8-K

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C.  20549

FORM 8-K

CURRENT REPORT

Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of

the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): August 19, 2014

THOMPSON CREEK METALS COMPANY INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

British Columbia, Canada	001-33783	98-0583591
(State or Other Jurisdiction	(Commission	(I.R.S. Employer
of Incorporation)	File Number)	Identification No.)

26 West Dry Creek Circle

Suite 810

Littleton, Colorado 80120

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

(303) 761-8801

Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:

o Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)

o Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)

o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))

o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))

Items to be Included in this Report

Item 7.01.Regulation FD Disclosure.    

The Company is furnishing as exhibits to this Current Report on Form 8-K investor presentations that will be used for meetings with investors, stockholders, and analysts. The Company does not intend to file any updates to these investor presentations. The fact that these investor presentations are being furnished should not be deemed an admission as to the materiality of any information contained in the presentations.

The information in this Current Report on Form 8-K and the exhibits attached hereto shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.

Item 9.01.Financial Statements and Exhibits.

(d)    Exhibits.

Exhibit No.	Description
99.1	Investor Presentation (Overview)
99.2	Investor Presentation (Mt. Milligan)
99.3	Investor Presentation (TC Mine)
99.4	Investor Presentation (Endako Mine)
99.5	Investor Presentation (Langeloth Facility)

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

	THOMPSON CREEK METALS COMPANY INC.
Date: August 19, 2014	By:	/s/ Wendy Cassity
	Name:	Wendy Cassity
	Title:	Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit No.	Description
99.1	Investor Presentation (Overview)
99.2	Investor Presentation (Mt. Milligan)
99.3	Investor Presentation (TC Mine)
99.4	Investor Presentation (Endako Mine)
99.5	Investor Presentation (Langeloth Facility)

EX-99.1

NYSE:TC TSX:TCM Mt. Milligan Mine Tour August 2014

2 Cautionary Statement This document contains ‘‘forward-looking statements’’ within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, Section 21E of the Securities Act of 1934, as amended and applicable Canadian securities legislation, which are intended to be covered by the safe harbor created by those sections and other applicable laws. These forward-looking statements generally are identified by the words "believe," "project," "expect," "anticipate," "estimate," "intend," "future," "opportunity," "plan," "may," "should," "will," "would," "will be," "will continue," "will likely result," and similar expressions. Our forward-looking statements may include, without limitation, statements with respect to: future financial or operating performance of the Company or its subsidiaries and its projects; the availability of, and terms and costs related to, future borrowing, debt repayment, and refinancing ; future inventory, production, sales, cash costs, capital expenditures and exploration expenditures; future earnings and operating results; expected concentrate and recovery grades; estimates of mineral reserves and resources, including estimated mine life and annual production; projected timing to ramp-up to design capacity at Mt. Milligan Mine; the potential development of our development properties and future exploration at our operations; future concentrate shipment dates and sizes; future operating plans and goals; and future copper, gold and molybdenum prices. Where we express an expectation or belief as to future events or results, such expectation or belief is expressed in good faith and believed to have a reasonable basis. However, our forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties which may cause actual results to differ materially from future results expressed, projected or implied by those forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause actual results and events to differ from those described in such forward- looking statements can be found in the section entitled ‘‘Risk Factors’’ in Thompson Creek’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and other documents filed on EDGAR at www.sec.gov and on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. Although we have attempted to identify those material factors that could cause actual results or events to differ from those described in such forward-looking statements, there may be other factors, currently unknown to us or deemed immaterial at the present time, that could cause results or events to differ from those anticipated, estimated or intended. Many of these factors are beyond our ability to control or predict. Given these uncertainties, the reader is cautioned not to place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise, and investors should not assume that any lack of update to a previously issued forward-looking statement constitutes a reaffirmation of that statement. Cautionary Note to our United States and Other Investors Concerning Estimates of Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources: This presentation uses the terms “Measured” and “Indicated” Resources. United States investors are advised that while such terms are recognized by Canadian regulations, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) only permits United States mining companies, in their filings with the SEC, to disclose those mineral deposits that a company can economically and legally extract or produce in accordance with SEC Industry Guide 7. Our United States and other investors are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of Measured or Indicated Mineral Resources will ever be converted into Mineral Reserves. Compliance with NI 43-101 Unless otherwise indicated, we have prepared the technical information in this presentation based on information contained in the technical reports available under our company profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. Each technical report was prepared by or under the supervision of a qualified person (a “Qualified Person”) as defined in National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects of the Canadian Securities Administrators (“NI 43-101”). For readers to fully understand the information in this presentation, they should read the technical reports n their entirety, including all qualifications, assumptions and exclusions that relate to the information set out in this presentation which qualifies such information. This presentation summarizes some of the information contained in the following technical reports: "Technical Report Thompson Creek Molybdenum Mine" dated February 9, 2011 and filed on SEDAR on February 24, 2011; "Technical Report Endako Molybdenum Mine" dated and filed on SEDAR on September 12, 2011; "Technical Report—Feasibility Update Mt. Milligan Property—Northern BC" dated October 13, 2009 and filed on our SEDAR profile on October 13, 2011 The Mineral Reserves estimates included in this presentation have been prepared in accordance with NI 43-101 and are classified in accordance with the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum's "CIM Definition Standards -– For Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves." Mineral Reserves are equivalent to Proven and Probable Reserves as defined by the SEC Industry Guide 7. The Mineral Resources estimates included in this presentation were estimated in accordance with the definitions and requirements of NI 43-101. The Mineral Resources are equivalent to Mineralized Material as defined by the SEC Industry Guide 7. The Mineral Resources are not included in and are in addition to the Mineral Reserves.

