XML 83 R15.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Derivative Instruments And Hedging Activities
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2012
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities Disclosure [Abstract]  
Derivative Instruments And Hedging Activities
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
The Company is exposed to interest rate risk associated with fluctuations in the interest rates on its floating-rate debt. In order to manage the risk associated with changes in interest rates on borrowings under the Term Loan, the Company has entered into interest rate derivative agreements to economically hedge a portion of the cash flows associated with the Term Loan.
The Company’s objectives in using interest rate derivatives are to add stability to interest expense and to manage its exposure to interest rate fluctuations. To accomplish these objectives, the Company uses interest rate caps and swaps as part of its interest rate risk management strategy. Interest rate caps involve the receipt of floating-rate amounts from a counterparty if interest rates rise above the strike rate on the contract in exchange for an up-front premium. Interest rate swaps involve the receipt of floating-rate amounts from a counterparty in exchange for the Company making fixed-rate payments over the life of the agreements without exchange of the underlying notional amount.
Interest Rate Cap Agreements
In November 2012, the Company entered into six interest rate cap agreements with a combined $650.0 million notional amount. Under these agreements, the Company made premium payments totaling $0.3 million to the counterparties in exchange for the right to receive payments from them of the amount, if any, by which three-month LIBOR exceeds 1.5% during the agreement period. The cap agreements are effective from January 14, 2013 through January 14, 2015.
During 2011, the Company entered into four interest rate cap agreements with a combined $500.0 million notional amount. Under these agreements, the Company made premium payments totaling $3.7 million to the counterparties in exchange for the right to receive payments from them of the amount, if any, by which three-month LIBOR exceeds 3.5% during the agreement period. The cap agreements are effective from January 14, 2013 through January 14, 2015.
In 2010, the Company entered into four interest rate cap agreements with a combined $1,100.0 million notional amount. Under these agreements, the Company made premium payments totaling $5.9 million to the counterparties in exchange for the right to receive payments from them of the amount, if any, by which three-month LIBOR exceeds 3.5% during the agreement period. The cap agreements are effective from January 14, 2011 through January 14, 2013.
These cap agreements have not been designated as cash flow hedges of interest rate risk for GAAP accounting purposes. Instead, the interest rate cap agreements are recorded at fair value on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet each period, with changes in fair value recorded directly to interest expense, net in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations.
Interest Rate Swap Agreements
There were no interest rate swaps outstanding as of December 31, 2012 or 2011. On January 14, 2011, the Company's two existing interest rate swap agreements terminated. The interest rate swaps hedged a portion of the cash flows associated with the Term Loan. On October 24, 2007, the Company entered into the first swap agreement with a notional amount of $1,500.0 million, and later amended this swap agreement effective July 14, 2009. On November 27, 2007, the Company entered into the second interest rate swap agreement with a notional amount of $700.0 million, which was reduced to $500.0 million as of January 14, 2010.
For the Company’s interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges of interest rate risk for GAAP accounting purposes, the effective portion of the changes in fair value of the swaps was initially recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets and subsequently reclassified into interest expense, net on the Company’s consolidated statements of operations in the period that the hedged forecasted transaction affected earnings. The ineffective portion of the change in fair value of the swaps was recognized directly in interest expense, net. For the Company’s interest rate swap not designated as a cash flow hedge of interest rate risk, changes in fair value of the swap were recorded directly to interest expense, net in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations.
Both of the Company’s interest rate swaps were initially designated as cash flow hedges. However, as a result of the amendment to the $1,500.0 million interest rate swap agreement, the Company prospectively discontinued the hedge accounting on the original interest rate swap agreement. Simultaneously, the Company designated the amended interest rate swap agreement as a cash flow hedge. On December 17, 2010, the Company discontinued the hedge accounting on the amended $1,500.0 million interest rate swap agreement as a result of an amendment to the Term Loan. The Company continued to report the net loss related to the discontinued cash flow hedges in accumulated other comprehensive loss, which was reclassified into earnings on a straight-line basis through January 14, 2011.
There was no loss reclassified into earnings during the year ended December 31, 2012. The amount of the loss reclassified into earnings during the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 was $2.1 million and $38.2 million, respectively.
The Company utilized the hypothetical derivative method to measure hedge ineffectiveness each period for interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges and recorded any ineffectiveness directly in interest expense, net. The Company recognized no gains or losses due to hedge ineffectiveness during the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The Company recognized a net non-cash gain of $62.2 million due to hedge ineffectiveness during the year ended December 31, 2010.
The following table summarizes the classification and fair value amounts of derivative instruments reported in the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2012 and 2011:
(in millions)
Balance Sheet Location
 
