corresp


	Sears Tower, Suite 5800
	233 S. Wacker Dr.
	Chicago, Illinois 60606
	Tel: (312) 876-7700 Fax: (312) 993-9767
	www.lw.com
	FIRM / AFFILIATE OFFICES
	Brussels	New York
	Chicago	Northern Virginia
	Frankfurt	Orange County
	Hamburg	Paris
Via EDGAR	Hong Kong	San Diego
	London	San Francisco
	Los Angeles	Shanghai
September 27, 2007	Milan	Silicon Valley
	Moscow	Singapore
	Munich	Tokyo
	New Jersey	Washington, D.C.

Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, N.E.
Mailstop 3561
Washington, D.C. 20549


Attention:		H. Christopher Owings Scott Anderegg


Re:		Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc. — Amendment No. 2
		Registration Statement on Form S-1
		File No. 333-144405

Ladies and Gentlemen:

On behalf of Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), we hereby transmit for filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, Amendment No. 2 (the “Amendment”) to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (the “Registration Statement”), including certain exhibits. The Company supplementally advises the staff (the “Staff”) of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) that it plans to file an application for confidential treatment with respect to a certain exhibit to the Registration Statement with the Secretary of the Commission concurrently with the Amendment. Courtesy copies of this letter and the Amendment (specifically marked to show changes thereto) are being submitted to the Staff by hand delivery.

The Amendment reflects the responses of the Company to comments received from the Staff in a letter from H. Christopher Owings, dated September 14, 2007 (the “Comment Letter”). Where we have revised the disclosure in the Registration Statement in response to the Staff’s comments, we have noted the applicable page number of the Amendment next to the comment. In addition, certain marked copies of the Amendment provided to the Staff have been marked with the number of the response next to the corresponding text of the Amendment.

General

We note your response to comment 1 in our letter dated August 3, 2007. As discussed with counsel, please ensure that you provide a price range in your next amendment.

Securities and Exchange Commission
September 27, 2007
Page 2

Response: In response to the Staff’s comment, we have provided a price range in the Amendment.

Front Cover of Prospectus

2.		We note your response to comment 4 in our letter dated August 3, 2007. Please revise your disclosure to remove the names of the joint book-running managers from the front cover page. You may include this information on the back cover of the prospectus.

		Response: We supplementally advise the Staff that J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. and Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC, the two underwriters identified as joint book-running managers in the response to prior comment 4, are managing underwriters of the offering, as are Thomas Weisel Partners LLC, Cowen and Company, LLC and Piper Jaffray & Co. As such, we respectfully submit that Item 501(b)(8)(i) of Regulation S-K requires that each of J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC, Thomas Weisel Partners LLC, Cowen and Company, LLC and Piper Jaffray & Co. be listed on the outside front cover page.

Prospectus Summary, page 1

3.		We note your response to comment 6 in our letter dated August 3, 2007 and we re-issue it in part. We note your chart supporting your assertion that you are “the largest beauty retailer that provides one-stop shopping for prestige, mass and salon products and services in the United States” and your statement that you “offer the widest selection of categories across prestige and mass cosmetics, fragrances, haircare, skincare, bath and body products and salon styling tools.” In this regard, please provide us with copies of your source data cited in footnote 1. In addition, please explain to us the meaning of footnote 2. Please also explain by what measure you are referencing when you state that you are the largest.

		Response: In response to the Staff’s comment, we have updated the chart supporting our assertion that the Company is “the largest beauty retailer that provides one-stop shopping for prestige, mass and salon products and services in the United States” and the statement that the Company “offer[s] the widest selection of categories across prestige and mass cosmetics, fragrances, haircare, skincare, bath and body products and salon styling tools.” The updated chart and copies of the source data cited in footnotes to the chart are provided in Annex B hereto.

		In response to the Staff’s request for an explanation of footnote 2 in the above-referenced chart, we supplementally advise the Staff that Sally Beauty Holdings is comprised of two

Securities and Exchange Commission
September 27, 2007
Page 3

		divisions — Sally Beauty Supply (a retailer) and Beauty System Group, or BSG (a distributor). For comparison purposes, we have only included Sally Beauty Supply information in the chart.

		We also supplementally advise the Staff that we believe we are the largest U.S. retailer to offer products across all of the categories referenced above as measured by sales.

		We also note your revised disclosure concerning the assertion that you “pioneered our unique combination of beauty superstore and specialty store attributes.” In this regard, please disclose whether this information is based upon management’s belief, industry data, reports/articles or any other source. If the statement is based upon management’s belief, please indicate that this is the case and include an explanation for the basis of such belief. See also, “We provide affordable indulgence to our customers...” and “We provide our customers with a timely escape...”

		Response: In response to the Staff’s comment, we have revised the disclosure. Please see pages 1, 2, 33, 55 and 56.

		We further note your revised disclosure concerning the number salons in the United States. Please provide us with a copy of the report or study by Professional Consultants & Resources. Please also provide us support for your references to the “significant changes” that have occurred to the $75 billion beauty industry.

		Response: In response to the Staff’s comment, we have deleted the references to 230,000 salons and to the study by Professional Consultants & Resources on pages 60 and 69, because a copy of such study is not available on a cost-effective basis. In addition, we supplementally provide in the bulleted language below the support describing the “significant changes” that have occurred in the $75 billion beauty industry which is further discussed in greater detail in the “Our Market” section of the Registration Statement on pages 60 — 63.

	•		Department stores, which have traditionally been the primary distribution channel for prestige beauty products, have been meaningfully affected by changing consumer preferences and industry consolidation over the past decade. From 2000 to 2006, these changes have resulted in declines in the beauty retail market share of department stores from 18% to 15% while the specialty retail channel has increased its share of the beauty retail market from 7% to 9%, according to Kline & Company (a copy of its study is included in the backup materials in Annex D hereto).

	•		Women, and particularly women in younger generations, tend to find department stores intimidating, high-pressured and a hindrance to a multi-brand shopping experience and, as such, are choosing to shop elsewhere for their beauty care needs. According to NPD, 55% of women aged 18 to 24 and 40% of women aged 18 to 64 shop in specialty stores. In addition, a recent NPD study (a copy of which is included in the backup materials in Annex D hereto) found that nine out of ten women who

Securities and Exchange Commission
September 27, 2007
Page 4

			shop at specialty retailers for beauty products do so because they can touch, feel and smell the products.

	•		There has been an increase in the number of manufacturers of prestige beauty brands pursuing new distribution channels outside of the department store channel. Examples of these alternative distribution channels include specialty retail stores, spas and salons, direct response television (i.e., home shopping and infomercials) and the Internet. In addition, many manufacturers of smaller prestige brands are selling their products through these non-traditional channels due to the high fixed costs associated with marketing through most department stores and to capitalize on consumers’ growing propensity to shop elsewhere.

	•		Historically, beauty manufacturers have distributed their products through distinct channels—department stores for prestige products, drug stores and mass merchandisers for mass products, and salons and authorized retail outlets for professional hair care products. Women are increasingly shopping across retail channels for their beauty products (as opposed to shopping in just one channel), and they tend to purchase both prestige and mass beauty products. We attribute this trend to a number of factors, including the growing availability of prestige brands outside of department stores and increased innovation in mass products.

4.		We note your response to comment 8 in our letter dated August 3, 2007. We further note the revision that you have made to the prospectus summary. However, your disclosure continues to contain repetitive disclosures. For example, we note that your disclosure “Our competitive strengths” on page 2 contains disclosures that are identical to your disclosure on page 54. Accordingly, revise the summary to highlight each item of key information one time, and include a more complete description of each item only once in the body of your prospectus.

		Response: In response to the Staff’s comment, we have revised the disclosure. Please see page 2.

Risk Factors, page 9

Any significant interruption in the operations of our distribution and order fulfillment infrastructure could disrupt our ability to deliver our merchandise..., page 11

We note your response to comment 11 in our letter dated August 3, 2007. Your subheading does not fully describe the risk disclosed in the text. The risk you describe appears to be that you are dependent on only one distribution center and if that one distribution center experiences any significant interruption it would significantly reduce your ability to supply your stores with your products which in

Securities and Exchange Commission
September 27, 2007
Page 5

		turn would likely reduce your revenues. Please revise your risk factor subheading to reflect this risk.

		Response: In response to the Staff’s comment, we have revised the disclosure. Please see page 11.

We as well as our vendors are subject to laws and regulations that could require us to modify our current business practices..., page 15

6.		We note your response to comment 14 in our letter dated August 3, 2007. Please revise to tailor this risk to your company. As drafted you have included risk that could apply to nearly any issuer in your industry and even to other industries, like local zoning and land use restrictions and risk that are more specific to your operations, like California’s “Proposition 65” and FDA and FTC regulations. This comment also refers to the risk entitled “If we fail to maintain the value of our brand...”

		Response: In response to the Staff’s comment, we have revised the disclosure. Please see pages 15 - 16. In addition, in response to the Staff’s comment, we have deleted the risk entitled “If we fail to maintain the value of our brand . . .”

Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations, page 32

7.		We note your response to comment 20 in our letter dated August 3, 2007. We note your discussion of trends in your industry and your plans to take advantage of those trends. Please expand your discussion to also include known risks, challenges or uncertainties that will have, or are reasonably likely to have, a material impact on your revenues, income, or your liquidity.

		Response: In response to the Staff’s comment, we have revised the disclosure. Please see pages 34 - 35.

Growth Strategy, page 55

We note your response to comment 37 in our letter dated August 3, 2007. We continue to believe that, without additional support, your indication that you will be able to expand to 1,000 retail stores over the next 10 years is inappropriate. The support you have provided for this statement would appear to provide support for your ability to identify new locations, however, you do not speak to any other aspect

Securities and Exchange Commission
September 27, 2007
Page 6

of this goal, such as the ability to finance such expansions. Please revise to provide additional support.

Response: In response to the Staff’s comment, we have revised the disclosure. Please see pages 58 - 59.

Our Market, page 57

9.		We note your response to comment 38 in our letter dated August 3, 2007. We reissue our prior comment in part. We note your submission of the referenced studies published by Kline & Company, and IBIS World Inc., a survey by American Express, and articles citing studies by NPD and Professional Consultants & Resources. We were unable to verify some of the statements attributable to these materials. We could not verify all the statements because you did not provide us a means to cross reference statements in the prospectus with the studies. Please provide copies of these studies to us, appropriately marked in a manner that cross references the support materials with your statements in your prospectus.

		Response: In response to the Staff’s comment, we have marked the prospectus and copies of the studies published by Kline & Company, and IBIS World Inc., the survey by American Express, and articles citing studies by NPD to cross reference certain statements attributable to these materials. Marked copies of the source data together with an index are provided in Annex D hereto.

Compensation discussion and analysis, page 73

10.		We note your response to comment 43 in our letter dated August 3, 2007. Please expand your discussion to explain the components of the benchmark that was utilized, such as the items of compensation you have benchmarked. Please also discuss the generally and retail industry surveys that you utilized. Please also explain in terms that an average investor could understand what a binominal option valuation model is and its role in awarding compensation.

		Response: In response to the Staff’s comment, we have revised the Philosophy and overview of compensation section to more specifically address the issues raised. Specifically, we have revised our discussion of the Compensation Committee’s use of compensation consultant services to benchmark total cash compensation (salary and bonus) to the marketplace. The Compensation Committee did not consider separate components or compensation items in their review. Instead, as noted in the discussion, the Compensation Committee looked

Securities and Exchange Commission
September 27, 2007
Page 7

		at overall compensation levels in the marketplace and increased the compensation of our executives in a commensurate manner. Please see pages 77 - 78.

		We also have revised our description of the general and retail industry surveys to specifically identify the surveys used. We have deleted the reference to the binomial option valuation model, as such model has not in fact been used for making any grants to date. Please see page 78.

11.		We note your response to comment 44 in our letter dated August 3, 2007. Please elaborate upon how the annual report of individual executive performance prepared by Ms. Kirby assists the Compensation Committee in determining appropriate individual compensation. Summarize the data that is provided in the annual report.

		Response: In response to the Staff’s comment, we have revised the Philosophy and overview of compensation section to more specifically describe the data contained in the annual report prepared by Ms. Kirby to assist the Compensation Committee in determining appropriate executive compensation. Please see page 78.

Summary Compensation Table, page 77

12.		We note your response to comment 47 in our letter dated August 3, 2007. You include a “$” at the top in the year column. Please delete the “$” in this column.

		Response: In response to the Staff’s comment, we have deleted the “$” within the referenced column. Please see page 82.

Review and approval of related party transactions, name 87

13.		We note your response to comment 49 in our letter dated August 3, 2007. We reissue our prior comment in part. Please revise yours discussion to indicate how you will determine whether a board member is “interested” in the transaction and what constitutes a “material economic interest.” Similarly, indicate what types of transactions, if not all, will be subject to this approval process.

		Response: In response to the Staff’s comment, we have revised the disclosure. Please see pages 96 - 97.

Securities and Exchange Commission
September 27, 2007
Page 8

Financial Statements

14.		Please revise to update the unaudited interim financial statements to include the 26 weeks ended August 4, 2007 in accordance with Rule 3-12 of Regulation S-X.

		Response: In response to the Staff’s comment, we have updated the unaudited interim financial statements to include the period as of and for the 26 weeks ended August 4, 2007, where appropriate. Please see pages F-3, F-5, F-7, F-10 and related notes to the consolidated financial statements.

15.		We note your responses to comments 51 and 57 in our letter dated August 3, 2007. Both of these comments require additional disclosure and or supplemental information related to the initial offering price of the common shares. We may have additional comment when the IPO price is available. Please update the information in Annex C to include grants subsequent to our initial comment letter.

		Response: In response to the Staff’s prior comment 51, we have added pro forma disclosure of the offering and pro forma earnings per share for the latest year and the six months ended August 4, 2007. Please see pages F-3, F-5 and F-12. We supplementally advise the Staff that we understand that the Staff may have additional comments in connection with this information.

		In addition, we respectfully submit that the analysis of our response to prior comment 57 is not dependent on the price range.

		We supplementally advise the Staff that we have updated the information included in Annex C for options granted subsequent to the initial comment letter.

		In order to assist the Staff in its analysis with respect to our option grants, we are supplementally providing the Staff with the following discussion regarding the Company’s valuation methodology and option grants during the 12-month period prior to filing its Registration Statement on Form S-1 on July 6, 2007. The discussion includes the methodologies used to determine the fair market value of the Company’s common stock for purposes of determining the exercise price of the Company’s stock options, and the events that have impacted the Company’s valuation during the relevant time period. All share and per share amounts reflected hereafter are presented on a pre-split basis.

		The Company has a history of issuing stock option grants to employees, directors, and others dating back to 1993 under various stock option plans as described in our Registration Statement. In accordance with our stock option plans, the Board of Directors is responsible for determining the fair market value of our common stock. To assist the Board of Directors, the Company has obtained independent third-party

Securities and Exchange Commission
September 27, 2007
Page 9

		valuations of the fair market value of its common stock from the same nationally recognized appraisal firm on a regular basis since 2000.

		The following table summarizes options granted during the twelve-month period prior to the filing of our initial Registration Statement (all numbers are shown on a pre-split basis):


Employee Option Grants July 2006 - July 2007
				Option		Underlying
Grant	Options			Strike		Share
Date	Granted			Price		Fair Value
10/24/2006		755,000		$	5.80	$	5.80
12/20/2006		120,000			5.80		5.80
2/28/2007		58,000			7.52		7.52
5/15/2007		70,000			7.89		7.89
7/18/2007		388,000			9.99		9.99
7/18/2007		500,000	⁽¹⁾		9.99		9.99
7/18/2007		500,000	⁽¹⁾		16.00		9.99

⁽¹⁾- Represents a grant to our Chief Executive Officer of 500,000 options at the current fair market value and 500,000 options at a price as determined by the Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors.

		Valuation Methodology

		As mentioned above, the Company has obtained valuation reports from the same nationally recognized third-party appraisal firm on a regular basis since 2000. For the twelve-month period prior to filing our initial Registration Statement, the Company obtained contemporaneous valuations to coincide with option grant approvals, which occurred during our regularly scheduled Board meetings.

		The methodology for estimating the fair market value of the Company’s common stock utilized by the third-party appraisal firm follows the guidance set forth in the AICPA’s Practice Aid, Valuation of Privately-Held-Company Equity Securities Issued as Compensation. The third-party appraisal firm estimated the Company’s enterprise value using both the market and income approaches. The Company’s historical operating performance and projected Earnings Before Interest and Taxes (EBIT) and Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA) assumptions were consistently applied in both approaches.

		The market approach uses direct comparisons of comparable publicly traded companies and the valuation of their equity securities to estimate the fair value of the common shares of privately issued securities. In determining a market-based estimate of our enterprise value, the third-party appraisal firm assessed our financial performance against a comparable set of high-growth specialty retailers. The firm developed a range of

Securities and Exchange Commission
September 27, 2007
Page 10

		valuation multiples based on the historical and projected EBIT / EBITDA and the actual market-based enterprise valuations. This range of valuation multiples was then applied to representative levels of the Company’s EBIT / EBITDA to derive an estimated market-based enterprise value. The multiples applied were consistent over the twelve-month period.

