10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One) 

☑ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2020

OR 

☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                      to                     

Commission File Number 001-33708

Philip Morris International Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Virginia	13-3435103
(State or other jurisdiction of     incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer     Identification No.)

120 Park Avenue	New York	New York	10017
(Address of principal executive offices)			(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (917) 663-2000

Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class	Trading Symbol(s)	Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, no par value	PM	New York Stock Exchange
1.875% Notes due 2021	PM21B	New York Stock Exchange
1.875% Notes due 2021	PM21C	New York Stock Exchange
4.125% Notes due 2021	PM21	New York Stock Exchange
2.900% Notes due 2021	PM21A	New York Stock Exchange
2.625% Notes due 2022	PM22A	New York Stock Exchange
2.375% Notes due 2022	PM22B	New York Stock Exchange
2.500% Notes due 2022	PM22	New York Stock Exchange
2.500% Notes due 2022	PM22C	New York Stock Exchange
2.625% Notes due 2023	PM23	New York Stock Exchange
2.125% Notes due 2023	PM23B	New York Stock Exchange
3.600% Notes due 2023	PM23A	New York Stock Exchange
2.875% Notes due 2024	PM24	New York Stock Exchange
2.875% Notes due 2024	PM24C	New York Stock Exchange
0.625% Notes due 2024	PM24B	New York Stock Exchange
3.250% Notes due 2024	PM24A	New York Stock Exchange

Title of each class	Trading Symbol(s)	Name of each exchange on which registered
2.750% Notes due 2025	PM25	New York Stock Exchange
3.375% Notes due 2025	PM25A	New York Stock Exchange
2.750% Notes due 2026	PM26A	New York Stock Exchange
2.875% Notes due 2026	PM26	New York Stock Exchange
0.125% Notes due 2026	PM26B	New York Stock Exchange
3.125% Notes due 2027	PM27	New York Stock Exchange
3.125% Notes due 2028	PM28	New York Stock Exchange
2.875% Notes due 2029	PM29	New York Stock Exchange
3.375% Notes due 2029	PM29A	New York Stock Exchange
0.800% Notes due 2031	PM31	New York Stock Exchange
3.125% Notes due 2033	PM33	New York Stock Exchange
2.000% Notes due 2036	PM36	New York Stock Exchange
1.875% Notes due 2037	PM37A	New York Stock Exchange
6.375% Notes due 2038	PM38	New York Stock Exchange
1.450% Notes due 2039	PM39	New York Stock Exchange
4.375% Notes due 2041	PM41	New York Stock Exchange
4.500% Notes due 2042	PM42	New York Stock Exchange
3.875% Notes due 2042	PM42A	New York Stock Exchange
4.125% Notes due 2043	PM43	New York Stock Exchange
4.875% Notes due 2043	PM43A	New York Stock Exchange
4.250% Notes due 2044	PM44	New York Stock Exchange

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  þ        No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).    Yes  þ        No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer    þ                        Accelerated filer            ☐  

Non-accelerated filer    ☐                         Smaller reporting company    ☐

Emerging growth company    ☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ☐    No  þ

At April 23, 2020, there were 1,557,129,538 shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock, no par value per share.

-1-

PHILIP MORRIS INTERNATIONAL INC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

		Page No.
PART I -	FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Financial Statements (Unaudited)
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings for the
	Three Months Ended March 31, 2020 and 2019	3
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Earnings for the
	Three Months Ended March 31, 2020 and 2019	4
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at
	March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019	5 – 6
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the
	Three Months Ended March 31, 2020 and 2019	7 – 8
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ (Deficit) Equity for the
	Three Months Ended March 31, 2020 and 2019	9
	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	10 – 39
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	40 – 80
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	81
PART II -	OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	82
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	82
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	83
Item 6.	Exhibits	84
Signature		85

In this report, “PMI,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer to Philip Morris International Inc. and its subsidiaries.

Trademarks and service marks in this report are the registered property of, or licensed by, the subsidiaries of Philip Morris International Inc. and are italicized.

-2-

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements.

Philip Morris International Inc. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings

(in millions of dollars, except per share data)

(Unaudited)

	For the Three Months Ended March 31,
	2020		2019
Revenues including excise taxes	$	18,253	$	17,705
Excise taxes on products	11,100		10,954
Net revenues	7,153		6,751
Cost of sales	2,402		2,465
Gross profit	4,751		4,286
Marketing, administration and research costs (Notes 8, 18 & 19)	1,944		2,217
Amortization of intangibles	18		19
Operating income	2,789		2,050
Interest expense, net	129		152
Pension and other employee benefit costs (Note 3)	23		21
Earnings before income taxes	2,637		1,877
Provision for income taxes	596		424
Equity investments and securities (income)/loss, net	54		(11		)
Net earnings	1,987		1,464
Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests	161		110
Net earnings attributable to PMI	$	1,826	$	1,354
Per share data (Note 6):
Basic earnings per share	$	1.17	$	0.87
Diluted earnings per share	$	1.17	$	0.87

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

-3-

Philip Morris International Inc. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Earnings

(in millions of dollars)

(Unaudited)

	For the Three Months Ended March 31,
	2020			2019
Net earnings	$	1,987		$	1,464
Other comprehensive earnings (losses), net of income taxes:
Change in currency translation adjustments:
Unrealized gains (losses), net of income taxes of ($96) in 2020 and ($128) in 2019	(1,582		)	286
(Gains)/losses transferred to earnings - deconsolidation of RBH, net of income taxes of $0 in 2020 and 2019 (Note 19)	—			502
Change in net loss and prior service cost:
Amortization of net losses, prior service costs and net transition costs, net of income taxes of ($17) in 2020 and ($4) in 2019	74			63
(Gains)/losses transferred to earnings - deconsolidation of RBH, net of income taxes of $0 in 2020 and ($15) in 2019 (Note 19)	—			27
Change in fair value of derivatives accounted for as hedges:
Gains (losses) recognized, net of income taxes of ($5) in 2020 and $1 in 2019	26			(1		)
(Gains) losses transferred to earnings, net of income taxes of $1 in 2020 and $1 in 2019	(9		)	(4		)
Total other comprehensive earnings (losses)	(1,491		)	873
Total comprehensive earnings	496			2,337
Less comprehensive earnings attributable to:
Noncontrolling interests	81			109
Comprehensive earnings attributable to PMI	$	415		$	2,228

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

-4-

Philip Morris International Inc. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(in millions of dollars)

(Unaudited)

	March 31, 2020		December 31, 2019
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$	3,746	$	6,861
Trade receivables (less allowances of $19 in 2020 and $20 in 2019)	2,785		3,080
Other receivables	549		637
Inventories:
Leaf tobacco	2,012		2,052
Other raw materials	2,155		1,596
Finished product	4,878		5,587
	9,045		9,235
Other current assets	736		701
Total current assets	16,861		20,514
Property, plant and equipment, at cost	13,700		14,446
Less: accumulated depreciation	7,593		7,815
	6,107		6,631
Goodwill (Note 4)	5,284		5,858
Other intangible assets, net (Note 4)	1,850		2,113
Investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries and equity securities (Notes 11&14)	4,390		4,635
Deferred income taxes	1,113		1,153
Other assets	1,889		1,971
TOTAL ASSETS	$	37,494	$	42,875

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Continued

-5-

Philip Morris International Inc. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Continued)

(in millions of dollars, except share data)

(Unaudited)

	March 31, 2020			December 31, 2019
LIABILITIES
Short-term borrowings (Note 10)	$	1,438		$	338
Current portion of long-term debt (Note 10)	1,933			4,051
Accounts payable	2,073			2,299
Accrued liabilities:
Marketing and selling	645			666
Taxes, except income taxes	5,058			5,837
Employment costs	783			1,042
Dividends payable	1,832			1,831
Other	2,011			1,973
Income taxes	811			796
Total current liabilities	16,584			18,833
Long-term debt (Note 10)	24,999			26,656
Deferred income taxes	838			908
Employment costs	3,560			3,634
Income taxes and other liabilities	2,576			2,443
Total liabilities	48,557			52,474
Contingencies (Note 8)
STOCKHOLDERS’ (DEFICIT) EQUITY
Common stock, no par value (2,109,316,331 shares issued in 2020 and 2019)	—			—
Additional paid-in capital	1,992			2,019
Earnings reinvested in the business	30,984			30,987
Accumulated other comprehensive losses	(10,774		)	(9,363		)
	22,202			23,643
Less: cost of repurchased stock    (552,210,107 and 553,421,668 shares in 2020 and 2019, respectively)	35,146			35,220
Total PMI stockholders’ deficit	(12,944		)	(11,577		)
Noncontrolling interests	1,881			1,978
Total stockholders’ deficit	(11,063		)	(9,599		)
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ (DEFICIT) EQUITY	$	37,494		$	42,875

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

-6-

Philip Morris International Inc. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(in millions of dollars)

(Unaudited)

	For the Three Months Ended March 31,
	2020			2019
CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net earnings	$	1,987		$	1,464
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to operating cash flows:
Depreciation and amortization	241			240
Deferred income tax (benefit) provision	(24		)	(94		)
Asset impairment and exit costs, net of cash paid (Note 18)	(48		)	17
Cash effects of changes in:
Receivables, net	116			4
Inventories	(575		)	237
Accounts payable	(65		)	(7		)
Accrued liabilities and other current assets	(662		)	(855		)
Income taxes	(54		)	(251		)
Pension plan contributions	(23		)	(17		)
Other	218			503			(1)
Net cash provided by operating activities	1,111			1,241
CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Capital expenditures	(170		)	(324		)
Investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries and equity securities	(2		)	(24		)
Deconsolidation of RBH (Note 19)	—			(1,346		)	(2)
Net investment hedges	684			91
Other	2			7
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities	514			(1,596		)

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Continued

-7-

Philip Morris International Inc. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Continued)

(in millions of dollars)

(Unaudited)

	For the Three Months Ended March 31,
	2020			2019
CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Short-term borrowing activity by original maturity:
Net issuances (repayments) - maturities of 90 days or less	$	1,097		$	(167	)
Issuances - maturities longer than 90 days	25			989
Long-term debt repaid	(3,641		)	(2,137		)
Dividends paid	(1,828		)	(1,780		)
Sale (purchase) of subsidiary shares to/(from) noncontrolling interests	2			—
Other	(204		)	(56		)
Net cash used in financing activities	(4,549		)	(3,151		)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash	(191		)	(28		)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash(3):
Increase (Decrease)	(3,115		)	(3,534		)
Balance at beginning of period	6,865			6,620
Balance at end of period	$	3,750		$	3,086

⁽¹⁾ Includes the Loss on Deconsolidation of RBH ($239 million) and the Canadian tobacco litigation-related charge ($194 million) that were included in marketing, administration and research costs in the condensed consolidated statements of earnings for the three months ended March 31, 2019. For further details on these charges, see Note 19. Deconsolidation of RBH.

⁽²⁾ Includes deconsolidation of RBH cash and cash equivalents of $1,323 million and restricted cash of $23 million.

⁽³⁾ The amounts for cash and cash equivalents shown above include restricted cash of $4 million and $5 million as of March 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively, and $4 million and $27 million as of December 31, 2019, and 2018, respectively, which were included in other current assets in the condensed consolidated balance sheets.

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

-8-

Philip Morris International Inc. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ (Deficit) Equity

For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2020 and 2019

(in millions of dollars, except per share amounts)

(Unaudited)

	PMI Stockholders’ (Deficit) Equity
	Common Stock		Additional Paid-in Capital			Earnings Reinvested in the Business			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Losses			Cost of Repurchased Stock			Noncontrolling Interests			Total
Balances, January 1, 2019	$	—	$	1,939		$	31,014		$	(10,111	)	$	(35,301	)	$	1,720		$	(10,739	)
Net earnings						1,354									110			1,464
Other comprehensive earnings (losses), net of income taxes									345						(1		)	344
Issuance of stock awards			(32		)							75						43
Dividends declared ($1.14 per share)						(1,780		)										(1,780		)
Payments to noncontrolling interests															(46		)	(46		)
Deconsolidation of RBH (Note 19)									529									529
Balances, March 31, 2019	$	—	$	1,907		$	30,588		$	(9,237	)	$	(35,226	)	$	1,783		$	(10,185	)
Balances, January 1, 2020	$	—	$	2,019		$	30,987		$	(9,363	)	$	(35,220	)	$	1,978		$	(9,599	)
Net earnings						1,826									161			1,987
Other comprehensive earnings (losses), net of income taxes									(1,411		)				(80		)	(1,491		)
Issuance of stock awards			(25		)							74						49
Dividends declared ($1.17 per share)						(1,829		)										(1,829		)
Payments to noncontrolling interests															(182		)	(182		)
Other			(2		)				—						4			2
Balances, March 31, 2020	$	—	$	1,992		$	30,984		$	(10,774	)	$	(35,146	)	$	1,881		$	(11,063	)

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

-9-

Philip Morris International Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Note 1. Background and Basis of Presentation:

Background

Philip Morris International Inc. is a holding company incorporated in Virginia, U.S.A., whose subsidiaries and affiliates and their licensees are engaged in the manufacture and sale of cigarettes and other nicotine-containing products, including reduced-risk products, in markets outside of the United States of America. In addition, PMI ships a version of its Platform 1 device and its consumables authorized by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration ("FDA") to Altria Group, Inc., for sale in the United States under license. Throughout these financial statements, the term "PMI" refers to Philip Morris International Inc. and its subsidiaries.

Reduced-risk products ("RRPs") is the term PMI uses to refer to products that present, are likely to present, or have the potential to present less risk of harm to smokers who switch to these products versus continuing smoking. PMI has a range of RRPs in various stages of development, scientific assessment and commercialization.

"Platform 1" is the term PMI uses to refer to PMI’s reduced-risk product that uses a precisely controlled heating device incorporating our IQOS HeatControl technology, into which a specially designed and proprietary tobacco unit is inserted and heated to generate an aerosol.

Basis of Presentation

The interim condensed consolidated financial statements of PMI are unaudited. These interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("U.S. GAAP") and such principles are applied on a consistent basis. It is the opinion of PMI’s management that all adjustments necessary for a fair statement of the interim results presented have been reflected therein. All such adjustments were of a normal recurring nature. Net revenues and net earnings attributable to PMI for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for the entire year.

PMI has analyzed the impact of the Coronavirus pandemic ("COVID-19") on its financial statements as of March 31, 2020. PMI has determined that the changes to its significant judgements and estimates did not have a material impact with respect to goodwill, intangible assets, long-lived assets or its hedge accounting activities. Additionally, PMI believes that the modification of certain customer payment terms has not changed its assessment of collectability and therefore, there has been no material impact on PMI’s revenue recognition.

As of March 22, 2019, PMI deconsolidated the financial results of its Canadian subsidiary, Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc. ("RBH") from PMI's financial statements. For further details, see Note 19. Deconsolidation of RBH.

These statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes, which appear in PMI’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019.

Note 2. Stock Plans:

In May 2017, PMI’s shareholders approved the Philip Morris International Inc. 2017 Performance Incentive Plan (the “2017 Plan”). Under the 2017 Plan, PMI may grant to eligible employees restricted shares and restricted share units, performance-based cash incentive awards and performance-based equity awards. Up to 25 million shares of PMI’s common stock may be issued under the 2017 Plan. At March 31, 2020, shares available for grant under the 2017 Plan were 17,384,530.

In May 2017, PMI’s shareholders also approved the Philip Morris International Inc. 2017 Stock Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors (the “2017 Non-Employee Directors Plan”). A non-employee director is defined as a member of the PMI Board of Directors who is not a full-time employee of PMI or of any corporation in which PMI owns, directly or indirectly, stock possessing at least 50% of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock entitled to vote in the election of directors in such corporation. Up to 1 million shares of PMI common stock may be awarded under the 2017 Non-Employee Directors Plan. At March 31, 2020, shares available for grant under the plan were 954,084.

-10-

Philip Morris International Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Restricted share unit (RSU) awards

During the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, shares granted to eligible employees, the weighted-average grant date fair value per share related to RSU awards and the recorded compensation expense related to RSU awards were as follows:

	Number of Shares Granted	Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value Per RSU Award Granted		Compensation Expense Related to RSU Awards (in millions)
2020	1,599,380	$ 86.62		$	39
2019	1,621,070		$ 77.13	$	36

As of March 31, 2020, PMI had $218 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested RSU awards. The cost is recognized over the original restriction period of the awards, which is typically three years after the date of the award, or upon death, disability or reaching the age of 58.

During the three months ended March 31, 2020, 1,011,318 RSU awards vested. The grant date fair value of all the vested awards was approximately $99 million. The total fair value of RSU awards that vested during the three months ended March 31, 2020 was approximately $88 million.

Performance share unit (PSU) awards

During the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, PMI granted PSU awards to certain executives. The PSU awards require the achievement of certain performance factors, which are predetermined at the time of grant, typically over a three-year performance cycle. The performance metrics for such PSU's granted during the three months ended March 31, 2020 consisted of PMI's Total Shareholder Return ("TSR") relative to a predetermined peer group and on an absolute basis (40% weight), PMI’s currency-neutral compound annual adjusted diluted earnings per share growth rate (30% weight), and PMI’s performance against specific measures of PMI’s transformation, defined as net revenues from PMI's RRPs and any other non-combustible products as a percentage of PMI's total net revenues in the last year of the performance cycle (30% weight). The performance metrics for such PSUs granted during the three months ended March 31, 2019 consisted of PMI’s TSR relative to a predetermined peer group and on an absolute basis (50% weight), PMI’s currency-neutral compound annual adjusted operating income growth rate, excluding acquisitions (30% weight), and PMI’s performance against specific measures of PMI’s transformation (20% weight).

The aggregate of the weighted performance factors for the three metrics in each such PSU award determines the percentage of PSUs that will vest at the end of the three-year performance cycle. The minimum percentage of such PSUs that can vest is zero, with a target percentage of 100 and a maximum percentage of 200. Each such vested PSU entitles the participant to one share of common stock. An aggregate weighted PSU performance factor of 100 will result in the targeted number of PSUs being vested. At the end of the performance cycle, participants are entitled to an amount equivalent to the accumulated dividends paid on common stock during the performance cycle for the number of shares earned.

During the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, shares granted to eligible employees, the grant date fair value per share and the recorded compensation expense related to PSU awards were as follows:

	Number of Shares Granted	PSU Grant Date Fair Value Subject to Other Performance Factors Per Share		PSU Grant Date Fair Value Subject to TSR Performance Factor Per Share		Compensation Expense Related to PSU Awards (in millions)
2020	643,640	$ 86.69		$ 79.76		$	23
2019	625,200		$ 77.20		$ 83.59	$	18

The grant date fair value of the PSU awards subject to the other performance factors was determined by using the average of the high and low market price of PMI’s stock at the date of the grant. The grant date fair value of the PSU market based awards subject to the TSR performance factor was determined by using the Monte Carlo simulation model. The following assumptions were used to determine the grant date fair value of the PSU awards subject to the TSR performance factor:

-11-

Philip Morris International Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

	2020		2019
Risk-free interest rate (a)	1.4	%	2.4	%
Expected volatility (b)	23.5	%	21.4	%

^(a) Based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve.

^(b) Determined using the observed historical volatility.

As of March 31, 2020, PMI had $60 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested PSU awards. The cost is recognized over the performance cycle of the awards, or upon death, disability or reaching the age of 58.

During the three months ended March 31, 2020, 343,806 PSU awards vested. The grant date fair value of all the vested awards was approximately $35 million. The total fair value of PSU awards that vested during the three months ended March 31, 2020 was approximately $30 million.

Note 3. Benefit Plans:

Pension coverage for employees of PMI’s subsidiaries is provided, to the extent deemed appropriate, through separate plans, many of which are governed by local statutory requirements. In addition, PMI provides health care and other benefits to substantially all U.S. retired employees and certain non-U.S. retired employees. In general, health care benefits for non-U.S. retired employees are covered through local government plans.

Pension and other employee benefit costs per the condensed consolidated statements of earnings consisted of the following:

	For the Three Months Ended March 31,
(in millions)	2020			2019
Net pension costs (income)	$	(4	)	$	(5	)
Net postemployment costs	25			24
Net postretirement costs	2			2
Total pension and other employee benefit costs	$	23		$	21

Pension Plans

Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost

Net periodic pension cost consisted of the following:

	Pension (1)
	For the Three Months Ended March 31,
(in millions)	2020			2019
Service cost	$	65		$	54
Interest cost	17			29
Expected return on plan assets	(86		)	(79		)
Amortization:
Net loss	65			45
Prior service cost	—			—
Net periodic pension cost	$	61		$	49

⁽¹⁾ Primarily non-U.S. based defined benefit retirement plans.

-12-

Philip Morris International Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Employer Contributions

PMI makes, and plans to make, contributions, to the extent that they are tax deductible and to meet specific funding requirements of its funded pension plans. Employer contributions of $23 million were made to the pension plans during the three months ended March 31, 2020. Currently, PMI anticipates making additional contributions during the remainder of 2020 of approximately $62 million to its pension plans, based on current tax and benefit laws. However, this estimate is subject to change as a result of changes in tax and other benefit laws, as well as asset performance significantly above or below the assumed long-term rate of return on pension assets, or changes in interest and currency rates.

Note 4. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, net:

The movements in goodwill were as follows:

(in millions)	European Union			Eastern Europe			Middle East & Africa			South & Southeast Asia			East Asia & Australia			Latin America & Canada			Total
Balances, December 31, 2019	$	1,338		$	300		$	89		$	2,898		$	551		$	682		$	5,858
Changes due to:
Currency	(53		)	(13		)	(19		)	(327		)	(47		)	(115		)	(574		)
Balances, March 31, 2020	$	1,285		$	287		$	70		$	2,571		$	504		$	567		$	5,284

At March 31, 2020, goodwill primarily reflects PMI’s acquisitions in Colombia, Greece, Indonesia, Mexico, Pakistan and Serbia, as well as the business combination in the Philippines.

Details of other intangible assets were as follows:

		March 31, 2020						December 31, 2019
(in millions)	Weighted-Average Remaining Useful Life	Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Net		Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Net
Non-amortizable intangible assets		$	1,112			$	1,112	$	1,319			$	1,319
Amortizable intangible assets:
Trademarks	14 years	1,160		$	518	642		1,217		$	526	691
Distribution networks	8 years	103		67		36		113		72		41
Other*	9 years	104		44		60		106		44		62
Total other intangible assets		$	2,479	$	629	$	1,850	$	2,755	$	642	$	2,113

* Primarily intellectual property rights

Non-amortizable intangible assets substantially consist of trademarks from PMI’s acquisitions in Indonesia and Mexico. The decrease since December 31, 2019 was due to currency movements of ($207 million).

The decrease in the gross carrying amount of amortizable intangible assets from December 31, 2019, was mainly due to currency movements of ($69 million).

The change in the accumulated amortization from December 31, 2019, was mainly due to currency movements of ($31 million), partially offset by the 2020 amortization of $18 million.

-13-

Philip Morris International Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Amortization expense for each of the next five years is estimated to be $75 million or less, assuming no additional transactions occur that require the amortization of intangible assets.

Note 5. Financial Instruments:

Overview

PMI operates in markets outside of the United States of America, with manufacturing and sales facilities in various locations around the world. PMI utilizes certain financial instruments to manage foreign currency and interest rate exposure. Derivative financial instruments are used by PMI principally to reduce exposures to market risks resulting from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange and interest rates by creating offsetting exposures. PMI is not a party to leveraged derivatives and, by policy, does not use derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes. Financial instruments qualifying for hedge accounting must maintain a specified level of effectiveness between the hedging instrument and the item being hedged, both at inception and throughout the hedged period. PMI formally documents the nature and relationships between the hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as its risk-management objectives, strategies for undertaking the various hedge transactions and method of assessing hedge effectiveness. Additionally, for hedges of forecasted transactions, the significant characteristics and expected terms of the forecasted transaction must be specifically identified, and it must be probable that each forecasted transaction will occur. If it were deemed probable that the forecasted transaction would not occur, the gain or loss would be recognized in earnings.

PMI uses deliverable and non-deliverable forward foreign exchange contracts, foreign currency swaps and foreign currency options, collectively referred to as foreign exchange contracts ("foreign exchange contracts"), and interest rate contracts to mitigate its exposure to changes in exchange and interest rates from third-party and intercompany actual and forecasted transactions. Both foreign exchange contracts and interest rate contracts are collectively referred to as derivative contracts ("derivative contracts"). The primary currencies to which PMI is exposed include the Euro, Indonesian rupiah, Japanese yen, Mexican peso, Philippine peso, Russian ruble and Swiss franc. At March 31, 2020, PMI had contracts with aggregate notional amounts of $24.0 billion of which $6.5 billion related to cash flow hedges, $8.4 billion related to hedges of net investments in foreign operations and $9.1 billion related to other derivatives that primarily offset currency exposures on intercompany financing.

The fair value of PMI’s derivative contracts included in the condensed consolidated balance sheets as of March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, were as follows:

	Derivative Assets					Derivative Liabilities
		Fair Value					Fair Value
(in millions)	Balance Sheet Classification	At March 31, 2020		At December 31, 2019		Balance Sheet Classification	At March 31, 2020		At December 31, 2019
Derivative contracts designated as hedging instruments	Other current assets	$	239	$	319	Other accrued liabilities	$	35	$	23
	Other assets	161		21		Income taxes and other liabilities	89		301
Derivative contracts not designated as hedging instruments	Other current assets	92		50		Other accrued liabilities	100		70
	Other assets	—		—		Income taxes and other liabilities	25		25
Total derivatives		$	492	$	390		$	249	$	419

For the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, PMI's cash flow and net investment hedging instruments impacted the condensed consolidated statements of earnings and comprehensive earnings as follows:

-14-

Philip Morris International Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

(pre-tax, in millions)	For the Three Months Ended March 31,
	Amount of Gain/(Loss) Recognized in Other Comprehensive Earnings/(Losses) on Derivatives					Statement of Earnings Classification of Gain/(Loss) Reclassified from Other Comprehensive Earnings/(Losses) into Earnings	Amount of Gain/(Loss) Reclassified from Other Comprehensive Earnings/(Losses) into Earnings
	2020		2019				2020			2019
Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationship
Derivative contracts	$	31	$	(2	)
						Net revenues	$	3		$	10
						Cost of sales	4			—
						Marketing, administration and research costs	5			(3		)
						Interest expense, net	(2		)	(2		)
Derivatives in Net Investment Hedging Relationship
Derivative contracts	407		211
Total	$	438	$	209			$	10		$	5

Cash Flow Hedges

PMI has entered into derivative contracts to hedge the foreign currency exchange and interest rate risks related to certain forecasted transactions. Gains and losses associated with qualifying cash flow hedge contracts are deferred as components of accumulated other comprehensive losses until the underlying hedged transactions are reported in PMI’s condensed consolidated statements of earnings. As of March 31, 2020, PMI has hedged forecasted transactions for periods not exceeding the next twenty-one months with the exception of one derivative contract that expires in May 2024. The impact of these hedges is primarily included in operating cash flows on PMI’s condensed consolidated statements of cash flows.

Hedges of Net Investments in Foreign Operations

PMI designates certain foreign currency denominated debt and derivative contracts as net investment hedges, primarily of its Euro net assets. For the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, these hedges of net investments resulted in gains (losses), net of income taxes, of $314 million and $291 million, respectively, principally related to changes in the exchange rates between the Euro and U.S. dollar. These gains (losses) were reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive losses within currency translation adjustments, and were substantially offset by the losses and gains generated on the underlying assets. For the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, the gains for amounts excluded from the effectiveness testing recognized in earnings were $56 million and $56 million, respectively. These gains were accounted for in interest expense, net, on the condensed consolidated statement of earnings. The premiums paid for, and settlements of, net investment hedges are included in investing cash flows on PMI’s condensed consolidated statements of cash flows.

Other Derivatives

PMI has entered into derivative contracts to hedge the foreign currency exchange and interest rate risks related to intercompany loans between certain subsidiaries, and third-party loans. While effective as economic hedges, no hedge accounting is applied for these contracts; therefore, the unrealized gains (losses) relating to these contracts are reported in marketing, administration and research costs in PMI’s condensed consolidated statements of earnings. For the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, the gains (losses) from contracts for which PMI did not apply hedge accounting were $56 million and $(7) million, respectively. The gains (losses) from these contracts substantially offset the losses and gains generated by the underlying intercompany and third-party loans being hedged.

-15-

Philip Morris International Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

For the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, these items impacted the condensed consolidated statement of earnings as follows:

(pre-tax, in millions)	For the Three Months Ended March 31,
Derivatives not Designated as Hedging Instruments	Statement of Earnings Classification of Gain/(Loss)	Amount of Gain/(Loss) Recognized in Earnings
		For the Three Months Ended March 31,
		2020		2019
Derivative contracts
	Interest expense, net	$	34	$	17
Total		$	34	$	17

Qualifying Hedging Activities Reported in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Losses

Derivative gains or losses reported in accumulated other comprehensive losses are a result of qualifying hedging activity. Transfers of these gains or losses to earnings are offset by the corresponding gains or losses on the underlying hedged item. Hedging activity affected accumulated other comprehensive losses, net of income taxes, as follows:

(in millions)	For the Three Months Ended March 31,
	2020			2019
Gain/(loss) as of January 1,	$	3		$	35
Derivative (gains)/losses transferred to earnings	(9		)	(4		)
Change in fair value	26			(1		)
Gain/(loss) as of March 31,	$	20		$	30

At March 31, 2020, PMI expects $36 million of derivative gains that are included in accumulated other comprehensive losses to be reclassified to the condensed consolidated statement of earnings within the next 12 months. These gains are expected to be substantially offset by the statement of earnings impact of the respective hedged transactions.

Contingent Features

PMI’s derivative instruments do not contain contingent features.

Credit Exposure and Credit Risk

PMI is exposed to credit loss in the event of non-performance by counterparties. While PMI does not anticipate non-performance, its risk is limited to the fair value of the financial instruments less any cash collateral received or pledged. PMI actively monitors its exposure to credit risk through the use of credit approvals and credit limit and by selecting and continuously monitoring a diverse group of major international banks and financial institutions as counterparties.

Fair Value

See Note 11. Fair Value Measurements and Note 13. Balance Sheet Offsetting for additional discussion of derivative financial instruments.

-16-

Philip Morris International Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Note 6. Earnings Per Share:

Basic and diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) were calculated using the following:

(in millions)	For the Three Months Ended March 31,
	2020		2019
Net earnings attributable to PMI	$	1,826	$	1,354
Less distributed and undistributed earnings attributable to share-based payment awards	5		4
Net earnings for basic and diluted EPS	$	1,821	$	1,350
Weighted-average shares for basic EPS	1,557		1,555
Plus contingently issuable performance stock units (PSUs)	1		1
Weighted-average shares for diluted EPS	1,558		1,556

Unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents are participating securities and therefore are included in PMI’s earnings per share calculation pursuant to the two-class method.

For the 2020 and 2019 computations, there were no antidilutive stock awards.

Note 7. Segment Reporting:

PMI’s subsidiaries and affiliates are engaged in the manufacture and sale of cigarettes and other nicotine-containing products, including RRPs, in markets outside of the United States of America. In addition, PMI ships a version of its Platform 1 device and its consumables authorized by the FDA to Altria Group, Inc. for sale in the United States under license. Operating segments for PMI are organized by geographic region and managed by segment managers who are responsible for the operating and financial results of the regions inclusive of all product categories sold in the region. PMI’s operating segments are the European Union; Eastern Europe; Middle East & Africa; South & Southeast Asia; East Asia & Australia; and Latin America & Canada. PMI records net revenues and operating income to its segments based upon the geographic area in which the customer resides. Revenues from shipments of Platform 1 devices, heated tobacco units and accessories to Altria Group, Inc. for sale under license in the United States are included in Net Revenues of the Latin America & Canada segment.

PMI’s chief operating decision maker evaluates segment performance and allocates resources based on regional operating income, which includes results from all product categories sold in each region.

PMI disaggregates its net revenue from contracts with customers by both geographic location and product category for each of PMI's six operating segments, as PMI believes this best depicts how the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of its revenue and cash flows are affected by economic factors.

-17-

Philip Morris International Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Segment data were as follows:

(in millions)	For the Three Months Ended March 31,
	2020		2019
Net revenues:
European Union	$	2,535	$	2,159
Eastern Europe	788		579
Middle East & Africa	876		927
South & Southeast Asia	1,251		1,113
East Asia & Australia	1,255		1,321
Latin America & Canada (1)	448		652
Net revenues	$	7,153	$	6,751
Operating income (loss):
European Union	$	1,158	$	896
Eastern Europe	99		129
Middle East & Africa	321		344
South & Southeast Asia	599		440
East Asia & Australia	486		427
Latin America & Canada (1)	126		(186		)
Operating income	$	2,789	$	2,050

⁽¹⁾ As of March 22, 2019, PMI deconsolidated the financial results of its Canadian subsidiary, Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc. ("RBH") from PMI's financial statements. For further details, see Note 19. Deconsolidation of RBH.

Items affecting the comparability of results from operations were as follows:

• Canadian tobacco litigation-related expense - See Note 8. Contingencies and Note 19. Deconsolidation of RBH for details of the $194 million pre-tax charge included in the Latin America & Canada segment for the three months ended March 31, 2019.

• Loss on deconsolidation of RBH - See Note 19. Deconsolidation of RBH for details of the $239 million loss included in the Latin America & Canada segment for the three months ended March 31, 2019.

• Asset impairment and exit costs - See Note 18. Asset Impairment and Exit Costs for details of the $20 million pre-tax charge included in the South & Southeast Asia segment for the three months ended March 31, 2019.

-18-

Philip Morris International Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

PMI's net revenues by product category were as follows:

(in millions)	For the Three Months Ended March 31,
	2020		2019
Net revenues:
Combustible products:
European Union	$	1,911	$	1,812
Eastern Europe	523		471
Middle East & Africa	832		829
South & Southeast Asia	1,251		1,113
East Asia & Australia	642		638
Latin America & Canada	440		646
Total combustible products	$	5,598	$	5,508
Reduced-risk products:
European Union	$	624	$	347
Eastern Europe	265		108
Middle East & Africa	44		98
South & Southeast Asia	—		—
East Asia & Australia	613		683
Latin America & Canada	8		6
Total reduced-risk products	$	1,555	$	1,243
Total PMI net revenues	$	7,153	$	6,751

Note: Sum of product categories or Regions might not foot to total PMI due to roundings.

Net revenues related to combustible products refer to the operating revenues generated from the sale of these products, including shipping and handling charges billed to customers, net of sales and promotion incentives, and excise taxes. These net revenue amounts consist of the sale of PMI's cigarettes and other tobacco products combined. Other tobacco products primarily include roll-your-own and make-your-own cigarettes, pipe tobacco, cigars and cigarillos and do not include reduced-risk products.

Net revenues related to reduced-risk products refer to the operating revenues generated from the sale of these products, including shipping and handling charges billed to customers, net of sales and promotion incentives, and excise taxes. These net revenue amounts consist of the sale of PMI's heated tobacco units, IQOS devices and related accessories, and other nicotine-containing products, which primarily include PMI's e-vapor products.

PMI recognizes revenue, when control is transferred to the customer, typically either upon shipment or delivery of goods.

Note 8. Contingencies:

Tobacco-Related Litigation

Legal proceedings covering a wide range of matters are pending or threatened against us, and/or our subsidiaries, and/or our indemnitees in various jurisdictions. Our indemnitees include distributors, licensees, and others that have been named as parties in certain cases and that we have agreed to defend, as well as to pay costs and some or all of judgments, if any, that may be entered against them. Pursuant to the terms of the Distribution Agreement between Altria Group, Inc. (“Altria”) and PMI, PMI will indemnify Altria and Philip Morris USA Inc. (“PM USA”), a U.S. tobacco subsidiary of Altria, for tobacco product claims based in substantial part on products manufactured by PMI or contract manufactured for PMI by PM USA, and PM USA will indemnify PMI for tobacco product claims based in substantial part on products manufactured by PM USA, excluding tobacco products contract manufactured for PMI.

-19-

Philip Morris International Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

It is possible that there could be adverse developments in pending cases against us and our subsidiaries. An unfavorable outcome or settlement of pending tobacco-related litigation could encourage the commencement of additional litigation.

Damages claimed in some of the tobacco-related litigation are significant and, in certain cases in Brazil, Canada and Nigeria, range into the billions of U.S. dollars. The variability in pleadings in multiple jurisdictions, together with the actual experience of management in litigating claims, demonstrate that the monetary relief that may be specified in a lawsuit bears little relevance to the ultimate outcome. Much of the tobacco-related litigation is in its early stages, and litigation is subject to uncertainty. However, as discussed below, we have to date been largely successful in defending tobacco-related litigation.

We and our subsidiaries record provisions in the consolidated financial statements for pending litigation when we determine that an unfavorable outcome is probable and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. At the present time, except as stated otherwise in this Note 8. Contingencies, while it is reasonably possible that an unfavorable outcome in a case may occur, after assessing the information available to it (i) management has not concluded that it is probable that a loss has been incurred in any of the pending tobacco-related cases; (ii) management is unable to estimate the possible loss or range of loss for any of the pending tobacco-related cases; and (iii) accordingly, no estimated loss has been accrued in the consolidated financial statements for unfavorable outcomes in these cases, if any. Legal defense costs are expensed as incurred.

It is possible that our consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial position could be materially affected in a particular fiscal quarter or fiscal year by an unfavorable outcome or settlement of certain pending litigation. Nevertheless, although litigation is subject to uncertainty, we and each of our subsidiaries named as a defendant believe, and each has been so advised by counsel handling the respective cases, that we have valid defenses to the litigation pending against us, as well as valid bases for appeal of adverse verdicts. All such cases are, and will continue to be, vigorously defended. However, we and our subsidiaries may enter into settlement discussions in particular cases if we believe it is in our best interests to do so.    

CCAA Proceedings and Stay of Tobacco-Related Cases Pending in Canada

As a result of the Court of Appeal of Quebec’s decision in both the Létourneau and Blais cases described below, our subsidiary, Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc. (“RBH”), and the other defendants, JTI Macdonald Corp., and Imperial Tobacco Canada Limited, sought protection in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (“CCAA”) on March 22, March 8, and March 12, 2019 respectively. CCAA is a Canadian federal law that permits a Canadian business to restructure its affairs while carrying on its business in the ordinary course. The initial CCAA order made by the Ontario Superior Court on March 22, 2019 authorizes RBH to pay all expenses incurred in carrying on its business in the ordinary course after the CCAA filing, including obligations to employees, vendors, and suppliers. As further described in Note 19. Deconsolidation of RBH, RBH is now deconsolidated from our consolidated financial statements. As part of the CCAA proceedings, there is currently a comprehensive stay up to and including September 30, 2020 of all tobacco-related litigation pending in Canada against RBH and the other defendants, including PMI and our indemnitees (PM USA and Altria), namely, the smoking and health class actions filed in various Canadian provinces and health care cost recovery actions. These proceedings are presented below under the caption “Stayed Litigation — Canada.” Ernst & Young Inc. has been appointed as monitor of RBH in the CCAA proceedings. In accordance with the CCAA process, as the parties work towards a plan of arrangement or compromise in a confidential mediation, it is anticipated that the court will set additional hearings and further extend the stay of proceedings. On April 17, 2019, the Ontario Superior Court ruled that RBH and the other defendants will not be allowed to file an application to the Supreme Court of Canada for leave to appeal the Court of Appeal’s decision in the Létourneau and the Blais cases so long as the comprehensive stay of all tobacco-related litigation in Canada remains in effect and that the time period to file the application would be extended by the stay period. While RBH believes that the findings of liability and damages in both Létourneau and the Blais cases were incorrect, the CCAA proceedings will provide a forum for RBH to seek resolution through a plan of arrangement or compromise of all tobacco-related litigation pending in Canada. It is not possible to predict the resolution of the underlying legal proceedings or the length of the CCAA process.

-20-

Philip Morris International Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Stayed Litigation — Canada

Smoking and Health Litigation — Canada

In the first class action pending in Canada, Conseil Québécois Sur Le Tabac Et La Santé and Jean-Yves Blais v. Imperial Tobacco Ltd., Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc. and JTI-Macdonald Corp., Quebec Superior Court, Canada, filed in November 1998, RBH and other Canadian manufacturers (Imperial Tobacco Canada Ltd. and JTI-Macdonald Corp.) are defendants. The plaintiffs, an anti-smoking organization and an individual smoker, sought compensatory and punitive damages for each member of the class who allegedly suffers from certain smoking-related diseases. The class was certified in 2005. The trial court issued its judgment on May 27, 2015. The trial court found RBH and two other Canadian manufacturers liable and found that the class members’ compensatory damages totaled approximately CAD 15.5 billion, including pre-judgment interest (approximately $11 billion). The trial court awarded compensatory damages on a joint and several liability basis, allocating 20% to our subsidiary (approximately CAD 3.1 billion, including pre-judgment interest (approximately $2.2 billion)). In addition, the trial court awarded CAD 90,000 (approximately $63,760) in punitive damages, allocating CAD 30,000 (approximately $21,250) to RBH. The trial court estimated the disease class at 99,957 members. RBH appealed to the Court of Appeal of Quebec. In October 2015, the Court of Appeal ordered RBH to furnish security totaling CAD 226 million (approximately $160.1 million) to cover both the Létourneau and Blais cases, which RBH has paid in installments through March 2017. The Court of Appeal ordered Imperial Tobacco Canada Ltd. to furnish security totaling CAD 758 million (approximately $537 million) in installments through June 2017. JTI Macdonald Corp. was not required to furnish security in accordance with plaintiffs’ motion. The Court of Appeal ordered that the security is payable upon a final judgment of the Court of Appeal affirming the trial court’s judgment or upon further order of the Court of Appeal. On March 1, 2019, the Court of Appeal issued a decision largely affirming the trial court’s findings of liability and the compensatory and punitive damages award while reducing the total amount of compensatory damages to approximately CAD 13.5 billion including interest (approximately $9.6 billion) due to the trial court’s error in the calculation of interest. The compensatory damages award is on a joint and several basis with an allocation of 20% to RBH (approximately CAD 2.7 billion, including pre-judgment interest (approximately $1.91 billion)). The Court of Appeal upheld the trial court’s findings that defendants violated the Civil Code of Quebec, the Quebec Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms, and the Quebec Consumer Protection Act by failing to warn adequately of the dangers of smoking and by conspiring to prevent consumers from learning of the dangers of smoking. The Court of Appeal further held that the plaintiffs either need not prove, or had adequately proven, that these faults were a cause of the class members’ injuries. In accordance with the judgment, defendants are required to deposit their respective portions of the damages awarded in both the Létourneau case described below and the Blais case, approximately CAD 1.1 billion (approximately $779 million), into trust accounts within 60 days. RBH’s share of the deposit is approximately CAD 257 million (approximately $194.1 million). PMI recorded a pre-tax charge of $194 million in its consolidated results, representing $142 million net of tax, as tobacco litigation-related expense, in the first quarter of 2019. The charge reflects PMI’s assessment of the portion of the judgment that represents probable and estimable loss prior to the deconsolidation of RBH and corresponds to the trust account deposit required by the judgment.

In the second class action pending in Canada, Cecilia Létourneau v. Imperial Tobacco Ltd., Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc. and JTI-Macdonald Corp., Quebec Superior Court, Canada, filed in September 1998, RBH and other Canadian manufacturers (Imperial Tobacco Canada Ltd. and JTI-Macdonald Corp.) are defendants.  The plaintiff, an individual smoker, sought compensatory and punitive damages for each member of the class who is deemed addicted to smoking. The class was certified in 2005. The trial court issued its judgment on May 27, 2015. The trial court found RBH and two other Canadian manufacturers liable and awarded a total of CAD 131 million (approximately $93 million) in punitive damages, allocating CAD 46 million (approximately $32.6 million) to RBH. The trial court estimated the size of the addiction class at 918,000 members but declined to award compensatory damages to the addiction class because the evidence did not establish the claims with sufficient accuracy. The trial court found that a claims process to allocate the awarded punitive damages to individual class members would be too expensive and difficult to administer. On March 1, 2019, the Court of Appeal issued a decision largely affirming the trial court’s findings of liability and the total amount of punitive damages awarded allocating CAD 57 million including interest (approximately $40.4 million) to RBH. See the Blais description above and Note 19. Deconsolidation of RBH below for further detail concerning the security order pertaining to both Létourneau and Blais cases and the impact of the decision on PMI’s financial statements.

RBH and PMI believe the findings of liability and damages in both Létourneau and the Blais cases were incorrect and in contravention of applicable law on several grounds including the following: (i) defendants had no obligation to warn class members who knew, or should have known, of the risks of smoking; (ii) defendants cannot be liable to class members who would have smoked regardless of what warnings were given; and (iii) defendants cannot be liable to all class members given the individual differences between class members.

-21-

Philip Morris International Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

In the third class action pending in Canada, Kunta v. Canadian Tobacco Manufacturers' Council, et al., The Queen's Bench, Winnipeg, Canada, filed June 12, 2009, we, RBH, and our indemnitees (PM USA and Altria), and other members of the industry are defendants. The plaintiff, an individual smoker, alleges her own addiction to tobacco products and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (“COPD”), severe asthma, and mild reversible lung disease resulting from the use of tobacco products. She is seeking compensatory and punitive damages on behalf of a proposed class comprised of all smokers, their estates, dependents and family members, as well as restitution of profits, and reimbursement of government health care costs allegedly caused by tobacco products.

In the fourth class action pending in Canada, Adams v. Canadian Tobacco Manufacturers' Council, et al., The Queen's Bench, Saskatchewan, Canada, filed July 10, 2009, we, RBH, and our indemnitees (PM USA and Altria), and other members of the industry are defendants. The plaintiff, an individual smoker, alleges her own addiction to tobacco products and COPD resulting from the use of tobacco products. She is seeking compensatory and punitive damages on behalf of a proposed class comprised of all smokers who have smoked a minimum of 25,000 cigarettes and have allegedly suffered, or suffer, from COPD, emphysema, heart disease, or cancer, as well as restitution of profits.

In the fifth class action pending in Canada, Semple v. Canadian Tobacco Manufacturers' Council, et al., The Supreme Court (trial court), Nova Scotia, Canada, filed June 18, 2009, we, RBH, and our indemnitees (PM USA and Altria), and other members of the industry are defendants. The plaintiff, an individual smoker, alleges his own addiction to tobacco products and COPD resulting from the use of tobacco products. He is seeking compensatory and punitive damages on behalf of a proposed class comprised of all smokers, their estates, dependents and family members, as well as restitution of profits, and reimbursement of government health care costs allegedly caused by tobacco products.

In the sixth class action pending in Canada, Dorion v. Canadian Tobacco Manufacturers' Council, et al., The Queen's Bench, Alberta, Canada, filed June 15, 2009, we, RBH, and our indemnitees (PM USA and Altria), and other members of the industry are defendants. The plaintiff, an individual smoker, alleges her own addiction to tobacco products and chronic bronchitis and severe sinus infections resulting from the use of tobacco products. She is seeking compensatory and punitive damages on behalf of a proposed class comprised of all smokers, their estates, dependents and family members, restitution of profits, and reimbursement of government health care costs allegedly caused by tobacco products. To date, we, our subsidiaries, and our indemnitees have not been properly served with the complaint.

In the seventh class action pending in Canada, McDermid v. Imperial Tobacco Canada Limited, et al., Supreme Court, British Columbia, Canada, filed June 25, 2010, we, RBH, and our indemnitees (PM USA and Altria), and other members of the industry are defendants. The plaintiff, an individual smoker, alleges his own addiction to tobacco products and heart disease resulting from the use of tobacco products. He is seeking compensatory and punitive damages on behalf of a proposed class comprised of all smokers who were alive on June 12, 2007, and who suffered from heart disease allegedly caused by smoking, their estates, dependents and family members, plus disgorgement of revenues earned by the defendants from January 1, 1954, to the date the claim was filed.

In the eighth class action pending in Canada, Bourassa v. Imperial Tobacco Canada Limited, et al., Supreme Court, British Columbia, Canada, filed June 25, 2010, we, RBH, and our indemnitees (PM USA and Altria), and other members of the industry are defendants. The plaintiff, the heir to a deceased smoker, alleges that the decedent was addicted to tobacco products and suffered from emphysema resulting from the use of tobacco products. She is seeking compensatory and punitive damages on behalf of a proposed class comprised of all smokers who were alive on June 12, 2007, and who suffered from chronic respiratory diseases allegedly caused by smoking, their estates, dependents and family members, plus disgorgement of revenues earned by the defendants from January 1, 1954, to the date the claim was filed. In December 2014, plaintiff filed an amended statement of claim.

In the ninth class action pending in Canada, Suzanne Jacklin v. Canadian Tobacco Manufacturers' Council, et al., Ontario Superior Court of Justice, filed June 20, 2012, we, RBH, and our indemnitees (PM USA and Altria), and other members of the industry are defendants. The plaintiff, an individual smoker, alleges her own addiction to tobacco products and COPD resulting from the use of tobacco products. She is seeking compensatory and punitive damages on behalf of a proposed class comprised of all smokers who have smoked a minimum of 25,000 cigarettes and have allegedly suffered, or suffer, from COPD, heart disease, or cancer, as well as restitution of profits.

Health Care Cost Recovery Litigation — Canada

In the first health care cost recovery case pending in Canada, Her Majesty the Queen in Right of British Columbia v. Imperial Tobacco Limited, et al., Supreme Court, British Columbia, Vancouver Registry, Canada, filed January 24, 2001, we, RBH, our indemnitee (PM USA), and other members of the industry are defendants. The plaintiff, the government of the province of British

-22-

Philip Morris International Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Columbia, brought a claim based upon legislation enacted by the province authorizing the government to file a direct action against cigarette manufacturers to recover the health care costs it has incurred, and will incur, resulting from a “tobacco related wrong.”

In the second health care cost recovery case filed in Canada, Her Majesty the Queen in Right of New Brunswick v. Rothmans Inc., et al., Court of Queen's Bench of New Brunswick, Trial Court, New Brunswick, Fredericton, Canada, filed March 13, 2008, we, RBH, our indemnitees (PM USA and Altria), and other members of the industry are defendants. The claim was filed by the government of the province of New Brunswick based on legislation enacted in the province. This legislation is similar to the law introduced in British Columbia that authorizes the government to file a direct action against cigarette manufacturers to recover the health care costs it has incurred, and will incur, as a result of a “tobacco related wrong.”

