EX-99.3 6 ex993-wgp123113onform8xk.htm EX-99.3 EX 99.3 - WGP 12.31.13 on Form 8-K

EXHIBIT 99.3

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data                
WESTERN GAS EQUITY PARTNERS, LP
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



1



WESTERN GAS EQUITY PARTNERS, LP
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Unitholders
Western Gas Equity Holdings, LLC (as general partner of Western Gas Equity Partners, LP):
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Western Gas Equity Partners, LP (the Partnership) and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the related consolidated statements of income, equity and partners’ capital, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2013. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Western Gas Equity Partners, LP and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2013, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Houston, Texas
August 27, 2014


2


WESTERN GAS EQUITY PARTNERS, LP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
thousands except per-unit amounts
 
2013 (1)
 
2012 (1)
 
2011 (1)
Revenues – affiliates
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gathering, processing and transportation of natural gas and natural gas liquids
 
$
306,810

 
$
249,997

 
$
227,535

Natural gas, natural gas liquids and condensate sales
 
496,848

 
436,423

 
417,547

Other, net
 
1,868

 
1,606

 
2,337

Total revenues – affiliates
 
805,526

 
688,026

 
647,419

Revenues – third parties
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gathering, processing and transportation of natural gas and natural gas liquids
 
175,732

 
132,333

 
119,934

Natural gas, natural gas liquids and condensate sales
 
44,396

 
71,916

 
84,836

Other, net
 
4,109

 
2,201

 
5,955

Total revenues – third parties
 
224,237

 
206,450

 
210,725

Total revenues
 
1,029,763

 
894,476

 
858,144

Equity income, net (2)
 
22,948

 
16,042

 
11,261

Operating expenses
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cost of product (3)
 
364,285

 
336,079

 
327,371

Operation and maintenance (3)
 
168,657

 
140,106

 
126,464

General and administrative (3)
 
33,464

 
99,728

 
40,564

Property and other taxes
 
23,244

 
19,688

 
16,579

Depreciation, amortization and impairments
 
145,916

 
120,608

 
113,133

Total operating expenses
 
735,566

 
716,209

 
624,111

Operating income
 
317,145

 
194,309

 
245,294

Interest income, net – affiliates
 
16,900

 
16,900

 
24,106

Interest expense (4)
 
(51,797
)
 
(42,060
)
 
(30,345
)
Other income (expense), net
 
1,935

 
292

 
(44
)
Income before income taxes
 
284,183

 
169,441

 
239,011

Income tax expense
 
2,305

 
48,884

 
58,796

Net income
 
281,878

 
120,557

 
180,215

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
 
122,173

 
59,181

 
86,057

Net income attributable to Western Gas Equity Partners, LP
 
$
159,705

 
$
61,376

 
$
94,158

Limited partners’ interest in net income:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income attributable to Western Gas Equity Partners, LP
 
$
159,705

 
$
61,376

 

Results attributable to the pre-IPO period
 
(49
)
 
(56,860
)
 
 
Pre-acquisition net (income) loss allocated to Anadarko
 
(4,128
)
 
(1,707
)
 
 
Limited partners’ interest in net income
 
$
155,528

 
$
2,809

 
 
Net income per common unit – basic and diluted (5)
 
$
0.71

 
$
0.01

 
 
Weighted average common units outstanding – basic and diluted (5)
 
218,896

 
218,896

 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                    
(1) 
Financial information has been recast to include the financial position and results attributable to the TEFR Interests. See Note 1 and Note 2.
(2) 
Income earned from equity investments is classified as affiliate. See Note 1.
(3) 
Cost of product includes product purchases from Anadarko (as defined in Note 1) of $129.0 million, $145.3 million and $83.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Operation and maintenance includes charges from Anadarko of $56.4 million, $51.2 million and $51.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. General and administrative includes charges from Anadarko of $24.2 million, $92.9 million and $33.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. See Note 5.
(4) 
Includes affiliate (as defined in Note 1) interest expense of zero, $2.8 million and $4.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. See Note 11.
(5) 
Represents net income available to limited partners subsequent to closing the IPO of Western Gas Equity Partners, LP on December 12, 2012. Amounts for net income per common unit and weighted average common units outstanding are not applicable prior to closing the IPO of Western Gas Equity Partners, LP on December 12, 2012. See Note 4.

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

3


WESTERN GAS EQUITY PARTNERS, LP
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
 
 
December 31,
thousands except number of units
 
2013 (1)
 
2012 (1)
ASSETS
 
 
 
 
Current assets
 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
 
$
113,085

 
$
422,556

Accounts receivable, net (2)
 
83,943

 
48,550

Other current assets (3)
 
10,799

 
6,998

Total current assets
 
207,827

 
478,104

Note receivable – Anadarko
 
260,000

 
260,000

Property, plant and equipment
 
 
 
 
Cost
 
4,239,100

 
3,432,392

Less accumulated depreciation
 
855,845

 
714,436

Net property, plant and equipment
 
3,383,255

 
2,717,956

Goodwill
 
105,336

 
105,336

Other intangible assets
 
53,606

 
55,490

Equity investments
 
593,400

 
219,766

Other assets
 
27,401

 
27,798

Total assets
 
$
4,630,825

 
$
3,864,450

LIABILITIES, EQUITY AND PARTNERS’ CAPITAL
 
 
 
 
Current liabilities
 
 
 
 
Accounts and natural gas imbalance payables (4)
 
$
39,589

 
$
25,154

Accrued ad valorem taxes
 
13,860

 
11,949

Income taxes payable
 

 
552

Accrued liabilities (5)
 
138,034

 
148,600

Total current liabilities
 
191,483

 
186,255

Long-term debt
 
1,418,169

 
1,168,278

Deferred income taxes
 
37,998

 
47,149

Asset retirement obligations and other
 
79,145

 
68,749

Total long-term liabilities
 
1,535,312

 
1,284,176

Total liabilities
 
1,726,795

 
1,470,431

Equity and partners’ capital
 
 
 
 
Common units (218,895,515 units issued and outstanding at December 31, 2013 and 2012)
 
905,082

 
912,376

Net investment by Anadarko
 
312,092

 
313,600

Total partners’ capital
 
1,217,174

 
1,225,976

Noncontrolling interests
 
1,686,856

 
1,168,043

Total equity and partners’ capital
 
2,904,030

 
2,394,019

Total liabilities, equity and partners’ capital
 
$
4,630,825

 
$
3,864,450

                                                                                                                                                                                    
(1) 
Financial information has been recast to include the financial position and results attributable to the TEFR Interests. See Note 1 and Note 2.
(2) 
Accounts receivable, net includes amounts receivable from affiliates (as defined in Note 1) of $47.8 million and $17.5 million as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
(3) 
Other current assets includes natural gas imbalance receivables from affiliates of $0.1 million and $0.4 million as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
(4) 
Accounts and natural gas imbalance payables includes amounts payable to affiliates of $2.3 million and $2.5 million as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
(5) 
Accrued liabilities include amounts payable to affiliates of $0.1 million as of December 31, 2013 and 2012.

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

4


WESTERN GAS EQUITY PARTNERS, LP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY AND PARTNERS’ CAPITAL
 
 
Partners’ Capital
 
 
 
thousands
 
Net
Investment
by Anadarko
 
Common
Units
 
Noncontrolling
Interests
 
Total
Balance at December 31, 2010
 
$
421,121

 
$

 
$
812,821

 
$
1,233,942

Net income
 
94,158

 

 
86,057

 
180,215

Dividend payable—Anadarko (1)
 
(30,101
)
 

 

 
(30,101
)
Conversion of subordinated units to common units (2)
 
160,407

 

 
(160,407
)
 

WES equity transactions, net (3)
 
31,623

 

 
255,289

 
286,912

Contributions received from Chipeta noncontrolling interest owners (including Anadarko)
 

 

 
33,637

 
33,637

Distributions to Chipeta noncontrolling interest owners (including Anadarko)
 

 

 
(17,478
)
 
(17,478
)
Distributions to WES noncontrolling interest owners
 

 

 
(72,079
)
 
(72,079
)
Acquisitions from affiliates
 
(25,000
)
 

 

 
(25,000
)
Contributions of equity-based compensation to WES by Anadarko (4)
 
9,689

 

 
(23
)
 
9,666

Net pre-acquisition contributions from (distributions to) Anadarko
 
(61,549
)
 

 

 
(61,549
)
Elimination of net deferred tax liabilities
 
22,072

 

 

 
22,072

Other
 
(573
)
 

 
264

 
(309
)
Balance at December 31, 2011 (5)
 
$
621,847

 
$

 
$
938,081

 
$
1,559,928

Net income
 
58,567

 
2,809

 
59,181

 
120,557

Issuance of common units, net of offering expenses
 

 
409,903

 

 
409,903

Dividend payable—Anadarko (1)
 
(158,791
)
 

 

 
(158,791
)
WES equity transactions, net (3)
 
52,875

 
(173,787
)
 
332,844

 
211,932

Contributions received from Chipeta noncontrolling interest owners (including Anadarko)
 

 

 
29,108

 
29,108

Distributions to Chipeta noncontrolling interest owners (including Anadarko)
 

 

 
(17,303
)
 
(17,303
)
Distributions to WES noncontrolling interest owners
 

 

 
(99,570
)
 
(99,570
)
Acquisitions from affiliates
 
(458,764
)
 

 

 
(458,764
)
Acquisition of additional 24% interest in Chipeta (6)
 
(43,909
)
 

 
(77,195
)
 
(121,104
)
Contributions of equity-based compensation to WES by Anadarko (4)
 
86,673

 

 
384

 
87,057

Net distributions of other assets to Anadarko
 
(15,275
)
 

 
(21
)
 
(15,296
)
Net pre-acquisition contributions from (distributions to) Anadarko
 
363,977

 

 

 
363,977

Conversion of net investment by Anadarko to limited partner interest upon IPO
 
(673,451
)
 
673,451

 

 

Elimination of net deferred tax liabilities upon IPO
 
373,353

 

 

 
373,353

Elimination of net deferred tax liabilities
 
106,504

 

 

 
106,504

Other
 
(6
)
 

 
2,534

 
2,528

Balance at December 31, 2012 (5)
 
$
313,600

 
$
912,376

 
$
1,168,043

 
$
2,394,019

Net income
 
4,177

 
155,528

 
122,173

 
281,878

WES equity transactions, net (3)
 

 
187,016

 
537,795

 
724,811

Contributions received from Chipeta noncontrolling interest owners (including Anadarko)
 

 

 
2,247

 
2,247

Distributions to Chipeta noncontrolling interest owners (including Anadarko)
 

 

 
(13,127
)
 
(13,127
)
Distributions to WES noncontrolling interest owners
 

 

 
(130,706
)
 
(130,706
)
Distributions to WGP unitholders
 

 
(137,000
)
 

 
(137,000
)
Acquisitions from affiliates
 
(255,635
)
 
(209,865
)
 

 
(465,500
)
Contributions of equity-based compensation to WES by Anadarko (4)
 

 
2,846

 
86

 
2,932

Net pre-acquisition contributions from (distributions to) Anadarko (7)
 
203,420

 

 

 
203,420

Net distributions of other assets to Anadarko
 

 
(5,855
)
 

 
(5,855
)
Elimination of net deferred tax liabilities
 
46,530

 

 

 
46,530

Other
 

 
36

 
345

 
381

Balance at December 31, 2013 (5)
 
$
312,092

 
$
905,082

 
$
1,686,856

 
$
2,904,030

                                                                                                                                                                                    
(1) 
Associated with the Incentive Plan. See Note 6.
(2) 
Includes $93.6 million of tax associated with WES equity transactions that occurred prior to the one-for-one conversion of WES subordinated units to common units in August 2011.
(3) 
Includes the impact of WES’s public equity offerings and units issued in connection with acquisitions of assets from Anadarko as described in Note 2. Partners’ capital and noncontrolling interest include $18.4 million and $23.0 million, respectively, of tax associated with WES equity transactions for the year ended December 31, 2011. The $120.9 million decrease to partners’ capital, together with net income attributable to Western Gas Equity Partners, LP, totaled $(59.5) million for the year ended December 31, 2012. The $187.0 million increase to partners’ capital, together with net income attributable to Western Gas Equity Partners, LP totaled $346.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2013.
(4) 
Associated with the Anadarko Incentive Plans for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2013, and associated with the Anadarko Incentive Plans and the Incentive Plan for the year ended December 31, 2012, as defined and described in Note 1 and Note 6.
(5) 
Financial information has been recast to include the financial position and results attributable to the TEFR Interests. See Note 1 and Note 2.
(6) 
See Note 2 for a description of WES’s acquisition of Anadarko’s then-remaining 24% membership interest in Chipeta in August 2012. The $43.9 million decrease to partners’ capital resulting from the August 2012 Chipeta acquisition, together with net income attributable to Western Gas Equity Partners, LP, totaled $17.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2012.
(7) 
Includes deferred taxes on capitalized interest of $5.5 million associated with the acquisition of the TEFR Interests for the year ended December 31, 2013.

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

5


WESTERN GAS EQUITY PARTNERS, LP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
thousands
 
2013 (1)
 
2012 (1)
 
2011 (1)
Cash flows from operating activities
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income
 
$
281,878

 
$
120,557

 
$
180,215

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Depreciation, amortization and impairments
 
145,916

 
120,608

 
113,133

Non-cash equity-based compensation expense
 
3,822

 
3,717

 
3,490

Deferred income taxes
 
31,891

 
(2,263
)
 
(10,723
)
Debt-related amortization and other items, net
 
2,449

 
2,319

 
3,110

Equity income, net (2)
 
(22,948
)
 
(16,042
)
 
(11,261
)
Distributions from equity investment earnings (2)
 
17,698

 
20,660

 
15,999

Changes in assets and liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable, net
 
(34,148
)
 
23,157

 
(44,725
)
Increase (decrease) in accounts and natural gas imbalance payables and accrued liabilities, net
 
22,700

 
5,320

 
30,884

Change in other items, net
 
(4,478
)
 
(552
)
 
(21,233
)
Net cash provided by operating activities
 
444,780

 
277,481

 
258,889

Cash flows from investing activities
 
 
 
 
 
 
Capital expenditures
 
(646,471
)
 
(638,121
)
 
(149,717
)
Contributions in aid of construction costs from affiliates
 
617

 

 

Acquisitions from affiliates
 
(476,711
)
 
(611,719
)
 
(28,837
)
Acquisitions from third parties
 
(240,274
)
 

 
(301,957
)
Investments in equity affiliates
 
(294,693
)
 
(108,457
)
 
(6,203
)
Distributions from equity investments in excess of cumulative earnings (2)
 
4,438

 

 

Proceeds from the sale of assets to affiliates
 
85

 
760

 
382

Other
 
14

 

 
500

Net cash used in investing activities
 
(1,652,995
)
 
(1,357,537
)
 
(485,832
)
Cash flows from financing activities
 
 
 
 
 
 
Borrowings, net of debt issuance costs
 
957,503

 
1,041,648

 
1,055,939

Repayments of debt
 
(710,000
)
 
(549,000
)
 
(869,000
)
Increase (decrease) in outstanding checks
 
(1,763
)
 
1,800

 
4,039

Proceeds from the issuance of WGP common units, net of offering expenses
 
(2,367
)
 
412,020

 

Proceeds from the issuance of WES common units, net of offering expenses
 
725,050

 
211,932

 
328,345

Distributions to WGP unitholders
 
(137,000
)
 

 

Contributions received from Chipeta noncontrolling interest owners (including Anadarko)
 
2,247

 
29,108

 
33,637

Distributions to Chipeta noncontrolling interest owners (including Anadarko)
 
(13,127
)
 
(17,303
)
 
(17,478
)
Distributions to WES noncontrolling interest owners
 
(130,706
)
 
(99,570
)
 
(72,079
)
Net contributions from (distributions to) Anadarko
 
208,907

 
245,418

 
(36,975
)
Net cash provided by financing activities
 
898,744

 
1,276,053

 
426,428

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
 
(309,471
)
 
195,997

 
199,485

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
 
422,556

 
226,559

 
27,074

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
 
$
113,085

 
$
422,556

 
$
226,559

Supplemental disclosures
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net distributions to (contributions from) Anadarko of other assets
 
$
5,855

 
$
15,296

 
$
(29
)
Interest paid, net of capitalized interest
 
$
47,098

 
$
28,042

 
$
25,828

Taxes paid
 
$
552

 
$
495

 
$
190

                                                                                                                                                                                   
(1) 
Financial information has been recast to include the financial position and results attributable to the TEFR Interests. See Note 1 and Note 2.
(2) 
Income earned on, distributions from and contributions to equity investments are classified as affiliate. See Note 1.



