UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016
OR
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ____________ to ____________.
Commission file number 000-53988
DSG GLOBAL INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its charter)
| Nevada | 26-1134956 | |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
214 – 5455 152nd Street, Surrey, British Columbia V3S 5A5, Canada
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)
(604)
575-3848
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock, $0.001 par value
(Title of Class)
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes [ ] No [X]
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes [ ] No [X]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one):
| Large accelerated filer [ ] | Accelerated filer [ ] | Non-accelerated filer [ ] (Do not check if smaller reporting company) |
Smaller reporting company [X] |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes [ ] No [X]
As of December 31, 2016, the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates was $4,996,578 based on the closing price on that date. As of April 28, 2017, the registrant had 32,541,187 shares of common stock issued and outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrant’s Proxy Statement for the registrant’s 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by reference in Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Such Proxy Statement will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days of December 31, 2016, the last day of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
DSG
GLOBAL INC.
FORM 10-K
TABLE OF CONTENTS
| 2 |
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements that include information relating to future events, future financial performance, strategies, expectations, competitive environment, regulation and availability of resources. The words “believe,” “may,” “will,” “potentially,” “estimate,” “continue,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “could,” “would,” “project,” “plan,” “expect” and similar expressions that convey uncertainty of future events or outcomes are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements concerning the following:
| ● | our future financial and operating results; | |
| ● | our intentions, expectations and beliefs regarding anticipated growth, market penetration and trends in our business; | |
| ● | the timing and success of our business plan; | |
| ● | our plans regarding future financings; | |
| ● | our ability to attract and retain customers; | |
| ● | our dependence on growth in our customers’ businesses; | |
| ● | the effects of market conditions on our stock price and operating results; | |
| ● | our ability to maintain our competitive technological advantages against competitors in our industry; | |
| ● | the expansion of our business in our core golf market as well as in new markets like commercial fleet management and agriculture; | |
| ● | our ability to timely and effectively adapt our existing technology and have our technology solutions gain market acceptance; | |
| ● | our ability to introduce new offerings and bring them to market in a timely manner; | |
| ● | our ability to maintain, protect and enhance our intellectual property; | |
| ● | the effects of increased competition in our market and our ability to compete effectively; | |
| ● | the attraction and retention of qualified employees and key personnel; | |
| ● | future acquisitions of or investments in complementary companies or technologies; and | |
| ● | our ability to comply with evolving legal standards and regulations, particularly concerning requirements for being a public company. |
These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this Form 10-K and are subject to uncertainties, assumptions and business and economic risks. As such, our actual results could differ materially from those set forth in the forward-looking statements as a result of the factors set forth below in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” and in our other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Moreover, we operate in a very competitive and rapidly changing environment, and new risks emerge from time to time. It is not possible for us to predict all risks, nor can we assess the impact of all factors on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements we may make. In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the forward-looking events and circumstances discussed in this Form 10-K may not occur, and actual results could differ materially and adversely from those anticipated or implied in our forward-looking statements.
You should not rely upon forward-looking statements as predictions of future events. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in our forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee that the future results, levels of activity, performance or events and circumstances described in the forward-looking statements will be achieved or occur. Moreover, neither we nor any other person assumes responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of the forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements for any reason after the date of this Form 10-K to conform these statements to actual results or to changes in our expectations, except as required by law.
You should read this Annual Report on Form 10-K and the documents that we reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and have filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as exhibits thereto with the understanding that our actual future results and circumstances may be materially different from what we expect.
| 3 |
Our Corporate History and Background Prior to the Closing of the Share Exchange Agreement
Boreal Productions Inc. (the Company) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on September 24, 2007. Andrea Fehsenfeld was then appointed sole officer and director. The Company was formed to option feature films and TV projects and then package them to sell at a profit to various studios and production companies.
At that time the board of directors voted to seek capital and begin development of our business plan. We received our initial funding of $9,000 through the sale of common stock to Ms. Fehsenfeld who purchased 3,000,000 shares of common stock at $0.003 per share and $45,000 from the sale of 3,000,000 shares of common stock issued to 30 un-affiliated investors at $0.015 per share. On June 11, 2008, we effected a five for one forward stock split of our authorized and issued and outstanding common stock. As a result, our authorized capital increased from 75,000,000 to 375,000,000 shares of common stock and our outstanding share capital increased from 6,000,000 shares of common stock to 30,000,000 shares of common stock.
We have not achieved revenues and have accrued a Net Loss of $153,964 since inception through May 6, 2015, the date of the reverse merger. We have been issued a going concern opinion by our auditors and rely upon the sale of our securities to fund operations. To date we have been unable to raise sufficient capital to finance the production of any film or television production and, consequently, our management has sought alternative strategies, such as business combinations or acquisitions, to create value for our shareholders.
On April 13, 2015, we entered into a share exchange agreement with DSG TAG and the shareholders of DSG TAG who become parties to the share exchange agreement. Pursuant to the terms of the share exchange agreement, we agreed to acquire not less than 75% and up to 100% of the issued and outstanding shares of DSG TAG’s common stock in exchange for the issuance by our company of up to 20,000,000 shares of our common stock to the shareholders of DSG TAG on the basis of one of our common shares for 5.4935 common shares of DSG TAG.
Previously, in anticipation of the share exchange agreement with DSG TAG, we undertook to change our name and effect a reverse stock split of our authorized and issued common stock. Accordingly, on January 19, 2015, our board of directors approved an agreement and plan of merger to merge with our wholly-owned subsidiary DSG Global Inc., a Nevada corporation, to effect a name change from Boreal Productions Inc. to DSG Global Inc. Our company remains the surviving company. DSG Global Inc. was formed solely for the change of name.
Also on January 19, 2015, our company’s board of directors approved a resolution to effect a reverse stock split of our authorized and issued and outstanding shares of common stock on a three (3) old for one (1) new basis. Upon effect of the reverse split, our authorized capital will decrease from 375,000,000 shares of common stock to 125,000,000 shares of common stock and correspondingly, our issued and outstanding shares of common stock will decrease from 30,000,000 to 10,000,000 shares of common stock, all with a par value of $0.001.
Articles of Merger to effect the merger and change of name and a Certificate of Change to effect the reverse stock split were filed with the Nevada Secretary of State on January 22, 2015, with an effective date of February 2, 2015. The name change and forward split were reviewed by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) were approved for filing with an effective date of February 23, 2015.
The name change became effective with the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board and OTC Markets quotation system at the opening of trading on February 23, 2015 under the symbol “BRPOD”. Effective March 19, 2015 our stock symbol changed to “DSGT”. Our new CUSIP number following the symbol change is 23340C104. The first trade of our common shares occurred on March 25, 2015.
| 4 |
On May 6, 2015, we completed the acquisition of approximately 75% (82,435,748 common shares) of the issued and outstanding common shares of DSG TAG Systems as contemplated by the share exchange agreement by issuing 15,185,875 shares of our common stock to shareholders of DSG TAG Systems who became parties to the agreement. In addition, concurrent with the closing of the share exchange agreement, we issued an additional 179,823 shares of our common stock to Westergaard Holdings Ltd. in partial settlement of accrued interest on outstanding indebtedness of DSG TAG Systems.
Following the initial closing of the share exchange agreement and through October 22, 2015, we acquired an additional 101,200 shares of common stock of DSG TAG Systems from shareholders who became parties to the share exchange agreement, and issued to these shareholders an aggregate of 18,422 shares of our common stock. Following completion of these additional purchases, DSG Global owns approximately 100% of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of DSG TAG Systems. An aggregate of 4,229,384 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock of DSG TAG Systems continues to be held by Westergaard Holdings Ltd., an affiliate of Keith Westergaard, a member of our board of directors.
The reverse acquisition was accounted for as a recapitalization effected by a share exchange, wherein DSG TAG Systems is considered the acquirer for accounting and financial reporting purposes. The assets and liabilities of the acquired entity have been brought forward at their book value and no goodwill has been recognized. We adopted the business and operations of DSG TAG Systems upon the closing of the share exchange agreement.
Our principal executive office is located at 214 - 5455 152nd Street, Surrey, BC, V3S 5A5 Canada. The telephone number at our principal executive office is 1 (877) 589 - 8806.
Business Subsequent to the Closing of the Share Exchange Agreement
Subsequent to the closing of the share exchange agreement with DSG Tag Systems, Inc. (“DSG TAG”), we have adopted the business and operations of DSG TAG.
DSG TAG was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on April 17, 2008 and extra provincially registered in British Columbia, Canada in 2008. In March 2011, DSG TAG formed DSG Tag Systems International, Ltd. in the United Kingdom (“DSG UK”). DSG UK is a wholly owned subsidiary of DSG TAG.
When used the terms “Company,” “we,” “our,” “us,” “DSG,” or “DSG TAG,” means DSG Global, Inc. and its subsidiary DSG Tag Systems, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary DSG Tag Systems International, Ltd.
DSG Global Inc. (“DSG”) is a technology development company based in Surrey, British Columbia, Canada, engaged in the design, manufacture, and marketing of fleet management solutions for the golf industry, as well as commercial, government and military applications. Its principal activities are the sale and rental of GPS tracking devices and interfaces for golf vehicles, and related support services. The company was founded by a group of individuals who have dedicated their careers to fleet management technologies and have been at the forefront of the industry’s most innovative developments. The company has developed the TAG suite of products that represents a major breakthrough as the first completely modular fleet management solution for the golf industry. The Executive Team has over 50 years’ combined experience in the design and manufacture of wireless, GPS, and fleet tracking solutions. The TAG suite of products is currently sold and installed around the world in golf facilities and commercial applications through a network of established distributors and partnerships with some of the most notable brands in fleet and equipment manufacture.
The company specializes in the vehicle fleet management industry. DSG stands for “Digital Security Guard” which is the company’s primary value statement giving fleet operator’s new capabilities to track and control their vehicles. The company has developed a proprietary combination of hardware and software that is marketed around the world as the TAG System. The company has primarily focused on the golf industry where the TAG System is deployed to help golf course operators manage their fleet of golf carts, turf equipment, and utility vehicles. DSG is now a leader in the category of Fleet Management in the golf industry and was awarded “Best Technology of the Year” by Boardroom magazine the publication of the National Golf Course Owners Association in 2010. To date the TAG is installed on over 8,000 vehicles and the company has monitored over 6,000,000 rounds.
| 5 |
The TAG system fills a void in the marketplace by offering a modular structure which allows the customer to customize their system depending on desired functionality and budget constraints. In addition to the core TAG vehicle control functionality which can operate independently, DSG has two golfer information display systems; the alphanumeric TEXT and high definition TOUCH providing the operator two options which is unique in the industry.
The market for the TAG System is the 40,000 golf operations worldwide. While the golf industry is still the primary sales and marketing focus, the company has completed several successful pilots of the TAG in other vertical markets such as agriculture, and commercial fleet deployments. With appropriate resources in place the company will implement a sales and marketing strategy expanding into these markets.
We have a direct sales force in North America, which comprises the most significant portion of the golf fleet market, and have developed key relationships with distributors and golf equipment manufacturers such as E-Z-GO, Yamaha and Ransomes Jacobsen to help drive sales for the North American and worldwide markets.
Emerging Growth Company
We are an Emerging Growth Company as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups (JOBS) Act.
We shall continue to be deemed an emerging growth company until the earliest of:
(A) the last day of the fiscal year of the issuer during which it had total annual gross revenues of $1,000,000,000 (as such amount is indexed for inflation every 5 years by the Commission to reflect the change in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, setting the threshold to the nearest 1,000,000) or more;
(B) the last day of the fiscal year of the issuer following the fifth anniversary of the date of the first sale of common equity securities of the issuer pursuant to an effective registration statement under this title;
(C) the date on which such issuer has, during the previous 3-year period, issued more than $1,000,000,000 in non-convertible debt; or
(D) the date on which such issuer is deemed to be a ‘large accelerated filer’, as defined in section 240.12b-2 of title 17, Code of Federal Regulations, or any successor thereto.’.
As an emerging growth company we are exempt from Section 404(b) of Sarbanes Oxley. Section 404(a) requires Issuers to publish information in their annual reports concerning the scope and adequacy of the internal control structure and procedures for financial reporting. This statement shall also assess the effectiveness of such internal controls and procedures.
Section 404(b) requires that the registered accounting firm shall, in the same report, attest to and report on the assessment on the effectiveness of the internal control structure and procedures for financial reporting.
As an emerging growth company we are exempt from Section 14A and B of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 which require the shareholder approval of executive compensation and golden parachutes.
We have elected not to opt out of the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised accounting standards pursuant to Section 107(b) of the JOBS Act.
| 6 |
DSG Technologies and Products
Technology Overview
DSG produces a “modular” suite of products to provide fleet management solution for any vehicle required for a golf operation, and provides two golfer information display options to meet the operators budget requirements. DSG believes that it is currently the only company in the golf fleet management industry with these capabilities.
The DSG TAG System is designed from the ground up to be a golf/turf vehicle fleet management system. Its main function is addressing the golf course operator needs. While employing same core technology (cellular wireless and GPS) as traditional commercial vehicle fleet management systems, DSG has created patent pending solutions to adapt it to the very specific requirements of the golf environment. Compared to mainstream fleet tracking products, DSG collects 10 to 50 times more data points per MB (megabyte) of cellular data due to its proprietary data collection and compression algorithms. Also the relative positioning accuracy is improved by almost one order of magnitude by the use of application-specific geo-data validation and correction methods.
DSG’s proprietary methods make it possible to offer a solution suitable for use on golf courses at a price low enough to be affordable in the industry. Every system component incorporates state-of-the-art technology (server, mobile trackers, display). In developing its products DSG TAG Systems has adopted an application oriented approach placing the most emphasis (and research & development) on server and end-user software by taking advantage of the commodity level reached by mainstream technologies such as Global Positioning (GPS) and M2M (Machine to Machine) Cellular Data in the wider context of Commercial Fleet Management.
DSG leveraged the existence of an abundance of very cost effective telematics solutions by selecting an “off-the-shelf” hardware platform that meets all the main performance and environmental requirements for operation in the harsh, outdoor golf course environment. While removing all risk and cost associated with developing a proprietary hardware platform, DSG has maintained the unique nature of its hardware solution by developing a set of proprietary adapters and interfaces specifically for the golf application.
DSG has secured an exclusive supply agreement with the third-party hardware manufacturers for the vertical of golf industry. Additionally, DSG owns the design of all proprietary adapters and interfaces. This removes the risk of a potential competitor utilizing the same hardware platform. Competitors could attempt to reverse engineer or copycat the TAG technology and equipment. This risk factor is mitigated by the fact that our product does not rely on a particular technology or hardware platform to be successful but on a very specific vertical software application that is far more difficult to copy (and respectively easier to protect).
The application software contains patent features implemented in every core component of the system. The TAG device runs DSG proprietary firmware incorporating unique data collection and compression algorithms. The web server software which powers the end-user application is also proprietary and incorporates the industry knowledge accumulated through the over 70 years of collective experience of the DSG team.
This approach has given the product line a high level of endurance against technology obsolescence. At any point in time, if a hardware component is discontinued or a better/less expensive hardware platform becomes available, the software application can be easily adapted to operate on the new platform or with the new component. The company benefits from the constant increase of performance and cost reduction of mainstream hardware technology without any additional cost.
The web-based Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) model used by DSG TAG System is optimal for low operating and support costs and rapid-cycle release for software updates. It is also a major factor in eliminating or substantially reducing the need for any end-user premises equipment. Customers have access to the service through any internet connected computer or mobile device, there is no need for a local wireless network on the facility and installation time and cost are minimal.
DSG is positioned to take advantage of mainstream technology and utilize “best of breed” hardware platforms to create new generations of products. Our software is designed to be “portable” to future new platforms with better GPS and wireless technology in order to maintain the Company competitive edge.
All new product development effort of DSG is following the same model: select the best of breed third-party hardware platform, design and produce custom proprietary accessories while focusing the bulk of the development efforts on vertical software application to address a very specific set of end-customer needs.
| 7 |
The latest addition to the TAG family of products, the TAG TOUCH is a perfect example of this development philosophy in action: the main component is a last-generation Android tablet PC wrapped in a custom designed outdoor enclosure containing the power supply and interface components required for the golf environment. The software application is taking advantage of all the advanced high resolution graphics, touch user interface and computing power of the Android OS delivering a vastly superior user experience compared to competitive systems. The time to market for this product was 30% of how long it took to develop and launch this type of products in the past.
The TAG Control Unit
The company’s flagship product is the TAG Control unit. The TAG can operate as a “stand alone” unit or with one of two displays; the TEXT alphanumeric display or the TOUCH high definition “touch activated” screen. The TAG is GPS enabled and communicates with the TAG software using cellular GSM networks. Utilizing the cellular networks rather than erecting a local Wi-Fi network assures carrier grade uptime, and vehicle tracking “off- property”. GSM is the de facto global standard for mobile communications.
The TAG unit itself is discreetly installed usually in the nose of the vehicle to give the GPS clear line of site. It is then connected to the vehicle battery and ignition. The property is then mapped using the latest satellite imagery that is graphically enhanced and loaded into the TAG System as a map.
Once installed the vehicle owner utilizes the TAG software to locate the vehicle in real time using any computer, smartphone, or tablet that has an internet connection and perform various management operations.
The operator can use the geo-fencing capabilities to create “zones” on the property where they can control the vehicles behavior such as shutting down a vehicle that is entering a sensitive or dangerous area. The TAG System also monitors the strength of the vehicle’s battery helping to prevent sending out vehicles undercharged batteries which can be an inconvenience for the course and negatively impact the golfer experience.
Features and Benefits
| ● | Internal battery utilizing Smart Power technology which charges the battery only when the vehicle is running (gas) or being charged (electric) |
| ● | Pace of Play management and reporting which is a critical statistic for the golf operator |
| ● | No software to install |
| ● | Web based access on any computer, smartphone, or tablet |
| ● | Set up restricted zones to protect property, vehicles, and customers |
| ● | Real time tracking both on and off property (using Street Maps) |
| ● | Email alerts of zone activity |
| ● | Cart lockdown |
| ● | Detailed usage reporting for improved maintenance, proper vehicle rotation, and staff efficiency |
| ● | Geo fencing security features |
| ● | Ability to enforce cart path rules which is key to protecting course on wet weather days |
| ● | Modular system allows for hardware and feature options to fit any budget or operations |
| 8 |
TEXT Display
The TEXT is paired with the TAG Control unit as DSG’s entry level display system for operators who desire to provide basic hole distance information and messaging to the golf customer. The TEXT is a very cost effective solution for operators who desire to give their customers GPS services with the benefits of a Fleet Management back end. The TEXT can be mounted on the steering column or the dash depending on the customer’s preference.
DSG’s entry level alphanumeric golf informations display
Features and benefits
| ● | Hole information display |
| ● | Yardage displays for front, middle, back locations of the pin |
| ● | Messaging capabilities – to individual carts or fleet broadcast |
| ● | Zone violation warnings |
| ● | Pace of Play notifications |
| ● | Smart battery technology to prevent power drain |
| ● | Versatile mounting option |
TOUCH Display
The TOUCH is a solution for operators who desire to provide a high level visual information experience to their customers. The TOUCH is a high definition “Touch” activated display screen mounted in the golf cart integrated with the TAG Control unit to provide a full back/front end Fleet Management solution. The TOUCH displays hole graphics, yardage, and detailed course information to the golfer and provides interactive features such as Food and Beverage ordering and scorekeeping.
| 9 |
The industry leading Touch HD – the most sophisticated display in the market.
Features and Benefits
| ● | Integrated Food and Beverage ordering |
| ● | Pro Tips |
| ● | Flyover capability |
| ● | Daily pin placement display |
| ● | Interactive Scorecard with email capability |
| ● | Multiple language choices |
| ● | No power drain with Smart Battery technology |
| ● | Full broadcast messaging capabilities |
| ● | Pace of Play display |
| ● | Vivid hole graphics |
| ● | Option of steering or roof mount |
| ● | Generate advertising revenue and market additional services |
Advertising Platform
A unique feature of the TOUCH system is the advertising display capability. This can be used by the operator for internal promotion of services or for generating revenue by selling the ad real estate since the golf demographic is very desirable to advertisers. The TOUCH displays banner, panel, full page, pro tip, and Green view ads. There is also ad real estate on the interactive feature screens for Food and Beverage ordering and the scorecard. The Touch System can also display animated GIF files or play video for added impact.
| 10 |
Advertising displayed in multiple formats including animated GIF and video
| 11 |
DSG has developed proprietary “Ad Manager” software which is used to place and change the ads on the system(s) from a central NOC (Network Operations Center) in real time. The Ad Manager can deploy to a single system or multiple systems. This creates a network of screens that is also very desirable to advertisers as ad content can be deployed locally, regionally, or nationally. The advertising platform is an important part of the company’s future marketing and sales strategy.
DSG R3 Advertising Platform
The DSG R3 program delivers advance ROI (Revenue Optimization Intelligence). Utilizing all streams of advertising delivery, such as automated, direct, and self-serve. The R3 program has the ability to deliver relevant advertising to golfers the moment they sit in the cart. The R3 model is more effective than the previous advertising model of ‘One to One’, these are local ads only sold through direct sales by courses, or 3rd party advertising sales firms. The new R3 model offers ‘Many to one’ advertising options, delivering thousands of national, regional, and local advertisers an opportunity to advertise on our screens through our R3 Marketplace.
Previous ‘One to One’ model vs the new R3 model ‘Many to One’
| 12 |
TAG TURF/ECO TAG
The TAG Turf and the new ECO TAG were developed to give course operators the same back end management features for their turf equipment and utility vehicles. Turf equipment is expensive and a single piece can run over $100,000 and represents a large portion of a golf course operating budget. The TAG Turf and ECO TAG have comprehensive reporting that the operator can utilize to implement programs that can increase efficiencies, reduce labor costs, help lower idle times, provide fuel consumption and equipment performance, provide historical data on cutting patterns, and reduce pollution from emissions by monitoring idle times. Since the golf course needs to be maintained regardless of volume these cost saving measures directly impact the operator’s bottom line.
Features and Benefits
| ● | Can be installed on any turf, utility, or service vehicle |
| ● | Work activity tracking and management |
| ● | Work breakdown and analysis per area, work group, activity type or specific vehicle |
| ● | Vehicle idling alerts |
| ● | Zone entry alerts |
| ● | Detailed travel (cutting patterns) history |
| ● | Detailed usage reports with mileage and hours |
| ● | Protection for ecological areas through geo fencing |
| ● | Vehicle lock down and ‘off property’ locating features |
| 13 |
The TAG Turf provides detailed trail history and cutting patterns
Revenue Model
DSG derives revenue from four different sources.
Systems Sales Revenue, which consists of the sales price paid by those customers who purchase our TAG system hardware.
Monthly Service Fees are paid by all customers for the wireless data fee charges required to operate the GPS tracking on the TAG systems.
Monthly Rental Fees are paid by those customers that rent the TAG system hardware. The amount of a customer’s monthly payment varies based on the type of equipment rented (a TAG, a TAG and TEXT, or a TAG and TOUCH).
Advertising Revenue is a source of revenue that has not been taken full advantage of. We believe it has the potential to be strategic for us in the future. Currently, courses can deliver their own advertising to our TOUCH units and soon we’ll be introducing our R3 program which automates the delivery of advertising.
Markets
Sales and Marketing Plan
The market for the TAG System is the worldwide golf cart and Turf equipment fleets. There are 40,000 golf courses around the world with North America being the largest individual market with 20,000. This represents over 3,000,000 vehicles. The golf market has five distinct types of operations. Municipal, Private Country Clubs, Destination Resorts, Public Commercial, Military and University affiliated. DSG has deployed and has case studies developed TAG systems in each of these categories.
