BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Policies)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2016

The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. These statements include all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) management believes are necessary for a fair presentation of the results of operations, comprehensive income, financial position, and cash flows. The Company’s management believes the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading when read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 filed on February 29, 2016 and the Company's Amended Annual Reports on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2015 filed on March 30, 2016 and April 29, 2016. Operating results for the six months ended June 30, 2016 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ended December 31, 2016.

Principles of Consolidation

Principles of Consolidation: The Company consolidates into its financial statements all wholly-owned and any partially-owned subsidiaries the Company has the ability to control. Control generally equates to ownership percentage, whereby investments more than 50% owned are consolidated, investments in affiliates of 50% or less but greater than 20% are accounted for using the equity method, and investments in affiliates of 20% or less are accounted for using the cost method. See Note 11, Investment in Nonconsolidated Affiliates, for discussion regarding the Company's subsidiaries that were subject to regulatory control.

The Company does not consolidate any entity for which it has a variable interest based solely on power to direct the activities and significant participation in the entity’s expected results that would not otherwise be consolidated based on control through voting interests. Further, the Company’s affiliates are businesses established and maintained in connection with the Company's operating strategy. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.

Reclassifications

Reclassifications: Certain reclassifications from the prior year presentation have been made to conform to the current year presentation.

Concentrations of Credit Risk

Concentrations of Credit Risk: Financial instruments, which potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk, consist primarily of accounts receivable, cash deposits, cash equivalents, and derivatives. The Company’s customer base includes virtually every significant global light and commercial vehicle manufacturer and a large number of distributors, installers, and retailers of automotive aftermarket parts. The Company’s credit evaluation process and the geographical dispersion of sales transactions help to mitigate credit risk concentration. The Company only utilizes well-known and highly creditworthy financial institutions for cash deposits and investments in cash equivalents or as a counterparty to derivative transactions.

Factoring of Trade Accounts Receivable

Factoring of Accounts Receivable: The Company's subsidiaries in Brazil, France, Germany, Italy, Canada, and the United States are party to accounts receivable factoring and securitization facilities. Amounts factored under these facilities consist of the following:



	June 30		December 31
	2016		2015
Gross accounts receivable factored	$	566	$	408
Gross accounts receivable factored, qualifying as sales	$	556	$	401
Undrawn cash on factored accounts receivable	$	1	$	1

Proceeds from the factoring of accounts receivable qualifying as sales and expenses associated with the factoring of receivables are as follows:



	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30						June 30
	2016			2015			2016			2015
Proceeds from factoring qualifying as sales	$	429		$	410		$	842		$	800
Financing charges	(4		)	(2		)	$	(7	)	$	(4	)

Accounts receivable factored but not qualifying as a sale were pledged as collateral and accounted for as secured borrowings and recorded in the condensed consolidated balance sheets within “Accounts receivable, net” and “Short-term debt, including the current portion of long-term debt.”

The financing charges are recorded in the condensed consolidated statements of operations within “Other income (expense), net.” Where the Company receives a fee to service and monitor these transferred receivables, such fees are sufficient to offset the costs and as such, a servicing asset or liability is not recorded as a result of such activities.

Certain of the facilities contain terms that require the Company to share in the credit risk of the factored receivables. The maximum exposures to the Company associated with these certain facilities’ terms were $4 million and $11 million as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015.

Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures

ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC 820”), clarifies fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based upon assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. As a basis for considering such assumptions, ASC 820 establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows:


Level 1:	Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets;


Level 2:	Inputs, other than quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or indirectly; and


Level 3:	Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.

An asset’s or liability’s fair value measurement level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Valuation techniques used need to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. Estimates of the fair value of commodity derivative instruments are determined using exchange traded prices and rates.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01, Financial Instruments - Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. The updated guidance enhances the reporting model for financial instruments, which includes amendments to address aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure. The amendments in the ASU are effective prospectively for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods therein, with early adoption not permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the potential effects of this pronouncement.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) that replaces existing lease guidance. The new standard is intended to provide enhanced transparency and comparability by requiring lessees to record right-of-use assets and corresponding lease liabilities on the balance sheet. The new guidance will continue to classify leases as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the statement of income. The standard is effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2019, with early application permitted. The new standard is required to be applied with a modified retrospective approach to each prior reporting period presented with various optional practical expedients. The Company is currently evaluating the potential effects of this pronouncement.

As disclosed in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which provides a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue recognition, with subsequent amendments in 2015. In 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-08, ASU No. 2016-10, ASU No. 2016-11, and ASU 2016-12 which amend the implementation guidance and illustrations in the new standard. The Company is currently evaluating the effects of these accounting pronouncements.