3 Agenda Company Overview Jacques Perron, Chief Executive Officer Operations Overview Mt. Milligan Mine Ian Berzins, Vice President and General Manager John Hollow, Vice President Technical Services Bruce Parker, Mine Manager Thompson Creek Mine Scott Shellhaas, President and Chief Operating Officer Endako Mine Chris Gibbs, Vice President and General Manager Langeloth Metallurgical Facility Mark Wilson, Executive Vice President and Chief Commercial Officer

4 Company Overview NYSE: TC; TSX: TCM Overview: One of the largest molybdenum producers in the world with three operating mines Mt. Milligan Mine in B.C. (100% ownership) Thompson Creek Mine in Idaho (100% ownership) Endako Mine in B.C. (75% ownership) Langeloth metallurgical refinery in Pennsylvania (100% ownership) Diversified into copper and gold with the start-up of the Mt. Milligan mine in B.C. Start-up commenced August 2013 52.25% of life of mine gold production sold to Royal Gold

5 Company All Incidence Recordable Rate (AIRR)1 2007 – 2014 YTD 7.00 5.94 5.03 2.60 2.30 1.32 2.48 3.43 3.0 3.2 3.2 2.5 1.8 1.7 2.1 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 YTD 2014 Thompson Creek Metals Company Metals Mining U.S. AIRR Average 1 Includes lost time and reportable incidents.

6 Q214 Highlights Improving safety performance Cash flow from operations of $51 million, revenue of $248 million, operating income of $57 million, net income of $62 million and adjusted non-GAAP net income of $22 million Positive net cash flow Continued progress at Mt. Milligan Achieved average daily mill throughput of 48,065 tonnes in June, with daily record of 63,970 tonnes on June 16 Completed three shipments and recorded four sales (one sale from Q1 shipment) Copper and gold sales contributed $119 million to total revenue Molybdenum business significantly contributed to cash flow from operations S&P increased Company’s corporate credit rating to B- from CCC+ Completed exchange offer for 7,206,862 units, or 86.4% of the tMEDS Issued 42,129,829 shares of common stock, compared to 38,829,852 shares which would have been issued on mandatory conversion on May 15, 2014 Extinguished $10.4 million of future cash principal and interest payments

7 Updated 2014 Production and Cash Cost Guidance Updated 2014 Estimate Previous 2014 Estimate Mt. Milligan Copper and Gold 1 Concentrate production (000’s wet tonnes) (000’s dry tonnes) 135 – 150 125 – 140 135 – 150 125 – 140 Copper payable production (000’s lb) 65,000 – 75,000 65,000 – 75,000 Gold payable production (000’s oz) 185 – 195 165 – 175 Unit cash cost – By-product ($/payable lb copper production) 2,3 1.00 – 1.50 1.55 – 1.70 Molybdenum (000’s lb): 4 TC Mine 15,000 – 17,000 14,000 – 16,000 Endako Mine (75%) 9,000 – 10,000 10,000 – 12,000 Total molybdenum production (000’s lb) 24,000 – 27,000 24,000 – 28,000 Cash Cost ($/lb produced): TC Mine 4.50 – 5.25 4.75 – 5.75 Endako Mine 3 10.50 – 12.00 9.00 – 10.50 Total molybdenum cash cost ($/lb produced) 6.75 – 7.75 6.50 – 7.75 1 For Mt. Milligan guidance assumes that 100% of design capacity mill throughput and designed copper and gold recoveries are not achieved until year-end 2015. 2 Copper by-product unit cash cost is calculated using payable production, with an assumed gold price for the gold by-product of approximately $1,290 per ounce, which is then adjusted to take into account the contractual price of $435 per ounce under the Gold Stream Arrangement. See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” for the definition and reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures. 3 Estimates for cash costs assume a foreign exchange rate of US$1.00 = C$1.05. 4 Molybdenum production pounds represented are molybdenum oxide and high performance molybdenum disulfide (“HPM”) from our share of production from the mines but exclude molybdenum processed from purchased product.

8 Updated 2014 Cash Capital Expenditure Guidance Updated 2014 Estimate1,2 Previous 2014 Estimate1,2 Mt. Milligan Permanent Operations Residence 25 20 Mt. Milligan Operations 35 30 Operations (excludes Mt. Milligan) 5 10 TOTAL3 65 60 1 Cash capital expenditures guidance numbers are as of August 5, 2014. Canadian to US foreign exchange rate for 2014 assumes C$1.00 = US$1.05. 2 Plus or minus 10%. 3 Excludes approximately $22 million of accruals related to the Mt. Milligan Mine as of December 31, 2013, which will be paid in 2014. [millions of US$]

9 Mt. Milligan vs. North American Open Pit Mines in Junior / Intermediate Copper Companies Source: Company filings Note: Copper equivalent calculated using long-term prices of Au US$1,300/oz, Cu US$3.00/lb 1. Measured and Indicated resources shown inclusive of Proven and Probable reserves. Copper Mountain Huckleberry Mount Polley Mt. Milligan Mineral Park Gibraltar Pinto Valley -- 0.1% 0.2% 0.3% 0.4% 0.5% -- 5,000 10,000 15,000 Cu E qu iv. G ra de Cu Eq. Measured & Indicated Resource (Mlbs)(1) Minto (1.4%) Mt. Milligan’s resource is both large and higher grade compared to many similar mines

10 Mt. Milligan is a Large Scale and Low Cost Open Pit Mine Source: Company filings, Wood Mackenzie Note: Mt. Milligan, Pinto Valley, Minto production and cash costs based on company guidance; Gibraltar and Mineral Park estimates based on Wood Mackenzie; Copper Mountain, Huckleberry and Mount Polley production based on company guidance, cash costs based on BMO Research. 158 146 85 65 69 44 41 36 75 $2.42 $1.95 $1.74 $1.55 - $1.70 $2.59 $1.51 $2.50 $2.30 Gib ral tar Pin to Vall ey Coppe r Moun tai n Mt . Milliga n Minera l Par k Moun t Poll ey Min to Hu ck leb err y 2014E By-Product Cash Costs (US$/lb) 2014E Cu Production (Mlbs) Mt. Milligan compares favourably in 2014 with expected production increases and reducing costs from 2015 onwards as the ramp up continues

11 Mt. Milligan is one of Canada’s Largest New Mines Nameplate Throughput [in tpd] 55,000 60,000 61,000 Canadian Malartic Mt. Milligan Detour Lake Measured & Indicated Resources(1) [in Koz Au Eq.] 11,100 13,940 18,424 Canadian Malartic Mt. Milligan Detour Lake Mt. Milligan is comparable in scale to two new world class mines in Canada Source: Company filings Note: Copper equivalent calculated using long-term prices of Au US$1,300/oz, Cu US$3.00/lb 1. Measured and Indicated resources shown inclusive of Proven and Probable reserves.

