Nevada
|
20-8642477
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|
27 North 27th Street, Suite 21G, Billings, Montana
|
59101
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip Code)
|
(406) 294-9765
|
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
|
Large accelerated filer ¨
|
Accelerated filer ¨
|
Non-accelerated filer ¨
|
Smaller reporting company x
|
Exhibit
|
Description of Exhibit
|
|
31.1*
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
32.1*
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
101.INS*
|
XBRL Instance Document
|
|
101.SCH*
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema document
|
|
101.CAL*
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
|
|
101.DEF*
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
|
|
101.LAB*
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
|
|
101.PRE*
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
|
*
|
Filed herewith.
|
AMERICAN EAGLE ENERGY INC.
|
|
(Registrant)
|
|
August 25, 2011
|
/s/ Richard Findley
|
Richard Findley
|
|
President and Chairman
(Principal Executive, Financial and Accounting Officer)
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
|
I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15f) for the Company and have:
|
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
|
|
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
|
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
|
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting; and
|
I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
|
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
|
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.
|
1.
|
The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|
|
2.
|
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|
/s/ Richard Findley
|
|
Richard Findley
|
|
President and Chairman
|
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Parenthetical) (USD $)
|
Jun. 30, 2011
|
Dec. 31, 2010
|
---|---|---|
Oil and gas properties - subject to amortization, accumulated depletion | $ 142,079 | $ 113,596 |
Common stock, par value | $ 0.001 | $ 0.001 |
Common stock, shares authorized | 150,000,000 | 150,000,000 |
Common stock, shares outstanding | 43,374,158 | 37,540,000 |
Short-term Debt | Convertible Debenture
|
 |  |
Discount | 496,601 | Â |
Long-term Debt | Convertible Debenture
|
 |  |
Discount | Â | 926,333 |
Long-term asset retirement obligation
|
 |  |
Discount | $ 44,090 | $ 23,647 |
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (USD $)
|
3 Months Ended | 6 Months Ended | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Jun. 30, 2011
|
Jun. 30, 2010
|
Jun. 30, 2011
|
Jun. 30, 2010
|
|
Oil and gas revenues | $ 10,437 | Â | $ 46,477 | Â |
Gain on sale of oil and gas properties - not subject to amortization, net of costs | 2,085,627 | Â | 2,085,627 | Â |
Total revenue | 2,096,064 | Â | 2,132,104 | Â |
Operating expenses: | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Oil and gas operating expenses | 71,042 | Â | 117,676 | Â |
General and administrative | 167,722 | 34,708 | 275,072 | 40,048 |
Depreciation, amortization, and depletion expense | 14,278 | Â | 28,482 | Â |
Impairment of oil and gas prospects | Â | 5,937 | Â | 5,937 |
Total operating costs | 439,402 | 106,533 | 871,606 | 180,387 |
Total operating income (loss) | 1,656,662 | (106,533) | 1,260,498 | (180,387) |
Interest expense | (20,000) | (16,667) | (40,000) | (16,667) |
Accretion of debenture discount | (198,231) | (11,688) | (429,733) | (11,688) |
Accretion of discount on asset retirement obligation | (358) | Â | (707) | Â |
Income (loss before taxes | 1,438,073 | (134,888) | 790,058 | (208,742) |
Provision for income taxes | ||||
Net income (loss) | 1,438,073 | (134,888) | 790,058 | (208,742) |
Net income (loss) per common share: | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Basic | $ 0.03 | $ 0.00 | $ 0.02 | $ 0.00 |
Diluted | $ 0.03 | $ 0.00 | $ 0.02 | $ 0.00 |
Weighted average number of shares outstanding - | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Basic | 43,231,357 | 44,913,334 | 41,299,259 | 44,376,889 |
Diluted | 44,575,384 | 44,913,334 | 42,675,072 | 44,376,889 |
AllOther
|
 |  |  |  |
Operating expenses: | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Professional fees | 148,360 | 35,888 | 382,376 | 59,402 |
Related party
|
 |  |  |  |
Operating expenses: | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Professional fees | $ 38,000 | $ 30,000 | $ 68,000 | $ 75,000 |
Document and Entity Information
|
6 Months Ended | |
---|---|---|
Jun. 30, 2011
|
Aug. 15, 2011
|
|
Document Information [Line Items] | Â | Â |
Document Type | 10-Q | Â |
Amendment Flag | false | Â |
Document Period End Date | Jun. 30, 2011 | |
Document Fiscal Year Focus | 2011 | Â |
Document Fiscal Period Focus | Q2 | Â |
Trading Symbol | AMZG | Â |
Entity Registrant Name | AMERICAN EAGLE ENERGY INC. | Â |
Entity Central Index Key | 0001401983 | Â |
Current Fiscal Year End Date | --12-31 | Â |
Entity Filer Category | Smaller Reporting Company | Â |
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding | Â | 43,374,158 |
"+ text.join( "
\n" ) +"
" + text[p] + "
\n"; } } }else{ formatted = '' + raw + '