In the third health care cost recovery case filed in Canada, Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario v. Rothmans Inc., et al., Ontario Superior Court of Justice, Toronto, Canada, filed September 29, 2009, we, RBH, our indemnitees (PM USA and Altria), and other members of the industry are defendants. The claim was filed by the government of the province of Ontario based on legislation enacted in the province. This legislation is similar to the laws introduced in British Columbia and New Brunswick that authorize the government to file a direct action against cigarette manufacturers to recover the health care costs it has incurred, and will incur, as a result of a “tobacco related wrong.”

In the fourth health care cost recovery case filed in Canada, Attorney General of Newfoundland and Labrador v. Rothmans Inc., et al., Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador, St. Johns, Canada, filed February 8, 2011, we, RBH, our indemnitees (PM USA and Altria), and other members of the industry are defendants. The claim was filed by the government of the province of Newfoundland and Labrador based on legislation enacted in the province that is similar to the laws introduced in British Columbia, New Brunswick and Ontario. The legislation authorizes the government to file a direct action against cigarette manufacturers to recover the health care costs it has incurred, and will incur, as a result of a “tobacco related wrong.”

In the fifth health care cost recovery case filed in Canada, Attorney General of Quebec v. Imperial Tobacco Limited, et al., Superior Court of Quebec, Canada, filed June 8, 2012, we, RBH, our indemnitee (PM USA), and other members of the industry are defendants. The claim was filed by the government of the province of Quebec based on legislation enacted in the province that is similar to the laws enacted in several other Canadian provinces. The legislation authorizes the government to file a direct action against cigarette manufacturers to recover the health care costs it has incurred, and will incur, as a result of a “tobacco related wrong.”

In the sixth health care cost recovery case filed in Canada, Her Majesty in Right of Alberta v. Altria Group, Inc., et al., Supreme Court of Queen's Bench Alberta, Canada, filed June 8, 2012, we, RBH, our indemnitees (PM USA and Altria), and other members of the industry are defendants. The claim was filed by the government of the province of Alberta based on legislation enacted in the province that is similar to the laws enacted in several other Canadian provinces. The legislation authorizes the government to file a direct action against cigarette manufacturers to recover the health care costs it has incurred, and will incur, as a result of a “tobacco related wrong.”

In the seventh health care cost recovery case filed in Canada, Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of Manitoba v. Rothmans, Benson & Hedges, Inc., et al., The Queen's Bench, Winnipeg Judicial Centre, Canada, filed May 31, 2012, we, RBH, our indemnitees (PM USA and Altria), and other members of the industry are defendants. The claim was filed by the government of the province of Manitoba based on legislation enacted in the province that is similar to the laws enacted in several other Canadian provinces. The legislation authorizes the government to file a direct action against cigarette manufacturers to recover the health care costs it has incurred, and will incur, as a result of a “tobacco related wrong.”

In the eighth health care cost recovery case filed in Canada, The Government of Saskatchewan v. Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc., et al., Queen's Bench, Judicial Centre of Saskatchewan, Canada, filed June 8, 2012, we, RBH, our indemnitees (PM USA and Altria), and other members of the industry are defendants. The claim was filed by the government of the province of Saskatchewan based on legislation enacted in the province that is similar to the laws enacted in several other Canadian provinces. The legislation authorizes the government to file a direct action against cigarette manufacturers to recover the health care costs it has incurred, and will incur, as a result of a “tobacco related wrong.”

In the ninth health care cost recovery case filed in Canada, Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of Prince Edward Island v. Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc., et al., Supreme Court of Prince Edward Island (General Section), Canada, filed September 10, 2012, we, RBH, our indemnitees (PM USA and Altria), and other members of the industry are defendants. The claim was filed by the government of the province of Prince Edward Island based on legislation enacted in the province that is similar to the laws enacted in several other Canadian provinces. The legislation authorizes the government to file a direct action

-23-

Philip Morris International Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

against cigarette manufacturers to recover the health care costs it has incurred, and will incur, as a result of a “tobacco related wrong.”

In the tenth health care cost recovery case filed in Canada, Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of Nova Scotia v. Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc., et al., Supreme Court of Nova Scotia, Canada, filed January 2, 2015, we, RBH, our indemnitees (PM USA and Altria), and other members of the industry are defendants. The claim was filed by the government of the province of Nova Scotia based on legislation enacted in the province that is similar to the laws enacted in several other Canadian provinces. The legislation authorizes the government to file a direct action against cigarette manufacturers to recover the health care costs it has incurred, and will incur, as a result of a “tobacco related wrong.”

__________

The table below lists the number of tobacco-related cases pertaining to combustible products pending against us and/or our subsidiaries or indemnitees as of April 24, 2020, April 23, 2019 and April 24, 2018:¹

Type of Case	Number of Cases Pending as of April 24, 2020	Number of Cases Pending as of April 23, 2019	Number of Cases Pending as of April 24, 2018
Individual Smoking and Health Cases	48	53	62
Smoking and Health Class Actions	10	10	11
Health Care Cost Recovery Actions	17	16	16
Label-Related Class Actions	—	1	1
Individual Label-Related Cases	4	7	1
Public Civil Actions	2	2	2

Since 1995, when the first tobacco-related litigation was filed against a PMI entity, 503 Smoking and Health, Label-Related, Health Care Cost Recovery, and Public Civil Actions in which we and/or one of our subsidiaries and/or indemnitees were a defendant have been terminated in our favor. Thirteen cases have had decisions in favor of plaintiffs. Nine of these cases have subsequently reached final resolution in our favor and four remain on appeal.

The table below lists the verdict and significant post-trial developments in the four pending cases where a verdict was returned in favor of the plaintiff:

Date	Location of Court/Name of Plaintiff	Type of Case	Verdict	Post-Trial Developments
February 2004	Brazil/The Smoker Health Defense Association	Class Action	The Civil Court of São Paulo found defendants liable without hearing evidence. In April 2004, the court awarded “moral damages” of R$1,000 (approximately $183) per smoker per full year of smoking plus interest at the rate of 1% per month, as of the date of the ruling. The court did not assess actual damages, which were to be assessed in a second phase of the case. The size of the class was not defined in the ruling.	Defendants appealed to the São Paulo Court of Appeals, which annulled the ruling in November 2008, finding that the trial court had inappropriately ruled without hearing evidence and returned the case to the trial court for further proceedings. In May 2011, the trial court dismissed the claim. In March 2017, plaintiff filed an en banc appeal to the Superior Court of Justice. In addition, the defendants filed a constitutional appeal to the Federal Supreme Tribunal on the basis that plaintiff did not have standing to bring the lawsuit. Both appeals are still pending.

______

¹ Includes cases pending in Canada.

-24-

Philip Morris International Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Date	Location of Court/Name of Plaintiff	Type of Case	Verdict	Post-Trial Developments
May 27, 2015	Canada/Conseil Québécois Sur Le Tabac Et La Santé and Jean-Yves Blais	Class Action	On May 27, 2015, the Superior Court of the District of Montreal, Province of Quebec ruled in favor of the Blais class on liability and found the class members’ compensatory damages totaled approximately CAD 15.5 billion (approximately $11 billion), including pre-judgment interest. The trial court awarded compensatory damages on a joint and several liability basis, allocating 20% to our subsidiary (approximately CAD 3.1 billion including pre-judgment interest (approximately $2.2 billion)). The trial court awarded CAD 90,000 (approximately $63,760) in punitive damages, allocating CAD 30,000 (approximately $21,250) to our subsidiary. The trial court ordered defendants to pay CAD 1 billion (approximately $708.5 million) of the compensatory damage award, CAD 200 million (approximately $141.7 million) of which is our subsidiary’s portion, into a trust within 60 days.	In June 2015, RBH commenced the appellate process with the Court of Appeal of Quebec. On March 1, 2019, the Court of Appeal issued a decision largely affirming the trial court's decision. (See “Stayed Litigation — Canada” for further detail.)

-25-

Philip Morris International Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Date	Location of Court/Name of Plaintiff	Type of Case	Verdict	Post-Trial Developments
May 27, 2015	Canada/Cecilia Létourneau	Class Action	On May 27, 2015, the Superior Court of the District of Montreal, Province of Quebec ruled in favor of the Létourneau class on liability and awarded a total of CAD 131 million (approximately $92.8 million) in punitive damages, allocating CAD 46 million (approximately $32.6 million) to RBH. The trial court ordered defendants to pay the full punitive damage award into a trust within 60 days. The court did not order the payment of compensatory damages.	In June 2015, RBH commenced the appellate process with the Court of Appeal of Quebec. On March 1, 2019, the Court of Appeal issued a decision largely affirming the trial court's decision. (See “Stayed Litigation — Canada” for further detail.)

Date	Location of Court/Name of Plaintiff	Type of Case	Verdict	Post-Trial Developments
August 5, 2016	Argentina/Hugo Lespada	Individual Action	On August 5, 2016, the Civil Court No. 14 - Mar del Plata, issued a verdict in favor of plaintiff, an individual smoker, and awarded him ARS 110,000 (approximately $1,661), plus interest, in compensatory and moral damages. The trial court found that our subsidiary failed to warn plaintiff of the risk of becoming addicted to cigarettes.	On August 23, 2016, our subsidiary filed its notice of appeal. On October 31, 2017, the Civil and Commercial Court of Appeals of Mar del Plata ruled that plaintiff's claim was barred by the statute of limitations and it reversed the trial court's decision. On November 28, 2017, plaintiff filed an extraordinary appeal of the reversal of the trial court's decision to the Supreme Court of the Province of Buenos Aires.

Pending claims related to tobacco products generally fall within the following categories:

Smoking and Health Litigation: These cases primarily allege personal injury and are brought by individual plaintiffs or on behalf of a class or purported class of individual plaintiffs. Plaintiffs' allegations of liability in these cases are based on various theories of recovery, including negligence, gross negligence, strict liability, fraud, misrepresentation, design defect, failure to warn, breach of express and implied warranties, violations of deceptive trade practice laws and consumer protection statutes. Plaintiffs in these cases seek various forms of relief, including compensatory and other damages, and injunctive and equitable relief. Defenses raised in these cases include licit activity, failure to state a claim, lack of defect, lack of proximate cause, assumption of the risk, contributory negligence, and statute of limitations.

-26-

Philip Morris International Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

As of April 24, 2020, there were a number of smoking and health cases pending against us, our subsidiaries or indemnitees, as follows:

• 48 cases brought by individual plaintiffs in Argentina (31), Brazil (5), Canada (2), Chile (4), Costa Rica (1), Italy (1), the Philippines (1), Poland (1), Turkey (1) and Scotland (1), compared with 53 such cases on April 23, 2019, and 62 cases on April 24, 2018; and

• 10 cases brought on behalf of classes of individual plaintiffs in Brazil (1) and Canada (9), compared with 10 such cases on April 23, 2019 and 11 such cases on April 24, 2018.

The class actions pending in Canada are described above under the caption “Smoking and Health Litigation — Canada.”

In the class action pending in Brazil, The Smoker Health Defense Association (ADESF) v. Souza Cruz, S.A. and Philip Morris Marketing, S.A., Nineteenth Lower Civil Court of the Central Courts of the Judiciary District of São Paulo, Brazil, filed July 25, 1995, our subsidiary and another member of the industry are defendants. The plaintiff, a consumer organization, is seeking damages for all addicted smokers and former smokers, and injunctive relief. In 2004, the trial court found defendants liable without hearing evidence and awarded “moral damages” of R$1,000 (approximately $183) per smoker per full year of smoking plus interest at the rate of 1% per month, as of the date of the ruling. The court did not award actual damages, which were to be assessed in the second phase of the case. The size of the class was not estimated. Defendants appealed to the São Paulo Court of Appeals, which annulled the ruling in November 2008, finding that the trial court had inappropriately ruled without hearing evidence and returned the case to the trial court for further proceedings. In May 2011, the trial court dismissed the claim. In February 2015, the appellate court unanimously dismissed plaintiff's appeal. In September 2015, plaintiff appealed to the Superior Court of Justice. In February 2017, the Chief Justice of the Superior Court of Justice denied plaintiff's appeal. In March 2017, plaintiff filed an en banc appeal to the Superior Court of Justice. In addition, the defendants filed a constitutional appeal to the Federal Supreme Tribunal on the basis that plaintiff did not have standing to bring the lawsuit. Both appeals are still pending.

Health Care Cost Recovery Litigation: These cases, brought by governmental and non-governmental plaintiffs, seek reimbursement of health care cost expenditures allegedly caused by tobacco products. Plaintiffs' allegations of liability in these cases are based on various theories of recovery including unjust enrichment, negligence, negligent design, strict liability, breach of express and implied warranties, violation of a voluntary undertaking or special duty, fraud, negligent misrepresentation, conspiracy, public nuisance, defective product, failure to warn, sale of cigarettes to minors, and claims under statutes governing competition and deceptive trade practices. Plaintiffs in these cases seek various forms of relief including compensatory and other damages, and injunctive and equitable relief. Defenses raised in these cases include lack of proximate cause, remoteness of injury, failure to state a claim, adequate remedy at law, “unclean hands” (namely, that plaintiffs cannot obtain equitable relief because they participated in, and benefited from, the sale of cigarettes), and statute of limitations.

As of April 24, 2020, there were 17 health care cost recovery cases pending against us, our subsidiaries or indemnitees in Brazil (1), Canada (10), Korea (1) and Nigeria (5), compared with 16 such cases on April 23, 2019 and 16 such cases on April 24, 2018.

The health care cost recovery actions pending in Canada are described above under the caption “Health Care Cost Recovery Litigation — Canada.”

In the health care cost recovery case in Brazil, The Attorney General of Brazil v. Souza Cruz Ltda., et al., Federal Trial Court, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, filed May 21, 2019, we, our subsidiaries, and other members of the industry are defendants. Plaintiff seeks reimbursement for the cost of treating alleged smoking-related diseases for the past five years, payment of anticipated costs of treating future alleged smoking-related diseases, and moral damages. Defendants' answers to the complaint are due in May 2020. A challenge to the service of PMI as improper remains pending.

In the first health care cost recovery case in Nigeria, The Attorney General of Lagos State v. British American Tobacco (Nigeria) Limited, et al., High Court of Lagos State, Lagos, Nigeria, filed March 13, 2008, we and other members of the industry are defendants. Plaintiff seeks reimbursement for the cost of treating alleged smoking-related diseases for the past 20 years, payment of anticipated costs of treating alleged smoking-related diseases for the next 20 years, various forms of injunctive relief, plus punitive damages. We are in the process of making challenges to service and the court's jurisdiction. Currently, the case is stayed in the trial court pending the appeals of certain co-defendants relating to service objections.

In the second health care cost recovery case in Nigeria, The Attorney General of Kano State v. British American Tobacco (Nigeria) Limited, et al., High Court of Kano State, Kano, Nigeria, filed May 9, 2007, we and other members of the industry are defendants.

-27-

Philip Morris International Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Plaintiff seeks reimbursement for the cost of treating alleged smoking-related diseases for the past 20 years, payment of anticipated costs of treating alleged smoking-related diseases for the next 20 years, various forms of injunctive relief, plus punitive damages. We are in the process of making challenges to service and the court's jurisdiction. Currently, the case is stayed in the trial court pending the appeals of certain co-defendants relating to service objections.

In the third health care cost recovery case in Nigeria, The Attorney General of Gombe State v. British American Tobacco (Nigeria) Limited, et al., High Court of Gombe State, Gombe, Nigeria, filed October 17, 2008, we and other members of the industry are defendants. Plaintiff seeks reimbursement for the cost of treating alleged smoking-related diseases for the past 20 years, payment of anticipated costs of treating alleged smoking-related diseases for the next 20 years, various forms of injunctive relief, plus punitive damages. In February 2011, the court ruled that the plaintiff had not complied with the procedural steps necessary to serve us. As a result of this ruling, plaintiff must re-serve its claim. We have not yet been re-served.

In the fourth health care cost recovery case in Nigeria, The Attorney General of Oyo State, et al., v. British American Tobacco (Nigeria) Limited, et al., High Court of Oyo State, Ibadan, Nigeria, filed May 25, 2007, we and other members of the industry are defendants. Plaintiffs seek reimbursement for the cost of treating alleged smoking-related diseases for the past 20 years, payment of anticipated costs of treating alleged smoking-related diseases for the next 20 years, various forms of injunctive relief, plus punitive damages. We challenged service as improper. In June 2010, the court ruled that plaintiffs did not have leave to serve the writ of summons on the defendants and that they must re-serve the writ. We have not yet been re-served.

In the fifth health care cost recovery case in Nigeria, The Attorney General of Ogun State v. British American Tobacco (Nigeria) Limited, et al., High Court of Ogun State, Abeokuta, Nigeria, filed February 26, 2008, we and other members of the industry are defendants. Plaintiff seeks reimbursement for the cost of treating alleged smoking-related diseases for the past 20 years, payment of anticipated costs of treating alleged smoking-related diseases for the next 20 years, various forms of injunctive relief, plus punitive damages. In May 2010, the trial court rejected our service objections. We have appealed.

In the health care cost recovery case in Korea, the National Health Insurance Service v. KT&G, et. al., filed April 14, 2014, our subsidiary and other Korean manufacturers are defendants. Plaintiff alleges that defendants concealed the health hazards of smoking, marketed to youth, added ingredients to make their products more harmful and addictive, and misled consumers into believing that Lights cigarettes are safer than regular cigarettes. The National Health Insurance Service seeks to recover damages allegedly incurred in treating 3,484 patients with small cell lung cancer, squamous cell lung cancer, and squamous cell laryngeal cancer from 2003 to 2012. The case is now in the evidentiary phase.

Label-Related Cases: These cases, now brought only by individual plaintiffs, allege that the use of the descriptor “Lights” or other alleged misrepresentations or omissions of labeling information constitute fraudulent and misleading conduct. Plaintiffs' allegations of liability in these cases are based on various theories of recovery including misrepresentation, deception, and breach of consumer protection laws. Plaintiffs seek various forms of relief including restitution, injunctive relief, and compensatory and other damages. Defenses raised include lack of causation, lack of reliance, assumption of the risk, and statute of limitations.

As of April 24, 2020, there were 4 label-related cases brought by individual plaintiffs in Italy (1) and Chile (3) pending against our subsidiaries, compared with 7 such cases on April 23, 2019, and 1 such case on April 24, 2018.

Public Civil Actions: Claims have been filed either by an individual, or a public or private entity, seeking to protect collective or individual rights, such as the right to health, the right to information or the right to safety. Plaintiffs' allegations of liability in these cases are based on various theories of recovery including product defect, concealment, and misrepresentation. Plaintiffs in these cases seek various forms of relief including injunctive relief such as banning cigarettes, descriptors, smoking in certain places and advertising, as well as implementing communication campaigns and reimbursement of medical expenses incurred by public or private institutions.

As of April 24, 2020, there were 2 public civil actions pending against our subsidiaries in Argentina (1) and Venezuela (1), compared with 2 such cases on April 23, 2019, and 2 such cases on April 24, 2018.

In the public civil action in Argentina, Asociación Argentina de Derecho de Danos v. Massalin Particulares S.A., et al., Civil Court of Buenos Aires, Argentina, filed February 26, 2007, our subsidiary and another member of the industry are defendants. The plaintiff, a consumer association, seeks the establishment of a relief fund for reimbursement of medical costs associated with diseases allegedly caused by smoking. Our subsidiary filed its answer in September 2007. In March 2010, the case file was transferred to the Federal Court on Administrative Matters after the Civil Court granted plaintiff's request to add the national government as a co-plaintiff in the case. The case is currently awaiting a court decision on the merits.

-28-

Philip Morris International Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

In the public civil action in Venezuela, Federation of Consumers and Users Associations (“FEVACU”), et al. v. National Assembly of Venezuela and the Venezuelan Ministry of Health, Constitutional Chamber of the Venezuelan Supreme Court, filed April 29, 2008, we were not named as a defendant, but the plaintiffs published a notice pursuant to court order, notifying all interested parties to appear in the case. In January 2009, our subsidiary appeared in the case in response to this notice. The plaintiffs purport to represent the right to health of the citizens of Venezuela and claim that the government failed to protect adequately its citizens' right to health. The claim asks the court to order the government to enact stricter regulations on the manufacture and sale of tobacco products. In addition, the plaintiffs ask the court to order companies involved in the tobacco industry to allocate a percentage of their “sales or benefits” to establish a fund to pay for the health care costs of treating smoking-related diseases. In October 2008, the court ruled that plaintiffs have standing to file the claim and that the claim meets the threshold admissibility requirements. In December 2012, the court admitted our subsidiary and BAT's subsidiary as interested third parties. In February 2013, our subsidiary answered the complaint.

Reduced-Risk Products

In Colombia, an individual filed a purported class action, Ana Ferrero Rebolledo v. Philip Morris Colombia S.A., et al., in April 2019 against our subsidiaries with the Civil Court of Bogota related to the marketing of our Platform 1 product. Plaintiff alleged that our subsidiaries advertise the product in contravention of law and in a manner that misleads consumers by portraying the product in a positive light, and further asserts that the Platform 1 vapor contains many toxic compounds, creates a high level of dependence, and has damaging second-hand effects. Plaintiff sought injunctive relief and damages on her behalf and on a behalf of two classes (class 1 - all Platform 1 consumers in Colombia who seek damages for the purchase price of the product and personal injuries related to the alleged addiction, and class 2 - all residents of the neighborhood where the advertising allegedly took place who seek damages for exposure to the alleged illegal advertising). Our subsidiaries answered the complaint in January 2020, and in February 2020, plaintiff filed an amended complaint. The amended complaint modifies the relief sought on behalf of the named plaintiff and on behalf of a single class (all consumers of Platform 1 products in Colombia who seek damages for the product purchase price and personal injuries related to the use of an allegedly harmful product). The amended complaint has not yet been served on our subsidiaries.

Other Litigation

The Department of Special Investigations of the government of Thailand ("DSI") conducted an investigation into alleged underpayment by our subsidiary, Philip Morris (Thailand) Limited ("PM Thailand"), of customs duties and excise taxes relating to imports from the Philippines covering the period 2003-2007. On January 18, 2016, the Public Prosecutor filed charges against our subsidiary and seven former and current employees in the Bangkok Criminal Court alleging that PM Thailand and the individual defendants jointly and with the intention to defraud the Thai government, under-declared import prices of cigarettes to avoid full payment of taxes and duties in connection with import entries of cigarettes from the Philippines during the period of July 2003 to June 2006. The government is seeking a fine of approximately THB 80.8 billion (approximately $2.5 billion). In May 2017, Thailand enacted a new customs act. The new act, which took effect in November 2017, substantially limits the amount of fines that Thailand could seek in these proceedings. PM Thailand believes that its declared import prices are in compliance with the Customs Valuation Agreement of the World Trade Organization and Thai law and that the allegations of the Public Prosecutor are inconsistent with several decisions already taken by Thai Customs and other Thai governmental agencies. Trial in the case began in November 2017 and concluded in September 2019. In November 2019, the trial court found our subsidiary guilty of under-declaration of the prices and imposed a fine of approximately THB 1.2 billion (approximately $37.1 million). The trial court dismissed all charges against the individual defendants. In December 2019, as required by the Thai law, our subsidiary paid the fine. This payment is included in other assets on the condensed consolidated balance sheets and negatively impacted net cash provided by operating activities in the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows in the period of payment. Our subsidiary will appeal the trial court's decision. If our subsidiary ultimately prevails on appeal, then Thailand will be required to return this payment to our subsidiary.

The DSI also conducted an investigation into alleged underpayment by PM Thailand of customs duties and excise taxes relating to imports from Indonesia covering the period 2000-2003. On January 26, 2017, the Public Prosecutor filed charges against PM Thailand and its former Thai employee in the Bangkok Criminal Court alleging that PM Thailand and its former employee jointly and with the intention to defraud the Thai government under-declared import prices of cigarettes to avoid full payment of taxes and duties in connection with import entries during the period from January 2002 to July 2003. The government is seeking a fine

-29-

Philip Morris International Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

of approximately THB 19.8 billion (approximately $612 million). In May 2017, Thailand enacted a new customs act. The new act, which took effect in November 2017, substantially limits the amount of fines that Thailand could seek in these proceedings. PM Thailand believes that its declared import prices are in compliance with the Customs Valuation Agreement of the World Trade Organization and Thai law, and that the allegations of the Public Prosecutor are inconsistent with several decisions already taken by Thai Customs and a Thai court. Trial in the case began in November 2018 and concluded in December 2019. In March 2020, the trial court found our subsidiary guilty of under-declaration of the prices and imposed a fine of approximately THB 130 million (approximately $4 million). The trial court dismissed all charges against the individual defendant. In April 2020, as required by Thai law, our subsidiary paid the fine. Our subsidiary will appeal the trial court's decision. If our subsidiary ultimately prevails on appeal, then Thailand will be required to return this payment to our subsidiary.

The South Korean Board of Audit and Inspection (“BAI”) conducted an audit of certain Korean government agencies and the tobacco industry into whether inventory movements ahead of the January 1, 2015 increase of cigarette-related taxes by tobacco companies, including Philip Morris Korea Inc. ("PM Korea"), our South Korean affiliate, were in compliance with South Korean tax laws.  In November 2016, the tax authorities completed their audit and assessed allegedly underpaid taxes and penalties.  In order to avoid nonpayment financial costs, PM Korea paid approximately KRW 272 billion (approximately $221 million), of which KRW 100 billion (approximately $81.1 million) was paid in 2016 and KRW 172 billion (approximately $139.5 million) was paid in the first quarter of 2017.  These paid amounts are included in other assets in the condensed consolidated balance sheets and negatively impacted net cash provided by operating activities in the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows in the period of payment.  PM Korea appealed the assessments. In January 2020, a trial court ruled that PM Korea did not underpay the approximately KRW 218 billion (approximately $177 million) in taxes that were subject to its jurisdiction. The tax authorities appealed this decision. If the tax authorities ultimately lose, then they would be required to return the paid amounts to PM Korea. The hearing for this case is scheduled in May 2020. The hearing for PM Korea's appeal of approximately KRW 54 billion of alleged underpayments (approximately $43.8 million) was held in April 2020, and a decision is scheduled for June 2020.

The Moscow Tax Inspectorate for Major Taxpayers (“MTI”) conducted an audit of AO Philip Morris Izhora (“PM Izhora”), our Russian affiliate, for the 2015-2017 financial years. On July 26, 2019, MTI issued its initial assessment, claiming that intercompany sales of cigarettes between PM Izhora and another Russian affiliate prior to excise tax increases and submission by PM Izhora of the maximum retail sales price notifications for cigarettes to the tax authorities were improper under Russian tax laws and resulted in underpayment of excise taxes and VAT. In August 2019, PM Izhora submitted its objections disagreeing with MTI’s allegations set forth in the initial assessment and MTI’s methodology for calculating the alleged underpayments. MTI accepted some of PM Izhora’s arguments and in September 2019, issued the final tax assessment claiming an underpayment of RUB 24.3 billion (approximately $374 million), including penalties and interest. In accordance with Russian tax laws, PM Izhora paid the entire amount of MTI’s final assessment. This amount was neither imposed on, nor concurrent with, the specific revenue-producing transaction, nor was it collected from customers of our Russian affiliates. PMI believes that the loss of $374 million in this matter is probable and estimable. Consequently, in the third quarter of 2019, PMI recorded a pre-tax charge of $374 million, in marketing, administration and research costs in the condensed consolidated statements of earnings, representing $315 million net of income tax. Under the Russian law, PM Izhora has until mid-September 2020 to challenge the final tax assessment to the Federal Tax Service and is considering whether to pursue such challenge.

A putative shareholder class action lawsuit, In re Philip Morris International Inc. Securities Litigation, is pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, purportedly on behalf of purchasers of Philip Morris International Inc. stock between July 26, 2016 and April 18, 2018.  The lawsuit names Philip Morris International Inc. and certain officers and employees as defendants and includes allegations that the defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose information about PMI’s business, operations, financial condition, and prospects, related to product sales of, and alleged irregularities in clinical studies of, PMI’s Platform 1 product.  The lawsuit seeks various forms of relief, including damages. In November 2018, the court consolidated three putative shareholder class action lawsuits with similar allegations previously filed in the Southern District of New York (namely, City of Westland Police and Fire Retirement System v. Philip Morris International Inc., et al, Greater Pennsylvania Carpenters’ Pension Fund v. Philip Morris International Inc., et al., and Gilchrist v. Philip Morris International Inc., et al.) into these proceedings. A putative shareholder class action lawsuit, Rubenstahl v. Philip Morris International Inc., et al., that had been previously filed in December 2017 in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, was voluntarily dismissed by the plaintiff due to similar allegations in these proceedings. On February 4, 2020, the court granted defendants’ motion in its entirety, dismissing all but one of the plaintiffs’ claims with prejudice.  The court noted that one of plaintiffs’ claims (allegations relating to four non-clinical studies of PMI’s Platform 1 product) did not state a viable claim but allowed plaintiffs to replead that claim by March 3, 2020. On February 18, 2020, the plaintiffs filed a motion for reconsideration of the court's February 4th decision. The court extended the time for plaintiffs to replead the claim relating to four

-30-

Philip Morris International Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

non-clinical studies mentioned above within 30 days after the court's decision on the motion. We believe that this lawsuit is without merit and will continue to defend it vigorously.

In April 2020, affiliates of British American Tobacco plc (“BAT”) commenced patent infringement proceedings, RAI Strategic Holdings, Inc., et al. v. Philip Morris International Inc., et al.,  in the federal court in the Eastern District of Virginia, where PMI and its subsidiary, as well as Altria Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries, are defendants. Plaintiffs seek damages and injunctive relief against further commercialization of the Platform 1 products in the United States.  In April 2020, BAT affiliates filed a complaint against the same PMI and Altria Group, Inc. parties before the International Trade Commission. Plaintiffs seek an order to prevent the importation of Platform 1 products into the United States.

We believe that the foregoing proceedings by the affiliates of BAT are without merit and will defend them vigorously.

We are also involved in additional litigation arising in the ordinary course of our business. While the outcomes of these proceedings are uncertain, management does not expect that the ultimate outcomes of other litigation, including any reasonably possible losses in excess of current accruals, will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial position.

Note 9. Income Taxes:

Income tax provisions for jurisdictions outside the United States of America, as well as state and local income tax provisions, were determined on a separate company basis, and the related assets and liabilities were recorded in PMI’s condensed consolidated balance sheets.

On March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (“CARES Act”) was signed into law in the U.S. to provide certain relief as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition, governments around the world have enacted or implemented various forms of tax relief measures in response to the economic conditions in the wake of COVID-19. As of March 31, 2020, PMI has determined that neither the CARES Act nor changes to income tax laws or regulations in other jurisdictions had a significant impact on PMI’s effective tax rate.

PMI’s effective tax rates for the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019 were 22.6% and 22.6%, respectively. The effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2020 was favorably impacted by a decrease in deferred tax liabilities related to the fair value adjustment of equity securities held by PMI ($16 million). For further details, see Note 11. Fair Value Measurements. The effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2019 was favorably impacted by the reversal of a deferred tax liability on the unremitted earnings of PMI's Canadian subsidiary, RBH ($49 million) and by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. PMI estimates that its full-year 2020 effective tax rate will be approximately 23%, excluding the discrete tax event mentioned above. Changes in currency exchange rates, earnings mix by taxing jurisdiction or future regulatory developments may have an impact on the effective tax rates, which PMI monitors each quarter. Significant judgment is required in determining income tax provisions and in evaluating tax positions.

PMI is regularly examined by tax authorities around the world and is currently under examination in a number of jurisdictions. The U.S. federal statute of limitations remains open for the years 2015 and onward. Foreign and U.S. state jurisdictions have statutes of limitations generally ranging from three to five years.

It is reasonably possible that within the next 12 months certain tax examinations will close, which could result in a change in unrecognized tax benefits along with related interest and penalties. An estimate of any possible change cannot be made at this time.

Note 10. Indebtedness:

Short-term Borrowings:

PMI's short-term borrowings, consisting of commercial paper and bank loans to certain PMI subsidiaries at March 31, 2020 and bank loans to certain PMI subsidiaries at December 31, 2019, had a carrying value of $1,438 million and $338 million, respectively. The fair value of PMI’s short-term borrowings, based on current market interest rates, approximates carrying value.

-31-

Philip Morris International Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Long-term Debt:

At March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, PMI’s long-term debt consisted of the following:

(in millions)	March 31, 2020		December 31, 2019
U.S. dollar notes, 1.875% to 6.375% (average interest rate 3.567%), due through 2044	$	17,489	$	19,783
Foreign currency obligations:
Euro notes, 0.125% to 3.125% (average interest rate 1.983%), due through 2039	8,331		9,822
Swiss franc notes, 1.000% to 2.000% (average interest rate 1.521%), due through 2024	915		899
Other (average interest rate 3.009%), due through 2025	197		203
	26,932		30,707
Less current portion of long-term debt	1,933		4,051
	$	24,999	$	26,656

Other foreign currency debt above includes mortgage debt in Switzerland and finance lease obligations at March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019.

Credit Facilities:

On January 31, 2020, PMI entered into an agreement to amend and extend the term of its $2.0 billion 364-day revolving credit facility from February 4, 2020, to February 2, 2021.

On February 10, 2020, PMI entered into a new $2.0 billion multi-year revolving credit facility, expiring on February 10, 2025. The new credit facility replaced the $2.5 billion multi-year revolving credit facility, which was terminated effective February 10, 2020. PMI had no borrowings outstanding under the terminated facility, which was due to expire on February 28, 2021.

At March 31, 2020, PMI's total committed credit facilities were as follows:

(in billions)

Type	Committed Credit Facilities
364-day revolving credit, expiring February 2, 2021	$	2.0
Multi-year revolving credit, expiring October 1, 2022	3.5
Multi-year revolving credit, expiring February 10, 2025	2.0
Total facilities	$	7.5

At March 31, 2020, there were no borrowings under these committed credit facilities, and the entire committed amounts were available for borrowing.

Note 11. Fair Value Measurements:

The authoritative guidance defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. The guidance also establishes a fair value hierarchy, which requires an entity to maximize

-32-

Philip Morris International Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The guidance describes three levels of input that may be used to measure fair value, which are as follows:

Level 1 - Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

Level 2 - Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities; and

Level 3 - Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

Equity Securities

The fair value of PMI’s equity securities, which are determined by using quoted prices in active markets, have been classified within Level 1.

Derivative Financial Instruments

PMI assesses the fair value of its foreign exchange contracts and interest rate contracts using standard valuation models that use, as their basis, readily observable market inputs. The fair value of PMI’s foreign exchange forward contracts is determined by using the prevailing foreign exchange spot rates and interest rate differentials, and the respective maturity dates of the instruments. The fair value of PMI’s currency options is determined by using a Black-Scholes methodology based on foreign exchange spot rates and interest rate differentials, currency volatilities and maturity dates. PMI’s derivative financial instruments have been classified within Level 2 in the table shown below. See Note 5. Financial Instruments for additional discussion of derivative financial instruments.

Debt

The fair value of PMI’s outstanding debt, which is utilized solely for disclosure purposes, is determined using quotes and market interest rates currently available to PMI for issuances of debt with similar terms and remaining maturities. The aggregate carrying value of PMI’s debt, excluding short-term borrowings and $49 million of finance leases, was $26,883 million at March 31, 2020. The fair value of PMI’s outstanding debt, excluding the aforementioned short-term borrowings and finance leases, was classified within Level 1 and Level 2 in the table shown below.

The aggregate fair values of PMI's investments in equity securities, derivative financial instruments and PMI's debt as of March 31, 2020, were as follows:

(in millions)	Fair Value at March 31, 2020		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets/Liabilities (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Assets:
Equity securities (1)	$	254	$	254	$	—	$	—
Derivative contracts	492		—		492		—
Total assets	$	746	$	254	$	492	$	—
Liabilities:
Debt	$	28,127	$	27,959	$	168	$	—
Derivative contracts	249		—		249		—
Total liabilities	$	28,376	$	27,959	$	417	$	—

⁽¹⁾ Unrealized pre-tax loss of $78 million ($62 million net of tax) on equity securities was recorded in the condensed consolidated statement of earnings for the three months ended March 31, 2020.

-33-

Philip Morris International Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Note 12. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Losses:

PMI’s accumulated other comprehensive losses, net of taxes, consisted of the following:

 

(in millions)	At March 31, 2020			At December 31, 2019			At March 31, 2019
Currency translation adjustments	$	(7,039	)	$	(5,537	)	$	(5,711	)
Pension and other benefits	(3,755		)	(3,829		)	(3,556		)
Derivatives accounted for as hedges	20			3			30
Total accumulated other comprehensive losses	$	(10,774	)	$	(9,363	)	$	(9,237	)

Reclassifications from Other Comprehensive Earnings

The movements in accumulated other comprehensive losses and the related tax impact, for each of the components above, that are due to current period activity and reclassifications to the income statement, including those related to the deconsolidation of RBH, are shown on the condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive earnings for the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019. For additional information, see Note 3. Benefit Plans for disclosures related to PMI's pension and other benefits, Note 5. Financial Instruments for disclosures related to derivative financial instruments and Note 19. Deconsolidation of RBH for disclosures related to the deconsolidation of RBH.

Note 13. Balance Sheet Offsetting:

Derivative Financial Instruments

PMI uses foreign exchange contracts and interest rate contracts to mitigate its exposure to changes in exchange and interest rates from third-party and intercompany actual and forecasted transactions. Substantially all of PMI's derivative financial instruments are subject to master netting arrangements, whereby the right to offset occurs in the event of default by a participating party. While these contracts contain the enforceable right to offset through close-out netting rights, PMI elects to present them on a gross basis in the condensed consolidated balance sheets. Collateral associated with these arrangements is in the form of cash and is unrestricted. See Note 5. Financial Instruments for disclosures related to PMI's derivative financial instruments.

-34-

Philip Morris International Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

The effects of these derivative financial instrument assets and liabilities on PMI's condensed consolidated balance sheets were as follows:

(in millions)	Gross Amounts Recognized		Gross Amount Offset in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet		Net Amounts Presented in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet		Gross Amounts Not Offset in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet
							Financial Instruments			Cash Collateral Received/Pledged			Net Amount
At March 31, 2020
Assets
Derivative contracts	$	492	$	—	$	492	$	(212	)	$	(253	)	$	27
Liabilities
Derivative contracts	$	249	$	—	$	249	$	(212	)	$	(1	)	$	36
At December 31, 2019
Assets
Derivative contracts	$	390	$	—	$	390	$	(297	)	$	(91	)	$	2
Liabilities
Derivative contracts	$	419	$	—	$	419	$	(297	)	$	(59	)	$	63

Note 14. Related Parties - Investments in Unconsolidated Subsidiaries, Equity Securities and Other:

Investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries:

At March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, PMI had total investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries of $923 million and $1,053 million, respectively, which were accounted for under the equity method of accounting. Equity method investments are initially recorded at cost. Under the equity method of accounting, the investment is adjusted for PMI's proportionate share of earnings or losses, dividends, capital contributions, changes in ownership interests and movements in currency translation adjustments. The carrying value of our equity method investments at March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019 exceeded our share of the unconsolidated subsidiaries' book value by $782 million and $901 million, respectively. The difference between the investment carrying value and the amount of underlying equity in net assets, excluding $751 million and $863 million attributable to goodwill as of March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively, is being amortized on a straight-line basis over the underlying assets' estimated useful lives of 10 to 20 years. At March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, PMI received year-to-date dividends from unconsolidated subsidiaries of $23 million and $100 million, respectively.

PMI holds a 23% equity interest in Megapolis Distribution BV, the holding company of CJSC TK Megapolis, PMI's distributor in Russia (Eastern Europe segment).

PMI holds a 49% equity interest in United Arab Emirates-based Emirati Investors-TA (FZC) (“EITA”). PMI holds an approximate 25% economic interest in Société des Tabacs Algéro-Emiratie (“STAEM”), an Algerian joint venture that is 51% owned by EITA and 49% by the Algerian state-owned enterprise Management et Développement des Actifs et des Ressources Holding ("MADAR Holding"), which is part of the Middle East & Africa segment, manufactures and distributes under license some of PMI’s brands.

The initial investments in Megapolis Distribution BV and EITA were recorded at cost and are included in investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries and equity securities on the condensed consolidated balance sheets.

-35-

Philip Morris International Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Equity securities:

Following the deconsolidation of RBH on March 22, 2019, PMI recorded the continuing investment in RBH, PMI's wholly owned subsidiary, at fair value of $3,280 million at the date of deconsolidation, within investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries and equity securities. For further details, see Note 19. Deconsolidation of RBH. Transactions between PMI and RBH are considered to be related party transactions from the date of deconsolidation and are included in the tables below.

Other related parties:

United Arab Emirates-based Trans-Emirates Trading and Investments (FZC) ("TTI") holds a 33% non-controlling interest in Philip Morris Misr LLC ("PMM"), an entity incorporated in Egypt which is consolidated in PMI’s financial statements in the Middle East & Africa segment. PMM sells, under license, PMI brands in Egypt through an exclusive distribution agreement with a local entity that is also controlled by TTI.

Godfrey Phillips India Ltd ("GPI") is one of the non-controlling interest holders in IPM India, which is a 56.3% owned PMI consolidated subsidiary in the South & Southeast Asia segment. GPI also acts as contract manufacturer and distributor for IPM India. Amounts in the tables below include transactions between these related parties.

Financial activity with the above related parties:

PMI’s net revenues and expenses with the above related parties were as follows:

	For the Three Months Ended March 31,
(in millions)	2020		2019
Net revenues:
Megapolis Group	$	496	$	359
Other	281		213
Net revenues (a)	$	777	$	572
Expenses:
Other	$	19	$	13
Expenses	$	19	$	13

^(a) Net revenues exclude excise taxes and VAT billed to customers.

PMI’s balance sheet activity with the above related parties was as follows:

(in millions)	At March 31, 2020		At December 31, 2019
Receivables:
Megapolis Group	$	271	$	375
Other	242		148
Receivables	$	513	$	523
Payables:
Other	$	10	$	20
Payables	$	10	$	20

-36-

Philip Morris International Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

The activities with the above related parties are in the ordinary course of business, and are primarily for distribution, service fees, contract manufacturing and license agreements. PMI eliminated its respective share of all significant intercompany transactions with the equity method investees.

Note 15. Sale of Accounts Receivable:

To mitigate risk and enhance cash and liquidity management PMI sells trade receivables to unaffiliated financial institutions. These arrangements allow PMI to sell, on an ongoing basis, certain trade receivables without recourse. The trade receivables sold are generally short-term in nature and are removed from the condensed consolidated balance sheets. PMI sells trade receivables under two types of arrangements, servicing and non-servicing. For servicing arrangements, PMI continues to service the sold trade receivables on an administrative basis and does not act on behalf of the unaffiliated financial institutions. When applicable, a servicing liability is recorded for the estimated fair value of the servicing. The amounts associated with the servicing liability were not material as of March 31, 2020 and March 31, 2019. Under the non-servicing arrangements, PMI does not provide any administrative support or servicing after the trade receivables have been sold to the unaffiliated financial institutions.

Cumulative trade receivables sold, including excise taxes, for the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, were $2.9 billion and $2.4 billion, respectively. PMI’s operating cash flows were positively impacted by the amount of the trade receivables sold and derecognized from the condensed consolidated balance sheets, which remained outstanding with the unaffiliated financial institutions. The trade receivables sold that remained outstanding under these arrangements as of March 31, 2020 and March 31, 2019, were $1.0 billion, and $0.5 billion, respectively. The net proceeds received are included in cash provided by operating activities in the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows. The difference between the carrying amount of the trade receivables sold and the sum of the cash received is recorded as a loss on sale of trade receivables within marketing, administration and research costs in the condensed consolidated statements of earnings. For the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, the loss on sale of trade receivables was immaterial.

Note 16. Product Warranty:

PMI's IQOS devices are subject to standard product warranties generally for a period of 12 months from the date of purchase or such other periods as required by law. PMI generally provides in cost of sales for the estimated cost of warranty in the period the related revenue is recognized. PMI assesses the adequacy of its accrued product warranties and adjusts the amounts as necessary based on actual experience and changes in future estimates. Factors that affect product warranties may vary across markets but typically include device version mix, product failure rates, logistics and service delivery costs, and warranty policies. PMI accounts for its product warranties within other accrued liabilities. At March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, these amounts were as follows:

(in millions)	At March 31, 2020			At December 31, 2019
Balance at beginning of period	$	140		$	67
Changes due to:
Warranties issued	84			303
Settlements	(66		)	(230		)
Currency	—			—
Balance at end of period	$	158		$	140

-37-

Philip Morris International Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Note 17. Leases:

The components of PMI’s lease cost were as follows for the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019:

	For the Three Months Ended March 31,
(in millions)	2020		2019
Operating lease cost	$	60	$	60
Short-term lease cost	13		12
Variable lease cost	8		8
Total lease cost	$	81	$	80

For the three months ended March 31, 2020, lease cost of $19 million were recorded in cost of sales and $62 million were recorded in marketing, administration and research cost. For the three months ended March 31, 2019, lease costs of $19 million were recorded in cost of sales and $61 million were recorded in marketing, administration and research cost.

Note 18. Asset Impairment and Exit Costs:

For the three months ended March 31, 2020, PMI did not record any pre-tax charges for asset impairment and exit costs.

Global Manufacturing Infrastructure Optimization

In light of declining PMI cigarette volumes resulting from lower total industry volumes and the shift to smoke-free alternatives, PMI continues to optimize its global manufacturing infrastructure. During 2019, PMI recorded asset impairment and exit costs related to plant closures in Argentina, Colombia, Germany and Pakistan as part of its global manufacturing infrastructure optimization.

For the three months ended March 31, 2019, PMI recorded pre-tax asset impairment and exit costs of $20 million related to a plant closure in Pakistan. This total pre-tax charge in the first quarter of 2019 was included in marketing, administration and research costs on the condensed consolidated statements of earnings and was included in the operating income of the South & Southeast Asia segment.

Movement in Exit Cost Liabilities

The movement in exit cost liabilities for the three months ended March 31, 2020 was as follows:

(in millions)
Liability balance, January 1, 2020	$	191
Charges, net	—
Cash spent	(48		)
Currency/other	(3		)
Liability balance, March 31, 2020	$	140

Future cash payments for exit costs incurred to date are anticipated to be substantially paid by the end of 2021, with approximately $66 million expected to be paid in the remainder of 2020.

-38-

Philip Morris International Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Note 19. Deconsolidation of RBH:

As discussed in Note 8. Contingencies, following the March 1, 2019 judgment of the Court of Appeal of Québec in two class action lawsuits against PMI's Canadian subsidiary, Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc. ("RBH"), PMI recorded in its consolidated results a pre-tax charge of $194 million, representing $142 million net of tax, in the first quarter of 2019. This pre-tax Canadian tobacco litigation-related expense was included in marketing, administration and research costs on PMI's condensed consolidated statement of earnings for the three months ended March 31, 2019. The charge reflects PMI’s assessment of the portion of the judgment that represents probable and estimable loss prior to the deconsolidation of RBH and corresponds to the trust account deposit required by the judgment. RBH’s share of the deposit is approximately CAD 257 million.

On March 22, 2019, RBH obtained an initial order from the Ontario Superior Court of Justice granting it protection under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act ("CCAA"), which is a Canadian federal law that permits a Canadian business to restructure its affairs while carrying on its business in the ordinary course with minimal disruption to its customers, suppliers and employees.

The administration of the CCAA process, principally relating to the powers provided to the court and the court appointed monitor, removes certain elements of control of the business from both PMI and RBH. As a result, PMI has determined that it no longer has a controlling financial interest over RBH as defined in ASC 810 (Consolidation), and PMI deconsolidated RBH as of the date of the CCAA filing. PMI has also determined that it does not exert "significant influence" over RBH as that term is defined in ASC 323 (Investments-Equity Method and Joint Ventures). Therefore, as of March 22, 2019, PMI accounted for its continuing investment in RBH in accordance with ASC 321 (Investments-Equity Securities) as an equity security, without readily determinable fair value.

Following the deconsolidation, the carrying value of assets and liabilities of RBH was removed from the consolidated balance sheet of PMI, and the continuing investment in RBH was recorded at fair value at the date of deconsolidation. The total amount deconsolidated from PMI’s balance sheet was $3,519 million, including $1,323 million of cash, $1,463 million of goodwill, $529 million of accumulated other comprehensive earnings, primarily related to historical currency translation and $204 million of other assets and liabilities, net. While PMI is accounting for its investment in RBH as an equity security, PMI would recognize dividends as income upon receipt. However, while it remains under creditor protection, RBH does not anticipate paying dividends.

The fair value of PMI’s continuing investment in RBH of $3,280 million was determined at the date of deconsolidation, recorded within Investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries and equity securities and is assessed for impairment on an ongoing basis. The estimated fair value of the underlying business was determined based on an income approach using a discounted cash flow analysis, as well as a market approach for certain contingent liabilities. The information used in the estimate includes observable inputs, primarily a discount rate of 8%, a terminal growth rate of 2.5% and information about total tobacco market size in Canada and RBH’s share of the market, as well as unobservable inputs such as operating budgets and strategic plans, various inflation scenarios, estimated shipment volumes, and expected product pricing and projected margins.

The difference between the carrying value of the assets and liabilities of RBH that were deconsolidated, and the fair value of the continuing investment, as determined at the date of deconsolidation, was $239 million, before tax, and this loss on deconsolidation is reflected within marketing, administration and research costs on PMI’s condensed consolidated statement of earnings for the three months ended March 31, 2019. PMI also recorded a tax benefit of $49 million within the provision for income taxes for the three months ended March 31, 2019, related to the reversal of a deferred tax liability on unremitted earnings of RBH.

RBH is party to transactions with PMI and its consolidated subsidiaries entered into in the normal course of business; these transactions include royalty payments and recharge of various corporate expenses for services benefiting RBH. Up to the date of the CCAA filing, these transactions were eliminated on consolidation and had no impact on PMI’s consolidated statement of earnings. After deconsolidating RBH, these transactions are treated as third-party transactions in PMI’s financial statements. The amount of these related party transactions is included within Note 14. Related Parties - Investments in Unconsolidated Subsidiaries, Equity Securities and Other.

Developments in the CCAA process, including resolution through a plan of arrangement or compromise of all pending tobacco-related litigation currently stayed in Canada, as discussed in Note 8. Contingencies, could result in a material change in the fair value of PMI’s continuing investment in RBH.