Our marketing strategy is focused on building brand awareness, generating quality leads, and providing excellent customer service.
| 14 |
North America Sales
Since the largest market is North America the company employs a direct sales team and Sales Agents that provides full sales coverage. Our Sales Agents are experienced golf industry professionals who maintain established relationships with the golf industry and carry multiple golf lines. Our sales objective is to offer our existing and prospective customers a dedicated, knowledgeable, and outstanding customer service team.
In addition, our team is dedicated to existing accounts that focus on up-selling and cross-selling additional products to our current customer base, securing renewal agreements, and providing excellent customer service. The current regions are:
| ● | Western Canada |
| ● | Eastern Canada |
| ● | Northeast USA |
| ● | Western USA |
| ● | Southeastern USA |
| ● | Midwest USA |
International Sales
DSG focuses on select global golf markets that offer significant volume opportunities and that value the benefits that our products deliver.
We utilize strategic distributor partnerships in each targeted region/country to sell, install and service our products. Distributors are selected based on market strength, market share, technical and selling capability, and overall reputation. We believe that DSG solutions appeal to all distributors because they are universal and fit any make or model of vehicle. We maintain and leverage our strong relationship with Yamaha, E-Z-GO and Ransomes Jacobsen (sister company to E-Z-GO) in developing our distributor network around the world. Today, many of our distributor partners are the leading distributors for E-Z-GO and RJ and hold a dominant position in their respective markets. While they are Yamaha or E-Z-GO distributors, most sell DSG products to all courses regardless of their choice of golf car as a value add to their customers and to generate additional revenue. We complement this distributor base with independent distributors as needed to ensure we have sufficient coverage in critical markets.
Currently DSG is focused on Europe, Asia and South Africa. The company is looking to expand next into Australia and Latin America.
Management Companies
Many golf facilities are managed by management companies. The portfolios of these companies vary from a few to hundreds of golf courses. Troon®, the world’s largest player in golf course management, has over 200 courses under management. The management companies provide everything from branding, staffing, management systems, marketing, and procurement. DSG is currently providing products and services to Troon, OB Sports, Kemper Sports, Trump, Marriott Golf, Blue Green, Crown Golf, American Golf, Billy Casper, Club Corp, and Club Link.
DSG has been successful in completing installations and developing relationships with several of the key players who control a substantial number of courses. DSG will continue to implement system developments that are driven by the needs of these management companies such as combined reporting, multiple course access through a centralized dashboard. This development will become a competitive advantage for DSG in the management company market.
DSG has dedicated a team to create specific collateral for this market and has assigned a senior executive to have direct responsibility to manage these relationships.
| 15 |
Competition
We compete with a number of established producers and distributors of vehicle fleet management systems. Our competitors include producers of golf specific applications, such as GPS Industries, LLC., one of the leading suppliers of golf cart fleet management systems, as well as producers of non-golf specific utility vehicle fleet management systems, such as Toro. Many of our competitors have longer operating histories, better brand recognition and greater financial resources than we do. In order for us to successfully compete in our industry we must:
| ● | demonstrate our products’ competitive advantages; | |
| ● | develop a comprehensive marketing system; and | |
| ● | increase our financial resources. |
However, there can be no assurance that even if we do these things we will be able to compete effectively with the other companies in our industry.
We believe that we will be able to compete effectively in our industry because of the versatility, reliability, and relative affordability of our products when compared to those of our competitors. We will attempt to build awareness of our competitive advantages among existing and potential customers through trade shows, sales visits and demonstrations, online marketing, and positive word of mouth advertising.
However, as we are newly-established company relative to our competitors, we face the same problems as other new companies starting up in an industry, such as limited access to capital. Our competitors may be substantially larger and better funded than us, and have significantly longer histories of research, operation and development than us. In addition, they may be able to provide more competitive products than we can and generally be able to respond more quickly to new or emerging technologies and changes in legislation and regulations relating to the industry. Additionally, our competitors may devote greater resources to the development, promotion and sale of their products or services than we do. Increased competition could also result in loss of key personnel, reduced margins or loss of market share, any of which could harm our business.
Our primary competitor in the field of golf course fleet management is GPS Industries, a company that was founded in 1996 by Mr. Bob Silzer, the founder of DSG TAG Systems. GPS Industries is currently the largest player in the marketplace with an installed base of approximately 750 golf courses worldwide. GPS Industries was consolidated by various mergers and acquisitions with a diversity of hardware platforms and application software. Since 2009, when GPS Industries has introduced their latest product offering called the Visage, in an exclusive partnership with Club Car, their strategy has been to target mostly their existing customers and motivate them into replacing their existing, older GPS system, with the Visage system.
GPS Industries is leveraging very heavily their partnership with Club Car, which is one of the three largest golf cars manufacturers in the world and at times is benefiting from golf operators’ preference for Club Car and their vehicles when they select their management system.
Market Mix
Since the introduction of the DSG product line, the golf course operators realized that they have now access to a budget-friendly fleet management tool that works not only on golf cars but also with all other vehicles used on the golf course such as turf maintenance, shuttles, and other utility vehicles.
Marketing studies have identified that half of the golf course operators only need a fleet management system and only 15% need a high-end GPS golf system. This illustrates the strong competitive advantage that DSG TAG Systems has versus GPS Industries since their product can only address the needs of a relatively small fraction of the marketplace.
| 16 |
Consequently, GPS Industries installed base has steadily declined since most of their new product installations have replaced older product for existing customers and some customers have opted for a lower budget system and switched over to DSG TAG Systems.
Marketing Activities
The company has a multi layered approach marketing the TAG suite of products. One of the foundations of this plan is attending industry trade shows which are well attended by golf operators. The two largest shows are the PGA Merchandise Show and the Golf Industry Show which are held in Florida at the end of January. The company also attends a number of regional shows around North America. International events are attended by our distributors and partners.
The second layer is memberships in key organizations such as the National Golf Course Owners Association, Golf Course Superintendents Association, and Club Managers Association of America. These are very influential in the industry and have marketing channels such as publications, email blasts, and web based marketing. The company also markets directly to course operators through email, surveys direct mail programs.
Lead Generation
One of the primary sources of lead generation is through the company’s strategic partnerships with EZ-GO, Yamaha, and Ransomes Jacobson. These relationships provide the company with a great deal of market intelligence. The sales forces of the partners work in tandem with the DSG sales team by passing on the leads, creating joint proposals, and distributing TAG sales material. The company has also created co-branded materials for specific value items of interest to operators such as Pace of Play solutions. DSG sale s and marketing staff attend partner sales events to conduct training and discuss marketing strategies.
The company is in the process of testing an internal telemarketing program in several key markets to gauge whether this particular channel warrants larger scale implementation.
Competitive Advantages
Pricing
One of the “heroes” of the TAG System is providing the course operator a range of modular fleet management options that are very competitively priced. Pricing options range from the TURF, TAG, Text, and Touch System, giving the customer a wide range of pricing options.
Functional advantages
DSG has the distinctive advantage of being able to offer a true fleet management system, encompassing all the vehicles on the golf course not just the golf carts. Due to the modular nature of the system, customers have now the option to configure their system’s configuration to match exactly their needs and their budget.
Product advantages
DSG products are the robust, reliable, and user friendly systems in the world. DSG is the only company currently providing systems that are waterproof with internal batteries to ensure our partners retain the full golf cart manufacturer’s warranty.
| 17 |
Operational Plan
Our Operations Department’s main functions are outlined below:
Product Supply Chain Management
| ● | Product procurement, lead-time management |
| ● | Inventory Control |
Customer Service
| ● | Training |
| ● | Troubleshooting & Support |
| ● | Hardware Repairs |
Installations
| ● | Content & graphics procurement |
| ● | System configurations |
| ● | Shipping and Installation |
Infrastructure Management
| ● | Communication Servers Management |
| ● | Cellular Data Carriers |
| ● | Service and administration tools |
Product Supply Chain
In order to maintain high product quality and control, as well as benefiting from cost savings, the company is currently procuring all main hardware components offshore. Final assembly is locally performed in order to ensure product quality. Other main components are also procured directly from manufacturers or from local suppliers that outsource components office in order to keep the price as low as possible.
The company is requesting the suppliers to perform a complete set of quality testing and minimum 24 hours’ burn-in before the product is delivered. The local hardware assembler and components supplier offers 12 months’ warranty. The main hardware components offshore supplier offers a warranty plan of 15 months from the date the product is shipped. With an extended 90 days beyond the current warranty, such repair service would be paid by the supplier except for component replacement costs, which would be paid by DSG.
Another important activity related to the management of the product supply chain is working closely with the suppliers and ensuring that we have alternate sources for the main components and identify well in advance any components that may go “end-of-life” and find suitable replacements before product shortages may occur.
Inventory Control
The Company has implemented strict inventory management procedures that govern the inbound flow of products from suppliers, the outgoing flow to customers as well as the internal movement of inventory between warehouses (Canada, US and UK). There are also procedures in place to control the flow of equipment returning from customers for repairs and their replacements.
Installation
The Company is utilizing a small number of its own field engineers, geographically positioned to be in close proximity of areas with high concentrations of current and future customers. Occasionally, when new installations exceed the internal capacity, the company employs a number of external contractors, on a project by project basis. Each contractor has been trained extensively to perform product installations and the Company has created an extensive collection of Installation Manuals for all products and vehicle types.
The product was designed with ease of installation as one of its features. Additionally, the installation process includes a pre-shipping configuration process that prepares each device with all the settings and graphics content (if applicable) required for the specific location it will be deployed. This makes the installation process a lot simpler and less time consuming in the field which reduces costs (accommodations, food, travel) for internal staff as well as external contractor cost (less billable time).
| 18 |
Another benefit of the simplified installation procedure is increased scalability in anticipation of increased number of installs in the future by reducing the skill level and training time requirements for additional contractors.
Customer Service
The company has deployed its Customer Service staff strategically so it has at least one service representative active during business hours in North America, Europe and South Africa.
The company is handling Customer Service directly in North America and UK, offering telephone and on-line support to end-customers. In other international markets, the first-line customer service is handled by local distributor’s staff while DSG is supplying training and more advanced support to the distributors.
For the management of the customer service activities, the company is utilizing SalesForce.com CRM system which allows creating, updating, closing and escalation of service cases, including the issuance of RMA (Return Material Authorization) numbers for defective equipment. Using SalesForce.com also allows generation of management reports for service issues, customer satisfaction, and equipment failures in order to quickly identify trends, problem accounts or systemic issues.
In addition, DSG will begin to offer the DSG Par 72 Service & Support Plan to guarantee service and support to client courses in the golf business, this program will be available April 2016. This new program for client courses will guarantee service and support program within 24 hours of a problem arising.
Product Development and Engineering
The company employs a team of software engineers in house to develop and maintain the main components of the server software and firmware.
All product development is derived from business needs assessment and customer requests.
The Product Manager is reviewing periodically the list of feature requests with the Sales, establishes priorities and updates the Product Roadmap.
The software engineers are also responsible for developing specialized tools and systems utilized increase efficiency in the operation of the company. These projects include functionality such as: automated system monitoring, automatic service alerts, improved remote troubleshooting tools, cellular data monitoring and reporting. All these tools are critical in future ability to support more customers with less resources, streamline support, and improve internal efficiency.
All hardware development (electronics and mechanical) is generally outsourced, however small projects like mounting solutions or cabling are handled in house.
Material Contracts
On March 31, 2015 DSG entered into an agreement with Adore Creative Agency Inc., a corporation owned by our director Rupert Wainwright pursuant to which Adore will provide marketing services to DSG. The terms included cash payment of $17,500 and a note in the amount of $310,000, with 5% interest per annum, convertible at the election of the holder into 248,000 common shares in the capital stock of DSG Global, Inc. at a price of $1.25 per share, maturing on March 30, 2016. As of December 31, 2016, approximately 90% of the marketing services related to the agreement have been expensed for a total amount of $280,000 and the remaining $30,000 is recorded as a prepaid deposit. Marketing services to date have not been completed.
On May 19, 2015 DSG entered into a commercial collaboration agreement for tablet products for the North America market with Remo Manufacturing (‘Remo’), a Chinese company in Shanghai, China. Remo is a first-tier developer and manufacturer of wireless tablets and devices. As per the agreement Remo and DSG have partnered together to develop new product lines.
| 19 |
On August 25, 2015 DSG entered into a convertible note agreement with Jerry Katell for $250,000. The term of the note is for six months, interest of 10% per annum to be repaid in full by way of common shares @ USD $1.75 per share with piggyback registration rights on the first registration statement filed by DSG and one full warrant @ USD $2.25 per share.
On January 21, 2016, DSG signed a three-month Lease Agreement regarding DSG’s offices located at 5455-152nd Street, Surrey, British Columbia. The term will commence on February 1, 2016 and end on April 30, 2016. The Lease is subject to DSG TAG negotiating a Lease with the Landlord, Benchmark Group, for the current occupied space or another space in the building prior to March 31, 2016. If no agreement has been signed, the Landlord reserves the right to terminate the Lease on March 31, 2016. On April 7, 2016, DSG has signed an additional two-month extension on the current lease at 214-5455 152nd Avenue, Surrey, BC, V3S 5A5. The term will on May 1, 2016 and end on July 31, 2016.
On January 22, 2016, DSG TAG entered into a short-term loan agreement with Jeremy Yaseniuk for CAD$337,172 or USD$250,000, payable in either currency at the exchange rate of 1.35. The maturity date of the agreement is no more than six months of the agreement or July 22, 2016. The loan amount bears an interest rate of 10% per annum which shall be payable on the on the maturity date with minimum interest of $25,000.
On January 25, 2016, DSG TAG signed a Letter of Intent for exclusive work rights in golf courses and gated communities for Mullen Golf Cars of Mullen Technologies, Inc. DSG has the exclusive rights to offer models 100e 2 seater, 2 door 4 seater, the 100 e4 and any new Mullen golf worthy SLV to the gated communities known as The Villages, Florida, USA.
On March 5, 2016, by letter agreement dated December 31, 2015 with Westergaard Holdings Ltd., a corporation owned by our Director Keith Westergaard, we amended the Subscription and Debt Settlement Agreement dated September 26, 2014 between DSG Tag Systems, Inc. and Westergaard Holdings, as previously amended on October 4, 2015. Westergaard Holdings owns 4,229,384 shares Series A Convertible Preferred Stock of DSG TAG. Pursuant to the settlement agreement, the parties have agreed that DSG Global will complete financings for gross proceeds of at least $10 million and use a portion of the proceeds to redeem all of the Series A Convertible Preferred Shares. The letter agreement modifies the redemption provisions of the original agreement, which now obligate us to raise capital and redeem the Series A Convertible Preferred Shares at a price of $1.25 per share as follows: (i) on or before May 1, 2016, DSG Global must complete a financing for gross proceeds of at least $2.5 million and use at least $1.125 million to redeem a minimum of 900,000 Series A Shares; (ii) on or before June 1, 2016, DSG Global must complete an additional financing for gross proceeds of at least $2.5 million and use at least $1.125 million to redeem a minimum of 900,000 additional Series A Shares; and (iii) on or before July 1, 2016, DSG Global must complete an additional financing for gross proceeds of at least $5.0 million and use at least $3.04 million to redeem the remaining 2,429,384 Series A Shares.
On March 31, 2016, DSG TAG signed a promissory note for $54,000 CAD. The terms are payable on or before April 30th, 2016 to the order of E. Gary Risler, together with interest of 6% per annum simple interest. Interest will be accrued and payable at the time of promissory note repayment. Security for this note will $150,000 CAD of Tag, Touch, and Text inventory currently owed by DSG TAG.
On April 6, 2016, DSG TAG entered into a loan agreement with Westergaard Holdings Ltd. a corporation owned by our director Keith Westergaard, pursuant to which we raised proceeds of $120,000 CAD. DSG TAG agrees to pay the loan plus fees no later than the final due date of July 6, 2016. The fees for service are as follows: (a) DSG TAG agrees to pay a fee for service equal to 5% of the amount of the loan or $6,000 CAD if the loan is paid in full, including fees on or before May 6, 2016; (b) DSG TAG agrees to pay a fee for service equal to 10% of the amount of the original loan, or $12,000 CAD if the loan is paid in full, including fees, between May 7, 2016 and June 5, 2016; and (c) DSG TAG agrees to pay a fee for service equal to 20% of the amount of the original loan, or $24,000 CAD if the loan is paid full, including fees, between June 6, 2016 and July 5, 2016. DSG TAG agrees to pay partial payments towards the principal amount of the loan and fees. DSG TAG agrees that fees will be charged on the initial amount of the loan.
On April 7, 2016, DSG TAG has signed an additional two-month extension on the current lease at 214-5455 152nd Avenue, Surrey, BC, V3S 5A5. The term will begin on May 1, 2016 and end on July 31, 2016.
| 20 |
On April 29, 2016 Westergaard Holdings Ltd., an affiliate of a member of our board of directors and a shareholder of the Company, amended the Subscription / Debt Settlement Agreement dated September 26, 2014 between DSG TAG and Westergaard Holdings, as previously amended. Westergaard Holdings owns 4,229,384 Series A Shares. Pursuant to the settlement agreement, DSG TAG has agreed that DSG Global Inc. will complete financings for gross proceeds of at least $10 million and use a portion of the proceeds to redeem all of the Series A Shares. The letter agreement modifies the redemption provisions, which now obligate the Company to raise capital and redeem the Series A Shares at a price of $1.25 per share as follows: (i) on or before August 1, 2016, the Company must complete a financing for gross proceeds of at least $2.5 million and use at least $1.125 million to redeem a minimum of 900,000 Series A Shares; (ii) on or before September 1, 2016, the Company must complete an additional financing for gross proceeds of at least $2.5 million and use at least $1.125 million to redeem a minimum of 900,000 additional Series A Shares; and (iii) on or before October 1, 2016, the Company must complete an additional financing for gross proceeds of at least $5.0 million and use at least $3.14 million to redeem the remaining 2,429,384 Series A Shares.
On July 26, 2016, DSG TAG has signed an additional six-month extension on the current lease. The term will begin on August 1, 2016 and end on January 31, 2017.
On August 5, 2016, DSG Global signed a convertible note agreement for $150,000 USD. The term of the note is 45 days from the date of contract with interest accrued at 2% per month. The principal and interest will be repaid in full by way of cash repayment or Class A common shares.
On November 7, 2016, we entered into a securities purchase agreement with Coastal Investment Partners. Pursuant to the agreement, Coastal Investment provided us with cash proceeds of $125,000 on November 10, 2016. In exchange, we issued a secured convertible promissory note in the principal amount of $138,888.89 (the “$138,888.89 Note”), inclusive of an 8% original issue discount, which bears interest at 8% per annum to the holder. The $138,888.89 Note matures six months from issuance and is convertible at the option of the holder into our common shares at a price per share that is the lower of $0. 12 or the closing price of our common stock on the conversion date. In addition, under the same terms, the company also issued a secured convertible note of $50,000 in consideration of cash proceeds of $10,000 and another secured convertible note of $75,000 in consideration of cash proceeds of $10,000.
On December 6, 2016, a convertible loan was received from Brent Silzer in the amount of $29,791 (CAD $40,000). Interest is 8% annual rate for one month and 4% monthly rate thereafter if not paid by January 15, 2017. The note is convertible, in whole or in part, at $0.05 per share.
On December 21, 2016, we entered into a convertible note agreement for the principal amount of $74,500. The terms are payable at the date of maturity, December 21, 2017, together with interest of 12% per annum. Interest will be accrued and payable at the time of promissory note repayment. The Holder shall have the right to convert all or any part of the outstanding and unpaid principal amount into fully paid and non-assessable shares of Common Stock at a conversion price equal to the lessor of (i) the closing sale price of the Common Stock on the Principal Market on the Trading Day immediately preceding the Closing Date, and (ii) 50% of the lowest sale price for the Common Stock on the Principal Market during the twenty five (25) consecutive Trading Days immediately preceding the Conversion Date. As of December 31, 2016, this convertible note was still outstanding to be received. In January 2017, the funds from this note were received by the Company and the liability recorded.
On January 3, 2017, we entered into an investor relations agreement with Chesapeake Group Inc., to assist in all phases of our investor relations including broker/dealer relations. The contract will commence on January 3, 2017 and end on July 2, 2017. In consideration for the agreement, we are committed to providing 1,800,000 restricted common shares within 10 days of the agreement, plus an additional 450,000 restricted common shares representing a monthly fee of $3,750. These restricted common shares are to be issued in monthly installments of 75,000 restricted common shares on the 2nd of each month beginning on February 2, 2017 and ending on July 2, 2017.
On January 18, 2017, we issued a convertible promissory note in the principal amount of $75,000. The terms are payable at the date of maturity, October 18, 2017, together with interest of 12% per annum. Interest will be accrued and payable at the time of promissory note repayment. The Holder shall have the right to convert all or any part of the outstanding and unpaid principal amount into fully paid and non-assessable shares of Common Stock at a conversion price equal to the lessor of (i) 60% multiplied by the lowest Trading Price (representing a discount rate of 40%) during the previous twenty five (25) Trading Day period ending on the latest complete Trading Day prior to the date of this Note and (ii) the Variable Conversion Price which means 50% multiplied by the lowest Trading Price (representing a discount rate of 50%) during the previous twenty five (25) Trading Day period ending on the latest complete Trading Day prior to the Conversion Date.
| 21 |
On March 15, 2017, we entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement, pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue 500,000 common shares of the Company at a price of $0.10 per share for aggregate consideration of $50,000.
On April 3, 2017, we issued a convertible promissory note in the principal amount of $110,000. The terms are payable at the date of maturity, October 3, 2017, together with interest of 10% per annum. Interest will be accrued and payable at the time of promissory note repayment. In connection with the issuance of this convertible promissory note, the Borrower shall issue 550,000 shares of common stock as a commitment fee provided, however, these shares must be returned if the Note is fully repaid and satisfied prior to the date which is 180 days following the issuance. The Holder shall have the right to convert all or any part of the outstanding and unpaid principal amount into fully paid and non-assessable shares of Common Stock at a conversion price equal to the lessor of (i) 55% multiplied by the lowest Trading Price (representing a discount rate of 45%) during the previous twenty five (25) Trading Day period ending on the latest complete Trading Day prior to the date of this Note and (ii) the Alternate Conversion Price which means 55% multiplied by the lowest Trading Price (representing a discount rate of 50%) during the previous twenty five (25) Trading Day period ending on the latest complete Trading Day prior to the Conversion Date.
On February 15, 2017, DSG TAG signed an additional six-month extension on the current lease. The term will begin on February 1, 2017 and end on July 31, 2017.
Description of Property
On January 21, 2016 DSG entered into a three-month Lease Agreement regarding the lease DSG’s offices located at 5455-152nd Street, Surrey, British Columbia. Pursuant to the agreement DSG has leased the approximately 2,957 square foot space on a month to month basis at the rate of CAD$5,518.63 (approximately USD $4,087.87) per month. DSG may terminate the lease with 30 days’ notice. On April 7, 2016, DSG has signed an additional two-month extension on the current lease at 214-5455 152nd Avenue, Surrey, BC, V3S 5A5. The term will on May 1, 2016 and end on July 31, 2016.
During the year ended December 31, 2016, the lease was extended and will expire on January 31, 2017. On February 15, 2017, an additional six-month extension on the lease was signed with the term beginning on February 1, 2017 and ending on July 31, 2017.
For the year ended December 31, 2016, the aggregate rental expense was CAD$92,825 (approximately USD$70,025). Rent expense included other amounts paid in Canada and the United Kingdom for warehouse storage and offices under month to month or as needed basis.