See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

6

WESTERN GAS EQUITY PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


1.  SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

General. Western Gas Equity Partners, LP is a Delaware master limited partnership formed in September 2012 to own three types of partnership interests in Western Gas Partners, LP, a publicly traded partnership. Western Gas Equity Partners, LP was formed in September 2012 by converting WGR Holdings, LLC into a limited partnership and changing its name. Western Gas Partners, LP (together with its subsidiaries, “WES”) is a Delaware master limited partnership formed by Anadarko Petroleum Corporation in 2007 to own, operate, acquire and develop midstream energy assets. WES closed its initial public offering (“IPO”) to become publicly traded in 2008.
For purposes of these consolidated financial statements, “WGP” refers to Western Gas Equity Partners, LP in its individual capacity or to Western Gas Equity Partners, LP and its subsidiaries, including Western Gas Holdings, LLC and WES, as the context requires. “WES GP” refers to Western Gas Holdings, LLC, individually as the general partner of WES, and excludes WES itself. WGP’s general partner, Western Gas Equity Holdings, LLC (“WGP GP”), is a wholly owned subsidiary of Anadarko Petroleum Corporation. “Anadarko” refers to Anadarko Petroleum Corporation and its subsidiaries, excluding WGP and WGP GP, and “affiliates” refers to subsidiaries of Anadarko, excluding WGP and its subsidiaries, and includes equity interests in Fort Union Gas Gathering, LLC (“Fort Union”), White Cliffs Pipeline, LLC (“White Cliffs”), Rendezvous Gas Services, LLC (“Rendezvous”), Enterprise EF78 LLC (the “Mont Belvieu JV”), Texas Express Pipeline LLC (“TEP”), Texas Express Gathering LLC (“TEG”) and Front Range Pipeline LLC (“FRP”). The interests in TEP, TEG and FRP are referred to collectively as the “TEFR Interests.” All income earned on, distributions from and contributions to WES’s equity investments are considered to be affiliate transactions. See Note 2. “Equity investment throughput” refers to WES’s 14.81% share of average Fort Union throughput and 22% share of average Rendezvous throughput, but excludes throughput measured in barrels, consisting of WES’s 10% share of average White Cliffs throughput, 25% share of average Mont Belvieu JV throughput, 20% share of average TEP and TEG throughput, and 33.33% share of average FRP throughput.
The three types of partnership interests in WES owned by WGP are as follows: (i) a 2.0% general partner interest in WES, held through a consolidated subsidiary, WES GP; (ii) 100% of the incentive distribution rights (“IDRs”) in WES, which entitle WGP to receive increasing percentages, up to the maximum level of 48.0%, of any incremental cash distributed by WES as certain target distribution levels are reached in any quarter; and (iii) a significant limited partner interest in WES. WES GP owns a 2.0% general partner interest in WES, which constitutes substantially all of its business, which primarily is to manage the affairs and operations of WES. Refer to Note 4 for a discussion of WGP’s holdings of WES equity.
In December 2012, WGP completed its IPO of 19,758,150 common units representing limited partner interests at a price of $22.00 per common unit, generating net proceeds of $412.0 million. The common units are listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “WGP.” WGP used $409.4 million of the net proceeds from its IPO to purchase common and general partner units of WES (see Note 4).
WES is engaged in the business of gathering, processing, compressing, treating and transporting natural gas, condensate, NGLs and crude oil for Anadarko, as well as third-party producers and customers. As of December 31, 2013, WES’s assets and investments accounted for under the equity method, including the TEFR Interests, consisted of the following:
 
 
Owned and
Operated
 
Operated
Interests
 
Non-Operated
Interests
 
Equity Interests
Natural gas gathering systems
 
13

 
1

 
5

 
2

NGL gathering systems
 

 

 

 
2

Natural gas treating facilities
 
8

 

 

 
1

Natural gas processing facilities
 
8

 
3

 

 
2

NGL pipelines
 
3

 

 

 
2

Natural gas pipelines
 
3

 

 

 

Oil pipeline
 

 

 

 
1


These assets are located in the Rocky Mountains (Colorado, Utah and Wyoming), the Mid-Continent (Kansas and Oklahoma), north-central Pennsylvania, and Texas. WES was also constructing the Lancaster processing plant in Northeast Colorado at the end of the fourth quarter of 2013.

7

WESTERN GAS EQUITY PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1.  SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

Basis of presentation. The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”). The information furnished herein reflects all normal recurring adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements.
The consolidated financial results of WES are included in WGP’s consolidated financial statements due to WGP’s 100% ownership interest in WES GP and WES GP’s control of WES. All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated. Throughout these notes to the consolidated financial statements, and to the extent material, any differences between the consolidated financial results of WGP and WES are identified as those of WGP as a standalone parent and its subsidiaries, excluding WES.
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of WGP and entities in which it holds a controlling financial interest, including WES and WES GP. Investments in non-controlled entities over which WES, or WGP through its investment in WES, exercises significant influence are accounted for under the equity method. WGP proportionately consolidates WES’s 33.75% share of the assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses attributable to the Non-Operated Marcellus Interest and Anadarko-Operated Marcellus Interest (see Note 2) and WES’s 50% share of the assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses attributable to the Newcastle system in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
WGP has no independent operations or material assets other than its partnership interests in WES. WGP’s consolidated financial statements differ from those of WES primarily as a result of (i) the presentation of noncontrolling interest ownership (attributable to the limited partner interests in WES held by the public and Anadarko Marcellus Midstream, L.L.C. (“AMM”) (see Note 2)), (ii) the elimination of WES GP’s investment in WES with WES GP’s underlying capital account, (iii) income tax expense and liabilities incurred by WGR Holdings, LLC, computed on a separate-return basis prior to its conversion into a limited partnership, and (iv) the general and administrative expenses incurred by WGP, which are separate from, and in addition to, those incurred by WES.

Noncontrolling interests. The interests in Chipeta Processing LLC (“Chipeta”) held by a third-party member, and the limited partner interests in WES held by AMM and the public, are reflected as noncontrolling interests in the consolidated financial statements.

Chipeta. In July 2009, WES acquired a 51% interest in Chipeta and became party to Chipeta’s limited liability company agreement (the “Chipeta LLC agreement”). On August 1, 2012, WES acquired Anadarko’s then-remaining 24% membership interest in Chipeta (the “additional Chipeta interest”). Prior to this transaction, the interests in Chipeta held by Anadarko and a third-party member were reflected as noncontrolling interests in the consolidated financial statements. The acquisition of the additional Chipeta interest was accounted for on a prospective basis as WES acquired an additional interest in an already-consolidated entity. As such, effective August 1, 2012, noncontrolling interest excludes the financial results and operations of the additional Chipeta interest. The remaining 25% membership interest held by the third-party member is reflected within noncontrolling interests in the consolidated financial statements for all periods presented. See Note 2.

WES. The publicly held limited partner interests in WES are reflected as noncontrolling interests in the consolidated financial statements for all periods presented. In addition, in March 2013, WES acquired a 33.75% interest in both the Liberty and Rome gas gathering systems from AMM, a wholly owned subsidiary of Anadarko. As part of the consideration paid, WES issued 449,129 WES common units to AMM. The limited partner interest in WES held by AMM is reflected within noncontrolling interests in the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2013. See Note 2.
The difference between the carrying value of WGP’s investment in WES and the underlying book value of common units issued by WES is accounted for as an equity transaction. Thus, if WES issues common units at a price different than WGP’s per-unit carrying value, any resulting change in the carrying value of WGP’s investment in WES is reflected as an adjustment to partners’ capital.

8

WESTERN GAS EQUITY PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1.  SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

Presentation of WES assets. The “WES assets” refer collectively to the assets indirectly owned and interests accounted for under the equity method by WGP through its partnership interests in WES as of December 31, 2013. Because WGP owns and controls WES GP, and WGP GP is owned and controlled by Anadarko, each of WES’s acquisitions of WES assets from Anadarko has been considered a transfer of net assets between entities under common control. As such, WES assets acquired from Anadarko were initially recorded at Anadarko’s historic carrying value, which did not correlate to the total acquisition price paid by WES. Further, after an acquisition of WES assets from Anadarko, WES and WGP (by virtue of its consolidation of WES) may be required to recast their financial statements to include the activities of such WES assets as of the date of common control. See Note 2.
For those periods requiring recast, the consolidated financial statements for periods prior to the acquisition of WES assets from Anadarko have been prepared from Anadarko’s historical cost-basis accounts and may not necessarily be indicative of the actual results of operations that would have occurred if WES had owned the WES assets during the periods reported. Net income attributable to the WES assets acquired from Anadarko for periods prior to WES’s acquisition of the WES assets is not allocated to the limited partners for purposes of calculating net income per common unit.

Use of estimates. In preparing financial statements in accordance with GAAP, management makes informed judgments and estimates that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses. Management evaluates its estimates and related assumptions regularly, using historical experience and other methods considered reasonable under the particular circumstances. Changes in facts and circumstances or additional information may result in revised estimates and actual results may differ from these estimates. Effects on the business, financial condition and results of operations resulting from revisions to estimates are recognized when the facts that give rise to the revisions become known.

Fair value. The fair-value-measurement standard defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The standard characterizes inputs used in determining fair value according to a hierarchy that prioritizes those inputs based upon the degree to which they are observable. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:

Level 1 – Inputs represent quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 – Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly (for example, quoted market prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets or quoted market prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets not considered to be active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, or market-corroborated inputs).

Level 3 – Inputs that are not observable from objective sources, such as management’s internally developed assumptions used in pricing an asset or liability (for example, an estimate of future cash flows used in management’s internally developed present value of future cash flows model that underlies the fair value measurement).

Nonfinancial assets and liabilities initially measured at fair value include certain assets and liabilities acquired in a third-party business combination, assets and liabilities exchanged in non-monetary transactions, long-lived assets (asset groups), goodwill and other intangibles, initial recognition of asset retirement obligations, and initial recognition of environmental obligations assumed in a third-party acquisition. Impairment analyses for long-lived assets, goodwill and other intangibles, and the initial recognition of asset retirement obligations and environmental obligations use Level 3 inputs. When a fair value measurement is required and there is not a market-observable price for the asset or liability or a market-observable price for a similar asset or liability, the cost, income, or market valuation approach is used, depending on the quality of information available to support management’s assumptions.

9

WESTERN GAS EQUITY PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1.  SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

The fair value of debt reflects any premium or discount for the difference between the stated interest rate and the quarter-end market interest rate, and is based on quoted market prices for identical instruments, if available, or based on valuations of similar debt instruments. See Note 11.
The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable reported on the consolidated balance sheets approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of these items.

Cash equivalents. All highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased are considered to be cash equivalents.

Bad-debt reserve. Revenues are primarily from Anadarko, for which no credit limit is maintained. Exposure to bad debts is analyzed on a customer-by-customer basis for its third-party accounts receivable and may establish credit limits for significant third-party customers. As of December 31, 2013, the third-party accounts receivable balance was net of the associated bad-debt reserve of $13,000. As of December 31, 2012, there was no reserve for bad debts.

Natural gas imbalances. The consolidated balance sheets include natural gas imbalance receivables and payables resulting from differences in gas volumes received into WES’s systems and gas volumes delivered by WES to customers’ pipelines. Natural gas volumes owed to or by WES that are subject to monthly cash settlement are valued according to the terms of the contract as of the balance sheet dates and reflect market index prices. Other natural gas volumes owed to or by WES are valued at the weighted average cost of natural gas as of the balance sheet dates and are settled in-kind. As of December 31, 2013, natural gas imbalance receivables and payables were $3.6 million and $2.5 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2012, natural gas imbalance receivables and payables were $1.7 million and $3.1 million, respectively. Changes in natural gas imbalances are reported in equity income and other, net for imbalance receivables or in cost of product for imbalance payables.

Inventory. The cost of NGLs inventories is determined by the weighted average cost method on a location-by-location basis. Inventory is stated at the lower of weighted-average cost or market value and is reported in other current assets in the consolidated balance sheets.

Property, plant and equipment. Property, plant and equipment are generally stated at the lower of historical cost less accumulated depreciation or fair value, if impaired. Because acquisitions of assets from Anadarko are transfers of net assets between entities under common control, the assets acquired from Anadarko are initially recorded at Anadarko’s historic carrying value. The difference between the carrying value of net assets acquired from Anadarko and the consideration paid is recorded as an adjustment to partners’ capital.
Assets acquired in a business combination or non-monetary exchange with a third party are initially recorded at fair value. All construction-related direct labor and material costs are capitalized. The cost of renewals and betterments that extend the useful life of property, plant and equipment is also capitalized. The cost of repairs, replacements and major maintenance projects that do not extend the useful life or increase the expected output of property, plant and equipment is expensed as incurred.
Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method based on estimated useful lives and salvage values of assets. However, subsequent events could cause a change in estimates, thereby impacting future depreciation amounts. Uncertainties that may impact these estimates include, but are not limited to, changes in laws and regulations relating to environmental matters, including air and water quality, restoration and abandonment requirements, economic conditions, and supply and demand in the area.

10

WESTERN GAS EQUITY PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1.  SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

Management evaluates the ability to recover the carrying amount of its long-lived assets to determine whether its long-lived assets have been impaired. Impairments exist when the carrying amount of an asset exceeds estimates of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset. When alternative courses of action to recover the carrying amount of a long-lived asset are under consideration, estimates of future undiscounted cash flows take into account possible outcomes and probabilities of their occurrence. If the carrying amount of the long-lived asset is not recoverable based on the estimated future undiscounted cash flows, the impairment loss is measured as the excess of the asset’s carrying amount over its estimated fair value, such that the asset’s carrying amount is adjusted to its estimated fair value with an offsetting charge to impairment expense. Refer to Note 8 for a description of impairments recorded during the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011.