		The income approach converts future economic benefits into a present value. The third-party appraisal firm used the discounted cash flow method which measured our forecasted future unlevered free cash flows based on our five year plan projections. The analysis included a sensitivity analysis surrounding the discount rate and the terminal enterprise valuation multiple applied to the cash flow forecast. The discount rates and terminal enterprise valuation multiples applied were consistent over the twelve-month period.

		The following table summarizes the valuation results as provided by the third-party appraisal firm during the twelve-month period prior to filing our initial Registration Statement:


	October 16,			February 12,			April 30,			July 7,
	2006			2007			2007			2007
				(in millions)
Enterprise value from operations⁽¹⁾	$	692.6		$	820.0		$	827.3		$	982.6
Adjusted enterprise value⁽²⁾	$	574.2		$	701.0		$	693.5		$	855.7
Private company liquidity discount		15.0	%		10.0	%		5.0	%		2.5	%
Net aggregate value	$	488.1		$	630.9		$	658.8		$	834.2
Diluted shares outstanding⁽³⁾		84.2			83.9			83.5			83.5
Per share value	$	5.80		$	7.52		$	7.89		$	9.99

⁽¹⁾— Enterprise value from operations represents the midpoint of the market and income approach derived enterprise value estimates.

⁽²⁾— Adjusted enterprise value is defined as enterprise value from operations, adjusted for non-operating assets and liabilities, debt, accrued dividends, liquidation value of the non-convertible Series III preferred stock, and assumed option proceeds.

⁽³⁾— Includes outstanding common and preferred shares, and dilutive options.

Securities and Exchange Commission
September 27, 2007
Page 11

Valuation Driver Milestones

		The increases in fair market value of the Company’s common stock during this 12-month period are attributed to a mix of the following:

		Continued strong increases in financial performance as measured by EBITDA as included in the market valuation approach.

		Decrease of the private company liquidity discount from 15.0% to 2.5% over the period to align the private company common stock fair market value to a planned 2007 IPO event.

		Revisions to our rolling five year plan and the passage of time resulting in older periods being removed and replaced with higher performing periods due to the Company’s forward looking growth plans. As the Company continues to achieve its growth targets, the income approach continues to reflect increases in enterprise value as determined by projected cash flows and the expected future terminal value.

		Third-Party Stock Sales

		In February 2007, the Company reacquired 146,348 and 214,077 of its outstanding Series I and Series II preferred stock, respectively, from BCI Growth III, L.P. (BCI), a sophisticated investor and shareholder of the Company for over 10 years. The purchase price of $5.00 per share (pre-split) was the negotiated price determined at arms length between the Company and BCI. We believe this transaction supports the Board of Directors common stock value of $5.80 applied to the October and December, 2006 option grants.

		Midpoint Common Stock Value (Pre-Split)

		We began to seriously consider an initial public offering in early Spring 2007 after the close of fiscal 2006. The Board of Directors approved the selection of a banking group in April 2007 and we filed our initial Registration Statement on July 6, 2007. The initial pricing provided by our two lead bank teams in September 2007 on a pre-split basis reflected a midpoint of the range of $9.48, which reflects a customary IPO discount. The prospectus cover price range of $14.00 — $16.00 reflects a reverse stock split ratio of 0.6320-for-1 from the pre-split range of $8.85 to $10.11.

		Conclusion

		Based on the information provided above, we believe the stock options granted during the twelve-month period prior to filing our initial Registration Statement were properly valued by the Board of Directors in all material respects. We also believe that we have taken the necessary steps, including obtaining contemporaneous independent valuations, to properly assess the fair market value of our common stock during the preceding 12-month period prior to the Company’s filing of an initial Registration Statement.

* * * *

Beauty Retailing USA 2006

Report Outline

L INTRODUCTION

2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
3. PURCHASE CHANNELS

A review of all purchase channels for cosmetics and toiletries, with detailed descriptions and analysis for each channel shown in Table 1. Each profile includes the following:

·Channel developments ·Sales and analysis by subclass ·Number of doors/stores ·Leading retailers ·Role of cosmetics and toiletries · Manufacturers’ sales by product category for 2001 and 2006

· Retail sales by product category for 2001 and 2006

· Promotional and advertising activity

· Role of private-label products

· Outlook to 2011

4. PRODUCT CATEGORIES

Profiles will be given for each of the categories listed in Table 2. information provided in each category profile includes the following:

· Historical overview

· Key developments and shifts

· Analysis by purchase channel

· Manufacturers’ sales by purchase channel for 2001 and 2006

· Retail sales by purchase channel for 2001 and 2006

· Outlook to 2011

5. RETAILER PROFILES

Profiles of 10 retailers (as shown in Table 3) win be provided with specific discussion pertaining to the cosmetic and toiletry business of these companies- Profiles will include:

· Overview

· Corporate sales

· Number of stores

· Competitive focus and strengths

· Role of cosmetics and toiletries

· Role of private-label products

· Recent developments

· Marketing activities

· Outlook to 2011

cBeauty Retailing USA 2006

Department stores

Low-end (e.g., Sears, J.C. Penney, Kohl’s) Traditional (e.g., Macy’s, Dillard’s) Specialty (e.g., Nordstrom, Neitian Marcus)

i Food outlets

Traditional supermarkets

Superstores

Food/drug combination stores

Supercenters/combo stores

Convenience stores

~S.CONTDollar stores

· Chain dollar stores

· Independents

, Mass merchandisers Direct marketing

· Person-to-person

· Home shopping networks

· Inforrnercials

· E-commerce

· Catalogs and other direct response

Specialty stores

Vertically integrated (e.g.. Bath & Body Works, Origins) Cosmetic specialty (e.g., Sephora, Sally Beauty, Ulta) Apparel (H&M, Banana Republic)

Drug outlets

· Chain drug stores
· Independents

Warehouse clubs

I Fragrances Hair Care The Body Shop Federated Department Stores j

· Fragrances for men • Ethnic hair care products ~ ,, ‘• ~~” \

m Frances for women \ . Hair coloring products s.Wt10lesall£1i<L!£ ___j ............ i | • Hair styling productsC.O. Bigelow Nordstrom I :• Shampoos and conditioners _ctfg ‘Target “ I

Skin Care Color Cosmetics Drugstore.com i Trader Joe’s j

· Bath additives

· Includes blushers, eye makeup, make-

· Facial treatments up bases, face powders, lipsticks, and |

· Hand and body creams. nail polishes (Color cosmetics are ana- | lotions.and treatments lyzed as single category, given that the

· Sun care products } distribution patterns for individual prod- ! ucts are similar) Oral Care j Otfier Toiletries !

· Mouthwashesi

· Deodorants and antiperspirants

· Toothpastes

· Personal cleansing products f, “f i

cBeauty Retailing USA 2006

Objectives

The objectives of Beauty Retailing USA 2006 are to provide subscribers with an accurate and independent assessment of cosmetic and toiletry purchase channels and. most importantly, to deliver the information and insights required to capitalize on changes in these channels.

To complete these objectives, Kline will analyze the market for cosmetics and toiletries by conducting extensive primary research with retail executives, buyers, distributors, sales representatives, manufacturers, and marketers in the beauty products industry.

Based on this research, together with information from Kline’s databases and previously published market research reports, the study will present an objective and pragmatic assessment of issues confronting marketers today.

Sources and Methodology

Members of Kline & Company’s Consumer Products practice will conduct the research and analysis for Beauty Retailing USA 2006. Using previous editions of our retailing series, as well as our Cosmetics & Toiletries

USA annual service and other.marketing data as a foundation, the sources of data for the study will consist of the following:

· In-person and telephone interviews with retail execu

tives, category managers/buyers, store/counter man agers, distributors, sales representatives, manufactur ers, marketers, trade organizations, and consumers

· A review of pertinent secondary materials, including

annual reports, 10-Ks, company literature and other reports, product literature, trade publications, and nonconfidential information (ram Kline’s extensive database

· Store and Web site checks to obtain information on

product selection and availability, display and sales
techniques, and other merchandising trends

Forecasts in this report will be generated with Kline’s FutureView Scenario Forecasting Model. With the enhanced forecasts, subscribers can see how adjustments in the assumptions behind the forecasts can bring about different outcomes-

Tentative Schedule

The report is scheduled for publication in the second quarter of 2007. Draft sections can be made available to subscribers prior to final publication.

Subscription Terms and Privileges

Beauty Retailing USA 20O6 is available only by subscription, in order to maximize the value and usefulness of this report to each subscriber, the following privileges and services will be made available:

· An executive summary presentation to be given by

the project team, either in-person or via Web confer ence.

· One day of consultation with members of the proj

ect team to be used at the client’s discretion within six months of receipt of the report. This meeting can be used as a company-specific work session to help each subscriber obtain maximum value from the program. Expenses related to any travel made at the request of the subscriber are tu be reimbursed by the subscriber.

· Hard copy, online, and pdf versions of the report.

The standard subscription includes one hard copy, the report contents in pdf format, and unlimited online access to the report contents through KlineOnline.com for members of the subscribing company, Additional hard copies will be available for a nominal fee.

· A discount from the standard price for companies

subscribing to the report before it is completed.

Details regarding subscription options and rates are described in the attached subscription agreement. To subscribe now, please complete the subscription agreement and forward it to our offices. For more details on (he study program, please contact us at any of our locations listed on the back cover,

The Kline Group iCredentials

Kline & Company is an international management consulting and market research firm offering a broad range of services to the consumer products, cosmetics and toiletries, and chemicals industries.

Established in 1959 as a specialist in the chemicals field, Kline has evolved over the past four decades to provide consulting services and syndicated market research reports across the entire value chain. We help management solve practical problems in marketing strategies, acquisition and divestiture programs, and the appraisal of new technology. Kline provides clients with facts, forecasts, and recommended solutions to business problems, based solidly on the realities of the market as well as modern strategic principles.

Through our Consumer Products practice, Kline has attained a leadership position in providing consulting services to the consumer products industry. Our firm has developed in-depth expertise in this area by tracking and analyzing U.S. markets for cosmetics, toiletries, fragrances, and household products for more than 40 years.

In addition to our resources in the finished goods sector, Kline has a thorough understanding of the markets for specialty raw materials for consumer products through our Specialty Chemicals practice.

The Consumer Products Practice has published its Cosmetics & Toiletries USA syndicated report annually since 1980. Beauty Retailing USA, now in its seventh edition, was first published in 1992. These reports are considered the authoritative source of information on the U.S. personal care market. A partial list of other recently published syndicated analyses by the Consumer Products Practice and those currently under consideration is shown below:

· Global Cosmetics and Toiletries

· Competitor Cost Structures

· Home Fragrances USA

· Household Cleaning Products USA

(annual service)

· Professional Skin Care

· Salon Hair Care USA

· The U.S. Male Grooming Market ·1

Beauty Retailing USA 2006

Subscription Agreement

Please enter our subscription to your comprehensive study BEAUTY RETAILING USA 2OO6. The standard subscription includes one hard copy of the report, online access to the report contents via KlineOnline.com, pdf files of the report sections, and one day of consultation time to be used within six months of publication of the report. Expenses related to any travel made at the request of the subscriber are to be reimbursed by the subscriber. Additional hard copies are available for a nominal fee.

To protect our investment in this report and that of other subscribers, we agree that, for a period of three years after its date of issue, we will: (1) refrain from reproducing or copying this report in whole or in part by any means; (2) restrict its circulation to our own employees; and (3) use all reasonable precautions to prevent the disclosure of its contents to any other persons or organizations. We may, however, make this report available to any subsidiary company in which we hold more than half interest or to any parent company that holds more than a half interest in our-firm. We may also use or disclose any information in this report that is public knowledge, that was already in our possession before receipt of the report, or that comes to us from third parlies independently of this report.

Kline & Company, Inc. similarly agrees that it will use all reasonable precautions to prevent the disclosure of the contents of this report to any persons or organizations other than subscribers for three years after its date of issue,

We understand that BEAUTY RETAILING USA ZOO6 is available only by subscription. Subscription prices do not include sales tax. (NJ add 7% sales tax.) You will invoice us for the total amount, and we will pay this invoice within 15 days of receipt. We understand that this agreement is fully binding on the corporation and non-cancelable. Domestic ground shipping within the United States is included in the subscription price. Overnight and international shipping fees are optional and will be added to the total amount.

We have indicated our subscription preferences on the following page.

We have complet&l and signed this sutoscftplw &ye&rtenL Pfease *Wjcate >our acceptance o/ ths stibscnption Oy counte/signing end letumfag one copy tor wf ftas

tf tf?i/o*ces to.

NAME

traj ACCflESS rniE E_:HH fHUNE PURCHASE OBDER * Shipping address (ifOMwX ««rt tiffing adOtossf: NAUF rrriE SIGMAJURE KAtJE TITLE METHOD OF PAYMENT: Send invoice D D M cyd] © MAv Please fax signed agreement to +1-973-435-3395 Y416e

The Kline Group USA Kline & Company, Inc. Overlook at Great Notch 150 Clove Road, #410 Little Falls. NJ 07424-0410 Phone: +1-973-435-6262 Fax: + 1-973135-6291 E-mail: oonsult@klinegroijp.com

iH
Stilt!

EUROPE

Kline Europe, S.A.

1 Avenue Gribaumont

8-1150 Brussels Belgium Phone: +32-2 770-4740 Fax: +32-2 770-9440

E-mail: consult@kline-europe.corn

JAPAN

Kline Japan Ltd.

Phone: +81-3 3242-6277

Fax: +81-3 3242-6278
E-mail: consult@klinejapan.com

CHINA Kline Asia

Phone: +86-21 5382-6677 Fax: +86-21 5383-3889 E-mail: consult@klme-asia.com

INDIA Klin* India

Phone: +91-1244546-100 Fax: +91-124 4546-122 E-mail: consult@kline-india.com

BRAZIL

Factor de Solugao

Phone: +55-11 30797843 +55-11 30790792 Fax: +55-11 30796197 E-mail: srebelo@factordeso!ucao com.br

www.klinegroup.com

Bucharest

Krakow

Chicago

Milan

Dubai • Houston * Islanbul

· Philadelphia • Prague

Kline

or planning to make. The Boomers are more likely to own original art (31% as compared with 24% among Gen X), a fine jewelry collection (29% to 25%), a vacation/second home (26% to 18%) and an antique or other collection (24% to 18%). Members of Gen X, by comparison, are more likely to place a greater emphasis on active or experiential ‘toys’ such as sports cars, (owned by 28% of Gen X compared with 24% of Boomers) and boats and yachts (21% to 17%).

Dramatic Spending Differences Among Rich vs. Affluent

The survey also looked at the difference in spending patterns and attitudes between the rich and the affluent. In this survey, the rich sample earn an average of $390,400 per year with approximately $10 million in investible assets and represent the top 2% of American households. The affluent sample earn an average of $152,500 per year with approximately $1 million in investible assets.

In comparing the rich with the affluent, the rich spend three times more than the affluent in both the luxury goods and luxury experiences categories — an astounding $81,172 total per year. And in several categories the rich spend nearly four times as much as the affluent. For instance, the rich spend $17,185 on luxury jewelry and watches vs. $5,163 by the affluent; $12,831 on luxury pet products vs. $1,316; $11,679 on luxury children’s goods vs. $3,577; $9,931 on luxury fashion accessories vs. $2,898; and $7,703 on luxury wines and liquors vs. $1,880.

Interestingly, the rich spend about as much on luxury products for their pets as they do on luxuries for the children.

The rich also indulge more in luxury experiences than the affluent, spending three times more in almost every category: $6,281 on personal and health services vs. $1,851 by the affluent; $6,363 on entertainment vs. $1,791; $9,313 on sporting events vs. $2,891; $7,611 on dining vs. $2,632; and $17,051 on luxury travel vs. $7,815.

Value Conscious But Willing to Pay More For Personal Service and High Quality

While the luxury consumers surveyed buy luxury in a variety of categories, they also enjoy shopping wisely and searching for the best value and price.

· 80% of luxury consumers surveyed agree with the statement, “Getting a discount or finding

a really good sale price on a luxury item makes me feel like a smart shopper.”

· 63% agreed that “The price of most luxury goods is too high, and I rarely pay full price for a luxury brand.”

· 58% said their last luxury purchase was bought on sale and 83% said a sale or discount

was very or somewhat important to their purchase decision.

“The luxury shopper is value conscious and passionate about getting the best price. However, despite their propensity to watch their wallets, they are willing to pay more for superior service and greater convenience,” said Peggy Maher, senior vice president and general manger, Consumer Charge Card, American Express Company. “Most of the wealthy consumers surveyed come from middle-class backgrounds and are thus more value-conscious. As we know from our Platinum Cardmembers, they are willing to pay for goods and services as long as they see the value.”