Intellectual Property
General
Our success will depend in part on our ability to protect our products and product candidates by obtaining and maintaining a strong proprietary position both in the United States and in other countries. To develop and maintain our proprietary position, we will rely on patent protection, trade secrets, know-how, continuing technological innovations and licensing opportunities. In that regard, we retain and rely on the advice of legal counsel specialized in the field of intellectual property.
Patents
| DSG owns two U.S. patents | ||
| ● | US Patent No. 8,836,490 for a “Vehicle Management” was issued September 16, 2014 and expires June 29, 2031. | |
| ● | US Patent No. 9,280,902 for a “Facilities Management” was issued March 8, 2016 and expires January 24, 2032. |
| 22 |
Patent Litigation
On December 30, 2012, a corporation filed an action against DSG in the United States courts claiming patent infringement. On March 8, 2013, the parties agreed to a settlement, with the Company admitting no wrong doing, in the amount of $125,000. The settlement is to be paid over an 18-month period in equal installments of $7,500 with annual interest rate of 8%. DSG has accrued all liabilities related to this matter in the financial statements.
Domain Names
We have registered and own the domain name of our website www.dsgtag .com.
Copyright
We own the common law copyright in the contents of our website (www.dsgtag.com.) and our various promotional materials.
Trademarks
We own the common-law trademark rights in our corporate name, product names, and associated logos, including “DSG TAG”, “TAG Golf”, “ECO TAG”, “TAG Text”, “TAG Touch”, “TAG Turf”, “TAG Commercial” and “TAG Military”. We have not applied to register any trademarks with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
Employees
As of April 28, 2017, we have 5 full-time employees in general and administrative, operations, engineering, research and development, business development, sales and marketing, and finance. We also engage independent contractors and consultants from time to time on an as-needed basis to supplement our core staff.
Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below, together with all of the other information in this Form 10-K, including our consolidated financial statements and related notes, before investing in our common stock. If any of the following risks materialize, our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects could be materially and adversely affected. In that event, the price of our common stock could decline, and you could lose part or all of your investment.
Risks Related to Our Business
We have a limited operating history with significant losses and expect losses to continue for the foreseeable future.
We have yet to establish any history of profitable operations and have incurred net losses since our inception. We have generated only nominal revenues since our inception and do not anticipate that we will generate revenues which will be sufficient to sustain our operations in the near future. Our profitability will require the successful commercialization and sales of our products. We may not be able to successfully achieve any of these requirements or ever become profitable.
There is doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern due to recurring losses from operations, accumulated deficit and insufficient cash resources to meet our business objectives, all of which means that we may not be able to continue operations.
Our independent auditors have added an explanatory paragraph to their audit opinion issued in connection with the financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 with respect to their doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note [3] to our financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, we have generated operating losses since inception, and our cash resources are insufficient to meet our planned business objectives, which together raise doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.
| 23 |
Our inability to complete our future research and development and engineering projects in a timely manner could have a material adverse effect of our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
If our research and development projects are not completed in a timely fashion, we could experience:
| ● | substantial additional cost to obtain a marketable product; | |
| ● | additional competition resulting from competitors in the surveillance and facial recognition market, and; | |
| ● | delay in obtaining future inflow of cash from financing or partnership activities. |
We face intense competition, which could result in lower revenues and higher research and development expenditures and could adversely affect our results of operations.
Unless we keep pace with changing technologies, we could lose existing customers and fail to win new customers. In order to compete effectively in the fleet management systems market, we must continually design, develop and market new and enhanced technologies. Our future success will depend, in part, upon our ability to address the changing and sophisticated needs of the marketplace. Fleet management technologies have achieved widespread commercial acceptance and our strategy of expanding our fleet management technologies business could adversely affect our business operations and financial condition.
Further, we expect to derive revenue from government contracts, which are often non-standard, involve competitive bidding, may be subject to cancellation with or without penalty and may produce volatility in earnings and revenue.
The market for our technologies is still developing and if the industry adopts technology standards that are different from our own our competitive position would be negatively affected.
Parts of our company’s business plan are dependent on business relationships with various parties.
We expect to rely in part upon original equipment manufacturers (OEM), and distribution partners to sell and install our products, and we may be adversely affected if those parties do not actively promote our products or pursue installations that use our products. Further, if our products are not timely delivered or do not perform as promised, we could experience increased costs, lower margins, liquidated damage payment obligations and reputational harm.
We must attract and maintain key personnel or our business will fail.
Success depends on the acquisition of key personnel. We will have to compete with other companies both within and outside the electronics industry to recruit and retain competent employees. If we cannot maintain qualified employees to meet the needs of our anticipated growth, this could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.
| 24 |
We may not be able to secure additional financing to meet our future capital needs due to changes in general economic conditions.
We anticipate requiring significant capital to fulfill our contractual obligations, continue development of our planned products to meet market evolution, and execute our business plan, generally. We may use capital more rapidly than currently anticipated and incur higher operating expenses than currently expected, and we may be required to depend on external financing to satisfy our operating and capital needs. We may need new or additional financing in the future to conduct our operations or expand our business. Any sustained weakness in the general economic conditions and/or financial markets in the United States and Europe, or globally could adversely affect our ability to raise capital on favorable terms or at all. From time to time we have relied, and may also rely in the future, on access to financial markets as a source of liquidity to satisfy working capital requirements and for general corporate purposes. We may be unable to secure debt or equity financing on terms acceptable to us, or at all, at the time when we need such funding. If we do raise funds by issuing additional equity or convertible debt securities, the ownership percentages of existing stockholders would be reduced, and the securities that we issue may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of the holders of our common stock or may be issued at a discount to the market price of our common stock which would result in dilution to our existing stockholders. If we raise additional funds by issuing debt, we may be subject to debt covenants, which could place limitations on our operations including our ability to declare and pay dividends. Our inability to raise additional funds on a timely basis would make it difficult for us to achieve our business objectives and would have a negative impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our business and operating results could be harmed if we fail to manage our growth or change.
Our business may experience periods of rapid change and/or growth that could place significant demands on our personnel and financial resources. To manage possible growth and change, we must continue to try to locate skilled engineers and professionals and adequate funds in a timely manner.
Our business depends on GPS technology owned and controlled by others. If we do not have continued access to GPS technology, we will be unable to deliver our services and our revenues will decrease.
Our services rely on signals from GPS satellites built and maintained by the U.S. Department of Defense. GPS satellites and their ground support systems are subject to electronic and mechanical failures and sabotage. If one or more satellites malfunction, there could be a substantial delay before they are repaired or replaced, if at all, and our services may cease and customer satisfaction would suffer.
Our GPS technology depends on the use of radio frequency spectrum controlled by others.
Our GPS technology is dependent on the use of radio frequency spectrum. The assignment of spectrum is controlled by an international organization known as the International Telecommunications Union, or ITU. The Federal Communications Commission, or FCC, is responsible for the assignment of spectrum for non-government use in the United States in accordance with ITU regulations. Any ITU or FCC reallocation of radio frequency spectrum, including frequency band segmentation or sharing of spectrum, could cause interference with the reception of GPS signals and may materially and adversely affect the utility and reliability of our products, which would, in turn, cause a material adverse effect on our operating results. In addition, emissions from mobile satellite service and other equipment operating in adjacent frequency bands or in band may materially and adversely affect the utility and reliability of our products, which could result in a material adverse effect on our operating results.
Government regulations and standards may harm our business and could increase our costs or reduce our opportunities to earn revenues.
In addition to regulations applicable to businesses in general, we may also be subject to direct regulation by governmental agencies, including the FCC and Department of Defense. A number of legislative and regulatory proposals under consideration by federal, state, provincial, local and foreign governmental organizations may lead to laws or regulations concerning various aspects of wireless communications and GPS technology. Additionally, it is uncertain how existing laws governing issues such as taxation, intellectual property, libel, user privacy and property ownership, will be applied to our services. The adoption of new laws or the application of existing laws may expose us to significant liabilities and additional operational requirements, which could decrease the demand for our services and increase our cost of doing business.
If we are not able to adequately protect our intellectual property, then we may not be able to compete effectively and we may not be profitable.
Our commercial success may depend, in part, on obtaining and maintaining patent protection of our technologies and product as well as successfully defending third-party challenges to such technologies and products. We will be able to protect our technologies and product candidates from use by third parties only to the extent that valid and enforceable patents cover them and we have exclusive rights to use them. The ability of our licensors, collaborators and suppliers to maintain their patent rights against third-party challenges to their validity, scope or enforceability will also play an important role in determining our future.
| 25 |
The copyright and patent positions of software and technology related companies can be highly uncertain and involve complex legal and factual questions that include unresolved principles and issues. No consistent policy regarding the breadth of claims allowed regarding such companies’ patents has emerged to date in the United States, and the patent situation outside the United States is even more uncertain. Changes in either the patent laws or in interpretations of patent laws in the United States or other countries may diminish the value of our intellectual property. Accordingly, we cannot predict with any certainty the range of claims that may be allowed or enforced concerning our patents.
We may also rely on trade secrets to protect our technologies, especially where we do not believe patent protection is appropriate or obtainable. However, trade secrets are difficult to protect. While we seek to protect confidential information, in part, through confidentiality agreements with our consultants and scientific and other advisors, they may unintentionally or willfully disclose our information to competitors. Enforcing a claim against a third party related to the illegal acquisition and use of trade secrets can be expensive and time consuming, and the outcome is often unpredictable. If we are not able to maintain patent or trade secret protection on our technologies and product candidates, then we may not be able to exclude competitors from developing or marketing competing products, and we may not be able to operate profitability.
If we are the subject of an intellectual property infringement claim, the cost of participating in any litigation could cause us to go out of business.
There has been, and we believe that there will continue to be, significant litigation and demands for licenses in our industry regarding patent and other intellectual property rights. Although we anticipate having a valid defense to any allegation that our current products, production methods and other activities infringe the valid and enforceable intellectual property rights of any third parties, we cannot be certain that a third party will not challenge our position in the future. Other parties may own patent rights that we might infringe with our products or other activities, and our competitors or other patent holders may assert that our products and the methods we employ are covered by their patents. These parties could bring claims against us that would cause us to incur substantial litigation expenses and, if successful, may require us to pay substantial damages. Some of our potential competitors may be better able to sustain the costs of complex patent litigation, and depending on the circumstances, we could be forced to stop or delay our research, development, manufacturing or sales activities. Any of these costs could cause us to go out of business.
Risks Relating to Ownership of Our Securities
Trading on the OTCQB® Venture Marketplace may be volatile and sporadic, which could depress the market price of our common stock and make it difficult for our stockholders to resell their shares.
Our common stock is quoted on the OTCQB Venture Marketplace operated by the OTC Markets Group. Trading in stock quoted on the OTCQB is often thin and characterized by wide fluctuations in trading prices due to many factors that may have little to do with our operations or business prospects. This volatility could depress the market price of our common stock for reasons unrelated to operating performance. Moreover, the OTCQB is not a stock exchange, and trading of securities on the OTCQB is often more sporadic than the trading of securities listed on a stock exchange like the Nasdaq Stock Market or New York Stock Exchange. Accordingly, our shareholders may have difficulty reselling any of their shares.
| 26 |
Our stock is a penny stock. Trading of our stock may be restricted by the SEC’s penny stock regulations and FINRA’s sales practice requirements, which may limit a stockholder’s ability to buy and sell our stock.
Our stock is a penny stock. The Securities and Exchange Commission has adopted Rule 15g-9 which generally defines “penny stock” to be any equity security that has a market price (as defined) less than $5.00 per share or an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. Our securities are covered by the penny stock rules, which impose additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers who sell to persons other than established customers and “accredited investors”. The term “accredited investor” refers generally to institutions with assets in excess of $5,000,000 or individuals with a net worth in excess of $1,000,000 or annual income exceeding $200,000 or $300,000 jointly with their spouse. The penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from the rules, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document in a form prepared by the SEC which provides information about penny stocks and the nature and level of risks in the penny stock market. The broker-dealer also must provide the customer with current bid and offer quotations for the penny stock, the compensation of the broker-dealer and its salesperson in the transaction and monthly account statements showing the market value of each penny stock held in the customer’s account. The bid and offer quotations, and the broker-dealer and salesperson compensation information, must be given to the customer orally or in writing prior to effecting the transaction and must be given to the customer in writing before or with the customer’s confirmation. In addition, the penny stock rules require that prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from these rules; the broker-dealer must make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser’s written agreement to the transaction. These disclosure requirements may have the effect of reducing the level of trading activity in the secondary market for the stock that is subject to these penny stock rules. Consequently, these penny stock rules may affect the ability of broker-dealers to trade our securities. We believe that the penny stock rules discourage investor interest in, and limit the marketability of, our common stock.
In addition to the “penny stock” rules promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission, FINRA has adopted rules that require that in recommending an investment to a customer, a broker-dealer must have reasonable grounds for believing that the investment is suitable for that customer. Prior to recommending speculative low priced securities to their non-institutional customers, broker-dealers must make reasonable efforts to obtain information about the customer’s financial status, tax status, investment objectives and other information. Under interpretations of these rules, FINRA believes that there is a high probability that speculative low-priced securities will not be suitable for at least some customers. FINRA requirements make it more difficult for broker-dealers to recommend that their customers buy our common stock, which may limit your ability to buy and sell our stock.
We do not anticipate paying any cash dividends to our common shareholders.
We presently do not anticipate that we will pay dividends on any of our common stock in the foreseeable future. If payment of dividends does occur at some point in the future, it would be contingent upon our revenues and earnings, if any, capital requirements, and general financial condition. The payment of any common stock dividends will be within the discretion of our Board of Directors. We presently intend to retain all earnings after paying the interest for the preferred stock, if any, to implement our business plan; accordingly, we do not anticipate the declaration of any dividends for common stock in the foreseeable future.
Volatility in Our Common Share Price May Subject Us to Securities Litigation.
The market for our common stock is characterized by significant price volatility as compared to seasoned issuers, and we expect that our share price will continue to be more volatile than a seasoned issuer for the indefinite future. In the past, plaintiffs have often initiated securities class action litigation against a company following periods of volatility in the market price of its securities. We may, in the future, be the target of similar litigation. Securities litigation could result in substantial costs and liabilities and could divert management’s attention and resources.
The Elimination of Monetary Liability Against our Directors, Officers and Employees under Nevada law and the Existence of Indemnification Rights of our Directors, Officers and Employees May Result in Substantial Expenditures by our Company and may Discourage Lawsuits Against our Directors, Officers and Employees.
Our articles of incorporation do not contain any specific provisions that eliminate the liability of our directors for monetary damages to our company and shareholders; however, we are prepared to give such indemnification to our directors and officers to the extent provided for by Nevada law. We may also have contractual indemnification obligations under our employment agreements with our officers. The foregoing indemnification obligations could result in our company incurring substantial expenditures to cover the cost of settlement or damage awards against directors and officers, which we may be unable to recoup. These provisions and resultant costs may also discourage our company from bringing a lawsuit against directors and officers for breaches of their fiduciary duties, and may similarly discourage the filing of derivative litigation by our shareholders against our directors and officers even though such actions, if successful, might otherwise benefit our company and shareholders.
Our business is subject to changing regulations related to corporate governance and public disclosure that have increased both our costs and the risk of noncompliance.
Because our common stock is publicly traded, we are subject to certain rules and regulations of federal, state and financial market exchange entities charged with the protection of investors and the oversight of companies whose securities are publicly traded. These entities, including the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the SEC and FINRA, have issued requirements and regulations and continue to develop additional regulations and requirements in response to corporate scandals and laws enacted by Congress, most notably the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Our efforts to comply with these regulations have resulted in, and are likely to continue resulting in, increased general and administrative expenses and diversion of management time and attention from revenue-generating activities to compliance activities. Because new and modified laws, regulations and standards are subject to varying interpretations in many cases due to their lack of specificity, their application in practice may evolve over time as new guidance is provided by regulatory and governing bodies. This evolution may result in continuing uncertainty regarding compliance matters and additional costs necessitated by ongoing revisions to our disclosure and governance practices.
| 27 |
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
Our principal executive office is located at 214 - 5455 152nd Street, Surrey, BC, V3S 5A5 Canada, where we lease approximately 2,957 square feet of office space. On February 15, 2017, an additional six-month extension on the lease was signed with the term beginning on February 1, 2017 and ending on July 31, 2017.
On June 4, 2015, a lawsuit was commenced against DSG TAG Systems Inc. in the Supreme Court of British Columbia, captioned Amanda McGuire v. DSG TAG Systems Inc., No. S-154634, Vancouver Registry. The plaintiff alleges that a promissory note in the principal amount of $100,000 CDN issued by DSG TAG Systems was not converted into common shares of DSG TAG Systems, as asserted by DSG TAG Systems, and the plaintiff seeks repayment of indebtedness in the amount of $100,000 CDN plus interest and costs. An agreement was reached on August 13, 2015 between DSG TAG Systems and the plaintiff, pursuant to which DSG TAG Systems agreed to pay the plaintiff $119,700 CDN in monthly installations of $17,100 CDN, the first payment commencing on October 1, 2015, and the plaintiff agreed to exchange 101,200 shares of common stock of DSG Tag Systems for 18,422 shares of common stock of DSG Global, which exchange occurred on October 22, 2015.
A Director of the Company, representing their company Adore Creative Agency Inc. (Adore), has filed a notice of default on March 31, 2016, in regard to the related party convertible note on the financial statements of DSG TAG. The note was issued in lieu of marketing services and has a maturity date of March 31, 2016. DSG TAG has countersued Adore for failure to provide services as obligated under the terms and agreement of the convertible note, and in addition for damages as a result.
On September 7, 2016, Chetu Inc. has filed a Complaint for Damage in Florida to recover unpaid invoice amounts of $27,335 plus interest of $4,939. The invoice was not paid due to a dispute that DSG TAG did not think that vendor had delivered the service according to the agreement between the two parties.
On October 17, 2016, the Supreme Court of British Columbia made an order in relating to the above discussed lawsuit from a shareholder to recover a loan of CAD$100,000. DSG TAG was ordered to repay the remaining loan plus costs in the amount of $77,589 to the shareholder in 14 monthly payments of $5,500 each plus $589 at the 15th month, starting February 15, 2017.
We may, from time to time, be party to litigation and subject to claims incident to the ordinary course of business. As our growth continues, we may become party to an increasing number of litigation matters and claims. The outcome of litigation and claims cannot be predicted with certainty, and the resolution of any future matters could materially affect our future financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
| 28 |
| ITEM 5. | MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES |
Market Information for Common Stock
Our common stock is currently quoted on the OTC Market’s OTCQB Venture Marketplace (“OTCQB”) under the symbol “DSGT”. The following table sets forth for the periods indicated the high and low bid price per share of our common stock as reported on the OTCQB. The following quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission, and may not represent actual transactions:
OTC Markets Group Inc. OTCQB(1)
| Quarter Ended | High $ | Low $ | ||||||
| December 31, 2016 | 0.30 | 0.05 | ||||||
| September 30, 2016 | 0.62 | 0.15 | ||||||
| June 30, 2016 | 1.78 | 0.38 | ||||||
| March 31, 2016 | 2.45 | 0.55 | ||||||
| December 31, 2015 | 2.58 | 1.06 | ||||||
| September 30, 2015 | 3.00 | 2.25 | ||||||
| June 30, 2015 | 2.90 | 1.75 | ||||||
| March 31, 2015 | 1.75 | 1.75 | ||||||
| December 31, 2014 | (2 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||
(1) Over-the-counter market quotations reflect inter-dealer prices without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission, and may not represent actual transactions. (2) The first trade of our common shares occurred on March 25, 2015.
Holders of Record
As of December 31, 2016, we had 75 holders of record of our common stock. The actual number of stockholders is greater than this number of record holders and includes stockholders who are beneficial owners but whose shares are held in street name by brokers and other nominees.
Dividend Policy
We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our common stock. We currently intend to retain all available funds and any future earnings for use in the operation of our business and do not anticipate paying any dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future, if at all. Any future determination to declare dividends will be made at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on our financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements, general business conditions and other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant.
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
None.
Recent Sale of Unregistered Securities
None.
| ITEM 6. | SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA |
Not applicable.
| 29 |
| ITEM 7. | MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
You should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the related notes to the consolidated financial statements included later in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. In addition to historical financial information, the following discussion contains forward-looking statements that reflect our plans, estimates, beliefs and expectations that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results and the timing of events could differ materially from those discussed in these forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to these differences include those discussed below and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, particularly in “Risk Factors” and “Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.”
Overview
DSG Global, Inc. is a technology development company based in Surrey, British Columbia, Canada, engaged in the design, manufacture, and marketing of fleet management solutions for the golf industry, as well as commercial, government and military applications. Our principal activities are the sale and rental of GPS tracking devices and interfaces for golf vehicles, and related support services. We were founded by a group of individuals who have dedicated their careers to fleet management technologies and have been at the forefront of the industry’s most innovative developments, and our executive team has over 50 years of experience in the design and manufacture of wireless, GPS, and fleet tracking solutions. We have developed the TAG suite of products that we believe is the first completely modular fleet management solution for the golf industry. The TAG suite of products is currently sold and installed around the world in golf facilities and as commercial applications through a network of established distributors and partnerships with some of the most notable brands in fleet and equipment manufacture.
DSG stands for “Digital Security Guard”, which is our primary value statement giving fleet operator’s new capabilities to track and control their vehicles. We have developed a proprietary combination of hardware and software that is marketed around the world as the TAG system. We have primarily focused on the golf industry where the TAG system is deployed to help golf course operators manage their fleet of golf carts, turf equipment, and utility vehicles. We are a leader in the category of fleet management in the golf industry and were awarded “Best Technology of the Year” in 2010 by Boardroom magazine, a publication of the National Golf Course Owners Association. To date the TAG system is installed on over 8,000 vehicles and has been used to monitor over 6,000,000 rounds of golf.
The TAG system fills a void in the marketplace by offering a modular structure that allows the customer to customize their system to meet desired functionality and budget constraints. In addition to the core TAG system vehicle control functionality, which can operate independently, we offer two golfer information display systems — the alphanumeric TEXT and high definition TOUCH — providing the operator with two display options which is unique in the industry.
The primary market for our TAG system is the 40,000 golf operations worldwide. While the golf industry remains the primary focus of our sales and marketing efforts, we have completed several successful pilots of the TAG system in other markets such as agriculture and commercial fleet operations. With appropriate resources, we intend to expand our sales and marketing efforts into these new markets.
We have a direct sales force in North America, which comprises the most significant portion of the golf fleet market, and have developed key relationships with distributors and golf equipment manufacturers such as E-Z-GO, Yamaha and Ransomes Jacobsen to help drive sales for the North American and worldwide markets.
Reverse Acquisition
DSG Global, Inc. (formerly Boreal Productions Inc.) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on September 24, 2007. We were formed to option feature films and TV projects to be packaged and sold to movie studios and production companies.
| 30 |
In January 2015, we changed our name to DSG Global, Inc. and effected a one-for-three reverse stock split of our issued and outstanding common stock in anticipation of entering in a share exchange agreement with DSG TAG Systems, Inc., a corporation incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on April 17, 2008 and extra provincially registered in British Columbia, Canada in 2008.
On April 13, 2015, we entered into a share exchange agreement with DSG TAG Systems Inc. and the shareholders of DSG TAG Systems who become parties to the agreement. Pursuant to the terms of the share exchange agreement, we agreed to acquire not less than 75% and up to 100% of the issued and outstanding common shares in the capital stock of DSG TAG Systems in exchange for the issuance to the selling shareholders of up to 20,000,000 shares of our common stock on the basis of 1 common share for 5.4935 common shares of DSG TAG Systems.
