is at the election and risk of the tendering stockholder. If delivery is by mail, then registered mail with return receipt requested, properly insured, is recommended. In all cases, sufficient time should be allowed to ensure timely delivery.

Unless otherwise indicated, it will be assumed that all Shares held by us for your account are to be tendered.

 

 

Dated:                           , 2012

 

 

(Signatures(s))
 

 

(Please Print  Name(s))
   

Address  

 

 

(Include Zip Code)
   

Area Code and Telephone No.  

 

 

   

Taxpayer Identification or Social Security No.  

 

 

     
EX-99.(A)(1)(G) 8 d376793dex99a1g.htm SUMMARY ADVERTISEMENT AS PUBLISHED IN THE WALL STREET JOURNAL Summary Advertisement as published in the Wall Street Journal

Exhibit No. (a)(1)(G)

This announcement is neither an offer to purchase nor a solicitation of an offer to sell Shares (as defined below). The Offer (as defined below) is made solely by the Offer to Purchase (as defined below), dated July 10, 2012, and the related Letter of Transmittal (as defined below) and any amendments or supplements thereto. The Offer is not being made to (nor will tenders be accepted from or on behalf of) holders of Shares in any jurisdiction in which the making of the Offer or the acceptance thereof would not be in compliance with the securities, blue sky or other laws of such jurisdiction or any administrative or judicial action pursuant thereto. Purchaser (as defined below) may, in its discretion, take such action as it deems necessary to make the Offer to holders of Shares in such jurisdiction. In those jurisdictions where applicable laws require that the Offer be made by a licensed broker or dealer, the Offer will be deemed to be made on behalf of Purchaser, by Citigroup Global Markets, Inc., the Dealer Manager for the Offer, or by one or more registered brokers or dealers licensed under the laws of such jurisdiction to be designated by Purchaser.

Notice of Offer to Purchase for Cash

All Outstanding Shares of Common Stock

of

AMYLIN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

at

$31.00 Net Per Share

by

B&R ACQUISITION COMPANY,

a wholly-owned subsidiary of

BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY

B&R Acquisition Company, a Delaware corporation (“Purchaser”), and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, a Delaware corporation (“Parent”), offers to purchase for cash all outstanding shares of common stock, par value $0.001 (“Shares”), of Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), at a price of $31.00 per Share, net to the seller in cash, without interest thereon and less any applicable withholding taxes, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Offer to Purchase, dated July 10, 2012 (as may be amended or supplemented from time to time, the “Offer to Purchase”), and in the related Letter of Transmittal (as may be amended or supplemented from time to time, the “Letter of Transmittal” and, together with the Offer to Purchase, the “Offer”). Tendering stockholders who have Shares registered in their names and who tender directly to Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (the “Depositary”) will not be obligated to pay brokerage fees or commissions or, except as set forth the Letter of Transmittal, transfer taxes on the purchase of Shares by Purchaser pursuant to the Offer. Stockholders who hold their Shares through a broker or bank should consult with such institution as to whether it charges any service fees or commissions.

 

THE OFFER AND WITHDRAWAL RIGHTS WILL EXPIRE AT 5:00 PM, NEW YORK CITY TIME, ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 7, 2012, UNLESS THE OFFER IS EXTENDED.

The Offer is being made pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of June 29, 2012, by and among Parent, Purchaser and the Company (the “Merger Agreement”), pursuant to which, after completion of the Offer and the satisfaction or waiver of certain conditions, Purchaser and the Company will merge (the “Merger”) and each issued and outstanding Share (other than Shares owned by Parent, Purchaser or the Company, or by any


stockholder of the Company who is entitled to and properly exercises appraisal rights under Delaware law) will, by virtue of the Merger and without any action on the part of the holder thereof, be canceled and converted into the right to receive an amount in cash equal to the per Share price paid pursuant to the Offer, without interest and less any applicable withholding taxes. As a result of the Merger, the Company will cease to be a publicly traded company and will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent. The Merger Agreement is more fully described in the Offer to Purchase.

The Offer is not subject to a financing condition. The Offer is conditioned upon, among other things, there being validly tendered in accordance with the terms of the Offer and not validly withdrawn prior to the expiration of the Offer, a number of Shares which, together with Shares then owned by Parent and Purchaser (if any), represents a majority of the total number of then outstanding Shares on a fully diluted basis (which total number shall be the number of Shares issued and outstanding plus the number of Shares which the Company would be required to issue pursuant to any then outstanding warrants, options, benefit plans or obligations or securities convertible or exchangeable into Shares or otherwise, but only to the extent then so exercisable, convertible or exchangeable or exercisable, convertible or exchangeable as a result of the consummation of the Offer). The foregoing condition is referred to as the “Minimum Condition.” The Minimum Condition may be waived by Parent and Purchaser only with the prior written consent of the Company. The Offer is also subject to other conditions described in the Offer to Purchase, including the expiration or termination of any applicable waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended (the “HSR Act”) and the absence of any applicable law or court order prohibiting the consummation of the Offer or the Merger.

The purpose of the Offer is for Parent, through Purchaser, to acquire control of, and the entire equity interest in, the Company. Following the consummation of the Offer, Parent and Purchaser intend to effect the Merger.

After careful consideration, the board of directors of the Company (the “Company Board”), has unanimously determined that the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the Offer, the Top-Up Option (as defined below) and the Merger, are advisable, fair to and in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. Accordingly, the Company Board recommends that the Company’s stockholders accept the Offer and tender their Shares to Purchaser in the Offer and vote in favor of the adoption and approval of the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the Merger, if required by applicable law.

The Company has granted, subject to certain conditions, Purchaser an irrevocable option to purchase (the “Top–Up Option”), at any time prior to the effective time of the Merger, a number of newly-issued Shares equal to the number of Shares that, when added to the number of Shares held by Parent and Purchaser at the time of such exercise, constitutes one Share more than the number of Shares necessary for Purchaser to be merged into the Company pursuant to Section 253 of the DGCL (after giving effect to the issuance of Shares pursuant to the exercise of the Top-Up Option). The Top–Up Option is intended to expedite the timing of the completion of the Merger by permitting Purchaser to effect a “short–form” merger pursuant to applicable Delaware law at a time when the approval of the Merger at a meeting of the Company’s stockholders would be assured because of Parent’s and Purchaser’s ownership of a majority of the Shares following completion of the Offer. The Top-Up Option is not exercisable if the number of Shares issuable upon exercise of the Top-Up Option would exceed the number of authorized but unissued and unreserved Shares.

If, after the consummation of the Offer and any exercise of the Top-Up Option, the number of Shares beneficially owned by Parent, Purchaser and their respective subsidiaries collectively represents at least the number of Shares necessary for Purchaser to be merged into the Company pursuant to Section 253 of the DGCL, Parent, Purchaser and the Company will take all necessary and appropriate actions to cause the Merger to be completed as promptly as reasonably practicable after consummation of the Offer, in accordance with Section 253 of the DGCL without convening a meeting of the stockholders of the Company.

Subject to the provisions of the Merger Agreement and the applicable rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and the Nasdaq Stock Market (“Nasdaq”), Purchaser reserves

 

2


the right to waive or otherwise modify or amend any of the terms and conditions of the Offer; provided that the Minimum Condition and certain other terms and conditions of the Offer described in the Offer to Purchase may be waived or modified by Parent and Purchaser only with the prior written consent of the Company.

The Merger Agreement provides that Purchaser will, so long as neither the Company nor Parent terminates the Merger Agreement in accordance with its terms, extend the Offer for any period required by any rule, regulation, interpretation or position of the SEC or its staff or Nasdaq that is applicable to the Offer. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, so long as the Merger Agreement has not been terminated in accordance with its terms, Purchaser may extend the Offer for one or more successive periods of up to 10 business days if any conditions to the Offer have not been satisfied or waived. In addition, if any conditions to the Offer have not been satisfied or waived, Purchaser also will be required to extend the Offer until the Outside Date in the same way if requested by the Company. The “Outside Date” means December 31, 2012, unless the only condition to the Offer that has not been satisfied is that relating to required antitrust approvals, in which case the “Outside Date” will automatically be extended until March 31, 2013. Any extension, delay, termination, waiver or amendment of the Offer will be followed as promptly as practicable by public announcement thereof, and such announcement in the case of an extension will be made no later than 9:00 AM, New York City time, on the next business day after the previously scheduled expiration of the Offer.

Following Purchaser’s acceptance of Shares tendered in the Offer, Purchaser may, without the consent of the Company, provide a subsequent offering period (a “Subsequent Offering Period”) in accordance with Rule 14d-11 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). If requested by the Company, Purchaser will, and Parent will cause Purchaser to, make available a Subsequent Offering Period of not less than 5 business days and extend such Subsequent Offering Period for an additional 5 business days; provided that Purchaser will not be required to make available such Subsequent Offering Period or extend such Subsequent Offering Period if Parent and Purchaser, directly or indirectly, own at least 90% of the outstanding Shares prior to the commencement of such Subsequent Offering Period (after taking into account the exercise of the Top-Up Option). No withdrawal rights apply to Shares tendered in a Subsequent Offering Period, and no withdrawal rights apply during a Subsequent Offering Period with respect to Shares previously tendered in the Offer and accepted for payment. If Purchaser elects to provide for a Subsequent Offering Period, it will announce the Subsequent Offering Period by issuing a press release to a national news service prior to 9:00 AM, New York City time, on the next business day after the Expiration Date.

For purposes of the Offer, Purchaser will be deemed to have accepted for payment and thereby purchased Shares validly tendered and not validly withdrawn if and when Purchaser gives oral or written notice to the Depositary of Purchaser’s acceptance for payment of such Shares pursuant to the Offer. Upon the terms and subject to the conditions of the Offer, Purchaser will pay for Shares accepted for payment pursuant to the Offer by depositing the purchase price therefor with the Depositary, which will act as agent for the tendering stockholders for purposes of transmitting such payments to the tendering stockholders. Under no circumstances will interest be paid on the consideration paid for Shares pursuant to the Offer, regardless of any extension of the Offer or any delay in payment for Shares.

In all cases, Purchaser will pay for Shares tendered and accepted for payment pursuant to the Offer only after timely receipt by the Depositary of (i) certificates representing such Shares or confirmation of the book-entry transfer of such Shares into the Depositary’s account at The Depository Trust Company (“DTC”) pursuant to the procedures set forth in the Offer to Purchase, (ii) a Letter of Transmittal (or manually signed facsimile thereof), properly completed and duly executed, with any required signature guarantees or, in the case of a book-entry transfer, an Agent’s Message (as defined in the Offer to Purchase) in lieu of the Letter of Transmittal, and (iii) any other documents required by the Letter of Transmittal.

Shares tendered pursuant to the Offer may be withdrawn at any time prior to the expiration of the Offer. Thereafter, tenders of Shares are irrevocable. For a withdrawal of Shares to be effective, the Depositary must receive at one of its addresses set forth on the back cover of the Offer to Purchase a written or facsimile transmission notice of withdrawal before the Offer has expired. Any such notice of withdrawal must specify the

 

3


name of the person having tendered the Shares to be withdrawn, the number of Shares to be withdrawn and the name of the registered holder of the Shares to be withdrawn, if different from that of the person who tendered such Shares. The signature(s) on the notice of withdrawal must be guaranteed by an Eligible Institution (as defined in the Offer to Purchase), unless such Shares have been tendered for the account of any Eligible Institution. If Shares have been tendered pursuant to the procedures for book-entry transfer as set forth in the Offer to Purchase, any notice of withdrawal must specify the name and number of the account at DTC to be credited with the withdrawn Shares and must otherwise comply with DTC’s procedures. If certificates representing the Shares to be withdrawn have been delivered or otherwise identified to the Depositary, the name of the record owner and the serial numbers shown on such certificates must also be furnished to the Depositary prior to the physical release of such certificates. Purchaser will determine, in its reasonable discretion, all questions as to the form and validity (including time of receipt) of any notice of withdrawal, and such determination will be final and binding, subject to the rights of the tendering holders of Shares to challenge the Purchasers determination in a court of competent jurisdiction. None of Purchaser, the Depositary, the Information Agent (listed below) or any other person will be under any duty to give notification of any defects or irregularities in any notice of withdrawal or incur any liability for failure to give such notification. Withdrawals of tenders of Shares may not be rescinded, and any Shares validly withdrawn will be deemed not to have been validly tendered for purposes of the Offer. However, withdrawn Shares may be retendered by following one of the procedures for tendering Shares described in the Offer to Purchase at any time prior to the expiration of the Offer or during a Subsequent Offering Period (if any).

The Company has provided to Purchaser its list of stockholders and security position listings for the purpose of disseminating the Offer to holders of Shares. The Offer to Purchase and related Letter of Transmittal will be mailed to record holders of Shares whose names appear on the Company’s stockholder list and will be furnished to brokers, dealers, commercial banks, trust companies and similar persons whose names, or the names of whose nominees, appear on the stockholder list or, if applicable, who are listed as participants in a clearing agency’s security position listing for subsequent transmittal to beneficial owners of Shares.

The receipt of cash as payment for the Shares pursuant to the Offer or pursuant to the Merger will be a taxable transaction for United States Federal income tax purposes. For a summary of the material United States Federal income tax consequences of the Offer and the Merger, see the Offer to Purchase. Each holder of Shares should consult its, his or her own tax adviser regarding the specific tax consequences of the Offer and the Merger to it, him or her in light of its, his or her particular circumstances, including Federal estate, gift and other non-income tax consequences and tax consequences under state, local or non-United States tax laws.

The information required to be disclosed by paragraph (d)(1) of Rule 14d-6 of the General Rules and Regulations under the Exchange Act is contained in the Offer to Purchase and is incorporated herein by reference.

The Offer to Purchase and the related Letter of Transmittal contain important information and both documents should be read carefully and in their entirety before any decision is made with respect to the Offer.

 

4


Questions and requests for assistance may be directed to the Information Agent at the address and telephone number set forth below. Requests for copies of the Offer to Purchase and the related Letter of Transmittal may be directed to the Information Agent or to brokers, dealers, commercial banks or trust companies. Such copies will be furnished promptly at Purchaser’s expense. Parent and Purchaser will not pay any fees or commissions to any broker or dealer or any other person (other than to the Depositary, the Dealer Manager and the Information Agent) in connection with the solicitation of tenders of Shares pursuant to the Offer.

The Information Agent for the Offer is:

 

LOGO

199 Water Street, 26th Floor

New York, NY 10038

Banks and Brokers Call: (212) 440-9800

Call Toll Free: (888) 663-7851

The Dealer Manager for the Offer is:

 

LOGO

Citigroup Global Markets Inc.

388 Greenwich Street

New York, NY 10013

Call: (212) 816-7837

July 10, 2012

EX-99.(A)(5)(B) 9 d376793dex99a5b.htm PRESS RELEASE Press Release

Exhibit No. (a)(5)(B)

LOGO

Bristol-Myers Squibb Begins Tender Offer to Acquire Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(NEW YORK & PRINCETON, NJ, July 10, 2012) — Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (NYSE: BMY) is commencing today, through its wholly owned subsidiary B&R Acquisition Company, a cash tender offer to purchase all outstanding shares of common stock of Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ: AMLN). Bristol-Myers Squibb announced on Friday, June 29, 2012 its intent to acquire Amylin.

Upon the successful closing of the tender offer, stockholders of Amylin will receive $31.00 in cash for each share of Amylin common stock validly tendered and not validly withdrawn in the offer, without interest and less any applicable withholding taxes. Following the purchase of shares in the tender offer, Amylin will become a subsidiary of Bristol-Myers Squibb.

Bristol-Myers Squibb will file today with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) a tender offer statement on Schedule TO which provides the terms of the tender offer. Additionally, Amylin will file with the SEC a solicitation/recommendation statement on Schedule 14D-9 that includes the recommendation of the Amylin board of directors that Amylin stockholders accept the tender offer and tender their shares. As previously announced, the Amylin board of directors has determined that the merger agreement entered into by Bristol-Myers Squibb, B&R Acquisition Company and Amylin on June 29, 2012 and its related transactions including the tender offer, are advisable, fair to and in the best interests of Amylin and its stockholders.

The tender offer will expire at 5:00 PM (New York City time) on Tuesday, August 7, 2012 unless extended in accordance with the merger agreement and the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC. The closing of the tender offer is subject to customary terms and conditions, including there being validly tendered a number of shares that constitutes at least a majority of Amylin’s outstanding shares of common stock determined on a fully diluted basis, and the expiration or the termination of the waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act.

Georgeson, Inc. is acting as information agent for Bristol-Myers Squibb. Evercore Group L.L.C. and Citigroup Global Markets Inc. are serving as financial advisers to Bristol-Myers Squibb in connection with the acquisition and Kirkland & Ellis LLP is its legal adviser. Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC and Goldman, Sachs & Co. are serving as financial advisers to Amylin in connection with the acquisition and Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP is its legal adviser.

Forward Looking Statements

This press release contains “forward-looking statements” as that term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, relating to the acquisition of Amylin by Bristol-Myers Squibb and the discovery, development and commercialization of certain biological compounds. Such forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and involve inherent risks and uncertainties, including factors that could delay, divert or change any of them, and could cause actual outcomes and results to differ materially from current expectations. No forward-looking statement can be guaranteed. Among other risks, there can be no guarantee that the acquisition will be completed, or if it is completed, that it will close within the anticipated time period or that the expected benefits of the acquisition will be realized. The actual dilutive impact on earnings per share in the near- and mid-term may differ from the expected impact described in this release. In addition, the compounds described in this release are subject to all the risks inherent in the drug development process, and there can be no assurance that these compounds will receive regulatory approval or be commercially successful. Forward-looking statements in the press release should be evaluated together with the many uncertainties that affect Bristol-Myers Squibb’s business, particularly those identified in the cautionary factors discussion in Bristol-Myers Squibb’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, its Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, and Current Reports on Form 8-K. Bristol-Myers Squibb undertakes no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.


This press release is neither an offer to purchase nor a solicitation of an offer to sell securities. Bristol-Myers Squibb and B&R Acquisition Company will file with the SEC a tender offer statement on Schedule TO, and will mail an offer to purchase, forms of letter or transmittal and related documents to Amylin stockholders. Investors and Amylin stockholders are strongly advised to read the tender offer statement (including an offer to purchase, letter of transmittal and related tender offer documents) and the related solicitation/recommendation statement on Schedule 14D-9 that will be filed by Amylin with the SEC, because they will contain important information.

These documents will be available at no charge at the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. The tender offer statement and the related materials may be obtained for free by directing a request by mail to Georgeson, Inc., 199 Water Street, 26th Floor, New York, NY or by calling toll-free (888) 663-7851. In addition, a copy of the offer to purchase, letter or transmittal and certain other related tender offer documents (once they become available) may also be obtained free of charge from Bristol-Myers Squibb by directing a request to: Public Affairs, Telephone Number: (609) 252-6579; E-Mail: jennifer.mauer@bms.com.

Contacts

 

Media:

  

Jennifer Fron Mauer, Telephone No.: (609) 252-6579; jennifer.mauer@bms.com

Laura Hortas, Telephone No.: (609) 252-4587 laura.hortas@bms.com

Investors:

  

Teri Loxam, Telephone No.: (609) 252-3368, teri.loxam@bms.com

Timothy Power, Telephone No.: (609) 252-7509, timothy.power@bms.com

 

2

EX-99.(A)(5)(C) 10 d376793dex99a5c.htm CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT DATED JULY 3, 2012 Class Action Complaint dated July 3, 2012

Exhibit (a)(5)(C)

 

LOGO

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

 

MAXINE PHILLIPS, Individually and on Behalf of All    )   
Others Similarly Situated,    )   
   )   

Plaintiff,

   )    C.A. No.
   )   
v.    )   
   )   
AMYLIN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., PAULO F.    )   
COSTA, ADRIAN ADAMS, TERESA BECK, M.    )   
KATHLEEN BEHRENS, PH.D., DANIEL M.    )   
BRADBURY, ALEXANDER J. DENNER, PH.D.,    )   
KARIN EASTHAM, JAMES R. GAVIN III, M.D.,    )   
PH.D, JAY S. SKYLER, M.D., MACP, JOSEPH P.    )   
SULLIVAN, BRISTOL-MEYERS SQUIBB    )   
COMPANY, and B&R ACQUISITION COMPANY,    )   
   )   

Defendants.

   )   

 

   )   

VERIFIED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

Plaintiff Maxine Phillips (“Plaintiff”), on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, by her attorneys, alleges the following upon information and belief, except as to those allegations pertaining to Plaintiff which are alleged upon personal knowledge:

NATURE OF THE ACTION

1. This is a shareholder class action complaint on behalf of the holders of the common stock Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Amylin” or the “Company”) against certain officers and/or directors of Amylin (the “Board”), and other persons and entities involved in a proposed transaction through which the Company will be acquired by Bristol-Meyers Squibb Company (“BMS”) for inadequate consideration.

2. On June 29, 2012 Amylin and BMS issued a joint press release announcing that they had entered into a definitive merger agreement pursuant to which BMS would acquire Amylin, via a tender offer made by BMS’s wholly-owned subsidiary


B&R Acquisition Company (“Merger Sub”), for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $5.3 billion. Under the terms of the Proposed Transaction (as defined below), Amylin common shareholders will receive $31.00 per share in cash for each Amylin share they own. The total value of the transaction, including Amylin’s net debt and a contractual payment obligation to Eli Lilly & Company, together totaling about $1.7 billion, is approximately $7 billion.

3. Specifically, pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated June 29, 2012 (the “Merger Agreement”) entered into between Amylin, BMS, and Merger Sub, Merger Sub would commence a cash tender offer (the “Tender Offer”) to purchase all outstanding shares of Amylin common stock at a purchase price of $31.00 per share in cash, to be followed by a merger of Merger Sub with and into the Company, with the Company continuing as the surviving corporation and becoming a wholly owned subsidiary of BMS.

4. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, the Tender Offer is to commence no later than July 11, 2012. If Merger Sub acquires 90% or more of the outstanding shares pursuant to the Tender Offer, including following the exercise of a Top-Up Option, then BMS will consummate the Merger in a second-step merger without a vote or any further action by the holders of shares (collectively the Tender Offer, the Top-Up Option, and the second-step merger are referred to herein as the “Proposed Transaction”). Following completion of the Proposed Transaction, AstraZeneca will make a payment to Amylin, as a wholly owned subsidiary of BMS, in the amount of approximately $3.4 billion in cash. Profits and losses arising from the collaboration will be shared equally between BMS and AstraZeneca.

 

2


5. As discussed below, both the consideration to Amylin common shareholders contemplated in the Proposed Transaction and the process by which Defendants propose to consummate the Proposed Transaction are fundamentally unfair to Plaintiff and the other common shareholders of the Company. The Individual Defendants’ (as defined herein) conduct constitutes a breach of their fiduciary duties owed to Amylin common shareholders, and a violation of applicable legal standards governing the Individual Defendants’ conduct.

6. In February 2012, BMS made an unsolicited offer to acquire Amylin at $22 per share. The Board rejected the offer and determined not to publicly disclose that it had received an offer from BMS. However, news of the offer was leaked to the public by Bloomberg news on March 28, 2012.

7. Carl Icahn, a significant shareholder of the Amylin, thereafter filed suit in the Delaware Court of Chancery against the Company and the Individual Defendants in an action styled Icahn Partners, LP v. Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc., C.A. No. 7404-VCN (the “Icahn Action”), seeking waiver of the Advance Notice Bylaw provision that barred a proxy contest in advance of the Company’s May 15, 2012 shareholder meeting. Mr. Icahn’s purported intention was to push Amylin into a sale of the Company. In fact, Mr. Icahn had unsuccessfully attempted to engineer a sale of the Company to its then diabetes drug partner, Eli Lilly and Co. in 2009, though succeeded in a proxy fight against the company at that time. The Icahn Action was withdrawn on or about May 25, 2012, after Mr. Icahn held discussions with Defendant Bradbury, Amylin’s President and Chief Executive Officer, suggesting that Mr. Icahn was satisfied that the Company would bend to his will and pursue a sale of the Company.

 

3


8. On June 26, 2012, a derivative action was filed against on behalf of Amylin against the Individual Defendants in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware styled Berger v. Bradbury et al., 1:12-cv-00824 (UNA) (the “Derivative Action”). The Derivative Action alleged that the Individual Defendants had breached their fiduciary duties by (1) summarily rejecting BMS’s premium offer of $22 without obtaining adequate information, (2) granting low priced options to the Company’s executive officers without having first publicly disclosed the receipt of that offer (thus avoiding the rise in stock price that would have occurred following disclosure), (3) failing to publicly disclose the offer, which would have caused the Company’s stock price to rise to that level; and then (4) engaging in a dilutive secondary offering. The Derivative Action sought money damages against the Individual Defendants and an accounting of all profits and special benefits they had received as a result of their allegedly unlawful conduct. In an effort to avoid personal liability in the Derivative Action, the Individual Defendants now seek to push through the Proposed Transaction and thereby extinguish those claims.

9. For these reasons and as set forth in detail herein, Plaintiff seeks to enjoin Defendants from taking any steps to consummate the Proposed Transaction or, in the event the Proposed Transaction is consummated, recover damages resulting from the Individual Defendants’ violations of their fiduciary duties of loyalty, good faith, and due care.

PARTIES

10. Plaintiff currently holds shares of common stock of Amylin and has held such shares at all relevant times.

 

4


11. Defendant Amylin is a Delaware Corporation with its principal executive offices located at 9360 Towne Centre Drive Suite 110 San Diego, CA 92121. The Company is a biopharmaceutical company dedicated to the discovery, development and commercialization of innovative medicines for patients with diabetes and other metabolic diseases. Amylin’s primary focus is on the research, development and commercialization of a franchise of GLP-1 agonists, for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Shares of Amylin common stock trade on NASDAQ under the ticker symbol “AMLN.”

12. Defendant Paulo F. Costa (“Costa”) has been a member of the Board since June 2009 and Chairman of the Board since August 2009.

13. Defendant Adrian Adams (“Adams”) has been a member of the Board since October 2007.

14. Defendant Teresa Beck (“Beck”) has been a member of the Board since March 2007.

15. Defendant M. Kathleen Behrens (“Behrens”) has been has been a member of the Board since June 2009.

16. Defendant Daniel M. Bradbury (“Bradbury”) has been the Chief Executive Officer since March 2007, President since June 2006, Chief Operating Officer since June 2003, and a member of the Board since June 2006.

17. Defendant Alexander J. Denner (“Denner”) has been has been a member of the Board since June 2009.

18. Defendant Karin Eastham (“Eastham”) has been has been a member of the Board since September 2005.

19. Defendant James R. Gavin III, M.D., Ph.D. (“Gavin”) has been has been a member of the Board since June 2009.

 

5


20. Defendant Jay S. Skyler, M.D., MACP (“Skyler”) has been has been a member of the Board since August 1999.

21. Defendant Joseph P. Sullivan (“Sullivan”) has been has been a member of the Board since September 2003.

22. Defendants Costa, Adams, Beck, Behrens, Bradbury, Denner, Eastham, Gavin, Skyler, and Sullivan are collectively referred to hereinafter as the “Individual Defendants.”

23. Defendant BMS is a global biopharmaceutical company that develops, licenses, manufactures, markets, and sells pharmaceutical and nutritional products. BMS products and experimental therapies address cancer, heart disease, HIV/AIDS, diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, hepatitis, organ transplant rejection, and psychiatric disorders.

24. Defendant Merger Sub is a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of BMS formed for the sole purpose of effectuating the Proposed Transaction (Merger Sub and BMS are sometimes collectively referred to herein as “BMS”) (BMS, together with Amylin and the Individual Defendants, are referred to collectively as the “Defendants”).

THE FIDUCIARY DUTIES OF THE INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS

25. By reason of the Individual Defendants’ positions with the Company as officers and/or directors, said individuals are in a fiduciary relationship with Plaintiff and the other public shareholders of Amylin (the “Class”) and owe Plaintiff and the other members of the Class the duties of good faith, fair dealing, loyalty and full and candid disclosure.

 

6


26. By virtue of their positions as directors and/or officers of Amylin, the Individual Defendants, at all relevant times, had the power to control and influence, and did control and influence and cause Amylin to engage in the practices complained of herein.

27. Each of the Individual Defendants is required to act in good faith, in the best interests of the Company’s shareholders and with due care, including reasonable inquiry. In a situation where the directors of a publicly traded company undertake a transaction that may result in a change in corporate control, the directors must take all steps reasonably required to maximize the value shareholders will receive rather than use a change of control to benefit themselves, and to disclose all material information concerning the proposed change of control to enable the shareholders to make an informed voting decision. To diligently comply with this duty, the directors of a corporation may not take any action that:

(a) adversely affects the value provided to the corporation’s shareholders;

(b) contractually prohibits them from complying with or carrying out their fiduciary duties;

(c) discourages or inhibits alternative offers to purchase control of the corporation or its assets; or

(d) will otherwise adversely affect their duty to search for and secure the best value reasonably available under the circumstances for the corporation’s shareholders.

 

7


28. Plaintiff alleges herein that the Individual Defendants, separately and together, in connection with the Proposed Transaction, violated duties owed to Plaintiff and the other public shareholders of Amylin, including their duties of loyalty, good faith and independence, insofar as they, inter alia, engaged in self-dealing and obtained for themselves personal benefits, including personal financial benefits, not shared equally by Plaintiff or the public shareholders of Amylin common stock.

CLASS ACTION ALLEGATIONS

29. Plaintiff brings this action pursuant to Court of Chancery Rule 23, individually and on behalf of the Class. The Class specifically excludes Defendants herein, and any person, firm, trust, corporation or other entity related to, or affiliated with, any of the Defendants.

30. This action is properly maintainable as a class action.

31. The Class is so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable. As of March 27, 2012, Amylin had approximately 161,656,477 shares of common stock outstanding. Members of the Class are scattered throughout the United States and are so numerous that it is impracticable to bring them all before this Court.

32. Questions of law and fact exist that are common to the Class, including, among others:

(a) whether the Individual Defendants have fulfilled and are capable of fulfilling their fiduciary duties owed to Plaintiff and the Class;

(b) whether the Individual Defendants have engaged and continue to engage in a scheme to benefit themselves at the expense of Amylin shareholders in violation of their fiduciary duties;

 

8


(c) whether the Individual Defendants are acting in furtherance of their own self-interest to the detriment of the Class;

(d) whether Defendants have disclosed and will disclose all material facts in connection with the Proposed Transaction; and

(e) whether Plaintiff and the other members of the Class will be irreparably damaged if Defendants are not enjoined from continuing the conduct described herein.

33. Plaintiff is committed to prosecuting this action and has retained competent counsel experienced in litigation of this nature. Plaintiffs claims are typical of the claims of the other members of the Class and Plaintiff has the same interests as the other members of the Class. Accordingly, Plaintiff is an adequate representative of the Class and will fairly and adequately protect the interests of the Class.

34. The prosecution of separate actions by individual members of the Class would create the risk of inconsistent or varying adjudications with respect to individual members of the Class, which would establish incompatible standards of conduct for Defendants, or adjudications with respect to individual members of the Class which would, as a practical matter, be dispositive of the interests of the other members not parties to the adjudications or substantially impair or impede their ability to protect their interests.

35. Preliminary and final injunctive relief on behalf of the Class as a whole is entirely appropriate because Defendants have acted, or refused to act, on grounds generally applicable and causing injury to the Class.

 

9


SUBSTANTIVE ALLEGATIONS

 

A. Background

36. Amylin is a biopharmaceutical company dedicated to improving lives of patients through the discovery, development, and commercialization of innovative medicines. Amylin is committed to delivering novel therapies that transform the way diabetes and other metabolic disorders are treated. Amylin is headquartered in San Diego, California and has a commercial manufacturing facility in Ohio. The Company is marketing two medicines to treat diabetes, BYETTA (exenatide) injection and SYMLIN (pramlintide acetate) injection. It is also marketing a diabetes treatment, BYDUREON (exenatide extended-release for injectable suspension). BYDUREON is an extended-release medication for type 2 diabetes that provides continuous glycemic control in a once-weekly dose. Amylin maintains a research and early development program focused on peptide and protein therapeutics. It has also entered into strategic alliances and business initiatives, including its strategic relationship with Biocon, Limited (Biocon) to develop pharmaceutical products, including AC165198, a peptide hybrid drug candidate for diabetes, which was developed from its phybrid technology platform.