Capitalized interest. Interest is capitalized as part of the historical cost of constructing assets for significant projects that are in progress. Capitalized interest is determined by multiplying WES’s weighted-average borrowing cost on debt by the average amount of qualifying costs incurred. Once the construction of an asset subject to interest capitalization is completed and the asset is placed in service, the associated capitalized interest is expensed through depreciation or impairment, together with other capitalized costs related to that asset.

Goodwill. Goodwill represents the allocated portion of Anadarko’s midstream goodwill attributed to the assets WGP, through its consolidation of WES, has acquired from Anadarko. The carrying value of Anadarko’s midstream goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price paid to a third-party entity over the estimated fair value of the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed by Anadarko. Accordingly, the goodwill balance does not represent, and in some cases is significantly different from, the difference between the consideration WES paid for its acquisitions from Anadarko and the fair value of such net assets on their respective acquisition dates. The consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, include goodwill of $105.3 million, the impairment of which (if applicable) is not deductible for tax purposes.
Goodwill is evaluated for impairment annually, as of October 1, or more often as facts and circumstances warrant. WES has allocated goodwill on its two reporting units: (i) gathering and processing and (ii) transportation. An initial qualitative assessment may be performed prior to proceeding to the comparison of the fair value of each reporting unit to which goodwill has been assigned, to the carrying amount of net assets, including goodwill, of each reporting unit. If, based on qualitative factors, it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, then goodwill is not impaired, and estimating the fair value of the reporting unit is not necessary. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, goodwill is written down to its implied fair value through a charge to operating expense based on a hypothetical purchase price allocation. The carrying value of goodwill after such an impairment would represent a Level 3 fair value measurement. Estimating the fair value of the reporting units was not necessary based on the qualitative evaluation as of October 1, 2013, and no goodwill impairment has been recognized in these consolidated financial statements.

Other intangible assets. The intangible asset balance in the consolidated balance sheets includes the fair value, net of amortization, of (i) contracts assumed by WES in connection with the Platte Valley acquisition in February 2011, which are amortized on a straight-line basis over 50 years, and (ii) interconnect agreements at Chipeta entered into in November 2012, amortized on a straight-line basis over 10 years.
WES assesses intangible assets for impairment together with related underlying long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. See Property, plant and equipment within this Note 1 for further discussion of management’s process to evaluate potential impairment of long-lived assets. No intangible asset impairment has been recognized in these consolidated financial statements. As of December 31, 2013, the intangible asset carrying value was $53.6 million, net of $3.4 million of accumulated amortization. An estimated $1.4 million of intangible asset amortization will be recorded for each of the next five years. As of December 31, 2012, the intangible asset carrying value was $55.5 million, net of $2.0 million of accumulated amortization.


11

WESTERN GAS EQUITY PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1.  SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

Equity-method investments. The following table presents the activity of WES’s investments in equity of Fort Union, White Cliffs, Rendezvous, Mont Belvieu JV, TEG, TEP and FRP:
 
Equity Investments
thousands
Fort 
Union (1)
 
White 
Cliffs (2)
 
Rendezvous (3)
 
Mont
Belvieu JV (4)
 
TEG (5)
 
TEP (6)
 
FRP (7)
Balance at December 31, 2011
$
22,268

 
$
17,710

 
$
69,839

 
$

 
$

 
$
6,110

 
$

Initial investment

 

 

 

 
9,086

 

 
23,878

Investment earnings (loss), net of amortization
6,383

 
7,871

 
1,857

 

 
(53
)
 
(4
)
 
(12
)
Contributions

 
862

 

 

 

 
74,631

 

Distributions
(5,198
)
 
(8,876
)
 
(6,586
)
 

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2012
$
23,453

 
$
17,567

 
$
65,110

 
$

 
$
9,033


$
80,737

 
$
23,866

Initial investment

 

 

 
78,129

 

 

 

Investment earnings (loss), net of amortization
6,273

 
9,681

 
2,088

 
5,690

 
93

 
(776
)
 
(101
)
Contributions
16

 
19,087

 

 
37,309

 
6,732

 
108,969

 
105,547

Capitalized interest

 

 

 
1,352

 
791

 
8,801

 
6,089

Distributions
(4,570
)
 
(9,099
)
 
(4,029
)
 

 

 

 

Distributions in excess of cumulative earnings

 
(2,197
)
 
(2,241
)
 

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2013
$
25,172

 
$
35,039

 
$
60,928

 
$
122,480

 
$
16,649

 
$
197,731

 
$
135,401

                                                                                                                                                                                   
(1)
WES has a 14.81% interest in Fort Union, a joint venture which owns a gathering pipeline and treating facilities in the Powder River Basin. Anadarko is the construction manager and physical operator of the Fort Union facilities. Certain business decisions, including, but not limited to, decisions with respect to significant expenditures or contractual commitments, annual budgets, material financings, dispositions of assets or amending the owners’ firm gathering agreements, require 65% or unanimous approval of the owners.
(2)
WES has a 10% interest in White Cliffs, a limited liability company which owns a crude oil pipeline that originates in Platteville, Colorado and terminates in Cushing, Oklahoma. The third-party majority owner is the manager of the White Cliffs operations. Certain business decisions, including, but not limited to, approval of annual budgets and decisions with respect to significant expenditures, contractual commitments, acquisitions, material financings, dispositions of assets or admitting new members, require more than 75% approval of the members.
(3)
WES has a 22% interest in Rendezvous, a limited liability company that operates gas gathering facilities in Southwestern Wyoming. Certain business decisions, including, but not limited to, decisions with respect to significant expenditures or contractual commitments, annual budgets, material financings, dispositions of assets or amending the members’ gas servicing agreements, require unanimous approval of the members.
(4) 
WES has a 25% interest in the Mont Belvieu JV, an entity formed to design, construct, and own two fractionation trains located in Mont Belvieu, Texas. A third party is the operator of the Mont Belvieu JV fractionation trains. Certain business decisions, including, but not limited to, decisions with respect to the execution of contracts, settlements, disposition of assets, or the creation, appointment, or removal of officer positions require 50% or unanimous approval of the owners.
(5) 
WES has a 20% interest in TEG, an entity that consists of two NGL gathering systems that link natural gas processing plants to TEP. Enbridge Midcoast Energy, LP (“Enbridge”) is the operator of the two gathering systems. Certain business decisions, including, but not limited to, decisions with respect to the execution of contracts, settlements, disposition of assets, or the delegation, creation, appointment, or removal of officer positions require more than 50% approval of the members.
(6) 
WES has a 20% interest in TEP, which consists of an NGL pipeline that originates in Skellytown, Texas and extends to Mont Belvieu, Texas. Enterprise Products Operating LLC (“Enterprise”) is the operator of TEP. Certain business decisions, including, but not limited to, decisions with respect to the execution of contracts, settlements, disposition of assets, or the creation, appointment, or removal of officer positions require more than 50% approval of the members.
(7) 
WES has a 33.33% interest in the FRP, an NGL pipeline that extends from Weld County, Colorado to Skellytown, Texas. Enterprise is the operator of FRP. Certain business decisions, including, but not limited to, decisions with respect to the execution of contracts, settlements, disposition of assets, or the creation, appointment, or removal of officer positions require more than 50% approval of the members owners.

12

WESTERN GAS EQUITY PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1.  SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

The investment balance at December 31, 2013, includes $2.5 million and $44.0 million for the purchase price allocated to the investment in Fort Union and Rendezvous, respectively, in excess of the historic cost basis of Western Gas Resources, Inc. (“WGRI”), the entity that previously owned the interests in Fort Union and Rendezvous, which Anadarko acquired in August 2006. This excess balance is attributable to the difference between the fair value and book value of such gathering and treating facilities (at the time WGRI was acquired by Anadarko) and is being amortized over the remaining estimated useful life of those facilities.
The investment balance in White Cliffs at December 31, 2013, is $9.3 million less than WES’s underlying equity in White Cliffs’ net assets as of December 31, 2013, primarily due to WES recording the acquisition of its initial 0.4% interest in White Cliffs at Anadarko’s historic carrying value. This difference is being amortized to equity income over the remaining estimated useful life of the White Cliffs pipeline.
Management evaluates its equity-method investments for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such investments may have experienced a decline in value that is other than temporary. When evidence of loss in value has occurred, management compares the estimated fair value of the investment to the carrying value of the investment to determine whether the investment has been impaired. Management assesses the fair value of equity-method investments using commonly accepted techniques, and may use more than one method, including, but not limited to, recent third-party comparable sales and discounted cash flow models. If the estimated fair value is less than the carrying value, the excess of the carrying value over the estimated fair value is recognized as an impairment loss.
The following tables present the summarized combined financial information for WES’s equity method investments (amounts represents 100% of investee financial information):
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
thousands
 
2013
 
2012
 
2011
Consolidated Statements of Income
 
 
 
 
 
 
Revenues
 
$
261,705

 
$
199,764

 
$
153,131

Operating income
 
171,496

 
135,498

 
90,544

Net income
 
170,175

 
133,987

 
88,504

 
 
December 31,
thousands
 
2013
 
2012
Consolidated Balance Sheets
 
 
 
 
Current assets
 
$
186,690

 
$
79,835

Property, plant and equipment, net
 
2,676,531

 
1,174,311

Other assets
 
38,258

 
45,100

Total assets
 
$
2,901,479

 
$
1,299,246

Current liabilities
 
206,602

 
76,862

Non-current liabilities
 
34,012

 
50,759

Equity
 
2,660,865

 
1,171,625

Total liabilities and equity
 
$
2,901,479

 
$
1,299,246


Asset retirement obligations. Management recognizes a liability based on the estimated costs of retiring tangible long-lived assets. The liability is recognized at fair value, measured using discounted expected future cash outflows for the asset retirement obligation when the obligation originates, which generally is when an asset is acquired or constructed. The carrying amount of the associated asset is increased commensurate with the liability recognized. Over time, the discounted liability is adjusted to its expected settlement value through accretion expense, which is reported within depreciation, amortization and impairments in the consolidated statements of income. Subsequent to the initial recognition, the liability is also adjusted for any changes in the expected value of the retirement obligation (with a corresponding adjustment to property, plant and equipment) until the obligation is settled. Revisions in estimated asset retirement obligations may result from changes in estimated inflation rates, discount rates, asset retirement costs and the estimated timing of settling asset retirement obligations. See Note 10.

13

WESTERN GAS EQUITY PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1.  SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

Environmental expenditures. WES expenses environmental obligations related to conditions caused by past operations that do not generate current or future revenues. Environmental obligations related to operations that generate current or future revenues are expensed or capitalized, as appropriate. Liabilities are recorded when the necessity for environmental remediation or other potential environmental liabilities becomes probable and the costs can be reasonably estimated. Accruals for estimated losses from environmental remediation obligations are recognized no later than at the time of the completion of the remediation feasibility study. These accruals are adjusted as additional information becomes available or as circumstances change. Costs of future expenditures for environmental-remediation obligations are not discounted to their present value. See Note 12.

Segments. Because WGP reflects its ownership interest in WES on a consolidated basis, and has no independent operations or material assets outside those of WES, WGP’s segment analysis and presentation is the same as that of WES. WES’s operations are organized into a single operating segment, the assets of which gather, process, compress, treat and transport Anadarko and third-party natural gas, condensate, NGLs and crude oil in the United States.

Revenues and cost of product. Under its fee-based gathering, treating and processing arrangements, WES is paid a fixed fee based on the volume and thermal content of natural gas and recognizes revenues for its services in the month such services are performed. Producers’ wells are connected to WES’s gathering systems for delivery of natural gas to WES’s processing or treating plants, where the natural gas is processed to extract NGLs and condensate or treated in order to satisfy pipeline specifications. In some areas, where no processing is required, the producers’ gas is gathered and delivered to pipelines for market delivery. Under cost-of-service gathering agreements, fees are earned for gathering and compression services based on rates calculated in a cost-of-service model and reviewed periodically over the life of the agreements. Under percent-of-proceeds contracts, revenue is recognized when the natural gas, NGLs or condensate are sold. The percentage of the product sale ultimately paid to the producer is recorded as a related cost of product expense.
WES purchases natural gas volumes at the wellhead for gathering and processing. As a result, WES has volumes of NGLs and condensate to sell and volumes of residue to either sell, to use for system fuel or to satisfy keep-whole obligations. In addition, depending upon specific contract terms, condensate and NGLs recovered during gathering and processing are either returned to the producer or retained and sold. Under keep-whole contracts, when condensate or NGLs are retained and sold, producers are kept whole for the condensate or NGL volumes through the receipt of a thermally equivalent volume of residue. The keep-whole contract conveys an economic benefit to WES when the combined value of the individual NGLs is greater in the form of liquids than as a component of the natural gas stream; however, WES is adversely impacted when the value of the NGLs is lower than the value of the natural gas stream including the liquids. WES has commodity price swap agreements with Anadarko to mitigate exposure to commodity price uncertainty that would otherwise be present as a result of the purchase and sale of natural gas, condensate or NGLs. See Note 5. Revenue is recognized from the sale of condensate and NGLs upon transfer of title and related purchases are recorded as cost of product.
WES earns transportation revenues through firm contracts that obligate each of its customers to pay a monthly reservation or demand charge regardless of the pipeline capacity used by that customer. An additional commodity usage fee is charged to the customer based on the actual volume of natural gas transported. Transportation revenues are also generated from interruptible contracts pursuant to which a fee is charged to the customer based on volumes transported through the pipeline. Revenues for transportation of natural gas and NGLs are recognized over the period of firm transportation contracts or, in the case of usage fees and interruptible contracts, when the volumes are received into the pipeline. From time to time, certain revenues may be subject to refund pending the outcome of rate matters before the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (the “FERC”) and reserves are established where appropriate.
Proceeds from the sale of residue, NGLs and condensate are reported as revenues from natural gas, natural gas liquids and condensate sales in the consolidated statements of income. Revenues attributable to the fixed-fee component of gathering and processing contracts as well as demand charges and commodity usage fees on transportation contracts are reported as revenues from gathering, processing and transportation of natural gas and natural gas liquids in the consolidated statements of income.