'; } html = ''+ "\n"+''+ "\n"+''+ "\n"+' formatted: '+ ( this.Default == 'raw' ? 'as Filed' : 'with Text Wrapped' ) +''+ "\n"+' | '+ "\n"+'
'+ "\n"+' | '+ "\n"+' '+ "\n"+'
'+ "\n"+' | '+ "\n"+' '+ "\n"+'
Convertible Debenture
|
6 Months Ended | ||
---|---|---|---|
Jun. 30, 2011
|
|||
Convertible Debenture |
On
April 15, 2010, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase
Agreement, pursuant to which the Company sold a $1 million Secured,
Convertible Debenture to a third party investor. The
Debenture bears interest at a rate of 8% per
annum. Interest expense related to the Debenture totaled
$20,000 and $40,000 for the three-month and six-month periods ended
June 30, 2011, respectively. Accrued interest payable as
of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 totaled $40,000 and $40,000,
respectively. The Debenture’s original maturity
date was April 15, 2011. On February 24, 2011, the
lender extended the maturity date to April 15,
2012. Accordingly, the Convertible Debenture is
presented as a current and non-current liability on the
Company’s balance sheets as of June 30, 2011 and December 31,
2010, respectively. Interest is payable on a quarterly
basis, either in cash or through the issuance of additional shares
of the Company’s common stock at an initial conversion price
of $1.125 per share, or a combination thereof. The
Debenture is secured by substantially all of the Company’s
existing assets.
At
any time, or from time to time, the holder of the Debenture may
elect to convert all or a portion of the Debenture into shares of
the Company’s common stock. The initial conversion price was
subject to reduction in the event that the Company subsequently
sells, or grants any option to purchase, shares of the
Company’s common stock at an effective price that is less
than the initial conversion price. The initial conversion price was
also subject to reduction in the event that the Company pays
dividends, declares a stock split, or engages into a merger
transaction.
Attached
to the convertible debentures were 416,667 warrants to purchase
shares of the Company’s common stock at an initial exercise
price of $1.20 per share (Note 9). The initial exercise
price was reduced from $1.20 per share to $0.60 per share as a
result of a private placement commitment that was received in
December 2010, which also increased the number of exercisable
warrants from 416,667 to 833,333.
The
Debenture may not be converted if, immediately after, the
conversion would result in the holder of the Debenture possessing a
beneficial ownership interest in excess of 4.99% of the
Company’s then outstanding common shares. Upon
providing 60 days prior written notice, the holder of the Debenture
may increase or decrease such ownership limit, but in no instance
can the ownership limit exceed 9.99% of the Company’s
outstanding shares.
Because
the initial trading value of the Company’s stock on the date
the Debentures were issued was less than the initial conversion
price, the Debentures were not deemed to contain a beneficial
conversion feature at the time the Debentures were initially
sold.
A
portion of the net proceeds from the issuance of the Debenture was
allocated to the warrants and recorded as an increase to additional
paid in capital. Accordingly, the Company recorded an initial debt
discount in the amount of $280,511. The initial debt
discount is being accreted using the straight line method over the
original life of the Debenture. The Company recognized
amortization expense of $35,065 and $105,194 during the three-month
and six-month periods ended June 30, 2011 related to the additional
debt discount. Debt discount accretion for the
three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2010 was
$11,688.
In
December 2010, the Company received an irrevocable commitment to
purchase 5,833,333 shares of its common stock at a price of $0.60
per share (see Note 9). Also in December 2010, the
Company granted 2,141,842 options to purchase shares of the
Company’s common stock to certain consultants and members of
the Company’s management, in exchange for the contribution of
certain exploratory concepts. The terms of the option
agreements stipulate an exercise price of $0.60 per
share. At that time, the initial conversion price
associated with the debenture was reduced. The adjusted
conversion price of the Debenture is $0.60 per share as of June 30,
2011.
These
two events triggered the reduction of the initial conversion price
of the Debentures from $1.125 per share to $0.60 per
share. As a result, it was determined that the
Debentures included a beneficial conversion feature as of December
31, 2010 and, accordingly, the Company recorded an additional debt
discount related to the Debentures in the amount of
$875,000. The Company recognized debt discount accretion
expense of $163,166 and $324,539 during the three-month and
six-month periods ended June 30, 2011 related to the additional
debt discount.
Because
the adjusted conversion price is less than the trading value of the
Company’s stock as of June 30, 2011, the amount by which the
Debenture’s “if converted value” exceeded its
principal amount was $1,250,000 as of June 30, 2011.