37. On February 6, 2012, Amylin reported positive Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2011 financial results. The Company reported that total revenue for the quarter ended December 31, 2011 was $164.9 million, including net product sales of $160.0 million. Defendant Bradbury commented on the Company’s position, “Our strong execution in 2011 has positioned us to enter 2012 with an extraordinary opportunity to maximize shareholder value. We generated positive operating cash flow, reacquired the full rights to the exenatide franchise, expanded the approved uses for BYETTA, and,

 

10


most importantly, positioned ourselves well to successfully launch BYDUREON in the U.S. following its recent approval. We will also work to secure a new partner for exenatide outside the U.S. to advance our commitment to diabetes patients around the world, and continue to invest strategically in value-driving opportunities while continuing our focus on financial discipline.”

38. In February 2012, BMS made an unsolicited offer to acquire Amylin at $22 per share. The Board rejected the offer and determined not to publicly disclose that it had received an offer from BMS. However, news of the offer was leaked to the public by Bloomberg news on March 28, 2012.

39. Carl Icahn, a significant shareholder of the Amylin, thereafter filed the Icahn Action in the Delaware Court of Chancery against the Company and the Individual Defendants, seeking waiver of the Advance Notice Bylaw provision that barred a proxy contest in advance of the Company’s May 15, 2012 shareholder meeting. Mr. Icahn’s purported intention was to push Amylin into a sale of the Company. In fact, Mr. Icahn had unsuccessfully attempted to engineer a sale of the Company to its then diabetes drug partner, Eli Lilly and Co. in 2009, though succeeded in a proxy fight against the company at that time. The Icahn Action was withdrawn on or about May 25, 2012, after Mr. Icahn held discussions with Defendant Bradbury, Amylin’s President and Chief Executive Officer, suggesting that Mr. Icahn was satisfied that the Company would bend to his will and pursue a sale of the Company.

40. On June 26, 2012, the Derivative Action was filed against on behalf of Amylin against the Individual Defendants in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. The Derivative Action alleged that the Individual Defendants had

 

11


breached their fiduciary duties by (1) summarily rejecting BMS’s premium offer of $22 without obtaining adequate information, (2) granting low priced options to the Company’s executive officers without having first publicly disclosed the receipt of that offer (thus avoiding the rise in stock price that would have occurred following disclosure), (3) failing to publicly disclose the offer, which would have caused the Company’s stock price to rise to that level; and then (4) engaging in a dilutive secondary offering. The Derivative Action sought money damages against the Individual Defendants and an accounting of all profits and special benefits they had received as a result of their allegedly unlawful conduct. In an effort to avoid personal liability in the Derivative Action, the Individual Defendants now seek to push through the Proposed Transaction and thereby extinguish those claims.

B. The Proposed Transaction

41. On June 29, 2012, Amylin and BMS issued a press release announcing that they had entered into the Merger Agreement. Under the terms of the Proposed Transaction, BMS would acquire Amylin by making the cash Tender Offer to acquire all of the outstanding shares of common stock of Amylin at a purchase price of $31.00 per share.

42. Specifically, the press release stated, in relevant part:

(PRINCETON, N.J., LONDON, and SAN DIEGO, June 29, 2012) - Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (NYSE: BMY) and Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ: AMLN) announced today that Bristol-Myers Squibb will acquire Amylin for $31.00 per share in cash, pursuant to a cash tender offer and second step merger, or an aggregate purchase price of approximately $5.3 billion. The total value of the transaction, including Amylin’s net debt and a contractual payment obligation to Eli Lilly & Company, together totaling about $1.7 billion, is approximately $7 billion. The acquisition has been unanimously approved by the boards of directors of Bristol-Myers Squibb and Amylin. The board of directors of Amylin has unanimously recommended that Amylin’s stockholders tender their shares into the tender offer.

 

12


Bristol-Myers Squibb and AstraZeneca (LSE:AZN) announced today that, following the completion of Bristol-Myers Squibb’s acquisition of Amylin, the companies will enter into collaboration arrangements, based on the framework of the existing diabetes alliance, regarding the development and commercialization of Amylin’s portfolio of products. Following completion of Bristol-Myers Squibb’s acquisition of Amylin, AstraZeneca will make a payment to Amylin, as a wholly owned subsidiary of Bristol-Myers Squibb, in the amount of approximately $3.4 billion in cash. Profits and losses arising from the collaboration will be shared equally. In addition, AstraZeneca has the option, exercisable at its sole discretion following the closing of the acquisition, to establish equal governance rights over key strategic and financial decisions regarding the collaboration, upon the payment to Bristol-Myers Squibb of an additional $135 million. These collaboration arrangements have been approved by the boards of directors of Bristol-Myers Squibb and AstraZeneca.

Amylin is a biopharmaceutical company dedicated to the discovery, development and commercialization of innovative medicines for patients with diabetes and other metabolic diseases. Amylin’s primary focus is on the research, development and commercialization of a franchise of GLP-1 agonists, for the treatment of type 2 diabetes.

“Amylin’s innovative diabetes portfolio, talented people and state-of-the art manufacturing facility complement our long-standing leadership in metabolics,” said Lamberto Andreotti, chief executive officer, Bristol-Myers Squibb. “We are pleased to be able to strengthen the portfolio we have built to help patients with diabetes by building on the success Amylin has had with its GLP-1 franchise. The acquisition of Amylin by Bristol-Myers Squibb is also a unique way for Bristol-Myers Squibb and AstraZeneca to expand the alliance between the two companies, and it demonstrates Bristol-Myers Squibb’s innovative and targeted approach to partnerships and business development.”

Simon Lowth, interim chief executive officer of AstraZeneca, said: “This is a compelling proposition that will have an immediate positive impact on revenues and is fully in line with our stated partnering strategy to enhance top-line growth and strengthen our late stage pipeline. The broadening of our diabetes collaboration with Bristol-Myers Squibb is another important step towards creating a leadership position in the treatment of a disease with growing unmet medical need that is reaching epidemic proportions in many areas of the world. The combined development, regulatory and commercial strengths of the AstraZeneca and Bristol Myers-Squibb alliance for diabetes provides an excellent platform to unlock the potential of Amylin’s differentiated treatments for the benefit of patients worldwide and for our shareholders.”

 

13


“We are pleased to announce this transaction that provides substantial value for Amylin shareholders,” said Daniel M. Bradbury, president and chief executive officer of Amylin. “Over the last several months, our Board of Directors, with the assistance of our financial and legal advisors, has been actively engaged in a robust and thorough strategic process designed to maximize the value of our unique diabetes franchise. I strongly believe that we have accomplished that objective. Our recent U.S. launch of BYDUREON, the first ever once-weekly therapy for patients with type 2 diabetes, solidified our position as a driving force in the fight against this rising global epidemic. Importantly, this transaction with Bristol-Myers Squibb and their alliance with AstraZeneca provide the means to maximize the potential and impact of Amylin’s innovative diabetes therapies and reach more patients around the world with treatment options to help manage their disease. In addition, I would like to acknowledge and thank the dedicated employees of Amylin whose tireless efforts are responsible for creating the tremendous value that is being recognized today by two of the most respected companies in the pharmaceutical industry.”

Amylin’s assets include:

 

   

A GLP-1 agonist franchise, including two treatments for type 2 diabetes, BYETTA(exenatide) injection and BYDUREON (exenatide extended-release for injectable suspension/exenatide 2 mg powder and solvent for prolonged release suspension for injection), approved for use in both the U.S. and Europe, and a life-cycle management pipeline, including delivery devices and formulation improvements. The addition of the Amylin GLP-1 franchise complements Bristol-Myers Squibb’s and AstraZeneca’s current diabetes portfolio creating a comprehensive disease management platform;

 

   

Metreleptin, a leptin analog currently under review at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of diabetes and/or hypertriglyceridemia (high levels of triglycerides in the bloodstream) in patients with rare forms of inherited or acquired lipodystrophy;

 

   

SYMLIN® (pramlintide acetate) injection an amylin analog, approved by the FDA for the treatment of type 1 and type 2 diabetes patients with inadequate glycemic control on meal-time insulin; and

 

   

A state-of-the-art sterile production facility in Ohio.

Under the terms of the definitive merger agreement between Bristol-Myers Squibb and Amylin, Bristol-Myers Squibb will commence a cash tender offer to purchase all of the outstanding shares of Amylin’s common

 

14


stock for $31.00 per share. The closing of the tender offer is subject to customary terms and conditions, including the tender of a number of shares that constitutes at least a majority of Amylin’s outstanding shares of common stock, on a fully diluted basis, and expiration or termination of the waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act. The agreement also provides for the parties to effect, subject to customary conditions, a merger to be completed following the completion of the tender offer which would result in all shares not tendered in the tender offer being converted into the right to receive $31.00 per share in cash. The merger agreement contains a provision under which Amylin has agreed not to solicit any competing offers for the company. Bristol-Myers Squibb will finance the acquisition from its existing cash resources and credit facilities.

The companies expect the tender offer to close approximately thirty days after commencement of the tender offer.

Citi and Evercore are serving as financial advisers to Bristol-Myers Squibb in connection with the acquisition and Kirkland & Ellis LLP is its legal adviser. Bank of America Merrill Lynch is serving as financial adviser to AstraZeneca in connection with the transactions and Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP and Covington & Burling LLP are its legal advisers. Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC and Goldman Sachs & Co. are serving as financial advisers to Amylin in connection with the acquisition and Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP is its legal adviser.

For Bristol-Myers Squibb, the transactions are expected to be dilutive to Non-GAAP earnings per share (EPS) in 2012 and 2013 by approximately $0.03, becoming slightly accretive starting in 2014 with meaningful accretion expected in the later part of the decade. The estimated Non-GAAP EPS impact excludes amortization of acquired intangible assets, restructuring costs and other costs associated with the transactions.

43. The consideration offered to Amylin public stockholders in the Proposed Transaction is unfair and grossly inadequate because, among other things, the intrinsic value of Amylin common stock is materially in excess of the amount offered for those securities in the proposed acquisition given the Company’s prospects for future growth and earnings, particularly in light of the commercialization of BYDUREON following its recent FDA approval. Moreover, at least one independent Wall Street analyst has set a price target for Amylin of $32.00 per share. The Proposed Transaction will deny Class

 

15


members their right to share equitably in the true value of the Company. As a result, the Individual Defendants breached the fiduciary duties they owe to the Company’s public shareholders because those shareholders will not receive adequate or fair value for their Company common stock in the Proposed Transaction.

44. Based on the aforementioned, the Proposed Transaction is wrongful, unfair and harmful to Amylin public shareholders because, among other things, they will not be able to see a fair return on the commercialization of BYDUREON. The Proposed Transaction represents an effort by Defendants to aggrandize their own financial position and interests at the expense of and to the detriment of Class members by denying Class members their right to share proportionately and equitably in the true value of the Company.

 

C. The Preclusive Deal Protection Devices

45. In addition to the woefully inadequate consideration offered to Amylin shareholders, the entire process deployed by BMS and Amylin Board is also unfair and inadequate. Namely, as part of the Merger Agreement, the Individual Defendants agreed to certain onerous and preclusive deal protection devices that operate conjunctively to make the Proposed Transaction a fait accompli and ensure that no competing offers will emerge for the Company.

46. Defendants are attempting to circumvent the requirement of a shareholder vote through an irrevocable “Top-Up Option” which Amylin Board voted to grant to BMS. The Top-Up Option is contained in Section 1.4 of the Merger Agreement and states that in the event BMS falls short of obtaining the minimum number of shares in the Tender Offer necessary for it to effectuate a short form merger under Section 253 of the

 

16


Delaware General Corporation Law, BMS may purchase, at its option, the number of shares necessary for it to exceed the ninety percent threshold. The Top-Up Option therefore allows BMS to pursue a merger without a vote and without any requirement of establishing the entire fairness of the Proposed Transaction.

47. Moreover, §5.2 of the Merger Agreement, titled “No Solicitation of Competing Proposals,” contains a provision barring the Board and any Company personnel from attempting to procure a price in excess of the amount offered by BMS. Section 5.2(a) of the Merger Agreement further demands that the Company terminate any and all prior or on-going discussions with other potential suitors. Despite the fact that Defendants have already “locked up” the transaction in favor of BMS and precluded the Board from soliciting alternative bids, the Merger Agreement provides other ways to guarantee that BMS will be the Company’s only suitor.

48. Pursuant to §5.2(b) of the Merger Agreement, should an unsolicited bidder arise, the Company must notify BMS of the bidder’s offer and its identity within twenty- four (24) hours. Moreover, the Company must provide any non-public information to Parent within thirty-six hours of providing the same information to a bidder who has made a Competing Proposal that the “Company Board determines in good faith after consultation with its independent financial and outside legal advisors that such Competing Proposal either constitutes a Superior Proposal or would reasonably be expected to result in a Superior Proposal, and ... the Company Board determines in good faith after consultation with its outside legal counsel that the failure to take such action would be inconsistent with the directors’ fiduciary duties under applicable Law.” Further, per section 5.2(i) of the Merger Agreement, if the Company receives a

 

17


Competing Proposal which the Board determines constitutes a Superior Proposal, the Board must provide written notice to BMS of the Superior Proposal and negotiate with BMS for at least three (3) business days following BMS receipt of the notice, so that BMS has the opportunity to adjust the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement so that the Competing Proposal ceases to be a Superior Proposal. Accordingly, the Merger Agreement unfairly assures that any “auction” will favor BMS and piggy-back upon the due diligence of the foreclosed alternative bidder.

49. In addition, §8.3 of the Merger Agreement provides that Amylin must pay to BMS a termination fee of $160 million (representing approximately 3.02% of the purchase price) if the Company decides to pursue another offer, thereby essentially requiring that the alternate bidder agree to pay a naked premium for the right to provide the shareholders with a superior offer.

50. Ultimately, these preclusive deal protection devices illegally restrain the Company’s ability to solicit or engage in negotiations with any third party regarding a proposal to acquire all or a significant interest in the Company. The circumstances under which the Board may respond to an unsolicited alternative acquisition proposal that constitutes, or would reasonably be expected to constitute, a superior proposal are too narrowly circumscribed to provide an effective “fiduciary out” under the circumstances. Likewise, these provisions will foreclose the new bidder from providing the needed market check of BMS’s inadequate offer.

51. Accordingly, because the foregoing process represents a violation of state law, Plaintiff seeks injunctive and other equitable relief to prevent the irreparable injury that Company shareholders have and will continue to suffer absent judicial intervention.

 

18


FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION

Claim for Breach of Fiduciary Duties Against the Individual Defendants

52. Plaintiff repeats and realleges each allegation set forth herein.

53. The Individual Defendants have violated fiduciary duties of care, loyalty, candor and good faith owed to public shareholders of Amylin.

54. By the acts, transactions and courses of conduct alleged herein, the Individual Defendants, individually and acting as a part of a common plan, are attempting to unfairly deprive Plaintiff and other members of the Class of the true value of their investment in Amylin.

55. As demonstrated by the allegations above, the Individual Defendants failed to exercise the care required, and breached their duties of loyalty, good faith, candor and independence owed to the shareholders of Amylin because, among other reasons, they failed to take steps to maximize the value of Amylin to its public shareholders.

56. The Individual Defendants dominate and control the business and corporate affairs of Amylin, and are in possession of private corporate information concerning the Company’s assets, business and future prospects. Thus, there exists an imbalance and disparity of knowledge and economic power between them and the public shareholders of Amylin which makes it inherently unfair for them to benefit their own interests to the exclusion of maximizing shareholder value.

57. By reason of the foregoing acts, practices and course of conduct, the Individual Defendants have failed to exercise due care and diligence in the exercise of their fiduciary obligations toward Plaintiff and the other members of the Class.

 

19


58. As a result of the actions of the Individual Defendants, Plaintiff and the Class will suffer irreparable injury in that they have not and will not receive their fair portion of the value of the Company’s assets and businesses and have been and will be prevented from obtaining a fair price for their common stock.

59. Unless the Individual Defendants are enjoined by the Court, they will continue to breach their fiduciary duties owed to Plaintiff and the members of the Class, all to the irreparable harm of the members of the Class.

60. Plaintiff and the members of the Class have no adequate remedy at law. Only through the exercise of this Court’s equitable powers can Plaintiff and the Class be fully protected from the immediate and irreparable injury which the Individual Defendants’ actions threaten to inflict.

SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION

On Behalf of Plaintiff and the Class

Against BMS and Merger Sub for Aiding and Abetting the

Individual Defendants’ Breach of Fiduciary Duty

61. Plaintiff incorporates by reference and realleges each and every allegation contained above, as though fully set forth herein.

62. BMS and Merger Sub have acted and are acting with knowledge of, or with reckless disregard to, the fact that the Individual Defendants are in breach of their fiduciary duties to Amylin public shareholders, and have participated in such breaches of fiduciary duties.

63. BMS and Merger Sub knowingly aided and abetted the Individual Defendants’ wrongdoing alleged herein. In so doing, BMS and Merger Sub rendered substantial assistance in order to effectuate the Individual Defendants’ plan to consummate the Proposed Transaction in breach of their fiduciary duties.

 

20


64. Plaintiff has no adequate remedy at law.

PRAYER FOR RELIEF

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands injunctive relief in their favor and in favor of the Class and against Defendants as follows:

A. Declaring that this action is properly maintainable as a Class action and certifying Plaintiff as Class representatives;

B. Enjoining Defendants, their agents, counsel, employees and all persons acting in concert with them from consummating the Proposed Transaction, unless and until the Company adopts and implements a procedure or process to obtain a merger agreement providing the best possible terms for shareholders;

C. Rescinding, to the extent already implemented, the Proposed Transaction or any of the terms thereof, or granting Plaintiff and the Class rescissory damages;

D. Directing the Individual Defendants to account to Plaintiff and the Class for all damages suffered as a result of the Individual Defendants’ wrongdoing;

E. Awarding Plaintiff the costs and disbursements of this action, including reasonable attorneys’ and experts’ fees; and

F. Granting such other and further equitable relief as this Court may deem just and proper.

 

Dated: July 3, 2012    FARUQI & FARUQI, LLP   
OF COUNSEL:   

/s/ James P. McEvilly, III

  

 

FARUQI & FARUQI, LLP

Juan E. Monteverde

Brian Moon

369 Lexington Avenue, 10th Fl.

New York, NY10017

Tel.: (212) 983-9330

 

   James P. McEvilly, III (#4807)   
   20 Montchanin Road, Suite 145   
   Wilmington, DE 19807   
   Tel.: (302) 482-3182   
   Fax: (302) 4823612   
  

 

Attorneys for Plaintiff

  
Attorneys for Plaintiff      

 

21

EX-99.(A)(5)(D) 11 d376793dex99a5d.htm CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT DATED JULY 3, 2012 Class Action Complaint dated July 3, 2012

Exhibit(a)(5)(D)

      
  

ROBBINS UMEDA LLP

  

BRIAN J. ROBBINS (190264)

  

STEPHEN J. ODDO (174828)

  

ARSHAN AMIRI (246874)

  

EDWARD B. GERARD (248053)

  

JUSTIN D. RIEGER (257321)

  

600 B Street, Suite 1900

  

San Diego, CA 92101

  

Telephone: (619) 525-3990

  

Facsimile: (619) 525-3991

  

Attorneys for Plaintiff

  

[Additional Counsel on Signature Page]

  

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO

 

DOUGLAS PETERSON, on Behalf of

    )       Case No. 37-2012-00100092-CU-BT-CTL

Himself and All Others Similarly Situated,

    )      
    )       CLASS ACTION
                                         Plaintiff,     )      

              V.

    )      
    )       COMPLAINT BASED UPON SELF-DEALING

AMYLIN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,

    )       AND BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY

DANIEL M. BRADBURY,

    )      

PAULO F. COSTA,

    )      

JAY S. SKYLER,

    )      

JOSEPH P. SULLIVAN,

    )      

KARIN EASTHAM,

    )      

JAMES R. GAVIN III,

    )      

TERESA BECK,

    )      

ADRIAN ADAMS,

    )      

M. KATHLEEN BEHRENS,

    )      

ALEXANDER DENNER,

    )      

BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY,

    )      

B&R ACQUISITION COMPANY,

    )      

and DOES 1-25, inclusive,

    )      

 

Defendants.

 

   

 

 

)

)

)

  

  

  

  

 

 

COMPLAINT BASED UPON SELF-DEALING AND BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY

 


SUMMARY OF THE ACTION

1. This is a stockholder class action brought by plaintiff on behalf of holders of common stock of Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Amylin” or the “Company”) against Amylin, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (“BMS”), B&R Acquisition Company (“Merger Sub”), and certain Amylin officers and directors arising out of the Individual Defendants’ (as defined herein) agreement to sell Amylin to BMS and at an unfair price of $31 for each share of Amylin common stock (the “Proposed Acquisition”). This action seeks to enjoin defendants from further breaching their fiduciary duties in their pursuit of a sale of the Company at an unfair price through an unfair and self-serving process to BMS. In pursuing the unlawful plan to induce Amylin’s shareholders to approve the Proposed Acquisition via an unfair and uninformed process, each of the defendants violated applicable law by directly breaching and/or aiding the other defendants’ breaches of their fiduciary duties of loyalty, due care, diligence, independence, good faith, and fair dealing.

2. Amylin develops diabetes drugs, including BYDUREONTM, a once-a-week treatment for diabetes that could potentially become a $2 billion a year product. BMS’s own experimental diabetes product, dapagliflozin, failed to win U.S. marketing approval in January, when the U.S. Food and Drug Administration asked for more data to assess its risks and benefits. Diabetes has become a key target for pharmaceutical companies as a result of rising obesity rates and the aging of the Baby Boom generation. About 346 million people globally have the illness, and the number of deaths may double from 2005 to 2030, according to the World Health Organization.

3. On March 28, 2012, Bloomberg reported that BMS had made an offer to acquire Amylin that the Company rejected. After receiving this offer and not disclosing it to the Company’s shareholders, the Company’s management attempted to capitalize on a potential sale by awarding themselves with stock options. For example, on March 6, 2012, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), defendant Daniel M. Bradbury (“Bradbury”) was granted 300,000 stock options with a strike price of $16.02 per share—almost half the value of the stock value in the Proposed Acquisition.

 

COMPLAINT BASED UPON SELF-DEALING AND BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY

 

1


4. In order to lock in the Proposed Acquisition, the defendants entered into numerous preclusive and onerous deal protection devices, set forth in the Agreement and Plan of Merger the Company entered into on June 29, 2012 (the “Merger Agreement”). These provisions, which collectively preclude any competing offers for the Company, include: (i) a “Top-Up” Option, which requires the Company to issue enough additional stock for BMS to purchase after the tender offer expires so that BMS can acquire one more share than the 90% threshold needed to exercise a short-form merger, and avoid a shareholder vote on the Proposed Acquisition; (ii) a no-solicitation provision prohibiting the Company from properly shopping itself; (iii) a termination fee payable by the Company to BMS of $160 million if Amylin is to accept a competing bid; and (iv) a three business-day matching rights period during which BMS can match any superior proposal received by the Company. These provisions reflect an attempt by the Board to lock up the Proposed Acquisition at a price that grossly undervalues the Company.

5. Because the Individual Defendants dominate and control the business and corporate affairs of Amylin, there exists an imbalance and disparity of economic power between them and the public shareholders of Amylin. Therefore, it is inherently unfair for the Individual Defendants to execute and pursue any Proposed Acquisition agreement under which they will reap disproportionate benefits to the exclusion of obtaining the maximum shareholder value. Nonetheless, instead of attempting to negotiate a contract reflecting the best consideration reasonably available for the Amylin shareholders, who they are duty-bound to serve, the Individual Defendants disloyally placed their own interests first, and tailored the terms and conditions of the Proposed Acquisition to meet their own personal needs and objectives.

6. In short, the Proposed Acquisition is designed to unlawfully divest Amylin public shareholders of the Company’s valuable assets for grossly inadequate consideration.

7. To remedy defendants’ breaches of fiduciary duty and other misconduct, plaintiff seeks, inter alia: (i) injunctive relief preventing consummation of the Proposed Acquisition, unless and until the Company adopts and implements a procedure or process to obtain a transaction that provides the best possible terms for shareholders; (ii) a directive to the Individual

 

COMPLAINT BASED UPON SELF-DEALING AND BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY

 

2


Defendants to exercise their fiduciary duties to obtain a transaction which is in the best interests of Amylin shareholders; and (iii) rescission of, to the extent already implemented, the Merger Agreement, or any of the terms thereof.

JURISDICTION AND VENUE

8. This Court has jurisdiction over the causes of action asserted herein pursuant to the California Constitution, Article VI, §10, because this case is a cause not given by statute to other trial courts.

9. This Court has jurisdiction over this action because certain of the defendants conduct business in and/or have sufficient minimum contacts with California. Amylin is a citizen of California as it is has its principal place of business at 9360 Towne Centre Drive, San Diego, California.

10. Venue is proper in this Court because the conduct at issue took place and had an effect in this County.

PARTIES

11. Plaintiff Douglas Peterson has been a shareholder at all times relevant hereto and is a shareholder of Amylin.

12. Defendant Amylin is a Delaware corporation with principal executive offices located at 9360 Towne Centre Drive, San Diego, California. Amylin is a biopharmaceutical company that is committed to improving the lives of people with diabetes and other metabolic diseases through the discovery, development, and commercialization of innovative medicines. Amylin is committed to delivering novel therapies that transform the way diabetes and other metabolic disorders are treated. Amylin is currently marketing two first-in-class medicines to treat diabetes, known as BYETTA® (exenatide) injection and SYMLIN® (pramlintide acetate) injection. Amylin is also marketing the first and only once-weekly diabetes treatment called BYDUREONTM, an extended-release medication for type 2 diabetes that provides continuous glycemic control in a once-weekly dose.

13. Defendant Bradbury is Amylin’s CEO and has been since March 2007; President and a director and has been since June 2006; and Chief Operating Officer and has been since

 

COMPLAINT BASED UPON SELF-DEALING AND BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY

 

3


June 2003. Bradbury was also an Amylin Executive Vice President from June 2000 to June 2003 and served in various officer-level positions in Corporate Development and Marketing beginning in 1994.

14. Defendant Paulo F. Costa is Amylin’s Chairman of the Board of Directors (the “Board”) and has been since August 2009 and a director and has been since June 2009.

15. Defendant Jay S. Skyler is an Amylin director and has been since August 1999.

16. Defendant Joseph P. Sullivan is an Amylin director and has been since September 2003.

17. Defendant Karin Eastham is an Amylin director and has been since September 2005.

18. Defendant James R. Gavin III is an Amylin director and has been since December 2005.

19. Defendant Teresa Beck is an Amylin director and has been since March 2007.

20. Defendant Adrian Adams is an Amylin director and has been since October 2007.

21. Defendant M. Kathleen Behrens is an Amylin director and has been since June 2009.

22. Defendant Alexander Denner is an Amylin director and has been since June 2009.

23. Defendant BMS is a Delaware corporation with principal executive offices located at 345 Park Avenue, New York, New York. BMS is a global biopharmaceutical company with the mission to discover, develop, and deliver innovative medicines that help patients prevail over serious diseases. BMS’s business is focused on innovative biopharmaceutical products and, at times, BMS enters into strategic alliances which provide it with rights to develop, manufacture, market, and/or sell pharmaceutical products that are owned by third parties. In January 2007, BMS and AstraZeneca PLC (“AstraZeneca”) entered into a worldwide (except for Japan) co-development and commercialization agreement, which enables BMS to research, develop, and commercialize select investigational drugs for type 2 diabetes.

 

COMPLAINT BASED UPON SELF-DEALING AND BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY

 

4


24. Defendant Merger Sub is a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of BMS formed solely for the purpose of engaging in the transactions contemplated by the Proposed Acquisition.

25. The defendants named above in ¶¶13-22 are sometimes collectively referred to herein as the “Individual Defendants.”

26. The true names and capacities of defendants sued herein under California Code of Civil Procedure §474 as Does 1 through 25, inclusive, are presently not known to plaintiff, who therefore sues these defendants by such fictitious names. Plaintiff will seek to amend this complaint and include these Doe defendants’ true names and capacities when they are ascertained. Each of the fictitiously named defendants is responsible in some manner for the conduct alleged herein and for the injuries suffered by the Class (as defined herein).

INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS’ FIDUCIARY DUTIES

27. Under Delaware law, the officers and directors of a publicly traded corporation have fiduciary duties of loyalty and care to shareholders. To diligently comply with these duties, neither the officers nor the directors may take any action that:

(a) adversely affects the value provided to the corporation’s shareholders;

(b) will discourage, inhibit, or deter alternative offers to purchase control of the corporation or its assets;

(c) contractually prohibits themselves from complying with their fiduciary duties;

(d) will otherwise adversely affect their duty to secure the best value reasonably available under the circumstances for the corporation’s shareholders; and/or

(e) will provide the officers and/or directors with preferential treatment at the expense of, or separate from, the public shareholders.

28. In accordance with their duties of loyalty, the Individual Defendants, as officers and/or directors of Amylin, are obligated under Delaware law to refrain from:

(a) participating in any transaction where the officers’ or directors’ loyalties are divided;

 

COMPLAINT BASED UPON SELF-DEALING AND BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY

 

5


(b) participating in any transaction where the officers or directors receive, or are entitled to receive, a personal financial benefit not equally shared by the public shareholders of the corporation; and/or

(c) unjustly enriching themselves at the expense or to the detriment of the public shareholders.

29. Defendants, separately and together, in connection with the Proposed Acquisition, are knowingly or recklessly violating their fiduciary duties and aiding and abetting such breaches, including their duties of loyalty, good faith, and independence owed to plaintiff and other public shareholders of Amylin. Certain of the defendants stand on both sides of the transaction, are engaging in self-dealing, are obtaining for themselves personal benefits, including personal financial benefits not shared equally by plaintiff or the Class. Certain Amylin executives and directors are also retaining their prestigious and lucrative positions and compensation at the post-Proposed Acquisition company. These executives and directors have managed to secure for themselves substantial employment at the expense of the shareholders’ best interests. Accordingly, the Proposed Acquisition will benefit the Individual Defendants in significant ways not shared with the Class members. As a result of the Individual Defendants’ self-dealing and divided loyalties, neither plaintiff nor the Class will receive adequate or fair value for their Amylin’s common stock in the Proposed Acquisition.

30. Because the Individual Defendants are knowingly or recklessly breaching their duties of loyalty, good faith, and independence in connection with the Proposed Acquisition, the burden of proving the inherent or entire fairness of the Proposed Acquisition, including all aspects of its negotiation, structure, price, and terms, is placed upon defendants as a matter of law.

BACKGROUND

31. On March 28, 2012, Bloomberg reported that Amylin had rejected an offer to be acquired by BMS. At the time, M. Ian Somaiya, an analyst with Piper Jaffray & Co. stated that Amylin could be worth as much as $37 per share. Once it was known that BMS might be “in play” numerous other suitors approached the Company to explore potential strategic alternatives, including Pfizer Inc., AstraZeneca, Merck & Co., Sanofi-Aventis, Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., and Roche Holding AG.

 

COMPLAINT BASED UPON SELF-DEALING AND BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY

 

6


32. On April 4, 2012, activist investor Carl Icahn (“Icahn”) lashed out at the Board of Amylin, urging it to put the Company up for sale and threatening a proxy fight. Icahn, the Company’s third-largest shareholder with an 8.9 % stake, criticized Amylin for failing to confirm or deny media reports that it had rejected a $22-a-share takeover offer from BMS.

