Litigation	6 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2018
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]
Litigation	NOTE 11 — LITIGATION The Company was served in Hays County, Texas in a complaint for breach of contract in February 2017. In April 2017, the Company settled this complaint for $129,000 payable over a four-month period. As of the filing date of this Form 10-Q, the balance in arrears is $95,000 plus interest and other charges which has been accrued at September 30, 2018. The Company repaid $237,300 in principal plus interest to L2 Capital LLC and $101,700 plus interest to SBI Investments LLC on September 30, 2017, and $149,555 plus interest to L2 Capital LLC and $64,095 plus interest to SBI Investments LLC on November 3, 2017, respectively. CAUSE NUMBER 17-2033; Hays County, Texas Two lenders, SBI Investments LLC, 2014-1, and L2 Capital, LLC, asked Quantum Materials’ transfer agent, Empire Stock Transfer, Inc., to set aside fifty-million (50,000,000) shares of stock as collateral for four loan agreements Quantum Materials had entered into in late March 2017. This joint request occurred despite the fact that or about September 30, 2017 Quantum had repaid $339,000 (plus accrued interest of $10,170) on two of the loans. Subsequently, in November 2017, the Company also repaid $213,650 and $8,636 of accrued interest on two of the remaining loans on their due dates. Quantum filed suit for an injunction to stop the release of the stock. The two lenders, SBI Investments LLC, 2014-1 (SBI), and L2 Capital, LLC (L2), hired the national law firm of K&L Gates to stop the injunction; problematically, this same firm had previously represented Quantum Materials. Quantum filed a motion to disqualify the law firm for that conflict, and they subsequently withdrew. New counsel for SBI and L2, Cleveland Terrazas PLLC, brought suit against Quantum for $1.5 million on the four notes that had been repaid and were not in actual default, though SBI Investments LLC, 2014-1, and L2 Capital, LLC claimed technical defaults. The court in Hays County granted Quantum’s temporary injunction and set the full case for trial. The next day, SBI Investments LLC, 2014-1, and L2 Capital, LLC dismissed their suit against Quantum and refiled similar actions in Kansas and Florida on the notes claiming that one note was paid on a Monday when it was due on a Sunday, demanding late payment in stock (they refused cash), and another was paid on a Friday when it was due Saturday, claiming a pre-payment penalty. All three suits are related to the same transactions. The lenders claim 140% interest, attorney’s fees, 20 million shares of stock, and damages. Quantum maintains all loans have been paid timely. The Company denies all the above-mentioned allegations and will vigorously defend all claims. CAUSE NUMBER: 17CV06093; Johnson County, Kansas The Kansas lawsuit is based on the same nucleus of facts. The putative default is the failure to properly and timely file a Form S-1 with the SEC. Three causes of action are alleged: the first is breach of contracts regarding the Registration Rights Agreement against Quantum; the second claim is for breach of contract of the first L2 promissory note against Quantum; the final claim is for breach of contract regarding the second L2 promissory note against both Quantum and Squires, individually. The Company denies all the above-mentioned allegations and will vigorously defend all claims. CAUSE NUMBER: 2017-025283-CA-01; Miami-Dade County, Florida The Florida lawsuit largely mirrors the suit in Kansas; defaults are alleged as follows: On July 6, 2017, Quantum filed a revised Form 10-Q/A report (the Report) with the SEC, restating its financial statements. In comparison to the unrestated financial statement previously filed by Quantum, the Revised Report materially and adversely affects SBI’s rights with respect to the notes. This restatement of financial statements constituted a breach of each of the notes. Furthermore, because each note contains a cross-default clause, each of Quantum’s breaches of a specific note also constituted a breach of every other note. On July 27, 2017, Quantum’s auditor resigned, and replaced its auditor without seeking or obtaining the consent of SBI. This replacement of Quantum’s auditor constituted an alleged breach of the SBI notes. Because each note contains a cross-default clause, each of Quantum’s breaches of a specific note also constituted a breach of every other note. The Company denies all of the above-mentioned allegations and will vigorously defend all claims. The case was reheard in late March 2018 and a 45-day continuance was decided resulting in an April 30, 2018 rehearing. After a day of litigation in San Marcos, QTMM’s motion to enjoin L2 and SBI and prevent them from obtaining stock before a full trial on the merits was granted on October 27, 2017, by Judge Gary Steel. L2 and SBI objected to the injunction and appealed to the Third Court of Appeals in Austin, TX. On March 8, 2018, in a unanimous opinion, the Third Court of Appeals denied the appeal, sustained the injunction in favor of QTMM and awarded costs of court. On March 29, 2018, at a discovery hearing, wherein QTMM asked the court to order L2 and SBI to produce evidence to support their positions, L2 and SBI requested and received a stay of litigation, postponing the trial date of April 2018, which they had previously requested, and also postponing discovery until rulings in Florida and Kansas, or until further order of the court. The court also announced that when Florida and Kansas have spoken, discovery will be expedited. A jurisdiction hearing for the Florida case on August 15, 2018 resulted in the lawsuit being dismissed and a hearing is scheduled in Kansas in April 2019. The Company expects to successful in the L2 and SBI litigation. The ultimate outcome is not determinable and as such, no liability has been recorded for this contingent liability at December 31, 2018. Quantum v. K&L Gates, Inc., 18-2393, pending in Hays County, Texas. In September 2017, Quantum filed an injunction suit against two of its lenders, SBI Investments, LLC, 2014-1 and L2 Capital LLC, in Hays County, Texas (428th Judicial District; Cause No. 17-2033). On October 2017, these two lenders intervened in the proceeding, asserted affirmative claims for monetary damages against Quantum, and opposed Quantum’s request for temporary injunctive relief. The lenders’ law firm was K&L Gates. In 2016, the Board of Directors for Quantum retained the law firm of K&L Gates. In this professional capacity, K&L Gates attended confidential board meetings and reviewed, inter alia, corporate secrets. K&L Gates billed approximately $100,000 per month. The Company has accrued $319,000 in relation to this action. Quantum moved to disqualify K&L Gates. The day before Quantum’s motion to disqualify was ruled on, K&L Gates withdrew in lieu of the Austin law firm Cleveland & Terrazas. On September 21, 2018, the “Deputy General Counsel of K&L Gates,” Mr. Charles Tea, sent a demand for payment of over $300,000 to Quantum’s CEO. On October 16, 2018, Quantum filed suit against K&L Gates alleging Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Deceptive Trade Practices, and Legal Malpractice.

