Organization And Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2019

Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract]

Basis of Presentation

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the same basis as the Company's annual consolidated financial statements. These unaudited condensed financial statements are presented in accordance with (i) accounting standards generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and (ii) the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in the annual consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. In the opinion of management, the financial statements include all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for the fair presentation of the interim periods presented.

Results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2019, for any other interim period or for any other future year.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2018, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2018-02, "Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income" ("ASU 2018-02"), which provides entities the option to reclassify tax effects stranded in accumulated other comprehensive income as a result of legislation enacted in 2017, informally titled the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”) to retained earnings. The Company adopted this new standard effective January 1, 2019 with no impact to its consolidated condensed financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-02, "Leases (Topic 842)" ("ASU 2016-02" and "ASU 2018-11"). The ASU requires lessees to record most leases on their balance sheets but recognize the expense on their statements of operations in a manner similar to accounting rules previously in effect. ASU 2016-02 states that a lessee would recognize a lease liability for the obligation to make lease payments and a right-to-use ("ROU") asset for the right to use the underlying asset for the lease term.

The Company has completed its implementation of ASU 2016-02 and applicable methods of transition. As permitted under the transition guidance, for leases in existence prior to adoption, the Company carried forward the assessment of whether its arrangements are or contain leases, the classification of its leases, the impact of initial direct costs associated with its leases, and the remaining lease terms.

The Company adopted the requirements of ASU 2016-02 utilizing the modified retrospective method of transition to identified leases as of January 1, 2019 (the “effective date”). The adoption of the standard had a material impact to the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets. There was no impact upon adoption to the condensed consolidated statements of operations or cash flows. The impact of the adoption was due to:

• the recognition of additional operating lease liabilities of $82.5 million and corresponding operating ROU assets of $80.5 million. These represent the operating leases existing as of the effective date which have a lease term of greater than twelve months. The operating ROU assets were recorded net of a $2.0 million reclassification of other accrued liabilities and prepaid expenses representing previously deferred or prepaid rent and lease incentives.

• the de-recognition of previously recorded facility financing obligations of $46.1 million and related plant, property and equipment assets of $46.1 million from a build-to-suit lease arrangement for which construction is complete and the Company is leasing the constructed asset but previously did not qualify for sale accounting.

Accounting Pronouncements Pending Adoption

In August 2018, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2018-15, "Intangibles-Goodwill and Other-Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40) - Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract" ("ASU 2018-15"). ASU 2018-15 aligns the accounting for implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the accounting for implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software under ASC 350-40, in order to determine which costs to capitalize and recognize as an asset and which costs to expense. ASU 2018-15 is effective for annual reporting periods, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2019, and can be applied either prospectively to implementation costs incurred after the date of adoption or retrospectively to all arrangements. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2018-15 on its consolidated financial statements and expects to adopt the new standard in the first quarter of 2020.

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Except for changes to the Company's lease accounting policy, as included below, there have been no changes to the Company’s significant accounting policies described in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, filed with the SEC on February 26, 2019.

Leases

The Company has various non-cancelable arrangements to lease office and dedicated data center facility space. These arrangements include services and other incremental costs to maintain or operate the space and do not contain any material residual value guarantees, material variable payments, or restrictive covenants.

The Company determines at contract inception whether the arrangement 1) contains a lease based on its ability to control a physically distinct asset for more than 12 months, and 2) should be classified as an operating or finance lease. For both its office and data center facility leases, the Company combines all components of the lease including related services as a single component.

Operating leases are reflected as operating ROU assets and operating lease liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Operating ROU assets and operating lease liabilities represent the Company's obligation to make payments arising from the lease. The operating ROU asset also includes any lease payments made and excludes lease incentives. The liabilities are measured at the commencement date based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term utilizing our incremental borrowing rate. Lease payments are typically discounted at our incremental borrowing rate as the interest rate implicit in the lease cannot be readily determined in the absence of key inputs which are typically not reported by our lessors. Judgment was used to estimate the incremental borrowing rate associated with these leases based on relevant market data and Company inputs applied to accepted valuation methodologies.

The Company recognizes lease expense relating to its operating leases on a straight-line basis over the lease term, which commences when the Company controls the leased asset. The lease term includes optional periods to extend or terminate the leases when it is reasonably certain that the option will be exercised. Lease incentives are recognized as a reduction to lease expense on a straight-line basis over the underlying lease term.

In the normal course of operations, the Company enters into subleases for unoccupied leased office space. Any sublease payments received are recognized as a reduction to the related lease expense on a straight-line basis over the life of the sublease.

Fair Value Measurement

Fair value represents the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Valuation techniques used to measure fair value must maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. Observable inputs are based on market data obtained from independent sources. The fair value hierarchy is based on the following three levels of inputs, of which the first two are considered observable and the last one is considered unobservable:

• Level 1 – Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access at the measurement date.

• Level 2 – Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.

•

Level 3 – Unobservable inputs.