About two-thirds (64%) of wealthy consumers surveyed are willing to pay more for special services when they travel or shop at a more exclusive boutique. The overwhelming majority of survey respondents said luxury had to do with quality and service, not a price tag or label.

· Nearly 80% of the luxury consumers surveyed agreed with the statement, “An important

part of my enjoyment of a luxury experience is how well the service personnel treat me and the extra service they provide.”

· Sometimes buying luxury is based on pure convenience with 43% of wealthy consumers

agreeing, “I often trade off spending more money for convenience, because I know I could
find it cheaper but it is just too much of a hassle.”

o About The American Express Platinum Luxury Survey

The American Express Platinum Luxury Survey was a quantitative survey conducted in March 2005 among a random cross-section of 770 wealthy consumers in the U.S. Including:

· 270 consumers with a household income over $200,000 of any age group

· 250 Baby Boomers with a household income of $125,000 to $199,999 (average age of 50

years)

· 250 Gen Xers with a household income of $125,000 to $199,999 (average age of 34 years)

Those surveyed had to possess an income of at least $125,000 to be considered and were not required to be American Express Cardmembers to participate.

AH of the participants purchased a luxury good or experience in the pest 12 months to qualify- The average income of the respondents was $235,900. Unity Marketing conducted the survey on behalf of American Express,

http://home3.americanexpress.com/corp/pc/2005/genx_lux.asp

Contents Industry Definition ......................................... 3 ... ACTIVITIES (PRODUCTS AND SERVICES)- .. 3 ... SIMILAR INDUSTRIES .......................................... 3 .. DEMANDS, SUPPLY INDUSTRIES .................................. 3 .. Key Statistics .............................................. 5 ... CONSTANT PRICES ............................................. 5 ... CURRENT PRICES .............................................. 5 ... REAL GROWTH ................................................. 5 ... RATIO TABLE.. ............................................... 6 .. GRAPHS ...................................................... 6 ... Segmentation ................................................ 7 ... PRODUCTS AND SERVICE SEGMENTATION ........................... 7 ... MAJOR MARKET SEGMENTS ....................................... 8 ... INDUSTRY CONCENTRATION ...................................... 9 ... GEOGRAPHIC SPREAD ........................................... 10

Market Characteristics 12

MARKET SIZE ................................ 12

LINKAGES ................................... 12 .. DEMAND DETERMINANTS ........................ 12 .. DOMESTIC AND INTERNATIONAL MARKETS .................................. 13 .. BASIS OF COMPETITION..,’ ................... 13 .. LIFE CYCLE ................................. 13 .. Industry Conditions .......................... 15

BARRIERS TO ENTRY .......................... — ........................... 15 .. TAXATION ................................... 15 .. INDUSTRY ASSISTANCE ........................ 15 .. REGULATION AND DEREGULATION ................ 15 .. COST STRUCTURE ............................. 16

CAPITAL AND LABOR INTENSITY ................ 16 .. TECHNOLOGY AND SYSTEMS ..................... 17 .. INDUSTRY VOLATILITY ........................ 17 .. GLOBALIZATION .............................. 17 .. Key Factors .................................. 18

KEY SENSITIVITIES .......................... 18 .. KEY SUCCESS FACTORS ........................ 18 .. Key Competitors .............................. , .......... 19

MAJOR PLAYERS’ ............ :.’...”. ...... ,.-:- ....................... 19

PLAYER PERFORMANCE• .. :: ....... ..19

OTHER PLAYERS .............................. ‘. ....... ./: ................. 23

Industry Performance ......................... ,../ .............................................................. 25

CURRENT PERFORMANCE ........................ ;,.’ ............ :...:’. ............ 25 .. HISTORICAL PERFORMANCE ..................... ; .. ..............I.! .. 28 .. Outlook ...................................... ; ............... ‘.” .............................. 31

Industry Definition

This industry comprises establishments primarily engaged in one or more of the following: (1) providing hair care services; (2) providing nail care services; and (3) providing facials or applying makeup (except permanent makeup).

ACTIVITIES (PRODUCTS AND SERVICES) The primary activities of this industry are:

· Barber shops

· Beauty salons

· Cosmetology salons or shops

· Nail salons

· Beautician services « Beauty and barber shops, combined

· Beauty parlors

· Beauty shops

· Esthetician (i.e., skin care) services

· Facial salons

· Hair stylist salons or shops, unisex or women’s

· Hair stylist services, unisex or women’s

· Hairdresser services

· Hairdressing salons or shops, unisex or women’s

/ • Make-up (except permanent) satons

-MJ The major products and services in this industry are:

· Hair Care Services « Nail Salons and associated services · Barber Shops

SIMILAR INDUSTRIES

Industry: s 61151 — Technical and Trade Schools in the US

Description: Establishments primarily engaged in offering training in bartering, hair styling, or the cosmetic arts

Industry: B 62 — Health Care and Social Assistance in the US

Description: Establishments primarily engaged in providing medical skin care sen/ices (e.g., cosmetic surgery,

dermatology)

Industry: — 81219-Other Personal Care Services in the US

Description: Establishments primarily engaged in providing massage, electrolysis (i.e., hair removal), permanent makeup.

or tanning services

DEMAND & SUPPLY INDUSTRIES

” 42221 — Drugs and Druggists’ Sundries Wholesalers in the US
s 44612 — Cosmetics, Beauty Supplies and Perfume Stores in the US

” 53112- Lessors of Nonresidential Buildings (except Miniwarehouses) in the US \\J

o Segmentation PRODUCTS AND SERVICE SEGMENTATION ProducV’S6rvic8s Sham “S3 Hair Care Services 91.5% BS8 Nafl Salons and associated services 5.4% • Barber Stops 3 I %

c · Results from the US Census Bureau’s 2002 Economic Census indicated lhat there were 4,060 barbers’ shops which had total revenue of $508.3 mi.’lion; there were 73,933 beauty salons with aggregate revenues of $15,098 million and 8,481 nail salons with combined revenues of $869.7 million. These results excluded figures for non-emcloysr establishments (i e. sell-enpioyed persons).

For Hair Care/Beauty Salons:

· This segment includes both female and unisex salons.

· Revenue from hair sen/ices accounts for 79.0% of the tolal segment sates, revenue from nail services accounts for

4.5%, rental income from leased stations and booths w.thin beauty salons accounts for 3.9% and sales of hair care. revenue from diet and weight reducir\g programs accounts for 0.9% and merchandise sales tor 5.3% of total levenue. Other sales revenues accounts for the remainder.

· Sub-leasing of soace to nail and other personal care service providers is a significant componeni of the total personal

care services offered by some beauty salons, such as nail or diet service operators. In all, about 20,0% of beauty
salons derive additional income from the sub-leasing of areas to otner beauty operators.

· The most common beauty services provided include eyelash and eyebrow tinting hair removal and manicures.

· The major benefit provided to clients by the beauty salon industry is the feeling of oe;ng tampered and. associelec!

with this, total satisfaction with the end result These factors are more important ihsn price to the client. However, segments of the industry still continue (o compete heavily on srice.

· Day spas, offering massages and other sen/ices fa.- the mind and body lo assist in relieving stress and the built up of

life pressures, is currently a growth segment in the beauty area. Surveys indicate that since 1997, about 8.0% of saters hat offer har and nail treatments have also commenced to con vet and offer cay spa treatments and this is expected 10 grow further.

Nail Care Salons

· Revenue from stand alone, independent conlraclors, those located within h.air care salons, and including booth

renters, is estimated to account for 5 A % of tolal industry revenue.

c k.i.- m..i

· Revenue from nail services accounts for 95.5 % of lotol revenue, hair sen/ices accounts for 0.6 %, renlal income from leased stations and booths w-th’n jeauty salons accounts for 1.1 % and sates of merchandise accounts for 0.7 % of total revenue. » For 2005, research by N’A’LS magazine indicated that there were 57,838 salons in operation, and that there were 380,635 licensed technicians — or an average ol 6.6 per salon. The estimated revenue of this segment by this magazine was $6.430 -mllion, which decreased by 6 % over 2004. This translated to an average annual revenue of $111,173 psr salon or $16,893 per licensed technician. Again, (he major benefit provided by the nail care segment to their clients is the feeling of behg pampered anc, associated with this, satisfaction with the end result.

· The magazine reported that at leas! 75 % of nail salons cffe’ed manicures, scrylics (any type), paraffin dips, nail art

and waxing services 61 % offered hair care, just under hclf offered gels/U’v light-cured systems and 42 % used fibreglass. Around s third of salons offered facials, massage, make up application, skin care, silk wraps, colored/design acrylics and UV top coat service, Between 20 and 25 % offered nail jewelry, feflexology. powder/gel extensions, tanning, arorraherapy treatments, earpiercing and airSrushing.

· In 2005. 95.6 % of salon employees were female, and 96.4 % of salons were licensee. Most people have been doing

nails for an average of 8.6 years and the average age lor technicians is just over 38 years. 33.5 % were salon owners doinc nails, 32.2 % ware nail technicians’booth renters, 25.7 % were nail technirans/employees. 5.7 % were salon managers or nail department managers who did nails. The average salon had 2.3 nail technicians. 93.6 % of clients were female, mostly aged 26 years and over and 72,5 % of clients use the service every other week. The average weekly income was $619.52. In terms of payment, 7.6% of employees were on a salary on.y, 13.8 %were on a salary plus commission, 56 3 % were on commission only and 8.9 % en tiered commissions. T.ie average com.Tlission rate was 55,7 %. The average number of clients per week was 30.6 end the average prices for services ranged Irom $17.16 for a manicure, $32,45 ‘or a pedicure, $40.23 ‘or a acrylic full nail set (lips with overlay) and $24.36 for an acrylic f/lt, $45.39 fora full set/sculptured acrylic. Most operators ssll retail products for their clients’ use at home. NAILS Magazine estimated that 46 % of nail technicians are Caucasian, 6 % African American, 8 % Hispanic and 37 % Vietnamese.

Barbershops

» The smallest segment of t.iis industry is the barber shops which acccuni for around 3 per cen! of total industry revenue. In 2002 there were 4060 employer establisnments (down from 4242 operators in 1997) which had an average revenue of $124,700 per annum. 94.4 per cent of revenue was derived from hair services and 3.6 per cent from rental of leased stations or booths.

MAJOR MARKET SEGMENTS

f 0,0%’ 0 arm 1000 or mora employees

: US Census • Comiy ElKmss Patterns No<e: Released Sjptemtxa 2005 Informal on reijles » wrpb/w «joMslwents cnl; (i.e. e>dudcs lorwmpfcivef estebl’5’wi-isnls).

The (able indicates that almost two-lhirds of employer establishments have 4 or less employees and with 85.0% having 9 or fewer employees. The industry is small business oriented and will remain so. Therefore, the level of industry concentration is noi expected :to cnange in the near future.

GEOGRAPHIC SPREAD

Year; 2007
Share of Employees by Region

r Region · South East

EH Mid East IB deal Lakes

· Far West sSK South West fit! Plains ·I New England · Rocky Mouniains

Percentage

21,0

20,6 19,1 12.7 9 I 78 6.8 24

Share of Establishments by Region

Region

· South East

OS Mid East

· Greet Lakes IB FarWesI 8S South Wesl B5i Plains

·1 New England

· Rocl<y Mountains

Percentage

21.9 224 15,7 126

7.3 7.5 2.7

Share of Revenue by Region

Region Percentage

· SojlriEest 21.3 I BB Mid East 20.9 |

· Great Ukes 17.7 i ‘

· FarWesI 13,7 ‘M South West 91 HA Plains 75

· New England 72

· Rocty Mountains ?.3

The general regional share of overall s provided in the table below from US Census.

psftr” 7f ‘.,”—— ,?:,:;’’r"- sPercsrrtage New England 4.8

Mki Easl 15.9

Great Lakes 15,3

Plains 6.7

Souti Easl 25.1

“South West ‘, ‘ 117

ftocky Mis 34

Far West 17.1

Tola) 100

—— —

Soufce ICISvVortd

In general, Ihe location of hair care and beauty salons is found ir> drecl proportion lo an area’s population (and in

areas such as the CBO in terms of workforce) size and numbers and this pattern hss no; changed skjnfficsnt!y over
time,

Nail salons, however, lend to be more concentrated in the relatively highe— household income suburbs.

For this induslry it len-as to have 3 higher concenlration, in terms numoer of salons, above average size and revenue, in the Rocky Mountains, South Weal, Plains, Mid Easl and New England regions — many of which have large population and cities. This is reinforced by olher information provided below.

In terms of nail salons, NAiLS Magazine in 2005 estimated that 175% were in the Mid West (particularly in Illinois.
Michigan and Ohio}, 30.7% res;ced in the West (particularly California and Texas), 22,7% in the South (particularly

Florida), 25.9% resided in Ihe Eastern (paTfcularty New York. New Jersey and Pennsylvania) and 3.2 % ir. :he
Mountain region (particulafly Colorado), The is, again, largely related lo populalion distribution across all regions.

This level o’ geographic concentration is expected by iBISWorld to not change in tie near future.

ccMarket Characteristics

MARKET $I2£

· IBISWorld estimates thai, in constant 2005 prices, the Hair, Nail and Skin Care Services Industry will generate

$42,107 million in revenue in 2007, which represents real revenue growth of 2.3%.

· This industry wiH also contribute an estimated 523,293 million to the US economy in 2007, which represents 0.17% of

total GDP.

In 2007. iBISWorld also estimates that this industry;

· Consists of approximately 769,5’8 establish-nenis.whch is 1.8% higher than in 2006

· Employs ap:roxirna(ely 1,05 mil ion, which is 1.8% hichsrlhan in 2006.

· Pays total wages of $10,S11 million, which was 2.4% hkjnsr than in 2006.

· In 2005. according to NAILS magazine Ihs’e were 57,838 salons (up from 51,571 licensed nail salons in 2002 and

from 54,120 in 2004). These h’vea (oial of 380,535 licensed technicians (up from 368.813 in 2002. but down 1.9% over 388.635 in 2004), or an average o’6,6 technicians per licensed salon. Industry revenue was estimated to have decreased 6.0%, in nominal terms, to 55/30 million in 2005 (compered wiiri $6,450 million in 2002 ana $6,80 million in 2004).

LIMKAGES Demand Linkages

“81411- Private Households in the U S

Private households account for nearly all of the demand for services provided by this industry.

Supply Linkages
· 42221 — Drugs and Druggists’ Sundries Wholesalers in the US

Supply of cosmetic and reteted products • 44612 — Cosmetics, Beauty Supplies and Perfume Stores in the US

Supply of products for direct use ana sale

” 53112 • Lessors of Monresidenlial Buildings (except MinJwarehouses) in the US Leasing of shop space

3 81232 — Orycteaning and Laundry Services (except Coin-Operated) in lha US Laundry services for linen

DEYAND DETERMINANTS

· Most households sccess hair care salons.

· IBISWorld analysis indicates that the industry displays a high degree of sensitivity to changes in household

dispcsabfe income, which results from changes m employment and from tax and interest rales. More recerlly, the high and inaeasing gas prices is also having an adverse effect on disposable income, and consumer expenditure H is evident that as the growth in household disposable income changes 3 sh.ft in (he ‘requency of use of services occurs. Also, (here .3 a shift in trie use of higher priced/value added services (above the basic cut service), and in the purchase of haircare and beauty products from salons. Other importanl aspects include population growth and the progressive aging of the population, particularly, among a ponion the post-war baby boom era that are now retiring or

c:C approaching retirement, with a far higher level of disposable incomes and wealth, and fewer financial commitments than previous generations.

· Day spas, offering massages and other services for the mind and body, to assist in relieving stress and Ihe built up

life pressures is currently stil a growth segment in the na.ls segment. NAILS Magazine industry survey indicated thai
in 2001, 36% of satons offered spa sen/ices.

· The Arner-can Salon G’een Book indicates thai day spas are a growing segment and almost half of all people who

use a day spa are between the ages of 34 and 52, many have college degrees and over a Ihird earn more Ihgn
$75,000 per annum. Mosl spas are used for relaxation purposes.

· Surveys have also indicated that Ihe number of men using salons is increasing and for a greater array of services

such as hair, skin, nail -regiments, and they are also purchasing Ihe salons’ retail products,

DOMESTIC AND INTERNATIONAL MARKETS

Domestic and International Markets Exports

Exports in (his industry are tow Exports in this industry are steady

Domestic and International Markets Imports Imports in this industry are low Imports in this industry are steady

Domestic and International Markets Analysis

· In general, the industry services the needs of the domeslic market.

· One majcf operator, Regis Corporation has. however, expanded both its company owned and franchised salons

internationally. In late-2005, the company’s North American operations rnduded 6.551 corporate salons and 2,310 frcnchised ones, while internationally \ had 426 corporate salons and 1.592 franchised ones, mainly located in the UK, France, Italy and Spain. It had 55.000 corporate employees globally (an average of around 8 per salon). However, Ihe company generates 85% of ils revenue domestically.