33. Icahn also commenced a suit in the Delaware Chancery Court against the Individual Defendants and Amylin captioned, Icahn Partners, LP v. Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc., C.A. No. 7404-VCN (the “Icahn Action”), seeking waiver of a bylaw provision that would bar a proxy contest in time for the Company’s annual meeting. Icahn alleged that the BMS’s offer and the Board’s rejection thereof were not disclosed “at the time received or rejected, or in connection with Amylin subsequently issuing additional stock at $15.62 per share through a registration statement filed with the [U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”)], or in connection with the Board’s approval of executive stock options at an exercise price of $16.02 per share.” Icahn argued that the Company’s failure and refusal to negotiate in good faith with BMS and its failure to disclose BMS’s offer demonstrated that the Individual Defendants had effectively changed their investment strategy for the Company from faithfully considering a value maximizing transaction for the Company and its shareholders, to a different strategy which involved rejecting premium bids out of hand.

34. Vice Chancellor John W. Noble granted Icahn’s request for expedited discovery, finding that Icahn had pled a colorable claim that the “Board’s refusal to engage in discussions with Bristol-Myers signals a significant enough change in the expectations of shareholders to warrant reopening of the nomination process” for the Company’s coming proxy. Icahn Partners LP v. Amylin Pharms., Inc., C.A. No. 7404-VCN, 2012 WL 1526814, at *3 (Del. Ch. April 20, 2012) (citation omitted). In other words, Icahn had alleged a colorable claim that the Individual Defendants’ conduct departed from that of a Board seeking to maximize value for its shareholders and the Company through a premium transaction, and instead now reflected an entrenchment mode. Icahn eventually settled his action with the Company on undisclosed terms, but still advocated the Company’s sale.

 

COMPLAINT BASED UPON SELF-DEALING AND BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY

 

7


35. Then, on May 15, 2012, Bloomberg reported that seven companies have signed confidentiality agreements as part of Amylin’s sale process: Pfizer Inc., AstraZeneca, Sanofi-Aventis, Merck & Co., BMS, Roche Holding AG, and Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Notably, the Individual Defendants have not confirmed the accuracy of this report.

THE PROPOSED ACQUISITION

36. On June 29, 2012, Amylin and BMS jointly issued the following press release announcing that the Individual Defendants had agreed to sell Amylin to BMS for $31 per Amylin share:

Bristol-Myers Squibb and AstraZeneca Expand Diabetes Alliance Through Bristol-Myers Squibb’s Acquisition of Amylin Pharmaceuticals

 

   

Strengthens Leadership Position of Successful Alliance in Growing Area of High Unmet Medical Need

 

   

Complements Current Portfolio Creating a More Comprehensive Disease Management Platform with the Addition of Novel GLP-1 Agonist Franchise

 

   

Adds Approved and Marketed Products for Type 2 Diabetes, including BYETTA® and BYDUREONTM

PRINCETON, N.J., LONDON, & SAN DIEGO—(BUSINESS WIRE)—Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (NYSE: BMY) and Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ: AMLN) announced today that Bristol-Myers Squibb will acquire Amylin for $31.00 per share in cash, pursuant to a cash tender offer and second step merger, or an aggregate purchase price of approximately $5.3 billion. The total value of the transaction, including Amylin’s net debt and a contractual payment obligation to Eli Lilly & Company, together totaling about $1.7 billion, is approximately $7 billion. The acquisition has been unanimously approved by the boards of directors of Bristol-Myers Squibb and Amylin. The board of directors of Amylin has unanimously recommended that Amylin’s stockholders tender their shares into the tender offer.

Bristol-Myers Squibb and AstraZeneca (LSE:AZN) announced today that, following the completion of Bristol-Myers Squibb’s acquisition of Amylin, the companies will enter into collaboration arrangements, based on the framework of the existing diabetes alliance, regarding the development and commercialization of Amylin’s portfolio of products. Following completion of Bristol-Myers Squibb’s acquisition of Amylin, AstraZeneca will make a payment to Amylin, as a

 

COMPLAINT BASED UPON SELF-DEALING AND BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY

 

8


wholly owned subsidiary of Bristol-Myers Squibb, in the amount of approximately $3.4 billion in cash. Profits and losses arising from the collaboration will be shared equally. In addition, AstraZeneca has the option, exercisable at its sole discretion following the closing of the acquisition, to establish equal governance rights over key strategic and financial decisions regarding the collaboration, upon the payment to Bristol-Myers Squibb of an additional $135 million. These collaboration arrangements have been approved by the boards of directors of Bristol-Myers Squibb and AstraZeneca.

Amylin is a biopharmaceutical company dedicated to the discovery, development and commercialization of innovative medicines for patients with diabetes and other metabolic diseases. Amylin’s primary focus is on the research, development and commercialization of a franchise of GLP-1 agonists, for the treatment of type 2 diabetes.

“Amylin’s innovative diabetes portfolio, talented people and state-of-the art manufacturing facility complement our long-standing leadership in metabolics,” said Lamberto Andreotti, chief executive officer, Bristol-Myers Squibb. “We are pleased to be able to strengthen the portfolio we have built to help patients with diabetes by building on the success Amylin has had with its GLP-1 franchise. The acquisition of Amylin by Bristol-Myers Squibb is also a unique way for Bristol-Myers Squibb and AstraZeneca to expand the alliance between the two companies, and it demonstrates Bristol-Myers Squibb’s innovative and targeted approach to partnerships and business development.”

Simon Lowth, interim chief executive officer of AstraZeneca, said: “This is a compelling proposition that will have an immediate positive impact on revenues and is fully in line with our stated partnering strategy to enhance top-line growth and strengthen our late stage pipeline. The broadening of our diabetes collaboration with Bristol-Myers Squibb is another important step towards creating a leadership position in the treatment of a disease with growing unmet medical need that is reaching epidemic proportions in many areas of the world. The combined development, regulatory and commercial strengths of the AstraZeneca and Bristol Myers-Squibb alliance for diabetes provides an excellent platform to unlock the potential of Amylin’s differentiated treatments for the benefit of patients worldwide and for our shareholders.”

“We are pleased to announce this transaction that provides substantial value for Amylin shareholders,” said Daniel M. Bradbury, president and chief executive officer of Amylin. “Over the last several months, our Board of Directors, with the assistance of our financial and legal advisors, has been actively engaged in a robust and thorough strategic process designed to maximize the value of our unique diabetes franchise. I strongly believe that we have accomplished that objective. Our recent U.S. launch of BYDUREON, the first ever once-weekly therapy for patients with type 2 diabetes, solidified our position as a driving force in the fight against this rising global epidemic. Importantly, this transaction with Bristol-Myers Squibb and their alliance with AstraZeneca provide the means to maximize the potential and impact of Amylin’s innovative diabetes therapies and reach more patients around the world with treatment options to help manage their

 

COMPLAINT BASED UPON SELF-DEALING AND BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY

 

9


disease. In addition, I would like to acknowledge and thank the dedicated employees of Amylin whose tireless efforts are responsible for creating the tremendous value that is being recognized today by two of the most respected companies in the pharmaceutical industry.”

Amylin’s assets include:

 

   

A GLP-1 agonist franchise, including two treatments for type 2 diabetes, BYETTA (exenatide) injection and BYDUREON (exenatide extended-release for injectable suspension/exenatide 2 mg powder and solvent for prolonged release suspension for injection), approved for use in both the U.S. and Europe, and a life-cycle management pipeline, including delivery devices and formulation improvements. The addition of the Amylin GLP-1 franchise complements Bristol-Myers Squibb’s and AstraZeneca’s current diabetes portfolio creating a comprehensive disease management platform;

 

   

Metreleptin, a leptin analog currently under review at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of diabetes and/or hypertriglyceridemia (high levels of triglycerides in the bloodstream) in patients with rare forms of inherited or acquired lipodystrophy;

 

   

SYMLIN® (pramlintide acetate) injection an amylin analog, approved by the FDA for the treatment of type 1 and type 2 diabetes patients with inadequate glycemic control on meal-time insulin; and

 

   

A state-of-the-art sterile production facility in Ohio.

Under the terms of the definitive merger agreement between Bristol-Myers Squibb and Amylin, Bristol-Myers Squibb will commence a cash tender offer to purchase all of the outstanding shares of Amylin’s common stock for $31.00 per share. The closing of the tender offer is subject to customary terms and conditions, including the tender of a number of shares that constitutes at least a majority of Amylin’s outstanding shares of common stock, on a fully diluted basis, and expiration or termination of the waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act. The agreement also provides for the parties to effect, subject to customary conditions, a merger to be completed following the completion of the tender offer which would result in all shares not tendered in the tender offer being converted into the right to receive $31.00 per share in cash. The merger agreement contains a provision under which Amylin has agreed not to solicit any competing offers for the company. Bristol-Myers Squibb will finance the acquisition from its existing cash resources and credit facilities.

The companies expect the tender offer to close approximately thirty days after commencement of the tender offer.

Citi and Evercore are serving as financial advisers to Bristol-Myers Squibb in connection with the acquisition and Kirkland & Ellis LLP is its legal adviser. Bank of America Merrill Lynch is serving as financial adviser to AstraZeneca in

 

COMPLAINT BASED UPON SELF-DEALING AND BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY

 

10


connection with the transactions and Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP and Covington & Burling LLP are its legal advisers. Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC and Goldman Sachs & Co. are serving as financial advisers to Amylin in connection with the acquisition and Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP is its legal adviser.

For Bristol-Myers Squibb, the transactions are expected to be dilutive to Non-GAAP earnings per share (EPS) in 2012 and 2013 by approximately $0.03, becoming slightly accretive starting in 2014 with meaningful accretion expected in the later part of the decade. The estimated Non-GAAP EPS impact excludes amortization of acquired intangible assets, restructuring costs and other costs associated with the transactions. Executives of Bristol-Myers Squibb will discuss the transactions during a conference call at 8:00 a.m. EDT on Monday, July 2, 2012. Investors and the general public are invited to listen by dialing 785-830-1925, confirmation code: 2561034.

Bristol-Myers Squibb Use of Non-GAAP Financial Information

This non-GAAP information is intended to enhance an investor’s overall understanding of the company’s financial performance and prospects for the future. This non-GAAP information is not intended to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for financial measures prepared in accordance with GAAP. There is no reasonably accessible or reliable comparable GAAP measure for this forward-looking information.

About Bristol-Myers and AstraZeneca Collaboration

Bristol-Myers Squibb and AstraZeneca entered into a collaboration in January 2007 to enable the companies to research, develop and commercialize select investigational drugs for type 2 diabetes. The Bristol-Myers Squibb/AstraZeneca diabetes collaboration is focused around ONGLYZA® (saxagliptin), part of the innovative class of DPP-4 inhibitors, KOMBIGLYZE® (saxagliptin and metfomin HCI extended-release) and FORXIGA®(dapagliflozin), an SGLT2 inhibitor, and is dedicated to global patient care, improving patient outcomes and creating a new vision for the treatment of diabetes. ONGLYZA has been submitted for regulatory approval in 93 countries and is approved in 77 countries including the US, Canada, Mexico, EU, India, Brazil and China. Dapagliflozin received a positive opinion from the CHMP in Europe in April 2012.

37. On July 3, 2012, the Company also filed a Form 8-K with the SEC wherein it disclosed the Merger Agreement. The announcement and filing reveal that the Proposed Acquisition is the product of a flawed sale process and, unless the offer price is increased, would be consummated at an unfair price.

38. Section 1.4 of the Merger Agreement contains the irrevocable Top-Up Option. This Top-Up Option will allow BMS to pursue a short form merger, and thus prevent any

 

COMPLAINT BASED UPON SELF-DEALING AND BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY

 

11


shareholder vote on the acquisition, even if it the requisite number of public shareholders do not tender their stock to BMS. In particular, section 1.4(a) states:

The Company hereby grants to Merger Sub an irrevocable option (the “Top-Up Option”), exercisable upon the terms and conditions of this Section 1.4, to purchase from the Company a number of newly-issued Shares (the “Top-Up Shares”) equal to the number of Shares that, when added to the number of Shares held by Parent and Merger Sub at the time of such exercise, shall constitute one (1) Share more than the number of Shares necessary for Merger Sub to be merged into the Company pursuant to Section 253 of the DGCL (after giving effect to the issuance of Shares pursuant to the exercise of the Top-Up Option).

39. Under section 5.2 of the Merger Agreement, Amylin is subject to a no-solicitation clause that prohibits the Company from seeking a superior offer for its shareholders. Section 5.2(a) states that Amylin shall:

…immediately cease and cause to be terminated any discussions or negotiations pending as of the date hereof regarding any Competing Proposal. Except as otherwise provided for in Section 5.2(b), neither the Company nor any Subsidiary of the Company, nor any of its officers or directors shall, and the Company shall instruct and shall use its reasonable best efforts to cause its Subsidiaries and its and their respective employees, investment bankers, attorneys, accountants and other advisors or representatives (such officers, directors, employees, investment bankers, attorneys, accountants and other advisors or representatives, collectively, “Representatives”) not to, directly or indirectly: (i) solicit, initiate or knowingly facilitate or encourage any inquiries or the making of any proposal or offer that constitutes, or may reasonably be expected to lead to, a Competing Proposal, (ii) participate in any discussions or negotiations regarding, or furnish to any Person (other than Parent, Merger Sub or their Representatives) any confidential information with respect to, any Competing Proposal or any inquiry, proposal or offer that could reasonably be expected to lead to a Competing Proposal, except as permitted by the subsequent provisions of this Section 5.2 and to notify such Person of the existence of this Section 5.2, (iii) grant any waiver, amendment or release under any standstill or confidentiality agreement (or any standstill or confidentiality provision of any other Contract) or Takeover Statutes for the purpose of allowing a third party to make a Competing Proposal or (iv) resolve or propose to do any of the foregoing.

40. Though the Merger Agreement ostensibly has a “fiduciary out” provision that allows the Company to negotiate with other bidders, this provision is actually illusory. In order for Amylin to negotiate with any other suitors, the potential acquirer would first have to make an unsolicited superior offer. Without access to non-public information, which the Company is prevented from offering under the Merger-Agreement prior to the receipt of an offer that the Board reasonably expects to lead to a superior deal, no other bidder will emerge to make such an offer.

 

COMPLAINT BASED UPON SELF-DEALING AND BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY

 

12


41. The likelihood of another offer is further reduced by the “matching rights” clause found in section 5.2(d)(i) of the Merger Agreement. This provision affords BMS three business days to consider and match the terms of any proposal superior to its own, and serves to dissuade any competing bid from emerging.

42. Amylin is also subject to another preclusive lock-up provision in section 8.3 of the Merger Agreement. Section 8.3 states that Amylin must pay to BMS a termination fee of $160 million if it accepts a superior proposal. According to the Merger Agreement, there were over 163.5 million shares of Amylin common stock outstanding as of June 27, 2012. Thus, the termination fee adds another $0.98 per share to the price tag for any interested suitors seeking to bid for the Company. This termination fee deters other bidders by adding transaction costs for a bidder who makes a superior offer. The termination fee also improperly limits the ability of shareholders to receive a superior offer for their shares and is contrary to their interests because it deters and prevents the submission of higher proposals, especially in connection with the no-solicitation and matching rights clauses in section 5.2.

43. The provisions above, which will serve to unreasonably deter and discourage superior offers from other interested parties, were agreed to by the Individual Defendants to help secure the personal benefits and unfair profits afforded to them through the Proposed Acquisition and all but ensure that no other bidder steps forward to submit a superior proposal. In doing so, the Board is attempting to lock up the Proposed Acquisition for the benefit of defendants, even though it significantly undervalues the Company and its future prospects.

SELF-DEALING

44. By reason of their positions with Amylin, the Individual Defendants have access to non-public information concerning the financial condition and prospects of Amylin. Thus, there exists an imbalance and disparity of knowledge and economic power between the Individual Defendants and the public shareholders of Amylin. Therefore, it is inherently unfair for the Individual Defendants to execute and pursue any Proposed Acquisition agreement under

 

COMPLAINT BASED UPON SELF-DEALING AND BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY

 

13


which they will reap disproportionate benefits to the exclusion of obtaining the best value for shareholders. Instead, Individual Defendants disloyally placed their own interests first, and tailored the terms and conditions of the Proposed Acquisition to meet their own personal needs and objectives. Certain Individual Defendants are also receiving lucrative change-in-control benefits or prestigious positions at the combined company.

45. Instead of maximizing value for all Amylin’s shareholders, the officers and directors of Amylin have decided to pursue their own interests, seeking to cash in on valuable stock options. In particular, defendant Bradbury received 300,000 options on March 6, 2012, after the bid from BMS was received and not disclosed. With an exercise price of $16.02 per share, his profit on a $31 per share Proposed Acquisition price is approximately $4.5 million.

46. In order to meet their fiduciary duties, the Individual Defendants are obligated to explore transactions that will maximize shareholder value, and not structure a preferential deal for themselves. Due to the Individual Defendants’ eagerness to enter into a transaction with BMS, they failed to implement a process to obtain the maximum price for Amylin’s shareholders. Indeed, according to numerous reports, Pfizer Inc., AstraZeneca, Merck & Co., Sanofi-Aventis, Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., and Roche Holding AG were all interested in acquiring the Company.

47. As a result of defendants’ conduct, Amylin’s public stockholders have been and will continue to be denied the fair process and arm’s-length negotiated terms to which they are entitled in a sale of their Company. The consideration reflected in the Merger Agreement does not reflect the true inherent value of the Company that was known only to the Individual Defendants, as directors and officers of Amylin, and BMS at the time the Proposed Acquisition was announced. Indeed, the Individual Defendants ensured that Amylin would be sold to one buyer and one buyer only.

48. The Proposed Acquisition is wrongful, unfair, and harmful to Amylin’s public stockholders, and represents an effort by the Individual Defendants to aggrandize their own financial position and interests at the expense of and to the detriment of the Class members. Specifically, defendants are attempting to deny plaintiff and the Class their shareholder rights through the sale of Amylin via an unfair process. Accordingly, the Proposed Acquisition will benefit the Individual Defendants at the expense of Amylin’s shareholders.

 

COMPLAINT BASED UPON SELF-DEALING AND BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY

 

14


49. In light of the foregoing, the Individual Defendants must, as their fiduciary obligations require:

 

   

Withdraw their consent to the merger of Amylin with BMS and allow the shares to trade freely without impediments;

 

   

Act independently so that the interests of Amylin’s public stockholders will be protected;

 

   

Adequately ensure that no conflicts of interest exist between defendants’ own interests and their fiduciary obligation to maximize stockholder value or, if such conflicts exist, to ensure that all conflicts be resolved in the best interests of Amylin’s public stockholders; and

 

   

Solicit competing bids to BMS’s offer to ensure that the Company’s shareholders are receiving the maximum value for their shares.

CLASS ACTION ALLEGATIONS

50. Plaintiff brings this action for himself and on behalf of all holders of Amylin common stock which have been or will be harmed by the conduct described herein (the “Class”). Excluded from the Class are the defendants and any individual or entity affiliated with any defendant.

51. This action is properly maintainable as a class action.

52. The Class is so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable. According to Amylin SEC filings, there were more than 163.5 million shares of Amylin’s common stock outstanding as of June 27, 2012.

53. There are questions of law and fact which are common to the Class and which predominate over questions affecting any individual Class member. The common questions include, inter alia, the following:

 

COMPLAINT BASED UPON SELF-DEALING AND BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY

 

15


(a) whether the Individual Defendants have breached their fiduciary duties of undivided loyalty, independence, or due care with respect to plaintiff and the other members of the Class in connection with the Proposed Acquisition;

(b) whether the Individual Defendants are engaging in self-dealing in connection with the Proposed Acquisition;

(c) whether the Individual Defendants have breached any of their other fiduciary duties owed to plaintiff and the other members of the Class in connection with the Proposed Acquisition, including the duties of good faith, diligence, and fair dealing;

(d) whether Amylin aided and abetted the Individual Defendants’ breaches of fiduciary duties;

(e) whether BMS and Merger Sub aided and abetted the Individual Defendants’ breaches of fiduciary duties; and

(f) whether plaintiff and the other members of the Class would suffer irreparable injury were the transactions complained of herein consummated.

54. Plaintiffs claims are typical of the claims of the other members of the Class and Plaintiff does not have any interests adverse to the Class.

55. Plaintiff has retained competent counsel experienced in litigation of this nature and will fairly and adequately represent and protect the interests of the Class.

56. The prosecution of separate actions by individual members of the Class would create a risk of inconsistent or varying adjudications with respect to individual members of the Class which would establish incompatible standards of conduct for the party opposing the Class.

57. Plaintiff anticipates that there will be no difficulty in the management of this litigation. A class action is superior to other available methods for the fair and efficient adjudication of this controversy.

58. Defendants have acted on grounds generally applicable to the Class with respect to the matters complained of herein, thereby making appropriate the relief sought herein with respect to the Class as a whole.

 

COMPLAINT BASED UPON SELF-DEALING AND BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY

 

16


FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION

Claim for Breach of Fiduciary Duties Against the Individual Defendants and Does 1-15.

59. Plaintiff incorporates by reference and realleges each and every allegation contained above as though fully set forth herein.

60. The Individual Defendants and Does 1-15 have violated the fiduciary duties of care, loyalty, and independence owed to the public shareholders of Amylin and have acted to put their personal interests ahead of the interests of Amylin’s shareholders.

61. By the acts, transactions, and course of conduct alleged herein, defendants, individually and acting as a part of a common plan, are attempting to unfairly deprive plaintiff and other members of the Class of the true value inherent in and arising from Amylin.

62. The Individual Defendants and Does 1-15 have violated their fiduciary duties by entering Amylin into the Proposed Acquisition without regard to the effect of the proposed transaction on Amylin’s shareholders.

63. As demonstrated by the allegations above, the Individual Defendants and Does 1-15 failed to exercise the care required, and breached their duties of loyalty and independence owed to the shareholders of Amylin because, among other reasons:

(a) they failed to take steps to maximize the value of Amylin to its public shareholders;

(b) they failed to properly value Amylin and its various assets and operations; and

(c) they ignored or did not protect against the numerous conflicts of interest resulting from the directors’ own interrelationships or connection with the Proposed Acquisition.

64. Because the Individual Defendants and Does 1-15 dominate and control the business and corporate affairs of Amylin, and are in possession of or have access to private corporate information concerning Amylin’s assets, business, and future prospects, there exists an imbalance and disparity of knowledge and economic power between them and the public shareholders of Amylin which makes it inherently unfair for them to pursue and recommend any proposed transaction wherein they will reap disproportionate benefits to the exclusion of maximizing shareholder value.

 

COMPLAINT BASED UPON SELF-DEALING AND BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY

 

17


65. By reason of the foregoing acts, practices, and course of conduct, the Individual Defendants and Does 1-15 have failed to exercise ordinary care and diligence in the exercise of their fiduciary obligations toward plaintiff and the other members of the Class.

66. The Individual Defendants and Does 1-15 are engaging in self-dealing, are not acting in good faith toward plaintiff and the other members of the Class, and have breached and are breaching their fiduciary duties to the members of the Class.

67. As a result of the Individual Defendants and Does 1-15’s unlawful actions, plaintiff and the other members of the Class will be irreparably harmed in that they will not receive their fair portion of the value of Amylin’s assets and operations. Unless the Proposed Acquisition is enjoined by the Court, the Individual Defendants will continue to breach their fiduciary duties owed to plaintiff and the members of the Class, will not engage in arm’s-length negotiations on the Proposed Acquisition terms, and may consummate the Proposed Acquisition, all to the irreparable harm of the members of the Class.

68. Plaintiff and the members of the Class have no adequate remedy at law. Only through the exercise of this Court’s equitable powers can plaintiff and the Class be fully protected from the immediate and irreparable injury which defendants’ actions threaten to inflict.

SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION

Claim for Aiding and Abetting Breaches of Fiduciary Duty Against Amylin

69. Plaintiff incorporates by reference and realleges each and every allegation contained above as though fully set forth herein.

70. The Individual Defendants and Does 1-15 owed to plaintiff and the members of the Class certain fiduciary duties as fully set out herein.

71. By committing the acts alleged herein, the Individual Defendants and Does 1-15 breached their fiduciary duties owed to Plaintiff and the members of the Class.

72. Amylin colluded in or aided and abetted the Individual Defendants and Does 1-15’s breaches of fiduciary duties, and was an active and knowing participant in the Individual Defendants and Does 1-15’s breaches of fiduciary duties owed to plaintiff and the members of the Class.

 

COMPLAINT BASED UPON SELF-DEALING AND BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY

 

18


73. Plaintiff and the members of the Class shall be irreparably injured as a direct and proximate result of the aforementioned acts.

THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION

Claim for Aiding and Abetting Breaches of Fiduciary Duty Against

BMS, Merger Sub, and Does 16-25

74. Plaintiff incorporates by reference and realleges each and every allegation contained above as though fully set forth herein.

75. The Individual Defendants and Does 1-15 owed to plaintiff and the members of the Class certain fiduciary duties as fully set out herein.

76. By committing the acts alleged herein, the Individual Defendants and Does 1-15 breached their fiduciary duties owed to plaintiff and the members of the Class.

77. Defendants BMS, Merger Sub, and Does 16-25 colluded in or aided and abetted the Individual Defendants and Does 1-15’s breaches of fiduciary duties, and were active and knowing participants in the Individual Defendants and Does 1-15’s breaches of fiduciary duties owed to plaintiff and the members of the Class.

78. Defendants BMS, Merger Sub, and Does 16-25 participated in the breach of the fiduciary duties by the Individual Defendants and Does 1-15 for the purpose of advancing their own interests. Defendants BMS, Merger Sub, and Does 16-25 obtained and will obtain both direct and indirect benefits from colluding in or aiding and abetting the Individual Defendants and Does 1-15’s breaches. Defendants BMS, Merger Sub, and Does 16-25 will benefit, inter alia, from the acquisition of the Company at an inadequate and unfair price if the Proposed Acquisition is consummated.

79. Plaintiff and the members of the Class shall be irreparably injured as a direct and proximate result of the aforementioned acts.

 

COMPLAINT BASED UPON SELF-DEALING AND BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY

 

19


PRAYER FOR RELIEF

WHEREFORE, plaintiff demands injunctive relief, in his favor and in favor of the Class and against defendants as follows:

A. Declaring that this action is properly maintainable as a class action;

B. Declaring and decreeing that the Merger Agreement was agreed to in breach of the fiduciary duties of the Individual Defendants and is therefore unlawful and unenforceable;

C. Rescinding, to the extent already implemented, the merger agreement;

D. Enjoining defendants, their agents, counsel, employees, and all persons acting in concert with them from consummating the Proposed Acquisition, unless and until the Company adopts and implements a procedure or process reasonably designed to enter into a merger agreement providing the best possible value for shareholders;

E. Directing the Individual Defendants to exercise their fiduciary duties to commence a sale process that is reasonably designed to secure the best possible consideration for Amylin and obtain a transaction which is in the best interests of Amylin’s shareholders;

F. Imposition of a constructive trust, in favor of plaintiff and members of the Class, upon any benefits improperly received by defendants as a result of their wrongful conduct;

G. Awarding plaintiff the costs and disbursements of this action, including reasonable attorneys’ and experts’ fees; and

H. Granting such other and further equitable relief as this Court may deem just and proper.

 

DATED: July 3, 2012

   ROBBINS UMEDA LLP
   BRIAN J. ROBBINS
   STEPHEN J. ODDO
   ARSHAN AMIRI
   EDWARD B. GERARD
   JUSTIN RIEGER
  

LOGO

  

BRIAN J. ROBBINS

   600 B Street, Suite 1900
   San Diego, CA 92101
   Telephone: (619) 525-3990
   Facsimile: (619) 525-3991

 

COMPLAINT BASED UPON SELF-DEALING AND BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY

 

20


ANDERSON, HELGEN, DAVIS &

NISSEN, PA

HENRY M. HELGEN, III

AMANDA R. CEFALU

150 South Fifth Street, Suite 3100

Minneapolis, MN 55402

Telephone: (612) 435-6356

Facsimile: (612) 435-6379

Attorneys for Plaintiff

 

COMPLAINT BASED UPON SELF-DEALING AND BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY

 

21

EX-99.(D)(2) 12 d376793dex99d2.htm TENDER AND SUPPORT AGREEMENT Tender and Support Agreement

Exhibit (d)(2)

EXECUTION VERSION

TENDER AND SUPPORT AGREEMENT

This TENDER AND SUPPORT AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”), dated as of June 29, 2012, is by and among Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, a Delaware corporation (“Parent”), B&R Acquisition Company, a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of Parent (“Sub”), Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) and each of the Persons set forth on Schedule A hereto (each, a “Stockholder”). The Company shall only be a party to this Agreement for purposes of Sections 4.7 through 4.10 and Article V of this Agreement.

WHEREAS, as of the date hereof, each Stockholder (i) is the record and beneficial owner (as defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act) of the number of shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share (“Common Stock”), of the Company set forth opposite such Stockholder’s name on Schedule A (all such shares set forth on Schedule A, together with any shares of Common Stock of the Company that are hereafter issued to or otherwise acquired or owned by any Stockholder prior to the termination of this Agreement being referred to herein as the “Subject Shares”) and (ii) directly or indirectly owns the number of Company Stock Options set forth opposite such Stockholder’s name on Schedule A;

WHEREAS, Parent, Sub and the Company intend to enter into an Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of the date hereof and as it may be amended from time to time (the “Merger Agreement”), which provides, among other things, for Sub to commence a tender offer for all of the issued and outstanding Common Stock of the Company (the “Offer”) and the merger of the Company and Sub (the “Merger”), upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement (capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the respective meanings ascribed to such terms in the Merger Agreement); and

WHEREAS, as a condition to their willingness to enter into the Merger Agreement, Parent and Sub have required that each Stockholder, and as an inducement and in consideration therefor, each Stockholder (in such Stockholder’s capacity as a holder of the Subject Shares and, if applicable, Company Stock Options) has agreed to, enter into this Agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the respective representations, warranties, covenants and agreements set forth below and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound, do hereby agree as follows:

ARTICLE I

AGREEMENT TO TENDER

1.1 Agreement to Tender. Each Stockholder agrees to validly tender or cause to be tendered in the Offer all of such Stockholder’s Subject Shares pursuant to and in accordance with the terms of the Offer, free and clear of all Encumbrances (other than Permitted Encumbrances). Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, as promptly as practicable after, but in no event later than (10) Business Days after, the commencement of the Offer, each Stockholder shall (i) deliver pursuant to the terms of the Offer (A) a letter of transmittal with respect to such Stockholder’s Subject Shares complying with the terms of the Offer, (B) a Certificate representing such Subject Shares or an


“agent’s message” (or such other evidence, if any, of transfer as the Paying Agent may reasonably request) in the case of a book-entry share of any uncertificated Subject Shares, and (C) all other documents or instruments required to be delivered by stockholders of the Company (the “Company Stockholders”) pursuant to the terms of the Offer, or (ii) instruct such Stockholder’s broker or such other Person that is the holder of record of any Subject Shares beneficially owned by such Stockholder to tender such Subject Shares pursuant to and in accordance with clause (i) of this Section 1.1 and the terms of the Offer. Each Stockholder agrees that, once such Stockholder’s Subject Shares are tendered, such Stockholder will not withdraw any of such Subject Shares from the Offer, unless and until (A) the Offer shall have been terminated in accordance with the terms of the Merger Agreement, or (B) this Agreement shall have been terminated in accordance with its terms.

ARTICLE II

REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF THE STOCKHOLDERS

Each Stockholder represents and warrants to Parent and Sub as to such Stockholder, severally but not jointly, that:

2.1. Organization; Authorization; Binding Agreement. If such Stockholder is an entity, such Stockholder is duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the Laws of the jurisdiction in which it is incorporated or constituted (to the extent such concepts are recognized in such jurisdiction) and the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby are within such Stockholder’s corporate or organizational powers and have been duly authorized by all necessary corporate or organizational actions on the part of such Stockholder. Such Stockholder has full power and authority to execute, deliver and perform this Agreement. This Agreement has been duly and validly executed and delivered by such Stockholder, and constitutes a legal, valid and binding obligation of such Stockholder enforceable against such Stockholder in accordance with its terms, subject to the effects of bankruptcy, insolvency, fraudulent conveyance, reorganization, moratorium and other similar Laws relating to or affecting creditors’ rights generally and general equitable principles (whether considered in a Proceeding in equity or at law).