14

WESTERN GAS EQUITY PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1.  SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

Equity-based compensation. Concurrently with WGP’s IPO, WGP GP adopted the Western Gas Equity Partners, LP 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan (“WGP LTIP”). The WGP LTIP permits the issuance of up to 3,000,000 WGP common units, of which 2,963,762 units remained available for future issuance as of December 31, 2013. Upon vesting of each phantom unit, the holder will receive common units of WGP or, at the discretion of WGP GP’s board of directors, cash in an amount equal to the market value of common units of WGP on the vesting date. Equity-based compensation expense attributable to grants made under the WGP LTIP impacts cash flows from operating activities only to the extent cash payments are made to a participant in lieu of issuance of WGP common units to the participant. Stock-based compensation expense attributable to awards granted under the WGP LTIP will be amortized over the vesting periods applicable to the awards.
The Western Gas Partners, LP 2008 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “WES LTIP”) was adopted by WES GP concurrently with the IPO of WES and permits the issuance of up to 2,250,000 WES common units, of which 2,139,027 units remained available for future issuance as of December 31, 2013. Upon vesting of each phantom unit award, the holder will receive common units of WES or, at the discretion of WES GP’s board of directors, cash in an amount equal to the market value of common units of WES on the vesting date. Equity-based compensation expense attributable to grants made under the WES LTIP impact cash flows from operating activities only to the extent cash payments are made to a participant in lieu of issuance of common units to the participant. Stock-based compensation expense attributable to awards granted under the WES LTIP will be amortized over the vesting periods applicable to the awards.
Additionally, general and administrative expenses include equity-based compensation costs allocated by Anadarko for grants made pursuant to (i) the Western Gas Holdings, LLC Equity Incentive Plan, as amended and restated (the “Incentive Plan”) for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 and (ii) the Anadarko Petroleum Corporation 1999 Stock Incentive Plan and the Anadarko Petroleum Corporation 2008 and 2012 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plans (Anadarko’s plans are referred to collectively as the “Anadarko Incentive Plans”) for all periods presented. Grants made under equity-based compensation plans result in equity-based compensation expense, which is determined by reference to the fair value of equity compensation. For equity-based awards ultimately settled through the issuance of units or stock, the fair value is measured as of the date of the relevant equity grant. Equity-based compensation granted under the Anadarko Incentive Plans does not impact cash flows from operating activities since the offset to compensation expense is recorded as a contribution to partners’ capital in the consolidated financial statements at the time of contribution, when the expense is realized. However, distribution equivalent rights awarded in tandem with equity-or liability-based awards are paid in cash and reflected within financing cash flows in the consolidated statements of cash flows. See Note 6.

WES income taxes. WES generally is not subject to federal income tax or state income tax other than Texas margin tax on the portion of its income that is apportionable to Texas. Deferred state income taxes are recorded on temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. WES routinely assesses the realizability of its deferred tax assets. If WES concludes that it is more likely than not that some of the deferred tax assets will not be realized, the tax asset is reduced by a valuation allowance. Federal and state current and deferred income tax expense was recorded on WES assets prior to WES’s acquisition of these assets from Anadarko.
For periods beginning on and subsequent to WES’s acquisition of the WES assets, WES makes payments to Anadarko pursuant to the tax sharing agreement entered into between Anadarko and WES for its estimated share of taxes from all forms of taxation, excluding taxes imposed by the United States, that are included in any combined or consolidated returns filed by Anadarko. The aggregate difference in the basis of WES’s assets for financial and tax reporting purposes cannot be readily determined as WES does not have access to information about each partner’s tax attributes in WES.
The accounting standards for uncertain tax positions defines the criteria an individual tax position must satisfy for any part of the benefit of that position to be recognized in the financial statements. WES had no material uncertain tax positions at December 31, 2013 or 2012.
With respect to assets acquired from Anadarko, WES recorded Anadarko’s historic current and deferred income taxes for the periods prior to WES’s ownership of the assets. For periods subsequent to WES’s acquisition, WES is not subject to tax except for the Texas margin tax and, accordingly, does not record current and deferred federal income taxes related to the assets acquired from Anadarko.

15

WESTERN GAS EQUITY PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1.  SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

WGP income taxes. Prior to its September 2012 conversion to a limited partnership legal form, WGP was WGR Holdings, LLC, a single-member Delaware limited liability company treated as a division of Anadarko and disregarded for U.S. federal income tax purposes. As such, WGR Holdings, LLC was included in Anadarko’s consolidated income tax return for federal and state income tax purposes. In addition to WES’s historic Texas margin tax expense and liabilities, the accompanying consolidated financial statements of WGP include income tax expense and liabilities incurred by WGR Holdings, LLC, computed on a separate-return basis.
Deferred federal and state income taxes included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements are attributable to temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amount and tax basis of WGP’s investment in WES. WGP’s accounting policy is to “look through” its investment in WES for purposes of calculating deferred income tax asset and liability balances attributable to WGP’s interests in WES. The application of such accounting policy resulted in no deferred income taxes being recognized for the book and tax basis difference in goodwill, which is non-deductible for tax purposes for all periods presented. WGP had no material uncertain tax positions at December 31, 2013 or 2012.

Net income per common unit. Earnings per unit is calculated by dividing the limited partners’ interest in net income by the weighted average number of common units outstanding. Net income per common unit is calculated assuming that cash distributions are equal to the net income attributable to WGP. Net income attributable to periods prior to WGP’s IPO is not allocated to the limited partners for purposes of calculating net income per unit. As a result, pre-IPO net income, representing the financial results prior to WGP’s IPO on December 12, 2012, has been excluded from the limited partners’ interest in net income. Net income equal to the amount of available cash (as defined in WGP’s partnership agreement) is allocated to the common unitholders consistent with actual cash distributions. See Note 4.

Other assets. For the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, other current assets on the consolidated balance sheets includes $0.4 million for a receivable recognized in conjunction with the capital lease component of a processing agreement assumed in connection with the acquisition of Mountain Gas Resources, LLC (“MGR”). See Note 2. The agreement, in which WES is the lessor, extends through December 2014. Other assets includes $4.6 million related to the unguaranteed residual value of the processing plant included in the processing agreement, based on a measurement of fair value estimated when the plant was acquired by Anadarko in 2006. Interest income related to the capital lease is recorded to other income (expense), net on the consolidated statements of income.

Contributions in aid of construction costs from affiliates. On certain of WES’s capital projects, Anadarko is obligated to reimburse WES for all or a portion of project capital expenditures. The majority of such arrangements are associated with projects related to pipeline construction activities and production well tie-ins. These cash receipts are presented as “Contributions in aid of construction costs from affiliates” within the investing section of the consolidated statements of cash flows. See Note 5.

2.  ACQUISITIONS

In May 2008, concurrently with the closing of the WES’s IPO, Anadarko contributed to WES the assets and liabilities of Anadarko Gathering Company LLC, Pinnacle Gas Treating LLC, and MIGC LLC. In December 2008, WES completed the acquisition of the Powder River assets from Anadarko, which included (i) the Hilight system, (ii) a 50% interest in the Newcastle system and (iii) a 14.81% membership interest in Fort Union. In July 2009, the WES closed on the acquisition of a 51% membership interest in Chipeta from Anadarko. WES closed the acquisitions of Anadarko’s Granger and Wattenberg assets in January 2010 and August 2010, respectively. In September 2010, WES acquired a 10% interest in White Cliffs. See Note 13.

16

WESTERN GAS EQUITY PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

2.  ACQUISITIONS (CONTINUED)

The following table presents the acquisitions completed by WES during the years ended December 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013, and identifies the funding sources for such acquisitions:
thousands except unit and percent amounts
 
Acquisition
Date
 
Percentage
Acquired
 
Borrowings
 
Cash
On Hand
 
WES Common
Units Issued
 
WES GP Units
Issued
Platte Valley (1)
 
02/28/2011
 
100
%
 
$
303,000

 
$
602

 

 

Bison (2)
 
07/08/2011
 
100
%
 

 
25,000

 
2,950,284

 
60,210

MGR (3)
 
01/13/2012
 
100
%
 
299,000

 
159,587

 
632,783

 
12,914

Chipeta (4)
 
08/01/2012
 
24
%
 

 
128,250

 
151,235

 
3,086

Non-Operated Marcellus Interest (5)
 
03/01/2013
 
33.75
%
 
250,000

 
215,500

 
449,129

 

Anadarko-Operated Marcellus Interest (6)
 
03/08/2013
 
33.75
%
 
133,500

 

 

 

Mont Belvieu JV (7)
 
06/05/2013
 
25
%
 

 
78,129

 

 

OTTCO (8)
 
09/03/2013
 
100
%
 
27,500

 

 

 

                                                                                                                                                                                    
(1) 
WES acquired (i) a natural gas gathering system and related compression and other ancillary equipment and (ii) cryogenic gas processing facilities from a third party. These assets are located in the Denver-Julesburg Basin. The acquisition is referred to as the “Platte Valley acquisition.”
(2) 
The Bison gas treating facility acquired from Anadarko is located in the Powder River Basin in northeastern Wyoming and includes (i) three amine treating units, (ii) compressor units, and (iii) generators. These assets are referred to collectively as the “Bison assets.” The Bison assets are the only treating and delivery point into the third-party-owned Bison pipeline. The Bison assets were placed in service in June 2010.
(3) 
The assets acquired from Anadarko consisted of (i) the Red Desert complex, which is located in the greater Green River Basin in southwestern Wyoming, and includes the Patrick Draw processing plant, the Red Desert processing plant, gathering lines, and related facilities, (ii) a 22% interest in Rendezvous, which owns a gathering system serving the Jonah and Pinedale Anticline fields in southwestern Wyoming, and (iii) certain additional midstream assets and equipment. These assets are collectively referred to as the “MGR assets” and the acquisition as the “MGR acquisition.”
(4) 
WES acquired Anadarko’s additional Chipeta interest (as described in Note 1). WES received distributions related to the additional interest beginning July 1, 2012. This transaction brought WES’s total membership interest in Chipeta to 75%. The remaining 25% membership interest in Chipeta held by a third-party member is reflected as noncontrolling interests in the consolidated financial statements for all periods presented.
(5) 
WES acquired Anadarko’s 33.75% interest (non-operated) in the Liberty and Rome gas gathering systems, serving production from the Marcellus shale in north-central Pennsylvania. The interest acquired is referred to as the “Non-Operated Marcellus Interest” and the acquisition as the “Non-Operated Marcellus Interest acquisition.” In connection with the issuance of WES common units, WES GP purchased 9,166 general partner units for consideration of $0.5 million in order to maintain its 2.0% general partner interest in WES.
(6) 
WES acquired a 33.75% interest in each of the Larry’s Creek, Seely and Warrensville gas gathering systems, which are operated by Anadarko and serve production from the Marcellus shale in north-central Pennsylvania, from a third party. The interest acquired is referred to as the “Anadarko-Operated Marcellus Interest” and the acquisition as the “Anadarko-Operated Marcellus Interest acquisition.” See Anadarko-Operated Marcellus Interest acquisition below for further information, including the final allocation of the purchase price.
(7) 
WES acquired a 25% interest in Enterprise EF78 LLC, an entity formed to design, construct, and own two fractionation trains located in Mont Belvieu, Texas, from a third party. The interest acquired is accounted for under the equity method of accounting and is referred to as the “Mont Belvieu JV” and the acquisition as the “Mont Belvieu JV acquisition.” See Mont Belvieu JV acquisition below for further information.
(8) 
WES acquired Overland Trail Transmission, LLC (“OTTCO”), a Delaware limited liability company, from a third party. OTTCO owns and operates an intrastate pipeline that connects WES’s Red Desert and Granger complexes in southwestern Wyoming.

17

WESTERN GAS EQUITY PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

2.  ACQUISITIONS (CONTINUED)

Anadarko-Operated Marcellus Interest acquisition. The Anadarko-Operated Marcellus Interest acquisition has been accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting. The assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the Anadarko-Operated Marcellus Interest acquisition were recorded in the consolidated balance sheet at their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date. Results of operations attributable to the Anadarko-Operated Marcellus Interest were included in the consolidated statements of income beginning on the acquisition date in the first quarter of 2013.
The following is the final allocation of the purchase price, including $1.1 million of post-closing purchase price adjustments, to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the Anadarko-Operated Marcellus Interest acquisition as of the acquisition date:
thousands
 
 
Property, plant and equipment
 
$
134,819

Asset retirement obligations
 
(174
)
Total purchase price
 
$
134,645


The purchase price allocation is based on an assessment of the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the Anadarko-Operated Marcellus Interest acquisition. The fair values of the interests in the land, right-of-way contracts, and gathering systems were based on the market and income approaches. All fair-value measurements of assets acquired and liabilities assumed are based on inputs that are not observable in the market and thus represent Level 3 inputs.
The following table presents pro forma condensed financial information as if the Anadarko-Operated Marcellus Interest acquisition had occurred on January 1, 2012:
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
thousands except per-unit amounts
 
2013
 
2012
Revenues
 
$
1,031,017

 
$
899,353

Net income
 
282,026

 
118,528

Net income attributable to Western Gas Equity Partners, LP
 
159,853

 
59,347

Net income per common unit - basic and diluted
 
$
0.71

 
$

 
The pro forma information is presented for illustration purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of the operating results that would have occurred had the Anadarko-Operated Marcellus Interest acquisition been completed at the assumed date, nor is it necessarily indicative of future operating results of the combined entity. The pro forma information in the table above includes $14.1 million of revenues and $0.7 million of operating expenses, excluding depreciation, amortization and impairments, attributable to the Anadarko-Operated Marcellus Interest that are included in the consolidated statement of income for the year ended December 31, 2013. The pro forma adjustments reflect pre-acquisition results of the Anadarko-Operated Marcellus Interest including (a) estimated revenues and expenses; (b) estimated depreciation and amortization based on the purchase price allocated to property, plant and equipment and estimated useful lives; and (c) interest on borrowings under WES’s revolving credit facility to finance the Anadarko-Operated Marcellus Interest acquisition. The pro forma adjustments include estimates and assumptions based on currently available information. Management believes the estimates and assumptions are reasonable, and the relative effects of the transaction are properly reflected. The pro forma information does not reflect any cost savings or other synergies anticipated as a result of the Anadarko-Operated Marcellus Interest acquisition, nor any future acquisition related expenses.

18

WESTERN GAS EQUITY PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

2. ACQUISITIONS (CONTINUED)

Mont Belvieu JV acquisition. The acquisition purchase price represented WES’s 25% share of construction costs incurred by the joint venture partner and 25% of the capitalized interest charged to the financial statements of the Mont Belvieu JV up to the date of acquisition. The allocated capitalized interest is reflected as a component of the equity investment balance recorded upon acquisition. Based on the total estimated net project cost, the construction of the fractionation facilities owned by the Mont Belvieu JV is considered a significant project and satisfies criteria for capitalization of interest. Capitalization of interest subsequent to the acquisition is treated as a basis difference between the cost of the investment and the underlying equity in the net assets of the Mont Belvieu JV. Upon completion of construction in the fourth quarter of 2013, WES began amortizing the capitalized interest recognized subsequent to the Mont Belvieu JV acquisition. This amortization is reflected as an adjustment to equity earnings from the Mont Belvieu JV.