BASIS OF COMPETITION Competition in this industry is high Competition in this industry is increasing

» IBISWortd contends that the basis of competition in (he hair care component appears, overwhelmingly, to be price-based, due to both the number of operators and the ease ol entry into Ihe industry

· Many more successful operators, however, compe’e on the basis of quality service, consistent cuts and services and

according to the client’s wans and desires. They also seek to ensure higin client satisfaction and return rates and,
therefore, obtain the benefit of good word of mouth recommendations.

· Many of Ihe same factors are important in the nails salon segment — wi:h sanitation and service being important.

life cycle

Life Cycle Stage

The life cycle stage is growth

Life Cycle Reasons

· Changing age structure of Ihe population.
· Changing attitudes to beauty and other treatments, by boih males and females

•

· Increased demand (or day spas. Life Cycle Analysis

· While over the longer term,, Ictal resl industry revenue lends to grow slowly and in line with the domestic population

growth, there are a number of segments that are growing at slightly faster rates.

· A part of this industry w.hicn is in 3 growtn phase is the beauty segment and is related to the changing age structurs

of the population and (he increasing demand tor more facials, beauty treatments, hair colorings, nails and general pampering etc.

· Sons industry segments, such as the bas’c hair cut se-vices. operate in a \ieiy price competitive environment, and

this may be an indication that there may be too many operators in some segments.

· Sons industry services, particilarty oesuty and health ones, are increasingly being provided in health retreats and holiday resorts.

· New services are increasingly being offered by operators — including unique or custom ones

· which reinforce

pampering — and can be linked lo massage, facials, tanning, waxing and leflexology

· Growth in this industry is occurring in the franchising area • both domestically and internationally, and wilh further

potential for further growth over the outlook period.

•

Industry Conditions BARRIERS TO ENT3Y Barriers to enlry in Ihis industry are tow These barriers are steady

· The level of capital investment required .5 low.

· Operators csn lease suitable premises,

· Operators can lease equipment.

· Some training is required

Analysis

· The barriers to entry are low. The industry relies on personal skills and training and new operators have the ability to

lease a.’l their equipment and to renl retail space to enter the industry. Seme licensing of operators occurs in some
States

TAXATION

Licensing of Estabfertment 50 • 100% Industry Specfic Licensing erf Individuate 25-50% Industry Specie

C » In some Stales, there are annual’y renewable license lees lor the location/shop where hair and beauty care services are provided, as well as for individually qualified persons.

INDUSTRY ASSISTANCE

The level of Industry Assistance is none

The trend of Industry Assistance is increasing

There are nc specific tariffs for this industry

· This industry, like most personal sen/ices ones, is totally unprotected and receives no assistance in any form from

government, apart from operators having to meet some licensing requirements. In some slates, the need lot further hair care or beauty apprentices has tc be established first, prior to obtaining the approval of the relevant Slate Board and commencing an apprenticeship.

REGULAT’CN AND DEREGULATION The level cf Regulation is medium The trend of Regulation is increas-ng

· Most Stales have individual requirements for the training and testing of persons in this industry and a consumer

complaints process.

· In both the hair and beauty rea’.ment areas (including \y demonstrators and instructors), most people reed to be

licensed by the appropriate State Board of Cosmetology and the establishment wnere services are provided may also
need lo be separately licensed.

· Licensing requires between 300 and 3,000 hours of study as an apprentice under a ful’y Qualified operator or in an

approved/licensed school, sifting fcr a written exam and paying the appropriate license fee. In some States,

cMD’./;7RY

apprentices have 10 indicate or prove Inat there is an ac!ual need or demand (or the apprenticeship, prior to approval lo commence. In most Stales applicants have lo be at least 16 years old. All licenses onrl work par-nits must be posted in public view with a current photo attached State Boards also establish and enforce safety and sanitation practice standards (or operators and perfc-rm regular inspections.

· Some of the more specnc regulation may require that all tools and implements used are slenleed/disinfec’.ed, lhal

testing be unceraken prior to ha/ coloring and that certain chemicals be not used on “air, naifs or wilh (acia.s. Any special need of people with diabetes, who have a manicure or pedicure, need to taken into accoont No medical services, such as removal of naiss etc.. can tie undertaken.

· Currenl’y, many States are considering legislation to regulate satons which rer( space for a booth to an independent

contractor rather Ihsr an employee and (or (he licensing of these activities. These regulations currently vary
according to State.

COST STRUCTURE Year; 2006

Item Cost %

•I Wages 26.IV *” Purchases 15.0V •Renl 7.6V m UfMM t‘°°’°’ KsS Employor costs at fringe benefits 2.9%’ m Depreciation 2.0V ii?’ • Comnun nation cosfs 0.7%’ •Repairs and maintenance D.6%1 •I Other 3$1%’ 1 f • Profil S.OV

Analysis

· Since this industry is a labor-intensive, the major cost relates lo wages, which accounts for an estimated 26 % of total

revenue.

· Given the general intense state of competition in this indusl’y, Ihe return cr in’/cshient. is generally low, wilh an

estimated 5 % margin accruing lo owrers. The small margin makes (his inciisiry financially vulnerable loany changes in demand for services and’er price-based competition II is a:so afectea by any ‘acio- which affecis waes and benefil costs, including recently increasing workers’ compensation insurance and for medical benefits.

CAPITAL AND LABOR INTENSITY The level of Capital Intensity is low

· The industry involves a large degree of personal client service.

c · Most areas of operation from taking appomlmenls. to providing hair and nail and other services and cleaning requires

direct labor input

· There has been no significant change in industry operation, which involves a significant change in capital

requirements recently.

Analysis

· Ratio: The labor intensity of this induslry is determined by the ratio of labor to capital. To calculate (his ratio, wage

and depreciation costs (taken from the cost structure) are utilized as proxies.

· Labor costs, in total, account ‘or around 50 % of the total and depreciation for under 2 %. The ratio of labor to capital

is 1:0,04, meaning that fcr every dotar spenl on wages, only 4 cenls is spent en utilizing and replacing equipment
and buildings.

· This industry, like all oine’s in ;he perscnsl services induslry, requires a very high direc! labor input. Personal quality

and professional service are all important, as is client satisfaction with the end result.

TECHNOLOGY AND SYSTEMS

the level of Technology Change is tow

· Technology has impacted only slowly on the hair care component. However, technology and products used in the

beauty industry have changed dramatically over (he last few years with the emergence ol new computerized
equipment. This includes equipment using the Blend method, which combines electrolysis with a short wave current.

» Franchis ng has emerged as a major segment in the hair care area and is the major area of change currently

afleclmg it. The major hairca’e franchisor is Regis Corporation, utilizing its Regis Salons, MaslerCu’s, Trade Secrets, SmartStyte, Supercuts, Cos! Cutters, Hair Masters, Style America. First Choice Ha’rculters, Magicuts brsnds both in the domestic and inlernationa. market (mainly France and the UK_; bui expanding rapidly elsewhere).

INDUSTRY VOLATILITY

The level of volatility is medium

· The industry is sensitive to econcmic conditions, including consumer confidence. · The demand for value added serv,ces follows the trend rate of growth of househoid disposable income. · Some hair and nail and other services are seen as discretionary by consumers. · Most households require regular haircuts. · Continuec growth in (he nails segment, with spas being popular.

globalization

The level of Globalization is low

The trend of Globalization is increasing

· The industry, in general, services the needs of (he domestic market. One major operator. Regis Corporation, has

expanded both its company owned and franchised personal hair care saions internationally, but siill generates 85% ol
its revenue domestically

Key Factors

KEY SENSITIVITY

The key sensitivities affecting Ihe performance of the Hair, Nail and Skin Care Services indusiry include:

Consumer Sentiment Index

Description: The level of consumer confidence.

Changes in consumer confidence levels has a direct effect on iheir sae.’icfing on basic snd value added services.

Per Capita Disposable Income

Description1 The level of and/or movements ir, real per capita disposable income

The h’jusiry -s sensitive to changes in ho-jsehcid disposable income, which is affected cy changes in general employment growth as well as in tax and interest rales. H has a direct effect on the demand (or value added services, purchases of merchandise and, to some extent, :he frequency of use of services

Population Growth Rate

Description: The level of population growth in the US

The industry is sensitive to population size, age structure and growth rale within sn individual operator’s catchment area.

f KcY SUCCESS FACTORS The key success factors in the Hair, Nail aid Skin Care Services industry are:

· Access to multtskilled and flexible workforce To have the right mix of people a~d services needed by customers in the catchment area.

· Access lo niche markets

To develop niche areas of service/expertise so 35 not to be as affected by focal price competition

· Having a loyal customer base

Have a highly satisfied and repeat client base.

· Must have license

To have the appropriate liceises

· Maintenance of excellent customer relations

To ensure on-going customer satisfaction and good word of rnoulh recommendations.

Key Competitors

MAJOR PLAYERS Market Share

Jlf

Major Player Regis CorpoiaBon UHla Salon, Coynelics & Fragrance, Inc.

Olher

Market Share

Range

5.91% (2006) 0.94% (20061 93.15% (20061

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

Regis Corporation Brand/Trading Name(s): Regis Salons. MasterCuts, Trade Secrets. Smart Style, Supercuts, Cost Cutters, Hair Master. Style America, First Choice Haircurters, Magiculs Market Share; 5.91%

History

Regis Corporation is the leading hair care and retail salon owner, operator and franchisor, and has its head ofice in Minnesota. It provides a fu! range of services from custom hairslyling, cutting, coloring, perms and manicures ax sells hair care products. It operates under the brands of Regis Salons, MasterCu’.s, Trade Secret, SmartStyle Supercuts, Cost Cutters. Hasr Masters, Style America, First Choice Haircut’ers and Magicuts. Its up market salons operate under the Regis Salons brand, te value-priced salons trade under the Cost Cutters and MasterCuts brands. Regis’ salons are also located in stopping malls (under the brand, Regis, MasterCufs and Trade secret) and s’.np centers (under the brand, Supercuts. Cost Cutters). Tney are also found within Wat-Marls where they trade under the brand, SmartStyie. It continues to expand through a combina’.ion of mergers, acquisitions and openings. As at trie end of December 2005. it had a total of 11,211 company-owned and franchised stores worldwide.

tn January 2006, it was announced tnal a subsidiary of Regis Corporation was to merge wih Sally Beauty Company, a business unit of Albedo-diver Company, the I would own 54.5 % of the new company, subject to shareholder and regulatory approvals. The company would retain the Regis name and continue ‘.o ee headquartered in Minneapolis Sally Beauty Company is a ending gloSa! marketer of professional beauly supplies, with annual revenue of $2.25 bil’ion and with 822 Beauty Systems Stores and 1.244 sales people. Regis was to be transformed into a professional beauty products distribution and services company. However, the merger did not proceed and Regis receive:: $50 million as a merger termination fee. of which cost offsets was So.l mill-on.

A summary of the recent financiai performance of this company is provided in ths following table wilh further discussion below.

cSummary of Recent Financial Performance

: Fiscal Year ‘ . 1 . ‘ “ MtSori Defers Nat • , : • -,” Revenue . ; Percept Growth Income. •Percenl. Growth 19S8 800 M<C 31 N’/C 1999 975 21.9% 30 -32% 2000 1140 16.9% 50 667% 2001 1312 15.1% 53.1 62% 2002 1454 10.6% 70.3 32.4% 2003 1635 159% 86.7 233% 2004 1620 139% 105,0 21.1% 2005 2194 (4.3% 64.6 -38.5%

2006 2431 10,8% 109.6 637% —— —— —— —— —

Source Annual Repofl Nolo “iscal year ending Lie

In 1999, Regis acquired Barbers Hai’styling for Men and Women Inc and Heidi’s Inc. In that year, sales revenue increased to about $975 millon, but net income growth was static at around $30 million (or 3.0% of revenue). In 2000, it acquired Supercuts, UK. For that year, revenue increased lo $1,140 million and net income increased to almost S50 million, which represented 4.3% of revenue. In Seplember 2001. il acquired the French franchisor, GGG.

Fiscal 2001

In fecal 2001, revenue tolaieo $1312 million (up 14.8%) and it had 41.130 employees. Service revenue ;ncreased 14.6% to $893.5 million, aroduct sales increased 156% to S361.9 million, franchise revenue increased 12.0% to S56.3 million and lota) system-wide sates was $1,903 million, up 13.7%, Jusi under 93.0% of revenue (or around 11,200 trillion) was generated in the domestic market. The E8ITDA to sales ratio was around 13.3%. operating income increased 9.1% to $109.3 milton and the net profit margin was aSout 4.0% of sates (or $53.1 milionj. Same store sales growth was 2.8% and total assets was valued at $736.5 rrillon. During the year, it serviced around 118 million customers worldwide through its 5,655 company owned and franchised salons in the US, 632 stores in Canada, 30 stores in Puerto Rico and 364 stores in the UK. The total stores numbered 6,681 worldwide.

The firm generated around two thirds of its revenue from hair services, 28.0% from high margin hair care merchandise sates and 3.0% from franchisor income. It also stocks a range of hair care products. During 2002. the firm planned to open a further 550 stores-Fiscal 2002

In early 2002, the firm expanded its operations to Italy. Spain, Brazil. Belgium, Switzerland and Poland.
It also acquired the Jean Louis David trademark and salons, which was the number ore salon operator in Europe.

In July, it acquired 328 salons operating as BoRics, which generated revenue of $62 miH’or. These were added to an additional 53 salons which had been acquired over the previous tnree months and had a total of $9 miHion in revenue. The BoRics were added to the exisl.ng 3,400 strip shopping center salons. The firm estimated that there were 40,000 salons in US strip shopping centers.

c:c Since the ear!y-1990s, the company made 233 acquisitions, which added 6,622 salons, with annual revenue that totaled 5735 miilion and system-wide sales of over $1,800 million.

For fiscal 2002, system-wide sates increased 18.4% to $2,253 million and total reverse ‘.vere up 10 9% to $1,454 million. Operating income increased 22.5% to S109.3 million, net income increased 32.4% to S70-3 million and Hie EDITDA increased 10.6% to $193.6 rnllion. Aiihe end of June 2002, the company had a Ictol of 8,684 salons, of which 4,776 were company-owned and 3.908 werersnchised. The domestic salons com prised 1,016 Regis Salons, 551 Masterculs, 490 company-owned and 25 franchised Trade Secret, 361 company-owned and 210 franchised Smartstyle/Cost Cutlers and 1,476 company-owned and 1.988 (ranched Sins Centers, internationally, il had 382 company-owned and 1.684 Iranchised stores. Regis Salciis generated $4’6.2 million in revenue. Mastercuts generated $164 8 million. Trade Secret generaled $190 million, SmahStyle genera’.ed S178.7 million, Strip Center generaleu $321.3 million, internationally located salons generated $105,6 million ard franchisee1 revenue generated $77.6 million

Fiscal 2003

At the enc’ of DeceTiber 2002, Ihe comaany had 9,313 salons, of which 5,373 were ccmpany-owned and the remaircer were franchisee, while internationally it had 332 company-owned salons and 1,684 (ranchised ones, it was also announced that the company had acquired Vidal Sassoon salons and acsdernies and introduced a new salon concept, Vidal Sassoon Studios. It also acquired Haircare Limited’s licensing agreement with Procter & Gamble to expand the salon group using the Vidal Sassoon brand name in North America. UK and Germany.

In March, the company announced hat if would expand its European high-’ashion hair salon brand. Jean Louis David, ojlside of New Yod< City and plannec to add between 100 and 200 stores n ;he greater New York, New Jersey and Connecticut areas. In thai same month, the company transferred its stock listing to the NYSE.

In May, the company acquired 286 salons from Opal Concepts, of which 90 were company-owned, and the remainder were f’anchised. The Iranchised salons operated under he Pro-Cuts brand and were prmarily located in Tetas. Over the past 10 years Regis had completed 255 acquisitions, which involved 7,043 salons and annual total revenues of S817 million, and system-wide sales c! over $1,000 mill:on.

For fiscal 20D3, system-wide sales increased 23.0% to $2,600 million, while consolidated Seles he-eased 15.8% to S1.684 5 million (of which international revenue was $171.5 million), and operating expenses was 51,526.0 million Operating income was S158.9 rniBion and net income was S86.7 million, or 5.1% ol reverse. The firm constructed 397 new salons, added a further 275 franchised stores and acquired a further 758 salons, which included 198 franchised ones As at June 2003, the company owned, operated or franchised 9617 sa-ons, compared with 8.684 in June 2002. Il had 1,096 Ragis Salons. 590 Master cuts. 517 company-owned Trace Secret, 25 franchisee Trade Secret, 1,033 company-owned Smarlstyle/Cosl Cul:ers in Wal-Mart. 230 frarcnised Smartstyfe/Cost Cutters in Wal-Mart. 1928 company-owned Strip Centers. 2172 fran.cnised strip centers and 399 compeny-owned and ‘. ,627 franchised international salons.

