XML 17 R6.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Note 1 - Business
6 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2011
Notes  
Note 1 - Business

NOTE 1 – BUSINESS

 

Sonnen Corporation was incorporated in the state of Nevada on November 16, 2006 as “Simple Tech, Inc.” Sonnen Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Sonnen One, Inc., are referred to herein as the “Company”. By June 2009, the Company had been unable to realize its original business objective. In July 2009, the Company entered into a licensing agreement to research, develop and market products that rely upon a novel process for energy generation consisting of specific materials and proprietary material combinations. 

 

On November 3, 2009, the Company amended its articles of incorporation to change its name from “Simple Tech, Inc.” to “Sonnen Corporation” and to decrease the number of its authorized common stock from one billion five hundred million (1,500,000,000) shares (par value $0.0001) to two hundred fifty million (250,000,000) shares (par value $0.0001) without affecting the number of issued and outstanding shares. The Company’s subsidiary changed its name from “Sonnen Corporation” to “Sonnen One, Inc.”

 

On November 9, 2009, the Company formed a Scientific Advisory Board to support the Company with its research, development, and commercialization efforts through advice, counsel, and direct participation utilizing the industry expertise and professional and academic backgrounds of its Scientific Advisory Board members pursuant to its current business plan.

 

On February 6, 2010, the licensor of the licensing agreement notified the Company of a purported breach of contract terms, including a breach of confidentiality, insufficient funding for research and development activities and failure to provide direct access to our patent attorneys. The license agreement allowed for a ninety day period in which to cure purported breaches. The Company subsequently learned that the licensor was not the rightful owner of the license and had no rights to grant the license to the Company.

 

Since the licensor failed to remedy the breach of the licensing agreement, the Company filed a legal complaint on March 8, 2010 and impaired the entire $672,000 book value of the licensing agreement.

 

The Company has since been seeking to litigate an outcome of the dispute.