10-K

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

þ   ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For The Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2013

o    TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File No. 333-146316

KRAIG BIOCRAFT LABORATORIES, INC.

(Exact name of issuer as specified in its charter)

Wyoming	83-0459707
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S.  Employer Identification No.)
120 N. Washington Square, Suite 805, Lansing, Michigan	48933
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (517) 336-0807

Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:  None.

Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:  None.

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.  Yes o    No  þ

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.  Yes o   No   þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes  þ   No  o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes  þ   No  o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.   þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer	o	Accelerated filer	o
Non-accelerated filer	o	Smaller reporting company	þ
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes  o   No  þ

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant on June 30, 2013 was approximately $16,561,885.  The aggregate market value was computed by reference to the last sale price of such common equity as of that date.

As of April 14, 2014, the registrant had654,605,270shares issued and outstanding.

Documents Incorporated by Reference: None.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		PAGE
PART I		3
ITEM 1.	DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS		3
ITEM 2.	DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY		8
ITEM 3.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS		8
ITEM 4.	MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES		8
PART II			8
ITEM 5.	MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY; RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES		8
ITEM 7.	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS		9
ITEM 8.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA		F-1
ITEM 9.	CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE		13
ITEM 9A.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES		13
ITEM 9B.	OTHER INFORMATION		14
PART III			15
ITEM 10.	DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE		15
ITEM 11.	EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION		16
ITEM 12.	SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS		18
ITEM 13.	CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE		19
ITEM 14.	PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES		20
PART IV			21
ITEM 15.	EXHIBITS		21
SIGNATURES			22

2

“Kraig”, “Kraig Biocraft” “KBLB”, “the Company”, “we”, “us” and “our” refer to Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc., a Wyoming corporation, unless the context otherwise requires.

PART I

ITEM 1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS.

Overview

Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc. is a corporation organized under the laws of Wyoming on April 25, 2006. We were organized to develop high strength fibers using recombinant DNA technology, for commercial applications in both the specialty fiber and technical textile industries. Specialty fibers are engineered for specific uses that require exceptional strength, flexibility, heat resistance and/or chemical resistance. The specialty fiber market is exemplified by two synthetic fiber products: aramid fibers and ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene fiber. The technical textile industry involves products for both industrial and consumer products, such as filtration fabrics, medical textiles (e.g., sutures and artificial ligaments), safety and protective clothing and fabrics used in military and aerospace applications (e.g., high-strength composite materials).

We are using genetic engineering technologies to develop fibers with greater strength, resiliency and flexibility for use in our target markets, namely the textile, specialty fiber and technical textile industries.

Recent Developments

On October 15, 2013, the Company entered into an intellectual property agreement with a scientific researcher relating to the development of new recombinant silk fibers.  Under the terms of that agreement the scientific researcher will transfer to the Company his rights to intellectual property, inventions and trade secrets which the researcher develops relating to recombinant silk.  The researcher will receive 8,000,000 warrants of the Company’s stock, exercisable 24 months from the date of the agreement.  The researcher will also receive additional warrants when and if the researcher develops advanced recombinant silk fibers for the Company’s use.  Under the terms of the agreement the researcher will receive 10,000,000 warrants in the event that he develops a new recombinant silk fiber with certain performance characteristics, and another 10,000,000 warrants if he develops a second recombinant silk fiber with certain characteristics.  If the consultant performs the contract in good faith the consultant will be entitled to an additional 8,000 warrants.  The warrants described in this note all contain a cashless exercise provision and are exercisable on the 24 month anniversary of the date on which they were issuable under the agreement.

On February 17, 2014, the Company entered into two consulting agreements with two consultants for independent technical expertise to further the Company’s business plans and scientific research and development.  As consideration for the services performed, the Company agrees to issue the following to each of the consultants:

●   Within 30 days of the date of this agreement, a warrant for six hundred thousand shares of the Company’s common stock to be exercisable on the 14 month anniversary of this agreement for a period of 12 months with a cashless exercise provision.

●   Within 30 days of the date of this agreement, a warrant for one million shares of the Company’s common stock to be exercisable on the 20 month anniversary of this agreement for a period of 12 months with a cashless exercise provision.

●   Within 30 days of the date of this agreement, a warrant for two million shares of the Company’s common stock to be exercisable on the 32 month anniversary of this agreement for a period of 12 months with a cashless exercise provision.

●   Based on the consultants reaching two sets of benchmarks, two separate warrants for one million five hundred thousand shares of the Company’s common stock to be exercisable on the 28 month anniversary of this agreement for a period of 12 months with a cashless exercise provision.

●   On the three year anniversary, assuming the consultant acted in good faith and the Company’s board of directors approval, a warrant for one million five hundred thousand shares of the Company’s common stock to be exercisable on the 28 month anniversary of this agreement for a period of 12 months with a cashless exercise provision.

3

The Market

We are focusing our work on the creation of new fibers with unique properties including fibers with potential high performance and technical fiber applications. The performance fiber market is exemplified by two classes of product: aramid fibers, and ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene fiber. These products service the need for materials with high strength, resilience, and flexibility. Because these synthetic performance fibers are stronger and tougher than steel, they are used in a wide variety of military, industrial, and consumer applications.

Among the users of performance fibers are the military and police, which employ them for ballistic protection. The materials are also used for industrial applications requiring superior strength and toughness, i.e. critical cables and abrasion/impact resistant components. Performance fibers are also employed in safety equipment, high strength composite materials for the aero-space industry and for ballistic protection by the defense industry.

The global market for technical textiles has been estimated at $127 billion.

These are industrial materials which have become essential products for both industrial and consumer applications. The market for technical textiles can be defined as consisting of:

● Medical textiles;

● Geotextiles;

● Textiles used in Defense and Military;

● Safe and Protective Clothing;

● Filtration Textiles;

● Textiles used in Transportation;

● Textiles used in Buildings;

● Composites with Textile Structure;

● Functional and Sportive Textiles.

We believe that the superior mechanical characteristics of the next generation of protein-based polymers (in other words, genetically engineered silk fibers), will open up new applications for the technology. The materials which we are working to produce are many times tougher and stronger than steel. These fibers are often referred to as “super fibers.”

The Product

Certain fibers produced in nature possess unique mechanical properties in terms of strength, resilience and flexibility.

4

Comparison of the Properties of Spider Silk and Steel

	Material Toughness1		Tensile Strength2		Weight3
Dragline spider silk		120,000-160,000		1,100-2,900		1.18-1.36
Steel		2,000-6,000		300-2,000		7.84

_______________

1 Measured by the energy required to break a continuous filament, expressed in joules per kilogram (J/kg). A .357 caliber bullet has approximately 925 joules of kinetic energy at impact.

2 Tensile strength refers to the greatest longitudinal stress the fiber can bear, measured by force over area in units of newtons per square meter. The measurement here is in millions of pascals.

3 In grams per cubic centimeter of material.

This comparison table was the result of research performed by Randolph Lewis, Ph.D. at the University of Wyoming. Such work was summarized in an article entitled “Spider Silk: Ancient Ideas for New Biomaterials” which was published in Chemicals Review, volume 106, issue 9, pages 3672 – 3774. The measurements in joules in the table above are a conversion from Dr. Lewis’ measurements in newtons/meter squared.

We believe that the genetically engineered protein-based fibers we seek to produce have properties that are in some ways superior to the materials currently available in the marketplace. For example, as noted above, the ability of spider silk to absorb in excess of 100,000 joules of kinetic energy makes it a potentially ideal material for structural blast protection.

Production of this material in commercial quantities holds the potential of a life-saving ballistic resistant material, which is lighter, thinner, more flexible, and tougher than steel. Other applications for spider silk based recombinant fibers include use as structural material and for any application in which light weight and high strength are required. We believe that fibers made with recombinant protein-based polymers will make significant inroads into the specialty fiber and technical textile markets.

While the properties of spider silks are well known, there was no known way to produce these fibers in commercial quantity. The spiders are cannibalistic, and cannot be raised in concentrated colonies.

Our Technology

While scientists have been able to replicate the proteins that are the building blocks of spider silk, the technological barrier that has stymied production until now has been the inability to form these proteins into a fiber with the desired mechanical characteristics and to do so in a cost effective manner.

We have licensed the right to use the patented genetic sequences and genetic engineering technology developed in university laboratories. The Company has been working collaboratively with university laboratories to develop fibers with the mechanical characteristics of spider silk. We are applying this proprietary genetic engineering technology to domesticated silkworms, which are already the most efficient commercial producers of silk.

Our technology builds upon the unique advantages of the domesticated silkworm for this application. The silkworm is ideally suited to produce recombinant protein fiber because it is already an efficient commercial and industrial producer of protein based polymers. Forty percent (40%) of the caterpillars’ weight is devoted to the silk glands. The silk glands produce large volumes of protein, called fibroin, which are then spun into a composite protein thread (silk).

We are working to use our genetic engineering technology to create recombinant silk polymers. On September 29, 2010, we jointly announced with the University of Notre Dame the success of our collaborative research with the University in creating approximately twenty different strains of transgenic silkworm which produce recombinant silk polymers. In April 2011, we entered into a licensing agreement with Sigma-Aldrich which provides us the use of Sigma-Aldrich’s zinc finger technology to accelerate and enhance our product development.

A part of our intellectual property portfolio is the exclusive right to use certain patented spider silk gene sequences in silkworm. Under the Exclusive License Agreement with The University of Wyoming, we have obtained certain exclusive rights to use numerous genetic sequences which are the subject of US patents.

The introduction of the gene sequence, in the manner employed by us, results in a germline transformation and is therefore self-perpetuating. This technology is in essence a protein expression platform which has other potential applications including diagnostics and pharmaceutical production.

5

The Company

Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc. (Kraig) is a Wyoming corporation. Our shares are traded on the OTCQB under the ticker symbol: KBLB . There are 654,605,270 shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of March 28, 2014. Kim Thompson, our founder and CEO, owns approximately 42.17% of the issued and outstanding common shares. There are 2 shares of super voting preferred stock issued and outstanding as of March 28, 2014. Kim Thompson owns 100% of the issued and outstanding super voting preferred shares.

The inventor of our technology concept, Kim Thompson, is the founder of Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc. Our protein expression system is, in concept, scalable, cost effective, and capable of producing a wide range of proteins and materials.

On April 8, 2011, Kraig and Sigma-Aldrich Co., an Illinois corporation (“Sigma”) entered into a License and Option Agreement. Under the terms of the agreement, Sigma will provide Kraig with its proprietary genetic engineering tools and expertise in zinc finger nuclease to enable Kraig to significantly accelerate its product development. In addition to providing the customized tools and technological know-how, Sigma has granted Kraig an option for a commercial license to use the technology in the textile, technical textile and biomedical markets. Sigma will be creating customized zinc fingers for Kraig's use in its development of spider silk polymers and technical textiles.

In September 2010 the Company announced that it had succeeded in introducing spider silk DNA in silkworm with the result that the transgenic silkworm were producing new recombinant silk fibers. These fibers are a combination of natural silkworm silk proteins and proteins that the silkworms are making as a result of the introduction of the spider silk DNA. The Company announced that it had created approximately twenty different transgenic silkworm strains producing recombinant silk.

We entered into an intellectual property and collaborative research agreement with the University of Notre Dame in 2007. That agreement was subsequently extended and expanded to include research and development of certain platform technologies with potential applications for diagnostics and pharmaceutical production. On March 20, 2010, the Company extended its agreement with Notre Dame through February 28, 2011. Pursuant to these agreements the genetic work has been conducted primarily within Notre Dame’s laboratories. On October 28, 2011, the Company entered into a license agreement with the University of Notre Dame for a term of 20 years.

We also entered into an intellectual property and sponsored research agreement with the University of Wyoming in 2006.

License Agreements/Intellectual Property

We have obtained certain rights to use a number of university created, and patented, spider silk proteins, gene sequences and methodologies.

In 2010, the University of Notre Dame filed a provisional patent application pursuant to our intellectual property and collaborative research agreement. Under the terms of that agreement the Company has an option for the exclusive commercial rights to that technology. The Company has notified the University of its exercise of that option.

We do not own any patents. We have filed approximately seven notices of intent to use trademark applications for marks which the Company intends to use in the future.

License Agreement with Notre Dame University

On October 28, 2011, the Company entered into a license agreement with the University of Notre Dame. Under the agreement, the Company received exclusive and non-exclusive rights to certain spider silk technologies including commercial rights with the right to sublicense such intellectual property.

6

In consideration of the licenses granted under the Agreement, the Company agreed to issue to the University of Notre Dame 2,200,000 shares of its common stock and to pay a royalty of 2% of net sales.

The Agreement has a term of 20 years which can be extended on an annual basis after that. It can be terminated by the University of Notre Dame if the Company defaults on its obligations under the Agreement and fails to cure such default within 90 days of a written notice by the university. The Company can terminate the Agreement upon a 90 day written notice subject to payment of a termination fee of $5,000 if the termination takes place within 2 years after its effectiveness, $10,000 if the termination takes place within 4 years after its effectiveness, and $20,000 if the Agreement is terminated after 4 years.

Exclusive License Agreement with University of Wyoming

In May 2006, we entered into a license agreement with the University of Wyoming, pursuant to which we have licensed the right to commercialize the production by silkworms of certain synthetic and natural spider silk proteins and the genetic sequencing for such spider silk proteins. These spider silk proteins and genetic sequencing are covered by patents held by the University of Wyoming. Our license allows us only to use silkworms to produce the licensed proteins and genetic sequencing. We have the right to sublicense the intellectual property that we license from the University of Wyoming. Our license agreement with the University of Wyoming requires that we pay licensing and research fees to the university in exchange for an exclusive license in our field of use for certain university-developed intellectual property including patented spider silk gene sequences. Pursuant to the agreement, we issued 17,500,000 shares of our Class A common stock to the University Foundation. Our license agreement with the University of Wyoming will continue until the later of (i) expiration of the last-to-expire patent we license from the University of Wyoming under this license agreement in such country or (ii) ten years from the date of first commercial sale of a licensed product in such country. There are no royalties payable to the University of Wyoming under the terms of our agreement with them.

We anticipate paying all accrued fees to, or making alternative arrangements with the University within the next ninety days. If we fail to make such payment the University of Wyoming could terminate our license agreement. We anticipate that such a termination would result in a loss of three to nine months of research time and result in increased research and development costs in the range of $30,000 to $140,000.

Research and Development

On September 29, 2010 we announced that we had achieved our longstanding goal of producing new silk fibers composed of recombinant proteins. The Company intends to turn our technology to the development and production of high performance polymers.

During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2012 and 2013, we have spent approximately 7,400 and 7,000 hours, respectively, on research and development activities, which consisted primarily of laboratory research on genetic engineering by our outside consultants pursuant to our collaborative research agreement with the University of Notre Dame.

Employees

In fiscal year 2013 we had no employees other than Kim Thompson, our sole officer and director.  In the first quarter of 2014 we hired an office administrator. We plan to hire more persons on as-needed basis.

7

ITEM 2. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY.

We rent office space at 120 N. Washington Square, Suite 805, Lansing, Michigan 48950, which is our principal place of business. Our current lease is on a month to month basis. We pay an annual rent of $600 for conference facilities, mail, fax and reception services located at our principal place of business.

We rent laboratory space in South Bend, Indiana. Our current lease is on a month to month basis. We pay an annual rent of $12,750 for laboratory space, conference facilities and reception services.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

To the best of our knowledge, there are no known or pending litigation proceedings against us.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.

Not applicable.

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.

Market Information

Our common stock has traded on the OTCQB system under the symbol “KBLB .”

The following table sets forth the high and low trade information for our Class A common stock for each quarter during the past two years. The prices reflect inter-dealer quotations, do not include retail mark-ups, markdowns or commissions and do not necessarily reflect actual transactions.

	Low Price		High Price
Fourth Quarter 2013	$	0.0465	$	0.065
Third Quarter 2013	$	0.051	$	0.086
Second Quarter 2013	$	0.06	$	0.136
First Quarter 2013	$	0.0363	$	0.1
Fourth Quarter 2012	$	0.036	$	0.043
Third Quarter 2012	$	0.034	$	0.058
Second Quarter 2012	$	0.0524	$	0.075
First Quarter 2012	$	0.075	$	0.098

8

Holders

As of March 28, 2014 in accordance with our transfer agent records, we had 25 record holders of our Class A common stock.

Dividends

To date, we have not declared or paid any dividends on our common stock. We currently do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future on our common stock. Although we intend to retain our earnings, if any, to finance the exploration and growth of our business, our Board of Directors will have the discretion to declare and pay dividends in the future.

Payment of dividends in the future will depend upon our earnings, capital requirements, and other factors, which our Board of Directors may deem relevant.

Sale of Unregistered Securities

On December 11, 2013 the Company issued 3,063,725 shares of common stock for $125,000 ($0.04/share).

On January 28, 2014 the Company issued 3,537,736 shares of common stock for $150,000 ($0.04/share).

On February 18, 2014 the Company issued 3,409,091 shares of common stock for $150,000 ($0.04/share).

On February 2, 2014, the Company issued 9,821,429 shares in connection with the exercise of 10,000,000 warrants, exercise price of $0.001, for $10,000.

On March 12, 2014 the Company issued 2,551,020 shares of common stock for $100,000 ($0.04/share).

On March 28, 2014, the Company renewed and extended a consulting agreement and has agreed to issue 44,000 shares of common stock as consideration for consulting fees owed from June 1, 2012 through March 31, 2014.

The foregoing issuances of the shares were effectuated pursuant to the exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act and/or Regulation D promulgated thereunder.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

Caution Regarding Forward-Looking Information

Certain statements contained herein, including, without limitation, statements containing the words “believes,” “anticipates,” “expects,” “plan” and words of similar import, constitute forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company, or industry results, to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.

9

Such factors include, among others, the following: international, national and local general economic and market conditions: demographic changes; the ability of the Company to sustain, manage or forecast its growth; the ability of the Company to successfully make and integrate acquisitions; raw material costs and availability; new product development and introduction; existing government regulations and changes in, or the failure to comply with, government regulations; adverse publicity; competition; the loss of significant customers or suppliers; fluctuations and difficulty in forecasting operating results; changes in business strategy or development plans; business disruptions; the ability to attract and retain qualified personnel; the ability to obtain sufficient financing to continue and expand business operations; the ability to develop technology and products; changes in technology and the development of technology and intellectual property by competitors; the ability to protect technology and develop intellectual property; and other factors referenced in this and previous filings.

Given these uncertainties, readers of this filing and investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements.

Plan of Operations

During the next twelve months, we expect to take the following steps in connection with the further development of our business and the implementation of our plan of operations:

»	We expect to spend approximately $35,000 per quarter through March 2015 on collaborative research and development of high strength polymers at the University of Notre Dame. If our financing will allow, management will give strong consideration to accelerating the pace of spending on research and development within the University of Notre Dame’s laboratories.
»	We expect to spend approximately $13,700 on collaborative research and development of high strength polymers and spider silk protein at the University of Wyoming over the next twelve months. This level of research spending at the university is also a requirement of our licensing agreement with the university. If our financing will allow, management will give strong consideration to accelerating the pace of spending on research and development within the University of Wyoming’s laboratories.
»	We will actively consider pursuing collaborative research opportunities with other university laboratories in the area of high strength polymers. If our financing will allow, management will give strong consideration to increasing the depth of our research to include polymer production technologies that are closely related to our core research
»	We will consider buying an established revenue producing company in a compatible business, in order to broaden our financial base and facilitate the commercialization of our products. We expect to use a combination of stock and cash for any such purchase.
»	We will also actively consider pursuing collaborative research opportunities with both private and university laboratories in areas of research which overlap the company’s existing research and development. One such potential area for collaborative research which the company is considering is protein expression platforms. If our financing will allow, management will give strong consideration to increasing the breadth of our research to include protein expression platform technologies.
»	We plan to actively pursue collaborative research and product testing, opportunities with companies in the biotechnology, materials, textile and other industries.
»	We plan to actively pursue collaborative commercialization, marketing and manufacturing opportunities with companies in the textile and material sectors for the fibers we developed and for any new polymers that we create in 2014.
»	We plan to actively pursue the development of commercial scale production of our recombinant materials including Monster SilkTM.

Limited Operating History

We have not previously demonstrated that we will be able to expand our business through an increased investment in our research and development efforts. We cannot guarantee that the research and development efforts described in this filing will be successful. Our business is subject to risks inherent in growing an enterprise, including limited capital resources, risks inherent in the research and development process and possible rejection of our products in development.

10

If financing is not available on satisfactory terms, we may be unable to continue expanding our operations. Equity financing will result in a dilution to existing shareholders.

Results of Operations for the Years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012.

Revenue for the twelve months ended December 31, 2013 was $0. This compares to $0 in revenue for the for the twelve month period which ended December 31, 2012.

Operating expenses for the twelve months ended December 31, 2013 were $2,280,469. This compares to $1,560,406 in expenses during the twelve month period which ended December 31, 2012. Research and development expenses for the twelve months ended December 31, 2013 were $489,434. This compares to $465,293 spent on research and development during the twelve months ended December 31, 2012. The increase in research and development spending was the result of the reimbursement nature of our collaborative research agreement with the University of Notre Dame. In addition, we had the following expenses during the twelve month period which ended December 31, 2013: general and administrative $1,375,528, professional fees $178,373, officer’s salary $237,134 and public relations $0. This compares to the same expenses during the twelve month period which ended December 31, 2012: general and administrative $379,326, professional fees $48,667, officer’s salary $267,120 and public relations $400,000.

Capital Resources and Liquidity

As of December 31, 2013 we had $295,381 in cash compared to $53,782 as of December 31, 2012.

We believe we can not satisfy our cash requirements for the next twelve months with our current cash. Completion of our plan of operation is subject to attaining adequate financing. We cannot assure investors that adequate financing will be available. In the absence of such financing, we may be unable to proceed with our plan of operations.

We anticipate that our operational, and general & administrative expenses for the next 12 months will total approximately $1,200,000. We do not anticipate the purchase or sale of any significant equipment. We also do not expect any significant additions to the number of employees. The foregoing represents our best estimate of our cash needs based on current planning and business conditions. The exact allocation, purposes and timing of any monies raised in subsequent private financings may vary significantly depending upon the exact amount of funds raised and our progress with the execution of our business plan.

In the event we are not successful in obtaining financing, we may not be able to proceed with our business plan for the commercialization of our products and further research and development of new products. We anticipate that we will incur operating losses in the foreseeable future. Therefore, our auditors have raised substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our financial statements and related public financial information are based on the application of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”). GAAP requires the use of estimates; assumptions, judgments and subjective interpretations of accounting principles that have an impact on the assets, liabilities, and revenue and expense amounts reported. These estimates can also affect supplemental information contained in our external disclosures including information regarding contingencies, risk and financial condition. We believe our use of estimates and underlying accounting assumptions adhere to GAAP and are consistently and conservatively applied. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ materially from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We continue to monitor significant estimates made during the preparation of our financial statements.

Our significant accounting policies are summarized in Note 1 of our financial statements. While all these significant accounting policies impact its financial condition and results of operations, we view certain of these policies as critical. Policies determined to be critical are those policies that have the most significant impact on our financial statements and require management to use a greater degree of judgment and estimates. Actual results may differ from those estimates. Our management believes that given current facts and circumstances, it is unlikely that applying any other reasonable judgments or estimate methodologies would cause effect on our results of operations, financial position or liquidity for the periods presented in this report.

11

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In July 2013, FASB issued ASU No. 2013-11, "Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists." The provisions of ASU No. 2013-11 require an entity to present an unrecognized tax benefit, or portion thereof, in the statement of financial position as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward or a tax credit carryforward, with certain exceptions related to availability. ASU No. 2013-11 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2013. The adoption of ASU No. 2013-11 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.

In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2013-02, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, to improve the transparency of reporting these reclassifications. Other comprehensive income includes gains and losses that are initially excluded from net income for an accounting period. Those gains and losses are later reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income into net income. The amendments in the ASU do not change the current requirements for reporting net income or other comprehensive income in financial statements. All of the information that this ASU requires already is required to be disclosed elsewhere in the financial statements under U.S. GAAP. The new amendments will require an organization to:

Present (either on the face of the statement where net income is presented or in the notes) the effects on the line items of net income of significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income - but only if the item reclassified is required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified to net income in its entirety in the same reporting period; and

Cross-reference to other disclosures currently required under U.S. GAAP for other reclassification items (that are not required under U.S. GAAP) to be reclassified directly to net income in their entirety in the same reporting period. This would be the case when a portion of the amount reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income is initially transferred to a balance sheet account (e.g., inventory for pension-related amounts) instead of directly to income or expense.

The amendments apply to all public and private companies that report items of other comprehensive income. Public companies are required to comply with these amendments for all reporting periods (interim and annual). The amendments are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012, for public companies. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU No. 2013-02 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In January 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-01, Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities, which clarifies which instruments and transactions are subject to the offsetting disclosure requirements originally established by ASU 2011-11. The new ASU addresses preparer concerns that the scope of the disclosure requirements under ASU 2011-11 was overly broad and imposed unintended costs that were not commensurate with estimated benefits to financial statement users. In choosing to narrow the scope of the offsetting disclosures, the Board determined that it could make them more operable and cost effective for preparers while still giving financial statement users sufficient information to analyze the most significant presentation differences between financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and those prepared under IFRSs. Like ASU 2011-11, the amendments in this update will be effective for fiscal periods beginning on, or after January 1, 2013. The adoption of ASU 2013-01 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In October 2012, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update ASU 2012-04, “Technical Corrections and Improvements” in Accounting Standards Update No. 2012-04. The amendments in this update cover a wide range of Topics in the Accounting Standards Codification. These amendments include technical corrections and improvements to the Accounting Standards Codification and conforming amendments related to fair value measurements. The amendments in this update will be effective for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2012. The adoption of ASU 2012-04 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In August 2012, the FASB issued ASU 2012-03, “Technical Amendments and Corrections to SEC Sections: Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 114, Technical Amendments Pursuant to SEC Release No. 33-9250, and Corrections Related to FASB Accounting Standards Update 2010-22 (SEC Update)” in Accounting Standards Update No. 2012-03. This update amends various SEC paragraphs pursuant to the issuance of SAB No. 114. The adoption of ASU 2012-03 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In July 2012, the FASB issued ASU 2012-02, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment” in Accounting Standards Update No. 2012-02. This update amends ASU 2011-08, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment and permits an entity first to assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that an indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the quantitative impairment test in accordance with Subtopic 350-30, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - General Intangibles Other than Goodwill. The amendments are effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012. Early adoption is permitted, including for annual and interim impairment tests performed as of a date before July 27, 2012, if a public entity’s financial statements for the most recent annual or interim period have not yet been issued or, for nonpublic entities, have not yet been made available for issuance. The adoption of ASU 2012-02 has not had a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements, financings, or other relationships with unconsolidated entities or other persons, also known as “special purpose entities” (SPEs).

