XML 16 R8.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.20.1
Basis of Presentation
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2020
Accounting Policies [Abstract]  
Basis of Presentation
Basis of Presentation
General
The accounting and reporting policies of the Company and the methods of applying those policies that materially affect the consolidated financial statements conform with U.S. GAAP and with general financial services industry practices. The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements include the accounts of BBVA USA Bancshares, Inc. and its subsidiaries and have been prepared in conformity with U.S. GAAP for interim financial information and in accordance with the instructions to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X as promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal and recurring items, necessary for the fair presentation of the condensed consolidated financial statements have been included. Operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2020, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ended December 31, 2020. These interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019.
The Company has evaluated subsequent events for potential recognition and disclosure through the filing date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to determine if either recognition or disclosure of significant events or transactions is required.
Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Consolidated Financial Statements
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period, the most significant of which relate to the allowance for credit losses and goodwill impairment. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic impacts the results of operations and financial condition, will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted.
Recently Adopted Accounting Standards
Credit Losses
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses, which introduces new guidance for the accounting for credit losses on instruments within its scope. The new approach changes the impairment model for most financial assets, and will require the use of an “expected credit loss” model for financial instruments measured at amortized cost and certain other instruments. This model applies to receivables, loans, debt securities, and off-balance sheet credit exposures. This model requires entities to estimate the lifetime expected credit loss on such instruments and record an allowance that represents the portion of the amortized cost basis that the entity does not expect to collect. This allowance is deducted from the financial asset’s amortized cost basis to present the net amount expected to be collected. The new expected credit loss model also applies to purchased financial assets with credit deterioration, superseding current accounting guidance for such assets.
The amended guidance also amends the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities, requiring entities to determine whether all or a portion of the unrealized loss on such securities is a credit loss, and also eliminating the option for management to consider the length of time a security has been in an unrealized loss position as a factor in concluding whether or not a credit loss exists. The amended model states that an entity will recognize an allowance for credit losses on available-for-sale debt securities, instead of a direct reduction of the amortized cost basis of the investment, as required under current guidance. As a result, entities recognize improvements to estimated credit losses on available-for-sale debt securities immediately in earnings as opposed to in interest income over time. There are also additional disclosure requirements included in this guidance.
In November 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-19 and in April, May and November 2019 and February 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2019-04, ASU 2019-05, ASU 2019-11, and ASU 2020-02 respectively, which made minor clarifications to the guidance in ASU 2016-13.
The Company’s implementation process included loss model development, data sourcing and validation, development of governance processes, development of a qualitative framework, documentation and governance surrounding economic forecast for credit loss purposes, evaluation of technical accounting topics, updates to allowance policies and methodology documentation, development of reporting processes and related internal controls.
The Company adopted this ASU, as amended on January 1, 2020 using a modified retrospective method for all financial assets measured at amortized cost and off-balance-sheet credit exposures. Results for reporting periods beginning after January 1, 2020 are presented under this ASU, while prior period amounts continue to be reported in accordance with previously applicable GAAP. The Company recorded a net of tax increase to accumulated deficit of $150.2 million as of January 1, 2020 for the cumulative effect of adopting this ASU.
The Company adopted this ASU using the prospective transition approach for debt securities for which other-than -temporary impairment has been recognized prior to January 1, 2020. As a result, the amortized cost basis remained the same before and after the effective date of this ASU. The effective interest rate on these debt securities was not changed. Amounts previously recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income as of January 1, 2020 related to improvements in cash flows expected to be collected will be accreted into income over the remaining life of the asset. Recoveries of amounts previously written off relating to improvements in cash flows after January 1, 2020 will be recorded in earnings when received.
The amended guidance in this ASU eliminates the current accounting model for purchased-credit-impaired loans, but requires an allowance to be recognized for purchased-credit-deteriorated assets (those that have experienced more-than-insignificant deterioration in credit quality since origination). The Company had no impact from purchased-credit-deteriorated assets upon adoption.
The following table illustrates the impact of ASC 326.
 
January 1, 2020
 
As Reported Under ASC 326
 
Pre-ASC Adoption
 
Impact of ASC 326 Adoption
 
(In Thousands)
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
Allowance for credit losses on debt securities held to maturity
$
1,847

 
$

 
$
1,847

Allowance for credit losses on loans
1,105,924

 
920,993

 
184,931

 
 
 
 
 
 
Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
Allowance for credit losses on letters of credit and unfunded commitments
76,946

 
66,955

 
9,991


The Company did not record a material allowance with respect to HTM and AFS securities as the portfolios consist primarily of U.S. Treasury and agency-backed securities that inherently have minimal credit risk.
See Note 2, Debt Securities Available for Sale and Debt Securities Held to Maturity, and Note 3, Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses, for the required disclosures in accordance with this ASU.
Fair Value Measurements
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, Disclosure Framework - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurements. The amendments in this ASU modified the disclosure requirements for fair value measurements in Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements. The Company adopted this ASU on January 1, 2020. The adoption of this standard did not have material impact on the financial condition or results of operation of the Company. See Note 9, Fair Value Measurements, for the modified disclosure in accordance with this ASU.
Internal-Use Software
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-15, Customer's Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That is a Service Contract. The amendments in this ASU align the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software and hosting arrangements that include an internal-use software license. The Company adopted this ASU on January 1, 2020. The adoption of this standard did not have material impact on the financial condition or results of operation of the Company.