Litigation

6 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2018

Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]

NOTE 11 — LITIGATION

The Company was served in Hays County, Texas in a complaint for breach of contract in February 2017. In April 2017, the Company settled this complaint for $129,000 payable over a four-month period. As of the filing date of this Form 10-Q, the balance in arrears is $95,000 plus interest and other charges which has been accrued at September 30, 2018. The Company repaid $237,300 in principal plus interest to L2 Capital LLC and $101,700 plus interest to SBI Investments LLC on September 30, 2017, and $149,555 plus interest to L2 Capital LLC and $64,095 plus interest to SBI Investments LLC on November 3, 2017, respectively.

CAUSE NUMBER 17-2033; Hays County, Texas

Two lenders, SBI Investments LLC, 2014-1, and L2 Capital, LLC, asked Quantum Materials’ transfer agent, Empire Stock Transfer, Inc., to set aside fifty-million (50,000,000) shares of stock as collateral for four loan agreements Quantum Materials had entered into in late March 2017. This joint request occurred despite the fact that or about September 30, 2017 Quantum had repaid $339,000 (plus accrued interest of $10,170) on two of the loans. Subsequently, in November 2017, the Company also repaid $213,650 and $8,636 of accrued interest on two of the remaining loans on their due dates.

Quantum filed suit for an injunction to stop the release of the stock. The two lenders, SBI Investments LLC, 2014-1 (SBI), and L2 Capital, LLC (L2), hired the national law firm of K&L Gates to stop the injunction; problematically, this same firm had previously represented Quantum Materials. Quantum filed a motion to disqualify the law firm for that conflict, and they subsequently withdrew.

New counsel for SBI and L2, Cleveland Terrazas PLLC, brought suit against Quantum for $1.5 million on the four notes that had been repaid and were not in actual default, though SBI Investments LLC, 2014-1, and L2 Capital, LLC claimed technical defaults. The court in Hays County granted Quantum’s temporary injunction and set the full case for trial. The next day, SBI Investments LLC, 2014-1, and L2 Capital, LLC dismissed their suit against Quantum and refiled similar actions in Kansas and Florida on the notes claiming that one note was paid on a Monday when it was due on a Sunday, demanding late payment in stock (they refused cash), and another was paid on a Friday when it was due Saturday, claiming a pre-payment penalty. All three suits are related to the same transactions. The lenders claim 140% interest, attorney’s fees, 20 million shares of stock, and damages. Quantum maintains all loans have been paid timely.