-39-

Item 2.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Description of Our Company

We are leading a transformation in the tobacco industry to create a smoke-free future and ultimately replace cigarettes with smoke-free products to the benefit of adults who would otherwise continue to smoke, society, the company and its shareholders. We are a leading international tobacco company engaged in the manufacture and sale of cigarettes, as well as smoke-free products and associated electronic devices and accessories, and other nicotine-containing products in markets outside the United States. In addition, we ship a version of our Platform 1 device and its consumables authorized by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration ("FDA") to Altria Group, Inc. for sale in the United States under license. We are building a future on a new category of smoke-free products that, while not risk-free, are a much better choice than continuing to smoke. Through multidisciplinary capabilities in product development, state-of-the-art facilities and scientific substantiation, we aim to ensure that our smoke-free products meet adult consumer preferences and rigorous regulatory requirements. Our IQOS smoke-free product brand portfolio includes heat-not-burn tobacco and nicotine-containing vapor products.

We manage our business in six operating segments:

• European Union ("EU");

• Eastern Europe ("EE");

• Middle East & Africa ("ME&A"), which includes our international duty free business;

• South & Southeast Asia ("S&SA");

• East Asia & Australia ("EA&A"); and

• Latin America & Canada ("LA&C"), which includes transactions under license with Altria Group, Inc. for the distribution of our Platform 1 product in the United States.

Our cigarettes are sold in more than 180 markets, and in many of these markets they hold the number one or number two market share position. We have a wide range of premium, mid-price and low-price brands. Our portfolio comprises both international and local brands. In addition to the manufacture and sale of cigarettes, we are engaged in the development and commercialization of reduced-risk products ("RRPs"). RRPs is the term we use to refer to products that present, are likely to present, or have the potential to present less risk of harm to smokers who switch to these products versus continuing smoking. 

We use the term net revenues to refer to our operating revenues from the sale of our products, including shipping and handling charges billed to customers, net of sales and promotion incentives, and excise taxes. Our net revenues and operating income are affected by various factors, including the volume of products we sell, the price of our products, changes in currency exchange rates and the mix of products we sell. Mix is a term used to refer to the proportionate value of premium-price brands to mid-price or low-price brands in any given market (product mix). Mix can also refer to the proportion of shipment volume in more profitable markets versus shipment volume in less profitable markets (geographic mix).

Our cost of sales consists principally of: tobacco leaf, non-tobacco raw materials, labor and manufacturing costs; shipping and handling costs; and the cost of the IQOS devices produced by third-party electronics manufacturing service providers. Estimated costs associated with IQOS warranty programs are generally provided for in cost of sales in the period the related revenues are recognized.

Our marketing, administration and research costs include the costs of marketing and selling our products, other costs generally not related to the manufacture of our products (including general corporate expenses), and costs incurred to develop new products. The most significant components of our marketing, administration and research costs are marketing and sales expenses and general and administrative expenses.

Philip Morris International Inc. is a legal entity separate and distinct from its direct and indirect subsidiaries. Accordingly, our right, and thus the right of our creditors and stockholders, to participate in any distribution of the assets or earnings of any subsidiary is subject to the prior rights of creditors of such subsidiary, except to the extent that claims of our company itself as a creditor may be recognized. As a holding company, our principal sources of funds, including funds to make payment on our debt securities, are from the receipt of dividends and repayment of debt from our subsidiaries. Our principal wholly owned and majority-owned

-40-

subsidiaries currently are not limited by long-term debt or other agreements in their ability to pay cash dividends or to make other distributions with respect to their common stock that are otherwise compliant with law.

Executive Summary

The following executive summary provides the business update and significant highlights from the "Discussion and Analysis" that follows.

Consolidated Operating Results for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2020

The results below include the impact of favorable estimated distributor and trade inventory movements related to COVID-19, as further discussed in "Operating Results - Three Months Ended March 31, 2020." We expect such favorable impact to reverse in the second quarter of 2020.

• Net Revenues - Net revenues of $7.2 billion for the three months ended March 31, 2020 increased by $402 million, or 6.0%, from the comparable 2019 amount. The change in our net revenues from the comparable 2019 amount was driven by the following (variances not to scale with quarterly results):

During the quarter, net revenues, excluding unfavorable currency, increased by 7.1%, mainly reflecting: a favorable pricing variance, notably driven by Australia, the GCC, Germany, Mexico, the Philippines and Turkey, partly offset by Italy; and a favorable volume/mix, primarily driven by heated tobacco unit volume (notably in the EU and Eastern Europe, partly offset by PMI Duty Free), partially offset by lower IQOS device volume (notably in Japan) and lower cigarette volume (mainly due to Mexico, the Philippines, Saudi Arabia and Turkey, largely offset by Germany, Italy, Japan, North Africa and Russia). The currency-neutral growth in net revenues of 7.1% came despite the unfavorable "Other" impact of $228 million, shown above, mainly resulting from the deconsolidation of our Canadian subsidiary, Rothmans, Benson & Hedges ("RBH"), effective March 22, 2019. For further details on the deconsolidation of RBH, see Note 8. Contingencies and Note 19. Deconsolidation of RBH.

-41-

Net revenues by product category for the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, are shown below:

        

• Diluted Earnings Per Share - The changes in our reported diluted earnings per share ("diluted EPS") for the three months ended March 31, 2020, from the comparable 2019 amounts, were as follows:

	Diluted EPS			% Growth (Decline)
For the three months ended March 31, 2019	$	0.87
2019 Asset impairment and exit costs	0.01
2019 Canadian tobacco litigation-related expense	0.09
2019 Loss on deconsolidation of RBH	0.12
2019 Tax items	—
Subtotal of 2019 items	0.22
2020 Asset impairment and exit costs	—
2020 Fair value adjustment for equity security investments	(0.04		)
2020 Tax items	—
Subtotal of 2020 items	(0.04		)
Currency	(0.13		)
Interest	0.01
Change in tax rate	(0.01		)
Operations	0.25
For the three months ended March 31, 2020	$	1.17		34.5	%

Asset impairment and exit costs – We recorded pre-tax asset impairment and exit costs of $20 million (or $0.01 per share impact on diluted EPS) during the three months ended March 31, 2019, related to a plant closure in Pakistan as a part of the optimization of our global manufacturing footprint. The total pre-tax charge was included in marketing, administration and research costs on the condensed consolidated statements of earnings. For further details, see Note 18. Asset Impairment and Exit Costs.

Canadian tobacco litigation-related expense – In the first quarter of 2019, we recorded a pre-tax charge of $194 million, representing $142 million net of tax, relating to the judgment against our Canadian subsidiary, Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc. ("RBH"), in two Québec smoking and health class actions. The charge of $0.09 per share reflects our assessment of the portion of the judgment that represents probable and estimable loss prior to the deconsolidation of RBH and corresponds to the trust account deposit required by the judgment. The total pre-tax charge was included in marketing, administration and research costs on the condensed

-42-

consolidated statements of earnings and was included in the operating income of the Latin America & Canada segment. For further details, see Note 8. Contingencies and Note 19. Deconsolidation of RBH.

Loss on deconsolidation of RBH – Following the judgment in the two Québec smoking and health class actions, RBH obtained an initial order from the Ontario Superior Court of Justice granting it protection under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (“CCAA”), which is a Canadian federal law that permits a Canadian business to restructure its affairs while carrying on its business in the ordinary course with minimal disruption to its customers, suppliers and employees. The administration of the CCAA process, principally relating to the powers provided to the court and the court appointed monitor, removes certain elements of control of the business from both PMI and RBH. As a result, we have determined that we no longer have a controlling financial interest over RBH and that we do not exert "significant influence" over RBH under U.S. GAAP. Therefore, we deconsolidated RBH as of the date of the CCAA filing on March 22, 2019, and will account for our continuing investment in RBH as an equity security, without readily determinable fair value.

A loss on the deconsolidation of RBH of $239 million was included in marketing, administration and research costs on the condensed consolidated statements of earnings for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and was included in the operating income of the Latin America & Canada segment. The $0.12 per share impact also included a tax benefit of $49 million within the provision for income taxes, as discussed above, related to the reversal of a deferred tax liability on the unremitted earnings of RBH. For further details, see Note 8. Contingencies and Note 19. Deconsolidation of RBH.

Fair Value adjustment for equity security investments – In the first quarter of 2020, we recorded an unfavorable fair value adjustment for our equity security investments of $(62) million after tax (or $0.04 per share decrease in diluted EPS). The fair value adjustment for our equity security investments was included in equity investments and securities (income)/loss, net ($78 million loss) and provision for income taxes ($16 million benefit) on the condensed consolidated statements of earnings. For further details, see Note 11. Fair Value Measurements.

Currency – The unfavorable impact of $0.13 per share in the first quarter includes $0.07 per share of transactional impact incurred in March, primarily from the revaluation of Euro or Dollar denominated payables in certain markets, such as Russia, where the local currency has seen a significant devaluation. The unfavorable currency impact also includes the fluctuations of the U.S. dollar, especially against the Argentine peso, Brazilian real, and Euro. This unfavorable currency movement has impacted our profitability across our primary revenue markets and local currency cost bases.

Income Taxes – The change in the tax rate that decreased our diluted EPS by $0.01 per share in the table above was primarily due to changes in earnings mix by taxing jurisdiction. For further details, see Note 9. Income Taxes.

Operations – The increase in diluted EPS of $0.25 from our operations in the table above was due primarily to the following segments:

• European Union: Favorable volume/mix and favorable pricing, partially offset by higher marketing, administration and research costs, and higher manufacturing costs;

• South & Southeast Asia: Favorable pricing, partially offset by unfavorable volume/mix and higher marketing, administration and research costs;

• East Asia & Australia: Lower manufacturing costs, lower marketing, administration and research costs and favorable pricing, partially offset by unfavorable volume/mix; and

• Eastern Europe: Favorable volume/mix and favorable pricing, partially offset by higher manufacturing costs and higher marketing, administration and research costs;

partially offset by

• Latin America & Canada: Unfavorable impact resulting from the deconsolidation of RBH, as well as unfavorable volume/mix, partially offset by favorable pricing and lower marketing, administration and research costs; and

• Middle East & Africa: Unfavorable volume/mix, higher manufacturing costs and lower fees for certain distribution rights billed to customers in certain markets, partially offset by favorable pricing and lower marketing, administration and research costs.

For further details, see the “Consolidated Operating Results” and “Operating Results by Business Segment” sections of the following “Discussion and Analysis.”

-43-

COVID-19 Impact on Our Business

COVID-19: Business Continuity Update

Since the onset of COVID-19, PMI has undertaken a number of business continuity measures to mitigate potential disruption to its operations and route-to-market in order to preserve the availability of products to its customers and adult consumers.

Currently, PMI has sufficient access to the inputs for its products and is not facing any significant business continuity issues.

The large majority of PMI's manufacturing facilities globally are currently operational, including all heated tobacco unit factories. Certain cigarette production facilities are temporarily impacted by government-mandated shutdowns or production limitations. Such facilities account for approximately 20% of PMI's total cigarette production capacity worldwide.

Based on current sales trends, there are adequate inventories of PMI finished goods, on average across all markets, of over two months for heated tobacco units, over three months for tobacco heating devices, and over one and a half months for cigarettes. While government-related restrictions have led to complexities in the company's route-to-market in select geographies, PMI does not currently anticipate out-of-stock situations in any major operating income markets and generally expects consumers to have adequate access to its products. However, in Argentina, in light of a factory lockdown, we are currently experiencing an out-of-stock situation. In certain emerging markets, potential difficulties for some smaller general trade outlets could lead to temporary localized out-of-stock situations given less developed route-to-market infrastructures.

Currently, PMI has sufficient liquidity resources through cash on hand, the ongoing cash generation of its business, and continued access to commercial paper. As of March 31, 2020, PMI had approximately $3.7 billion of cash and cash equivalents. We had $1.1 billion of commercial paper, with an average term of approximately 30 days, and $7.5 billion in stand-by revolving credit facilities. PMI repaid approximately $3.6 billion in bond maturities during the first quarter and paid approximately $3.6 billion in dividends to shareholders year-to-date April (reflecting dividends declared in the fourth quarter of 2019 and the first quarter of 2020). The company has a well laddered bond portfolio and $0.3 billion of bonds maturing through the end of 2020. For further details on our liquidity position, see the "Financial Review" section of this MD&A.

COVID-19: Primary Business Impacts

While the trajectory and duration of the COVID-19 pandemic -- and related government restrictions -- remain uncertain, PMI anticipates the primary areas of impact from temporary changes to its operating environment to be as follows:

• Reduced Duty-Free Sales: Government travel restrictions and related reductions in passenger travel are having a significant impact on the company's duty-free business, which contributed approximately 4% of total net revenues in 2019 and has relatively high unit margins reflecting its skew to premium brands. As a result of this premium skew, only a portion of the COVID-linked duty-free volume decline is expected to be recovered by the company's own brand portfolio in local markets, and generally at lower margins.

• Delayed IQOS User Acquisition: Lock-down measures and other restrictions limit PMI's ability to engage with adult smokers through the company's field sales forces, as well as company-owned and third-party retail touch-points, and are only partly mitigated by PMI's increasing use of digital tools that enable virtual guided trials and other e-commerce activities. Based on trends since lock-down measures were introduced, PMI expects the rate of new user acquisition to be, on average, around 50% lower than it previously anticipated for as long as government restrictions are in place, with variations depending on the level of restrictions by market. We do not expect customer retention or conversion rates to be significantly affected.

• Indonesia - Minimum Retail Price Delay: The Indonesian government has announced that the enforcement of the new minimum price, originally scheduled for April 1, 2020, is delayed until June, due to COVID-19 restrictions. PMI expects the delay to prolong unfavorable retail price gaps between the low end of the market and PMI's cigarette brands, with a corresponding negative impact on PMI's cigarette market share and timing of pricing.

PMI also anticipates uncertainty as to the general economic impact of the global pandemic and ultimate shape of the recovery, particularly with respect to the effects of increased unemployment and decreased disposable income on consumption and down-trading.

Recent devaluations of currencies against the U.S. dollar, in particular in developing markets, are also expected to impact PMI's financial results.

-44-

Discussion and Analysis

Consolidated Operating Results

See pages 75-81 for a discussion of our "Cautionary Factors That May Affect Future Results." Our net revenues and operating income by segment are shown in the table below:

(in millions)	For the Three Months Ended March 31,
	2020		2019			Change
Net revenues:
European Union	$	2,535	$	2,159		17.4	%
Eastern Europe	788		579			36.1	%
Middle East & Africa	876		927			(5.5	)%
South & Southeast Asia	1,251		1,113			12.4	%
East Asia & Australia	1,255		1,321			(5.0	)%
Latin America & Canada (1)	448		652			(31.3	)%
Net revenues	$	7,153	$	6,751		6.0	%
Operating income (loss):
European Union	$	1,158	$	896		29.2	%
Eastern Europe	99		129			(23.3	)%
Middle East & Africa	321		344			(6.7	)%
South & Southeast Asia	599		440			36.1	%
East Asia & Australia	486		427			13.8	%
Latin America & Canada (1)	126		(186		)	+100%
Operating income	$	2,789	$	2,050		36.0	%

⁽¹⁾ As of March 22, 2019, PMI deconsolidated the financial results of its Canadian subsidiary, Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc. ("RBH") from PMI's financial statements. For further details, see Note 19. Deconsolidation of RBH.

Items affecting the comparability of results from operations were as follows:

• Canadian tobacco litigation-related expense - See Note 8. Contingencies and Note 19. Deconsolidation of RBH for details of the $194 million pre-tax charge included in the Latin America & Canada segment for the three months ended March 31, 2019.

• Loss on deconsolidation of RBH - See Note 19. Deconsolidation of RBH for details of the $239 million loss included in the Latin America & Canada segment for the three months ended March 31, 2019.

• Asset impairment and exit costs - See Note 18. Asset Impairment and Exit Costs for details of the $20 million pre-tax charge included in the South & Southeast Asia segment for the three months ended March 31, 2019.

-45-

Our net revenues by product category are shown in the table below:

PMI Net Revenues by Product Category
(in millions)	For the Three Months Ended March 31,
	2020		2019		Change
Combustible Products
European Union	$	1,911	$	1,812	5.4	%
Eastern Europe	523		471		11.1	%
Middle East & Africa	832		829		0.5	%
South & Southeast Asia	1,251		1,113		12.4	%
East Asia & Australia	642		638		0.6	%
Latin America & Canada	440		646		(31.9	)%
Total Combustible Products	$	5,598	$	5,508	1.6	%
Reduced-Risk Products
European Union	$	624	$	347	79.9	%
Eastern Europe	265		108		+100%
Middle East & Africa	44		98		(55.7	)%
South & Southeast Asia	—		—		—	%
East Asia & Australia	613		683		(10.2	)%
Latin America & Canada	8		6		38.5	%
Total Reduced-Risk Products	$	1,555	$	1,243	25.1	%
Total PMI Net Revenues	$	7,153	$	6,751	6.0	%

Note: Sum of product categories or Regions might not foot to total PMI due to roundings.

Net revenues related to combustible products refer to the operating revenues generated from the sale of these products, including shipping and handling charges billed to customers, net of sales and promotion incentives, and excise taxes. These net revenue amounts consist of the sale of our cigarettes and other tobacco products combined. Other tobacco products primarily include roll-your-own and make-your-own cigarettes, pipe tobacco, cigars and cigarillos and do not include reduced-risk products.

Net revenues related to reduced-risk products refer to the operating revenues generated from the sale of these products, including shipping and handling charges billed to customers, net of sales and promotion incentives, and excise taxes. These net revenue amounts consist of the sale of our heated tobacco units, IQOS devices and related accessories, and other nicotine-containing products, which primarily include our e-vapor products.

We recognize revenue when control is transferred to the customer, typically either upon shipment or delivery of goods.

Revenues from shipments of Platform 1 devices, heated tobacco units and accessories to Altria Group, Inc., commencing in the third quarter of 2019, for sale under license in the United States are included in Net Revenues of the Latin America & Canada segment.

References to "Cost/Other" in the Consolidated Financial Summary table of total PMI and the six operating segments throughout this "Discussion and Analysis" reflects the currency-neutral variances of: cost of sales (excluding the volume/mix cost component); marketing, administration and research costs (including asset impairment and exit costs, the Canadian tobacco litigation-related expense, and the charge related to the deconsolidation of RBH in Canada); and amortization of intangibles. “Cost/Other” also includes the currency-neutral net revenue variance, unrelated to volume/mix and price components, attributable to fees for certain distribution rights billed to customers in certain markets in the ME&A Region, as well as the impact of the deconsolidation in RBH.

-46-

Our shipment volume by segment for cigarettes and heated tobacco units is shown in the table below:

PMI Shipment Volume (Million Units)
	For the Three Months Ended March 31,
	2020	2019	Change
Cigarettes
European Union	40,646	39,488	2.9	%
Eastern Europe	21,419	20,320	5.4	%
Middle East & Africa	29,996	33,304	(9.9	)%
South & Southeast Asia	37,595	41,492	(9.4	)%
East Asia & Australia	12,299	12,113	1.5	%
Latin America & Canada	15,063	17,580	(14.3	)%
Total Cigarettes	157,018	164,297	(4.4	)%
Heated Tobacco Units
European Union	4,661	2,293	+100%
Eastern Europe	4,366	1,548	+100%
Middle East & Africa	470	754	(37.7	)%
South & Southeast Asia	—	—	—	%
East Asia & Australia	7,122	6,849	4.0	%
Latin America & Canada (1)	108	54	+100%
Total Heated Tobacco Units	16,727	11,498	45.5	%
Cigarettes and Heated Tobacco Units
European Union	45,307	41,781	8.4	%
Eastern Europe	25,785	21,868	17.9	%
Middle East & Africa	30,466	34,058	(10.5	)%
South & Southeast Asia	37,595	41,492	(9.4	)%
East Asia & Australia	19,421	18,962	2.4	%
Latin America & Canada	15,171	17,634	(14.0	)%
Total Cigarettes and Heated Tobacco Units	173,745	175,795	(1.2	)%

⁽¹⁾ Includes shipments to Altria Group, Inc., commencing in the third quarter of 2019, for sale in the United States under license.

Following the deconsolidation of our Canadian subsidiary, we will continue to report the volume of brands sold by RBH for which other PMI subsidiaries are the trademark owners. These include HEETS, Next, Philip Morris and Rooftop.

Heated tobacco units ("HTU") is the term we use to refer to heated tobacco consumables, which for us include our HEETS, HEETS Creations, HEETS Marlboro and HEETS FROM MARLBORO, defined collectively as HEETS, as well as Marlboro HeatSticks and Parliament HeatSticks.

Shipment volume of heated tobacco units to the United States is included in the heated tobacco unit shipment volume of the Latin America & Canada segment.

References to total international market, defined as worldwide cigarette and heated tobacco unit volume excluding the United States, total industry, total market and market shares throughout this "Discussion and Analysis" are our estimates for tax-paid products based on the latest available data from a number of internal and external sources and may, in defined instances, exclude the People's Republic of China and/or our duty free business. In addition, to reflect the deconsolidation of RBH, effective March 22, 2019, PMI's total market share has been restated for previous periods.

-47-

In-market sales ("IMS") is defined as sales to the retail channel, depending on the market and distribution model.

North Africa is defined as Algeria, Egypt, Libya, Morocco and Tunisia.

The Gulf Cooperation Council ("GCC") is defined as Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE).

Unless otherwise stated, references to total industry, total market, our shipment volume and our market share performance reflect cigarettes and heated tobacco units.

From time to time, PMI’s shipment volumes are subject to the impact of distributor inventory movements, and estimated total industry/market volumes are subject to the impact of inventory movements in various trade channels that include estimated trade inventory movements of PMI’s competitors arising from market-specific factors that significantly distort reported volume disclosures. Such factors may include changes to the manufacturing supply chain, shipment methods, consumer demand, timing of excise tax increases or other influences that may affect the timing of sales to customers. In such instances, in addition to reviewing PMI shipment volumes and certain estimated total industry/market volumes on a reported basis, management reviews these measures on an adjusted basis that excludes the impact of distributor and/or estimated trade inventory movements. Management also believes that disclosing PMI shipment volumes and estimated total industry/market volumes in such circumstances on a basis that excludes the impact of distributor and/or estimated trade inventory movements, such as on an IMS basis, improves the comparability of performance and trends for these measures over different reporting periods.

-48-

Key market data regarding total market size, our shipments and market share are shown in the tables below:

	For the Three Months Ended March 31,
			PMI Shipments (billion units)						PMI Market Share (%)(1)
Market	Total Market (billion units)		Total		Cigarette		Heated Tobacco Unit		Total		Heated Tobacco Unit
	2020	2019	2020	2019	2020	2019	2020	2019	2020	2019	2020	2019
Total	606.6	624.7	173.7	175.8	157.0	164.3	16.7	11.5	27.9	28.1	2.9	2.0
European Union
France	8.3	9.1	4.0	4.2	4.0	4.1	—	—	44.5	45.0	0.4	0.2
Germany	16.0	15.4	6.7	6.1	6.4	5.9	0.4	0.2	42.2	39.5	2.4	1.0
Italy	15.7	15.6	9.2	7.7	7.8	7.1	1.4	0.6	51.9	51.0	7.4	3.7
Poland	10.8	10.6	4.3	4.2	3.9	4.0	0.5	0.2	40.0	39.9	4.3	1.8
Spain	10.4	10.2	3.7	3.6	3.5	3.5	0.1	0.1	31.0	31.7	0.9	0.6
Eastern Europe
Russia	46.6	46.7	15.0	12.1	12.4	11.3	2.6	0.8	32.6	28.4	6.5	3.0
Middle East & Africa
Saudi Arabia	4.3	5.3	1.1	3.8	1.0	3.8	—	—	40.8	41.7	—	—
Turkey	22.4	29.5	10.2	13.9	10.2	13.9	—	—	45.1	47.2	—	—
South & Southeast Asia
Indonesia	67.2	67.6	20.4	22.1	20.4	22.1	—	—	30.4	32.7	—	—
Philippines	15.3	16.8	10.7	11.7	10.7	11.7	—	—	70.2	70.1	—	—
East Asia & Australia
Australia	2.5	3.1	0.7	0.8	0.7	0.8	—	—	28.0	24.4	—	—
Japan	35.5	37.7	12.8	12.1	6.8	6.5	6.0	5.7	36.3	34.5	19.1	17.0
Korea	16.2	15.6	3.5	3.6	2.4	2.5	1.1	1.2	21.8	23.3	6.6	7.3
Latin America & Canada
Argentina	8.0	8.5	5.3	6.1	5.3	6.1	—	—	66.1	72.3	—	—
Mexico	6.7	7.4	4.1	4.7	4.1	4.7	—	—	61.1	63.6	0.2	—
(1) Market share estimates are calculated using IMS data
Note: % change for Total Market and PMI shipments is computed based on millions of units; PMI Market Share estimates for previous periods are restated to reflect RBH deconsolidation and exclude RBH-owned brands.

Consolidated Operating Results for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2020

The following discussion compares our consolidated operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2020, with the three months ended March 31, 2019.

Our total shipment volume decreased by 1.2%, principally due to:

• Middle East & Africa, reflecting lower cigarette shipment volume, notably in Saudi Arabia and Turkey, partly offset by North Africa;

• South & Southeast Asia, reflecting lower cigarette shipment volume, primarily in Indonesia, Pakistan and the Philippines; and

• Latin America & Canada, reflecting lower cigarette shipment volume, primarily in Argentina, Canada (mainly due to the impact of the deconsolidation of RBH), and Mexico. Excluding the volume impact from the RBH deconsolidation, our total shipment volume in the Region decreased by 8.8%;

-49-

partly offset by

• the EU, reflecting higher heated tobacco unit shipment volume across the Region, particularly in Italy, as well as higher cigarette shipment volume, notably in Germany and Italy;

• Eastern Europe, reflecting higher heated tobacco unit shipment volume across the Region, notably in Russia and Ukraine, as well as higher cigarette shipment volume, mainly in Russia, partly offset by Ukraine; and

• East Asia & Australia, mainly reflecting higher cigarette and heated tobacco unit shipment volume in Japan.

Excluding the volume impact from the RBH deconsolidation of approximately 1.0 billion units (reflecting first quarter 2019 volume of RBH-owned brands and including Duty-Free sales of these brands in Canada), PMI's total shipment volume decreased by 0.6%.

First-Quarter Impact of Inventory Movements

Excluding the volume impact from the deconsolidation of RBH, and the net favorable impact of estimated distributor inventory movements of approximately 5.4 billion units, our total in-market sales declined by 3.7%, due to a 6.7% decline in cigarettes, partly offset by a 35.6% increase in heated tobacco units.

The net favorable impact of estimated distributor inventory movements of approximately 5.4 billion units reflected:

• A net favorable impact of 4.7 billion cigarettes, mainly driven by the EU Region, Japan, North Africa, PMI Duty Free and Russia, partly offset by Saudi Arabia; and

• A net favorable impact of 0.7 billion heated tobacco units, mainly driven by the EU Region and Russia.

Our cigarette shipment volume by brand and heated tobacco units shipment volume are shown in the table below:

PMI Shipment Volume by Brand (Million Units)
	First-Quarter
	2020	2019	Change
Cigarettes
Marlboro	59,245	59,963	(1.2	)%
L&M	22,641	21,816	3.8	%
Chesterfield	12,903	14,298	(9.8	)%
Philip Morris	11,463	10,723	6.9	%
Sampoerna A	8,548	7,901	8.2	%
Parliament	7,573	8,830	(14.2	)%
Dji Sam Soe	6,175	6,651	(7.2	)%
Bond Street	5,612	5,671	(1.0	)%
Lark	4,025	5,270	(23.6	)%
Fortune	2,482	3,045	(18.5	)%
Others	16,351	20,129	(18.8	)%
Total Cigarettes	157,018	164,297	(4.4	)%
Heated Tobacco Units (1)	16,727	11,498	45.5	%
Total Cigarettes and Heated Tobacco Units	173,745	175,795	(1.2	)%

⁽¹⁾ Includes shipments to Altria Group, Inc., commencing in the third quarter of 2019, for sale in the United States under license.

Note: Sampoerna A includes Sampoerna; Philip Morris includes Philip Morris/Dubliss; and Lark includes Lark Harmony.

Our cigarette shipment volume of the following brands decreased:

• Marlboro, mainly due to the GCC, Indonesia, Mexico and Turkey, partially offset by Germany, Italy, Japan, North Africa and Russia;

-50-

• Chesterfield, mainly due to Argentina, Russia, Saudi Arabia and Turkey, partly offset by Brazil;

• Parliament, mainly due to Russia and Turkey;

• Dji Sam Soe in Indonesia, mainly due to Dji Sam Soe Magnum Mild, reflecting adult smoker down-trading to super-low-price brands due to widened price gaps;

• Bond Street, mainly due to Ukraine, partly offset by Russia;

• Lark, mainly due to Japan and Turkey;

• Fortune in the Philippines, mainly reflecting the impact of the August 2019 price increase, which widened price gaps with competitive brands; and

• "Others," notably due to: the impact of the deconsolidation of RBH in Canada; mid-price Sampoerna U in Indonesia and Muratti in Turkey; and low-price Morven in Pakistan.

The increase in our heated tobacco unit shipment volume was mainly driven by the EU (notably Italy), Eastern Europe (notably Russia and Ukraine) and Japan, partly offset by PMI Duty Free.

Our cigarette shipment volume of the following brands increased:

• L&M, mainly driven by Mexico and North Africa (primarily Egypt), partly offset by Saudi Arabia;

• Philip Morris, primarily driven by Japan and Russia, partly offset by Argentina; and

• Sampoerna A in Indonesia, mainly driven by premium A Mild, notably reflecting reduced price gaps with directly competitive mid and low-price brands.

First-Quarter International Share of Market (excluding China and the United States)

Our total international market share (excluding China and the U.S.), defined as our cigarette and heated tobacco unit sales volume as a percentage of total industry cigarette and heated tobacco unit sales volume, decreased by 0.2 points to 27.9%, reflecting:

• Total international market share for cigarettes of 25.0%, down by 1.1 points; and

• Total international market share for heated tobacco units of 2.9%, up by 0.9 points.

Our total international cigarette sales volume as a percentage of total industry cigarette sales volume was down by 0.8 points to 25.9%, mainly reflecting: out-switching to heated tobacco units, as well as lower cigarette market share, notably in Argentina, Indonesia, Mexico, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and Turkey.

-51-

Financial Summary
Financial Summary - Quarters Ended March 31,							Change Fav./(Unfav.)				Variance Fav./(Unfav.)
	2020			2019			Total		Excl. Curr.		Total		Cur- rency			Price		Vol/ Mix		Cost/ Other(1)
(in millions)
Net Revenues	$	7,153		$	6,751		6.0	%	7.1	%	$	402	$	(74	)	$	323	$	381	$	(228	)
Cost of Sales	(2,402		)	(2,465		)	2.6	%	0.6	%	63		49			—		29		(15		)
Marketing, Administration and Research Costs(2)	(1,944		)	(2,217		)	12.3	%	20.0	%	273		(171		)	—		—		444
Amortization of Intangibles	(18		)	(19		)	5.3	%	5.3	%	1		—			—		—		1
Operating Income	$	2,789		$	2,050		36.0	%	45.6	%	$	739	$	(196	)	$	323	$	410	$	202

⁽¹⁾ Cost/Other variance includes the impact of the RBH deconsolidation.

⁽²⁾ Unfavorable Cost/Other variance of $9 million, excluding 2019 asset impairment and exit costs of $20 million, the 2019 Canadian tobacco litigation-related expense of $194 million and the 2019 Loss on deconsolidation of RBH of $239 million.

Note: Net Revenues include revenues from shipments of Platform 1 devices, heated tobacco units and accessories to Altria Group, Inc., commencing in the third quarter of 2019, for sale under license in the United States.

During the quarter, net revenues, excluding unfavorable currency, increased by 7.1%, mainly reflecting: a favorable pricing variance, notably driven by Australia, the GCC, Germany, Mexico, the Philippines and Turkey, partly offset by Italy; and a favorable volume/mix, primarily driven by heated tobacco unit volume (notably in the EU and Eastern Europe, partly offset by PMI Duty Free), partially offset by lower IQOS device volume (notably in Japan) and lower cigarette volume (mainly due to Mexico, the Philippines, Saudi Arabia and Turkey, largely offset by Germany, Italy, Japan, North Africa and Russia). The currency-neutral growth in net revenues of 7.1% came despite the unfavorable impact of $228 million, shown in "Cost/Other," mainly resulting from the deconsolidation of RBH.

The unfavorable currency in net revenues was due primarily to the Brazilian real, Euro and Turkish lira, partially offset by the Egyptian pound, Philippine peso and Ukrainian hryvnia.

Net revenues include $1,555 million in 2020 and $1,243 million in 2019 related to the sale of RRPs.

Operating income, excluding unfavorable currency, increased by 45.6%, notably reflecting a favorable comparison to charges recorded in the first quarter of 2019 of $453 million, related to the loss on deconsolidation of RBH of $239 million, the Canadian tobacco litigation-related expense of $194 million, and asset impairment and exit costs related to a plant closure in Pakistan of $20 million.

Excluding the impact of these 2019 charges, operating income, excluding unfavorable currency, increased by 19.3%, primarily reflecting: a favorable pricing variance; and favorable volume/mix, primarily driven by heated tobacco unit volume (notably in the EU and Eastern Europe, partly offset by PMI Duty Free); partially offset by higher manufacturing costs; higher marketing, administration and research costs (notably reflecting increased investment behind reduced-risk products, mainly in the EU and Eastern Europe); and the net unfavorable impact resulting from the deconsolidation of RBH, included in "Cost/Other."

Interest expense, net, of $129 million decreased by $23 million (15.1%).

Our effective tax rate was 22.6% in the first quarter of 2020 and 2019. The effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2020 was favorably impacted by a decrease in deferred tax liabilities related to the fair value adjustment of equity securities held by PMI ($16 million). The effective income tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2019 was favorably impacted by the reversal of a deferred tax liability on the unremitted earnings of our Canadian subsidiary, RBH ($49 million) and by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. We estimate that our full-year 2020 effective tax rate will be approximately 23%, excluding the discrete tax event mentioned above. Changes in currency exchange rates, earnings mix by taxing jurisdiction or future regulatory developments may have an impact on the effective tax rates, which we monitor each quarter. Significant judgment is required in determining income tax provisions and in evaluating tax positions. For further details, see Note 9. Income Taxes.

-52-

We are regularly examined by tax authorities around the world, and we are currently under examination in a number of jurisdictions. It is reasonably possible that within the next 12 months certain tax examinations will close, which could result in a change in unrecognized tax benefits along with related interest and penalties. An estimate of any possible change cannot be made at this time.

Net earnings attributable to PMI of $1.8 billion increased by $472 million or 34.9%. This increase was due primarily to higher operating income as discussed above. Diluted and basic EPS of $1.17 increased by 34.5%. Excluding an unfavorable currency impact of $0.13, diluted EPS increased by 49.4%.

Operating Results by Business Segment

Business Environment

Taxes, Legislation, Regulation and Other Matters Regarding the Manufacture, Marketing, Sale and Use of Tobacco Products

The tobacco industry and our company face a number of challenges that may adversely affect our business, volume, results of operations, cash flows and financial position. These challenges, which are discussed below and in “Cautionary Factors That May Affect Future Results,” include:

• regulatory restrictions on our products, including restrictions on the packaging, marketing, and sale of tobacco or other nicotine-containing products that could reduce our competitiveness, eliminate our ability to communicate with adult consumers, or even ban certain of our products;

• fiscal challenges, such as excessive excise tax increases and discriminatory tax structures;

• illicit trade in cigarettes and other tobacco products, including counterfeit, contraband and so-called “illicit whites”;

• intense competition, including from non-tax paid volume by certain local manufacturers;

• pending and threatened litigation as discussed in Note 8. Contingencies; and

• governmental investigations.

Regulatory Restrictions: The tobacco industry operates in a highly regulated environment. The well-known risks of smoking have led regulators to impose significant restrictions and high excise taxes on cigarettes.

We support a comprehensive regulatory framework for tobacco and nicotine-containing products based on the principle of harm reduction, including mandated health warnings, minimum age laws, restrictions on advertising, and public place smoking restrictions. We also support regulatory measures that help reduce illicit trade.

Much of the regulation that shapes the business environment in which we operate is driven by the World Health Organization's (“WHO”) Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (“FCTC”), which entered into force in 2005. The FCTC has as its main objective to establish a global agenda for tobacco regulation, with the purpose of reducing tobacco use. To date, 180 countries and the European Union are Parties to the FCTC. The treaty requires Parties to have in place various tobacco control measures and recommends others. The FCTC governing body, the Conference of the Parties (“CoP”), has also adopted non-binding guidelines and policy recommendations related to certain articles of the FCTC that go beyond the text of the treaty. In October 2018, the CoP recognized the need for more scientific assessment and improved reporting to define policy on heated tobacco products. Similar to its previous policy recommendations on e-cigarettes, the CoP invited countries to regulate, restrict or prohibit heated tobacco products, as appropriate under their national laws.

In July 2019, the WHO issued the Report on the Global Tobacco Epidemic 2019. While citing insufficient independent studies regarding the benefits and the unknown long-term health impacts of electronic nicotine delivery systems and heated tobacco products, the WHO has taken the position that such products are not risk-free and should be regulated in the same manner as cigarettes and in line with the FCTC provisions. It is not possible to predict whether or to what extent measures recommended by the WHO, including the FCTC guidelines, will be implemented.

We agree that all tobacco and nicotine-containing products, including our RRPs, need to be regulated; however, we continue to seek to engage in a dialogue with regulators with respect to those measures that we do not believe would protect public health and, if implemented, could disrupt competition, severely limit our ability to market and sell our products (including our RRPs) to adult smokers, or increase illicit trade. We advocate for measures that would accelerate switching to better alternatives to continued smoking and embrace a regulatory framework that recognizes a risk continuum of tobacco and other nicotine-containing products.

-53-

Certain measures are discussed in more detail below and in the Reduced-Risk Products (RRPs) section.

Fiscal Challenges: Excessive and disruptive excise, sales and other tax increases and discriminatory tax structures are expected to continue to have an adverse impact on our profitability, due to lower consumption and consumer down-trading to non-premium, discount, other low-price or low-taxed combustible tobacco products such as fine cut tobacco and illicit cigarettes. In addition, in certain jurisdictions, some of our combustible products are subject to tax structures that discriminate against premium-price products and manufactured cigarettes. We believe that such tax policies undermine public health by encouraging consumers to turn to illicit trade, and ultimately undercut government revenue objectives, disrupt the competitive environment, and encourage criminal activity. Other jurisdictions have imposed, or are seeking to impose, levies or other taxes specifically on tobacco companies, such as taxes on revenues and/or profits.

EU Tobacco Products Directive: In April 2014, the EU adopted a significantly revised EU Tobacco Products Directive (TPD), which entered into force in May 2016. All Member States have adopted laws transposing the TPD.  The TPD sets forth a comprehensive set of regulatory requirements for tobacco products, including:

• health warnings covering 65% of the front and back panels of cigarette packs, with an option for Member States to further standardize tobacco packaging, including the introduction of plain packaging;

• a ban on characterizing flavors in some tobacco products, with a transition period for menthol expiring in May 2020;

• security features and tracking and tracing measures that became effective on May 20, 2019; and

• a framework for the regulation of novel tobacco products and e-cigarettes, including requirements for health warnings and information leaflets, a prohibition on product packaging text related to reduced risk, and the introduction of notification requirements or authorization procedures in advance of commercialization.

Plain Packaging and Other Packaging Restrictions: Plain packaging legislation bans the use of branding, logos and colors on packaging other than the brand name and variant that may be printed only in specified locations and in a uniform font. To date, plain packaging laws have been adopted in certain markets in all of our operating segments, including the key markets of Australia, France, Saudi Arabia and Turkey, and are in various degrees of implementation. Some countries, such as Canada, New Zealand and Israel, adopted plain packaging regulations that apply to all tobacco products, including RRPs. Other countries are also considering plain packaging legislation.

Some countries have adopted, or are considering adopting, packaging restrictions that could have an impact similar to plain packaging. Examples of such restrictions include standardizing the shape and size of packages, prohibiting certain colors or the use of certain descriptive phrases on packaging, and requiring very large graphic health warnings that leave little space for branding.

Restrictions and Bans on the Use of Ingredients: The WHO and others in the public health community have recommended restrictions or total bans on the use of some or all ingredients in tobacco products, including menthol. Broad restrictions and ingredient bans would require us to reformulate our American blend tobacco products and could reduce our ability to differentiate these products in the market in the long term. In many countries, menthol bans would eliminate the entire category of mentholated tobacco products. The European Union has banned flavored tobacco products, subject to an exemption until May 2020 for menthol. Other countries may follow the EU’s approach. For instance, Turkey has banned menthol as of May 2020. Broader ingredient bans have been adopted by Canada and Brazil. In Brazil, an ingredient ban is currently on appeal by a tobacco industry union, of which our Brazilian subsidiary is a member. It is not possible to predict the outcome of these legal proceedings.

Bans on Display of Tobacco Products at Retail: In a number of our markets, including, but not limited to, Australia and Russia, governments have banned the display of tobacco products at the point of sale. Other countries are considering similar bans.

Bans and Restrictions on Advertising, Marketing, Promotions and Sponsorships: For many years, the FCTC has called for, and countries have imposed, partial or total bans on tobacco advertising, marketing, promotions and sponsorships, including bans and restrictions on advertising on radio and television, in print and on the Internet. The FCTC's non-binding guidelines recommend that governments prohibit all forms of communication with adult smokers.

Restrictions on Product Design: Some members of the public health community are calling for the further standardization of tobacco products by requiring, for example, that cigarettes have a certain minimum diameter, which would amount to a ban on slim cigarettes, or requiring the use of standardized filter and cigarette paper designs. In addition, at its meeting in November 2016, the CoP adopted non-binding guidelines recommending that countries regulate product design features that increase the attractiveness of tobacco products, such as the diameter of cigarettes and the use of flavor capsules.

-54-

Restrictions on Public Smoking: The pace and scope of public smoking restrictions have increased significantly in most of our markets. Many countries around the world have adopted, or are likely to adopt, regulations that restrict or ban smoking in public and/or work places, restaurants, bars and nightclubs. Some public health groups have called for, and some countries, regional governments and municipalities have adopted or proposed, bans on smoking in outdoor places, as well as bans on smoking in cars (typically, when minors are present) and private homes.

Other Regulatory Issues: Some regulators are considering, or in some cases have adopted, regulatory measures designed to reduce the supply of tobacco products. These include regulations intended to reduce the number of retailers selling tobacco products by, for example, reducing the overall number of tobacco retail licenses available or banning the sale of tobacco products within specified distances of certain public facilities.

In a limited number of markets, most notably Japan, we are dependent on governmental approvals that may limit our pricing flexibility.

The EU Single-Use Plastics Directive, which will require tobacco manufacturers and importers to cover the costs of public collection systems for tobacco product filters, entered into force on July 2, 2019, after which Member States will have two years to transpose it into national law. While we cannot predict the impact of this initiative on our business at this time, we are monitoring developments in this area.

Illicit Trade: Illicit tobacco trade creates a cheap and unregulated supply of tobacco products, undermines efforts to reduce smoking prevalence, especially among youth, damages legitimate businesses and intellectual property rights, stimulates organized crime, increases corruption and reduces government tax revenue. Excluding China and the U.S., illicit trade may account for as much as 10 to 12% of global cigarette consumption; this includes counterfeit, contraband and the growing problem of “illicit whites,” which are cigarettes legally produced in one jurisdiction for the sole purpose of being exported and illegally sold in another jurisdiction where they have no legitimate market. Currently, we estimate that illicit trade in the European Union accounted for approximately 8% of total cigarette consumption in 2019.

A number of jurisdictions are considering actions to prevent illicit trade. In November 2012, the FCTC adopted the Protocol to Eliminate Illicit Trade in Tobacco Products (the “Protocol”), which includes supply chain control measures, such as licensing of manufacturers and distributors, enforcement of these control measures in free trade zones, controls on duty free and Internet channels and the implementation of tracking and tracing technologies. To date, 58 Parties, including the European Union, have ratified it. The Protocol came into force in September 2018. Parties must now start implementing its provisions in their national legislation. In October 2018, the first Meeting of the Parties to the Protocol decided to produce a comprehensive report on good practices for the implementation of tracking and tracing systems and to prepare a conceptual framework for global information sharing to combat illicit tobacco trade. We welcome this decision and expect that other Parties will ratify the Protocol.

We devote substantial resources to help prevent illicit trade in combustible tobacco products and RRPs. For example, we engage with governments, our business partners and other stakeholders to implement effective measures to combat illicit trade and, in some instances, pursue legal remedies to protect our intellectual property rights.

The tracking and tracing regulations for cigarettes and roll-your-own products manufactured or destined for the EU became effective on May 20, 2019. The effective date for other tobacco-containing products, including some of our RRPs such as heated tobacco units, is May 20, 2024. While we expect that this regulation will increase our operating expenses, we do not expect this increase to be significant.

In 2009, our Colombian subsidiaries entered into an Investment and Cooperation Agreement with the national and regional governments of Colombia to promote investment in, and cooperation on, anti-contraband and anti-counterfeit efforts. The agreement provides $200 million in funding over a 20-year period to address issues such as combating illegal cigarette trade and increasing the quality and quantity of locally-grown tobacco.

In May 2016, PMI launched PMI IMPACT, a global initiative that supports third-party projects dedicated to fighting illegal trade and related crimes such as corruption, organized criminal networks and money laundering. The centerpiece of PMI IMPACT is a council of external independent experts in the fields of law, anti-corruption and law enforcement. The experts are responsible for evaluating and approving funding proposals for PMI IMPACT grants. PMI has pledged $100 million to fund projects within PMI IMPACT over three funding rounds.

-55-

Reduced-Risk Products (RRPs)    

Our Approach to RRPs: We recognize that smoking cigarettes causes serious diseases and that the best way to avoid the harms of smoking is never to start or to quit. Nevertheless, it is predicted that over the next decade the number of smokers will remain largely unchanged from the current estimate of 1.1 billion, despite the considerable efforts to discourage smoking.

Cigarettes burn tobacco, which produces smoke. As a result of the combustion process, the smoker inhales various toxic substances. In contrast, RRPs do not burn tobacco and produce an aerosol that contains significantly lower levels of harmful and potentially harmful constituents ("HPHCs") than found in cigarette smoke.

For smokers who would otherwise continue to smoke, we believe that RRPs, while not risk-free, offer a much better consumer choice. Accordingly, our key strategic priorities are: to develop and commercialize products that present less risk of harm to adult smokers who switch to those products versus continued smoking; and to convince current adult smokers who would otherwise continue to smoke to switch to those products.

We recognize that this transformation from cigarettes to RRPs will take time and that the speed of transformation will depend in part upon factors beyond our control, such as the willingness of governments, regulators and other policy groups to embrace RRPs as a desired alternative to continued cigarette smoking. We also recognize that our part in this transformation must be funded from our existing cigarette business. For as long as a significant number of adult smokers continues to smoke, it is critical that the industry be led by responsible and ethical manufacturers. Therefore, during the transformation, we intend to remain a leading international cigarette manufacturer.

We have a range of RRPs in various stages of development, scientific assessment and commercialization. We conduct rigorous scientific assessments of our RRP platforms to substantiate that they reduce exposure to HPHCs and, ultimately, that these products present, are likely to present, or have the potential to present less risk of harm to adult smokers who switch to them versus continued smoking. We draw upon a team of expert scientists and engineers from a broad spectrum of scientific disciplines and our extensive learnings of adult consumer preferences to develop and assess our RRPs. Our efforts are guided by the following key objectives:

• to develop RRPs that adult smokers who would otherwise continue to smoke find to be satisfying alternatives to smoking;

• for those adult smokers, our goal is to offer RRPs with a scientifically substantiated risk-reduction profile that approaches as closely as possible that associated with smoking cessation;

• to substantiate the reduction of risk for the individual adult smoker and the reduction of harm to the population as a whole, based on scientific evidence of the highest standard that is made available for scrutiny and review by external independent scientists and relevant regulatory bodies; and

• to advocate for the development of science-based regulatory frameworks for the development and commercialization of RRPs, including the communication of scientifically substantiated information to enable adult smokers to make better consumer choices.

Our RRP Platforms: Our product development is based on the elimination of combustion via tobacco heating and other innovative systems for aerosol generation, which we believe is the most promising path to providing a better consumer choice for those who would otherwise continue to smoke. We recognize that no single product will appeal to all adult smokers. Therefore, we are developing a portfolio of products intended to appeal to a variety of distinct adult consumer preferences.

Four RRP platforms are in various stages of development and commercialization readiness:

        Platform 1 uses a precisely controlled heating device incorporating our IQOS HeatControl technology, into which a specially designed and proprietary tobacco unit is inserted and heated to generate an aerosol. We have conducted a series of clinical studies for this platform, the results of which were included in our submission to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) described below. The results of the first six-month term of the 6+6 month exposure response study were received at the end of 2017, and the related report was completed and submitted to the FDA in the second quarter of 2018. The study showed that all eight of the co-primary clinical risk endpoints moved in the same direction in the group that switched to our Platform 1 product as observed for smoking cessation, with statistically significant changes in five of the eight endpoints compared with on-going smoking. We received the results of the second six-month term of the 6+6 month exposure response study in the second quarter of 2018, and expect to finalize our analysis and report the results for submission to the FDA in the next few months. In addition, we completed an 18-month combined chronic toxicity and carcinogenicity study in mice, which was on-going at the time of our FDA submission. We shared the results with the FDA in August 2018.

-56-

    Platform 2 uses a pressed carbon heat source which, when ignited, generates a nicotine-containing aerosol by heating tobacco. The results of our pharmacokinetic study (that measured the nicotine pharmacokinetic profile as well as subjective effects) and of our five-day reduced exposure study indicate that this platform could be an acceptable substitute for adult smokers who seek an alternative to cigarettes. The reduced exposure study results showed a substantial reduction in relevant biomarkers of exposure to the measured HPHCs in those who switched to Platform 2 compared to those who continued to smoke cigarettes over a five-day period. The sustainability of this reduction as well as changes in clinical risk markers were assessed in a three-month reduced exposure study. The results of this study were received at the end of 2017, and the related report was finalized in the second quarter of 2018.