On May 6, 2015, we completed the acquisition of approximately 75% (82,435,748 common shares) of the issued and outstanding common shares of DSG TAG Systems as contemplated by the share exchange agreement by issuing 15,185,875 shares of our common stock to shareholders of DSG TAG Systems who became parties to the agreement. In addition, concurrent with the closing of the share exchange agreement, we issued an additional 179,823 shares of our common stock to Westergaard Holdings Ltd. in partial settlement of accrued interest on outstanding indebtedness of DSG TAG Systems.
Following the initial closing of the share exchange agreement and through October 22, 2015, we acquired an additional 101,200 shares of common stock of DSG TAG Systems from shareholders who became parties to the share exchange agreement, and issued to these shareholders an aggregate of 18,422 shares of our common stock. Following completion of these additional purchases, DSG Global owns approximately 100% of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of DSG TAG Systems. An aggregate of 4,229,384 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock of DSG TAG Systems continues to be held by Westergaard Holdings Ltd., an affiliate of Keith Westergaard, a member of our board of directors.
The reverse acquisition was accounted for as a recapitalization effected by a share exchange, wherein DSG TAG Systems is considered the acquirer for accounting and financial reporting purposes. The assets and liabilities of the acquired entity have been brought forward at their book value and no goodwill has been recognized. We adopted the business and operations of DSG TAG Systems upon the closing of the share exchange agreement.
Factors Affecting Our Performance
We believe that the growth of our business and our future success depend on various opportunities, challenges and other factors, including the following:
Inventory Sourcing
In order to successfully deliver products, increase sales, and maintain customer satisfaction, we need to have a reliable supplier of our hardware units and components at competitive prices. Presently, we source our TOUCH units from one supplier in China and our TAG units from one supplier in the United Kingdom. We have recently established a new relationship with a supplier for our TOUCH units in China to provide us with higher quality, newer technology at competitive pricing.
In addition, DSG is currently in negotiations with a telecommunications provider to provide new technology in hardware and wireless access.
Competition
We compete with a number of established producers and distributors of vehicle fleet management systems, as well as producers of non-golf specific utility vehicle fleet management systems. Many of our competitors have longer operating histories, better brand recognition and greater financial resources than we do. In order for us to successfully compete in our industry we must demonstrate our products’ competitive advantages, develop a comprehensive marketing system, and increase our financial resources.
We believe that we will be able to compete effectively in our industry because of the versatility, reliability, and relative affordability of our products when compared to those of our competitors. We will attempt to build awareness of our competitive advantages among existing and potential customers through trade shows, sales visits and demonstrations, online marketing, and positive word of mouth advertising. However, there can be no assurance that even if we do these things we will be able to compete effectively with the other companies in our industry.
| 31 |
Additional Capital
We require additional capital to continue to develop software and products, meet our contractual obligations, and execute our business plan. There can be no assurances that we will be able to raise additional capital on acceptable terms or at all, which would adversely affect our ability to achieve our business objectives.
Components of Our Results of Operations
Revenue
We derive revenue from four different sources, as follows:
Systems Sales Revenue, which consists of the sales price paid by those customers who purchase our TAG system hardware.
Monthly Service Fees are paid by all customers for the wireless data fee charges required to operate the GPS tracking on the TAG systems.
Monthly Rental Fees are paid by those customers that rent the TAG system hardware. The amount of a customer’s monthly payment varies based on the type of equipment rented (a TAG, a TAG and TEXT, or a TAG and TOUCH).
Advertising Revenue is a new source of revenue that we believe has the potential to be strategic for us in the future. We are in the process of implementing and designing software to provide advertising and other media functionality on our TOUCH units.
We recognize revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the fee is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured. In instances where final acceptance of the product is specified by the customer, revenue is deferred until all acceptance criteria have been met. We accrue for warranty costs, sales returns, and other allowances based on its historical experience.
| 32 |
Our revenue recognition policies are discussed in more detail under “Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in the notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this Form 10-K.
Cost of Revenue
Our cost of revenue consists primarily of hardware purchases, wireless data fees, mapping, installation costs, freight expenses and inventory adjustments.
Hardware purchases. Our equipment purchases consist primarily of TAG system control units, TEXT display, and TOUCH display tablets. The TAG system control unit is sold as a stand-alone unit or in conjunction with our TEXT alphanumeric display or TOUCH high definition “touch activated” display. Hardware purchases also include costs of components used during installations, such as cables, mounting solutions, and other miscellaneous equipment.
Wireless data fees. Our wireless data fees consist primarily of the data fees charged by outside providers of GPS tracking used in all of our TAG system control units.
Mapping. Our mapping costs consist of aerial mapping, course map, geofencing, and 3D flyovers for golf courses. This cost is incurred at the time of hardware installation.
Installation. Our installation costs consist primarily of costs incurred by our employed service technicians for the cost of travel, meals, and miscellaneous components required during installations. In addition, these costs also include fees paid to external contractors for installations on a project by project basis.
Freight expenses and Inventory adjustments. Our freight expenses consist primarily of costs to ship hardware to courses for installations. Our inventory adjustments include inventory write offs, write downs, and other adjustments to the cost of inventory.
Operating Expenses & Other Income (Expenses) We classify our operating expenses and other income (expenses) into six categories: compensation, research and development, general and administrative, warranty, foreign currency exchange, and finance costs. Our operating expenses consist primarily of sales and marketing, salaries and wages, consulting fees, professional fees, trade shows, software development, and allocated costs. Allocated costs include charges for facilities, office expenses, telephones and other miscellaneous expenses. Our other income (expenses) primarily consists of financing costs and foreign exchange gains or losses.
Compensation expense. Our compensation expenses consist primarily of personnel costs, such as employee salaries, payroll expenses, and employee benefits. This includes salaries for management, administration, engineering, sales and marketing, and service support technicians. Salaries and wages directly related to projects or research and development are expensed as incurred to their operating expense category.
Research and development. Our research and development expenses consist primarily of personnel costs and professional services associated with the ongoing development and maintenance of our technology.
Research and development expenses include payroll, and other headcount-related expenses associated with product development. Research and development expenses also include third-party development and programming costs. Such costs related to software development are included in research and development expense until the point that technological feasibility is reached. Research and development is expensed and is included in operating expenses.
| 33 |
General and administrative. Our general and administrative expenses consist primarily of sales and marketing, commissions, travel, trade shows, consultant fees, insurance, and compliance and other administrative functions, as well as accounting and legal professional services fees, allocated costs and other corporate expenses. Sales and marketing includes brand marketing, marketing materials, and media management.
We expect to continue to invest in corporate infrastructure and incur additional expenses associated with being a public company, including increased legal and accounting costs, investor relations costs, higher insurance premiums and compliance costs associated with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. In addition, we expect sales and marketing expenses to increase in absolute dollars in future periods. In particular, we expect to incur additional marketing costs to support the expansion of our offerings in new markets like commercial fleet management and agriculture.
Warranty expense. Our warranty expenses consist primarily of associated material product costs, labor costs for technical support staff, and other associated overhead. Warranty costs are expensed as they are incurred.
Foreign currency exchange. Our foreign currency exchange consist primarily of foreign exchange fluctuations recorded in Canadian dollar (CAD), British Pounds (GBP), or Euro (EUR) at the rates of exchange in effect when the transaction occurred.
Finance costs. Our finance costs consist primarily of investor interest expense, investor commission fees, and other financing charges for obtaining debt financing.
| 34 |
Results of Operations
The following tables set forth our consolidated results of operations as a percentage of revenue for the periods presented:
| For the year ended | ||||||||
| December 31, 2016 | December 31, 2015 | |||||||
| Revenue | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||
| Cost of revenue | 43.9 | % | 59.6 | % | ||||
| Gross profit | 56.1 | % | 40.4 | % | ||||
| Operating Expenses | ||||||||
| Compensation expense | 83.1 | % | 44.6 | % | ||||
| Research and development expense | 5.0 | % | 2.1 | % | ||||
| General and administration expense | 87.3 | % | 70.5 | % | ||||
| Warranty expense | 17.3 | % | 17.0 | % | ||||
| Bad debt | 3.3 | % | (0.4 | )% | ||||
| Depreciation and amortization expense | 4.2 | % | 2.6 | % | ||||
| Total operating expense | 200.2 | % | 136.5 | % | ||||
| Loss from operations | (144.1 | )% | (96.2 | )% | ||||
| Other Income (Expense) | ||||||||
| Foreign currency exchange | (4.1 | )% | (5.0 | )% | ||||
| Oher (expenses) Income | (0.9 | )% | 3.0 | % | ||||
| Finance costs | (87.6 | )% | (32.4 | )% | ||||
| Total Other Expense | (92.6 | )% | (34.4 | )% | ||||
| Loss from continuing operations before income taxes | (236.7 | )% | (130.6 | )% | ||||
| Provision for income taxes | - | % | - | |||||
| Net loss | ||||||||
| (236.7 | )% | (130.6 | )% | |||||
Less attributed to non-controlling interest | 39.5 | % | 21.2 | % | ||||
| Net loss attributable to controlling interest | ||||||||
| (197.1 | )% | (109.4 | )% | |||||
| Other comprehensive income | ||||||||
| Foreign currency translation | (1.4 | )% | 14.1 | |||||
| Comprehensive loss | (198.0 | )% | (93.7 | )% | ||||
| 35 |
Comparison of the Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015
Revenue
| For
the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2016 | 2015 | % Change | ||||||||||
| Revenue | $ | 1,169,936 | $ | 1,911,935 | -38.8 | % | ||||||
Revenue decreased by $741,999, or 38.8%, for the years ended December 31, 2016 as compared to the years ended December 31, 2015. The decrease was primarily due to lower sales in 2016 and continued design and redevelopment of our product line.
Due to the redevelopment of our product line, it has created lower sales overall than anticipated. We have been forced to move to a 3G/4G GPS cellular device, require redevelopment of our advertising, and also software development delays in integrating the tournament software onto the TOUCH screen, all of which that has caused delays in sales. Our company along with the new sales team is aggressively building its pipeline for the next year.
Cost of Revenue
| For
the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2016 | 2015 | % Change | ||||||||||
| Cost of revenue | $ | 513,638 | $ | 1,140,065 | -54.9 | % | ||||||
Cost
of revenue decreased by $626,427, or 54.9%, for the years ended December 31, 2016 as compared to the years ended December 31,
2015. The decrease was primarily due to the decrease in hardware leases and sales. Lower costs of revenue as mentioned above was
also due to a contract lease renewal that had no hardware costs associated. Lower sales also resulted in lower installation costs,
freight charges, mapping, and direct labor costs in 2016 in comparison to 2015. Installation costs, such as direct labor decreased
by $17,938, cost of goods decreased by $508,905, mapping and freight costs decreased by $23,731. Wireless fees also decreased
by $104,335 which was due to new lower negotiated wireless fee rates. An estimated value of $116,058 has been written off for
the touch tablets.
Compensation Expense
| For
the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2016 | 2015 | % Change | ||||||||||
| Compensation expense | $ | 972,179 | $ | 853,507 | 13.9 | % | ||||||
Compensation expense increased by $118,672, or 13.9%, for the years ended December 31, 2016 as compared to the years ended December 31, 2015. The increase was primarily due to our continued efforts to reduce costs.
| 36 |
Research and Development
| For
the Years Ended December 31 | ||||||||||||
| 2016 | 2015 | % Change | ||||||||||
| Research and development expense | $ | 58,115 | $ | 41,070 | 41.5 | % | ||||||
Research and development expense increased by $17,045, or 41.5% for the years ended December 31, 2016 as compared to the years ended December 31, 2015. As indicated, we expect research and development expenses to increase as we enter new markets like commercial fleet management, agriculture, and advertising. This increase in costs will be required to develop the new 3G/4G GPS cellular device.
General and Administration Expense
| For
the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2016 | 2015 | % Change | ||||||||||
| General & administration expense | $ | 1,021,482 | $ | 1,347,547 | -24.2 | % | ||||||
General & administration expense decreased by $326,065 or 24.2% for the years ended December 31, 2016 as compared to the years ended December 31, 2015. The table below outlines the differences in detail:
| December 2016 | December 2015 | Difference | % Difference | |||||||||||||
| Accounting & Legal, & Setup Costs for Public Company | 186,791 | 281,055 | (94,264 | ) | -33.54 | % | ||||||||||
| Marketing & Advertising | 221,868 | 354,936 | (133,068 | ) | -37.49 | % | ||||||||||
| Subcontractor & Commissions | 79,484 | 228,478 | (148,994 | ) | -65.21 | % | ||||||||||
| Interest Expense | 6,621 | 7,072 | (451 | ) | -6.38 | % | ||||||||||
| Meals & Entertainment | 107,873 | 166,336 | (58,463 | ) | -35.15 | % | ||||||||||
| Shipping Expense | 41,161 | 23,833 | 17,328 | 72.71 | % | |||||||||||
| Office Expense, Rent, Software, Bank & Credit Card Charges, & Telephone | 377,684 | 285,837 | 91,847 | 32.13 | % | |||||||||||
| 1,021,482 | 1,347,547 | (326,065 | ) | |||||||||||||
Overall, there was a decrease of $94,264 in accounting & legal was overall due to the higher costs associated with the merger in May 2015, as well the decrease was also due to efforts in decreasing legal costs for public filing requirements. There was a decrease of $148,994 in subcontractor and commissions due to the hiring of more employees instead of contract workers and lower sales resulting in less commissions being paid. There was an increase of $7,293 in hardware design for the development of the new hardware prototype for tradeshows and an overall increase in shipping costs of 17,328 or 72.7% due to the increased use of rush shipping services in 2016 for urgent customer service calls. Office expense increased overall by 91,857 mostly due to an increase of $116,517 in tradeshow costs from a large tradeshow which took place in January 2016. Overall, there was a decrease of $58,463 or 35.2% in travel and meals reflecting our efforts of saving costs.
| 37 |
Warranty Expense
| For
the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2016 | 2015 | % Change | ||||||||||
| Warranty expense | $ | 202,393 | $ | 325,820 | -37.9 | % | ||||||
Warranty expense decreased by $123,427, or 37.9% for the years ended December 31, 2016 as compared to the years ended December 31, 2015. The decrease in warranty expense from 2016 to 2015 was primarily due to the initial recording of the warranty reserve in 2015 for $117,315 (CAD $150,000) for future warranty costs, no reserve was used in prior periods, and warranty costs were expensed as incurred.
Foreign Currency Exchange
| For
the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2016 | 2015 | % Change | ||||||||||
| Foreign currency exchange | $ | 47,497 | $ | 96,177 | -50.6 | % | ||||||
For the years ended December 31, 2016, we recognized $47,497 in foreign currency transaction losses as compared to $96,177 in foreign currency transaction gains for the years ended December 31, 2015. The decrease was primarily due to the gains or losses arising from exchange rate fluctuations on payables, receivables, and other foreign exchange transactions denominated in currencies other than the functional currencies of the legal entities in which the transactions are recorded. Foreign currency fluctuations are primarily from the Canadian Dollar, Euro and British pound.
Finance Costs
| For
the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2016 | 2015 | % Change | ||||||||||
| Finance costs | $ | 1,024,723 | $ | 619,451 | 65.4 | % | ||||||
Finance costs increased by $405,272 or 65.4% for the years ended December 31, 2016 as compared to the years ended December 31, 2015. The increase was primarily due to the derivative liability recorded in the fourth quarter as well as accrued interest expensed from additional loans and note convertible loans obtained during the year ending 2016.
Net Loss
| For
the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2016 | 2015 | % Change | ||||||||||
| Net loss attributable to controlling interest | $ | 2,306,249 | $ | 2,092,184 | 10.2 | % | ||||||
As a result of the above factors, we have net loss after noncontrolling interest attributable to the Company’s common stockholders of approximately $2,306,249 for the year ended December 31, 2016 as compared to approximately $2,092,184 for the year ended December 31, 2015, representing an increase of approximately $214,065 or approximately 10.2%. This increase was primarily due to increased finance costs relating to the derivative expense recorded in the fourth quarter. The increase was also due to the tradeshow which took place in January 2016 which was mostly offset due to company efforts to lower operating costs in general and administration expenses.
| 38 |
Liquidity and Capital Resources
From our incorporation in April 17, 2008 through December 31, 2016, we have financed our operations, capital expenditures and working capital needs through the sale of common shares and the incurrence of indebtedness, including term loans, convertible loans, revolving lines of credit and purchase order financing. At December 31, 2016, we had $2,970,965 in outstanding indebtedness, which has either already reached maturity or matures within the next twelve months.
We had cash in the amount of $nil as of December 31, 2016 as compared to $nil as of December 31, 2015. We had a working capital deficit of $5,580,774 as of December 31, 2016 compared to working capital deficit of $2,999,744 as of December 31, 2015.
Liquidity and Financial Condition
| At December 31, 2016 | At December 31, 2015 | Percentage
Increase/(Decrease) | ||||||||||
| Current Assets | $ | 226,687 | $ | 657,835 | (65.5 | )% | ||||||
| Current Liabilities | $ | 5,807,461 | $ | 3,657,579 | 58.8 | % | ||||||
| Working Capital | $ | (5,580,774 | ) | $ | (2,999,744 | ) | 86.0 | % | ||||
Cash Flow Analysis
Our cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities are summarized as follows:
| December 31 | ||||||||
| 2016 | 2015 | |||||||
| Net cash used in operating activities | $ | (620,157 | ) | $ | (688,196 | ) | ||
| Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | 18,654 | 161,700 | ||||||
| Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | 599,248 | 446,668 | ||||||
| Net (decrease) increase in cash | - | (91,840 | ) | |||||
| Cash at beginning of period | - | 91,840 | ||||||
| Cash at end of period | $ | - | $ | - | ||||
Net Cash Used in Operating Activities. During the year ended December 31, 2016, cash used in operations totaled $620,157. This reflects the net loss of $2,768,659 less $2,148,502 provided by changes in operating assets and liabilities and adjustments for non-cash items. Cash provided by working capital items was primarily impacted by decreased inventory purchases of $153,495, a decrease in prepaid expense and deposits of $43,691, a decrease in related party receivable of $97,313 and an increase in trade payables and accruals of $1,250,632.
During the years ended December 31, 2015, cash used in operations totaled $688,196. This reflects the net loss of $2,497,146 less $1,808,949 provided by changes in operating assets and liabilities and adjustments for non-cash items. Cash provided by working capital items was primarily impacted by a non-cash item of $303,079 for notes issued for services, a decrease in prepaid expense and deposits of $219,072, a decrease in related party receivable of $16,660 and an increase in trade payables of $805,119.
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities. Investing activities provided $18,654 of cash in the years ended December 31, 2016, of which was primarily provided by a decrease in property, plant, and equipment. Investing activities provided $161,700 of cash in the years ended December 31, 2015, of which $89,001 was acquired as part of our reverse acquisition transaction.
| 39 |
Net Cash (Used in) Provided by Financing Activities. Net cash used in financing activities during the year ended December 31, 2016 totaled $599,248 provided primarily by proceeds for loans payable of $650,099. Net cash used in financing activities during the year ended December 31, 2015 totaled $446,668 provided primarily by proceeds from loans payable and the issuance of common shares.
Outstanding Indebtedness
Our current indebtedness as of December 31, 2016 is comprised of the following:
| ● | Unsecured loan payable in the amount of $186,192 bearing interest at 15% per annum and due on demand; | |
| ● | Unsecured loan payable in the amount of $317,500 bearing interest at 18% per annum; | |
| ● | Unsecured note payable in the amount of $45,548, bearing interest at 36% per annum and due on July 20, 2017; | |
| ● | Unsecured loan payable in the amount of $67,029, fees for services payable on the original loan amount of 5% by May 6, 2016, 10% payable by June 5, 2016, or 20% payable by July 5, 2016 | |
| ● | Unsecured loan payable in the amount of $250,000, bearing interest at 10% per annum, with a minimum interest amount of $25,000, and due on July 22, 2016. | |
| ● | Secured convertible loan payable in the amount of $916,905, bearing interest at 15.2% per annum and due on December 31, 2015; | |
| ● | Unsecured, convertible note payable to related party in the amount of $310,000, bearing interest at 5% per annum and due on March 30, 2016; | |
| ● | Unsecured, convertible note payable in the amount of $250,000, bearing interest at 10% per annum and due on February 25, 2016; | |
| ● | Unsecured, convertible note payable in the amount of $150,000, bearing interest at 2% per month. Principal plus interest repayable in cash or common shares. Due 45 days from August 5, 2016 or upon filing of registration statement, convertible at $0.27 per share; | |
| ● | Senior secured discount convertible note payable in the amount of $261,389, bearing interest at 8% per annum. Repayable in cash or common shares at the lower of (i) twelve cents ($0.12) and (ii) the closing sales price of the Common Stock on the date of conversion and due on May 7, 2017; | |
| ● | Unsecured, convertible note payable in the amount of $29,791 (CAD $40,000), bearing interest at 8% annual rate for one month; if not paid by January 15, 2017, bearing interest at 4% per month thereafter; and is convertible at $0.05 per share. |
Preferred Stock Redemption Obligations
Westergaard Holdings Ltd., an affiliate of Keith Westergaard, a member of our board of directors, owns 4,229,384 shares (the “Series A Shares”) of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock of DSG TAG Systems. Pursuant to a Subscription / Debt Settlement Agreement dated September 26, 2014 between DSG TAG Systems and Westergaard Holdings, as amended on November 10, 2015, DSG TAG Systems has agreed that DSG Global, Inc. will complete financings for gross proceeds of at least $10 million and use a portion of the proceeds to redeem all of the Series A Shares at a price of $1.25 per share, as follows:
| ● | On or before August 1, 2016, we must complete a financing for gross proceeds of at least $2.5 million and use at least $1.125 million to redeem a minimum of 900,000 Series A Shares; |
| 40 |
| ● | On or before September 1, 2016, we must complete an additional financing for gross proceeds of at least $2.5 million and use at least $1.125 million to redeem a minimum of 900,000 additional Series A Shares; and | |
| ● | On or before October 1, 2016, we must complete an additional financing for gross proceeds of at least $5.0 million and use at least $3.14 million to redeem the remaining 2,509,384 Series A Shares. |
If we fail to satisfy the above described financing and share redemption schedule, we will be in default of the Subscription and Debt Settlement Agreement which would entitle the holder of the Preferred Shares to convert the Series A Convertible Preferred Shares into common shares in the capital of DSG Global at the price of $1.25 per share. As of the date of this report, these commitments have not been satisfied and we are currently negotiating an extension on the terms of this agreement.
Prospective Capital Needs
We estimate our operating expenses and working capital requirements for the twelve-month period to be as follows:
| Estimated Expenses for the Twelve Month Period ending December 31, 2017 | ||||
| Management compensation | $ | 500,000 | ||
| Professional fees | $ | 150,000 | ||
| General and administrative | $ | 1,900,000 | ||
| Total | $ | 2,550,000 | ||
At present, our cash requirements for the next 12 months outweigh the funds available to maintain our operations or development of any future properties. Of the $2,550,000 that we require for the next 12 months, we had $34,647 in cash as of April 28, 2017.
Our principal sources of liquidity are our existing cash and cash generated from product sales. Our working capital at December 31, 2016 was $(5,580,774).
In order to improve our liquidity, we also plan to pursue additional equity financing from private investors or possibly a registered public offering. We do not currently have any definitive arrangements in place for the completion of any further private placement financings and there is no assurance that we will be successful in completing any further private placement financings. To help finance our day to day working capital needs, the founder and CEO of the company has made a total payment of $108,651 since late 2015. If we are unable to achieve the necessary additional financing, then we plan to reduce the amounts that we spend on our business activities and administrative expenses in order to be within the amount of capital resources obligations, and execute our business plan. We have already suspended payments of management compensation to our CEO since October 2015.
There can be no assurances that we will be able to raise additional capital on acceptable terms or at all, which would adversely affect our ability to achieve our business objectives. In addition, if our operating performance during the next twelve months is below our expectations, our liquidity and ability to operate our business could be adversely affected.
