XML 35 R14.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.6.0.2
Transactions with Affiliates
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2016
Related Party Fees and Other Arrangements, Limited Liability Company (LLC) or Limited Partnership (LP) [Abstract]  
Transactions with Affiliates
5.  TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES

Affiliate transactions. Revenues from affiliates include amounts earned by WES from services provided to Anadarko as well as from the sale of residue and NGLs to Anadarko. In addition, WES purchases natural gas from an affiliate of Anadarko pursuant to gas purchase agreements. Operation and maintenance expense includes amounts accrued for or paid to affiliates for the operation of WES assets, whether in providing services to affiliates or to third parties, including field labor, measurement and analysis, and other disbursements. A portion of general and administrative expenses is paid by Anadarko, which results in affiliate transactions pursuant to the reimbursement provisions of the omnibus agreements of WES and WGP. Affiliate expenses do not bear a direct relationship to affiliate revenues, and third-party expenses do not bear a direct relationship to third-party revenues. See Note 2 for further information related to contributions of assets to WES by Anadarko.

Cash management. Anadarko operates a cash management system whereby excess cash from most of its subsidiaries’ separate bank accounts is generally swept to centralized accounts. Prior to the acquisition of WES assets, third-party sales and purchases related to such assets were received or paid in cash by Anadarko within its centralized cash management system. The outstanding affiliate balances were entirely settled through an adjustment to net investment by Anadarko in connection with the acquisition of WES assets. Subsequent to the acquisition of WES assets from Anadarko, transactions related to such assets are cash-settled directly with third parties and with Anadarko affiliates. Chipeta cash settles its transactions directly with third parties and Anadarko, as well as with the other subsidiaries of WES.

Note receivable - Anadarko and Deferred purchase price obligation - Anadarko. Concurrently with the closing of WES’s May 2008 initial public offering, WES loaned $260.0 million to Anadarko in exchange for a 30-year note bearing interest at a fixed annual rate of 6.50%, payable quarterly. The fair value of the note receivable from Anadarko was $313.3 million and $252.3 million at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The fair value of the note reflects consideration of credit risk and any premium or discount for the differential between the stated interest rate and quarter-end market interest rate, based on quoted market prices of similar debt instruments. Accordingly, the fair value of the note receivable from Anadarko is measured using Level 2 inputs.
The consideration to be paid by WES to Anadarko for the March 2015 acquisition of DBJV consists of a cash payment due on March 31, 2020. See Note 2 and Note 12.

WGP working capital facility. On November 1, 2012, WGP entered into a $30.0 million working capital facility (the “WGP WCF”) with Anadarko as the lender. The WGP WCF is available exclusively to fund WGP’s working capital borrowings. Borrowings under the WGP WCF will mature on November 1, 2017, and bear interest at the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus 1.50%. See Note 12.

Commodity price swap agreements. WES has commodity price swap agreements with Anadarko to mitigate exposure to a majority of the commodity price risk inherent in its percent-of-proceeds and keep-whole contracts. Notional volumes for each of the commodity price swap agreements are not specifically defined. Instead, the commodity price swap agreements apply to the actual volume of natural gas, condensate and NGLs purchased and sold. The commodity price swap agreements do not satisfy the definition of a derivative financial instrument and, therefore, are not required to be measured at fair value.
5.  TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES (CONTINUED)

The following table summarizes gains and losses upon settlement of commodity price swap agreements recognized in the consolidated statements of operations:
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
thousands
 
2016
 
2015
 
2014
Gains (losses) on commodity price swap agreements related to sales: (1)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Natural gas sales
 
$
11,116

 
$
45,978

 
$
9,494

Natural gas liquids sales
 
59,918

 
145,258

 
113,866

Total
 
71,034

 
191,236

 
123,360

Losses on commodity price swap agreements related to purchases (2)
 
(42,577
)
 
(124,944
)
 
(68,492
)
Net gains (losses) on commodity price swap agreements
 
$
28,457

 
$
66,292

 
$
54,868

                                                                                                                                                                                    
(1) 
Reported in affiliate Natural gas and natural gas liquids sales in the consolidated statements of operations in the period in which the related sale is recorded.
(2) 
Reported in Cost of product in the consolidated statements of operations in the period in which the related purchase is recorded.