    Platform 3 provides an aerosol of nicotine salt. We have explored two routes for this platform, one with electronics and one without, and conducted nicotine pharmacokinetic studies with both versions. The results of the pharmacokinetic study related to the version without electronics were received, and the related report was finalized in the fourth quarter of 2018. The results indicate this product's potential as an acceptable alternative to continued cigarette smoking in terms of product satisfaction. In February 2020, we completed a product use and adaptation study in adult smokers. We expect to finalize our analysis and report the results in the next few months.

    Platform 4 covers e-vapor products, which are battery-powered devices that produce an aerosol by vaporizing a nicotine-containing liquid solution. Our e-vapor products comprise devices using current generation technology and our new e-vapor mesh technology that addresses certain challenges presented by some e-vapor products currently on the market. Our IQOS MESH products are designed to ensure the consistency and quality of the generated aerosol. We conducted a nicotine pharmacokinetic study in 2017. The results of this study were received in the second quarter of 2018 for analysis, and the related report was finalized in the fourth quarter of 2018. The results of this study indicate that IQOS MESH products are an effective means of nicotine delivery while being a satisfying alternative for e-cigarette users. In March 2019, a six-month pre-clinical study in mice evaluating the impact of e-cigarette vapor on the risks of pulmonary and cardiovascular disease compared to cigarette smoke was completed; this study did not pertain to a specific product. The study demonstrated that e-cigarette vapors induce significantly lower biological responses associated with cardiovascular and pulmonary diseases compared with cigarette smoke. We will also initiate a clinical study to measure selected biomarkers of exposure to HPHCs and assess changes in clinical risk markers.

After we receive the results of our scientific studies mentioned above, in accordance with standard scientific practices, we intend to share the conclusions in scientific forums and to submit them for inclusion in peer-reviewed publications.

Commercialization of RRPs: We are building a new product category and tailor our commercialization strategy to the characteristics of each specific market. We focus our commercialization efforts on consumer retail experience, guided consumer trials and customer care, as well as digital communication programs.  In order to accelerate switching to our Platform 1 product, our initial market introductions typically entail one-on-one consumer engagement and introductory device discounts.  These initial commercialization efforts require substantial investment, which we believe will moderate over time.

In 2014, we introduced our Platform 1 product in pilot city launches in Nagoya, Japan, and in Milan, Italy. Since then, we have continuously expanded our commercialization activities, and the product is currently available for sale in 53 markets in key cities or nationwide. While our Platform 1 products are currently available for sale in Mexico, that country recently banned the importation of e-cigarettes and devices that heat tobacco.

We estimate that only a very small percentage of adult smokers who convert to our Platform 1 product switch back to cigarettes.

We have integrated the production of our heated tobacco units into a number of our existing manufacturing facilities, are progressing with our plans to build manufacturing capacity for our other RRP platforms, and continue to optimize our manufacturing infrastructure.

An adequate supply chain for our RRP portfolio, including the supply of electronic devices, is important to our business. We work with two electronics manufacturing service providers for the supply of our Platform 1 and IQOS MESH devices and a small number of other providers for other products in our RRP portfolio and related accessories. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the operations of our two electronic manufacturing service providers were temporarily suspended at different times. Even though these suspensions did not materially affect our operations, if both of these service providers were significantly constrained at the same time, the supply of the devices could be disrupted. Although we work closely with these service providers on monitoring their production capability and financial health, we cannot guarantee that they will remain capable of meeting their commitments, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic; if they will not, the commercialization of our RRPs could be adversely affected. The production of our RRP portfolio requires various metals, and we believe that there is an adequate supply of such metals in the world markets to satisfy our current and anticipated production requirements. However, some components and materials necessary for the

-57-

production of our RRPs, including those for the electronic devices, are obtained from single or limited sources, and can be subject to industry-wide shortages and price fluctuations. While we were successful in maintaining adequate supply of such components and materials so far, we may not be able to secure such supply going forward, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic; this could negatively impact the commercialization of our RRPs. For details on the impact of COVID-19 on our production and supply chain, see the "Executive Summary" section of this MD&A.

Our Platform 1 and IQOS MESH devices are subject to standard product warranties generally for a period of 12 months from the date of purchase or such other periods as required by law. We discuss product warranties in more detail in Note 16. Product Warranty. The significance of warranty claims is dependent on a number of factors, including device version mix, product failure rates, logistics and service delivery costs, and warranty policies, and may increase with the number of devices sold.

Product quality may affect consumer acceptance of our RRPs.

Our commercialization efforts for the other RRP platforms are as follows:

• In light of the current confusion in the e-vapor category, in February 2020, we postponed our planned launch of an improved version of this product until the third quarter of 2020, expecting to reach the optimal capacity for commercialization at scale. We will adjust our launch plans based on market-specific factors.

• With respect to TEEPS, our Platform 2 product, we are finalizing our improvements to this product and plan to conduct a consumer test in the beginning of 2021.

• We plan to conduct a consumer test of our Platform 3 product by the end of 2020.

Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, these plans may be delayed.

RRP Regulation and Taxation: RRPs contain nicotine and are not risk-free. We therefore support science-based regulation and taxation of RRPs. Regulation and taxation should differentiate between cigarettes and products that present, are likely to present, or have the potential to present less risk of harm to adult smokers who switch to these products versus continued smoking and should recognize a continuum of risk for tobacco and other nicotine-containing products. Regulation should provide minimum standards for all RRP categories and specific rules for product assessment methodologies, ingredients, labeling and consumer communication, and should ensure that the public is informed about the health risks of all combustible and non-combustible tobacco and nicotine-containing products. Regulation, as well as industry practices, should reflect the fact that youth should not consume nicotine in any form.

Some governments have banned or are seeking to ban or severely restrict emerging tobacco and nicotine-containing products such as our RRPs and communication of truthful and non-misleading information about such products. These regulations might foreclose or unreasonably restrict adult consumer access even to products that might be shown to be a better consumer choice than continuing to smoke. During the COVID-19 pandemic, governments may temporarily be unable to focus on the development of science-based regulatory frameworks for the development and commercialization of RRPs or on the enforcement or implementation of regulations that are significant to our business.

We oppose blanket bans and unreasonable restrictions of products that have the potential to present less risk of harm compared to continued smoking. By contrast, we support regulation that sets clear standards for all RRP categories and propels innovation to benefit adult smokers who would otherwise continue to smoke.

In the United States, an established regulatory framework for assessing “Modified Risk Tobacco Products” and “New Tobacco Products” exists under the jurisdiction of the FDA. We submitted to the FDA a Modified Risk Tobacco Product Application (“MRTPA”) for our Platform 1 product in December 2016, and a Premarket Tobacco Product Application (“PMTA”) for our Platform 1 product in March 2017.

On April 30, 2019, the FDA determined that a version of our Platform 1 product is appropriate for the protection of public health and authorized it for sale in the United States. The FDA’s decision followed its comprehensive assessment of our PMTA. The FDA’s marketing order does not mean that the agency “approved” our Platform 1 product.  The authorization is subject to strict marketing, reporting and other requirements and is not a guarantee that the product will remain authorized, particularly if there is a significant uptake in youth initiation.  The FDA will monitor the marketing of the product.

We filed a supplemental PMTA application for the IQOS 3 device in March 2020.

-58-

The FDA referred our MRTPA to the Tobacco Product Scientific Advisory Committee (“TPSAC”). TPSAC held a meeting on January 24 and January 25, 2018 to discuss our MRTPA. The recommendations and votes of TPSAC are not binding on the FDA. By regulation, the FDA’s decision on our MRTPA will take into account, in addition to the views of TPSAC, scientific evidence as well as comments, data and information submitted by interested persons. The FDA closed the public comment period on February 11, 2019. In late 2019, we provided a response to the FDA's request for clarification regarding our mice study described above. Following our response, the FDA re-opened a public comment period that ended on February 24, 2020. The FDA review of our MRTPA is on-going.

In March 2020, we requested a clarification from the FDA regarding the applicability of its new health warning requirements to our heated tobacco units sold in the United States.

In July 2017, the FDA issued a policy announcement aiming to explore the potential of nicotine reduction in cigarettes in conjunction with the availability of less harmful products that deliver nicotine for adults who choose to use such products. In July 2018, as part of a public consultation procedure, we submitted our views on this topic to the FDA. It is not possible to predict the regulatory measures that may be recommended by the FDA as a result of this policy.

In the U.S., tobacco and nicotine-containing products that were not commercially marketed as of February 15, 2007 are subject to review and authorization by the FDA. Manufacturers of all non-authorized products currently on the market are required to file a PMTA with the FDA by May 12, 2020. In April 2020, the U.S. District Court allowed the FDA to extend the filing date by 120 days given the COVID-19 pandemic.

On January 2, 2020, the FDA announced an enforcement policy against the sale of e-vapor products sold without FDA authorization, prioritizing enforcement against the sale of cartridge-based e-vapor products with flavors other than tobacco and menthol, and sale of any nicotine-containing products to minors and where the manufacturer fails to take adequate measures to prevent access by minors. The FDA indicated that the enforcement policy will be amended to reflect the PMTA deadline extension mentioned above.

While we do not sell e-vapor products in the U.S. and therefore are not subject to these actions, we continue to support regulation and industry practices that reflect the fact that youth should not consume nicotine in any form.

FDA actions may influence the regulatory approach of other governments.

Until recently, there were no countries with specific product standards for heat-not-burn products. Currently, national standards setting minimum quality and safety requirements for heat-not-burn products have been adopted with defined methods for demonstrating the absence of combustion in Russia, Ukraine, Kazakhstan, the UAE, Egypt, Jordan, and Kyrgyzstan. We expect and encourage other governments to consider similar product standards going forward.

In the EU, all EU Member States have transposed the EU Tobacco Products Directive, including the provisions on novel tobacco products, such as heated tobacco units, and e-cigarettes. Most of the EU Member States require a notification submitted six months before the intended placing on the market of a novel tobacco product, while some require pre-market authorizations for the introduction of such products. To date, we have filed a comprehensive dossier summarizing our scientific assessment of our Platform 1 product in over 20 Member States.

In addition, in Italy, in April 2018, we submitted under recent legislation an application for HEETS, used with the IQOS device, requesting regulatory recognition of the reduction of toxic substances and potential risk reduction resulting from switching to this product compared to continued cigarette smoking. In January 2019, our application was not granted primarily on the grounds of insufficient data and questions of methodology.  Due to the constraints of the review process, we had been unable to supplement the application with all the data we subsequently filed with the FDA and to address methodological questions during the review. We plan to submit a new application where we will clarify the concerns raised by the decision and further strengthen our application by submitting additional evidence that became available since we submitted our first application, consistent with our FDA filing. We are confident that our evidence supports our application.

To date, several governmental agencies have published their scientific findings that analyze the harm-reduction potential of certain RRPs versus continuing smoking, including:

In December 2017, at the request of the U.K. Department of Health and Public Health England, the U.K. Committee on Toxicity published its assessment of the risk of heat-not-burn products relative to cigarette smoking. This assessment included analysis of

-59-

scientific data for two heat-not-burn products, one of which was our Platform 1 product. The assessment concluded that, while still harmful to health, compared with the known risks from cigarettes, heat-not-burn products are probably less harmful. Subsequently, in February 2018, Public Health England published a report stating that the available evidence suggests that heat-not-burn products may be considerably less harmful than cigarettes and more harmful than e-cigarettes.

In May 2018, the German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (“BfR”) published a study on the Platform 1 aerosol relative to cigarette smoke using the Health Canada Intense Smoking Regimen. BfR found reductions in selected HPHCs in a range of 80-99%. This publication indicates that significant reductions in the levels of selected toxicants are likely to reduce toxicant exposure, which BfR stated might be regarded as a discrete benefit compared to combustible cigarettes.

In May 2018, the Dutch National Institute for Public Health and Environment (“RIVM”) published a factsheet on novel tobacco products that heat rather than burn tobacco, focusing on our Platform 1 product. RIVM analyzed the aerosol generated by our Platform 1 product and concluded that the use of this product, while still harmful to health, is probably less harmful than continued smoking.

In June 2018, the Korean Food and Drug Administration (“KFDA”) issued a statement on products that heat rather than burn tobacco. The KFDA tested three heat-not-burn products, one of which was our Platform 1 product. The KFDA confirmed that the levels of the nine HPHCs tested in the aerosol of these products were on average approximately 90% lower compared to those measured in the cigarette smoke of the top five cigarette brands in South Korea. However, the KFDA stated that it could not establish that the tested heat-not-burn products are less harmful than cigarettes. In October 2018, our Korean affiliate filed a request with a local court seeking information underlying KFDA’s analysis, conclusions and public statements. We expect a decision in May 2020.

In August 2018, the Science & Technology Committee of the U.K. House of Commons published a report of its inquiry into e-cigarettes and heat-not-burn products. The report concluded that e-cigarettes are significantly less harmful to health than smoking tobacco. The report also observed that for those smokers who don’t accept e-cigarettes, heat-not-burn products may offer a public health benefit despite their relative risk. The report called for a risk-proportionate regulatory environment for both e-cigarettes and heat-not-burn products and noted that e-cigarettes should remain the least taxed, cigarettes the most taxed, with heat-not-burn products falling between the two. The U.K. Committee on Advertising Practice announced the removal of a prohibition of health claims in the advertising of e-cigarettes in the U.K. effective November 2018.

In November 2018, the Eurasian Economic Commission (regulatory body of the Eurasian Union consisting of Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Russia) published the results of its commissioned study on novel nicotine-containing products, including our Platform 1 product. The study confirms significantly lower levels of HPHCs in the aerosol generated by this product compared to cigarette smoke.

In January 2019, scientific media published the results of the study of the China National Tobacco Quality Supervision and Test Centre (“CNTQST”) comparing the aerosol generated by our Platform 1 product with cigarette smoke. The CNTQST found that the former contained fewer, and lower levels of, harmful constituents than the latter and concluded that the lower temperature of heating tobacco in our Platform 1 product contributed to the difference. The CNTQST stated that the reduction in emissions of harmful constituents cannot be interpreted as equivalent to a proportionate harm/risk reduction for smokers.

We make our scientific findings publicly available for scrutiny and peer review through several channels, including our websites. From time to time, adult consumers, competitors, members of the scientific community, and others inquire into our scientific methodologies, challenge our scientific conclusions or request further study of certain aspects of our RRPs and their health effects. We are committed to a robust and open scientific debate but believe that such debate should be based on accurate and reliable scientific information. We seek to provide accurate and reliable scientific information about our RRPs; nonetheless, we may not be able to prevent third-party dissemination of false, misleading or unsubstantiated information about these products. The dissemination of scientifically unsubstantiated information or studies with a strong confirmation bias by third parties may cause confusion among adult smokers and affect their decision to switch to better alternatives to continued smoking, such as our RRPs.

To date, we have been largely successful in demonstrating to regulators that our heated tobacco units are not cigarettes due to the absence of combustion, and as such they are generally taxed either as a separate category or as other tobacco products, which typically yields more favorable tax rates than cigarettes. Although we believe that this is sensible from the public health perspective, we cannot guarantee that regulators will continue this approach.

-60-

There can be no assurance that we will succeed in our efforts to replace cigarettes with RRPs or that regulation will allow us to commercialize RRPs in all markets, to communicate about our RRPs, including making scientifically substantiated risk-reduction claims, or to treat RRPs differently from cigarettes.

Legal Challenges to RRPs: We face various administrative and legal challenges related to certain RRP activities, including allegations concerning product classification, advertising restrictions, corporate communications, product coach activities, scientific substantiation, product liability, and unfair competition.  While we design our programs to comply with relevant regulations, we expect these or similar challenges to continue as we expand our efforts to commercialize RRPs and to communicate publicly. The outcomes of these matters may affect our RRP commercialization and public communication activities and performance in one or more countries.

Our RRP Business Development Initiatives: In December 2013, we established a strategic framework with Altria Group, Inc. (“Altria”) setting out terms on how the parties would collaborate to develop and commercialize e-vapor products and commercialize two of our RRPs in the U.S. In late 2018, Altria announced that it will participate in the e-vapor category only through another e-vapor company in which Altria acquired a minority interest. Regarding heat-not-burn products, as discussed above, the FDA has authorized a version of our Platform 1 product for sale in the U.S., and we are seeking authorization for our MRTP submission. These efforts are not affected by Altria's e-vapor announcement. In September 2019, Altria's subsidiary, Philip Morris USA Inc., began commercialization of a version of our Platform 1 product in the U.S.

In January 2020, we announced an agreement with KT&G, a leading tobacco and nicotine company in South Korea, for the commercialization of KT&G’s smoke-free products outside of South Korea on an exclusive basis.  For more information, see Acquisitions and Other Business Arrangements below.

Other Developments: In September 2017, we announced our support of the Foundation for a Smoke-Free World. We agreed to contribute $80 million per year over the next 12 years, as specified in the agreement. We made an initial contribution of $4.5 million in 2017, the first annual contribution of $80 million in the first quarter of 2018 and the second annual contribution of $80 million in the first quarter of 2019. The Foundation is an independent body and is governed by its independent Board of Directors. The Foundation’s role, as set out in its corporate charter, includes funding research in the field of tobacco harm reduction, encouraging measures that reduce the harm caused by smoking, and assessing the effect of reduced cigarette consumption on the industry value chain.

Governmental Investigations

From time to time, we are subject to governmental investigations on a range of matters, including tax, customs, antitrust, advertising, and labor practices. We describe certain matters pending in Thailand, Russia and South Korea in Note 8. Contingencies.

In November 2010, a WTO panel issued its decision in a dispute relating to facts that arose from August 2006 between the Philippines and Thailand concerning a series of Thai customs and tax measures affecting cigarettes imported by PM Thailand into Thailand (see Note 8. Contingencies for additional information). The WTO panel decision, which was upheld by the WTO Appellate Body, concluded that Thailand had no basis to find that PM Thailand's declared customs values and taxes paid were too low, as alleged by the DSI in 2009. The decision also created obligations for Thailand to revise its laws, regulations, or practices affecting the customs valuation and tax treatment of future cigarette imports. Thailand agreed in September 2011 to fully comply with the decision by October 2012. The Philippines asserts that to date Thailand has not fully complied with the WTO panel decision. The Philippines has repeatedly expressed concerns with ongoing investigations by Thailand of PM Thailand, including those that led to the criminal charges described in Note 8. Contingencies, and has commenced two formal proceedings at the WTO to challenge criminal charges against PM Thailand arguing that the criminal charges appear to be based on grounds not supported by WTO customs valuation rules and inconsistent with several decisions already taken by Thai Customs and other Thai governmental agencies. On November 12, 2018 and July 12, 2019, the WTO issued its decisions agreeing with the Philippines that the criminal charges against PM Thailand and its former and current employees in connection with import entries of cigarettes from the Philippines and Indonesia, respectively, described in Note 8. Contingencies, are inconsistent with WTO customs valuation rules. In January 2019 and September 2019, Thailand appealed the WTO decision related to the criminal charges in connection with import entries of cigarettes from the Philippines and Indonesia, respectively. The WTO Appellate Body is not operational, and the appeals by Thailand are suspended indefinitely. In February 2020, the Philippines requested an authorization from the WTO Dispute Settlement Body to suspend certain concessions and other trade obligations to Thailand. It is not possible to predict any future developments in these proceedings.

-61-

Asset Impairment and Exit Costs

We discuss asset impairment and exit costs in Note 18. Asset Impairment and Exit Costs to our condensed consolidated financial statements.

Organizational Design Optimization

As part of our transformation to a smoke-free future, we seek to optimize our organizational design, including relocation and outsourcing of certain activities.

In January 2020, we commenced the first phase of a two-phase restructuring project in Switzerland. During the first quarter of 2020, we initiated the employee consultation procedure, as required under Swiss law, for the impacted employees in the first phase. This consultation was completed in April 2020; however, in light of the COVID-19 pandemic, PMI management has communicated that it has suspended restructuring plans. Due to the timing of the closure of the consultation, in combination with the suspension announced by PMI management, no amounts have been recorded in the first quarter of 2020, as the proposed exit activity is not considered probable (under U.S. GAAP) as of March 31, 2020.

Acquisitions and Other Business Arrangements

In January 2020, PMI announced a global collaboration agreement with the leading tobacco and nicotine company in South Korea, KT&G, to commercialize KT&G’s smoke-free products outside of the country. The agreement will run for an initial period of three years. The two companies plan for global collaboration with the intention to actively expand to cover many markets, based on commercial success. The agreement allows PMI to distribute current KT&G smoke-free products, and their evolutions, on an exclusive basis, and does not restrict PMI from distributing its own or third-party products. KT&G’s smoke-free product brand portfolio includes heat-not-burn tobacco products (e.g., Lil Mini and Lil Plus), hybrid technologies that combine heat-not-burn tobacco and e-vapor technologies (e.g., Lil Hybrid), and e-vapor products (e.g., Lil Vapor). PMI will be responsible for the commercialization of smoke-free products supplied under the agreement.

Products sold under the agreement will be subject to careful assessment to ensure they meet the regulatory requirements in the markets where they are launched, as well as our standards of quality and scientific substantiation of their harm reduction potential. PMI and KT&G will seek any necessary regulatory approvals that may be required on a market-by-market basis. There are no current plans to commercialize KT&G products in the United States.

Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the timing of our commercial initiatives planned for the licensed KT&G products later this year could be delayed.

Investments in Unconsolidated Subsidiaries and Equity Securities

We discuss our investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries and equity securities in Note 11. Fair Value Measurements and Note 14. Related Parties - Investments in Unconsolidated Subsidiaries, Equity Securities and Other to our condensed consolidated financial statements.

Trade Policy

We are subject to various trade restrictions imposed by the United States of America and countries in which we do business (“Trade Sanctions”), including the trade and economic sanctions administered by the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control and the U.S. Department of State. It is our policy to comply fully with these Trade Sanctions.

Tobacco products are agricultural products under U.S. law and are not technological or strategic in nature. From time to time we make sales in countries subject to Trade Sanctions, either where such sanctions do not apply to our business or pursuant to exemptions or licenses.

A subsidiary sells products to distributors that, in turn, sell those products to duty free customers that supply U.N. peacekeeping forces around the world, including those in the U.N. peacekeeping mission located in Abyei, a special administrative territory in Sudan. We do not believe that these sales, which are not subject to Trade Sanctions, and are de minimis in volume and value, present a material risk to our shareholders, our reputation or the value of our shares. We have no employees, operations or assets in Sudan.

To our knowledge, none of our commercial arrangements results in the governments of any country identified by the U.S. government

-62-

as a state sponsor of terrorism, nor entities controlled by those governments, receiving cash or acting as intermediaries in violation of U.S. laws.

We do not sell products in Iran, North Korea and Syria. From time to time, we explore opportunities to sell our products in one or more of these countries, as permitted by law.

Certain states within the U.S. have enacted legislation permitting or requiring state pension funds to divest or abstain from future investment in stocks of companies that do business with certain countries that are sanctioned by the U.S. We do not believe such legislation has had a material effect on the price of our shares.

Operating Results – Three Months Ended March 31, 2020

The following discussion compares operating results within each of our operating segments for the three months ended March 31, 2020, with the three months ended March 31, 2019.

Unless otherwise stated, references to total industry, total market, our shipment volume and our market share performance reflect cigarettes and heated tobacco units.

European Union:

Financial Summary - Quarters Ended March 31,					Change Fav./(Unfav.)				Variance Fav./(Unfav.)
	2020		2019		Total		Excl. Curr.		Total		Cur- rency			Price		Vol/ Mix		Cost/ Other
(in millions)
Net Revenues	$	2,535	$	2,159	17.4	%	20.7	%	$	376	$	(70	)	$	16	$	430	$	—
Operating Income	$	1,158	$	896	29.2	%	36.5	%	$	262	$	(65	)	$	16	$	378	$	(67	)

During the quarter, net revenues, excluding unfavorable currency, increased by 20.7%, primarily reflecting favorable volume/mix, mainly driven by higher heated tobacco unit volume across the Region (notably in the Czech Republic, Germany, Italy and Poland), as well as higher cigarette volume (notably in Germany and Italy). The favorable pricing variance reflected higher combustible pricing across the Region (notably in Germany), partly offset by lower heated tobacco unit pricing (notably in Italy) and lower IQOS device pricing.

The net revenues of the European Union segment include $624 million in 2020 and $347 million in 2019 related to the sale of RRPs.

Operating income, excluding unfavorable currency, increased by 36.5%, mainly reflecting: favorable volume/mix, driven by the same factors as for net revenues noted above; and a favorable pricing variance; partly offset by higher manufacturing costs; and higher marketing, administration and research costs, largely related to increased investments behind reduced-risk products.

European Union - Total Market, PMI Shipment Volume and Market Share Commentaries

Total market, PMI shipment volume and market share performance are shown in the table below:

-63-

European Union Key Data	First-Quarter
					Change
	2020		2019		% / pp
Total Market (billion units)	109.3		107.4		1.8	%
PMI Shipment Volume (million units)
Cigarettes	40,646		39,488		2.9	%
Heated Tobacco Units	4,661		2,293		+100%
Total European Union	45,307		41,781		8.4	%
PMI Market Share
Marlboro	17.7	%	18.2	%	(0.5	)
L&M	6.5	%	6.7	%	(0.2	)
Chesterfield	5.7	%	5.9	%	(0.2	)
Philip Morris	2.6	%	2.8	%	(0.2	)
HEETS	3.9	%	2.1	%	1.8
Others	3.0	%	3.2	%	(0.2	)
Total European Union	39.4	%	38.9	%	0.5

In the quarter, the estimated total market in the EU increased by 1.8% to 109.3 billion units, mainly driven by:

• Denmark, up by +100%, mainly reflecting the net favorable impact of estimated trade inventory movements in advance of a significant excise tax increase on April 1, 2020. Excluding these movements, the total estimated market decreased by 2.0%; and

• Germany, up by 3.7%, or down by 1.8% excluding the net favorable impact of estimated trade inventory movements, primarily reflecting the impact of price increases in March 2019;

partly offset by

• France, down by 8.7%, primarily reflecting the impact of significant excise tax-driven price increases in November 2019 and March 2020, and a higher prevalence of illicit trade.

Excluding the net favorable impact of estimated trade inventory movements, the estimated total market in the EU was down by 0.4%.

Our total shipment volume increased by 8.4% to 45.3 billion units, reflecting:

• higher heated tobacco unit shipment volume across the Region, driven by higher market share (notably in Germany, Italy and Poland) and the net favorable impact of estimated distributor inventory movements (partly driven by distributor inventory increases related to COVID-19, notably in Italy); and

• higher cigarette shipment volume, mainly driven by the net favorable impact of estimated distributor inventory movements (partly driven by distributor inventory increases related to COVID-19, notably in Italy and Spain), partly offset by lower market share (notably in Italy and Poland, partially reflecting out-switching to heated tobacco units).

Excluding the net favorable impact of estimated distributor inventory movements, our total in-market sales in the Region increased by 3.1%.

-64-

Eastern Europe:

Financial Summary - Quarters Ended March 31,					Change Fav./(Unfav.)				Variance Fav./(Unfav.)
	2020		2019		Total		Excl. Curr.		Total			Cur- rency			Price		Vol/ Mix		Cost/ Other
(in millions)
Net Revenues	$	788	$	579	36.1	%	35.1	%	$	209		$	6		$	14	$	189	$	—
Operating Income	$	99	$	129	(23.3	)%	48.1	%	$	(30	)	$	(92	)	$	14	$	129	$	(81	)

During the quarter, net revenues, excluding favorable currency, increased by 35.1%, mainly reflecting: favorable volume/mix, predominantly driven by higher heated tobacco unit volume in Russia and Ukraine; and a favorable pricing variance, driven mainly by higher combustible pricing (notably in Russia and Ukraine), partly offset by lower IQOS device pricing (predominantly in Russia).

The net revenues of the Eastern Europe segment include $265 million in 2020 and $108 million in 2019 related to the sale of RRPs.

Operating income, excluding unfavorable currency, (primarily related to an adverse transaction currency impact from the revaluation of foreign currency payables in Russia), increased by 48.1%, mainly reflecting: favorable volume/mix, reflecting the same drivers as for net revenues noted above; and a favorable pricing variance; partially offset by higher manufacturing costs and higher marketing, administration and research costs (primarily related to reduced-risk products in Russia and Ukraine).

Eastern Europe - Total Market, PMI Shipment Volume and Market Share Commentaries

In the quarter, the estimated total market in Eastern Europe decreased, notably due to:

• Russia, down by 0.1%, or by 3.9% excluding the net favorable impact of estimated trade inventory movements, primarily reflecting the impact of price increases, as well as an increase in the prevalence of illicit trade; and

• Ukraine, down by 6.5%, mainly reflecting the impact of excise tax-driven price increases.

PMI Shipment Volume (million units)	First-Quarter
	2020	2019	Change
Cigarettes	21,419	20,320	5.4	%
Heated Tobacco Units	4,366	1,548	+100%
Total Eastern Europe	25,785	21,868	17.9	%

Our total shipment volume increased by 17.9% to 25.8 billion units, mainly driven by:

• Kazakhstan, up by 15.6%, mainly reflecting a higher market share of heated tobacco units; and

• Russia, up by 24.0%, or by 14.5% excluding the net favorable impact of estimated distributor inventory movements (primarily for cigarettes and driven by distributor inventory increases due to COVID-19), mainly reflecting a higher market share of heated tobacco units.

-65-

Middle East & Africa:

Financial Summary - Quarters Ended March 31,					Change Fav./(Unfav.)				Variance Fav./(Unfav.)
	2020		2019		Total		Excl. Curr.		Total			Cur- rency			Price		Vol/ Mix			Cost/ Other
(in millions)
Net Revenues	$	876	$	927	(5.5	)%	(5.3	)%	$	(51	)	$	(2	)	$	72	$	(76	)	$	(45	)
Operating Income	$	321	$	344	(6.7	)%	(1.2	)%	$	(23	)	$	(19	)	$	72	$	(30	)	$	(46	)

During the quarter, net revenues, excluding unfavorable currency, decreased by 5.3%, reflecting: unfavorable volume/mix, mainly due to lower heated tobacco unit and IQOS device volume in PMI Duty Free and lower cigarette volume (notably in Saudi Arabia and Turkey, partly offset by Kuwait and North Africa); and lower fees for certain distribution rights billed to customers in certain markets, shown in "Cost/Other"; partially offset by a favorable pricing variance, driven predominantly by the GCC and Turkey.

The net revenues of the Middle East & Africa segment include $44 million in 2020 and $98 million in 2019 related to the sale of RRPs.

Operating income, excluding unfavorable currency, decreased by 1.2%, reflecting: unfavorable volume/mix, mainly due to lower heated tobacco unit volume in PMI Duty Free and lower cigarette volume (notably in Saudi Arabia, partly offset by Kuwait and North Africa); and unfavorable "Cost/Other," mainly due to lower fees for certain distribution rights, as for net revenues noted above, and higher manufacturing costs, partly offset by lower marketing, administration and research costs; partially offset by a favorable pricing variance.

Middle East & Africa - Total Market, PMI Shipment Volume and Market Share Commentaries

In the quarter, the estimated total market in the Middle East & Africa decreased, mainly due to:

• International Duty Free, down by 33.0%, primarily reflecting the impact of government travel restrictions and reduced passenger traffic due to the COVID-19 pandemic;

• Saudi Arabia, down by 18.6%, notably reflecting the increased prevalence of non-domestic products following the implementation of plain packaging in the fourth quarter of 2019; and

• Turkey, down by 24.1%, mainly reflecting a higher prevalence of illicit trade related to cut tobacco following significant industry-wide price increases in 2019;

partly offset by

• Egypt, up by 5.9%, partly reflecting a lower prevalence of illicit trade and in-switching to cigarettes from other tobacco products.

PMI Shipment Volume (million units)	First-Quarter
	2020	2019	Change
Cigarettes	29,996	33,304	(9.9	)%
Heated Tobacco Units	470	754	(37.7	)%
Total Middle East & Africa	30,466	34,058	(10.5	)%

Our total shipment volume decreased by 10.5% to 30.5 billion units, notably due to:

• PMI Duty Free, down by 12.8%, or by 28.1% excluding the net favorable impact of estimated distributor inventory movements (driven by cigarettes), mainly reflecting the lower total market;

• Saudi Arabia, down by 72.6%. Excluding the net unfavorable impact of estimated distributor inventory movements of 2.3 billion cigarettes, largely attributable to the timing of shipments in 2019, PMI's in-market sales decreased by 20.4%, mainly due to the lower total market; and

-66-

• Turkey, down by 27.0%, mainly reflecting the lower total market and lower market share due primarily to adult smoker down-trading following the price increases;

partly offset by

• Egypt, up by 17.1%, or by 6.1% excluding the net favorable impact of estimated distributor inventory movements, mainly reflecting the higher total market.

South & Southeast Asia:

Financial Summary - Quarters Ended March 31,					Change Fav./(Unfav.)				Variance Fav./(Unfav.)
	2020		2019		Total		Excl. Curr.		Total		Cur- rency		Price		Vol/ Mix			Cost/ Other
(in millions)
Net Revenues	$	1,251	$	1,113	12.4	%	10.7	%	$	138	$	19	$	159	$	(40	)	$	—
Operating Income	$	599	$	440	36.1	%	31.8	%	$	159	$	19	$	159	$	(18	)	$	(1	)

During the quarter, net revenues, excluding favorable currency, increased by 10.7%, reflecting a favorable pricing variance, principally driven by the Philippines, partly offset by unfavorable volume/mix, mainly due to lower cigarette volume in Indonesia and the Philippines, partially offset by favorable cigarette mix in Indonesia.

Operating income, excluding favorable currency, increased by 31.8%, partly reflecting a favorable comparison to a charge recorded in the first quarter of 2019 for asset impairment and exit costs related to a plant closure in Pakistan ($20 million).

Excluding the impact of the 2019 charge, operating income, excluding favorable currency, increased by 26.1%, reflecting a favorable pricing variance, partly offset by unfavorable volume/mix, due to the same factors as for net revenues noted above, and higher marketing, administration and research costs.

South & Southeast Asia - Total Market, PMI Shipment Volume and Market Share Commentaries

In the quarter, the estimated total market in South & Southeast Asia decreased, notably due to:

• Indonesia, down by 0.6%, or by approximately 7% excluding the net favorable impact of estimated trade inventory movements, mainly reflecting the impact of excise tax-driven price increases;

• Pakistan, down by 25.3%, or by 41.9% excluding the net favorable impact of estimated trade inventory movements, mainly due to the impact of excise tax-driven price increases in June 2019; and

• the Philippines, down by 8.9%, or by 13.2% excluding the net favorable impact of estimated trade inventory movements, mainly reflecting the impact of industry-wide price increases in the third quarter of 2019 and the implementation of quarantines related to COVID-19 in select geographies beginning in mid-March 2020.

PMI Shipment Volume (million units)	First-Quarter
	2020	2019	Change
Cigarettes	37,595	41,492	(9.4	)%
Heated Tobacco Units	—	—	—	%
Total South & Southeast Asia	37,595	41,492	(9.4	)%

Our total shipment volume decreased by 9.4% to 37.6 billion units, notably due to:

• Indonesia, down by 7.6%, primarily reflecting lower market share, mainly due to Marlboro and Dji Sam Soe Magnum Mild, partly offset by Sampoerna A;

-67-

• Pakistan, down by 35.0%, mainly due to the lower total market; and

• the Philippines, down by 8.8%, mainly reflecting the lower total market.

East Asia & Australia:

Financial Summary - Quarters Ended March 31,			Change Fav./(Unfav.)				Variance Fav./(Unfav.)
	2020	2019	Total		Excl. Curr.		Total			Cur- rency			Price		Vol/ Mix			Cost/ Other
(in millions)
Net Revenues	$ 1,255	$ 1,321	(5.0	)%	(4.3	)%	$	(66	)	$	(9	)	$	13	$	(70	)	$	—
Operating Income	$ 486	$ 427	13.8	%	14.8	%	$	59		$	(4	)	$	13	$	(11	)	$	61

During the quarter, net revenues, excluding unfavorable currency, decreased by 4.3%, reflecting: unfavorable volume/mix, mainly due to lower IQOS device volume in Japan and unfavorable cigarette volume/mix in Australia, partly offset by higher cigarette and heated tobacco unit volume in Japan. The unfavorable volume/mix was partly offset by a favorable pricing variance, mainly driven by Australia.

The net revenues of the East Asia & Australia segment include $613 million in 2020 and $683 million in 2019 related to the sale of RRPs.

Operating income, excluding unfavorable currency, increased by 14.8%, mainly reflecting lower manufacturing costs related to Japan; lower marketing, administration and research costs; and a favorable pricing variance; partly offset by unfavorable volume/mix, notably due to unfavorable cigarette volume/mix in Australia, partially offset by higher cigarette volume in Japan.

East Asia & Australia - Total Market, PMI Shipment Volume and Market Share Commentaries

In the quarter, the estimated total market in East Asia & Australia, excluding China, decreased, notably due to:

• Australia, down by 19.1%, or by 7.9% excluding the net unfavorable impact of estimated trade inventory movements, mainly due to the impact of excise tax-driven retail price increases;

• Japan, down by 5.7%, mainly reflecting adult smoker out-switching from cigarettes to the cigarillo category; and

• Taiwan, down by 14.4%, or by 3.2% excluding the net unfavorable impact of estimated trade inventory movements, notably due to an increase in the prevalence of illicit trade.

PMI Shipment Volume (million units)	First-Quarter
	2020	2019	Change
Cigarettes	12,299	12,113	1.5	%
Heated Tobacco Units	7,122	6,849	4.0	%
Total East Asia & Australia	19,421	18,962	2.4	%

Our total shipment volume increased by 2.4% to 19.4 billion units, notably in:

• Japan, up by 5.6%, reflecting the net favorable impact of estimated distributor inventory movements of approximately 0.8 billion units (driven by a 0.9 billion favorable impact for cigarettes), partly due to accelerated cigarette and heated tobacco unit shipments to the distributor related to COVID-19. Excluding the impact of these inventory movements, PMI's in-market sales decreased by 0.9%, mainly due to the lower total market, partly offset by higher heated tobacco unit market share.

-68-

Latin America & Canada:

Financial Summary - Quarters Ended March 31,						Change Fav./(Unfav.)				Variance Fav./(Unfav.)
	2020		2019			Total		Excl. Curr.		Total			Cur- rency			Price		Vol/ Mix			Cost/ Other(1)
(in millions)
Net Revenues	$	448	$	652		(31.3	)%	(28.5	)%	$	(204	)	$	(18	)	$	49	$	(52	)	$	(183	)
Operating Income	$	126	$	(186	)	+100%		+100%		$	312		$	(35	)	$	49	$	(38	)	$	336

⁽¹⁾ Cost/Other variance includes the impact of the RBH deconsolidation.

Note: Net Revenues include revenues from shipments of Platform 1 devices, heated tobacco units and accessories to Altria Group, Inc., commencing in the third quarter of 2019, for sale under license in the United States.

During the quarter, net revenues, excluding unfavorable currency, decreased by 28.5%, reflecting: the unfavorable impact of the deconsolidation of RBH shown in "Cost/Other"; and unfavorable volume/mix, notably due to lower cigarette volume in Argentina and Mexico; partly offset by a favorable pricing variance, driven by Mexico.

The net revenues of the Latin America & Canada segment include $8 million in 2020 and $6 million in 2019 related to the sale of RRPs.

Operating income, excluding unfavorable currency, increased by +100%, notably reflecting a favorable comparison to charges recorded in the first quarter of 2019 of $433 million, included in "Cost/Other," related to the loss on deconsolidation of RBH of $239 million and the Canadian tobacco litigation-related expense of $194 million.

Excluding the impact of these 2019 charges, operating income, excluding unfavorable currency, decreased by 34.8%, reflecting: the unfavorable impact of the deconsolidation of RBH, included in "Cost/Other"; and unfavorable volume/mix, due to the same factors as for net revenues noted above; partly offset by a favorable pricing variance and lower marketing, administration and research costs.

Latin America & Canada - Total Market, PMI Shipment Volume and Market Share Commentaries

In the quarter, the estimated total market in Latin America & Canada decreased, notably due to:

• Argentina, down by 5.7%, mainly reflecting the impact of price increases; and

• Mexico, down by 10.5%, mainly due to the impact of excise tax-driven price increases in January 2020;

partly offset by

• Brazil, up by 10.3%, mainly reflecting an estimated lower prevalence of illicit trade due to reduced price gaps with legal products and improved macro-economic conditions.

PMI Shipment Volume (million units)	First-Quarter
	2020	2019	Change
Cigarettes	15,063	17,580	(14.3	)%
Heated Tobacco Units	108	54	+100%
Total Latin America & Canada	15,171	17,634	(14.0	)%

Our total shipment volume decreased by 14.0% to 15.2 billion units, or by 8.8% excluding the impact of the RBH deconsolidation, notably due to:

• Argentina, down by 13.2%, primarily reflecting a lower market share due to adult smoker down-trading to ultra-low-price brands produced by local manufacturers, as well as the lower total market; and

-69-

• Mexico, down by 14.0%, mainly due to the lower total market and lower market share due to adult smoker down-trading.

Financial Review

COVID-19 Impact on Our Liquidity

During the first quarter of 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic created significant volatility in the financial markets. The pandemic also increased our working capital requirements, primarily due to a build-up of inventory levels across our supply chain, with extended payment terms to selected customers as part of our ongoing business continuity plans.

Currently, PMI has sufficient liquidity resources through cash on hand, the ongoing cash generation of our business, and continued access to commercial paper. As of March 31, 2020, PMI had approximately $3.7 billion of cash and cash equivalents. We had $1.1 billion of commercial paper, with an average term of approximately 30 days, and $7.5 billion in stand-by revolving credit facilities.

At the end of March 2020, the commercial paper market experienced considerable strain as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. This situation for PMI was limited to a few days, after which the access to the commercial paper market was fully restored. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York established a Commercial Paper Funding Facility ("CPFF") as part of the U.S. COVID-19 stimulus package to provide liquidity to U.S. issuers of commercial paper. While we are currently not planning to register for this funding facility, the CPFF and our revolving credit facilities could serve as a liquidity back-stop in case of renewed financial market strains. Additionally, the continued or increasing strength of the U.S. dollar could delay further deleveraging of our balance sheet versus our previous expectations.

To further mitigate the potential impact of COVID-19 pandemic, we have actively managed our exposure to foreign currency exchange primarily through the increased usage of derivative financial instruments to hedge the primary currencies to which PMI is exposed. We have introduced more stringent cash management policies to manage our counterparty exposure.

-70-

Cash Flow Highlights

	For the Three Months Ended March 31,
(in millions)	2020			2019
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	1,111		$	1,241
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities	514			(1,596		)
Net cash used in financing activities	(4,549		)	(3,151		)

Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities

During the first quarter of 2020, net cash provided by operating activities decreased by $130 million compared with the first quarter of 2019. Excluding unfavorable currency movements of $50 million, net cash provided by operating activities decreased by $80 million, due primarily to higher working capital requirements of $0.4 billion and higher cash payments in 2020 for asset impairment and exit costs, partially offset by higher net earnings (excluding the non-cash charges in 2019 related to the Canadian tobacco litigation-related expense and the 2019 loss on deconsolidation of RBH).

The higher working capital requirements were primarily due to COVID-19 pandemic related build-up of inventory levels across our supply chain, with extended payment terms to selected customers, as well as timing of shipments and excise tax payments, partially offset by increased usage of our factoring arrangements to sell trade receivables in the first quarter of 2020 compared with the first quarter of 2019. For further details on our factoring arrangements to sell trade receivables, see Note 15. Sale of Accounts Receivable.

Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities

During the first quarter of 2020, net cash provided by investing activities was $514 million, compared with net cash used in investing activities of $1,596 million in the first quarter of 2019. The change was primarily due to the reduction of cash in 2019 resulting from the deconsolidation of RBH, higher cash collateral received to secure derivatives designated as net investment hedges of Euro assets principally related to changes in exchange rates between the Euro and the U.S. dollar, and lower capital expenditures. For further details on deconsolidation of RBH, see Note 19. Deconsolidation of RBH. For further details on our derivatives designated as net investment hedges, see Note 5. Financial Instruments.

During the first quarter of 2020, capital expenditures decreased by $154 million compared with the first quarter of 2019. The 2020 and 2019 capital expenditures were primarily related to our ongoing investments in RRPs. We expect total capital expenditures in 2020 to be approximately $0.8 billion, compared to approximately $1.0 billion disclosed previously.

-71-

Net Cash Used in Financing Activities

During the first quarter of 2020, net cash used in financing activities increased by $1.4 billion compared with the first quarter of 2019. The change was due primarily to higher long-term debt repayments ($3.6 billion in 2020 compared with $2.1 billion in 2019).

Debt and Liquidity

We define cash and cash equivalents as short-term, highly liquid investments, readily convertible to known amounts of cash that mature within a maximum of three months and have an insignificant risk of change in value due to interest rate or credit risk changes. As a policy, we do not hold any investments in structured or equity-linked products. Our cash and cash equivalents are predominantly held in demand deposits with institutions that have investment-grade long-term credit rating. As part of our cash management strategy and in order to manage counterparty exposure, we also enter into reverse repurchase agreements. Such agreements are collateralized with government or corporate securities held by a custodial bank and, at maturity, cash is paid back to PMI, and the collateral is returned to the bank. During the three months ended March 31, 2020, we had an average balance of $0.1 billion, and we had zero balance at March 31, 2020. For the full-year 2019, the activity for such reverse repurchase agreements was not material.

We utilize long-term and short-term debt financing, including a commercial paper program that is regularly used to finance ongoing liquidity requirements, as part of our overall cash management strategy. Our ability to access the capital and credit markets as well as overall dynamics of these markets may impact borrowing costs. We expect that the combination of our long-term and short-term debt financing, the commercial paper program and the committed credit facilities, coupled with our operating cash flows, will enable us to meet our liquidity requirements.

Credit Ratings – The cost and terms of our financing arrangements as well as our access to commercial paper markets may be affected by applicable credit ratings. At March 31, 2020, our credit ratings and outlook by major credit rating agencies were as follows:

	Short-term	Long-term	Outlook
Moody’s	P-1	A2	Stable
Standard & Poor’s	A-1	A	Stable
Fitch	F1	A	Stable

Credit Facilities – On January 31, 2020, we entered into an agreement to amend and extend the term of our $2.0 billion 364-day revolving credit facility from February 4, 2020, to February 2, 2021.

On February 10, 2020, we entered into a new $2.0 billion multi-year revolving credit facility, expiring on February 10, 2025. The new credit facility replaced the $2.5 billion multi-year revolving credit facility, which was terminated effective February 10, 2020. We had no borrowings outstanding under the terminated facility, which was due to expire on February 28, 2021.

At March 31, 2020, our committed credit facilities and commercial paper outstanding were as follows:

(in billions)
Type	Committed Credit Facilities		Commercial Paper
364-day revolving credit, expiring February 2, 2021	$	2.0
Multi-year revolving credit, expiring October 1, 2022	3.5
Multi-year revolving credit, expiring February 10, 2025	2.0
Total facilities	$	7.5
Commercial paper outstanding			$	1.1

-72-

At March 31, 2020, there were no borrowings under the committed credit facilities, and the entire committed amounts were available for borrowing.

All banks participating in our committed credit facilities have an investment-grade long-term credit rating from the credit rating agencies. We continuously monitor the credit quality of our banking group, and at this time we are not aware of any potential non-performing credit provider.

These facilities do not include any credit rating triggers, material adverse change clauses or any provisions that could require us to post collateral. The $3.5 billion multi-year revolving credit facility in the table above requires us to maintain a ratio of consolidated earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“consolidated EBITDA”) to consolidated interest expense of not less than 3.5 to 1.0 on a rolling four-quarter basis. At March 31, 2020, our ratio calculated in accordance with the agreements was 11.7 to 1.0. We expect to continue to meet our covenants. The terms “consolidated EBITDA” and “consolidated interest expense,” both of which include certain adjustments, are defined in the facility agreement previously filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

In addition to the committed credit facilities discussed above, certain of our subsidiaries maintain short-term credit arrangements to meet their respective working capital needs. These credit arrangements, which amounted to approximately $2.5 billion at March 31, 2020 and $2.7 billion at December 31, 2019, are for the sole use of our subsidiaries. Borrowings under these arrangements amounted to $365 million at March 31, 2020, and $338 million at December 31, 2019.

Commercial Paper Program – We continue to have access to liquidity in the commercial paper market through programs in place in the U.S. and in Europe having an aggregate issuance capacity of $8.0 billion. At March 31, 2020, we had commercial paper outstanding of $1.1 billion. At December 31, 2019, we had no commercial paper outstanding. The average commercial paper balance outstanding during the first quarter of 2020 was $2.7 billion. The average commercial paper balance outstanding during 2019 was $2.3 billion.

Sale of Accounts Receivable – To mitigate credit risk and enhance cash and liquidity management we sell trade receivables to unaffiliated financial institutions. These arrangements allow us to sell, on an ongoing basis, certain trade receivables without recourse. The trade receivables sold are generally short-term in nature and are removed from the condensed consolidated balance sheets. We sell trade receivables under two types of arrangements, servicing and nonservicing.

Our operating cash flows were positively impacted by the amount of the trade receivables sold and derecognized from the condensed consolidated balance sheets, which remained outstanding with the unaffiliated financial institutions. The trade receivables sold that remained outstanding under these arrangements as of March 31, 2020, and March 31, 2019 were $1.0 billion and $0.5 billion, respectively. The net proceeds received are included in cash provided by operating activities in the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows.

For further details, see Note 15. Sale of Accounts Receivable to our condensed consolidated financial statements.

Debt – Our total debt was $28.4 billion at March 31, 2020 and $31.0 billion at December 31, 2019.

On February 11, 2020, we filed a shelf registration statement with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, under which we may from time to time sell debt securities and/or warrants to purchase debt securities over a three-year period.

Guarantees – At March 31, 2020, we were contingently liable for guarantees of our own performance, of which $0.3 billion were related to our obligations under indemnity agreements to enable appeals of customs assessments against our distributors. Additionally, we have other guarantees of our own performance, which are primarily related to excise taxes on the shipment of our products. There is no liability in the condensed consolidated financial statements associated with these guarantees. These guarantees have not had, and are not expected to have, a significant impact on PMI’s liquidity.

Equity and Dividends

We discuss our stock awards as of March 31, 2020 in Note 2. Stock Plans to our condensed consolidated financial statements.

