XML 25 R15.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.10.0.1
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2018
Accounting Policies [Abstract]  
Principles of consolidation

Principles of consolidation

 

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Rubicon Technology Worldwide LLC, Rubicon Technology BP LLC, Rubicon Sapphire Technology (Malaysia) SDN BHD and Rubicon Technology Hong Kong Limited. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

Investments

Investments

 

The Company invests available cash primarily in U.S. Treasury securities, investment grade commercial paper, FDIC guaranteed certificates of deposit, common stock and corporate notes. Investments classified as available-for-sale securities are carried at fair value with unrealized gains and losses recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Investments in trading securities are reported at fair value, with both realized and unrealized gains and losses recorded in other income (expense), in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. Investments in which the Company has the ability and intent, if necessary, to liquidate are classified as short-term.

 

The Company reviews its available-for-sale securities investments at the end of each quarter for other-than-temporary declines in fair value based on the specific identification method. The Company considers various factors in determining whether an impairment is other-than-temporary, including the severity and duration of the impairment, changes in underlying credit ratings, forecasted recovery, its ability and intent to hold the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in market value and the probability that the scheduled cash payments will continue to be made. When the Company concludes that an other-than-temporary impairment has resulted, the difference between the fair value and carrying value is written off and recorded as a charge on the consolidated statement of operations.

Accounts receivable

Accounts receivable

 

The majority of the Company’s accounts receivable is due from defense subcontractors, industrial manufacturers, fabricators and resellers. Credit is extended based on an evaluation of the customer’s financial condition. Accounts receivable are due based on contract terms and at stated amounts due from customers, net of an allowance for doubtful accounts. Losses from credit sales are provided for in the financial statements.

 

Accounts outstanding longer than the contractual payment terms are considered past due. The Company determines its allowance by considering a number of factors, including length of time a customer’s account is past due, the customer’s current ability to pay and the condition of the general economy and industry as a whole. The Company writes off accounts receivable when they are deemed uncollectible and such write-offs, net of payments received, are recorded as a reduction to the allowance. The following table shows the activity of the allowance for doubtful accounts:

 

  

September 30,

2018

  

December 31,

2017

 
   (in thousands) 
Beginning balance  $7   $31 
Charges to costs and expenses   1    (20)
Accounts charged off, less recoveries       (4)
Ending balance  $8   $7 
Inventories

Inventories

 

Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Raw materials cost is determined using the first-in, first-out method, and work-in-process and finished goods costs are determined on a standard cost basis, which includes materials, labor and manufacturing overhead. The Company reduces the carrying value of its inventories for differences between the cost and the estimated net realizable value, taking into account usage, expected demand, technological obsolescence and other information.

 

The Company establishes inventory reserves when conditions exist that suggest inventory may be in excess of anticipated demand or is obsolete based on customer specifications. The Company evaluates the ability to realize the value of its inventory based on a combination of factors, including forecasted sales, estimated current and future market value and changes in customers’ product specifications. The Company’s method of estimating excess and obsolete inventory has remained consistent for all periods presented.

  

Inventories consisted of the following:

 

  

September 30,

2018

  

December 31,

2017

 
   (in thousands) 
Raw materials  $469   $476 
Work-in-process   1,875    2,334 
Finished goods   218    220 
   $2,562   $3,030 
Property and equipment

Property and equipment

 

Property and equipment consisted of the following:

 

  

September 30,

2018

  

December 31,

2017

 
   (in thousands) 
Leasehold improvements  $3,620   $4,624 
Machinery, equipment and tooling   3,293    6,105 
Buildings   1,686     
Information systems   819    819 
Land and land improvements   594     
Furniture and fixtures   8    8 
Total cost   10,020    11,556 
Accumulated depreciation and amortization   (7,247)   (10,741)
Property and equipment, net  $2,773   $815 
Assets held for sale and long-lived assets

Assets held for sale and long-lived assets

 

When circumstances, such as adverse market conditions, indicate that the carrying value of a long-lived asset may be impaired, the Company performs an analysis to review the recoverability of the asset’s carrying value. The Company makes estimates of the undiscounted cash flows (excluding interest charges) from the expected future operations of the asset. These estimates consider factors such as expected future operating income, operating trends and prospects, as well as the effects of demand, competition and other factors. If the analysis indicates that the carrying value is not recoverable from future cash flows, an impairment loss is recognized to the extent that the carrying value exceeds the estimated fair value. The estimated fair value of assets is determined using appraisal techniques, which assume the highest and best use of the asset by market participants, considering the use of the asset that is physically possible, legally permissible, and financially feasible at the measurement date. Any impairment losses are recorded as operating expenses, which reduce net income.