The Company denies all the above-mentioned allegations and will vigorously defend all claims.

CAUSE NUMBER: 17CV06093; Johnson County, Kansas

The Kansas lawsuit is based on the same nucleus of facts. The putative default is the failure to properly and timely file a Form S-1 with the SEC. Three causes of action are alleged: the first is breach of contracts regarding the Registration Rights Agreement against Quantum; the second claim is for breach of contract of the first L2 promissory note against Quantum; the final claim is for breach of contract regarding the second L2 promissory note against both Quantum and Squires, individually.

The Company denies all the above-mentioned allegations and will vigorously defend all claims.

CAUSE NUMBER: 2017-025283-CA-01; Miami-Dade County, Florida

The Florida lawsuit largely mirrors the suit in Kansas; defaults are alleged as follows:

On July 6, 2017, Quantum filed a revised Form 10-Q/A report (the Report) with the SEC, restating its financial statements. In comparison to the unrestated financial statement previously filed by Quantum, the Revised Report materially and adversely affects SBI’s rights with respect to the notes. This restatement of financial statements constituted a breach of each of the notes. Furthermore, because each note contains a cross-default clause, each of Quantum’s breaches of a specific note also constituted a breach of every other note.

On July 27, 2017, Quantum’s auditor resigned, and replaced its auditor without seeking or obtaining the consent of SBI. This replacement of Quantum’s auditor constituted an alleged breach of the SBI notes. Because each note contains a cross-default clause, each of Quantum’s breaches of a specific note also constituted a breach of every other note.

The Company denies all of the above-mentioned allegations and will vigorously defend all claims.

The case was reheard in late March 2018 and a 45-day continuance was decided resulting in an April 30, 2018 rehearing. After a day of litigation in San Marcos, QTMM’s motion to enjoin L2 and SBI and prevent them from obtaining stock before a full trial on the merits was granted on October 27, 2017, by Judge Gary Steel. L2 and SBI objected to the injunction and appealed to the Third Court of Appeals in Austin, TX. On March 8, 2018, in a unanimous opinion, the Third Court of Appeals denied the appeal, sustained the injunction in favor of QTMM and awarded costs of court.

On March 29, 2018, at a discovery hearing, wherein QTMM asked the court to order L2 and SBI to produce evidence to support their positions, L2 and SBI requested and received a stay of litigation, postponing the trial date of April 2018, which they had previously requested, and also postponing discovery until rulings in Florida and Kansas, or until further order of the court. The court also announced that when Florida and Kansas have spoken, discovery will be expedited. A jurisdiction hearing for the Florida case on August 15, 2018 resulted in the lawsuit being dismissed and a hearing is scheduled in Kansas in April 2019.

The Company expects to successful in the L2 and SBI litigation. The ultimate outcome is not determinable and as such, no liability has been recorded for this contingent liability at December 31, 2018.

Quantum v. K&L Gates, Inc., 18-2393, pending in Hays County, Texas.

In September 2017, Quantum filed an injunction suit against two of its lenders, SBI Investments, LLC, 2014-1 and L2 Capital LLC, in Hays County, Texas (428th Judicial District; Cause No. 17-2033). On October 2017, these two lenders intervened in the proceeding, asserted affirmative claims for monetary damages against Quantum, and opposed Quantum’s request for temporary injunctive relief. The lenders’ law firm was K&L Gates. In 2016, the Board of Directors for Quantum retained the law firm of K&L Gates. In this professional capacity, K&L Gates attended confidential board meetings and reviewed, inter alia, corporate secrets. K&L Gates billed approximately $100,000 per month. The Company has accrued $319,000 in relation to this action. Quantum moved to disqualify K&L Gates. The day before Quantum’s motion to disqualify was ruled on, K&L Gates withdrew in lieu of the Austin law firm Cleveland & Terrazas. On September 21, 2018, the “Deputy General Counsel of K&L Gates,” Mr. Charles Tea, sent a demand for payment of over $300,000 to Quantum’s CEO. On October 16, 2018, Quantum filed suit against K&L Gates alleging Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Deceptive Trade Practices, and Legal Malpractice.