12

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.

Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

CONTENTS

PAGE	1-2	REPORTS OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMS
PAGE	3	BALANCE SHEETS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND DECEMBER 31, 2012.
PAGE	4	STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND DECEMBER 31, 2012 AND FOR THE PERIOD APRIL 25, 2006 (INCEPTION) TO DECEMBER 31, 2013.
PAGES	5	STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT FOR THE PERIOD FROM APRIL 25, 2006 (INCEPTION) TO DECEMBER 31, 2013.
PAGE	6	STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND DECEMBER 31, 2012 AND FOR THE PERIOD APRIL 25, 2006 (INCEPTION) TO DECEMBER 31, 2013.
PAGES	7-28	NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors

Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc. (A Development Stage Company) (the Company) as of December 31, 2013 and the related statements of operations, stockholders’ deficit and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. The financial statements of Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc. as of December 31, 2012 and for the period from April 25, 2006 (inception) to December 31, 2012 were audited by other auditors whose report dated April 10, 2013 expressed an unqualified opinion on those statements.

We conducted our audit in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc. (A Development Stage Company) as of December 31, 2013 and the results of its operations and cash flows for the period described above in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 3 to the financial statements, the Company suffered a net loss from operations and has a net capital deficiency, which raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans regarding those matters are also described in Note 3. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/ M&K CPAS, PLLC

www.mkacpas.com

Houston, Texas

April 15, 2014

F-1

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors of

Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc.

Houston, Texas

We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc. (a development stage company) as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 and the related statements of income, cash flows and stockholders' equity for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 and for the period from April 25, 2006 (inception) to December 31, 2012. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit of these financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc. as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the periods then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 3 to the financial statements, the Company has suffered significant losses and will require additional capital to develop its business until the Company either (1) achieves a level of revenues adequate to generate sufficient cash flows from operations; or (2) obtains additional financing necessary to support its working capital requirements. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 2. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

PS STEPHENSON & CO, P.C.

Wharton, Texas

April 10, 2013, except for Note 2 which is December 6, 2013

F-2

Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

 Balance Sheets

ASSETS
	December 31, 2013			December 31, 2012
				(RESTATED)
Current Assets
Cash	$	295,381		$	53,782
Prepaid expenses		1,743			2,270
Loan receivable		-			6,000
Interest receivable		-			192
Total Current Assets		297,124			62,244
Property and Equipment, net		14,093			16,508
Total Assets	$	311,217		$	78,752
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
Current Liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	362,436		$	246,964
Current portion of loan payable		3,981			4,377
Royalty agreement payable - related party		64,720			66,000
Accounts payable and Accrued expenses  - related party		1,081,482			886,449
Total Current Liabilities		1,512,619			1,203,790
Long Term Liabilities
Convertible note payable - net of debt discount		-			5,000
Loan payable, net of current portion		-			4,378
Total Liabilities		1,512,619			1,213,168
Commitments and Contingencies
Stockholders' Deficit
Convertible Preferred stock Series A,  no par value;
2 and none shares issued and outstanding, respectively		5,217,800			-
Common stock Class A,  no par value; unlimited shares authorized,
635,241,994 and 604,115,638 shares issued and outstanding, respectively		7,810,920			6,360,920
Common stock Class B,  no par value; unlimited shares authorized,
no shares issued and outstanding		-			-
Common Stock Issuable, 1,122,311 and 1,122,311 shares, respectively		22,000			22,000
Additional paid-in capital		2,053,236			1,320,337
Deficit accumulated during the development stage		(16,305,358	)		(8,837,673	)
		.
Total Stockholders' Deficit		(1,201,402	)		(1,134,416	)
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficit	$	311,217		$	78,752

F-3

Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Statements of Operations

	For the Years Ended						For the Period from April 25, 2006
	December 31, 2013			December 31, 2012			(Inception) to December 31, 2013
				(RESTATED)			(RESTATED)
Revenue	$	-		$	-		$	-
Operating Expenses
General and Administrative		1,375,528			379,326			3,315,030
Public Relations		-			400,000			619,890
Amortization of Debt Discount		-			-			120,000
Professional Fees		178,373			48,667			513,448
Officer's Salary		237,134			267,120			1,840,648
Contract Settlement		-			-			107,143
Research and Development		489,434			465,293			1,791,443
Total Operating Expenses		2,280,469			1,560,406			8,307,602
Loss from Operations		(2,280,469	)		(1,560,406	)		(8,307,602	)
Other Income/(Expenses)
Gain on forgiveness of debt		6,775			-			6,775
Other income		-			3,000			7,881
Bad debt expense		(6,238	)		-			(6,238	)
Interest income		47			192			239
Loss on settlement of accrued payroll-related party		(5,187,800	)		-			(5,187,800	)
Change in fair value of embedded derivative liability		-			-			(2,790,185	)
Change in fair value of embedded derivative liability-related party		-			-			119,485
Interest expense		-			(45,707	)		(147,913	)
Total Other Income/(Expenses)		(5,187,216	)		(42,515	)		(7,997,756	)
Net (Loss) before Provision for Income Taxes		(7,467,685	)		(1,602,921	)		(16,305,358	)
Provision for Income  Taxes		-			-			-
Net (Loss)	$	(7,467,685	)	$	(1,602,921	)	$	(16,305,358	)
Net Income (Loss) Per Share  - Basic and Diluted	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.00	)
Weighted average number of shares outstanding
during the period - Basic and Diluted		616,313,968			596,143,581

F-4

Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

 Statement of Changes in Stockholders Deficit

 For the period from April 25, 2006 (inception) to December 31, 2013

														Common Stock -
														Class A Shares												Deficit
	Preferred Stock - Series A				Common Stock - Class A					Common Stock - Class B				To be issued									Deferred			Accumulated during
	Shares		Par		Shares			Par		Shares		Par		Shares			Par			APIC			Compensation			Development Stage			Total
Balance, April 25, 2006		-	$	-		-		$	-		-	$	-		-		$	-		$	-			-		$	-		$	-
Stock issued to founder		-		-		332,292,000			180		-		-		-			-			-			-			-			180
Stock issued for services ($.01/share)		-		-		17,500,000			140,000		-		-		-			-			-			-			-			140,000
Stock issued for services ($.01/share)		-		-		700,000			5,600		-		-		-			-			-			-			-			5,600
Stock contributed by shareholder		-		-		(11,666,500	)		-		-		-		-			-			-			-			-			-
Stock issued for cash ($.05/share)		-		-		4,000			200		-		-		-			-			-			-			-			200
Stock issued for cash ($.05/share)		-		-		4,000			200		-		-		-			-			-			-			-			200
Fair value of warrants issued		-		-		-			-		-		-		-			-			126,435			-			-			126,435
Net Loss		-		-		-			-		-		-		-			-			-			-			(530,321	)		(530,321	)
Balance, December 31, 2006		-		-		338,833,500			146,180		-		-		-			-			126,435			-			(530,321	)		(257,706	)
Stock issued for cash ($.01/share)		-		-		1,750,000			15,000		-		-		-			-			-			-			-			15,000
Stock issued for cash ($.01/share)		-		-		12,000,000			103,000		-		-		-			-			-			-			-			103,000
Stock issued for cash ($.0003/share)		-		-		9,000,000			3,000		-		-		-			-			-			-			-			3,000
Stock issued for cash ($.01/share)		-		-		1,875,000			15,000		-		-		-			-			-			-			-			15,000
Stock issued for cash ($.01/share)		-		-		1,875,000			15,000		-		-		-			-			-			-			-			15,000
																														-
Stock issued for services ($.01/share)		-		-		2,000,000			16,000		-		-		-			-			-			-			-			16,000
Stock issued for cash ($.01/share)		-		-		13,125,000			105,000		-		-		-			-			-			-			-			105,000
Stock issued for cash ($.003/share)		-		-		80,495,000			241,485		-		-		-			-			-			-			-			241,485
Stock issued for cash ($.003/share)		-		-		200,000			600		-		-		-			-			-			-			-			600
Stock issued for cash ($.003/share)		-		-		8,300,000			24,900		-		-		-			-			-			-			-			24,900
Stock issued for cash ($.003/share)		-		-		25,000			75		-		-		-			-			-			-			-			75
Stock issued for cash ($.003/share)		-		-		120,000			360		-		-		-			-			-			-			-			360
Stock issued for cash ($.003/share)		-		-		1,025,000			3,075				-					-			-			-			-			3,075
Stock issued in connection to cash offering		-		-		28,125,000			84,375		-		-		-			-			(84,375	)		-			-			-
Stock issued for services ($.01/share)		-		-		600,000			6,000		-		-		-			-			-			-			-			6,000
Net loss, for the year ended December 31, 2007		-		-		-			-		-		-		-			-			-			-			(472,986	)		(472,986	)
Balance, December 31, 2007		-		-		499,348,500			779,050		-		-		-			-			42,060			-			(1,003,307	)		(182,197	)
Stock issuable for services ($.01/share)		-		-		-			-		-		-		400,000			4,000			-			-			-			4,000
Net loss, for the year ended December 31, 2008		-		-		-			-		-		-		-			-			-			-			(1,721,156	)		(1,721,156	)
Balance, December 31, 2008		-		-		499,348,500			779,050		-		-		400,000			4,000			42,060			-			(2,724,463	)		(1,899,353	)
Stock issued for cash ($.01/share)		-		-		2,500,000			25,000		-		-		-			-			-			-			-			25,000
Stock issued for cash ($.008/share)		-		-		366,599			3,000		-		-		-			-			-			-			-			3,000
Stock issued for services		-		-		280,000			14,000		-		-		722,311			18,000			-			-			-			32,000
Stock issued for services		-		-		-			-		-		-		10,000,000			200,000			-			(103,333	)		-			96,667
Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2009		-		-		-			-		-		-		-			-			-			-			(1,432,091	)		(1,432,091	)
Balance, December 31, 2009		-		-		502,495,099			821,050		-		-		11,122,311			222,000			42,060			(103,333	)		(4,156,554	)		(3,174,777	)
Stock issued for services ($.01/share)		-		-		540,000			5,400		-		-		-			-			-			(5,000	)		-			400
Stock issued for services ($.02/share)		-		-		17,885,915			334,000		-		-		-			-			-			-			-			334,000
Stock issued for services ($.08/share)		-		-		387,500			31,000		-		-		-			-			-			-			-			31,000
Stock issued for services ($.15/share)		-		-		200,000			30,000		-		-		-			-			-			-			-			30,000
Stock issued for services ($.05/share)		-		-		280,000			14,000		-		-		-			-			-			-			-			14,000
Warrants issued for services		-		-		-			-		-		-		-			-			168,000			(168,000	)		-			-
Stock issued in connection with convertible note conversion		-		-		5,694,451			100,000		-		-		-			-			-			-			-			100,000
Stock issued in connection with convertible note conversion		-		-		854,169			15,000		-		-		-			-			-			-			-			15,000
Stock issued for cash ($.02/share)		-		-		10,000,000			200,000		-		-		(10,000,000	)		(200,000	)		-			-			-			-
Stock issued for cash ($.01/share)		-		-		4,000,000			28,632		-		-		-			-			-			-			-			28,632
Stock issued for cash ($.02/share)		-		-		4,513,116			70,000		-		-		-			-			-			-			-			70,000
Stock issued for cash ($.08/share)		-		-		1,179,245			100,000		-		-		-			-			-			-			-			100,000
Stock issued for cash ($.06/share)		-		-		1,157,407			75,000		-		-		-			-			-			-			-			75,000
Exercise of 6,000,000 warrants in exchange for stock		-		-		5,177,801			10,000		-		-		-			-			677,908			-			-			687,908
Deferred compensation realized		-		-		-			-		-		-		-			-			-			250,333			-			250,333
Forgiveness of accrued payable to related party		-		-		-			-		-		-		-			-			499,412									499,412
Forgiveness of derivative liability to related party		-		-		-			-		-		-		-			-			2,102,795									2,102,795
Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2010		-		-		-			-		-		-		-			-			-			-			(1,782,888	)		(1,782,888	)
Balance, December 31, 2010		-		-		554,364,703			1,834,082		-		-		1,122,311			22,000			3,490,175			(26,000	)		(5,939,442	)		(619,185	)
Stock issued for cash ($.06/share)		-		-		1,470,588			100,000		-		-		-			-			-			-			-			100,000
Stock issued for cash ($.05/share)		-		-		2,083,333			100,000		-		-		-			-			-			-			-			100,000
Stock issued for services ($.07/share)		-		-		1,000,000			70,000		-		-		-			-			-			-			-			70,000
Stock issued for services ($.07/share)		-		-		1,029,412			70,000		-		-		-			-			-			-			-			70,000
Stock issued for cash ($.07/share)		-		-		1,420,455			100,000		-		-		-			-			-			-			-			100,000
Stock issued for cash ($0.07/share)		-		-		1,372,119			100,000		-		-		-			-			-			-			-			100,000
Stock issued for cash ($0.08/share)		-		-		1,314,406			100,000		-		-		-			-			-			-			-			100,000
Stock issued for cash ($0.06/share)		-		-		1,543,210			100,000		-		-		-			-			-			-			-			100,000
Stock issued for license ($0.11/share)		-		-		2,200,000			242,000		-		-		-			-			-			-			-			242,000
Exercise of 20,000,000 warrants in exchange for stock		-		-		19,767,985			2,569,838		-		-		-			-			(2,569,838	)		-			-			-
Deferred compensation realized		-		-		-			-		-		-		-			-			-			26,000			-			26,000
Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2011		-		-		-			-		-		-		-			-			-			-			(1,295,310	)		(1,295,310	)
Balance, December 31, 2011		-		-		587,566,211			5,385,920		-		-		1,122,311			22,000			920,337			-			(7,234,752	)		(906,495	)
Stock issued for cash ($0.06/share)		-		-		1,562,500			100,000		-		-		-			-			-			-			-			100,000
Stock issued for cash ($0.04/share)		-		-		2,403,846			100,000		-		-		-			-			-			-			-			100,000
Stock issued for cash ($0.05/share)		-		-		1,923,077			100,000		-		-		-			-			-			-			-			100,000
Stock issued for cash ($0.04/share)		-		-		2,155,172			100,000		-		-		-			-			-			-			-			100,000
Stock issued for cash ($0.02/share)		-		-		1,004,832			25,000		-		-		-			-			-			-			-			25,000
Shares issued for services ($0.10/share)		-		-		3,000,000			300,000		-		-		-			-			-			-			-			300,000
Shares issued for services ($0.06/share)		-		-		300,000			18,000		-		-		-			-			-			-			-			18,000
Shares issued for services ($0.06/share)		-		-		1,600,000			96,000		-		-		-			-			-			-			-			96,000
Shares issued for services ($0.06/share)		-		-		1,600,000			96,000		-		-		-			-			-			-			-			96,000
Shares issued for services ($0.04/Share)		-		-		1,000,000			40,000		-		-		-			-			-			-			-			40,000
Grant 100,000,000 warrants for services		-		-		-			-		-		-		-			-			400,000			-			-			400,000
Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2012		-		-		-			-		-		-		-			-			-			-			(1,602,921	)		(1,602,921	)
Balance, December 31, 2012		-		-		604,115,638			6,360,920		-		-		1,122,311			22,000			1,320,337			-			(8,837,673	)		(1,134,416	)
Stock issued for cash ($0.05/share)		-		-		961,538			50,000		-		-		-			-			-			-			-			50,000
Stock issued for cash ($0.05/share)		-		-		945,537			50,000		-		-		-			-			-			-			-			50,000
Stock issued for cash ($0.06/share)		-		-		822,368			50,000		-		-		-			-			-			-			-			50,000
Stock issued for cash ($0.08/share)		-		-		884,434			75,000		-		-		-			-			-			-			-			75,000
Stock issued for cash ($0.06/share)		-		-		3,521,126			200,000		-		-		-			-			-			-			-			200,000
Stock issued for cash ($0.05/share)		-		-		1,838,235			100,000		-		-		-			-			-			-			-			100,000
Stock issued for cash ($0.05/share)		-		-		1,923,077			100,000		-		-		-			-			-			-			-			100,000
Stock issued for cash ($0.05/share)		-		-		2,100,840			100,000		-		-		-			-			-			-			-			100,000
Stock issued for cash ($0.04/share)		-		-		5,208,334			200,000		-		-		-			-			-			-			-			200,000
Stock issued for cash ($0.04/share)		-		-		3,063,725			125,000		-		-		-			-			-			-			-			125,000
Exercise of 10,000,000 warrants in exchange for stock		-		-		9,857,142			400,000		-		-		-			-			(400,000	)		-			-			-
Preferred Stock issued  for settlement of accrued  payroll-related party		2		5,217,800		-			-		-		-		-			-			-			-			-			5,217,800
Grant 10,000,000 warrants for services		-		-		-			-		-		-		-			-			736,816			-			-			736,816
Grant 8,000,000 warrants for services, net of M2M adjustment for unvested warrants		-		-		-			-		-		-		-			-			396,083			-			-			396,083
Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2013		-		-		-			-		-		-		-			-			-			-			(7,467,685	)		(7,467,685	)
Balance, December 31, 2013		2	$	5,217,800		635,241,994		$	7,810,920		-	$	-		1,122,311		$	22,000		$	2,053,236		$	-		$	(16,305,358	)	$	(1,201,402	)

F-5

Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

 Statements of Cash Flows

							For the Period from
							April 25, 2006
							(Inception) to
	For the Year Ended December 31,						December 31,
	2013			2012			2013
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:				(RESTATED)			(RESTATED)
Net Loss	$	(7,467,685	)	$	(1,602,921	)	$	(16,305,358	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operations
Depreciation expense		5,888			5,583			17,294
Gain on forgiveness of debt		(6,775	)					(6,775	)
Stock issuable for services		-			-			22,000
Loss on settlement of accrued payroll - related party		5,187,800			-			5,187,800
Change in Fair Value of Derivative Liability		-			-			2,790,703
Stock issued for services		-			550,000			1,458,180
Warrants issued to employees		-			-			126,435
Warrants issued to consultants		1,132,899			400,000			1,700,899
Deferred compensation realized		-			-			200,000
Bad debt expense		6,238			-			6,238
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
(Decrease) in interest receivable		(46)			0			(46)
(Increase) Decrease in prepaid expenses		527			(2,270	)		(1,743	)
Increase in accrued expenses and other payables - related party		223,749			235,377			1,593,349
Increase in accounts payable		117,251			(148,691	)		446,477
Net Cash Used In Operating Activities		(800,154	)		(562,922	)		(2,764,547	)
Cash Flows From Investing Activities:
Loan receivable		-			-			(6,000	)
Interest receivable		-			(192	)		(192	)
Purchase of Fixed Assets and Domain Name		(3,473	)		-			(31,387	)
Net Cash Used In Investing Activities		(3,473	)		(192	)		(37,579	)
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:
Proceeds from Notes Payable - Stockholder		150,000			-			150,000
Repayments of Notes Payable - Stockholder		(150,000	)		-			(150,000	)
Proceeds from issuance of convertible note		-			-			120,000
Repayments of loan payable		(4,774	)		(3,513	)		3,980
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		1,050,000			425,000			2,973,527
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities		1,045,226			421,487			3,097,507
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash		241,599			(141,627	)		295,381
Cash at Beginning of Period		53,782			195,409			-
Cash at End of Period	$	295,381		$	53,782		$	295,381
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid for interest	$	-		$	-		$	-
Cash paid for taxes	$	-		$	-		$	-
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities:
Shares issued in connection with cashless warrants exercise	$	400,000		$	-		$	2,969,838
Shares issued for settlement of accrued payroll - related party	$	30,000		$	-		$	30,000
Shares issued in connection with convertible note payable	$	-		$	-		$	115,000
Beneficial conversion feature on convertible notes and related debt discount	$	-		$	-		$	120,000

F-6

KRAIG BIOCRAFT LABORATORIES, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

NOTE 1SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ORGANIZATION

(A)  Organization

Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc. (a development stage company) (the "Company") was incorporated under the laws of the State of Wyoming on April 25, 2006. The Company was organized to develop high strength, protein based fiber, using recombinant DNA technology, for commercial applications in the textile and specialty fiber industries.

Activities during the development stage include developing the business plan and raising capital.

(B) Use of Estimates

In preparing financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and revenues and expenses during the reported period.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.

(C) Cash

For purposes of the cash flow statements, the Company considers all highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents.  There were no cash equivalents as of December 31, 2013 or 2012.

(D) Loss Per Share

Basic and diluted net loss per common share is computed based upon the weighted average common shares outstanding as defined by FASB Accounting Standards Codification No. 260, “Earnings per Share.”  As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, warrants were not included in the computation of income/ (loss) per share because their inclusion is anti-dilutive.

The computation of basic and diluted loss per share at December 31, 2013 and 2012 excludes the common stock equivalents of the following potentially dilutive securities because their inclusion would be anti-dilutive:

	December 31, 2013		December 31, 2012
Stock Warrants (Exercise price - $0.001/share)		18,000,000		10,000,000
Convertible Preferred Stock		2		2
Total		18,000,002		18,000,002

(E) Research and Development Costs

The Company expenses all research and development costs as incurred for which there is no alternative future use. These costs also include the expensing of employee compensation and employee stock based compensation.

(F) Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes under FASB Codification Topic 740-10-25 (“ASC 740-10-25”).  Under ASC 740-10-25, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases.  Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.  Under ASC 740-10-25, the effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

F-7

KRAIG BIOCRAFT LABORATORIES, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

The net deferred tax liability in the accompanying balance sheets includes the following amounts of deferred tax assets and liabilities:

	2013		2012
Expected income tax recovery (expense) at the statutory rate of 34%	$	(2,539,012)	$	(544,999)
Tax effect of expenses that are not deductible for income tax purposes (net of other amounts deductible for tax purposes)		2,153,127		324,053
Change in valuation allowance		385,853		220,946
Provision for income taxes	$	-	$	-

The components of deferred income taxes are as follows:

	Years Ended December,
	2013			2012
Deferred tax liability:	$	-		$	-
Deferred tax asset
Net Operating Loss Carryforward		2,415,595			2,029,742
Valuation allowance		(2,415,595	)		(2,029,742	)
Net deferred tax asset		-			-
Net deferred tax liability	$	-		$	-

The valuation allowance was established to reduce the deferred tax asset to the amount that will more likely than not be realized. This is necessary due to the Company’s continued operating losses and the uncertainty of the Company’s ability to utilize all of the net operating loss carryforwards before they will expire through the year 2033.

The net change in the valuation allowance for the year ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 was an increase of $385,853 and $220,946, respectively.

Effective January 1, 2009, the Company adopted guidance regarding accounting for uncertainty in income taxes. This guidance clarifies the accounting for income taxes by prescribing the minimum recognition threshold an income tax position is required to meet before being recognized in the financial statements and applies to all federal or state income tax positions. Each income tax position is assessed using a two step process. A determination is first made as to whether it is more likely than not that the income tax position will be sustained, based upon technical merits, upon examination by the taxing authorities. If the income tax position is expected to meet the more likely than not criteria, the benefit recorded in the financial statements equals the largest amount that is greater than 50% likely to be realized upon its ultimate settlement. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012 there were no amounts that had been accrued in respect to uncertain tax positions.

F-8

KRAIG BIOCRAFT LABORATORIES, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

None of the Company’s federal or state income tax returns is currently under examination by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) or state authorities.  However, fiscal years 2009 and later remain subject to examination by the IRS and respective states.

(G) Derivative Financial Instruments

Fair value accounting requires bifurcation of embedded derivative instruments such as conversion features in convertible debt or equity instruments, and measurement of their fair value for accounting purposes. In determining the appropriate fair value, the Company uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. In assessing the convertible debt instruments, management determines if the convertible debt host instrument is conventional convertible debt and further if there is a beneficial conversion feature requiring measurement. If the instrument is not considered conventional convertible debt, the Company will continue its evaluation process of these instruments as derivative financial instruments.

Once determined, derivative liabilities are adjusted to reflect fair value at each reporting period end, with any increase or decrease in the fair value being recorded in results of operations as an adjustment to fair value of derivatives. In addition, the fair value of freestanding derivative instruments such as warrants, are also valued using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model.

(H) Stock-Based Compensation

In December 2004, the FASB issued FASB Accounting Standards Codification No. 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation.  Under FASB Accounting Standards Codification No. 718, companies are required to measure the compensation costs of share-based compensation arrangements based on the grant-date fair value and recognize the costs in the financial statements over the period during which employees are required to provide services. Share-based compensation arrangements include stock options, restricted share plans, performance-based awards, share appreciation rights and employee share purchase plans.  As such, compensation cost is measured on the date of grant at their fair value.  Such compensation amounts, if any, are amortized over the respective vesting periods of the option grant.  The Company applies this statement prospectively.

Equity instruments (“instruments”) issued to other than employees are recorded on the basis of the fair value of the instruments, as required by FASB Accounting Standards Codification No. 718.  FASB Accounting Standards Codification No. 505, Equity Based Payments to Non-Employees defines the measurement date and recognition period for such instruments.  In general, the measurement date is when either a (a) performance commitment, as defined, is reached or (b) the earlier of (i) the non-employee performance is complete or (ii) the instruments are vested. The measured value related to the instruments is recognized over a period based on the facts and circumstances of each particular grant as defined in the FASB Accounting Standards Codification.

(I) Business Segments

The Company operates in one segment and therefore segment information is not presented.

(J) Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In July 2013, FASB issued ASU No. 2013-11, "Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists." The provisions of ASU No. 2013-11 require an entity to present an unrecognized tax benefit, or portion thereof, in the statement of financial position as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward or a tax credit carryforward, with certain exceptions related to availability. ASU No. 2013-11 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2013. The adoption of ASU No. 2013-11 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.

In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2013-02, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, to improve the transparency of reporting these reclassifications. Other comprehensive income includes gains and losses that are initially excluded from net income for an accounting period. Those gains and losses are later reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income into net income. The amendments in the ASU do not change the current requirements for reporting net income or other comprehensive income in financial statements. All of the information that this ASU requires already is required to be disclosed elsewhere in the financial statements under U.S. GAAP. The new amendments will require an organization to:

Present (either on the face of the statement where net income is presented or in the notes) the effects on the line items of net income of significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income - but only if the item reclassified is required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified to net income in its entirety in the same reporting period; and Cross-reference to other disclosures currently required under U.S. GAAP for other reclassification items (that are not required under U.S. GAAP) to be reclassified directly to net income in their entirety in the same reporting period. This would be the case when a portion of the amount reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income is initially transferred to a balance sheet account (e.g., inventory for pension-related amounts) instead of directly to income or expense.