As
of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company has reserved
1,666,667 shares of its common stock in the event that the
Debenture is converted.
|
Related Party Transactions
|
6 Months Ended | ||
---|---|---|---|
Jun. 30, 2011
|
|||
Related Party Transactions |
In
January 2010, the Company engaged Synergy Resources LLC
(“Synergy”) to provide geological and engineering
consulting services. The Company’s President and
sole Director is also a member of Synergy’s management
team. Geological and engineering consulting service fees
provided by Synergy for the three-month and six-month periods ended
June 30, 2011 and 2010 totaled $38,000, $68,000, $30,000 and
$75,000, respectively.
As
discussed in Note 9, in January 2010, the Company issued an
aggregate of 6,666,667 restricted shares of its common stock at a
price of $0.0015 to four individuals in a private
transaction. Of the 6,666,667 shares issued, 4,222,222
shares were purchased by two of the individuals who are our sole
officers at June 30, 2011. The proceeds received from
the sale of the stock totaled $10,000. Proceeds from the
two related parties totaled $6,333.
As
discussed in Note 3, at Passport's December 2010 Annual General
Meeting, Passport increased their number of directors to eight, one
of whom is the Company's Vice President of
Operations. As a result, the Company’s investment
in Passport’s common stock is classified as a related party
asset. As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the
fair market value of the Company’s investment in Passport was
$127,426 and $197,453, respectively.
|
Description of Business
|
6 Months Ended | ||
---|---|---|---|
Jun. 30, 2011
|
|||
Description of Business |
American
Eagle Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated in
the state of Nevada in March 2007 for the purpose of identifying
and pursuing exploratory oil and gas opportunities. As
of June 30, 2011, the Company had acquired working interests in oil
and gas prospects located in Montana, North Dakota, Texas, and
southeastern Saskatchewan, Canada.
In
December 2010, the Company changed its fiscal year end from April
30 to December 31. The 2010 figures presented herein are
presented for comparative purposes and are based on different
fiscal quarters than what was presented in the Company’s
previously filed Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q.
|
Commitments and Contingencies
|
6 Months Ended | ||
---|---|---|---|
Jun. 30, 2011
|
|||
Commitments and Contingencies |
Drilling Commitments
As
of June 30, 2011, the Company owned a 50% working interest in the
Hardy Property. Accordingly, the Company may elect to
participate in the drilling of exploratory wells on the
property. As discussed in Note 4, the Company and its
working interest partner, Eternal Energy, entered into a farm-out
agreement with Passport whereby Passport agreed to fund 38.5% of
the drilling, completion and abandonment costs of up to two future
wells to be located within the Hardy Property, in exchange for a
25% working interest in the completed wells. The
remaining working interest in the wells will be shared equally by
the Company and Eternal Energy. The first well to be
drilled under the Participation Agreement was the Hardy 4-16
well. Plans are in place to commence drilling of the
second well within the Hardy Prospect. The current
estimate of drilling and completion costs of the second well is
$3,200,000, of which the Company, through its participation
election, would be obligated to pay approximately $984,000 should
it elect to participate in such well.
Stock Issuances
As
discussed in Note 5, the Company has reserved 1,666,667 shares of
its common stock in the event that the Debenture is
converted.
|
Subsequent Events
|
6 Months Ended | ||
---|---|---|---|
Jun. 30, 2011
|
|||
Subsequent Events |
In
July 2011, the Company, along with its working interest partners,
completed the fracture stimulation of the Hardy 4-16 well at an
estimated aggregate cost of $725,000. The
Company’s share of these costs is approximately
$223,000. Management is currently evaluating the results
of the fracture stimulation project.
|
Earnings (Loss) Per Share
|
6 Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun. 30, 2011
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Earnings (Loss) Per Share |
The
following is a reconciliation of the number of shares used in the
calculation of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share for the
three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and
2010:
(a) In
periods where the Company incurs a loss, potentially dilutive
securities are not included in the computation of diluted net loss
per share as their effect would have been
anti-dilutive. The following securities were not
included in the computation of diluted net loss per share as their
effect would have been anti-dilutive:
|
Asset Retirement Obligations
|
6 Months Ended | ||
---|---|---|---|
Jun. 30, 2011
|
|||
Asset Retirement Obligations |
The
Company has recorded estimated asset retirement obligations for the
future plugging and abandonment of the Hardy 7-9 and Hardy 4-16
wells. As of June 30, 2011, the discounted value of the
Hardy asset retirement obligations is $16,473. The
Company recognized accretion expense of $358 and $707 for the
three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2011 associated
with the Hardy asset retirement obligations. No
accretion expense was recognized during the three-month and
six-month periods ended June 30, 2010 as the Company had not yet
restored the Hardy 7-9 well to production nor recorded an asset
retirement obligation associated with the well. The
projected plugging dates for the Hardy 7-9 and Hardy 4-16 wells are
December 2020 and June 2036, respectively.
|
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
|
6 Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun. 30, 2011
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
Basis of Presentation
The
accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts
of the Company and its wholly-owned, Canadian subsidiary, AEE
Canada Inc. The subsidiary was created to house the
Company’s Canadian oil and gas property holdings and to
conduct business activities within Canada. All material
intercompany accounts, transactions, and profits have been
eliminated.