12 $2.78 -- 3 6 9 $2.00 $2.50 $3.00 $3.50 Jan-14 Feb-14 Mar-14 Apr-14 May-14 Jun-14 Jul-14 Aug-14 Vo lu m e (m illio n s )S h a re P ri ce ( U S$ ) Volume Price Share Price & Volume (YTD) Bond Trading Price (YTD) Shares and Notes Trading Overview Source: Bloomberg, FactSet 98.500 109.948 111.400 80 90 100 110 120 Jan-14 Feb-14 Mar-14 Apr-14 May-14 Jun-14 Jul-14 Aug-14 B o n d T ra d in g P ri c e 9.75% (Due 2017) 7.375% (Due 2018) 12.5% (Due 2019) Feb. 20, 2014 Commercial production declared at Mt. Milligan

13 Proven and Probable Reserves billion pounds Cu 1 Avg. grade of 0.20% Cu million pounds Mo 2 Avg. grade of 0.075% Mo million pounds Mo 2 Avg. grade of 0.052%Mo 1 Based on Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves as of December 31, 2013, contained metal. The mineral reserve estimates for Mt. Milligan Mine were prepared by Robert Clifford, our Director of Mine Engineering, who is a Qualified Person under NI 43-101. For more information on our reserves, see our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013. 2 Based on Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves as of December 31, 2013, contained metal. The mineral reserve estimates for TC Mine and Endako Mine were prepared by the TC Mine and Endako Mine staff, respectively, under the supervision of Robert Clifford, our Director of Mine Engineering, who is a Qualified Person under NI 43-101. For more information on our reserves, see our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013. Endako Mine Thompson Creek Mine Mt. Milligan Mine 2.1 6.0 million ounces Au 1 Avg. grade of 0.011 oz/t 122.1 75.8

14 Key Messages Mt. Milligan continues to progress very well and exceed our expectations at this stage of the ramp-up Expect to consistently achieve approximately 80% of mill throughput design capacity by year-end 2014 and 100% by year-end 2015 Company’s financial performance turned the corner in Q2 233% increase operating income Positive net cash flow Company will continue to evaluate opportunities to strengthen the balance sheet Recent exchange offer of the tMEDS was just the first step towards reducing debt First repayment not due until December 2017

EX-99.2

1 Mt. Milligan Mine

Mt. Milligan Overview Ian Berzins, Vice President and General Manager John Hollow, Vice President Technical Services Bruce Parker, Mine Manager 2

3 All Incidence Recordable Rate (AIRR)1 2013 – 2014 YTD 3.86 3.71 2.48 3.18 2013 YTD 2014 Mt. Milligan Total Company 1 Includes lost time and reportable incidents. 3 Surface Metals Mining U.S. AIRR Average for 2013 was 2.10

Safety Incident Trends YTD 2014 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 JAN. FEB MAR. APR MAY JUNE JULY AUG. SEPT OCT. NOV. DEC. Dangerous Occurrence Property Damage First Aid 4

5 Operating Statistics | First Half 2014 Copper (Cu) 16.0 14.2 30.3 Q214 Q114 H114 Cu Payable Production (millions lb) $0.33 $2.48 $1.34 $1.97 $2.27 $2.11 Q214 Q114 H114 Cash Cost ($/payable lb produced) By-Product Cash Cost ($/payable lb produced) Co-Product 1 1 1 Please refer to Appendix for non-GAAP reconciliation. Q2 2014 H1 2014 Cu Ore Grade 0.27% 0.28% Cu Recovery 80.4% 79.8%

6 Operating Statistics | First Half 2014 Gold (Au) 37,030 39,243 76,273 Q214 Q114 H114 Au Payable Production (oz) $538 $606 $573 Q214 Q114 H114 Cash Cost ($/payable oz produced) Co-Product Q2 2014 H1 2014 Au Ore Grade (g/tonne) 0.52 0.61 Au Recovery 65.1% 61.8% 1 Please refer to Appendix for non-GAAP reconciliation. 1

7 Updated 2014 Production and Cash Cost Guidance Updated 2014 Estimate Previous 2014 Estimate Mt. Milligan Copper and Gold 1 Concentrate production (000’s wet tonnes) (000’s dry tonnes) 135 – 150 125 – 140 135 – 150 125 – 140 Copper payable production (000’s lb) 65,000 – 75,000 65,000 – 75,000 Gold payable production (000’s oz) 185 – 195 165 – 175 Unit cash cost – By-product ($/payable lb copper production) 2,3 1.00 – 1.50 1.55 – 1.70 1 For Mt. Milligan guidance assumes that 100% of design capacity mill throughput and designed copper and gold recoveries are not achieved until year-end 2015. 2 Copper by-product unit cash cost is calculated using payable production, with an assumed gold price for the gold by-product of approximately $1,290 per ounce, which is then adjusted to take into account the contractual price of $435 per ounce under the Gold Stream Arrangement. See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” for the definition and reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures. 3 Estimates for cash costs assume a foreign exchange rate of US$1.00 = C$1.05.