Off-Balance Sheet Transactions
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.
Contractual Obligations and Known Future Cash Requirements
Indemnification Agreements
In the ordinary course of business, we enter into agreements of varying scope and terms pursuant to which we agree to indemnify customers, vendors, lessors, business partners and other parties with respect to certain matters, including, but not limited to, losses arising out of breach of such agreements, services to be provided by us or from intellectual property infringement claims made by third parties. In addition, we have entered into indemnification agreements with directors and certain officers and employees that will require us, among other things, to indemnify them against certain liabilities that may arise by reason of their status or service as directors, officers or employees. No demands have been made upon us to provide indemnification under such agreements and there are no claims that we are aware of that could have a material effect on our consolidated balance sheet, consolidated statements of operations, consolidated statements of comprehensive loss or consolidated statements of cash flows.
Operating Leases
We currently lease our corporate headquarters in Surrey, British Columbia, under operating lease agreements that expire through to July 31, 2017. The terms of the lease agreements provide for rental payments on a graduated basis. We recognize rent expense on a straight-line basis over the lease periods.
| 41 |
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
We prepare our consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The preparation of consolidated financial statements also requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, costs and expenses, and related disclosures. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ significantly from the estimates made by our management. To the extent that there are differences between our estimates and actual results, our future financial statements presentation, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows will be affected.
We believe that the assumptions and estimates associated with revenue recognition, foreign currency and foreign currency transactions and comprehensive loss have the greatest potential impact on our consolidated financial statements. Therefore, we consider these to be our critical accounting policies and estimates. For further information on all of our significant accounting policies, see the notes to our consolidated financial statements.
Recently Issued and Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
For fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016:
In April 2016, the FASB issued ASC 2016-10 “Revenue from Controls with Customers (Topic 606) – Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing”. These amendments are intended to clarify the identifying of performance obligations and the licensing of implementation guidance, while retaining the related principles for those areas. These amendments are effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is not permitted.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASC 2016-09, “Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718) – Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting”. These amendments are intended to simplify several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. Early adoption is permitted. Entities have the option to apply the amendments on either a prospective basis or a modified retrospective basis.
In November 2015, the FASB issued ASC 2015-17 “Income Taxes (Topic 740) – Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes” guidance simplifying the presentation of deferred tax liabilities and assets requiring that deferred tax liabilities and assets be classified as noncurrent in a classified statement of financial position. Early adoption permitted.
In August 2014, the FASB issued ASC 2014-15 “Presentation of Financial Statements – Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40) – Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern” new guidance which provides details on when and how to disclose going concern uncertainties. The new standard requires management to perform interim and annual assessments of an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year and to provide certain footnote disclosures if conditions or events raise substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. Early adoption permitted.
In July 2015, the FASB issued ASC 2015-11 “Inventory (Topic 330) – Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory”. This standard requires entities that use inventory methods other than the last-in, first-out (LIFO) or retail inventory method to measure inventory at the lower of cost or net realizable value, which is defined as the estimated selling prices in the normal course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation.
For fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017:
In August 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASC 2016-15 “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) – Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments”. These amendments are intended to provide guidance for each of the eight issues included, to reduce the current and potential future diversity in practice. Early adoption is permitted including in an interim period.
| 42 |
In January 2016, the FASB issued ASC 2016-01 “Financial Instruments – Overall (Subtopic 825-10) – Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Liabilities” a new standard related primarily to accounting for equity investments, financial liabilities where the fair value option has been elected, and the presentation and disclosure requirements for financial instruments. There will no longer be an available-for-sale classification and therefore, no changes in fair value will be reported in other comprehensive income for equity securities with readily determinable fair values. Early adoption is permitted.
For fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018:
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASC 2016-02 “Leases (Topic 842)” a comprehensive standard related to lease accounting to increase transparency and comparability among organizations by recognizing lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. Most significantly, the new guidance requires lessees to recognize operating leases with a term of more than 12 months as lease assets and lease liabilities. The adoption will require a modified retrospective approach at the beginning of the earliest period presented. Early adoption permitted.
The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the above standards on their consolidated financial statements. Other recent accounting pronouncements issued by the FASB, including its Emerging Issues Task Force, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, and the Securities and Exchange Commission did not or are not believed by management to have a material impact on the Company’s present or future consolidated financial statements.
| ITEM 7A. | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
Not applicable.
| 43 |
[INSERT AUDITOR REPORT HERE]
| 44 |
| ITEM 8. | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTAL DATA |
DSG
GLOBAL INC., AND SUBSIDIARY
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
| 45 |
Lichter, Yu and Associates, Inc.
Certified Public Accountants
21031 Ventura Blvd., suite 316
Woodland Hills, CA 91364
Tel (818)789-0265 Fax (818) 789-3949
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Board of Directors and Stockholders of
DSG Global, Inc. and Subsidiary
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of DSG Global, Inc. and Subsidiary (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss, stockholders’ deficit, and cash flows for each of the years in the two year period ended December 31, 2016. The Company’s management is responsible for these financial statements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of DSG Global, Inc. and Subsidiary as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for the two year period ended December 31, 2016, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has an accumulated deficit of $27,013,446 and negative working capital of $5,580,774 which raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans concerning these matters are also described in Note 3. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
| /s/ Lichter, Yu and Associates, Inc. | |
| Woodland Hills, California | |
| April 28, 2017 |
| 46 |
DSG GLOBAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
| December 31, 2016 | December 31, 2015 | |||||||
| ASSETS | ||||||||
| CURRENT ASSETS | ||||||||
| Cash | $ | - | $ | - | ||||
| Trade receivables, net | 90,038 | 73,212 | ||||||
| Inventories | 80,573 | 306,648 | ||||||
| Funds held in trust | - | 3,414 | ||||||
| Prepaid expenses and deposits | 56,076 | 155,932 | ||||||
| Other current assets | - | 26,902 | ||||||
| Receivable from related party | - | 91,727 | ||||||
| TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS | 226,687 | 657,835 | ||||||
| NON-CURRENT ASSETS | ||||||||
| Intangible assets, net | 16,580 | 16,984 | ||||||
| Fixed assets, net | 4,741 | 6,971 | ||||||
| Equipment on lease, net | 42,763 | 105,526 | ||||||
| TOTAL NON-CURRENT ASSETS | 64,084 | 129,481 | ||||||
| TOTAL ASSETS | $ | 290,771 | $ | 787,316 | ||||
| LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT | ||||||||
| CURRENT LIABILITIES | ||||||||
| Bank overdraft | $ | 5,316 | $ | 25,269 | ||||
| Trade and other payables | 2,568,792 | 1,428,509 | ||||||
| Payable to related party | 1,526 | - | ||||||
| Deferred revenue | 149,147 | 99,739 | ||||||
| Warranty reserve | 111,715 | 108,381 | ||||||
| Convertible note payable to related party | 339,791 | 310,000 | ||||||
| Loans payable | 866,269 | 546,137 | ||||||
| Derivative liability | 365,944 | - | ||||||
| Convertible notes payable | 1,398,961 | 1,139,543 | ||||||
| TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES | 5,807,461 | 3,657,579 | ||||||
| Commitments and contingencies | - | - | ||||||
| MEZZANINE EQUITY | ||||||||
| Redeemable Noncontrolling Interest - Preferred Shares | $ | 5,286,731 | $ | 5,286,731 | ||||
| STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT | ||||||||
| Common stock, $0.001 par value, 125,000,000 shares authorized and 30,291,187 outstanding at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015. | 30,291 | 30,291 | ||||||
| Additional paid in capital | 15,982,222 | 15,873,724 | ||||||
| Other accumulated comprehensive income | 1,296,652 | 1,306,959 | ||||||
| Accumulated deficit | (27,013,446 | ) | (24,707,197 | ) | ||||
| Total shareholders' deficit attributable to DSG Global | (9,704,281 | ) | (7,496,223 | ) | ||||
| Noncontrolling interest | (1,099,140 | ) | (660,771 | ) | ||||
| TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT | (10,803,421 | ) | (8,156,994 | ) | ||||
| TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT | $ | 290,771 | $ | 787,316 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the audited consolidated financial statements
| 47 |
DSG GLOBAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND 2015
| 2016 | 2015 | |||||||
| Revenue | $ | 1,169,936 | $ | 1,911,935 | ||||
| Cost of revenue | 513,638 | 1,140,065 | ||||||
| Gross profit | 656,298 | 771,870 | ||||||
| Operating Expenses | ||||||||
| Compensation expense | 972,179 | 853,507 | ||||||
| Research and development expense | 58,115 | 41,070 | ||||||
| General and administration expense | 1,021,482 | 1,347,547 | ||||||
| Warranty expense | 202,393 | 325,820 | ||||||
| Bad debt | 38,202 | (7,045 | ) | |||||
| Depreciation and amortization expense | 49,664 | 49,463 | ||||||
| Total operating expense | 2,342,035 | 2,610,362 | ||||||
| Loss from operations | (1,685,737 | ) | (1,838,492 | ) | ||||
| Other Income (Expense) | ||||||||
| Foreign currency exchange | (47,497 | ) | (96,177 | ) | ||||
| Other (expenses) income | (10,702 | ) | 56,974 | |||||
| Finance costs | (1,024,723 | ) | (619,451 | ) | ||||
| Total Other Expense | (1,082,922 | ) | (658,654 | ) | ||||
| Loss from continuing operations before income taxes | (2,768,659 | ) | (2,497,146 | ) | ||||
| Provision for income taxes | - | - | ||||||
| Net loss | (2,768,659 | ) | (2,497,146 | ) | ||||
| Less attributed to noncontrolling interest | 462,410 | 404,962 | ||||||
| Net loss attributable to DSG Global | $ | (2,306,249 | ) | $ | (2,092,184 | ) | ||
| Net loss per share | ||||||||
| Basic and Diluted: | ||||||||
| Basic | $ | (0.076 | ) | $ | (0.081 | ) | ||
| Diluted | $ | (0.076 | ) | $ | (0.081 | ) | ||
| Weighted average number of shares used in computing basic and diluted net loss per share: | ||||||||
| Basic | 30,291,187 | 25,965,534 | ||||||
| Diluted | 30,291,187 | 25,965,534 | ||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the audited consolidated financial statements
| 48 |
DSG GLOBAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND 2015
| 2016 | 2015 | |||||||
| Net loss | $ | (2,768,659 | ) | $ | (2,497,146 | ) | ||
| Other comprehensive income | ||||||||
| Change in foreign currency translation adjustments | (15,978 | ) | 269,991 | |||||
| Comprehensive loss | (2,784,637 | ) | (2,227,155 | ) | ||||
| Less: Comprehensive loss attributable to noncontrolling interest | 468,081 | 435,800 | ||||||
| Total comprehensive loss attributable to DSG Global | $ | (2,316,556 | ) | $ | (1,791,355 | ) | ||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the audited consolidated financial statements
| 49 |
DSG GLOBAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
| Equity Attributable to Common Shareholders' | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Common Stock | Additional Paid in | Accumulated | Accumulated Comprehensive | Total
Deficit Attributable to Common | Noncontrolling | Total Stockholders' | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Shares | Amount | Capital | Deficit | Income | Shareholders' | Interest | Deficit | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance December 31, 2015 | 30,291,187 | $ | 30,291 | $ | 15,873,724 | $ | (24,707,197 | ) | $ | 1,306,959 | $ | (7,496,223 | ) | $ | (660,771 | ) | $ | (8,156,994 | ) | |||||||||||||
| Adjustment to paid in capital for minority interest | - | - | (24,041 | ) | - | - | (24,041 | ) | 24,041 | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Beneficial conversion feature of loans | - | - | 132,539 | - | - | 132,539 | - | 132,539 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net (loss) income for 2016 | - | - | - | (2,306,249 | ) | (10,307 | ) | (2,316,556 | ) | (462,410 | ) | (2,778,966 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Balance December 31, 2016 | 30,291,187 | $ | 30,291 | $ | 15,982,222 | $ | (27,013,446 | ) | $ | 1,296,652 | $ | (9,704,281 | ) | $ | (1,099,140 | ) | $ | (10,803,421 | ) | |||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the audited consolidated financial statements
| 50 |
DSG GLOBAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
| Year Ended | ||||||||
| December 31, 2016 | December 31, 2015 | |||||||
| Net loss attributable to the Company | (2,768,659 | ) | (2,497,146 | ) | ||||
| Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in | ||||||||
| operating activities: | ||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | 49,664 | 49,463 | ||||||
| Inventory write-off | 116,058 | - | ||||||
| Interest on discount of convertible debt | 143,912 | - | ||||||
| Non-cash fair value adjustment on derivative | 223,795 | - | ||||||
| Reserve for bad debt | 33,947 | - | ||||||
| Non-cash financing costs | - | 188,580 | ||||||
| Notes issued for services | - | 303,079 | ||||||
| (Increase) decrease in assets: | ||||||||
| Trade receivables, net | (48,710 | ) | 67,354 | |||||
| Inventories | 153,495 | (83,785 | ) | |||||
| Funds held in trust | 3,564 | (3,695 | ) | |||||
| Prepaid expense and deposits | 43,691 | 219,072 | ||||||
| Related party receivable | 97,313 | 16,660 | ||||||
| Other assets | 34,202 | 21,828 | ||||||
| Increase (decrease) in current liabilities: | ||||||||
| Trade payables and accruals | 1,250,632 | 805,119 | ||||||
| Warranty reserve | - | 117,315 | ||||||
| Deferred revenue | 46,939 | 107,959 | ||||||
| Net cash used in operating activities | (620,157 | ) | (688,196 | ) | ||||
| Cash flows from investing activities | ||||||||
| Purchase of property, plant and equipment | (1,992 | ) | (9,479 | ) | ||||
| Return (purchase) of equipment on lease | 21,436 | 87,208 | ||||||
| Purchase of intangible assets | (790 | ) | (5,030 | ) | ||||
| Cash acquired from merger | - | 89,001 | ||||||
| Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | 18,654 | 161,700 | ||||||
| Cash flows from financing activities | ||||||||
| Bank overdraft | (33,699 | ) | 27,601 | |||||
| Proceeds from issuing shares | - | 103,660 | ||||||
| Payments on notes payable | (47,327 | ) | (146,233 | ) | ||||
| Proceeds from notes payable | 650,099 | 340,964 | ||||||
| Related party loan payable, net | 30,175 | 120,677 | ||||||
| Net cash provided by financing activities | 599,248 | 446,668 | ||||||
| Net increase in cash and cash equivalents | (2,255 | ) | (79,828 | ) | ||||
| Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | 2,255 | (12,012 | ) | |||||
| Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | - | 91,840 | ||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period | $ | - | $ | - | ||||
| Supplemental disclosures | ||||||||
| Cash paid during the period for: | ||||||||
| Income tax payments | $ | - | $ | - | ||||
| Interest payments | $ | 5,386 | $ | 5,803 | ||||
| Supplemental schedule of non-cash financing activities: | ||||||||
| Issuance of stock for financing costs | $ | - | $ | 188,580 | ||||
| Noncontrolling interest change to mezzanine equity | $ | 5,286,731 | ||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the audited consolidated financial statements
| 51 |
DSG
GLOBAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1 –ORGANIZATION
DSG Global, Inc. (formerly Boreal Productions Inc.) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on September 24, 2007. We were formed to option feature films and TV projects to be packaged for sale to movie studios and production companies.
Previously, in anticipation of the share exchange agreement with DSG Tag Systems, Inc. (“DSG TAG”), we undertook to change our name and effect a reverse stock split of our authorized and issued common stock. Accordingly, on January 19, 2015, our board of directors approved an agreement and plan of merger to merge with our wholly-owned subsidiary DSG Global Inc., a Nevada corporation, to affect a name change from Boreal Productions Inc. to DSG Global, Inc. Our company remains the surviving company. DSG Global, Inc. was formed solely for the change of our name.
Subsequent to the closing of the share exchange agreement with DSG TAG, we have adopted the business and operations of DSG TAG.
DSG TAG was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on April 17, 2008 and extra provincially registered in British Columbia, Canada in 2008. In March 2011, DSG TAG formed DSG Tag Systems International, Ltd. in the United Kingdom (“DSG UK”). DSG UK is a wholly owned subsidiary of DSG TAG.
Reverse Acquisition
On April 13, 2015, we entered into a share exchange agreement with DSG TAG and the shareholders of DSG TAG who become parties to the agreement. Pursuant to the terms of the share exchange agreement, we agreed to acquire not less than 75% and up to 100% of the issued and outstanding common shares in the capital stock of DSG TAG in exchange for the issuance to the selling shareholders of up to 20,000,000 shares of our common stock on the basis of 1 common share for 5.4935 common shares of DSG TAG.
On May 6, 2015, we completed the acquisition of approximately 75% (82,435,748 common shares) of the issued and outstanding common shares of DSG TAG as contemplated by the share exchange agreement by issuing 15,185,875 shares of our common stock to shareholders of DSG TAG who became parties to the agreement. In addition, concurrent with the closing of the share exchange agreement, we issued an additional 179,823 shares of our common stock to Westergaard Holdings Ltd. in partial settlement of accrued interest on outstanding indebtedness of DSG TAG.
Following the initial closing of the share exchange agreement and through July 6, 2015, we acquired an additional 27,035,175 shares of common stock of DSG TAG from shareholders who became parties to the share exchange agreement, and issued to these shareholders an aggregate of 4,921,303 shares of our common stock. Following completion of these additional purchases, DSG Global owns 100% (109,572,123 common shares) of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of DSG TAG as of October 13, 2015.
As of October 13, 2015, an aggregate of 101,200 of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of DSG TAG (less than 0.1%) has been converted by the last remaining shareholder of DSG TAG. As of October 2015, we own 100% (109,572,123 common shares) of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of DSG TAG. See Part II, Item 1. “Legal Proceeding,” of this Form 10-K for a description of the settlement agreement and the additional changes to the original agreement, that has been amended in February 2016. Additionally, an aggregate of 4,229,384 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock of DSG TAG continues to be held by Westergaard Holdings Ltd., an affiliate of Keith Westergaard, a member of our board of directors.
| 52 |
The reverse acquisition was accounted for as a recapitalization effected by a share exchange, wherein DSG TAG Systems is considered the acquirer for accounting and financial reporting purposes. The assets and liabilities of the acquired entity have been brought forward at their book value and no goodwill has been recognized. We adopted the business and operations of DSG TAG upon the closing of the share exchange agreement.
When used in these notes, the terms “Company,” “we,” “our,” or “us” mean DSG Global, Inc. and its subsidiary DSG Tag Systems, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary DSG Tag Systems International, Ltd.
Note 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”) and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of DSG Global Inc. and its subsidiary DSG Tag Systems, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary DSG Tag Systems International, Ltd., collectively referred to as the Company. All material intercompany accounts, transactions and profits were eliminated in consolidation.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Estimates and assumptions are reviewed periodically and the effects of revisions are reflected in the consolidated financial statements in the period they are determined.
Exchange (Loss) Gain
During the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, the transactions of the Company and its subsidiary were denominated in foreign currencies and were recorded in Canadian dollar (CAD), or British Pounds (GBP), at the rates of exchange in effect when the transactions occurred. Exchange gains and losses are recognized for the different foreign exchange rates applied when the foreign currency assets and liabilities are settled.
Foreign Currency Translation and Comprehensive (Loss) Income
The accounts of the Company and its subsidiary were maintained, and its financial statements were expressed, in CAD and GBP. Such financial statements were translated into United States dollars (USD) with the CAD or GBP as the functional currency. All assets and liabilities were translated at the exchange rate at the balance sheet date, stockholders’ deficit is translated at the historical rates and income statement items are translated at the average exchange rate for the period. Transactions in foreign currencies are initially recorded at the functional currency rate ruling at the date of transaction. Any differences between the initially recorded amount and the settlement amount are recorded as a gain or loss on foreign currency transaction in the consolidated statements of operations. The resulting translation adjustments are reported under other comprehensive income as a component of shareholders’ equity.
| 53 |
Reportable Segment
The Company has one reportable segment. The Company’s activities are interrelated and each activity is dependent upon and supportive of the other. Accordingly, all significant operating decisions are based on analysis of financial products provided as a single global business.
Revenue Recognition
The Company recognizes revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the fee is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured. In instances where final acceptance of the product is specified by the customer, revenue is deferred until all acceptance criteria have been met. The Company accrues for warranty costs, sales returns, and other allowances based on its historical experience.
Research and Development
Research and development expenses include payroll, employee benefits, and other headcount-related expenses associated with product development. Research and development expenses also include third-party development and programming costs, localization costs incurred to translate software for international markets, and the amortization of purchased software code and services content. Such costs related to software development are included in research and development expense until the point that technological feasibility is reached. Research and development is expensed and is included in operating expenses.
Income Taxes
The Company utilizes the liability method of accounting for income tax. Under the liability method, deferred income tax assets and liabilities are provided based on the difference between the financial statements and tax basis of assets and liabilities measured by the current enacted tax rates in effect for the years in which these differences are expected to reverse.
The Company has adopted accounting standards for the accounting for uncertain income taxes. These standards provide guidance for the accounting and disclosure about uncertain tax positions taken. Management believes that all of the positions taken in its federal and states income tax returns are more likely than not to be sustained upon examination.
Concentration of Credit Risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk are cash, accounts receivable and other receivables arising from its normal business activities. The Company places its cash in what it believes to be credit-worthy financial institutions. The Company has a diversified customer base, most of which are in Canada, United States and the United Kingdom. The Company controls credit risk related to accounts receivable through credit approvals, credit limits and monitoring procedures. The Company routinely assesses the financial strength of its customers and, based upon factors surrounding the credit risk, establishes an allowance, if required, for uncollectible accounts and, as a consequence, believes that its accounts receivable credit risk exposure beyond such allowance is limited.
| 54 |
Risks and Uncertainties
The Company is subject to risks from, among other things, competition associated with the industry in general, other risks associated with financing, liquidity requirements, rapidly changing customer requirements, limited operating history, foreign currency exchange rates and the volatility of public markets.
Contingencies
Certain conditions may exist as of the date the financial statements are issued, which may result in a loss to the Company but which will only be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur. The Company’s management and legal counsel assess such contingent liabilities, and such assessment inherently involves judgment. In assessing loss contingencies related to legal proceedings that are pending against the Company or un-asserted claims that may result in such proceedings, the Company’s legal counsel evaluates the perceived merits of any legal proceedings or un-asserted claims as well as the perceived merits of the amount of relief sought or expected to be sought.
If the assessment of a contingency indicates it is probable that a material loss has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be estimated, then the estimated liability would be accrued in the Company’s financial statements. If the assessment indicates that a potential material loss contingency is not probable but is reasonably possible, or is probable but cannot be estimated, then the nature of the contingent liability, together with an estimate of the range of possible loss if determinable and material would be disclosed. Loss contingencies considered to be remote by management are generally not disclosed unless they involve guarantees, in which case the guarantee would be disclosed.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and equivalents include cash in hand and cash in demand deposits, certificates of deposit and all highly liquid debt instruments with original maturities of three months or less. At December 31, 2016 and 2015, there were no uninsured balances for accounts in Canada, the United States and the United Kingdom. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts and believes it is not exposed to any risks on its cash in bank accounts.
Accounts Receivable
All accounts receivable are due thirty (30) days from the date billed. If the funds are not received within thirty (30) days the customer is contacted to arrange payment. The Company uses the allowance method to account for uncollectable accounts receivable. The allowance for doubtful accounts as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 was $47,289 and $14,368, respectively.