 

In connection with the Company’s decision in 2016 to limit its focus to the optical and industrial sapphire markets and exit the LED market, the Company developed a plan to close its Malaysia facility, scale down and consolidate remaining operations in the U.S. and sell additional assets that would not be needed. The Company evaluated its U.S. and Malaysia asset portfolios to identify assets needed for its current business strategy and excess assets that were no longer needed. The Company determined it had excess machinery, equipment and facilities. Excess U.S. and Malaysia assets were evaluated based on assuming an orderly liquidation plan, which considers economic obsolescence and sales of comparable equipment, as it is the Company’s intention to sell these assets. Additionally, the Company evaluated its U.S. assets continuing to be used in operations using a cost and market approach to determine the current fair value.

 

As a result, for the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $1.0 million on lower than expected sales prices for certain machinery and equipment held for sale, and identification of assets that will not be needed to support the Company’s current operations. Additionally, for the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $4.0 million on its U.S. and Malaysia land and building assets on lower than expected sale price. At September 30, 2018, and at the end of the two preceding fiscal quarters, the Company reviewed the current fair value of its assets and concluded no adjustments were needed. The Company will continue to assess its long-lived assets to ensure the carrying amount of these assets is still appropriate given any changes in the asset usage, marketplace and other factors used in determining the current fair value.

 

In September 2018, the Company completed the sale of its 134,400 square-foot manufacturing and office facility located in Batavia, Illinois, with the net book value of $5.9 million. The selling price for the property was $6.7 million. The Company realized net proceeds of approximately $6.4 million after the payment of real estate taxes, brokerage and legal fees, transfer taxes and other expenses, and recorded a gain on sale of this asset of $504,000.

 

In the nine months ended September 30, 2018, the Company completed individual sales and held auctions for equipment and consumable assets located at each of its U.S. properties, resulting in the sale of a significant amount of its excess U.S. assets, which had a total net book value of $1.6 million. In the beginning of 2018, the Company intended to sell a certain number of its crystal growth furnaces. Due to the Company’s changed needs and business plan, it reduced the number of furnaces it wanted to sell. The difference in the number of furnaces it originally intended to sell and the number it actually disposed of, had a net book value of $236,000. The additional furnaces that the Company decided to retain were reclassified from current assets held for sale to fixed assets held and used at September 30, 2018. Additionally, in the nine months ended September 30, 2018, the Company completed sales of Malaysia equipment with a total net book value of $131,000. Based on these sales, a gain on disposal of equipment and consumable assets of $2.2 million was recorded for the nine months ended September 30, 2018. Unsold excess Malaysia equipment continued to be classified as current assets held for sale at September 30, 2018.

 

The Company is actively pursuing the sale of a parcel of land it owns in Batavia, Illinois, and the sale or lease of its 65,000 square-foot facility located in Penang, Malaysia. Although the Company cannot assure the timing of these sales, it is the Company’s intention to complete these sales within the next twelve-month period, hence, these properties were classified as current assets held for sale at September 30, 2018, and December 31, 2017.

  

The Company cannot guarantee that it will be able to successfully complete the sale or lease of any assets.

 

In September 2018, the Company completed the purchase of a property located in Bensenville, Illinois. The purchase price for the property was $2.3 million. Previously, the Bensenville property was leased by the Company and it was the headquarters of its operations and one of its growth facilities. Going forward, this will be the Company’s sole operating facility and will also be used for its fabrication operations. The Company used its cash on hand to purchase the property.