8 Updated 2014 Cash Capital Expenditure Guidance Updated 2014 Estimate1,2 Previous 2014 Estimate1,2 Mt. Milligan Permanent Operations Residence 25 20 Mt. Milligan Operations 35 30 TOTAL3 65 60 1 Cash capital expenditures guidance numbers are as of August 5, 2014. Canadian to US foreign exchange rate for 2014 assumes C$1.00 = US$1.05. 2 Plus or minus 10%. 3 Excludes approximately $22 million of accruals related to the Mt. Milligan Mine as of December 31, 2013, which will be paid in 2014. [millions of US$]

Prince George 17% Mackenzie 21% Fort St James 18% Vanderho of 7% Others 37% Home City Workforce – Demographics 9

2014 Mine Production 10

Deposits • Main Zone and Southern Star on separate monzonite intrusive centres – Main Zone sub-divided into four zones: MBX, 66, WBX and DWBX Mineralization • Chalcopyrite – disseminations; lesser veinlets – Decreases in intensity away from stocks • Bornite – disseminations close to footwall intrusive contact • Magnetite – disseminations, patches, veinlets, breccia matrix • Pyrite – increases dramatically away from potassic zone into propylitic altered rocks Deposit Geology 11

Typical N-S Section of Phase 3 Mining Area (for discussion purposes only) 12

Typical E-W Cross Section of Ultimate Pit (for discussion purposes only) 13

End Q2 2014 Mining Area 14

End Q4 2014 Mining Area 15

Pump Barge South Pond 1057 Tailings Management 16

Mine to Mill Continuous Improvements Optimize Fragmentation Powder Factors/Blasting Procedures Model Rock Characterization Modify Blast Hole Diameter Material Blending Weathered Material Modeling Material Characterization Point Load Testing Aquila Drill data Fragmentation/Comminution Studies 17

Resources and Reserves 18 Category US Tons (millions) Grade (% Cu) Grade (% Au) Contained Copper (millions of pounds) Contained Gold (millions of ounces) Measured Resources 66.9 0.130 0.006 178 0.41 Indicated Resources 182.4 0.150 0.006 540 1.07 Measured and Indicated – Total1 249.3 0.140 0.006 718 1.48 Proven Reserves 298.5 0.210 0.013 1,252 3.81 Probable Reserves 227.8 0.186 0.009 846 2.14 Proven and Probable – Total2 526.3 0.199 0.011 2,098 5.95 Inferred 3 23.0 0.150 0.006 71 0.14 Total 798.6 2,887 7.57 1 The mineral resource estimates for Mt. Milligan were prepared by Robert Clifford, our Director of Mine Engineering, who is a Qualified Person under NI 43-101. The mineral resource estimates were prepared using optimized pit shells at a $4.10/t NSR cut-off value, metal prices of $2.00/lb copper, $800/oz gold and an exchange rate of C$1.00/US$0.85, and incorporate estimated costs for milling, plan services, tailing services and general and administrative charges. The mineral resource estimates are based on the cost and price assumptions included in a NI 43-101 technical report prepared for Terrane entitled “Technical Report – Feasibility Update Mt. Milligan Property – Northern BC” dated October 13, 2009 and filed on SEDAR on October 13, 2011. 2 The mineral reserve estimates for Mt. Milligan were prepared by Robert Clifford, our Director of Mine Engineering, who is a Qualified Person under NI 43-101. The mineral reserve estimates were prepared using optimized pit shells at a $4.10/t NSR cut-off value, metal prices of $1.60/lb copper, $690/oz gold and an exchange rate of C$1.00/US$0.85, and incorporate estimated costs for milling, plan services, tailing services and general and administrative charges. The mineral reserve estimates are based on the cost and price assumptions included in a NI 43-101 technical report prepared for Terrane entitled “Technical Report – Feasibility Update Mt. Milligan Property – Northern BC” dated October 13, 2009 and filed on SEDAR on October 13, 2011. Mill recoveries vary by rock type and region but average 84.1% copper and 71.4% gold. Anticipated losses resulting from beneficiation average 4.9% copper and 3.5% gold. 3 The inferred mineral resource estimates for Mt. Milligan were prepared by Robert Clifford, our Director of Mine Engineering, who is a Qualified Person under NI 43- 101. The inferred mineral resource estimates were prepared using optimized pit shells at a $4.10/t NSR cut-off value, metal prices of $2.00/lb copper, $800/oz gold and an exchange rate of C$1.00/US$0.85, and incorporate estimated costs for milling, plan services, tailing services and general and administrative charges. The mineral resource estimates are based on the cost and price assumptions included in a NI 43-101 technical report prepared for Terrane entitled “Technical Report – Feasibility Update Mt. Milligan Property – Northern BC” dated October 13, 2009 and filed on SEDAR on October 13, 2011.

19 Mill Production

20 Daily Mill Throughput 41,935 0 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 Start up Aug Month 1 Sep Month 2 Oct Month 3 Nov Month 4 Dec Month 5 Jan Month 6 Feb Month 7 Mar Month 8 Ap Month 9 May Month 10 Jun Month 11 Jul Da il y M il l T onne s P e r Da y Design tpd – 60,000

21 Ramp-up Achievements • Sep 4, 2013 – initial ore to mill • Feb 18, 2014 – achieved commercial production (60% of designed throughput for 30 days) • Jun 16, 2014 – processed a daily record 63,970 dmt • Jun 2014 – average daily throughput of 48,065 dmt (80% of design capacity)

22 Hourly Mill Availability 89.1% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Start up Aug Month 1 Sep Month 2 Oct Month 3 Nov Month 4 Dec Month 5 Jan Month 6 Feb Month 7 Mar Month 8 Apr Month 9 May Month 10 Jun Month 11 Jul Design Availability – 92%

23 Downtime by Source

24 Hourly Mill Throughput 1,962 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 Start up Aug Month 1 Sep Month 2 Oct Month 3 Nov Month 4 Dec Month 5 Jan Month 6 Feb Month 7 Mar Month 8 Apr Month 9 May Month 10 Jun Month 11 Jul Design tpoh – 2,715

25 Mill Metal Recovery – Ramp-up

26 Copper and Gold Recoveries 69.0% 84.10% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Start up Aug Month 1 Sep Month 2 Oct Month 3 Nov Month 4 Dec Month 5 Jan Month 6 Feb Month 7 Mar Month 8 Apr Month 9 May Month 10 Jun Month 11 Jul Actual Gold Recovery Actual Copper Recovery Design Gold Recovery 71% Design Copper Recovery 84%