TEFR Interests Acquisition. On March 3, 2014, WES acquired Anadarko’s 20% interest in TEP and TEG, and a 33.33% interest in FRP (collectively, the “TEFR Interests acquisition”) for $375.0 million. WES financed the TEFR Interests acquisition with $6.3 million of cash on hand, borrowings of $350.0 million on the 2014 WES RCF, and the issuance of 308,490 WES common units to Anadarko at an implied price of $60.78 per unit. See Note 13.
Due to Anadarko’s control of WES through its ownership and control of WGP, the acquisition of the TEFR Interests is considered a transfer of net assets under common control. As such, WGP’s historical financial statements previously filed with the SEC have been recast in this Current Report on Form 8-K to include the results attributable to the TEFR Interests from 2011 when Anadarko made its initial investment in the respective businesses. The consolidated financial statements for periods prior to WES’s acquisition of the TEFR Interests have been prepared from Anadarko’s historical cost-basis accounts and may not necessarily be indicative of the actual results of operations that would have occurred if WES had owned the TEFR Interests during the period reported.
The following table presents the impact of the TEFR Interests on revenue, equity income (loss), net and net income (loss) as presented in WGP’s historical consolidated statements of income:
 
 
Year Ended December 31, 2013
thousands
 
WGP Historical
 
TEFR Interests
 
Combined
Revenues
 
$
1,029,763

 
$

 
$
1,029,763

Equity income (loss), net
 
23,732

 
(784
)
 
22,948

Net income (loss)
 
$
282,387

 
$
(509
)
 
$
281,878

 
 
Year Ended December 31, 2012
thousands
 
WGP Historical
 
TEFR Interests
 
Combined
Revenues
 
$
894,476

 
$

 
$
894,476

Equity income (loss), net
 
16,111

 
(69
)
 
16,042

Net income (loss)
 
$
120,601

 
$
(44
)
 
$
120,557


 
 
Year Ended December 31, 2011
thousands
 
WGP Historical
 
TEFR Interests
 
Combined
Revenues
 
$
858,144

 
$

 
$
858,144

Equity income (loss), net
 
11,261

 

 
11,261

Net income (loss)
 
$
180,215

 
$

 
$
180,215



19

WESTERN GAS EQUITY PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

3.  PARTNERSHIP DISTRIBUTIONS

WGP partnership distributions. WGP’s partnership agreement requires WGP to distribute all of its available cash (as defined in its partnership agreement) to WGP unitholders of record on the applicable record date within 55 days of the end of each quarter.
The board of directors of WGP GP declared the following cash distributions to WGP unitholders for the periods presented:
thousands except per-unit amounts
Quarters Ended
 
Total Quarterly
Distribution
per Unit
 
Total Quarterly
Cash Distribution
 
Date of
Distribution
2012
 
 
 
 
 
 
December 31 (pro-rated from IPO date)
 
$
0.03587

 
$
7,852

 
February 2013
2013
 
 
 
 
 
 
March 31
 
$
0.17875

 
$
39,128

 
May 2013
June 30
 
$
0.19750

 
$
43,232

 
August 2013
September 30
 
$
0.21375

 
$
46,789

 
November 2013
December 31 (1)
 
$
0.23125

 
$
50,620

 
February 2014
                                                                                                                                                                                    
(1) 
On January 20, 2014, the board of directors of WGP GP declared a cash distribution to WGP unitholders of $0.23125 per unit, or $50.6 million in aggregate. The cash distribution was paid on February 21, 2014, to WGP unitholders of record at the close of business on January 31, 2014.

WES partnership distributions. WES’s partnership agreement requires WES to distribute all of its available cash (as defined in WES’s partnership agreement) to WES unitholders of record on the applicable record date within 45 days of the end of each quarter. The board of directors of WES GP declared the following cash distributions to WES unitholders for the periods presented:
thousands except per-unit amounts
Quarters Ended
 
Total Quarterly
Distribution
per Unit
 
Total Quarterly
Cash Distribution
 
Date of
Distribution
2011
 
 
 
 
 
 
March 31
 
$
0.390

 
$
33,168

 
May 2011
June 30
 
$
0.405

 
$
36,063

 
August 2011
September 30
 
$
0.420

 
$
40,323

 
November 2011
December 31
 
$
0.440

 
$
43,027

 
February 2012
2012
 
 
 
 
 
 
March 31
 
$
0.460

 
$
46,053

 
May 2012
June 30
 
$
0.480

 
$
52,425

 
August 2012
September 30
 
$
0.500

 
$
56,346

 
November 2012
December 31
 
$
0.520

 
$
65,657

 
February 2013
2013
 
 
 
 
 

March 31
 
$
0.540

 
$
70,143

 
May 2013
June 30
 
$
0.560

 
$
79,315

 
August 2013
September 30
 
$
0.580

 
$
83,986

 
November 2013
December 31 (1)
 
$
0.600

 
$
92,609

 
February 2014
                                                                                                                                                                                    
(1) 
On January 20, 2014, the board of directors of WES GP declared a cash distribution to WES unitholders of $0.60 per unit, or $92.6 million in aggregate, including incentive distributions. The cash distribution was paid on February 12, 2014, to WES unitholders of record at the close of business on January 31, 2014.


20

WESTERN GAS EQUITY PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

3.  PARTNERSHIP DISTRIBUTIONS (CONTINUED)

WES’s available cash. The amount of available cash (as defined in WES’s partnership agreement) generally is all cash on hand at the end of the quarter, plus, at the discretion of WES GP, working capital borrowings made subsequent to the end of such quarter, less the amount of cash reserves established by WES GP to provide for the proper conduct of WES’s business, including reserves to fund future capital expenditures; to comply with applicable laws, debt instruments or other agreements (such as the Chipeta LLC agreement); or to provide funds for distributions to WES unitholders and to WES GP for any one or more of the next four quarters. Working capital borrowings generally include borrowings made under a credit facility or similar financing arrangement. It is intended that working capital borrowings be repaid within 12 months. In all cases, working capital borrowings are used solely for working capital purposes or to fund distributions to partners.

General partner interest and incentive distribution rights of WES. WES GP is currently entitled to 2.0% of all quarterly distributions by WES. WES GP is entitled to incentive distributions if the amount distributed by WES with respect to any quarter exceeds specified target levels shown below:
 
 
Total Quarterly Distribution
Target Amount
 
Marginal Percentage
Interest in Distributions
 
 
 
Unitholders
 
General Partner
Minimum quarterly distribution
 
$0.300
 
98.0%
 
2.0%
First target distribution
 
up to $0.345
 
98.0%
 
2.0%
Second target distribution
 
above $0.345 up to $0.375
 
85.0%
 
15.0%
Third target distribution
 
above $0.375 up to $0.450
 
75.0%
 
25.0%
Thereafter
 
above $0.450
 
50.0%
 
50.0%

The table above assumes that WES GP maintains its 2.0% general partner interest in WES that WES GP continues to own the IDRs. The maximum distribution sharing percentage of 50.0% includes distributions paid to WES GP on its 2.0% general partner interest and does not include any distributions that it may receive on WES common units that it owns or may acquire.

4.  EQUITY AND PARTNERS’ CAPITAL

Initial Public Offering. In December 2012, WGP completed its IPO of 19,758,150 common units representing limited partner interests at a price of $22.00 per common unit. As of December 31, 2013, Anadarko held 199,137,365 of WGP’s common units, representing a 91.0% limited partner interest in WGP, and, through its ownership of WGP GP, Anadarko indirectly held a non-economic general partner interest in WGP. The public held 19,758,150 WGP common units, representing a 9.0% limited partner interest in WGP.

Net income per common unit. For WGP, earnings per unit is calculated by dividing the limited partners’ interest in net income by the weighted average number of common units outstanding. Net income per common unit is calculated assuming that cash distributions are equal to the net income attributable to WGP. Net income attributable to periods prior to WGP’s IPO, including compensation expense for grants of awards under the Incentive Plan (see Note 6), is attributable to subsidiaries of Anadarko and therefore not allocated to the limited partners for purposes of calculating net income per unit. As a result, pre-IPO net income, representing the financial results prior to WGP’s IPO on December 12, 2012, has been excluded from the limited partners’ interest in net income. Similarly, post-IPO net income attributable to the WES assets (as defined in Note 1) acquired from Anadarko, for periods prior to WES’s acquisition of such assets, is not allocated to the limited partners when calculating net income per common unit.
Net income equal to the amount of available cash (as defined by WGP’s partnership agreement) is allocated to WGP common unitholders consistent with actual cash distributions. Net income available to limited partners for the 20-day period beginning on the date WGP’s IPO closed through December 31, 2012, was calculated based on the number of common units outstanding after the IPO.


21

WESTERN GAS EQUITY PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

4.  EQUITY AND PARTNERS’ CAPITAL (CONTINUED)

Holdings of WES equity. WES’s common units are listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “WES.” As of December 31, 2013, WGP and affiliates held 49,296,205 WES common units, representing a 41.2% limited partner interest in WES, and, through its ownership of WES GP, WGP indirectly held 2,394,345 general partner units, representing a 2.0% general partner interest in WES, and 100% of WES’s IDRs. As of December 31, 2013, AMM, a subsidiary of Anadarko, separately held 449,129 WES common units, representing a 0.4% limited partner interest in WES, and the public held 67,577,478 WES common units, representing a 56.4% limited partner interest in WES, which are both reflected as noncontrolling interests within the consolidated financial statements of WGP (see Note 1 and Note 2).

WES public equity offerings. WES completed the following public offerings of its common units during 2011, 2012 and 2013:
thousands except unit
   and per-unit amounts
WES Common
Units Issued (1)
 
WES GP
Units Issued (2)
 
Price Per
Unit
 
Underwriting
Discount and
Other Offering
Expenses
 
Net
Proceeds to WES
March 2011 equity offering
3,852,813

 
78,629

 
$
35.15

 
$
5,621

 
$
132,569

September 2011 equity offering
5,750,000

 
117,347

 
35.86

 
7,655

 
202,748

June 2012 equity offering
5,000,000

 
102,041

 
43.88

 
7,468

 
216,409

May 2013 equity offering
7,015,000

 
143,163

 
61.18

 
13,203

 
424,733

December 2013 equity offering (3)
4,500,000

 
91,837

 
61.51

 
8,716

 
273,728

                                                                                                                                                                                    
(1) 
Includes the issuance of 302,813 WES common units, 750,000 WES common units and 915,000 WES common units pursuant to the full exercise of the underwriters’ over-allotment option granted in connection with the March 2011, September 2011 and May 2013 equity offerings, respectively.
(2) 
Represents general partner units of WES issued to WES GP in exchange for WES GP’s proportionate capital contribution to maintain its 2.0% general partner interest.
(3) 
Excludes the issuance of 300,000 WES common units on January 3, 2014, pursuant to the partial exercise of the underwriters’ over-allotment option, and the corresponding issuance of 6,122 general partner units of WES to WES GP in exchange for WES GP’s proportionate capital contribution to maintain its 2.0% general partner interest. Total net proceeds for the partial exercise of the underwriters’ over-allotment option (including the WES GP’s proportionate capital contribution) were $18.3 million.

In addition, pursuant to WES’s registration statement filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) in August 2012 authorizing the issuance of up to an aggregate of $125.0 million of WES common units (the “Continuous Offering Program”), during the three months ended December 31, 2013, WES completed trades totaling 642,385 common units at an average price per unit of $60.83, generating gross proceeds of $39.9 million (including the WES GP’s proportionate capital contribution and before $0.9 million of associated offering expenses). During the year ended December 31, 2013, WES completed trades totaling 685,735 common units at an average price per unit of $60.84, generating gross proceeds of $42.6 million (including WES GP’s proportionate capital contribution and before $1.0 million of associated offering expenses).


22

WESTERN GAS EQUITY PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

4.  EQUITY AND PARTNERS’ CAPITAL (CONTINUED)

WES common and general partner units. The following table summarizes WES’s common and general partner units issued during the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2013:
 
 
WES Common
Units
 
WES General
Partner Units
 
Total
Balance at December 31, 2011
 
90,140,999

 
1,839,613

 
91,980,612

MGR acquisition
 
632,783

 
12,914

 
645,697

Long-Term Incentive Plan awards
 
12,570

 
257

 
12,827

June 2012 equity offering
 
5,000,000

 
102,041

 
5,102,041

Chipeta acquisition
 
151,235

 
3,086

 
154,321

WGP unit purchase agreement
 
8,722,966

 
178,019

 
8,900,985

Balance at December 31, 2012
 
104,660,553

 
2,135,930

 
106,796,483

Non-Operated Marcellus Interest acquisition
 
449,129

 
9,166

 
458,295

Long-Term Incentive Plan awards
 
12,395

 
253

 
12,648

May 2013 equity offering
 
7,015,000

 
143,163

 
7,158,163

Continuous Offering Program
 
685,735

 
13,996

 
699,731

December 2013 equity offering
 
4,500,000

 
91,837

 
4,591,837

Balance at December 31, 2013
 
117,322,812

 
2,394,345

 
119,717,157


5.  TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES

Affiliate transactions. Revenues from affiliates include amounts earned by WES from services provided to Anadarko as well as from the sale of residue, condensate and NGLs to Anadarko. In addition, WES purchases natural gas from an affiliate of Anadarko pursuant to gas purchase agreements. Operating and maintenance expense includes amounts accrued for or paid to affiliates for the operation of WES assets, whether in providing services to affiliates or to third parties, including field labor, measurement and analysis, and other disbursements. A portion of general and administrative expenses is paid by Anadarko, which results in affiliate transactions pursuant to the reimbursement provisions of the omnibus agreements of WES and WGP. Affiliate expenses do not bear a direct relationship to affiliate revenues, and third-party expenses do not bear a direct relationship to third-party revenues. See Note 2 for further information related to contributions of assets to WES by Anadarko.

Cash management. Anadarko operates a cash management system whereby excess cash from most of its subsidiaries’ separate bank accounts is generally swept to centralized accounts. Prior to the acquisition of WES assets, third-party sales and purchases related to such assets were received or paid in cash by Anadarko within its centralized cash management system. Anadarko charged or credited WES interest at a variable rate on outstanding affiliate balances for the periods these balances remained outstanding. The outstanding affiliate balances were entirely settled through an adjustment to net investment by Anadarko in connection with the acquisition of WES assets. Subsequent to the acquisition of WES assets from Anadarko, transactions related to such assets are cash-settled directly with third parties and with Anadarko affiliates, and affiliate-based interest expense on current intercompany balances is not charged. Chipeta cash settles its transactions directly with third parties and Anadarko, as well as with the other subsidiaries of WES.


23

WESTERN GAS EQUITY PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

5.  TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES (CONTINUED)

WES note receivable from and amounts payable to Anadarko. Concurrently with the closing of WES’s May 2008 IPO, WES loaned $260.0 million to Anadarko in exchange for a 30-year note bearing interest at a fixed annual rate of 6.50%, payable quarterly. The fair value of the note receivable from Anadarko was $296.7 million and $334.8 million at December 31, 2013, and 2012, respectively. The fair value of the note reflects consideration of credit risk and any premium or discount for the differential between the stated interest rate and quarter-end market interest rate, based on quoted market prices of similar debt instruments. Accordingly, the fair value of the note receivable from Anadarko is measured using Level 2 inputs.
In 2008, WES entered into a five-year $175.0 million term loan agreement with Anadarko, which was repaid in full in June 2012 using the proceeds from the issuance of 4.000% Senior Notes due 2022. See Note 11.