2.2. Non-Contravention. The execution and delivery of this Agreement by such Stockholder does not, and the performance by such Stockholder of such Stockholder’s obligations hereunder and the consummation by such Stockholder of the transactions contemplated hereby will not (i) violate any Law applicable to such Stockholder or such Stockholder’s Subject Shares or, if applicable, Company Stock Options, (ii) except as may be required by applicable securities Law, require any consent, approval, order, authorization or other action by, or filing with or notice to, any Person (including any Governmental Entity) under, constitute a default (with or without the giving of notice or the lapse of time or both) under, or give rise to any right of termination, cancellation or acceleration under, or result in the creation of any Encumbrances on any of the Subject Shares or, if applicable, Company Stock Options pursuant to, any Contract, agreement, trust, commitment, order, judgment, writ, stipulation, settlement, award, decree or other instrument binding on such Stockholder or any applicable Law, (iii) render any Takeover Statutes applicable to the Merger, the Offer or any other transaction involving Parent, Sub or any Affiliate thereof, or (iv) if such Stockholder is an entity, violate any provision of such Stockholder’s organizational documents.

2.3. Ownership of Subject Shares, Company Stock Options; Total Shares. Such Stockholder is the record or beneficial owner (as defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act) of such Stockholder’s Subject Shares and, if applicable, Company Stock Options and has good and

 

2


marketable title to such Subject Shares and, if applicable, Company Stock Options free and clear of any liens, claims, proxies, voting trusts or agreements, options, rights, understandings or arrangements or any other encumbrances or restrictions whatsoever on title, transfer or exercise of any rights of a stockholder in respect of such Subject Shares and, if applicable, Company Stock Options (collectively, “Encumbrances”), except as provided hereunder or pursuant to any applicable restrictions on transfer under the Securities Act (collectively, “Permitted Encumbrances”). The Subject Shares and Company Stock Options listed on Schedule A opposite such Stockholder’s name constitute all of the Equity Interests of the Company beneficially owned by such Stockholder as of the date hereof, and such Stockholder neither holds nor has any beneficial ownership in any other Equity Interest in the Company. Except pursuant to this Agreement, no Person has any contractual or other right or obligation to purchase or otherwise acquire any of such Stockholder’s Subject Shares or, if applicable, Company Stock Options.

2.4. Voting Power. Other than as provided in this Agreement, such Stockholder has full voting power, with respect to such Stockholder’s Subject Shares and full power of disposition, full power to issue instructions with respect to the matters set forth herein and full power to agree to all of the matters set forth in this Agreement, in each case with respect to all of such Stockholder’s Subject Shares and, if applicable, Company Stock Options. None of such Stockholder’s Subject Shares are subject to any proxy, voting trust or other agreement or arrangement with respect to the voting of such Subject Shares, except as provided hereunder.

2.5. Reliance. Such Stockholder has had the opportunity to review the Merger Agreement and this Agreement with counsel of such Stockholder’s own choosing. Such Stockholder understands and acknowledges that Parent and Sub are entering into the Merger Agreement in reliance upon such Stockholder’s execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement.

2.6 Absence of Litigation. With respect to such Stockholder, as of the date hereof, there is no Proceeding pending against, or, to the knowledge of such Stockholder, threatened in writing against such Stockholder or any of such Stockholder’s properties or assets (including the Subject Shares and, if applicable, Company Stock Options) that would reasonably be expected to prevent or materially delay or impair the consummation by such Stockholder of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement or otherwise adversely impact such Stockholder’s ability to perform its obligations hereunder.

2.7 Brokers. No broker, finder, financial advisor, investment banker or other Person is entitled to any brokerage, finder’s, financial advisor’s or other similar fee or commission in connection with the transactions contemplated hereby based upon arrangements made by or, to the knowledge of such Stockholder, on behalf of such Stockholder.

ARTICLE III

REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF PARENT AND SUB

Each of Parent and Sub represent and warrant to each of the Stockholders, jointly and severally, that:

3.1. Organization; Authorization. Each of Parent and Sub is duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the Laws of the State of Delaware. The consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby are within each of Parent’s and Sub’s corporate powers and have been duly authorized by all necessary corporate actions on the part of Parent and Sub. Each of Parent and Sub have full corporate power and authority to execute, deliver and perform this Agreement.

 

3


3.2. Binding Agreement. This Agreement has been duly authorized, executed and delivered by each of Parent and Sub and constitutes a legal, valid and binding obligation of Parent and Sub enforceable against Parent and Sub in accordance with its terms, subject to the effects of bankruptcy, insolvency, fraudulent conveyance, reorganization, moratorium and other similar Laws relating to or affecting creditors’ rights generally and general equitable principles (whether considered in a Proceeding in equity or at law).

ARTICLE IV

ADDITIONAL COVENANTS OF THE STOCKHOLDERS

Each Stockholder hereby covenants and agrees, severally but not jointly, that until the termination of this Agreement:

4.1. Voting of Subject Shares.

(a) At every meeting of the Company Stockholders called, and at every adjournment or postponement thereof, such Stockholder shall, or shall cause the holder of record on any applicable record date to, appear or otherwise cause such Stockholder’s Subject Shares to be counted as present for purposes of establishing a quorum at any such meeting of Company Stockholders and vote such Stockholder’s Subject Shares (to the extent that any of the Subject Shares are not purchased in the Offer) (the “Vote Shares”) (i) in favor of (A) the adoption and approval of the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby or any other transaction pursuant to which Parent proposes to acquire the Company, whether by tender offer or merger, in which Company Stockholders would (x) receive aggregate consideration per share of Common Stock equal to or greater than the consideration to be received by such Company Stockholders in the Offer and the Merger, (y) receive only cash and no other form of consideration and (z) not be required to agree to any additional obligations, liabilities, covenants or other agreements, and (B) approval of any proposal to adjourn or postpone the meeting to a later date, if there are not sufficient votes for the adoption and approval of the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby or such other transaction on the date on which such meeting is held, (ii) against (A) any action or agreement which would in any material respect impede, interfere with or prevent the Offer or the Merger, including, but not limited to, any other extraordinary corporate transaction, including, a merger, acquisition, sale, consolidation, reorganization, recapitalization, extraordinary dividend or liquidation involving the Company and any Person (other than Parent, Sub or their respective Affiliates), or any other proposal of any Person (other than Parent, Sub or their respective Affiliates) to acquire the Company or all or substantially all of the assets thereof, (B) any Competing Proposal and any action in furtherance of any Competing Proposal or (C) any action, proposal, transaction or agreement that would reasonably be expected to result in the occurrence of any condition set forth in Annex I to the Merger Agreement or result in a breach of any covenant, representation or warranty or any other obligation or agreement of such Stockholder under this Agreement and/or (iii) in favor of any other matter necessary for consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, which is considered at any such meeting of the Company Stockholders.

4.2. No Transfer; No Inconsistent Arrangements. Except as provided hereunder (including pursuant to Section 1.1 or Section 4.1) or under the Merger Agreement, such Stockholder shall not, directly or indirectly, (i) create or permit to exist any Encumbrance, other than Permitted

 

4


Encumbrances, on any or all of such Stockholder’s Subject Shares and, if applicable, Company Stock Options, (ii) transfer, sell, assign, gift, hedge, pledge or otherwise dispose (whether by sale, liquidation, dissolution, dividend or distribution) of, or enter into any derivative arrangement with respect to (collectively, “Transfer”), any or all of such Stockholder’s Equity Interests in the Company, including any Subject Shares and Company Stock Options, or any right or interest therein (or consent to any of the foregoing), (iii) enter into any contract, option or other agreement, arrangement or understanding with respect to any Transfer of any or all of such Stockholder’s Subject Shares and, if applicable, Company Stock Options, or any right or interest therein, (iv) grant or permit the grant of any proxy, power-of-attorney or other authorization or consent in or with respect to any or all of such Stockholder’s Subject Shares and, if applicable, Company Stock Options, (v) deposit or permit the deposit of any or all of such Stockholder’s Equity Interests in the Company, including any Subject Shares, into a voting trust or enter into a voting agreement or arrangement with respect to any of such Equity Interests, including the Subject Shares, or (vi) take or permit any other action that would in any way restrict, limit or interfere with the performance of such Stockholder’s obligations hereunder or the transactions contemplated hereby or otherwise make any representation or warranty of such Stockholder herein untrue or incorrect in any material respect. Any action taken in violation of the foregoing sentence shall be null and void ab initio and such Stockholder agrees that any such prohibited action may and should be enjoined. If any involuntary Transfer of any or all of such Stockholder’s Subject Shares and, if applicable, Company Stock Options shall occur (including, if applicable, a sale by such Stockholder’s trustee in any bankruptcy, or a sale to a purchaser at any creditor’s or court sale), the transferee (which term, as used herein, shall include any and all transferees and subsequent transferees of the initial transferee) shall take and hold such Subject Shares and, if applicable, Company Stock Options subject to all of the restrictions, liabilities and rights under this Agreement, which shall continue in full force and effect until valid termination of this Agreement. Such Stockholder agrees that it shall not, and shall cause each of its Affiliates not to, become a member of a “group” (as defined under Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act) with respect to any Equity Interests in the Company for the purpose of opposing or competing with or taking any actions inconsistent with the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, such Stockholder may make Transfers of Subject Shares and, if applicable, Company Stock Options (a) to any “Permitted Transferee” (as defined below), in which case the Subject Shares and, if applicable, Company Stock Options shall continue to be bound by this Agreement and provided that any such Permitted Transferee agrees in writing to be bound by the terms and conditions of this Agreement prior to the consummation of any such Transfer; (b) with respect to any Company Stock Options which expire on or prior to an applicable Expiration Date, to the Company for purpose of a net exercise permitted under the documents related to such Company Stock Options (pursuant to which any Common Stock issued by the Company would be Subject Shares); or (c) as Parent may otherwise agree in writing in its sole discretion. If so requested by Parent, such Stockholder agrees that the Subject Shares and, if applicable, Company Stock Options shall bear a legend stating that the respective Subject Shares, Company Stock Options are subject to this Agreement, provided such legend shall be removed upon the valid termination of this Agreement. A “Permitted Transferee” means, with respect to any Stockholder, (i) a spouse, lineal descendant or antecedent, brother or sister, adopted child or grandchild, or the spouse of any child, adopted child, grandchild, or adopted grandchild of such Stockholder, (ii) any charitable organization described in Section 170(c) of the Code, (iii) any trust, the beneficiaries of which include only the Persons named in clause (i) or (ii) of this definition, or (iv) any corporation, limited liability company, or partnership, the stockholders, members, and general or limited partners of which include only the Persons named in clause (i) or (ii) of this definition.

 

5


4.3. No Exercise of Appraisal Rights; Actions. Such Stockholder (i) waives and agrees not to exercise any Appraisal Rights in respect of such Stockholder’s Subject Shares that may arise with respect to the Merger and (ii) agrees not to commence or join in, and agrees to take all actions necessary to opt out of any class in any class action with respect to, any claim, derivative or otherwise, against Parent, Sub, the Company or any of their respective successors (x) challenging the validity of, or seeking to enjoin the operation of, any provision of this Agreement or (y) alleging breach of any fiduciary duty of any Person in connection with the negotiation and entry into the Merger Agreement.

4.4. Documentation and Information. Such Stockholder consents to and hereby authorizes Parent and Sub to publish and disclose in all documents and schedules filed with the SEC, and any press release or other disclosure document that Parent or Sub reasonably determines to be necessary in connection with the Offer, the Merger and any transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, such Stockholder’s identity and ownership of the Subject Shares and/or, if applicable, Company Stock Options, the existence of this Agreement and the nature of such Stockholder’s commitments and obligations under this Agreement, and such Stockholder acknowledges that Parent and Sub may in Parent’s sole discretion, file this Agreement or a form hereof with the SEC or any other Governmental Entity. Such Stockholder agrees to promptly give Parent any information it may reasonably require for the preparation of any such disclosure documents, and such Stockholder agrees to promptly notify Parent of any required corrections with respect to any written information supplied by it specifically for use in any such disclosure document, if and to the extent that such Stockholder shall become aware that any such information shall have become false or misleading in any material respect.

4.5. No Solicitation.

(a) Such Stockholder shall keep Parent reasonably informed on a current basis of the status and terms of any Competing Proposal (including any material changes to the key terms thereof) and the general status of any discussions and negotiations with respect thereto, and provide Parent with any documents describing or evidencing any such Competing Proposal sent by or provided to the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or Representatives as promptly as reasonably practicable (and in any event within twenty-four (24) hours after receipt or delivery thereof).

(b) Such Stockholder shall not, nor shall such Stockholder authorize or permit any of such Stockholder’s Representatives to, directly or indirectly, (a) solicit, initiate or knowingly facilitate or encourage any inquiries or the making of any proposal or offer that constitutes, or may reasonably be expected to lead to, a Competing Proposal or (b) participate in any discussions or negotiations regarding, or furnish to any Person (other than Parent, Sub or their Representatives) any confidential information with respect to, any Competing Proposal or any inquiry, proposal or offer that could reasonably be expected to lead to a Competing Proposal, except as permitted by the Merger Agreement and to notify such Person of the existence of this Section 4.5. Such Stockholder shall immediately cease and cause to be terminated any discussions or negotiations pending as of the date hereof regarding any Competing Proposal.

4.6 Adjustments. In the event (a) of any stock split, stock dividend, merger, reorganization, recapitalization, reclassification, combination, exchange of shares or the like of the capital stock of the Company on, of or affecting the Subject Shares or (b) that such Stockholder shall become the beneficial owner of any additional shares of Common Stock, then the terms of this Agreement shall apply to the shares of Common Stock held by such Stockholder immediately following the effectiveness of the events described in clause (a) or such Stockholder becoming the beneficial owner

 

6


thereof as described in clause (b), as though, in either case, they were Subject Shares hereunder. In the event that any such Stockholder shall become the beneficial owner of any other securities entitling the holder thereof to vote or give consent with respect to the matters set forth in Section 4.1 hereof, then the terms of Section 4.1 hereof shall apply to such other securities as though they were Subject Shares hereunder.

4.7 Exercise of Options. Such Stockholder hereby irrevocably elects to exercise such Stockholder’s Company Stock Options that are vested or will become vested, as applicable, if any, conditioned solely upon the occurrence of the Acceptance Time and the Wire Initiation, in a cashless exercise (without shares of Common Stock being sold into the public market in connection therewith) such that such Stockholder will be entitled to receive immediately after the Wire Initiation in full satisfaction of the Company’s obligations with respect to the vested Company Stock Options the number of shares of Common Stock equal to the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock underlying the Company Stock Options, less the number of shares of Common Stock (valued at the Offer Price per share for this purpose and rounded up to the nearest whole share) withheld by the Company (a) in payment of the exercise price of the Company Stock Options, as applicable, and (b) in order to satisfy all required withholding taxes due on account of the exercise of the Company Stock Options, as applicable (the net shares so delivered, the “Net Shares”). The Company covenants that it shall issue, or cause to be issued, duly and validly executed physical stock certificates representing the Net Shares in the name of such Stockholder immediately after the Wire Initiation in full satisfaction of the Company’s obligations under the Company Stock Options.

4.8 Transfer of Net Shares. Such Stockholder hereby irrevocably directs the Company, on its behalf, to transfer any share certificates issued pursuant to Section 4.7 with respect to the Net Shares to Sub immediately upon the Wire Initiation, and the Company covenants to so transfer and deliver such share certificates to Sub.

4.9 Payment for Net Shares. Sub shall pay to such Stockholder an amount equal to the Offer Price per share for the Net Shares. The “Wire Initiation” means the initiation by or on behalf of Sub of a wire of immediately available funds to an account designated by such Stockholder, in writing within ten (10) Business Days after the date hereof, in an amount equal to the aggregate consideration for such Stockholder’s Net Shares.

4.10 No Adjustments. Such Stockholder and the Company acknowledge and agree that (a) no changes may be made to such Stockholder’s directives to exercise the Company Stock Options, as applicable, issue the applicable shares of Common Stock to such Stockholder and transfer all of the share certificates with respect to the shares pursuant to Sections 4.7 though 4.10 without the express written consent of Parent, (b) Parent is an intended beneficiary of Sections 4.7 through 4.10 and (c) all Stockholder directives pursuant to Sections 4.7 through 4.10 shall be binding, as applicable, upon Stockholder’s estate, beneficiaries, heirs, successors, assigns and any other person who may acquire beneficial ownership of, or any other interest in, the Company Stock Options.

 

7


ARTICLE V

MISCELLANEOUS

5.1. Notices. Any notices or other communications required or permitted under, or otherwise in connection with this Agreement, shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly given when delivered in person, or upon confirmation of receipt when transmitted by facsimile transmission or by electronic mail, or on receipt after dispatch by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, or on the next business day (as defined in the Merger Agreement) if transmitted by national overnight courier, in each case addressed as follows: (i) if to Parent or Sub, in accordance with the provisions of the Merger Agreement and (ii) if to a Stockholder, to such Stockholder’s address, facsimile number or e-mail address set forth on a signature page hereto, or to such other address, facsimile number or e-mail address as such party may hereafter specify in writing for the purpose by notice to each other party hereto.

5.2. Termination. This Agreement shall terminate automatically, without any notice or other action by any Person, upon the first to occur of (i) the termination of the Merger Agreement in accordance with its terms, (ii) the Effective Time, (iii) the date the Offer shall have terminated or the Expiration Date shall have occurred, in each case without acceptance for payment of the Subject Shares pursuant to the Offer, (iv) the date of any material modification, waiver or amendment to any provision of the Merger Agreement that reduces the amount, changes the form or otherwise adversely affects the consideration payable to the Stockholder pursuant to the Merger Agreement as in effect on the date hereof, and (v) the mutual written consent of all of the parties hereto. Upon termination of this Agreement, no party shall have any further obligations or liabilities under this Agreement; provided, however, that (x) nothing set forth in this Section 5.2 shall relieve any party from liability for any breach of this Agreement prior to termination hereof and (y) the provisions of this Article V shall survive any termination of this Agreement.

5.3. Amendments and Waivers. Any provision of this Agreement may be amended or waived if such amendment or waiver is in writing and is signed, in the case of an amendment, by each party to this Agreement or, in the case of a waiver, by each party against whom the waiver is to be effective. No failure or delay by any party in exercising any right, power or privilege hereunder shall operate as a waiver thereof nor shall any single or partial exercise thereof preclude any other or further exercise thereof or the exercise of any other right, power or privilege.

5.4. Expenses. All fees and expenses incurred in connection herewith and the transactions contemplated hereby shall be paid by the party incurring such expenses, whether or not the Offer or the Merger is consummated.

5.5. Binding Effect; Benefit; Assignment. The parties hereby agree that their respective representations, warranties and covenants set forth herein are solely for the benefit of the other parties, in accordance with and subject to the terms of this Agreement, and this Agreement is not intended to, and does not, confer upon any Person other than the parties hereto any rights or remedies hereunder, including the right to rely upon the representations and warranties set forth herein. Neither this Agreement nor any of the rights, interests or obligations hereunder shall be assigned by any of the parties (whether by operation of Law or otherwise) without the prior written consent of the other parties, except to the extent that such rights, interests or obligations are assigned pursuant to a Transfer expressly permitted under Section 4.2. No assignment by any party shall relieve such party of any of its obligations hereunder. Subject to the foregoing, this Agreement will be binding upon, inure to the benefit of and be enforceable by the parties and their respective successors and permitted assigns.

 

8


5.6. Governing Law; Venue. (a) THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE GOVERNED BY, AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, REGARDLESS OF THE LAWS THAT MIGHT OTHERWISE GOVERN UNDER APPLICABLE PRINCIPLES OF CONFLICTS OF LAWS.

(b) Each of the parties hereto (i) irrevocably consents to submit itself to the exclusive jurisdiction of the Delaware Court of Chancery and any state appellate court therefrom within the State of Delaware (unless the Delaware Court of Chancery shall decline to accept jurisdiction over a particular matter, in which case, in any Delaware state or federal court within the State of Delaware) (such courts, collectively, the “Delaware Courts”) in the event any dispute, claim or cause of action arises out of or relates to this Agreement or the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, (ii) agrees that it will not attempt to deny or defeat such personal jurisdiction by motion or other request for leave from any Delaware Court and (iii) agrees that it will not bring any claim or action arising out of or relating to this Agreement or the transactions contemplated by this Agreement in any court other than a Delaware Court. Each of the parties hereto hereby irrevocably and unconditionally consents to service of process in the manner provided for notices in Section 5.1 (Notices). Nothing in this Agreement will affect the right of any party to this Agreement to serve process in any other manner permitted by Law.

(c) EACH PARTY ACKNOWLEDGES AND AGREES THAT ANY CONTROVERSY WHICH MAY ARISE UNDER THIS AGREEMENT IS LIKELY TO INVOLVE COMPLICATED AND DIFFICULT ISSUES, AND THEREFORE EACH SUCH PARTY HEREBY IRREVOCABLY AND UNCONDITIONALLY WAIVES ANY RIGHT SUCH PARTY MAY HAVE TO A TRIAL BY JURY IN RESPECT OF ANY LITIGATION DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED HEREBY, INCLUDING ANY CONTROVERSY INVOLVING ANY REPRESENTATIVE OF PARENT UNDER THIS AGREEMENT. EACH PARTY CERTIFIES AND ACKNOWLEDGES THAT (i) NO REPRESENTATIVE, AGENT OR ATTORNEY OF ANY OTHER PARTY HAS REPRESENTED, EXPRESSLY OR OTHERWISE, THAT SUCH OTHER PARTY WOULD NOT, IN THE EVENT OF LITIGATION, SEEK TO ENFORCE THE FOREGOING WAIVER, (ii) EACH PARTY UNDERSTANDS AND HAS CONSIDERED THE IMPLICATIONS OF THIS WAIVER, (iii) EACH PARTY MAKES THIS WAIVER VOLUNTARILY, AND (iv) EACH PARTY HAS BEEN INDUCED TO ENTER INTO THIS AGREEMENT BY, AMONG OTHER THINGS, THE MUTUAL WAIVERS AND CERTIFICATIONS IN THIS SECTION 5.6(c).

5.7. Counterparts; Delivery by Facsimile or Email. This Agreement may be executed by facsimile and in one or more counterparts, and by the different parties in separate counterparts, each of which when executed shall be deemed to be an original but all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same agreement. This Agreement, and any amendments hereto, waivers hereof or consents or notifications hereunder, to the extent signed and delivered by means of a facsimile machine or by email with facsimile or scan attachment, shall be treated in all manner and respects as an original contract and shall be considered to have the same binding legal effects as if it were the original signed version thereof delivered in person. At the request of any party, each other party shall re-execute original forms thereof and deliver them to all other parties. No party shall raise the use of a facsimile machine or email to deliver a signature or the fact that any signature or Contract was transmitted or communicated through the use of facsimile machine or by email with facsimile or scan attachment as a defense to the formation of a contract, and each such party forever waives any such defense.

 

9


5.8. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement of the parties and supersedes all prior agreements and undertakings, both written and oral, among the parties, or any of them, with respect to the subject matter hereof and thereof.

5.9. Severability. If any term or other provision of this Agreement is invalid, illegal or incapable of being enforced by any rule of law or public policy, all other conditions and provisions of this Agreement shall nevertheless remain in full force and effect so long as the economic or legal substance of the transactions contemplated hereby is not affected in any manner materially adverse to any party. Upon such determination that any term or other provision is invalid, illegal or incapable of being enforced, the parties shall negotiate in good faith to modify this Agreement so as to effect the original intent of the parties as closely as possible to the end that transactions contemplated hereby are fulfilled to the greatest extent possible.

5.10. Specific Performance. The parties agree that irreparable damage would occur if any provision of this Agreement were not performed in accordance with the terms hereof, and, accordingly, that the parties shall be entitled to an injunction or injunctions to prevent breaches of this Agreement or to enforce specifically the performance of the terms and provisions hereof, in addition to any other remedy to which they are entitled at law or in equity. In any Proceeding for specific performance, the parties will waive the defense of adequacy of a remedy at law, and the parties waive any requirement for the securing or posting of any bond in connection with the remedies referred to in this Section 5.10.

5.11 Headings. The Section headings contained in this Agreement are for reference purposes only and shall not affect in any way the meaning or interpretation of this Agreement.

5.12. Mutual Drafting. Each party has participated in the drafting of this Agreement, which each party acknowledges is the result of extensive negotiations between the parties; accordingly, in the event an ambiguity or question of intent or interpretation arises, this Agreement shall be construed as if drafted jointly by the parties, and no presumption or burden of proof shall arise favoring or disfavoring any party by virtue of the authorship of any provisions of this Agreement.

5.13. Further Assurances. Parent, Sub and each Stockholder will execute and deliver, or cause to be executed and delivered, all further documents and instruments and use their respective reasonable best efforts to take, or cause to be taken, all actions and to do, or cause to be done, all things necessary, proper or advisable under applicable Laws and regulations, to perform their respective obligations under this Agreement.

5.14. Interpretation. Unless the context otherwise requires, as used in this Agreement: (i) “or” is not exclusive; (ii) “including” and its variants mean “including, without limitation” and its variants; (iii) words defined in the singular have the parallel meaning in the plural and vice versa; (iv) words of one gender shall be construed to apply to each gender; and (v) the terms “Article,” “Section” and “Schedule” refer to the specified Article, Section or Schedule of or to this Agreement.

5.15 Capacity as Stockholder. Each Stockholder signs this Agreement solely in such Stockholder’s capacity as a Stockholder of the Company, and not in any other capacity and this Agreement shall not limit or otherwise affect the actions of such Stockholder or any affiliate, employee or designee of such Stockholder or any of its affiliates in its capacity, if applicable, as an officer or director of the Company.

 

10


5.16 No Agreement Until Executed. This Agreement shall not be effective unless and until (i) the Merger Agreement is executed by all parties thereto, and (ii) this Agreement is executed by all parties hereto.

5.17 No Ownership Interest. Except as otherwise provided herein, nothing contained in this Agreement shall be deemed to vest in Parent or Sub any direct or indirect ownership or incidence of ownership of or with respect to the Subject Shares. All rights, ownership and economic benefits of and relating to the Subject Shares shall remain vested in and belong to each applicable Stockholder, and neither Parent nor Sub shall have any authority to manage, direct, restrict, regulate, govern, or administer any of the policies or operations of the Company or exercise any power or authority to direct such Stockholder in the voting of any of the Shares, except as otherwise provided herein.

5.18 Stockholder Obligations Several and Not Joint. The obligations of each Stockholder hereunder shall be several and not joint, and no Stockholder shall be liable for any breach of the terms of this Agreement by any other Stockholder.

[Signature Page Follows]

 

11


The parties are executing this Agreement on the date set forth in the introductory clause.

 

BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY
By:  

/s/ Demetrios Kydonieus

Name:   Demetrios Kydonieus
Title:  

Vice President, Strategy,

Alliances & Transactions

B&R ACQUISITION COMPANY
By:  

/s/ Demetrios Kydonieus

Name:   Demetrios Kydonieus
Title:   President
AMYLIN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
By:  

/s/ Daniel M. Bradbury

Name:   Daniel M. Bradbury
Title:   President and Chief Executive Officer

[Signature Page to Tender and Support Agreement]


/s/ Daniel M. Bradbury

Daniel M. Bradbury
Address for Notices

9360 TOWNE CENTRE DR.

SAN DIEGO CA 92121

 

[Signature Page to Tender and Support Agreement]


/s/ Mark Foletta

Mark Foletta
Address for Notices

9360 TOWNE CENTRE DR.

SAN DIEGO CA 92121

 

[Signature Page to Tender and Support Agreement]


/s/ Orville G. Kolterman

Orville G. Kolterman
Address for Notices

5408 Soledad Road

La Jolla, CA 92037

 

[Signature Page to Tender and Support Agreement]


/s/ Mark Gergen

Mark Gergen
Address for Notices

c/o AMYLIN PHARMACEUTICALS

9360 TOWNE CENTRE DRIVE

SAN DIEGO CA 92121

[Signature Page to Tender and Support Agreement]


Schedule A

 