27 Mill Process Continuous Improvement • Jul 2014 – Begin Snubber Installation in mill electrical distribution system (action items from failure analysis)  Two ABB 25KV to 6KV transformer failures in 2013  Associated GE 600 V transformer failures • Jul 2014 – temporary upgrade to 1st cleaner scavenger concentrate pumping system • Jul 2014 – complete crushing/grinding circuit with assistance from JKTech and ALS Metallurgical • Aug 2014 – initiate secondary crush pilot test program • Aug 2014 – temporary upgrade to 3rd cleaner tank cell feed and discharge system (gold recovery)

28 Ramp-Up Next Steps • Sep 2014 – 2nd SAG reline scheduled  Increase SAG grates from 85mm to 90mm and effective open area from 7% to 10% • Sep 2014 Cleaner Flotation Circuit Upgrade 1. Complete concentrate thickener O/F pumping system upgrade 2. Complete bypass system for 3rd cleaner stage (column and tank cells) concentrate pumps 3. Complete 3rd cleaner tails pumping system 4. Modify feed piping for 3rd cleaner feed (column and tank cells) 5. Complete 1st cleaner scavenger pumping upgrade

29 Copper Mineralogy Malachite - Cu3(CO3)2(OH)2 Azurite - Cu2CO3(OH)2 Bornite - Cu5FeS5 Chalcopyrite - CuFeS2

30 Copper Mineralogy Native Copper – Cu (dark green), all other minerals are silicates (MLA Images)

31 Concentrate Copper Grade

32 Concentrate Copper Grade

33 Concentrate Gold Grade

34 Concentrate Gold Grade

35 Appendix

36 Non-GAAP Reconciliation Copper-Gold Operations Unit Cost Per Pound Produced Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 2013 2014 2013 Direct mining costs 1 $ 39.8 $ — $ 89.4 $ — Truck and rail transportation and warehousing costs 4.6 — 6.2 — Costs reflected in inventory and operations costs $ 44.4 — $ 95.6 — Refining and treatment costs 5.7 — 8.5 — Ocean freight and insurance costs 1.5 — 3.5 — Direct costs reflected in revenue and selling and marketing costs $ 7.2 — $ 12.0 — Non-GAAP cash costs $ 51.6 $ — $ 107.6 $ — Reconciliation to amounts reported (US$ in millions) Direct costs $ (7.2 ) — $ (12.0 ) — Changes in inventory 25.0 — 16.2 — Non cash costs and other 0.3 — 0.7 — Copper-Gold segment US GAAP operating expenses $ 69.7 $ — $ 112.5 $ — 1 Mining, milling and on-site general and administration costs. Mining includes all stripping costs but excludes costs capitalized related to the construction of the tailings dam. Stripping costs that provide access to mineral reserves that will be produced in future periods are expensed as incurred under US GAAP. (US$ in millions, except pounds and per pound amounts) Non-GAAP Cash Cost

37 By-Product Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 2013 2014 2013 Copper payable production (000's lbs) 16,035 — 30,278 — Non-GAAP cash cost $ 51.6 $ — $ 107.6 $ — Gold sales 1 54.4 — 78.9 — Less gold sales related to deferred portion of Gold Stream Arrangement (9.7 ) — (14.1 ) — Net gold by-product credits $ 44.7 — $ 64.8 — Silver by-product credits2 1.6 — 2.3 — Total by-product credits $ 46.3 — $ 67.1 — Non-GAAP cash cost net of by-product credits $ 5.3 — $ 40.5 — Non-GAAP unit cash cost $ 0.33 $ — $ 1.34 $ — (US$ in millions, except pounds and per pound amounts) Non-GAAP Reconciliation Copper-Gold Operations Unit Cost Per Pound Produced 1 Excluded refining and treatment charges. 2 Silver sales are reflected as a credit to operating costs.

38 Non-GAAP EDITDA Reconciliation Copper-Gold Operations Unit Cost Per Pound Produced Revision to By-Product Costs During the second quarter of 2014 the Company revised the calculation of its non-GAAP unit cash cost on a by- product basis for Mt. Milligan Mine. This revision in calculation had no effect on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, Condensed Statements of Operations, Condensed Statements of Cash Flow, or Condensed Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for the periods impacted. Following is a reconciliation of the Company’s previously reported and revised non-GAAP unit cash cost on a by- product basis for Mt. Milligan Mine for the first quarter of 2014. Three Months Ended March 31, 2014 As Previously Reported As Revised Copper payable production (000's lbs) 14,223 14,243 Non-GAAP cash cost $ 56.0 $ 56.0 Gold sales 1 24.5 24.5 Less gold sales related to deferred portion of Gold Stream Arrangement (1.7 ) (4.4 ) Net gold by-product credits $ 22.8 $ 20.1 Silver by-product credits 2 0.7 0.7 Total by-product credits $ 23.5 $ 20.8 Non-GAAP cash cost net of by-product credits 32.5 35.2 Non-GAAP unit cash cost $ 2.29 $ 2.48 (US$ in millions, except pounds and per pound amounts) 1 Excluded refining and treatment charges. 2 Silver sales are reflected as a credit to operating costs.

39 Co- Product (US$ in millions, except pounds and per pound amounts) Non-GAAP Reconciliation Copper-Gold Operations Unit Cost Per Pound Produced Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 2013 2014 2013 Copper payable production (000’s lbs) 16,035 — 30,278 — Gold payable production in Cu eq. (000’s lbs) 1 10,125 — 20,565 — Payable production (000’s lbs) 26,160 — 50,843 — Non-GAAP cash cost allocated to Copper $ 31.6 $ — $ 64.1 $ — Non-GAAP unit cash cost $ 1.97 $ — $ 2.11 $ — Non-GAAP cash cost allocated to Gold $ 20.0 $ — $ 43.5 $ — Gold payable production (ounces) 37,030 — 76,273 — Non-GAAP unit cash cost $ 538 $ — $ 573 $ — 1 Gold has been converted from payable ounces to thousands of copper equivalent pounds by using the gold production for the periods presented, using a gold price of $842 and $844 per ounce for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, respectively (adjusted for the Royal Gold price of $435 per ounce) and a copper price of $3.08 and $3.14 per pound for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, respectively.