These
condensed consolidated financial statements are presented in United
States Dollars and have been prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for
interim financial information and with the instructions to
Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Form 10-Q
and Article 8 of SEC Regulation S-X. The principles for
interim financial information do not require the inclusion of all
the information and footnotes required by generally accepted
accounting principles for complete financial
statements. Therefore, these financial statements should
be read in conjunction with the Company’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the eight-month period ended December 31, 2010 and
for the year ended April 30, 2010. The condensed
consolidated financial statements included herein are unaudited;
however, in the opinion of management, they contain all normal
recurring adjustments necessary for a fair statement of the
condensed results for the interim periods. Operating
results for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30,
2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be
expected for the year ending December 31, 2011.
Revenue Recognition
The Company records the sale of its interests
in prospects as a reduction to the cost pool when the terms of the
transaction are final and the sales price is
determinable. Working interest, royalty, and net profit
interests are recognized as revenue when oil and gas is sold and
persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred
or services have been rendered, the fee for the arrangement is
fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably
assured.
Concentration of Credit Risk
At
June 30, 2011, the Company had $2,974,526 on deposit that that
exceeded the United States (FDIC) federal insurance limit of
$250,000 per bank. The Company believes that this credit
risk is mitigated by the financial strength of the financial
institution with which the funds are held.
Components of Other Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive
income consists of net income and other gains and losses affecting
shareholders’ equity that, under generally accepted
accounting principles are excluded from net income. For
the Company, such items consist solely of unrealized gains and
losses on marketable equity investments.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash
equivalents consist of time deposits and liquid debt investments
with original maturities of three months or less at the time of
purchase. The Company does not have any cash equivalents
at June 30, 2011 or December 31, 2010.
Marketable Securities
The
Company determines the appropriate classification of its
investments in equity securities at the time of purchase and
reevaluates such determinations at each balance sheet
date. Marketable equity securities not classified as
held to maturity or as trading are classified as available for
sale, and are carried at fair market value, with the unrealized
gains and losses, net of tax, included in the determination of
comprehensive income and reported in stockholders’
equity.
The
fair value of substantially all securities is determined by quoted
market prices. The estimated fair value of securities
for which there are no quoted market prices is based on similar
types of securities that are traded in the
market. Warrants to purchase common stock are calculated
using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model.
Oil and Gas Properties
The
Company follows the full cost method of accounting for its
investments in oil and gas properties. Under the full
cost method, all costs associated with the exploration of
properties are capitalized into appropriate cost centers within the
full cost pool. Internal costs that are capitalized are
limited to those costs that can be directly identified with
acquisition, exploration, and development activities undertaken and
do not include any costs related to production, general corporate
overhead, or similar activities. Cost centers are
established on a country by country basis.
Capitalized
costs within the cost centers are amortized on the unit of
production basis using proved oil and gas reserves. The
cost of investments in unproved properties and major development
projects are excluded from capitalized costs to be amortized until
it is determined whether or not proved reserves can be assigned to
the properties. Until such a determination is made, the
properties are assessed annually to ascertain whether impairment
has occurred. The costs of drilling exploratory dry
holes are included in the amortization base immediately upon
determination that the well is dry.
As
of the end of each reporting period, the capitalized costs of each
cost center are subject to a ceiling test, in which the costs shall
not exceed the cost center ceiling. The cost center
ceiling is equal to i) the present value of estimated future net
revenues computed by applying current prices of oil and gas
reserves (with consideration of price changes only to the extent
provided by contractual arrangements) to estimated future
production of proved oil and gas reserves as of the date of the
latest balance sheet presented, less estimated future expenditures
(based on current costs) to be incurred in developing and producing
the proved reserves computed using a discount factor of ten percent
and assuming continuation of existing economic conditions; plus ii)
the cost of properties not being amortized; plus iii) the lower of
cost or estimated fair value of unproven properties included in the
costs being amortized; less iv) income tax effects related to
differences between the book and tax basis of the
properties. If unamortized costs capitalized within a
cost center, less related deferred income taxes, exceed the cost
center ceiling, the excess is charged to expense and separately
disclosed during the period in which the excess
occurs.
Proceeds
received from disposals are credited against accumulated cost
except when the sale represents a significant disposal of reserves,
in which case a gain or loss is recognized. The sum of
net capitalized costs and estimated future development and
dismantlement costs for each cost center is depleted on the
equivalent unit-of-production method, based on proved oil and gas
reserves. Excluded from amounts subject to depletion are
costs associated with unevaluated properties.