Swap extensions - DJ Basin complex, Hugoton system and MGR assets. On June 25, 2015, WES extended its commodity price swap agreements with Anadarko for the DJ Basin complex from July 1, 2015, through December 31, 2015, and for the Hugoton system from October 1, 2015, through December 31, 2015. On December 8, 2015, the commodity price swap agreements with Anadarko for the DJ Basin complex and Hugoton system were further extended from January 1, 2016, through December 31, 2016. On December 1, 2016, the commodity price swap agreements with Anadarko for the DJ Basin complex and the MGR assets were extended from January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017.
Revenues or costs attributable to volumes settled during the respective extension period, at the applicable market price in the tables below, are recognized in the consolidated statements of operations. WES also records a capital contribution from Anadarko in its consolidated statements of equity and partners’ capital for the amount by which the swap price exceeds the applicable market price in the tables below. For the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, the capital contributions from Anadarko were $45.8 million and $18.4 million, respectively, attributable to the commodity price swap agreements for the DJ Basin complex and the Hugoton system. The tables below summarize the swap prices for the extension periods compared to the forward market prices as of the various agreement dates.
 
 
DJ Basin Complex
per barrel except natural gas
 
2015 - 2017 Swap Prices
 
 2015 Market Prices (1)
 
2016 Market Prices (1)
 
2017 Market Prices (1)
Ethane
 
$
18.41

 
$
1.96

 
$
0.60

 
$
5.09

Propane
 
47.08

 
13.10

 
10.98

 
18.85

Isobutane
 
62.09

 
19.75

 
17.23

 
26.83

Normal butane
 
54.62

 
18.99

 
16.86

 
26.20

Natural gasoline
 
72.88

 
52.59

 
26.15

 
41.84

Condensate
 
76.47

 
52.59

 
34.65

 
45.40

Natural gas (per MMBtu)
 
5.96

 
2.75

 
2.11

 
3.05

 
 
Hugoton System (2)
per barrel except natural gas
 
2015 - 2016 Swap Prices
 
 2015 Market Prices (1)
 
2016 Market Prices (1)
Condensate
 
$
78.61

 
$
32.56

 
$
18.81

Natural gas (per MMBtu)
 
5.50

 
2.74

 
2.12

5.  TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES (CONTINUED)
 
 
MGR Assets
per barrel except natural gas
 
2015 Swap Prices
 
2016 - 2017 Swap Prices
 
2017 Market Prices (1)
Ethane
 
$
23.41

 
$
23.11

 
$
4.08

Propane
 
52.99

 
52.90

 
19.24

Isobutane
 
74.02

 
73.89

 
25.79

Normal butane
 
65.04

 
64.93

 
25.16

Natural gasoline
 
81.82

 
81.68

 
45.01

Condensate
 
81.82

 
81.68

 
53.55

Natural gas (per MMBtu)
 
4.66

 
4.87

 
3.05

                                                                                                                                                                                    
(1) 
Represents the New York Mercantile Exchange forward strip price as of June 25, 2015, December 8, 2015 and December 1, 2016, for the 2015 Market Prices, 2016 Market Prices and 2017 Market Prices, respectively, adjusted for product specification, location, basis and, in the case of NGLs, transportation and fractionation costs.
(2) 
The Hugoton system was sold in October 2016. See Note 2.

Gathering and processing agreements. WES has significant gathering and processing arrangements with affiliates of Anadarko on a majority of its systems. WES’s natural gas gathering, treating and transportation throughput (excluding equity investment throughput) attributable to production owned or controlled by Anadarko was 37%, 53% and 56% for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. WES’s natural gas processing throughput (excluding equity investment throughput) attributable to production owned or controlled by Anadarko was 54%, 51% and 57% for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. WES’s crude/NGL gathering, treating and transportation throughput (excluding equity investment throughput) attributable to production owned or controlled by Anadarko was 65% for the year ended December 31, 2016, and 100% for each of the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014. Prior to January 1, 2016, Springfield’s contracts were with a subsidiary of Anadarko who contracted with third parties. Effective January 1, 2016, Springfield’s contracts are with both a subsidiary of Anadarko and third parties directly.

Commodity purchase and sale agreements. WES sells a significant amount of its natural gas, condensate and NGLs to Anadarko Energy Services Company (“AESC”), Anadarko’s marketing affiliate. In addition, WES purchases natural gas, condensate and NGLs from AESC pursuant to purchase agreements. WES’s purchase and sale agreements with AESC are generally one-year contracts, subject to annual renewal.

Acquisitions from Anadarko. On March 14, 2016, WES acquired Springfield from Anadarko, and on March 2, 2015, WES acquired DBJV from Anadarko. See Note 2 for further information on these acquisitions.