40 Average realized sales price The average realized sales price per payable pound or payable ounce sold is calculated by dividing copper or gold sales revenue, gross, by the pounds or ounces sold, respectively, as shown in the tables below. Non-GAAP Reconciliation Copper-Gold Operations Unit Cost Per Pound Produced Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 2013 2014 2013 Average realized sales price for Copper Payable pounds of copper sold (000's lb) 21,939 — 32,732 — Copper sales, net $ 64.8 $ — $ 94.6 $ — Refining and treatment costs 5.4 — 8.1 — Copper sales, gross $ 70.2 $ — $ 102.7 $ — Average realized sales price per payable pound sold 1 $ 3.20 $ — $ 3.14 $ — Average realized sales price for Gold Payable ounces of gold sold under Gold Stream Arrangement 26,990 — 39,364 — TCM share of payable ounces of gold sold to MTM Customers 24,993 — 36,493 — Payable ounces of gold sold 51,983 — 75,857 — Gold sales related to cash portion of Gold Stream Arrangement $ 11.7 $ — $ 17.2 $ — Gold sales related to deferred portion of Gold Stream Arrangement 9.7 — 14.1 — Gold sales under Gold Stream Arrangement 21.4 — 31.3 — TCM share of gold sales to MTM Customers 32.7 — 47.2 — Gold sales, net 54.1 — 78.5 — Refining and treatment charges 0.3 — 0.4 — Gold sales, gross $ 54.4 $ — $ 78.9 $ — Average realized sales price related to cash portion of Gold Stream Arrangement $ 435 $ — $ 435 $ — Average realized sales price related to deferred portion of Gold Stream Arrangement $ 359 $ — $ 359 $ — Average realized sales price per payable ounce sold under Gold Stream Arrangement $ 794 $ — $ 794 $ — Average realized sales price per payable ounce sold for TCM share 1 $ 1,320 $ — $ 1,305 $ — Average realized sales price per payable ounce sold (1) $ 1,047 $ — $ 1,040 $ — 1 The average realized sales price per payable pound of copper sold and payable ounces of gold sold is impacted by any final volume and pricing adjustments and mark-to-market adjustments for shipments made in prior periods. (US$ in millions, except pounds and per pound amounts)

EX-99.3

1 Thompson Creek Mine

2 Thompson Creek Mine Layout 2

3 2.95 2.94 2.25 2.45 3.10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 YTD Lost Time Injury Reportable Medical Aids AIRR Safety - Lost Time/Reportable Incidents And All Incident Recordable Rate (AIRR) July QTD YTD Lost time incidents 0 0 3 Reportable incidents 0 0 1

4 Thompson Creek Mine Operating Statistics 5.1 10.8 4.4 10.3 $3.97 $3.91 $5.33 $4.67 1 Please refer to Appendix for non-GAAP reconciliation. Q214 Q213 H114 H113 Q214 Q213 H114 H113 Mo Production (millions lbs) Cash Costs1 (US $/lb)

5 Updated 2014 Production and Cash Cost Guidance Updated 2014 Estimate Previous 2014 Estimate Molybdenum (000’s lb): Thompson Creek Mine Production 1 15,000 – 17,000 14,000 – 16,000 Cash Costs ($/lb produced) 4.50 – 5.25 4.75 – 5.75 1 Molybdenum production pounds represented are molybdenum oxide and high performance molybdenum disulfide (“HPM”) from our share of production from the mines, but exclude molybdenum processed from purchased product.

Expect to complete mining of Phase 7 ore by the end August First round of layoffs in August (approximately 30-35 people) Processing of stockpiled ore to commence in August and continue through November Current plan to place TC Mine on care and maintenance by year-end 2014 Expect to incur non-recurring costs in 2015 and 2016 of an aggregate amount of approximately $35 million related to tailings dam slope management and employee retention and severance costs In addition, expect annual care and maintenance costs to be approximately $8 to $10 million Management still evaluating economically viable options for Phase 8 stripping and mining, which may include stripping at a reduced rate with continued scaled operations Thompson Creek Mine Update 6

Thompson Creek Tailings Management 7 • Tailings Dam meets regulatory requirements and is managed in accordance with detailed Tailings Operating Manual • Independent Professional Engineer of Record inspects dam twice a year accompanied by State Regulatory Officials • Idaho Department of Water Resources Dam Safety Division inspects with Engineer of Record twice a year and independently every other year • Current freeboard of 12’ exceeds regulatory requirement by 30%. • Mechanical placement of sand with bulldozers and addition of sand through cyclone production to dam slope for consistent slope of 2.75:1

Category US Tons (millions) Grade (% Mo) Contained Mo (M lbs) Measured Resources 27.8 0.064 35.5 Indicated Resources 31.4 0.062 39.0 Measured and Indicated - Total 59.2 0.063 74.5 Proven Reserves 45.1 0.080 72.4 Probable Reserves 35.9 0.069 49.7 Proven and Probable – Total 81.0 0.075 122.1 Total1 140.2 0.070 196.6 Based on Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves as of December 31, 2013, contained metal. The mineral reserve estimates for TC Mine were prepared by the TC Mine staff under the supervision of Robert Clifford, our Director of Mine Engineering, who is a Qualified Person under NI 43-101. For more information on our reserves, see our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013. Thompson Creek Mine Resources and Reserves 8