Fiscal 2004

In April, the company announced that it acquired 153 Holiday Hair salons located primarily in Pennsylvania which was expected Io add around $45 mill’on ;o arnuatized revenues. Dunne ‘he third quarter 2004 the company also acquired 115 salons in 14 separate transactions, of which 86 were franchise buy-backs, which added $25 million to annualized revenues.

For fiscsl 2004, revenue increased 14.0% to $1,920 million and same store revenue growth was 2.6%. Net income increased 22.0% to S105 million (a margin cf 5.5%). At year-end, the company had a total o’ 10,162 salons (6.238 company owned and 3,924 franchised), compared with 9,617 salons previously, which represented a net increase of 545 salons, The company constructed 452 salons and franchisees built an additional 268 and. in addition. 411 salons were acq-jired. This included 206 franchise buybacks snd 380 salons were closed or relocated. It had 1,096 Recis Salons. 590 Mastercuts and 517 Trade Secret salons. Most of its salons (around 4,435 salons) were located in strip retail centers, a’though it had 1,465 company owned and franchised salons located in Wal-Mart stores. Total value of its assets was $1,27’ million. Internationally it nsc 423 company-owned and 1,594 franchisee stores. Regis Selons nad revenue of S482 million, Mastercuts had revenue of $170.3 million, Trade Secret had revenue of $21D million, SmartStyle had revenue of $227.5 million Strip Centers had revenue of S468 million end its international stores had revenue of S171.5 million.

in June, the company acquired the Blame Beauly Career Schools, a beauty school operator with six schoo’s, located in Massachusetts and which acdc-cl 513 million to annual revenue. Regis employed 156 a-.isli: directors and nvested around $16 million each year in tracing its 53,000 stylists worldwide.

Fiscal 2005

For fiscal 2005, lotal consolidated revenue increased 14.1% lo $2,194.3 million, although same store sales increased only 0.9%, compared to 2.1% m fiscal 2004 and 1.2% ‘n fiscal 2003. North American salons revenue was $1,874.0 million, up from $1.706.0 million over the previous year. International revenue totaled $227.0 million, up from $203.0 million, beauty schools revenue was $33.9 million and the hair restoration cenlers revenue was $59.4 million. Services revenue comprised 66.3% of the iola!, with product revenue at 29.6% and franchise royalties and fees at 3.6%. Cosi of services ( represented 57.0% ol service revenue, and cost of product comprised 51.8% of trvs revenue. Sile operating revenue

comprised 8.3% of lotal, wh.le general and administrative costs were 11.9%, rent at 14.2% and depreciation and amo.Tization at 4.2%. Operating incorre represented 6.3% of total revenue, but decreased from 9.3% over !he previous two years. This was largely due to lower product revenue, due to lower retail margins and increased competition. Tne ne< income represented 2.9% of tofal revenue, down f-om 5.4% in 2004 and 5 1% in 2003. The company estimated Ihe lolal value of the hair care industry at $53.0 billion domestically and S150.0 billion globally. The company’s North American cperalicns included 6,551 corporate salons and 2,310 franchised ones, while internationally it had 426 corporate salons and ‘ ,592 franchised ones, mainly located in the UK, France, Italy and Spain. It had 55,000 corporate employees globaly (an average of around 8 per salon).

In May, the company purchased 130 salons of TGF Precision Hairculters for an undisclosed sum.

Over the past 12 years Ihe company made 339 acquisitions, that added 7,165 locations, a net 700 new salons added in 2005 by construction and acquisition. For company-owned salons, its services comprised 72.0% of total revenue ‘rom haircutting and styling, 18.0% from hair coloring, 5.0% from hair waxing, 2.0% from waxing and 30% from other services. In general, the proportion of lotal revenue from hair coloring service revenues had increased over the past three years, bul decreased from haircutting and styling services.

Fiscal 2006

For fiscal 2006, revenue inreased 10.8% to $2,430.9 million, with $1,634 0 million from services (up 11.4%). $718 9 million in product sales (up 10.9%) and $77.9 million in royalties snd fees (-2 0%). Operaling expenses increased 8.3% to 52,226.4 million (or lo 91.6% of revenje). Costs of services was $928.5 million, cost of product at S3? 1.0 million, site operating expenses at S199.5 million, general and administrative costs at $294.1 million, rent at S350.9 million and

c depreciation a! $115.9 million. Oaa’ating income was S204.5 million (or 8.4% of revenue) and nel income increased lo $109 6 million (4.5% of revenue). Tolal value of assets was $’, .982.1 million.

At the end of June 2006, it had a lotsl of 11,477 salons, (up 4.4%), of whin 7,559 were company-owned, 3,774 were franchised, 54 beauty career schools, 48 cam-any owned hair restoration centers and 42 ftanchised hair restoration centers In North Americe il had 1,079 Regis Salons, 642 Mastercuts. 634 Trade Secret, 1,903 Srnartstyle/Cost Cutters in Wai Marls and 5.035 Strip Center Salons. It had 2,040 international salons (of which 1,587 were (ranchised).

Total revenue from North Arneica salons increased 8.7% to S2,036.6 million (with $481.8 from Regis, $174 7 million from MasterCuls, S262.9 million from Trade Secret, $413.9 million from SmartS:yle and $703.3 million from Strip Centers).

The same slore increase “n revenue was 0.4%, down Irom 0.9% in 2005.

The compsny’s results were affected by the impact of he hurricanes KaMna, Rite and Wilma and lower product sales, which cost :he company 2,700 lost salon days and $2.5 million in revenue. 15 company-owned stores were still :iosed a! the end of December 2005.

Also in December, Regis was affected by lower retail product margins due to higher p-omolional activities. Overall, ii incicgted lhat il had operated in a challenging market over the previous 18 months in terms of growth in earnings. At the end of December 2005, it had 11,211 worldwide locations.

tn 200E the company acqui’ed less ‘han a 20.0% interest in Cool Cuts 4 Kids sabns, but wrote off its contribution in 2006 due to results being less than anticipated il still neld its option to purchase the reman,ng slock in 2008. Also during 2006, C ‘ it closed 64 underperfocming Regis and MaslerCuls salons, largely based in malls.

Fiscal 2007

For the first half fiscal 2007, tolal revenue increased 8.9% lo 51,296.2 million, as service revenue increased 10.7% to S874.9 million, product revenue increased 5.5% :o S381.7 million and royalties and fees increased 2 4% to $38.7 million. Operating expenses increased 9.6% to $1,205.0 million, or 93 0% of /evenue. Net income was static at 550.0 million, a margin of 3.9% of revenue). Total store locations increase: 2.1% to 11,713, as international slores increased 1.8% lo 2,077. Same store revenue grow.h was 0.2%, compared to 1.0% previously. North America revenue increased 7.4% lo $1.078.8 million, operating expenses were $942.1 niilion (87.3% of revenue) and the ope-a’.ing income before tax was $137.7 million (3 margin of 12.8%). The company indicated that there were signs of recovery of its business in the second quarter.

Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc.

Market Share: 0.94%

This company is privately owned by Doubletnousse Investments and Global Retail Partners amcng others, and operates in both the hair care and beauty sen/ices components. II has around 130 stores across 16 States, with most being in Texas and III nois. It also retails “sir, fragrances and beauiy products. In 2002, i: had revenues of around $308 million, whic-’i was up almost 20% over 2001, and employed 3.200 people, (up by 73%). For 2003. estimated revenue was S362 million, $375 million lor 2005 and $385 million in 2006.

OTHER PLAYERS Cheveax LLC

c Industry Performance

CURRENT PERFORMANCE Industry Contribution to GOP

· ISiSWortd estimates that, in constant 2005 prices, the Hair, Nail and Skin Care Services Industry will generate

$42,107 million in revenue in 2007, which represents real revenue growth of 2 3%.

· This industry will also contribute an estimated 523,293 million to the US economy in 2007, which represents 0.17% of

total GOP

» The industry revenue is eslimated to comprise: 73 per cenl from hair care services operators, 24 per cent from nail and beauty services and 2 per cent from barber shops

Sensitivities

· Tie :‘ia r care industry is sensitive to changes in real household disposable incomes, which is affected by changes in

employment and from tax and interest rate changes, and more recently gas srices. It is evident lhai as the growth in householc disposable incomes lucluales, Ihere is a shift in the frequency of use of hair care and beauty services, particularly of higher priced/value added services (above the basic cut service). More recently high and increasing

gas prices has also affected household disposable income and consumer expenditure on hair and beauty care. Revenue { _. Over the five years lo 2007, real industry revenue is expected by IBISWorld to increase at an average annual rale of 3.9%, due lo:

· continuing population growth;

· increasing aging of the population and demand for skin care and other pampering services, and

· the general provision of higher value/higher priced sen/ices and products lo meet customer demand.

However forecast low economic growth in 2007 is expected lo slow industry growth in that year. Employment

Over the same five year period, industry employment is expected by IBISWorid to have grown at an average annual rate of 2.3% Ic 1.05 million ana relating tc the tendency lo use casual and part-time staff to provide sen/ices at peak customer times. Also, some affecting this was some fluctuation ;n derrgnd for sen/tees, particularly higher priced ones, as consumer serliment falls, or when household disoosable income growth comes under pressure from interest rate and gas price r:ses. such as in 2005 and 2DC6.

Value Added • Profitability

Real value added, over t-e :ive years to 2007. was expected by iBISWork) lo have grown at an average annual rale of 4.1%, due largely to:

· some increase in industry employment, even with the greater use of casual slaff; and

· some increase in profit margins, although ft wW ccri’jnue to remain relatively low, due lo continuing high level ol .no’us’.ry competition, as economic g*owiJi slows in 2007.

Industry Trands

In general, the hair care incuslry suffers from significant financial problems caused by a lack of working capital, general lack ol management and marketing skills, competition being based mainly on price, cost pressures due to over-staffing ol salons (i.e. hiring of Mi-time staff lo levels which ensure full service a; pejk limes), low productivity and lack of profitability. Some of the above problems are being overcome by (he establishment of franchised operators, although these still only account for a small part of total induslry operators and revenue.

Day spas (offering massages end other services for the Tihd and body) to assisl in relieving stress and built up life pressures were a grow-.h secment ir the beauty area. Industry surveys indicated that in 2002 around 36 % of nail and beauty salons offered day spa treatments, along with ether beauty (reatments, and this was est mated to have continued to grow further.

Surveys have indicated that the number of men using salons is increasing and for a greater array of services such as hair, skin, nail treatments aid also purchasing retail products for home use. Referrals from nesr-by riedical practitioners provides some additional bus.ness and salons should, particularly, develop links with local plasl.c surgeons.

Recent Performance By Year 2001

For 2001, the significantly stowe’ econorrc growth (and, therefore, in employment and household incomes) was estimated by IBISWorld to have led lo relatively slow real industry revenue of about 4,2% and value added growth, from reduced profits and employment. Bolh the frequency of people attending hair care and beauty salons and sales of retail products through salons fell. Ccupled with the intensified price-based competition was operator consolidation, tn this year, the industry experienced its first year of slow revenue growth since 1996. The events of September 11, 2001 also led to reduced consumer confidence anr. to an assooalect listening in general consumer expenditures, especially on the higher priced services and products, ‘.owards year-end. MAILS Magazine estimate: ‘.hat for 2001, the revenue of the nails salon services segmenl, in nominal terms, was the same as in 1999.

2002

In 2002, while economic growlh increased sl’ghtly, it was accompanied by reduced business and consumer confidence and increased general unemployment. The fluctuations in stock market va’ues had a negative impact on household wealth and the failure of a number of high profile companies also depressed general confidence levels. As such, it was estimated ny IBISWorid that the industry experienced lower growlh in real revenue of 2,0% and in profits and employment (and -.herefore value added) and bs competition increased. Both :he frequency of people attending hair care and beauty salons, requesting higher priced value aoded services and tne revenue obtained ?rom the sales of retail products also slowed Some further operator consolidation occurred, NAILS Magazine estimated that in 2002, the nail technicians’ real revenue growth fell and thai working hours fell, as the number of salons increased 4.1% and technicians 1.2%.

2003

For 2003, lor (he first half, continued low economic growth led to Ihe industry experiencing similar Irading conditions as 2002. However, the increasec household disposable income from past income tax reductions and improved consumer sentiment in Ihe second half was est nated by IBISWcrki to have resulted in significantly increased real industry revenue growth, particularly in the second hslf year, to 3.5%. This led so improved industry employment snd profits, and therefore value added growth, as the demand for hair care and besuty services inc’eased. While competition levels remained fierce, operators were once again able to sell Ineir higher margin, value-added services and products. In real terms, Ihe nails segmeni tolat revenue, once again decreased marginally.

2004

In 2004, both stronger econorrc growth and in household disposable income was estimated by ©ISVVorW to have led to the industry experiencing much stronger trac ng conditions Real revenue grcwtn was, therefore, estimated by IBiSWc’Md to have re-bounded to 7.7%, to the level last experienced in the late-199Cs and in 2000. More favorable economic growth also significantly increased valje added growth, as industry employment ?.\vl profitability inc’eased. Competition remained strong, but there was some inc’eased demand for higher margin, value adced hair, beauty and nails products and services. Based on Nails Magazine survey infcr-nal’on, this industry segment’s ‘evenues grew strongly, in rj-l terms, and possibly fo: Ihe first time since the late-1990s. However, towards the end c; the ysar. seme industry components may have commenced to have felt some adverse effects on demand from Ihe increasec interest rales and of high gss prices. Bolh o:” these hac a direct effect on notsehold disposable incomes, which, in (urn. acverseJy affected demand for incustry services and product sales.

2005

In 2005, bolh slower economic growth and in household disposable income, was estimated by IBISWorld lo have !ed to Ihe industry experiencing slower trading conditions and real revenue (o 3.2%, and value added growth. The mcustry commenced lo feel the lagged effects from the general interest rate increases throughout 2005. This reduced growth in household disposable income, and, therefore, consumer expenditures, which included on hair and nail services. According to Nads Magazine survey results, the beauty segmeni experienced a real reduction in overall industry revenue, as well as employment. Overall, lower real revenue growth (lowed through into lower g.’cwth in industry employment and profits, and, therefore, value added, Competition rema ned high.

2006

IBISWortd estimated that in 2005 both the continued low economic and household disposable income growth, resulted in the industry experiencing slower trading conditions, with real reyen je growth at 2.9%, together with low value added growth. The indusiiy is expected to feel the tagged effects from the general interest rate increases which occurred lo mid-2006, as well as from high ess prices. These factors both had a direct impact on household disposaole income, and, therefore, consumer sentiment aid expenditure, including on personal services, such as hair and oeaury care. Low revenue growth also flowed through into ‘ower industry employment and profil growth, and, therefore, in value added. Competition increased significantly as revanue growth declined.

2007

In 2007. IBISWorld expects that the forecast slow economic growth and in household disposable income, will result in me industry experiencing slower trading conditions and real revenue of about 2.3%. The industry is also expected Ic continue to feel the lagged effects from the genera; interest rsle increases which occurred to mid-2006, as well as from the high gas prices in Ihe latter part of 2006. These factors have a direct impact on household disposable income growth. Overall

( ‘ — ii N:n! p.-io Skir C,“ia- S’-i m:k i:> ‘-c US

.*, ••

industry competition will increase and some industry consolidation is expected, with possibly faster growth in the (ranchised component and from mergers and acquisitions,

Barriers to Future Industry Growth

The major barrier to future industry g:owth is tie continuing price-based competition, in tne basic services area, t is also highly sensitive lo changes rn economic conditions, especially any ‘actor which affects the growth in household disposable incomes However the industry does potentially offer opportunit’-ss for further expans*on and development o; cha r. or (ranchised operators.

HISTORICAL PErCRMANCE

The hair care and beauty industry has experienced s-gnificant cha.’ige in its operations over a number of years. A major change was the development of na r care salons for both mates and females, away from the former barber shops which serviced only men. More recently, here has been an increased demand fcr beauty services, n line with the general aging of the population, and an increasing emphasis and awareness on appearance, health and lifestyle

The industry has shown a degree of sensitivity to changes in real household disposable income. In low economic growth periods, mere is a tendency for customers to defer hair or beauty services, particularly higher value added ones, and to not purchase retail merchandise from salons.

During the early 1990s, it was estimated that the industry was affected by the economic recession, which ledloa signif cantly slower real growth h household disposable incomes, as unemployment rose. This ed lo both decreased demand for higher priced services and reduced frequency of visits by clients. It also intensified the level of price-based ( ., competition among operators and led to salon closures and reduced industry employment.

From 1994 to 1998, the return of slronger economic growth was estimated lo have led lo significantly increased industry revenue and value adijed growth, as industry profitability and employment increased. This resulted from inc’eased real household disposable incomes, as employment grew rapidly and from lax and, particularly, interest rates reduclions. The industry also witnessed increased consumer confidence. Wh.le industry operalors and employment levels increased, profit margins remained snail, due to continued aggressive competition.