Asset Retirement Obligations
The
Company records asset retirement obligations in the period in which
the obligation is incurred and when a reasonable estimate of fair
value can be determined. The initial recording of an
asset retirement obligation results in an increase in the carrying
amount of the related long-lived asset and the creation of a
liability. The portion of the asset retirement
obligation expected to be realized during the next 12-month period
is classified as a current liability, while the portion of the
asset retirement obligation expected to be realized during
subsequent periods is discounted and recorded at its net present
value. The discount factor used to determine the net
present value of the Company’s asset retirement obligation is
10%, which is consistent with the discount factor that is applied
to oil and gas reserves when performing the periodic ceiling
tests.
Changes
in the noncurrent portion of the asset retirement obligation due to
the passage of time are measured by applying an interest method of
allocation. The amount of change is recognized as an
increase in the liability and an accretion expense in the statement
of operations. Changes in either the current or
noncurrent portion of the Company’s asset retirement
obligation resulting from revisions to the timing or the amount of
the original estimate of undiscounted cash flows are recognized as
an increase or a decrease to the carrying amount of the liability
and the related long-lived asset
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Fair
value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid
to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market
participants. Hierarchy Levels 1, 2 or 3 are terms for
the priority of inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair
value. Hierarchy Level 1 inputs are quoted prices in
active markets for identical assets or
liabilities. Hierarchy Level 2 inputs are inputs other
than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are directly or
indirectly observable for the asset or
liability. Hierarchy Level 3 inputs are inputs that are
not observable in the market. The fair value
measurements of the Company’s financial instruments at June
30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were as follows:
The
Company uses level 2 inputs to determine the fair value of its
marketable securities - related party, which consists of common
stock and warrants in an entity which is traded on the Canadian
National Stock Exchange. The warrants are valued using
the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model which includes a calculation
of historical volatility of the stock. Level 2 inputs
were also used to determine the fair value of the Company's stock
options which were granted to related parties for intangible oil
and gas intellectual property. Recent market
transactions were used to determine the market price of the stock
and a comparable company was used to calculate
volatility.
Convertible Debt
The
Company has allocated a portion of the proceeds received from the
issuance of convertible debentures to additional paid in capital to
recognize the value of the common stock warrants issued in
connection with the convertible debentures as well as a beneficial
conversion feature that was triggered when the trading value of the
Company’s stock first exceeded its conversion price per
share. The amount charged to additional paid in capital
has been offset by a charge to debt discount. Debt
discounts are amortized using the straight line method over the
life of the corresponding debt instrument.
Basic and Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share
Basic earnings (loss) per common share is
computed by dividing net income (loss) available to common
stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per
common share is computed in the same way as basic earnings per
common share except that the denominator is increased to include
the number of additional common shares that would be outstanding if
all potential common shares had been issued and if the additional
common shares were dilutive. However, diluted loss per
common share for the three-month and six-month periods ended June
30, 2010 is computed in the same way as basic loss per common share
as the inclusion of additional common shares that would be
outstanding if all potential common shares had been issued would be
anti-dilutive. See Note 8 for the calculation of basic
and diluted earnings (loss) per share for the three-month and
six-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.
Income Taxes
Deferred
income tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax
benefits and consequences attributable to differences between the
financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and
liabilities and their respective tax balances. Deferred
income tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted or
substantially enacted tax rates expected to apply to the taxable
income in the years in which those differences are expected to be
recovered or settled. The effect on deferred income tax
assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in
income in the period that includes the date of enactment or
substantive enactment. Net operating loss carry forwards
and other deferred tax assets are reviewed annually for
recoverability, and if necessary, are recorded net of a valuation
allowance.
Use of Estimates and Assumptions
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States requires the use
of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses and disclosure of
contingent obligations in the financial statements and accompanying
notes. The Company’s most significant assumptions
are the estimates used in the determination of the deferred income
tax asset valuation allowance, the valuation of oil and gas
reserves to which the Company owns rights, estimates related to the
Company’s asset retirement obligations, the valuation of the
warrants held by the Company as investments and the estimates used
to determine the Black-Scholes fair value of the stock options
issued as consideration for oil and gas intangible
assets. The estimation process requires assumptions to
be made about future events and conditions, and as such, is
inherently subjective and uncertain. Actual results
could differ materially from these estimates.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In
December 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-29,
Disclosure of Supplementary Pro Forma Information for Business
Combinations. The objective of this Update is to address
diversity in practice about the interpretation of the pro forma
revenue and earnings disclosure requirements for business
combinations.
The
amendments in this Update specify that if a public entity presents
comparative financial statements, the entity should disclose
revenue and earnings of the combined entity as though the business
combination(s) that occurred during the current year had occurred
as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period
only. The amendments also expand the supplemental pro
forma disclosures to include a description of the nature and amount
of material, nonrecurring pro forma adjustments directly
attributable to the business combination included in the reported
pro forma revenue and earnings.
The
amendments affect any public entity as defined by Topic 805 that
enters into business combinations that are material on an
individual or aggregate basis.
