Income Tax	3 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2016
Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]
Income Tax	NOTE 11 – INCOME TAX The Company follows ASC 740 “Income Taxes” regarding the accounting for deferred tax assets and liabilities. Under the asset and liability method required by this guidance, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. A deferred tax asset will be reduced by a valuation allowance when, based on the Company’s estimates, it is more likely than not that a portion of those assets will not be realized in a future period. The Company assesses the likelihood that deferred tax assets will be recovered from the existing deferred tax liabilities or future taxable income. To the extent the Company believes that recovery will not meet the more likely than not threshold, it establishes a valuation allowance. The Company has recorded valuation allowances in the U.S. for its net deferred tax assets since management believes it is more likely than not that these assets will not be realized because future taxable income necessary to utilize these losses cannot be established or projected. As of September 30, 2016, the Company had approximately $27,000,000 in U.S. net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards that expire beginning in 2029. Under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (“IRC Section 382”), a corporation that undergoes an “ownership change”, as defined therein, is subject to limitations on its use of pre-change NOL carryforwards to offset future taxable income. The Company believes there is a 382 limitation on its NOLs that will substantially limit the use of its NOLs in the future, including disallowing the use of a material portion of its NOLs. However, the Company is currently evaluating whether an “ownership change” has occurred and, if so, what the annual limitation on NOL will be in future periods. The Company anticipates this evaluation to be complete by the end of the second quarter of this fiscal year. The Company has recorded a valuation allowance on the entire NOL as it believes that it is more likely than not that the deferred tax asset associated with the NOLs will not be realized regardless of whether an “ownership change” has occurred. When a company operates in a jurisdiction that generates ordinary losses but does not expect to realize them, ASC 740-270-30-36(a) requires the exclusion of the respective jurisdiction from the overall annual effective tax rate (“AETR”) calculation and instead, a separate AETR should be computed. The Company operates in one jurisdiction and has determined that its deferred tax assets are not realizable on a more likely than not basis and has recorded a full valuation allowance.The effective income tax rate for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 was 0%.

Income Tax

3 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2016

NOTE 11 – INCOME TAX

The Company follows ASC 740 “Income Taxes” regarding the accounting for deferred tax assets and liabilities. Under the asset and liability method required by this guidance, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. A deferred tax asset will be reduced by a valuation allowance when, based on the Company’s estimates, it is more likely than not that a portion of those assets will not be realized in a future period.

The Company assesses the likelihood that deferred tax assets will be recovered from the existing deferred tax liabilities or future taxable income. To the extent the Company believes that recovery will not meet the more likely than not threshold, it establishes a valuation allowance. The Company has recorded valuation allowances in the U.S. for its net deferred tax assets since management believes it is more likely than not that these assets will not be realized because future taxable income necessary to utilize these losses cannot be established or projected.

As of September 30, 2016, the Company had approximately $27,000,000 in U.S. net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards that expire beginning in 2029. Under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (“IRC Section 382”), a corporation that undergoes an “ownership change”, as defined therein, is subject to limitations on its use of pre-change NOL carryforwards to offset future taxable income. The Company believes there is a 382 limitation on its NOLs that will substantially limit the use of its NOLs in the future, including disallowing the use of a material portion of its NOLs. However, the Company is currently evaluating whether an “ownership change” has occurred and, if so, what the annual limitation on NOL will be in future periods. The Company anticipates this evaluation to be complete by the end of the second quarter of this fiscal year. The Company has recorded a valuation allowance on the entire NOL as it believes that it is more likely than not that the deferred tax asset associated with the NOLs will not be realized regardless of whether an “ownership change” has occurred.

When a company operates in a jurisdiction that generates ordinary losses but does not expect to realize them, ASC 740-270-30-36(a) requires the exclusion of the respective jurisdiction from the overall annual effective tax rate (“AETR”) calculation and instead, a separate AETR should be computed. The Company operates in one jurisdiction and has determined that its deferred tax assets are not realizable on a more likely than not basis and has recorded a full valuation allowance.The effective income tax rate for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 was 0%.