9 Appendix

10 Molybdenum Operations - Cash Cost per Pound Produced, Weighted-Average Cash Cost per Pound Produced and Average Realized Sales Price per Pound Sold Three Months Ended June 30, 2014 June 30, 2013 Operating Expenses Pounds Produced 1 $/lb Operating Expenses Pounds Produced 1 $/lb TC Mine Cash cost - Non-GAAP $ 20.3 5,108 $ 3.97 $ 23.5 4,418 $ 5.33 Add/(Deduct): Stock-based compensation 0.2 0.3 Inventory and other adjustments 11.3 6.7 US GAAP operating expenses $ 31.8 $ 30.5 Endako Mine Cash cost - Non-GAAP $ 26.5 2,373 $ 11.17 $ 25.1 2,107 $ 11.93 Add/(Deduct): Stock-based compensation — 0.1 Inventory and other adjustments (6.6 ) (3.7 ) US GAAP operating expenses $ 19.9 $ 21.5 Other operations US GAAP operating expenses 2 $ 26.8 $ 25.1 Molybdenum segments US GAAP operating expenses $ 78.5 $ 77.1 Weighted-average cash cost—Non-GAAP $ 46.8 7,481 $ 6.25 $ 48.7 6,525 $ 7.46 (US$ in millions, except pounds and per pound amounts) Non-GAAP Reconciliation Cash Cost Per Pound Produced 1 Pounds produced are shown in molybdenum oxide and include an estimated loss from our share of the sulfide production from the mines to oxide. They exclude molybdenum processed from purchased product. 2 Other operations represent activities related to the roasting and processing of third-party concentrate and other metals at the Langeloth Facility and exclude product volumes and costs related to the roasting and processing of TC Mine and Endako Mine concentrate. The Langeloth Facility costs associated with roasting and processing of TC Mine and Endako Mine concentrate are included in their respective operating results above.

11 Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 June 30, 2013 Operating Expenses Pounds Produced 1 $/lb Operating Expenses Pounds Produced 1 $/lb TC Mine Cash cost - Non-GAAP $ 42.1 10,766 $ 3.91 $ 48.3 10,347 $ 4.67 Add/(Deduct): Stock-based compensation 0.4 0.5 Inventory and other adjustments 15.3 10.0 US GAAP operating expenses $ 57.8 $ 58.8 Endako Mine Cash cost - Non-GAAP $ 50.0 4,602 $ 10.87 $ 45.8 3,868 $ 11.85 Add/(Deduct): Stock-based compensation — 0.2 Inventory and other adjustments (0.4 ) (8.9 ) US GAAP operating expenses $ 49.6 $ 37.1 Other operations US GAAP operating expenses 2 $ 41.9 $ 49.9 Molybdenum segments US GAAP operating expenses $ 149.3 $ 145.8 Weighted-average cash cost—Non- GAAP $ 92.1 15,368 $ 5.99 $ 94.1 14,215 $ 6.62 Molybdenum Operations - Cash Cost per Pound Produced, Weighted-Average Cash Cost per Pound Produced and Average Realized Sales Price per Pound Sold (US$ in millions, except pounds and per pound amounts) 1 Pounds produced are shown in molybdenum oxide and include an estimated loss from our share of the sulfide production from the mines to oxide. They exclude molybdenum processed from purchased product. 2 Other operations represent activities related to the roasting and processing of third-party concentrate and other metals at the Langeloth Facility and exclude product volumes and costs related to the roasting and processing of TC Mine and Endako Mine concentrate. The Langeloth Facility costs associated with roasting and processing of TC Mine and Endako Mine concentrate are included in their respective operating results above. Non-GAAP Reconciliation Cash Cost Per Pound Produced

EX-99.4

1 Endako Mine 1

2 Endako Mine Safety Performance 0 5 5 4 4 0 4 1 0 0 3.1 2.4 1.4 1.98 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 YTD 2 AIRR – All Incident Recordable Rate Medical Aids Lost Time Injury AIRR – Rolling 12 Month Average --- AIRR Max/Min Average

3 Endako Mine

4 Endako Mine LOM Mining Areas 4

5 Endako Mill Facility and Flow Sheet Grinding SAG 2x Ball Roughers Regrind + Cleaning Concentrate Storage Leaching + Drying Roasting 5

6 Endako Tailings Management 6 Operate and manage three tailings facilities. Pond 1 and 3 are essentially one facility and is where active deposition currently takes place. Pond 2 is no longer in use (since March 2013). The pond is actively being reclaimed and moved towards it’s planned state at closure. The facilities are diligently operated and managed based on the requirements set out in the sites Mines Act permit and the requirements set out in the Canadian Dam Association dam safety guidelines. To ensure operations excellence, the site has a Tailings Operation, Maintenance and Surveillance Manual and an active Tailings Surveillance Committee conducting detailed inspections monthly. Our Engineer of Record is consulted on an as needed basis and visits the site annually, at a minimum, for a detailed geotechnical and operations/management inspection. They also oversee our short and long-term Tailings Management Plan. Post the Mount Polley incident we immediately conducted an internal audit and review of our tailings facilities with our Engineer of Record. No issues or concerns were identified. In addition we are currently arranging for a further third party geotechnical and engineering review.

7 Endako Operating Statistics 2.4 4.6 2.1 3.9 $11.17 $10.87 $11.93 $11.85 1 Please refer to Appendix for non-GAAP reconciliation. Q214 Q213 H114 H113 Q214 Q213 H114 H113 Mo Production (75%) (millions lbs) Cash Costs1 (US $/lb)

8 Endako Updated 2014 Production and Cash Cost Guidance Updated 2014 Estimate Previous 2014 Estimate Molybdenum (000’s lb): Endako Mine Production (75%) 1 9,000 – 10,000 10,000 – 12,000 Cash Costs ($/lb produced) 2 10.50 – 12.00 9.00 – 10.50 1 Molybdenum production pounds represented are molybdenum oxide and high performance molybdenum disulfide (“HPM”) from our share of production from the mines, but exclude molybdenum processed from purchased product. 2 Estimates for cash costs assume a foreign exchange rate of US$1.00 = C$1.05.