In
May 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2011-04, Fair
Value Measurement (Topic 820), Amendments to Achieve Common Fair
Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and
IFRS. Many of the amendments in this update change the
wording used in the existing guidance to better align U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles with International
Financial Reporting Standards and to clarify the FASB’s
intent on various aspects of the fair value
guidance. This update also requires increased disclosure
of quantitative information about unobservable inputs used in a
fair value measurement that is categorized within Level 3 of the
fair value hierarchy. This update is effective for
financial statements for reporting periods beginning after December
15, 2011 and should be applied retrospectively. Other
than requiring additional disclosures, the adoption of this new
guidance is not expected to have a significant impact on the
Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In
June 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2011-05,
Comprehensive Income (Topic 220). This new guidance
requires the components of net income and other comprehensive
income to be either presented in one continuous statement, referred
to as the statement of comprehensive income, or in two separate,
but consecutive statements. This new guidance eliminates
the current option to report other comprehensive income and its
components in the statement of stockholders’
equity. While the new guidance changes the presentation
of comprehensive income, there are no changes to the components
that are recognized in net income or other comprehensive income
under current accounting guidance. The Company has
adopted the new guidance in its financial statements as of and for
the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30,
2011.
|
Marketable Securities
|
6 Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun. 30, 2011
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Marketable Securities |
As
of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company held the
following marketable securities that were classified as available
for sale:
In
June 2010, the Company purchased 500,000 units of Passport Energy
Inc. (formerly Covenant Resources Inc.) (“Passport”), a
Canadian resources company traded on the Canadian National Stock
Exchange, at a purchase price of $0.05 per unit. Each
unit consisted of one share of common stock and a warrant to
purchase an additional share of Passport’s common stock at a
purchase price of $0.05 per share. The warrants have a
two-year life and expire on June 23, 2012. Total
consideration paid to acquire the common shares and warrants was
$24,635 (CDN$25,000). During 2011, the Company
subsequently paid an additional $911 to Passport in connection with
the shares. Management considers the investment in
Passport as “available for sale” but has no intention
of liquidating the investments during the upcoming twelve-month
period. Accordingly, the marketable securities have been
classified as noncurrent assets. The Passport warrants
to purchase common stock are calculated using the Black-Scholes
Option Pricing Model, with the following assumptions at June 30,
2011;
A
marketability discount was applied to the Passport shares and
warrants.
At
Passport's December 2010 Annual General Meeting, Passport increased
its number of directors to eight, one of whom is the Company's
President and another of whom is the Company’s Vice President
of Operations. As a result, the investment in Passport
is classified as a related party asset. Passport's name
change occurred in December 2010.
There
were no sales of marketable securities during the six-month period
ended June 30, 2011.
|
Proposed Merger
|
6 Months Ended | ||
---|---|---|---|
Jun. 30, 2011
|
|||
Proposed Merger |
On
April 8, 2011, the Company entered into a definitive agreement (the
“Merger Agreement”) with Eternal Energy to merge the
two companies. Pursuant to the terms of the Merger
Agreement, Eternal Energy formed a wholly owned subsidiary which
will be merged into the Company, with the Company being the
survivor as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Eternal
Energy. The ratio of stockholdings between the two
companies at the time of closing is expected to be 80% for American
Eagle’s legacy stockholders and 20% for Eternal
Energy’s stockholders (exclusive of outstanding options to
purchase shares of the Company’s common stock and shares of
the Eternal Energy’s common stock). Despite the
fact the Company’s shareholders will hold shares of the
combined company’s common stock that will represent
approximately 80% of the then-outstanding shares and the
stockholders of Eternal Energy will hold shares of the combined
company’s common stock that will represent approximately 20%
of the then-outstanding shares (in each case without taking into
account any outstanding options to purchase shares of either
company’s common stock), other factors present in the
structure of the proposed business combination result in Eternal
Energy being considered the accounting acquirer in the
transaction.
The
corresponding purchase price allocation and pro forma financial
statements that reflect the proposed merger can be found in the
footnotes to the condensed consolidated financial statements of
Eternal Energy, as presented in Eternal Energy’s Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q, filed with the Securities Exchange Commission
on August 18, 2011.
|
Oil and Gas Properties
|
6 Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun. 30, 2011
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Oil and Gas Properties |
As
of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, all of the Company's
investments in oil and gas properties are divided into two cost
pools; one pool that is subject to amortization because drilling
activities have commenced and proven reserves have been identified,
and one pool that is not subject to amortization because no proven
reserves have been assigned to the properties. The two
cost pools are further split into cost centers based on the
geographical location of the properties included in the
pools.
As
of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the net costs included in
the Company’s cost centers were as follows:
The
Company has entered into participation agreements in a number
exploratory oil and gas properties. Unproven exploratory prospects
are excluded from its respective amortizable cost pool until such a
time when proven reserves are identified. Each
prospect’s costs are transferred into the amortization base
on an ongoing (well by well or property by property) basis as the
prospect is evaluated and proved reserves are established or
impairment is determined.