Financing Receivables and Guarantees
The Company provides financing arrangements, including operating leases and financed service contracts for certain qualified customers. Lease receivables primarily represent sales-type and direct-financing leases. Leases typically have two- to three-year terms and are collateralized by a security interest in the underlying assets. The Company makes an allowance for uncollectible financing receivables based on a variety of factors, including the risk rating of the portfolio, macroeconomic conditions, historical experience, and other market factors. At December 31, 2016 and 2015 management determined that there was no allowance necessary. The Company also provides financing guarantees, which are generally for various third-party financing arrangements to channel partners and other customers. The Company could be called upon to make payment under these guarantees in the event of nonpayment to the third party.
| 55 |
Advertising Costs
The Company expenses all advertising costs as incurred. Advertising costs were $221,868 and $354,936 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
Inventory
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost (determined on a weighted average basis) or market. Management compares the cost of inventories with the market value and allowance is made to write down inventories to market value, if lower. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, inventory only consisted of finished goods.
Fixed Assets
Fixed assets are stated at cost and depreciated using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful life of the asset or the lease term. The estimated useful lives of our property and equipment are generally as follows:
Rental equipment:
| Tag | 5-year useful life |
| Touch/Text | 5-year useful life |
| Office furniture and equipment | 5-year useful life |
| Computer equipment | 3-year useful life |
As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, fixed assets consisted of the following:
| December 31, 2016 | December 31, 2015 | |||||||
| Furniture and equipment | $ | 20,838 | $ | 20,216 | ||||
| Computer equipment | 23,317 | 24,695 | ||||||
| Accumulated depreciation | (39,414 | ) | (37,940 | ) | ||||
| $ | 4,741 | $ | 6,971 | |||||
As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, leased equipment consisted of the following:
| December 31, 2016 | December 31, 2015 | |||||||
| Tags | $ | 122,935 | $ | 141,400 | ||||
| Text | 27,171 | 26,195 | ||||||
| Touch | 22,507 | 20,386 | ||||||
| Accumulated Depreciation | (129,850 | ) | (82,455 | ) | ||||
| $ | 42,763 | $ | 105,526 | |||||
As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, total depreciation expense was $49,664 and $49,463 for the fixed assets and leased equipment, respectively.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
For certain of the Company’s financial instruments, including cash and equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued liabilities and short-term debt, the carrying amounts approximate their fair values due to their short maturities. ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” requires disclosure of the fair value of financial instruments held by the Company. ASC Topic 825, “Financial Instruments,” defines fair value, and establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosures of fair value measurement that enhances disclosure requirements for fair value measures. The carrying amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheets for receivables and current liabilities each qualify as financial instruments and are a reasonable estimate of their fair values because of the short period of time between the origination of such instruments and their expected realization and their current market rate of interest. The three levels of valuation hierarchy are defined as follows:
| 56 |
Level 1 inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.
Level 2 inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.
Level 3 inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.
The Company analyzes all financial instruments with features of both liabilities and equity under ASC Topic 480, “Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity,” and ASC Topic 815, “Derivatives and Hedging.”
As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company did not identify any assets and liabilities that are required to be presented on the balance sheet at fair value.
Basic and Diluted Net Loss per Common Share
Basic and diluted net loss per share attributable to common stockholders is computed by dividing net loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Our potentially dilutive shares, which include outstanding convertible loans and notes, have not been included in the computation of diluted net loss per share attributable to common stockholders for all periods presented, as the results would be antidilutive. Such potentially dilutive shares are excluded when the effect would be to reduce net loss per share.
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015:
| December 31, 2016 | December 31, 2015 | |||||||
| Net loss attributable to DSG Global Inc. | $ | (2,306,249 | ) | $ | (2,092,184 | ) | ||
| Net loss per share | ||||||||
| Basic and Diluted: | ||||||||
| Basic | $ | (0.076 | ) | $ | (0.081 | ) | ||
| Diluted | $ | (0.076 | ) | $ | (0.081 | ) | ||
Weighted average number of shares used in computing basic and diluted net loss per share:
| Basic | 30,291,187 | 25,965,534 | ||||||
| Diluted | 30,291,187 | 25,965,534 |
| 57 |
Intangible Assets
The Company records identifiable intangible assets at fair value on the date of acquisition and evaluates the useful life of each asset. Finite-lived intangible assets primarily consist of software development capitalized. Finite-lived intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis and are tested for recoverability if events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amounts may not be recoverable. These intangibles have useful lives ranging from 1 to 20 years.
Stock-Based Compensation
We recognize all share-based payments to employees and to non-employee directors as compensation for service on our board of directors as compensation expense in the consolidated financial statements based on the fair values of such payments. Stock-based compensation expense recognized each period is based on the value of the portion of share-based payment awards that is ultimately expected to vest during the period. Forfeitures are estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates.
For share-based payments to consultants and other third-parties, compensation expense is determined at the “measurement date.” The expense is recognized over the vesting period of the award. Until the measurement date is reached, the total amount of compensation expense remains uncertain. We record compensation expense based on the fair value of the award at the reporting date. The awards to consultants and other third-parties are then revalued, or the total compensation is recalculated based on the then current fair value, at each subsequent reporting date.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
For fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016:
In April 2016, the FASB issued ASC 2016-10 “Revenue from Controls with Customers (Topic 606) – Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing”. These amendments are intended to clarify the identifying of performance obligations and the licensing of implementation guidance, while retaining the related principles for those areas. These amendments are effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is not permitted.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASC 2016-09, “Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718) – Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting”. These amendments are intended to simplify several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. Early adoption is permitted. Entities have the option to apply the amendments on either a prospective basis or a modified retrospective basis.
In November 2015, the FASB issued ASC 2015-17 “Income Taxes (Topic 740) – Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes” guidance simplifying the presentation of deferred tax liabilities and assets requiring that deferred tax liabilities and assets be classified as noncurrent in a classified statement of financial position. Early adoption permitted.
In August 2014, the FASB issued ASC 2014-15 “Presentation of Financial Statements – Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40) – Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern” new guidance which provides details on when and how to disclose going concern uncertainties. The new standard requires management to perform interim and annual assessments of an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year and to provide certain footnote disclosures if conditions or events raise substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. Early adoption permitted.
| 58 |
In July 2015, the FASB issued ASC 2015-11 “Inventory (Topic 330) – Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory”. This standard requires entities that use inventory methods other than the last-in, first-out (LIFO) or retail inventory method to measure inventory at the lower of cost or net realizable value, which is defined as the estimated selling prices in the normal course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation.
For fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017:
In August 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASC 2016-15 “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) – Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments”. These amendments are intended to provide guidance for each of the eight issues included, to reduce the current and potential future diversity in practice. Early adoption is permitted including in an interim period.
In January 2016, the FASB issued ASC 2016-01 “Financial Instruments – Overall (Subtopic 825-10) – Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Liabilities” a new standard related primarily to accounting for equity investments, financial liabilities where the fair value option has been elected, and the presentation and disclosure requirements for financial instruments. There will no longer be an available-for-sale classification and therefore, no changes in fair value will be reported in other comprehensive income for equity securities with readily determinable fair values. Early adoption is permitted.
For fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018:
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASC 2016-02 “Leases (Topic 842)” a comprehensive standard related to lease accounting to increase transparency and comparability among organizations by recognizing lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. Most significantly, the new guidance requires lessees to recognize operating leases with a term of more than 12 months as lease assets and lease liabilities. The adoption will require a modified retrospective approach at the beginning of the earliest period presented. Early adoption permitted.
The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the above standards on their consolidated financial statements. Other recent accounting pronouncements issued by the FASB, including its Emerging Issues Task Force, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, and the Securities and Exchange Commission did not or are not believed by management to have a material impact on the Company’s present or future consolidated financial statements.
Note 3 – GOING CONCERN
As reflected in the accompanying financial statements, the Company had an accumulated deficit of $27,013,446 as of December 31, 2016 and had a net loss of $2,768,659 for the year ended December 31, 2016.
While the Company is attempting to grow revenues, improve margins and lower costs, the Company’s cash position may not be sufficient to support the Company’s daily operations. Management is seeking to raise additional funds by way of a public or private offering. Management believes that the actions presently being taken to further implement its business plan and generate revenues provide the opportunity for the Company to continue as a going concern. While the Company believes in the viability of its strategy to generate revenues and in its ability to raise additional funds, there can be no assurances to that effect. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon the Company’s ability to further implement its business plan and generate revenues.
The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.
| 59 |
Note 4 – ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE, NET
As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, accounts receivable consists of the following:
| December 31, 2016 | December 31, 2015 | |||||||
| Accounts receivables | $ | 137,327 | $ | 87,580 | ||||
| Allowance for bad debt | (47,289 | ) | (14,368 | ) | ||||
| Total accounts receivables, net | $ | 90,038 | $ | 73,212 | ||||
Note 5 – OTHER ASSETS
Other assets consist of the following as of December 31, 2016 and 2015:
| December 31, 2016 | December 31, 2015 | |||||||
| GST/VAT Receivable | $ | - | $ | 26,902 | ||||
| $ | - | $ | 26,902 | |||||
Note 6 – INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Intangible assets consist of the following of December 31, 2016 and 2015:
| December 31, 2016 | December 31, 2015 | |||||||
| Intangible Asset - Patents | $ | 21,253 | $ | 20,473 | ||||
| Accumulated Amortization | (4,673 | ) | (3,489 | ) | ||||
| $ | 16,580 | $ | 16,984 | |||||
The estimated useful life of the Patent is twenty years. Patents are amortized on a straight-line basis. As of December 31, 2016, $4,673 has been amortized.
Note 7 – TRADE AND OTHER PAYABLES
As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, trade and other payables consist of the following:
| December 31, 2016 | December 31, 2015 | |||||||
| Accounts payable | $ | 940,722 | $ | 742,256 | ||||
| Accrued expenses | 388,331 | 35,113 | ||||||
| Accrued interest | 1,222,151 | 622,903 | ||||||
| Other liabilities | 17,588 | 28,237 | ||||||
| Total payables | $ | 2,568,792 | $ | 1,428,509 | ||||
Note 8 – LOANS PAYABLE
As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, loans payable consisted of the following:
| December 31, 2016 | December 31, 2015 | |||||||
| Unsecured, due on demand, interest 15% per annum | $ | 186,192 | $ | 180,635 | ||||
| Unsecured, due on demand, interest 36% per annum | 45,548 | 50,502 | ||||||
| Unsecured, loan payable, interest 18% per annum | 317,500 | 315,000 | ||||||
| Unsecured, loan payable, fee for services payable on the original loan amount of 5% by May 6, 2016, 10% payable by June 5, 2016, or 20% payable by July 5, 2016 | 67,029 | - | ||||||
| Unsecured, loan payable, interest 10% per annum, with a minimum interest amount of $25,000, due July 22, 2016. | 250,000 | - | ||||||
| Total | $ | 866,269 | $ | 546,137 | ||||
| Current portion | 866,269 | 546,137 | ||||||
| Long term portion | - | - | ||||||
| Total | $ | 866,269 | $ | 546,137 | ||||
| 60 |
Note 9 – CONVERTIBLE LOANS
As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, convertible loans payable consisted of the following:
Convertible Loans
| December 31, 2016 | December 31, 2015 | |||||||
| Unsecured, interest 15.2% per annum, from equity investment, mature from February 28, 2015 to December 31, 2015. Principal is repayable in cash or Tags units. Convertible at the average closing price of the 120 days period prior to conversion date | $ | 916,905 | $ | 889,543 | ||||
| Unsecured, interest 10% per annum. Principal plus interest repayable in cash or common shares due on demand. Convertible at $1.75 per share | 250,000 | 250,000 | ||||||
| Unsecured, interest 2% per month. Principal plus interest repayable in cash or common shares. Due 45 days from August 5, 2016 or upon filing of registration statement, convertible at $0.27 per share | 150,000 | - | ||||||
| Senior secured, interest 8% per annum. Repayable in cash or common shares at the lower of (i) twelve cents ($0.12) and (ii) the closing sales price of the Common Stock on the date of conversion. (1) | 261,389 | - | ||||||
| Less: debt discount (1) | (179,333 | ) | - | |||||
| Total | $ | 1,398,961 | $ | 1,139,543 | ||||
| Current portion | 1,398,961 | 1,139,543 | ||||||
| Long term portion | $ | - | $ | - | ||||
Convertible Loans to Related Party
| December 31, 2016 | December 31, 2015 | |||||||
| Unsecured, interest 5% per annum, matures March 30, 2016, and is convertible at $1.25/per share | $ | 310,000 | $ | 310,000 | ||||
| Unsecured, 8% annual rate for one month; if not paid by July 16, 2016, 4% per month thereafter; convertible at $0.08 per share. | 29,791 | - | ||||||
| Total current portion | $ | 339,791 | $ | 310,000 | ||||
| 61 |
Securities Purchase Agreement – Coastal Investment
(1) On November 7, 2016, we entered into a securities purchase agreement with Coastal Investment Partners. Pursuant to the agreement, Coastal Investment provided us with cash proceeds of $125,000 on November 10, 2016. In exchange, we issued a secured convertible promissory note in the principal amount of $138,888.89 (the “$138,888.89 Note”), inclusive of an 8% original issue discount, which bears interest at 8% per annum to the holder. The $138,888.89 Note matures six months from issuance and is convertible at the option of the holder into our common shares at a price per share that is the lower of $0.12 or the closing price of our common stock on the conversion date. In addition, under the same terms, the company also issued a secured convertible note of $50,000 in consideration of cash proceeds of $10,000 and another secured convertible note of $72,500 in consideration of cash proceeds of $10,000. Discount on the notes was $116,389 and is being amortized over life of the notes.
The fair market value of the potential derivative liability was $365,944, recorded as of December 31, 2016, and was calculated using the binomial method with a volatility rate of 171% and discount interest rate of 0.62%. Derivative liability applied as discount on the notes was $145,000 and is being amortized over the life of the notes.
Under the agreements, the Company has the right to redeem $62,500 and $40,000 of the notes in consideration of $1 each at any time prior to the maturity date in the event that the $138,888.89 Note is exchanged or converted into a revolving credit facility with Coastal Investment, whereupon the two $10,000 convertible note balances shall be rolled into such credit facility.
Note 10 – PAYABLE TO SHAREHOLDER
On October 1, 2015, the Company converted the debt of $149,766 payable to a shareholder and former director of the Company that is unsecured and carries no interest. The debt was converted into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion price equal to the price at which the Company sells shares of common stock in its next equity financing.
Note 11 – MEZZANINE EQUITY
DSG TAG has 150,000,000 shares of undesignated preferred stock authorized, each having a par value of $0.001 as of December 31, 2016 and 2015. DSG TAG designated 5,000,000 shares as Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series A Shares”) and issued 4,309,384 Series A Shares to a company controlled by a director of DSG TAG for conversion of its debt of $5,386,731 on October 24, 2014. The Series A Shares have no general voting rights and carry a 5% per annum interest rate. Series A Shares that are converted to common shares are entitled to the same voting rights as other common shareholders. At any time on or after the issuance date any holder of Series A Shares may convert to common stock based on predetermined conversion price of $1.25 per share. The preferred shares are recorded in the consolidated financial statements as non-controlling interest. The Series A Shares were not exchanged for securities of DSG Global, Inc. as part of the Share Exchange Agreement. The Series A Shares are subject to a redemption obligation pursuant to which the Company must redeem at a price of $1.25 per share, 900,000 Series A Shares ($1,250,000) by May 1, 2016, an additional 900,000 Series A Shares ($1,250,000) by June 1, 2016, and the remaining 2,509,384 Series A Shares ($3,136,730) by July 1, 2016.
As of December 31, 2016, 80,000 preferred shares were purchased by an unrelated third-party and exchanged for 80,000 shares of common stock of DSG Global, Inc.
| 62 |
Note 12 – STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
Common Stock
The Company has 125,000,000 shares of common stock authorized, each having a par value of $0.001, as of December 31, 2016 and 2015. According to the Share Exchange Agreement dated April 13, 2015, we agreed to acquire not less than 75% and up to 100% of the issued and outstanding common shares of DSG TAG in exchange for the issuance to the subscribing shareholders of up to 20,000,000 shares of our common stock on the basis of 1 common share of DSG Global, Inc. for 5.4935 common shares of DSG TAG. The Company also issued an additional 179,823 common shares to a director of DSG TAG to meet debt agreement obligations. There were 30,291,187 and 30,291,187 shares of common stock of the Company issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Each share of common stock is entitled to one (1) vote.
Non-controlling Interest
DSG TAG has 150,000,000 shares of undesignated preferred stock authorized, each having a par value of $0.001 as of December 31, 2015 and 2014. DSG TAG designated 5,000,000 shares as Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series A Shares”) and issued 4,309,384 Series A Shares to a company controlled by a director of DSG TAG for conversion of its debt of $5,386,731 on October 24, 2014. The Series A Shares were not exchanged for securities of DSG Global, Inc. as part of the Share Exchange Agreement. Noncontrolling interest as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 was $1,099,140 or 16.18% and $660,771 or 16.18%, respectively.
Note 13 – STOCK OPTIONS AND WARRANTS
Stock Compensation to employees and officers
On March 1, 2013, the Company extended warrants issued in 2008 to five employees and officers that were to expire on March 31, 2013 to December 31, 2016. The Company issued warrants to these individuals to purchase an aggregate of 7,006,098 shares of common stock. The warrants had an exercise price of $0.23 per share. The fair value of the warrants at the time they were extended was estimated at $769,760 using a Black-Scholes model with the following assumptions: expected volatility of 17%, risk free interest of 0.38%, expected life of 3 years and no dividends. The fair value of the warrants were recorded as equity and compensation expense. On January 18, 2015, DSG TAG cancelled 5,913,898 of the warrants. The remaining 1,092,200 warrants expired as of December 31, 2016.
Stock Warrant for Convertible Loan
In connection with the extension of a convertible loan for $2,614,268, DSG TAG issued warrants to the convertible loan holder to purchase an aggregate of 546,100 shares of common stock of DSG TAG. The warrants had an exercise price of $0.23 per share and an expiration date of December 31, 2016. The fair value of the warrants was estimated at $112,596 using a Black-Scholes model with the following assumptions: expected volatility of 15%, risk free interest of 0.68%, expected life of 3 years and no dividends. The fair value of the warrants was recorded as equity and a debt discount and was amortized to interest expense over the term of the loan. The final debt discount balance as of December 31, 2013 was $96,724. The convertible loan was converted into equity in September 2014 at which time the remaining unamortized debt discount of $69,233 was expensed. On January 18, 2015, the warrants were cancelled.
| 63 |
Note 14 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
On March 31, 2015, the Company entered into an agreement with a marketing firm that is owned by one of the directors of the Company. The terms included cash payment of $17,500 and a note in the amount of $310,000, with 5% interest per annum, convertible at the election of the holder into 248,000 shares of Common Stock of DSG Global, Inc. at a price of $1.25 per share, maturing on March 30, 2016. As of December 31, 2016, it was estimated that approximately 90% of the marketing services related to the agreement have been provided and we have therefore expensed $280,000 and the remaining $30,000 is recorded as a prepaid deposit. As of March 31, 2016, the Director of the Company has filed a lawsuit for payment of the convertible note and the Company has countersued for failure to provide services as obligated as per the agreement. (See Note 17).
A shareholder and former director of the Company is owed $149,766. On May 6, 2015 upon the closing of the Share Exchange Agreement, the director resigned. On October 1, 2015, the parties agreed to convert this debt into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion price equal to the price at which the Company sells shares of common stock in its next equity financing. The $149,766 was converted to 85,580 shares at $1.75 USD per share on October 1, 2015.
On June 16, 2016, a convertible loan was received from a related party in the amount of $29,791. Interest is 8% annual rate for one month and 4% monthly rate thereafter if not paid by July 16, 2016. The note is convertible at $0.08 per share. (See Note 9).
Amount due to and from related party at December 31, 2016 and 2015 was $(1,526) and $91,727, respectively. The amounts consist of advances to a director and officer of the Company. These amounts are unsecured, non-interest bearing and due on demand.
Note 15 – INCOME TAX
For the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, there is $nil and $nil current and deferred income tax expense, respectively, reflected in the Statement of Operations.
The following are the components of income before income tax reflected in the Statement of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015:
Component of Loss Before Income Tax and Noncontrolling Interest
| December 31, 2016 | December 31, 2015 | |||||||
| Loss before income tax and noncontrolling interest | $ | (2,768,659 | ) | $ | (2,497,146 | ) | ||
| Income Tax | $ | - | $ | - | ||||
| Effective tax rate | 0 | % | 0 | % | ||||
Deferred income taxes arise from temporary differences between the tax and financial statement recognition of revenue and expense. In evaluating the ability to recover the deferred tax assets within the jurisdiction from which they arise, the Company considered all available positive and negative evidence, including scheduled reversals of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, tax planning strategies and recent financial operations. In projecting future taxable income, the Company began with historical results adjusted for changes in accounting policies and incorporates assumptions including the amount of future pretax operating income, the reversal of temporary differences, and the implementation of feasible and prudent tax planning strategies. These assumptions require significant judgment about the forecasts of future taxable income and are consistent with the plans and estimate the Company are using to manage the underlying businesses. In evaluating the objective evidence that historical results provide, the Company consider three years of cumulative operating income (loss).
| 64 |
As of December 31, 2016, the Company had net operating losses, or NOLs, of approximately $27 million to offset future taxable income in Canada and the United Kingdom. The deferred tax assets at December 31, 2016 were fully reserved. Management believes it is more likely than not that these assets will not be realized in the near future.
Note 16 – GEOGRAPHIC SEGMENT INFORMATION
As a result of the reverse merger on May 6, 2015, the Company operates in three regions: Canada, United Kingdom and the United States of America. All inter-company transactions are eliminated in consolidation. Prior to the merger, the Company operated in two regions.
For the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, geographic segment information is as follows:
| For the Year Ended December 31, 2016 | Canada | United
Kingdom | United States | Elimination | Consolidated | |||||||||||||||
| Revenue | $ | 922,654 | $ | 258,054 | - | $ | (10,772 | ) | $ | 1,169,936 | ||||||||||
| Cost of Revenue | 397,095 | 127,315 | - | (10,772 | ) | 513,638 | ||||||||||||||
| Total Expenses | 2,004,848 | 322,356 | 14,830 | 2,342,035 | ||||||||||||||||
| Other Income (Expenses) | (989,743 | ) | (33,843 | ) | (1,137 | ) | (1,024,723 | ) | ||||||||||||
| Noncontrolling Interest | 462,410 | - | - | 462,410 | ||||||||||||||||
| Net (Loss) Income | (2,064,821 | ) | (225,461 | ) | (15,967 | ) | (2,306,249 | ) | ||||||||||||
| Assets | 222,634 | 16,444 | 51,693 | (200,139 | ) | 290,771 | ||||||||||||||
| Liabilities | 5,456,349 | 339,374 | 11,738 | (200,139 | ) | 5,807,461 | ||||||||||||||
| For the Year Ended December 31, 2015 | Canada | United Kingdom | United States | Elimination | Consolidated | |||||||||||||||
| Revenue | $ | 1,686,990 | $ | 481,555 | - | $ | (256,610 | ) | $ | 1,911,935 | ||||||||||
| Cost of Revenue | 1,085,877 | 310,798 | - | (256,610 | ) | 1,140,065 | ||||||||||||||
| Total Expenses | 2,332,014 | 282,339 | (3,991 | ) | - | 2,610,362 | ||||||||||||||
| Other Income (Expenses) | (653,613 | ) | (7,170 | ) | 2,129 | - | (658,654 | ) | ||||||||||||
| Noncontrolling Interest | 404,962 | - | - | - | 404,962 | |||||||||||||||
| Net (Loss) Income | (1,979,552 | ) | (118,752 | ) | 6,120 | - | (2,092,184 | ) | ||||||||||||
| Assets | 797,904 | 81,641 | 70,776 | (163,005 | ) | 787,316 | ||||||||||||||
| Liabilities | 3,578,182 | 227,547 | 14,855 | (163,005 | ) | 3,657,579 | ||||||||||||||
Note 17 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Lease Obligations
The Company leases offices in Canada under a renewable operating lease which originally expired on April 30, 2016, following which the term of the lease is month to month, with 30 days’ notice to terminate. If no agreement is signed, the Landlord reserves the right to terminate the Lease on March 31, 2016.
| 65 |
On April 7, 2016, the Company signed an additional two-month extension on the current lease with a term of May 1, 2016 to July 31, 2016. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the lease was extended and will expire on January 31, 2017.