Derivative Assets
 
Derivative
Liabilities
 
 
 
December 31,
 
December 31,
 
 
 
2012
 
2011
 
2012
 
2011
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate cap agreements
Other assets
 
$
0.1

 
$
0.7

 
$

 
$


Derivative instruments carried at fair value as of December 31, 2012 were classified in the fair value hierarchy as follows:
(in millions)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Total
Interest rate cap agreements
$

 
$
0.1

 
$

 
$
0.1


The fair value of the Company’s interest rate caps is classified as Level 2 in the hierarchy. The valuation of the interest rate cap agreements is derived by using a discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash receipts that would occur if variable interest rates rise above the strike rate of the caps. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the cap agreements, including the period to maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs, including LIBOR curves and implied volatilities. The Company also incorporates credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect the respective counterparty’s nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements. The counterparty credit spreads are based on publicly available credit information obtained from a third party credit data provider.
The effect of derivative instruments on the consolidated statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 was as follows:
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(in millions)
Amount of Loss Recognized in
Interest Expense, net
 
 
2012
 
 
2011
 
 
2010
 
Interest rate cap agreements
$
(0.9
)
 
 
$
(4.2
)
 
 
$
(4.7
)
 
Total
$
(0.9
)
 
 
$
(4.2
)
 
 
$
(4.7
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(in millions)
Amount of Loss Recognized in
Other Comprehensive Income
(Effective Portion)
 
 
2012
 
 
2011
 
 
2010
 
Interest rate swap agreements
$

 
 
$

 
 
$
(35.7
)
(2) 
Total
$

 
 
$

 
 
$
(35.7
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Amount of Loss Reclassified
from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
into Interest Expense, net
(Effective Portion)
 
 
2012
 
 
2011
 
 
2010
 
Interest rate swap agreements
$

 
 
$
(2.8
)
(1) 
 
$
(77.3
)
(3) 
Total
$

 
 
$
(2.8
)
 
 
$
(77.3
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Amount of Gain
Recognized in Interest Expense,
net
(Ineffective Portion)
 
 
2012
 
 
2011
 
 
2010
 
Interest rate swap agreements
$

 
 
$

 
 
$
25.8

(4) 
Total
$

 
 
$

 
 
$
25.8

 
(1)
The Company reclassified realized losses of $2.8 million from accumulated other comprehensive loss to net income, or $1.9 million net of tax as reflected on the Company's consolidated statement of shareholders' equity (deficit).
(2)
The Company recorded changes in unrealized losses of $35.7 million in accumulated other comprehensive loss. A net amount of $32.1 million was reflected in the consolidated statement of shareholders’ equity (deficit), primarily due to a deferred tax adjustment of $3.8 million applied to a portion of this amount.
(3)
The Company reclassified realized losses of $77.3 million from accumulated other comprehensive loss to net loss, or $47.3 million net of tax as reflected in the consolidated statement of shareholders’ equity (deficit).
(4)
The Company recorded a net, non-cash gain of $25.8 million in earnings, primarily comprised of the $62.2 million gain representing the cumulative change in the fair value of the amended swap, partially offset by the $38.2 million of loss reclassified to earnings related to the discontinued and de-designated swaps.
The Company had no derivative instruments with credit-risk-related contingent features that were in a liability position as of December 31, 2012.