Commodity price swap agreements. WES has commodity price swap agreements with Anadarko to mitigate exposure to commodity price volatility that would otherwise be present as a result of the purchase and sale of natural gas, condensate or NGLs. Notional volumes for each of the commodity price swap agreements are not specifically defined; instead, the commodity price swap agreements apply to the actual volume of natural gas, condensate and NGLs purchased and sold at the Granger, Hilight, Hugoton, Newcastle, MGR and Wattenberg assets, with various expiration dates through December 2016. In December 2013, WES extended the commodity price swap agreements for the Hilight and Newcastle assets through December 2014. The commodity price swap agreements do not satisfy the definition of a derivative financial instrument and, therefore, are not required to be measured at fair value.
Below is a summary of the fixed price ranges on WES’s outstanding commodity price swap agreements as of December 31, 2013 excluding the Hilight and Newcastle assets: 
per barrel except natural gas
 
2014
 
2015
 
2016
Ethane
 
$
18.36

$
30.53

 
$
18.41

$
23.41

 
$
23.11

Propane
 
$
46.47

$
53.78

 
$
47.08

$
52.99

 
$
52.90

Isobutane
 
$
61.24

$
75.13

 
$
62.09

$
74.02

 
$
73.89

Normal butane
 
$
53.89

$
66.01

 
$
54.62

$
65.04

 
$
64.93

Natural gasoline
 
$
71.85

$
83.04

 
$
72.88

$
81.82

 
$
81.68

Condensate
 
$
75.22

$
83.04

 
$
76.47

$
81.82

 
$
81.68

Natural gas (per MMBtu)
 
$
4.45

$
6.20

 
$
4.66

$
5.96

 
$
4.87


Below is a summary of the fixed prices or ranges on the WES’s outstanding commodity price swap agreements for the Hilight and Newcastle assets as of December 31, 2013:
per barrel except natural gas
 
2014
Propane
 
 
 
$
40.38

Normal butane
 
$
64.73

$
66.83

Natural gasoline
 
 
 
$
90.89

Condensate
 
 
 
$
87.30

Natural gas (per MMBtu)
 
 
 
$
3.45




24

WESTERN GAS EQUITY PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

5.  TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES (CONTINUED)

The following table summarizes realized gains and losses on commodity price swap agreements:
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
thousands
 
2013
 
2012
 
2011
Gains (losses) on commodity price swap agreements related to sales: (1)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Natural gas sales
 
$
21,382

 
$
37,665

 
$
33,845

Natural gas liquids sales
 
102,076

 
66,260

 
(36,802
)
Total
 
123,458

 
103,925

 
(2,957
)
Losses on commodity price swap agreements related to purchases (2)
 
(85,294
)
 
(89,710
)
 
(27,234
)
Net gains (losses) on commodity price swap agreements
 
$
38,164

 
$
14,215

 
$
(30,191
)
                                                                                                                                                                                    
(1) 
Reported in affiliate natural gas, NGLs and condensate sales in the consolidated statements of income in the period in which the related sale is recorded.
(2) 
Reported in cost of product in the consolidated statements of income in the period in which the related purchase is recorded. 
    
Gas gathering and processing agreements. WES has significant gas gathering and processing arrangements with affiliates of Anadarko on a majority of its systems. For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, 57%, 64% and 67%, respectively, of WES’s gathering, transportation and treating throughput (excluding equity investment throughput and volumes measured in barrels) was attributable to natural gas production owned or controlled by Anadarko. For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, 56%, 59% and 64%, respectively, of WES’s processing throughput (excluding equity investment throughput and volumes measured in barrels) was attributable to natural gas production owned or controlled by Anadarko.

Gas purchase and sale agreements. WES sells substantially all of its natural gas, NGLs, and condensate to Anadarko Energy Services Company (“AESC”), Anadarko’s marketing affiliate. In addition, WES purchases natural gas from AESC pursuant to gas purchase agreements. WES’s gas purchase and sale agreements with AESC are generally one-year contracts, subject to annual renewal.

Omnibus agreements. Pursuant to the omnibus agreements discussed below, Anadarko performs centralized corporate functions for WGP and WES such as legal; accounting; treasury; cash management; investor relations; insurance administration and claims processing; risk management; health, safety and environmental; information technology; human resources; credit; payroll; internal audit; tax; marketing; and midstream administration.

WGP omnibus agreement. In connection with WGP’s IPO in December 2012, WGP entered into an omnibus agreement with WGP GP and Anadarko that governs the following: (i) WGP’s obligation to reimburse Anadarko for expenses incurred or payments made on WGP’s behalf in conjunction with Anadarko’s provision of general and administrative services to WGP, including public company expenses and general and administrative expenses; (ii) WGP’s obligation to pay Anadarko in quarterly installments an administrative services fee of $250,000 per year (subject to an annual increase as described in the agreement); and (iii) WGP’s obligation to reimburse Anadarko for all insurance coverage expenses it incurs or payments it makes with respect to our assets.
The following table summarizes the amounts WGP reimbursed to Anadarko, separate from, and in addition to, those reimbursed by WES:
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
thousands
 
2013
 
2012
General and administrative expenses
 
$
271

 
$
13

Public company expenses
 
2,391

 
503

Total reimbursement
 
$
2,662

 
$
516



25

WESTERN GAS EQUITY PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

5.  TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES (CONTINUED)

WES omnibus agreement. In connection with WES’s IPO in 2008, WES entered into an omnibus agreement with Anadarko and WES GP that governs its relationship regarding certain reimbursement and indemnification matters (the “WES omnibus agreement”).
The following table summarizes the amounts WES reimbursed to Anadarko:
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
thousands
 
2013
 
2012
 
2011
General and administrative expenses
 
$
16,882

 
$
14,904

 
$
11,754

Public company expenses
 
7,152

 
6,830

 
7,735

Total reimbursement
 
$
24,034

 
$
21,734

 
$
19,489


Services and secondment agreement. Pursuant to the services and secondment agreement, specified employees of Anadarko are seconded to provide operating, routine maintenance and other services with respect to the assets owned and operated by WES under the direction, supervision and control of WES GP. Pursuant to the services and secondment agreement, WES reimburses Anadarko for services provided by the seconded employees. The initial term of the services and secondment agreement extends through May 2018 and the term will automatically extend for additional twelve-month periods unless either party provides 180 days written notice of termination before the applicable twelve-month period expires. The consolidated financial statements include costs allocated by Anadarko for expenses incurred under the services and secondment agreement for periods including and subsequent to the acquisition of the WES assets.

WGP tax sharing agreement. Prior to WGP’s conversion from WGR Holdings, LLC to a limited partnership in September 2012, WGP was a single-member limited liability company, required to reflect its income tax expense liability on a separate-return basis. Upon the completion of WGP’s IPO in December 2012, WGP became a partnership for U.S. federal and state income tax purposes and is therefore not subject to U.S. federal and state income taxes, except for Texas margin tax on the portion of WGP’s income apportionable to Texas. See Note 7.
In connection with WGP’s IPO in December 2012, WGP entered into a tax sharing agreement with Anadarko, pursuant to which WGP reimburses Anadarko for its estimated share of taxes from all forms of taxation, excluding taxes imposed by the United States, borne by Anadarko on WGP’s behalf as a result of WGP’s results being included in a combined or consolidated tax return filed by Anadarko with respect to periods including and subsequent to the closing date of the IPO. Anadarko may use its tax attributes to cause its combined or consolidated group, of which WGP may be a member for this purpose, to owe no tax. Nevertheless, WGP will be required to reimburse Anadarko for the estimated share of taxes that WGP would have owed had the attributes not been available or used for WGP’s benefit, regardless of whether Anadarko pays taxes for the period.

WES tax sharing agreement. Concurrently with WES’s IPO in 2008, WES entered into a tax sharing agreement, pursuant to which WES reimburses Anadarko for its estimated share of applicable state taxes.
These taxes include income taxes attributable to WES’s income which are directly borne by Anadarko through its filing of a combined or consolidated tax return with respect to periods beginning on and subsequent to the acquisition of the WES assets from Anadarko. Anadarko may use its own tax attributes to reduce or eliminate the tax liability of its combined or consolidated group, which may include WES as a member. However, under this circumstance, WES nevertheless is required to reimburse Anadarko for the allocable share of taxes that would have been owed had tax attributes not been available to Anadarko.


26

WESTERN GAS EQUITY PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

5.  TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES (CONTINUED)

WES long-term debt and WES RCF indemnification agreements. WES’s long-term debt is recourse to WES GP. In turn, WES GP has been indemnified by wholly owned subsidiaries of Anadarko for any claims made against WES GP under the indentures governing WES’s long-term debt or the WES RCF. See Note 11.

Allocation of costs. For periods prior to the acquisition of the WES assets, the consolidated financial statements include costs allocated by Anadarko in the form of a management services fee, which approximated the general and administrative costs incurred by Anadarko attributable to the WES assets. This management services fee was allocated to WES based on its proportionate share of Anadarko’s assets and revenues or other contractual arrangements. Management believes these allocation methodologies are reasonable.
The employees supporting WES’s operations are employees of Anadarko. Anadarko allocates costs to WES for its share of personnel costs, including costs associated with equity-based compensation plans, non-contributory defined pension and postretirement plans, defined contribution savings plan pursuant to the WES omnibus agreement and services and secondment agreement. In general, WES’s reimbursement to Anadarko under the WES omnibus agreement or services and secondment agreement is either (i) on an actual basis for direct expenses Anadarko and WES GP incur on behalf of WES, or (ii) based on an allocation of salaries and related employee benefits between WES, WES GP and Anadarko based on estimates of time spent on each entity’s business and affairs. Most general and administrative expenses charged to WES by Anadarko are attributed to WES on an actual basis, and do not include any mark-up or subsidy component. With respect to allocated costs, management believes the allocation method employed by Anadarko is reasonable. Although it is not practicable to determine what the amount of these direct and allocated costs would be if WES were to directly obtain these services, management believes that aggregate costs charged to WES by Anadarko are reasonable.

Equipment purchases and sales. The following table summarizes WES’s purchases from and sales to Anadarko of pipe and equipment:
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
 
2013
 
2012
 
2011
 
2013
 
2012
 
2011
thousands
 
Purchases
 
Sales
Cash consideration
 
$
11,211

 
$
24,705

 
$
3,837

 
$
85

 
$
760

 
$
382

Net carrying value
 
5,309

 
8,009

 
1,998

 
38

 
393

 
316

Partners’ capital adjustment
 
$
5,902

 
$
16,696

 
$
1,839

 
$
47

 
$
367

 
$
66


Contributions in aid of construction costs from affiliates. During the fourth quarter of 2013, a subsidiary of Anadarko entered into an aid in construction agreement with WES, whereby WES will construct five receipt-point facilities at its Brasada system that will serve the Anadarko subsidiary. Such subsidiary will reimburse WES for costs associated with construction of the receipt points. These reimbursements are presented within the investing section of the consolidated statements of cash flows as “Contributions in aid of construction costs from affiliates.”

27

WESTERN GAS EQUITY PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

5.  TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES (CONTINUED)

Summary of affiliate transactions. Transactions with affiliates include revenue from affiliates, reimbursement of operating expenses and purchases of natural gas. The following table summarizes affiliate transactions, including transactions with Anadarko, its affiliates, WGP GP and WES GP:
 
 
Year ended December 31,
thousands
 
2013
 
2012
 
2011
Revenues (1)
 
$
805,526

 
$
688,026

 
$
647,419

Equity income, net
 
22,948

 
16,042

 
11,261

Cost of product (1)
 
129,045

 
145,250

 
83,722

Operation and maintenance (2)
 
56,435

 
51,237

 
51,339

General and administrative (3)
 
24,235

 
92,887

 
33,305

Operating expenses
 
209,715

 
289,374

 
168,366

Interest income, net (4)
 
16,900

 
16,900

 
24,106

Interest expense (5)
 

 
2,766

 
4,935

Distributions to WGP unitholders (6)
 
124,634

 

 

Distributions to WES unitholders (7)
 
755

 

 

Contributions from Anadarko as a Chipeta noncontrolling interest owner (8)
 

 
12,588

 
16,476

Distributions to Anadarko as a Chipeta noncontrolling interest owner (8)
 

 
6,528

 
9,437

                                                                                                                                                                                    
(1) 
Represents amounts recognized under gathering, treating or processing agreements, and purchase and sale agreements.
(2) 
Represents expenses incurred on and subsequent to the date of the acquisition of WES assets, as well as expenses incurred by Anadarko on a historical basis related to WES assets prior to the acquisition of such assets by WES.
(3) 
Represents general and administrative expense incurred on and subsequent to the date of WES’s acquisition of WES assets, as well as a management services fee for reimbursement of expenses incurred by Anadarko for periods prior to the acquisition of WES assets by WES. These amounts include equity-based compensation expense allocated to WES by Anadarko (see Note 6) and amounts charged by Anadarko under the WGP omnibus agreement.
(4) 
Represents interest income recognized on the note receivable from Anadarko. For the year ended December 31, 2011, this line item also includes interest income, net on affiliate balances related to the Non-Operated Marcellus Interest, the MGR assets and the Bison assets for periods prior to the acquisition of such assets. Beginning December 7, 2011, Anadarko discontinued charging interest on intercompany balances. The outstanding affiliate balances on the aforementioned assets prior to their acquisition were entirely settled through an adjustment to net investment by Anadarko.
(5) 
For the year ended December 31, 2012, includes interest expense recognized on the WES note payable to Anadarko (see Note 11) and interest imputed on the reimbursement payable to Anadarko for certain expenditures Anadarko incurred in 2011 related to the construction of the Brasada facility and Lancaster plant. WES repaid the WES note payable to Anadarko in June 2012, and repaid the reimbursement payable to Anadarko related to the construction of the Brasada facility and Lancaster plant in the fourth quarter of 2012.
(6) 
Represents distributions paid under WGP’s partnership agreement.
(7) 
Represents distributions paid under WES’s partnership agreement (see Note 4).
(8) 
As described in Note 2, WES acquired the additional Chipeta interest on August 1, 2012, and accounted for the acquisition on a prospective basis. As such, contributions from noncontrolling interest owners and distributions to noncontrolling interest owners subsequent to the acquisition date no longer reflect contributions from or distributions to Anadarko.

Concentration of credit risk. Anadarko was the only customer from whom revenues exceeded 10% of consolidated revenues for all periods presented on the consolidated statements of income.
 

28

WESTERN GAS EQUITY PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

6.  EQUITY-BASED COMPENSATION

WGP LTIP. During the year ended December 31, 2013, WGP GP awarded 9,480 phantom units valued at a weighted-average grant-date fair value of $39.19 per common unit under the WGP LTIP to its independent directors, all of which were unvested at December 31, 2013. The phantom units awarded to the independent directors vest one year from the grant date. Compensation expense over the vesting period was $0.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2013. As of December 31, 2013, there was $27,000 of unrecognized compensation expense attributable to the outstanding independent director awards under the WGP LTIP, which will be realized by WGP and is expected to be recognized in one month.

