XML 32 R17.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.8.0.1
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2017
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]  
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Goodwill

The table below summarizes changes in goodwill recorded by the Company during the periods ended December 31, 2017 and 2016:
 
December 31,
2017
 
December 31,
2016
Beginning balance, January 1
$
66,351

 
$
65,982

Additions
3,132

 
369

Ending balance
$
69,483

 
$
66,351



At December 31, 2017, goodwill totaled $69.5 million, of which $33.8 million relates to the marine segment and $35.7 million relates to the concrete segment.
                                                
Additions to goodwill in 2017 were attributable to the acquisition of TBC. The additions above represent goodwill calculated for the acquisition at the date of closing, plus the working capital adjustment which was all attributable to goodwill. Additions to goodwill in 2016 were attributable to the acquisition of TAS (See Note 3).

As discussed previously in Note 2, goodwill is reviewed at a reporting unit level for impairment annually as of October 31 or whenever circumstances arise that indicate a possible impairment might exist. Test of impairment requires a two-step process to be performed to analyze whether or not goodwill has been impaired. Step one of the October 31, 2017 goodwill impairment test resulted in no indication of impairment for either reporting unit, and no events have occurred since that date that would require an interim impairment test. The discount rate used in testing goodwill for impairment for the marine segment was 35.0%, and the fair value of the reporting unit exceeded carrying value by 12.8%. The fair value of the marine reporting unit was $212.0 million, and the carrying value was $188.0 million. The discount rate used in testing goodwill for impairment for the concrete reporting unit was 30.0%, and the fair value of the reporting unit exceeded carrying value by 13.7%. The fair value of the concrete reporting unit was $153.0 million, and the carrying value was $134.5 million.

Intangible assets

The tables below present the activity and amortizations of finite-lived intangible assets:

 
December 31,
2017
 
December 31,
2016
Intangible assets, January 1
$
34,362

 
$
34,362

Additions
878

 

Total intangible assets, end of year
35,240

 
34,362

 
 

 
 
Accumulated amortization, January 1
$
(19,220
)
 
$
(11,933
)
Current year amortization
(4,736
)
 
(7,287
)
Total accumulated amortization
(23,956
)
 
(19,220
)
 
 

 
 
Net intangible assets, end of year
$
11,284

 
$
15,142



Finite-lived intangible assets were acquired as part of the purchase of TBC, which included contractual backlog and customer relationships. Contractual backlog was valued at approximately $0.1 million and was amortized over seven months in 2017. Customer relationships were valued at approximately $0.7 million and will be amortized over seven years. Both of these assets will be amortized using an accelerated method based on the pattern in which the economic benefits of the assets are consumed. For the year ended December 31, 2017, $4.7 million of amortization expense was recognized for these assets. In 2017 and 2016, the Company evaluated the useful lives of these finite-lived intangible assets and no change was needed. Future expense remaining of approximately $11.3 million will be amortized as follows:
2018
$
3,389

2019
2,640

2020
2,069

2021
1,521

2022
1,239

Thereafter
426

 
$
11,284


Additionally, the Company has one indefinite-lived intangible asset, a trade name, which is tested for impairment annually on October 31, or whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the trade name may not be recoverable. Impairment is calculated as the excess of the trade name’s carrying value over its fair value. The fair value of the trade name is determined using the relief from royalty method, a variation of the income approach. This method assumes that if a company owns intellectual property it does not have to "rent" the asset and is, therefore, "relieved" from paying a royalty. Once a supportable royalty rate is determined, the rate is then applied to the projected revenues over the expected remaining life of the intangible assets to estimate the royalty savings. This approach is dependent on a number of factors, including estimates of future growth and trends, royalty rates, discount rates and other variables. The impairment test concluded that the fair value of the trade name was $9.2 million, and the carrying value was $6.9 million, therefore no impairment was recorded.