Name of Stockholder

   No. Shares      No. Company
Stock Options
 

Daniel M. Bradbury

     438,784         2,221,000   

Mark G. Foletta

     111,943         612,083   

Orville G. Kolterman

     109,398         513,300   

Mark J. Gergen

     225,019         592,000   
GRAPHIC 13 g376793citi_logo.jpg GRAPHIC begin 644 g376793citi_logo.jpg M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!`@$`8`!@``#_[0;F4&AO=&]S:&]P(#,N,``X0DE-`^T` M`````!``8`````$``0!@`````0`!.$))300-```````$````'CA"24T$&0`` M````!````!XX0DE-`_,```````D```````````$`.$))300*```````!```X M0DE-)Q````````H``0`````````".$))30/U``````!(`"]F9@`!`&QF9@`& M```````!`"]F9@`!`*&9F@`&```````!`#(````!`%H````&```````!`#4` M```!`"T````&```````!.$))30/X``````!P``#_____________________ M________`^@`````_____________________________P/H`````/______ M______________________\#Z`````#_____________________________ M`^@``#A"24T$"```````$`````$```)````"0``````X0DE-!!X```````0` M````.$))300:``````!S````!@``````````````)0```#D````)`&,`:0!T M`&D`7P!L`&\`9P!O`````0`````````````````````````!```````````` M```Y````)0`````````````````````````````````````````````X0DE- M!!$```````$!`#A"24T$%```````!`````(X0DE-!`P`````!$0````!```` M.0```"4```"L```8W```!"@`&``!_]C_X``02D9)1@`!`@$`2`!(``#_[@`. M061O8F4`9(`````!_]L`A``,"`@("0@,"0D,$0L*"Q$5#PP,#Q48$Q,5$Q,8 M$0P,#`P,#!$,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,`0T+"PT.#1`. M#A`4#@X.%!0.#@X.%!$,#`P,#!$1#`P,#`P,$0P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P, M#`P,#`P,#`P,#`S_P``1"``E`#D#`2(``A$!`Q$!_]T`!``$_\0!/P```04! M`0$!`0$``````````P`!`@0%!@<("0H+`0`!!0$!`0$!`0`````````!``(# M!`4&!P@)"@L0``$$`0,"!`(%!P8(!0,,,P$``A$#!"$2,05!46$3(G&!,@84 MD:&Q0B,D%5+!8C,T)E M\K.$P]-UX_-&)Y2DA;25Q-3D]*6UQ=7E]59F=H:6IK;&UN;V-T=79W>'EZ>W MQ]?G]Q$``@(!`@0$`P0%!@<'!@4U`0`"$0,A,1($05%A<2(3!3*!D12AL4(C MP5+1\#,D8N%R@I)#4Q5C+RLX3# MTW7C\T:4I(6TE<34Y/2EM<75Y?569G:&EJ:VQM;F]B7I[?'_]H` M#`,!``(1`Q$`/P#U5)"OR:,=F^YX8.T\GX!4QUW`W1[P/';HDINWWU8]1MM. MUK?Q\@L5_4.H]0L->(TUL_DZ&/Y=GYJTLD=/R<5I;55)<(UXW=_I)*KYM67:QU))8UL$'365MXO4<;+>64DDM$F1&B2FIT_K(M>*(*K?5W^9N_K#\B2FCUC$HQ;V,I&UKFR9).LGQ6YC=/Q<5Y M?2TM?=)3@4_P#+Q_XU_P"1RZ!<_3_R M\?\`C7_D>R\&224_1V M,,3]E90H+RZ!ZI<(/\G:T%S?^DC?5Z/1M@S[ASIV7S6DDI^D?K!]G_1;B1=! MVP)$?RM0@]$_I8]4NW;#Z0(T[?1<3^ZOG1))3]%T[?VZ=3/J.[>3O-;Z^54D ME/\`_]DX0DE-!"$``````%4````!`0````\`00!D`&\`8@!E`"``4`!H`&\` M=`!O`',`:`!O`'`````3`$$`9`!O`&(`90`@`%``:`!O`'0`;P!S`&@`;P!P M`"``-@`N`#`````!`#A"24T$!@``````!P`(``$``0$`_^X`#D%D;V)E`&1` M`````?_;`(0``0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$! M`0$!`0$!`0("`@("`@("`@("`P,#`P,#`P,#`P$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`@(!`@(# M`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,# M`P,#_\``$0@`)0`Y`P$1``(1`0,1`?_=``0`"/_$`(T```(#`0$````````` M``````<)!@@*``,!`0$!`0$```````````````,!`@`$$``!!`$#`P("!`L) M```````"`0,$!081$@<`$P@A%%$5,2*U"4%A<3)B4Q9V%W1^0R\:X:J[3%\>:/::T;X0Y[$1Q2;: MF9)F+I,!6..!N(68SC&NBB*/D*$JZQC>60]I2=(GG9>$N5Q*F3EG*G,>*X\+ M#*/3[&Q2_?1B'_]#>!G?)&#\9U*76<9%!H(+A$W&20KKTRL5:3X#'(_T>M^W(SO$F_)<;@#E7CUODS,?\1RN M)ZR32X;@@3)EQ'*LE,2U-N`[:29)N39$J?;RSB1U3NO.FXJ"(;M$%$LE*JKE MG1<:6P+:\MN9\7YCRO&9^&3[=^DJ<>6)(C6,9^`TW:G93GG'VH;CIMDX<1UH M5=1$)4%!7T1.EA%Q3KD*A<7&[%4D\`+R8O$KE+FJ3A>1XA.L>37+29CTN4PF M2T4.5/I6I;S[DJ317=;$EN@U%-$D.-DZ8B(J6@BB:6\8U3L9>CE1JY9K^$.% M?',?^S.2_P#5W6-GX&Z(_]'2/$AY#YA>0\]F3:2(="KEC+;?$>]^SN`T\L68 M;$*.6UI)DLI;+:FH[2F2E=,534>O1:$0+SD7YE^$7`+]&55'H;J%8^W[0Y,S MDMP[<(\B+I*.+)DO8\3BK^<*01!4^@4^GHO2S MBSN/#*T^7W%&$\29OC-+@U=(K:^RQ4;26U(L9UD3DQ;>RB*X+L]]]QL>Q'!- MJ*@^FNFJ];@W)-LQ-)-4&G\:\`<8<26L^ZP:FEUMA95ZU>XER+XU\I9!AEU%O:D*>SK3E1D<#MS(,^, MT\TZR^#3[*D*BXWO$>XRX#@ZB0JNXIJ:3,-IQ=`*?=X_Y-Y$_>:J^RCZURY1 M./#`]]X1_P`F85^XH_;]SUKB]+_).3*&S)-AJD-?=1]+%4&!J\VBS26,Y,VQ M$4D607M&3=T#5>V!%]"*O0"BAL1_KTE_S-S;[.ONG?Q]@?L[C@^@&/_3U:^; M+/`KV4M#/L,@K>4TKV"LWL2IZR[A'%%H%K&,MBV%Y0"U8.QM$8=8>.0W'VJZ MV;?83I>/:G\A3UKXB]]EDL-@)3^0!BJRB1J1[20[#0O3<;$-R:U6E*TTU!'T M_M=+YA^1?WC9KB5OQ6YR:P2=EDJX&IAIF\[)*J/7RW7-RK4'6U4"XLJ9BM0? M-<"*FCH$?[OH8@X?R%[1^0^*Y+5[UD16HI"7RL]$ M$6IDQ#14_"JI^3J!&&$+8R[B-G@1+8JL*VOBSJ^51]^,AL M7CDFSKW8`^^4BB.L!)+47Q-O0@(>XZWZ'';P'_DJL+\N65(K;*;9=T3;IQ,6V68BM&T9$KH[!$[R>ET,PS<\<3"O_P#= LDHAE3%E?Q+S1>RL%@8^_Y=?;A]REB3FU$UT7M:K\$ZK^/L=^_<;OT`Q__]D_ ` end GRAPHIC 14 g376793g02b19.jpg GRAPHIC begin 644 g376793g02b19.jpg M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!`@$`8`!@``#_[0L.4&AO=&]S:&]P(#,N,``X0DE-`^T` M`````!``8`````$``0!@`````0`!.$))300-```````$````'CA"24T$&0`` M````!````!XX0DE-`_,```````D```````````$`.$))300*```````!```X M0DE-)Q````````H``0`````````".$))30/U``````!(`"]F9@`!`&QF9@`& M```````!`"]F9@`!`*&9F@`&```````!`#(````!`%H````&```````!`#4` M```!`"T````&```````!.$))30/X``````!P``#_____________________ M________`^@`````_____________________________P/H`````/______ M______________________\#Z`````#_____________________________ M`^@``#A"24T$"```````$`````$```)````"0``````X0DE-!!X```````0` M````.$))300:``````!M````!@``````````````,@```,8````&`&<`,``R M`&(`,0`Y`````0`````````````````````````!``````````````#&```` M,@`````````````````````````````````````````````X0DE-!!$````` M``$!`#A"24T$%```````!`````(X0DE-!`P`````"'$````!````<````!P` M``%0```DP```"%4`&``!_]C_X``02D9)1@`!`@$`2`!(``#_[@`.061O8F4` M9(`````!_]L`A``,"`@("0@,"0D,$0L*"Q$5#PP,#Q48$Q,5$Q,8$0P,#`P, M#!$,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,`0T+"PT.#1`.#A`4#@X. M%!0.#@X.%!$,#`P,#!$1#`P,#`P,$0P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P, M#`P,#`S_P``1"``<`'`#`2(``A$!`Q$!_]T`!``'_\0!/P```04!`0$!`0$` M`````````P`!`@0%!@<("0H+`0`!!0$!`0$!`0`````````!``(#!`4&!P@) M"@L0``$$`0,"!`(%!P8(!0,,,P$``A$#!"$2,05!46$3(G&!,@84D:&Q0B,D M%5+!8C,T)E\K.$P]-U MX_-&)Y2DA;25Q-3D]*6UQ=7E]59F=H:6IK;&UN;V-T=79W>'EZ>WQ]?G]Q$` M`@(!`@0$`P0%!@<'!@4U`0`"$0,A,1($05%A<2(3!3*!D12AL4(CP5+1\#,D M8N%R@I)#4Q5C+RLX3#TW7C\T:4 MI(6TE<34Y/2EM<75Y?569G:&EJ:VQM;F]B7I[?'_]H`#`,!``(1 M`Q$`/P#J^@97_.G.ZAU'*BSIF%D.P^GXAUK.P-==G7L^CD67[V?9_49^JU?S M7Z2RVQ:F9T*HY&)DX`^ROHR&V7LI<:J[JX_>TZ$U6,K^RY$?Z/(94Y]:O?6KKO4^A_8[*3CVLS\ MRK#94]CPY@M#MUV]MWZ;8YGT/2J^FDIWK\G'QJ_5R;64UR&[['!K9<=K6[GQ M])R5&1CY-8MQ[675DD!];@YLM.UPW,EOM<-JY%]G4LG_`!B,Q+75S@=+];%W ML<:_4LL;3D95-7J[V6/:78W\]9Z=7_&(?U@P.K]#P?K'UG$S@[(ZACLL^R4U MEGI.J%>-?G4O]:Q^YN.7V6V>G]/T_?\`HDE/7#J/3S=Z`R:?6W^GZ7J-W[P- MWI[-V[U-OYBD,9U]8R#Q27MWG3=_-SO^BN?R<#IS/\`%W9C5L:,2OIA ML80!`IZ:2GO:NI=.NQ[,JG*ILQJ-WK7,L:YC-@WV>I8UVQGIM]S] MR"_KW1:ZGW6YU%556TV/LL:P`62*7'U"WV7;7>B__"_X-<[]9OJ_4R[UL#U, MG/ZEU#%R\K`<\'[33A?SF.T6&NBFBFO99OR7>CZWV?']3U;<:M7<_I]W6OK! MTK*&,YF!@U93HYEO7,PFFO(_:-N(]EE9<658[6,Q\5GIV5-910RS]&S9_I7I?\WNK] M,Z3@]/Z9U#'ZAU'I679E8U&2WTZW5^F]CL38RRU^_'^W-LQW^I^CWT_X/8DI MZ_'RL7):78US+VM):YU;@\!PTR/>U<'U;ZR=0;T/ZPQTVSHOUBKHHLR=CO4#Z7.&)]MHR*0WWU4^JSU?\#Z M=?Z:ST/T70=9P<"GZA9./2&UXV-@&S&+2!M?57Z^-P!SVU/:\M!^BYS M6.=MW;5Q%ANZKU+ZBOZF"ZW(QTO9G,>1I+12UP8[]YF[W)*?_T/2F9&0W*Z@P]0R*]*K,F'BO5KYQZ6M9CX]F MZMGZ:FEE[_\`2+3224TL[I&'FWT95@=7EXI)Q\FH[;&;OILW?1LJL_PE%S;* M7_Z-3HZ?CU.ML?NONO`9;;:=QVG_3.QMW_:3UOLVS]!Z/V?]"I9W0.GY^51EY'J>MB$ MNQ2RQS!4XCTW.K8PM9[F?OK2224^=_6*_+Z_UJC%P768[L*VS%P;ZK'4WO?+ MJLVRS*9[J<9[L+*J]K'^SI^9E?K#_L&!E7G?5_J?U>=T_,9U[/SLNS,HQ[<; M(M-E%U=KPS(KJQK3=96^G']7)]7UK?2KQ[;%F=4V_P#.)_[$];?]H?Z<3N^U M;K_M/V7_`+J_:/VCN]?_``W[7_[S?675=,V_;L?]L^M^U=COLGVKTMD1^G^Q M_8_U;U]G\]N_6_3]7T_U1)3??T7%^W6]0QW68F7D-#,BRD@"P-_FW756-LH? M;7^9?Z?K[/T7J>DHV_5[IEC<>&V5V8;WW8]S+'BQME@+;;76;OT[K-WZ3[3Z MS+/\(M)))33IZ5B5OR;+`FTEKJ\&QY=5##OJJ?N_378];Q[,6^ZS&_P7I>C756 MM5))3FYG0,#-SZ>H7F[[5B[_`+-8VU[?2]1HJN])C'>G^E8WW[VI\KH.!E]1 MHZG<;3EXF[[+8+'`5^HWTKO3J!]+]*P>_>QZT4DE/__9`#A"24T$(0`````` M50````$!````#P!!`&0`;P!B`&4`(`!0`&@`;P!T`&\`C&O M6DG)\D)EDM:UUSS>DPZV\=6NK(RMBZ]HNAV^M\Q.6IEET;0-K?<4G=G\Y/DI MS4Q1IFQ#W&:LC8O4&2D9HXD;D*5'@!0@FCP,TRIF^.#2[%^/)/'JGGKSX[)& M[:5WVBC[JYPUOI%2DB5,SA\2)SEB6*SJE3"3ZDR!_/P).2])FE*ZMB@\)^#S M"0G)CXLOOF')\5$GF&J$HL1]D$'`.`<`X!P#@'`.`<`X!P#@'`.`<` MX!P#@'`.!__067A6GKMNOYR[3VCFON75Y^EK[NAHRK*,69CK6ZGLE41%G*-$ M,K*-OBL(GB=H2","9D!!)173NS@8K$!L#9TZJ7@4;LNQ*_,A7H\.%;1BW"(R&+W M`D]8:<0JGLJ&265P>4KRS\!+$UGK$#X$T8090X%G&.#'&9T5>UNW['I]!)=; M-DT[<;_4,"9&M[EUF03-/N3(RENSTF8$Z$<>D5O1:Q%ZXIR7I@F>T9%!&`J` MB"8+`3?3$F3"U/Y2J>V,J6.63K'5%Z7W(Y2TR:0HJ?B3'`62?L49C$E?H@9* M)XXS.Q([7<)9GV01E3G5[>*A9UL M#7SZZ0&,5()=BX6FUBVB,NM9D-K*;(5+U(5:-X=V#,5/9TQZE.Y%+!$C*3'8 M,P2<2<4779 M,;@_XX@L1>1S*_'KGA(2F/*E0,RT'AN_]Y%G:SUS*QR1""/S1QS('1:]QZ12 M&/%L\'&UM:)SL%2_#C9YR`")N`H.+`9D1(`$F#PR76YQ"KD6^TFB%..&Q5RN?O--I[D/F[?'FY%CW:Q*87A_0H0C/4- MI7I&@!4QXSREA0U^5%LY5<5NNC)NUV!6LS2&*F.1->%1'4:VN;:X)T; MJR/;6L*&0K0K""%28X&0&%ASCA+,<4P;'N:=:1\R5:UT%:6PD)@[S)(HLM&/ MOE5P2O97-8DXFLLCB=;.EF3Z*NLV/8GQ&I1*G4I$3'/=$"+(<5&0F>F7'NE/ MJUN36^V1UK-<+B=IP.5TA*T$%M2#VY#R8=*HA,ER$YRRP*DB5X?&]P-2HBPF M95(E*EO/+.+,3*#RQX'P68[]:1N1;J[QR'PB)IL(#Q&.LA=VAO"60<9ZWI)U`RA);SX(^V]ZB=:XVDL' M9_7RY*?J4QP:&Q]MMO-KZUX;7ZEY6%H$AUC(*SFD@G<>:3EB@LH+BF97!N": M+TSCR3!IPGC&>KRE"OM9&NKR.675,7?+]C\M3-#K&_V2/U9&_-1Q[1#7H90V MO-@V#7\27,8T_IY[BG(9X_6!DLH8<#R`BOC7WS)Z=[#O=X1]C_:G!G'7U.D^ MOR9[#&_W"AY<):*"MD1A;=!)+.W>=S1YEW:WMS6U)E2MT5FE$HP'FFE@%,M7 M6S!;7UY%5>L]=GWE<>G6T47H-L7,Z62V.']A+L[1)#('1,RLTDDE:,UUKYVU MQY6Y+TP#/428<4?KA"I1DG=2N"3/$O*0^-S]81:O"W/#<$8%K."*_6([2Q\A MEL`U9<0L>$0FO"+ZA#)\R0>&GX;*3Y;Y?.$/M_=Y]'E3%SC'+__1[GV\\>>= M=/+YO,7D0XZC7!*@=UB$CNPB$Z&@`//;D_./U<+)GRCKXZ/*/8_D@8'2?UEJJ MT0NLXI8Z:O)P_P`KV!+.DC.<)H9WY:Z,D304_P"WD)25J>BA`*&Y(GX4OFC%#"(/!(:]E57&#& MYRDJ-6W(Q-\4D"H:@A.`DU0Y.BA3U[AF]\\MV8TD7R^2:M-U=YM,+?U@C6I; M#"Y%8QM>'M$LDFP->NC4QG0RT(7.UAQJ5`U879-7M4:4(P"*SC.!*?U?H[L9 MK$Q++E6=L.IW,\:'V_JVC+>7-S!;:ZS3M>XU(XA+"I,>RTW8[J\S16!,^IBD MAB56:QIWF/D@QZAJ)"<5Z(B^PKTG468N_P"%K_@8K-HK3Q9:RX;FXE$Y3YOF MEF2947@C)[P[RR=R,:%Q6&)PX":<3%43:C+[NI@$Z0H`L]09XG2;?:H0?=&P ME&ITMH^WF_/QTZJK9J.)8[)$IQJ1Y:6>90>;'/*=G<$P0JT2I1(8FQJ^\!A? M:)O"+KD80=%73O!3[47[(-H/MO))> M_2"``"$37Q;:L`A"YN48A\;D4(EB!" M(G"ACF[+,7\Z0H79*5GO1N+@->6YXP9@(STR\E1CJ`X(A)TFWVJJZ`QF97%] MT!:5FTV-0YUK0\(2LE_RYI!D<:2*C-;T]>%0EU<2A`1+I#FQ%*1.%"(>5)9[ M*J-P6(+<;D#ROZ(H>6RZY+>7G$U1U1#'1S*MM<;%US:6FG"W=-&F"9R^=GPN MTWTI6M7EB:F[ZEC3PSL@S\AR4F1I,X!V"&;G*]KK,:VM--ISO;ZPZQL:`$Z6 M)DILY@I)(;%YZI8)3&9F^E$IVXP#:I7(`Q M\>#A`,QD38#]`^F<NPFKLP^5FTA;(M([WA3D@.CECMPH%&E4>C3F\Q%TR0%0,<=1EH2W M-&H5MI^$Q)'N<#)$`-8LLQ*H+^W1G;_MGOMOQN/;*H;U:CW#X^6F4*QY7`8F MJS)FO7&LC,>=@&439&V>NFUJ0EE@!@IO)P4'M!U")&M^)).FKG96OF&U]=[T MK.4)DZN/SRHK$BCJ4I3`5E@2O<3=D&5(2!C+[E"(9V#BA8&`8#2PB"((L8%B ML3N,S7VJVQ4TE]5;):U21P7.<6I][@T^KCW)H#RF%%98Y>EF$>39'VGI&[+U M%T[@G)#D97N5RP?0L0L^K(WO.JBU]O\`54PSKRC[I3>1`^0+J);8LDBS0>(0 MD*:=/]IOL4;9?E/_`#)SFP11T>T:40^OHX=C!AQ@>`B#)V;_`%C23YCOX8.Z M/_IIS_YNS\MZ9U^T9?Z4>#"`Y M``(C`BW`<8GAO]X__TKPO(GX_[8I[=VI/+EI=!5M@SJNW MQO7;*4+%2PXEUEQ(MD/A4JE-;MV`>F[R][K-R5MB]`#JH4'%)E::M]A#_M\2GD8/$!ZADQ9C MPC)6MC@20J3F@%@0.G3.:S9A51YJMNHRPZUV-I=3J-7=NW.S<;55C%:-K9&K MFDW9(O(Q$I9?-92Q1TAR71]K0QXP\M'E6$D2E6:`8,9((5&DRKK.7W5LTJ>98V(+="6.9LJII/7-:RJZ_$GT[VX<;/983>2LDY/7]>N M=T.R6:IXG+GS!>6N+FQ.?-06G.5YX``83BW0TS!0%&2757/RUQY:WYS;585G M!E%FV!8$0A]?)D2=P%,7Y_;6^/'IEI'N6_*%R.4!3N1SH5T]H4GR::K$((20 MC$(.,US5B;D:W6#Y2_&_8<)D$72U=8DS?':T-=F64(G%A=F9%$Y8Z*J7S9;> MYFK5D6E-C5S@);VG$6$QB$^F%&$>LD,+S.VI?C36^!BV#V[4='I9;#0MK/9W M4&1S.%V'4DM3_"S'$5?IB]3&(3IO:C\X^7B;@FDHD!3BD$>E/-0Y."/)2A.8 M$F;M MET/MTY[!?_FC2$#^M(G]WTOU]>W\>(N_;W^;;<9KUG*HD[H=TP)\E&(;.(U#99 M+5><$A&X.F$ZPW/4(U!WZ@YRX2S;NJ1_,]JW86MGD/UR\ML-@[Q8-,Q";TL\ M[%(HZC4.+S#EE4/+:D-D2].F&(Y''I)7+8G1)U^2A(V]S08PK%C"I.`Q?;6M MS+JU-P6Z*FLRL&:ZH'8D1DM3O[""3-D_0/2+$9&R")]/"(3_`+4RZ?T9NO<]0>Q15155.311KO%L=EU4L\@PSMS&O"A,;W=:V.9Q9JY`:F'PN.O9%ZUW/IIY> M-6XH^SB#U/:K@;'&U/;-.3IF8I!)JEGXTI!,B;3&IU)'(HZ3AX3F&-#N2%*) M:DP2H),"+J$$[6RZU2]XT=+H#67F^VZ=]227$_3>D:X=:\?GK#NJD\,S8L_8 M:]6OU&(),>I/^JLQ:3?(*#DRD:P;<%H`4K'D_P!N:2PEPI^D+%*%#[7E;/LEI[VM*/4@2D'F$(23CL@$$O.,UB3-5A^"'2!3XZ-7) M9;&T:YDJ.V=F9#%UC@P3UY:(P?"H;&&Q\.@$->!O*I,!!-W/YAW=7!!Z@5!! M)A"<\DM0C/"&1K:YO"LG[?"QJ]AV^_D5=Y=.X;%FIZ^9^'#,>D(?4&<"_+/7B+OU&@'S03F%,WCBV[B3Q,(LU2I^I=Q M,8XRY2!I0R!Y+$]-I03&EF5*RG%Q`(U.8'&22QXR(`L?GC/16=>XS"T8^LA7 MVONY3$:\-1;VIV2BYZ9F,<$@'502&[-4S1'$-XCL*S2@E)S!9$$&<8"`6?RQ MGI/#?[Q__]/?QP&#L7576:W7LV3V?K_3D[E1RY*7W$^X](808"(.<8Z<+FE96E(4M2R5P14[4-7U,B=U`U;LDK2` M12")7-48<:H&I<$\6:6HI:H&>>,>1F8$+(QB%UZYSGA,Y[.AP.._QY@E;,X1 MV4L;/)8^[I\I'5B?VQ$\,SFE$((A)G!L<2%*):G$(&,Y`8`0(/*&`9IC%)(A2M;1I^93%"C"L\QI>&6-(G!M&23`9 M$9CNSUS^/"YOM(?A#66)1=)6\H:U=LT[5EH*F0)@6538E?1*:J&@)P30FA:S MI*T.9C>$T*@S`L%9!W8&+K^>>!U*]JBK:C:U;)5-:P"L65>M,<5S17L.CL+: MUK@<(0C5ZMOC;<"6&NUN96PDPLLXLPDXL!I1H!% MFE&!",LPL85S1H.TITV4NYS^HU*UE/?E+R7(U M#V=0U6&NY\A)!@LE^.'&.F!<+F^TC5+I;SR!)CT!Z(T`DQR(Y,+)8BA!R`0,Y#G'3\.$,Y8NLFMM MP/)3B0B!06LXTW0RMX7$Z^A[0`1;3%(1'&>*1IK+&+N&6W,3"C0-:( M`A?CG!10<9SPCV2B)Q:<,+C%IK&H_,(P[D^W=HY*&9ND#"Z)^X(_0<6AV3*V M]:3WAQGM-+$'KC&>G`:R#ZP:TUB^IY16VO%&5[)D:3"!)(H/4L!B;ZE0A[NU M$G=V&/H'`A('NST+"9@&.N?PX7-]G-E4+ATZ;R6B;Q.,S)J3+2W%.V2IA:Y" MWD.!)"A,4O)1.Z58F*6E)EAI830AP,(#1AQGH(6,D(#_`"YZ]_W$TU_AA"/Z MCX7-]E3*ZLK&>+$SC.*Y@O?]Q--?X80C^H^%S?;_U-_'`.`<`X!P#@'`.`<` MX$+O(O44VOG17:NHJW+-53R;TM-&R*-I`AA/?7E.W#IQZGZ.[A9W&(!1/(X.`0^:9CB,4155;XYF(TJ3F!CD15V3HB69#=@-3 M;/E;QA-&JEE]I.B,V:MY$BRF0.J1&D,P8)6J(+%ET;.*D\K6CMLQ$R4@N-LK MQ2W-*1WDD7LQ.;&7N-$*32"#<*UA67&+/)*`Y0'W"IIF0NKRXJQKA%A;\$841>I9Y6O\K(X!P#@'`.`<`X!P#@'` M_]7?QP#@'`.`<`X!P#@'`.`<##1Y#/XFEU_VR_-;_!__`'A?^*HOWN/^O_\` M>OZ;S+K.I_:7OC8_[UP?^QG]OROXJW[Z/\V9^[[_`.0/]?\`HO7EB;>6MKE< 2QP#@'`.`<`X!P#@'`.`<#__9 ` end GRAPHIC 15 g376793g29p26.jpg GRAPHIC begin 644 g376793g29p26.jpg M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!`0$`>`!X``#_X0":17AI9@``24DJ``@````#``!1!``! M``````````)1`0!@````,@````-1`0`!`````#_#````````4(T06Y0@9ILP M<:)`?*I0A[%@DKAPG;]_I\:/LLV?O=2OR-N_T^+/WNK?Z?'O]/C___\````` M``````````````````````````````````````````````````````#_VP!# M``8$!08%!`8&!08'!P8("A`*"@D)"A0.#PP0%Q08&!<4%A8:'24?&ALC'!86 M("P@(R8G*2HI&1\M,"TH,"4H*2C_VP!#`0<'!PH("A,*"A,H&A8:*"@H*"@H M*"@H*"@H*"@H*"@H*"@H*"@H*"@H*"@H*"@H*"@H*"@H*"@H*"@H*"@H*"C_ MP``1"``:`1T#`2(``A$!`Q$!_\0`'P```04!`0$!`0$```````````$"`P0% M!@<("0H+_\0`M1```@$#`P($`P4%!`0```%]`0(#``01!1(A,4$&$U%A!R)Q M%#*!D:$((T*QP152T?`D,V)R@@D*%A<8&1HE)B7J#A(6&AXB)BI*3E)66EYB9FJ*C MI*6FIZBIJK*SM+6VM[BYNL+#Q,7&Q\C)RM+3U-76U]C9VN'BX^3EYN?HZ>KQ M\O/T]?;W^/GZ_\0`'P$``P$!`0$!`0$!`0````````$"`P0%!@<("0H+_\0` MM1$``@$"!`0#!`<%!`0``0)W``$"`Q$$!2$Q!A)!40=A<1,B,H$(%$*1H;'! M"2,S4O`58G+1"A8D-.$E\1<8&1HF)R@I*C4V-S@Y.D-$149'2$E*4U155E=8 M65IC9&5F9VAI:G-T=79W>'EZ@H.$A8:'B(F*DI.4E9:7F)F:HJ.DI::GJ*FJ MLK.TM;:WN+FZPL/$Q<;'R,G*TM/4U=;7V-G:XN/DY>;GZ.GJ\O/T]?;W^/GZ M_]H`#`,!``(1`Q$`/P#W7XC2RW^F7FD6DKQ((//O98FVLD9.%0'L7(/_``%6 M]17&:#IJ^'&UG33':&^T\M.D-U;AXKN$D89>Z$9'W3M^;!!()J/P]?ZQK<^H M"^T$ZM(]S))+9O?QVZ9#;/GB8;G"[0@+$K\G`SDUA>-KR[35[:.]\S1DA1T: M1KI;Y[<$'Y2R\@75J)_O;?U^7XFOXD\.Q:O MKE\()B1I$+-<7ELHA43-QY<2KPN,=26;AP3TKUOP[>SSVTMK?D'4;)O)N"!