The amendments apply to all public and private companies that report items of other comprehensive income. Public companies are required to comply with these amendments for all reporting periods (interim and annual). The amendments are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012, for public companies. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU No. 2013-02 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

F-9

KRAIG BIOCRAFT LABORATORIES, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

In January 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-01, Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities, which clarifies which instruments and transactions are subject to the offsetting disclosure requirements originally established by ASU 2011-11. The new ASU addresses preparer concerns that the scope of the disclosure requirements under ASU 2011-11 was overly broad and imposed unintended costs that were not commensurate with estimated benefits to financial statement users. In choosing to narrow the scope of the offsetting disclosures, the Board determined that it could make them more operable and cost effective for preparers while still giving financial statement users sufficient information to analyze the most significant presentation differences between financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and those prepared under IFRSs. Like ASU 2011-11, the amendments in this update will be effective for fiscal periods beginning on, or after January 1, 2013. The adoption of ASU 2013-01 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In October 2012, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update ASU 2012-04, “Technical Corrections and Improvements” in Accounting Standards Update No. 2012-04. The amendments in this update cover a wide range of Topics in the Accounting Standards Codification. These amendments include technical corrections and improvements to the Accounting Standards Codification and conforming amendments related to fair value measurements. The amendments in this update will be effective for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2012. The adoption of ASU 2012-04 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In August 2012, the FASB issued ASU 2012-03, “Technical Amendments and Corrections to SEC Sections: Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 114, Technical Amendments Pursuant to SEC Release No. 33-9250, and Corrections Related to FASB Accounting Standards Update 2010-22 (SEC Update)” in Accounting Standards Update No. 2012-03. This update amends various SEC paragraphs pursuant to the issuance of SAB No. 114. The adoption of ASU 2012-03 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In July 2012, the FASB issued ASU 2012-02, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment” in Accounting Standards Update No. 2012-02. This update amends ASU 2011-08, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment and permits an entity first to assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that an indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the quantitative impairment test in accordance with Subtopic 350-30, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - General Intangibles Other than Goodwill. The amendments are effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012. Early adoption is permitted, including for annual and interim impairment tests performed as of a date before July 27, 2012, if a public entity’s financial statements for the most recent annual or interim period have not yet been issued or, for nonpublic entities, have not yet been made available for issuance. The adoption of ASU 2012-02 has not had a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

(K) Reclassification

The 2012 financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the 2013 presentation.

 (L) Equipment

The Company values property and equipment at cost and depreciates these assets using the straight-line method over their expected useful life. The Company uses a five year life for automobiles.

In accordance with FASB Accounting Standards Codification No. 360, Property, Plant and Equipment, the Company carries long-lived assets at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value. Impairment is evaluated by estimating future undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition. If the sum of the expected undiscounted future cash flow is less than the carrying amount of the assets, an impairment loss is recognized. Fair value, for purposes of calculating impairment, is measured based on estimated future cash flows, discounted at a market rate of interest.

There were no impairment losses recorded during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

We hold certain financial assets, which are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis in accordance with the Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“ASC Topic 820-10”).   ASC Topic 820-10 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements).  ASC Topic 820-10 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Level 1 instruments include cash, account receivable, prepaid expenses, inventory and account payable and accrued liabilities. The carrying values are assumed to approximate the fair value due to the short term nature of the instrument.

The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under ASC Topic 820-10 are described below:

o Level 1 - Valuations based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that an entity has the ability to access.  We believe our carrying value of level 1 instruments approximate their fair value at December 31, 2013.

o Level 2 - Valuations based on quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

o Level 3 - Valuations based on inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. We consider depleting assets, asset retirement obligations and net profit interest liability to be Level 3. We determine the fair value of Level 3 assets and liabilities utilizing various inputs, including NYMEX price quotations and contract terms. 

		2013	2012
Level 1	$	-	$           -
Level 2		-	-
Level 3		-	-
Total	$	-	$           -

F-10

KRAIG BIOCRAFT LABORATORIES, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

NOTE 2RESTATEMENT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The audited financial statements  for the year ended December 31, 2012, filed with the SEC on  April 15, 2013, have been restated as a result of management’s determination that the Company’s accounting treatment pertaining to the issuance of 10,000,000 warrants to consultant with a fair value of $400,000 should be recorded as a public relations expense.

The effect of the restatement on our previously issued audited financial statements as of December 31, 2012 is as follows:

	RESTATED BALANCE SHEET									Note
	As Reported			Adjustments			Restated
Total Assets	$	78,752		$	-		$	78,752
Total Liabilities	$	1,213,168		$	-		$	1,213,168
Commitments and Contingencies
Stockholders' Deficit
Preferred stock, no par value; unlimited shares authorized,
none issued  and outstanding		-			-			-
Common stock Class A,  no par value; unlimited shares authorized,
603,269,838 and 586,720,411 shares issued and outstanding, respectively		6,360,920			-			6,360,920
Common stock Class B,  no par value; unlimited shares authorized,
no shares issued and outstanding		-			-			-
Common Stock Issuable, 1,122,311 and 1,122,311 shares, respectively		22,000			-			22,000			1
Additional paid-in capital		920,337			400,000			1,320,337
Deferred Compensation		-			-			-
Deficit accumulated during the development stage		(8,437,673	)		(400,000	)		(8,837,673	)		1
		.
Total Stockholders' Deficit		(1,134,416	)		-			(1,134,416	)
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficit	$	78,752		$	-		$	78,752

F-11

KRAIG BIOCRAFT LABORATORIES, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

	RESTATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
	For the Year Ended						For the Year Ended
	December 31, 2012						December 31, 2012
	As Reported			Adjustments			Restated
Revenue	$	-					$	-
								-
Operating Expenses								-
General and Administrative		379,326						379,326
Public Relations		-			400,000			400,000		1
Amortization of Debt Discount		-						-
Professional Fees		48,667						48,667
Officer's Salary		267,120						267,120
Contract Settlement		-						-
Research and Development		465,293						465,293
Total Operating Expenses		1,160,406			400,000			1,560,406
								-
Loss from Operations		(1,160,406	)		(400,000	)		(1,560,406	)
								-
Other Income/(Expenses)								-
Other income		3,000						3,000
Interest income		192						192
Change in fair value of embedded derivative liability		-						-
Change in fair value of embedded derivative liability-related party		-						-
Interest expense		(45,707	)					(45,707	)
Other expense		-						-
Total Other Income/(Expenses)		(42,515	)		-			(42,515	)
								-
Net (Income) Loss before Provision for Income Taxes		(1,202,921	)		(400,000	)		(1,602,921	)
								-
Provision for Income  Taxes		-			-			-
								-
Net Income (Loss)	$	(1,202,921	)	$	(400,000	)	$	(1,602,921	)
								-
Net Income (Loss) Per Share  - Basic and Diluted	$	(0.00	)				$	(0.00	)
Weighted average number of shares outstanding
during the period - Basic and Diluted		596,143,581						596,143,581

F-12

KRAIG BIOCRAFT LABORATORIES, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

	RESTATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
	For the Period from April 25, 2006 (Inception) to December 31, 2012						For the Period from April 25, 2006 (Inception) to December 31, 2012
	As Reported			Adjustments			Restated
Revenue	$	-					$	-
								-
Operating Expenses								-
General and Administrative		1,939,502						1,939,502
Public Relations		219,890			400,000			619,890		1
Amortization of Debt Discount		120,000						120,000
Professional Fees		335,075						335,075
Officer's Salary		1,603,514						1,603,514
Contract Settlement		107,143						107,143
Research and Development		1,302,009						1,302,009
Total Operating Expenses		5,627,133			400,000			6,027,133
								-
Loss from Operations		(5,627,133	)		(400,000	)		(6,027,133	)
								-
Other Income/(Expenses)								-
Other income		7,881						7,881
Interest income		192						192
Change in fair value of embedded derivative liability		(2,790,185	)					(2,790,185	)
Change in fair value of embedded derivative liability-related party		119,485						119,485
Interest expense		(147,913	)					(147,913	)
Total Other Income/(Expenses)		(2,810,540	)		-			(2,810,540	)
								-
Net (Income) Loss before Provision for Income Taxes		(8,437,673	)		(400,000	)		(8,837,673	)
								-
Provision for Income  Taxes		-			-			-
								-
Net Income (Loss)	$	(8,437,673	)	$	(400,000	)	$	(8,837,673	)

F-13

KRAIG BIOCRAFT LABORATORIES, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

	RESTATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
	For the Year Ended						For the Year Ended
	December 31, 2012						December 31, 2012
	As Reported			Adjustments			Restated
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:
Net Loss	$	(1,202,921	)	$	(400,000	)	$	(1,602,921	)	1
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operations
Depreciation expense		5,583						5,583
Stock issuable for services		-						-
Change in Fair Value of Derivative Liability		-						-
Stock issued for services		550,000						550,000
Warrants issued to employees		-						-
Warrants issued to consultants		-			400,000			400,000
Deferred compensation realized		-						-
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:								-
(Increase)Decrease in prepaid expenses		(2,270	)					(2,270	)
(Increase)Decrease in other receivables								-
Increase in accrued expenses and other payables - related party		238,977						238,977
Increase in accounts payable		(152,291	)					(152,291	)
Net Cash Used In Operating Activities		(562,922	)		-			(562,922	)

F-14

KRAIG BIOCRAFT LABORATORIES, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

	RESTATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
	For the Period from April 25, 2006 (Inception) to December 31, 2012						For the Period from April 25, 2006 (Inception) to December 31, 2012
	As Reported			Adjustments			Restated
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:
Net Loss	$	(8,437,673	)	$	(400,000	)	$	(8,837,673	)	1
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operations
Depreciation expense		11,406						11,406
Stock issuable for services		22,000						22,000
Change in Fair Value of Derivative Liability		2,790,703						2,790,703
Stock issued for services		1,458,180						1,458,180
Warrants issued to employees		126,435						126,435
Warrants issued to consultants		168,000			400,000			568,000		1
Deferred compensation realized		200,000						200,000
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:								-
(Increase)Decrease in prepaid expenses		(2,270	)					(2,270	)
Increase in accrued expenses and other payables - related party		1,369,600						1,369,600
Increase in accounts payable		329,226						329,226
Net Cash Used In Operating Activities		(1,964,393	)		-			(1,964,393	)

Note:

1. Adjustment to recongnize 10,000,000 warrants issued to consultant on November 21, 2012, with fair value of $400,000 (See Note 7(E)).

F-15

KRAIG BIOCRAFT LABORATORIES, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

NOTE 3GOING CONCERN

As reflected in the accompanying financial statements, the Company is in the development stage, has a working capital deficiency of $1,215,495 and stockholders’ deficiency of $1,201,402 and used $2,764,547 of cash in operations from inception.  This raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.  The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent on the Company’s ability to raise additional capital and implement its business plan.  The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.

Management believes that actions presently being taken to obtain additional funding and implement its strategic plans provide the opportunity for the Company to continue as a going concern.

NOTE 4EQUIPMENT

         At December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 equipment is as follows:

	As of December 31, 2013			As of December 31, 2012
Automobile	$	25,828		$	25,828
Office Equipment		5,560			2,086
Less Accumulated Depreciation		(17,295	)		(11,406	)
Total Property and Equipment	$	14,093		$	16,508

Depreciation and amortization expense for the year ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 was $5,888 and $5,583 respectively.

NOTE 5CONVERTIBLE DEBT, DEBT DISCOUNT AND FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT OF DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

On July 17, 2009, the Company entered into an agreement with an investor group where the Company will issue up to $120,000 in convertible units.  The debentures will be in the face amount of $10,000 each, mature on December 31, 2010, bear interest at the rate of 5% simple interest per annum, payable at maturity or convertible with the principal, and the principal and interest shall be convertible at the option of the holder at a fixed price of $0.018 per share.  Each debenture shall have a warrant attached exercisable for the purchase of 500,000 shares of common stock.  The warrants shall expired on December 31, 2011, have a cashless exercise provision, and be exercisable at a fixed price of $0.02.  The agreement also requires the investment group to purchase up to $1,000,000 of common stock monthly at the lesser of $75,000 or 200% of the average daily volume multiplied by the average of the daily closing prices for the ten days immediately preceding the exercise date.  Each investment by the investment group is priced at the lowest closing “bid” price of the common stock during the five days immediately before the investment.  The term of the funding shall be the earlier of (a) the drawing down of the entire $1,000,000 or (b) 24 months after the Effective Date, July 17, 2011.  In addition, the Company is required to file and maintain an effective registration statement covering the convertible units, cannot issue more than 5% of its common stock outstanding without the investor group’s consent and must maintain a contractual relationship with a public relations firm, which is related to the investor group. The Company has issued $120,000 of convertible debt to date.   On July 21, 2010, the issuance of 1,799,434 shares was approved by the board of directors in exchange for the $15,000 specified in the put notice.

The $120,000 convertible debt instrument was determined to have a separate derivative liability instrument requiring bifurcation and the computation of fair value. The conversion price per share equals to the lower of the conversion price and the average closing bid price of the common stock during the 20 trading days prior to and including the date on which the conversion notice is delivered to the holder, however, the mandatory Conversion price shall not be less than $0.005. The Company calculated the estimated fair values of the liabilities for warrant derivative instruments and embedded conversion option derivative instruments with the Black-Scholes option pricing model.

The fair value of the embedded conversion options at the commitment date was $251,919.  Of the total, $120,000 was assigned to debt discount and $131,919 was recorded as a derivative expense.

F-16

KRAIG BIOCRAFT LABORATORIES, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

On February 11, 2010 the Company authorized the issuance of 5,694,451 shares of Common Stock for the exercise price of $0.02/share in exchange for $100,000 in convertible note payable and on April 6, 2010 the Company authorized the issuance of 854,169 shares of Common Stock for the exercise price of $0.02/share in exchange for $15,000 in convertible note payable.

At December 31, 2010, pursuant to the agreement, all outstanding principal and accrued interest on the convertible debt was due, and the conversion rights of the holder terminated.  Accordingly, at December 31, 2010, the Company determined that no derivative liability existed in connection to the outstanding remaining debt of $5,000.   For the year ended December 31, 2013, the note holder forgave the remaining balance and the $5,000 convertible note balance along with accrued interest of $1,775 was recorded as a gain on forgiveness of debt.  As of December 31, 2013 the remaining convertible note balance was $0.

In addition, on October 4, 2010, the Company issued 5,177,801 shares in connection with the cashless exercise of the 6,000,000 warrants.

At June 30, 2011 the Company recorded interest expense and related accrued interest payable of $2,466.  The Company also recorded $92,600 for the amortization of debt discount in interest expense on the statement of operations.  The debt discount is being amortized over the life of the convertible debt.

NOTE 6LOAN PAYABLE

On December 8, 2010 the Company entered into a five year loan agreement with the principal loan amount of $15,828. The loan carries an interest rate of 6.94%, and is secured by an automobile.  The remaining balance of $3,981 fully matures during the year ending December 31, 2014.

NOTE 7LOAN PAYABLE – RELATED PARTY

On February 25, 2013 the Company received $150,000 from a principal stockholder.    Pursuant to the terms of the loan, the advance bears interest at 3%, is unsecured and due on demand. At December 31, 2013 the loan balance was repaid.  The Company recorded accrued interest payable of $2,001.

NOTE 8STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

(A)       Common Stock Issued for Cash

On April 28, 2006, the Company issued 8,000 shares of common stock for cash of $400 ($0.05 per share).

On January 8, 2007 the Company issued 1,750,000 shares of common stock for $15,000 ($0.01/share).  This agreement was subsequently terminated effective May 23, 2007.

 On January 22, 2007 the Company issued 12,000,000 shares of common stock for $103,000 ($0.01/share).   In addition, 9,000,000 shares were issued for $3,000 ($0.0003/share).

On April 4, 2007, the Company issued 1,875,000 shares of common stock for cash of $15,000 ($0.01 per share).

On April 20, 2007, the Company issued 1,875,000 shares of common stock for cash of $15,000 ($0.01 per share).

On May 18, 2007, the Company issued 13,125,000 shares of common stock for cash of $105,000 ($0.01 per share).

F-17

KRAIG BIOCRAFT LABORATORIES, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

On August 28, 2007 the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement to issue 80,495,000 shares common stock in the amount of $241,485 ($0.003/share).

On August 29, 2007 the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement to issue 200,000 shares common stock in the amount of $600 ($0.003/share).

On August 29, 2007 the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement to issue 8,300,000 shares common stock in the amount of $24,900 ($0.003/share).

On September 1, 2007 the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement to issue 25,000 shares common stock in the amount of $75 ($0.003/share).

On September 5, 2007 the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement to issue 120,000 shares common stock in the amount of $360 ($0.003/share).

On September 12, 2007 the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement to issue 1,025,000 shares common stock in the amount of $3,075 ($0.003/share).

In accordance with the May 2007 stock purchase agreement which contains an anti-dilution clause which requires the Company to issue additional common shares under the stock purchase agreement for any subsequent issuance at a price below $.08 per share for a period of 12 months, the Company has issued 28,125,000 additional shares through May 2008 as a result of the subsequent stock issuances at $0.003/share.

On April 24, 2009 the Company issued 2,000,000 shares of common stock for $20,000 ($0.01/share).

On May 22, 2009, the Company issued 500,000 shares of common stock for $5,000 ($0.01/share).

On September 30, 2009, the Company issued 366,599 shares of common stock for $3,000 ($0.01/share).

On May 18, 2010, the Company issued 4,000,000 shares of common stock for cash of $21,642 and in exchange of $6,990 in note payables ($0.007158 per share).

On July 21, 2010, the Company issued 1,875,000 shares of common stock for $15,000 ($0.008/share).

On September 10, 2010, the Company issued 1,351,351 shares of common stock for $20,000 ($0.0148/share).

On September 22, 2010, the Company issued 1,286,765 shares of common stock for $35,000 ($0.0272/share).

On October 15, 2010, the Company issued 1,179,245 shares of common stock for $100,000 ($0.084/share).

On December 7, 2010, the Company issued 1,157,407 shares of common stock for $75,000 ($0.065/share).

During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company had to issue an additional 845,800 make-up shares related to a transaction entered into during the year ended December 31, 2010.

On January 25, 2011 the Company issued 1,470,588 shares of common stock for $100,000 ($0.068/share).

On March 22, 2011 the Company issued 2,083,333 shares of common stock for $100,000 ($0.048/share).

On April 18, 2011 the Company issued 1,029,412 shares of common stock for $70,000 ($0.07/share).

On April 22, 2011 the Company issued 1,420,455 shares of common stock for $100,000 ($0.07/share).

F-18

KRAIG BIOCRAFT LABORATORIES, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

On September 22, 2011, the Company issued 1,372,119 shares of common stock for $100,000 ($0.07/share).

On November 9, 2011, the Company issued 1,314,406 shares of common stock for $100,000 ($0.08/share).

On December 16, 2011, the Company issued 1,543,210 shares of common stock for $100,000 ($0.06/share).

On January 20, 2012, the Company issued 1,562,500 shares of common stock for $100,000 ($0.06/share).

On April 19, 2012, the Company issued 2,403,846 shares of common stock for $100,000 ($0.06/share).

On May 19, 2012, the Company issued 1,923,077 shares of common stock for $100,000 ($0.05/share).

On June 29, 2012, the Company issued 2,155,172 shares of common stock for $100,000 ($0.04/share).

On December 21, 2012, the Company issued 1,004,832 shares of common stock for $25,000 ($0.02/share).

On February 19, 2013, the Company issued 961,538 shares of common stock for $50,000 ($0.05/share).

On March 4, 2013, the Company issued 945,537 shares of common stock for $50,000 ($0.05/share).

On April 1, 2013, the Company issued 822,368 shares of common stock for $50,000 ($0.06/share).

On April 15, 2013, the Company issued 884,434 shares of common stock for $75,000 ($0.08/share).

On July 11, 2013 the Company issued 1,760,563 shares of common stock for $100,000 ($0.06/share).

On July 25, 2013 the Company issued 1,760,563 shares of common stock for $100,000 ($0.06/share).

On August 13, 2013 the Company issued 1,838,235 shares of common stock for $100,000 ($0.05/share).

On September 3, 2013 the Company issued 1,923,077 shares of common stock for $100,000 ($0.05/share).

On September 19, 2013 the Company issued 2,100,840 shares of common stock for $100,000 ($0.05/share).

On October 3, 2013 the Company issued 2,604,167 shares of common stock for $100,000 ($0.04/share).

On October 17, 2013 the Company issued 2,604,167 shares of common stock for $100,000 ($0.04/share).

On December 11, 2013 the Company issued 3,063,725 shares of common stock for $125,000 ($0.04/share).

(B) Common Stock Issued for Intellectual Property

On April 26, 2006, the Company issued 332,292,000 shares of common stock to its founder having a fair value of $180 ($0.000001/share) in exchange for intellectual property.  The fair value of the patent was determined based upon the historical cost of the intellectual property contributed by the founder.

(C) Common Stock Issued for Services

On May 8, 2006, the Company entered into a license agreement for research and development. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, the Company issued 17,500,000 shares of common stock upon execution of the agreement. The Company also received a five-year call option from the license holder to repurchase 7,000,000 common shares at an exercise price of $150,000 or $.02 per share. The option gives the Company the right, but not the obligation to repurchase the shares of common stock.  The call option expires May 4, 2011. As of June 30, 2011 the value of the stock was $.07 per share.  The Company does not have the obligation to repurchase the shares.

F-19

KRAIG BIOCRAFT LABORATORIES, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

On July 1, 2006 the Company entered into a five year consulting agreement for research and development. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, the Company paid 700,000 shares of common stock upon execution.  These shares had a fair value of $5,600 ($0.01/share) based upon the recent cash offering price.  Additionally, 2,000,000 shares of common stock were issued on May 18, 2007 with a fair value of $16,000 ($0.01/share).   As of December 31, 2008, the Company issued 600,000 shares of common stock for consulting services rendered with a fair value of $6,000 ($0.01/share).  On January 15, 2008 the Company authorized the issuance of 400,000 shares of common stock for consulting services rendered with a fair value of $4,000 ($0.01/share).

On July 1, 2009, the issuance of 280,000 shares was approved by the board of directors as repayment for services previously provided to the Company by a consultant having a fair value of $14,000 ($0.05/share) in accordance with a consulting agreement (See Note 9(C)).

On July 1, 2009, the issuance of 482,825 shares was approved by the board of directors as partial payment for services previously provided to the Company by a consultant in accordance with a consulting agreement.  The total amount of issuable shares for the consultant is 1,122,311 shares, which includes 400,000 issuable shares previously approved by the board of directors and 239,486 shares were approved to be issued on November 19, 2009 for a fair value of $18,000 (See Note 9(C)).

On August 3, 2009, the Company entered into an agreement with a consultant to provide investor relations services.  On October 5, 2009 the Company issued 10,000,000 shares with a fair value of $200,000 ($0.02/share) to a consultant for investor relations to be provided over a term of 180 days.  The Company started receiving services beginning October 5, 2009.  As of March 31, 2010 $200,000 was recorded (See Note 8(D)).

On January 15, 2010 the Company issued 500,000 shares with a fair value of $5,000 ($0.01/share) to a consultant for investor relations to be provided over a term of 12 months once certain conditions are met.  As of March 31, 2010, $5,000 was recognized as deferred compensation (See Note 8).

On May 21, 2010 the Company issued 40,000 shares with a fair value of $400 ($0.01/share) to a consultant for research and development services (See Note 9(C )).

On July 30, 2010 the Company issued 2,400,000 shares with a fair value of $30,000 ($0.0125/share) to a consultant for legal services incurred in behalf of the Company.

On August 26, 2010 the Company issued 280,000 shares with a fair value of $14,000 ($0.05/share) to a consultant for research and development services provided in the past.

On August 26, 2010 the Company issued 985,915 shares with a fair value of $14,000 ($0.0142/share) to a consultant for research and development services provided in the past (See Note 9(C)).

On August 26, 2010 the Company issued 4,500,000 shares with a fair value of $90,000 ($0.02/share) to a consultant for research and development services (See Note 9(C)).

On August 26, 2010 the Company issued 10,000,000 shares with a fair value of $200,000 ($0.02/share) to a consultant for research and development services (See Note 9(C)).

On September 16, 2010, the Company entered into an agreement with a consultant to provide technical support.  On September 16, 2010 the Company issued 100,000 shares, as a sign on bonus, with a fair value of $15,000 ($0.15/share) to the consultant for technical support to be provided over the next 3 years. In addition, the consultant shall receive 30,000 shares for three years commencing on or about September 10 of each of the next three years (See Note 9(C)).

F-20

KRAIG BIOCRAFT LABORATORIES, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

On September 16, 2010, the Company entered into an agreement with a consultant to provide technical support.  On September 16, 2010 the Company issued 100,000 shares, as a sign on bonus, with a fair value of $15,000 ($0.15/share) to the consultant for technical support to be provided over the next 3 years. In addition, the consultant shall receive 30,000 shares for three years commencing on or about September 10 of each of the next three years (See Note 9(C)).

On September 23, 2010 the Company issued 387,500 shares with a fair value of $31,000 ($0.08/share) to a consultant for legal services incurred on behalf of the Company.

On April 1, 2011 the Company issued 1,000,000 shares with a fair value of $70,000 ($0.07/share) to a consultant for research and development services.

On April 18, 2011, the Company issued 1,029,412 shares of stock with a fair value of $70,000 based on the average trading price over a 30 day period for a research and development consulting agreement.

On October 28, 2011, the Company issued 2,200,000 shares of stock with a fair value of $242,000 ($0.11/share) to obtain the use of a license.

On May 24, 2012 the Company issued 3,200,000 shares with a fair value of $192,000 ($0.06/share) to a consultants for research and development services.

On May 24, 2012 the Company issued 300,000 shares with a fair value of $18,000 ($0.06/share) to a consultant for research and development services provided in the past.

On May 24, 2012 the Company issued 3,000,000 shares with a fair value of $300,000 ($0.10/share) to a consultant for research and development services provided in the past.

On December 18, 2012 the Company issued 1,000,000 shares with a fair value of $40,000 ($0.04/share) to a consultant for research and development services provided in the past.

(D) Cancellation and Retirement of Common Stock

On December 29, 2006, the Company’s founder returned 11,666,500 shares of common stock to the Company.  These shares were cancelled and retired.  Accordingly, the net effect on equity is $0.