Glacier Prospect
In
January 2011, the Company acquired an undivided 66.67% working
interest in approximately 47,392 net acres located in Toole
Country, Montana (the “Glacier Prospect”) for cash
consideration of $1,195,624. Subsequently, the Company
sold one-half of its working interest to FX Energy, Inc. (“FX
Energy”) for $597,812, which represents 50% of the original
purchase price. The Company has recorded a receivable
from FX for this amount as of June 30, 2011.
As
of June 30, 2011, the Company owns a 33% undivided working interest
in approximately 63,630 gross acres (21,210 net acres) that is held
by approximately 400 leases, with expiration dates ranging from May
2012 to June 2015, ratably.
Because
no proven reserves have yet been identified, the Glacier Prospect
has been assigned to the full cost pool that is not subject to
amortization. Management is currently in the process of
developing its exploration strategy relative to the Glacier
Prospect. The Company is evaluating the results of
nearby wells drilled by other companies in order to make a
determination on the future of the Glacier Prospect. The
Glacier Prospect is evaluated for impairment during each reporting
period. There were no impairments evident as of June 30,
2011.
Spyglass Prospect
During
the period from February 1, 2010 through June 18, 2010, the Company
acquired oil and gas leases covering approximately 6,239 net acres
located in Divide County, North Dakota (the “Spyglass
Prospect”). On June 18, 2010, the Company sold 50%
of its interest in these oil and gas leases to Eternal Energy Corp.
(“Eternal Energy”) and received, in exchange, a 50%
working interest in approximately 4,480 acres located in
southeastern Saskatchewan, Canada (the “Hardy
Property”). The Company reclassified 50% of the
then carrying value of its investment in the Spyglass Prospect to
the Hardy Prospect at the time of the exchange. During
the period from June 19, 2010 through May 27, 2011, the Company,
along with its working interest partner, Eternal Energy, continued
to acquire additional oil and gas leases within the Spyglass
Prospect.
On May 27, 2011, the Company sold half of its working interest in
the Spyglass Prospect to a third party. Because
the Company’s interest in the Spyglass Prospect represented a
significant portion of the full cost pool, not subject to
amortization, the Company has allocated the total cost of the full
cost pool, not subject to amortization, among the individual
prospects included within the pool, based on their estimated
relative fair market values as of the date that the sale
occurred. Net cash
consideration received from the sale totaled
$3,777,793. The allocated basis attributed to the
portion of the Spyglass Prospect that was sold was $1,692,166,
resulting in a gain of $2,085,627 on the transaction.
As
of June 30, 2011, the Company still owns an undivided 25% working
interest in approximately 68,962 gross acres (8,948 net acres)
which is held by approximately 783 leases, with expiration dates
ranging from February 2013 to August 2016, ratably.
Because
no proven reserves have yet been identified, the Spyglass Prospect
has been assigned to the full cost pool that is not subject to
amortization. Management is currently in the process of
developing its exploration strategy relative to the Spyglass
Prospect. The Company is evaluating the results of
nearby wells drilled by other companies in order to make a
determination on the future of the Spyglass
Prospect. The Spyglass Prospect is evaluated for
impairment during each reporting period. There were no
impairments evident as of June 30, 2011.
West Spyglass Prospect
In
June, 2011, the Company began acquiring interests in oil and gas
leases located in an area adjacent to the existing Spyglass
Prospect. The Company’s management refers to the
adjacent acreage as the West Spyglass Prospect. As of
June 30, 2011, the Company owns a 100% working interest in
approximately 7,467 gross acres (1,120 net acres) located within
the West Spyglass Prospect. The net acres are held by 21
leases, with expiration dates ranging from April 2014 to April
2016. The Company’s management is currently
evaluating this prospect. No formal determination of the
ultimate viability of this prospect is expected during the next
twelve months. Management has reviewed the carrying
value of this property and determined that no impairment exists as
of June 30, 2011.
Musta Prospect
During
December 2009 and January 2010, the Company incurred $10,995 of
brokerage costs related to potential lease acquisitions, in Divide
County, North Dakota (the “Musta
Prospect”). As of May 27, 2011, the Company has
not yet entered into any oil and gas leases within the Musta
Prospect. As part of the reallocation of total costs
included in the full cost pool, not subject to amortization,
associated with the partial sale of the Company’s interest in
the Spyglass Prospect, the estimated fair market value assigned to
the Musta Prospect was zero. Management considers the
Musta Prospect to be fully impaired as of June 30,
2011.
Mississippi and Texas Prospects
In
January 2010, the Company entered into two assignment agreements
with Murrayfield Limited, a United Kingdom company, pursuant to
which the Company paid $150,000 in cash to acquire a 15% working
interest in a contemplated well located in Wilkinson County,
Mississippi (the “Mississippi Prospect”) and $137,500
in cash to acquire a 12.5% working interest in an oil and gas lease
located in Willacy County, Texas (the “Texas
Prospect”). In June 2010, the Company resold its
interest in the Mississippi Prospect to the original
seller. Net proceeds from the sale totaled $144,063,
which represent the original purchase price of $150,000, less
preliminary drilling costs incurred to date of $5,937.