In 1997, (he US Census Bu’eau found that there were 83,991 employer establishments (i.e. excluc’ec: non-employer establishments) in this industry, whicn had a combined revenue of $12100 million collars (an average o’ revenue of £144,000 per establishment), that employed a tola’ 0/410,995 persons (an average o’ 5 employees per establishment) and oa«c iota’ wages of $500 m.llion. Average salaries paid in this industry was still low. To ihis figure, had to be added a further 462,414 non-employer establishments (self-employed operalors) which had total revenues of 38100 million.

Over this period, there was a significant expansion in franchised operalors, bul the majority remained single shop owner-operators.

In 1999 and 2000, the strong economic growth was estimated lo have led to stronger industry revenue and value added grow.h, as real household disposable incomes .ncreased. This led lo .ncreased f’equency of attendance at salons and increased demand for high oncec’value added ser/ices (such as hair coloring and beauty treatments). In terms of the nail/beauty ser/ices, tl’.is segment was also est.mated to have experienced high growlh relalec to changed perceptions by consumers \hz[ beauly treat/rants were no longer a luxury, bul increasingly were akir to hair care and other personal services. The emphasis in the geiera! community on increased health and fitness and diets a.so assisted 8etween t997 and 1999, MAILS Magazine estimated thai total industry segment revenue increased from $6,280 million to 56,440 million

c The market for beauly services also expanded and included bolh males and females of any age group and income, Salons were established to cater for males only, as well as (or various age groups.

Revenue

1988S 23,895.0 N.’A 1989-90 23,6560 -1,0

1990-91 22,828.0 -3.5

1991-92 22,485.0 •1.5 1992-93 22.234.0 •1.1 1991-94 1994-95 22,726.0 23,839.0 22, 4.9 1995-96 24,559.0 3-4

1998-97 26,286.0 66

1997-98 28,210.0 7.3

1998-99 30.493.0 8.1

1999-00 32,727,0 7.3

2000-01 34.101.0 4,2

2001-02 34.786.0 2.0

2002-03 36.001.0 3.5

2003-04 38.758.0 7.7

2004-05 40,000.0 3J 2005-06 41,160.0 2.9

2006-07 42.107.0 2,3

—— —— —

Revenue Revenue Growth Rale 45000 — 10 • 40000 — O” 8 • • p 35000 &00& BfiSH 1

30000 -o 25000 — O yi|f_s JL o 2 20000 co<sc * 2” ° “ipr tti!}i -fciuikidS-r*’ 15000 • i-tt 10000 • •2 ’ tj 5000 0 • O Q alO>tr>CT)O>OCJ>CJ>C7l&)O)CIOOOOOO —

42.

‘!:n ,v,:j Sk n Care §?r*v Outlook Revenue

-, . Revenue $ MBon Growth % 2005 41.160-0 2.9

2007 42.1070 2.3

2008 43,370.0 3.0

2009 44.6280 2.9

2010 45.9670 30

2011 47,208.0 2.7

2012 48,624.0 3.0

—— —— —

~S.CONTRevenue Revenue Growth Rale

60000 I 10 -I

50000 • 8 — r. n

-V** 6 ‘ 1

40000 ‘ ₀ooO°U 4~ n r r ! P Mi e i hi ! 1 I 30000 • £ V* 20000 • — — —— —

Tfi

-2 — JwJ t •

10000 • 0 — -4 U i R —— -

35 o) 01 o* 01 en o o o o o o 05 § i —— —

Hair, Nail and Skin Care Services Industry — Future Growth to 2012. Revenue

Over the Ive years to 2012, real industry revenue is expected by ISISWorld 10 increase at an avarage annual rate of 2.9%. with this relating lo:

· continuing population growth and in its aging;

· but also, in particular, from (he forecast slower economic growth and. therefore, in household disposable income,

which wiH affect the demand for I igher value/priced products and services.

· Industry competition is expected to also increase due to slower growth.

Employment

c Over ihe five years lo 2012, industry employment is expected by IBlSWorld to increase at an average annual rate of 2.2% to 1.17 million with this mainly relating to tn» increasing use of casual and part-time staff to cover peak customer service periods, especially in the expected slow industry growth environment.

Value Added • Profitability

Over Ihe five years to 2012, real industry value added is expected by IBiSWorid to increase a< an average annual rate cl 3.0%, which is oily slightly higher than expected for GDP growth over the same period of 2.8%. with this being related ma’.ni’y to industry employment growth with only an expected marginal improvement in industry profitability, and the continuing low profit margin, due lo on-going high levels ol competition.

Trends

Over this pe’iod, it is expected that (hers w>!l continue lo be further restructuring of the hair care industry towards Ihe estab! siiment of unisex hair care and beauty salons, with the traditional barber shops continuing to decline

Operators in the hair care component are expected to continue lo face significant price competition Tnis is not so much consumer ted, since having the feeling of being pampered, helping a person lo feel good about themselves and overall satisfaction with the end result are repeatedly highlighted in consumer research as being the key benefits sought fay their ciienf. Price-based competition is usually salon-owner-led and is an indicator of Ihe general lack of managerial and marketing skills of operators. The ossic need, therefore is for an improvement in overall managerial skills, especially in the marketing and financial areas and including pricing, cash flow management and cost control.

2008

In 2008 IBlSWorld expecls that the forecast slow economic growth and in household disposable income, will result in the industry experiencing continu-r.g stow trading conditions, with real revenue growth of about 3.0%. The industry wiil continue lo feel the lagged effects frcm the general interest rate increases which occurred to mid-2006, as wel! as from the high gas pnces in the latter part of 2006 These factors have a direct impact on household disposable income, and, therefore, consumer sentiment and expenditure, including on hair, nail and skin care services. Demand particularly for high value services and products is expected to slow. Overall, the level of industry competition will also increase and some industry consolidation will occ jr, with possibly faster growth in the franchised component and from mergers and acquisitions.

2009-2012

The forecast continuing low economic growth through to 2012 is expected lo lead to similar ccndilions as in 2008 right through this period. The industry will cortirue to segment into large franchised operators and niche ones that offer soecia’ services and have a very good understanding of their clients’ needs, with high and consistent levels of customer service and outcomes. It will also become increasing important to offer a range of products that are suited lo dierts, although overstocking needs to be avoided. Frartcnised operators will continue to expand domestically and intemationai.’y as compet;tion increases.

Opportunities ‘or the industry are seen as possibly occurring in selling an increasing range of value-added hair and -beauty services to men and to the baby boomer generation. Day spas have increased in some areas and among certain components of the population, especially those with above average incomes, ard is expected to continue. However, 1’iese services have lo be professionally targeted, delivered and packaged to the right households lo succeed. Franchising ol

Press Release — June 28, 2007 ,,—. Page Lof2

for Release june 28, 2007

FOR MORE INFORMATION;

Cnstuid Hilsoorath

[ 516362-1819 or Dora Brunette

+ 1 516 625 1603

The NCO Group. Inc. 900 West Shore Road Port Washington, NY 11050

NPD REPORTS THE INTERNET IS ONE OF THE FASTEST GROWING CHANNELS FOR BUYING BEAUTY PRODUCTS

Older Women Just as Connected as Younger Ones

PORT WASHINGTON, NY, June 28, 2007 -Sales over the Internet now make up four percent of all sates or about $1.7 billion in the more than $12 billion dollar beauty industry. Even though It’s onfy about four percent of sales- It’s one of the fastest growing channels for shopping, according to a new report from leading consumer and relall information provider The NPD Group,

In its recent report, Emerging Channels: Beauty Care Products Over the Internet, one in ten women across all age groups tell NPD they shop for beauty products, such as makeup, sklncare, and fragrances, on the Web. Forty-three percent of women who shop for beauty on the Internet say they spent more online in 2006 than they did in 2005. The number one reason they use die Internet is convenience. More than seven out of ten (74%) of those women say it “saves time” and about 70 percent say “It’s easier/Quicker to shop online than a store.”

“Consumers have become more wired and so they are more likely to research, choose and replenish beauty brands online. We find that women are less accepting of buying new brands over the Internet, but they are spending their money on brands they know and trust,” said Karen Grant, senior beauty industry analyst for The NPD Group.

Baby Boomer women are just as likely to shop on the Internet for beauty products as their younger counterparts. Women ages 45-64 make up a large segment of the Internet shopper base, and this age group will become increasingly more Important as Ifs the fastest growing segment of the population, In fact, among the women who shop the Web for beauty products over four in 10 (41%) are 15 to 64 years old compared to 36 percent of women who are 18-34 years old.

“Buying beauty products has traditionally been a touch and feel experience, but we are seeing women utilizing the Internet more and more to buy beauty products, particularly the brands they are familiar with. Age Is not an Issue; we find shopping online crosses all age groups,” said Grant.

http://www.npd.com/press/releases/pressJI70628. hlml 7/3/2007

Press Release — June 28, 2007

Page

The higher the income, the greater the likelihood women will shop for beauty products via the Internet Fifteen percent of women In the $75,000 and above category shop the Web for beauty products, versus 10 percent of women with household incomes of $35,000-44,000 and seven percent of women with household Incomes of <$3S,000.

Top S Websites Women Report Buying From

Dnjgstore.com

Sephors.com

Avon.com

Oinique.com

Battiandbodyworks.com

“As a channel, the growing importance of the Internet for beauty is undeniable. However, kke every other channel, it also has inherent challenges that must be better understood to fully leverage its power as it relates to beauty shopping,” said Grant. “For example, women tovethe Internet for its convenience, tfljt foey also toye the in store experience. In fact, nine out of 10 females ages 18-64 tell us SaFtne number one rcasoTnfj’wiH shop in-store Is the experience of touching’ andleelingTne products — something the Internet does not provide. So, it’s important to get a“deeper urvJerstafioTrRToT WRat drives consumer choice on the Internet. Where and how beauty Is purchased Is not an dther-or scenario. It is the marriage of the In-store experience with the Internet that will secure the success for brands, manufacturers and retailers In the future,” sakj Grant.

Emerging Channels: Beauty Care Products Over the Internet

Survey over 15,000 women ages 18-64 with an ending sample of 4,135 women who reported shopping for beauty products during the past 12 months.

About The NPD Group, Inc.

The NPD Group is tte leading provider of reKabte and comprehensive consumer and retail information for a wide range of Industries. Today, more than 1,600 manufacturers, retailers, and service companies rely on NPD to help them drive critical business decisions at the global, national, and local market levels. NPO helps our clients to identify new business opportunities and guide product development, marketing, sates, merchandising, and other functions. Information is available for the following industry sectors: automotive, beauty, commerdai technology, consumer technology, entertainment, fashion, food and beverage, foodservice, home, office supplies, software, sports, toys, and wireless. For more information, visit www.npd com.

The HPO Gioup • 9i)v V’<>st Shoif finad — Km Washington, NY i !OSO

hi(p://www.nrxl.com/press/releases/prcss_07Q628.html

7/3/2007

| NEW! If INTENSIVE te CUTICLE CARE p Problem aitides? fe: : Crape seed oil & |t* lavendennstantiy E moisturize and I;—rescue dry, • —— - | rough cuticles.

SIIH
tl!If»*y|SWB!5

lifefifi’I

& tor eolflf

SI,]

NEW!

DIAMOND
BASE +• TOP COAT

Lock in your

nail color, help stop
chipping and shine,

shine, snine!

NEWI

TRIPLE INDULGENCE Nourishing formula softens hands, smoothes cuticles and strengthens nails.

-5»« -I » 1 «4 m y sgjz • , :

iADVANCED NAIL HARDENER ProtTsise your nails a new future... get harder, smoother nails in 7 days!

NEW!

REVOLUTIONARY WHfTE TIP PEN!

Salon Perfect French Manicure in 5 Minutes!

ill iJi&y j /s/EVW

W-if /iiif-?? .;,•§ i DIAMOND

( PERfrCT •

i f SHINE •

f ‘ The perect

| — blend o(

’ treatment and is

-’"' irresistible.

lasting shine. M

•xX***- f««ea. K

J*“iii !t .S-’Kk S

’ -V»i2-/-5?**=;v’ a •

’ >’ “J‘:rf • ;lj£2vpjfjj,; 1m

m H K

,9 II

/»l:W’r"'"' M •

: * ™:’ftMIIE”! *” ’ !® _-mr- -’ £.

"*s*” “ “ “SsSuii’igp,,- X’ •

1 1

1 jj

i /«

04 WWDBEAflTYREPORT

HOKJ-*. PuW-JMtr We (V-jJv .,r<t F««-irfiv» t >Wc«

editor’s note

Due lo Ugriant dorreslic sates, b«auly brands riusi nove abroad to bolner :heif business as well ss .ouk cross- !)orffcf lof produa-devetopweni ideas.

One article in Ihrt issue ol the XW/’D inlematiofui Bod’j?)’ Repo”, locjses ot the evolttion of Chine’s b-Muty slon nwikp’. Aisigside lamped-ao pfessuw ‘rail locsl aultvx ties, ‘JoxviiK companies li?Pi lh? heat /ram muUinatiori.i: bJuty UMrHfc. — amoog tlvrn. Nippon K/i?nafd 3rxl Pfii — ‘.vfuch arc rapidly sstlirx) up t.ler owr sheas cocnlrywice. t>ip slon market there is already huge ‘n 2004, ia sates leapl 37 5% 1C 2?0 tuSion yujn (#eu#2.8 bihcrVIlS 7 W-lion/127.3 billion) txcr 2003, according to China’s Bcssuty and Cosmelxs Chdfifaer

!-•> Ihe run-up to ‘.he Cowxiprol trade mow in Sologiw. taly. in ea’lv April. WWD ‘Aternatioral Seat/ly Repon queried th» tDuril"/1} *xi>cutivei ibout then busi’iesi \VhHe the/ look to make changes tit ho.Te.

llil»n beauty nwkeler? say Ihey obn lo expand abroad—pariicularty in A:’3 ard t.Htecn tufcapv-io rtiiireti. incluc fig Russia, lapsn jnd Korea. “You ta.Tt dpja>id Ofi the lUi’iftn market anymoie,” said Giamuea Sonc-tti.vKe president of stflcKj-es and business. u<>veloqrr.eni of the Oei’;’3h Group.

Mesnwhile, oeaciy coiipan -:-i such as Coty Inc. Frccler S Gamble and Unilever havp clr“anf*d prtrJuct iM=.ptr,itkin trojr. the occommg World Cup sotcer di.irrr»oi’,rnip ir. GCTinany Executives sie playing i;p Uw coinpel’ttan and hc;{)irH.) to cash in on fx> new ‘.herrvjd squad of toileinet pfcducti “W.th 3DO mrt .00 spectatCKS. il is a uoiqu» occasion.” said Mjrie! Pauli. ma’tc-ting d reclof at Coty Beauty, referring to (rte event s media coverage bringing matches to possible ccnsi_mefs around the plane:.

Indetd, 5!ODali;ation is te<mg pbce at an eii-quicker clip these days

Jennifer Weil

’ JW4..J. (MlJl* A ft

WV/l), HufVil*r tHAKUS Ol B,-U V1> Croup frAA&tr. tixftK 4t

06 THINK PIECE ftop:»-i play :K» fpll

08 HAIR CARE Ann-age »»3tne

1 2 CHINA Ulani M lit rub
1 4 ITALY HiflcettfHtaiigt ud.

1 6 PACKAGING (owjiners jt t 1 8 WORLD CUP Sccctf-rninii hiu tfjul 1 9 MEMOPAD l.i* lamt « mfdn clugi.

ON THE COVER

* 1 C OtheV Hj)f,i-yli-

-H-xjJv-e «•* rrotj**-

,’( .•-flf 3 Ctff‘tf” 1VV1

* r <>•*• itX’ *-k,*»
fw \ic*v t;’- r*-’ 8

HAlft CARL ‘ur-iw-"'..!-.

· ! i’-AI-pl!. •.’..,!_

c08;

mi . ,v /.- v?*?* miSsiSm =r*:r\ -

HAIR TODAY, YOUNG TOMORROW

I’lfM!:;-1, ,i i, ..e!r.>rfi j-.m’.re. fj’X’i ;•’••>!’•-:: -.. • .• . • ; r-: /. i ,/rv-. av.. ,,,-.-.. BY ELLEN GROVES

c BEAUTY BRANDS’ LATEST ELIXIRS ARE Mf ANT TO KEEP HAIfl

from showing signs o’ age by reinjigofstincj scalps and proteaino, from pollution

H» r, skc skin, changes as oeopte get on in years

“With time, the production of sebum d.mirisheE aid the scalp becomes dry.” sa>o RcJano de la Mr-ens, stitntilic director ai L Oreal Professional Products division, in a release ‘Hair can thus loose its softness, suppleness and shine. rvticro-C’rculalior. and cellular exchanges stow down, the root oses vitality and produces hair that is thinner iino less loned”

From a marketing standpoint. Urgetmg ne aging baby-boomer population is alluring, since <t rep’cserls a growing dcmogfaphic. WorfdwfiO*. there are 629 million people Tore than 60 years old, three-times more than SO years 350. according lo United Nations r««ar:>v m France alone. 30% o’ tr~e population is olc«f than 50.