Endako Resources and Reserves (100%) as of December 31, 2013 Category US Tons (millions) Grade (% Mo) Contained Mo (M lbs) Measured Resources 56.1 0.050 56.5 Indicated Resources 64.5 0.052 66.5 Measured and Indicated - Total 120.6 0.051 122.9 Proven Reserves 33.7 0.055 37.4 Probable Reserves 38.8 0.049 38.4 Proven and Probable – Total 72.5 0.052 75.8 Total 193.1 0.051 198.7 The mineral resource and reserve estimates for Endako Mine were prepared by the Endako Mine staff, under the supervision of Robert Clifford, our Director of Mine Engineering, who is a Qualified Person under NI 43-101. For more information on our mineral resources and reserves, see our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013. 9

10 Endako Mine 2014 Optimization Activities Crusher Optimization Reliability & Engineering Focus Operating Strategy, Systems and Procedures Mine Improvement Fleet Availability Blast Movement Technology Operator Efficiencies & Mine Planning Reduced Haulage Distance Recovery Improvement Projects Causeway Ore Reagents Expert System 10

11 Appendix

12 Molybdenum Operations - Cash Cost per Pound Produced, Weighted-Average Cash Cost per Pound Produced and Average Realized Sales Price per Pound Sold Three Months Ended June 30, 2014 June 30, 2013 Operating Expenses Pounds Produced 1 $/lb Operating Expenses Pounds Produced 1 $/lb TC Mine Cash cost - Non-GAAP $ 20.3 5,108 $ 3.97 $ 23.5 4,418 $ 5.33 Add/(Deduct): Stock-based compensation 0.2 0.3 Inventory and other adjustments 11.3 6.7 US GAAP operating expenses $ 31.8 $ 30.5 Endako Mine Cash cost - Non-GAAP $ 26.5 2,373 $ 11.17 $ 25.1 2,107 $ 11.93 Add/(Deduct): Stock-based compensation — 0.1 Inventory and other adjustments (6.6 ) (3.7 ) US GAAP operating expenses $ 19.9 $ 21.5 Other operations US GAAP operating expenses 2 $ 26.8 $ 25.1 Molybdenum segments US GAAP operating expenses $ 78.5 $ 77.1 Weighted-average cash cost—Non-GAAP $ 46.8 7,481 $ 6.25 $ 48.7 6,525 $ 7.46 (US$ in millions, except pounds and per pound amounts) Non-GAAP Reconciliation Cash Cost Per Pound Produced 1 Pounds produced are shown in molybdenum oxide and include an estimated loss from our share of the sulfide production from the mines to oxide. They exclude molybdenum processed from purchased product. 2 Other operations represent activities related to the roasting and processing of third-party concentrate and other metals at the Langeloth Facility and exclude product volumes and costs related to the roasting and processing of TC Mine and Endako Mine concentrate. The Langeloth Facility costs associated with roasting and processing of TC Mine and Endako Mine concentrate are included in their respective operating results above.

13 Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 June 30, 2013 Operating Expenses Pounds Produced 1 $/lb Operating Expenses Pounds Produced 1 $/lb TC Mine Cash cost - Non-GAAP $ 42.1 10,766 $ 3.91 $ 48.3 10,347 $ 4.67 Add/(Deduct): Stock-based compensation 0.4 0.5 Inventory and other adjustments 15.3 10.0 US GAAP operating expenses $ 57.8 $ 58.8 Endako Mine Cash cost - Non-GAAP $ 50.0 4,602 $ 10.87 $ 45.8 3,868 $ 11.85 Add/(Deduct): Stock-based compensation — 0.2 Inventory and other adjustments (0.4 ) (8.9 ) US GAAP operating expenses $ 49.6 $ 37.1 Other operations US GAAP operating expenses 2 $ 41.9 $ 49.9 Molybdenum segments US GAAP operating expenses $ 149.3 $ 145.8 Weighted-average cash cost—Non- GAAP $ 92.1 15,368 $ 5.99 $ 94.1 14,215 $ 6.62 Molybdenum Operations - Cash Cost per Pound Produced, Weighted-Average Cash Cost per Pound Produced and Average Realized Sales Price per Pound Sold (US$ in millions, except pounds and per pound amounts) 1 Pounds produced are shown in molybdenum oxide and include an estimated loss from our share of the sulfide production from the mines to oxide. They exclude molybdenum processed from purchased product. 2 Other operations represent activities related to the roasting and processing of third-party concentrate and other metals at the Langeloth Facility and exclude product volumes and costs related to the roasting and processing of TC Mine and Endako Mine concentrate. The Langeloth Facility costs associated with roasting and processing of TC Mine and Endako Mine concentrate are included in their respective operating results above. Non-GAAP Reconciliation Cash Cost Per Pound Produced

EX-99.5

1 Langeloth and Molybdenum Market Overview

2 Incidence Recordable Rate (AIRR)1 2010 – 2014 YTD 7.4 0.6 1.7 2.3 4.5 2.6 2.3 1.3 2.5 3.4 6.3 6.1 6.2 2.9 2010 2011 2012 2013 YTD 2014 Langeloth Total Company Primary Metals Manufacturing 1 Includes lost time and reportable incidents. 2

Annual molybdenum roasting capacity 36 Million lbs MoS2 + O2  1100◦ F  MoO3 + SO2 Molybdenite Concentrate Molybdic Tech Oxide 600 ◦ C Molybdenum Roasting

4 Ferromolybdenum Products 9+ Million lbs / Year

5 5+ Million lbs / year Briquette Production

6 Pure Sublimed Oxide 3 Million lbs / year MoO3 + O2 63% 2100°F 1150°C MoO3 + Metal 66.53% Pure Oxide Production

Sulfuric Acid Plant – 72,000 tons per year

1st Half 2014 Full Year Total Actual Projected Capacity Mo Roasted Conc (m lbs) 18.7 35.3 36 FerroMoly (m lbs) 4.9 9.1 9+ Briquettes (m lbs) 2.8 5.9 5+ Pure Moly Oxide (m lbs) 1.3 2.7 3 Sulfuric Acid (Tons) 36,900 69,650 70,900 2014 YTD Performance thru June

Molybdenum Market Million pounds Mo 2014 Non Chinese Mo Production 380 Up 8% from 2013 China Net Trade 22 Up 24% from 2013 Supply Ex-China 402 up 32m lbs or 8.7% from 2013 Metals Week YTD July Price $11.99 $9.52 in ‘13, a 26% increase to ‘14 MW Price as of Aug 13 $13.05 $9.25 in ’13, a 41% increase to ‘14  Market is very tight during seasonally slow period  At the start of 2015 Thompson Creek Mine will reduce annual supply by 18 million lbs  With the current low inventory levels the Sierra Gorda start-up is not weighing on the market  High levels of production (40m+ lbs) from Sierra Gorda likely will be price disruptive  The key to market pricing will be the China primary production response to low cost supply expansion