@ M/QE9`/1EP?8Y':O'?`,M_?Z;+!_87]M1^8TKV[:A';JQW%=\D3#">%[Q;MHT4;@#(O*[2<@.2?G(!&X5%:FY) MP;^'T_K\"Z%11:FE\7J>K7UFG$4LQC1G\N(9=\#.%'1Z+XHUB_'@72O!UU;:/IVHVT\7E2V_GM"T*MNRQ/SYQD8V\XSGD5T=UK?B[ M3_&\F@B\M-2G7P^]["BVPA$MP#M&XY/\2GH5&&QVS3EAN5M/S_.W84<5S)-> M7Y7[W/3;F>&UMI;BYE2*")#))(YPJ*!DDGL`*CT^]M]1L8+RRE6:VG021R+T M93R#7AMOXCUGQ'X2\1P77B21;RWTBZ.H:9=6,<,T4@7G9A>4(#+DG<-P)Y(Q M;\':OKYA\(>$],U1;?[5I:ZC+>-;(SPPX*K$BG@G*GYF!//MR/"-1=WJO7;[ M@6,3DK+1^F]_4]3\:>(HO"OARZU>>UGNHH,;DAQGDX!.2,#)'K]*U;"X%Y8V MURJE1-&L@4]L@''ZUXEXZU[5UT'QSX5UVXCOY;*TAN8+U8A$TD;21\.J\9!8 M=,=Z[V/QYX=T&QT^PU6^EANEM(6*+:32``H"/F5"/UJ98=J"LKN_3M9?YE1Q M*[_R)/#OCZUU;QCJ/AFYLIK#4[0%@LKJPE`P>"IQG!!QZ9]#1XX\ M?6GA;5])TH6I.$B@B=4(RP522W`RQP/H:\U\5Z1='Q#XN\4:-QJ^@:E M#,M+UF]1M2L(DFTPQVZCSU<[4X[DLR*?LV1UR.TN]**VL M,-M8K-+J-V0Q90I!P@*XXQQ@DUSK"3?5?U;_`#.AXN"Z/\//_(]PHKR";6_' MEYXKT/0WOK#1[J\TPW4Z"T$OE.I((Y8Y)*CH0`&(Y(!-;_A*O$MKXTFT;7-= M&F70N8DLEFL46TOX0P#'S,%E=QGO@$XZ]!823ZKOU_R!XN*Z/MT_S/4_%6O6 MGAGP_>:QJ(D-M:J"PC&68E@H`'J20*Y>S\=ZD;O1AJ?A:\L;+594BANC<)(J M[P2N\+RI/'!]>O&*ZKQ-HEGXCT*\TG4E8VMTFU]APP((((/J"`?PKRW2-4U[ MX8:WIV@^);C^T_#5XXM[&^`_>0'@!6'H,CCGCH>,4480G!JUY?IY>85ISA-. M]H_KY^1[+17A\_BOQ;JGPYU;QI:ZPFGP)(RVVGQVL;CR]X3+.06W(;WQI?Z-+J%L\::-%=6Q:VX61@N&?#98\G."`>P%*6%E%-MK3]+?YA M'%1DTDGK^M_\CM?$7B.QT"738[_S]VH7*VD/E1E_G;IG'053\->*XM>U[7M+ MCLKFUETAHDD,^W+EPQ!`!/&%SU[]J\XTCQUXDNO"W@;4);VWWZIK0LKO%NNY MT,Q&`>BC:".F>ASGK8TNUU6X\??$Q]$U5M-N(3:N"($E$A$3D`[P<#CMSSUK M3ZLHQDI;KK\TNQ'UERE%QV?3Y-]SO]1\616/C;2?#.Y^41`(C, M1UR3QCH.HKI*\&L]5GLWI]R9=\3^-X-)UN#0]-T^YU?79D\P6EL541K_`'I'8X4?Y[C+_#?B MJ[U+7[C1]6T*YTB\CMQ'/QK\>_;,?;`( MQ%GKY7'3VQY?Z5UWQ0\43>$O"4VH6<*37LDB6]NC_=\QNA/L`"?PHE3BI*E% M7;2U\W^%@C4DXNK*5DF]/)?C/9@E0<\-S@=>>.5G\6^-E\(>)/$)UVT5=%U0V8MDL$Q.`\:D$G)5?G M!&.>N3TPHX64K--6?KZ=ARQ<8W33NO3U[GO-%>3+KGB_3/%^G:=>ZM9W?]J: M9-=+$UF$CM950L`-IW,N1CD\UB0>,/%]K\.K'QU/K$-U!)<;9M,:TC1/+\TQ M_*X&[.1W/?VY%A).UFM?7K?R\@>+BKW3T].EO/S/=**\7\?^-]5TW^U[S0O$ M33MI[1.]G#IBM;Q*[JHCFF.3OY[$=",#MKWVL>*M3^)W_"/Z9JUM86#Z6+XN MMHKO$"P'&XG,C-+ZK*UVU^/EY>8_K4;\J3_#S\_(]1HKPNV\;>*H M_#^FZU?:JG]GVNJMIFIO':QY*!AB;IQUP0/;'>NYTQ]=U_7->>Q\026NDVMT M+:WVVL+EG509.2OW0QV@^QHGAI0U;7X_Y!#$QGI%/\/\QGCVUM].6YN9DQ:W MG*3`E6M;H``,K#!7S%&TD$?,H'5ZYC.GZU=7MW:P+]FA1[;1["WA+-)S\\^T M#@$Y^8X&3@_,HKTCQY#%<>#-:CGC26,VKDJZAAD#(X/H0#7@_P`/K^\M?#L; MVUW<0O,[O(TCK2<^JT,*VE50Z/4ZR\N-+TB?4K%9$;2[A6 MN=/GW&-[*8`!XL\-&0,#'&`5!R6->B^$+^IP6R6]O,OEV4*)M$5OG(..Q M<_.>^"H/*UX3XE=[_P`3Z#]N9KGS7D23SCOWJ$R`<]0#VKZ:'`XJ<3[L(ON/ M"^].2[$-[";FSG@6:6!I8V02Q$!X\C&Y201D=1Q7F^F?#'4=+\/W.@6'BR>+ M1;@MOC%DAEPV`RB3/`(]N]>G45RPJR@K1.N=*,W>1PMI\.K73]7\.W>F7TMO M!H:/';VYB5@P<$2%FZDMD\]B>*?XB\"3:OXDNM:CURXL[F6P;3XQ%$!Y2')! M!!!R&.>OM7;T57MZE[WU)]A3M:VAY]_PKE[W4KW4-=UJ2_NY].DTQ9([5("L M;J5+-C.]N3SP/:J]A\,[FQ72;JW\1S+K&EQ?9K:Z%HFP08QY3QY^8S?3]+M;.6:#D,2>O0<=.*Z^BA59J7.MP=*#CR6T/--2T^Q\2?%_2P(_-F\.6WFW MMQC`:1\&&/'J#NDK6N?!$]OXGOM;\.:R^ESZ@!]KB:V6>-V'`=02-K=?7J:[ M6BJ=>6B6UK=_ZU(5".K>][]OZT.+M?`\T/BK3MHG>_Y#>'IM6M^+,#QOX<_X2C0_L*7LMA.D\=Q#=1#+1.C`Y'(YQD=> M,Y]JP3X!O-2U?3+SQ5XBFUB'39/.M[86D<"EQC#/MSNZ>W\\][12C6G!63'* MC";YFCQ'XB>%CX,^&^N6UIKQ30YY,P:=-"I;>S@[%DSD@8+8QGY3SUKIM/\` M")U>2P\1Z%X@EL6N]+BLYS#$DPD0`?=+?=/&,\\BO2**T>*DXVZ_+_+R,UA8 M*5^G;7_,\TMOA9]ET71=-AUV=8=)O?M]NQMT+>9G(SZ@'/YU-+\.]135M>N[ M'Q3<6ZZV`MXK6:.Y4`@!&R-N`Q`./UYKT6BI^LU._P""]2OJU/M^+]#SJ;X9 M?9;W0+GP]K4VG-HL+Q6TQ'RDEMQSSUZ8KH?!GA2'PU_:$[74M]J M6HS>?=W7]J@4.LB?W70\-_G.<#%2_P#AW_;MC=Q>+-HDK/;^MQ.A3;;:W_K;8X7_A!;R^U#2[GQ'XAF MU1-+;S;2+[,L0\T#B23!.\C`/;]3FFWPQ#>%M:T)];G:VU6]^W3O]G0,'R&8 M#T!*(?;'O7HU%/ZQ46S_`"$\/3>Z_%G`Z[X4,&H6?B._UTH=(LGA^>!%1D*D M.6.>"1^5<3\,/#!\9?##1;&ZUS_B3V\[M=:?%"N\NLSL$:3.0"&5L8SR.:]T MHJUB9*/+U^7GY>9+PL7/FZ?/R\_(\RU#X5&YAUVQ@U^XMM&U>Y^US6BVR,RR M;@W$AYVY`XQV'/7.S8^"KFU\5+K_`/;"/AMKFFW-Q)JHU>9H[:!HU1WN9>!C'N`WMM L-=]X.T./PYX8T[28L'[-$%=A_&YY=OQ8D_C6S11.M*<;/O<<*,82NNUC_]D_ ` end GRAPHIC 16 g376793g74t90.jpg GRAPHIC begin 644 g376793g74t90.jpg M_]C_X0`817AI9@``24DJ``@``````````````/_L`!%$=6-K>0`!``0```!D M``#_X0-!:'1T<#HO+VYS+F%D;V)E+F-O;2]X87`O,2XP+P`\/WAP86-K970@ M8F5G:6X](N^[OR(@:60](EG)E4WI.5&-Z:V,Y9"(_/B`\ M>#IX;7!M971A('AM;&YS.G@](F%D;V)E.FYS.FUE=&$O(B!X.GAM<'1K/2)! M9&]B92!835`@0V]R92`U+C`M8S`V,2`V-"XQ-#`Y-#DL(#(P,3`O,3(O,#7!E+U)E&UL M;G,Z>&UP/2)H='1P.B\O;G,N861O8F4N8V]M+WAA<"\Q+C`O(B!X;7!-33I$ M;V-U;65N=$E$/2)X;7`N9&ED.C)%1D5%.30P0S&UP34TZ1&5R:79E9$9R;VT@#IX M;7!M971A/B`\/WAP86-K970@96YD/2)R(C\^_^X`#D%D;V)E`&3``````?_; M`(0``0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$! M`0("`@("`@("`@("`P,#`P,#`P,#`P$!`0$!`0$"`0$"`@(!`@(#`P,#`P,# M`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#_\`` M$0@`/0#K`P$1``(1`0,1`?_$`+(```(!!0$!`0`````````````(!P$"`P8) M!00*`0`"`@,!`0``````````````!00&`@,'`0@0```&`0,#`@,%!`<(`P`` M``$"`P0%!@<`$0@A$A,Q%$$B%6$R%A<)47$C)9&AL<'10E+P@6(S0R0T&'*" M4Q$``0($!`0#!@0%`P0#`````0(#`!$$!2$Q$@9!46$3<2(4@:$R0A4'D5)B M(['1OKN)E2_P';K'M&%RM$$,4P']LZ7]R7[JA2&W`)R:#;%O5_[ M"J55K`,TL`@3Y!:P`1U'L!&<1UZ\5`_XC:&4F4BYB1XI'\(W5'`W+BUR4>ID M;F&O`0#=FY+(0N%,7URHRTA(+&3!%0MIM"UM,S8-TRF_A%8F5.8VX*EVZBKQ MMQAD)HK8E=1/%3[JUCPTH*)^T^R(QM-U?<)JJ]T-\F@$>^1E[_&,=OX?XX;P M4C.Y&Y$:0MDR9)R,T]RX\5-[>)4IT=9&:4^UB(__G'F/*FV=&+LBD)3='V\ M*JSIM*&*^BI&=R+:00*?R]N>*NZ`9`\`C$B>?&,+2BK#Q"'%KHTJ(U+G-0X2 MY]3'9'^S7)HLD81^4P]O3<=Q_H#_``T01<4_^K^G1!&31!!H@@T01:8VP?;\ M/\=$$8=$$&B"#1!!H@@T00:((-$$&B"#1!'T:((-$$&B"#1!!H@B@B!0$3"! M0#U$1``#]XCTT00=P;;[AMMOOO\`#]O[M`QR@.&<*%D_F'2ZM8E<;XJKEAY! M9?%)3>B8O!G(M(%0!*FFK>KS;A5T_P!1 MNBV[?:)3[K\TZQR:1+4X3C*0D99PGJ[S3LN>GIP7JLF02G''J.1'( M6/>FY8974I])G#`93C[@=R>`BB1H]HA#7C*`@I:;214"[.D&1F;901$`.8FP M:EN7S;UB6$;8I>_5HP]54@+F92);9D$)'%)7J4.4\8\125U:@_45Z$*^1LRD M.JN/64-3BC`F&<&1!X3$F-JG1&*ZGF>'@XI%*1D5^T"^XE9E<%Y>5<=H;>1R MNJ?;XZJM?>+G@!L'KI:*G4&TDN.J,@$#5CU(P'M,1$QXRWO/\ MDC2DN+5\W93B&D'@?CEG(B<:Q05%8LN7)0+.J M:6TY`?J/$\^$/6,AC%$I1,15<1'8';ERVYM=I2+0$W"Z)40:F4Z913DMA*@%*2)C<)FQP]?CGOM4ZC./%`L>9I$%CMB6HHGK&*F+@NY3F?7>5331>H)#N!BL$79A^'P'5 MV1LA^AI?6[J?IZ.F4)I;*DJ?4,?^R#J!''5**Y5[A>=4JGMS*BM)D5&02?`S M.<>47CYDK*R@.^0V57KN!72$_P"4F*57]-HQ.Y0#E:3D\58MIM12$#L,)U&R M1MQV)ML&M+F[-K61':VM3-*J$C!ZHDLDCBE"04)D<4GS=08&;/<;BT';LH%E M8!TI)G[9PTM%HM0QW")UNFUR%J\*W$!0CH9@W8-@Z`7O4!$I3+KFV^8YQ$YO MB(ZK-9=:^\*%7`AY0VNFMR"U2HDV3T)_B3&[=Y M?4!`?W==0E.(20E1D591.D1PC#YPW$```V]=Q`1_H`=PUZI;:20HRET/\H\( M=G\"I M)X1@%$J(*2`..&,9.P`]1_N#1E&<4W2Z[&*.WKL/=L'VAN.@>8:ABDP2,I\( MH"B0F$H;;@.P_*(=?CL(AUV^S7A,LP9>!C%"T.3"#/3G%#"4=A+_`%=-8..! MM&N1(Z1Z"#B,HQ"?;X?U@']HZ\#BU-AQ#:B")\)_QCWS3D$F/%O(R)7?-$I!^SCA1*^=,V:BQ5W*#0S@@*&(4P$[@WVW#6]+52XUW MFVEJ:!`41*2">"C.4_"<:W'FF5I;<4`I7N\8]PH]Q0-L(;AOL/J'V#MN&L3* M>!F(VD2,@01S$5T1Y!H@@T00:((-$$&B"#1!!H@BNX^NX[Z((IH@CX'LDVCD ME7#LZ3=LW247W5TM^W;':V/JV[U]RX)U=FE9 MQ<&&'>43)L<%2!5@9<)U)^KN-U=53VYMQMH&0=41H4.!2`9D',81M%"Q5@7C M.:3N-KN4,XR)-"9Q;\O97M,0M>;&H<.Q8@2DJX35C(;?HBP9)H-4B[%`H[:B M7>\;OWF\S;Z5I=+:F2$M4U*B2'4('E+P"1J<.:U8XS,^$;J:VVFV)+]>^CUA M'[BB<"KYI3.4\HTB\_J:\.,?K-V!,]OX6@1!6:@E\FG%/L79%I>"MVWRD*$GSM4Z5K=21FDJ*-((/*8ZQ!1D"3$=PG'+FM>9$EIS4KA6T3:+DZ\8SR%9;;;*=!@H8ZJ2L M/C2M,HBHGI0O3ZUV;9]+3T.N2-2G2T MD9@!2ECR@?FQA5<$4C;BG*B[.)?422VC'2?R@=(5.R&Y7Y:9^VX>M^:CTD@* MI6^8>0.4F>,Z6BF(?^6QJ3N#&?E`$X")15(F0P;;?9>J%W9-B/J-[HLN@?%2 MTZ%J>;(,I%<])]D^IA*&+E6_MV.HKTNSEW'"-!ZB1G(]8<'!V&/U.*]26D%D M_E7BXLBHY5=+RZ^/U+]:V2)T4?\`L"2CYQ`P[ANV.F80/X5#!OUW`=<]W=?? ML_5W$5&V+9U1A-954X6A,BI042J7'+C"]Y M8FN4MNNR^,^-G++*>8LNM%VZ-MFJY6J#2N/N+$14)[E6XSS>&E1DYDY$Q!*, M9+*N#".YA)N(:M%CH=GL4!O.ZK4S16I*)M(<=<54U'((0DA,I8ZLO"4X15)N MEV*J2S7!YVY),EI;\J0>(!5+"<=-J?>F'''#E-C^3F?*W8+E&12A+'?;(M$5 M9>S2/F6=.#QL$FL1=TFR26*@F5%-18Y$P$2]PB&N05%#4;HOE0K:-MJ1;G'E M*9:`U%+<_*">G6+I0UB+7:V*6ZO!5P;;"7)D%6L9S.1/A&@&YIOKR<[7CQQ_ MR[F0HN2MT+8YBDL;8Z52/OL^1M=S!JY=M``-]T&*NX#TTV5LAVV:AN6KI:)] M!DIHJUNCF"A$Y*'$$Q"7N*HJ5EJVTSKG)4AI/4=#'I'K'.+(!.^5OV(<"QZQ MQ$&50KLCD^V)-S=2H.)FS.(VO$<$W#X/00VUFFI^WUK2@L,UUPJABO MN%+3)5^D)4I>GQEX1B*?=E63WW*=FG.2<2H#K(2G[8@?/&/*WBFN1[?*.>^2 M6<[5(`D(4`^9'O"[L[XN**?:5*E;:"$%;3>D/$8%24A(DDD>4 M'$<91-L=.[MVE547I\(I%XI*S-03PU?JYQM*W-:E6$3-<*X\RMGER#A5H1]C MZH/&U3*Y2W#9>ZV7Z+7Q;B<-A4156*4.H]-:V?M]74B@C<=526Q!3.3ZB5@< MBVV%*GTE$K_)Z=T:K;3U%6P?A4V!I4.8)(P\8TJ[\M\X8K@G5[RIQ0EZICN, M=1B!'`B43JVA-XIF:E"M%1I!GC[ MI?[Q+=>"69PTQ[=5C'NGI$P!TZ9,W3ARLT:JJ=2IF4.8H M=-QTFK7&&J@EA"Q2+5Y9R)`_5+CX"4-J1"F:4)?.D-B6HY*EQ'CUCS;'D6A4 M\$1M=RJ]:]P,:OJ5N"0I;S:9\"9&-N062GJHH8 MI`ZC\1#6QB=3BP"H$3$A/4.8E&EQT-)0I0P7U`EXSC+[A#_]2?<\GWB_<_U? M>]/M]-OCKW0[^4YR]O+QC;AS'X_Z_&,VO((Q^4OS^@]GKU#]NW[>FM96I`*G MDE#8R.!GUD,8]4"@:G,$JW38UJD=4WUB8:-GK@2%,8 MB#".`XOWSM<0`J2229C*&$`+N.GUDVW?]R5**:PTCU4%B>I"3I2#Q5/(F=I?;_8%J2W=;F*C>;J3K M;I0'U,.$>9O3/RK2<"3UD"(YU<*C(] MHC:J=P6F+.\^KRU-HN%HUT).]]+N#\@\ZRJ*A=CC)7:_K2M9J;I5N8Q?Y>@Z M%,3#VB&P:3UGW(IK6H)9?55NJ.30]/3?](0$NJ2#B"5"?$1-I-FU%:E*ZW6: M50FG4=3@'ZB?+JYRATL<<:,&X.3/.1-:B`F$$S&>9`NCI&7L8@F8QS_SZ9W; M1#4@B(^)J#1$/@0`#;54W!OW>F[7NTY5/&CXM-S"9<@D9C^HJBSVW;-FLWG; MIV)#YER*O$G'&(WRW^H;Q+PVHO&3V4XZT64>MO$U/:Y)Y$/S5AGX/)L5Y'5=`P/G M9A$!'QJ#MTZCMJUO?;G[<[0="MT7FGJW$_W&*-*BM*N*=3@TB702Y&$'^2;C MO:?_`$[7:95\*W`92X'"-DC.%7(W+!$'G*;EY>I./<;*26-L'D+C6G&W*;M9 M&F&@#85"I=VQE"&()P`0]!U`JM];1M+G_P!(M#82@20[526I0&2BD3$ST(C: MSM*[5H[E\KW2I6)2T2`"-^$S)N\>8CIT5-))D25L[Q@6Y-UO\`8H*?N,G_`+BP4IE^914` MD?CC&FY[DM=G!!+:JI/Q-MRF#RX1S5M_)FVFH'M[6JF,!%<+\?-K7E2 MUHBF(IQN2\GLU$:7C.,<]?*T;/!=B3<%#AL(:ZO1[,H=HH#]:EINM[DC4/D" MG;SFMML?N.R.&0]D4JNW!<[\XCL,NBF(Q;3(K/3#`0R=`P-R0E*Y'5&+?TGA MWB5FD*3.DXD:,[1E!=DLF)A--WJ3;&B8^84.H85EFJ*RP',.RH^HUV[7_:3; MBGG#5WB])61W')-TA`.':;_N!&&`4E!/$0[IK1?7VTIG3T5)I&GMA7J`/_(2 M-)7STDCK$^X\X<8$QZ_0L1JD:]WA,`%;(&3G[J^7!PJ.XG4+*V%1Y[,#'$1` MB!$B%WV`-M5N[;\W%="4(<12TF0;ITAI`'+R^8^TXP[IMN6YD!50%5%3Q6X9 ME1XDC+'PAGR@@V1`I"IMVZ)`*4I2E2223(&P`4H`4I"%#T#H`:IZUJ6HK62I M9.)Q))/O),.1VF&Y#2AE(Z``?P`CF=R)_49H=+L+[$V')*'N&3BG,Q?RX$>3 M5;J+E0`(4"L()%]*76?2,;Y(R/*8W>``JHF&^NP[.^T-ZOEM3N2ZI]-8-(6" MORJ=0>*9_"/U*D)8Q0[QO=EJH]!:I.ODRU"1`,1IA7%G)2T2SZ^UVOJ4ZX6Y MKX;/R4Y#,V\UE.0C53"NA%8UQ.P6&,Q]5F)E!]JT>+@/;L*R9SAT8[@O>U:: MG3:ZAR=!3I`:I:&0;64DDJJG5']QQ7S%(('R@9Q"HK=>J^N]7H*%@^9QS)7] M`S`]D_"'`JW"W&*4JC:\M/K!GZ\$,"H6'*S\T\Q9+;I'$(.I@5&K0:!%4@,F M5!H!BAT[AU1*_?EP<;%)9&*>V6]&"44Z0%2_4X9J)Z@CI%I9VQ2&K.JK(SLT[B:K4JS&N'[]VKX(Z*BHUDD99902D M*FBBDF0H[%*&XCT`!$0#52::K;I6!M&MZM=5Q)4I1/$DS/B3#IURFMM(7)!% M,VG)(``'(`80AU1B+#S)O58UY7>/]!DQE<)X^E"+MG61)M(Q@;98O$>? M8#0Z(%`T&P4#8.P')NI@#5\O%U'VXL+UEM0:?W36:4OU`.IMELB99;D-05B= M:I3G(8816;?4U^XG15/-AFT),T:L2L<%?>0]SDG5SN.3)^&>)N`Q=1[),"X!%L19/MF7S$$4FY">W3W$PZ MN9WC>MNV]RMN:4,U=6THLTC82E#.K#6XG,F7PI)D)SE,X(7K'07&L::I`L-L MJ`6O@N7Y>AZ@1V=8M&\8P:1[)N1NS8-4&C1N@':DDV;)%2022+N.Q$TR``?N MUPI=6\^\IZK![JU$J5P))F3'3J=AIEM-.S@T@`"?(1]'E+L`C\N^P;#Z@(_M M`/0-]8)J:=Q9;:6%.`R('",G2EG%P@"%ZRERGP]B9\2OS-A^OW=SLG&8ZI#) MQ<+[)N#")$D$:["E<.6WE.`!WN103#?<3;:LUJVO>[LGO-L*:HY_W7/*WU\Q MD,!PX\(3UE[H:1,P2ZO\J)$^^(B2M7,',JP_ABG5WC52W?:JE/Y!%O>,HKMA M`2&.VI,4Z&N5];_,4'CMT;$VZ77KB]47.Z$S*&R!3ZN27%&9 M20,0E.?&%";I?+HK31M%EHY=S.74"?XQ$F9\(4G'=0":R/9\L\E,NV0[B`QU M5;)<99HSM5T?)']BPAZ=5UX>+91D>)AD MH;;:F3J42D%:4#$^=07/5D)\\!(0KN>W:=`4[N#I^%M4DI5R"21A'B_ M^EF8?P]]#_,V2\O_`*A?D]]2^OS'N?S-_-#\P_<=_N^[\-^S_E7E_P#,]K\G MD[>FG?\`^AV?UGJ/1,:/\D]=+0)=KTO8[>7P:O/I_-C*<8?X[4^G[?=JI_1^ MQF)ZN_KU9_W)83RT\8>?,O(;'6%D6C:Q.GDS;9M0[:JXZJR(3-YMKSM$"MX6 M!;G\QD@./\1=<46Z(`)C'Z:YO9-KW:^J*Z1M2:%$NX\H$--@G-2I2P&,AB8M M=SW!;+8D]Q86^,T)(U3Y2CGCEWD]D3P++Y(RO6N-T2_.LC`8=QBK'91Y.WA4 MY>]O%MCMDWD55Y=43$`4T&BQD-S=Y^F^NI;?V5:F5I304E36GA*7EF1"UX(XF9LR-DQ/-]GP MD:+D6ZZKO'\KR5M,I:'%>:%*4&EFFZR91W,V^ZB4>]/W`Q\ M._-HVFRM[IFWE;[R#(Z0"21QF8B@G)?]2+D4N=#!/'6-P93W M1`,A=LIK`O)F:N"]72!)0C9F=P01`2@@U<=OH`:MKOV]^RVQ%+3NR^(N=8TJ M79HTD!"DYI45#S)ZS`ZQ`&\=WW]$K'2+984)I6OBDY'#*-ECOTR\@Y>>(SW+ MWE-DC)BJA=W=(J4F_KM3[3"83-A\@IIG2V/VF[&:8=.@Z4N?>';M@2&/M]96 M&6T`A#U0$K6K]1"9G'^OV1(9V!<+F/4[AKWR\X-2D-D@))Q*1.6`\(>_#_#[ MCC@ILS;8QQ+3Z^\:$(`3JD6A*V%91/IYUIN4*Z?`HPO<`'*57YOO[:ZO;MK_ M`&<^WY5!)SC7KL";MP M9+;_`*8:T[I^_-[OM,F@L-+26NV($F^P@)7H'PS(D`1F3CCQC=;=B4J'/7W5 M1,HZ2TVB4W'L,A7Z16(.JPS-19P]D7BEHZ6B;[=*A*$=/]SG M&V:AQ)A:L]K-SV7(]I?+B4K1A!5*,\LDLL\4 M,!2'5!)'KN)P`-/;5MVZ7_( MF15[>4)U+TSF-S<*"5U>2O#_`(\OO&8E*AG";_.=]BETP.(6J81\I&$_;*'"P/Q#P#QRC6[7&E!BV4JDEXW%KDR#,VU^8>ISNI^ M0\SX>\_42$,1,!'H4-53=/W$W;O%U;EYJ2FF6HGL,_MTZ.24-B0"1D)S(BRV MG:EFLXG3M!3OYE8F&7_W;!_MZ:I,6/PRB'\Q9TQY@ZOEF[M+&*[>J@RKU8BD M3REKM4LIT;1%<@6@*/Y)\X.(``$)VEWW,(`&^G]BVU=MPO*10-*-.V-3CI!# M;2!FI:N0Y"9/`0MN-UIK:UK:TTRH&-D))N M^QKQ?9.U96:L+UNL56/>WV+B@7>WBPJ'\9TH9!([1JIL*G<8-@Z%:J=5"IRS M["!K[BI!0_6A!2T)Y]DK`4A'#4H`GPBG7.HJ*QU+U6ZCT!D?3B?=`Y+^75X& M42VDMR9SVBBQJ,>IQ>Q"=,K=*=EF31]F2=C`*"9!@*^<%(:@-CM@`$CN@7=I MEVV2*(=%?T_9>S5N/U]0N];D>5K6VE9]*RLYI4X<7)',(PG\T,$KO%P2U3VU MHTMJ;``URU:?`3$33C?CQB?"?NIV%ADW=I_4L-YE^U/N<.I>VS) MEI`C;Y1,*1#IMT@]"@4-@JUZW)>MPJ-.5+;IUJ\K3(TMH!R2E'\,S.&R+5:K M:?5/))=.*E3&?'/*%ZMU[M7+.3?XMP=+2%:P\T=J1>6<[L@4;A/-$U?'+4+$ M4@00*_DGB93(OI=/=%FF802$ZFVG]OL]NVA1)N6XIO7W1.F9!25(QF%U$\1T M2!XF$U7756X:GT%O;6U1),BM4I*`_+*'0H])JF,:E"4ZGQ;&!K%;CTF$='-` M*B@W;-R?,L9-A'L!G:$X7MT]ZN)[E:XA%(O$-B>M(Y*.4QTAD\:8*Q7A]FJUQY2(2NJ.S M=\E*(MS.9Z87-MY'$S8'QG,S*+JB4!,*ZZ@B/75?NVX;Q?"4W"H<+/RH3)*$ MC@$I$DB7"0AU1V.V4I[B&SW#B9\XED"=H?<`.FWH/]O3XZ0-L--*UI*RKF3, MPW)*1)D``?ZX1'A<85P;^KDMP1Q)6HL06!BU9!P=TRK<2804?-ZXQ,0$(I68 M6`#O%B@*R_:!1/V!VZ8&NJ/3^E29,DS5+CX^'#A$!RB"ZI-89=X''E[(D'P# MMM\VWC[/3_B[M]OV]VH7;;RQE*6?#/\`&&O=QG+YI^Z4:[IFP> M5^5SRMSG)>2=0TS$1TJU9PWF]KVZDH#:@@)7K1-2B!+5E+4<\9XXQ0ZO9%OJ*QVO2I0?=65*GB) MDS/LB3^+'Z>$%@K*-BS9?[E#9.O!D5HVDQ\-CJ$I-8HL0BJN*3N+:`YF9E_: M)%H8I7;YP]'O/OVE`!#95>ONCN*]64;;IUFGM!"0M(D"N7"8^3]/$`3ZY6W9 M-LI:U%SJTI=KFB>V<=*4\,#FHW17ZM.6;[<"5:W8#XXXLNN;W MW?F\-R@IO5QJ7D$2TZM*9?THTCW18:/;-@H0!34C(ED2F9_$S)B;RH(@)!`3 M[)^A3#W%'Y>T`$!`1V#U^'75/[3?$`GF<3[X?)DVG0V`E($L`!A&8O;U^0H; M`/IMZ!_]0VUD``)#`1Y,G$YPG?(3FE0IUU8`"1 MQTX$^S**Y>MQM6A0;#+E0\?E1*?OB`#U3]07D](.5K?>Z]PPQ%)`@FTI-!;- MKMGI>,43,=X:8OK_`+JQ795RF?Q@5JS-[<`^ZT_=KZM./I*;,H(FN7(D8`R]D-/A_AQQVP MVYKPDM554M-),R:;`;;2#\J4H`\HY&<.J>P6FG674-#O'$J)))//$R]T,Z!$ MQ`NQ"[!]WY0Z;=`V_=JIE*5&:@">L-TI2@22`!&37L91!^=N1^%^-E4/;\QW MJ*J;`_RO0#^'&5:K1J;J>L4DL<0*5)J@H("("82EZZ:VJR76]O M^GMC*W7,S(>5(YJ49)`\3$:IK*:D3J?6$].)\!F815')7-KF;)MGN"F[KB'Q MN<(F;JY$R?1R.\\7E!8H^62IU.DWP,J6P!,W:@N\3.N)P%0#!]P+DNU[3VNV M!>EJK[Z`9L-*`9;/`+<$R2.('X0A-5=KL2FA2:>BG_<4/,1T$\.DOQAIN.?# M/$7'0CV:C4I7(N4IQVXD+3FG)BS6RY,L#QTH950#SJC5(8N/3,<03;-"I)@4 M?F[QZZ0WS>%ZOK**)YSM6IH2;8;\K:1U`EJ/54^DHGV^QT%N)=;3JJE&96K% M1/2>7L_$PVFJM#B#1!',WE)^H57,0W.4P=5_I=F(2 M.LJ<9%"[F[ZX=MU!7:1K$$U%=@!4R8=Q==:V?]JKAN2SN;C<=;%L:3J#:#J= M=E/4D"8")$2)5[.<47<.]J2S5J;4A)-:O#40=")Y$R$SG/"%XPHE>\FV&2DL M'TNX6K(*ZCIA=^K2$$SBUWK!%8#X/Q7(*-'*[)NFYV:)(HM6)>@+*'ZA MIO=:VAIJ8MWE]-+;T`(;MM$1-S2?BJ5$_/+S*Q,R9`F(M'25%:K52MARK*IJ MJ%Z@D3QFVG^<_9'1W#G%VEXSEG=ZL,U/9?RU+?-(Y2R0HUEIYJF(%[XRJ,RH M$CJ;!E4*)BM6)"#U^=Y7"Y4XMU`A-!9`)!ADD!7_`,JL%.'