These baby boomers trave deep pockels, with money lo spend on keeping that youlhM gk>w.
Beauty t-xecj’.ives sse arm-i»gc l’.iir can? is a natural progresson.

“U s related to th* growing trerxJ of anl:-aging skin car,” s<j’d Edma Dobss, product msnage- cf S1oc<holrr-basea Cn’larne Cosmc’.ics. which oebuted » three-urn anti-89 ng line for older hair in mof? Ihari 50 courtnes in October 2005. “The target grot.p ol mature and elderly women is growing, ana they are oofcng ''or prod-uch actaDted 10 their specifk needs “

And thos? needs have shi’ted.

“Krw, ai 60 years 0(0, ynu can SCSI be « h*auli’’ul vvoman—not necessarily [;ust| a grandmother,” lad Muriel Guilto. marketing dir-c-tor of Phyto. owned by the Pans-Dseri Aies Groups.

L’0«e3)’s Kerasiase brara oit,» up with a proctou lor ine scalp and another for the hair lhat are combmeo with a massage in wlnns. Called Age-Re;,st. the th’ee-«ea program said to strengthen O’ten britlle. agtrig h»r, was irtrcd»ci>3 m France 21 the end of February

A rwo-Mep version :’or at-home use bovjed in tandem. It comes in

a set comprisi-ig 10, 6-ml Lxjlttes of UpD-Recha.-ge massatje treat-Tent, said to reinforce the scalp’s hydro-’ipidic film, wmch becomes vveater and more sensitive with age, and to protect ii Irom external factors. D’er? ii also a ?£0-ml jar o< Age Recterge strengthening hair mask, contai.iirwj a cample* designed to reinforce a hair shaft’s CO-e The duo retails for #eu#65 (£45/S78).

Ot’laTe’s tnree-unit aaii Ageing co’lection coruns a slrengthen-ing complex that also p<ov.cjes a film to protect Hair’s surface and ann-oxidanls lo protect hair from damage from pollution, weaihei and cver-s4ylrig.

Th« Ime mduo?s a 250-ml, shampoo snd a 250-ml conditioner both lor #eu#4 50, and a 125-ril mask, for #eu#7.

Wm’e Dobos declined to discuss, specific figures. *,ne said Ine inti-agmg lire has outpec;cxmed ne brand’s exisling Kai.- care collec’ioris.

It’s not just older consumers being targeted by anli-sjing hair care l.nps. ah with sfcin care, some brarxi claim tiir prodjcts have a preveiUlivc fur-.ction, (hat people spring Iroin Ihe age of 30 stojld begin taking steps to fortify their ha’r.

“VW know thai wifr ago, kke tfe Skin, ‘aai-’ becaTies fir~3r and loses its titckness,” sa-d Phyla’s G’.iifk). “earlier arc tMrlwr, v/omen try and stow down aging, and now you can use nair p’oduo for preven-dot. 6ke a ccsmelics cream, when you’re ir you’ Ihir-jes anc fornes.”

Phyto’s :’M>-unit Phytodef siurn is an any-aqirq lino .-.cljdmg a shampoo sam lo restore minerals lo hair’s liter and provide i, protective din on the hair’s surface There ,s also a ser jin—tc be appl’t’d rl»•!Kly lo thn scalp—contamirg Gatjli.ie, Age Deftisr-, j veoetjbff active ingredient that fights free radicals, olackcjrrant seed oil and omega acids, ‘//.itch rre ni! eti :o (xjpnfrte tht1 sc-i’p

The duo comprises a iCO-ml. shampoo snti a SO-ml serum, which retail for #eu#l I a.nd #eu#30. resoeaiYety

Ates sola 90₍&30 until ol Phytodensujm in ll~? ihree rrcns fc -lowing its October 2005 launch A trMtrnent rrast may b? adtiwJ ‘.o the lineup, said Guillo •

• WVO Pl ,M •! V l-IVl HJtl \

With ill unique (anr*pt ARTDCCO <ampNf-menu the tiadidonal prrtn urn

tn oivTidi<£iod vantly ol colcwi. inno-y*tiv< product! jrd tpjicl the lipstick i«*1t’, «y*-<k>v U4M. pro- _s

camoufUg* ‘tuke-ap, jf lo frete a rn»k*-up i/wn fl pro’ei ‘*iu“t. And a very tutteulul b/on colleciior. with

* r*dunt tm ·I

ARTDICOhj

Vt*tcr tfi new (omitq narkali. J pioneer “i jrornatic fool And lund (ire with WCUFEET -I’M) HAND VALANCE. A new q*TMsratK>rt of foot ind h*fvd cre wrth exqumte a’onrwtic coirpotlTiom and pieciotn natural otlt »o eni3ody s new welln«i corxept fw ttie pefi’jmery.

th« piDducti k afio ai ihe ca*t of th* fiew ikin «irt coliecUon with hv-wvjtfve hiqhliqKu like Civijr Uftnq and SiJk Ewentiafe

"w-0-

and premium quality at pikes, Ejiclusively for tr\e voe-fitiaj autiiOr.es boo

eyewear cheated by tfte

nd inake-up artJus o Hcv.

York, Ibtii did Munk, If, many c nei, tuch * the NetherUftds. BIVU w placed e sn 11 DcuqldS perlumcries, Gfllerifi-i lafaycttg m FfancS1 srt ai leading ptrfunx’ftw nd dc|M*t(nem stones jtso oHer-QtVU — Of* of the fastest qp-owv brands in <oirnet!Ci bunci. wvwwbevd.de 1 : t |wj»s#**P8 i/ L

c 12!:

CHINA’S

THE RUB

.’/’, if-:1 M.’!”•<’ :n |>-.’:1,1*° p. r.’..’-.. :’f-!>‘"'. ·.;•’) !•.’-!;’

BYjAME MOIR

C CHINA’S BEAUTY SALON INDUSTRY 15 READYING FOR A FACELIFT.

Ai women across Ihe country spend mor? than ever on beauty treatments, local parlors are coming under intense p.-es>jte (o raiw the bar. Inere are tough times ahed for the majority of small ope’-a tors offering ‘ittle more than a couple 0( beds and one masseuse in a 555-sq.-lt converted apartment

6ui foreign companies that havf started nibbling at (he edges o( this fast-growing market are po.sed to rrake serious progress ir launching their own beauty salons

In most of China’s major cities, th<?y art already making their presence known Japanese brantis such as Nippon Memrc have sought to tap the high end ol the rna-ket, with eigi; ssions in China

Mensrd’s peei Pola just opened -Is second salon in Shanghai in September, where a two-tiouf treatment a! 500 yuan (#eu#62/£43/175) oulstrps (he national average by >•» tines.

Leading the charge, howe/e’, are wlon chains f-om Taiwan and Hong Kong Taipei-based Natural Gea-fty las rolled out 850 salons across China. whHe Hong Kong’s sal Holdings plans to open 100 parlors ow the next five years with jO’nt-venture partners in cities such js Gu»ng;hou, Shenznen and X an.

As they C2rrpelc for nid-renge c-isntetf, <in mcrpite in disposable income ii giving the f-utjt* ch.i“ii an edge. Chinese women can now afford to .avoid the smaller paric-s that haw for years been docjged by tales d( botched treatments »ra dangerous miiaps

Cver ;he past decade, more tan 300.000 people have been injured a a result of shoddy bes.ity treatments, according lo the China Beauty and Hsirc.’C-” 19 Association

More than 2CO.OOO dtiputes involving beauty salons ha>, nnore-ovef, Dcen repoded to the China Cansuner Association since 1995

There are so mary smafl mlprprnr: thiit have got Iwo beds and call themselves beauty parleys,” said 3ernso*ite Lai, uirector o: spa devflrjnmeni at the inangfi-La’s Chi sfia in iharghai, Ahtch was opened in September. “ney »re uswg ia5e< macfires that should be handled by a doctor or professional’

The covefrrteit recently stepped n to force some kind of quality control A dran notice was issued by the Ministry of Commc-ce last

April demanding th? industry set up a “blacklist” system, under which solcis (nat failc-d lo meet basic standards would be reported to the acthor ties

The Chines? ministry 14 also drafting detailed standards lor the industry, wtiich is expected to resull soon in a sta;-ratir,g system China’s 1 72 million beauty parlors will be under pressjre to caK il quits unless they improve their game

flic stakes are h.gh. Rapid growth in Chirac beauty business has turned the soon industry into a huge morveyrr.altei, Sales m 200 leapt 37 5% to 220 billion yuan m i004 ov& 2003. accofdmg to China’s Beauty ana Cosmetic Chamber.

A group of economists a: Beijing Normal University in August, moreover, predicted the sector’s earnings will double over the ne*l five years

Such figures reflect a general boom m cosmetics demand. Average year’/ spending on beauty items has increase ‘rom about 1 yuan n the early Eighths to 25 yuan in moie recent years

‘radilionally. 4O% of c-.Jitomers will visit their local beauty salon once 3 month, while one-third will go to to tnree times monthly Body »nd neck massages are the most popular irestrrents.

“Massages are more important than facials (lot customers!.~ said Amanda Teng. assistant director at the Ei/ian Spa «i Shanghai “Even when r, comes to a ‘aoal, they want a massage throughout”

Customers aie also very sarticjlar anout the (acid prodi.rts u;eo in treatments. However, brand iecogr.;tion is still .orw coiiparocf to what it is oviyse»i

Yet that’s set to change Foreign companies wilh a c.u»lily tract record look s«t to gain a definite edge as skills and service tak? o.-i g’oatcr importance. 6ig mLltina’.ioral biands. stch as Groupe Clams, are r jrcreC :o be eyeing the possihili’y ol open-•ng a bouly salon ir- Shanghai

And Teng expects foreign competition to miensily

“I have been hedrmp news o’ a lo’. of spa companies coming in over the netf half year.” she explained

This is echoed by Lai. who added. “I trunk it’s a( happening it’s all go-go out there “ •

(pO

14: BY ST?PHAN;E EPIRO

ITALY

CHANGES

TACK C IN THE WAKE OF A THREE-YEAR S4.UMR ITALY’S BEAUTY INDUSTRY 15 GEARING UP FOR

iorve rritijut clwnges—both dl home and abroad.

·ry 2005 (the latest year’s statistics available dt p-ess lime) the business’ w« were expected 1= use ;ust 2 /% (o #eu#7 4 billion (CS 1 biilion/48.9 b.ilion) over 20Ot, according lo Unipro. Ihe Itahan sssoc i( on of cwnencs induslrre-

The Kalian econcmy is re.illy sufferi’ig, and tha’. -. reflectiry) back on Ihe induslry.” said Fcbio Frarxhina. Uriipro’s new president. “We are facmy tvjij irajor problems We need to gro*’ outside the countr/, and in:e’nal y. we need tc have ir evolution in fw mdi.rry For Italian beauly companies lo move ahead no/;, they c.eed 10 specialize in somet’icng that’s ol great quality and great serwcc “

Gter ut:n Jonetti. vi.e presic<>,“t of strategies and business oevdopmenl ol Ihe Deborah G’ouj. agreed, saying. “You cVl depend on the UaSan market anymore “

Nunwous iaclOrs have con|nbuted to tts pntnomtnon Among them was the introduction ol Ite euro, which drove corsjmer gcods- prices up and Helped drrve down consjmf’r conh-defice, ‘Mitch nov.’ is at Us lowest since 1996. said Oma Sch*zen Nolarber, maniqiriq directoi Ol Ihe Estfe lander Cos Itaiy. Further, beajty manufacturers hav* only recently begun drversity 19

INeir p/oa jcl oHer to mee( the needs o* an increasingly seg.-renfed trad? channel, m which pharmacies and Netbai stares have gained muide. she acfdetf

There’s been ramped up compenuor -torn Asl, as wed.

“We Can”, conoete ‘«th China on pac<3ging. pronodon and rrukeup ii’.s .1 (act. v.’hat llalran cosrnetics producers n»ed to cio no* i ef;ecUVfrly red*xe costs of picducxion wh le not losing the cuaiity that we are tamous for,” said Robefto Manone. chairman of ITF-ICR

Cnar.ges re expected to uke place on luty’i. beauty retail front, too.

“Italian consumers like the ease of buying their procure in pe.-lurrecies wilhin stores, and Ihe market is slartinr; to shilt [in that direcliori],” said AJIredo GrasseMi. i partner at cranage-mam corsj’Wncy Bain & Co.. re(emrw) 30(ticulor)y to new beauly coiner f<ymats m ng coi-ceived ‘.<y supermarkets.

He adderj thai half of Italian consumers still prefer buyirig makeup from traditiorui perfumeries, However Yet such perfumeries, in turr. aie Itekng ‘.he heat from mass-mart”:! beai/:y sellers. And “Jie resjlting once w has picked up spead over tne past ihre* years.

Mxzzeten. amoig Italy’s most prestigious perturnery chains, with fr/e stores m Milan and 23 Ofcfnpic slcres elsew-wre ii Italy, is leading & group of pcrftrr-E-nei, irv:ljding Gruppo Garbo, Ross Bianca 4,10 Deswee, intent on siaoiliarg prices.

“We want 10 work together to mate a s-..ir\o 01 b-ands that should rwve similar prices m per-ftrrrtcs across fre board,” ia:d Antonefla Mandcfl:, generfil rranagef of fvfazzolan. “How can you stii a customer sooeti-irtg if she kiows sha can get it down the street with a big discount’”

c ITALY 115 f

fai other retailers. Ihei’ locus mate thar ever is on customer service. ‘Prices drf- reolly impS’taTl. hj: we will invest mo’c mor thi1* /iv.r on bi’’.1(?r r>cj i;hv nuali-ly of (‘jr rr-f’.ce,” wo S’.pfari<j Bif«ji. curnmerc l o rector of l-moni

Other manufacturers are changing their production lo lo’.vw-pixed beauty goods. Massimo 3*»d n, commercial iJjfHClor o’ Vtaviicea. ,i two-y wr-Did corrpany tha”. produces per’ jmery ! nes destined lor the youth rrjrkei, such as Sweet ymjs anc Billionaire, wd Me comaany’s solei growth of S4% to #eu#6 milVon last year was ta’Hy d’ivi>n by fragrances costing less thn #eu#30.

‘Ouf co’isurws ‘yyouh \n money, but tney woit lo c“Te 1010 <i perfumery ard bjy a good-qcaiiiy p’oducl—our lines are really acce>s-b.e.’ he said ‘ [ trwfifc th& fulian pvrlumefy ol the lutbre will bt one that sells a lot o’ products with s price range from #eu#0,50 to #eu#200.”

U ira-expws.ive bea’y items ate wiling w<>ll n lialy tx(»cu( i’ts 11 ppr1inneri(>s Mtjzolari and Limoni recorded sfong sacs o’ uber-prestige products, surh ss Estee Laucsr’s Re-Nuinv Re-Oeation cream, which goes few #eu#500

“Ntce grovth is comirig from the eery selective, h gb-posicned btandi.” vi d Estee Laudef’s Nofarber. “This segment has not been :mpaaeci Dy the decline in corsump:jon i’slee Uuder brand, lite Re-Nutrw Re-Cieation and U mot. ver/ selectively drslnbuted. are pan of this trend “

However, the biggest groivth lor Italy’s beauty bxiimess 15 predicled to item from exports

You can’t depend on the Italian market anymore.

— Gianluca Bonetti, vice president of strategic development of the Deborah Group

r At press lime, sles abroad were expected to have Hi»n 6.5% to reach C2 13 bdl’O.T m 2005 versus 2004

Russia and China are convdered icey marge’s for Ine -ndustry Export sof?* there Irorn Ifaiy wife believec to increase 4’i % and 133%. respc-ct uely. in 20CLi A relatrvel/ new eniry on (he expcn: ;ti?rie la: Uly s Vietnam. Saiss lo that country spiko-i ISO’Vi for ihe firvt three qua’lers o: 2005 versus 2004. s;in U:npro.

Most Italian beauty executives reqstd expoitino as v.ey to si.irvwal. Even hisiorically Italy-cenlnc comp.in’aj, such cs Deborah Group, have Degjn exploring new hor sons For example, the company plas to export its Hea”;S & Color line ic tvjo new rrarkets—i!*e U.K. and U S —b/ 2008

Ferfjgjrr Paihuns K arnc-’ig lh( m.iriy Italian corroni?s gearirg iu si.vtccy ‘.ord iePing in Asian Countries, where it is enjoirr relaii SLCceii

luciro Benme’li. perfumes division directoi o) ferragamDParfums. jaid thr> company had achievixi «traordiriary sales in liper—ivhere -ey ir.cieased 35% in 2005, and in Korea, where Fcrrarjomo Psrfjrns is the sav«r,th !:eslselliii(i brsnd Set ‘.o launT a new women’s Saivaw.’e Fercagamo scent this spring. Ihe compiny-’5 fragrance arm will invest in television acK’e.’l ‘, ng (or ‘.he IrH time in /spar <;rid Kor₍?D FoirdQ-virc: Parfums will clso rework the juice of iiTianue Uncjaro’s Apparition IragrfliiKc-. ; nc t was considered loo sweet b/ scwre Asian reloilers. The re-launch is expectsd next year.

