XML 23 R8.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
3 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2014
Notes to Financial Statements  
NOTE 3 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Use of Estimates

 

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.  Significant estimates include those relating to revenue recognition, share-based compensation, and assumptions that have been used to value warrants, warrant modifications, and previous put option and note term extension liabilities.

 

Revenue Recognition

 

Although we do not currently have any such arrangements, we have historically generated revenue principally from collaborative research and development arrangements, technology access fees and government grants. Revenue arrangements with multiple components are divided into separate units of accounting if certain criteria are met, including whether the delivered component has stand-alone value to the customer. Consideration received is allocated among the separate units of accounting based on their respective selling prices.  The selling price for each unit is based on vendor-specific objective evidence, or VSOE, if available, third party evidence if VSOE is not available, or estimated selling price if neither VSOE nor third party evidence is available.  The applicable revenue recognition criteria are then applied to each of the units.

 

We recognize revenue when the four basic criteria of revenue recognition are met: (1) a contractual agreement exists; (2) the transfer of technology has been completed or services have been rendered; (3) the fee is fixed or determinable; and (4) collectability is reasonably assured.  For each source of revenue, we comply with the above revenue recognition criteria in the following manner:

 

Collaborative arrangements typically consist of non-refundable and/or exclusive technology access fees, cost reimbursements for specific research and development spending, and various milestone and future product royalty payments.  If the delivered technology does not have stand-alone value, the amount of revenue allocable to the delivered technology is deferred.  Non-refundable upfront fees with stand-alone value that are not dependent on future performance under these agreements are recognized as revenue when received, and are deferred if we have continuing performance obligations and have no objective and reliable evidence of the fair value of those obligations.  We recognize non-refundable upfront technology access fees under agreements in which we have a continuing performance obligation ratably, on a straight-line basis, over the period in which we are obligated to provide services.  Cost reimbursements for research and development spending are recognized when the related costs are incurred and when collectability is reasonably assured.  Payments received related to substantive, performance-based “at-risk” milestones are recognized as revenue upon achievement of the milestone event specified in the underlying contracts, which represent the culmination of the earnings process.  Amounts received in advance are recorded as deferred revenue until the technology is transferred, costs are incurred, or a milestone is reached.

 

Technology license agreements typically consist of non-refundable upfront license fees, annual minimum access fees and/or royalty payments. Non-refundable upfront license fees and annual minimum payments received with separable stand-alone values are recognized when the technology is transferred or accessed, provided that the technology transferred or accessed is not dependent on the outcome of the continuing research and development efforts. Otherwise, revenue is recognized over the period of our continuing involvement.

 

Government grants, which have supported our research efforts on specific projects, generally provide for reimbursement of approved costs as defined in the terms of grant awards. Grant revenue is recognized when associated project costs are incurred.

 

Research and Development Expenses

 

Research and development expenses are composed of both internal and external costs.  Internal costs include salaries and employment-related expenses of scientific personnel and direct project costs.  External research and development expenses consist primarily of sponsored stem cell research and development costs, costs associated with clinical and non-clinical development of AV-101, our small molecule prodrug candidate for neuropathic pain, depression and potentially other neurological conditions, and costs related to the application and prosecution of patents related to the Company’s stem cell technology platform, Human Clinical Trials in a Test Tube™, and AV-101. All such costs are charged to expense as incurred.

 

Stock-Based Compensation

 

We recognize compensation cost for all stock-based awards to employees based on the grant date fair value of the award.  Non-cash, stock-based compensation expense is recognized over the period during which the employee is required to perform services in exchange for the award, which generally represents the scheduled vesting period.  We have no awards with market or performance conditions.  For equity awards to non-employees, we re-measure the fair value of the awards as they vest and the resulting value is recognized as an expense during the period over which the services are performed.

 

The table below summarizes stock-based compensation expense included in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013:

 

    Three Months Ended  
    June 30,  
    2014     2013  
             
 Research and development expense:            
 Stock option grants   $ 61,500     $ 54,300  
 Warrants granted to officer in March 2014 and 2013     36,300       33,400  
      97,800       87,700  
 General and administrative expense:                
 Stock option grants     34,800       43,500  
 Warrants granted to officers and directors                
      in March 2014 and 2013     70,800       66,900  
      105,600       110,400  
 Total stock-based compensation expense   $ 203,400     $ 198,100  

 

We did not grant options to employees or consultants during the three months ended June 30, 2014. During the three months ended June 30, 2013, we granted options to purchase an aggregate of 80,000 shares of our common stock at exercise prices from $0.80 per share to $0.82 per share (the quoted market price on the grant dates) to two new employees and a consultant. At June 30, 2014, there were options outstanding to purchase 4,227,357 shares of our common stock at a weighted average exercise price of $0.50 per share. In May 2014, we issued 200,000 shares of restricted common stock having a grant date fair value of $134,000 to a consultant in partial payment for strategic business development services.  The fair value of the stock issued is included in general and administrative expense in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss.