During 2019, we did not repurchase any shares under a share repurchase program, and we do not presently intend to repurchase shares of our common stock in 2020.

-73-

Dividends paid in the first quarter of 2020 were $1.8 billion. During the third quarter of 2019, our Board of Directors approved a 2.6% increase in the quarterly dividend to $1.17 per common share. As a result, the present annualized dividend rate is $4.68 per common share.

Market Risk

Counterparty Risk - We predominantly work with financial institutions with strong short- and long-term credit ratings as assigned by Standard & Poor’s and Moody’s. These banks are also part of a defined group of relationship banks. Non-investment grade institutions are only used in certain emerging markets to the extent required by local business needs. We have a conservative approach when it comes to choosing financial counterparties and financial instruments. As such, we do not invest or hold investments in any structured or equity-linked products. The majority of our cash and cash equivalents is currently invested in demand deposits maturing within less than 30 days.

We continuously monitor and assess the credit worthiness of all our counterparties.

Derivative Financial Instruments - We operate in markets outside of the United States of America, with manufacturing and sales facilities in various locations throughout the world. Consequently, we use certain financial instruments to manage our foreign currency and interest rate exposure. We use derivative financial instruments principally to reduce our exposure to market risks resulting from fluctuations in foreign exchange and interest rates by creating offsetting exposures. We are not a party to leveraged derivatives and, by policy, do not use derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes.

See Note 5. Financial Instruments, Note 11. Fair Value Measurements, and Note 13. Balance Sheet Offsetting to our condensed consolidated financial statements for further details on our derivative financial instruments and the related collateral arrangements.

Contingencies

See Note 8. Contingencies to our condensed consolidated financial statements for a discussion of contingencies.

Cautionary Factors That May Affect Future Results

Forward-Looking and Cautionary Statements

We may from time to time make written or oral forward-looking statements, including statements contained in filings with the SEC, in reports to stockholders and in press releases and investor webcasts. You can identify these forward-looking statements by use of words such as "strategy," "expects," "continues," "plans," "anticipates," "believes," "will," "estimates," "intends," "projects," "goals," "targets," "forecasts" and other words of similar meaning. You can also identify them by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts.

We cannot guarantee that any forward-looking statement will be realized, although we believe we have been prudent in our plans and assumptions. Our RRPs constitute a new product category in its early stages that is less predictable than our mature cigarette business. Achievement of future results is subject to risks, uncertainties and inaccurate assumptions. Should known or unknown risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove inaccurate, actual results could vary materially from those anticipated, estimated or projected. Investors should bear this in mind as they consider forward-looking statements and whether to invest in or remain invested in our securities. In connection with the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, we are identifying important factors that, individually or in the aggregate, could cause actual results and outcomes to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements made by us; any such statement is qualified by reference to the following cautionary statements. We elaborate on these and other risks we face throughout this document, particularly in the “Business Environment” section. You should understand that it is not possible to predict or identify all risk factors. Consequently, you should not consider the following to be a complete discussion of all potential risks or uncertainties. We do not undertake to update any forward-looking statement that we may make from time to time, except in the normal course of our public disclosure obligations.

-74-

Risks Related to Our Business and Industry

Consumption of tax-paid cigarettes continues to decline in many of our markets.

This decline is due to multiple factors, including increased taxes and pricing, governmental actions, the diminishing social acceptance of smoking, continuing economic and geopolitical uncertainty, and the continuing prevalence of illicit products. These factors and their potential consequences are discussed more fully below and in the "Business Environment" section.

Cigarettes are subject to substantial taxes. Significant increases in cigarette-related taxes have been proposed or enacted and are likely to continue to be proposed or enacted in numerous jurisdictions. These tax increases may disproportionately affect our profitability and make us less competitive versus certain of our competitors.

Tax regimes, including excise taxes, sales taxes and import duties, can disproportionately affect the retail price of cigarettes versus other combustible tobacco products, or disproportionately affect the relative retail price of our cigarette brands versus cigarette brands manufactured by certain of our competitors. Because our portfolio is weighted toward the premium-price cigarette category, tax regimes based on sales price can place us at a competitive disadvantage in certain markets. As a result, our volume and profitability may be adversely affected in these markets.

Increases in cigarette taxes are expected to continue to have an adverse impact on our sales of cigarettes, due to resulting lower consumption levels, a shift in sales from manufactured cigarettes to other combustible tobacco products and from the premium-price to the mid-price or low-price cigarette categories, where we may be under-represented, from local sales to legal cross-border purchases of lower price products, or to illicit products such as contraband, counterfeit and "illicit whites."

Our business faces significant governmental action aimed at increasing regulatory requirements with the goal of reducing or preventing the use of tobacco products.

Governmental actions, combined with the diminishing social acceptance of smoking and private actions to restrict smoking, have resulted in reduced industry volume in many of our markets, and we expect that such factors will continue to reduce consumption levels and will increase down-trading and the risk of counterfeiting, contraband, "illicit whites" and legal cross-border purchases. Significant regulatory developments will continue to take place over the next few years in most of our markets, driven principally by the World Health Organization's Framework Convention on Tobacco Control ("FCTC"). Since it came into force in 2005, the FCTC has led to increased efforts by tobacco control advocates and public health organizations to promote increasingly restrictive regulatory measures on the marketing and sale of tobacco products to adult smokers. Regulatory initiatives that have been proposed, introduced or enacted include:

• restrictions on or licensing of outlets permitted to sell cigarettes;

• the levying of substantial and increasing tax and duty charges;

• restrictions or bans on advertising, marketing and sponsorship;

• the display of larger health warnings, graphic health warnings and other labeling requirements;

• restrictions on packaging design, including the use of colors, and plain packaging;

• restrictions on packaging and cigarette formats and dimensions;

• restrictions or bans on the display of tobacco product packaging at the point of sale and restrictions or bans on cigarette vending machines;

• requirements regarding testing, disclosure and performance standards for tar, nicotine, carbon monoxide and other smoke constituents;

• disclosure, restrictions, or bans of tobacco product ingredients;

• increased restrictions on smoking in public and work places and, in some instances, in private places and outdoors;

• regulation, restrictions or prohibitions of novel tobacco or nicotine-containing products;

• elimination of duty free sales and duty free allowances for travelers;

• encouraging litigation against tobacco companies; and

• excluding tobacco companies from transparent public dialogue regarding public health and other policy matters.

-75-

Our financial results could be significantly affected by regulatory initiatives resulting in a significant decrease in demand for our brands, in particular requirements that lead to a commoditization of tobacco products or impede adult consumers' ability to convert to our RRPs, as well as any significant increase in the cost of complying with new regulatory requirements.

Litigation related to tobacco use and exposure to environmental tobacco smoke could substantially reduce our profitability and could severely impair our liquidity.

There is litigation related to tobacco products pending in certain jurisdictions. Damages claimed in some tobacco-related litigation are significant and, in certain cases in Brazil, Canada, and Nigeria, range into the billions of U.S. dollars. We anticipate that new cases will continue to be filed. The FCTC encourages litigation against tobacco product manufacturers. It is possible that our consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial position could be materially affected in a particular fiscal quarter or fiscal year by an unfavorable outcome or settlement of certain pending litigation. See Note 8. Contingencies to our condensed consolidated financial statements for a discussion of pending litigation and "Business Environment—Reduced-Risk Products (RRPs)—Legal Challenges to RRPs."

We face intense competition, and our failure to compete effectively could have a material adverse effect on our profitability and results of operations.

We compete primarily on the basis of product quality, brand recognition, brand loyalty, taste, R&D, innovation, packaging, customer service, marketing, advertising and retail price and, increasingly, adult smoker willingness to convert to our RRPs. We are subject to highly competitive conditions in all aspects of our business. The competitive environment and our competitive position can be significantly influenced by weak economic conditions, erosion of consumer confidence, competitors' introduction of lower-price products or innovative products, higher tobacco product taxes, higher absolute prices and larger gaps between retail price categories, and product regulation that diminishes the ability to differentiate tobacco products and restricts adult consumer access to truthful and non-misleading information about our RRPs. Competitors include three large international tobacco companies, new market entrants, particularly with respect to innovative products, several regional and local tobacco companies and, in some instances, state-owned tobacco enterprises, principally in Algeria, Egypt, the PRC, Taiwan, Thailand and Vietnam. Industry consolidation and privatizations of state-owned enterprises have led to an overall increase in competitive pressures. Some competitors have different profit and volume objectives, and some international competitors are susceptible to changes in different currency exchange rates. Certain new market entrants may alienate consumers from innovative products through inappropriate marketing campaigns and messaging and inferior product satisfaction, while not relying on scientific substantiation based on appropriate R&D protocols and standards. The growing use of digital media could increase the speed and extent of the dissemination of inaccurate and misleading information about our RRPs.

Because we have operations in numerous countries, our results may be influenced by economic, regulatory and political developments, natural disasters, pandemics or conflicts.

Some of the countries in which we operate face the threat of civil unrest and can be subject to regime changes. In others, nationalization, terrorism, conflict and the threat of war may have a significant impact on the business environment. Natural disasters, pandemics, economic, political, regulatory or other developments could disrupt our supply chain, manufacturing capabilities or distribution capabilities. In addition, such developments could increase costs of our materials and operations and lead to loss of property or equipment that are critical to our business in certain markets and difficulty in staffing and managing our operations, all of which could reduce our volumes, revenues and net earnings. We discuss risks associated with the COVID-19 pandemic below.

In certain markets, we are dependent on governmental approvals of various actions such as price changes, and failure to obtain such approvals could impair growth of our profitability.

In addition, despite our high ethical standards and rigorous control and compliance procedures aimed at preventing and detecting unlawful conduct, given the breadth and scope of our international operations, we may not be able to detect all potential improper or unlawful conduct by our employees and partners.

Our business, results of operations, cash flows and financial position will be adversely impacted during the continuation of the COVID-19 pandemic.

The COVID-19 pandemic has created significant societal and economic disruption, and resulted in closures of stores, factories and offices, and restrictions on manufacturing, distribution and travel, all of which will adversely impact our business, results of operations, cash flows and financial position during the continuation of the pandemic. Our business continuity plans and other safeguards may not be effective to mitigate the results of the pandemic.

-76-

While much of the COVID-19 pandemic and its effect on our business is still unknown, currently, significant risks include our diminished ability to convert adult smokers to our RRPs as store closures preclude in-person guided trials, significant volume declines in our duty-free business and certain other key markets, disruptions or delays in our manufacturing and supply chain, increased currency volatility, and delays in certain cost saving, transformation and restructuring initiatives. Our business could also be adversely impacted if key personnel or a significant number of employees or business partners become unavailable due to the COVID-19 outbreak. The significant adverse impact of COVID-19 on the economic or political conditions in markets in which we operate could result in changes to the preferences of our adult consumers and lower demand for our products, particularly for our mid-price or premium-price brands. Continuation of the pandemic could disrupt our access to the credit markets or increase our borrowing costs. Governments may temporarily be unable to focus on the development of science-based regulatory frameworks for the development and commercialization of RRPs or on the enforcement or implementation of regulations that are significant to our business. In addition, messaging about the potential negative impacts of the use of our products on COVID-19 risks may lead to increasingly restrictive regulatory measures on the sale and use of our products, negatively impact demand for our products, the willingness of adult consumers to switch to our RRPs and our efforts to advocate for the development of science-based regulatory frameworks for the development and commercialization of RRPs.

The impact of these risks also depends on factors beyond our knowledge or control, including the duration and severity of the outbreak and actions taken to contain its spread and to mitigate its public health effects, and the ultimate economic consequences thereof.

We may be unable to anticipate changes in adult consumer preferences.

Our business is subject to changes in adult consumer preferences, which may be influenced by local economic conditions. To be successful, we must: 

• promote brand equity successfully;

• anticipate and respond to new adult consumer trends;

• develop new products and markets and broaden brand portfolios;

• improve productivity;

• convince adult smokers to convert to our RRPs;

• ensure adequate production capacity to meet demand for our products; and

• be able to protect or enhance margins through price increases.

In periods of economic uncertainty, adult consumers may tend to purchase lower-price brands, and the volume of our premium-price and mid-price brands and our profitability could suffer accordingly. Such down-trading trends may be reinforced by regulation that limits branding, communication and product differentiation.

The financial and business performance of our reduced-risk products is less predictable than our cigarette business.

Our RRPs are novel products in a new category, and the pace at which adult smokers adopt them may vary, depending on the competitive, regulatory, fiscal and cultural environment, and other factors in a specific market. There may be periods of accelerated growth and periods of slower growth for these products, the timing and drivers of which may be more difficult for us to predict versus our mature cigarette business. The impact of this lower predictability on our projected results for a specific period may be significant, particularly during the early stages of this new product category and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

We lose revenues as a result of counterfeiting, contraband, cross-border purchases, "illicit whites," non-tax-paid volume produced by local manufacturers, and counterfeiting of our Platform 1 device and heated tobacco units.

Large quantities of counterfeit cigarettes are sold in the international market. We believe that Marlboro is the most heavily counterfeited international cigarette brand, although we cannot quantify the revenues we lose as a result of this activity. In addition, our revenues are reduced by contraband, legal cross-border purchases, "illicit whites" and non-tax-paid volume produced by local manufacturers. Our revenues and consumer satisfaction with our Platform 1 device and heated tobacco units may be adversely affected by counterfeit products that do not meet our product quality standards and scientific validation procedures.

From time to time, we are subject to governmental investigations on a range of matters.

Investigations include allegations of contraband shipments of cigarettes, allegations of unlawful pricing activities within certain markets, allegations of underpayment of income taxes, customs duties and/or excise taxes, allegations of false and misleading usage of descriptors, allegations of unlawful advertising, and allegations of unlawful labor practices. We cannot predict the outcome

-77-

of those investigations or whether additional investigations may be commenced, and it is possible that our business could be materially affected by an unfavorable outcome of pending or future investigations. See Note 8. Contingencies—Other Litigation and “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Operating Results by Business Segment—Business Environment—Governmental Investigations” for a description of certain governmental investigations to which we are subject.

We may be unsuccessful in our attempts to introduce reduced-risk products, and regulators may not permit the commercialization of these products or the communication of scientifically substantiated risk-reduction claims.

Our key strategic priorities are: to develop and commercialize products that present less risk of harm to adult smokers who switch to those products versus continued smoking; and to convince current adult smokers who would otherwise continue to smoke to switch to those RRPs. For our efforts to be successful, we must: develop RRPs that such adult smokers find acceptable alternatives to smoking; conduct rigorous scientific studies to substantiate that they reduce exposure to harmful and potentially harmful constituents in smoke and, ultimately, that these products present, are likely to present, or have the potential to present less risk of harm to adult smokers who switch to them versus continued smoking; and effectively advocate for the development of science-based regulatory frameworks for the development and commercialization of RRPs, including communication of scientifically substantiated information to enable adult smokers to make better consumer choices. We might not succeed in our efforts. If we do not succeed, but others do, or if heat-not-burn products are inequitably regulated compared to other RRP categories without regard to the totality of the scientific evidence available for such products, we may be at a competitive disadvantage. In addition, actions of some market entrants, such as the inappropriate marketing of e-vapor products to youth, as well as alleged health consequences associated with the use of certain e-vapor products, may unfavorably impact public opinion and/or mischaracterize all e-vapor products or other RRPs to consumers, regulators and policy makers without regard to the totality of scientific evidence for specific products. This may impede our efforts to advocate for the development of science-based regulatory frameworks for the development and commercialization of RRPs. We cannot predict whether regulators will permit the sale and/or marketing of RRPs with scientifically substantiated risk-reduction claims. Such restrictions could limit the success of our RRPs. Moreover, the FDA’s premarket tobacco product authorization of a version of our Platform 1 product is subject to strict marketing, reporting and other requirements and is not a guarantee that the product will remain authorized, particularly if there is a significant uptake in youth initiation.

We may be unsuccessful in our efforts to differentiate reduced-risk products and cigarettes with respect to taxation.

To date, we have been largely successful in demonstrating to regulators that our RRPs are not cigarettes, and as such they are generally taxed either as a separate category or as other tobacco products, which typically yields more favorable tax rates than cigarettes. If we cease to be successful in these efforts, RRP unit margins may be adversely affected.

Our reported results could be adversely affected by unfavorable currency exchange rates, and currency devaluations could impair our competitiveness.

We conduct our business primarily in local currency and, for purposes of financial reporting, the local currency results are translated into U.S. dollars based on average exchange rates prevailing during a reporting period. During times of a strengthening U.S. dollar, our reported net revenues, operating income and EPS will be reduced because the local currency translates into fewer U.S. dollars. During periods of economic crises, such as during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, foreign currencies may be devalued significantly against the U.S. dollar, reducing our margins. Actions to recover margins may result in lower volume and a weaker competitive position.

Changes in the earnings mix and changes in tax laws may result in significant variability in our effective tax rates. Our ability to receive payments from foreign subsidiaries or to repatriate royalties and dividends could be restricted by local country currency exchange controls and other regulations.

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act that was signed into law in December 2017 constitutes a major change to the U.S. tax system. Our estimated impact of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act is based on management’s current interpretations, and our analysis is ongoing.  Our final tax liability may be materially different from current estimates due to developments such as implementing regulations and clarifications. In future periods, our effective tax rate and our ability to recover deferred tax assets could be subject to additional uncertainty as a result of such developments. Furthermore, changes in the earnings mix or applicable foreign tax laws may result in significant variability in our effective tax rates. Because we are a U.S. holding company, our most significant source of funds is distributions from our non-U.S. subsidiaries. Certain countries in which we operate have adopted or could institute currency exchange controls and other regulations that limit or prohibit our local subsidiaries' ability to convert local currency into U.S. dollars or to make payments outside the country. This could subject us to the risks of local currency devaluation and business disruption.

-78-

Our ability to grow profitability may be limited by our inability to introduce new products, enter new markets or improve our margins through higher pricing and improvements in our brand and geographic mix.

Our profit growth may suffer if we are unable to introduce new products or enter new markets successfully, to raise prices or to improve the proportion of our sales of higher margin products and in higher margin geographies.

We may be unable to expand our brand portfolio through successful acquisitions or the development of strategic business relationships.

One element of our growth strategy is to strengthen our brand portfolio and market positions through selective acquisitions and the development of strategic business relationships. Acquisition and strategic business development opportunities are limited and present risks of failing to achieve efficient and effective integration, strategic objectives and anticipated revenue improvements and cost savings. There is no assurance that we will be able to acquire attractive businesses on favorable terms, or that future acquisitions or strategic business developments will be accretive to earnings.

Government mandated prices, production control programs, shifts in crops driven by economic conditions and the impact of climate change may increase the cost or reduce the quality of the tobacco and other agricultural products used to manufacture our products.

As with other agricultural commodities, the price of tobacco leaf and cloves can be influenced by imbalances in supply and demand and the impacts of natural disasters and pandemics such as COVID-19, and crop quality can be influenced by variations in weather patterns, including those caused by climate change. Tobacco production in certain countries is subject to a variety of controls, including government mandated prices and production control programs. Changes in the patterns of demand for agricultural products could cause farmers to produce less tobacco or cloves. Any significant change in tobacco leaf and clove prices, quality and quantity could affect our profitability and our business.

Our ability to achieve our strategic goals may be impaired if we fail to attract and retain the best global talent.

To be successful, we must continue transforming our culture and ways of working, align our talent with our business needs, innovate and transform to a consumer-centric business. We compete for talent, including in areas that are new to us, such as digital and technical solutions, with companies in the consumer products, technology and other sectors that enjoy greater societal acceptance. As a result, we may be unable to attract and retain the best global talent with the right degree of diversity, experience and skills to achieve our strategic goals.

The failure of our information systems to function as intended or their penetration by outside parties with the intent to corrupt them or our failure to comply with privacy laws and regulations could result in business disruption, litigation and regulatory action, and loss of revenue, assets or personal or other confidential data.

We use information systems to help manage business processes, collect and interpret data and communicate internally and externally with employees, suppliers, consumers, customers and others. Some of these information systems are managed by third-party service providers. We have backup systems and business continuity plans in place, and we take care to protect our systems and data from unauthorized access. Nevertheless, failure of our systems to function as intended, or penetration of our systems by outside parties intent on extracting or corrupting information or otherwise disrupting business processes, could place us at a competitive disadvantage, result in a loss of revenue, assets or personal or other sensitive data, litigation and regulatory action, cause damage to our reputation and that of our brands and result in significant remediation and other costs. Failure to protect personal data, respect the rights of data subjects, and adhere to strict cybersecurity protocols could subject us to substantial fines and other legal challenges under regulations such as the EU General Data Protection Regulation. As we are increasingly relying on digital platforms in our business, the magnitude of these risks is likely to increase.

We may be unable to adequately protect our intellectual property rights, and disputes relating to intellectual property rights could harm our business.

Our intellectual property rights are valuable assets, and their protection is important to our business.  If the steps we take to protect our intellectual property rights globally, including through a combination of trademark, design, patent and other intellectual property rights, are inadequate, or if others infringe or misappropriate our intellectual property rights, notwithstanding legal protection, our business could suffer. Intellectual property rights of third parties may limit our ability to introduce new products or improve the quality of existing products in one or more markets. Competitors or other third parties may claim that we infringe their intellectual property rights. Any such claims, regardless of merit, could divert management’s attention, be costly, disruptive, time-consuming and unpredictable and expose us to litigation costs and damages, and impede our ability to manufacture and sell new products or improve existing products. If, as a result, we are unable to manufacture or sell our RRPs or improve their quality in one or more markets, our ability to convert adult smokers to our RRPs in such markets would be adversely affected.

-79-

We may be required to replace third-party contract manufacturers or service providers with our own resources.

In certain instances, we contract with third parties to manufacture some of our products or product parts or to provide other services. We may be unable to renew these agreements on satisfactory terms for numerous reasons, including government regulations. Accordingly, our costs may increase significantly if we must replace such third parties with our own resources.

-80-

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

PMI carried out an evaluation, with the participation of PMI’s management, including PMI’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of PMI’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, PMI’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that PMI’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective. There have been no changes in PMI’s internal control over financial reporting during the most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, PMI’s internal control over financial reporting.

-81-

Part II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

See Note 8. Contingencies of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I – Item 1 of this report for a discussion of legal proceedings pending against Philip Morris International Inc. and its subsidiaries.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

Information regarding Risk Factors appears in “MD&A – Cautionary Factors That May Affect Future Results,” in Part I – Item 2 of this Form 10-Q and in Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019.

-82-

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

Our share repurchase activity for each of the three months in the quarter ended March 31, 2020 was as follows:

Period	Total Number of Shares Repurchased		Average Price Paid Per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs	Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
January 1, 2020 – January 31, 2020 (1)	—		$	—	—	$	—
February 1, 2020 – February 29, 2020 (1)	—		$	—	—	$	—
March 1, 2020 – March 31, 2020 (1)	—		$	—	—	$	—
Pursuant to Publicly   Announced Plans   or Programs	—		$	—
January 1, 2020 – January 31, 2020 (2)	5,814		$	84.25
February 1, 2020 – February 29, 2020 (2)	135,549		$	87.41
March 1, 2020 – March 31, 2020 (2)	2,200	2,342	$	79.85
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2020	143,563		$	87.16

(1) During this reporting period, we did not have an authorized share repurchase program.

(2) Shares repurchased represent shares tendered to us by employees who vested in restricted and performance share unit awards and used shares to pay all, or a portion of, the related taxes.

-83-

Item 6. Exhibits.

3.1	Amended and Restated By-Laws of Philip Morris International Inc., effective as of March 5, 2020 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 6, 2020).
10.1	Amendment and Extension Agreement, effective February 4, 2020, among PMI, each lender named therein and Citibank Europe PLC, UK Branch (formerly, Citibank International Limited), as administrative agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 3, 2020).
10.2	Credit Agreement, dated as of February 10, 2020, among PMI, the lenders named therein, Citibank Europe PLC, UK Branch, as facility agent, and Citibank, N.A., as swingline agent (incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 11, 2020).
10.3	Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 11, 2020).
10.4	Form of Performance Share Unit Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 11, 2020).
10.5	Employment Agreement with Emmanuel Babeau (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 2, 2020).
10.6	Severance Provisions of Employment Agreement with Martin G. King, effective May 1, 2020 (described in the Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 6, 2020).
31.1	Certification of the Registrant's Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2	Certification of the Registrant's Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1	Certification of the Registrant's Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2	Certification of the Registrant's Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101.INS	XBRL Instance Document - the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document.
101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema.
101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase.
101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase.
101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase.
101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase.
104	Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101)

-84-

Signature

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

PHILIP MORRIS INTERNATIONAL INC.

/s/ MARTIN G. KING

Martin G. King

Chief Financial Officer

April 28, 2020

-85-

EX-10.6

Exhibit 10.6

Severance Provisions of Employment Agreement with Martin G. King (effective May 1, 2020).

Martin G. King will be entitled to the following severance provisions if his employment is terminated without Cause:

-  Mr. King will receive a lump sum cash payment determined based on his years of service, equivalent to 18 months of his base salary, plus his prorated incentive compensation award;

-  Mr. King’s restricted share units will vest fully, and his performance share units will vest as scheduled and certified by the Compensation and Leadership Development Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company; and

-  Mr. King will receive a lump sum cash payment equivalent to 18 months of his base salary upon compliance with a 24-month non-competition period following the termination date.

Any severance under this agreement is subject to the Company’s clawback policy.

Cause is defined in the Philip Morris International Inc. 2017 Performance Incentive Plan, filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on March 23, 2017 as Exhibit B to the proxy statement.

EX-31.1

Exhibit 31.1

Certifications

I, André Calantzopoulos, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Philip Morris International Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: April 28, 2020

/s/ ANDRÉ CALANTZOPOULOS

André Calantzopoulos

Chief Executive Officer

-1-

EX-31.2

Exhibit 31.2

Certifications

I, Martin G. King, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Philip Morris International Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: April 28, 2020

/s/ MARTIN G. KING

Martin G. King

Chief Financial Officer

- 1 -

EX-32.1

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Philip Morris International Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2020 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, André Calantzopoulos, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)        the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)        the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ ANDRÉ CALANTZOPOULOS

André Calantzopoulos

Chief Executive Officer

April 28, 2020

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Philip Morris International Inc. and will be retained by Philip Morris International Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

-1-

EX-32.2

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Philip Morris International Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2020 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Martin G. King, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)        the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)        the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ MARTIN G. KING

Martin G. King

Chief Financial Officer

April 28, 2020

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Philip Morris International Inc. and will be retained by Philip Morris International Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

-1-

XML

Earnings Per Share

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2020

Earnings Per Share [Abstract]

Earnings Per Share

Earnings Per Share:

Basic and diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) were calculated using the following:

(in millions)	For the Three Months Ended March 31,
	2020		2019
Net earnings attributable to PMI	$	1,826	$	1,354
Less distributed and undistributed earnings attributable to share-based payment awards	5		4
Net earnings for basic and diluted EPS	$	1,821	$	1,350
Weighted-average shares for basic EPS	1,557		1,555
Plus contingently issuable performance stock units (PSUs)	1		1
Weighted-average shares for diluted EPS	1,558		1,556

Unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents are participating securities and therefore are included in PMI’s earnings per share calculation pursuant to the two-class method.

For the 2020 and 2019 computations, there were no antidilutive stock awards.

XML

Stock Plans

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2020

Share-based Payment Arrangement [Abstract]

Stock Plans

Stock Plans:

In May 2017, PMI’s shareholders approved the Philip Morris International Inc. 2017 Performance Incentive Plan (the “2017 Plan”). Under the 2017 Plan, PMI may grant to eligible employees restricted shares and restricted share units, performance-based cash incentive awards and performance-based equity awards. Up to 25 million shares of PMI’s common stock may be issued under the 2017 Plan. At March 31, 2020, shares available for grant under the 2017 Plan were 17,384,530.

In May 2017, PMI’s shareholders also approved the Philip Morris International Inc. 2017 Stock Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors (the “2017 Non-Employee Directors Plan”). A non-employee director is defined as a member of the PMI Board of Directors who is not a full-time employee of PMI or of any corporation in which PMI owns, directly or indirectly, stock possessing at least 50% of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock entitled to vote in the election of directors in such corporation. Up to 1 million shares of PMI common stock may be awarded under the 2017 Non-Employee Directors Plan. At March 31, 2020, shares available for grant under the plan were 954,084.

Restricted share unit (RSU) awards

During the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, shares granted to eligible employees, the weighted-average grant date fair value per share related to RSU awards and the recorded compensation expense related to RSU awards were as follows:

	Number of Shares Granted	Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value Per RSU Award Granted		Compensation Expense Related to RSU Awards (in millions)
2020	1,599,380	$ 86.62		$	39
2019	1,621,070		$ 77.13	$	36

As of March 31, 2020, PMI had $218 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested RSU awards. The cost is recognized over the original restriction period of the awards, which is typically three years after the date of the award, or upon death, disability or reaching the age of 58.

During the three months ended March 31, 2020, 1,011,318 RSU awards vested. The grant date fair value of all the vested awards was approximately $99 million. The total fair value of RSU awards that vested during the three months ended March 31, 2020 was approximately $88 million.

Performance share unit (PSU) awards

During the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, PMI granted PSU awards to certain executives. The PSU awards require the achievement of certain performance factors, which are predetermined at the time of grant, typically over a three-year performance cycle. The performance metrics for such PSU's granted during the three months ended March 31, 2020 consisted of PMI's Total Shareholder Return ("TSR") relative to a predetermined peer group and on an absolute basis (40% weight), PMI’s currency-neutral compound annual adjusted diluted earnings per share growth rate (30% weight), and PMI’s performance against specific measures of PMI’s transformation, defined as net revenues from PMI's RRPs and any other non-combustible products as a percentage of PMI's total net revenues in the last year of the performance cycle (30% weight). The performance metrics for such PSUs granted during the three months ended March 31, 2019 consisted of PMI’s TSR relative to a predetermined peer group and on an absolute basis (50% weight), PMI’s currency-neutral compound annual adjusted operating income growth rate, excluding acquisitions (30% weight), and PMI’s performance against specific measures of PMI’s transformation (20% weight).

The aggregate of the weighted performance factors for the three metrics in each such PSU award determines the percentage of PSUs that will vest at the end of the three-year performance cycle. The minimum percentage of such PSUs that can vest is zero, with a target percentage of 100 and a maximum percentage of 200. Each such vested PSU entitles the participant to one share of common stock. An aggregate weighted PSU performance factor of 100 will result in the targeted number of PSUs being vested. At the end of the performance cycle, participants are entitled to an amount equivalent to the accumulated dividends paid on common stock during the performance cycle for the number of shares earned.

During the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, shares granted to eligible employees, the grant date fair value per share and the recorded compensation expense related to PSU awards were as follows:

	Number of Shares Granted	PSU Grant Date Fair Value Subject to Other Performance Factors Per Share		PSU Grant Date Fair Value Subject to TSR Performance Factor Per Share		Compensation Expense Related to PSU Awards (in millions)
2020	643,640	$ 86.69		$ 79.76		$	23
2019	625,200		$ 77.20		$ 83.59	$	18

The grant date fair value of the PSU awards subject to the other performance factors was determined by using the average of the high and low market price of PMI’s stock at the date of the grant. The grant date fair value of the PSU market based awards subject to the TSR performance factor was determined by using the Monte Carlo simulation model. The following assumptions were used to determine the grant date fair value of the PSU awards subject to the TSR performance factor:

	2020		2019
Risk-free interest rate (a)	1.4	%	2.4	%
Expected volatility (b)	23.5	%	21.4	%

^(a) Based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve.

^(b) Determined using the observed historical volatility.

As of March 31, 2020, PMI had $60 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested PSU awards. The cost is recognized over the performance cycle of the awards, or upon death, disability or reaching the age of 58.

During the three months ended March 31, 2020, 343,806 PSU awards vested. The grant date fair value of all the vested awards was approximately $35 million. The total fair value of PSU awards that vested during the three months ended March 31, 2020 was approximately $30 million.

XML

Benefit Plans (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2020

Retirement Benefits [Abstract]

Components of Pension and Other Employee Benefit Costs

Pension and other employee benefit costs per the condensed consolidated statements of earnings consisted of the following:

	For the Three Months Ended March 31,
(in millions)	2020			2019
Net pension costs (income)	$	(4	)	$	(5	)
Net postemployment costs	25			24
Net postretirement costs	2			2
Total pension and other employee benefit costs	$	23		$	21

Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost

Net periodic pension cost consisted of the following:

	Pension (1)
	For the Three Months Ended March 31,
(in millions)	2020			2019
Service cost	$	65		$	54
Interest cost	17			29
Expected return on plan assets	(86		)	(79		)
Amortization:
Net loss	65			45
Prior service cost	—			—
Net periodic pension cost	$	61		$	49

⁽¹⁾ Primarily non-U.S. based defined benefit retirement plans.

XML

Segment Reporting (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2020

Segment Reporting [Abstract]

Segment Data

Segment data were as follows:

(in millions)	For the Three Months Ended March 31,
	2020		2019
Net revenues:
European Union	$	2,535	$	2,159
Eastern Europe	788		579
Middle East & Africa	876		927
South & Southeast Asia	1,251		1,113
East Asia & Australia	1,255		1,321
Latin America & Canada (1)	448		652
Net revenues	$	7,153	$	6,751
Operating income (loss):
European Union	$	1,158	$	896
Eastern Europe	99		129
Middle East & Africa	321		344
South & Southeast Asia	599		440
East Asia & Australia	486		427
Latin America & Canada (1)	126		(186		)
Operating income	$	2,789	$	2,050

⁽¹⁾ As of March 22, 2019, PMI deconsolidated the financial results of its Canadian subsidiary, Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc. ("RBH") from PMI's financial statements. For further details, see Note 19. Deconsolidation of RBH.

Items affecting the comparability of results from operations were as follows:

• Canadian tobacco litigation-related expense - See Note 8. Contingencies and Note 19. Deconsolidation of RBH for details of the $194 million pre-tax charge included in the Latin America & Canada segment for the three months ended March 31, 2019.

• Loss on deconsolidation of RBH - See Note 19. Deconsolidation of RBH for details of the $239 million loss included in the Latin America & Canada segment for the three months ended March 31, 2019.

• Asset impairment and exit costs - See Note 18. Asset Impairment and Exit Costs for details of the $20 million pre-tax charge included in the South & Southeast Asia segment for the three months ended March 31, 2019.

PMI's net revenues by product category were as follows:

(in millions)	For the Three Months Ended March 31,
	2020		2019
Net revenues:
Combustible products:
European Union	$	1,911	$	1,812
Eastern Europe	523		471
Middle East & Africa	832		829
South & Southeast Asia	1,251		1,113
East Asia & Australia	642		638
Latin America & Canada	440		646
Total combustible products	$	5,598	$	5,508
Reduced-risk products:
European Union	$	624	$	347
Eastern Europe	265		108
Middle East & Africa	44		98
South & Southeast Asia	—		—
East Asia & Australia	613		683
Latin America & Canada	8		6
Total reduced-risk products	$	1,555	$	1,243
Total PMI net revenues	$	7,153	$	6,751

Note: Sum of product categories or Regions might not foot to total PMI due to roundings.

XML

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Losses (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2020

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net of Tax [Abstract]

Components of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Earnings (Losses), Net of Taxes

PMI’s accumulated other comprehensive losses, net of taxes, consisted of the following:

 

(in millions)	At March 31, 2020			At December 31, 2019			At March 31, 2019
Currency translation adjustments	$	(7,039	)	$	(5,537	)	$	(5,711	)
Pension and other benefits	(3,755		)	(3,829		)	(3,556		)
Derivatives accounted for as hedges	20			3			30
Total accumulated other comprehensive losses	$	(10,774	)	$	(9,363	)	$	(9,237	)

XML

Earnings Per Share (Calculation of Basic and Diluted EPS) (Details) - USD ($) $ in Millions	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2020	Mar. 31, 2019
Earnings Per Share [Abstract]
Net earnings attributable to PMI	$ 1,826	$ 1,354
Less distributed and undistributed earnings attributable to share-based payment awards	5	4
Net earnings for basic and diluted EPS	$ 1,821	$ 1,350
Weighted-average shares for basic EPS (in shares)	1,557,000,000	1,555,000,000
Plus contingently issuable performance stock units (PSUs) (in shares)	1,000,000	1,000,000
Weighted-average shares for diluted EPS (in shares)	1,558,000,000	1,556,000,000
Antidilutive stock awards (in shares)	0	0

XML

Financial Instruments (Narrative) (Details) - USD ($) $ in Millions	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2020	Mar. 31, 2019
Derivative [Line Items]
Unrealized gain (loss) on hedges of net investments	$ (1,582)	$ 286
Gain on amounts excluded from effectiveness testing	56	56
Derivative Contract [Member]
Derivative [Line Items]
Notional amount	24,000
Derivative instruments, gains to be reclassified to earnings	$ 36
Derivative Contract [Member] | Maximum [Member]
Derivative [Line Items]
Maximum length of time hedged in a cash flow hedge	21 months
Derivative Contract [Member] | Not Designated as Hedging Instrument [Member]
Derivative [Line Items]
Notional amount	$ 9,100
Gain on derivatives not designated as hedging instruments	56	(7)
Derivative Contract [Member] | Cash Flow Hedging [Member]
Derivative [Line Items]
Notional amount	6,500
Derivative Contract [Member] | Net Investment Hedging [Member]
Derivative [Line Items]
Notional amount	8,400
Unrealized gain (loss) on hedges of net investments	$ 314	$ 291

XML

Benefit Plans (Narrative) (Details) $ in Millions	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2020 USD ($)
Retirement Benefits [Abstract]
Employer contributions	$ 23
Anticipated additional employer contributions during the remainder of the current fiscal year	$ 62

XML

Deconsolidation of RBH (Details) $ in Millions, $ in Millions			3 Months Ended
	Mar. 01, 2019 CAD ($) litigation_case	Mar. 01, 2019 USD ($) litigation_case	Mar. 31, 2020 USD ($) litigation_case	Mar. 31, 2019 USD ($)	Mar. 22, 2019 USD ($)
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Number of cases decided in favor of plaintiff | litigation_case			13
Tax benefit for reversal of deferred tax liabilities			$ 16.0
Marketing Administration And Research Costs [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Deconsolidation amount				$ 239.0
Measurement Input, Discount Rate [Member] | Valuation Technique, Discounted Cash Flow [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Pending litigation liabilities measurement input					0.08
Measurement Input, Terminal Growth Rate [Member] | Valuation Technique, Discounted Cash Flow [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Pending litigation liabilities measurement input					0.025
RBH [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Amount deconsolidated from balance sheet					$ 3,519.0
Equity securities					3,280.0
Tax benefit for reversal of deferred tax liabilities				49.0
RBH [Member] | Cash [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Amount deconsolidated from balance sheet					1,323.0
RBH [Member] | Goodwill [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Amount deconsolidated from balance sheet					1,463.0
RBH [Member] | Other Comprehensive Earnings [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Amount deconsolidated from balance sheet					529.0
RBH [Member] | Other Assets and Liabilities [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Amount deconsolidated from balance sheet					$ 204.0
Canada [Member] | Appellate Ruling [Member] | RBH [Member] | Smoking And Health Class Actions [Member] | Cecilia Letourneau & Conseil Quebecois Sur La Tabac Et La Sante and Jean-Yves Blais Cases [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Number of cases decided in favor of plaintiff | litigation_case	2	2
Amount of litigation charge				194.0
Amount of litigation charge net of tax				$ 142.0
Amount of security ordered, funded by defendant	$ 257	$ 194.1

XML

Fair Value Measurements (Aggregate Fair Value of Derivative Financial Instruments, Equity Securities and Debt (Details) $ in Millions	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2020 USD ($)
Liabilities:
Equity securities, unrealized gain (loss)	$ (78)
Equity securities, unrealized gain (loss), net	(62)
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets/Liabilities (Level 1) [Member]
Assets:
Equity securities	254
Derivative contracts	0
Total assets	254
Liabilities:
Debt	27,959
Derivative contracts	0
Total liabilities	27,959
Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) [Member]
Assets:
Equity securities	0
Derivative contracts	492
Total assets	492
Liabilities:
Debt	168
Derivative contracts	249
Total liabilities	417
Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) [Member]
Assets:
Equity securities	0
Derivative contracts	0
Total assets	0
Liabilities:
Debt	0
Derivative contracts	0
Total liabilities	0
Fair Value [Member]
Assets:
Equity securities	254
Derivative contracts	492
Total assets	746
Liabilities:
Debt	28,127
Derivative contracts	249
Total liabilities	$ 28,376

XML

Related Parties - Investments in Unconsolidated Subsidiaries, Equity Securities and Other (Balance Sheet and Earnings Activity) (Details) - USD ($) $ in Millions	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2020	Mar. 31, 2019	Dec. 31, 2019
Schedule of Equity Method Investments [Line Items]
Net revenues	$ 777	$ 572
Expenses	19	13
Receivables	513		$ 523
Payables	10		20
Megapolis Group
Schedule of Equity Method Investments [Line Items]
Net revenues	496	359
Receivables	271		375
Other
Schedule of Equity Method Investments [Line Items]
Net revenues	281	213
Expenses	19	$ 13
Receivables	242		148
Payables	$ 10		$ 20

XML

Related Parties - Investments in Unconsolidated Subsidiaries, Equity Securities and Other (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2020

Equity Method Investments and Joint Ventures [Abstract]

Earnings and Balance Sheet Activities with Related Parties - Investments in Unconsolidated Subsidiaries, equity securities and Other

PMI’s net revenues and expenses with the above related parties were as follows:

	For the Three Months Ended March 31,
(in millions)	2020		2019
Net revenues:
Megapolis Group	$	496	$	359
Other	281		213
Net revenues (a)	$	777	$	572
Expenses:
Other	$	19	$	13
Expenses	$	19	$	13

^(a) Net revenues exclude excise taxes and VAT billed to customers.

PMI’s balance sheet activity with the above related parties was as follows:

(in millions)	At March 31, 2020		At December 31, 2019
Receivables:
Megapolis Group	$	271	$	375
Other	242		148
Receivables	$	513	$	523
Payables:
Other	$	10	$	20
Payables	$	10	$	20

XML

Stock Plans (Additional Information) (Details) - shares	Mar. 31, 2020	May 31, 2017
2017 Performance Incentive Plan [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Estimated common stock to be awarded under a stock benefit plan, maximum limit (in shares)		25,000,000
Shares available for grant under the plan (in shares)	17,384,530
Non Employee Directors Plan [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Estimated common stock to be awarded under a stock benefit plan, maximum limit (in shares)		1,000,000
Shares available for grant under the plan (in shares)	954,084
Percentage of voting shares that PMI may own, used in determining non-employee director status		50.00%

XML

Benefit Plans (Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost) (Details) - Pension Plan [Member] - USD ($) $ in Millions	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2020	Mar. 31, 2019
Defined Benefit Plan Disclosure [Line Items]
Service cost	$ 65	$ 54
Interest cost	17	29
Expected return on plan assets	(86)	(79)
Amortization:
Net loss	65	45
Prior service cost	0	0
Net periodic pension cost	$ 61	$ 49

XML

Contingencies (Public Civil Actions) (Details) - Public Civil Actions [Member] - Combustible Products [Member] - litigation_case	Apr. 24, 2020	Apr. 23, 2019	Apr. 24, 2018
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Cases brought against PM		2	2
Subsequent Event [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Cases brought against PM	2
Subsequent Event [Member] | Argentina [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Cases brought against PM	1
Subsequent Event [Member] | Venezuela [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Cases brought against PM	1

XML

Contingencies (Verdicts and Post-Trial Developments) (Details)							1 Months Ended
	Mar. 01, 2019 CAD ($)	Mar. 01, 2019 USD ($)	Aug. 05, 2016 USD ($)	Aug. 05, 2016 ARS ($)	May 27, 2015 CAD ($)	May 27, 2015 USD ($)	Apr. 30, 2004 USD ($)	Apr. 30, 2004 BRL (R$)
Brazil [Member] | Smoking And Health Class Actions [Member] | The Smoker Health Defense Association (ADESF) [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Smoking and health loss contingency interest rate (percentage per month)							1.00%	1.00%
Brazil [Member] | Smoking And Health Class Actions [Member] | Award per smoker per year [Member] | The Smoker Health Defense Association (ADESF) [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Damages awarded							$ 183	R$ 1,000
Canada [Member] | Smoking And Health Class Actions [Member] | Cecilia Letourneau [Member] | Judicial Ruling [Member] | Imperial Tobacco Ltd., Rothmans, Benson And Hedges Inc., And JTI Macdonald Corp. [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Punitive damages awarded					$ 131,000,000	$ 93,000,000
Canada [Member] | Smoking And Health Class Actions [Member] | Cecilia Letourneau [Member] | Judicial Ruling [Member] | RBH [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Punitive damages awarded					$ 46,000,000	$ 32,600,000
Payment period for awarded punitive damages to be deposited into trust					60 days	60 days
Canada [Member] | Smoking And Health Class Actions [Member] | Conseil Quebecois Sur Le Tabac Et La Sante and Jean-Yves Blais [Member] | Judicial Ruling [Member] | Imperial Tobacco Ltd., Rothmans, Benson And Hedges Inc., And JTI Macdonald Corp. [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Punitive damages awarded					$ 90,000	$ 63,760
Compensatory damages awarded					15,500,000,000.0	11,000,000,000
Awarded compensatory damages that are to be deposited into trust					1,000,000,000	708,500,000
Canada [Member] | Smoking And Health Class Actions [Member] | Conseil Quebecois Sur Le Tabac Et La Sante and Jean-Yves Blais [Member] | Judicial Ruling [Member] | RBH [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Punitive damages awarded					30,000	21,250
Compensatory damages awarded	$ 2,700,000,000	$ 1,910,000,000			$ 3,100,000,000.0	$ 2,200,000,000
Damages allocated to subsidiary (percent)	20.00%	20.00%			20.00%	20.00%
Awarded compensatory damages that are to be deposited into trust					$ 200,000,000	$ 141,700,000
Payment period for compensatory damages to be deposited into trust					60 days	60 days
Argentina [Member] | Individual Action [Member] | Hugo Lespada [Member] | Judicial Ruling [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Compensatory damages awarded			$ 1,661	$ 110,000

XML

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Earnings - USD ($) $ in Millions	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2020	Mar. 31, 2019
Net earnings	$ 1,987	$ 1,464
Change in currency translation adjustments:
Unrealized gains (losses), net of income taxes	(1,582)	286
Change in net loss and prior service cost:
Amortization of net losses, prior service costs and net transition costs and (Gains)/losses transferred to earnings – deconsolidation of RBH, net of income taxes	74	63
Change in fair value of derivatives accounted for as hedges:
Gains (losses) recognized, net of income taxes	26	(1)
(Gains) losses transferred to earnings, net of income taxes	(9)	(4)
Total other comprehensive earnings (losses)	(1,491)	873
Total comprehensive earnings	496	2,337
Less comprehensive earnings attributable to:
Noncontrolling interests	81	109
Comprehensive earnings attributable to PMI	415	2,228
Deconsolidation of RBH [Member]
Change in currency translation adjustments:
(Gains)/losses transferred to earnings - deconsolidation of RBH, net of income taxes (Note 19)	0	502
Change in net loss and prior service cost:
Amortization of net losses, prior service costs and net transition costs and (Gains)/losses transferred to earnings – deconsolidation of RBH, net of income taxes	$ 0	$ 27

XML

Asset Impairment and Exit Costs

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2020

Restructuring and Related Activities [Abstract]

Asset Impairment and Exit Costs

Asset Impairment and Exit Costs:

For the three months ended March 31, 2020, PMI did not record any pre-tax charges for asset impairment and exit costs.

Global Manufacturing Infrastructure Optimization

In light of declining PMI cigarette volumes resulting from lower total industry volumes and the shift to smoke-free alternatives, PMI continues to optimize its global manufacturing infrastructure. During 2019, PMI recorded asset impairment and exit costs related to plant closures in Argentina, Colombia, Germany and Pakistan as part of its global manufacturing infrastructure optimization.

For the three months ended March 31, 2019, PMI recorded pre-tax asset impairment and exit costs of $20 million related to a plant closure in Pakistan. This total pre-tax charge in the first quarter of 2019 was included in marketing, administration and research costs on the condensed consolidated statements of earnings and was included in the operating income of the South & Southeast Asia segment.

Movement in Exit Cost Liabilities

The movement in exit cost liabilities for the three months ended March 31, 2020 was as follows:

(in millions)
Liability balance, January 1, 2020	$	191
Charges, net	—
Cash spent	(48		)
Currency/other	(3		)
Liability balance, March 31, 2020	$	140

Future cash payments for exit costs incurred to date are anticipated to be substantially paid by the end of 2021, with approximately $66 million expected to be paid in the remainder of 2020.

XML

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - USD ($) $ in Millions		3 Months Ended
		Mar. 31, 2020	Mar. 31, 2019
CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net earnings		$ 1,987	$ 1,464
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to operating cash flows:
Depreciation and amortization		241	240
Deferred income tax (benefit) provision		(24)	(94)
Asset impairment and exit costs, net of cash paid (Note 18)		(48)	17
Cash effects of changes in:
Receivables, net		116	4
Inventories		(575)	237
Accounts payable		(65)	(7)
Accrued liabilities and other current assets		(662)	(855)
Income taxes		(54)	(251)
Pension plan contributions		(23)	(17)
Other		218	503	[1]
Net cash provided by operating activities		1,111	1,241
CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Capital expenditures		(170)	(324)
Investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries and equity securities		(2)	(24)
Deconsolidation of RBH (Note 19)		0	(1,346)	[2]
Net investment hedges		684	91
Other		2	7
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		514	(1,596)
Short-term borrowing activity by original maturity:
Net issuances (repayments) - maturities of 90 days or less		1,097	(167)
Issuances - maturities longer than 90 days		25	989
Long-term debt repaid		(3,641)	(2,137)
Dividends paid		(1,828)	(1,780)
Sale (purchase) of subsidiary shares to/(from) noncontrolling interests		2	0
Other		(204)	(56)
Net cash used in financing activities		(4,549)	(3,151)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash		(191)	(28)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash:
Increase (Decrease)	[3]	(3,115)	(3,534)
Balance at beginning of period	[3]	6,865	6,620
Balance at end of period	[3]	$ 3,750	$ 3,086

[1] Includes the Loss on Deconsolidation of RBH ($239 million) and the Canadian tobacco litigation-related charge ($194 million) that were included in marketing, administration and research costs in the condensed consolidated statements of earnings for the three months ended March 31, 2019. For further details on these charges, see Note 19. Deconsolidation of RBH.

