XML 32 R2.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.26.1
Pay vs Performance Disclosure
2 Months Ended 10 Months Ended 12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2025
Oct. 27, 2025
Dec. 31, 2026
Dec. 31, 2025
USD ($)
Dec. 31, 2024
USD ($)
Dec. 31, 2023
USD ($)
Dec. 31, 2022
USD ($)
Dec. 31, 2021
USD ($)
Pay vs Performance Disclosure                
Pay vs Performance Disclosure, Table      
Year
Summary Compen-sation Table Total for Kurt Sievers
($)1
Compen-
sation Actually Paid to Kurt Sievers
($)1,2
Summary Compen-sation Table Total for Rafael Sotomayor
($)1
Compen-
sation Actually Paid to Rafael Sotomayor
($)1,2
Average Summary Compen-
sation Table Total for Non-PEO NEOs ($)1
Average Compen-
sation Actually Paid to Non-PEO NEOs ($)1,2
Value of initial fixed $100 investment based on:3
Net Income
($ in millions)
Revenue
($ in millions)
Non-GAAP Gross Margin4
Company TSR ($)Philadelphia Sox Index TSR ($)
20253,341,713 (8,561,293)14,736,019 12,209,362 4,346,546 2,343,477 148.94 268.22 2,021 12,270 56.8%
202420,694,772 4,565,906 — — 4,326,009 1,552,410 177.19 287.31 2,510 12,614 58.1%
202321,123,742 47,273,053 — — 4,217,705 8,167,390 192.49 238.72 2,797 13,276 58.5%
202220,771,851 4,693,294 — — 3,969,488 2,053,189 129.76 142.94 2,787 13,205 57.9%
202120,911,892 43,710,558 — — 3,649,332 8,137,948 183.30 219.51 1,871 11,063 56.1%
       
Company Selected Measure Name     Revenue          
Named Executive Officers, Footnote       For fiscal year 2025 Kurt Sievers served as our PEO through October 27, 2025. Rafael Sotomayor was appointed as our PEO on October 28, 2025 and has served as our PEO since that date. The Non-PEO NEOs for whom the average compensation is presented in this table are: (i) for fiscal year 2021, Peter Kelly, William Betz, Andrew Micallef, Steven Owen and Jennifer Wuamett; and (ii) for fiscal years 2022, 2023, 2024 and 2025, William Betz, Christopher Jensen, Andrew Micallef and Jennifer Wuamett.        
Peer Group Issuers, Footnote       The Peer Group Total Shareholder Return ("TSR") set forth in this table utilizes the Philadelphia Stock Exchange Semiconductor Index (“Philadelphia Sox Index”), which we also utilize in the stock performance graph in our Annual Report on Form 10-K. The comparison assumes $100 was invested for the period starting December 31, 2020 through the last trading day of the reporting year in the Company and in the Philadelphia Sox Index, respectively, assuming the reinvestment of any dividends. Historical stock performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock performance.        
Adjustment To PEO Compensation, Footnote       The amounts shown as Compensation Actually Paid have been calculated in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S‑K and do not reflect compensation actually realized or received by a PEO or the other NEOs. Mr. Sievers is the only NEO who has participated in a pension during the reporting years. The amounts shown as Compensation Actually Paid reflect total compensation as set forth in the Summary Compensation Table ("SCT") for each year, adjusted as required. The following table details those adjustments for 2025.
YearSummary Compen-
sation Table Total ($)
Grant Date
 Fair Value of Equity
Awards Granted
During Applicable
Year from SCT ($)
( — )
Year-End Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted During Applicable Year ($)
 ( + )
Change in Fair Value as of Year-End of Any Prior Year Awards that Remain Unvested as of Year-End ($)
( + )
Change in Fair Value as of the Vesting Date of Any Prior Year Awards that Vested During Applicable Year ($)
( + )
Change in Pension Value for the Applicable Year from SCT ($)
( — )
 Pension Service Costs Attributable to the Applicable Year ($)
( + )
Compensation Actually Paid ($)
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)(g)(h)(i)(j)
2025Kurt Sievers (PEO)3,341,713 — — (10,304,602)(592,180)1,006,223 — (8,561,293)
2025Rafael Sotomayor (PEO)14,736,019 13,383,486 13,025,275 (2,080,728)(87,718)— — 12,209,362 
2025Average Non-PEO NEO4,346,546 3,560,101 3,558,308 (1,907,979)(93,297)— — 2,343,477 
For the equity values included in the above tables, the valuation assumptions used to calculate fair values did not materially differ from those disclosed at the time of the grant. Equity values are calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. PSU awards outstanding as of December 31 of the reporting year have been valued using a Monte Carlo simulation. RSU awards outstanding as of December 31 of the reporting year have been valued using the value date closing stock price discounted for future dividend payments. The fair values as of the vesting date are calculated using the closing share price on the day prior to the vesting date. No dividends or dividend equivalents are paid or earned on unvested equity awards and no equity awards were granted and vested in the same year.
       