(E) Common Stock Warrants

During 2006, the Company issued 6,000,000 warrants to an officer under his employment agreement.   The Company recognized an expense of $126,435 for the period from inception to December 31, 2006.  The Company recorded the fair value of the warrants  based on the fair value of each warrant grant estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions used for grants in 2006, dividend yield of zero, expected volatility of 183%; risk-free interest rates of 4.98%, expected life of one year. The warrants vested immediately.   The options expire between 5 and 9 years from the date of issuance and have an exercise price of between $.21 and $.40 per share. During November 2006, the Company and the officer entered into an amendment to the employment agreement whereby all the warrants were retired.

F-21

KRAIG BIOCRAFT LABORATORIES, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

On July 29, 2010, the Company issued a warrant for 20,000,000 common shares in connection to a consulting agreement. The warrant was value at $200,000, the fair value of the services to be provided pursuant to the agreement. The warrant has a term of 2 years.

On October 4, 2010, the Company issued 5,177,801 shares in connection with the cashless exercise of the 6,000,000 warrants.

On May 11, 2011, the Company issued 19,767,985 shares in connection with the cashless exercise of the 20,000,000 warrants.

On November 21, 2012, the Company issued 10-year warrants for 10,000,000 shares with a consultant, with an exercise price of $0.001 per share. The warrants were granted for services rendered. The warrants had a fair value of $400,000, based upon the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The Company used the following weighted average assumptions:

Expected dividends		0	%
Expected volatility		283.23	%
Expected term	10 years
Risk free interest rate		1.69.	%
Expected forfeitures		0	%

On July 18, 2013, the Company issued 9,857,142 shares in connection with the cashless exercise of the 10,000,000 warrants.

On July 9, 2013, the Company issued 5-year warrants for 10,000,000 shares to a consultant, with an exercise price of $0.001 per share. The warrants were granted for services rendered. The warrants had a fair value of $736,816, based upon the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The Company used the following weighted average assumptions:

Expected dividends		0	%
Expected volatility		183.35	%
Expected term	5 years
Risk free interest rate		1.50.	%
Expected forfeitures		0	%

On October 15, 2013, the Company issued 1-year warrants for 8,000,000 shares to a consultant, with an exercise price of $0.001 per share. The warrants were granted for services to be rendered. The warrants had a fair value of $396,083, based upon the Black-Scholes option-pricing model on the date of grant and were fully vested upon and will be exercisable beginning October 15, 2015 for a  period of 12 months.

	Grant Date
Expected dividends		0	%
Expected volatility		96.35	%

F-22

KRAIG BIOCRAFT LABORATORIES, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

Expected term	3 years
Risk free interest rate		1.45.	%
Expected forfeitures		0	%

	Number of Warrants			Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (in Years)
Balance, December 31, 2011		-		$	-
Granted		10,000,000			0.001
Exercised
Cancelled/Forfeited		-			-
Balance, December 31, 2012		10,000,000			0.001		9.90
Granted		18,000,000		$	0.001
Exercised		(10,000,000	)	$	-
Cancelled/Forfeited		-
Balance, December 31, 2013		18,000,000		$	0.001		2.9
Intrinsic Value		918,000

For the year ended December 31, 2013, the following warrants were outstanding:

Exercise Price		Warrants Outstandning		Warrants Exercisable		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life		Aggregate Intrinsic Value
$	0.001		28,000,000		18,000,000		2.9		918,000

For the year ended December 31, 2012, the following warrants were outstanding:

Exercise Price		Warrants Outstandning		Warrants Exercisable		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life		Aggregate Intrinsic Value
$	0.001		10,000,000		10,000,000		9.895890411		365,000

(F)  Amendment to Articles of Incorporation

On February 16, 2009, the Company amended its articles of incorporation to amend the number and class of shares the Company is authorized to issue as follows:

●   Common stock Class A, unlimited number of shares authorized, no par value

●   Common stock Class B, unlimited number of shares authorized, no par value

●   Preferred stock, unlimited number of shares authorized, no par value

Effective December 17 2013, the Company amended its articles of incorporation to designate a Series A no par value preferred stock.  Two shares of Series A Preferred stock have been authorized.

F-23

KRAIG BIOCRAFT LABORATORIES, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

(G) Stock Split Effected in the Form of a Stock Dividend

On March 23, 2009, the Company's Board of Directors declared a nine-for-one stock split to be effected in the form of a dividend.  The stock dividend was distributed to shareholders of record as of April 27, 2009.  A total of 449,773,650 shares of common stock were issued.  All basic and diluted loss per share and average shares outstanding information has been adjusted to reflect the aforementioned stock dividend.

(H) Conversion of debt & Issuance of Convertible Preferred Stock – related party

During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company's Chief Executive Officer converted accrued payroll of $30,000 in exchange for the issuance of Series A convertible Preferred Stock (“Series A PS”). 

Each share of Series A PS is entitled to vote together with the holders of the Company’s common stock on all matters and is entitled to 200,000,000 votes on all such matters.  Each Share of Series A PS is convertible into one share of the Company’s common stock at the holder’s option.

	Series A PS Valuation
Debt converted – related party	$	(30,000	)
Valuation of Series A PS issued as consideration		5,217,800
Loss on settlement of debt	$	5,187,800

              The valuation of the Series A PS was performed by a third party valuation expert and was based on the voting control obtained and the Company's market cap at the time of the transaction.

NOTE 9COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

On March 18, 2010, the Company entered into an addendum to the employment agreement whereby the Company will reimburse the employee and his family for up to $20,000 of out of pocket medical and dental care costs, including prescription costs or co-pays.

On September 30, 2010, the Company entered into an addendum to the employment agreement whereby all but $250,000 of unpaid back salary will be forgiven by the principal stockholder.  The addendum also eliminated the various milestone achievement awards from the prior employment agreements.  In addition, the addendum reduced the interest rate to 3% per year.  Further, the conversion rights for unpaid back salary where amended whereby the principal shareholder has the option to convert any accured salary into Class “A” Common stock by dividing the dollar value of the debt to be converted to stock by the closing price of the stock on the date that the conversion notice is received by the Company.  This amemdment effectively eliminated any beneficial conversion features related to accrued salary of September 30, 2010.  In exchange the Company agreed to issue 10,000,000 preferred shares to the principal stockholder no later than September 30, 2011, that date was extended by mutual agreement to December 31, 2012.  The agreement was subsequently extended to October 30, 2013. By agreement with the principal share holder, this obligation to issue preferred shares was satisfied by the December 17, 2013 issuance of 2 shares of super voting preferred stock.

On November 10, 2010, the Company entered into an addendum to the employment agreement, effective January 1, 2011 through the December 31, 2015.  The term of the agreement is a five year period at an annual salary of $210,000.  There is a 6% annual increase.  The employee is also to receive a 20% bonsus based on the annual based salary.  Any stock, stock options bonuses have to be approved by the board of directors (See Note 10).

(B)License Agreement

On May 8, 2006, the Company entered into a license agreement.  Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, the Company paid a non-refundable license fee of $10,000. The Company will pay a license maintenance fee of $10,000 on the one year anniversary of this agreement and each year thereafter.  The Company will pay an annual research fee of $13,700 with first payment due January 2007, then on each subsequent anniversary of the effective date commencing May 4, 2007.  Pursuant to the terms of the agreement the Company may be required to pay additional fees aggregating up to a maximum of $10,000 a year for patent maintenance and prosecution relating to the licensed intellectual property.

F-24

KRAIG BIOCRAFT LABORATORIES, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

On October 28, 2011, the Company entered into a license agreement with the University of Notre Dame. Under the agreement, the Company received exclusive and non-exclusive rights to certain spider silk technologies including commercial rights with the right to sublicense such intellectual property. In consideration of the licenses granted under the agreement, the Company agreed to issue to the University of Notre Dame 2,200,000 shares of its common stock and to pay a royalty of 2% of net sales. In addition, the Company is in negotiations with the University of Notre Dame for a research and development agreement. Upon successfully entering into such an agreement, the Company anticipates it could owe approximately $144,000.

The license agreement has a term of 20 years which can be extended on an annual basis after that. It can be terminated by the University of Notre Dame if the Company defaults on its obligations under the agreement and fails to cure such default within 90 days of a written notice by the university. The Company can terminate the agreement upon a 90 day written notice subject to payment of a termination fee of $5,000 if the termination takes place within 2 years after its effectiveness, $10,000 if the termination takes place within 4 years after its effectiveness and $20,000 if the Agreement is terminated after 4 years.

(C)Royalty and Research Agreements

On September 16, 2010, the Company entered into an agreement with a consultant for research and development.  On September 16, 2010 the Company issued 100,000 shares as a sign on bonus with a fair value of $15,000 ($0.15/share) to the consultant for technical support to be provided over the next 3 years. In addition, the consultant shall receive 30,000 shares for three years commencing on or about September 10 of each of the next three years.

On September 16, 2010, the Company entered into an agreement with a consultant for research and development.  On September 16, 2010 the Company issued 100,000 shares as a sign on bonus with a fair value of $15,000 ($0.15/share) to the consultant for technical support to be provided over the next 3 years. In addition, the consultant shall receive 30,000 shares for three years commencing on or about September 10 of each of the next three years.

On May 21, 2010 the Company entered into a three year consulting agreement for research and development.   Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, the Company is required to issue 40,000 shares upon the execution of the agreement and subsequently 10,000 shares per year during the three year term of the agreement.  The annual payment of 10,000 shares for the three years begins on Janaury15 of each of the next three years following the execution of this agreement.

On May 1, 2008 the Company entered into a five year consulting agreement for research and development. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, the Company will be required to pay $1,000 per month, or at the Company’s option, the consulting fee may be paid in the form of Company common stock based upon the greater of $0.05 per share or the average of the closing price of the Company’s shares over the five days preceding such stock issuance.  As of June 30, 2011 the Company had accrued $17,000 of accounts payable for the services provided of which was paid in common stock on July 1, 2009 (See Note 8(C)).  As of June 30, 2011 the Company issued 280,000 shares of common stock in exchange for $14,000 of accounts payable for the services performed.

On December 26, 2006, the Company entered into an addendum to the intellectual property transfer agreement with an officer.  In consideration of the Company issuing either 200,000 preferred shares with the following preferences; no dividends and voting rights equal to 100 common shares per share of preferred stock or the payment of $120,000, the officer agreed to terminate the royalty payments due under the agreement and give title to the exclusive license for the non protective apparel use of the intellectual property to the Company.  On the date of the agreement, the Company did not have any preferred stock authorized with the required preferences.  In accordance with FASB Accounting Standards Codification No 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity, the Company determined that the present value of the payment of $120,000 that was due on December 26, 2007, the one year anniversary of the addendum, should be recorded as an accrued expense until such time as the Company has the ability to assert that it has preferred shares authorized.  As of March 31, 2010, the Company has recorded $120,000 in accrued expenses- related party.  On December 21, 2007 the officer extended the due date to July 30, 2008.  On May 30, 2008 the officer extended the due date to December 31, 2008.  On October 10, 2008, the officer extended the due date to the earlier of (a) March 30, 2010 or (b) upon demand by the officer.  The due date was extended to March 31, 2011.  On September 8, 2009, a payment of $15,000 was paid to the officer. An additional payment of $10,000 was made on October 19, 2009 and December 1, 2009, respectfully.  Additionally, the accrued expenses are accruing 7% interest per year. On January 15, 2010 an additional payment of $10,000 was made.  During the quarter ending September 30, 2010 an additional payment of $8,000 was made. During the quarter ending September 30, 2012 an additional payment of $1,000 was made.  During the year ended December 31, 2013, an additional payment of $1,280 was made.  As of December 31, 2013 the outstanding balance is $64,720. As of December 31, 2013, the Company recorded interest expense and related accrued interest payable of $1,508.

F-25

KRAIG BIOCRAFT LABORATORIES, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

On February 1, 2007 the Company entered into a consulting agreement for research and development for period of one year at a cost of $150,000.  In April 2008, this agreement was extended through March 31, 2009 on a cost reimbursement basis.  Reimbursements are to be made quarterly and are not to exceed $35,000.  On March 1, 2010 the Company entered into a one year consulting agreement for research and development. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, the Company was  required to pay up to $150,000 in research and development fees on a cost reimbursement basis.   The agreement expired on February 28, 2011.

On June 6, 2012 the Company entered into a consulting agreement for intellectual property and collaborative research and development with an American university.  The agreement covers ongoing research and development work performed by the university at the Company’s behest and with the Company’s assistance from May 1, 2011 and extending through April 30, 2013.  Pursuant to the terms of the agreement the Company will be required to pay approximately $637,984 for research and development over the two year period. For the year ended December 31, 2012 the Company paid $465,293 in research and development fees.  For the year ended December 31, 2013 the Company paid $489,434 in research and development fees.

On July 1, 2006 the Company entered into a five year consulting agreement for research and development. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, the Company paid 700,000 shares of common stock upon execution.  These shares had a fair value of $5,600 ($0.01/share) based upon the recent cash offering price.  Additionally, 2,000,000 shares of common stock were issued on May 18, 2007 with a fair value of $16,000 ($0.01/share).   As of December 31, 2008, the Company issued 600,000 shares of common stock for consulting services rendered with a fair value of $6,000 ($0.01/share).  On January 15, 2008 the Company authorized the issuance of 400,000 shares of common stock for consulting services rendered with a fair value of $4,000 ($0.01/share).   On July 1, 2009, the issuance of 482,825 shares was approved by the board of directors as partial payment for services previously provided to the Company by a consultant in accordance with a consulting agreement.  The total amount of issuable shares for the consultant is 1,122,311 shares, which includes 400,000 issuable shares previously approved by the board of directors and 239,486 shares approved to be issued in November 2009. On August 26, 2010, the Company entered into an addendum to the employment agreement where the monthly fee to the consultant was increased to $10,000 per month starting on September 1, 2010.  On August 26, 2010 the Company issued 985,915 shares with a fair value of $14,000 ($0.0142/share) to a consultant for research and development services provided in the past In addition, On August 26, 2010 the Company issued 4,500,000 bonus shares with a fair value of $90,000 ($0.02/share) to a consultant for research and development services and 10,000,000 shares with a fair value of $200,000 ($0.02/share) to a consultant for research and development services (See Note 8(C) ).

(D)Consulting Agreement

On August 3, 2009, the Company entered into an agreement with a consultant to provide investor relations services.  On October 5, 2009 the Company issued 10,000,000 shares with a fair value of $200,000 ($0.02/share) to a consultant for investor relations to be provided over a term of 180 days.  The Company started receiving services beginning October 5, 2009.  As of September 30, 2011, $200,000 was recorded as a consulting expense (See Note 8(C)).

On January 15, 2010, the Company entered into an agreement with a consultant to provide investor relations services in exchange for 500,000 shares or $15,000.  On January 15, 2010 the Company issued 500,000 shares with a fair value of $5,000 ($0.01/share) to a consultant for investor relations to be provided over a term of 12 months (See Note 9(C)).

On July 29, 2010, the Company entered into an agreement with a consultant to provide investor relations services in exchange for a warrant for 20,000,000 common shares. The value of the services was $200,000, which approximated fair value.  The agreement will remain in effect until January 29, 2011(See Note 9(E)).

On April 8, 2011 the Company entered into a five year consulting agreement for research and development. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, the Company has to issue within 10 days following the effective date $70,000 worth of stock and pay a license fee of $30,000.  The Company has a five year right to exercise the option for a commercial medical license or the commercial textile license.  The fee for the first license is a $289,000 and shares equivalent in value to $675,000.  The fee for a second commercial license is $75,000 and shares equivalent in value to $175,000.  All payments are non-refundable. On April 18, 2011, the Company issued 1,029,412 shares of stock with a fair value of $70,000 based on the average trading price over a 30 day period.

On September 30, 2011 the Company entered into an addendum to an agreement with a consultant, superseding previous agreements, to provide research and development for a term of four years. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, the Company will issue 3,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock and replaces any stock currently owed to the consultant pursuant to consulting fee provisions of prior agreements.  Additionally the Company will issue one million shares of the Company’s common stock per year as a consulting fee on the annual anniversary of this agreement or at the Company’s option, pay an annual consulting fee of $100,000.  As of September 30, 2011, the fair value of the Company’s shares of common stock was $0.10 per share and the Company owed the consultant $130,000.  Accordingly, the Company has recorded an additional liability to the consultant of $170,000 as of September 30, 2011. For the year ended December 31, 2012 the Company issued 4,000,000 shares with a fair value of $340,000 to a consultant for research and development services provided in the past.

On November 9, 2012, the Company entered into an agreement with a consultant to provide investor relations services in exchange for a warrant for 10,000,000 common shares. The agreement will remain in effect until May 27, 2013. On July 18, 2013, the Company issued 9,857,142 shares in connection with the cashless exercise of the 10,000,000 warrants.

On July 9, 2013, the Company entered into an agreement with a consultant to provide investor relations services in exchange for a warrant for 10,000,000 common shares at $.001 with a cashless provision and a five year term.

F-26

KRAIG BIOCRAFT LABORATORIES, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

On September 30, 2013 the Company entered into a Collaborative Yarn and Textile Development Agreement with a technical textile manufacturing company.  Pursuant to the terms of that agreement the Company has agreed to supply the technical textile manufacturing company with sample quantities of the Company’s recombinant spider silk for the purpose of developing and testing new textiles which are made from, or which incorporate recombinant spider silk.  The agreement provides that the two companies will jointly share, on an equal basis, any intellectual property, including any utility patents, which are developed as a result of this collaboration.  Such intellectual property potentially includes utility patents on textile designs.  The Company has agreed that it will pay half of the cost associated with the filing and prosecution of utility patents relating to intellectual property which is developed through its collaboration with the technical textile manufacturing company.

On October 15, 2013 the Company entered into an intellectual property agreement with a scientific researcher relating to the development of new recombinant silk fibers.  Under the terms of that agreement the scientific researcher will transfer to the Company his rights to intellectual property, inventions and trade secrets which the researcher develops relating to recombinant silk.  The researcher will receive 8,000,000 warrants of the Company’s stock, exercisable 24 months from the date of the agreement.  The researcher will also receive additional warrants when and if the researcher develops advanced recombinant silk fibers for the Company’s use.  Under the terms of the agreement the researcher will receive 10,000,000 warrants in the event that he develops a new recombinant silk fiber with certain performance characteristics, and another 10,000,000 warrants if he develops a second recombinant silk fiber with certain characteristics.  If the consultant performs the contract in good faith the consultant will be entitled to an additional 8,000 warrants.  The warrants described in this note all contain a cashless exercise provision and are exercisable on the 24 month anniversary of the date on which they were issuable under the agreement.

(E)Operating Lease Agreement

On April 1, 2012 the Company executed a one-year non-cancelable operating lease for its Laboratory space. The lease was subsequently extended through March 31, 2014. In March of 2014, the Company once again extended the lease on a month to month basis.

Rent expense for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 is $13,565 and 9,789, respectively.

NOTE 10RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

On October 6, 2006 the Company received $10,000 from a principal stockholder.    Pursuant to the terms of the loan, the advance bears interest at 12%, is unsecured and matured on May 1, 2007. At June 30, 2011 the Company recorded interest expense and related accrued interest payable of $776.   As of June 30, 2011, the loan principal was repaid in full.

On December 26, 2006, the Company entered into an addendum to the intellectual property transfer agreement with an officer.  In consideration of the Company issuing either 200,000 preferred shares with the following preferences; no dividends and voting rights equal to 100 common shares per share of preferred stock or the payment of $120,000, the officer agreed to terminate the royalty payments due under the agreement and give title to the exclusive license for the non protective apparel use of the intellectual property to the Company.  On the date of the agreement, the Company did not have any preferred stock authorized with the required preferences.  In accordance with In accordance with FASB Accounting Standards Codification No. 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity, the Company determined that the present value of the payment of $120,000 that was due on December 26, 2007, the one year anniversary of the addendum, should be recorded as an accrued expense until such time as the Company has the ability to assert that it has preferred shares authorized.  As of March 31, 2010, the Company has recorded $120,000 in royalty agreement payable- related party.  On December 21, 2007 the officer extended the due date to July 30, 2008.  On May 30, 2008 the officer extended the due date to March 31, 2009.  On October 10, 2008, the officer extended the due date to the earlier of (a) March 30, 2010 or (b) upon demand by the officer. On March 30, 2010, the officer extended the due date to the earlier of (a) March 30, 2010 or (b) upon demand by the officer.  On September 8, 2009, a payment of $15,000 was paid to the officer. On October 19, 2009 and December 1, 2009, $10,000 was paid to the officer respectfully.  An additional payment of $10,000 was made on January 15, 2010.  During the quarter ending September 30, 2010 an additional payment of $8,000 was made. During the year ended December 31, 2012 an additional payment of $1,000 was made. During the year ended December 31, 2013 an additional payment of $1,280 was made.  As of December 31, 2013, the outstanding balance is $66,000.  Additionally, the accrued expenses are accruing 7% interest per year.  As of December 31, 2013 the Company recorded interest expense and related accrued interest payable of $1,508.

During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company's Chief Executive Officer forgave accrued payroll of $30,000 and extended the term of existing debt in exchange for the issuance of Series A convertible Preferred Stock ("Series A PS"). In connection with this transaction, incurred a loss on settlement of debt of $5,187,800. See note (8(H)).

F-27

KRAIG BIOCRAFT LABORATORIES, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

As of December 31, 2013, the Company owes $669,184 in accrued salary to principal stockholder.  On November 10, 2010, the Company entered into an addendum to the employment agreement, effective January 1, 2011 through the December 31, 2015.    The term of the agreement is a five year period at an annual salary of $210,000.  There is a 6% annual increase.  The employee is also to receive a 20% bonsus based on the annual based salary.  Any stock, stock options bonuses have to be approved by the board of directors.

On February 25, 2013 the Company received $150,000 from a principal stockholder.    Pursuant to the terms of the loan, the advance bears interest at 3%, is unsecured and due on demand. At December 31, 2013 the Company recorded interest expense and related accrued interest payable of $2,001 and the loan balance of $150,000 was repaid.

As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, there was $97,138 and $82,262, respectively, included in accounts payable and accrued expenses - related party, which is owed to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer.

NOTE 11SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On January 28, 2014 the Company issued 3,537,736 shares of common stock for $150,000 ($0.04/share).

On February 18, 2014 the Company issued 3,409,091 shares of common stock for $150,000 ($0.04/share).

On February 2, 2014, the Company issued 9,821,429 shares in connection with the exercise of 10,000,000 warrants, exercise price of $0.001, for $10,000.

On February 17, 2014, the Company entered into two consulting agreements with two consultants for independent technical expertise to further the Company’s business plans and scientific research and development.  As consideration for the services performed, the Company agrees to issue the following to each of the consultants:

●   Within 30 days of the date of this agreement, a warrant for six hundred thousand shares of the Company’s common stock to be exercisable on the 14 month anniversary of this agreement for a period of 12 months with a cashless exercise provision.

●   Within 30 days of the date of this agreement, a warrant for one million shares of the Company’s common stock to be exercisable on the 20 month anniversary of this agreement for a period of 12 months with a cashless exercise provision.

●   Within 30 days of the date of this agreement, a warrant for two million shares of the Company’s common stock to be exercisable on the 32 month anniversary of this agreement for a period of 12 months with a cashless exercise provision.

●   Based on the consultants reaching two sets of benchmarks, two separate warrants for one million five hundred thousand shares of the Company’s common stock to be exercisable on the 28 month anniversary of this agreement for a period of 12 months with a cashless exercise provision.

●   On the three year anniversary, assuming the consultant acted in good faith and the Company’s board of directors approval, a warrant for one million five hundred thousand shares of the Company’s common stock to be exercisable on the 28 month anniversary of this agreement for a period of 12 months with a cashless exercise provision.

On March 12, 2014 the Company issued 2,551,020 shares of common stock for $100,000 ($0.04/share).

On March 19, 2014, the Company entered into a five year consulting agreement for general advisor and consulting services.  As consideration for the services performed, the Company agrees to pay the consultant a fee of $1,000 per month.  At the Company’s option, said consulting fee may be paid to the consultant in the form of Company stock based upon the greater of $0.50/share or the average of the closing price of the Company’s common stock over the five days preceding such stock issuance.

On March 21, 2014, the Company renewed its lease of a Laboratory. The lease is on a month to month basis at an annual rate of $12,750.

On March 28, 2014, the Company renewed and extended a consulting agreement and has agreed to issue 44,000 shares of common stock as consideration for consulting fees owed from June 1, 2012 through March 31, 2014.

F-28

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

We changed our independent registered public accounting firm effective October 28, 2013 from PS Stephenson & Co, P.C. (“Stephenson”) to M&K CPAs. Information regarding the change in the independent registered public accounting firm was disclosed in our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 30, 2013.  There were no disagreements with Stephenson or any reportable events requiring disclosure under Item 304(b) of Regulation S-K.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”), the Company carried out an evaluation, with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) (the Company’s principal financial and accounting officer), of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined under Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, the Company’s CEO and CFO concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are not effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including the Company’s CEO and CFO, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Management's Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.

Our Chief Executive Officer, as the principal executive officer (chief executive officer) and principal financial officer (chief financial officer), is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f). Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, our internal controls and procedures may not prevent or detect misstatements. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies and procedures may deteriorate.

Our management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013. The framework used by management in making that assessment was the criteria set forth in the document entitled “ Internal Control – Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on that assessment, our management has determined that as of December 31, 2013, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was not effective for the purposes for which it is intended based on the following material weaknesses:

13

– We do not have a system in place to ensure all of our consulting agreements are timely reconciled to the financial statements.

We are developing a plan to ensure that all information will be recorded, processed, summarized and reported accurately, and as of the date of this report, we have taken the following steps to address the above-referenced material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting:

1.	We will continue to educate our management personnel to increase its ability to comply with the disclosure requirements and financial reporting controls; and
2.	We will increase management oversight of accounting and reporting functions in the future; and
3.	As soon as we can raise sufficient capital or our operations generate sufficient cash flow, we will hire personnel to handle our accounting and reporting functions.

While the first two steps of our remediation process are ongoing, we do not expect to remediate the weaknesses in our internal controls over financial reporting until the time when we start to commercialize a recombinant fiber (and, therefore, may have sufficient cash flow for hiring personnel to handle our accounting and reporting functions).

This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management's report was not subject to attestation by the Company's registered public accounting firm because as a smaller reporting company we are not subject to Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

No change in our system of internal control over financial reporting occurred during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

14

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL PERSONS: COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(A) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT

Our sole executive officer and director as of March 28, 2014 is as follows:

NAME	AGE	POSITION	DATE APPOINTED
Kim Thompson	52	President, Chief Executive Officer, Director, and Chief Financial Officer	April 25, 2006

The following summarizes the occupation and business experience during the past five years for our sole officer and directors.