WES LTIP. WES GP awards phantom units under the WES LTIP primarily to its independent directors and its Chief Executive Officer. The phantom units awarded to the independent directors vest one year from the grant date, while all other awards are subject to graded vesting over a three-year service period. Compensation expense is recognized over the vesting period and was $0.6 million, $0.4 million and $0.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. As of December 31, 2013, there was $0.6 million of unrecognized compensation expense attributable to the outstanding awards under the WES LTIP, of which $0.5 million will be realized by WES, and which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.4 years.
The following table summarizes WES LTIP award activity for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011:
 
2013
 
2012
 
2011
 
Weighted-Average Grant-Date Fair Value
 
Units
 
Weighted-Average Grant-Date Fair Value
 
Units
 
Weighted-Average Grant-Date Fair Value
 
Units
Phantom units outstanding at beginning of year
$
41.77

 
25,619

 
$
33.92

 
23,978

 
$
20.19

 
17,503

Vested
$
41.28

 
(14,695
)
 
$
33.20

 
(14,260
)
 
$
20.51

 
(15,119
)
Granted
$
62.49

 
5,920

 
$
45.91

 
15,901

 
$
35.66

 
21,594

Phantom units outstanding at end of year
$
49.47

 
16,844

 
$
41.77

 
25,619

 
$
33.92

 
23,978


WGP LTIP and Anadarko Incentive Plans. During the year ended December 31, 2013, WGP GP awarded 26,758 phantom units valued at a weighted-average grant-date fair value of $39.19 per common unit under the WGP LTIP to certain of its executive officers, all of which were unvested at December 31, 2013. These phantom unit awards are subject to graded vesting over a three-year service period. For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, general and administrative expenses included $3.0 million, $3.3 million and $2.5 million, respectively, of equity-based compensation expense, allocated to WES by Anadarko, for awards granted to the executive officers of WES GP and other employees under the WGP LTIP and Anadarko Incentive Plans. Of these amounts, $2.9 million, $3.2 million and $1.0 million are reflected as a contribution to partners’ capital in the consolidated statements of equity and partners’ capital for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. As of December 31, 2013, $5.5 million of estimated unrecognized compensation expense attributable to the WGP LTIP and Anadarko Incentive Plans (excluding performance-based awards) will be allocated to WES over a weighted-average period of 2.1 years.
During the fourth quarter of 2011, $9.7 million was recorded to partners’ capital in the consolidated financial statements related to accumulated compensation expense attributable to the Anadarko Incentive Plans that was allocated to WES by Anadarko.


29

WESTERN GAS EQUITY PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

6.  EQUITY-BASED COMPENSATION (CONTINUED)

The Incentive Plan. For the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, general and administrative expenses included $68.8 million and $11.4 million, respectively, of compensation expense for grants of Unit Value Rights (“UVRs”), Unit Appreciation Rights (“UARs”) and Distribution Equivalent Rights (“DERs”) under the Incentive Plan to certain executive officers of WES GP as a component of their compensation, which was allocated to WES by Anadarko.
Under the terms of the Incentive Plan, the value of a UAR was equal to an amount calculated by dividing the “determined value” (defined below) by 1,000,000, less the applicable UAR exercise price. Prior to WGP’s IPO in December 2012, the value of awards issued under the Incentive Plan were revised periodically based on the estimated fair value of WES GP using a discounted cash flow estimate and multiples-valuation terminal value. UARs outstanding under the Incentive Plan as of December 31, 2011 were valued at $634.00 per UAR.
Anadarko and the Incentive Plan participants entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (the “MOU”) that, among other things, confirmed the intent and the understanding that WGP’s IPO resulted in the vesting of all unvested Incentive Plan awards and that the value of WES’s common units held by WGP prior to its IPO would not be considered in the valuation of the Incentive Plan awards.
WGP’s IPO and concurrent execution of the MOU triggered the exercise of all outstanding UARs and lump-sum cash payments (less any applicable withholding taxes) to plan participants equal to the value of each award, less its exercise price, if applicable. Pursuant to the MOU, the “determined value” was defined as equal to the aggregate WGP equity value, as determined using the market price of WGP based on the IPO price of WGP’s common units, reduced by the market value of WES’s common units owned by WGP prior to its IPO (based on the closing price of WGP’s common units on the day of the pricing of the IPO). Awards outstanding under the Incentive Plan at the time of WGP’s IPO (and the effective termination of the Incentive Plan) were valued at $2,745.00 per UAR and $12.00 per DER. Outstanding UVRs that vested concurrent with WGP’s IPO were cash-settled at their grant-date fair value.
In addition to the execution of the MOU, WGP, WES GP and Anadarko entered into a contribution agreement whereby cash, in an amount equal to the aggregate cash payment required to settle all outstanding awards, was contributed to WES GP by Anadarko. The cash payments made in connection with WGP’s IPO and the vesting, exercise and settlement of all outstanding awards under the Incentive Plan as described above, impacted WGP’s cash flows to the extent compensation expense was allocated to WES since the inception of the Incentive Plan. The compensation expense allocated to WES since the inception of the Incentive Plan, and subsequently contributed by Anadarko during the fourth quarter of 2012, was recorded to partners’ capital in the consolidated financial statements.
The following table summarizes Incentive Plan award activity for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011:
 
 
UVRs
 
UARs
 
DERs
Outstanding at December 31, 2011
 
14,691

 
75,369

 
75,369

Vested and settled (1)
 
(14,691
)
 
(75,369
)
 
(75,369
)
Outstanding at December 31, 2012
 

 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Weighted average intrinsic per-unit value as of:
 
 
 
 
 
 
December 31, 2011 (2)
 
$
65.24

 
$
579.54

 
$

December 31, 2012 (3)
 
$
65.24

 
$
2,690.47

 
$
11.93

                                                                                                                                                                                   
(1)
UARs and DERs remained outstanding upon vesting until they were settled in cash, forfeited, or expired. As of December 31, 2011, 60,678 of the outstanding UARs and 3,334 of the DERs were vested.
(2)
The DERs had no attributed value since WES GP had not declared or paid distributions.
(3)
As discussed above, all awards then outstanding under the Incentive Plan were settled upon the closing of WGP’s IPO.


30

WESTERN GAS EQUITY PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

7.  INCOME TAXES

The components of income tax expense (benefit) are as follows:
 
Year Ended December 31,
thousands
2013
 
2012
 
2011
Current income tax expense (benefit)
 
 
 
 
 
Federal income tax expense (benefit)
$
(30,222
)
 
$
48,223

 
$
64,959

State income tax expense
636

 
2,924

 
4,560

Total current income tax expense (benefit)
(29,586
)
 
51,147

 
69,519

Deferred income tax expense (benefit)
 
 
 
 
 
Federal income tax expense (benefit)
32,930

 
(9,144
)
 
(13,464
)
State income tax expense (benefit)
(1,039
)
 
6,881

 
2,741

Total deferred income tax expense (benefit)
31,891

 
(2,263
)
 
(10,723
)
Total income tax expense
$
2,305

 
$
48,884

 
$
58,796


Total income taxes differed from the amounts computed by applying the statutory income tax rate to income before income taxes. The sources of these differences are as follows:
 
Year Ended December 31,
thousands except percentages
2013
 
2012
 
2011
Income before income taxes
$
284,183

 
$
169,441

 
$
239,011

Statutory tax rate
%
 
%
 
%
Tax computed at statutory rate
$

 
$

 
$

Adjustments resulting from:
 
 
 
 
 
Non-deductible goodwill

 

 
1,484

Federal taxes on income attributable to Anadarko’s investment in WES
3,043

 
41,557

 
23,872

State taxes on income attributable to Anadarko’s investment in WES (net of federal benefit)
621

 
6,069

 
1,290

Federal taxes on income attributable to WES assets pre-acquisition

 

 
29,502

State taxes on income attributable to WES assets pre-acquisition (net of federal benefit)

 

 
1,984

Texas margin tax expense (benefit)
(1,359
)
 
1,258

 
664

Income tax expense
$
2,305

 
$
48,884

 
$
58,796

Effective tax rate
1
%
 
29
%
 
25
%

The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of deferred tax assets (liabilities) are as follows:
 
December 31,
thousands
2013
 
2012
Credit carryforwards
$
14

 
$
14

Net current deferred income tax assets
14

 
14

Depreciable property
(38,528
)
 
(47,554
)
Credit carryforwards
527

 
541

Other
3

 
(136
)
Net long-term deferred income tax liabilities
(37,998
)
 
(47,149
)
Total net deferred income tax liabilities
$
(37,984
)
 
$
(47,135
)

Credit carryforwards, which are available for use on future income tax returns, consist of $0.5 million of state income tax credits that expire in 2026.

31

WESTERN GAS EQUITY PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

8.  PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

A summary of the historical cost of property, plant and equipment is as follows:
 
 
 
 
December 31,
thousands
 
Estimated Useful Life
 
2013
 
2012
Land
 
n/a
 
$
2,584

 
$
501

Gathering systems
 
3 to 47 years
 
3,673,008

 
2,911,572

Pipelines and equipment
 
15 to 45 years
 
146,008

 
91,126

Assets under construction
 
n/a
 
405,633

 
422,002

Other
 
3 to 40 years
 
11,867

 
7,191

Total property, plant and equipment
 
 
 
4,239,100

 
3,432,392

Accumulated depreciation
 
 
 
855,845

 
714,436

Net property, plant and equipment
 
 
 
$
3,383,255

 
$
2,717,956


The cost of property classified as “Assets under construction” is excluded from capitalized costs being depreciated. These amounts represent property that is not yet suitable to be placed into productive service as of the respective balance sheet date.
During 2013, WES recognized a $1.2 million impairment primarily related to the cancellation of various capital projects by the third-party operator of the Non-Operated Marcellus Interest.
During 2012, WES recognized a $6.0 million impairment related to a gathering system in central Wyoming that was impaired to its estimated fair value using Level 3 fair-value inputs and an impairment of $0.6 million for the original installation costs on a compressor relocated within WES’s operating assets.
During 2011, WES recognized a $7.3 million impairment related to certain equipment and materials. The costs of the equipment and materials, previously capitalized as assets under construction and related to a Red Desert complex (see Note 2) expansion project, were deemed no longer recoverable as the expansion project was indefinitely postponed. Also during 2011, following an evaluation of estimated future cash flows, an impairment of $3.0 million was recognized for a transportation pipeline that was impaired to its estimated fair value using Level 3 fair-value inputs.

9.  COMPONENTS OF WORKING CAPITAL

A summary of other current assets is as follows: 
 
 
December 31,
thousands
 
2013
 
2012
Natural gas liquids inventory
 
$
2,584

 
$
1,678

Natural gas imbalance receivables
 
3,605

 
1,663

Prepaid insurance
 
2,900

 
1,897

Other
 
1,710

 
1,760

Total other current assets
 
$
10,799

 
$
6,998



32

WESTERN GAS EQUITY PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

9.  COMPONENTS OF WORKING CAPITAL (CONTINUED)

A summary of accrued liabilities is as follows:
 
 
December 31,
thousands
 
2013
 
2012
Accrued capital expenditures
 
$
94,750

 
$
112,311

Accrued plant purchases
 
21,396

 
16,350

Accrued interest expense
 
18,119

 
15,868

Short-term asset retirement obligations
 
1,966

 
1,711

Short-term remediation and reclamation obligations
 
562

 
799

Other
 
1,241

 
1,561

Total accrued liabilities
 
$
138,034

 
$
148,600


10.  ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS

The following table provides a summary of changes in asset retirement obligations:
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
thousands
 
2013
 
2012
Carrying amount of asset retirement obligations at beginning of year
 
$
66,723

 
$
64,345

Liabilities incurred
 
14,143

 
9,414

Liabilities settled
 
(1,943
)
 
(786
)
Accretion expense
 
4,326

 
4,270

Revisions in estimated liabilities
 
(5,214
)
 
(10,520
)
Carrying amount of asset retirement obligations at end of year
 
$
78,035

 
$
66,723


Revisions in estimated liabilities for the year ended December 31, 2013, related primarily to the change in the estimated timing of settling asset retirement obligations at the Wattenberg system. The liabilities incurred for the year ended December 31, 2013, represented the increase in the capital expansion at the Wattenberg and Hilight systems and the June 2013 completion of the Brasada facility.
Revisions in estimated liabilities for the year ended December 31, 2012, related primarily to the change in the estimated timing of settling asset retirement obligations at the Wattenberg system. The liabilities incurred for the year ended December 31, 2012, represented the increase in asset retirement obligations primarily related to the capital expansion at the Wattenberg system.



33

WESTERN GAS EQUITY PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

11.  DEBT AND INTEREST EXPENSE

The following table presents outstanding debt as of December 31, 2013 and 2012:
 
 
December 31, 2013
 
December 31, 2012
thousands
 
Principal
 
Carrying
Value
 
Fair
Value (1)
 
Principal
 
Carrying
Value
 
Fair
Value (1)
4.000% Senior Notes due 2022
 
$
670,000

 
$
673,278

 
$
641,237

 
$
670,000

 
$
673,617

 
$
669,928

5.375% Senior Notes due 2021
 
500,000

 
495,173

 
533,615

 
500,000

 
494,661

 
499,946

2.600% Senior Notes due 2018
 
250,000

 
249,718

 
247,988

 

 

 

Total debt outstanding
 
$
1,420,000

 
$
1,418,169

 
$
1,422,840

 
$
1,170,000

 
$
1,168,278

 
$
1,169,874

                                                                                                                                                                                    
(1) 
Fair value is measured using Level 2 inputs.

Debt activity. The following table presents the debt activity for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012:
thousands
 
Carrying Value
Balance as of December 31, 2011
 
$
669,178

WES revolving credit facility borrowings
 
374,000

Issuance of 4.000% Senior Notes due 2022
 
670,000

Repayment of WES revolving credit facility
 
(374,000
)
Repayment of WES note payable to Anadarko
 
(175,000
)
WES revolving credit facility borrowings - Swingline
 
20,000

WES repayment of revolving credit facility - Swingline
 
(20,000
)
Other
 
4,100

Balance as of December 31, 2012
 
$
1,168,278

WES revolving credit facility borrowings
 
710,000

Repayments of WES revolving credit facility
 
(710,000
)
Issuance of 2.600% Senior Notes due 2018
 
250,000

Other
 
(109
)
Balance as of December 31, 2013
 
$
1,418,169


WES Senior Notes. In August 2013, WES completed the offering of $250.0 million aggregate principal amount of 2.600% Senior Notes due 2018 (the “2018 Notes”) at a price to the public of 99.879% of the face amount. Including the effects of the issuance and underwriting discounts, the effective interest rate of the 2018 Notes is 2.806%. Interest is paid semi-annually on February 15 and August 15 of each year. Proceeds (net of underwriting discount of $1.5 million, original issue discount and debt issuance costs) were used to repay amounts then outstanding under WES’s $800.0 million senior unsecured revolving credit facility (“WES RCF”).
The 2018 Notes mature on August 15, 2018, unless earlier redeemed. WES may redeem the 2018 Notes in whole or in part, at any time before July 15, 2018, at a redemption price equal to the greater of (i) 100% of the principal amount of the 2018 Notes to be redeemed or (ii) the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest on such 2018 Notes (exclusive of interest accrued to the redemption date) discounted to the redemption date on a semi-annual basis (assuming a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months) at the Treasury Rate (as defined in the indenture governing the 2018 Notes) plus 20 basis points, plus, in either case, accrued and unpaid interest to such redemption date, if any, on the principal amount being redeemed. On or after July 15, 2018, the 2018 Notes may be redeemed, at any time in whole, or from time to time in part, at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the 2018 Notes to be redeemed, plus accrued interest on the 2018 Notes to be redeemed to the date of redemption.