^KR\D M@Q;*&Q4E"ZJH6D.5RS-2R,9]!D/XQ+^2\F4K$-.E;Y?YM""KD2"!%G*I3K+N MGCQ8C6/BXUFB4[F1E9-XH1%NW2*9154X%*&J_;+;5W>N;M]$`7W#(3(2D#BI M2C()2!B5$R`AC4U#5*R7G3)`_$\@.IX0E@T[+O+B;5GLN)3>'>++1F0[#$+I M\G"@H==>7R5*,EBO*_3UT"A_*2JI**IANOL`CO>E5%HVT.(K=U*P M4ZE.IIA612V3,.+RDM,Q/(\(KJJ:JO;@>K@&[6G$)F0I4N*CP'/_`$8]UQS" MP[6Q_*/BQ197D/:ZG[>O!1<&M8LE-IBJ9!1:,[;D)^JQH53:H@E_$\CM5ON#I=N;FADF?;09^PJ(Y8<8+JZRJM`JD'58)@D1))C$1[9H M"HD+VBX=JI)E5>NU/4ZJICJ'$1$1U3+K>;G>ZE55FE:4A*0E(`2.`RB5(9 M\8NU['L&B"#1!!H@C!U^&_V_NT01:&WPV[MNFVV^W3T_JUHJ>[H_9^*",8^/ MM'_E[_'^GX[:B4\M7D[GJ>,\I\<^$9?NS_:TS]\7E^Z&WIM\/3^O3+S?/\7& M/#JGY_BXQ=HCR#1!%Q?\W_Q'1!'@$^F?4?G%G]3\0]NP(>^]IWCZ]PBOX._? MT^7?6NK]7Z0]OU7I>.B6F?3$?SA>[]+]:CX?5\9RS]L>NEV=W^7OW#?;[^^X M[;[_`!WWU%H_3:$]ON:](^//_JZ\XG'T^L]N6N<9S;[]=_LW_NU.C+QC(3T_ MWZ((7'E580^302[FCIQ`1=CDS1P)*@^2K;"=LM5@2V$Q!`6R MCMR*0*``=@B("5E:?IPKVS==1H=0U`3$QU(!(',@$RR$0Z[UAISZ$@/]1/\` M"9`GXF.4G!I'A:AF=LEER0SC*Z)#5QD)E/O\([UAML&VVVP;;>FWPVVZ;;:XJ9SQSBYB4L,HKHCV#1 M!!H@B*[/^4?XLC?Q<-#_`!9X"_3`GPKGUSP=X;>S&0,$IXN[T[`[-_MT[MW^ M3>D=^E^M]!\W;UZ.OPX>,XA5'TG6/6>E]1PUZ=7O]T2B3Q^,OC[/%V%[.S;Q M^/M#M[-OD[.WTVZ;:2G5J.J>N?MG$Q,I#1+3PE%J6VP]OW-_E]?3<=_4.FO, M>.<9*GJ.K.%RY5AB`<12X9G,Z+7O?PGT,T05(]J"Z_66'X.&C%5.GW7;\0^W M^G`00/YO^'NT[V_Z_P"I(^GZ>Y(ZM4]&B1UZY8Z-,]72%-Y]'Z!?K9]G#+/5 M,:=/6L'T+Z)]2EY/3=KO2X:>[YI\M.,)4_2_I:/6^ MK]%+'7JY_-HZYSCK_BC\J/P/#_DI^!OR\\8_1?RZ^B_A?;8OE]K]`_[#W&^W ME_ZO?]_YM]YW=6O5UU8^'"66$66B])Z5'H='I9>73*4 :O9[^/.)&TNB5!H@@T00:((-$$&B"#1!'_]D_ ` end GRAPHIC 17 g376793img1.jpg GRAPHIC begin 644 g376793img1.jpg M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!`@``9`!D``#_[``11'5C:WD``0`$````9```_^X`#D%D M;V)E`&3``````?_;`(0``0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$! M`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`0("`@("`@("`@("`P,#`P,#`P,#`P$!`0$!`0$"`0$" M`@(!`@(#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,# M`P,#`P,#`P,#_\``$0@`7P$N`P$1``(1`0,1`?_$`+H```("`P$!`0$````` M```````(!PD$!08#"@(!`0$``@(#`0$!````````````!@<%"`(#!`D!"A`` M``<``00"`@$"!`,&!P```0(#!`4&!P@`$1(3%`DA%18Q(D%Q,B-1822A,R6V M%QB!-"9V-W'LW- MRUME'2U&SW/DCB]^,A/S)?G.B+"9)KZ`:!(+LG##U^U,KA$?D`8`4!'IIK9R MZO,UK&(_!A\QD)=PD!#)1]@%!9NL=$?:X]4HFT:N$6:@>SQ*<3G6.*?Y3`J@ M--I)&F&B2"C0RGR7;A@9RT21;N0*"RJGI3 M23.`C_<`ATTTS%`VS.-';,3U^RQHOGZ2JK>)H M2(G8A20CVDJR(_CG;E-PV,ZC7R*Y`,`>22I3!^!#J*W#.,/M-8]ON=RHX*Z/ M;DCRJK+N`PW!.XW!!'^!&K[P[XM?(WL'&Z;,,'PG)+KBU8',%534,TL$HCD> M)S'(BE6XR(Z-L?#*P^HUE*%"J+W5*--, MJ5=.8^3\0TV2*(+@6_E[`1#R[=OSUS.:XD+:+P;C1_Q1F]0E]B\#)MRX@EBY*.<\Q5A'&N[.00!J18GD7A$ M[(Y7$0VM4.3E-QAI2Q8^P96*/7=:3!0C$9.7EJ1Z>15MT\S^N**L)&T#R2?8BOL6;P-3/UF=5KK53LY#UB#F;+8I M-E"U^O14C.3LQ(KD:Q\3#Q+19_)R;]RJ)4FS)@R;G554,(%(0@B/X#KJGGAI MH'J:AE2GC0LS$[!54;L2?T``))_;7OM5KN-\NE-9;/!)4W>LJ(X((8U+22S2 MN(XHXU'EG=V554>2Q`&M31[U3M,J4#?,_LL-<:9:&)9.NV>OOD9*%F8\YSI$ M>1SYN8Z#EN91(Q0,41#N4>NJAKJ.Y4D=?;Y$FHY5Y(Z$%6'[@CP1K(91BV1X M3D%7BF7453;LEH93'44U0C1S0R``E)$8!E;8@[$?0C75]>K6`UHK/9Z]2JW/ M7"VS,=7*M5H>1L%CGY=TDRBH2$B&BK^4E9)XL8J+5BP9('554.(%(0HB/X#K MHJ:FGHJ:2LJW6.EB0N[L=E55&[,2?H`!N3^VLK8['>,FO-)CN/TTU9?:ZICI MZ>"%2\LT\SB.**-%W+/([!54#W7"BK:2XTD==02)-1RKR1U.ZL#^H(\$ M:]&38QD.&7^KQ7+**HMV24,QBJ*:=#'-#(OU21&`96&_D$;ZP=&TF@Y%39G0 M]0M]?H5&KI69YVV6F2;1$%$DD)!I$L3/I!V=-NW!W)/D4$_(0\E52E#\B'7" MXW*@M-&]PN4QQO*_"-`6;A&CNVP\*K$^!KK&+UI),F/B4PACKM>K18J7\V\U,-+2\ MM@TCA`2?H!N?)_P&YVW.IEU_UEV'VO?/^&NM;+<[[?A$9&@HJ>2H=(U(#2.( MU/KC!(!=RJ\BJ[[D`])1[W2M-JL->LZMMFAKJ*Y4J5UNECGHY!NKQL&5A_@RD@^?! M_8^#YUA24EJH9()XFV!`DBE577=2&7<;,I##=2 M#J*M1Y7<9L2M$+2=>WK)LUMUA(@K$5NYWJO5^8=-W*HH-GAV,B^07:,'*X"1 M-PL":!S@(`81`>V*N>58U9:I**[U])35 M@^[>SK%4Y/UYB>07K'J,L)JBCH:BHA5E')D#QHRO(J_INL150R`'*DD8# MG$I1`>N^[9#8[#`E3>:NGIH)#LC2.JAC]?MW/W>/)VWV'D^-8OK[I[M3MBZU M-DZUQZ\7R[44?.HBHZ66=H%W*[S<%(BW8%5#E2S`JH+#;4CQEIK$U6F=SA[% M!RM0D(A.P,+5'2S![7'L"JU^/YZR,=53 M34PK(9$:D9.8<,"A7;?D&!V*[>=]]MO.H96V*]VV]28W<:.J@R*&H-.]+)%( ME0DX;@86A91(LH?[#&5#\OMVW\:X2O[QB]IRDNZP.HT=_C1F$G*?^IX6.-;T M^V:JM7\Y!50-9^+-[N M8$>RDJQYD@`!@03O]1J57?JKLJQ9\>K+K8KI%V0)8XOXS\>1JTR31I-$@IT5 MI&=XG215"DE6!^FL+'.16#\A8^6E,-U[/-78P#M-E.JT6U1-A/#.5RJ&;)RK M:/6R5=/5)&=F]3J_$GZ<@#N-_ MTW^OZ:]78_3G:W4%93T':..WBP557&7@%=2RTXF5=@QB:10LG`D!PA)0D!P" M1J9NLSJMM+TCRTXP.-8-A*'(#(EMC(^/%&S9*^UP]N"83`14@_U!9`7`SR8` M/DQ`/EE[?E/J/C*\9:Z_P:U](;QRX^GVI[.7^SQWWY?^K_5_AJWY/C]WC#@` M[4EQ'(5ZX,0E_D305`I/2?I/[C'Q]!_2?_=']'TP@B!0$QA```!$1$>P``?D M1$1_```=2#50@$G8>2=+/3>:'$;1+?&4"A\F,,N5XF7+IG$5&LZ?3YJQ2;IB MU=/GC=C$1\LN^=+-6;)950I"")4TC&'\`(]1JCS+$KA5K04%RH9JYR0L:31L M[$`D@*&).P!)\?0'5V9'\:_D)A^/3Y;E>$Y3;<7ID5Y:NIME7#3QJ[*B,\TD M2HH9W15)8;LR@>2-WW&YT4%;&0&1Y55E)`(! M!/CP0?\`0=>3$_BM\D,\QRFR_#,(R6Z8O6HSP55-0SRPS*KM&QC=%(ZY77LNO+Q./IN@O[K!%I]G?+-7[Q-I!V!-XI& M22XMHMR?Q24,(`@H`]A*(![*S*<;H+?%=JRNI8[9.=HY3(OK<[$[*^^Q.RGZ M']#^VHWCG0O=679A7]?8WBM^K,ZM<9DK+?'13FKID#(A>>G*"2->4L8W90#S M3;PPU_=.Y+\?,@U,LMJM,7$PUI(ZC4YAN>"?N5RH22:T M6J1P4R0F**1RF[]A#KGIZ>9[Y)5"F6`*3*T[2>H M0A/J9#(0@7Z\O&D>LGVB<`:_!R+?_\`?+_Z=;&M\*/ETHW'6^8$ M_P"%NG_\Z@:KIN_)FC;%<@F>96^YMQXS)JQC[?4<'FKHTC-#=02YR2M/MR49 M$/5)"2?V2%>&%K)MGJ2'J$/!`X@(AD+EF>)6>H%)=;E1T]445^$DBJW%ANK; M']&'D']=0_"OC1\A>Q[,V18#A>1WBQ+42P&HI**6:+WP/ZYH>:C;V1."KJ?Z M2"/KIR[ERGXVX+%\;G&7WG.:CQLW.8T:+LW(V`F(69JU?L<%2U+!6V%ENJR\ M@R1G[/+&4*87ZAEA7;&0$I#'_M];Y+CL=J_G6KJ7^%W`]XD4Q;D[`Y926:BIY)YYY;?,L<,,*-)++(VVRHB*S,Q\!02?`U:$K M#S8PR$55X=S)7*&:+UX1)69TET;**ODW/@ M,DT61["=/N0LPUKEI4L"Y(:TST7'<]O=@=0333FW(GE=J2E].=VZIF'-;4\K M-`H"K.6;M7E1^.]%`P$4\O$I52!W'N4K34YA6<.Y:5W0;M2B2.&3V?Z;:,B0 MO@M&\&TFIB%?QJ#F1?5OY<;%S,?+NW@)-#N/!T50P&(/?Q+TTU*6>[U:*7H, M;@^^,'#"VOT%1IMX9L7BU7N[9!0`3!I)D:)-0=(M1`S@IO%5N80*J'<0,+33 MG=--'337R_RE.VVW?;7]BZ6+<:^,?(UXRBN/RD^PY+';DCJLW7S*O%8/*I[X MB7`7LHHDH1UV*3^Q%/\`(_TZUAEH[U5]KY$+-;;9<75*7D*S;9`84V*;JWEO M(;Z>`-?=2AR/K''O\OSIM^R\USC#::6HOX@DQL,9*IEN51S2JXS1?9$"K1>3 M]SOX_773?9U4].K?!KB?#WGCYQ^R_27O/?.7"F-Y`+%#'YQZXB[VU@D9)P$5 M'MA_E+5!NA)J*HF`J9A`PB4O8/3V727.FPBU0UUOM]+OE'G]QQ?+\NON%Q]3W%1>+OS:[P(LM"TYC7VR-_V5 MFD>F57&[`$;$[EQHJ#WC/,#YD7[3N#G$7C#*UCB_K#VCVK'TJ!=WUCD4:=/2 M+^`M$2%/:LGE8$8ULLNS>D79O1(":R)R]P"8107VWV&\5]SLEIMDL5LG,3T_ MJD+GUL2KKZP"G@$JVZM]""-:Y5]TZIS#MGKC$\'[1["SB@KLYM25M+=S7T24 M\9K((TGI9?RV=*G^Y(B30E)H=^<2=FE MFU8K<%5XLRR./'?.$(6K5>/B*_$I'*B)4FS-L@@41`"D`.H?;:V2JR#!;A4! M?:ULK'8(BHO_`.'W(5$"HO\`@J@#]AK8[-,8HK%U!\K,1L[S_@PYUCE-$U34 MSU,NQNX16FJJJ26HE(WW>2:1W(\LQU'N(_8[STU4M"Y-5E?<-#@[MN8P4SQ? MJG#Z5D\,A\.&T.H&1-6^1L9#.)21T>N-&8N#JF>'2%<3)+)B"*B1L?9>Q<[N MGHR6F-;4035W%J)+>QIEIN94\*M5+&9`-]^6V^X(\$&8=G?#3XHX$;MTC>TQ M>SW2V8M[X,5&.RS+%';JAW$800AN'%XWWD20,#J&L#( M1Q)'C93RJ+!L!^.70=-T309+A]7DG8_8;VJ\2WI;E54TEL>HKZ7\&*@I8N5) M/^.\B?DQ5$;&548UV;@[];0\^?\-4'\O\`)>L[)\H>Z+;G&.RWG);C7F*T5:UDM,MJ MJ@JEZEX4^VK#*47U2?:.)(\MN+?^K^L5+3LN86=_7S6:*;KG=PW[EB@=9L"Y2"JD7R+W+^>H+FETMU5 MBU]MU//$]?36V;VQJP+Q\X7*;57TN) MWK-K8*"KE@D2GK#37.FCJ/QI64)-Z78))ZRW%CQ.Q\:J^XJ\@-YE7?* MCLW(J#\C-<5R*T&UU'NF3\8UM>T%5_:CD6*7V1J%_O))PVW3BWG47\W=_P!6 MUOC3]W6=WRUEGZ;A&KT?2HK/&"8B=ZJX M5(8@@!@`1#K&9K?[K=L;S6WU\OLHZ&JI(X%XJ."M*A8;J`6\@?U$D:G/QAZD MP+K[NOXPYCBE`:3(\JL%_J[I+[9W_)GBH*A(I.$LCI%LDC`"%8U8$$@[`Z^D M/*?_`,79M_\`8-/_`/+T=UL7:O\`],IO_L(__F#7QBSW_P!N;U_XM6?]XDTM M'+'%\@U>7H,O*5#&-(Y,Y[$7V6XQT+;[A(L:=)V66A4V\Z\EJ,R=NRVJ(8LX M]-RY6")?N&(-2J(F1.7V!&\KLUHNLL$LL-'4Y+3I*U'%4R$1L[+LQ:($\U`` M)/K8KQW&Q\ZNSH#LKL3`;?=K?0W');+TE>*B@BR6NLM)&]9%313%H$BKG1/Q M97>1HXT_*@CG,I202*>!3OZ40BZKAF^XN^:/(;6LCY4ZW%;=5VJ<>3/JS?)1 M^V]D7D`1;ETW1S1!E%%(S14%-P1R1P8Z92'3$8ATOZJ6QU]F<%+M272=:E!M MZDE8C[:?B2/2`OV@[$$-N`"-;&?YF9K[]VEB795+)'4]?Y#@=IELM2QD-?4T M,2-M+=_:JL;DSRDS.O*-HVB"NS*^T(_8Y0^-T->MDQS'<-:\B?L)Y]U2+KP1 M,X?^7)Y-4(J+5K#;7)*3G/F-L@K=8CR`NU,T,U^6\CD%3]DFPG#"=B4&.0UU M99[/0BX=@7Z)4XM_<]$:KP$Y9MQ3H@\KQX\F12?"[ZL[X:97W/<<6QOL?L;* M9,.^(74M?+4>V`?B&ZU1[B6JJ29C$] MR+5ND`CY)`(>.FL$,?9EIQ>^A*NCH<7"K[!R1I`QCD<*VXW*@@>-PH'[:DM[ M[;N=;\'NPN^.JGJ<>R+*N]WGF_#D,-1#1O!'64E-)+`5;BDK*S`-P>620@;. M0>=X#85(=P+BQOHK/IZQ>"[].B& MM$DLHZ;M_P`N4V_H\B%'N7S8'8Y,GZF2@JZJJAM=/4U7VQ/Q]\2ERL3/Y/JY MDE@/Z@./@:S/RR[3I.B_\P>HRW'[#8[CG5WLM@`GKJ<3"UW"=:=);A!3[K&: MX4T:+%))_NVD]NS-X,Q\&+V:3J\8FUI>V MWZ99#,NHI=%Q)1X/D4Q!CV5^6X!(I$SJ^L.LQA%KQZZ]*44.4MQL<:R2R$NR M+M'4RL.14[D;[?;YY'8`$[:KCY29UW#@'^9YE%QZ%A]_:=;+14%$BTT55*6K M++00OZ5E4K')P+#W[KZHR[,ZQ\SKLOK@H"NO\L=RY_T/&T..7&N^997\3PFB MHUUC2I'6X6"FXZ6=;=/4^);M(^):O"PZ;:)-ZQ,NR6[%,8J(JK^SKJ@-WRNN MSVAHQ;L;GI4IJ:+@(S.JL&-2T:@!0>(5/'E3X)VW:-_,W+8^N^@<6^).5Y&V M9=U6F_5%ZOE<:AZV.TS3PR1+98*N5GDE9/.(=P$.XAW M`0[@/80[AV[@/^`AU=VOEV#L=]?,GJ_&_C_J>ST#@3P2RI!U*X]R1@.07*[E MJ[,K8)/'G["7>R[^E):O(_(LEDTV>7***<>#Q0C11J1(X"=)ZJPUJNN.6"Z7 MFGP3!J4&6CN*U5=7G[VIR&+&/WG=WF8^`G(A2H!\AS']NL![G[#;I4E)Y%U#<;?@F+KBUP7-:+(Q)>KC33RU_.P,?\`F'@O;N1]:Y%VC8+EB%-!75MF MO%:$L=91Q.(Y*9;5&=Z">)Z0S)%*SL\^S2!I'D;_JET4*3(\QGY&(BV[M6L1D6H,^[9G/\>2_N17(8 M"$[2&KQ/%K[V5%C]!;J*&UVB%:JJ,<*(99Y/]Q"Y50>"K_=9?H_E6!V&J>L' MR"[XZJ^$MP[>R[,>=AW.6Q6)*RXU51'06NC&]VN4$>"TB_Q%H[C;;8\LKL?FYEZ5$EQVN(+J!;9H>+4@`9/ M?R4FH^P#9]XFVS@UHV.\$^#_`!HWE"(A9[MR928T;DL" M3HZ",-N0>/\`4=B1NQ\GZF?]9?*/#>QOE3VAW9U0U14VG%^CYD2MJ(?3-U+C ME9D%7*H']"FX330G;Z@(?H1K['-*D8^)X/W>0E'K6.8-^+,Y[WKU=-LU1]V4 MKMTO:LJ8I">Q94I"]Q_)C``?D>MQ:W_V,F_\+?\`[N=?S;8N0/DQ;2?_`.>4 M_P#UW9-?)=P8X]21620(W32`0*D)>J$ZYM66U.'4$E!8,>JZ!D?C-4;>]P)G M!+[H?(.ZK]?M`U];?F?G_P`>K-\DLMHLN[=[AQW*X*BE$ULM`?\`BZ:1K?2O M&E,5J(_LDC*2RD!=I9)/(^NF(J",#S$^TOD=E/(/C]H3J6O'&Q/&IFK-\[BI M!#C!<(2;IY(:UQ=@0(=DEG<&BT0/%VQMW1>HRR21@!)8Z03&.UVVX=XUU-74 MT$].MBB(22-74'G$-PK`@'8D#8?KMK6ZJSO-<0_RL,4OF*WFZ6F\3=JW!)*B MBK)Z6:1/QZ]RKRP21NZ%D5V#,02H<[D`ZEO@_2Y?,^3'V+<5*GG67\B*-7X[ M%)Q_6G];B6/'NO[:W@$6-ALHP%B3E(BNMS32[KW-VI#+_P#AOBV3\&I$R=&# MVJV0]A93C5-!"V,(U-)Z"BM"DQ4%@J,"H._+QMXX`?ZHVRGRESW.;E\.^AN[ MKU=KC#WG4Q7JB_E8ZB6"Y55LCE=8I):F)DGD7@(=G+?W!5/(23.Q:`,-J5`S MRT?91M5^K5;&I%$SFBTE)P70W+ZVKPC*@6>1B`3IE?:OVO8R;./` M!(DDJD"9TRCU^]:66S/E>4\`1;Q1GU;&0@1[K]FQ`(X[;$#]M,P_*+*[JYG]A978'<,0;:^) M&Q*>IHUH+_'6]-LK&_KG;J8D$I&KL(U:.EUX`R*94E! M5!LY7\3%%7R"]]?)X``;#Z:9A[)Z"TF4W%PJ-(Y!DBYD*\J8M4&KZ@U1@I`Z MZ4B#1=-Z%EADI=P"RK-JZ7*W:I@KZ5CB;LTTJNIX1(6CAAK51XY2,MIZ=KU\ MV@QM,=/58&ZP^E:%L\;:+FA=ET$HMG!06?1JJHL0432!NT+[%DP,FF(M-,W3 M=6B>6M*EJ^]J=^CJJXM\]7\M?V_1>03W0>2%!T/4Q@/ MYDOE&RR-!BY$E9@8RNQ*(LXF+%"BRA06,]U M%_>HN,%PJN/L,%08E/!511LJ[[`*/!)\[G]=;N]>_/?M_KOK"S=14UHPN[8? M8??^&MUL\=?+&:F>6HE;G++QY-)*PY*BG@%4[\1K>C]8N!O,IJ6062[;]>:[ M2=]@.1T#+WS69"W6QO?*W"IP<7'&GIF.U16BIGKYZ>"O6K5I9S)()47BHY,#_;V\\`!Y).^YUBO_?@[9I\]N'8 MEEMF)6N\7/$I\=GBH;5'24K4-3,9Y9/1#(H_,+$**AF8^M50J54#3PZ70(#5 M\YON76KYP5C1Z;9J+8ABW0,9((.V0KV!E?U[T4E@:/?@OU/4KX&\#]C=A[=N MIMV57+\:IA>)^)V/&12K;']#L3L?T.M7L)RV[8#F5ISJP^K^(]@`(Q28'8J*IM55#[_; M9H7BI]WW'&1>#>P[0WI<-I@[)"\>B:U8 M"<=8?3OE&?$M\?FB1$R(O4G9Q,5`79F0)CZ/3\<12'$0]48M3W%:R)JT4:5/ MY"TGO?\`$6;??V"']#O^G+CM]NW'QJP[E_F`]]7;#IL:KHL:?):FR?P\V0&U M4YR&:V<0AI)+D22R%!L7]0FY?W?9[@)-;C7?JRXN[)JU_P!7G7&O5ASKS!LT MV2BYWJMCI&::\Y8,C,HN6T.I0QDB3S^.+XJE)[DFBZY14<(+&46]G==NK\8O M%UJ+K.:N)JM0*B**=XX:@@;*TL:_U$?7ZA2?+*=SOCNO?G=WIUO@5HP&U)CM M=!CLK/9ZZX6NGK;E:5D?G+%;ZN;5)X-*B$)#+&$CX2E7N"V.56L<5ZA M`SFH1L%Q!D5Y+,&C.\+M$YD[@$O)KH:31BW;VY@0R("5$R:)2]S`']IC`.4I M\'L]+36ND@>J6"T,3"!(1RW_`$EV`$@_PV'_`%Z@MX^4W8U^OF>9#=:6Q377 ML2%8[F[T2N80N^S6\N[-22'?RX9R=@?JH( M[C]>O'G<:CA-342O>3'XSE0;X9:\1N;V@73.HM**C(5:&@Y\B$FJ6/>QL*T3 M5%0BC@10`Q52G,^O\?O=)0TA$](;;L*9Z:0Q20KQ5>*OLW@A5!W!/C? M???>*=7?+[N#J_(`M$/8DDTK(%98QS M*F,J%"QTR^J;BK'97R.QYF.I_P`2Y3R=#F]87D-&DIZROIK/Y)&;CYAA9K"U MEIC]I-S29W*O5UU!$2@(%#'IU9BT=KN-H3\K\2Z-$TY,Q9RT1Y!@[A MFY,WW.6+%B3]-3&I^>W?-9GF&=BU'\#_`,08'!70VI8[='!3)#7QF&2&2FIV MBA]4,)$5*D*PK"B(`&()-B<%#LZ["0U?C_;\"#BH^'8_(4]J_P`.,:(LFWN5 M\2^Q7TH%\C=@[C^>W5A00I3P)3Q[^M$"C?Z[*-AO_P!`UIW=;C47BYU-WK./ MY=5/),_$;+SE=AR8[#?P-*YRHX58QRZ2HSW0U;S4[SF$E(2F;ZOD]P? M4#4*0O,-TFLRC`6E@DX,DRED6Z0+(K(K$$R93%`I@[C&,HPRS9:('N!GBKJ5 MBT,\$ABFC+#9@KC?PVPW!!'@$;'5Z=#_`"8[*^/4ETIL/6UW#%[Y#'%<;5=: M1*^V5JPL6A:>ED*[O$6;@Z.C;,RL64[:ZSC%Q7Q[B+GCC.,+A,@B64M5PL;\?E2\R\3;)D$P%32(1,"D3*'?OZL9Q:T8E;S;K M.C"-Y#([NQ>261OZGD<^68[#]@`/`&L!WAWQV-\AF MA2FHZ*DAW]5+24\?VQ0H68@;LS,Q+.QVV3;6_J`XR[)MU_Y"6.^M?J&+5R;L>V5RRX-3G M&?4?7:1J4G7-@'8!\W>W^N\BR:\VR MCQBLLN5W%:^MM-;;(JBT+6QO[(:FEHRZ_CR0-L8C')M]D9<.8HRK39;Q\RO% M\/A>/&:5X:OE]?JTC4HZ):.UUGI6,P5Z:9?N9-V9=T\FI9[).'3ARH)CJNEC M''^O;J3VNP6NS61,>ML?JMD<1C"@G?9M^1+'.EDX=U# M@T[DM29X93IT)YFA&71%I:998MCL%L(PL$W^E4;RD2G8;"=T5N+4A2JMFY@' MNB`C&:CK7':G$(<(=JH6.%^0"R;.QYO)L[<=F7FY;;C]0O[:O.S_`#:[CLOR M,N/RCIX;%)VE*WUT M8OQ"NKJ\9K?-]L+QS35Z*E!:7K$G6;$JTUMMGKY',)BXS3F2,*2I^U"``1Q`!_0;@?77B[X^8 M_97R'QF/%\UM6)T=,ER6N,]MM4='5R3!)D/LJ%=W>-_>[R(?ZY`CL25><) M"N@L@"JR`K(J)`NW,!%T14(8GM1.8IRE63[]RB("`"`?@>IVPY*5W(W'U'U_ MZ-:HQ2>J592JN%8'BPW4['?9AN-P?H1N/'ZZIWJ7T@<3*/+*3-7TGE;$.W5A M1M,J5AO$BP0GIU-R1VI(SI(^#:&E';M4O9954PJJ`8>YOSWZJ"DZ3Q2AE]U+ M4W5',G-MJH@,V^^[;*.1/ZD^3^^OHQD'^9_W_E%O%MOEEP&HIXZ,TL7LL49B4Q(^.FH(N#G.?^TQS",\.*VJ2Y5URJ/;,;C`L, MT3N6A**O#98_HO)?ZMCYW)_76IL??F>TF$XKA-G_``+>N&W6:XVZNI:=8;DM M5+.:D/-6`EIA#*=X`RCUA57R%`"Y8#]5W%WCOIE4U*LN=E#_`$[CQN2Q_7Z^=7+VU\\.].X<)K\%O:8];:"]20R7 MBHM=LAH:R]/3D&(W.HC),_%@&XHL2G8*04W0L[EO&7-]\DY> MFS&C.9J53D&!5J'#/H*NM*\U*R;*13!O'R!RG3,HMYB4OY`"@'4FM>-6VT7> MOO=+[#77)XVF+-N/[2E4"#8<0`?IN?TU1^=]W9KV'UYB76%^_#7%<+IZR&W+ M#$8Y"*Z9)ZAZAB["61I(P0P5-@6\$DG6%F'%;+0U3&RCH/)%6F+:,$ MI,)/8(#T2,PW80\>W;KA;,6M=IOE?D%)[/Y"X MF/W(V''P?/D[Z].<=\YUV#U9B73]_\`PO\`A'"UK!;O5"4GVKI% MEG]\A=A+]R#ALB<1N#O]=97(#C#F?)5;'%]'-8RJ89L=2W.CC7I_'EX. MZ^?(\;_OKHZC[PS;I6/(XL,%$4RG'*NR5OY$1E_[%6\/=Z=G3US?8.$AY!?/ MVG2OS?U8\4)B/Y=12D9>&2/-6RP%HV=>.M"+9T20KMV=:(U0IIS1"J==CWEK M>J.'21B./<`@3N!2E`(W-U=BDT5VB*SJ+U(CU!#['=)#*!']OV`R$EAYW^GZ M:NNW?/'OZW5W7M>D]KEDZRHJBELRR4I93'442V]FK![0:B1*5%CB8&/@=VV) M8D\#]@*EFL%'75GLEK.G4F/73R:WV!X#L\4\>Q#J,D7@&0!-0 MYQ.%84W3.-4D(IJ6MO45.O\`2B5C*HW.YV4*`-R23L!Y.^MZKU_F7=W9%1"DL3L"Q)^YO.V^H%US\[NX M>L\#?K6UVK#+CB#7FLNBP7*SI6I%55TKRRF%'F6.)$,CI`JIO%$?6&*_6P#A M+FG"7$LVL%%XROHHL;*6A\O?Y6RV!U)7ZUVYHH9DL^M\K.JIRCM9,.X-DR%2 M:)IG,=%,OM4,>1XSB=CQ&C>CLD1197+R.[%Y)'/^L[MN6/[#P!YV`W.]+]X_ M(/M+Y$Y)3Y+V?71U$M#2K34=-!#'2T5%3KY]-+30A8XE)`+,>4C[*'=@B!8G MU+A_D^/XSSIL]*<_M+9R,0NFQ2\I8+!!*LZOH["&L"]1E*"R<-$@B'<._F%7 M"9C**=_`A"F'OX#SLN,6RPUU?<:#V_D7*H]TW)N0Y_=_0-AQ'W'QY_TZZ.S. M],Y[9Q7$<.RS\'^'PJS_`,9;?1"8I/QO[0_[0YD?VR?V4^\",?4\=SOI!?II M?L*_)0-77O%7N:'\3D9E[9$Z?<:[)69[,K"HRL\G-:,9%V^44G$7C9`D6A7][T&[86LUDM3HL>Q/K&>QIBNHB_5%ZV6^&2<,R)\2 M/N1FARN"=S&?N&+:^ MSB?W"B%HSS&8F;9,ZQ7I*MQ;E9\O*R2J[E!@<4DFQUNP@TU[;59',22B^WN'AZ_P#5Y?V_UZ::HD^P M-]]@G'[:,'3H7/\`FF%-Y9\I8_(JW3@X_9*LCC=>N$HF:-,UF9!M)25V_C;1 MV5$`-F()DX`[ M>>);;6VG[)RTV#9YC1E*%;1/W%0-]:X8_\?Y/F-?,CS[X^V/&^O\`KO&J:W"N MI+C>ZAX*9:CWK)7&NK(2?2BP235(=D]:(!"LKL$.WT3[1)AOO/NX56`\E06*CZ['QK'X=\%\TS&6K:/, M^N:"VID$UEH*FKO8CAO-?"P0K:PE/)+/"[D)',\<22L1Z^:D,=O<_M)XS5%C MQO?L8[7=`#E?2+!=<589MG#RV3EC_CR#$5JHK7F[]O.MK:^?ORLT4`;G;)N" M*"Y<(()F6#MK.S\:I$MTB+5U'\K`\E.