KIM THOMPSON

Mr. Thompson was a founder of the California law firm of Ching & Thompson which was founded in 1997 where he focused primarily on commercial litigation. He has been a partner in the Illinois law firm of McJessy, Ching & Thompson since 2004 where he also emphasizes commercial and civil rights litigation. Mr. Thompson received his bachelor’s degree in applied economics from James Madison College, Michigan State University, and his Juris Doctorate from the University of Michigan. He is the named inventor or co-inventor on a number of provisional patent applications including inventions relating to biotechnology and mechanics. Mr. Thompson is the inventor of the technology concept that lead to the forming of the Company. We believe that Mr. Thompson is well suited to serve as our director because of his knowledge of biotechnology, legal expertise and background in economics.

Term of Office

Our directors are appointed for a one-year term to hold office until the next annual general meeting of our shareholders or until removed from office in accordance with our bylaws. Our officers are appointed by our board of directors and hold office until removed by the board. Mr. Thompson is employed as the CEO and CFO of the company pursuant to a five year employment contract.

Our officer and director has not filed any bankruptcy petition, been convicted of or been the subject of any criminal proceedings or the subject of any order, judgment or decree involving the violation of any state or federal securities laws within the past ten (10) years.

Our sole director was appointed for a one-year term to hold office until the next annual general meeting of our shareholders or until removed from office in accordance with our bylaws. Our sole officer was appointed by our board of directors and holds office until removed by the board

15

Committees

Because our Board of Directors currently consists of only one member, no board committees have been formed as of the filing of this Annual Report. All audit committee functions are performed by Mr. Kim Thompson, as the sole member of our Board of Directors and he is the largest shareholder of the Company and the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and President. Mr. Thompson does not qualify as an “audit committee financial expert” within the applicable definition of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Code of Ethics

The Company has adopted a Code of Ethics applicable to its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. This Code of Ethics was previously filed as an exhibit to our annual report on Form 10-KSB on March 26, 2008.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The following summary compensation table sets forth all compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to the named executive officer during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 in all capacities for the accounts of our executive, including the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO):

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

Name and principal position	Year	Salary ($)		Bonus ($)		Stock Awards ($)		Option Awards ($)		Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)		Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)		All Other Compensation ($)			Total ($)
Kim Thompson
President, CEO, CFO and Director	2013	$	237,134		0		0	$	0		0	$	0	$	8,793	(1)	$	245,927
	2012	$	222,600		44,520		0	$	0		0	$	0	$	40,950.81	(2)	$	308,070.81

1)   In 2013, Kim Thompson received $8,793 in medical insurance and medical reimbursement pursuant to an employment agreement entered into with us.

2)   In 2012, Kim Thompson received $10,950.81 in medical insurance and medical reimbursement, and $30,000 in retirement fund contributions pursuant to an employment agreement entered into with us.

Employment Agreements

On November 10, 2010 the Company entered into a five-year employment agreement with the Company’s Chairman, Chief Executive Officer  and Chief Financial Officer, effective as of January 1, 2011. The agreement renews annually so that at all times, the term of the agreement is five years. Pursuant to this agreement, the Company will pay an annual base salary of $210,000 for the period January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2011. Base pay will be increased each January 1st, for the subsequent twelve month periods by six percent. The officer will also be entitled to life, disability, health and dental insurance as well as an annual bonus in an amount equal to 20% of the base salary. The agreement also calls for the retention of the executive as a consultant following the termination of employment with compensation during such consultancy based upon the Company reaching certain milestones:

16

a. Upon the expiration or termination of this agreement for any reason, or by either party, Company agrees that it will employ Executive as a consultant for a period of four (4) years and at a rate of $4,500 per month.

b. In the event that Company achieves gross sales of five million dollars ($5,000,000) or more, or one million dollars ($1,000,000) or more in net income, in any year during the term of this agreement, or upon the Company’s achieving an average market capitalization over a 240 consecutive calendar day period, in excess of $70,000,000 during the term of this agreement, then the consulting period will be for five (5) years and the consulting rate will be increased to $5,500 per month.

c. In the event that Company achieves gross sales of ten million dollars ($10,000,000) or more, or two million dollars ($2,000,000) or more in net income, in any year during the term of this agreement, or upon the Company’s achieving an average market capitalization over a 240 consecutive calendar day period, in excess of $90,000,000 during the term of this agreement, then the consulting period will be for six (6) years and the consulting rate will be increased to $7,500 per month.

The November 10, 2010 employment agreement replaced the prior agreement dated April 26, 2006. On April 26, 2006, the Company entered into its first a five-year employment agreement with the Company’s Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. The agreement renewed annually so that at all times, the term of the agreement was five years. Pursuant to this agreement, the Company agreed to pay an annual base salary of $185,000 for the period May 1, 2006 through December 31, 2006. Base pay will be increased each January 1st, for the subsequent twelve month periods by six percent. The officer will also be entitled to life, disability, health and dental insurance. In addition, the officer received five year warrants to purchase 700,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.21 per share, eight year warrants to purchase 1,500,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.33 per share, and nine year warrants to purchase 2,000,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.40 per share. The warrants fully vested on the date of grant. The agreement also calls for the issuance of warrants and increase in the officer’s base compensation upon the Company reaching certain milestones. The Chief executive subsequently waved all warrants and milestone based compensation to which he would have been entitled under the April 26, 2006 agreement.

Compensation of Directors

Directors are permitted to receive fixed fees and other compensation for their services as directors. The Board of Directors has the authority to fix the compensation of directors. No amounts have been paid to, or accrued to, directors in such capacity.

17

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The following table provides the names and addresses of each person known to us to own more than 5% of our outstanding shares of common stock as of March 28, 2014 and by the officers and directors, individually and as a group. Except as otherwise indicated, all shares are owned directly.

Title of Class	Name and Address of Beneficial Owner	Amount and Nature of Beneficial Owner		Percent of Class (1)
Class A Common Stock	Kim Thompson 120 N. Washington Square, Suite 805 Lansing, MI 48933		276,031,421		42.17	%
Class A Common Stock	All executive officers and directors as a group (1 Person)		276,031,421		42.17	%

________

(1) The percent of class is based on 654,561,270 shares of our Class A common stock issued and outstanding as of April 14, 2014.

(2) This includes two shares of Class A common stock issuable upon conversion of two shares of Series A preferred stock held by Mr. Thompson.

18

Securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans

None.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTION, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Related Party Transactions

On October 6, 2006 the Company received $10,000 from a principal stockholder. Pursuant to the terms of the loan, the advance bears interest at 12%, is unsecured and matures on May 1, 2007. At December 31, 2007, the Company recorded interest expense and related accrued interest payable of $776. As of December 31, 2007, the loan principal was repaid.

In April 2006, the Company entered into a Founder’s Stock Purchase and Intellectual Property Transfer Agreement (the “Intellectual Property Agreement”) with its CEO. Pursuant to the Intellectual Property Agreement, the CEO contributed to the Company a provisional patent application pertaining to transgenic expression system for commercial production of certain silk proteins, in exchange for which the Company agreed to (i) issue to the CEO 33,229,200 shares of Class A common stock, (ii) certain royalty payments (which were subsequently waived pursuant to the Addendum), (iii) an exclusive license to use such intellectual property for non-protective apparel (which was subsequently waived pursuant to the Addendum).

On December 26, 2006, the Company entered into an Addendum to the Intellectual Property Agreement (the “Addendum”), pursuant to which the CEO agreed to give up his right to royalty payments for the intellectual property he transferred to the Company as well as an exclusive license to use such intellectual property for non-protective apparel. In exchange for giving up these rights in the Addendum, the Company agreed to use its best reasonable efforts to issue the CEO 200,000 preferred shares within 12 months of the date of the Addendum. The preferred shares would not have any priority to payments of dividends and would not have to have the right to receive dividend payments. However, such preferred shares would have 100 votes per share (20,000,000 votes). If the Company is unable, through the use of its best reasonable efforts, to issue such preferred shares, then the Company will provide its CEO with an alternative cash payment of $120,000 payable on the one year anniversary of the Addendum (Also see Note 6 (C) to the audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2009).

On April 1, 2012 the Company executed a one-year non-cancelable operating lease for its corporate office space. The lease was subsequently extended through March 31, 2014. In March of 2014, the Company once again extended the lease on a month to month agreement. Rent expense for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 is $13,565 and 9,789, respectively.

As of December 31, 2013, the Company owes$669,183 in accrued salary to principal stockholder. On September, 2010, the Company entered into an addendum to the employment agreement whereby all but $250,000 of unpaid back salary was forgiven by the principal stockholder. Also, the interest rate was reduced to 3% per year. In exchange the Company agreed to issue 10,000,000 preferred shares to the principal stockholder no later than September 30, 2011. As of December 31, 2013, no accrued salary has been converted to Class “A” Common Stock. On December 17, 2013 the Company issued 2 shares of supper voting preferred to the principal stockholder.  Each share of such preferred has voting rights equal to 200,000 common shares.  Each of the two preferred shares is convertible into one share of common stock.  Each of the two preferred shares has the same right to normal dividends as a common share but has no other right to distributions.  By agreement of the principal share holder, this issuance of two shares of super voting preferred fully satisfies the Company’s obligation to issue preferred stock to the principal shareholder stemming from the addendum of 2010.  On November 10, 2010, the Company entered into an addendum to the employment agreement, effective January 1, 2011 through the December 31, 2015. The term of the agreement is a five year period at an annual salary of $210,000. There is a 6% annual increase. The employee is also to receive a 20% bonus based on the annual based salary. Any stock, stock options bonuses have to be approved by the board of directors.

As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, there was $97,138 and $82,262, respectively, included in accounts payable and accrued expenses - related party, which is owed to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer.

Director Independence

Mr. Kim Thompson, our Chief Executive Officer and President, is our sole director. Mr. Thompson does not qualify as independent directors under Rule 10A-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and as defined in NASD Marketplace Rule 4200(15).

19

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

Audit Fees

For the Company’s fiscal years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, we were billed approximately $8,000 and $12,500 for professional services rendered for the audit and review of our financial statements.

Audit Related Fees

There were no fees for audit related services for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012.

Tax Fees

For the Company’s fiscal years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, we were not billed for professional services rendered for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning.

All Other Fees

The Company did not incur any other fees related to services rendered by our principal accountant for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012.

Effective May 6, 2003, the Securities and Exchange Commission adopted rules that require that before our auditor is engaged by us to render any auditing or permitted non-audit related service, the engagement be:

● approved by our audit committee; or

● entered into pursuant to pre-approval policies and procedures established by the audit committee, provided the policies and procedures are detailed as to the particular service, the audit committee is informed of each service, and such policies and procedures do not include delegation of the audit committee's responsibilities to management.

We do not have an audit committee. Our entire board of directors pre-approves all services provided by our independent auditors.

The pre-approval process has just been implemented in response to the new rules. Therefore, our board of directors does not have records of what percentage of the above fees were pre-approved. However, all of the above services and fees were reviewed and approved by the entire board of directors either before or after the respective services were rendered.

20

PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.

1. List of Financial Statements.

 The following consolidated financial statements of Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc. and Reporst of its current and former Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, M&K CPAs PLLC and PS Stephenson & Co, P.C., are included in this report:

●   Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms.

●   Balance Sheets at December 31, 2013 and 2012 (Restated)

●   Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 (Restated) and for the period from April 25, 2006 (inception) to December 31, 2013 (Restated)

●   Statements of Stockholders’ Equity/(Deficit) for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 and for the period from April 25, 2006 (inception) to December 31, 2013

●   Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 (Restated) and for the period from April 25, 2006 (inception) to December 31, 2013 (Restated)

●   Notes to Financial Statements for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 and for the period from April 25, 2006 (inception) to December 31, 2013

2. List of all Financial Statement Schedules.

All schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is shown in the financial statements or notes thereto.

3. Exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K. The following exhibits are filed as a part of, or incorporated by reference into, this Report:

EXHIBIT NUMBER	DESCRIPTION
3.1*	Articles of Incorporation.
3.2	Articles of Amendment (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the registration statement on Form S-1, SEC File No. 333-162316, filed on October 2, 2009, and incorporated by reference herein).
3.3*	By-Laws.
10.1*	Addendum to the Employment Contract, dated November 6, 2006, by and between Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc. and Kim Thompson and Employment Contract, dated as of April 26, 2006, by and between Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc. and Kim Thompson.
10.2*	Securities Purchase Agreement between Kraig Biocraft Laboratories and Worth Equity Fund, L.P. and Mutual Release.
10.3*	Securities Purchase Agreement between Kraig Biocraft Laboratories and Lion Equity.
10.4	Amended Letter Agreement, dated September 14, 2009, by and between Kraig Biocraft Laboratories and Calm Seas Capital, LLC. (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the registration statement on Form S-1, SEC File No. 333-162316, filed on October 2, 2009, and incorporated by reference herein).
10.5	Exclusive License Agreement, effective as of May 8, 2006, by and between The University of Wyoming and Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, filed on April 15, 2010 and incorporated by reference herein).
10.6	Addendum to the Founder’s Stock Purchase and Intellectual Property Transfer Agreement, dated December 26, 2006, and the Founder’s Stock Purchase and Intellectual Property Transfer Agreement dated April 26, 2006 (filed as Exhibit 10.6 to amendment no. 2 to the registration statement on Form S-1, SEC File No. 333-162316, filed on January 25, 2010, and incorporated by reference herein).
10.7	Intellectual Property/Collaborative Research Agreement, dated March 20, 2010, by and between Kraig Biocraft Laboratories and The University of Notre Dame du Lac (filed as exhibit 10.7 to the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, filed on April 15, 2010 and incorporated by reference herein)
14.1**	Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.
31.1 #	Certification of Chief Executive Officer/Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1 #	Certification of Chief Executive Officer/Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101 #	Interactive data files.

_____

* Filed as an exhibit to the registration statement on Form SB-2 filed with the SEC on September 26, 2007 and incorporated by reference herein.

** Filed as Exhibit 14.1 to the annual report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007 filed with the SEC on March 26, 2008 and incorporated by reference herein.

# Filed herewith.

21

SIGNATURES

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this Annual Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc.
Dated: April 15, 2014	By:	/s/ Kim Thompson
		Kim Thompson Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, THIS ANNUAL REPORT HAS BEEN SIGNED BY THE FOLLOWING PERSONS IN THE CAPACITIES AND ON THE DATES INDICATED:

Name	Title	Date
/s/ Kim Thompson	Chief Executive Officer and Sole Director	April 15, 2014
Kim Thompson

22

EX-31.1

EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION

OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Kim Thompson, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Kraig Biocraft Laboratories,  Inc.;
2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods present in this report;
4.	I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
	(a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
	(b)	Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under my supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding their reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
	(c)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
	(d)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financing reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.	I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
	(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
	(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involved management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:   April 15, 2014

/s/ Kim Thompson

Kim Thompson

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer)

EX-32.1

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kim Thompson, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc. hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2.	The information contained in the Report fairly represents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc.

Date: April 15, 2014

/s/ Kim Thompson

Kim Thompson

Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer (principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc. and will be retained by Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

XML

8. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Details Narrative) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Commitments And Contingencies Details Narrative
Rent expense	$ 13,565

XML

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ORGANIZATION (Details 2) (USD $)	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies And Organization Details 2
Net Operating Loss Carryforward	$ 2,415,595	$ 2,029,742
Valuation allowance	(2,415,595)	(2,029,742)
Net deferred tax asset	0	0
Net deferred tax liability	$ 0	$ 0

XML

2. GOING CONCERN

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2013

Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract]

GOING CONCERN

As reflected in the accompanying financial statements, the Company is in the development stage, has a working capital deficiency of $1,215,495 and stockholders’ deficiency of $1,201,402 and used $2,764,547 of cash in operations from inception.  This raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.  The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent on the Company’s ability to raise additional capital and implement its business plan.  The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.

Management believes that actions presently being taken to obtain additional funding and implement its strategic plans provide the opportunity for the Company to continue as a going concern.

XML

4. EQUIPMENT (Details Narrative) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Equipment Details Narrative
Depreciation and amortization expense	$ 5,888	$ 5,583

XML

4. EQUIPMENT (Details) (USD $)	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Equipment Details
Automobile	$ 25,828	$ 25,828
Office Equipment	5,560	2,086
Less Accumulated Depreciation	(17,295)	(11,406)
Total Property and Equipment	$ 14,093	$ 16,508

XML

7. STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT (Details)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Expected dividends	0.00%	0.00%
Expected volatility	183.35%	283.23%
Expected term	5 years	10 years
Risk free interest rate	1.50%	1.69%
Expected forfeitures	0.00%	0.00%
Grant Date
Expected dividends	0.00%
Expected volatility	96.35%
Expected term	3 years
Risk free interest rate	1.45%
Expected forfeitures	0.00%

XML

7. STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT (Details 1) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Stockholders Deficit Tables
Number of Warrants Outstanding, Beginning	10,000,000	0
Number of Warrants Granted	18,000,000	10,000,000
Number of Warrants Exercised	(10,000,000)	0
Number of Warrants Cancelled/Forfeited	0	0
Number of Warrants Outstanding, Ending	18,000,000	10,000,000
Weighted Average Exercise Price Outstanding, Beginning	$ 0.001	$ 0
Weighted Average Exercise Price Granted	$ 0.001	$ 0.001
Weighted Average Exercise Price Exercised	$ 0	$ 0
Weighted Average Exercise Price Cancelled/Forfeited	$ 0	$ 0
Weighted Average Exercise Price Outstanding, Ending	$ 0.001	$ 0.001
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years) Outstanding	2 years 10 months 24 days	9 years 10 months 24 days
Warrants Exercisable, Ending	18,000,000	10,000,000
Aggregate Intrinsic Value	$ 918,000	$ 365,000

XML

2. RESTATEMENT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2013

Equity [Abstract]

2. RESTATEMENT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The audited financial statements  for the year ended December 31, 2012, filed with the SEC on  April 15, 2013, have been restated as a result of management’s determination that the Company’s accounting treatment pertaining to the issuance of 10,000,000 warrants to consultant with a fair value of $400,000 should be recorded as a public relations expense.

The effect of the restatement on our previously issued audited financial statements as of December 31, 2012 is as follows:

	RESTATED BALANCE SHEET									Note
	As Reported			Adjustments			Restated
Total Assets	$	78,752		$	-		$	78,752
Total Liabilities	$	1,213,168		$	-		$	1,213,168
Commitments and Contingencies
Stockholders' Deficit
Preferred stock, no par value; unlimited shares authorized,
none issued  and outstanding		-			-			-
Common stock Class A,  no par value; unlimited shares authorized,
603,269,838 and 586,720,411 shares issued and outstanding, respectively		6,360,920			-			6,360,920
Common stock Class B,  no par value; unlimited shares authorized,
no shares issued and outstanding		-			-			-
Common Stock Issuable, 1,122,311 and 1,122,311 shares, respectively		22,000			-			22,000			1
Additional paid-in capital		920,337			400,000			1,320,337
Deferred Compensation		-			-			-
Deficit accumulated during the development stage		(8,437,673	)		(400,000	)		(8,837,673	)		1
		.
Total Stockholders' Deficit		(1,134,416	)		-			(1,134,416	)
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficit	$	78,752		$	-		$	78,752

	RESTATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
	For the Year Ended						For the Year Ended
	December 31, 2012						December 31, 2012
	As Reported			Adjustments			Restated
Revenue	$	-					$	-
								-
Operating Expenses								-
General and Administrative		379,326						379,326
Public Relations		-			400,000			400,000		1
Amortization of Debt Discount		-						-
Professional Fees		48,667						48,667
Officer's Salary		267,120						267,120
Contract Settlement		-						-
Research and Development		465,293						465,293
Total Operating Expenses		1,160,406			400,000			1,560,406
								-
Loss from Operations		(1,160,406	)		(400,000	)		(1,560,406	)
								-
Other Income/(Expenses)								-
Other income		3,000						3,000
Interest income		192						192
Change in fair value of embedded derivative liability		-						-
Change in fair value of embedded derivative liability-related party		-						-
Interest expense		(45,707	)					(45,707	)
Other expense		-						-
Total Other Income/(Expenses)		(42,515	)		-			(42,515	)
								-
Net (Income) Loss before Provision for Income Taxes		(1,202,921	)		(400,000	)		(1,602,921	)
								-
Provision for Income  Taxes		-			-			-
								-
Net Income (Loss)	$	(1,202,921	)	$	(400,000	)	$	(1,602,921	)
								-
Net Income (Loss) Per Share  - Basic and Diluted	$	(0.00	)				$	(0.00	)
Weighted average number of shares outstanding
during the period - Basic and Diluted		596,143,581						596,143,581

	RESTATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
	For the Period from April 25, 2006 (Inception) to December 31, 2012						For the Period from April 25, 2006 (Inception) to December 31, 2012
	As Reported			Adjustments			Restated
Revenue	$	-					$	-
								-
Operating Expenses								-
General and Administrative		1,939,502						1,939,502
Public Relations		219,890			400,000			619,890		1
Amortization of Debt Discount		120,000						120,000
Professional Fees		335,075						335,075
Officer's Salary		1,603,514						1,603,514
Contract Settlement		107,143						107,143
Research and Development		1,302,009						1,302,009
Total Operating Expenses		5,627,133			400,000			6,027,133
								-
Loss from Operations		(5,627,133	)		(400,000	)		(6,027,133	)
								-
Other Income/(Expenses)								-
Other income		7,881						7,881
Interest income		192						192
Change in fair value of embedded derivative liability		(2,790,185	)					(2,790,185	)
Change in fair value of embedded derivative liability-related party		119,485						119,485
Interest expense		(147,913	)					(147,913	)
Total Other Income/(Expenses)		(2,810,540	)		-			(2,810,540	)
								-
Net (Income) Loss before Provision for Income Taxes		(8,437,673	)		(400,000	)		(8,837,673	)
								-
Provision for Income  Taxes		-			-			-
								-
Net Income (Loss)	$	(8,437,673	)	$	(400,000	)	$	(8,837,673	)

	RESTATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
	For the Year Ended						For the Year Ended
	December 31, 2012						December 31, 2012
	As Reported			Adjustments			Restated
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:
Net Loss	$	(1,202,921	)	$	(400,000	)	$	(1,602,921	)	1
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operations
Depreciation expense		5,583						5,583
Stock issuable for services		-						-
Change in Fair Value of Derivative Liability		-						-
Stock issued for services		550,000						550,000
Warrants issued to employees		-						-
Warrants issued to consultants		-			400,000			400,000
Deferred compensation realized		-						-
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:								-
(Increase)Decrease in prepaid expenses		(2,270	)					(2,270	)
(Increase)Decrease in other receivables								-
Increase in accrued expenses and other payables - related party		238,977						238,977
Increase in accounts payable		(152,291	)					(152,291	)
Net Cash Used In Operating Activities		(562,922	)		-			(562,922	)

	RESTATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
	For the Period from April 25, 2006 (Inception) to December 31, 2012						For the Period from April 25, 2006 (Inception) to December 31, 2012
	As Reported			Adjustments			Restated
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:
Net Loss	$	(8,437,673	)	$	(400,000	)	$	(8,837,673	)	1
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operations
Depreciation expense		11,406						11,406
Stock issuable for services		22,000						22,000
Change in Fair Value of Derivative Liability		2,790,703						2,790,703
Stock issued for services		1,458,180						1,458,180
Warrants issued to employees		126,435						126,435
Warrants issued to consultants		168,000			400,000			568,000		1
Deferred compensation realized		200,000						200,000
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:								-
(Increase)Decrease in prepaid expenses		(2,270	)					(2,270	)
Increase in accrued expenses and other payables - related party		1,369,600						1,369,600
Increase in accounts payable		329,226						329,226
Net Cash Used In Operating Activities		(1,964,393	)		-			(1,964,393	)

Note:

1. Adjustment to recongnize 10,000,000 warrants issued to consultant on November 21, 2012, with fair value of $400,000 (See Note 7(E)).