Omnibus agreements. Pursuant to the omnibus agreements discussed below, Anadarko performs centralized corporate functions for WGP and WES such as legal; accounting; treasury; cash management; investor relations; insurance administration and claims processing; risk management; health, safety and environmental; information technology; human resources; credit; payroll; internal audit; tax; marketing; and midstream administration. Anadarko, in accordance with WES’s partnership agreement and the omnibus agreement between Anadarko and WES GP that governs certain reimbursement and indemnification matters (the “WES omnibus agreement”), determines, in its reasonable discretion, amounts to be reimbursed by WES in exchange for services provided under the WES omnibus agreement. See Summary of affiliate transactions below.

WGP omnibus agreement. In connection with WGP’s IPO in December 2012, WGP entered into an omnibus agreement with WGP GP and Anadarko that governs the following: (i) WGP’s obligation to reimburse Anadarko for expenses incurred or payments made on WGP’s behalf in conjunction with Anadarko’s provision of general and administrative services to WGP, including public company expenses and general and administrative expenses; (ii) WGP’s obligation to pay Anadarko, in quarterly installments, an administrative services fee of $250,000 per year (subject to an annual increase as described in the agreement); and (iii) WGP’s obligation to reimburse Anadarko for all insurance coverage expenses it incurs or payments it makes on WGP’s behalf.
5.  TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES (CONTINUED)

The following table summarizes the amounts WGP reimbursed to Anadarko, separate from, and in addition to, those reimbursed by WES:
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
thousands
 
2016
 
2015
 
2014
General and administrative expenses
 
$
258

 
$
256

 
$
254

Public company expenses
 
2,449

 
1,997

 
1,986

Total reimbursement
 
$
2,707

 
$
2,253

 
$
2,240


WES omnibus agreement. In connection with WES’s IPO in 2008, WES entered into the WES omnibus agreement with Anadarko and WES GP, which governs its relationship regarding certain reimbursement and indemnification matters.
The following table summarizes the amounts WES reimbursed to Anadarko:
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
thousands
 
2016
 
2015
 
2014
General and administrative expenses
 
$
29,360

 
$
22,896

 
$
20,249

Public company expenses
 
8,410

 
8,950

 
8,006

Total reimbursement
 
$
37,770

 
$
31,846

 
$
28,255



Services and secondment agreement. Pursuant to the services and secondment agreement, specified employees of Anadarko are seconded to provide operating, routine maintenance and other services with respect to the assets owned and operated by WES under the direction, supervision and control of WES GP. Pursuant to the services and secondment agreement, WES reimburses Anadarko for services provided by the seconded employees. The initial term of the services and secondment agreement extends through May 2018 and the term will automatically extend for additional twelve-month periods unless either party provides 180 days written notice of termination before the applicable twelve-month period expires. The consolidated financial statements include costs allocated by Anadarko for expenses incurred under the services and secondment agreement for periods including and subsequent to WES’s acquisition of the WES assets.

WGP tax sharing agreement. Prior to WGP’s conversion from WGR Holdings, LLC to a limited partnership in September 2012, WGP was a single-member limited liability company, required to reflect its income tax expense liability on a separate-return basis. Upon the completion of WGP’s IPO in December 2012, WGP became a partnership for U.S. federal and state income tax purposes and is therefore not subject to U.S. federal and state income taxes, except for Texas margin tax on the portion of WGP’s income apportionable to Texas. See Note 6.
In connection with WGP’s IPO in December 2012, WGP entered into a tax sharing agreement with Anadarko, pursuant to which WGP reimburses Anadarko for its estimated share of taxes from all forms of taxation, excluding taxes imposed by the United States. Taxes for which WGP reimburses Anadarko include state taxes attributable to WGP’s income which are directly borne by Anadarko on WGP’s behalf as a result of WGP’s results being included in a combined or consolidated tax return filed by Anadarko with respect to periods including and subsequent to the closing date of the IPO. Anadarko may use its tax attributes to cause its combined or consolidated group, of which WGP may be a member for this purpose, to owe no tax. Nevertheless, WGP will be required to reimburse Anadarko for the estimated share of taxes that WGP would have owed had the attributes not been available or used for WGP’s benefit, regardless of whether Anadarko pays taxes for the period.

5.  TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES (CONTINUED)

WES tax sharing agreement. Concurrently with WES’s IPO in 2008, WES entered into a tax sharing agreement, pursuant to which WES reimburses Anadarko for its estimated share of taxes from all forms of taxation, excluding taxes imposed by the United States. Taxes for which WES reimburses Anadarko include state taxes attributable to WES’s income, which are directly borne by Anadarko through its filing of a combined or consolidated tax return with respect to periods beginning on and subsequent to the acquisition of the WES assets from Anadarko. Anadarko may use its own tax attributes to reduce or eliminate the tax liability of its combined or consolidated group, which may include WES as a member. However, under this circumstance, WES nevertheless is required to reimburse Anadarko for the allocable share of taxes that would have been owed had tax attributes not been available to Anadarko.