Revenue recognition

Revenue recognition

 

The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with ASC Topic 606, Revenue From Contracts with Customers (“Topic 606”) which was adopted on January 1, 2018, using the full retrospective transition method. Adoption of Topic 606 had no impact on periods reported. Under Topic 606, the Company recognizes revenue when performance obligations under a purchase order or signed quotation are satisfied. Revenue is recognized when products are shipped and title and risk of loss transfer to a customer. The Company’s business practice commits the Company to manufacture and deliver product upon acceptance of a customer’s purchase order or signed quotation (“agreement”). The agreement with the customer includes specifications of the product to be delivered, price, expected ship date and payment terms. The Company’s agreements generally do not contain variable, financing, rights of return or non-cash components. There are no up-front costs to develop the production process. The performance obligation is satisfied at the point in time (single performance obligation) when the product is manufactured to the customer’s specification, as performance does not create an asset with an alternative use to the Company. Accordingly, the Company recognizes revenue when title and risk of loss have been transferred to the customer, generally at the time of shipment of product. The Company grants credit terms considering normal collection risk. If there is doubt about collection, full prepayment for the order is required. Any payments received prior to shipment are recorded as deferred revenue and included in Advance Payments in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. 

 

Government Contracts

 

The Company recognizes research and development revenue in the period during which the related costs are incurred over the contractually defined period. In July 2012, the Company signed a contract with the Air Force Research Laboratory to produce large-area sapphire windows on a cost plus fixed fee basis. The deliverables under the contract included development of machinery and technology to be able to produce large area sapphire windows, prove the concept of growing large windows with that equipment and delivery of large-area sapphire windows. The Company records research and development revenue on a gross basis as costs are incurred, plus a portion of the fixed fee over a period of time as the obligations (machinery, proof of concept and finished windows) are completed following the input method of measuring progress which recognizes revenue as resources are consumed, labor hours expended and costs are incurred. To date, the Company has recorded $4.7 million in revenue and the total value of the contract is $4.7 million. As the Company has completed its government contract, no additional revenue attributable to this contract was recorded in the three months ended September 30, 2018, and the total revenue recorded in the nine months ended September 30, 2018, was $56,000. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, $273,000 and $301,000 of revenue was recorded, respectively. At December 31, 2017, the estimated costs to complete the contract were in excess of the contract value. For the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company recorded estimated costs expected to be incurred in excess of this contract value of $243,000. No additional adjustments for the excess contract costs were recorded for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018. In reviewing its current estimates, the Company expects its remaining payments to be less than $200,000.

 

The Company does not provide maintenance or other services and it does not have sales that involve multiple elements or deliverables.

Net income (loss) per common share

Net income (loss) per common share

 

Basic net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted-average number of diluted common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted shares outstanding are calculated by adding to the weighted-average shares (a) any outstanding stock options based on the treasury stock method and (b) restricted stock units (“RSU”).

 

Diluted net income (loss) per share was the same as basic net income (loss) per share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, because the effects of potentially dilutive securities did not have a material impact on the calculation of diluted net income (loss) per share. The Company had outstanding options exercisable into 26,812 shares of the Company’s common stock that were deemed anti-dilutive at September 30, 2018.

New accounting pronouncements adopted

New accounting pronouncements adopted

 

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01 (“ASU 2016-01”), Financial Instruments – Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. Further clarifications were made in February 2018 with the issuance of ASU No. 2018-03 (“ASU 2018-03”). The amended guidance requires certain equity investments that are not consolidated and not accounted for under the equity method to be measured at fair value with changes recognized in net income rather than as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). It further states that an entity may choose to measure equity investments that do not have readily determinable fair values using a quantitative approach, or measurement alternative, which is equal to its cost minus impairment, if any, plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes in orderly transactions for the identical or a similar investment of the same issuer. The adoption of ASU 2016-01 and ASU 2018-03 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

 