34

WESTERN GAS EQUITY PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

11.  DEBT AND INTEREST EXPENSE (CONTINUED)

In June 2012, WES completed the offering of $520.0 million aggregate principal amount of 4.000% Senior Notes due 2022. In October 2012, WES issued an additional $150.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 4.000% Senior Notes due 2022. The October 2012 notes and the June 2012 notes were issued under the same indenture and are considered a single class of securities, collectively referred to as the “2022 Notes.”
In May 2011, WES completed the offering of $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of 5.375% Senior Notes due 2021 (the “2021 Notes”). The indentures governing the 2021 Notes, the 2022 Notes, and the 2018 Notes contain customary events of default. At December 31, 2013, WES was in compliance with all covenants under the indentures governing the 2021 Notes, 2022 Notes, and the 2018 Notes.

Interest rate agreements. In May 2012, WES entered into U.S. Treasury Rate lock agreements to mitigate the risk of rising interest rates prior to the issuance of the 2022 Notes. WES settled the rate lock agreements simultaneously with the June 2012 offering of the 2022 Notes, realizing a loss of $1.7 million, which is included in other income (expense), net in the consolidated statements of income.
In March 2011, WES entered into a forward-starting interest-rate swap agreement to mitigate the risk of rising interest rates prior to the issuance of the 2021 Notes. In May 2011, WES issued the 2021 Notes and terminated the swap agreement, realizing a loss of $1.9 million, which is included in other income (expense), net in the consolidated statements of income.

WES note payable to Anadarko. In 2008, WES entered into a five-year $175.0 million term loan agreement with Anadarko. The interest rate was fixed at 2.82% prior to June 2012 when the WES note payable to Anadarko was repaid in full with proceeds from the June 2012 offering of the 2022 Notes.

WES revolving credit facility. In March 2011, WES entered into the amended and restated $800.0 million senior unsecured WES RCF and borrowed $250.0 million under the WES RCF to repay the WES Wattenberg term loan (described below). The WES RCF amended and restated a $450.0 million credit facility, which was originally entered into in October 2009. At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the interest rate on the WES RCF was 1.67% and 1.71%, respectively. WES is required to pay a quarterly facility fee currently ranging from 0.20% to 0.35% of the commitment amount (whether used or unused), based upon its senior unsecured debt rating. The facility fee rate was 0.25% at December 31, 2013 and 2012. See Note 13.
As of December 31, 2013, WES had no outstanding borrowings, $12.8 million in outstanding letters of credit issued and $787.2 million available for borrowing under the WES RCF. At December 31, 2013, WES was in compliance with all covenants under the WES RCF.

35

WESTERN GAS EQUITY PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

11.  DEBT AND INTEREST EXPENSE (CONTINUED)

The 2021 Notes, the 2022 Notes, the 2018 Notes and obligations under the WES RCF are recourse to WES GP. WES GP is indemnified by a wholly owned subsidiary of Anadarko, WGRI, against any claims made against WES GP under the 2022 Notes, the 2021 Notes, and/or the WES RCF. See Note 2 and Note 13 for a discussion of amendments to the RCF and borrowing activity under the new RCF in March 2014, related to acquisitions which closed after December 31, 2013.
In connection with the acquisition of the Non-Operated Marcellus Interest in March 2013, WES GP and another wholly owned subsidiary of Anadarko entered into an indemnification agreement (the “2013 Indemnification Agreement”) whereby such subsidiary agreed to indemnify WES GP for any recourse liability it may have for WES RCF borrowings, or other debt financing, attributable to the acquisitions of the Non-Operated Marcellus Interest or the Anadarko-Operated Marcellus Interest. The 2013 Indemnification Agreement applies to the 2018 Notes. WES GP and WGRI also amended and restated the existing indemnity agreement between them to reduce the amount for which WGRI would indemnify WES GP by an amount equal to any amounts payable to WES GP under the 2013 Indemnification Agreement. See Note 13.

WGP working capital facility. On November 1, 2012, WGP entered into a $30.0 million working capital facility (the “WGP WCF”) with Anadarko as the lender. The facility is available exclusively to fund WGP’s working capital borrowings. Borrowings under the facility will mature on November 1, 2017, and will bear interest at London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus 1.50%. The interest rate was 1.67% and 1.71% at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
WGP is required to reduce all borrowings under the WGP WCF to zero for a period of at least 15 consecutive days during the twelve month period commencing on November 1, 2012, and during the twelve month period commencing on each anniversary thereof. As of December 31, 2013, WGP had no outstanding borrowings under the WGP WCF, and WGP was in compliance with all covenants under the WGP WCF.

WES Wattenberg term loan. In connection with the Wattenberg acquisition, in August 2010 WES borrowed $250.0 million under a three-year term loan from a group of banks (“Wattenberg term loan”). The Wattenberg term loan incurred interest at LIBOR plus a margin ranging from 2.50% to 3.50% depending on WES’s consolidated leverage ratio as defined in the Wattenberg term loan agreement. WES repaid the Wattenberg term loan in March 2011 using borrowings from the WES RCF and recognized $1.3 million of accelerated amortization expense related to its early repayment.


36

WESTERN GAS EQUITY PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

11.  DEBT AND INTEREST EXPENSE (CONTINUED)

Interest expense. The following table summarizes the amounts included in interest expense:
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
thousands
 
2013
 
2012
 
2011
Third parties
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest expense on long-term debt
 
$
59,293

 
$
41,171

 
$
20,533

Amortization of debt issuance costs and commitment fees (1)
 
4,449

 
4,319

 
5,297

Capitalized interest
 
(11,945
)
 
(6,196
)
 
(420
)
Total interest expense – third parties
 
51,797

 
39,294

 
25,410

Affiliates
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest expense on WES note payable to Anadarko (2)
 

 
2,440

 
4,935

Interest expense on affiliate balances (3)
 

 
326

 

Total interest expense – affiliates
 

 
2,766

 
4,935

Interest expense
 
$
51,797

 
$
42,060

 
$
30,345

                                                                                                                                                                                    
(1) 
For the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, includes $1.0 million and $1.1 million, respectively, of amortization of (i) the original issue discount for the June 2012 offering of the 2022 Notes, partially offset by the original issue premium for the October 2012 offering of the 2022 Notes, (ii) original issue discount for the 2021 Notes and (iii) underwriters’ fees. In addition, for the year ended December 31, 2013, includes the amortization of the original issue discount and underwriters’ fees for the 2018 Notes of $0.2 million. For the year ended December 31, 2011, includes $0.5 million of amortization of the original issue discount and underwriters’ fees for the 2021 Notes.
(2) 
In June 2012, the WES note payable to Anadarko was repaid in full. See WES note payable to Anadarko within this Note 11.
(3) 
Imputed interest expense on the reimbursement payable to Anadarko for certain expenditures Anadarko incurred in 2011 related to the construction of the Brasada facility and Lancaster plant. In the fourth quarter of 2012, WES repaid the reimbursement payable to Anadarko associated with the construction of the Brasada facility and Lancaster plant.

12.  COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Environmental obligations. WGP, through its partnership interest in WES, is subject to various environmental-remediation obligations arising from federal, state and local regulations regarding air and water quality, hazardous and solid waste disposal and other environmental matters. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, asset retirement obligations and other on the consolidated balance sheets included a $1.9 million long-term liability for remediation and reclamation obligations. The recorded obligations do not include any anticipated insurance recoveries. The majority of payments related to these obligations are expected to be made over the next five years. Management regularly monitors the remediation and reclamation process and the liabilities recorded and believes its environmental obligations are adequate to fund remedial actions to comply with present laws and regulations, and that the ultimate liability for these matters, if any, will not differ materially from recorded amounts nor materially affect the overall results of operations, cash flows or financial condition of WGP. There can be no assurance, however, that current regulatory requirements will not change, or past non-compliance with environmental issues will not be discovered. See Note 9.

Litigation and legal proceedings. In March 2011, DCP Midstream LP (“DCP”) filed a lawsuit against Anadarko and others, including a subsidiary of WES, Kerr-McGee Gathering LLC, in Weld County District Court (the “Court”) in Colorado, alleging that Anadarko diverted gas from DCP’s gathering and processing facilities in breach of certain dedication agreements. In addition to various claims against Anadarko, DCP is claiming unjust enrichment and other damages against Kerr-McGee Gathering LLC, the entity which holds the Wattenberg assets. Anadarko countersued DCP asserting that DCP has not properly allocated values and charges to Anadarko for the gas that DCP gathers and/or processes, and seeks a judgment that DCP has no valid gathering or processing rights to much of the gas production it is claiming, in addition to other claims.

37

WESTERN GAS EQUITY PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

12.  COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (CONTINUED)

In July 2011, the Court denied the defendants’ motion to dismiss without ruling on the merits and the case is in the discovery phase. Trial is set for April 2014. Management does not believe the outcome of this proceeding will have a material effect on the financial condition, results of operations or cash flows of WGP. WES intends to vigorously defend this litigation. Furthermore, without regard to the merit of DCP’s claims, management believes that WES has adequate contractual indemnities covering the claims against it in this lawsuit.
In addition, from time to time, WGP, through its partnership interests in WES, is involved in legal, tax, regulatory and other proceedings in various forums regarding performance, contracts and other matters that arise in the ordinary course of business. Management is not aware of any such proceeding for which a final disposition could have a material adverse effect on the financial condition, results of operations or cash flows of WGP.

Other commitments. WES has short-term payment obligations, or commitments, related to its capital spending programs, as well as those of its unconsolidated affiliates. As of December 31, 2013, WES had unconditional payment obligations for services to be rendered or products to be delivered in connection with its capital projects of $47.1 million, the majority of which is expected to be paid in the next twelve months. These commitments relate primarily to the continued construction of the Lancaster plant and an expansion project at the Fort Lupton compressor station in the Wattenberg system.

Lease commitments. Anadarko, on WES’s behalf, has entered into lease agreements for corporate offices, shared field offices and a warehouse supporting WES’s operations. The leases for the corporate offices and shared field offices extend through 2017 and 2018, respectively, and the lease for the warehouse extends through February 2014 and includes an early termination clause.
Rent expense associated with the office, warehouse and equipment leases was $2.8 million, $3.0 million and $4.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
The amounts in the table below represent existing contractual operating lease obligations as of December 31, 2013, that may be assigned or otherwise charged to WES pursuant to the reimbursement provisions of the WES omnibus agreement:
thousands
Operating Leases
2014
$
309

2015
245

2016
233

2017
157

2018
34

Thereafter

Total
$
978



38

WESTERN GAS EQUITY PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

13.  SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Effective February 12, 2014, Anthony R. Chase resigned as a director of WES GP due to his appointment to the board of directors of Anadarko. In connection with his resignation and in recognition of his service, WES GP’s board of directors accelerated the vesting of 1,280 phantom units held by Mr. Chase. Also effective February 12, 2014, Steven D. Arnold was appointed to the WES GP’s board of directors as an independent director and member of the audit committee and special committee of WES GP’s board of directors.
On February 26, 2014, WES entered into a five-year senior unsecured revolving credit agreement (the “2014 WES RCF”), amending and restating the WES RCF, which was originally entered into in March 2011 and had an outstanding balance of $60.0 million immediately prior to closing on the 2014 WES RCF. The aggregate initial commitments of the 2014 WES RCF lenders are $1.2 billion and are expandable to a maximum of $1.5 billion. The 2014 WES RCF matures on February 26, 2019, and bears interest at LIBOR, plus applicable margins ranging from 0.975% to 1.45%, or an alternate base rate equal to the greatest of (a) the Prime Rate, (b) the Federal Funds Effective Rate plus 0.5%, or (c) LIBOR plus 1%, in each case plus applicable margins currently ranging from zero to 0.45%, based on WES’s senior unsecured debt rating. WES is required to pay a quarterly facility fee ranging from 0.15% to 0.30% of the commitment amount (whether used or unused), also based upon its senior unsecured debt rating. As of February 26, 2014, there was $60.0 million outstanding on the 2014 RCF, drawn to repay amounts that were outstanding on the RCF upon WES entering into the 2014 RCF.
Refer to Note 2 for a description of the TEFR Interests acquisition on March 3, 2014. In connection with the TEFR Interests acquisition, WES GP and another wholly owned subsidiary of Anadarko entered into an indemnification agreement (the “TEFR Indemnification Agreement”) whereby such subsidiary will indemnify WES GP for any recourse liability it may have for 2014 WES RCF borrowings, or other debt financing, attributable to the TEFR Interests acquisition. WES GP and WGRI also amended and restated the existing indemnity agreement between them (as discussed in Note 11) to reduce the amount for which WGRI would indemnify WES GP by an amount equal to any amounts payable to WES GP under the TEFR Indemnification Agreement. WES GP and another wholly owned subsidiary of Anadarko also amended and restated the 2013 Indemnification Agreement (as discussed in Note 11) primarily to conform language among all the indemnity agreements with WES GP.


39


WESTERN GAS EQUITY PARTNERS, LP
SUPPLEMENTAL QUARTERLY INFORMATION
(UNAUDITED)

The following table presents a summary of operating results by quarter for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012. Operating results reflect the operations of the WES assets (as defined in Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies) from the dates of common control, unless otherwise noted, and have been recast to include results attributable to the TEFR Interests, as applicable. See Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Note 2—Acquisitions in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 8 of Exhibit 99.3 to this Current Report on Form 8-K.
thousands except per-unit amounts
First
Quarter
 
Second
Quarter
 
Third
Quarter
 
Fourth
Quarter
2013
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Revenues
$
225,766

 
$
251,402

 
$
273,502

 
$
279,093

Equity income
$
3,968

 
$
3,456

 
$
4,520

 
$
11,004

Operating income
$
62,758

 
$
68,938

 
$
89,524

 
$
95,925

Net income
$
51,733

 
$
60,949

 
$
81,223

 
$
87,973

Net income attributable to Western Gas Equity Partners, LP
$
32,372

 
$
34,527

 
$
44,444

 
$
48,362

Net income per common unit – basic and diluted (1)
$
0.12

 
$
0.16

 
$
0.20

 
$
0.22

2012
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Revenues
$
221,063

 
$
216,975

 
$
230,931

 
$
225,507

Equity income
$
3,617

 
$
3,331

 
$
3,758

 
$
5,336

Operating income (2)
$
67,225

 
$
59,276

 
$
61,267

 
$
6,541

Net income (loss) (2)
$
45,632

 
$
39,745

 
$
40,872

 
$
(5,692
)
Net income attributable to Western Gas Equity Partners, LP (2)
$
17,058

 
$
18,666

 
$
19,267

 
$
6,385

Net income per common unit – basic and diluted (1) (2) (3)
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
0.01

                                                                                                                                                                                   
(1)
Represents net income earned on and subsequent to the acquisition of the WES assets (as defined in Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 8 of Exhibit 99.3 to this Current Report on Form 8-K).
(2) 
During the fourth quarter of 2012, WES was allocated $54.9 million of general and administrative expenses from Anadarko associated with the Incentive Plan (as defined and described in Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and further described in Note 6—Equity-based Compensation in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 8 of Exhibit 99.3 to this Current Report on Form 8-K).
(3) 
There was no limited partners’ interest in net income prior to WGP’s IPO on December 12, 2012. See Note 4—Equity and Partners’ Capital and Note 6—Equity-based Compensation in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 8 of Exhibit 99.3 to this Current Report on Form 8-K.


40