XML

7. STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT (Details 2) (USD $)	12 Months Ended		92 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2013
Stockholders Deficit Tables
Debt converted – related party	$ (30,000)
Valuation of Series A PS issued as consideration	5,217,800
Loss on settlement of debt	$ 5,187,800	$ 0	$ 5,187,800

XML

Condensed Balance Sheets (USD $)	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
ASSETS
Cash	$ 295,381	$ 53,782
Prepaid expenses	1,743	2,270
Loan receivable	0	6,000
Interest receivable	0	192
Total Current Assets	297,124	62,244
Property and Equipment, net	14,093	16,508
Total Assets	311,217	78,752
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS DEFICIT
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	362,436	246,964
Current portion of loan payable	3,981	4,377
Royalty agreement payable - related party	64,720	66,000
Accrued expenses - related party	1,081,482	886,449
Total Current Liabilities	1,512,619	1,203,790
Long Term Liabilities
Convertible note payable - net of debt discount, of $0 and $0	0	5,000
Loan payable, net of current portion	0	4,378
Total Liabilities	1,512,619	1,213,168
Commitments and Contingencies
Stockholders Deficit
Convertible Preferred stock Series A, no par value 2 and none shares issued and outstanding, respectively	5,217,800
Common stock Class A, no par value; unlimited shares authorized, 635,241,994 and 604,115,638 shares issued and outstanding, respectively	7,810,920	6,360,920
Common stock Class B, no par value; unlimited shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding	0	0
Common Stock Issuable,1,122,311 and 1,122,311 shares, respectively	22,000	22,000
Additional paid-in capital	2,053,236	1,320,337
Deficit accumulated during the development stage	(16,305,358)	(8,837,673)
Total Stockholders Deficit	(1,201,402)	(1,134,416)
Total Liabilities and Stockholders Deficit	$ 311,217	$ 78,752

XML

Condensed Statements of Cash Flows (USD $)	12 Months Ended		92 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2013
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:
Net Loss	$ (7,467,685)	$ (1,602,921)	$ (16,305,358)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operations
Depreciation expense	5,888	5,583	17,294
Gain on forgiveness of debt	(6,775)	0	(6,775)
Stock issuable for services	0	0	22,000
Loss on settlement of accrued payroll - related party	5,187,800	0	5,187,800
Change in Fair Value of Derivative Liability	0	0	2,790,703
Stock issued for services	0	550,000	1,458,180
Warrants issued to employees	0	0	126,435
Warrants issued to consultants	1,132,899	400,000	1,700,899
Deferred compensation realized	0	0	200,000
Bad debt expense	6,238	0	6,238
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
(Decrease) in interest receivable	(46)	0	(46)
(Increase) Decrease in prepaid expenses	527	(2,270)	(1,743)
Increase in accrued expenses and other payables - related party	223,749	235,377	1,593,349
Increase in accounts payable	117,251	(148,691)	446,477
Net Cash Used In Operating Activities	(800,154)	(562,922)	(2,764,547)
Cash Flows From Investing Activities:
Loan receivable	0	0	(6,000)
Interest receivable	0	(192)	(192)
Purchase of Fixed Assets and Domain Name	(3,473)	0	(31,387)
Net Cash Used In Investing Activities	(3,473)	(192)	(37,579)
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:
Proceeds from Notes Payable - Stockholder	150,000	0	150,000
Repayments of Notes Payable - Stockholder	(150,000)	0	(150,000)
Proceeds from issuance of convertible note	0	0	120,000
Repayments of loan payable	(4,774)	(3,513)	3,980
Proceeds from issuance of common stock	1,050,000	425,000	2,973,527
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities	1,045,226	421,487	3,097,507
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash	241,599	(141,627)	295,381
Cash at Beginning of Period	53,782	195,409	0
Cash at End of Period	295,381	53,782	295,381
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid for interest	0	0	0
Cash paid for taxes	0	0	0
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities:
Shares issued in connection with cashless warrants exercise	400,000	0	2,969,838
Shares issued for settlement of accrued payroll - related party	30,000	0	30,000
Shares issued in connection with convertible note payable	0	0	115,000
Beneficial conversion feature on convertible notes and related debt discount	$ 0	$ 0	$ 120,000

XML

7. STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2013

Stockholders Deficit Tables

Weighted average assumptions for warrants issued

On November 21, 2012, the Company issued 10-year warrants for 10,000,000 shares with a consultant, with an exercise price of $0.001 per share. The warrants were granted for services rendered (See Notes 1 and 8(D)). The warrants had a fair value of $400,000, based upon the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The Company used the following weighted average assumptions:

Expected dividends		0	%
Expected volatility		283.23	%
Expected term	10 years
Risk free interest rate		1.69.	%
Expected forfeitures		0	%

On July 9, 2013, t the Company issued 5-year warrants for 10,000,000 shares to a consultant, with an exercise price of $0.001 per share. The warrants were granted for services rendered (See Notes 2 and 8(D)). The warrants had a fair value of $736,816, based upon the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The Company used the following weighted average assumptions:

Expected dividends		0	%
Expected volatility		183.35	%
Expected term	5 years
Risk free interest rate		1.50.	%
Expected forfeitures		0	%

Summary of warrants outstanding

	Number of Warrants			Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (in Years)
Balance, December 31, 2011		-		$	-
Granted		10,000,000			0.001
Exercised
Cancelled/Forfeited		-			-
Balance, December 31, 2012		10,000,000			0.001		9.90
Granted		18,000,000		$	0.001
Exercised		(10,000,000	)	$	-
Cancelled/Forfeited		-
Balance, December 31, 2013		18,000,000		$	0.001		2.9
Intrinsic Value		918,000

For the year ended December 31, 2013, the following warrants were outstanding:

Exercise Price		Warrants Outstandning		Warrants Exercisable		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life		Aggregate Intrinsic Value
$	0.001		28,000,000		18,000,000		2.9		918,000

For the year ended December 31, 2012, the following warrants were outstanding:

Exercise Price		Warrants Outstandning		Warrants Exercisable		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life		Aggregate Intrinsic Value
$	0.001		10,000,000		10,000,000		9.895890411		365,000

Forgiveness of debt & Issuance of Convertible Preferred Stock

	Series A PS Valuation
Debt converted – related party	$	(30,000	)
Valuation of Series A PS issued as consideration		5,217,800
Loss on settlement of debt	$	5,187,800

XML

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ORGANIZATION (Details 1) (USD $)	12 Months Ended		92 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2013
Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies And Organization Tables
Expected income tax recovery (expense) at the statutory rate of 34%	$ (2,539,012)	$ (544,999)
Tax effect of expenses that are not deductible for income tax purposes (net of other amounts deductible for tax purposes)	2,153,127	324,053
Change in valuation allowance	385,853	220,946
Provision for income taxes	$ 0	$ 0	$ 0

XML

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ORGANIZATION

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2013

Notes to Financial Statements

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ORGANIZATION

(A)  Organization

Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc. (a development stage company) (the "Company") was incorporated under the laws of the State of Wyoming on April 25, 2006. The Company was organized to develop high strength, protein based fiber, using recombinant DNA technology, for commercial applications in the textile and specialty fiber industries.

Activities during the development stage include developing the business plan and raising capital.

(B) Use of Estimates

In preparing financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and revenues and expenses during the reported period.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.

(C) Cash

For purposes of the cash flow statements, the Company considers all highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents. There were no cash equivalents as of December 31, 2013 or 2012.

(D) Loss Per Share

Basic and diluted net loss per common share is computed based upon the weighted average common shares outstanding as defined by FASB Accounting Standards Codification No. 260, “Earnings per Share.”  As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, warrants were not included in the computation of income/ (loss) per share because their inclusion is anti-dilutive.

The computation of basic and diluted loss per share at December 31, 2013 and 2012 excludes the common stock equivalents of the following potentially dilutive securities because their inclusion would be anti-dilutive:

	December 31, 2013		December 31, 2012
Stock Warrants (Exercise price - $0.001/share)		18,000,000		10,000,000
Convertible Preferred Stock		2		2
Total		18,000,002		18,000,002

(E) Research and Development Costs

The Company expenses all research and development costs as incurred for which there is no alternative future use. These costs also include the expensing of employee compensation and employee stock based compensation.

(F) Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes under FASB Codification Topic 740-10-25 (“ASC 740-10-25”).  Under ASC 740-10-25, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases.  Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.  Under ASC 740-10-25, the effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

The net deferred tax liability in the accompanying balance sheets includes the following amounts of deferred tax assets and liabilities:

	2013		2012
Expected income tax recovery (expense) at the statutory rate of 34%	$	(2,539,012)	$	(544,999)
Tax effect of expenses that are not deductible for income tax purposes (net of other amounts deductible for tax purposes)		2,153,127		324,053
Change in valuation allowance		385,853		220,946
Provision for income taxes	$	-	$	-

The components of deferred income taxes are as follows:

	Years Ended December,
	2013			2012
Deferred tax liability:	$	-		$	-
Deferred tax asset
Net Operating Loss Carryforward		2,415,595			2,029,742
Valuation allowance		(2,415,595	)		(2,029,742	)
Net deferred tax asset		-			-
Net deferred tax liability	$	-		$	-

The valuation allowance was established to reduce the deferred tax asset to the amount that will more likely than not be realized. This is necessary due to the Company’s continued operating losses and the uncertainty of the Company’s ability to utilize all of the net operating loss carryforwards before they will expire through the year 2033.

The net change in the valuation allowance for the year ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 was an increase of $385,853 and $220,946, respectively.

Effective January 1, 2009, the Company adopted guidance regarding accounting for uncertainty in income taxes. This guidance clarifies the accounting for income taxes by prescribing the minimum recognition threshold an income tax position is required to meet before being recognized in the financial statements and applies to all federal or state income tax positions. Each income tax position is assessed using a two step process. A determination is first made as to whether it is more likely than not that the income tax position will be sustained, based upon technical merits, upon examination by the taxing authorities. If the income tax position is expected to meet the more likely than not criteria, the benefit recorded in the financial statements equals the largest amount that is greater than 50% likely to be realized upon its ultimate settlement. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012 there were no amounts that had been accrued in respect to uncertain tax positions.

None of the Company’s federal or state income tax returns is currently under examination by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) or state authorities.  However, fiscal years 2009 and later remain subject to examination by the IRS and respective states.

(G) Derivative Financial Instruments

Fair value accounting requires bifurcation of embedded derivative instruments such as conversion features in convertible debt or equity instruments, and measurement of their fair value for accounting purposes. In determining the appropriate fair value, the Company uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. In assessing the convertible debt instruments, management determines if the convertible debt host instrument is conventional convertible debt and further if there is a beneficial conversion feature requiring measurement. If the instrument is not considered conventional convertible debt, the Company will continue its evaluation process of these instruments as derivative financial instruments.

Once determined, derivative liabilities are adjusted to reflect fair value at each reporting period end, with any increase or decrease in the fair value being recorded in results of operations as an adjustment to fair value of derivatives. In addition, the fair value of freestanding derivative instruments such as warrants, are also valued using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model.

(H) Stock-Based Compensation

In December 2004, the FASB issued FASB Accounting Standards Codification No. 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation.  Under FASB Accounting Standards Codification No. 718, companies are required to measure the compensation costs of share-based compensation arrangements based on the grant-date fair value and recognize the costs in the financial statements over the period during which employees are required to provide services. Share-based compensation arrangements include stock options, restricted share plans, performance-based awards, share appreciation rights and employee share purchase plans.  As such, compensation cost is measured on the date of grant at their fair value.  Such compensation amounts, if any, are amortized over the respective vesting periods of the option grant.  The Company applies this statement prospectively.

Equity instruments (“instruments”) issued to other than employees are recorded on the basis of the fair value of the instruments, as required by FASB Accounting Standards Codification No. 718.  FASB Accounting Standards Codification No. 505, Equity Based Payments to Non-Employees defines the measurement date and recognition period for such instruments.  In general, the measurement date is when either a (a) performance commitment, as defined, is reached or (b) the earlier of (i) the non-employee performance is complete or (ii) the instruments are vested. The measured value related to the instruments is recognized over a period based on the facts and circumstances of each particular grant as defined in the FASB Accounting Standards Codification.

(I) Business Segments

The Company operates in one segment and therefore segment information is not presented.

(J) Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In July 2013, FASB issued ASU No. 2013-11, "Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists." The provisions of ASU No. 2013-11 require an entity to present an unrecognized tax benefit, or portion thereof, in the statement of financial position as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward or a tax credit carryforward, with certain exceptions related to availability. ASU No. 2013-11 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2013. The adoption of ASU No. 2013-11 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.

In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2013-02, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, to improve the transparency of reporting these reclassifications. Other comprehensive income includes gains and losses that are initially excluded from net income for an accounting period. Those gains and losses are later reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income into net income. The amendments in the ASU do not change the current requirements for reporting net income or other comprehensive income in financial statements. All of the information that this ASU requires already is required to be disclosed elsewhere in the financial statements under U.S. GAAP. The new amendments will require an organization to:

Present (either on the face of the statement where net income is presented or in the notes) the effects on the line items of net income of significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income - but only if the item reclassified is required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified to net income in its entirety in the same reporting period; and Cross-reference to other disclosures currently required under U.S. GAAP for other reclassification items (that are not required under U.S. GAAP) to be reclassified directly to net income in their entirety in the same reporting period. This would be the case when a portion of the amount reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income is initially transferred to a balance sheet account (e.g., inventory for pension-related amounts) instead of directly to income or expense.

The amendments apply to all public and private companies that report items of other comprehensive income. Public companies are required to comply with these amendments for all reporting periods (interim and annual). The amendments are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012, for public companies. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU No. 2013-02 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In January 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-01, Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities, which clarifies which instruments and transactions are subject to the offsetting disclosure requirements originally established by ASU 2011-11. The new ASU addresses preparer concerns that the scope of the disclosure requirements under ASU 2011-11 was overly broad and imposed unintended costs that were not commensurate with estimated benefits to financial statement users. In choosing to narrow the scope of the offsetting disclosures, the Board determined that it could make them more operable and cost effective for preparers while still giving financial statement users sufficient information to analyze the most significant presentation differences between financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and those prepared under IFRSs. Like ASU 2011-11, the amendments in this update will be effective for fiscal periods beginning on, or after January 1, 2013. The adoption of ASU 2013-01 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In October 2012, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update ASU 2012-04, “Technical Corrections and Improvements” in Accounting Standards Update No. 2012-04. The amendments in this update cover a wide range of Topics in the Accounting Standards Codification. These amendments include technical corrections and improvements to the Accounting Standards Codification and conforming amendments related to fair value measurements. The amendments in this update will be effective for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2012. The adoption of ASU 2012-04 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In August 2012, the FASB issued ASU 2012-03, “Technical Amendments and Corrections to SEC Sections: Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 114, Technical Amendments Pursuant to SEC Release No. 33-9250, and Corrections Related to FASB Accounting Standards Update 2010-22 (SEC Update)” in Accounting Standards Update No. 2012-03. This update amends various SEC paragraphs pursuant to the issuance of SAB No. 114. The adoption of ASU 2012-03 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In July 2012, the FASB issued ASU 2012-02, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment” in Accounting Standards Update No. 2012-02. This update amends ASU 2011-08, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment and permits an entity first to assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that an indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the quantitative impairment test in accordance with Subtopic 350-30, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - General Intangibles Other than Goodwill. The amendments are effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012. Early adoption is permitted, including for annual and interim impairment tests performed as of a date before July 27, 2012, if a public entity’s financial statements for the most recent annual or interim period have not yet been issued or, for nonpublic entities, have not yet been made available for issuance. The adoption of ASU 2012-02 has not had a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

(K) Reclassification

The 2012 financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the 2012 presentation.

 (L) Equipment

The Company values property and equipment at cost and depreciates these assets using the straight-line method over their expected useful life. The Company uses a five year life for automobiles. 
 

In accordance with FASB Accounting Standards Codification No. 360, Property, Plant and Equipment, the Company carries long-lived assets at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value. Impairment is evaluated by estimating future undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition. If the sum of the expected undiscounted future cash flow is less than the carrying amount of the assets, an impairment loss is recognized. Fair value, for purposes of calculating impairment, is measured based on estimated future cash flows, discounted at a market rate of interest.

There were no impairment losses recorded during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012.

(M) Fair Value of Financial Instruments

We hold certain financial assets, which are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis in accordance with the Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“ASC Topic 820-10”).   ASC Topic 820-10 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements).  ASC Topic 820-10 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Level 1 instruments include cash, account receivable, prepaid expenses, inventory and account payable and accrued liabilities. The carrying values are assumed to approximate the fair value due to the short term nature of the instrument.

The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under ASC Topic 820-10 are described below:

Level 1 - Valuations based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that an entity has the ability to access.  We believe our carrying value of level 1 instruments approximate their fair value at December 31, 2013.

Level 2 - Valuations based on quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

Level 3 - Valuations based on inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. We consider depleting assets, asset retirement obligations and net profit interest liability to be Level 3. We determine the fair value of Level 3 assets and liabilities utilizing various inputs, including NYMEX price quotations and contract terms. 

		2013		2012
Level 1	$	—	$	—
Level 2		—		—
Level 3		—		—
Total	$	—	$	—

XML

Condensed Balance Sheets (Parenthetical) (USD $)	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Stockholders equity:
Preferred stock, par value	$ 0	$ 0
Preferred stock, issued shares	0	0
Preferred stock, outstanding shares	0	0
Preferred stock Series A, par value	$ 0	$ 0
Preferred stock Series A, issued shares	2	0
Preferred stock Series A, outstanding shares	2	0
Common stock Class A, par value	$ 0	$ 0
Common stock Class A, issued shares	635,241,994	604,115,638
Common stock Class A, outstanding shares	635,241,994	604,115,638
Common stock Class B, par value	$ 0	$ 0
Common stock Class B, issued shares	0	0
Common stock Class B, outstanding shares	0	0
Common Stock Issuable, Shares	1,122,311	1,122,311

XML

11. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2013

Subsequent Events [Abstract]

SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On January 28, 2014 the Company issued 3,537,736 shares of common stock for $150,000 ($0.04/share).

On February 18, 2014 the Company issued 3,409,091 shares of common stock for $150,000 ($0.04/share).

On February 2, 2014, the Company issued 9,821,429 shares in connection with the exercise of 10,000,000 warrants, exercise price of $0.001, for $10,000.

On February 17, 2014, the Company entered into two consulting agreements with two consultants for independent technical expertise to further the Company’s business plans and scientific research and development.  As consideration for the services performed, the Company agrees to issue the following to each of the consultants:

●   Within 30 days of the date of this agreement, a warrant for six hundred thousand shares of the Company’s common stock to be exercisable on the 14 month anniversary of this agreement for a period of 12 months with a cashless exercise provision.

●   Within 30 days of the date of this agreement, a warrant for one million shares of the Company’s common stock to be exercisable on the 20 month anniversary of this agreement for a period of 12 months with a cashless exercise provision.

●   Within 30 days of the date of this agreement, a warrant for two million shares of the Company’s common stock to be exercisable on the 32 month anniversary of this agreement for a period of 12 months with a cashless exercise provision.

●   Based on the consultants reaching two sets of benchmarks, two separate warrants for one million five hundred thousand shares of the Company’s common stock to be exercisable on the 28 month anniversary of this agreement for a period of 12 months with a cashless exercise provision.

●   On the three year anniversary, assuming the consultant acted in good faith and the Company’s board of directors approval, a warrant for one million five hundred thousand shares of the Company’s common stock to be exercisable on the 28 month anniversary of this agreement for a period of 12 months with a cashless exercise provision.

On March 12, 2014 the Company issued 2,551,020 shares of common stock for $100,000 ($0.04/share).

On March 19, 2014, the Company entered into a five year consulting agreement for general advisor and consulting services.  As consideration for the services performed, the Company agrees to pay the consultant a fee of $1,000 per month.  At the Company’s option, said consulting fee may be paid to the consultant in the form of Company stock based upon the greater of $0.50/share or the average of the closing price of the Company’s common stock over the five days preceding such stock issuance.

On March 21, 2014, the Company renewed its lease of a Laboratory. The lease is on a month to month basis at an annual rate of $12,750.

On March 28, 2014, the Company renewed and extended a consulting agreement and has agreed to issue 44,000 shares of common stock as consideration for consulting fees owed from June 1, 2012 through March 31, 2014.

XML

Document and Entity Information (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013	Apr. 14, 2014	Jun. 30, 2013
Document And Entity Information
Entity Registrant Name	Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc
Entity Central Index Key	0001413119
Document Type	10-K
Document Period End Date	Dec. 31, 2013
Amendment Flag	false
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--12-31
Is Entity a Well-known Seasoned Issuer?	No
Is Entity a Voluntary Filer?	No
Is Entity's Reporting Status Current?	Yes
Entity Filer Category	Smaller Reporting Company
Entity Public Float			$ 16,561,885
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding		654,605,270
Document Fiscal Period Focus	FY
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2013

XML

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ORGANIZATION (Policies)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2013

Notes to Financial Statements

(A) Basis of Presentation

Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc. (a development stage company) (the "Company") was incorporated under the laws of the State of Wyoming on April 25, 2006. The Company was organized to develop high strength, protein based fiber, using recombinant DNA technology, for commercial applications in the textile and specialty fiber industries.

Activities during the development stage include developing the business plan and raising capital.

(B) Use of Estimates

In preparing financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and revenues and expenses during the reported period.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.

(C) Cash

For purposes of the cash flow statements, the Company considers all highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents.

(D) Loss Per Share

Basic and diluted net loss per common share is computed based upon the weighted average common shares outstanding as defined by FASB Accounting Standards Codification No. 260, “Earnings per Share.”  As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, warrants were not included in the computation of income/ (loss) per share because their inclusion is anti-dilutive.

The computation of basic and diluted loss per share at December 31, 2013 and 2012 excludes the common stock equivalents of the following potentially dilutive securities because their inclusion would be anti-dilutive:

	December 31, 2013		December 31, 2012
Stock Warrants (Exercise price - $0.001/share)		18,000,000		10,000,000
Convertible Preferred Stock		2		2
Total		18,000,002		18,000,002

(E) Research and Development Costs

The Company expenses all research and development costs as incurred for which there is no alternative future use. These costs also include the expensing of employee compensation and employee stock based compensation.

(F) Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes under FASB Codification Topic 740-10-25 (“ASC 740-10-25”).  Under ASC 740-10-25, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases.  Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.  Under ASC 740-10-25, the effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

The net deferred tax liability in the accompanying balance sheets includes the following amounts of deferred tax assets and liabilities:

	2013		2012
Expected income tax recovery (expense) at the statutory rate of 34%	$	(2,539,012)	$	(544,999)
Tax effect of expenses that are not deductible for income tax purposes (net of other amounts deductible for tax purposes)		2,153,127		324,053
Change in valuation allowance		385,853		220,946
Provision for income taxes	$	-	$	-

The components of deferred income taxes are as follows:

	Years Ended December,
	2013			2012
Deferred tax liability:	$	-		$	-
Deferred tax asset
Net Operating Loss Carryforward		2,415,595			2,029,742
Valuation allowance		(2,415,595	)		(2,029,742	)
Net deferred tax asset		-			-
Net deferred tax liability	$	-		$	-

The valuation allowance was established to reduce the deferred tax asset to the amount that will more likely than not be realized. This is necessary due to the Company’s continued operating losses and the uncertainty of the Company’s ability to utilize all of the net operating loss carryforwards before they will expire through the year 2033.

The net change in the valuation allowance for the year ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 was an increase of $385,853 and $220,946, respectively.

Effective January 1, 2009, the Company adopted guidance regarding accounting for uncertainty in income taxes. This guidance clarifies the accounting for income taxes by prescribing the minimum recognition threshold an income tax position is required to meet before being recognized in the financial statements and applies to all federal or state income tax positions. Each income tax position is assessed using a two step process. A determination is first made as to whether it is more likely than not that the income tax position will be sustained, based upon technical merits, upon examination by the taxing authorities. If the income tax position is expected to meet the more likely than not criteria, the benefit recorded in the financial statements equals the largest amount that is greater than 50% likely to be realized upon its ultimate settlement. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012 there were no amounts that had been accrued in respect to uncertain tax positions.

None of the Company’s federal or state income tax returns is currently under examination by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) or state authorities.  However, fiscal years 2009 and later remain subject to examination by the IRS and respective states.

(G) Derivative Financial Instruments

Fair value accounting requires bifurcation of embedded derivative instruments such as conversion features in convertible debt or equity instruments, and measurement of their fair value for accounting purposes. In determining the appropriate fair value, the Company uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. In assessing the convertible debt instruments, management determines if the convertible debt host instrument is conventional convertible debt and further if there is a beneficial conversion feature requiring measurement. If the instrument is not considered conventional convertible debt, the Company will continue its evaluation process of these instruments as derivative financial instruments.

Once determined, derivative liabilities are adjusted to reflect fair value at each reporting period end, with any increase or decrease in the fair value being recorded in results of operations as an adjustment to fair value of derivatives. In addition, the fair value of freestanding derivative instruments such as warrants, are also valued using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model.

(H) Stock-Based Compensation

In December 2004, the FASB issued FASB Accounting Standards Codification No. 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation.  Under FASB Accounting Standards Codification No. 718, companies are required to measure the compensation costs of share-based compensation arrangements based on the grant-date fair value and recognize the costs in the financial statements over the period during which employees are required to provide services. Share-based compensation arrangements include stock options, restricted share plans, performance-based awards, share appreciation rights and employee share purchase plans.  As such, compensation cost is measured on the date of grant at their fair value.  Such compensation amounts, if any, are amortized over the respective vesting periods of the option grant.  The Company applies this statement prospectively.

Equity instruments (“instruments”) issued to other than employees are recorded on the basis of the fair value of the instruments, as required by FASB Accounting Standards Codification No. 718.  FASB Accounting Standards Codification No. 505, Equity Based Payments to Non-Employees defines the measurement date and recognition period for such instruments.  In general, the measurement date is when either a (a) performance commitment, as defined, is reached or (b) the earlier of (i) the non-employee performance is complete or (ii) the instruments are vested. The measured value related to the instruments is recognized over a period based on the facts and circumstances of each particular grant as defined in the FASB Accounting Standards Codification.

(I) Business Segments

The Company operates in one segment and therefore segment information is not presented.

(J) Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2013, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2013-04, Liabilities (Topic 405): Obligations Resulting from Joint and Several Liability Arrangements for Which the Total Amount of the Obligation Is Fixed at the Reporting Date (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force). This guidance requires an entity to measure obligations resulting from joint and several liability arrangements for which the total amount of the obligation within the scope of this guidance is fixed at the reporting date. This stipulates that (1) it will include the amount the entity agreed to pay for the arrangement between them and the other entities that are also obligated to the liability and (2) any additional amount the entity expects to pay on behalf of the other entities. The objective of this update is to provide guidance for the recognition, measurement, and disclosure of obligations resulting from joint and several liability arrangements. The amendments in this update are effective for fiscal periods (and interim reporting periods within those years) beginning after December 15, 2013. This standard is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s reported results of operations or financial position.

In February 2013, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2013-02, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. This update requires an entity to provide information about the amount reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by component. The entity is also required to disclose significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by the respective line items of net income but only if the amount reclassified is required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified to net income in its entirety in the same reporting periods. For other amounts that are not required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified in their entirety to net income, an entity is required to cross-reference to other discourses required under U.S. GAAP that provide additional detail about those amounts. The objective in this Update is to improve the reporting of reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income. The amendments in this update should be applied prospectively for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2013. This standard is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s reported results of operations or financial position.

(K) Reclassification

The 2013 financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the 2012 presentation.

(L) Equipment

The Company values property and equipment at cost and depreciates these assets using the straight-line method over their expected useful life. The Company uses a five year life for automobiles. 
 

In accordance with FASB Accounting Standards Codification No. 360, Property, Plant and Equipment, the Company carries long-lived assets at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value. Impairment is evaluated by estimating future undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition. If the sum of the expected undiscounted future cash flow is less than the carrying amount of the assets, an impairment loss is recognized. Fair value, for purposes of calculating impairment, is measured based on estimated future cash flows, discounted at a market rate of interest.

There were no impairment losses recorded during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012.

(M) Fair Value of Financial Instruments

We hold certain financial assets, which are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis in accordance with the Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“ASC Topic 820-10”).   ASC Topic 820-10 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements).  ASC Topic 820-10 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Level 1 instruments include cash, account receivable, prepaid expenses, inventory and account payable and accrued liabilities. The carrying values are assumed to approximate the fair value due to the short term nature of the instrument.

The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under ASC Topic 820-10 are described below:

Level 1 - Valuations based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that an entity has the ability to access.  We believe our carrying value of level 1 instruments approximate their fair value at December 31, 2013.

Level 2 - Valuations based on quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

Level 3 - Valuations based on inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. We consider depleting assets, asset retirement obligations and net profit interest liability to be Level 3. We determine the fair value of Level 3 assets and liabilities utilizing various inputs, including NYMEX price quotations and contract terms. 