On February 15, 2017, an additional six-month extension on the lease was signed with the term beginning on February 1, 2017 and ending on July 31, 2017.
The annual rent for the premises in Canada is approximately $66,000. For the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, the aggregate rental expense was CAD $92,825 and CAD $82,531, respectively. Rent expense included other amounts paid in Canada and the United Kingdom for warehouse storage and offices on a month-to-month or as-needed basis.
The Company signed an operating lease agreement through National Leasing for a photocopier. The lease terms are for 60 months commencing on May 22, 2015 and ending April 22, 2020 with a monthly lease payment of approximately $183.
The following table summarizes our future minimum payments under these arrangements as of December 31, 2016:
| December 31: | ||||
| 2017 | 2,200 | |||
| 2018 | 2,200 | |||
| 2019 | 2,200 | |||
| 2020 | 917 | |||
| $ | 7,517 | |||
Product Warranties
The Company’s product warranty costs are part of its cost of sales based on associated material product costs, labor costs for technical support staff, and associated overhead. The products sold are generally covered by a warranty for a period of one year. As of December 31, 2016, the Company has set up a reserve for future warranty costs of $111,715. The Company’s past experience with warranty related costs was used as a basis for the reserve. Prior to December 31, 2015 the Company expensed warranty costs as incurred. The warranty expense incurred was $202,393 and $325,820 (including set up of $111,715 reserve) for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
In the normal course of business, the Company indemnifies other parties, including customers, lessors, and parties to other transactions with the Company, with respect to certain matters. The Company has agreed to hold the other parties harmless against losses arising from a breach of representations or covenants, or out of intellectual property infringement or other claims made against certain parties. These agreements may limit the time within which an indemnification claim can be made and the amount of the claim. In addition, the Company has entered into indemnification agreements with its officers and directors, and the Company’s bylaws contain similar indemnification obligations to the Company’s agents. It is not possible to determine the maximum potential amount under these indemnification agreements due to the Company’s limited history with prior indemnification claims and the unique facts and circumstances involved in each particular agreement. Historically, payments made by the Company under these agreements have not had a material effect on the Company’s operating results, financial position, or cash flows.
| 66 |
Note 18 – LEGAL MATTERS
On December 30, 2012, a corporation filed an action against the Company in the United States courts claiming patent infringement. On March 8, 2013, the parties agreed to a settlement, with the Company admitting no wrongdoing, in the amount of $125,000. The settlement is to be paid over an 18-month period in equal installments of $7,500 with annual interest at a rate of 8%. The Company has accrued all liabilities related to this matter in the financial statements.
On June 4, 2015, a shareholder of the Company’s subsidiary filed a lawsuit to recover a loan of CAD$100,000 which was made on October 16, 2012 and was due on July 16, 2013 with accrued interest. A response to the claim was submitted on June 29, 2015. On August 13, 2015, a settlement was reached between both parties to pay the loan amount remaining plus interest, for a total of $119,700. In addition, the shareholder’s outstanding shares of DSG TAG were converted into 18,422 shares of common stock of DSG Global, Inc. on October 22, 2015. On February 16, 2016, a new agreement was reached after a breach of the settlement agreement dated August 13, 2015. DSG TAG defaulted on the settlement agreement and both parties agreed to new terms. The balance owing on February 16, 2106 was CAD$86,780 payable ratably over 16 months. The shareholder’s loan and accrued interest is appropriately recorded in these financial statements.
A Director of the Company, representing their company Adore Creative Agency Inc. (Adore), has filed a notice of default on March 31, 2016, in regard to the related party convertible note on the financial statements of DSG TAG. The note was issued in lieu of marketing services and has a maturity date of March 31, 2016. DSG TAG has countersued Adore for failure to provide services as obligated under the terms and agreement of the convertible note, and in addition for damages as a result.
On September 7, 2016, Chetu Inc. has filed a Complaint for Damage in Florida to recover unpaid invoice amount of $27,335 plus interest of $4,939. The invoice was not paid due to a dispute that DSG TAG did not think that vendor had delivered the service according to the agreement between the two parties.
On October 17, 2016, the Supreme Court of British Columbia made an order in relating to the above discussed lawsuit from a shareholder to recover a loan of CAD$100,000. DSG TAG was ordered to repay the remaining loan plus costs in the amount of $77,589 to the shareholder in 14 monthly payments of $5,500 each plus $589 at the 15th month, starting February 15, 2017.
Note 19 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Management has evaluated events subsequent to the year ended December 31, 2016 through April 28, 2017 for transactions and other events that may require adjustment of and/or disclosure in such financial statements.
On December 21, 2016, the Company entered into a convertible note agreement for the principal amount of $74,500. The terms are payable at the date of maturity, December 21, 2017, together with interest of 12% per annum. Interest will be accrued and payable at the time of promissory note repayment. The Holder shall have the right to convert all or any part of the outstanding and unpaid principal amount into fully paid and non-assessable shares of Common Stock at a conversion price equal to the lessor of (i) the closing sale price of the Common Stock on the Principal Market on the Trading Day immediately preceding the Closing Date, and (ii) 50% of the lowest sale price for the Common Stock on the Principal Market during the twenty five (25) consecutive Trading Days immediately preceding the Conversion Date. As of December 31, 2016, this convertible note was still outstanding to be received. In January 2017, the funds from this note were received by the Company and the liability recorded.
On January 3, 2017, the Company entered into an investor relations agreement with Chesapeake Group Inc., to assist the Company in all phases of investor relations including broker/dealer relations. The contract will commence on January 3, 2017 and end on July 2, 2017. In consideration for the agreement, the Company is committed to providing 1,800,000 restricted common shares within 10 days of the agreement, plus an additional 450,000 restricted common shares representing a monthly fee of $3,750. These restricted common shares are to be issued in monthly installments of 75,000 restricted common shares on the 2nd of each month beginning on February 2, 2017 and ending on July 2, 2017.
| 67 |
On January 18, 2017, the Company issued a convertible promissory note in the principal amount of $75,000. The terms are payable at the date of maturity, October 18, 2017, together with interest of 12% per annum. Interest will be accrued and payable at the time of promissory note repayment. The Holder shall have the right to convert all or any part of the outstanding and unpaid principal amount into fully paid and non-assessable shares of Common Stock at a conversion price equal to the lessor of (i) 60% multiplied by the lowest Trading Price (representing a discount rate of 40%) during the previous twenty five (25) Trading Day period ending on the latest complete Trading Day prior to the date of this Note and (ii) the Variable Conversion Price which means 50% multiplied by the lowest Trading Price (representing a discount rate of 50%) during the previous twenty five (25) Trading Day period ending on the latest complete Trading Day prior to the Conversion Date.
On March 15, 2017, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement, pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue 500,000 common shares of the Company at a price of $0.10 per share for aggregate consideration of $50,000.
On April 3, 2017, the Company issued a convertible promissory note in the principal amount of $110,000. The terms are payable at the date of maturity, October 3, 2017, together with interest of 10% per annum. Interest will be accrued and payable at the time of promissory note repayment. In connection with the issuance of this convertible promissory note, the Borrower shall issue 550,000 shares of common stock as a commitment fee provided, however, these shares must be returned if the Note is fully repaid and satisfied prior to the date which is 180 days following the issuance. The Holder shall have the right to convert all or any part of the outstanding and unpaid principal amount into fully paid and non-assessable shares of Common Stock at a conversion price equal to the lessor of (i) 55% multiplied by the lowest Trading Price (representing a discount rate of 45%) during the previous twenty five (25) Trading Day period ending on the latest complete Trading Day prior to the date of this Note and (ii) the Alternate Conversion Price which means 55% multiplied by the lowest Trading Price (representing a discount rate of 50%) during the previous twenty five (25) Trading Day period ending on the latest complete Trading Day prior to the Conversion Date.
On February 15, 2017, DSG TAG has signed an additional six-month extension on the current lease at 214-5455 152nd Avenue, Surrey, BC V3S 5A5. The term will begin on February 1, 2017 and end on July 31, 2017.
| 68 |
|
ITEM 9. | CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE |
None.
| ITEM 9A. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The phrase “disclosure controls and procedures” refers to controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, such as this Annual Report on Form 10-K, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC. Disclosure controls and procedures are also designed to ensure that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer, or CEO, and chief financial officer, or CFO, as appropriate to allow timely decision regarding required disclosure.
Our management, with the participation of our CEO and CFO, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a- 15(e) and 15d- 15(e) under the Exchange Act), as of December 31, 2015, the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Based on such evaluation, our CEO and CFO have concluded that as of December 31, 2015, our disclosure controls and procedures were designed at a reasonable assurance level and were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our CEO and CFO, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Our internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of consolidated financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
Our management, with the participation of our CEO and CFO, has assessed the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015. In making this assessment, our management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013 Framework). Based on this evaluation, our management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2016.
This Annual Report on Form 10-K does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm on our internal control over financial reporting due to an exemption established by the JOBS Act for “emerging growth companies.”
Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting identified in management’s evaluation pursuant to Rules 13a-15(d) or 15d-15(d) of the Exchange Act during the quarter ended December 31, 2016 that materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls and Procedures
In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. In addition, the design of disclosure controls and procedures must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and that management is required to apply judgment in evaluating the benefits of possible controls and procedures relative to their costs.
| ITEM 9B. | OTHER INFORMATION |
None.
| 69 |
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Directors and Executive Officers
The following sets forth information about our director and executive officer as of the date of this report:
| NAME | AGE | POSITION | DATE FIRST ELECTED OR APPOINTED | |||
| Robert Silzer | 70 | Director, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, Treasurer | May 6, 2015 (as President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, and Treasurer) June 16, 2015 (as Director) | |||
| Stephen Johnston | 65 | Director | June 16, 2015 | |||
| James Singerling | 72 | Director | June 16, 2015 | |||
| Kenneth (Kim) Marsh | 63 | Director | June 16, 2015 | |||
| Jason Sugarman | 45 | Director | June 16, 2015 | |||
| Rupert Wainwright | 55 | Director | June 16, 2015 |
Our directors will serve in that capacity until our next annual shareholder meeting or until his successor is elected and qualified. Officers hold their positions at the will of our Board of Directors. There are no arrangements, agreements or understandings between non-management security holders and management under which non-management security holders may directly or indirectly participate in or influence the management of our affairs.
Executive Management
Our executive management team represents a significant depth of experience in biometrics and facial recognition technologies, intelligent security and surveillance, high-growth and technology marketing, and domestic and international sales and business development. The team represents a cross-disciplinary approach to management and business development.
Robert Silzer, Director, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer.
Robert Silzer has over 20 years’ experience in the GPS tracking and fleet solutions industries. He is the founder of DSG TAG Systems Inc. and has served as Chief Executive Officer of DSG TAG since its inception in April, 2008. Mr. Silzer is a product designer who has developed multiple new product concepts and successfully introduced these products to market including the world’s first handheld bingo gaming unit, the first handheld and color handheld GPS golf units and the first Wi-Fi enabled GPS golf business solution. Prior to establishing DSG Tag, Mr Silzer’s designed and a total golf solution that addressed the growing needs in Golf Course management. Through a series of mergers and acquisitions different companies with diversified hardware and software platforms, he founded GPS Industries in 1996, serving as its president, CEO, Chairman and director until 2007. Under his leadership, it became the largest operator of golf GPS systems in the world and with a remarkable 750 golf courses worldwide using the installed system. Prior to founding GPSI, Mr. Silzer founded XGA, an online golf store and website company in 1993. He also founded Advanced Gaming Technology, Inc. in 1992, an electronic gaming company, where he served as Chief Executive Officer until 1998. From 1986 to 1992, Mr. Silzer founded and operated the private company Supercart International. With over 30 years as an entrepreneur in the technology and other markets, Mr. Silzer has developed expertise in taking companies to market, growing start-up business, initial public offerings, raising funds, operations, marketing and international licensing.
| 70 |
Stephen Johnston, Director
Stephen Johnston is the founding Partner of Global Golf Advisors and one of the leading authorities on operational analysis and financial solutions for golf businesses. Steve began his career at the accounting firm of Thorne Gunn/Thorne Riddell in Toronto in 1973. He earned his Chartered Accountant designation while with Thorne Riddell in 1976 and in 1984 was promoted to Partner and given responsibility for major client accounts. His audit experience with major accounts subsequently expanded into real estate, communications and insurance.
When the firm became known as KPMG, Steve continued as an Audit Partner and in 1992 created the KPMG Golf Industry Practice and assumed responsibility as National Director. In 2006 Steve purchased the KPMG Golf Industry Practice and created Global Golf Advisors Inc., bringing with him the entire staff complement and client files to the new firm.
Steve is a graduate of the University of Toronto with a Bachelor of Science degree and business courses complement relevant to his Chartered Accountant designation. Steve’s main focus is developing financial and business solutions for private clubs, public golf courses and resorts, golf communities, investors and lenders. He provides a keen insight for banking and finance solutions arising from his years of advising numerous international financial institutions.
He has completed due diligence and valuation assignments for some of the largest golf-related transactions in North America and has completed multiple market studies to reposition various golf assets. In addition, Steve has been actively involved with workouts/receiverships, providing operational and financial guidance. These assignments typically lead to member buyouts/transitions from developers or to an outright disposition of property. Steve has been recognized as one of the Top Powerbrokers in Canadian Golf by The National Post over the past 15 years.
James Singerling, Director
From 1990 until his retirement in 2015, James Singerling, CCM, served as the CEO of Club Managers Association of America (CMAA), the foremost professional association for managers of membership clubs in the US. In this role Mr. Singerling was credited for elevating the professional role of club managers by creating industry-standard development and certification programs. For over two decades, he spearheaded efforts to adopt the general manager/chief operating officer model at clubs nationwide, raising the qualifications and quality of club managers. Mr. Singerling is also recognized for building new relationships for the industry with federal and state governments and within the association community.
In addition to his work within the U.S., Mr. Singerling was instrumental in the development of professional club management associations internationally, helping other nations elevate the role of club managers by adopting professional standards and certifications. Regions where his leadership is recognized include South America, Australia, China, South Africa and the Asian-Pacific corridor, among others.
Prior to becoming chief executive at CMAA, Mr. Singerling was a leader in the golf course design and management companies of Robert Trent Jones, Sr., and also served as vice president and general manager of the Coral Ridge Country Club in Ft. Lauderdale, FL.
Mr. Singerling has been recognized as Industry Leader of the Year by the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, and Michigan State University, in addition to receiving awards from Florida State University, Pennsylvania State University, Oklahoma State University and Sun Yat Sen University – China. He also was elected to the Association Committee of 100 by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, widely recognized as the most prestigious organization of chief executives in the United States.
| 71 |
Kenneth (Kim) Marsh, Director
Kenneth (Kim) Marsh, CAMS, CFE, has a distinguished record of achievement in the areas of international financial crime and anti-money laundering. As Executive Vice President, International Operations, Kim brings 40 years of investigative experience to IPSA’s corporate, legal, financial, and government clients throughout Europe, the Middle East, Africa, South America and Asia.
Based in IPSA’s Vancouver office, Kim specializes in multi-jurisdictional financial and due diligence investigations, as well as anti-money laundering assignments targeting offshore and onshore tax havens. Prior to joining IPSA, Kim completed 25 years with the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, retiring as Commander of the International Organized Crime Investigation Unit, where he was responsible for large-scale, covert operations in Europe, Asia and North America. While with the RCMP, Kim was posted to the Canadian High Commission, London, UK between 1992-97, which had geographical coverage including the United Kingdom, Ireland, Nordic countries and the Former Soviet Union. During these years he worked closely with Canadian Immigration and Citizenship vetting applicants wishing to enter Canada.
Kim has been with IPSA International since 2002 and is the lead person for the due diligence services. During his tenure with the company he has built the due diligence team in Vancouver and recently completed a secondment to the UK where he orchestrated the opening of offices in London, Dubai and Hong Kong.
Kim has lectured internationally to public and private entities on covert investigative practices and global due diligence. He is a certified member of the Association of Certified Fraud Examiner (CFE), and a former Board of Directors of the UK and Vancouver Chapters of the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE). He is also a member of the Association of Certified Anti Money Laundering Specialists (ACAMS) and currently holds a board position on the Vancouver Chapter.
Jason Sugarman, Director
Jason Sugarman has over 20 years in the finance business with focus on asset back lending and private equity investments. As the founder of two asset management firms and the lead outside investor in numerous financial service companies and real estate projects, he has funded over $1 billion in direct loan and equity placements and is the Sr. VP of Valor Group LTD.
Beginning in 1993.Mr. Sugarman started developing land and single family real estate in Southern California. He was a founder and principal of a successful regional homebuilding and mortgage company from 1994-1999. During the 7-year period Mr. Sugarman was involved with over a dozen subdivision developments as well as developing many condominiums and townhomes. He sold out his interest in the development company to a Lehman Brother financed entity in 1999. In 2000 Mr. Sugarman started an investment firm which specialized in equity joint ventures and turned it into one of the premier mezz-real estate lending funds in the country with peak assets under management exceeding $700mm. Mr. Sugarman oversaw the expansion into new markets (Nevada, Colorado, Hawaii, Texas, Utah, Oregon, Arizona, Florida, and Washington) and the diversification of real estate assets (office, office condo, storage, hotel, condo-hotel, mixed use and agriculture).
In addition to real estate, he also personally sponsored in a number of highly successful early stage investments which have included the founding of BANC OF CALIFORNIA (a $7B bank holding company), COR Securities Holdings (the owner of the largest independent securities clearing company in the US), COR International Towers Inc. (a cell tower developer and manager in Central America), and COR Finance LTD (a company which has both telecom and solar infrastructure assets in Asia).
Mr. Sugarman is the Sr. VP of Valor Group LTD a $5 billion dollar Bermuda Insurance Company, a managing partner of Camden Capital, International Tower Group, and COR Finance LTD. He serves as a director of New Olympia Re, VL Life, DSG TAG, and is an advisor and investor in Ban of California (NASDAQ: BANC), COR Securities Holdings (COR Clearing) and Corum Financial Group.
| 72 |
Mr. Sugarman is on the board of a number of charities with a focus on elementary education, health care research and Jewish causes. He is a Graduate of Stanford University where he was a Scholar Athlete and member of the baseball team. He is married to Elizabeth Guber Sugarman’ and has three children. He is an active golf and tennis player and is a partner in Marucci Sports, the Oklahoma City Dodgers (AAA affiliate of the Los Angeles Dodgers), and the LA Football Club (MLS franchise).
Rupert Wainwright, Director
Since 2005 Rupert Wainwright has served as president and chief creative of Adore Creative, an integrated advertising and creative services agency with offices in London, Paris, Moscow, Sao Paolo, and Los Angeles. There he leads a talented staff and top tier production professionals to create has countless commercial TV awards working with global clients. Adore Creative has built a unparalleled record of winning campaigns for the Olympics, the FIFA World Cup, Reebok, AT&T, Fox Sports One TV, and many, many other clients. They are dedicated to producing innovative and successful creative work winning awards in the U.S. and all over the world including two Grand Effies, a Grammy, MTV Awards and several Cannes Dolphins. They are currently working on the Winter Olympics 2022 campaign.
As a director, Mr. Wainwright has shot all over the world and won awards for such US and International Fortune 500 clients as ATT, Sprint, Honda, Sprite, Walmart, Reebok, Footlocker, Gatorade, McDonalds, Converse, GHI, Hong Kong and Shanghai Bank, Deutsche Telekom, Barilla, BP Disney, Fritos, and his campaign for Reebok won Ad week’s highest Award, the Grand Effie, for the most effective advertising campaign of 1992. Mr. Wainwright is also the director of the feature films “The Fog” (2005), which was #1 at the US Box Office opening weekend, and “Stigmata” (1999) produced by MGM, among others. From 1990 to 1998 he was the founder and CEO of the independent production company, Fragile Films.
Mr. Wainwrights holds an MA in English Literature from the University of Oxford and an MFA in Film Directing from the University of California, Los Angeles where he was a Fullbright Scholar.
Keith Westergaard, former Director
Keith Westergaard has over 40 years’ experience in real estate finance and development. He is the founder and president of Westergaard Holdings Ltd., a diversified mortgage brokerage, real estate investment, and development company with offices in Alberta and British Columbia, Canada. Westergaard Holdings Ltd. has operated continuously since 1980. Its significant projects have included the Gleniffer Lake Resort & Country Club in Central Alberta, a 217-acre bare land condominium recreational & residential land development which included 750 lots, golf course, leisure facilities and marina.
Mr. Keith Westergaard resigned as a Director as of September 30, 2016. His resignation letter was included in the 10Q filing with the SEC filed on December 16, 2016.
Significant Employees
Other than Bob Silzer, we have no full-time employees whose services are materially significant to our business and operations who are employed at will by DSG Global, Inc.
Family Relationships
There are no family relationships among any of our directors or officers.
| 73 |
Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings
To the best of our knowledge, none of our directors or executive officers has, during the past ten years:
| 1. | been convicted in a criminal proceeding or been subject to a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offences); |
| 2. | had any bankruptcy petition filed by or against the business or property of the person, or of any partnership, corporation or business association of which he was a general partner or executive officer, either at the time of the bankruptcy filing or within two years prior to that time; |
| 3. | been subject to any order, judgment, or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction or federal or state authority, permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting, his involvement in any type of business, securities, futures, commodities, investment, banking, savings and loan, or insurance activities, or to be associated with persons engaged in any such activity; |
| 4. | been found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by the SEC or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated a federal or state securities or commodities law, and the judgment has not been reversed, suspended, or vacated; |
| 5. | been the subject of, or a party to, any federal or state judicial or administrative order, judgment, decree, or finding, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated (not including any settlement of a civil proceeding among private litigants), relating to an alleged violation of any federal or state securities or commodities law or regulation, any law or regulation respecting financial institutions or insurance companies including, but not limited to, a temporary or permanent injunction, order of disgorgement or restitution, civil money penalty or temporary or permanent cease-and-desist order, or removal or prohibition order, or any law or regulation prohibiting mail or wire fraud or fraud in connection with any business entity; or |
| 6. | been the subject of, or a party to, any sanction or order, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any self-regulatory organization (as defined in Section 3(a)(26) of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(26))), any registered entity (as defined in Section 1(a)(29) of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 1(a)(29))), or any equivalent exchange, association, entity or organization that has disciplinary authority over its members or persons associated with a member. |
Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires our executive officers and directors and persons who own more than 10% of our common stock to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission initial statements of beneficial ownership, reports of changes in ownership and annual reports concerning their ownership of our common stock and other equity securities, on Forms 3, 4 and 5 respectively. Executive officers, directors and greater than 10% shareholders are required by the SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) reports that they file.
Based solely on our review of the copies of such forms received by us, or written representations from certain reporting persons, we believe that during fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, all filing requirements applicable to our officers, directors and greater than 10% percent beneficial owners were complied with.
Corporate Governance Guidelines, Code of Ethics, and Business Conduct
The Board has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines (the “Guidelines”) to assist it in the exercise of its responsibilities. These Guidelines reflect the Board’s commitment to monitor the effectiveness of policy and decision making both at the Board and at the management level, with a view to enhancing stockholder value over the long term.