Non-PEO NEO Average Total Compensation Amount       $ 4,346,546 $ 4,326,009 $ 4,217,705 $ 3,969,488 $ 3,649,332
Non-PEO NEO Average Compensation Actually Paid Amount       $ 2,343,477 1,552,410 8,167,390 2,053,189 8,137,948
Adjustment to Non-PEO NEO Compensation Footnote       The amounts shown as Compensation Actually Paid have been calculated in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S‑K and do not reflect compensation actually realized or received by a PEO or the other NEOs. Mr. Sievers is the only NEO who has participated in a pension during the reporting years. The amounts shown as Compensation Actually Paid reflect total compensation as set forth in the Summary Compensation Table ("SCT") for each year, adjusted as required. The following table details those adjustments for 2025.
YearSummary Compen-
sation Table Total ($)
Grant Date
 Fair Value of Equity
Awards Granted
During Applicable
Year from SCT ($)
( — )
Year-End Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted During Applicable Year ($)
 ( + )
Change in Fair Value as of Year-End of Any Prior Year Awards that Remain Unvested as of Year-End ($)
( + )
Change in Fair Value as of the Vesting Date of Any Prior Year Awards that Vested During Applicable Year ($)
( + )
Change in Pension Value for the Applicable Year from SCT ($)
( — )
 Pension Service Costs Attributable to the Applicable Year ($)
( + )
Compensation Actually Paid ($)
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)(g)(h)(i)(j)
2025Kurt Sievers (PEO)3,341,713 — — (10,304,602)(592,180)1,006,223 — (8,561,293)
2025Rafael Sotomayor (PEO)14,736,019 13,383,486 13,025,275 (2,080,728)(87,718)— — 12,209,362 
2025Average Non-PEO NEO4,346,546 3,560,101 3,558,308 (1,907,979)(93,297)— — 2,343,477 
For the equity values included in the above tables, the valuation assumptions used to calculate fair values did not materially differ from those disclosed at the time of the grant. Equity values are calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. PSU awards outstanding as of December 31 of the reporting year have been valued using a Monte Carlo simulation. RSU awards outstanding as of December 31 of the reporting year have been valued using the value date closing stock price discounted for future dividend payments. The fair values as of the vesting date are calculated using the closing share price on the day prior to the vesting date. No dividends or dividend equivalents are paid or earned on unvested equity awards and no equity awards were granted and vested in the same year.
       
Compensation Actually Paid vs. Total Shareholder Return      
4595
       
Compensation Actually Paid vs. Net Income      
4598
       
Compensation Actually Paid vs. Company Selected Measure      
46034604
Kurt Sievers’ Compensation Actually Paid (CAP) for 2025 is negative and, as a result, is not reflected in the 2025 columns of the “Compensation Actually Paid” tables above.
       
Total Shareholder Return Vs Peer Group      
4595
       
Tabular List, Table      
Three-Year Relative Total Shareholder Return*
Revenue
Non-GAAP Gross Margin
Sustainability Goals Used in the Annual Incentive Plan Non-Financial Scorecard
       
Total Shareholder Return Amount       $ 148.94 177.19 192.49 129.76 183.30
Peer Group Total Shareholder Return Amount       268.22 287.31 238.72 142.94 219.51
Net Income (Loss)       $ 2,021,000,000 $ 2,510,000,000 $ 2,797,000,000 $ 2,787,000,000 $ 1,871,000,000
Company Selected Measure Amount       12,270,000,000 12,614,000,000 13,276,000,000 13,205,000,000 11,063,000,000
Additional 402(v) Disclosure    
*The SEC has provided guidance that multi-year performance measures cannot be used as the Company's selected measure included in the table; however because it is an important part of our compensation program we have listed it here.
In accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, which was adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission in 2022 pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, we are providing the following disclosure regarding executive compensation versus Company performance for the fiscal years listed below. The amounts in the table below are calculated in accordance with SEC rules and do not represent amounts actually earned or realized by NEOs.
Relationship Between Performance Measures and Compensation Actually Paid
Below are graphic representations that help illustrate the relationship between 'compensation actually paid' ("CAP") and the financial measures in the table above as well as the relationship of NXP’s TSR and the TSR of the Philadelphia SOX Index as well as the S&P 500 Index as a supplemental measure. CAP, as required under SEC rules, reflects adjusted values to unvested and vested equity awards during the years shown in the table based on year-end stock prices, various accounting valuation assumptions, and projected performance modifiers but does not reflect actual amounts paid out for those awards. Because our NEO compensation is heavily weighted on equity, specifically performance-based equity, the largest determinants of CAP are year over year changes in NXP’s stock price, realized achievement on PSUs awards that vested during the reporting year and projected PSU realizations on the unvested PSU awards in the form of Monte Carlo valuations.
       