In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-10 (“ASU 2016-10”), Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing. This update clarifies how an entity identifies performance obligations related to customer contracts as well as helps to improve the operability and understanding of the licensing implementation guidance. The amendments in this update affect the guidance in ASU No. 2014-09, (“ASU 2014-09”), Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which supersedes most of the current revenue recognition requirements. The underlying principle is that an entity will recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers at an amount that the entity expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services. The guidance provides a five-step analysis of transactions to determine when and how revenue is recognized. Other major provisions include capitalization of certain contract costs, consideration of time value of money in the transaction price, and allowing estimates of variable consideration to be recognized before contingencies are resolved in certain circumstances. The guidance also requires enhanced disclosures regarding the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from an entity’s contracts with customers. The guidance is effective for the interim and annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2017. The guidance permits the use of either a retrospective or cumulative effect transition method. In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-12, (“ASU 2016-12”), Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients. This update clarifies the objectives of collectability, sales and other taxes, noncash consideration, contract modifications at transition, completed contracts at transition and technical correction. The amendments in this update affect the guidance in ASU 2014-09. In September 2017, the FASB issued additional amendments providing clarification and implementation guidance. The Company’s revenue is primarily generated from the sale of finished products to customers. Sales predominantly contain a single delivery element and revenue is recognized at a single point in time when ownership, risks and rewards transfer. These are largely unaffected by the new standard as they closely align with the new standards principles relating to the measurement of revenue and timing of recognition. The Company adopted Topic 606 effective January 1, 2018, using the full retrospective transition method. As the underlying principles of the new standard, relating to the measurement of revenue and the timing of recognition, are closely aligned with the Company’s current business model and practices, the adoption of ASU 2014-09 did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

 

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15 (“ASU 2016-15”), Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments which adds or clarifies guidance on the classification of certain cash receipts and payments in the statement of cash flows. The standard addresses eight specific cash flow issues with the objective of reducing diversity in practice. ASU 2016-15 is effective for the interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. The Company’s adoption of ASU 2016-15 did not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

 

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18 (“ASU 2016-18”), Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash. The standard requires that amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amount shown on the statement of cash flows. In addition, the standard requires disclosure of the nature of restrictions on cash balances and how the statement of cash flows reconciles to the balance sheet in any situation in which the balance sheet includes more than one line item of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash. ASU 2016-18 is effective for the interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. The Company’s adoption of ASU 2016-18 did not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

 

In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-02 (“ASU 2018-02), Income Statement-Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Comprehensive Income. The new guidance allows companies to reclassify stranded tax effects resulting from the Tax Act, from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings. The guidance also requires certain new disclosures regardless of the election. Early adoption is permitted. The Company’s adoption of ASU 2018-02 did not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

Recent accounting pronouncements

Recent accounting pronouncements

 

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02 (“ASU 2016-02”), Leases (Topic 842), which modifies the lease recognition requirements and requires entities to recognize the assets and liabilities arising from leases on the balance sheet. ASU 2016-02 requires entities to use a modified retrospective approach for leases that exist or are entered into after the beginning of the earliest comparative period in the financial statements. ASU 2016-02 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The Company is evaluating the impact, if any, of adopting ASU 2016-02 on its financial statements.

 

In March 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-05 (“ASU 2018-05), Income Taxes (Topic 740): Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118. This standard amends ASC 740, Income Taxes, to provide guidance on accounting for tax effects of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”) pursuant to Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118, which allows companies to complete the accounting under ASC 740 within one-year measurement period from the Tax Act enactment date. This standard is effective upon issuance. The Company has decided to follow the guidance provided by ASU 2018-05 and will leave the one-year measurement period open to evaluate the impact of the Tax Act.

 

In June 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-07 (“ASU 2018-07”), Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting. These amendments expand the scope of Topic 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation which currently only includes share-based payments to employees to include share-based payments issued to non-employees for goods or services. Consequently, the accounting for share-based payments to non-employees and employees will be substantially aligned. ASU 2018-07 supersedes Subtopic 505-50, Equity – Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees. The guidance is effective for public companies for the interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted, but no earlier than a company’s adoption date of Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. At this time, the Company does not recognize the existence of any non-employee relationships involving share-based payments. The Company will continue to assess applicability of ASU 2018-07 prior to adoption.