(83(S\`/LX`AA(2>(&Q`(/)E4;ZQV M-_!3NW(:K,Z6JFQZT'`;I3T5YDN-Q2D@I_R&?:J%0T;0-2)'&9G?V+(T;((8 MI97$9\*U]J/&.9X_[#R#L#34L[C<&O".9ZCFMYHJL;K==T%\^9Q<14_XDPD9 M-!U*34D]!!`"NP33435^09`$5!+QINT<9FL%9?Z@55/'03^F>&6+:=)20JQ^ ML%@68G8?=L"#R*[';MO7P/[PMO;F.=16B2Q7BMRNUFY6RY4-<)+344"(\LU7 M^7)'&RQ0QH7?>+DRM'Z1*9$#=[C_`#VH&G/-(B;5CW)+`9W+J`[U.>AMRR"4 MKJTEGS$JAW-AK#ZMO;;$SYTBD[?!1I2I2DE@!WW][Q_CJNS22H'CY1]B_VA8SL.LYKD3S)>2N/2NW M,9^2PZS;5DYJ53]<8UJ*/-RBU/E4YV5<'[1!0<)_)0;E.DHEW,4ZR)%/!9NS MK-=[K36EZ2Y4I@]<3>MN3'^GR-P/!'ZL`9?V5\&>R>NNO[UV% M39!A61T&,2P1WNFLUU_-J[2]3*(8A5Q&")1_=/K;UR2$,LG@K%(RGDQF6Y.1&5/'_'6-T@[XD<>`<7A*3_`&*J"#LX%.[1CE6W M82G*QF\18U+=$CR&2W!#()UHC%ZPS(-Q$]0LGU5E61600%3 M_LOT+0N3OV%X9,4K5,XI&"YG-FS:[16-IR3W.)*FY_>;%:[_`*:M-6(8Y9Y; M'L<@YI3(XH,)QBV2[^L5E%!P-)V3<+ADV06.:&JIZ*@IF],BT^YA,<4KO+-R M?;=R`:93LLB@?3#&EQCK*^AIZ M6@MHAI_8$I4DDCO,PYST4\DFW,1H@F>E_8QF&3<5.)MJOUIV'DKK'(:M*_\` MIQ7:/D,4CN6RO8Q5P,O/$RNK3CBMUIO'D,D5QXR7H*`@*9E!!0"YFC[#MEJQ M:U55?+67*ZW"/^RD5.OY-05WY-Z$8H@'C?[]OVW\[5KDOPWSCL#OKL"PXE08 MYA6`X?6C^1J*V[2FR6=)0OI@-TJH%J:EI"&,>]/S)W#A!P+=\W^T_C*KQNUW MDJZ8ZI$Q.!V:$INS97-TA.$VK.K/8+#&UN-BK#29>99-D3*OI,#@J1\=$4T5 MP`XK(*I%]Z]HXT<=U($3F^" M'=T?=&/=*P2V&HN&64,]99[I!6F:S7"FIZ>2IDEIZV*%V.R1$<#`'#/$2HCE M21MYBWV2XAMFZPG']A2=TSVUWBEOM$R6:UG+Y"AUC8J5'(K.W-BSYQ)/3S+N M./'MEG2)WK)E[FZ)C%_/B4W?9NQ[)>KXE@C@KJ>JGA,L#3PF)*B,>2\1)Y$; M`L.2KN`3K%]E_"[L_K+JNJ[;J[GBMWL-KN26^ZPVJYQUU3:*V0A%IZ]8T$*2 M"1DB<0S3<)'53XW(CG[1.0NP^.[.R"[V!+,;3,8357JG@E^U6Y1/RY M+]RMMOL/(V;]CJ9?!CJ#KKMRJ[)C[#MRW%+%UG=KI0[RSQ>BNIC`(9QZ)8N9 M3FVR25?-?GOEF4Y3FE^M=JOC6^CML\2QI^- M#,")%8[$L`P`*_NQ._\`AK8.\VKXE="_&;J?.\^ZMBR[),VME=+6U/\`.7.W M2(U'/$A=(X7DA9W2<;`)$JF,>#R)#L_6?RLU?D51]JH/()"O#OO%[;+5AVDS M=3:?KZ[<58%=1.*M["-*5-*-/*"VK3)MHB);+H+"9-1PL!` M,5`QL!VWGESQRWO;,7.]^$/OED`5A34X=4YL&!7E*["-`0?!9MOZ3JV_\O#X MFX/W-F%-G7>RE>IWN1M5OI&>:)KY>7IY:@TL3PLDP@H:6.2KJI(W0!EACY$& M51%/V*\[MBQR6X*9M0^0[7C\]V3,K1HFQ:>KC2&VO6S"-I];1U_#GXJ]<]C6_M3-,JP^3+J7&[W2V^T6P7AK*C225=2M3RN M$E1!$H@IOQV_ONY;^A%:21=,OGG)'D9&\(Z?HV06N%^RG6]+NDY`4[2:?6H/ M%<_K48=,=-UOR=N.&]B4%3TK MU]9+9!/66ZKJ9[S7U,BO"II[7,!(*JHN`F#T[JTE-%$DDV[JA0YWUM0>P__`*R3V@7Z380\,@C!4[0[=&LRIQT#'1;$QVL3&HM6J*#? MWN5`(0`46.'ESZYRRHK.N(\IRJI#.GY#2RD*HXQRR`>%"CPH"J`-R=AY)UY? MFC\?+-C?S2K.A>@[*\-+4_P\%!01R33,9ZRWTDCDR3R2OLTLCRRN\GKC7DQ* M1KX7_@CS[Y`;/MW/6V;ZQ=4')\NR7-=KR?)9:-@F4C0LSL]8M5SA9*P23-FG M,N)^V49@PDWZ;QRH1NLX,5(B)``@8#!L\O\`>;U?:N_*8+52TD-3!`P4&*%T M>12Y`Y%I(@KL&)V)\!1XU;GRJ^)G4?6O6/5%@ZFECNV?7W(+E9KK=8I)WCKK ME35-+1S1T\;N85@I:Z2>F@:&-3(D8,C2,2Q73ZT><'(/DYJ6+AJ/V,4M6>MB MEDGY[BE(\8&50>V6(C#6-`M MZVS;(,FNE%_)Y%"9Y>;M0FB$9=5YCA'4<%5V``<\"2!N/.S:N+YL?%_J+H_! M,E."]-W-;5;Q30093'DSU:4TLOX[?D5=F%3//3Q.[R4Z&J1(V8K(.`>(&4]- MY`\_\&Y:8-6;QR/RR\Z+OG()C7VO!"B4&+>UVO<7)F6FV:>H!K;^(AK>TGH% MK7G(JJ.Q(15P0QBE61150#*7*_Y[8LKH*:MN-+/<:^X!!;(HE*)1,S#W>\JL M@90AW+;;G?\`J`*Z@F$=1_$GM;X_Y7>\7PR_6O#L3Q%ZALYKJ^5*BHR>&*!S M;/XF.::D>"=JB,*L08K&5!,4DDVRWPU1I,&Z0G6ALJDHX1B$57!4O%9-=+W=N=@W: MP0-:L5.USA$] M^QA\'N4E;06*W-+-!)>;A2TDU76SJT#QS?AVVGA?G(K+&]6\<1?>-XI/'[&. M5VZY=R'SW,3I0VWN\L@]-4U3:("7.T6R?PFX^2;1"<=#N&; MXR*":3AR5<4P%0ZR!"<>P\JOELR&GMG\FMDL;6YYUJ3`LWOJ%;8P?<"%V4JV MP`)WV\DJ!V?#CH/JO.>GKOG`P:;L_M.#,J>V365+I/;1:[-/$'6Z[PR1M*9) MEF@#NS1QE`Q"+'*S60\!=9U[=>'N#:WNT"VKNHWJF%FK"T:,RQK>1;'E)%O7 M;.G&$,9.-"WUE!G*"@3Q32%YV(4A/$A;&P.[7>^8A07:^1B.YSP\G`&P(Y$( M_']/8@5]OH.7@`>-:8_++K_KSJSY%97U]U75O68-:KEZ:=WG=F9MV+@=2[6NVL%7\'-_3^O^/]/^?_`&=--4U0%FC9+FUR M:W&=6B9AG@]73AH5P_\`T;$(@C9!DR:1[MX"3R=;P3:;E%7!Y!,Y$RE!8ATC M@7N#34F0V=0&67:5M.+R%:E^0B?'H_\1NF>4>TUNIZ)X(WYK M45KI((NX>.61.115(Q4E2E*9'IIK%C[-88GC[JKLLG%/--T7(M3O]SF(0\:1 M:)E;)795SGB3F:C&[4KEH2`545C7"_\`U`(@0J@%.7\--+OI+XI7^,XEFN1T M6ZZQ;,NJP3>AWT1"/SVF#%($!P\EJPNQLZ\O+`@FHD7YR:JH."@F('$.[34] M\-\@R>5?:56Y5PWNKZEWFQQ?\,LMBL5OCT%H489%9`C&YOI@Q86.FC*E2*F4.=\X4%!J7OXB(E\6FO7C,*V;Z18T(ZGPT))26/ M9_=++$5N-1BHRT`K;+C4F]J?`H=Q*+6>9J$+'.E"NE%_24OK*<2@'336NU/% MV-\BN4/'6&A(*R-7T8WUC$X*PW.UU6H,I5X#R-FV<],U5>/DX6G1=@_5]BGM<8DBH;M%/,2ZKQC4C=AR(Y;?LNY_PUO#\/.Z.NNI M<2[7M6=ULE)6Y1U]6VNW*L$\WNK9E<1Q,84<0AB1O)*4C&^Y;QK9^NO9:?6V4OG/'ZR;A*:E,.9N$8+U]*X4V$BJLLUB)!ZWDYH[F48G#_`*-) M8R`D`QP*`@/79E6.W6Z9KCUXHXU>W4$E2T[%E!3V1JJ$*2&;=A_J@[?4Z\?0 M7XNM\BK9:?,LNHK)%:X5@FD6H-)632U2M-&C10A8G'^^9`X)522" M-)YS?XNP$BPF M]1<&L*BC]N'QY!)5'U-C`"9C`VB&;8QF=ZR.L0T\E?CT]($I5%:::"FEX;.\ M\2$-,>>[#PX(V4^-^.Q?Q@[T^,_673&-U"7BDQ/N&U9#)4WZ9\8COETO-"*G MV4]-:;A/&\-L44X6"3^Y3LK^R=27"^_`XX\&>3=&OGU#V"WYZPB(_B;F'(ZI M[><;G3)%6K2UXC9R.J(L$XV:>&L2I>(2A>Y\)R(T^41M14=2MRN*RPQ5#GUS1*23]T3AXI!X,98KLP&^P\C&4WR? MZ;CO/1-7%D^2V67"<.GM]SKK13+^7;ZV555!ZJZGDIZ^D8;S7&F[4S+\5UKDU"\C&!>1,F=0U4O535A(]Y M#T6NUU$@(ING8.'YE/$YR+(JF10Q>,8;G-LEN$EE2HL]N>VR1PT\]8M6/RV_ MHECX@K$B?0,V[;^2""0LZ[U^2OQ6SJWXC2=F55H[&S.FS:BK+G>;5C4V/2'' MXP/RJ&J$\B35U14$EVBB,<`7=5:.1%DEX_!."_,0O*#@OO&B\?K9793%Y.VL M.1FE:;R[2W;0M&GK'15ZXXO\/#2=E?051HC:74469QD0?]A_U9RJ-S$0165\ MEAP?+_\`B:QWVXT$LMMMQ,V.WVZ"GKEJ%H)IHJ9)ZNN:(*DM35K^/ M_:4I,&EDC28N.>+?9[Q`HBW#;%<;QZ6I;/ MQXPDK'WR2O"21SE`4%R)$,<2)F,"9'0Y?';-V9B-",W+"L\O/LMDH#'XFX8_S=PUE$U; M4DM)JT*K5K;3I<). M8G'ZO?7!R%SC+ZMI^R<4<5N.,Z]QYE]$KE8=2\%<#3YOV=%T%921IR$]%A.+ M^XQU3$6+Z2$]A?84,5285E]@I\+5124]12-*B%EDY_=%+YC#+R. M^Y\^`-_(U/L@^3GQS[D$`]5=;P(Z MQH)?0G`*H*'V,W`\&UR^E?7WS#V3CA]DFBVC/JG6^1_.FW8,]K6`P-^K\A%4 M2G8S;8!9DE.WYXO$U.1MCZ$2<+.E$5`04,W`Q3`HY,@EY;E@&7WC'6XC.X5\NOCIUQW-TOAUCN]PK>F M>K+??4J;]/05$.,^Q3//W@ M/ND9662N887AVM4K29L9^"07@;#:J(\A(-DUA5'Q):73(JH"[\FW/C=00/UUJ5B_=G7-M^)7 M;/5E;72KG&591::VW0^B=EGIZ6N2>=VF"&*(K&"W&5T=CX4$G61]FO&O8.2# M+AXCD5<:6)3).963:]>@=3T'`_J:'549LDU+(C./V`22S4SU/LV;>URIW_L3 M-V'MR[*QN[Y&EH%IC$AI+Q!42[LJ\8DYL-P;>23C&NWW.-QI3J]G'V*\8^9 MW.C7<5XATS;Z/R>!$,J9!2;!%XO!N59&9=I/'4ZH*J*B;1 M8A6P>(C[.X16GMW8>,YE?+M9;1#6T-SFB9'>JBBXB-6`)4[L=RQW!"GQX^NK M^O&9_#GO#XV=6=>]F=AW+%\HP>V5L533T]@KKA[7K)XI&19U$<*%%@7BZM*A M,GW`<-BZ7UO<2M(XT4C8[ENDO7);?N36S6C<=40IZCA>J5E_85CJQU0@WCI- M->0;P_R'"IUA#Q!5T9(AE$TBK*3+KK$[CC=%65E\>-[]8>F81R&UZ>T7DE(U^;F\.>OZ-"42 M[$@9N+3KU0F++-D9O$JY28,%CQJ2KQ(B?QR$#N(]AA.<=3W2X07>Y6*X5$:[\`6`&P&MHOBU_F"X'A]UZZPGM7#\=I,.PN&HAA MO:1ULU=1&>&4U%7#30%T-16S\!4,L+,WL9CX'B?I"@_81Q<@N,SG'Z?3N:\5 M1LKF*9J,'IEAI.>;TWM4O(/)2+?UW6GZ"D`--KS:00B3,$4S*':1A3&%VT];<+$U+%&D4J5%JC83_F5#1R50G=@HEJ2H]2 MQ>N66OK?XI:9QAXSWNL:J-?:ZAL>IZAM5EI]1>%=U&@R>AI,6S2D0#T`(U7: MQ3.)1%51(/05=4Y$SJ)IE5/ENNL5N6,XU/373UBYUE5-4O'&=XXFEV`C4_0A M0HW(\;D@$@`FOOF=WYA/>/=MJOF!?F28-CEAMEFIJNK3A5U\5O+L];.GEE:5 MY7XJ_P#<**K.J.[1JIV`_6%H-X^KG)^%_(6TV?"[95]5L>AV9.@2M2MII!%O MHMWM%9A)1=):8K4O#.33C&2,B)E/!VS0\R@8@E"*6'K.X5O6-)AN02RT-7%5 M/*_J:.3<":1T5C]R,IY*^WG9E7?R-7]VU\XL1Q?YT9!\E.H*"ARFP5UAI[?3 M&OBJZ3ULUOHJ6IFB4B&IAF403TP?9>44TO$E6!U@<>_KKY>9)S!Y<:P]Y%WB MU0MPRJM5S-K]JJM+MD/N%N4S"8KC,-IH\*NE,#6\AL3Y$K%N5)E\ULF(`7"G^8O MQY[!^.W7N`4V'6N@N=NOU347&@M8K*6:R4@N<-0_\-6S*8?R;M3HYGD+3>F1 MMRH8`CRKO'_GWR5V[A,')G!LEP.H\)KN^T.P9YDEZLO_$M!24%)99S*T\4J,*A@ M!Q6&)!O$C<1S5MAMO]"`I[+QVY\3.E>L>SO^265Y!EF0]FVM+?!;+A0U,+6B M!VE7M==@9"*S.ISSB4A&=7RYJDK?(2_)M'!T^X./BB8WJ,;Q,+[KRY!CW9. M4^O';Q247&*X)*MT1T4K#&Q90D(_NK+L=OKQ_3_U]9[J'N/X3]"FM[CZYR') M_?78C46^3!:JEJ)XY;E5P+%,]3F=HDC<^U2`SMQ.T*?[L%O'$` M#SK)_&#_`#%^N+'EN#V7M[#\M861 MW.'T4Y[,0RFU9#3WVEI(\CA%J_$9 M*F2..1'YEO=_YCJZWD"I"!AGO6^ M.7'%<0IK-=75ZU"[,%)*Q\W9Q&I/U"`[?MOOMXVUJ9\U>Z,-[^^1=\[*P&FE MI\8J5I88I)D6.>K-+314[5DZ+X62H:,N`?O]?#V`2<@'QZG6M4]:UT8"D<&$ M!,`)JB)0_J8`3,(E#_@)OZ!_SZ::IS^LR*,>Z%&50E&L01N98B+=F[9HLS*BHD4#!XF M::1YKL=G>Y/'34I?UU',9#XRTK] M;;S#)PW/\H\H_,BH("4"F::8[!F&\/96#1JV09'9+&2H0#&;U6ZW.Q14D5&! M;J1[./\`BP=5G6K1HS(43-$2"JH"I@.?L8`\6FDW5Y90/"*(T/4-/U;)&&F' MT&TTEKF;5Y8D;"5*;UV)CIYO4XN000:W%I#LWQWSB35%!P(""AT0!,2"TU-U M,^P;BAH"LS1:)NL(VJ#6*C[[8EGD5`*1,)*SE[E)M.$>O&+YH4[]VZBUC)@) MB"=)82]_,?(&FG&JS'17SF_V#,(2D;14;ZY=RD-.AHC:O1MWK]Q%$;7'RU8. MS610&O)`5LDX!][G'E_FFE=T;4[-D$MN>JNJ+<",ZG15\/3BHE2.D;` MBPK<>RG(.3$7;Y-J[(U5M3EA&+%,D19R8J*H"LD8ZSR<8!G+[VIN`0.L9(I2&$53-- M62T3!<;S$T03,\XJN;MX@ZIF\?08Q&H1+D[EJ#)=:8B(,&<9.NCMRE+[WB2R MX>("!P'IIJJ_+;'/K9+R=,O'"*#3DWFT6RCG#MFI"$:FY%4V+6=,&)A+&MF2 MC)R9=10JYU3F*(F3*<"E%IIUN3'V&\<>+-TA)II0G^TRKX4?MR()^H!&MHND_A_W-WMC53G&,Q6NV8!25(IWNEWKH;;0 MM4D`^B*68\II!N.7J1E0D*[*Q`U*_&/E?AO+_/U]'PNW?R2&CI=Q7;%&2$<^ M@;14K$T(FJX@[1795%O(Q3\J2I3D$Q3(KD'R24.4!$,KC.563+J`W&QS>R%7 M*.I!5XW'U5T;8J?^HCR"=0+O#H+M'X[Y9:UHEYC"[8:M(Q4U78!Y+3)7UFF2UQ",>P*9DWC. M3BY[S9OD3?WMG")RCW$OYP-5GN-TN+19BTKO8Y>'%D4LV[MP"E?J"K;JP_0@ MC5K6/XE=U7WOFM^-T5#3TW:5O%298:B=(H2E-#^0TJ3G='CE@XS0./$D;JPV MW\.@0P'(4Y?])RE,'^'X,`"'_8/4S!W&^M:F4JQ4_4';7ZZ:_-0#R3Y+9;Q0 MS4^L;`[L#*GISL57#+UJL3-MD@DYD'(L2_J8)J[>_',#0_FKX^!/P`CW$.^! MR/)+7BMM_E;N9%H_8J;HC2'DV^WVJ"=O'U^FK:Z6Z4SOOW-1@'74=)+D1I9: M@+4U,-)'ZX>/,^V=D3E]XV7?D?.P\'2V\=?M(X@\HM`FZAR@)>X@/8H]1O'NS\1R>O>VVN M6;\F.%I6]D3QJL:[!F+.``!N/KJZ.XO@K\A^B\1ILVSNWV[^$K+G#;X/Q*^E MK99:N<2-%#'#3N\CLPC;PH)!V&WD:_.,_:7P^WC4X[):%;[;^]M#>TN*1(Y_7OS]+L`'X@$[>-]O&^OWLGX)_(KJG!)NP,LMUO\`XJA>E6XP M4UPI:FLM)K>(IOY*FAD9Z82ET4-]X4L.94>=0JV^\?@"YDHN)+:M72>S4LQ@ MXQ-SB.C-@=RLDX*U9,DA6A"B=PX6-V*0`$X]A[!^.L,O=N!-(L0EJ@[N%&]- M,-V)V`_I^IU9DW^5W\M8**>X&@L#4U-3O/(5O5N;A%&O)W.TQV51]2?`_?4T M[#]IO#G#=;F<=O=VLQ9FGR->A])MD!0[18\XRF7M1R$@8W1KM%,'$37GCT5" M^1>ZP("(E6%,Q%"DS-W[0P^R79[1732^Z%D6:1(G>&!G_I$TB@JA/_3M^NQ! MVK3KKX(_(WM'KZF[&Q6V4)MMQAJ)K=2SUU-3W&Z14H)GDMU%+(LM0B;'8_9S M&QC#JR%K#D%T'2"+ELLDX;.$DUV[A!0BR"Z"Q`426153$R:J2J9@,4Q1$#`/ M<.K!5E90RD%2-P1]"-:?RQ2P2M!.K),C%65@0RL#L00?((/@@^0?!UZ]?NNO M1TTT=--'331TTT=--'331TTT=--'331TTUK'0>8+$_Q,4Q!'L/8OL*)`$1#\ M@'7CH8(O4YN35;R:4?52L_*U2$/>Q9)U^6_^VF4!::GGF!K&57[!]LC*;<*W?9W"KA0WFD5NO3<>[=T M^3@K?"RBK6T^WWQD.BP02.LZ5?E%JU22.HL)/6(E::JLTAS*4'EM5-13>:Q3 M**;723313-JR.QU[:,OY&0=7?QD5"61JL]G\,--ZA7`1='?`WB7Z:`JMS$`Z MH=--2KM/)6(XW[SD],)0],D`RG'Z-$.7,O;(-]!0["+FEVQ9J?B:RD:'CXNTHQU>5*J M\E4?-D@F)"$*=T<.FFH3Y/M-$J?'ZDN]`N+FQ6^Q6YB:VG9N8]9"5-<+C&(Q ML>TJ#TQY"Y`O&_*2BA3;/7`'8H*I%%4`+TTTW6$U"6@+?Q@C9,83V-8;5-'> M,4*:EF8-4)MRBS7D5:U:%)"?X&)Y=P'\=_P`=--4&YH>6;<,. M2%_6.M\.1W#/;`S(#A\B[_7MN1]0EE9`9U2-%-Z4S!,X^E-D"B12^HW<3>0- M-=5Q;N5,R7[<_LK8;Q9*[3+_`*)#8K8G:5@O.!4.XC9B` M0/LY`'ZH?'V';ZM=ZXWDG8'^7MTI5]4T59:>[PT44DYI[K+4*8WJX MH59E:3>I,4DB[!:A`&'Y"!_+<^8'!Z5XN\QK5@+S4LK;O]\@LFT?6N+]6I=$ MNFR:_8Y==P5:FZO)%4K[\OF783+C%XJK" M:JE5J]8)IZ)(XI*BH=B?[VH[%? MI8L3GNMNM6355974=GM%/$JD5EJCVJ87@9H_10I&T?%[( M,V97:;=!9);V.2>@I(ICE5>K5DE[L2U,EMIUL+3*)ZW\Q::;DJK,\NVT;`/R M=5Y``@[L.(%_]TV+K//>E>KNUY;)29M=Y>V(+=-):L8&-3WRV"*>:>VTM`'$ ME5$S0"&GFF,32.CQ\(6]K-B\(+]>\.Y(<68_9V'(1I8=V@+/7J=J5#YF1_); MCGRSL!ZL200N-VH]C/99ZF)&7.1PU-VIE=,E&2TT;B5UG.\S M\C$!O#*.0??Z)OMR_P#YN\MO_P!:$_\`,]?ZV$[9_P#ZYNW_`.6_^FFOCQ_E M[_\`^S^OO_&S_P!VJ-?,9RPK]XX4<8([C61A.3_&/F="<<.16%RZSM9ZCEVN MQ!Z%,[/07;ET/F:.FT'!7[<@#_806O@!U#/5`UHRJGK<+QE<;"O)C-Y2DJZ9 MM]_1.OJ:HB)/Z,#R'_Q=MSS.OM_T%=\7^3/>4W=334M)W?UM59%CU\B"!#<[ M3**^&S5Z*OCV0LI@D)^I]_(J@I4-O&F)M.4_V./9I-X5 M4:'KJV+,)\EHJ[.>N.ROY1%PR2LKVG2KCUE,N*J#9-4A#AX(J`:V[D$RCL2Z MV3([E54%JMU'"U-'%.:<-S0-)4%@1S,;';SN`"`?"G?YY82]1T1\-1"!7D9693RE0JU_U1IE@ADE8*]2J/Q1E#$%W/E3MNS<= MSN22:"^?/1EFPOY(WZV=.V.HAQZELM!=+G14,,D]/8YJJG$E3%*T2LE+3J>, MR\RD40FX1\(U15L^N]NA\_I=OOEB6,WK])J\_;IQMQ+N9DUB@(@`F M39,CF#_+JS*VKAH**:OJ#M3P1/(Q_944LW_4#K1S&,>N.79+;L4LZA[O8LXU=27([G#ENVZ.\6;^UW+0651 MD-9(#,66!5=88$_7BL0)4#Z\O.Y`U]9\^RO$<+^=G5OQRM3\&HBJP0UNC@C`I$DB1-N+>VR1NH' M+K[6;1"3O_B>._7)1JC)0U>5`RD1*O@30W.U?V.QNY;I5QS5`V$T6-6>0124B,/OC6NK61Y^)"U%.PBD5@H MTM7VH7;!M2X^FV+DE98FPUA]7*/8+LX0J]W M(JNYAG";.5A0D"R+E1,GR2I)@;J-]HUMBNF/W.&SUU+`U#.&N%-ZA&]8ZNA2 M-Y"$D\E2%>/GS)`Y;#?5U_`_&>UL$[=P6Y=D8I?;M!E5LDBQ&^"N:LI\I2HK:>B5JFB(59HVFI:PTYIXU=O27%UKTE_'3^12-:E6XLL7N",6XDZL[ZLS6C MVCIIHZ::.FFCIIHZ::.FFCIIHZ::.FFCIIK4N"G$ZH`(&[@/8![=_P`#^`$H M?@?$W^/X$?\`X=--?/W&TN?IWV4\A\;M;X&=3Y(0T)IN>SQ8I:89L+;%H1[V M0GW$3+I?KI9U`VFO-RJME%_3Z%4TD`3,H1M-O MJ^TT/DMR1>Y4XJ^2*:GJMKG+0FW3MRZC*,?6B6N,NYBBQD<>6%!,J0++(^ON M=IJ,MDS"?:1\>2*E':VW\7T4,;TNUM8G38R=7S:9=K2>?Z8E%4[M->@Y-TFJ1K+ST?7&4FH9#R9C)QC1][2$,83+ M%3%,INWY!II:]BQ++K/ND94ZRXBVE+P(Z5ZO[V#6DDEX-L!5K*&73$@283A) M-I)^A.1=QJZ2RWPTDDU"=E0'IIJ![O#\I^3FH0):=!U2EQ%%M(V![(%M0==V&/M=W MM-35I9L-RUW4X!;7[@L[>IF0:+M$6ID3@)`*4K M345UJWZEGF6[%;[ON&([C2J=5)UC2KKC"5@B;/7KAH#&*I]>H%IS2/D9R)K$ M6VCSE=)ILUS"BZ2'NBF/Y%IJ8H[C]&Q?UN3^=-&S=&1LM.;6>4>)PC\'3NQL MYR+FV\VO#`Y"2&PD=1*:G_>BI\E,AO\`#Q!IIT-VXF\;.3:403>\7H6HJP`* M$@Y"S0J2TS$H+']J[2/G6IFLRT8N%?[U&Y%P14.'H;J?);M8HZO8SQTTQ$,K`;* M\D#GUDIPX>- MW";Q%.S0%;;(R,:A($%)\A`&6%=&MHNT#"FH2/(V M*=(PIB`D$2CQM.#XC8JXW*T6ZEIZX@CFJ`$`_4+]>`(\'AMX\?37?V#\IOD5 MVMBR85V)F-]N^*HR$TT]2QCD:,[HT^W$U+(P#*:@R$.`X/(`Z]2<'.(*>Q_^ MX%/CIE)-C_;FL/\`.BU5B$D%D,<5C68&OC^J"S&<"*PR(-_F^_\`W?;[/[NO MT81B(O'\^+=2_P`QSY^W@-^?^WM_3SW\\]N6_G??SKK;Y1?(=^N/^4;YC?SU MS^/^/^#^4_K_`!]MOQN6_M_&X_9^/[/3P^SAP^W4[Z'G=(UFE6'.=(K,5VY102^RGJ86XRPOQ*\D;8['BS+ M]/H2-<#HO&G`]M1BD+!*PZ1Q!1B>- MB%CMDQ(8/]@YB#W*(@/@N.-V&[4$5KN5)#/;X"ICC==U0HO%>/[;+X&WZ>-2 MO#>Z^V>O(8QDCQRWRAIZF6(;*SK]P'UX\AL2N_GB25W_368ZN^1?>?2 MM+5T'5>4WBQV^N;E/#33D0R/MQ]OJ8-&LW'9?*?)`8HJLY!@Y425+W#R(<0_P`>LA54M/74TE%5H)*65&1U M/T96!#*?\""0?\-0VP7V\8O?*/)<>J)*2_6^JBJ::>,[20SPNLD4J']'CD57 M4_HP!UB4JCU'.:=7L^HU>C:Q2JG#M*_7*U%(`C%0\*P1!NSC6;<1.!&J"!0* M!1$?Q_7KC14-);J..WT,:Q442!$11LJJ!L`!^P&O1DV49#F61UF79163UV37 M"I>HJ*F5N4LTTCE4J"K=MUJ7CI[2K!&-11DKG,1#9 MPSC'\VN)SBY78M7:I$_P`%!0WX_(]92CM%LM]545M%"D=75N&F=1YD900I8_ MJ0"0/].H'DG8F;Y?8;/C&37.JK=/["29/0T?-B6;=B26A*4I M"E(0H%*4`*4I0`I2E*'8"E`.P```'X#J3_3P/IJC22Q+,26)\G7]Z:_-'331 MTTT=--'331TTT=--'331TTT=--'336$I_K-_GTTU7!]B&.2\S18??LVA'DAK M&)R#*<:A#)D/-RE3*_;+3+5J41!1ZXB?25X@W`Q"&,F81\NW;III<;SH_(?> MJ%Q[@^+FCC3VO(^?%LXL56H<%'P_'BF4H&$OKEP1L4I"2S*8NCSP=LHELHV8 M_(DL@TI@LN^DJQR-R2ON#,YZ M'AK`#:(B+@^AWLR] M<9W2F6?1$(Z]XVQJ$W.)SM`L-9G:_%S^HY?!QL\_<0T;(2+J4:J&%,R3A,Z( MD::3#[`N"+52ZY)S9Q)@U5<4&VMG+BFUQZ92NVDL;(**C195V@^0&#MY69S. MJ@Z="@9;M^E6$HIMNFFFACZW7=LGL-EJ\XR51C8!\SF:=3+,ZB MF!K)=HQ?U"XDZ]+0TBFP:K+?L%WRR8HD31046!IJ8;_6+O3YB&XK8O16]N0G MZC:+5L\8A-6^\V:7;PMJT'6Y%TB[234"*7<.8YHNW7&2>*%(DD9NW3#I MIID,YQ^NVJNK9EE%+AZ[(2"3F+W37F4_-V2&@B%G`QDO4)Q%IKFN0-ASRWRE7PNS<4=GL6.5QC&3V*[[QHNGQ=$JBR MZ9X6Q73^)5Y_6[W#/(Z8(HSDW96LC:$NT_1]URHX"7R!IJ+L@XSZ#AD;-D5GL MSH=HD9J?NKC78?V%!TXD4D7#V4BU5I%P!FIVQ%?2V"1]!E">U86Z0JM-3#1< M)F9B_'KUYU_.H5)I`MYN7QG%F*#>P3,2[=*QR$Y?-`FEG%YG(QVHHHV45,FD MHJY2!1-R0WDF#32:;+J]MY%572<"X^T4:\]S!.69Z'Q5+/*8UR)>&97,B]*Y M'8?I3&34KET@7BT.=T#5T4Q),YE4G:ORNR)FFIML&B2O$;/*O"7:Z!M_)>S2 M-DC7IQ`WE*.!:.TMM&HEK*TA57R@BJ(@BA(NT^Y$R+''LTTXO%_% M9/.:Z]N5]@90KNKPD0D?\`N*4RPB'8 MY1#L/332^L(KCGR%;3U5SC9F]5J^JY;JU3Y(P,K1JZ*J&@5._QM(C7 M,O*N%JG='[@BL>J<%"H*J%!0@&`>FFH@1U]*]7-&/XH8TIIFP-'MPFHGDQ=L M\/"U.L-=&%U*3;2HRY&RK]2+,99)1D,@8K)9N;Q(H8X>(M--WQBX1MG,\<6NY%>S"U:;*.7QW39*M0P@']/[NW M_'OTTT=--'331_P_S#M_Q[]_QV_Y]_Z=--5\;?D7`33KJ@-[N.2T[5VB:OQW M]:U.L4.]`0KA;S^7&,IIFK))%DC^2@+MS^:I0*<1#N`M-0'$<%91C($=8ES] MT1!)6%7C6C!S/5VS>ELXC4"NI%DO#OFPB[,B5J*:GAZVS8I?$IA.)C--;*()% M4.10Q!::W-4XF\0*-92/]5Y)CJ-D6F6Q$&>F:U36!EK5&-4!?.D&3-XPDV=F M>%\#/2QZK,JZ($(LB