 

Warrant Liability

 

We have issued certain warrants to Platinum Long Term Growth VII, LLC, our largest investor (Platinum), and, subject to Platinum’s exercise of its rights to exchange shares of our Series A Preferred Stock that it holds, we are also obligated to issue an additional warrant to Platinum, that contain an exercise price adjustment feature in the event we subsequently issue additional equity instruments at a price lower than the exercise price of the warrants. We account for these warrants as non-cash liabilities and estimate their fair value as described in Note 4, Fair Value Measurements; Note 7, Convertible Promissory Notes and Other Notes Payable, and Note 9, Capital Stock. We compute the fair value of the warrant liability at each reporting period and record the change in the fair value as non-cash expense or non-cash income. The key component in determining the fair value of the warrant and the related liability is the market price of our common stock, which is subject to significant fluctuation and is not under our control. The resulting change in the fair value of the warrant liability on our net income or loss is therefore also subject to significant fluctuation and will continue to be so until all of the warrants are issued and exercised, amended or expire. Assuming all other fair value inputs remain generally constant, we will record an increase in the warrant liability and non-cash expense when our stock price increases and a decrease in the warrant liability and non-cash income when our stock price decreases.

 

Comprehensive Income (Loss)

 

We have no components of other comprehensive income (loss) other than net income (loss), and accordingly our comprehensive income (loss) is equivalent to our net income (loss) for the periods presented.

 

Income (Loss) per Common Share

 

Basic income (loss) per share of common stock excludes the effect of dilution and is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period. Diluted income (loss) per share of common stock reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue shares of common stock were exercised or converted into shares of common stock. In calculating diluted net income (loss) per share, we adjust the numerator for the change in the fair value of the warrant liability attributable to outstanding warrants, only if dilutive, and increase the denominator to include the number of potentially dilutive common shares assumed to be outstanding during the period using the treasury stock method. For loss periods, potentially dilutive securities have been excluded from the computation as their effect would be antidilutive.

 

Basic net income (loss) and diluted net loss attributable to common stockholders per share was computed as follows:

 

    Three Months Ended June 30,  
    2014     2013  
             
 Numerator:            
Net income (loss) for basic earnings per share   $ (4,553,300 )   $ 185,700  
  less: change in fair value of warrant liability attributable to Exchange                
 and Investment Warrants issued to Platinum     -       (649,300 )
                 
 Net loss for diluted earnings per share   $ (4,553,300 )   $ (463,600 )
                 
 Denominator:                
 Weighted average basic common shares outstanding     24,588,086       20,839,941  
    Assumed conversion of dilutive securities:                
 Warrants to purchase common stock     -       -  
 Potentially dilutive common shares     -       -  
                 
 Denominator for diluted earnings per share - adjusted                
 weighted average shares     24,588,086       20,839,941  
                 
 Basic net income (loss) per share   $ (0.19 )   $ 0.01  
                 
 Diluted net loss per share   $ (0.19 )   $ (0.02 )

 

Potentially dilutive securities excluded in determining diluted net loss per common share are as follows:

 

    As of June 30,  
    2014     2013  
             
Series A preferred stock issued and outstanding (1)     15,000,000       15,000,000  
                 
Warrant shares issuable to Platinum upon exercise of common stock warrants by Platinum                
    upon exchange of Series A Preferred under the terms of the October 11, 2012 Note                
    Purchase and Exchnge Agreement     7,500,000       7,500,000  
                 
Outstanding options under the 2008 and 1999 Stock Incentive Plans     4,227,357       4,816,771  
                 
Outstanding warrants to purchase common stock     18,981,490       11,031,029  
                 
10% convertible Exchange Note and Investment Notes issued to Platinum in October 2012,                
    February 2013 and March 2013, including accrued interest through June 30, 2014 and 2013                
    2013, respectively (2)     7,687,039       6,948,841  
                 
10% convertible note issued to Platinum on July 26, 2013, including accrued interest                
    through June 30, 2014     549,157       -  
                 
10% convertible notes issued as a component of Unit Private Placements, including accrued interest                 
    accrued interest through June 30, 2014 (3)     5,169,441       -  
                 
Total     59,114,484       45,296,641  
____________                

 

(1)Assumes exchange under the terms of the October 11, 2012  Note Exchange and Purchase Agreement with Platinum
(2)Assumes conversion under the terms of the October 11, 2012  Note Exchange and Purchase Agreement with Platinum and the terms of the individual notes
(3)Excludes effect of conversion premium upon conversion into securities which may be issued in a Qualified Financing, as defined in the notes

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in ASC 605, Revenue Recognition. This ASU is based on the principle that revenue is recognized to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The ASU also requires additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments and assets recognized from costs incurred to obtain or fulfill a contract. The effective date will be the first quarter of our fiscal year ending March 31, 2018, using one of two retrospective application methods. We have not determined the potential effects of adopting this ASU on our consolidated financial statements.

 

In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-10, Development Stage Entities (Topic 915): Elimination of Certain Financial Reporting Requirements, Including an Amendment to Variable Interest Entities Guidance in Topic 810, Consolidation. The amendments in this ASU remove all incremental financial reporting requirements for development stage entities.  Among other changes, this ASU no longer requires development stage entities to present inception-to-date information about income statement line items, cash flows, and equity transactions. The presentation and disclosure requirements in Topic 915 will no longer be required for the first annual period beginning after December 15, 2014, with early adoption permitted. We have adopted ASU 2014-10 effective with our fiscal year beginning April 1, 2014 and, accordingly, have eliminated inception-to-date information in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) and Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.