[2] Includes deconsolidation of RBH cash and cash equivalents of $1,323 million and restricted cash of $23 million.

[3] The amounts for cash and cash equivalents shown above include restricted cash of $4 million and $5 million as of March 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively, and $4 million and $27 million as of December 31, 2019, and 2018, respectively, which were included in other current assets in the condensed consolidated balance sheets.

XML

Related Parties - Investments in Unconsolidated Subsidiaries, Equity Securities and Other

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2020

Equity Method Investments and Joint Ventures [Abstract]

Related Parties - Investments in Unconsolidated Subsidiaries, Equity Securities and Other

Related Parties - Investments in Unconsolidated Subsidiaries, Equity Securities and Other:

Investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries:

At March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, PMI had total investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries of $923 million and $1,053 million, respectively, which were accounted for under the equity method of accounting. Equity method investments are initially recorded at cost. Under the equity method of accounting, the investment is adjusted for PMI's proportionate share of earnings or losses, dividends, capital contributions, changes in ownership interests and movements in currency translation adjustments. The carrying value of our equity method investments at March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019 exceeded our share of the unconsolidated subsidiaries' book value by $782 million and $901 million, respectively. The difference between the investment carrying value and the amount of underlying equity in net assets, excluding $751 million and $863 million attributable to goodwill as of March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively, is being amortized on a straight-line basis over the underlying assets' estimated useful lives of 10 to 20 years. At March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, PMI received year-to-date dividends from unconsolidated subsidiaries of $23 million and $100 million, respectively.

PMI holds a 23% equity interest in Megapolis Distribution BV, the holding company of CJSC TK Megapolis, PMI's distributor in Russia (Eastern Europe segment).

PMI holds a 49% equity interest in United Arab Emirates-based Emirati Investors-TA (FZC) (“EITA”). PMI holds an approximate 25% economic interest in Société des Tabacs Algéro-Emiratie (“STAEM”), an Algerian joint venture that is 51% owned by EITA and 49% by the Algerian state-owned enterprise Management et Développement des Actifs et des Ressources Holding ("MADAR Holding"), which is part of the Middle East & Africa segment, manufactures and distributes under license some of PMI’s brands.

The initial investments in Megapolis Distribution BV and EITA were recorded at cost and are included in investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries and equity securities on the condensed consolidated balance sheets.

Equity securities:

Following the deconsolidation of RBH on March 22, 2019, PMI recorded the continuing investment in RBH, PMI's wholly owned subsidiary, at fair value of $3,280 million at the date of deconsolidation, within investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries and equity securities. For further details, see Note 19. Deconsolidation of RBH. Transactions between PMI and RBH are considered to be related party transactions from the date of deconsolidation and are included in the tables below.

Other related parties:

United Arab Emirates-based Trans-Emirates Trading and Investments (FZC) ("TTI") holds a 33% non-controlling interest in Philip Morris Misr LLC ("PMM"), an entity incorporated in Egypt which is consolidated in PMI’s financial statements in the Middle East & Africa segment. PMM sells, under license, PMI brands in Egypt through an exclusive distribution agreement with a local entity that is also controlled by TTI.

Godfrey Phillips India Ltd ("GPI") is one of the non-controlling interest holders in IPM India, which is a 56.3% owned PMI consolidated subsidiary in the South & Southeast Asia segment. GPI also acts as contract manufacturer and distributor for IPM India. Amounts in the tables below include transactions between these related parties.

Financial activity with the above related parties:

PMI’s net revenues and expenses with the above related parties were as follows:

	For the Three Months Ended March 31,
(in millions)	2020		2019
Net revenues:
Megapolis Group	$	496	$	359
Other	281		213
Net revenues (a)	$	777	$	572
Expenses:
Other	$	19	$	13
Expenses	$	19	$	13

^(a) Net revenues exclude excise taxes and VAT billed to customers.

PMI’s balance sheet activity with the above related parties was as follows:

(in millions)	At March 31, 2020		At December 31, 2019
Receivables:
Megapolis Group	$	271	$	375
Other	242		148
Receivables	$	513	$	523
Payables:
Other	$	10	$	20
Payables	$	10	$	20

The activities with the above related parties are in the ordinary course of business, and are primarily for distribution, service fees, contract manufacturing and license agreements. PMI eliminated its respective share of all significant intercompany transactions with the equity method investees.

XML

Indebtedness

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2020

Debt Disclosure [Abstract]

Indebtedness

Indebtedness:

Short-term Borrowings:

PMI's short-term borrowings, consisting of commercial paper and bank loans to certain PMI subsidiaries at March 31, 2020 and bank loans to certain PMI subsidiaries at December 31, 2019, had a carrying value of $1,438 million and $338 million, respectively. The fair value of PMI’s short-term borrowings, based on current market interest rates, approximates carrying value.

Long-term Debt:

At March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, PMI’s long-term debt consisted of the following:

(in millions)	March 31, 2020		December 31, 2019
U.S. dollar notes, 1.875% to 6.375% (average interest rate 3.567%), due through 2044	$	17,489	$	19,783
Foreign currency obligations:
Euro notes, 0.125% to 3.125% (average interest rate 1.983%), due through 2039	8,331		9,822
Swiss franc notes, 1.000% to 2.000% (average interest rate 1.521%), due through 2024	915		899
Other (average interest rate 3.009%), due through 2025	197		203
	26,932		30,707
Less current portion of long-term debt	1,933		4,051
	$	24,999	$	26,656

Other foreign currency debt above includes mortgage debt in Switzerland and finance lease obligations at March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019.

Credit Facilities:

On January 31, 2020, PMI entered into an agreement to amend and extend the term of its $2.0 billion 364-day revolving credit facility from February 4, 2020, to February 2, 2021.

On February 10, 2020, PMI entered into a new $2.0 billion multi-year revolving credit facility, expiring on February 10, 2025. The new credit facility replaced the $2.5 billion multi-year revolving credit facility, which was terminated effective February 10, 2020. PMI had no borrowings outstanding under the terminated facility, which was due to expire on February 28, 2021.

At March 31, 2020, PMI's total committed credit facilities were as follows:

(in billions)

Type	Committed Credit Facilities
364-day revolving credit, expiring February 2, 2021	$	2.0
Multi-year revolving credit, expiring October 1, 2022	3.5
Multi-year revolving credit, expiring February 10, 2025	2.0
Total facilities	$	7.5

At March 31, 2020, there were no borrowings under these committed credit facilities, and the entire committed amounts were available for borrowing.

XML

Benefit Plans (Components of Pension and Other Employee Benefits Costs) (Details) - USD ($) $ in Millions	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2020	Mar. 31, 2019
Defined Benefit Plans and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans Table Text Block [Line Items]
Total pension and other employee benefit costs	$ 23	$ 21
Pension Plan [Member]
Defined Benefit Plans and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans Table Text Block [Line Items]
Total pension and other employee benefit costs	(4)	(5)
Postemployment Benefit Plans [Member]
Defined Benefit Plans and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans Table Text Block [Line Items]
Total pension and other employee benefit costs	25	24
Postretirement Benefit Costs [Member]
Defined Benefit Plans and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans Table Text Block [Line Items]
Total pension and other employee benefit costs	$ 2	$ 2

XML

Balance Sheet Offsetting (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2020

Offsetting [Abstract]

Offsetting Assets

The effects of these derivative financial instrument assets and liabilities on PMI's condensed consolidated balance sheets were as follows:

(in millions)	Gross Amounts Recognized		Gross Amount Offset in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet		Net Amounts Presented in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet		Gross Amounts Not Offset in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet
							Financial Instruments			Cash Collateral Received/Pledged			Net Amount
At March 31, 2020
Assets
Derivative contracts	$	492	$	—	$	492	$	(212	)	$	(253	)	$	27
Liabilities
Derivative contracts	$	249	$	—	$	249	$	(212	)	$	(1	)	$	36
At December 31, 2019
Assets
Derivative contracts	$	390	$	—	$	390	$	(297	)	$	(91	)	$	2
Liabilities
Derivative contracts	$	419	$	—	$	419	$	(297	)	$	(59	)	$	63

Offsetting Liabilities

The effects of these derivative financial instrument assets and liabilities on PMI's condensed consolidated balance sheets were as follows:

(in millions)	Gross Amounts Recognized		Gross Amount Offset in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet		Net Amounts Presented in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet		Gross Amounts Not Offset in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet
							Financial Instruments			Cash Collateral Received/Pledged			Net Amount
At March 31, 2020
Assets
Derivative contracts	$	492	$	—	$	492	$	(212	)	$	(253	)	$	27
Liabilities
Derivative contracts	$	249	$	—	$	249	$	(212	)	$	(1	)	$	36
At December 31, 2019
Assets
Derivative contracts	$	390	$	—	$	390	$	(297	)	$	(91	)	$	2
Liabilities
Derivative contracts	$	419	$	—	$	419	$	(297	)	$	(59	)	$	63

XML

Asset Impairment and Exit Costs (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2020

Restructuring and Related Activities [Abstract]

Movement in Exit Cost Liabilities

The movement in exit cost liabilities for the three months ended March 31, 2020 was as follows:

(in millions)
Liability balance, January 1, 2020	$	191
Charges, net	—
Cash spent	(48		)
Currency/other	(3		)
Liability balance, March 31, 2020	$	140

XML

Contingencies (Other Litigation) (Details) - Other Litigation [Member] ฿ in Millions, $ in Millions, ₽ in Billions, ₩ in Billions						1 Months Ended										3 Months Ended			5 Months Ended		12 Months Ended
	Feb. 18, 2020	Jan. 26, 2017 THB (฿)	Jan. 26, 2017 USD ($)	Jan. 18, 2016 THB (฿) defendant	Jan. 18, 2016 USD ($) defendant	Apr. 28, 2020 KRW (₩)	Apr. 28, 2020 USD ($)	Mar. 31, 2020 THB (฿)	Mar. 31, 2020 USD ($)	Jan. 31, 2020 KRW (₩)	Jan. 31, 2020 USD ($)	Nov. 30, 2019 THB (฿)	Nov. 30, 2019 USD ($)	Sep. 30, 2019 RUB (₽)	Sep. 30, 2019 USD ($)	Sep. 30, 2019 USD ($)	Mar. 31, 2017 KRW (₩)	Mar. 31, 2017 USD ($)	Mar. 31, 2017 KRW (₩)	Mar. 31, 2017 USD ($)	Dec. 31, 2016 KRW (₩)	Dec. 31, 2016 USD ($)
Thailand [Member] | The Department of Special Investigations of the Government of Thailand [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Loss contingency, damages sought, value		฿ 19,800	$ 612.0
Amount of fine imposed by trial court								฿ 130	$ 4.0			฿ 1,200	$ 37.1
Korea [Member] | The South Korean Board Of Audit And Inspection [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Amounts paid																	₩ 172	$ 139.5	₩ 272	$ 221.0	₩ 100	$ 81.1
Loss Contingency, Amount Of Taxes Not Underpaid As Ruled By Trial Court										₩ 218	$ 177.0
Korea [Member] | The South Korean Board Of Audit And Inspection [Member] | Subsequent Event [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Loss Contingency, Amount Of Alleged Tax Underpayments To Be Ruled By Court						₩ 54	$ 43.8
Eastern Europe [Member] | The Moscow Tax Inspectorate for Major Taxpayers Audit [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Amount of alleged underpayment of excise taxes and VAT claimed by tax authority, including penalties and interest														₽ 24.3	$ 374.0
Amount of pre-tax charge related to alleged underpayment of excise taxes and VAT claimed by tax authority, including penalties and interest																$ 374.0
Amount of after-tax charge related to alleged underpayment of excise taxes and VAT claimed by tax authority, including penalties and interest																$ 315.0
United States [Member] | Philip Morris International Inc. Securities Litigation [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Number of days for plaintiffs to replead claim	30 days
Pending Litigation [Member] | Thailand [Member] | The Department of Special Investigations of the Government of Thailand [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Number of defendants | defendant				8	8
Loss contingency, damages sought, value				฿ 80,800	$ 2,500.0

XML

Contingencies (Smoking and Health Litigation) (Details)	1 Months Ended
	Apr. 30, 2004 USD ($)	Apr. 30, 2004 BRL (R$)	Apr. 24, 2020 litigation_case	Apr. 23, 2019 litigation_case	Apr. 24, 2018 litigation_case
Individual Smoking And Health Cases [Member] | Combustible Products [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Cases brought against PM				53	62
Smoking And Health Class Actions [Member] | Brazil [Member] | The Smoker Health Defense Association (ADESF) [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Smoking and health loss contingency interest rate	1.00%	1.00%
Smoking And Health Class Actions [Member] | Brazil [Member] | Award per smoker per year [Member] | The Smoker Health Defense Association (ADESF) [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Damages awarded	$ 183	R$ 1,000
Smoking And Health Class Actions [Member] | Combustible Products [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Cases brought against PM				10	11
Subsequent Event [Member] | Individual Smoking And Health Cases [Member] | Combustible Products [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Cases brought against PM			48
Subsequent Event [Member] | Individual Smoking And Health Cases [Member] | Combustible Products [Member] | Argentina [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Cases brought against PM			31
Subsequent Event [Member] | Individual Smoking And Health Cases [Member] | Combustible Products [Member] | Brazil [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Cases brought against PM			5
Subsequent Event [Member] | Individual Smoking And Health Cases [Member] | Combustible Products [Member] | Canada [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Cases brought against PM			2
Subsequent Event [Member] | Individual Smoking And Health Cases [Member] | Combustible Products [Member] | Chile [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Cases brought against PM			4
Subsequent Event [Member] | Individual Smoking And Health Cases [Member] | Combustible Products [Member] | Costa Rica [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Cases brought against PM			1
Subsequent Event [Member] | Individual Smoking And Health Cases [Member] | Combustible Products [Member] | Italy [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Cases brought against PM			1
Subsequent Event [Member] | Individual Smoking And Health Cases [Member] | Combustible Products [Member] | Philippines [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Cases brought against PM			1
Subsequent Event [Member] | Individual Smoking And Health Cases [Member] | Combustible Products [Member] | Poland [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Cases brought against PM			1
Subsequent Event [Member] | Individual Smoking And Health Cases [Member] | Combustible Products [Member] | Turkey [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Cases brought against PM			1
Subsequent Event [Member] | Individual Smoking And Health Cases [Member] | Combustible Products [Member] | Scotland [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Cases brought against PM			1
Subsequent Event [Member] | Smoking And Health Class Actions [Member] | Combustible Products [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Cases brought against PM			10
Subsequent Event [Member] | Smoking And Health Class Actions [Member] | Combustible Products [Member] | Brazil [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Cases brought against PM			1
Subsequent Event [Member] | Smoking And Health Class Actions [Member] | Combustible Products [Member] | Canada [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Cases brought against PM			9

XML

Sale of Accounts Receivable

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2020

Sale of Accounts Receivable [Abstract]

Sale of Accounts Receivable

Sale of Accounts Receivable:

To mitigate risk and enhance cash and liquidity management PMI sells trade receivables to unaffiliated financial institutions. These arrangements allow PMI to sell, on an ongoing basis, certain trade receivables without recourse. The trade receivables sold are generally short-term in nature and are removed from the condensed consolidated balance sheets. PMI sells trade receivables under two types of arrangements, servicing and non-servicing. For servicing arrangements, PMI continues to service the sold trade receivables on an administrative basis and does not act on behalf of the unaffiliated financial institutions. When applicable, a servicing liability is recorded for the estimated fair value of the servicing. The amounts associated with the servicing liability were not material as of March 31, 2020 and March 31, 2019. Under the non-servicing arrangements, PMI does not provide any administrative support or servicing after the trade receivables have been sold to the unaffiliated financial institutions.

Cumulative trade receivables sold, including excise taxes, for the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, were $2.9 billion and $2.4 billion, respectively. PMI’s operating cash flows were positively impacted by the amount of the trade receivables sold and derecognized from the condensed consolidated balance sheets, which remained outstanding with the unaffiliated financial institutions. The trade receivables sold that remained outstanding under these arrangements as of March 31, 2020 and March 31, 2019, were $1.0 billion, and $0.5 billion, respectively. The net proceeds received are included in cash provided by operating activities in the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows. The difference between the carrying amount of the trade receivables sold and the sum of the cash received is recorded as a loss on sale of trade receivables within marketing, administration and research costs in the condensed consolidated statements of earnings. For the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, the loss on sale of trade receivables was immaterial.

XML

Fair Value Measurements

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2020

Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]

Fair Value Measurements

Fair Value Measurements:

The authoritative guidance defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. The guidance also establishes a fair value hierarchy, which requires an entity to maximize

the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The guidance describes three levels of input that may be used to measure fair value, which are as follows:

Level 1 - Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

Level 2 - Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities; and

Level 3 - Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

Equity Securities

The fair value of PMI’s equity securities, which are determined by using quoted prices in active markets, have been classified within Level 1.

Derivative Financial Instruments

PMI assesses the fair value of its foreign exchange contracts and interest rate contracts using standard valuation models that use, as their basis, readily observable market inputs. The fair value of PMI’s foreign exchange forward contracts is determined by using the prevailing foreign exchange spot rates and interest rate differentials, and the respective maturity dates of the instruments. The fair value of PMI’s currency options is determined by using a Black-Scholes methodology based on foreign exchange spot rates and interest rate differentials, currency volatilities and maturity dates. PMI’s derivative financial instruments have been classified within Level 2 in the table shown below. See Note 5. Financial Instruments for additional discussion of derivative financial instruments.

Debt

The fair value of PMI’s outstanding debt, which is utilized solely for disclosure purposes, is determined using quotes and market interest rates currently available to PMI for issuances of debt with similar terms and remaining maturities. The aggregate carrying value of PMI’s debt, excluding short-term borrowings and $49 million of finance leases, was $26,883 million at March 31, 2020. The fair value of PMI’s outstanding debt, excluding the aforementioned short-term borrowings and finance leases, was classified within Level 1 and Level 2 in the table shown below.

The aggregate fair values of PMI's investments in equity securities, derivative financial instruments and PMI's debt as of March 31, 2020, were as follows:

(in millions)	Fair Value at March 31, 2020		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets/Liabilities (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Assets:
Equity securities (1)	$	254	$	254	$	—	$	—
Derivative contracts	492		—		492		—
Total assets	$	746	$	254	$	492	$	—
Liabilities:
Debt	$	28,127	$	27,959	$	168	$	—
Derivative contracts	249		—		249		—
Total liabilities	$	28,376	$	27,959	$	417	$	—

⁽¹⁾ Unrealized pre-tax loss of $78 million ($62 million net of tax) on equity securities was recorded in the condensed consolidated statement of earnings for the three months ended March 31, 2020.

XML

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings - USD ($) $ in Millions	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2020	Mar. 31, 2019
Income Statement [Abstract]
Revenues including excise taxes	$ 18,253	$ 17,705
Excise taxes on products	11,100	10,954
Net revenues	7,153	6,751
Cost of sales	2,402	2,465
Gross profit	4,751	4,286
Marketing, administration and research costs (Notes 8, 18 & 19)	1,944	2,217
Amortization of intangibles	18	19
Operating income	2,789	2,050
Interest expense, net	129	152
Pension and other employee benefit costs (Note 3)	23	21
Earnings before income taxes	2,637	1,877
Provision for income taxes	596	424
Equity investments and securities (income)/loss, net	54	(11)
Net earnings	1,987	1,464
Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests	161	110
Net earnings attributable to PMI	$ 1,826	$ 1,354
Per share data:
Basic earnings per share (in dollars per share)	$ 1.17	$ 0.87
Diluted earnings per share (in dollars per share)	$ 1.17	$ 0.87

XML

Deconsolidation of RBH

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2020

Deconsolidation [Abstract]

Deconsolidation of RBH

Deconsolidation of RBH:

As discussed in Note 8. Contingencies, following the March 1, 2019 judgment of the Court of Appeal of Québec in two class action lawsuits against PMI's Canadian subsidiary, Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc. ("RBH"), PMI recorded in its consolidated results a pre-tax charge of $194 million, representing $142 million net of tax, in the first quarter of 2019. This pre-tax Canadian tobacco litigation-related expense was included in marketing, administration and research costs on PMI's condensed consolidated statement of earnings for the three months ended March 31, 2019. The charge reflects PMI’s assessment of the portion of the judgment that represents probable and estimable loss prior to the deconsolidation of RBH and corresponds to the trust account deposit required by the judgment. RBH’s share of the deposit is approximately CAD 257 million.

On March 22, 2019, RBH obtained an initial order from the Ontario Superior Court of Justice granting it protection under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act ("CCAA"), which is a Canadian federal law that permits a Canadian business to restructure its affairs while carrying on its business in the ordinary course with minimal disruption to its customers, suppliers and employees.

The administration of the CCAA process, principally relating to the powers provided to the court and the court appointed monitor, removes certain elements of control of the business from both PMI and RBH. As a result, PMI has determined that it no longer has a controlling financial interest over RBH as defined in ASC 810 (Consolidation), and PMI deconsolidated RBH as of the date of the CCAA filing. PMI has also determined that it does not exert "significant influence" over RBH as that term is defined in ASC 323 (Investments-Equity Method and Joint Ventures). Therefore, as of March 22, 2019, PMI accounted for its continuing investment in RBH in accordance with ASC 321 (Investments-Equity Securities) as an equity security, without readily determinable fair value.

Following the deconsolidation, the carrying value of assets and liabilities of RBH was removed from the consolidated balance sheet of PMI, and the continuing investment in RBH was recorded at fair value at the date of deconsolidation. The total amount deconsolidated from PMI’s balance sheet was $3,519 million, including $1,323 million of cash, $1,463 million of goodwill, $529 million of accumulated other comprehensive earnings, primarily related to historical currency translation and $204 million of other assets and liabilities, net. While PMI is accounting for its investment in RBH as an equity security, PMI would recognize dividends as income upon receipt. However, while it remains under creditor protection, RBH does not anticipate paying dividends.

The fair value of PMI’s continuing investment in RBH of $3,280 million was determined at the date of deconsolidation, recorded within Investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries and equity securities and is assessed for impairment on an ongoing basis. The estimated fair value of the underlying business was determined based on an income approach using a discounted cash flow analysis, as well as a market approach for certain contingent liabilities. The information used in the estimate includes observable inputs, primarily a discount rate of 8%, a terminal growth rate of 2.5% and information about total tobacco market size in Canada and RBH’s share of the market, as well as unobservable inputs such as operating budgets and strategic plans, various inflation scenarios, estimated shipment volumes, and expected product pricing and projected margins.

The difference between the carrying value of the assets and liabilities of RBH that were deconsolidated, and the fair value of the continuing investment, as determined at the date of deconsolidation, was $239 million, before tax, and this loss on deconsolidation is reflected within marketing, administration and research costs on PMI’s condensed consolidated statement of earnings for the three months ended March 31, 2019. PMI also recorded a tax benefit of $49 million within the provision for income taxes for the three months ended March 31, 2019, related to the reversal of a deferred tax liability on unremitted earnings of RBH.

RBH is party to transactions with PMI and its consolidated subsidiaries entered into in the normal course of business; these transactions include royalty payments and recharge of various corporate expenses for services benefiting RBH. Up to the date of the CCAA filing, these transactions were eliminated on consolidation and had no impact on PMI’s consolidated statement of earnings. After deconsolidating RBH, these transactions are treated as third-party transactions in PMI’s financial statements. The amount of these related party transactions is included within Note 14. Related Parties - Investments in Unconsolidated Subsidiaries, Equity Securities and Other.

Developments in the CCAA process, including resolution through a plan of arrangement or compromise of all pending tobacco-related litigation currently stayed in Canada, as discussed in Note 8. Contingencies, could result in a material change in the fair value of PMI’s continuing investment in RBH.

XML

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Parenthetical) - USD ($) $ in Millions	Mar. 31, 2020	Dec. 31, 2019
Statement of Financial Position [Abstract]
Receivables, allowances	$ 19	$ 20
Common stock, no par value (in dollars per share)
Common stock, shares issued (in shares)	2,109,316,331	2,109,316,331
Repurchased stock, shares (in shares)	552,210,107	553,421,668

XML

Segment Reporting

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2020

Segment Reporting [Abstract]

Segment Reporting

Segment Reporting:

PMI’s subsidiaries and affiliates are engaged in the manufacture and sale of cigarettes and other nicotine-containing products, including RRPs, in markets outside of the United States of America. In addition, PMI ships a version of its Platform 1 device and its consumables authorized by the FDA to Altria Group, Inc. for sale in the United States under license. Operating segments for PMI are organized by geographic region and managed by segment managers who are responsible for the operating and financial results of the regions inclusive of all product categories sold in the region. PMI’s operating segments are the European Union; Eastern Europe; Middle East & Africa; South & Southeast Asia; East Asia & Australia; and Latin America & Canada. PMI records net revenues and operating income to its segments based upon the geographic area in which the customer resides. Revenues from shipments of Platform 1 devices, heated tobacco units and accessories to Altria Group, Inc. for sale under license in the United States are included in Net Revenues of the Latin America & Canada segment.

PMI’s chief operating decision maker evaluates segment performance and allocates resources based on regional operating income, which includes results from all product categories sold in each region.

PMI disaggregates its net revenue from contracts with customers by both geographic location and product category for each of PMI's six operating segments, as PMI believes this best depicts how the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of its revenue and cash flows are affected by economic factors.

Segment data were as follows:

(in millions)	For the Three Months Ended March 31,
	2020		2019
Net revenues:
European Union	$	2,535	$	2,159
Eastern Europe	788		579
Middle East & Africa	876		927
South & Southeast Asia	1,251		1,113
East Asia & Australia	1,255		1,321
Latin America & Canada (1)	448		652
Net revenues	$	7,153	$	6,751
Operating income (loss):
European Union	$	1,158	$	896
Eastern Europe	99		129
Middle East & Africa	321		344
South & Southeast Asia	599		440
East Asia & Australia	486		427
Latin America & Canada (1)	126		(186		)
Operating income	$	2,789	$	2,050

⁽¹⁾ As of March 22, 2019, PMI deconsolidated the financial results of its Canadian subsidiary, Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc. ("RBH") from PMI's financial statements. For further details, see Note 19. Deconsolidation of RBH.

Items affecting the comparability of results from operations were as follows:

• Canadian tobacco litigation-related expense - See Note 8. Contingencies and Note 19. Deconsolidation of RBH for details of the $194 million pre-tax charge included in the Latin America & Canada segment for the three months ended March 31, 2019.

• Loss on deconsolidation of RBH - See Note 19. Deconsolidation of RBH for details of the $239 million loss included in the Latin America & Canada segment for the three months ended March 31, 2019.

• Asset impairment and exit costs - See Note 18. Asset Impairment and Exit Costs for details of the $20 million pre-tax charge included in the South & Southeast Asia segment for the three months ended March 31, 2019.

PMI's net revenues by product category were as follows:

(in millions)	For the Three Months Ended March 31,
	2020		2019
Net revenues:
Combustible products:
European Union	$	1,911	$	1,812
Eastern Europe	523		471
Middle East & Africa	832		829
South & Southeast Asia	1,251		1,113
East Asia & Australia	642		638
Latin America & Canada	440		646
Total combustible products	$	5,598	$	5,508
Reduced-risk products:
European Union	$	624	$	347
Eastern Europe	265		108
Middle East & Africa	44		98
South & Southeast Asia	—		—
East Asia & Australia	613		683
Latin America & Canada	8		6
Total reduced-risk products	$	1,555	$	1,243
Total PMI net revenues	$	7,153	$	6,751

Note: Sum of product categories or Regions might not foot to total PMI due to roundings.

Net revenues related to combustible products refer to the operating revenues generated from the sale of these products, including shipping and handling charges billed to customers, net of sales and promotion incentives, and excise taxes. These net revenue amounts consist of the sale of PMI's cigarettes and other tobacco products combined. Other tobacco products primarily include roll-your-own and make-your-own cigarettes, pipe tobacco, cigars and cigarillos and do not include reduced-risk products.

Net revenues related to reduced-risk products refer to the operating revenues generated from the sale of these products, including shipping and handling charges billed to customers, net of sales and promotion incentives, and excise taxes. These net revenue amounts consist of the sale of PMI's heated tobacco units, IQOS devices and related accessories, and other nicotine-containing products, which primarily include PMI's e-vapor products.

PMI recognizes revenue, when control is transferred to the customer, typically either upon shipment or delivery of goods.

XML

Benefit Plans

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2020

Retirement Benefits [Abstract]

Benefit Plans

Benefit Plans:

Pension coverage for employees of PMI’s subsidiaries is provided, to the extent deemed appropriate, through separate plans, many of which are governed by local statutory requirements. In addition, PMI provides health care and other benefits to substantially all U.S. retired employees and certain non-U.S. retired employees. In general, health care benefits for non-U.S. retired employees are covered through local government plans.

Pension and other employee benefit costs per the condensed consolidated statements of earnings consisted of the following:

	For the Three Months Ended March 31,
(in millions)	2020			2019
Net pension costs (income)	$	(4	)	$	(5	)
Net postemployment costs	25			24
Net postretirement costs	2			2
Total pension and other employee benefit costs	$	23		$	21

Pension Plans

Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost

Net periodic pension cost consisted of the following:

	Pension (1)
	For the Three Months Ended March 31,
(in millions)	2020			2019
Service cost	$	65		$	54
Interest cost	17			29
Expected return on plan assets	(86		)	(79		)
Amortization:
Net loss	65			45
Prior service cost	—			—
Net periodic pension cost	$	61		$	49

⁽¹⁾ Primarily non-U.S. based defined benefit retirement plans.

Employer Contributions

PMI makes, and plans to make, contributions, to the extent that they are tax deductible and to meet specific funding requirements of its funded pension plans. Employer contributions of $23 million were made to the pension plans during the three months ended March 31, 2020. Currently, PMI anticipates making additional contributions during the remainder of 2020 of approximately $62 million to its pension plans, based on current tax and benefit laws. However, this estimate is subject to change as a result of changes in tax and other benefit laws, as well as asset performance significantly above or below the assumed long-term rate of return on pension assets, or changes in interest and currency rates.

XML

Fair Value Measurements (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2020

Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]

Aggregate Fair Values of PMI's Investments in Equity Securities, Derivative Financial Instruments and PMI's Debt

The aggregate fair values of PMI's investments in equity securities, derivative financial instruments and PMI's debt as of March 31, 2020, were as follows:

(in millions)	Fair Value at March 31, 2020		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets/Liabilities (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Assets:
Equity securities (1)	$	254	$	254	$	—	$	—
Derivative contracts	492		—		492		—
Total assets	$	746	$	254	$	492	$	—
Liabilities:
Debt	$	28,127	$	27,959	$	168	$	—
Derivative contracts	249		—		249		—
Total liabilities	$	28,376	$	27,959	$	417	$	—

⁽¹⁾ Unrealized pre-tax loss of $78 million ($62 million net of tax) on equity securities was recorded in the condensed consolidated statement of earnings for the three months ended March 31, 2020.

XML

Stock Plans (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2020

Share-based Payment Arrangement [Abstract]

Disclosure of share-based compensation arrangements by payment award

During the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, shares granted to eligible employees, the grant date fair value per share and the recorded compensation expense related to PSU awards were as follows:

	Number of Shares Granted	PSU Grant Date Fair Value Subject to Other Performance Factors Per Share		PSU Grant Date Fair Value Subject to TSR Performance Factor Per Share		Compensation Expense Related to PSU Awards (in millions)
2020	643,640	$ 86.69		$ 79.76		$	23
2019	625,200		$ 77.20		$ 83.59	$	18

During the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, shares granted to eligible employees, the weighted-average grant date fair value per share related to RSU awards and the recorded compensation expense related to RSU awards were as follows:

	Number of Shares Granted	Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value Per RSU Award Granted		Compensation Expense Related to RSU Awards (in millions)
2020	1,599,380	$ 86.62		$	39
2019	1,621,070		$ 77.13	$	36

Schedule of assumptions used to determine the grant date fair value of the PSU awards subject to the TSR performance factor

The following assumptions were used to determine the grant date fair value of the PSU awards subject to the TSR performance factor:

	2020		2019
Risk-free interest rate (a)	1.4	%	2.4	%
Expected volatility (b)	23.5	%	21.4	%

^(a) Based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve.

^(b) Determined using the observed historical volatility.

XML

Earnings Per Share (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2020

Earnings Per Share [Abstract]

Calculation of Basic and Diluted EPS

Basic and diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) were calculated using the following:

(in millions)	For the Three Months Ended March 31,
	2020		2019
Net earnings attributable to PMI	$	1,826	$	1,354
Less distributed and undistributed earnings attributable to share-based payment awards	5		4
Net earnings for basic and diluted EPS	$	1,821	$	1,350
Weighted-average shares for basic EPS	1,557		1,555
Plus contingently issuable performance stock units (PSUs)	1		1
Weighted-average shares for diluted EPS	1,558		1,556

XML

Financial Instruments (Fair Value of Derivative Contracts) (Details) - Derivative Contract [Member] - USD ($) $ in Millions	Mar. 31, 2020	Dec. 31, 2019
Derivatives, Fair Value [Line Items]
Derivative asset fair value	$ 492	$ 390
Derivative liability fair value	249	419
Designated as Hedging Instrument [Member] | Other Current Assets [Member]
Derivatives, Fair Value [Line Items]
Derivative asset fair value	239	319
Designated as Hedging Instrument [Member] | Other Assets [Member]
Derivatives, Fair Value [Line Items]
Derivative asset fair value	161	21
Designated as Hedging Instrument [Member] | Other Accrued Liabilities [Member]
Derivatives, Fair Value [Line Items]
Derivative liability fair value	35	23
Designated as Hedging Instrument [Member] | Income Taxes and Other Liabilities [Member]
Derivatives, Fair Value [Line Items]
Derivative liability fair value	89	301
Not Designated as Hedging Instrument [Member] | Other Current Assets [Member]
Derivatives, Fair Value [Line Items]
Derivative asset fair value	92	50
Not Designated as Hedging Instrument [Member] | Other Assets [Member]
Derivatives, Fair Value [Line Items]
Derivative asset fair value	0	0
Not Designated as Hedging Instrument [Member] | Other Accrued Liabilities [Member]
Derivatives, Fair Value [Line Items]
Derivative liability fair value	100	70
Not Designated as Hedging Instrument [Member] | Income Taxes and Other Liabilities [Member]
Derivatives, Fair Value [Line Items]
Derivative liability fair value	$ 25	$ 25

XML

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, net (Movement in Goodwill) (Details) $ in Millions	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2020 USD ($)
Goodwill [Roll Forward]
Beginning Balance	$ 5,858
Changes due to:
Currency	(574)
Ending Balance	5,284
European Union [Member]
Goodwill [Roll Forward]
Beginning Balance	1,338
Changes due to:
Currency	(53)
Ending Balance	1,285
Eastern Europe [Member]
Goodwill [Roll Forward]
Beginning Balance	300
Changes due to:
Currency	(13)
Ending Balance	287
Middle East & Africa [Member]
Goodwill [Roll Forward]
Beginning Balance	89
Changes due to:
Currency	(19)
Ending Balance	70
South & Southeast Asia [Member]
Goodwill [Roll Forward]
Beginning Balance	2,898
Changes due to:
Currency	(327)
Ending Balance	2,571
East Asia & Australia [Member]
Goodwill [Roll Forward]
Beginning Balance	551
Changes due to:
Currency	(47)
Ending Balance	504
Latin America & Canada [Member]
Goodwill [Roll Forward]
Beginning Balance	682
Changes due to:
Currency	(115)
Ending Balance	$ 567

XML

Segment Reporting (Details) $ in Millions	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2020 USD ($) segment	Mar. 31, 2019 USD ($)
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]
Number of reportable segments | segment	6
Total PMI net revenues	$ 7,153	$ 6,751
Operating income	2,789	2,050
Asset impairment and exit costs		20
Combustible Products [Member]
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]
Total PMI net revenues	5,598	5,508
Reduced-Risk Products [Member]
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]
Total PMI net revenues	1,555	1,243
Marketing Administration And Research Costs [Member]
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]
Deconsolidation amount		239
European Union [Member] | Operating Segments [Member]
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]
Total PMI net revenues	2,535	2,159
Operating income	1,158	896
European Union [Member] | Operating Segments [Member] | Combustible Products [Member]
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]
Total PMI net revenues	1,911	1,812
European Union [Member] | Operating Segments [Member] | Reduced-Risk Products [Member]
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]
Total PMI net revenues	624	347
Eastern Europe [Member] | Operating Segments [Member]
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]
Total PMI net revenues	788	579
Operating income	99	129
Eastern Europe [Member] | Operating Segments [Member] | Combustible Products [Member]
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]
Total PMI net revenues	523	471
Eastern Europe [Member] | Operating Segments [Member] | Reduced-Risk Products [Member]
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]
Total PMI net revenues	265	108
Middle East & Africa [Member] | Operating Segments [Member]
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]
Total PMI net revenues	876	927
Operating income	321	344
Middle East & Africa [Member] | Operating Segments [Member] | Combustible Products [Member]
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]
Total PMI net revenues	832	829
Middle East & Africa [Member] | Operating Segments [Member] | Reduced-Risk Products [Member]
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]
Total PMI net revenues	44	98
South & Southeast Asia [Member] | Operating Segments [Member]
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]
Total PMI net revenues	1,251	1,113
Operating income	599	440
South & Southeast Asia [Member] | Operating Segments [Member] | Combustible Products [Member]
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]
Total PMI net revenues	1,251	1,113
South & Southeast Asia [Member] | Operating Segments [Member] | Reduced-Risk Products [Member]
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]
Total PMI net revenues	0	0
East Asia & Australia [Member] | Operating Segments [Member]
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]
Total PMI net revenues	1,255	1,321
Operating income	486	427
East Asia & Australia [Member] | Operating Segments [Member] | Combustible Products [Member]
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]
Total PMI net revenues	642	638
East Asia & Australia [Member] | Operating Segments [Member] | Reduced-Risk Products [Member]
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]
Total PMI net revenues	613	683
Latin America & Canada [Member] | Appellate Ruling [Member] | RBH [Member] | Smoking And Health Class Actions [Member] | Cecilia Letourneau & Conseil Quebecois Sur La Tabac Et La Sante and Jean-Yves Blais Cases [Member]
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]
Amount of litigation charge		194
Latin America & Canada [Member] | Operating Segments [Member]
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]
Total PMI net revenues	448	652
Operating income	126	(186)
Latin America & Canada [Member] | Operating Segments [Member] | Combustible Products [Member]
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]
Total PMI net revenues	440	646
Latin America & Canada [Member] | Operating Segments [Member] | Reduced-Risk Products [Member]
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]
Total PMI net revenues	$ 8	$ 6

XML

Asset Impairment and Exit Costs (Details) - USD ($) $ in Millions	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2020	Mar. 31, 2019	Dec. 31, 2020
Restructuring Cost and Reserve [Line Items]
Asset impairment and exit costs		$ 20
Movement in exit cost liabilities
Liability balance, January 1, 2020	$ 191		$ 140
Charges, net	0
Cash spent	(48)
Currency/other	(3)
Liability balance, March 31, 2020	$ 140
Pakistan [Member]
Restructuring Cost and Reserve [Line Items]
Asset impairment and exit costs		$ 20
Forecast [Member]
Movement in exit cost liabilities
Cash spent			$ (66)

XML

Fair Value Measurements (Narrative) (Details) $ in Millions	Mar. 31, 2020 USD ($)
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]
Finance lease, liability, noncurrent	$ 49
Debt excluding short-term borrowings and capital lease obligations, carrying value	$ 26,883

XML

Related Parties - Investments in Unconsolidated Subsidiaries, Equity Securities and Other (Narrative) (Details) - USD ($) $ in Millions	3 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2020	Dec. 31, 2019	Mar. 22, 2019
Schedule of Equity Method Investments [Line Items]
Equity method investments	$ 923	$ 1,053
Difference between equity method investment carrying value and book value	782	901
Dividends from unconsolidated subsidiaries	$ 23	100
IPM India [Member]
Schedule of Equity Method Investments [Line Items]
Parent ownership percentage	56.30%
EITA [Member] | STAEM [Member]
Schedule of Equity Method Investments [Line Items]
Ownership percentage	51.00%
Management Et Developpement Des Actifs Et Des Ressources Holding (MADAR Holding) [Member] | STAEM [Member]
Schedule of Equity Method Investments [Line Items]
Ownership percentage	49.00%
TTI [Member] | PMM [Member]
Schedule of Equity Method Investments [Line Items]
Noncontrolling ownership percentage	33.00%
Minimum [Member]
Schedule of Equity Method Investments [Line Items]
Difference between equity method investment carrying value and book value, amortization period	10 years
Maximum [Member]
Schedule of Equity Method Investments [Line Items]
Difference between equity method investment carrying value and book value, amortization period	20 years
Equity Method Investment Goodwill [Member]
Schedule of Equity Method Investments [Line Items]
Investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries and equity securities	$ 751	$ 863
Megapolis Group
Schedule of Equity Method Investments [Line Items]
Ownership percentage	23.00%
EITA [Member]
Schedule of Equity Method Investments [Line Items]
Ownership percentage	49.00%
STAEM [Member]
Schedule of Equity Method Investments [Line Items]
Ownership percentage	25.00%
RBH [Member]
Schedule of Equity Method Investments [Line Items]
Equity securities			$ 3,280

XML

Indebtedness (Narrative) (Details) - USD ($)	Jan. 31, 2020	Mar. 31, 2020	Feb. 10, 2020	Feb. 09, 2020	Dec. 31, 2019
Line of Credit Facility [Line Items]
Short-term borrowings, carrying value		$ 1,438,000,000			$ 338,000,000
Committed credit facilities		7,500,000,000
Borrowings under committed credit facilities		0
364-day revolving credit expiring February 2, 2021 [Member]
Line of Credit Facility [Line Items]
Committed credit facilities	$ 2,000,000,000.0	2,000,000,000.0
Debt instrument, term	364 days
Multi-year Revolving Credit Facility, Expiring February 10, 2025 [Member]
Line of Credit Facility [Line Items]
Committed credit facilities		$ 2,000,000,000.0	$ 2,000,000,000.0
Multi-year Revolving Credit Facility, Expiring February 10, 2020 [Member]
Line of Credit Facility [Line Items]
Committed credit facilities				$ 2,500,000,000
Borrowings under committed credit facilities				$ 0

XML

Contingencies (Label-Related Cases) (Details) - Individual Label Related Cases [Member] - Combustible Products [Member] - litigation_case	Apr. 24, 2020	Apr. 23, 2019	Apr. 24, 2018
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Cases brought against PM		7	1
Subsequent Event [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Cases brought against PM	4
Subsequent Event [Member] | Italy [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Cases brought against PM	1
Subsequent Event [Member] | Chile [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Cases brought against PM	3

XML

Contingencies (Number of Tobacco Related Cases Pertaining to Combustible Products Pending Against Us and/or Our Subsidiaries or Indemnitees) (Details) - Combustible Products [Member] - litigation_case	Apr. 24, 2020	Apr. 23, 2019	Apr. 24, 2018
Individual Smoking And Health Cases [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Cases brought against PM		53	62
Smoking And Health Class Actions [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Cases brought against PM		10	11
Health Care Cost Recovery Actions [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Cases brought against PM		16	16
Label Related Class Action [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Cases brought against PM		1	1
Individual Label Related Cases [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Cases brought against PM		7	1
Public Civil Actions [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Cases brought against PM		2	2
Subsequent Event [Member] | Individual Smoking And Health Cases [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Cases brought against PM	48
Subsequent Event [Member] | Smoking And Health Class Actions [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Cases brought against PM	10
Subsequent Event [Member] | Health Care Cost Recovery Actions [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Cases brought against PM	17
Subsequent Event [Member] | Label Related Class Action [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Cases brought against PM	0
Subsequent Event [Member] | Individual Label Related Cases [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Cases brought against PM	4
Subsequent Event [Member] | Public Civil Actions [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Cases brought against PM	2

XML

Product Warranty (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2020

Guarantees and Product Warranties [Abstract]

Schedule of Accrued Product Warranties

At March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, these amounts were as follows:

(in millions)	At March 31, 2020			At December 31, 2019
Balance at beginning of period	$	140		$	67
Changes due to:
Warranties issued	84			303
Settlements	(66		)	(230		)
Currency	—			—
Balance at end of period	$	158		$	140

XML

Stock Plans (RSU Awards) (Details) - Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) [Member] $ / shares in Units, $ in Millions	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2020 USD ($) year $ / shares shares	Mar. 31, 2019 USD ($) $ / shares shares
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Number of Shares Granted (in shares) | shares	1,599,380	1,621,070
Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value Per RSU Award Granted (in dollars per share) | $ / shares	$ 86.62	$ 77.13
Compensation Expense Related to Awards	$ 39	$ 36
Unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock awards	$ 218
Award requisite service period	3 years
Minimum retirement age | year	58
Stock awards vested during period (in shares) | shares	1,011,318
Grant Date Fair Value [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Fair value of vested stock awards	$ 99
Total Fair Value [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Fair value of vested stock awards	$ 88

XML

Leases

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2020

Leases [Abstract]

Leases

Leases:

The components of PMI’s lease cost were as follows for the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019:

	For the Three Months Ended March 31,
(in millions)	2020		2019
Operating lease cost	$	60	$	60
Short-term lease cost	13		12
Variable lease cost	8		8
Total lease cost	$	81	$	80

For the three months ended March 31, 2020, lease cost of $19 million were recorded in cost of sales and $62 million were recorded in marketing, administration and research cost. For the three months ended March 31, 2019, lease costs of $19 million were recorded in cost of sales and $61 million were recorded in marketing, administration and research cost.

XML

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Parenthetical) - USD ($) $ in Millions	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2020	Mar. 31, 2019		Dec. 31, 2019	Dec. 31, 2018
Asset impairment and exit costs		$ 20
Cash divested from deconsolidation	$ 0	1,346	[1]
Restricted cash	$ 4	5		$ 4	$ 27
Marketing Administration And Research Costs [Member]
Deconsolidation amount		239
Cash [Member]
Cash divested from deconsolidation		1,323
Restricted Cash [Member]
Cash divested from deconsolidation		23
Canada [Member] | Cecilia Letourneau & Conseil Quebecois Sur La Tabac Et La Sante and Jean-Yves Blais Cases [Member] | RBH [Member] | Appellate Ruling [Member] | Smoking And Health Class Actions [Member]
Amount of litigation charge		$ 194

[1] Includes deconsolidation of RBH cash and cash equivalents of $1,323 million and restricted cash of $23 million.

XML

Balance Sheet Offsetting

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2020

Offsetting [Abstract]

Balance Sheet Offsetting

Balance Sheet Offsetting:

Derivative Financial Instruments

PMI uses foreign exchange contracts and interest rate contracts to mitigate its exposure to changes in exchange and interest rates from third-party and intercompany actual and forecasted transactions. Substantially all of PMI's derivative financial instruments are subject to master netting arrangements, whereby the right to offset occurs in the event of default by a participating party. While these contracts contain the enforceable right to offset through close-out netting rights, PMI elects to present them on a gross basis in the condensed consolidated balance sheets. Collateral associated with these arrangements is in the form of cash and is unrestricted. See Note 5. Financial Instruments for disclosures related to PMI's derivative financial instruments.

The effects of these derivative financial instrument assets and liabilities on PMI's condensed consolidated balance sheets were as follows:

(in millions)	Gross Amounts Recognized		Gross Amount Offset in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet		Net Amounts Presented in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet		Gross Amounts Not Offset in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet
							Financial Instruments			Cash Collateral Received/Pledged			Net Amount
At March 31, 2020
Assets
Derivative contracts	$	492	$	—	$	492	$	(212	)	$	(253	)	$	27
Liabilities
Derivative contracts	$	249	$	—	$	249	$	(212	)	$	(1	)	$	36
At December 31, 2019
Assets
Derivative contracts	$	390	$	—	$	390	$	(297	)	$	(91	)	$	2
Liabilities
Derivative contracts	$	419	$	—	$	419	$	(297	)	$	(59	)	$	63

XML

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Earnings (Parenthetical) - USD ($) $ in Millions	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2020	Mar. 31, 2019
Income taxes on currency translation adjustments	$ (96)	$ (128)
Income taxes on gains (losses) and prior service costs	0	0
Income taxes on Amortization of net losses, prior service costs and net transition costs and (gains)/losses transferred to earnings – change in net loss and prior service cost	(17)	(4)
Income taxes on gain (losses) recognized on derivatives accounted for as hedges	(5)	1
Income taxes on gain (losses) transferred to earnings on derivatives accounted for as hedges	1	1
Deconsolidation of RBH [Member]
Income taxes on Amortization of net losses, prior service costs and net transition costs and (gains)/losses transferred to earnings – change in net loss and prior service cost	$ 0	$ (15)

XML

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, net (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2020

Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]

Schedule of movements in goodwill

The movements in goodwill were as follows:

(in millions)	European Union			Eastern Europe			Middle East & Africa			South & Southeast Asia			East Asia & Australia			Latin America & Canada			Total
Balances, December 31, 2019	$	1,338		$	300		$	89		$	2,898		$	551		$	682		$	5,858
Changes due to:
Currency	(53		)	(13		)	(19		)	(327		)	(47		)	(115		)	(574		)
Balances, March 31, 2020	$	1,285		$	287		$	70		$	2,571		$	504		$	567		$	5,284

Schedule of amortizable intangible assets

Details of other intangible assets were as follows:

		March 31, 2020						December 31, 2019
(in millions)	Weighted-Average Remaining Useful Life	Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Net		Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Net
Non-amortizable intangible assets		$	1,112			$	1,112	$	1,319			$	1,319
Amortizable intangible assets:
Trademarks	14 years	1,160		$	518	642		1,217		$	526	691
Distribution networks	8 years	103		67		36		113		72		41
Other*	9 years	104		44		60		106		44		62
Total other intangible assets		$	2,479	$	629	$	1,850	$	2,755	$	642	$	2,113

* Primarily intellectual property rights

Schedule of non-amortizable intangible assets

Details of other intangible assets were as follows:

		March 31, 2020						December 31, 2019
(in millions)	Weighted-Average Remaining Useful Life	Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Net		Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Net
Non-amortizable intangible assets		$	1,112			$	1,112	$	1,319			$	1,319
Amortizable intangible assets:
Trademarks	14 years	1,160		$	518	642		1,217		$	526	691
Distribution networks	8 years	103		67		36		113		72		41
Other*	9 years	104		44		60		106		44		62
Total other intangible assets		$	2,479	$	629	$	1,850	$	2,755	$	642	$	2,113

* Primarily intellectual property rights

XML

Contingencies (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2020

Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]

Schedule of Tobacco Related Cases Pertaining to Combustible Products Pending Against Company

The table below lists the number of tobacco-related cases pertaining to combustible products pending against us and/or our subsidiaries or indemnitees as of April 24, 2020, April 23, 2019 and April 24, 2018:¹

Type of Case	Number of Cases Pending as of April 24, 2020	Number of Cases Pending as of April 23, 2019	Number of Cases Pending as of April 24, 2018
Individual Smoking and Health Cases	48	53	62
Smoking and Health Class Actions	10	10	11
Health Care Cost Recovery Actions	17	16	16
Label-Related Class Actions	—	1	1
Individual Label-Related Cases	4	7	1
Public Civil Actions	2	2	2

Schedule of Verdicts and Significant Post Trial Developments Where a Verdict was Returned In Favor of the Plaintiff(s)

The table below lists the verdict and significant post-trial developments in the four pending cases where a verdict was returned in favor of the plaintiff:

Date	Location of Court/Name of Plaintiff	Type of Case	Verdict	Post-Trial Developments
February 2004	Brazil/The Smoker Health Defense Association	Class Action	The Civil Court of São Paulo found defendants liable without hearing evidence. In April 2004, the court awarded “moral damages” of R$1,000 (approximately $183) per smoker per full year of smoking plus interest at the rate of 1% per month, as of the date of the ruling. The court did not assess actual damages, which were to be assessed in a second phase of the case. The size of the class was not defined in the ruling.	Defendants appealed to the São Paulo Court of Appeals, which annulled the ruling in November 2008, finding that the trial court had inappropriately ruled without hearing evidence and returned the case to the trial court for further proceedings. In May 2011, the trial court dismissed the claim. In March 2017, plaintiff filed an en banc appeal to the Superior Court of Justice. In addition, the defendants filed a constitutional appeal to the Federal Supreme Tribunal on the basis that plaintiff did not have standing to bring the lawsuit. Both appeals are still pending.