		2013		2012
Level 1	$	—	$	—
Level 2		—		—
Level 3		—		—
Total	$	—	$	—

XML

Condensed Statements of Operations (USD $)	12 Months Ended		92 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2013
Income Statement [Abstract]
Revenue	$ 0	$ 0	$ 0
Operating Expenses
General and Administrative	1,375,528	379,326	3,315,030
Public Relations	0	400,000	619,890
Amrotization of Debt Discount	0	0	120,000
Professional Fees	178,373	48,667	513,448
Officer's Salary	237,134	267,120	1,840,648
Contract Settlement	0	0	107,143
Research and Development	489,434	465,293	1,791,443
Total Operating Expenses	2,280,469	1,560,406	8,307,602
Loss from Operations	(2,280,469)	(1,560,406)	(8,307,602)
Other Income/(Expenses)
Gain on forgiveness of debt	6,775	0	6,775
Other income	0	3,000	7,881
Bad debt expense	(6,238)	0	(6,238)
Interest income	47	192	239
Loss on settlement of accrued payroll - related party	(5,187,800)	0	(5,187,800)
Change in fair value of embedded derivative liability	0	0	(2,790,185)
Change in fair value of embedded derivative liability- related party	0	0	119,485
Interest expense	0	(45,707)	(147,913)
Total Other Income/(Expenses)	(5,187,216)	(42,515)	(7,997,756)
Net (Loss) before Provision for Income Taxes	(7,467,685)	(1,602,921)	(16,305,358)
Provision for Income Taxes	0	0	0
Net (Loss)	$ (7,467,685)	$ (1,602,921)	$ (16,305,358)
Net Income (Loss) Per Share - Basic and Diluted	$ (0.01)	$ 0.00
Weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period - Basic and Diluted	616,313,968	596,143,581

XML

6. LOAN PAYABLE

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2013

Debt Disclosure [Abstract]

LOAN PAYABLE

On December 8, 2010 the Company entered into a five year loan agreement with the principal loan amount of $15,828. The loan carries an interest rate of 6.94%, and is secured by an automobile.  The remaining balance of $3,981 fully matures during the year ending December 31, 2014.

XML

5. CONVERTIBLE DEBT, DEBT DISCOUNT AND FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT OF DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2013

Notes to Financial Statements

CONVERTIBLE DEBT, DEBT DISCOUNT AND FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT OF DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

On July 17, 2009, the Company entered into an agreement with an investor group where the Company will issue up to $120,000 in convertible units.  The debentures will be in the face amount of $10,000 each, mature on December 31, 2010, bear interest at the rate of 5% simple interest per annum, payable at maturity or convertible with the principal, and the principal and interest shall be convertible at the option of the holder at a fixed price of $0.018 per share.  Each debenture shall have a warrant attached exercisable for the purchase of 500,000 shares of common stock.  The warrants shall expired on December 31, 2011, have a cashless exercise provision, and be exercisable at a fixed price of $0.02.  The agreement also requires the investment group to purchase up to $1,000,000 of common stock monthly at the lesser of $75,000 or 200% of the average daily volume multiplied by the average of the daily closing prices for the ten days immediately preceding the exercise date.  Each investment by the investment group is priced at the lowest closing “bid” price of the common stock during the five days immediately before the investment.  The term of the funding shall be the earlier of (a) the drawing down of the entire $1,000,000 or (b) 24 months after the Effective Date, July 17, 2011.  In addition, the Company is required to file and maintain an effective registration statement covering the convertible units, cannot issue more than 5% of its common stock outstanding without the investor group’s consent and must maintain a contractual relationship with a public relations firm, which is related to the investor group. The Company has issued $120,000 of convertible debt to date.   On July 21, 2010, the issuance of 1,799,434 shares was approved by the board of directors in exchange for the $15,000 specified in the put notice.

The $120,000 convertible debt instrument was determined to have a separate derivative liability instrument requiring bifurcation and the computation of fair value. The conversion price per share equals to the lower of the conversion price and the average closing bid price of the common stock during the 20 trading days prior to and including the date on which the conversion notice is delivered to the holder, however, the mandatory Conversion price shall not be less than $0.005. The Company calculated the estimated fair values of the liabilities for warrant derivative instruments and embedded conversion option derivative instruments with the Black-Scholes option pricing model.

The fair value of the embedded conversion options at the commitment date was $251,919.  Of the total, $120,000 was assigned to debt discount and $131,919 was recorded as a derivative expense.

On February 11, 2010 the Company authorized the issuance of 5,694,451 shares of Common Stock for the exercise price of $0.02/share in exchange for $100,000 in convertible note payable and on April 6, 2010 the Company authorized the issuance of 854,169 shares of Common Stock for the exercise price of $0.02/share in exchange for $15,000 in convertible note payable.

At December 31, 2010, pursuant to the agreement, all outstanding principal and accrued interest on the convertible debt was due, and the conversion rights of the holder terminated.  Accordingly, at December 31, 2010, the Company determined that no derivative liability existed in connection to the outstanding remaining debt of $5,000.   For the year ended December 31, 2013, the note holder forgave the remaining balance and the $5,000 convertible note balance along with accrued interest of $1,775 was recorded as a gain on forgiveness of debt.  As of December 31, 2013 the remaining convertible note balance was $0.

In addition, on October 4, 2010, the Company issued 5,177,801 shares in connection with the cashless exercise of the 6,000,000 warrants.

At June 30, 2011 the Company recorded interest expense and related accrued interest payable of $2,466.  The Company also recorded $92,600 for the amortization of debt discount in interest expense on the statement of operations.  The debt discount is being amortized over the life of the convertible debt.

XML

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ORGANIZATION (Details)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Antidilutive Securities, Stock Warrants (Exercise price - $0.001/share)	18,000,002	18,000,002
Stock Warrants
Antidilutive Securities, Stock Warrants (Exercise price - $0.001/share)	18,000,000	18,000,000
Convertible Preferred Stock
Antidilutive Securities, Stock Warrants (Exercise price - $0.001/share)	2	2

XML

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ORGANIZATION (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2013

Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies And Organization Tables

Antidilutive Securities Excluded from Computation of Earnings Per Share

	December 31, 2013		December 31, 2012
Stock Warrants (Exercise price - $0.001/share)		18,000,000		10,000,000
Convertible Preferred Stock		2		2
Total		18,000,002		18,000,002

Schedule of income taxes

	2013		2012
Expected income tax recovery (expense) at the statutory rate of 34%	$	(2,539,012)	$	(544,999)
Tax effect of expenses that are not deductible for income tax purposes (net of other amounts deductible for tax purposes)		2,153,127		324,053
Change in valuation allowance		385,853		220,946
Provision for income taxes	$	-	$	-

Schedule of deferred income taxes

	Years Ended December,
	2013			2012
Deferred tax liability:	$	-		$	-
Deferred tax asset
Net Operating Loss Carryforward		2,415,595			2,029,742
Valuation allowance		(2,415,595	)		(2,029,742	)
Net deferred tax asset		-			-
Net deferred tax liability	$	-		$	-

Schedule of fair Value of Financial Instruments

		2013	2012
Level 1	$	-	$           -
Level 2		-	-
Level 3		-	-
Total	$	-	$           -

XML

9. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2013

Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

On March 18, 2010, the Company entered into an addendum to the employment agreement whereby the Company will reimburse the employee and his family for up to $20,000 of out of pocket medical and dental care costs, including prescription costs or co-pays.

On September 30, 2010, the Company entered into an addendum to the employment agreement whereby all but $250,000 of unpaid back salary will be forgiven by the principal stockholder.  The addendum also eliminated the various milestone achievement awards from the prior employment agreements.  In addition, the addendum reduced the interest rate to 3% per year.  Further, the conversion rights for unpaid back salary where amended whereby the principal shareholder has the option to convert any accured salary into Class “A” Common stock by dividing the dollar value of the debt to be converted to stock by the closing price of the stock on the date that the conversion notice is received by the Company.  This amemdment effectively eliminated any beneficial conversion features related to accrued salary of September 30, 2010.  In exchange the Company agreed to issue 10,000,000 preferred shares to the principal stockholder no later than September 30, 2011, that date was extended by mutual agreement to December 31, 2012.  The agreement was subsequently extended to October 30, 2013. By agreement with the principal share holder, this obligation to issue preferred shares was satisfied by the December 17, 2013 issuance of 2 shares of super voting preferred stock.

On November 10, 2010, the Company entered into an addendum to the employment agreement, effective January 1, 2011 through the December 31, 2015.  The term of the agreement is a five year period at an annual salary of $210,000.  There is a 6% annual increase.  The employee is also to receive a 20% bonsus based on the annual based salary.  Any stock, stock options bonuses have to be approved by the board of directors (See Note 10).

(B)License Agreement

On May 8, 2006, the Company entered into a license agreement.  Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, the Company paid a non-refundable license fee of $10,000. The Company will pay a license maintenance fee of $10,000 on the one year anniversary of this agreement and each year thereafter.  The Company will pay an annual research fee of $13,700 with first payment due January 2007, then on each subsequent anniversary of the effective date commencing May 4, 2007.  Pursuant to the terms of the agreement the Company may be required to pay additional fees aggregating up to a maximum of $10,000 a year for patent maintenance and prosecution relating to the licensed intellectual property.

On October 28, 2011, the Company entered into a license agreement with the University of Notre Dame. Under the agreement, the Company received exclusive and non-exclusive rights to certain spider silk technologies including commercial rights with the right to sublicense such intellectual property. In consideration of the licenses granted under the agreement, the Company agreed to issue to the University of Notre Dame 2,200,000 shares of its common stock and to pay a royalty of 2% of net sales. In addition, the Company is in negotiations with the University of Notre Dame for a research and development agreement. Upon successfully entering into such an agreement, the Company anticipates it could owe approximately $144,000.

The license agreement has a term of 20 years which can be extended on an annual basis after that. It can be terminated by the University of Notre Dame if the Company defaults on its obligations under the agreement and fails to cure such default within 90 days of a written notice by the university. The Company can terminate the agreement upon a 90 day written notice subject to payment of a termination fee of $5,000 if the termination takes place within 2 years after its effectiveness, $10,000 if the termination takes place within 4 years after its effectiveness and $20,000 if the Agreement is terminated after 4 years.

(C)Royalty and Research Agreements

On September 16, 2010, the Company entered into an agreement with a consultant for research and development.  On September 16, 2010 the Company issued 100,000 shares as a sign on bonus with a fair value of $15,000 ($0.15/share) to the consultant for technical support to be provided over the next 3 years. In addition, the consultant shall receive 30,000 shares for three years commencing on or about September 10 of each of the next three years.

On September 16, 2010, the Company entered into an agreement with a consultant for research and development.  On September 16, 2010 the Company issued 100,000 shares as a sign on bonus with a fair value of $15,000 ($0.15/share) to the consultant for technical support to be provided over the next 3 years. In addition, the consultant shall receive 30,000 shares for three years commencing on or about September 10 of each of the next three years.

On May 21, 2010 the Company entered into a three year consulting agreement for research and development.   Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, the Company is required to issue 40,000 shares upon the execution of the agreement and subsequently 10,000 shares per year during the three year term of the agreement.  The annual payment of 10,000 shares for the three years begins on Janaury15 of each of the next three years following the execution of this agreement.

On May 1, 2008 the Company entered into a five year consulting agreement for research and development. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, the Company will be required to pay $1,000 per month, or at the Company’s option, the consulting fee may be paid in the form of Company common stock based upon the greater of $0.05 per share or the average of the closing price of the Company’s shares over the five days preceding such stock issuance.  As of June 30, 2011 the Company had accrued $17,000 of accounts payable for the services provided of which was paid in common stock on July 1, 2009 (See Note 8(C)).  As of June 30, 2011 the Company issued 280,000 shares of common stock in exchange for $14,000 of accounts payable for the services performed.

On December 26, 2006, the Company entered into an addendum to the intellectual property transfer agreement with an officer.  In consideration of the Company issuing either 200,000 preferred shares with the following preferences; no dividends and voting rights equal to 100 common shares per share of preferred stock or the payment of $120,000, the officer agreed to terminate the royalty payments due under the agreement and give title to the exclusive license for the non protective apparel use of the intellectual property to the Company.  On the date of the agreement, the Company did not have any preferred stock authorized with the required preferences.  In accordance with FASB Accounting Standards Codification No 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity, the Company determined that the present value of the payment of $120,000 that was due on December 26, 2007, the one year anniversary of the addendum, should be recorded as an accrued expense until such time as the Company has the ability to assert that it has preferred shares authorized.  As of March 31, 2010, the Company has recorded $120,000 in accrued expenses- related party.  On December 21, 2007 the officer extended the due date to July 30, 2008.  On May 30, 2008 the officer extended the due date to December 31, 2008.  On October 10, 2008, the officer extended the due date to the earlier of (a) March 30, 2010 or (b) upon demand by the officer.  The due date was extended to March 31, 2011.  On September 8, 2009, a payment of $15,000 was paid to the officer. An additional payment of $10,000 was made on October 19, 2009 and December 1, 2009, respectfully.  Additionally, the accrued expenses are accruing 7% interest per year. On January 15, 2010 an additional payment of $10,000 was made.  During the quarter ending September 30, 2010 an additional payment of $8,000 was made. During the quarter ending September 30, 2012 an additional payment of $1,000 was made.  During the year ended December 31, 2013, an additional payment of $1,280 was made.  As of December 31, 2013 the outstanding balance is $64,720. As of December 31, 2013, the Company recorded interest expense and related accrued interest payable of $1,508.

On February 1, 2007 the Company entered into a consulting agreement for research and development for period of one year at a cost of $150,000.  In April 2008, this agreement was extended through March 31, 2009 on a cost reimbursement basis.  Reimbursements are to be made quarterly and are not to exceed $35,000.  On March 1, 2010 the Company entered into a one year consulting agreement for research and development. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, the Company was  required to pay up to $150,000 in research and development fees on a cost reimbursement basis.   The agreement expired on February 28, 2011.

On June 6, 2012 the Company entered into a consulting agreement for intellectual property and collaborative research and development with an American university.  The agreement covers ongoing research and development work performed by the university at the Company’s behest and with the Company’s assistance from May 1, 2011 and extending through April 30, 2013.  Pursuant to the terms of the agreement the Company will be required to pay approximately $637,984 for research and development over the two year period. For the year ended December 31, 2012 the Company paid $465,293 in research and development fees.  For the year ended December 31, 2013 the Company paid $489,434 in research and development fees.

On July 1, 2006 the Company entered into a five year consulting agreement for research and development. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, the Company paid 700,000 shares of common stock upon execution.  These shares had a fair value of $5,600 ($0.01/share) based upon the recent cash offering price.  Additionally, 2,000,000 shares of common stock were issued on May 18, 2007 with a fair value of $16,000 ($0.01/share).   As of December 31, 2008, the Company issued 600,000 shares of common stock for consulting services rendered with a fair value of $6,000 ($0.01/share).  On January 15, 2008 the Company authorized the issuance of 400,000 shares of common stock for consulting services rendered with a fair value of $4,000 ($0.01/share).   On July 1, 2009, the issuance of 482,825 shares was approved by the board of directors as partial payment for services previously provided to the Company by a consultant in accordance with a consulting agreement.  The total amount of issuable shares for the consultant is 1,122,311 shares, which includes 400,000 issuable shares previously approved by the board of directors and 239,486 shares approved to be issued in November 2009. On August 26, 2010, the Company entered into an addendum to the employment agreement where the monthly fee to the consultant was increased to $10,000 per month starting on September 1, 2010.  On August 26, 2010 the Company issued 985,915 shares with a fair value of $14,000 ($0.0142/share) to a consultant for research and development services provided in the past In addition, On August 26, 2010 the Company issued 4,500,000 bonus shares with a fair value of $90,000 ($0.02/share) to a consultant for research and development services and 10,000,000 shares with a fair value of $200,000 ($0.02/share) to a consultant for research and development services (See Note 8(C) ).

(D)Consulting Agreement

On August 3, 2009, the Company entered into an agreement with a consultant to provide investor relations services.  On October 5, 2009 the Company issued 10,000,000 shares with a fair value of $200,000 ($0.02/share) to a consultant for investor relations to be provided over a term of 180 days.  The Company started receiving services beginning October 5, 2009.  As of September 30, 2011, $200,000 was recorded as a consulting expense (See Note 8(C)).

On January 15, 2010, the Company entered into an agreement with a consultant to provide investor relations services in exchange for 500,000 shares or $15,000.  On January 15, 2010 the Company issued 500,000 shares with a fair value of $5,000 ($0.01/share) to a consultant for investor relations to be provided over a term of 12 months (See Note 9(C)).

On July 29, 2010, the Company entered into an agreement with a consultant to provide investor relations services in exchange for a warrant for 20,000,000 common shares. The value of the services was $200,000, which approximated fair value.  The agreement will remain in effect until January 29, 2011(See Note 9(E)).

On April 8, 2011 the Company entered into a five year consulting agreement for research and development. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, the Company has to issue within 10 days following the effective date $70,000 worth of stock and pay a license fee of $30,000.  The Company has a five year right to exercise the option for a commercial medical license or the commercial textile license.  The fee for the first license is a $289,000 and shares equivalent in value to $675,000.  The fee for a second commercial license is $75,000 and shares equivalent in value to $175,000.  All payments are non-refundable. On April 18, 2011, the Company issued 1,029,412 shares of stock with a fair value of $70,000 based on the average trading price over a 30 day period.

On September 30, 2011 the Company entered into an addendum to an agreement with a consultant, superseding previous agreements, to provide research and development for a term of four years. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, the Company will issue 3,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock and replaces any stock currently owed to the consultant pursuant to consulting fee provisions of prior agreements.  Additionally the Company will issue one million shares of the Company’s common stock per year as a consulting fee on the annual anniversary of this agreement or at the Company’s option, pay an annual consulting fee of $100,000.  As of September 30, 2011, the fair value of the Company’s shares of common stock was $0.10 per share and the Company owed the consultant $130,000.  Accordingly, the Company has recorded an additional liability to the consultant of $170,000 as of September 30, 2011. For the year ended December 31, 2012 the Company issued 4,000,000 shares with a fair value of $340,000 to a consultant for research and development services provided in the past.

On November 9, 2012, the Company entered into an agreement with a consultant to provide investor relations services in exchange for a warrant for 10,000,000 common shares. The agreement will remain in effect until May 27, 2013. On July 18, 2013, the Company issued 9,857,142 shares in connection with the cashless exercise of the 10,000,000 warrants.

On July 9, 2013, the Company entered into an agreement with a consultant to provide investor relations services in exchange for a warrant for 10,000,000 common shares at $.001 with a cashless provision and a five year term.

On September 30, 2013 the Company entered into a Collaborative Yarn and Textile Development Agreement with a technical textile manufacturing company.  Pursuant to the terms of that agreement the Company has agreed to supply the technical textile manufacturing company with sample quantities of the Company’s recombinant spider silk for the purpose of developing and testing new textiles which are made from, or which incorporate recombinant spider silk.  The agreement provides that the two companies will jointly share, on an equal basis, any intellectual property, including any utility patents, which are developed as a result of this collaboration.  Such intellectual property potentially includes utility patents on textile designs.  The Company has agreed that it will pay half of the cost associated with the filing and prosecution of utility patents relating to intellectual property which is developed through its collaboration with the technical textile manufacturing company.

On October 15, 2013 the Company entered into an intellectual property agreement with a scientific researcher relating to the development of new recombinant silk fibers.  Under the terms of that agreement the scientific researcher will transfer to the Company his rights to intellectual property, inventions and trade secrets which the researcher develops relating to recombinant silk.  The researcher will receive 8,000,000 warrants of the Company’s stock, exercisable 24 months from the date of the agreement.  The researcher will also receive additional warrants when and if the researcher develops advanced recombinant silk fibers for the Company’s use.  Under the terms of the agreement the researcher will receive 10,000,000 warrants in the event that he develops a new recombinant silk fiber with certain performance characteristics, and another 10,000,000 warrants if he develops a second recombinant silk fiber with certain characteristics.  If the consultant performs the contract in good faith the consultant will be entitled to an additional 8,000 warrants.  The warrants described in this note all contain a cashless exercise provision and are exercisable on the 24 month anniversary of the date on which they were issuable under the agreement.

(E)Operating Lease Agreement

On April 1, 2012 the Company executed a one-year non-cancelable operating lease for its Laboratory space. The lease was subsequently extended through March 31, 2014. In March of 2014, the Company once again extended the lease on a month to month basis.

Rent expense for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 is $13,565 and 9,789, respectively.

XML

7. LOAN PAYABLE-RELATED PARTY

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2013

Related Party Transactions [Abstract]

LOAN PAYABLE-RELATED PARTY

On February 25, 2013 the Company received $150,000 from a principal stockholder.    Pursuant to the terms of the loan, the advance bears interest at 3%, is unsecured and due on demand. At December 31, 2013 the loan balance was repaid.  The Company recorded accrued interest payable of $2,001.

XML

8. STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2013

Equity [Abstract]

STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT

(A)       Common Stock Issued for Cash

On April 28, 2006, the Company issued 8,000 shares of common stock for cash of $400 ($0.05 per share).

On January 8, 2007 the Company issued 1,750,000 shares of common stock for $15,000 ($0.01/share).  This agreement was subsequently terminated effective May 23, 2007.

On January 22, 2007 the Company issued 12,000,000 shares of common stock for $103,000 ($0.01/share).   In addition, 9,000,000 shares were issued for $3,000 ($0.0003/share).

On April 4, 2007, the Company issued 1,875,000 shares of common stock for cash of $15,000 ($0.01 per share).

On April 20, 2007, the Company issued 1,875,000 shares of common stock for cash of $15,000 ($0.01 per share).

On May 18, 2007, the Company issued 13,125,000 shares of common stock for cash of $105,000 ($0.01 per share).

On August 28, 2007 the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement to issue 80,495,000 shares common stock in the amount of $241,485 ($0.003/share).

On August 29, 2007 the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement to issue 200,000 shares common stock in the amount of $600 ($0.003/share).

On August 29, 2007 the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement to issue 8,300,000 shares common stock in the amount of $24,900 ($0.003/share).

On September 1, 2007 the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement to issue 25,000 shares common stock in the amount of $75 ($0.003/share).

On September 5, 2007 the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement to issue 120,000 shares common stock in the amount of $360 ($0.003/share).

On September 12, 2007 the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement to issue 1,025,000 shares common stock in the amount of $3,075 ($0.003/share).

In accordance with the May 2007 stock purchase agreement which contains an anti-dilution clause which requires the Company to issue additional common shares under the stock purchase agreement for any subsequent issuance at a price below $.08 per share for a period of 12 months, the Company has issued 28,125,000 additional shares through May 2008 as a result of the subsequent stock issuances at $0.003/share.

On April 24, 2009 the Company issued 2,000,000 shares of common stock for $20,000 ($0.01/share).

On May 22, 2009, the Company issued 500,000 shares of common stock for $5,000 ($0.01/share).

On September 30, 2009, the Company issued 366,599 shares of common stock for $3,000 ($0.01/share).

On May 18, 2010, the Company issued 4,000,000 shares of common stock for cash of $21,642 and in exchange of $6,990 in note payables ($0.007158 per share).

On July 21, 2010, the Company issued 1,875,000 shares of common stock for $15,000 ($0.008/share).

On September 10, 2010, the Company issued 1,351,351 shares of common stock for $20,000 ($0.0148/share).

On September 22, 2010, the Company issued 1,286,765 shares of common stock for $35,000 ($0.0272/share).

On October 15, 2010, the Company issued 1,179,245 shares of common stock for $100,000 ($0.084/share).

On December 7, 2010, the Company issued 1,157,407 shares of common stock for $75,000 ($0.065/share).

During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company had to issue an additional 845,800 make-up shares related to a transaction entered into during the year ended December 31, 2010.

On January 25, 2011 the Company issued 1,470,588 shares of common stock for $100,000 ($0.068/share).

On March 22, 2011 the Company issued 2,083,333 shares of common stock for $100,000 ($0.048/share).

On April 18, 2011 the Company issued 1,029,412 shares of common stock for $70,000 ($0.07/share).

On April 22, 2011 the Company issued 1,420,455 shares of common stock for $100,000 ($0.07/share).

On September 22, 2011, the Company issued 1,372,119 shares of common stock for $100,000 ($0.07/share).

On November 9, 2011, the Company issued 1,314,406 shares of common stock for $100,000 ($0.08/share).

On December 16, 2011, the Company issued 1,543,210 shares of common stock for $100,000 ($0.06/share).

On January 20, 2012, the Company issued 1,562,500 shares of common stock for $100,000 ($0.06/share).

On April 19, 2012, the Company issued 2,403,846 shares of common stock for $100,000 ($0.06/share).

On May 19, 2012, the Company issued 1,923,077 shares of common stock for $100,000 ($0.05/share).

On June 29, 2012, the Company issued 2,155,172 shares of common stock for $100,000 ($0.04/share).

On December 21, 2012, the Company issued 1,004,832 shares of common stock for $25,000 ($0.02/share).

On February 19, 2013, the Company issued 961,538 shares of common stock for $50,000 ($0.05/share).

On March 4, 2013, the Company issued 945,537 shares of common stock for $50,000 ($0.05/share).

On April 1, 2013, the Company issued 822,368 shares of common stock for $50,000 ($0.06/share).

On April 15, 2013, the Company issued 884,434 shares of common stock for $75,000 ($0.08/share).

On July 11, 2013 the Company issued 1,760,563 shares of common stock for $100,000 ($0.06/share).

On July 25, 2013 the Company issued 1,760,563 shares of common stock for $100,000 ($0.06/share).

On August 13, 2013 the Company issued 1,838,235 shares of common stock for $100,000 ($0.05/share).

On September 3, 2013 the Company issued 1,923,077 shares of common stock for $100,000 ($0.05/share).

On September 19, 2013 the Company issued 2,100,840 shares of common stock for $100,000 ($0.05/share).

On October 3, 2013 the Company issued 2,604,167 shares of common stock for $100,000 ($0.04/share).

On October 17, 2013 the Company issued 2,604,167 shares of common stock for $100,000 ($0.04/share).

On December 11, 2013 the Company issued 3,063,725 shares of common stock for $125,000 ($0.04/share).

(B) Common Stock Issued for Intellectual Property

On April 26, 2006, the Company issued 332,292,000 shares of common stock to its founder having a fair value of $180 ($0.000001/share) in exchange for intellectual property.  The fair value of the patent was determined based upon the historical cost of the intellectual property contributed by the founder.

(C) Common Stock Issued for Services

On May 8, 2006, the Company entered into a license agreement for research and development. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, the Company issued 17,500,000 shares of common stock upon execution of the agreement. The Company also received a five-year call option from the license holder to repurchase 7,000,000 common shares at an exercise price of $150,000 or $.02 per share. The option gives the Company the right, but not the obligation to repurchase the shares of common stock.  The call option expires May 4, 2011. As of June 30, 2011 the value of the stock was $.07 per share.  The Company does not have the obligation to repurchase the shares.