“Korea dnd }apan are markets “.hst ate rtirmnq 3t too sneed for u*.” sad Eert iel[i “It’s an ry v;orld “h?l presents thousands of opponur tioi [hat we will be par of “ •

16; PACK AGING

·II n .’. .’I -,’••’( •;!

PACKING A PUNCH

...:”,.:<•, -.i.m-w .-/,: -..-/!•: BYBRIDCOSILuLO

31 n’<i-g lijhti, zsny holograms s.id flashy games. Sound i ke a scene from Las Vega;’ Maybe But if packaging designers have their way, perfumery and supemnarlw! cosmetics she’ves will look ;jst os g ityy in the very near futu<f Creators are busy curicociTY) nt?w1a“r.!ed, ''igh-iecn methods to attract shoppers’ attention Arri iVsa gooc tiling, considering the ficustvxjs of new products n ttng be<iuly counti’-s yearly, making stateTiem-rriakincj paramount. Here. WWD ln:erna;ior>al Beauty Report reports on some new designs likely (o cause an m-store st-r.

fSCREEN SCENt

Siemens has aeaied technology that will allow brands la bring

their products’ packaging to I lo

The Mjnich-based firm ,s perfect.ng ‘reraatjre srrr-ens to display animated graphics—siicr- as advertising, hcw-io *-;tn.:tions or computer ganws—on labels

"[The tech.iologyl cculd be ui«l or Jiy kind of packagng.’ saia s conpany sookeinan

Such displays show images in coto* d can b« printed on paser-loi! labe 1. They u.’crk naik to clfctroctuixnic materials, which chafige cokx when ar tlcifical volt afte/s tKif molecules’ charge. as this shilts. the cokus al!er ‘.n create the &ffe<i ol moving pictuies The labels s-c charged ijsirg pnntabie batteries that last (of sewaf months.

Such animated labels are expected lo be commercially avail-ab’S pexi yr»<j(

Siemens louis the technology as bc-irg «cwsiblc lor any •ndcislry and dislrSxiiion channel—ncludmy tnt mass- osrket. That’s beca jse Ihe cost per -abd H likely be in cents, not euros, the company spokesman said.

Mf.TAL WORKS

A pair of eyes appfjirs and disappears •<; a customer strolls around a stoce Bui it’s not an over-zealous SJles assisiani lollow-ing her .i-ocrid Rather, it “b the la’.est packaging lof an eye cream tea’.u’ing holog’sptm print.

N’-elalF«, a Leeds, England-based company, has developed Holcrn. 3 printing system that enables images to appear am: diitippH>H dtccfdtng to changes ol light It c<)n holograms.

“We’io adtliny vdliQ w Ih ?n auractive finish/ Sheppard. friafkttmg maragr al the firrn “II puts (a brand using the technology] ihead of the crowd ‘

foe the beauty industry, Met/itFx’s metallic pnn;ing technology could allow cosmetics brands to rep/oduce shimmering mateup shades on pacicagi.ig and advertising

Th? ‘.echnology is ai’eoY bemg used on some ‘oad and toy packacj.ng. added

Sflff SCEN1
Sc«tSauol fhnoiogtes is venous aba’Jt secunry So much io, *n fart, tht the Jenkmto-.vn, PerrByrvanic-based lirn-: has developed 3 fragrance encapsj)atn)r techrr>locy fwl bis shopoers smell a pron-ua wnhou) aca.afiy rr?ddlmg witn the substance iell

“Most p«>p((» who ‘juy a shampoo 03*« il ar.d sn%ell it.” ssid Steven .andau, c\«?.’ te.:hno!.’:qy of cer at the firm, idclirg companies shy away (rum using ljmp<ff-proc’ seafe as thit could imp-xle the shopaer s p jfchjss decisoi But this cculd have a senojs dowi xidt ‘If you don’t p.n ,1 twn;>pr-*vitk>rl sys’.i-iii in pjce. your product is potentially exposed, and someone could tamper win the proriurt,” said Uncta.i

To cisure tne sa’ety of a fomiula. ScentSatioral TechTolcyit-i aPoA-s brancfc, to injecl th* scent ol tne’ snarrpoo. for eiample, into the lid of tie pack-Xing, so thct when shoppers open il they can sme1’ tie product’s Ddo’ frcrr. (he cap, while the hctcwd remains proteoed try a safety seal,

“They prohshy wojWr’l re-sli/e (the smell was coning from the cap),” said Landau, acdrig ‘.he coil ol suo a system is mm.mai. eshnnated al less tnan one cent per product.

is • MARX f TIN G*1EDI/\ *“ll A -V-H’UfJ ‘ · t-.-.i’i : mi .”• -.1 -i

MARKETERS HAVE A BALL

< C .).(..••’ i’., .’•’(. ’’-,:‘- i’’. ••.,;.:,••/.’!•’ ••... *.’ .;• <,: ,r -.- sli.. .. m . u :,.

by .melissa drier, with contributions from ellen groves and brid costello

TO HELP KICK OFF THE WORLD CUP SOCCER CHAMPIONSHIPS

in Germany, from June 9 10 Ju y 9, (He beauty industry rs putting togethe’ a learn of special-edition proajcls.

Soccer fans might -wer lave been particularly known for their swect-smeiiirg behavior Bu1 Coty Beauty, lor one, sees huge potfilisl m us Adidas Victory Leaci.s men’s dagrancf line, du? out in April m mass-market door; in Europe, the Middle and Far tasl. plt.s Utin Amend

“W.th 300 mii’ion spectators, it is a unique occasion lor Adidas,” said Murel Pjii, rrarket ng director st Coty Beauty. rei?rring to the event s rtidespread -ru.ilia coverage bringing the matches into homes around the globe

The brand’s special-edition lin? lor men. including aT eau de toilette, a1tersi.3v«, shower gel aid ceoaorant, ringc in prke from #eu#3 50 (£2 40/14,20) to #eu#13 8C.

Coty intends to beat the score set by its previous soccer scents (for tie Ejro 200 competition, fiy ir.3tittc.e, it sold 4 4 million umti) Executives banking on Adidas’s high visibility as one of the Worln Cup official sponsors are target’ng global sales ol 7 million un s lor Adidos Victory League

In France and Germany, the collect’on will be auailabl* in a gift scr,, ca led the Support’s Kn. wntch indudes lace paints m each padicipat ng co-i*r.r’,’’s na’jonal colors

Adtdai hos also crealeo a soccer drcam’team to auvsrtise the t?<in<j tt plans lo run 12 dt’lerenl posters, each starring a high-p’ofi e p’ayer, includric) Frfir-;6v. Zmodine Zidane and Frigl-ird’s Dsv.a Becicham.

Puma, which sponsors various World Cup IMms, such aj Italy, Gtaia and Ser-ietwl. is atte* soccer-tovinc guys and gals with its Iragrancft duo. Puma Um ted Edroon V/arr-an and tn, which was launched m Waich. The fragrances en- pactageo in f?d lot ‘net and bue ‘or him, with a s-Tcrfi b3!i-s.lap«<i wwci3’.\ cut mlo their s-j:er boxes. Prices for the line, also including shower gel and body lotion, are #eu#10 to #eu#15,

While produce’ Procter & Ganbte cuecotitfM rensined mjm on a sales target, industry sources eiti.T.dl? the line vviB bnng in #eu#60 rmBran at retail in <cs (ksi year

Douglas Pcrfumwi« also caugnt soccer fever in March, when it uffered an exclusive or the licensed men World cud fragrance,

,1IIftITlSjl I ; nilfill 1 Wi<i II

FIFA WM 2fX>5 Available in Douglaj doors m Gernany, Holland, Switerland. Itaty, France. Span. Po-iugal. Hurgary, Poland, Slovakia, the C2ech Republic and Denmark, plus Douglas online. the 100-ml. eau de lotiette spray retails lor #eu#29 95.

“It’s pedsrnirMj faitas’.icjlty and <s a top’SeHer at the momer.t,” said a Douglas spokesman “V/’omen are buying il tor men; collectors ft srappirg it up. and it’s sure lo be a prized ;ou-venir during the World Cup “

There are numerous toiletries products out with World Cup thernes. including Rexona’s deodorant, introduced m February. 10 help lans keep lh»ir coot Tie Uiiiover-owned brand launched the Imnited-eri’tion Men Sport jrocuct packaged in colors of participating nations, irckjo’ng France. Brazil. Ger.rary and Poland r>*e 200-ml can. priced f.( #eu#3 3S contains an aitii)crwirani ageT billed to redtce r-j-n.dity by 40%.

OlfKisi World Cos partaer Gillette lauichecf a shaving get witl’. patkacirg spcrtmg the tournameni’i logo to go ivith the introduction of its MachJ Power Nitro razor in January. The P&G-owned braid ntroduced the razor, (or #eu#5 53, and gets, liorn #eu#4. in the (J K.. Spain. Portugal. I’jly and Gernvsny. And vi? tors ;.o Giletie’s v.-ostte can compete to win much sought-after World Cup tickets

ATsrig tile earsest in ihc <wrne v;as L nk Orar-a Saint ons, of Criesterfield. Erg a/icf, ;\nich created a greeting products line under license for trgidnc s Football Association. Ih.L1 toiltjciiori. CfitTiprising l\.vo .howr” eels, two r-i-O’Joranl %pr_rjys anc a umje o> gift se’.s. is available in two sc«r ts. “Horti1” and ‘Awjy “ it boi’.i’d in Samsburys supermarkst c>‘iain dur-Tg the holidays

“0,jr wgf’-. Tiarkot is <nlo footbal, saiC man.wjir:.’) erector Ivar feygan. nonno ihe products have been sei ng v.’pif ift both gills ano perwral items Over the CHnstmas poriod dtene, 100,000 gif’ vte w,iih an ,iverao» retail price of £b 95 were sc-ia However, Tagge’l expects sales to increase ten- to Iwenryfold tn the run-up to the World C jo.

He uncertirod, howevt”, that as’.utc brsno’ing is ley for a product’s longevity fotlov.-irg Ih? soccer season,

“II rt’s purely a brand-slaeomg exercise on a weak product, theie’s not too r-mch to be (joined in (he rt«v(;top.-r.ew ol the male grooming market,’ ne said. «

ill!cCCLICK CAFES Lynx has often boasted that its odiferous body sprays help males attract iema« acmrws, And recently, the Unilever-owred men’s beauty b’end was out to prove it Oaring the month of March, the brand (a k.a Axe, in France) ran “Click Caies” around Europe that wore rnsoired by its latest fragrance, dick

The spaces, created lo attract students, we’e full o-’ attractive girls hired by Lynx Boys entering the caf<X were ;jd«ed on ihsnr powers of uetkrccicn by <}>r\\ storing IH«m with clicks of hand held giirnos The highest -scoring guy at e.xn event then txad hts p<cture I3ki»n—in n pose like tn<J( of actor Ben Afleck ir> an earliei A*e commercial—and then the image was displayed in the cafe where she event was he’d.

“Young people like to keep score on everything.” explained a spokesman ‘or th? Lynx brand adding that “click dating.” a ta’<e on spe&d dating, was also amor.g the Cl :k Cafes’ gM-mee-ts-boy acuvMtes.

ONLJNi TIME

‘Parfjmi Hermfrs tried to r.c”. male consumers via the Internet fcr Is ‘’.tsl fragrance bo’offi it hit sheK/es-

Tue company ran terre-el-ciel com. a site dedicated to its men’s scent ferri’ d’rtermSs, from feb 19 (0 March 4, two weeks before tSe product’s m-store launch lf.d\ day, information panair irg ;o tlie scent’s concept was revealed on ‘.he- site Meanwhile, a ;tock counted down line to when the site •, ‘ull Durpase would bf reveaied.

1h<> idea was to generate t-jn in a non-cociine’cio! way, ssid an Hernies spokeinnar

“What we wanted with the icea ol introd.jcmg lh<‘veteiw before insoctiiCing •.hs crocluct was to co itep-by-nep, creat-ifKj desire “ he said. *“wVe didn’t want i( to

ibe very branded on pjrpose because it’; a“cMt the experience Imfceri tc lie ur verse

, ot 1crr» d’Herms “

COMPETrnvE BRAMO Wen are oftc-i fourd racing ou! of per-’umerips That’s why Formula One star David CcuHhard’s nen’s grooming line, Pel? ?3 liot, was deiKjned to give meti a break from visiting stores altogether

Introduced in March, if1-? ‘.lirw-unit Irca’fneT, collection—including a 40-rnf. face ‘jvM’i, a dD-ml sitjving (cam and a 3C-ml montu.’i.riftg twlm for JJi (#eu#J4.g’£)9,50)—is delivered a meetly to custsmers’ doors. Store-averse shoppers car buy ih? pjoductj onl ne snd fcv«n have theii order aolorrwtic3)ry renewed rrantMy.

“People J>e really busy,” wid XfStine Sparks, marketing a1.rector at Norfolk. England-based Direct Beauty Products, thj brand’s producer “We’re all looking for faster ways to gel things done. Women enjoy pidorxj aat ‘.heir cosrru;1! ;a. but mor den t so much. This is a very simple way of receiving your essentials each month “

t-’AUKI. TlNG’Mt MA I

! FRAGRANCE FEATURE

; Esquire magazine teameo wi;h Elizabeth Araen to host a conpeutior promol-ng (he Provocative Woman scent For the

I everii, tsquin? j;’<ed reader? to nominate I thoir parrien to stsr in it p’loirishoo* ‘ inspired by the fragrance.

“The feature brings interesting content and cx’Autiful photography to the maca>

1 7ine.” i3id Helen Brock lebank group pro-

; motions dircclor at NeiMag. bsquire’s parent company. “Trvui ‘J’is comnetiuon,

: readers can see what men reallv vie* as
! sexy in a woman, including personality and

· rot just looks “

Five finalists will appear in the fcur-paae piece, which is lo be in magazine’s Apr! issue

PREEMPTIVE ACTION

Kingfi’’.pr Airhres is offfing fragrances ana cosmetics for free to travelers belore they t?vpn get to the airport

Th? ndar sirBne gives beauty product

vouchers v.ilund at 4,000 rupees : (#eu#7V£S2S90) lo its rui’onwrs jaendmq ‘ ‘0.000 oipees or mo-f on a pair of air ‘ tickets The couoons are then redppmanle ‘ in department stores aid rwf’jmery

chains m Inda. me ud ng Shopaers” Shea
ana Life Slyt*

i The proqrarTi. »/vhich was kkWd ofl on j la.i. 23 ard rjrrs thrcjql’ June 30. A calico | Sc*nl oi Good Times. ] “The idea bwvd the scheme is lo asso-; ciate w th like-m nded leading internior.al ! Drands to provide maximum value lo our ‘ guRsw rtnd also create an opportunrty lo

com-runkata with :(•« retevarit target aud-! ence Inraugh i non<onventiondl plat-I forrr.” wd Girrsti y-.sh, general manaQer • of rrvtAertfn} fr;,’ the a rlne, in a statmienl 19(a\


	Very truly yours,
	/s/ Christopher D. Lueking

	Christopher D. Lueking
	of LATHAM & WATKINS LLP


Grant	Strike		Options
Date	Price		Granted
2/26/2004	$	1.65		628,029
5/18/2004		1.65		254,000
6/21/2004		1.65		550,000
7/15/2004		1.65		235,000
10/26/2004		1.65		406,000

				2,073,029
7/19/2005		2.10		1,115,815
10/25/2005		2.10		197,000

				1,312,815
4/26/2006		2.60		1,230,000
10/24/2006		5.80		755,000
12/20/2006		5.80		120,000

				2,105,000
2/28/2007		7.52		58,000
5/15/2007		7.89		70,000
7/18/2007		9.99		888,000
7/18/2007		16.00		500,000

				1,516,000


Grant	Strike		Options
Date	Price		Granted
2/26/2004	$	2.61		396,914
5/18/2004		2.61		160,528
6/21/2004		2.61		347,600
7/15/2004		2.61		148,520
10/26/2004		2.61		256,592

				1,310,154
7/19/2005		3.32		705,195
10/25/2005		3.32		124,504

				829,699
4/26/2006		4.11		777,360
10/24/2006		9.18		477,160
12/20/2006		9.18		75,840

				1,330,360
2/28/2007		11.90		36,656
5/15/2007		12.48		44,240
7/18/2007		15.81		561,216
7/18/2007		25.32		316,000

				958,112


cc:		Gregg R. Bodnar Robert Guttman, Esq. Seth Diehl