WES long-term debt and WES RCF indemnification agreements. WES’s long-term debt is recourse to WES GP. In turn, WES GP has been indemnified by wholly owned subsidiaries of Anadarko for any claims made against WES GP under WES’s long-term debt or the WES RCF. See Note 12.

Allocation of costs. For periods prior to WES’s acquisition of the WES assets, the consolidated financial statements include costs allocated by Anadarko in the form of a management services fee, which approximated the general and administrative costs incurred by Anadarko attributable to the WES assets. This management services fee was allocated to WES based on its proportionate share of Anadarko’s assets and revenues or other contractual arrangements. Management believes these allocation methodologies are reasonable.
The employees supporting WES’s operations are employees of Anadarko. Anadarko allocates costs to WES for its share of personnel costs, including costs associated with equity-based compensation plans, non-contributory defined pension and postretirement plans and defined contribution savings plans pursuant to the WES omnibus agreement and services and secondment agreement. In general, WES’s reimbursement to Anadarko under the WES omnibus agreement or services and secondment agreement is either (i) on an actual basis for direct expenses Anadarko and WES GP incur on behalf of WES, or (ii) based on an allocation of salaries and related employee benefits between WES, WES GP and Anadarko based on estimates of time spent on each entity’s business and affairs. Most general and administrative expenses charged to WES by Anadarko are attributed to WES on an actual basis, and do not include any mark-up or subsidy component. With respect to allocated costs, management believes the allocation method employed by Anadarko is reasonable. Although it is not practicable to determine what the amount of these direct and allocated costs would be if WES were to directly obtain these services, management believes that aggregate costs charged to WES by Anadarko are reasonable.

WGP LTIP and Anadarko Incentive Plans. WGP GP awards phantom units under the WGP LTIP to its independent directors and executive officers. The phantom units awarded to the independent directors vest one year from the grant date, while awards granted to executive officers are subject to graded vesting over a three-year service period.
The following table summarizes WGP LTIP award activity for WGP GP independent directors and executive officers for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014:
 
 
2016
 
2015
 
2014
 
 
Weighted-Average Grant-Date Fair Value
 
Units
 
Weighted-Average Grant-Date Fair Value
 
Units
 
Weighted-Average Grant-Date Fair Value
 
Units
Phantom units outstanding at beginning of year
 
$
47.20

 
12,537

 
$
43.10

 
22,236

 
$
39.19

 
36,238

Vested
 
47.20

 
(12,537
)
 
44.44

 
(13,317
)
 
37.32

 
(18,400
)
Granted
 
39.78

 
5,658

 
62.21

 
3,618

 
51.19

 
4,398

Phantom units outstanding at end of year
 
39.78

 
5,658

 
47.20

 
12,537

 
43.10

 
22,236



5.  TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES (CONTINUED)

WGP LTIP and Anadarko Incentive Plans Compensation Expense. Compensation expense under the WGP LTIP is recognized over the vesting period and was $0.2 million for each of the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014. As of December 31, 2016, there was $0.1 million of unrecognized compensation expense attributable to the outstanding independent director awards under the WGP LTIP, which will be realized by WGP and is expected to be recognized in 0.3 years.
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, general and administrative expenses included $5.2 million, $3.9 million and $3.5 million, respectively, of equity-based compensation expense, allocated to WES by Anadarko, for awards granted to the executive officers of WES GP and other employees under the WGP LTIP and the Anadarko Incentive Plans. Of these amounts, $4.2 million, $3.6 million and $3.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively, are reflected as contributions to partners’ capital in the consolidated statements of equity and partners’ capital. As of December 31, 2016, $10.8 million of estimated unrecognized compensation expense attributable to the Anadarko Incentive Plans will be allocated to WES over a weighted-average period of 2.3 years.