On July 1, 2006 the Company entered into a five year consulting agreement for research and development. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, the Company paid 700,000 shares of common stock upon execution.  These shares had a fair value of $5,600 ($0.01/share) based upon the recent cash offering price.  Additionally, 2,000,000 shares of common stock were issued on May 18, 2007 with a fair value of $16,000 ($0.01/share).   As of December 31, 2008, the Company issued 600,000 shares of common stock for consulting services rendered with a fair value of $6,000 ($0.01/share).  On January 15, 2008 the Company authorized the issuance of 400,000 shares of common stock for consulting services rendered with a fair value of $4,000 ($0.01/share).

On July 1, 2009, the issuance of 280,000 shares was approved by the board of directors as repayment for services previously provided to the Company by a consultant having a fair value of $14,000 ($0.05/share) in accordance with a consulting agreement (See Note 9(C)).

On July 1, 2009, the issuance of 482,825 shares was approved by the board of directors as partial payment for services previously provided to the Company by a consultant in accordance with a consulting agreement.  The total amount of issuable shares for the consultant is 1,122,311 shares, which includes 400,000 issuable shares previously approved by the board of directors and 239,486 shares were approved to be issued on November 19, 2009 for a fair value of $18,000 (See Note 9(C)).

On August 3, 2009, the Company entered into an agreement with a consultant to provide investor relations services.  On October 5, 2009 the Company issued 10,000,000 shares with a fair value of $200,000 ($0.02/share) to a consultant for investor relations to be provided over a term of 180 days.  The Company started receiving services beginning October 5, 2009.  As of March 31, 2010 $200,000 was recorded (See Note 9(D)).

On January 15, 2010 the Company issued 500,000 shares with a fair value of $5,000 ($0.01/share) to a consultant for investor relations to be provided over a term of 12 months once certain conditions are met.  As of March 31, 2010, $5,000 was recognized as deferred compensation (See Note 9).

On May 21, 2010 the Company issued 40,000 shares with a fair value of $400 ($0.01/share) to a consultant for research and development services (See Note 9(C )).

On July 30, 2010 the Company issued 2,400,000 shares with a fair value of $30,000 ($0.0125/share) to a consultant for legal services incurred in behalf of the Company.

On August 26, 2010 the Company issued 280,000 shares with a fair value of $14,000 ($0.05/share) to a consultant for research and development services provided in the past.

On August 26, 2010 the Company issued 985,915 shares with a fair value of $14,000 ($0.0142/share) to a consultant for research and development services provided in the past (See Note 9 (C)).

On August 26, 2010 the Company issued 4,500,000 shares with a fair value of $90,000 ($0.02/share) to a consultant for research and development services (See Note 9 (C)).

On August 26, 2010 the Company issued 10,000,000 shares with a fair value of $200,000 ($0.02/share) to a consultant for research and development services (See Note 9 (C)).

On September 16, 2010, the Company entered into an agreement with a consultant to provide technical support.  On September 16, 2010 the Company issued 100,000 shares, as a sign on bonus, with a fair value of $15,000 ($0.15/share) to the consultant for technical support to be provided over the next 3 years. In addition, the consultant shall receive 30,000 shares for three years commencing on or about September 10 of each of the next three years (See Note 8(C)).

On September 16, 2010, the Company entered into an agreement with a consultant to provide technical support.  On September 16, 2010 the Company issued 100,000 shares, as a sign on bonus, with a fair value of $15,000 ($0.15/share) to the consultant for technical support to be provided over the next 3 years. In addition, the consultant shall receive 30,000 shares for three years commencing on or about September 10 of each of the next three years (See Note 8(C)).

On September 23, 2010 the Company issued 387,500 shares with a fair value of $31,000 ($0.08/share) to a consultant for legal services incurred on behalf of the Company.

On April 1, 2011 the Company issued 1,000,000 shares with a fair value of $70,000 ($0.07/share) to a consultant for research and development services.

On April 18, 2011, the Company issued 1,029,412 shares of stock with a fair value of $70,000 based on the average trading price over a 30 day period for a research and development consulting agreement.

On October 28, 2011, the Company issued 2,200,000 shares of stock with a fair value of $242,000 ($0.11/share) to obtain the use of a license.

On May 24, 2012 the Company issued 3,200,000 shares with a fair value of $192,000 ($0.06/share) to a consultants for research and development services.

On May 24, 2012 the Company issued 300,000 shares with a fair value of $18,000 ($0.06/share) to a consultant for research and development services provided in the past.

On May 24, 2012 the Company issued 3,000,000 shares with a fair value of $300,000 ($0.10/share) to a consultant for research and development services provided in the past.

On December 18, 2012 the Company issued 1,000,000 shares with a fair value of $40,000 ($0.04/share) to a consultant for research and development services provided in the past.

(D) Cancellation and Retirement of Common Stock

On December 29, 2006, the Company’s founder returned 11,666,500 shares of common stock to the Company.  These shares were cancelled and retired.  Accordingly, the net effect on equity is $0.

(E) Common Stock Warrants

During 2006, the Company issued 6,000,000 warrants to an officer under his employment agreement.   The Company recognized an expense of $126,435 for the period from inception to December 31, 2006.  The Company recorded the fair value of the warrants  based on the fair value of each warrant grant estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions used for grants in 2006, dividend yield of zero, expected volatility of 183%; risk-free interest rates of 4.98%, expected life of one year. The warrants vested immediately.   The options expire between 5 and 9 years from the date of issuance and have an exercise price of between $.21 and $.40 per share. During November 2006, the Company and the officer entered into an amendment to the employment agreement whereby all the warrants were retired.

On July 29, 2010, the Company issued a warrant for 20,000,000 common shares in connection to a consulting agreement. The warrant was value at $200,000, the fair value of the services to be provided pursuant to the agreement. The warrant has a term of 2 years.

On October 4, 2010, the Company issued 5,177,801 shares in connection with the cashless exercise of the 6,000,000 warrants.

On May 11, 2011, the Company issued 19,767,985 shares in connection with the cashless exercise of the 20,000,000 warrants.

On November 21, 2012, the Company issued 10-year warrants for 10,000,000 shares with a consultant, with an exercise price of $0.001 per share. The warrants were granted for services rendered . The warrants had a fair value of $400,000, based upon the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The Company used the following weighted average assumptions:

Expected dividends		0	%
Expected volatility		283.23	%
Expected term	10 years
Risk free interest rate		1.69.	%
Expected forfeitures		0	%

On July 18, 2013, the Company issued 9,857,142 shares in connection with the cashless exercise of the 10,000,000 warrants.

On July 9, 2013, the Company issued 5-year warrants for 10,000,000 shares to a consultant, with an exercise price of $0.001 per share. The warrants were granted for services rendered. The warrants had a fair value of $736,816, based upon the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The Company used the following weighted average assumptions:

Expected dividends		0	%
Expected volatility		183.35	%
Expected term	5 years
Risk free interest rate		1.50.	%
Expected forfeitures		0	%

On October 15, 2013, the Company issued 1-year warrants for 8,000,000 shares to a consultant, with an exercise price of $0.001 per share. The warrants were granted for services to be rendered . The warrants had a fair value of $396,083, based upon the Black-Scholes option-pricing model on the date of grant and were fully vested upon and will be exercisable beginning October 15, 2015 for a  period of 12 months.

	Grant Date
Expected dividends		0	%
Expected volatility		96.35	%

Expected term	3 years
Risk free interest rate		1.45.	%
Expected forfeitures		0	%

	Number of Warrants			Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (in Years)
Balance, December 31, 2011		-		$	-
Granted		10,000,000			0.001
Exercised
Cancelled/Forfeited		-			-
Balance, December 31, 2012		10,000,000			0.001		9.90
Granted		18,000,000		$	0.001
Exercised		(10,000,000	)	$	-
Cancelled/Forfeited		-
Balance, December 31, 2013		18,000,000		$	0.001		3.8
Intrinsic Value		918,000

For the year ended December 31, 2013, the following warrants were outstanding:

Exercise Price		Warrants Outstandning		Warrants Exercisable		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life		Aggregate Intrinsic Value
$	0.001		28,000,000		18,000,000		3.753729072		918,000

For the year ended December 31, 2012, the following warrants were outstanding:

Exercise Price		Warrants Outstandning		Warrants Exercisable		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life		Aggregate Intrinsic Value
$	0.001		10,000,000		10,000,000		9.895890411		365,000

(F)  Amendment to Articles of Incorporation

On February 16, 2009, the Company amended its articles of incorporation to amend the number and class of shares the Company is authorized to issue as follows:

●   Common stock Class A, unlimited number of shares authorized, no par value

●   Common stock Class B, unlimited number of shares authorized, no par value

●   Preferred stock, unlimited number of shares authorized, no par value

Effective December 17 2013, the Company amended its articles of incorporation to designate a Series A no par value preferred stock.  Two shares of Series A Preferred stock have been authorized.

(G) Stock Split Effected in the Form of a Stock Dividend

On March 23, 2009, the Company's Board of Directors declared a nine-for-one stock split to be effected in the form of a dividend.  The stock dividend was distributed to shareholders of record as of April 27, 2009.  A total of 449,773,650 shares of common stock were issued.  All basic and diluted loss per share and average shares outstanding information has been adjusted to reflect the aforementioned stock dividend.

(H) Conversion of debt & Issuance of Convertible Preferred Stock – related party

During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company's Chief Executive Officer converted accrued payroll of $30,000 in exchange for the issuance of Series A convertible Preferred Stock (“Series A PS”). 

Each share of Series A PS is entitled to vote together with the holders of the Company’s common stock on all matters and is entitled to 200,000,000 votes on all such matters.  Each Share of Series A PS is convertible into one share of the Company’s common stock at the holder’s option.

	Series A PS Valuation
Debt converted – related party	$	(30,000	)
Valuation of Series A PS issued as consideration		5,217,800
Loss on settlement of debt	$	5,187,800

              The valuation of the Series A PS was performed by a third party valuation expert and was based on the voting control obtained and the Company's market cap at the time of the transaction.

XML

10. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2013

Related Party Transactions [Abstract]

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

On October 6, 2006 the Company received $10,000 from a principal stockholder.    Pursuant to the terms of the loan, the advance bears interest at 12%, is unsecured and matured on May 1, 2007. At June 30, 2011 the Company recorded interest expense and related accrued interest payable of $776.   As of June 30, 2011, the loan principal was repaid in full.

On December 26, 2006, the Company entered into an addendum to the intellectual property transfer agreement with an officer.  In consideration of the Company issuing either 200,000 preferred shares with the following preferences; no dividends and voting rights equal to 100 common shares per share of preferred stock or the payment of $120,000, the officer agreed to terminate the royalty payments due under the agreement and give title to the exclusive license for the non protective apparel use of the intellectual property to the Company.  On the date of the agreement, the Company did not have any preferred stock authorized with the required preferences.  In accordance with In accordance with FASB Accounting Standards Codification No. 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity, the Company determined that the present value of the payment of $120,000 that was due on December 26, 2007, the one year anniversary of the addendum, should be recorded as an accrued expense until such time as the Company has the ability to assert that it has preferred shares authorized.  As of March 31, 2010, the Company has recorded $120,000 in royalty agreement payable- related party.  On December 21, 2007 the officer extended the due date to July 30, 2008.  On May 30, 2008 the officer extended the due date to March 31, 2009.  On October 10, 2008, the officer extended the due date to the earlier of (a) March 30, 2010 or (b) upon demand by the officer. On March 30, 2010, the officer extended the due date to the earlier of (a) March 30, 2010 or (b) upon demand by the officer.  On September 8, 2009, a payment of $15,000 was paid to the officer. On October 19, 2009 and December 1, 2009, $10,000 was paid to the officer respectfully.  An additional payment of $10,000 was made on January 15, 2010.  During the quarter ending September 30, 2010 an additional payment of $8,000 was made. During the year ended December 31, 2012 an additional payment of $1,000 was made. During the year ended December 31, 2013 an additional payment of $1,280 was made.  As of December 31, 2013, the outstanding balance is $66,000.  Additionally, the accrued expenses are accruing 7% interest per year.  As of December 31, 2013 the Company recorded interest expense and related accrued interest payable of $1,508.

During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company's Chief Executive Officer forgave accrued payroll of $30,000 and extended the term of existing debt in exchange for the issuance of Series A convertible Preferred Stock ("Series A PS"). In connection with this transaction, incurred a loss on settlement of debt of $5,187,800. See note (8(H)).

As of December 31, 2013, the Company owes $669,184 in accrued salary to principal stockholder.  On November 10, 2010, the Company entered into an addendum to the employment agreement, effective January 1, 2011 through the December 31, 2015.    The term of the agreement is a five year period at an annual salary of $210,000.  There is a 6% annual increase.  The employee is also to receive a 20% bonsus based on the annual based salary.  Any stock, stock options bonuses have to be approved by the board of directors.

On February 25, 2013 the Company received $150,000 from a principal stockholder.  Pursuant to the terms of the loan, the advance bears interest at 3%, is unsecured and due on demand. At December 31, 2013 the Company recorded interest expense and related accrued interest payable of $2,001 and the loan balance of $150,000 was repaid.

As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, there was $97,138 and $82,262, respectively, included in accounts payable and accrued expenses - related party, which is owed to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer.

XML

9. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS (Details Narrative) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Officer
Amount due to related party	$ 66,000
Interest expense related to intellectual property transfer agreement with an officer	1,508
Principal stockholder
Amount due to related party	669,184
Interest expense related to intellectual property transfer agreement with an officer	$ 2,001

XML

3. EQUIPMENT (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2013

Property, Plant and Equipment [Abstract]

Equipment

	As of December 31, 2013			As of December 31, 2012
Automobile	$	25,828		$	25,828
Office Equipment		5,560			2,086
Less Accumulated Depreciation		(17,295	)		(11,406	)
Total Property and Equipment	$	14,093		$	16,508

XML

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ORGANIZATION (Details Narrative) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies And Organization Details Narrative
Net change in the valuation allowance for deferred tax asset	$ 385,853	$ 220,946

XML

Condensed Statement of Changes in Stockholders Deficit (USD $)	Preferred Stock - Series A	Common Stock - Class A	Common Stock - Class B	Common Stock - Class A Shares To be issued	Additional Paid-In Capital	Deferred Compensation	Deficit Accumulated during Development Stage	Total
Beginning Balance, Amount at Apr. 24, 2006	$ 0	$ 0	$ 0	$ 0	$ 0	$ 0	$ 0	$ 0
Beginning Balance, Shares at Apr. 24, 2006	0	0	0	0
Stock issued to founder, Shares		332,292,000
Stock issued to founder, Amount		180						180
Stock issued for services, Shares		18,200,000
Stock issued for services, Amount		145,600						145,600
Stock contributed by shareholder		(11,666,500)
Stock issued for cash, Shares		8,000
Stock issued for cash, Amount		400						400
Fair value of warrants issued					126,435			126,435
Net Loss							(530,321)	(530,321)
Ending Balance, Amount at Dec. 31, 2006	0	146,180	0	0	126,435	0	(530,321)	(257,706)
Ending Balance, Shares at Dec. 31, 2006	0	338,833,500	0	0
Stock issued for services, Shares		2,600,000
Stock issued for services, Amount		22,000						22,000
Stock issued for cash, Shares		129,790,000
Stock issued for cash, Amount		526,495						526,495
Stock issued in connection to cash offering, Shares		28,125,000
Stock issued in connection to cash offering, Amount		84,375			(84,375)			0
Net Loss							(472,986)	(472,986)
Ending Balance, Amount at Dec. 31, 2007	0	779,050	0	0	42,060	0	(1,003,307)	(182,197)
Ending Balance, Shares at Dec. 31, 2007	0	499,348,500	0	0
Stock issued for services, Shares				400,000
Stock issued for services, Amount				4,000				4,000
Net Loss							(1,721,156)	(1,721,156)
Ending Balance, Amount at Dec. 31, 2008	0	779,050	0	4,000	42,060	0	(2,724,463)	(1,899,353)
Ending Balance, Shares at Dec. 31, 2008	0	499,348,500	0	400,000
Stock issued for services, Shares		280,000		10,722,311
Stock issued for services, Amount		14,000		218,000		(103,333)		128,667
Stock issued for cash, Shares		2,866,599
Stock issued for cash, Amount		28,000						28,000
Net Loss							(1,432,091)	(1,432,091)
Ending Balance, Amount at Dec. 31, 2009	0	821,050	0	222,000	42,060	(103,333)	(4,156,554)	(3,174,777)
Ending Balance, Shares at Dec. 31, 2009	0	502,495,099	0	11,122,311
Stock issued for services, Shares		19,293,415
Stock issued for services, Amount		414,400				(5,000)		409,400
Warrants issued for services					168,000	(168,000)		0
Stock issued in connection with convertible note conversion, Shares		6,548,620
Stock issued in connection with convertible note conversion, Amount		115,000						115,000
Stock issued for cash, Shares		20,849,768		(10,000,000)
Stock issued for cash, Amount		473,632		(200,000)				273,632
Exercise of warrants in exchange for stock		5,177,801
Exercise of warrants in exchange for stock		10,000			677,908			687,908
Deferred compensation realized						250,333		250,333
Forgiveness of accrued payable to related party					499,412			499,412
Forgiveness of derivative liability to related party					2,102,795			2,102,795
Net Loss							(1,782,888)	(1,782,888)
Ending Balance, Amount at Dec. 31, 2010	0	1,834,082	0	22,000	3,490,175	(26,000)	(5,939,442)	(619,185)
Ending Balance, Shares at Dec. 31, 2010	0	554,364,703	0	1,122,311
Stock issued for services, Shares		2,029,412
Stock issued for services, Amount		140,000						140,000
Stock issued for license, Shares		2,200,000
Stock issued for license, Amount		242,000						242,000
Stock issued in connection with convertible note conversion, Amount								0
Stock issued for cash, Shares		9,204,111
Stock issued for cash, Amount		600,000						600,000
Exercise of warrants in exchange for stock		19,767,985
Exercise of warrants in exchange for stock		2,569,838			(2,569,838)			0
Deferred compensation realized						26,000		26,000
Net Loss							(1,295,310)	(1,295,310)
Ending Balance, Amount at Dec. 31, 2011	0	5,385,920	0	22,000	920,337	0	(7,234,752)	(906,495)
Ending Balance, Shares at Dec. 31, 2011	0	587,566,211	0	1,122,311
Stock issued for services, Shares		7,500,000
Stock issued for services, Amount		550,000						550,000
Warrants issued for services					400,000			400,000
Stock issued in connection with convertible note conversion, Amount								0
Stock issued for cash, Shares		9,049,427
Stock issued for cash, Amount		425,000						425,000
Deferred compensation realized								0
Net Loss							(1,602,921)	(1,602,921)
Ending Balance, Amount at Dec. 31, 2012	0	6,360,920		22,000	1,320,337		(8,837,673)	(1,134,416)
Ending Balance, Shares at Dec. 31, 2012	0	604,115,638		1,122,311
Warrants issued for services					736,816			736,816
Stock issued in connection with convertible note conversion, Amount								0
Stock issued for cash, Shares		21,269,214
Stock issued for cash, Amount		1,050,000						1,050,000
Exercise of warrants in exchange for stock		9,857,142
Exercise of warrants in exchange for stock		400,000			(400,000)
Deferred compensation realized								0
Preferred Stock issued for settlement of accrued payroll - related party, shares	2							2
Preferred Stock issued for settlement of accrued payroll - related party, amount	5,217,800							5,217,800
Grant 8,000,000 warrants for services, net of M2M adjustment for unvested warrants					396,083			396,083
Net Loss							(7,467,685)	(7,467,685)
Ending Balance, Amount at Dec. 31, 2013	$ 5,217,800	$ 7,810,920	$ 0	$ 22,000	$ 2,053,236	$ 0	$ (16,305,358)	$ (1,201,402)
Ending Balance, Shares at Dec. 31, 2013	2	635,241,994	0	1,122,311

XML

4. EQUIPMENT

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2013

Property, Plant and Equipment [Abstract]

EQUIPMENT

At December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 equipment is as follows:

	As of December 31, 2013			As of December 31, 2012
Automobile	$	25,828		$	25,828
Office Equipment		5,560			2,086
Less Accumulated Depreciation		(17,295	)		(11,406	)
Total Property and Equipment	$	14,093		$	16,508

Depreciation and amortization expense for the year ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 was $5,888 and $5,583 respectively.

XML

3. GOING CONCERN (Details Narrative) (USD $)	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010	Dec. 31, 2009	Dec. 31, 2008	Dec. 31, 2007	Dec. 31, 2006	Apr. 24, 2006
Going Concern Details Narrative
Working capital deficiency	$ 1,215,495
Stockholders Deficit	$ 1,201,402	$ 1,134,416	$ 906,495	$ 619,185	$ 3,174,777	$ 1,899,353	$ 182,197	$ 257,706	$ 0

XML

2. RESTATEMENT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2013

Accounting Changes and Error Corrections [Abstract]

2. RESTATEMENT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

	RESTATED BALANCE SHEET									Note
	As Reported			Adjustments			Restated
Total Assets	$	78,752		$	-		$	78,752
Total Liabilities	$	1,213,168		$	-		$	1,213,168
Commitments and Contingencies
Stockholders' Deficit
Preferred stock, no par value; unlimited shares authorized,
none issued  and outstanding		-			-			-
Common stock Class A,  no par value; unlimited shares authorized,
603,269,838 and 586,720,411 shares issued and outstanding, respectively		6,360,920			-			6,360,920
Common stock Class B,  no par value; unlimited shares authorized,
no shares issued and outstanding		-			-			-
Common Stock Issuable, 1,122,311 and 1,122,311 shares, respectively		22,000			-			22,000			1
Additional paid-in capital		920,337			400,000			1,320,337
Deferred Compensation		-			-			-
Deficit accumulated during the development stage		(8,437,673	)		(400,000	)		(8,837,673	)		1
		.
Total Stockholders' Deficit		(1,134,416	)		-			(1,134,416	)
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficit	$	78,752		$	-		$	78,752

	RESTATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
	For the Year Ended						For the Year Ended
	December 31, 2012						December 31, 2012
	As Reported			Adjustments			Restated
Revenue	$	-					$	-
								-
Operating Expenses								-
General and Administrative		379,326						379,326
Public Relations		-			400,000			400,000		1
Amortization of Debt Discount		-						-
Professional Fees		48,667						48,667
Officer's Salary		267,120						267,120
Contract Settlement		-						-
Research and Development		465,293						465,293
Total Operating Expenses		1,160,406			400,000			1,560,406
								-
Loss from Operations		(1,160,406	)		(400,000	)		(1,560,406	)
								-
Other Income/(Expenses)								-
Other income		3,000						3,000
Interest income		192						192
Change in fair value of embedded derivative liability		-						-
Change in fair value of embedded derivative liability-related party		-						-
Interest expense		(45,707	)					(45,707	)
Other expense		-						-
Total Other Income/(Expenses)		(42,515	)		-			(42,515	)
								-
Net (Income) Loss before Provision for Income Taxes		(1,202,921	)		(400,000	)		(1,602,921	)
								-
Provision for Income  Taxes		-			-			-
								-
Net Income (Loss)	$	(1,202,921	)	$	(400,000	)	$	(1,602,921	)
								-
Net Income (Loss) Per Share  - Basic and Diluted	$	(0.00	)				$	(0.00	)
Weighted average number of shares outstanding
during the period - Basic and Diluted		596,143,581						596,143,581

	RESTATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
	For the Period from April 25, 2006 (Inception) to December 31, 2012						For the Period from April 25, 2006 (Inception) to December 31, 2012
	As Reported			Adjustments			Restated
Revenue	$	-					$	-
								-
Operating Expenses								-
General and Administrative		1,939,502						1,939,502
Public Relations		219,890			400,000			619,890		1
Amortization of Debt Discount		120,000						120,000
Professional Fees		335,075						335,075
Officer's Salary		1,603,514						1,603,514
Contract Settlement		107,143						107,143
Research and Development		1,302,009						1,302,009
Total Operating Expenses		5,627,133			400,000			6,027,133
								-
Loss from Operations		(5,627,133	)		(400,000	)		(6,027,133	)
								-
Other Income/(Expenses)								-
Other income		7,881						7,881
Interest income		192						192
Change in fair value of embedded derivative liability		(2,790,185	)					(2,790,185	)
Change in fair value of embedded derivative liability-related party		119,485						119,485
Interest expense		(147,913	)					(147,913	)
Total Other Income/(Expenses)		(2,810,540	)		-			(2,810,540	)
								-
Net (Income) Loss before Provision for Income Taxes		(8,437,673	)		(400,000	)		(8,837,673	)
								-
Provision for Income  Taxes		-			-			-
								-
Net Income (Loss)	$	(8,437,673	)	$	(400,000	)	$	(8,837,673	)

	RESTATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
	For the Year Ended						For the Year Ended
	December 31, 2012						December 31, 2012
	As Reported			Adjustments			Restated
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:
Net Loss	$	(1,202,921	)	$	(400,000	)	$	(1,602,921	)	1
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operations
Depreciation expense		5,583						5,583
Stock issuable for services		-						-
Change in Fair Value of Derivative Liability		-						-
Stock issued for services		550,000						550,000
Warrants issued to employees		-						-
Warrants issued to consultants		-			400,000			400,000
Deferred compensation realized		-						-
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:								-
(Increase)Decrease in prepaid expenses		(2,270	)					(2,270	)
(Increase)Decrease in other receivables								-
Increase in accrued expenses and other payables - related party		238,977						238,977
Increase in accounts payable		(152,291	)					(152,291	)
Net Cash Used In Operating Activities		(562,922	)		-			(562,922	)

	RESTATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
	For the Period from April 25, 2006 (Inception) to December 31, 2012						For the Period from April 25, 2006 (Inception) to December 31, 2012
	As Reported			Adjustments			Restated
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:
Net Loss	$	(8,437,673	)	$	(400,000	)	$	(8,837,673	)	1
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operations
Depreciation expense		11,406						11,406
Stock issuable for services		22,000						22,000
Change in Fair Value of Derivative Liability		2,790,703						2,790,703
Stock issued for services		1,458,180						1,458,180
Warrants issued to employees		126,435						126,435
Warrants issued to consultants		168,000			400,000			568,000		1
Deferred compensation realized		200,000						200,000
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:								-
(Increase)Decrease in prepaid expenses		(2,270	)					(2,270	)
Increase in accrued expenses and other payables - related party		1,369,600						1,369,600
Increase in accounts payable		329,226						329,226
Net Cash Used In Operating Activities		(1,964,393	)		-			(1,964,393	)

Note:

1. Adjustment to recongnize 10,000,000 warrants issued to consultant on November 21, 2012, with fair value of $400,000 (See Note 7(E)).