Measure:: 1                
Pay vs Performance Disclosure                
Name     Three-Year Relative Total Shareholder Return*          
Measure:: 2                
Pay vs Performance Disclosure                
Name     Revenue          
Measure:: 3                
Pay vs Performance Disclosure                
Compensation Actually Paid vs. Other Measure      
46034604
Kurt Sievers’ Compensation Actually Paid (CAP) for 2025 is negative and, as a result, is not reflected in the 2025 columns of the “Compensation Actually Paid” tables above.
       
Other Performance Measure, Amount       0.568 0.581 0.585 0.579 0.561
Name     Non-GAAP Gross Margin          
Non-GAAP Measure Description       Non-GAAP Gross Margin is a non-GAAP financial measure. We calculate Non-GAAP Gross Margin by adjusting Gross Margin to exclude the effects of purchase price accounting, restructuring, stock-based compensation, merger-related costs, and other incidentals. These measures should not be considered as a substitute for, or superior to, the measures of financial performance prepared in accordance with GAAP. Appendix A to this Proxy Statement quantifies and reconciles this measure to the comparable US GAAP financial measure.        
Measure:: 4                
Pay vs Performance Disclosure                
Name     Sustainability Goals Used in the Annual Incentive Plan Non-Financial Scorecard          
Aggregate Change in Present Value of Accumulated Benefit for All Pension Plans Reported in Summary Compensation Table                
Pay vs Performance Disclosure                
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount       $ 0        
Aggregate Pension Adjustments Service Cost                
Pay vs Performance Disclosure                
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount       0        
Aggregate Grant Date Fair Value of Equity Award Amounts Reported in Summary Compensation Table                
Pay vs Performance Disclosure                
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount       3,560,101        
Equity Awards Adjustments, Excluding Value Reported in Compensation Table                
Pay vs Performance Disclosure                
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount       3,558,308        
Year-end Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Covered Year that are Outstanding and Unvested                
Pay vs Performance Disclosure                
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount       (1,907,979)        
Year-over-Year Change in Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Prior Years That are Outstanding and Unvested                
Pay vs Performance Disclosure                
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount       (93,297)        
Kurt Sievers [Member]                
Pay vs Performance Disclosure                
PEO Total Compensation Amount       3,341,713 $ 20,694,772 $ 21,123,742 $ 20,771,851 $ 20,911,892
PEO Actually Paid Compensation Amount       (8,561,293) $ 4,565,906 $ 47,273,053 $ 4,693,294 $ 43,710,558
PEO Name   Kurt Sievers     Kurt Sievers Kurt Sievers Kurt Sievers Kurt Sievers
Kurt Sievers [Member] | Aggregate Change in Present Value of Accumulated Benefit for All Pension Plans Reported in Summary Compensation Table                
Pay vs Performance Disclosure                
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount       1,006,223        
Kurt Sievers [Member] | Aggregate Pension Adjustments Service Cost                
Pay vs Performance Disclosure                
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount       0        
Kurt Sievers [Member] | Aggregate Grant Date Fair Value of Equity Award Amounts Reported in Summary Compensation Table                
Pay vs Performance Disclosure                
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount       0        
Kurt Sievers [Member] | Equity Awards Adjustments, Excluding Value Reported in Compensation Table                
Pay vs Performance Disclosure                
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount       0        
Kurt Sievers [Member] | Year-end Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Covered Year that are Outstanding and Unvested                
Pay vs Performance Disclosure                
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount       (10,304,602)        
Kurt Sievers [Member] | Year-over-Year Change in Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Prior Years That are Outstanding and Unvested                
Pay vs Performance Disclosure                
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount       (592,180)        
Rafale Sotomayor [Member]                
Pay vs Performance Disclosure                
PEO Total Compensation Amount       14,736,019 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
PEO Actually Paid Compensation Amount       12,209,362 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
PEO Name Rafael Sotomayor              
Rafale Sotomayor [Member] | Aggregate Change in Present Value of Accumulated Benefit for All Pension Plans Reported in Summary Compensation Table                
Pay vs Performance Disclosure                
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount       0        
Rafale Sotomayor [Member] | Aggregate Pension Adjustments Service Cost                
Pay vs Performance Disclosure                
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount       0        
Rafale Sotomayor [Member] | Aggregate Grant Date Fair Value of Equity Award Amounts Reported in Summary Compensation Table                
Pay vs Performance Disclosure                
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount       13,383,486        
Rafale Sotomayor [Member] | Equity Awards Adjustments, Excluding Value Reported in Compensation Table                
Pay vs Performance Disclosure                
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount       13,025,275        
Rafale Sotomayor [Member] | Year-end Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Covered Year that are Outstanding and Unvested                
Pay vs Performance Disclosure                
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount       (2,080,728)        
Rafale Sotomayor [Member] | Year-over-Year Change in Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Prior Years That are Outstanding and Unvested                
Pay vs Performance Disclosure                
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount       $ (87,718)