WES LTIP. WES GP awards phantom units under the WES LTIP primarily to its independent directors, but also from time to time to its executive officers and Anadarko employees performing services for WES. The phantom units awarded to the independent directors vest one year from the grant date, while all other awards are subject to graded vesting over a three-year service period.
The following table summarizes WES LTIP award activity for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014:
 
 
2016
 
2015
 
2014
 
 
Weighted-Average Grant-Date Fair Value
 
Units
 
Weighted-Average Grant-Date Fair Value
 
Units
 
Weighted-Average Grant-Date Fair Value
 
Units
Phantom units outstanding at beginning of year
 
$
68.78

 
5,477

 
$
60.74

 
9,522

 
$
49.47

 
16,844

Vested
 
68.78

 
(5,477
)
 
60.69

 
(9,257
)
 
49.55

 
(13,122
)
Granted
 
49.30

 
7,304

 
69.10

 
5,212

 
68.14

 
5,800

Phantom units outstanding at end of year
 
49.30

 
7,304

 
68.78

 
5,477

 
60.74

 
9,522



WES LTIP Compensation Expense. Compensation expense is recognized over the vesting period and was $0.4 million, $0.5 million and $0.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. As of December 31, 2016, there was $0.1 million of unrecognized compensation expense attributable to the outstanding awards under the WES LTIP, all of which will be realized by WES, and which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 0.3 years.

Equipment purchases and sales. The following table summarizes WES’s purchases from and sales to Anadarko of pipe and equipment:
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
 
2016
 
2015
 
2014
 
2016
 
2015
 
2014
thousands
 
Purchases
 
Sales
Cash consideration
 
$
3,965

 
$
10,903

 
$
22,943

 
$
623

 
$
925

 
$
402

Net carrying value
 
(3,366
)
 
(6,318
)
 
(12,210
)
 
(605
)
 
(972
)
 
(375
)
Partners’ capital adjustment
 
$
599

 
$
4,585

 
$
10,733

 
$
18

 
$
(47
)
 
$
27


5.  TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES (CONTINUED)

Contributions in aid of construction costs from affiliates. On certain of WES’s capital projects, Anadarko is obligated to reimburse WES for all or a portion of project capital expenditures. The majority of such arrangements are associated with projects related to pipeline construction activities and production well tie-ins. The cash receipts resulting from such reimbursements are presented as “Contributions in aid of construction costs from affiliates” within the investing section of the consolidated statements of cash flows.

Summary of affiliate transactions. The following table summarizes material affiliate transactions. See Note 2 for discussion of affiliate acquisitions and related funding.
 
 
Year ended December 31,
thousands
 
2016
 
2015
 
2014
Revenues and other (1)
 
$
1,228,232

 
$
1,220,639

 
$
1,203,974

Equity income, net – affiliates (1)
 
78,717

 
71,251

 
57,836

Cost of product (1)
 
80,455

 
167,354

 
127,930

Operation and maintenance (2)
 
72,330

 
77,061

 
71,386

General and administrative (3)
 
38,873

 
34,703

 
32,055

Operating expenses
 
191,658

 
279,118

 
231,371

Interest income (4)
 
16,900

 
16,900

 
16,900

Interest expense (5)
 
(7,747
)
 
14,400

 
3

Distributions to WGP unitholders (6)
 
315,505

 
269,029

 
204,615

Distributions to WES unitholders (7)
 
5,614

 
2,235

 
1,747

Above-market component of swap extensions with Anadarko
 
45,820

 
18,449

 

(1) 
Represents amounts earned or incurred on and subsequent to the date of acquisition of WES assets, as well as amounts earned or incurred by Anadarko on a historical basis related to WES assets prior to the acquisition of such assets by WES, recognized under gathering, treating or processing agreements, and purchase and sale agreements.
(2) 
Represents expenses incurred on and subsequent to the date of the acquisition of WES assets, as well as expenses incurred by Anadarko on a historical basis related to WES assets prior to the acquisition of such assets by WES.
(3) 
Represents general and administrative expense incurred on and subsequent to the date of WES’s acquisition of WES assets, as well as a management services fee for reimbursement of expenses incurred by Anadarko for periods prior to the acquisition of WES assets by WES. These amounts include equity-based compensation expense allocated to WES and WGP by Anadarko (see WES LTIP and WGP LTIP and Anadarko Incentive Plans within this Note 5) and amounts charged by Anadarko under the WGP and WES omnibus agreements.
(4) 
Represents interest income recognized on the note receivable from Anadarko.
(5) 
For the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, includes amounts related to WES’s Deferred purchase price obligation - Anadarko (see Note 2 and Note 12) and for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, includes interest expense recognized on the WGP WCF (see Note 12).
(6) 
Represents distributions paid under WGP’s partnership agreement (see Note 3 and Note 4).
(7) 
Represents distributions paid to other subsidiaries of Anadarko under WES’s partnership agreement (see Note 3 and Note 4).

Concentration of credit risk. Anadarko was the only customer from whom revenues exceeded 10% of consolidated revenues for all periods presented in the consolidated statements of operations.