To
date, no drilling activities have occurred within the Texas
Prospect nor are any drilling plans being considered in the near
future. As part of the reallocation of total costs
included in the full cost pool, not subject to amortization,
associated with the partial sale of the Company’s interest in
the Spyglass Prospect, the estimated fair market value assigned to
the Texas Prospect was zero. Management considers the
Texas Prospect to be fully impaired as of June 30,
2011.
Sidney North Prospect
In
2010, the Company acquired oil and gas leases on approximately
2,621 gross (624 net acres located in Richland County, Montana (the
“Sidney North Prospect”) at an aggregate cost of
$215,041. The acreage is held by approximately 24 leases, with
expiration dates ranging from July 2013 to October 2015, ratably.
The Company’s management is currently evaluating this
prospect. No formal determination of the ultimate viability of this
prospect is expected during the next twelve months. Management has
reviewed the carrying value of this property and determined that no
impairment exists as of June 30, 2011.
Hardy Property
As
noted above, on June 18, 2010, the Company sold 50% of its working
interest in the Spyglass Prospect to Eternal Energy in exchange for
a 50% working interest in approximately 4,480 net acres located in
Southeastern Saskatchewan (the “Hardy Property”), which
included related equipment valued at approximately $238,681. At the
time, the Hardy Property contained one existing oil well (the Hardy
7-9 well) that, at acquisition, was shut in due to mechanical
issues. As a result, the Company reclassified $766,620 (half of the
carrying value of its Spyglass Prospect at that time) to the newly
acquired Hardy Property, which is part of the full cost pool that
is subject to amortization. The Company and Eternal Energy have
agreed that Eternal Energy will oversee all future exploration and
operational activities associated with their shared acreage. The
Company is obligated to pay 50% of the cost of any exploration or
development costs incurred for wells in which it elects to
participate.
During
August and September 2010, Eternal Energy performed a workover and
recompletion of the Hardy 7-9 well at an aggregate cost of
$475,274. The Company’s portion of the recompletion cost was
$237,637. The well was returned to production in September 2010. In
January 2011, the Hardy 7-9 well was taken off of production due to
a parted rod string. The well was returned to production in March
2011, after repairs were made to replace the parted rod string.
However, the well was again shut in during May and June 2011 due to
weather conditions in the area. The Company’s share of the
oil and gas sales generated by the Hardy 7-9 well during the
three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2011 totaled
$10,437 and $46,477, respectively.
On
May 2, 2011, the Company and its working interest partner, Eternal
Energy, entered into a farm-out agreement with Passport Energy,
whereby Passport agreed to fund 38.5% of the drilling, completion
and equipping costs of up to two future wells located within the
Hardy Property in exchange for a 25% working interest in the each
well. The remaining working interest will be shared equally between
the Company and Eternal Energy.
During
May and June 2011, the Company, along with its working interest
partners, drilled and completed an offset well within the Hardy
Property (the “Hardy 4-16” well) at an aggregate cost
of approximately $1,538,125. The Company’s share of this cost
is $472,973. The well was fracture stimulated in July 2011. The
Company is currently evaluating the results of the fracture
stimulation.
The
net capitalized cost of the Hardy Property as of June 30, 2011 and
December 31, 2010 is summarized below:
Using
the units-of-production method to calculate depletion expense
associated with its producing properties, the Company recognized
depletion expense totaling $14,278 and $28,482 for the three-month
and six-month periods ended June 30, 2011. The Company
did not recognize any depletion expense during the comparable
periods in 2010 because it had no producing wells at the
time.
As
of June 30, 2011, the Company owns a 50% working interest in
approximately 4,680 gross acres (4,280 net acres) held by
leases. The acreage is secured by 6 leases, each of
which is scheduled to expire on April 1, 2014. The Hardy
Property represents the only property that is included in the
portion of the Company’s full cost pool that is subject to
amortization.
Well Summary
The
following table summarizes the Company’s wells and drilling
activity for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and
2010:
The
following table summarizes the Company’s wells and drilling
activity for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and
2010:
The
Company did not drill any dry exploratory or developmental wells
during the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2011
and 2010.
Oil and Gas Concepts Purchased with Stock Options
On
December 30, 2010, the Company granted options to purchase
2,141,842 shares of its common stock to four individuals, two of
which are the Company’s officers, in connection with their
contribution of certain intellectual property related to
exploratory opportunities and transactions to the
Company. The intellectual property was initially
assigned a value of $1,247,195, which equaled the value of the
options granted as calculated using the Black-Scholes
model. The value of the contributed oil and gas concepts
has subsequently been reassessed in connection with the
reallocation of total costs included in the full cost pool, not
subject to amortization, associated with the partial sale of the
Company’s interest in the Spyglass Prospect
|