______

¹ Includes cases pending in Canada.

Date	Location of Court/Name of Plaintiff	Type of Case	Verdict	Post-Trial Developments
May 27, 2015	Canada/Conseil Québécois Sur Le Tabac Et La Santé and Jean-Yves Blais	Class Action	On May 27, 2015, the Superior Court of the District of Montreal, Province of Quebec ruled in favor of the Blais class on liability and found the class members’ compensatory damages totaled approximately CAD 15.5 billion (approximately $11 billion), including pre-judgment interest. The trial court awarded compensatory damages on a joint and several liability basis, allocating 20% to our subsidiary (approximately CAD 3.1 billion including pre-judgment interest (approximately $2.2 billion)). The trial court awarded CAD 90,000 (approximately $63,760) in punitive damages, allocating CAD 30,000 (approximately $21,250) to our subsidiary. The trial court ordered defendants to pay CAD 1 billion (approximately $708.5 million) of the compensatory damage award, CAD 200 million (approximately $141.7 million) of which is our subsidiary’s portion, into a trust within 60 days.	In June 2015, RBH commenced the appellate process with the Court of Appeal of Quebec. On March 1, 2019, the Court of Appeal issued a decision largely affirming the trial court's decision. (See “Stayed Litigation — Canada” for further detail.)

Date	Location of Court/Name of Plaintiff	Type of Case	Verdict	Post-Trial Developments
May 27, 2015	Canada/Cecilia Létourneau	Class Action	On May 27, 2015, the Superior Court of the District of Montreal, Province of Quebec ruled in favor of the Létourneau class on liability and awarded a total of CAD 131 million (approximately $92.8 million) in punitive damages, allocating CAD 46 million (approximately $32.6 million) to RBH. The trial court ordered defendants to pay the full punitive damage award into a trust within 60 days. The court did not order the payment of compensatory damages.	In June 2015, RBH commenced the appellate process with the Court of Appeal of Quebec. On March 1, 2019, the Court of Appeal issued a decision largely affirming the trial court's decision. (See “Stayed Litigation — Canada” for further detail.)

Date	Location of Court/Name of Plaintiff	Type of Case	Verdict	Post-Trial Developments
August 5, 2016	Argentina/Hugo Lespada	Individual Action	On August 5, 2016, the Civil Court No. 14 - Mar del Plata, issued a verdict in favor of plaintiff, an individual smoker, and awarded him ARS 110,000 (approximately $1,661), plus interest, in compensatory and moral damages. The trial court found that our subsidiary failed to warn plaintiff of the risk of becoming addicted to cigarettes.	On August 23, 2016, our subsidiary filed its notice of appeal. On October 31, 2017, the Civil and Commercial Court of Appeals of Mar del Plata ruled that plaintiff's claim was barred by the statute of limitations and it reversed the trial court's decision. On November 28, 2017, plaintiff filed an extraordinary appeal of the reversal of the trial court's decision to the Supreme Court of the Province of Buenos Aires.

XML

Income Taxes

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2020

Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]

Income Taxes

Income Taxes:

Income tax provisions for jurisdictions outside the United States of America, as well as state and local income tax provisions, were determined on a separate company basis, and the related assets and liabilities were recorded in PMI’s condensed consolidated balance sheets.

On March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (“CARES Act”) was signed into law in the U.S. to provide certain relief as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition, governments around the world have enacted or implemented various forms of tax relief measures in response to the economic conditions in the wake of COVID-19. As of March 31, 2020, PMI has determined that neither the CARES Act nor changes to income tax laws or regulations in other jurisdictions had a significant impact on PMI’s effective tax rate.

PMI’s effective tax rates for the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019 were 22.6% and 22.6%, respectively. The effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2020 was favorably impacted by a decrease in deferred tax liabilities related to the fair value adjustment of equity securities held by PMI ($16 million). For further details, see Note 11. Fair Value Measurements. The effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2019 was favorably impacted by the reversal of a deferred tax liability on the unremitted earnings of PMI's Canadian subsidiary, RBH ($49 million) and by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. PMI estimates that its full-year 2020 effective tax rate will be approximately 23%, excluding the discrete tax event mentioned above. Changes in currency exchange rates, earnings mix by taxing jurisdiction or future regulatory developments may have an impact on the effective tax rates, which PMI monitors each quarter. Significant judgment is required in determining income tax provisions and in evaluating tax positions.

PMI is regularly examined by tax authorities around the world and is currently under examination in a number of jurisdictions. The U.S. federal statute of limitations remains open for the years 2015 and onward. Foreign and U.S. state jurisdictions have statutes of limitations generally ranging from three to five years.

It is reasonably possible that within the next 12 months certain tax examinations will close, which could result in a change in unrecognized tax benefits along with related interest and penalties. An estimate of any possible change cannot be made at this time.

XML

Financial Instruments

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2020

Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities Disclosure [Abstract]

Financial Instruments

Financial Instruments:

Overview

PMI operates in markets outside of the United States of America, with manufacturing and sales facilities in various locations around the world. PMI utilizes certain financial instruments to manage foreign currency and interest rate exposure. Derivative financial instruments are used by PMI principally to reduce exposures to market risks resulting from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange and interest rates by creating offsetting exposures. PMI is not a party to leveraged derivatives and, by policy, does not use derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes. Financial instruments qualifying for hedge accounting must maintain a specified level of effectiveness between the hedging instrument and the item being hedged, both at inception and throughout the hedged period. PMI formally documents the nature and relationships between the hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as its risk-management objectives, strategies for undertaking the various hedge transactions and method of assessing hedge effectiveness. Additionally, for hedges of forecasted transactions, the significant characteristics and expected terms of the forecasted transaction must be specifically identified, and it must be probable that each forecasted transaction will occur. If it were deemed probable that the forecasted transaction would not occur, the gain or loss would be recognized in earnings.

PMI uses deliverable and non-deliverable forward foreign exchange contracts, foreign currency swaps and foreign currency options, collectively referred to as foreign exchange contracts ("foreign exchange contracts"), and interest rate contracts to mitigate its exposure to changes in exchange and interest rates from third-party and intercompany actual and forecasted transactions. Both foreign exchange contracts and interest rate contracts are collectively referred to as derivative contracts ("derivative contracts"). The primary currencies to which PMI is exposed include the Euro, Indonesian rupiah, Japanese yen, Mexican peso, Philippine peso, Russian ruble and Swiss franc. At March 31, 2020, PMI had contracts with aggregate notional amounts of $24.0 billion of which $6.5 billion related to cash flow hedges, $8.4 billion related to hedges of net investments in foreign operations and $9.1 billion related to other derivatives that primarily offset currency exposures on intercompany financing.

The fair value of PMI’s derivative contracts included in the condensed consolidated balance sheets as of March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, were as follows:

	Derivative Assets					Derivative Liabilities
		Fair Value					Fair Value
(in millions)	Balance Sheet Classification	At March 31, 2020		At December 31, 2019		Balance Sheet Classification	At March 31, 2020		At December 31, 2019
Derivative contracts designated as hedging instruments	Other current assets	$	239	$	319	Other accrued liabilities	$	35	$	23
	Other assets	161		21		Income taxes and other liabilities	89		301
Derivative contracts not designated as hedging instruments	Other current assets	92		50		Other accrued liabilities	100		70
	Other assets	—		—		Income taxes and other liabilities	25		25
Total derivatives		$	492	$	390		$	249	$	419

For the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, PMI's cash flow and net investment hedging instruments impacted the condensed consolidated statements of earnings and comprehensive earnings as follows:

(pre-tax, in millions)	For the Three Months Ended March 31,
	Amount of Gain/(Loss) Recognized in Other Comprehensive Earnings/(Losses) on Derivatives					Statement of Earnings Classification of Gain/(Loss) Reclassified from Other Comprehensive Earnings/(Losses) into Earnings	Amount of Gain/(Loss) Reclassified from Other Comprehensive Earnings/(Losses) into Earnings
	2020		2019				2020			2019
Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationship
Derivative contracts	$	31	$	(2	)
						Net revenues	$	3		$	10
						Cost of sales	4			—
						Marketing, administration and research costs	5			(3		)
						Interest expense, net	(2		)	(2		)
Derivatives in Net Investment Hedging Relationship
Derivative contracts	407		211
Total	$	438	$	209			$	10		$	5

Cash Flow Hedges

PMI has entered into derivative contracts to hedge the foreign currency exchange and interest rate risks related to certain forecasted transactions. Gains and losses associated with qualifying cash flow hedge contracts are deferred as components of accumulated other comprehensive losses until the underlying hedged transactions are reported in PMI’s condensed consolidated statements of earnings. As of March 31, 2020, PMI has hedged forecasted transactions for periods not exceeding the next twenty-one months with the exception of one derivative contract that expires in May 2024. The impact of these hedges is primarily included in operating cash flows on PMI’s condensed consolidated statements of cash flows.

Hedges of Net Investments in Foreign Operations

PMI designates certain foreign currency denominated debt and derivative contracts as net investment hedges, primarily of its Euro net assets. For the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, these hedges of net investments resulted in gains (losses), net of income taxes, of $314 million and $291 million, respectively, principally related to changes in the exchange rates between the Euro and U.S. dollar. These gains (losses) were reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive losses within currency translation adjustments, and were substantially offset by the losses and gains generated on the underlying assets. For the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, the gains for amounts excluded from the effectiveness testing recognized in earnings were $56 million and $56 million, respectively. These gains were accounted for in interest expense, net, on the condensed consolidated statement of earnings. The premiums paid for, and settlements of, net investment hedges are included in investing cash flows on PMI’s condensed consolidated statements of cash flows.

Other Derivatives

PMI has entered into derivative contracts to hedge the foreign currency exchange and interest rate risks related to intercompany loans between certain subsidiaries, and third-party loans. While effective as economic hedges, no hedge accounting is applied for these contracts; therefore, the unrealized gains (losses) relating to these contracts are reported in marketing, administration and research costs in PMI’s condensed consolidated statements of earnings. For the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, the gains (losses) from contracts for which PMI did not apply hedge accounting were $56 million and $(7) million, respectively. The gains (losses) from these contracts substantially offset the losses and gains generated by the underlying intercompany and third-party loans being hedged.

For the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, these items impacted the condensed consolidated statement of earnings as follows:

(pre-tax, in millions)	For the Three Months Ended March 31,
Derivatives not Designated as Hedging Instruments	Statement of Earnings Classification of Gain/(Loss)	Amount of Gain/(Loss) Recognized in Earnings
		For the Three Months Ended March 31,
		2020		2019
Derivative contracts
	Interest expense, net	$	34	$	17
Total		$	34	$	17

Qualifying Hedging Activities Reported in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Losses

Derivative gains or losses reported in accumulated other comprehensive losses are a result of qualifying hedging activity. Transfers of these gains or losses to earnings are offset by the corresponding gains or losses on the underlying hedged item. Hedging activity affected accumulated other comprehensive losses, net of income taxes, as follows:

(in millions)	For the Three Months Ended March 31,
	2020			2019
Gain/(loss) as of January 1,	$	3		$	35
Derivative (gains)/losses transferred to earnings	(9		)	(4		)
Change in fair value	26			(1		)
Gain/(loss) as of March 31,	$	20		$	30

At March 31, 2020, PMI expects $36 million of derivative gains that are included in accumulated other comprehensive losses to be reclassified to the condensed consolidated statement of earnings within the next 12 months. These gains are expected to be substantially offset by the statement of earnings impact of the respective hedged transactions.

Contingent Features

PMI’s derivative instruments do not contain contingent features.

Credit Exposure and Credit Risk

PMI is exposed to credit loss in the event of non-performance by counterparties. While PMI does not anticipate non-performance, its risk is limited to the fair value of the financial instruments less any cash collateral received or pledged. PMI actively monitors its exposure to credit risk through the use of credit approvals and credit limit and by selecting and continuously monitoring a diverse group of major international banks and financial institutions as counterparties.

Fair Value

See Note 11. Fair Value Measurements and Note 13. Balance Sheet Offsetting for additional discussion of derivative financial instruments.

XML

Background and Basis of Presentation

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2020

Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract]

Background and Basis of Presentation

Background and Basis of Presentation:

Background

Philip Morris International Inc. is a holding company incorporated in Virginia, U.S.A., whose subsidiaries and affiliates and their licensees are engaged in the manufacture and sale of cigarettes and other nicotine-containing products, including reduced-risk products, in markets outside of the United States of America. In addition, PMI ships a version of its Platform 1 device and its consumables authorized by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration ("FDA") to Altria Group, Inc., for sale in the United States under license. Throughout these financial statements, the term "PMI" refers to Philip Morris International Inc. and its subsidiaries.

Reduced-risk products ("RRPs") is the term PMI uses to refer to products that present, are likely to present, or have the potential to present less risk of harm to smokers who switch to these products versus continuing smoking. PMI has a range of RRPs in various stages of development, scientific assessment and commercialization.

"Platform 1" is the term PMI uses to refer to PMI’s reduced-risk product that uses a precisely controlled heating device incorporating our IQOS HeatControl technology, into which a specially designed and proprietary tobacco unit is inserted and heated to generate an aerosol.

Basis of Presentation

The interim condensed consolidated financial statements of PMI are unaudited. These interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("U.S. GAAP") and such principles are applied on a consistent basis. It is the opinion of PMI’s management that all adjustments necessary for a fair statement of the interim results presented have been reflected therein. All such adjustments were of a normal recurring nature. Net revenues and net earnings attributable to PMI for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for the entire year.

PMI has analyzed the impact of the Coronavirus pandemic ("COVID-19") on its financial statements as of March 31, 2020. PMI has determined that the changes to its significant judgements and estimates did not have a material impact with respect to goodwill, intangible assets, long-lived assets or its hedge accounting activities. Additionally, PMI believes that the modification of certain customer payment terms has not changed its assessment of collectability and therefore, there has been no material impact on PMI’s revenue recognition.

As of March 22, 2019, PMI deconsolidated the financial results of its Canadian subsidiary, Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc. ("RBH") from PMI's financial statements. For further details, see Note 19. Deconsolidation of RBH.

These statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes, which appear in PMI’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019.

XML

Product Warranty (Movement in Product Warranty Obligations) (Details) - USD ($) $ in Millions	3 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2020	Dec. 31, 2019
Movement in Standard Product Warranty Accrual [Roll Forward]
Balance at beginning of period	$ 140	$ 67
Changes due to:
Warranties issued	84	303
Settlements	(66)	(230)
Currency	0	0
Balance at end of period	$ 158	$ 140

XML

Indebtedness (Long-Term Debt) (Details) - USD ($) $ in Millions	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2020	Dec. 31, 2019
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Long-term debt, including current maturities	$ 26,932	$ 30,707
Less current portion of long-term debt	1,933	4,051
Long-term debt	24,999	26,656
US Dollar Notes [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Long-term debt, including current maturities	$ 17,489	19,783
Average interest rate	3.567%
US Dollar Notes [Member] | Minimum [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Interest rate, stated percentage	1.875%
US Dollar Notes [Member] | Maximum [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Interest rate, stated percentage	6.375%
Euro Notes [Member] | Foreign Currency Obligations [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Long-term debt, including current maturities	$ 8,331	9,822
Average interest rate	1.983%
Euro Notes [Member] | Foreign Currency Obligations [Member] | Minimum [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Interest rate, stated percentage	0.125%
Euro Notes [Member] | Foreign Currency Obligations [Member] | Maximum [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Interest rate, stated percentage	3.125%
Swiss Franc Notes [Member] | Foreign Currency Obligations [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Long-term debt, including current maturities	$ 915	899
Average interest rate	1.521%
Swiss Franc Notes [Member] | Foreign Currency Obligations [Member] | Minimum [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Interest rate, stated percentage	1.00%
Swiss Franc Notes [Member] | Foreign Currency Obligations [Member] | Maximum [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Interest rate, stated percentage	2.00%
Other [Member] | Foreign Currency Obligations [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Long-term debt, including current maturities	$ 197	$ 203
Average interest rate	3.009%

XML

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Losses (Components of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Earnings (Losses), Net of Tax) (Details) - USD ($) $ in Millions	Mar. 31, 2020	Dec. 31, 2019	Mar. 31, 2019	Dec. 31, 2018
Reclassification Adjustment out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income on Derivatives [Line Items]
Total accumulated other comprehensive losses	$ (11,063)	$ (9,599)	$ (10,185)	$ (10,739)
Currency translation adjustments [Member]
Reclassification Adjustment out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income on Derivatives [Line Items]
Total accumulated other comprehensive losses	(7,039)	(5,537)	(5,711)
Pension and other benefits [Member]
Reclassification Adjustment out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income on Derivatives [Line Items]
Total accumulated other comprehensive losses	(3,755)	(3,829)	(3,556)
Derivatives accounted for as hedges [Member]
Reclassification Adjustment out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income on Derivatives [Line Items]
Total accumulated other comprehensive losses	20	3	30
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Losses [Member]
Reclassification Adjustment out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income on Derivatives [Line Items]
Total accumulated other comprehensive losses	$ (10,774)	$ (9,363)	$ (9,237)	$ (10,111)

XML

Sale of Accounts Receivable (Details) - USD ($) $ in Billions	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2020	Mar. 31, 2019
Sale of Accounts Receivable [Abstract]
Servicing liability	$ 0.0	$ 0.0
Trade receivables sold and derecognized from the Consolidated Balance Sheets	2.9	2.4
Trade receivables sold and derecognized that remain uncollected	1.0	0.5
Loss on sale of trade receivables (immaterial)	$ 0.0	$ 0.0

XML

Financial Instruments (Qualifying Hedging Activity Reported in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Earnings (Losses) Net of Income Taxes) (Details) - USD ($) $ in Millions	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2020	Mar. 31, 2019
Hedging Activity, Affecting Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income [Roll Forward]
Derivative (gains)/losses transferred to earnings	$ (9)	$ (4)
Change in fair value	26	(1)
Derivative Contract [Member] | Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) [Member]
Hedging Activity, Affecting Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income [Roll Forward]
Gain/(loss) as of January 1,	3	35
Derivative (gains)/losses transferred to earnings	(9)	(4)
Change in fair value	26	(1)
Gain/(loss) as of March 31,	$ 20	$ 30

XML

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, net (Amortization Expense) (Details) $ in Millions	Mar. 31, 2020 USD ($)
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]
Estimated amortization expense, year one, assuming no additional transactions occur that require the amortization of intangible assets	$ 75
Estimated amortization expense, year two, assuming no additional transactions occur that require the amortization of intangible assets	75
Estimated amortization expense, year three, assuming no additional transactions occur that require the amortization of intangible assets	75
Estimated amortization expense, year four, assuming no additional transactions occur that require the amortization of intangible assets	75
Estimated amortization expense, year five, assuming no additional transactions occur that require the amortization of intangible assets	$ 75

XML

Financial Instruments (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2020

Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities Disclosure [Abstract]

Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments

For the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, these items impacted the condensed consolidated statement of earnings as follows:

(pre-tax, in millions)	For the Three Months Ended March 31,
Derivatives not Designated as Hedging Instruments	Statement of Earnings Classification of Gain/(Loss)	Amount of Gain/(Loss) Recognized in Earnings
		For the Three Months Ended March 31,
		2020		2019
Derivative contracts
	Interest expense, net	$	34	$	17
Total		$	34	$	17

Fair Value of Derivative Contracts

The fair value of PMI’s derivative contracts included in the condensed consolidated balance sheets as of March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, were as follows:

	Derivative Assets					Derivative Liabilities
		Fair Value					Fair Value
(in millions)	Balance Sheet Classification	At March 31, 2020		At December 31, 2019		Balance Sheet Classification	At March 31, 2020		At December 31, 2019
Derivative contracts designated as hedging instruments	Other current assets	$	239	$	319	Other accrued liabilities	$	35	$	23
	Other assets	161		21		Income taxes and other liabilities	89		301
Derivative contracts not designated as hedging instruments	Other current assets	92		50		Other accrued liabilities	100		70
	Other assets	—		—		Income taxes and other liabilities	25		25
Total derivatives		$	492	$	390		$	249	$	419

Cash Flow and Net Investment Hedging Activities Effect on Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings and Other Comprehensive Earnings

For the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, PMI's cash flow and net investment hedging instruments impacted the condensed consolidated statements of earnings and comprehensive earnings as follows:

(pre-tax, in millions)	For the Three Months Ended March 31,
	Amount of Gain/(Loss) Recognized in Other Comprehensive Earnings/(Losses) on Derivatives					Statement of Earnings Classification of Gain/(Loss) Reclassified from Other Comprehensive Earnings/(Losses) into Earnings	Amount of Gain/(Loss) Reclassified from Other Comprehensive Earnings/(Losses) into Earnings
	2020		2019				2020			2019
Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationship
Derivative contracts	$	31	$	(2	)
						Net revenues	$	3		$	10
						Cost of sales	4			—
						Marketing, administration and research costs	5			(3		)
						Interest expense, net	(2		)	(2		)
Derivatives in Net Investment Hedging Relationship
Derivative contracts	407		211
Total	$	438	$	209			$	10		$	5

Qualifying Hedging Activity Reported in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Earnings (Losses), Net of Income Taxes

Hedging activity affected accumulated other comprehensive losses, net of income taxes, as follows:

(in millions)	For the Three Months Ended March 31,
	2020			2019
Gain/(loss) as of January 1,	$	3		$	35
Derivative (gains)/losses transferred to earnings	(9		)	(4		)
Change in fair value	26			(1		)
Gain/(loss) as of March 31,	$	20		$	30

XML

Indebtedness (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2020

Debt Disclosure [Abstract]

Long-Term Debt

At March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, PMI’s long-term debt consisted of the following:

(in millions)	March 31, 2020		December 31, 2019
U.S. dollar notes, 1.875% to 6.375% (average interest rate 3.567%), due through 2044	$	17,489	$	19,783
Foreign currency obligations:
Euro notes, 0.125% to 3.125% (average interest rate 1.983%), due through 2039	8,331		9,822
Swiss franc notes, 1.000% to 2.000% (average interest rate 1.521%), due through 2024	915		899
Other (average interest rate 3.009%), due through 2025	197		203
	26,932		30,707
Less current portion of long-term debt	1,933		4,051
	$	24,999	$	26,656

Schedule of Committed Credit Facilities

At March 31, 2020, PMI's total committed credit facilities were as follows:

(in billions)

Type	Committed Credit Facilities
364-day revolving credit, expiring February 2, 2021	$	2.0
Multi-year revolving credit, expiring October 1, 2022	3.5
Multi-year revolving credit, expiring February 10, 2025	2.0
Total facilities	$	7.5

XML

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, net

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2020

Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, net

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, net:

The movements in goodwill were as follows:

(in millions)	European Union			Eastern Europe			Middle East & Africa			South & Southeast Asia			East Asia & Australia			Latin America & Canada			Total
Balances, December 31, 2019	$	1,338		$	300		$	89		$	2,898		$	551		$	682		$	5,858
Changes due to:
Currency	(53		)	(13		)	(19		)	(327		)	(47		)	(115		)	(574		)
Balances, March 31, 2020	$	1,285		$	287		$	70		$	2,571		$	504		$	567		$	5,284

At March 31, 2020, goodwill primarily reflects PMI’s acquisitions in Colombia, Greece, Indonesia, Mexico, Pakistan and Serbia, as well as the business combination in the Philippines.

Details of other intangible assets were as follows:

		March 31, 2020						December 31, 2019
(in millions)	Weighted-Average Remaining Useful Life	Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Net		Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Net
Non-amortizable intangible assets		$	1,112			$	1,112	$	1,319			$	1,319
Amortizable intangible assets:
Trademarks	14 years	1,160		$	518	642		1,217		$	526	691
Distribution networks	8 years	103		67		36		113		72		41
Other*	9 years	104		44		60		106		44		62
Total other intangible assets		$	2,479	$	629	$	1,850	$	2,755	$	642	$	2,113

* Primarily intellectual property rights

Non-amortizable intangible assets substantially consist of trademarks from PMI’s acquisitions in Indonesia and Mexico. The decrease since December 31, 2019 was due to currency movements of ($207 million).

The decrease in the gross carrying amount of amortizable intangible assets from December 31, 2019, was mainly due to currency movements of ($69 million).

The change in the accumulated amortization from December 31, 2019, was mainly due to currency movements of ($31 million), partially offset by the 2020 amortization of $18 million.

Amortization expense for each of the next five years is estimated to be $75 million or less, assuming no additional transactions occur that require the amortization of intangible assets.

XML

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' (Deficit) Equity (Parenthetical) - $ / shares	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2020	Mar. 31, 2019
Statement of Stockholders' Equity [Abstract]
Dividends declared (in dollars per share)	$ 1.17	$ 1.14

XML

Contingencies

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2020

Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]

Contingencies

Contingencies:

Tobacco-Related Litigation

Legal proceedings covering a wide range of matters are pending or threatened against us, and/or our subsidiaries, and/or our indemnitees in various jurisdictions. Our indemnitees include distributors, licensees, and others that have been named as parties in certain cases and that we have agreed to defend, as well as to pay costs and some or all of judgments, if any, that may be entered against them. Pursuant to the terms of the Distribution Agreement between Altria Group, Inc. (“Altria”) and PMI, PMI will indemnify Altria and Philip Morris USA Inc. (“PM USA”), a U.S. tobacco subsidiary of Altria, for tobacco product claims based in substantial part on products manufactured by PMI or contract manufactured for PMI by PM USA, and PM USA will indemnify PMI for tobacco product claims based in substantial part on products manufactured by PM USA, excluding tobacco products contract manufactured for PMI.

It is possible that there could be adverse developments in pending cases against us and our subsidiaries. An unfavorable outcome or settlement of pending tobacco-related litigation could encourage the commencement of additional litigation.

Damages claimed in some of the tobacco-related litigation are significant and, in certain cases in Brazil, Canada and Nigeria, range into the billions of U.S. dollars. The variability in pleadings in multiple jurisdictions, together with the actual experience of management in litigating claims, demonstrate that the monetary relief that may be specified in a lawsuit bears little relevance to the ultimate outcome. Much of the tobacco-related litigation is in its early stages, and litigation is subject to uncertainty. However, as discussed below, we have to date been largely successful in defending tobacco-related litigation.

We and our subsidiaries record provisions in the consolidated financial statements for pending litigation when we determine that an unfavorable outcome is probable and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. At the present time, except as stated otherwise in this Note 8. Contingencies, while it is reasonably possible that an unfavorable outcome in a case may occur, after assessing the information available to it (i) management has not concluded that it is probable that a loss has been incurred in any of the pending tobacco-related cases; (ii) management is unable to estimate the possible loss or range of loss for any of the pending tobacco-related cases; and (iii) accordingly, no estimated loss has been accrued in the consolidated financial statements for unfavorable outcomes in these cases, if any. Legal defense costs are expensed as incurred.

It is possible that our consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial position could be materially affected in a particular fiscal quarter or fiscal year by an unfavorable outcome or settlement of certain pending litigation. Nevertheless, although litigation is subject to uncertainty, we and each of our subsidiaries named as a defendant believe, and each has been so advised by counsel handling the respective cases, that we have valid defenses to the litigation pending against us, as well as valid bases for appeal of adverse verdicts. All such cases are, and will continue to be, vigorously defended. However, we and our subsidiaries may enter into settlement discussions in particular cases if we believe it is in our best interests to do so.    

CCAA Proceedings and Stay of Tobacco-Related Cases Pending in Canada

As a result of the Court of Appeal of Quebec’s decision in both the Létourneau and Blais cases described below, our subsidiary, Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc. (“RBH”), and the other defendants, JTI Macdonald Corp., and Imperial Tobacco Canada Limited, sought protection in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (“CCAA”) on March 22, March 8, and March 12, 2019 respectively. CCAA is a Canadian federal law that permits a Canadian business to restructure its affairs while carrying on its business in the ordinary course. The initial CCAA order made by the Ontario Superior Court on March 22, 2019 authorizes RBH to pay all expenses incurred in carrying on its business in the ordinary course after the CCAA filing, including obligations to employees, vendors, and suppliers. As further described in Note 19. Deconsolidation of RBH, RBH is now deconsolidated from our consolidated financial statements. As part of the CCAA proceedings, there is currently a comprehensive stay up to and including September 30, 2020 of all tobacco-related litigation pending in Canada against RBH and the other defendants, including PMI and our indemnitees (PM USA and Altria), namely, the smoking and health class actions filed in various Canadian provinces and health care cost recovery actions. These proceedings are presented below under the caption “Stayed Litigation — Canada.” Ernst & Young Inc. has been appointed as monitor of RBH in the CCAA proceedings. In accordance with the CCAA process, as the parties work towards a plan of arrangement or compromise in a confidential mediation, it is anticipated that the court will set additional hearings and further extend the stay of proceedings. On April 17, 2019, the Ontario Superior Court ruled that RBH and the other defendants will not be allowed to file an application to the Supreme Court of Canada for leave to appeal the Court of Appeal’s decision in the Létourneau and the Blais cases so long as the comprehensive stay of all tobacco-related litigation in Canada remains in effect and that the time period to file the application would be extended by the stay period. While RBH believes that the findings of liability and damages in both Létourneau and the Blais cases were incorrect, the CCAA proceedings will provide a forum for RBH to seek resolution through a plan of arrangement or compromise of all tobacco-related litigation pending in Canada. It is not possible to predict the resolution of the underlying legal proceedings or the length of the CCAA process.

Stayed Litigation — Canada

Smoking and Health Litigation — Canada

In the first class action pending in Canada, Conseil Québécois Sur Le Tabac Et La Santé and Jean-Yves Blais v. Imperial Tobacco Ltd., Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc. and JTI-Macdonald Corp., Quebec Superior Court, Canada, filed in November 1998, RBH and other Canadian manufacturers (Imperial Tobacco Canada Ltd. and JTI-Macdonald Corp.) are defendants. The plaintiffs, an anti-smoking organization and an individual smoker, sought compensatory and punitive damages for each member of the class who allegedly suffers from certain smoking-related diseases. The class was certified in 2005. The trial court issued its judgment on May 27, 2015. The trial court found RBH and two other Canadian manufacturers liable and found that the class members’ compensatory damages totaled approximately CAD 15.5 billion, including pre-judgment interest (approximately $11 billion). The trial court awarded compensatory damages on a joint and several liability basis, allocating 20% to our subsidiary (approximately CAD 3.1 billion, including pre-judgment interest (approximately $2.2 billion)). In addition, the trial court awarded CAD 90,000 (approximately $63,760) in punitive damages, allocating CAD 30,000 (approximately $21,250) to RBH. The trial court estimated the disease class at 99,957 members. RBH appealed to the Court of Appeal of Quebec. In October 2015, the Court of Appeal ordered RBH to furnish security totaling CAD 226 million (approximately $160.1 million) to cover both the Létourneau and Blais cases, which RBH has paid in installments through March 2017. The Court of Appeal ordered Imperial Tobacco Canada Ltd. to furnish security totaling CAD 758 million (approximately $537 million) in installments through June 2017. JTI Macdonald Corp. was not required to furnish security in accordance with plaintiffs’ motion. The Court of Appeal ordered that the security is payable upon a final judgment of the Court of Appeal affirming the trial court’s judgment or upon further order of the Court of Appeal. On March 1, 2019, the Court of Appeal issued a decision largely affirming the trial court’s findings of liability and the compensatory and punitive damages award while reducing the total amount of compensatory damages to approximately CAD 13.5 billion including interest (approximately $9.6 billion) due to the trial court’s error in the calculation of interest. The compensatory damages award is on a joint and several basis with an allocation of 20% to RBH (approximately CAD 2.7 billion, including pre-judgment interest (approximately $1.91 billion)). The Court of Appeal upheld the trial court’s findings that defendants violated the Civil Code of Quebec, the Quebec Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms, and the Quebec Consumer Protection Act by failing to warn adequately of the dangers of smoking and by conspiring to prevent consumers from learning of the dangers of smoking. The Court of Appeal further held that the plaintiffs either need not prove, or had adequately proven, that these faults were a cause of the class members’ injuries. In accordance with the judgment, defendants are required to deposit their respective portions of the damages awarded in both the Létourneau case described below and the Blais case, approximately CAD 1.1 billion (approximately $779 million), into trust accounts within 60 days. RBH’s share of the deposit is approximately CAD 257 million (approximately $194.1 million). PMI recorded a pre-tax charge of $194 million in its consolidated results, representing $142 million net of tax, as tobacco litigation-related expense, in the first quarter of 2019. The charge reflects PMI’s assessment of the portion of the judgment that represents probable and estimable loss prior to the deconsolidation of RBH and corresponds to the trust account deposit required by the judgment.

In the second class action pending in Canada, Cecilia Létourneau v. Imperial Tobacco Ltd., Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc. and JTI-Macdonald Corp., Quebec Superior Court, Canada, filed in September 1998, RBH and other Canadian manufacturers (Imperial Tobacco Canada Ltd. and JTI-Macdonald Corp.) are defendants.  The plaintiff, an individual smoker, sought compensatory and punitive damages for each member of the class who is deemed addicted to smoking. The class was certified in 2005. The trial court issued its judgment on May 27, 2015. The trial court found RBH and two other Canadian manufacturers liable and awarded a total of CAD 131 million (approximately $93 million) in punitive damages, allocating CAD 46 million (approximately $32.6 million) to RBH. The trial court estimated the size of the addiction class at 918,000 members but declined to award compensatory damages to the addiction class because the evidence did not establish the claims with sufficient accuracy. The trial court found that a claims process to allocate the awarded punitive damages to individual class members would be too expensive and difficult to administer. On March 1, 2019, the Court of Appeal issued a decision largely affirming the trial court’s findings of liability and the total amount of punitive damages awarded allocating CAD 57 million including interest (approximately $40.4 million) to RBH. See the Blais description above and Note 19. Deconsolidation of RBH below for further detail concerning the security order pertaining to both Létourneau and Blais cases and the impact of the decision on PMI’s financial statements.

RBH and PMI believe the findings of liability and damages in both Létourneau and the Blais cases were incorrect and in contravention of applicable law on several grounds including the following: (i) defendants had no obligation to warn class members who knew, or should have known, of the risks of smoking; (ii) defendants cannot be liable to class members who would have smoked regardless of what warnings were given; and (iii) defendants cannot be liable to all class members given the individual differences between class members.

In the third class action pending in Canada, Kunta v. Canadian Tobacco Manufacturers' Council, et al., The Queen's Bench, Winnipeg, Canada, filed June 12, 2009, we, RBH, and our indemnitees (PM USA and Altria), and other members of the industry are defendants. The plaintiff, an individual smoker, alleges her own addiction to tobacco products and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (“COPD”), severe asthma, and mild reversible lung disease resulting from the use of tobacco products. She is seeking compensatory and punitive damages on behalf of a proposed class comprised of all smokers, their estates, dependents and family members, as well as restitution of profits, and reimbursement of government health care costs allegedly caused by tobacco products.

In the fourth class action pending in Canada, Adams v. Canadian Tobacco Manufacturers' Council, et al., The Queen's Bench, Saskatchewan, Canada, filed July 10, 2009, we, RBH, and our indemnitees (PM USA and Altria), and other members of the industry are defendants. The plaintiff, an individual smoker, alleges her own addiction to tobacco products and COPD resulting from the use of tobacco products. She is seeking compensatory and punitive damages on behalf of a proposed class comprised of all smokers who have smoked a minimum of 25,000 cigarettes and have allegedly suffered, or suffer, from COPD, emphysema, heart disease, or cancer, as well as restitution of profits.

In the fifth class action pending in Canada, Semple v. Canadian Tobacco Manufacturers' Council, et al., The Supreme Court (trial court), Nova Scotia, Canada, filed June 18, 2009, we, RBH, and our indemnitees (PM USA and Altria), and other members of the industry are defendants. The plaintiff, an individual smoker, alleges his own addiction to tobacco products and COPD resulting from the use of tobacco products. He is seeking compensatory and punitive damages on behalf of a proposed class comprised of all smokers, their estates, dependents and family members, as well as restitution of profits, and reimbursement of government health care costs allegedly caused by tobacco products.

In the sixth class action pending in Canada, Dorion v. Canadian Tobacco Manufacturers' Council, et al., The Queen's Bench, Alberta, Canada, filed June 15, 2009, we, RBH, and our indemnitees (PM USA and Altria), and other members of the industry are defendants. The plaintiff, an individual smoker, alleges her own addiction to tobacco products and chronic bronchitis and severe sinus infections resulting from the use of tobacco products. She is seeking compensatory and punitive damages on behalf of a proposed class comprised of all smokers, their estates, dependents and family members, restitution of profits, and reimbursement of government health care costs allegedly caused by tobacco products. To date, we, our subsidiaries, and our indemnitees have not been properly served with the complaint.

In the seventh class action pending in Canada, McDermid v. Imperial Tobacco Canada Limited, et al., Supreme Court, British Columbia, Canada, filed June 25, 2010, we, RBH, and our indemnitees (PM USA and Altria), and other members of the industry are defendants. The plaintiff, an individual smoker, alleges his own addiction to tobacco products and heart disease resulting from the use of tobacco products. He is seeking compensatory and punitive damages on behalf of a proposed class comprised of all smokers who were alive on June 12, 2007, and who suffered from heart disease allegedly caused by smoking, their estates, dependents and family members, plus disgorgement of revenues earned by the defendants from January 1, 1954, to the date the claim was filed.

In the eighth class action pending in Canada, Bourassa v. Imperial Tobacco Canada Limited, et al., Supreme Court, British Columbia, Canada, filed June 25, 2010, we, RBH, and our indemnitees (PM USA and Altria), and other members of the industry are defendants. The plaintiff, the heir to a deceased smoker, alleges that the decedent was addicted to tobacco products and suffered from emphysema resulting from the use of tobacco products. She is seeking compensatory and punitive damages on behalf of a proposed class comprised of all smokers who were alive on June 12, 2007, and who suffered from chronic respiratory diseases allegedly caused by smoking, their estates, dependents and family members, plus disgorgement of revenues earned by the defendants from January 1, 1954, to the date the claim was filed. In December 2014, plaintiff filed an amended statement of claim.

In the ninth class action pending in Canada, Suzanne Jacklin v. Canadian Tobacco Manufacturers' Council, et al., Ontario Superior Court of Justice, filed June 20, 2012, we, RBH, and our indemnitees (PM USA and Altria), and other members of the industry are defendants. The plaintiff, an individual smoker, alleges her own addiction to tobacco products and COPD resulting from the use of tobacco products. She is seeking compensatory and punitive damages on behalf of a proposed class comprised of all smokers who have smoked a minimum of 25,000 cigarettes and have allegedly suffered, or suffer, from COPD, heart disease, or cancer, as well as restitution of profits.

Health Care Cost Recovery Litigation — Canada

In the first health care cost recovery case pending in Canada, Her Majesty the Queen in Right of British Columbia v. Imperial Tobacco Limited, et al., Supreme Court, British Columbia, Vancouver Registry, Canada, filed January 24, 2001, we, RBH, our indemnitee (PM USA), and other members of the industry are defendants. The plaintiff, the government of the province of British

Columbia, brought a claim based upon legislation enacted by the province authorizing the government to file a direct action against cigarette manufacturers to recover the health care costs it has incurred, and will incur, resulting from a “tobacco related wrong.”

In the second health care cost recovery case filed in Canada, Her Majesty the Queen in Right of New Brunswick v. Rothmans Inc., et al., Court of Queen's Bench of New Brunswick, Trial Court, New Brunswick, Fredericton, Canada, filed March 13, 2008, we, RBH, our indemnitees (PM USA and Altria), and other members of the industry are defendants. The claim was filed by the government of the province of New Brunswick based on legislation enacted in the province. This legislation is similar to the law introduced in British Columbia that authorizes the government to file a direct action against cigarette manufacturers to recover the health care costs it has incurred, and will incur, as a result of a “tobacco related wrong.”

In the third health care cost recovery case filed in Canada, Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario v. Rothmans Inc., et al., Ontario Superior Court of Justice, Toronto, Canada, filed September 29, 2009, we, RBH, our indemnitees (PM USA and Altria), and other members of the industry are defendants. The claim was filed by the government of the province of Ontario based on legislation enacted in the province. This legislation is similar to the laws introduced in British Columbia and New Brunswick that authorize the government to file a direct action against cigarette manufacturers to recover the health care costs it has incurred, and will incur, as a result of a “tobacco related wrong.”

In the fourth health care cost recovery case filed in Canada, Attorney General of Newfoundland and Labrador v. Rothmans Inc., et al., Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador, St. Johns, Canada, filed February 8, 2011, we, RBH, our indemnitees (PM USA and Altria), and other members of the industry are defendants. The claim was filed by the government of the province of Newfoundland and Labrador based on legislation enacted in the province that is similar to the laws introduced in British Columbia, New Brunswick and Ontario. The legislation authorizes the government to file a direct action against cigarette manufacturers to recover the health care costs it has incurred, and will incur, as a result of a “tobacco related wrong.”

In the fifth health care cost recovery case filed in Canada, Attorney General of Quebec v. Imperial Tobacco Limited, et al., Superior Court of Quebec, Canada, filed June 8, 2012, we, RBH, our indemnitee (PM USA), and other members of the industry are defendants. The claim was filed by the government of the province of Quebec based on legislation enacted in the province that is similar to the laws enacted in several other Canadian provinces. The legislation authorizes the government to file a direct action against cigarette manufacturers to recover the health care costs it has incurred, and will incur, as a result of a “tobacco related wrong.”

In the sixth health care cost recovery case filed in Canada, Her Majesty in Right of Alberta v. Altria Group, Inc., et al., Supreme Court of Queen's Bench Alberta, Canada, filed June 8, 2012, we, RBH, our indemnitees (PM USA and Altria), and other members of the industry are defendants. The claim was filed by the government of the province of Alberta based on legislation enacted in the province that is similar to the laws enacted in several other Canadian provinces. The legislation authorizes the government to file a direct action against cigarette manufacturers to recover the health care costs it has incurred, and will incur, as a result of a “tobacco related wrong.”

In the seventh health care cost recovery case filed in Canada, Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of Manitoba v. Rothmans, Benson & Hedges, Inc., et al., The Queen's Bench, Winnipeg Judicial Centre, Canada, filed May 31, 2012, we, RBH, our indemnitees (PM USA and Altria), and other members of the industry are defendants. The claim was filed by the government of the province of Manitoba based on legislation enacted in the province that is similar to the laws enacted in several other Canadian provinces. The legislation authorizes the government to file a direct action against cigarette manufacturers to recover the health care costs it has incurred, and will incur, as a result of a “tobacco related wrong.”

In the eighth health care cost recovery case filed in Canada, The Government of Saskatchewan v. Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc., et al., Queen's Bench, Judicial Centre of Saskatchewan, Canada, filed June 8, 2012, we, RBH, our indemnitees (PM USA and Altria), and other members of the industry are defendants. The claim was filed by the government of the province of Saskatchewan based on legislation enacted in the province that is similar to the laws enacted in several other Canadian provinces. The legislation authorizes the government to file a direct action against cigarette manufacturers to recover the health care costs it has incurred, and will incur, as a result of a “tobacco related wrong.”

In the ninth health care cost recovery case filed in Canada, Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of Prince Edward Island v. Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc., et al., Supreme Court of Prince Edward Island (General Section), Canada, filed September 10, 2012, we, RBH, our indemnitees (PM USA and Altria), and other members of the industry are defendants. The claim was filed by the government of the province of Prince Edward Island based on legislation enacted in the province that is similar to the laws enacted in several other Canadian provinces. The legislation authorizes the government to file a direct action

against cigarette manufacturers to recover the health care costs it has incurred, and will incur, as a result of a “tobacco related wrong.”

In the tenth health care cost recovery case filed in Canada, Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of Nova Scotia v. Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc., et al., Supreme Court of Nova Scotia, Canada, filed January 2, 2015, we, RBH, our indemnitees (PM USA and Altria), and other members of the industry are defendants. The claim was filed by the government of the province of Nova Scotia based on legislation enacted in the province that is similar to the laws enacted in several other Canadian provinces. The legislation authorizes the government to file a direct action against cigarette manufacturers to recover the health care costs it has incurred, and will incur, as a result of a “tobacco related wrong.”

__________

The table below lists the number of tobacco-related cases pertaining to combustible products pending against us and/or our subsidiaries or indemnitees as of April 24, 2020, April 23, 2019 and April 24, 2018:¹

Type of Case	Number of Cases Pending as of April 24, 2020	Number of Cases Pending as of April 23, 2019	Number of Cases Pending as of April 24, 2018
Individual Smoking and Health Cases	48	53	62
Smoking and Health Class Actions	10	10	11
Health Care Cost Recovery Actions	17	16	16
Label-Related Class Actions	—	1	1
Individual Label-Related Cases	4	7	1
Public Civil Actions	2	2	2

Since 1995, when the first tobacco-related litigation was filed against a PMI entity, 503 Smoking and Health, Label-Related, Health Care Cost Recovery, and Public Civil Actions in which we and/or one of our subsidiaries and/or indemnitees were a defendant have been terminated in our favor. Thirteen cases have had decisions in favor of plaintiffs. Nine of these cases have subsequently reached final resolution in our favor and four remain on appeal.

The table below lists the verdict and significant post-trial developments in the four pending cases where a verdict was returned in favor of the plaintiff:

Date	Location of Court/Name of Plaintiff	Type of Case	Verdict	Post-Trial Developments
February 2004	Brazil/The Smoker Health Defense Association	Class Action	The Civil Court of São Paulo found defendants liable without hearing evidence. In April 2004, the court awarded “moral damages” of R$1,000 (approximately $183) per smoker per full year of smoking plus interest at the rate of 1% per month, as of the date of the ruling. The court did not assess actual damages, which were to be assessed in a second phase of the case. The size of the class was not defined in the ruling.	Defendants appealed to the São Paulo Court of Appeals, which annulled the ruling in November 2008, finding that the trial court had inappropriately ruled without hearing evidence and returned the case to the trial court for further proceedings. In May 2011, the trial court dismissed the claim. In March 2017, plaintiff filed an en banc appeal to the Superior Court of Justice. In addition, the defendants filed a constitutional appeal to the Federal Supreme Tribunal on the basis that plaintiff did not have standing to bring the lawsuit. Both appeals are still pending.

______

¹ Includes cases pending in Canada.

Date	Location of Court/Name of Plaintiff	Type of Case	Verdict	Post-Trial Developments
May 27, 2015	Canada/Conseil Québécois Sur Le Tabac Et La Santé and Jean-Yves Blais	Class Action	On May 27, 2015, the Superior Court of the District of Montreal, Province of Quebec ruled in favor of the Blais class on liability and found the class members’ compensatory damages totaled approximately CAD 15.5 billion (approximately $11 billion), including pre-judgment interest. The trial court awarded compensatory damages on a joint and several liability basis, allocating 20% to our subsidiary (approximately CAD 3.1 billion including pre-judgment interest (approximately $2.2 billion)). The trial court awarded CAD 90,000 (approximately $63,760) in punitive damages, allocating CAD 30,000 (approximately $21,250) to our subsidiary. The trial court ordered defendants to pay CAD 1 billion (approximately $708.5 million) of the compensatory damage award, CAD 200 million (approximately $141.7 million) of which is our subsidiary’s portion, into a trust within 60 days.	In June 2015, RBH commenced the appellate process with the Court of Appeal of Quebec. On March 1, 2019, the Court of Appeal issued a decision largely affirming the trial court's decision. (See “Stayed Litigation — Canada” for further detail.)

Date	Location of Court/Name of Plaintiff	Type of Case	Verdict	Post-Trial Developments
May 27, 2015	Canada/Cecilia Létourneau	Class Action	On May 27, 2015, the Superior Court of the District of Montreal, Province of Quebec ruled in favor of the Létourneau class on liability and awarded a total of CAD 131 million (approximately $92.8 million) in punitive damages, allocating CAD 46 million (approximately $32.6 million) to RBH. The trial court ordered defendants to pay the full punitive damage award into a trust within 60 days. The court did not order the payment of compensatory damages.	In June 2015, RBH commenced the appellate process with the Court of Appeal of Quebec. On March 1, 2019, the Court of Appeal issued a decision largely affirming the trial court's decision. (See “Stayed Litigation — Canada” for further detail.)