We have adopted a written code of ethics and business conduct to provide guidance to all Company’s directors, officers and employees, for each employee, including our including the Company’s principal executive officer, principal accounting officer or controller or persons performing similar functions. The code of ethics is posted on our website at www.dsgtag.com. If we make certain amendments to or waivers of our code of ethics, we intend to satisfy the SEC disclosure requirements by promptly posting the amendment or waiver on our website.
| 74 |
Audit Committee and Audit Committee Financial Expert
Our board of directors has determined that it does not have a member of its audit committee that qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined in Item 407(d)(5)(ii) of Regulation S-K, and is “independent” as the term is used in Item 7(d)(3)(iv) of Schedule 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
We believe that our board of directors is capable of analyzing and evaluating our financial statements and understanding internal controls and procedures for financial reporting. We believe that retaining an independent director who would qualify as an “audit committee financial expert” would be overly costly and burdensome and is not warranted in our circumstances given the early stages of our development and the fact that we have not generated any material revenues to date. In addition, we currently do not have nominating, compensation or audit committees or committees performing similar functions nor do we have a written nominating, compensation or audit committee charter. Our sole director does not believe that it is necessary to have such committees because believes the functions of such committees can be adequately performed by the sole member of our board of directors.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Summary Compensation Table — Fiscal Years of DSG Global Inc. Years Ended December 31, 2016 & 2015
The particulars of the compensation paid to the following persons:
| (a) | our principal executive officer; |
| (b) | our principal financial officer; |
| (c) | each of our three most highly compensated executive officers who were serving as executive officers at the end of the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015; and |
| (d) | up to two additional individuals for whom disclosure would have been provided under (c) but for the fact that the individual was not serving as our executive officer at the end of the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, |
who we will collectively refer to as the named executive officers of our company, are set out in the following summary compensation table, except that no disclosure is provided for any named executive officer, other than our principal executive officers, whose total compensation did not exceed $100,000 for the respective fiscal year:
| 75 |
| EXECUTIVE SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE | ||||||||||||||||||
Name and principal position | Year | Salary ($) | Bonus ($) | Stock Awards ($) | Option Awards ($) | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($) | Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($) | All Other Compensation ($) | Total ($) | |||||||||
| Robert Silzer, Director, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, Treasurer | 2016
2015 | 200,000
136,404 | Nil
Nil | Nil
Nil | Nil
Nil | Nil
Nil | Nil
Nil | Nil
11,788 | 200,000 148,192 | |||||||||
| Andrea
Fehsenfeld, Former sole officer and Director | 2016
2015 | Nil
Nil | Nil
Nil | Nil
Nil | Nil
Nil | Nil
Nil | Nil
Nil | Nil
Nil | Nil
Nil | |||||||||
As of December 31, 2016, we had no employment agreements with any of our executive officers or employees.
Summary of Employment Agreements and Material Terms
We have not entered into any employment or consulting agreements with any of our current officers, directors or employees.
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 of DSG Global, Inc.
For the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, no director or executive officer of DSG Global, Inc. has received compensation from us pursuant to any compensatory or benefit plan. There is no plan or understanding, express or implied, to pay any compensation to any director or executive officer pursuant to any compensatory or benefit plan, although we anticipate that we will compensate our officers and directors for services to us with stock or options to purchase stock, in lieu of cash.
| 76 |
Compensation of Directors
The particulars of the compensation paid to each of our director during our fiscal years ended December 31, 2016 are set out in the following summary compensation table, except that no disclosure is provided for any director who’s also a named executive officer and whose compensation is fully reflected in the above Executive Summary Compensation Table:
| DIRECTOR COMPENSATION TABLE | ||||||||||||||||||
Name and principal position | Year | Salary ($) | Bonus ($) | Stock Awards ($) | Option Awards ($) | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($) | Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($) | All Other Compensation ($) | Total ($) | |||||||||
| Stephen Johnston, Director(1) | 2016
2015 | Nil
Nil | Nil
Nil | Nil
Nil | Nil
Nil | Nil
Nil | Nil
Nil | Nil
Nil | Nil
Nil | |||||||||
| James Singerling, Director (1) | 2016
2015 | Nil
Nil | Nil
Nil | Nil
Nil | Nil
Nil | Nil
Nil | Nil
Nil | Nil
Nil | Nil
Nil | |||||||||
| Kim Marsh, Director (1) | 2016
2015 | Nil
Nil | Nil
Nil | Nil
Nil | Nil
Nil | Nil
Nil | Nil
Nil | Nil
Nil | Nil
Nil | |||||||||
| Jason Sugarman, Director (1) | 2016
2015 | Nil
Nil | Nil
Nil | Nil
Nil | Nil
Nil | Nil
Nil | Nil
Nil | Nil
Nil | Nil
Nil | |||||||||
| Rupert Wainwright, Director (1) | 2016
2015 | Nil
Nil | Nil
Nil | Nil
Nil | Nil
Nil | Nil
Nil | Nil
Nil | Nil 297,500(2) | Nil
297,500 | |||||||||
| Keith Westergaard, Director (3) | 2016
2015 | Nil
Nil | Nil
Nil | Nil
Nil | Nil
Nil | Nil
Nil | Nil
Nil | Nil
Nil | Nil
Nil | |||||||||
| (1) | Appointed as a Director on June 16, 2015 | |
| (2) | Consists of $17,500 in cash paid and $280,000 of the convertible note payable that was expensed on the financial statements for marketing and advertising services provided by Adore Creative, a company owned by Mr. Wainwright. | |
| (3) | Resigned as of September 30, 2016 |
| ITEM 12. | SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS |
The following table sets forth information regarding beneficial ownership of our common stock as of December 31, 2016 (i) by each person who is known by us to beneficially own more than 5% of our common stock; (ii) by each of our officers and directors; and (iii) by all of our officers and directors as a group.
| 77 |
| Name and Address of Beneficial Owner | Office, If Any | Title of Class | Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership (1) | Percent of Class (2) | ||||||||
| Officers and Directors | ||||||||||||
| Robert
Silzer 214 - 5455 152nd Street Surrey, British Columbia, Canada V3S 5A5 | Director, president, chief executive officer, chief financial officer, secretary and treasurer | Common Stock | 8,070,285 | 26.64 | % | |||||||
| Keith
Westergaard 214 - 5455 152nd Street Surrey, British Columbia, Canada V3S 5A5 | Former Director | Common Stock | 3,248,662 | (3) | 10.72 | % | ||||||
| Jason
Sugarman 214 - 5455 152nd Street Surrey, British Columbia, Canada V3S 5A5 | Director | Common Stock | (4 | ) | (4 | ) | ||||||
| Rupert
Wainwright 214 - 5455 152nd Street Surrey, British Columbia, Canada V3S 5A5 | Director | Common Stock | (4 | ) | (4 | ) | ||||||
| Stephen
Johnston 214 - 5455 152nd Street Surrey, British Columbia, Canada V3S 5A5 | Director | Common Stock | (4 | ) | (4 | ) | ||||||
| James
Singerling 214 - 5455 152nd Street Surrey, British Columbia, Canada V3S 5A5 | Director | Common Stock | (4 | ) | (4 | ) | ||||||
| Kim
March 214 - 5455 152nd Street Surrey, British Columbia, Canada V3S 5A5 | Director | Common Stock | (4 | ) | (4 | ) | ||||||
| All officers and directors as a group | Common stock, $0.001 par value | 11,318,947 | 37.38 | % | ||||||||
| 5%+ Security Holders | ||||||||||||
| n/a | n/a | Common Stock | n/a | n/a | ||||||||
| All 5%+ Security Holders | Common stock, $0.001 par value | n/a | n/a | |||||||||
| (1) | Under Rule 13d-3, a beneficial owner of a security includes any person who, directly or indirectly, through any contract, arrangement, understanding, relationship, or otherwise has or shares: (i) voting power, which includes the power to vote, or to direct the voting of shares; and (ii) investment power, which includes the power to dispose or direct the disposition of shares. Certain shares may be deemed to be beneficially owned by more than one person (if, for example, persons share the power to vote or the power to dispose of the shares).In addition, shares are deemed to be beneficially owned by a person if the person has the right to acquire the shares (for example, upon exercise of an option) within 60 days of the date as of which the information is provided .In computing the percentage ownership of any person, the amount of shares outstanding is deemed to include the amount of shares beneficially owned by such person (and only such person) by reason of these acquisition rights.
|
| (2) | Percentages are based on 30,291,187 shares of our company’s common stock issued and outstanding as of the date of this report there were. |
| (3) | The 3,248,632 common shares are held by Westergaard Holdings Ltd. Keith Westergaard has voting and dispositive control over securities held by Westergaard Holdings Ltd. |
| (4) | Less than 1%. |
| 78 |
| ITEM 13. | CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE |
Transactions with Related Persons of DSG Global Inc.
Except as disclosed herein, no director, executive officer, shareholder holding at least 5% of shares of our common stock, or any family member thereof, had any material interest, direct or indirect, in any transaction, or proposed transaction since the year ended December 31, 2016, in which the amount involved in the transaction exceeded or exceeds the lesser of $120,000 or one percent of the average of our total assets at the year-end for the last three completed fiscal years.
As at December 31, 2016, we had advanced an aggregate amount of $(1,526) to our Director and sole officer, Robert Silzer. The amounts are repayable on demand.
On September 26, 2014 DSG TAG entered into a Subscription and Debt Settlement Agreement (as amended on October 7, 2014) whereby Westergaard Holdings Ltd., a corporation owned and controlled by our current director Keith Westergaard, purchased: (i) 4,229,384 Series A Preferred Shares of DSG TAG at a deemed price of $1.25 per share in consideration for the settlement of $5,386,730.50 in debt payable to Westergaard Holdings; and (ii) 2,001,735 common shares of DSG TAG at a deemed price of 0.25 per share in consideration of $2,502,168.23 in interest and expenses accrued in respect of the debt. Until such time as all Series A Shares have been redeemed by DSG TAG Westergaard Holdings may convert any or all of its remaining Series A Shares and accrued interest into common shares of DSG Global at $1.25 per share.
Pursuant to the Agreement, DSG Tag agreed to complete a going public transaction by share exchange within 60 days of the Agreement, and a private placement financing of not less than $5,000,000 in gross proceeds within 60 days of going public., the Company and/or Pubco shall have completed a financing for gross proceeds of at least $5,000.000. DSG Tag agreed to pay $2,500,000 of the financing proceeds to Westergaard Holdings to redeem 2,000,000 of the Series A Preferred Shares at the deemed redemption price of $1.25 per share. DSG TAG further agreed to raise additional gross proceeds of $5,000,000 and to redeem an additional 2,000,000 Series A Preferred Shares from Westergaard Holdings (at a redemption price of $1.25 per share or $2,500,000 in the aggregate). within 150 days following the going public transaction. Subsequent to the Agreement, DSG TAG completed its going public transaction on May 6, 2015 but did not raise sufficient capital to redeem the Series A Preferred Shares. The Subscription and Debt Settlement Agreement was subsequently amended by letter of agreement dated December 31, 2015, as described below.
On March 5, 2016, by letter agreement dated December 31, 2015 with Westergaard Holdings Ltd., a corporation owned by our Director Keith Westergaard, we amended the Subscription and Debt Settlement Agreement dated September 26, 2014 between DSG Tag Systems, Inc. and Westergaard Holdings, as previously amended on October 4, 2015. Westergaard Holdings owns 4,229,384 shares Series A Convertible Preferred Stock of DSG TAG. Pursuant to the settlement agreement, the parties have agreed that DSG Global will complete financings for gross proceeds of at least $10 million and use a portion of the proceeds to redeem all of the Series A Convertible Preferred Shares. The letter agreement modifies the redemption provisions of the original agreement, which now obligate us to raise capital and redeem the Series A Convertible Preferred Shares at a price of $1.25 per share as follows: (i) on or before May 1, 2016, DSG Global must complete a financing for gross proceeds of at least $2.5 million and use at least $1.125 million to redeem a minimum of 900,000 Series A Shares; (ii) on or before June 1, 2016, t DSG Global must complete an additional financing for gross proceeds of at least $2.5 million and use at least $1.125 million to redeem a minimum of 900,000 additional Series A Shares; and (iii) on or before July 1, 2016, DSG Global must complete an additional financing for gross proceeds of at least $5.0 million and use at least $3.04 million to redeem the remaining 2,429,384 Series A Shares.
| 79 |
On March 31, 2015, DSG entered into an agreement with Adore Creative Agency Inc., a corporation owned by our director Rupert Wainwright pursuant to which Adore will provide marketing services to DSG. The terms included cash payment of $17,500 and a note in the amount of $310,000, with 5% interest per annum, convertible at the election of the holder into 248,000 common shares in the capital stock of DSG Global, Inc. at a price of $1.25 per share, maturing on March 30, 2016. As of December 31, 2015, approximately 90% of the marketing services have been expensed in the amount of $280,000 and the remaining $30,000 is recorded as a prepaid deposit. Marketing services to date have not been completed.
On April 6, 2016, DSG TAG entered into a loan agreement with Westergaard Holdings Ltd. a corporation owned by our director Keith Westergaard, pursuant to which we raised proceeds of $120,000 CAD. DSG TAG agrees to pay the loan plus fees no later than the final due date of July 6, 2016. The fees for service are as follows: (a) DSG TAG agrees to pay a fee for service equal to 5% of the amount of the loan or $6,000 CAD if the loan is paid in full, including fees on or before May 6, 2016; (b) DSG TAG agrees to pay a fee for service equal to 10% of the amount of the original loan, or $12,000 CAD if the loan is paid in full, including fees, between May 7, 2016 and June 5, 2016; and (c) DSG TAG agrees to pay a fee for service equal to 20% of the amount of the original loan, or $24,000 CAD if the loan is paid full, including fees, between June 6, 2016 and July 5, 2016. DSG TAG agrees to pay partial payments towards the principal amount of the loan and fees. DSG TAG agrees that fees will be charged on the initial amount of the loan.
On December 16, 2016, a convertible loan was received Brent Silzer, in the amount of $29,791 (CAD $40,000). Interest is 8% annual rate for one month and 4% monthly rate thereafter if not paid by January 15, 2017. The note is convertible at $0.05 per share.
Promoters and Certain Control Persons
We did not have any promoters at any time during the past five fiscal years.
Director Independence
We currently act with six (6) directors consisting of Robert Silzer, Jason Sugarman, Rupert Wainwright, Stephen Johnston, James Singerling and Kim March. We have not made any determination as to whether any of our directors are independent directors, as that term is used in Rule 4200(a) (15) of the Rules of National Association of Securities Dealers.
| 80 |
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
Audit Fees, Audit Related Fees, and All Other Fees
The following represents fees for professional services rendered by our independent registered public accounting firm (Lichter, Yu and Associates) for each of the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.
| Lichter, Yu and Associates | ||||||||
| 2016 | 2015 | |||||||
| Audit Fees | $ | 76,762 | $ | 54,000 | ||||
| Audit Related Fees (1) | Nil | Nil | ||||||
| Tax Fees (2) | 2,500 | 9,152 | ||||||
| All Other Fees (3) | 1,000 | 3,813 | ||||||
| Total | $ | 80,262 | $ | 66,965 | ||||
| (1) | Travel expenses due for audit work |
| (2) | United States tax return and filing fees from Sept 2007 to Sept 2014 for DSG Global Inc, formerly own as Boreal Ltd and for 2015 year end. |
| (3) | Filing application fee for the Canadian Public Accountability Board (CPAB), & time spent on filing 8-K related to reverse merger of DSG Global Inc. & DSG Tag Systems Inc. |
Lichter, Yu and Associates has served as our independent registered public accounting firm since September 2014.
The following represents fees for professional services rendered by a previous independent registered public accounting firm, Harris & Gillespie CPA’s PLLC, for the years ended 2016 and 2014. These represent audit fees paid for DSG Global Inc., formerly own as Boreal Ltd prior to the merger in May 6, 2015. Changes in registrant’s certifying accountant was filed as an 8-K on August 3, 2015.
| Harris & Gillespie CPA’s PLLC | ||||||||
| 2016 | 2015 | |||||||
| Audit Fees | $ | Nil | $ | 5,900 | ||||
| Total | $ | Nil | $ | 5,900 | ||||
Tax Fees
The following represents fees for the professional services rendered by our independent Canadian tax accounting firm (J.K.C. Fraser, CPA, CA) for each of the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.
| J.K.C. Fraser, CPA, CA | ||||||||
| 2016 | 2015 | |||||||
| Tax Fees (1) | $ | 396 | $ | 1,564 | ||||
| Total | $ | 396 | $ | 1,564 | ||||
| (1) | This represents tax return and filings for 2014 for DSG Tag Systems Inc., Canadian tax filing requirements. The fees are $2,000 CAD, the above amount has been converted to USD. |
The following represents fees for the professional services rendered by our independent United Kingdom tax accounting firm (Ascot Sinclair Associates Ltd.) for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.
| Ascot Sinclair Associates Ltd. | ||||||||
| 2016 | 2015 | |||||||
| Tax Fees (1) | $ | Nil | $ | 5,216 | ||||
| Total | $ | Nil | $ | 5,216 | ||||
| (1) | This represents tax return and filings for 2013 & 2014 for DSG Tag Systems International Ltd., United Kingdom tax filing requirements. The fees are £3,413 BPS, the above amount has been converted to USD. |
| 81 |
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
| We have filed the following documents as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K: | ||
| 1. | Consolidated Financial Statements | |
| Our consolidated financial statements are listed in the “Index to Consolidated Financial Statements” under Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. | ||
| 2. | Financial Statement Schedules | |
| All schedules have been omitted because they are not required, not applicable, not present in amounts sufficient to require submission of the schedule, or the required information is otherwise included in our consolidated financial statements and related notes. | ||
| 3. | Exhibits | |
| See the Exhibit Index immediately following the signature pages of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. | ||
| 82 |
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| Dated: April 28, 2017 | DSG Global Inc. | |
| By: | /s/ Robert Silzer | |
Robert Silzer Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) | ||
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Robert Silzer as his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution for him, and in his name in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and to file the same, with exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorney-in-fact and agent, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done therewith, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact and agent, or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
| Signature | Title | Date | ||
| /s/ Robert Silzer | Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chairman of the | April 28, 2017 | ||
| Robert Silzer | Board of Directors (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|||
| /s/ Stephen Johnston | Director | April 28, 2017 | ||
| Stephen Johnston | ||||
| /s/ Kenneth Marsh | Director | April 28, 2017 | ||
| Kenneth Marsh | ||||
| /s/ James Singerling | Director | April 28, 2017 | ||
| James Singerling | ||||
| /s/ Jason Sugarman | Director | April 28, 2017 | ||
| Jason Sugarman | ||||
| /s/ Rupert Wainwright | Director | April 28, 2017 | ||
| Rupert Wainwright |
| S-1 |
EXHIBIT INDEX
| Exhibit | Filed | |||||||||
| Number | Exhibit Description | Form | Exhibit | Filing Date | Herewith | |||||
| 3.1.1 | Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant | SB-2 | 3.1 | 10-22-07 | ||||||
| 3.1.2 | Certificate of Change of the Registrant | 8-K | 3.1 | 06-24-08 | ||||||
| 3.1.3 | Articles of Merger of the Registrant | 8-K | 3.1 | 02-23-15 | ||||||
| 3.1.4 | Certificate of Change of the Registrant | 8-K | 3.2 | 02-23-15 | ||||||
| 3.1.5 | Certificate of Correction of the Registrant | 8-K | 3.3 | 02-23-15 | ||||||
| 3.2.1 | Bylaws of the Registrant | SB-2 | 3.2 | 10-22-07 | ||||||
| 3.2.2 | Amendment No. 1 to Bylaws of the Registrant | 8-K | 3.2 | 06-19-15 | ||||||
| 4.1 | Form of the Registrant’s common stock certificate | X | ||||||||
| 4.1.2 | DSG Global, Inc. 2015 Omnibus Incentive Plan | 10-Q | 10.3 | 11-13-15 | ||||||
| 10.1.1 | Subscription Agreement / Debt Settlement, dated September 26, 2014, between DSG TAG Systems Inc. and Westergaard Holdings Ltd. | 8-K | 10.1 | 08-17-15 | ||||||
| 10.1.2 | Addendum to Subscription Agreement / Debt Settlement, dated October 7, 2014, between DSG TAG Systems Inc. and Westergaard Holdings Ltd. | 8-K | 10.2 | 08-17-15 | ||||||
| 10.1.3 | Second Addendum to Subscription Agreement / Debt Settlement, dated April 29, 2015, between DSG TAG Systems Inc. and Westergaard Holdings Ltd. | 8-K | 10.3 | 08-17-15 | ||||||
| 10.1.4 | Third Addendum to Subscription Agreement / Debt Settlement, dated August 11, 2015, between DSG TAG Systems Inc. and Westergaard Holdings Ltd. | 8-K | 10.4 | 08-17-15 | ||||||
| 10.1.5 | Letter from Westergaard Holdings Ltd., dated September 1, 2015, extending dates of redemption obligations.
|
8-K | 10.1 | 09-08-15 |
| EX-1 |
| Exhibit | Filed | |||||||||
| Number | Exhibit Description | Form | Exhibit | Filing Date | Herewith |
| 10.1.6 | Letter from Westergaard Holdings Ltd., dated November 10, 2015, extending dates of redemption obligations | 10-Q | 10.1 | 11-13-15 | ||||||
| 10.1.7 | Letter fromWestergaard Holdings Ltd., dated December 31, 2015, extending dates of redemption obligations | 8-K | 10.1 | 03-09-16 | ||||||
| 10.2 | Convertible Note of DSG TAG Systems Inc., dated March 31, 2015, payable to Adore Creative Agency, Inc. | 8-K | 10.5 | 08-14-15 | ||||||
| 10.3 | Convertible Note Agreement, dated August 25, 2015, between the Registrant and Jerry Katell, Katell Productions, LLC and Katell Properties, LLC | 10-Q | 10.2 | 11-13-15 | ||||||
| 10.4 | Agreement (TAG Touch) dated February 15, 2014 between DSG TAG Systems Inc. and DSG Canadian Manufacturing Corp. | 8-K | 10.1 | 05-06-15 | ||||||
| 10.5 | Loan agreement, dated October 24, 2014 between DSG TAG Systems Inc. and A.Bosa & Co (Kootenay) Ltd. | X | ||||||||
| 10.6 | Lease agreement (Modified), dated January 21, 2016 and February 1, 2016 between DSG TAG Systems Inc. and Benchmark Group | X | ||||||||
| 10.7 | Loan agreement, dated February 11, 2016 between DSG TAG Systems Inc. and Jeremy Yaseniuk | X | ||||||||
| 10.8 | Loan agreement, dated March 31, 2016 between DSG TAG Systems Inc. and E. Gary Risler | X | ||||||||
| 21 | List of Subsidiary: |
|||||||||
| 21.1 | DSG Tag Systems Inc. (Nevada) (100%) | |||||||||
| 21.2 | DSG Tag Systems International Ltd. (United Kingdom) (100%) |
| EX-2 |
| Exhibit | Filed | |||||||||
| Number | Exhibit Description | Form | Exhibit | Filing Date | Herewith |
| 31.1 | Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | X | ||||||||
| 32.1# | Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | X | ||||||||
| 101* | Interactive Data File | |||||||||
| 101.INS | XBRL Instance Document | X | ||||||||
| 101.SCH | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document | X | ||||||||
| 101.CAL | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document | X | ||||||||
| 101.DEF | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document | X | ||||||||
| 101.LAB | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document | X | ||||||||
| 101.PRE | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document | X |
*
| #* | The information in this exhibit is furnished and deemed not filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for purposes of section 18 of the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of DSG Global Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing. |
| EX-3 |