XML 29 R7.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.2.0.727
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2015
Notes to Financial Statements  
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Investments

 

Investments that are purchased and held principally for the purpose of selling them in the near term are classified as “trading securities” and reflected on the balance sheet at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses included in earnings. All the Company’s investments are considered “trading securities” at December 31, 2014. During the six months ended June 30, 2015, the Company sold all investments and received cash proceeds of $35,970.  The Company recorded realized losses of $11,946 upon the sale.

 

Intangible Assets

 

The Company’s intangible assets consist of technology licenses and are carried at the legal cost to obtain them. Intangible assets are amortized using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life. Useful lives on technology licenses are 5 to 15 years.

 

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

 

The Company groups its assets and liabilities measured at fair value, in three levels based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value.  Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (an exit price).

 

Financial instruments with readily available active quoted prices or for which fair value can be measured from actively quoted prices generally will have a higher degree of market price observability and a lesser degree of judgment used in measuring fair value.

 

The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:

 

 Level 1 – Valuation is based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.  Valuations are obtained from readily available pricing sources for market transactions involving identical assets or liabilities.

 

 Level 2 – Valuation is based on observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

 

 Level 3 – Valuation is based on unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.  Level 3 assets and liabilities include financial instruments whose value is determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, as well as instruments for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation.

 

In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy.  In such cases, an instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.  The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the financial instrument.

 

The Company recognizes transfers between levels at the end of the reporting period as if the transfers occurred on the last day of the reporting period.

 

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at June 30, 2015 are summarized below:

 

  June 30, 2015  
  Level 1   Level 2   Level 3   Fair Value  
Current Liabilities:                        
       Derivative warrant liability   $ -     $ -     $ 1,628,343     $ 1,628,343  
                                 

 

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at December 31, 2014 are summarized below:

 

    December 31, 2014  
    Level 1     Level 2     Level 3     Fair Value  
Current Assets:                        
       Trading securities   $ 39,930     $ -     $ -     $ 39,930  
Current Liabilities:                                
       Derivative warrant liability   $ -     $ -     $ 1,354,319     $ 1,354,319  

 

The following table sets forth the changes in the estimated fair value for our Level 3 classified derivative warrant liability:

 

    Six Months Ended     Six Months Ended  
    June 30, 2015     June 30, 2014  
Fair value at beginning of period   $ 1,354,319     $ 2,549,196  
                 
Modification and reclassification of outstanding warrants     -       114,923  
 Change in fair value     274,024       625,165  
Fair value at end of period   $ 1,628,343     $ 3,289,284  

 

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

 

In April 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2015-03, 'Interest - Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs”. ASU 2015-03 is intended to simplify the presentation of debt issuance costs. These amendments require that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs are not affected by the amendments in this ASU. This new guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently in the process of evaluating the impact of the adoption of this ASU on the financial statements.

 

In January 2015, FASB issued ASU 2015-01 “Income Statement - Extraordinary and Unusual Items (Subtopic 225-20): Simplifying Income Statement Presentation by Eliminating the Concept of Extraordinary Items”. This ASU removes the concept of an extraordinary item.  Subtopic 225-20, Income Statement - Extraordinary and Unusual Items, required that an entity separately classify, present, and disclose extraordinary events and transactions. Presently, an event or transaction is presumed to be an ordinary and usual activity of the reporting entity unless evidence clearly supports its classification as an extraordinary item.  If an event or transaction meets the criteria for extraordinary classification, an entity is required to segregate the extraordinary item from the results of ordinary operations and show the item separately in the income statement, net of tax, after income from continuing operations. The entity also is required to disclose applicable income taxes and either present or disclose earnings-per-share data applicable to the extraordinary item.  The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015.  Early adoption is permitted provided that the guidance is applied from the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption.  The Company is currently in the process of evaluating the impact of the adoption of this ASU on the financial statements.