Date	Location of Court/Name of Plaintiff	Type of Case	Verdict	Post-Trial Developments
August 5, 2016	Argentina/Hugo Lespada	Individual Action	On August 5, 2016, the Civil Court No. 14 - Mar del Plata, issued a verdict in favor of plaintiff, an individual smoker, and awarded him ARS 110,000 (approximately $1,661), plus interest, in compensatory and moral damages. The trial court found that our subsidiary failed to warn plaintiff of the risk of becoming addicted to cigarettes.	On August 23, 2016, our subsidiary filed its notice of appeal. On October 31, 2017, the Civil and Commercial Court of Appeals of Mar del Plata ruled that plaintiff's claim was barred by the statute of limitations and it reversed the trial court's decision. On November 28, 2017, plaintiff filed an extraordinary appeal of the reversal of the trial court's decision to the Supreme Court of the Province of Buenos Aires.

Pending claims related to tobacco products generally fall within the following categories:

Smoking and Health Litigation: These cases primarily allege personal injury and are brought by individual plaintiffs or on behalf of a class or purported class of individual plaintiffs. Plaintiffs' allegations of liability in these cases are based on various theories of recovery, including negligence, gross negligence, strict liability, fraud, misrepresentation, design defect, failure to warn, breach of express and implied warranties, violations of deceptive trade practice laws and consumer protection statutes. Plaintiffs in these cases seek various forms of relief, including compensatory and other damages, and injunctive and equitable relief. Defenses raised in these cases include licit activity, failure to state a claim, lack of defect, lack of proximate cause, assumption of the risk, contributory negligence, and statute of limitations.

As of April 24, 2020, there were a number of smoking and health cases pending against us, our subsidiaries or indemnitees, as follows:

• 48 cases brought by individual plaintiffs in Argentina (31), Brazil (5), Canada (2), Chile (4), Costa Rica (1), Italy (1), the Philippines (1), Poland (1), Turkey (1) and Scotland (1), compared with 53 such cases on April 23, 2019, and 62 cases on April 24, 2018; and

• 10 cases brought on behalf of classes of individual plaintiffs in Brazil (1) and Canada (9), compared with 10 such cases on April 23, 2019 and 11 such cases on April 24, 2018.

The class actions pending in Canada are described above under the caption “Smoking and Health Litigation — Canada.”

In the class action pending in Brazil, The Smoker Health Defense Association (ADESF) v. Souza Cruz, S.A. and Philip Morris Marketing, S.A., Nineteenth Lower Civil Court of the Central Courts of the Judiciary District of São Paulo, Brazil, filed July 25, 1995, our subsidiary and another member of the industry are defendants. The plaintiff, a consumer organization, is seeking damages for all addicted smokers and former smokers, and injunctive relief. In 2004, the trial court found defendants liable without hearing evidence and awarded “moral damages” of R$1,000 (approximately $183) per smoker per full year of smoking plus interest at the rate of 1% per month, as of the date of the ruling. The court did not award actual damages, which were to be assessed in the second phase of the case. The size of the class was not estimated. Defendants appealed to the São Paulo Court of Appeals, which annulled the ruling in November 2008, finding that the trial court had inappropriately ruled without hearing evidence and returned the case to the trial court for further proceedings. In May 2011, the trial court dismissed the claim. In February 2015, the appellate court unanimously dismissed plaintiff's appeal. In September 2015, plaintiff appealed to the Superior Court of Justice. In February 2017, the Chief Justice of the Superior Court of Justice denied plaintiff's appeal. In March 2017, plaintiff filed an en banc appeal to the Superior Court of Justice. In addition, the defendants filed a constitutional appeal to the Federal Supreme Tribunal on the basis that plaintiff did not have standing to bring the lawsuit. Both appeals are still pending.

Health Care Cost Recovery Litigation: These cases, brought by governmental and non-governmental plaintiffs, seek reimbursement of health care cost expenditures allegedly caused by tobacco products. Plaintiffs' allegations of liability in these cases are based on various theories of recovery including unjust enrichment, negligence, negligent design, strict liability, breach of express and implied warranties, violation of a voluntary undertaking or special duty, fraud, negligent misrepresentation, conspiracy, public nuisance, defective product, failure to warn, sale of cigarettes to minors, and claims under statutes governing competition and deceptive trade practices. Plaintiffs in these cases seek various forms of relief including compensatory and other damages, and injunctive and equitable relief. Defenses raised in these cases include lack of proximate cause, remoteness of injury, failure to state a claim, adequate remedy at law, “unclean hands” (namely, that plaintiffs cannot obtain equitable relief because they participated in, and benefited from, the sale of cigarettes), and statute of limitations.

As of April 24, 2020, there were 17 health care cost recovery cases pending against us, our subsidiaries or indemnitees in Brazil (1), Canada (10), Korea (1) and Nigeria (5), compared with 16 such cases on April 23, 2019 and 16 such cases on April 24, 2018.

The health care cost recovery actions pending in Canada are described above under the caption “Health Care Cost Recovery Litigation — Canada.”

In the health care cost recovery case in Brazil, The Attorney General of Brazil v. Souza Cruz Ltda., et al., Federal Trial Court, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, filed May 21, 2019, we, our subsidiaries, and other members of the industry are defendants. Plaintiff seeks reimbursement for the cost of treating alleged smoking-related diseases for the past five years, payment of anticipated costs of treating future alleged smoking-related diseases, and moral damages. Defendants' answers to the complaint are due in May 2020. A challenge to the service of PMI as improper remains pending.

In the first health care cost recovery case in Nigeria, The Attorney General of Lagos State v. British American Tobacco (Nigeria) Limited, et al., High Court of Lagos State, Lagos, Nigeria, filed March 13, 2008, we and other members of the industry are defendants. Plaintiff seeks reimbursement for the cost of treating alleged smoking-related diseases for the past 20 years, payment of anticipated costs of treating alleged smoking-related diseases for the next 20 years, various forms of injunctive relief, plus punitive damages. We are in the process of making challenges to service and the court's jurisdiction. Currently, the case is stayed in the trial court pending the appeals of certain co-defendants relating to service objections.

In the second health care cost recovery case in Nigeria, The Attorney General of Kano State v. British American Tobacco (Nigeria) Limited, et al., High Court of Kano State, Kano, Nigeria, filed May 9, 2007, we and other members of the industry are defendants.

Plaintiff seeks reimbursement for the cost of treating alleged smoking-related diseases for the past 20 years, payment of anticipated costs of treating alleged smoking-related diseases for the next 20 years, various forms of injunctive relief, plus punitive damages. We are in the process of making challenges to service and the court's jurisdiction. Currently, the case is stayed in the trial court pending the appeals of certain co-defendants relating to service objections.

In the third health care cost recovery case in Nigeria, The Attorney General of Gombe State v. British American Tobacco (Nigeria) Limited, et al., High Court of Gombe State, Gombe, Nigeria, filed October 17, 2008, we and other members of the industry are defendants. Plaintiff seeks reimbursement for the cost of treating alleged smoking-related diseases for the past 20 years, payment of anticipated costs of treating alleged smoking-related diseases for the next 20 years, various forms of injunctive relief, plus punitive damages. In February 2011, the court ruled that the plaintiff had not complied with the procedural steps necessary to serve us. As a result of this ruling, plaintiff must re-serve its claim. We have not yet been re-served.

In the fourth health care cost recovery case in Nigeria, The Attorney General of Oyo State, et al., v. British American Tobacco (Nigeria) Limited, et al., High Court of Oyo State, Ibadan, Nigeria, filed May 25, 2007, we and other members of the industry are defendants. Plaintiffs seek reimbursement for the cost of treating alleged smoking-related diseases for the past 20 years, payment of anticipated costs of treating alleged smoking-related diseases for the next 20 years, various forms of injunctive relief, plus punitive damages. We challenged service as improper. In June 2010, the court ruled that plaintiffs did not have leave to serve the writ of summons on the defendants and that they must re-serve the writ. We have not yet been re-served.

In the fifth health care cost recovery case in Nigeria, The Attorney General of Ogun State v. British American Tobacco (Nigeria) Limited, et al., High Court of Ogun State, Abeokuta, Nigeria, filed February 26, 2008, we and other members of the industry are defendants. Plaintiff seeks reimbursement for the cost of treating alleged smoking-related diseases for the past 20 years, payment of anticipated costs of treating alleged smoking-related diseases for the next 20 years, various forms of injunctive relief, plus punitive damages. In May 2010, the trial court rejected our service objections. We have appealed.

In the health care cost recovery case in Korea, the National Health Insurance Service v. KT&G, et. al., filed April 14, 2014, our subsidiary and other Korean manufacturers are defendants. Plaintiff alleges that defendants concealed the health hazards of smoking, marketed to youth, added ingredients to make their products more harmful and addictive, and misled consumers into believing that Lights cigarettes are safer than regular cigarettes. The National Health Insurance Service seeks to recover damages allegedly incurred in treating 3,484 patients with small cell lung cancer, squamous cell lung cancer, and squamous cell laryngeal cancer from 2003 to 2012. The case is now in the evidentiary phase.

Label-Related Cases: These cases, now brought only by individual plaintiffs, allege that the use of the descriptor “Lights” or other alleged misrepresentations or omissions of labeling information constitute fraudulent and misleading conduct. Plaintiffs' allegations of liability in these cases are based on various theories of recovery including misrepresentation, deception, and breach of consumer protection laws. Plaintiffs seek various forms of relief including restitution, injunctive relief, and compensatory and other damages. Defenses raised include lack of causation, lack of reliance, assumption of the risk, and statute of limitations.

As of April 24, 2020, there were 4 label-related cases brought by individual plaintiffs in Italy (1) and Chile (3) pending against our subsidiaries, compared with 7 such cases on April 23, 2019, and 1 such case on April 24, 2018.

Public Civil Actions: Claims have been filed either by an individual, or a public or private entity, seeking to protect collective or individual rights, such as the right to health, the right to information or the right to safety. Plaintiffs' allegations of liability in these cases are based on various theories of recovery including product defect, concealment, and misrepresentation. Plaintiffs in these cases seek various forms of relief including injunctive relief such as banning cigarettes, descriptors, smoking in certain places and advertising, as well as implementing communication campaigns and reimbursement of medical expenses incurred by public or private institutions.

As of April 24, 2020, there were 2 public civil actions pending against our subsidiaries in Argentina (1) and Venezuela (1), compared with 2 such cases on April 23, 2019, and 2 such cases on April 24, 2018.

In the public civil action in Argentina, Asociación Argentina de Derecho de Danos v. Massalin Particulares S.A., et al., Civil Court of Buenos Aires, Argentina, filed February 26, 2007, our subsidiary and another member of the industry are defendants. The plaintiff, a consumer association, seeks the establishment of a relief fund for reimbursement of medical costs associated with diseases allegedly caused by smoking. Our subsidiary filed its answer in September 2007. In March 2010, the case file was transferred to the Federal Court on Administrative Matters after the Civil Court granted plaintiff's request to add the national government as a co-plaintiff in the case. The case is currently awaiting a court decision on the merits.

In the public civil action in Venezuela, Federation of Consumers and Users Associations (“FEVACU”), et al. v. National Assembly of Venezuela and the Venezuelan Ministry of Health, Constitutional Chamber of the Venezuelan Supreme Court, filed April 29, 2008, we were not named as a defendant, but the plaintiffs published a notice pursuant to court order, notifying all interested parties to appear in the case. In January 2009, our subsidiary appeared in the case in response to this notice. The plaintiffs purport to represent the right to health of the citizens of Venezuela and claim that the government failed to protect adequately its citizens' right to health. The claim asks the court to order the government to enact stricter regulations on the manufacture and sale of tobacco products. In addition, the plaintiffs ask the court to order companies involved in the tobacco industry to allocate a percentage of their “sales or benefits” to establish a fund to pay for the health care costs of treating smoking-related diseases. In October 2008, the court ruled that plaintiffs have standing to file the claim and that the claim meets the threshold admissibility requirements. In December 2012, the court admitted our subsidiary and BAT's subsidiary as interested third parties. In February 2013, our subsidiary answered the complaint.

Reduced-Risk Products

In Colombia, an individual filed a purported class action, Ana Ferrero Rebolledo v. Philip Morris Colombia S.A., et al., in April 2019 against our subsidiaries with the Civil Court of Bogota related to the marketing of our Platform 1 product. Plaintiff alleged that our subsidiaries advertise the product in contravention of law and in a manner that misleads consumers by portraying the product in a positive light, and further asserts that the Platform 1 vapor contains many toxic compounds, creates a high level of dependence, and has damaging second-hand effects. Plaintiff sought injunctive relief and damages on her behalf and on a behalf of two classes (class 1 - all Platform 1 consumers in Colombia who seek damages for the purchase price of the product and personal injuries related to the alleged addiction, and class 2 - all residents of the neighborhood where the advertising allegedly took place who seek damages for exposure to the alleged illegal advertising). Our subsidiaries answered the complaint in January 2020, and in February 2020, plaintiff filed an amended complaint. The amended complaint modifies the relief sought on behalf of the named plaintiff and on behalf of a single class (all consumers of Platform 1 products in Colombia who seek damages for the product purchase price and personal injuries related to the use of an allegedly harmful product). The amended complaint has not yet been served on our subsidiaries.

Other Litigation

The Department of Special Investigations of the government of Thailand ("DSI") conducted an investigation into alleged underpayment by our subsidiary, Philip Morris (Thailand) Limited ("PM Thailand"), of customs duties and excise taxes relating to imports from the Philippines covering the period 2003-2007. On January 18, 2016, the Public Prosecutor filed charges against our subsidiary and seven former and current employees in the Bangkok Criminal Court alleging that PM Thailand and the individual defendants jointly and with the intention to defraud the Thai government, under-declared import prices of cigarettes to avoid full payment of taxes and duties in connection with import entries of cigarettes from the Philippines during the period of July 2003 to June 2006. The government is seeking a fine of approximately THB 80.8 billion (approximately $2.5 billion). In May 2017, Thailand enacted a new customs act. The new act, which took effect in November 2017, substantially limits the amount of fines that Thailand could seek in these proceedings. PM Thailand believes that its declared import prices are in compliance with the Customs Valuation Agreement of the World Trade Organization and Thai law and that the allegations of the Public Prosecutor are inconsistent with several decisions already taken by Thai Customs and other Thai governmental agencies. Trial in the case began in November 2017 and concluded in September 2019. In November 2019, the trial court found our subsidiary guilty of under-declaration of the prices and imposed a fine of approximately THB 1.2 billion (approximately $37.1 million). The trial court dismissed all charges against the individual defendants. In December 2019, as required by the Thai law, our subsidiary paid the fine. This payment is included in other assets on the condensed consolidated balance sheets and negatively impacted net cash provided by operating activities in the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows in the period of payment. Our subsidiary will appeal the trial court's decision. If our subsidiary ultimately prevails on appeal, then Thailand will be required to return this payment to our subsidiary.

The DSI also conducted an investigation into alleged underpayment by PM Thailand of customs duties and excise taxes relating to imports from Indonesia covering the period 2000-2003. On January 26, 2017, the Public Prosecutor filed charges against PM Thailand and its former Thai employee in the Bangkok Criminal Court alleging that PM Thailand and its former employee jointly and with the intention to defraud the Thai government under-declared import prices of cigarettes to avoid full payment of taxes and duties in connection with import entries during the period from January 2002 to July 2003. The government is seeking a fine

of approximately THB 19.8 billion (approximately $612 million). In May 2017, Thailand enacted a new customs act. The new act, which took effect in November 2017, substantially limits the amount of fines that Thailand could seek in these proceedings. PM Thailand believes that its declared import prices are in compliance with the Customs Valuation Agreement of the World Trade Organization and Thai law, and that the allegations of the Public Prosecutor are inconsistent with several decisions already taken by Thai Customs and a Thai court. Trial in the case began in November 2018 and concluded in December 2019. In March 2020, the trial court found our subsidiary guilty of under-declaration of the prices and imposed a fine of approximately THB 130 million (approximately $4 million). The trial court dismissed all charges against the individual defendant. In April 2020, as required by Thai law, our subsidiary paid the fine. Our subsidiary will appeal the trial court's decision. If our subsidiary ultimately prevails on appeal, then Thailand will be required to return this payment to our subsidiary.

The South Korean Board of Audit and Inspection (“BAI”) conducted an audit of certain Korean government agencies and the tobacco industry into whether inventory movements ahead of the January 1, 2015 increase of cigarette-related taxes by tobacco companies, including Philip Morris Korea Inc. ("PM Korea"), our South Korean affiliate, were in compliance with South Korean tax laws.  In November 2016, the tax authorities completed their audit and assessed allegedly underpaid taxes and penalties.  In order to avoid nonpayment financial costs, PM Korea paid approximately KRW 272 billion (approximately $221 million), of which KRW 100 billion (approximately $81.1 million) was paid in 2016 and KRW 172 billion (approximately $139.5 million) was paid in the first quarter of 2017.  These paid amounts are included in other assets in the condensed consolidated balance sheets and negatively impacted net cash provided by operating activities in the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows in the period of payment.  PM Korea appealed the assessments. In January 2020, a trial court ruled that PM Korea did not underpay the approximately KRW 218 billion (approximately $177 million) in taxes that were subject to its jurisdiction. The tax authorities appealed this decision. If the tax authorities ultimately lose, then they would be required to return the paid amounts to PM Korea. The hearing for this case is scheduled in May 2020. The hearing for PM Korea's appeal of approximately KRW 54 billion of alleged underpayments (approximately $43.8 million) was held in April 2020, and a decision is scheduled for June 2020.

The Moscow Tax Inspectorate for Major Taxpayers (“MTI”) conducted an audit of AO Philip Morris Izhora (“PM Izhora”), our Russian affiliate, for the 2015-2017 financial years. On July 26, 2019, MTI issued its initial assessment, claiming that intercompany sales of cigarettes between PM Izhora and another Russian affiliate prior to excise tax increases and submission by PM Izhora of the maximum retail sales price notifications for cigarettes to the tax authorities were improper under Russian tax laws and resulted in underpayment of excise taxes and VAT. In August 2019, PM Izhora submitted its objections disagreeing with MTI’s allegations set forth in the initial assessment and MTI’s methodology for calculating the alleged underpayments. MTI accepted some of PM Izhora’s arguments and in September 2019, issued the final tax assessment claiming an underpayment of RUB 24.3 billion (approximately $374 million), including penalties and interest. In accordance with Russian tax laws, PM Izhora paid the entire amount of MTI’s final assessment. This amount was neither imposed on, nor concurrent with, the specific revenue-producing transaction, nor was it collected from customers of our Russian affiliates. PMI believes that the loss of $374 million in this matter is probable and estimable. Consequently, in the third quarter of 2019, PMI recorded a pre-tax charge of $374 million, in marketing, administration and research costs in the condensed consolidated statements of earnings, representing $315 million net of income tax. Under the Russian law, PM Izhora has until mid-September 2020 to challenge the final tax assessment to the Federal Tax Service and is considering whether to pursue such challenge.

A putative shareholder class action lawsuit, In re Philip Morris International Inc. Securities Litigation, is pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, purportedly on behalf of purchasers of Philip Morris International Inc. stock between July 26, 2016 and April 18, 2018.  The lawsuit names Philip Morris International Inc. and certain officers and employees as defendants and includes allegations that the defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose information about PMI’s business, operations, financial condition, and prospects, related to product sales of, and alleged irregularities in clinical studies of, PMI’s Platform 1 product.  The lawsuit seeks various forms of relief, including damages. In November 2018, the court consolidated three putative shareholder class action lawsuits with similar allegations previously filed in the Southern District of New York (namely, City of Westland Police and Fire Retirement System v. Philip Morris International Inc., et al, Greater Pennsylvania Carpenters’ Pension Fund v. Philip Morris International Inc., et al., and Gilchrist v. Philip Morris International Inc., et al.) into these proceedings. A putative shareholder class action lawsuit, Rubenstahl v. Philip Morris International Inc., et al., that had been previously filed in December 2017 in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, was voluntarily dismissed by the plaintiff due to similar allegations in these proceedings. On February 4, 2020, the court granted defendants’ motion in its entirety, dismissing all but one of the plaintiffs’ claims with prejudice.  The court noted that one of plaintiffs’ claims (allegations relating to four non-clinical studies of PMI’s Platform 1 product) did not state a viable claim but allowed plaintiffs to replead that claim by March 3, 2020. On February 18, 2020, the plaintiffs filed a motion for reconsideration of the court's February 4th decision. The court extended the time for plaintiffs to replead the claim relating to four

non-clinical studies mentioned above within 30 days after the court's decision on the motion. We believe that this lawsuit is without merit and will continue to defend it vigorously.

In April 2020, affiliates of British American Tobacco plc (“BAT”) commenced patent infringement proceedings, RAI Strategic Holdings, Inc., et al. v. Philip Morris International Inc., et al.,  in the federal court in the Eastern District of Virginia, where PMI and its subsidiary, as well as Altria Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries, are defendants. Plaintiffs seek damages and injunctive relief against further commercialization of the Platform 1 products in the United States.  In April 2020, BAT affiliates filed a complaint against the same PMI and Altria Group, Inc. parties before the International Trade Commission. Plaintiffs seek an order to prevent the importation of Platform 1 products into the United States.

We believe that the foregoing proceedings by the affiliates of BAT are without merit and will defend them vigorously.

We are also involved in additional litigation arising in the ordinary course of our business. While the outcomes of these proceedings are uncertain, management does not expect that the ultimate outcomes of other litigation, including any reasonably possible losses in excess of current accruals, will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial position.

XML

Product Warranty (Narrative) (Details)	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2020
Guarantees and Product Warranties [Abstract]
Standard product warranty term	12 months

XML

Leases (Details) - USD ($) $ in Millions	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2020	Mar. 31, 2019
Lessee, Lease, Description [Line Items]
Operating lease cost	$ 60	$ 60
Short-term lease cost	13	12
Variable lease cost	8	8
Total lease cost	81	80
Cost of Sales [Member]
Lessee, Lease, Description [Line Items]
Total lease cost	19	19
Marketing Administration And Research Costs [Member]
Lessee, Lease, Description [Line Items]
Total lease cost	$ 62	$ 61

XML

Indebtedness (Credit Facilities) (Details) - USD ($)	Mar. 31, 2020	Feb. 10, 2020	Jan. 31, 2020
Line of Credit Facility [Line Items]
Committed credit facilities	$ 7,500,000,000
364-day revolving credit expiring February 2, 2021 [Member]
Line of Credit Facility [Line Items]
Committed credit facilities	2,000,000,000.0		$ 2,000,000,000.0
Multi-year revolving credit, expiring October 1, 2022 [Member]
Line of Credit Facility [Line Items]
Committed credit facilities	3,500,000,000
Multi-year Revolving Credit Facility, Expiring February 10, 2025 [Member]
Line of Credit Facility [Line Items]
Committed credit facilities	$ 2,000,000,000.0	$ 2,000,000,000.0

XML

Balance Sheet Offsetting (Details) - Derivative Contract [Member] - USD ($) $ in Millions	Mar. 31, 2020	Dec. 31, 2019
Assets
Gross Amounts Recognized	$ 492	$ 390
Gross Amount Offset in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet	0	0
Net Amounts Presented in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet	492	390
Gross Amounts Not Offset in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet, Financial Instruments	(212)	(297)
Gross Amounts Not Offset in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet, Cash Collateral Received/Pledged	(253)	(91)
Net Amount	27	2
Liabilities
Gross Amounts Recognized	249	419
Gross Amount Offset in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet	0	0
Net Amounts Presented in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet	249	419
Gross Amounts Not Offset in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet, Financial Instruments	(212)	(297)
Gross Amounts Not Offset in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet, Cash Collateral Received/Pledged	(1)	(59)
Net Amount	$ 36	$ 63

XML

Financial Instruments (Cash Flow and Net Investment Hedging Activities Effect on Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings and Other Comprehensive Earnings) (Details) - Derivative Contract [Member] - USD ($) $ in Millions	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2020	Mar. 31, 2019
Derivative Instruments, Gain (Loss) [Line Items]
Amount of Gain/(Loss) Recognized in Other Comprehensive Earnings/(Losses) on Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationship	$ 31	$ (2)
Amount of Gain/(Loss) Recognized in Other Comprehensive Earnings/(Losses) on Derivatives in Net Investment Hedging Relationship	407	211
Total Amount of Gain/(Loss) Recognized in Other Comprehensive Earnings/(Losses) on Derivatives	438	209
Amount of Gain/(Loss) Reclassified from Other Comprehensive Earnings/(Losses) into Earnings	10	5
Not Designated as Hedging Instrument [Member]
Derivative Instruments, Gain (Loss) [Line Items]
Amount of Gain/(Loss) Recognized in Earnings	34	17
Net Revenue [Member]
Derivative Instruments, Gain (Loss) [Line Items]
Amount of Gain/(Loss) Reclassified from Other Comprehensive Earnings/(Losses) into Earnings	3	10
Cost of Sales [Member]
Derivative Instruments, Gain (Loss) [Line Items]
Amount of Gain/(Loss) Reclassified from Other Comprehensive Earnings/(Losses) into Earnings	4	0
Marketing Administration And Research Costs [Member]
Derivative Instruments, Gain (Loss) [Line Items]
Amount of Gain/(Loss) Reclassified from Other Comprehensive Earnings/(Losses) into Earnings	5	(3)
Interest Expense, Net [Member]
Derivative Instruments, Gain (Loss) [Line Items]
Amount of Gain/(Loss) Reclassified from Other Comprehensive Earnings/(Losses) into Earnings	(2)	(2)
Interest Income Expense Net [Member] | Not Designated as Hedging Instrument [Member]
Derivative Instruments, Gain (Loss) [Line Items]
Amount of Gain/(Loss) Recognized in Earnings	$ 34	$ 17

XML

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, net (Other Intangible Assets) (Details) - USD ($) $ in Millions	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2020	Mar. 31, 2019	Dec. 31, 2019
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]
Non-amortizable intangible assets	$ 1,112		$ 1,319
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Amortizable intangible assets, Accumulated Amortization	629		642
Total other intangible assets, gross	2,479		2,755
Total other intangible assets, net	1,850		2,113
Non-amortizable intangible assets, currency movements	(207)
Finite-lived intangible assets, currency movements	(69)
Amortization of intangibles	18	$ 19
Trademarks and Distribution Networks [Member]
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Change in accumulated amortization, currency movements	31
Amortization of intangibles	18
Trademarks [Member]
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Amortizable intangible assets, Gross Carrying Amount	1,160		1,217
Amortizable intangible assets, Accumulated Amortization	518		526
Amortizable intangible assets, Net	$ 642		691
Weighted-average remaining useful life	14 years
Distribution Networks [Member]
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Amortizable intangible assets, Gross Carrying Amount	$ 103		113
Amortizable intangible assets, Accumulated Amortization	67		72
Amortizable intangible assets, Net	$ 36		41
Weighted-average remaining useful life	8 years
Other [Member]
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Amortizable intangible assets, Gross Carrying Amount	$ 104		106
Amortizable intangible assets, Accumulated Amortization	44		44
Amortizable intangible assets, Net	$ 60		$ 62
Weighted-average remaining useful life	9 years

XML

Contingencies (Health Care Cost Recovery Litigation) (Details) - Health Care Cost Recovery Actions [Member]	May 21, 2019	Apr. 14, 2014 patient	Oct. 17, 2008	Mar. 13, 2008	Feb. 26, 2008	May 25, 2007	May 09, 2007	Apr. 24, 2020 litigation_case	Apr. 23, 2019 litigation_case	Apr. 24, 2018 litigation_case
Brazil [Member] | Pending Litigation [Member] | The Attorney General of Brazil [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Damages sought, period of past reimbursements	5 years
Korea [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Damages sought, number of patients | patient		3,484
Nigeria [Member] | Pending Litigation [Member] | The Attorney General Of Lagos State [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Damages sought, period of past reimbursements				20 years
Damages sought, period of future reimbursements				20 years
Nigeria [Member] | Pending Litigation [Member] | The Attorney General Of Kano State [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Damages sought, period of past reimbursements							20 years
Damages sought, period of future reimbursements							20 years
Nigeria [Member] | Pending Litigation [Member] | The Attorney General Of Gombe State [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Damages sought, period of past reimbursements			20 years
Damages sought, period of future reimbursements			20 years
Nigeria [Member] | Pending Litigation [Member] | The Attorney General Of Oyo State [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Damages sought, period of past reimbursements						20 years
Damages sought, period of future reimbursements						20 years
Nigeria [Member] | Pending Litigation [Member] | The Attorney General Of Ogun State [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Damages sought, period of past reimbursements					20 years
Damages sought, period of future reimbursements					20 years
Combustible Products [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Cases brought against PM									16	16
Subsequent Event [Member] | Combustible Products [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Cases brought against PM								17
Subsequent Event [Member] | Combustible Products [Member] | Brazil [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Cases brought against PM								1
Subsequent Event [Member] | Combustible Products [Member] | Canada [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Cases brought against PM								10
Subsequent Event [Member] | Combustible Products [Member] | Korea [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Cases brought against PM								1
Subsequent Event [Member] | Combustible Products [Member] | Nigeria [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Cases brought against PM								5

XML

Contingencies (Tobacco-Related Litigation) (Details)							1 Months Ended		3 Months Ended
	Mar. 01, 2019 CAD ($) litigation_case	Mar. 01, 2019 USD ($) litigation_case	May 27, 2015 CAD ($) manufacturer plaintiff	May 27, 2015 USD ($) manufacturer plaintiff	Jun. 20, 2012 cigarette	Jul. 10, 2009 cigarette	Oct. 30, 2015 CAD ($)	Oct. 30, 2015 USD ($)	Mar. 31, 2019 USD ($)	Mar. 31, 2020 litigation_case
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Number of cases decided in favor of PM										503
Number of cases decided in favor of plaintiff										13
Cases Remaining On Appeal [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Cases on appeal										4
Case Decided In Favor Of Plaintiff [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Number of cases that reached final resolution in favor of PM										9
Canada [Member] | Adams [Member] | Pending Litigation [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Minimum number of cigarettes smoked | cigarette						25,000
Canada [Member] | Suzanne Jacklin [Member] | Pending Litigation [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Minimum number of cigarettes smoked | cigarette					25,000
Canada [Member] | Smoking And Health Class Actions [Member] | Conseil Quebecois Sur Le Tabac Et La Sante and Jean-Yves Blais [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Number of additional manufacturers found liable | manufacturer			2	2
Court-estimated number of members in class | plaintiff			99,957	99,957
Canada [Member] | Smoking And Health Class Actions [Member] | Conseil Quebecois Sur Le Tabac Et La Sante and Jean-Yves Blais [Member] | Judicial Ruling [Member] | Imperial Tobacco Ltd., Rothmans, Benson And Hedges Inc., And JTI Macdonald Corp. [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Compensatory damages awarded			$ 15,500,000,000.0	$ 11,000,000,000
Punitive damages awarded			90,000	63,760
Damages, reduced amount	$ 13,500,000,000	$ 9,600,000,000
Canada [Member] | Smoking And Health Class Actions [Member] | Conseil Quebecois Sur Le Tabac Et La Sante and Jean-Yves Blais [Member] | Judicial Ruling [Member] | RBH [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Compensatory damages awarded	$ 2,700,000,000	$ 1,910,000,000	$ 3,100,000,000.0	$ 2,200,000,000
Damages allocated to subsidiary (percent)	20.00%	20.00%	20.00%	20.00%
Punitive damages awarded			$ 30,000	$ 21,250
Canada [Member] | Smoking And Health Class Actions [Member] | Cecilia Letourneau & Conseil Quebecois Sur La Tabac Et La Sante and Jean-Yves Blais Cases [Member] | Judicial Ruling [Member] | Imperial Tobacco Ltd., Rothmans, Benson And Hedges Inc., And JTI Macdonald Corp. [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Amount to be deposited into trust	$ 1,100,000,000	$ 779,000,000
Payment period	60 days	60 days
Canada [Member] | Smoking And Health Class Actions [Member] | Cecilia Letourneau & Conseil Quebecois Sur La Tabac Et La Sante and Jean-Yves Blais Cases [Member] | Appellate Ruling [Member] | RBH [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Motion for security ordered by appeals court, paid by defendant							$ 226,000,000	$ 160,100,000
Amount of security ordered, funded by defendant	$ 257,000,000	$ 194,100,000
Amount of litigation charge | $									$ 194,000,000
Amount of litigation charge net of tax | $									142,000,000
Number of cases decided in favor of plaintiff	2	2
Canada [Member] | Smoking And Health Class Actions [Member] | Cecilia Letourneau & Conseil Quebecois Sur La Tabac Et La Sante and Jean-Yves Blais Cases [Member] | Appellate Ruling [Member] | Imperial Tobacco Ltd. [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Motion for security ordered by appeals court							$ 758,000,000	$ 537,000,000
Canada [Member] | Smoking And Health Class Actions [Member] | Cecilia Letourneau [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Number of additional manufacturers found liable | manufacturer			2	2
Court-estimated number of members in class | plaintiff			918,000	918,000
Canada [Member] | Smoking And Health Class Actions [Member] | Cecilia Letourneau [Member] | Judicial Ruling [Member] | Imperial Tobacco Ltd., Rothmans, Benson And Hedges Inc., And JTI Macdonald Corp. [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Punitive damages awarded			$ 131,000,000	$ 93,000,000
Canada [Member] | Smoking And Health Class Actions [Member] | Cecilia Letourneau [Member] | Judicial Ruling [Member] | RBH [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Punitive damages awarded			$ 46,000,000	$ 32,600,000
Punitive damages, value	$ 57,000,000	$ 40,400,000
Latin America & Canada [Member] | Smoking And Health Class Actions [Member] | Cecilia Letourneau & Conseil Quebecois Sur La Tabac Et La Sante and Jean-Yves Blais Cases [Member] | Appellate Ruling [Member] | RBH [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Amount of litigation charge | $									$ 194,000,000

XML

Income Taxes (Details) - USD ($) $ in Millions	3 Months Ended		12 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2020	Mar. 31, 2019	Dec. 31, 2020	Dec. 31, 2019
Income Taxes [Line Items]
Effective tax rate	22.60%	22.60%
Tax adjustments	$ 16
Minimum [Member]
Income Taxes [Line Items]
Statue of limitations				3 years
Maximum [Member]
Income Taxes [Line Items]
Statue of limitations				5 years
Forecast [Member]
Income Taxes [Line Items]
Effective tax rate			23.00%
RBH [Member]
Income Taxes [Line Items]
Tax adjustments		$ 49

XML

Leases (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2020

Leases [Abstract]

Lease cost components

The components of PMI’s lease cost were as follows for the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019:

	For the Three Months Ended March 31,
(in millions)	2020		2019
Operating lease cost	$	60	$	60
Short-term lease cost	13		12
Variable lease cost	8		8
Total lease cost	$	81	$	80

For the three months ended March 31, 2020, lease cost of $19 million were recorded in cost of sales and $62 million were recorded in marketing, administration and research cost. For the three months ended March 31, 2019, lease costs of $19 million were recorded in cost of sales and $61 million were recorded in marketing, administration and research cost.

XML

Stock Plans (PSU Awards) (Details) $ / shares in Units, $ in Millions	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2020 USD ($) performance_metric year $ / shares shares	Mar. 31, 2019 USD ($) $ / shares shares
Performance Shares [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Length of performance cycle period	3 years
Absolute basis	40.00%	50.00%
Annual adjusted operating income growth rate, excluding acquisitions		30.00%
Currency-neutral compound annual adjusted diluted earnings per share growth rate	30.00%
Performance against specific measures of transformation	30.00%	20.00%
Performance metrics predefined at time of grant | performance_metric	3
Number of shares of common stock issued for each vested PSU (in shares) | shares	1
Aggregate weighted performance factor	100.00%
Number of Shares Granted (in shares) | shares	643,640	625,200
Compensation Expense Related to Awards	$ 23	$ 18
Risk-free interest rate	1.40%	2.40%
Expected volatility	23.50%	21.40%
Share-based Payment Arrangement, Nonvested Award, Cost Not yet Recognized, Amount	$ 60
Minimum retirement age | year	58
Stock awards vested during period (in shares) | shares	343,806
Performance Shares [Member] | Grant Date Fair Value [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Fair value of vested stock awards	$ 35
Performance Shares [Member] | Total Fair Value [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Fair value of vested stock awards	$ 30
Performance Shares [Member] | Minimum [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Award vesting rights, percentage	0.00%
Performance Shares [Member] | Maximum [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Award vesting rights, percentage	200.00%
Performance Share Units, Other Performance Factors [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value Per RSU Award Granted (in dollars per share) | $ / shares	$ 86.69	$ 77.20
Performance Share Units, TSR Relative To Customer Peer Group [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value Per RSU Award Granted (in dollars per share) | $ / shares	$ 79.76	$ 83.59

XML

Cover Page - shares	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2020	Apr. 23, 2020
Entity Information [Line Items]
Document Type	10-Q
Document Quarterly Report	true
Document Period End Date	Mar. 31, 2020
Document Transition Report	false
Entity File Number	001-33708
Entity Registrant Name	Philip Morris International Inc.
Entity Central Index Key	0001413329
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--12-31
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2020
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q1
Amendment Flag	false
Entity Incorporation, State or Country Code	VA
Entity Tax Identification Number	13-3435103
Entity Address, Address Line One	120 Park Avenue
Entity Address, City or Town	New York
Entity Address, State or Province	NY
Entity Address, Postal Zip Code	10017
City Area Code	(917)
Local Phone Number	663-2000
Entity Current Reporting Status	Yes
Entity Interactive Data Current	Yes
Entity Filer Category	Large Accelerated Filer
Entity Small Business	false
Entity Emerging Growth Company	false
Entity Shell Company	false
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding		1,557,129,538
Common Stock [Member]
Entity Information [Line Items]
Title of 12(b) Security	Common Stock, no par value
Trading Symbol	PM
Security Exchange Name	NYSE
1.875% Notes due 2021 - 1 [Member]
Entity Information [Line Items]
Title of 12(b) Security	1.875% Notes due 2021
Trading Symbol	PM21B
Security Exchange Name	NYSE
1.875% Notes due 2021 - 2 [Member]
Entity Information [Line Items]
Title of 12(b) Security	1.875% Notes due 2021
Trading Symbol	PM21C
Security Exchange Name	NYSE
4.125% Notes due 2021 [Member]
Entity Information [Line Items]
Title of 12(b) Security	4.125% Notes due 2021
Trading Symbol	PM21
Security Exchange Name	NYSE
2.900% Notes due 2021 [Member]
Entity Information [Line Items]
Title of 12(b) Security	2.900% Notes due 2021
Trading Symbol	PM21A
Security Exchange Name	NYSE
2.625% Notes due 2022 [Member]
Entity Information [Line Items]
Title of 12(b) Security	2.625% Notes due 2022
Trading Symbol	PM22A
Security Exchange Name	NYSE
2.375% Notes due 2022 [Member]
Entity Information [Line Items]
Title of 12(b) Security	2.375% Notes due 2022
Trading Symbol	PM22B
Security Exchange Name	NYSE
2.500% Notes due 2022 - 1 [Member]
Entity Information [Line Items]
Title of 12(b) Security	2.500% Notes due 2022
Trading Symbol	PM22
Security Exchange Name	NYSE
2.500% Notes due 2022 - 2 [Member]
Entity Information [Line Items]
Title of 12(b) Security	2.500% Notes due 2022
Trading Symbol	PM22C
Security Exchange Name	NYSE
2.625% Notes due 2023 [Member]
Entity Information [Line Items]
Title of 12(b) Security	2.625% Notes due 2023
Trading Symbol	PM23
Security Exchange Name	NYSE
2.125% Notes due 2023 [Member]
Entity Information [Line Items]
Title of 12(b) Security	2.125% Notes due 2023
Trading Symbol	PM23B
Security Exchange Name	NYSE
3.600% Notes due 2023 [Member]
Entity Information [Line Items]
Title of 12(b) Security	3.600% Notes due 2023
Trading Symbol	PM23A
Security Exchange Name	NYSE
2.875% Notes due 2024 - 1 [Member]
Entity Information [Line Items]
Title of 12(b) Security	2.875% Notes due 2024
Trading Symbol	PM24
Security Exchange Name	NYSE
2.875% Notes due 2024 - 2 [Member]
Entity Information [Line Items]
Title of 12(b) Security	2.875% Notes due 2024
Trading Symbol	PM24C
Security Exchange Name	NYSE
0.625% Notes due 2024 [Member]
Entity Information [Line Items]
Title of 12(b) Security	0.625% Notes due 2024
Trading Symbol	PM24B
Security Exchange Name	NYSE
3.250% Notes due 2024 [Member]
Entity Information [Line Items]
Title of 12(b) Security	3.250% Notes due 2024
Trading Symbol	PM24A
Security Exchange Name	NYSE
2.750% Notes due 2025 [Member]
Entity Information [Line Items]
Title of 12(b) Security	2.750% Notes due 2025
Trading Symbol	PM25
Security Exchange Name	NYSE
3.375% Notes due 2025 [Member]
Entity Information [Line Items]
Title of 12(b) Security	3.375% Notes due 2025
Trading Symbol	PM25A
Security Exchange Name	NYSE
2.750% Notes due 2026 [Member]
Entity Information [Line Items]
Title of 12(b) Security	2.750% Notes due 2026
Trading Symbol	PM26A
Security Exchange Name	NYSE
2.875% Notes due 2026 [Member]
Entity Information [Line Items]
Title of 12(b) Security	2.875% Notes due 2026
Trading Symbol	PM26
Security Exchange Name	NYSE
0.125% Notes due 2026 [Member]
Entity Information [Line Items]
Title of 12(b) Security	0.125% Notes due 2026
Trading Symbol	PM26B
Security Exchange Name	NYSE
3.125% Notes due 2027 [Member]
Entity Information [Line Items]
Title of 12(b) Security	3.125% Notes due 2027
Trading Symbol	PM27
Security Exchange Name	NYSE
3.125% Notes due 2028 [Member]
Entity Information [Line Items]
Title of 12(b) Security	3.125% Notes due 2028
Trading Symbol	PM28
Security Exchange Name	NYSE
2.875% Notes due 2029 [Member]
Entity Information [Line Items]
Title of 12(b) Security	2.875% Notes due 2029
Trading Symbol	PM29
Security Exchange Name	NYSE
3.375% Notes due 2029 [Member]
Entity Information [Line Items]
Title of 12(b) Security	3.375% Notes due 2029
Trading Symbol	PM29A
Security Exchange Name	NYSE
0.800% Notes due 2031 [Member]
Entity Information [Line Items]
Title of 12(b) Security	0.800% Notes due 2031
Trading Symbol	PM31
Security Exchange Name	NYSE
3.125% Notes due 2033 [Member]
Entity Information [Line Items]
Title of 12(b) Security	3.125% Notes due 2033
Trading Symbol	PM33
Security Exchange Name	NYSE
2.000% Notes due 2036 [Member]
Entity Information [Line Items]
Title of 12(b) Security	2.000% Notes due 2036
Trading Symbol	PM36
Security Exchange Name	NYSE
1.875% Notes due 2037 [Member]
Entity Information [Line Items]
Title of 12(b) Security	1.875% Notes due 2037
Trading Symbol	PM37A
Security Exchange Name	NYSE
6.375% Notes due 2038 [Member]
Entity Information [Line Items]
Title of 12(b) Security	6.375% Notes due 2038
Trading Symbol	PM38
Security Exchange Name	NYSE
1.450% Notes due 2039 [Member]
Entity Information [Line Items]
Title of 12(b) Security	1.450% Notes due 2039
Trading Symbol	PM39
Security Exchange Name	NYSE
4.375% Notes due 2041 [Member]
Entity Information [Line Items]
Title of 12(b) Security	4.375% Notes due 2041
Trading Symbol	PM41
Security Exchange Name	NYSE
4.500% Notes due 2042 [Member]
Entity Information [Line Items]
Title of 12(b) Security	4.500% Notes due 2042
Trading Symbol	PM42
Security Exchange Name	NYSE
3.875% Notes due 2042 [Member]
Entity Information [Line Items]
Title of 12(b) Security	3.875% Notes due 2042
Trading Symbol	PM42A
Security Exchange Name	NYSE
4.125% Notes due 2043 [Member]
Entity Information [Line Items]
Title of 12(b) Security	4.125% Notes due 2043
Trading Symbol	PM43
Security Exchange Name	NYSE
4.875% Notes due 2043 [Member]
Entity Information [Line Items]
Title of 12(b) Security	4.875% Notes due 2043
Trading Symbol	PM43A
Security Exchange Name	NYSE
4.250% Notes due 2044 [Member]
Entity Information [Line Items]
Title of 12(b) Security	4.250% Notes due 2044
Trading Symbol	PM44
Security Exchange Name	NYSE

XML

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets - USD ($) $ in Millions	Mar. 31, 2020	Dec. 31, 2019
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$ 3,746	$ 6,861
Trade receivables (less allowances of $19 in 2020 and $20 in 2019)	2,785	3,080
Other receivables	549	637
Inventories:
Leaf tobacco	2,012	2,052
Other raw materials	2,155	1,596
Finished product	4,878	5,587
Total inventory, net	9,045	9,235
Other current assets	736	701
Total current assets	16,861	20,514
Property, plant and equipment, at cost	13,700	14,446
Less: accumulated depreciation	7,593	7,815
Total property, plant and equipment, net	6,107	6,631
Goodwill (Note 4)	5,284	5,858
Other intangible assets, net (Note 4)	1,850	2,113
Investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries and equity securities (Notes 11&14)	4,390	4,635
Deferred income taxes	1,113	1,153
Other assets	1,889	1,971
TOTAL ASSETS	37,494	42,875
LIABILITIES
Short-term borrowings (Note 10)	1,438	338
Current portion of long-term debt (Note 10)	1,933	4,051
Accounts payable	2,073	2,299
Accrued liabilities:
Marketing and selling	645	666
Taxes, except income taxes	5,058	5,837
Employment costs	783	1,042
Dividends payable	1,832	1,831
Other	2,011	1,973
Income taxes	811	796
Total current liabilities	16,584	18,833
Long-term debt (Note 10)	24,999	26,656
Deferred income taxes	838	908
Employment costs	3,560	3,634
Income taxes and other liabilities	2,576	2,443
Total liabilities	48,557	52,474
Contingencies (Note 8)
STOCKHOLDERS’ (DEFICIT) EQUITY
Common stock, no par value (2,109,316,331 shares issued in 2020 and 2019)	0	0
Additional paid-in capital	1,992	2,019
Earnings reinvested in the business	30,984	30,987
Accumulated other comprehensive losses	(10,774)	(9,363)
Total stockholders' equity before treasury stock	22,202	23,643
Less: cost of repurchased stock (552,210,107 and 553,421,668 shares in 2020 and 2019, respectively)	35,146	35,220
Total PMI stockholders’ deficit	(12,944)	(11,577)
Noncontrolling interests	1,881	1,978
Total stockholders’ deficit	(11,063)	(9,599)
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ (DEFICIT) EQUITY	$ 37,494	$ 42,875

XML

Product Warranty

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2020

Guarantees and Product Warranties [Abstract]

Product Warranty

Product Warranty:

PMI's IQOS devices are subject to standard product warranties generally for a period of 12 months from the date of purchase or such other periods as required by law. PMI generally provides in cost of sales for the estimated cost of warranty in the period the related revenue is recognized. PMI assesses the adequacy of its accrued product warranties and adjusts the amounts as necessary based on actual experience and changes in future estimates. Factors that affect product warranties may vary across markets but typically include device version mix, product failure rates, logistics and service delivery costs, and warranty policies. PMI accounts for its product warranties within other accrued liabilities. At March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, these amounts were as follows:

(in millions)	At March 31, 2020			At December 31, 2019
Balance at beginning of period	$	140		$	67
Changes due to:
Warranties issued	84			303
Settlements	(66		)	(230		)
Currency	—			—
Balance at end of period	$	158		$	140

XML

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' (Deficit) Equity - USD ($) $ in Millions	Total	Common Stock [Member]	Additional Paid-in Capital [Member]	Earnings Reinvested in the Business [Member]	Accumulated Other Comprehensive Losses [Member]	Cost of Repurchased Stock [Member]	Noncontrolling Interests [Member]
Beginning balance at Dec. 31, 2018	$ (10,739)	$ 0	$ 1,939	$ 31,014	$ (10,111)	$ (35,301)	$ 1,720
Increase (Decrease) in Stockholders' Equity [Roll Forward]
Net earnings	1,464			1,354			110
Other comprehensive earnings (losses), net of income taxes	344				345		(1)
Other comprehensive earnings (losses), net of income taxes	873
Issuance of stock awards	43		(32)			75
Dividends declared	(1,780)			(1,780)
Payments to noncontrolling interests	(46)						(46)
Deconsolidation of RBH (Note 19)	529				529
Ending balance at Mar. 31, 2019	(10,185)	0	1,907	30,588	(9,237)	(35,226)	1,783
Beginning balance at Dec. 31, 2019	(9,599)	0	2,019	30,987	(9,363)	(35,220)	1,978
Increase (Decrease) in Stockholders' Equity [Roll Forward]
Net earnings	1,987			1,826			161
Other comprehensive earnings (losses), net of income taxes	(1,491)				(1,411)		(80)
Issuance of stock awards	49		(25)			74
Dividends declared	(1,829)			(1,829)
Payments to noncontrolling interests	(182)						(182)
Other	2		(2)				4
Ending balance at Mar. 31, 2020	$ (11,063)	$ 0	$ 1,992	$ 30,984	$ (10,774)	$ (35,146)	$ 1,881

XML

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Losses

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2020

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net of Tax [Abstract]

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Losses

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Losses:

PMI’s accumulated other comprehensive losses, net of taxes, consisted of the following:

 

(in millions)	At March 31, 2020			At December 31, 2019			At March 31, 2019
Currency translation adjustments	$	(7,039	)	$	(5,537	)	$	(5,711	)
Pension and other benefits	(3,755		)	(3,829		)	(3,556		)
Derivatives accounted for as hedges	20			3			30
Total accumulated other comprehensive losses	$	(10,774	)	$	(9,363	)	$	(9,237	)

Reclassifications from Other Comprehensive Earnings

The movements in accumulated other comprehensive losses and the related tax impact, for each of the components above, that are due to current period activity and reclassifications to the income statement, including those related to the deconsolidation of RBH, are shown on the condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive earnings for the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019. For additional information, see Note 3. Benefit Plans for disclosures related to PMI's pension and other benefits, Note 5. Financial Instruments for disclosures related to derivative financial instruments and Note 19. Deconsolidation of RBH for disclosures related to the deconsolidation of RBH.