SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Policies)	6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2015
Accounting Policies [Abstract]
Use of Estimates	The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant estimates inherent in the preparation of the accompanying financial statements include assumptions used to determine the fair value of (i) debt with conversion features and embedded derivatives, (ii) the warrant liability, (iii) stock-based compensation, and (iv) the initial valuation of acquisition intangibles and other net assets acquired or assumed. Other significant estimates include assumptions related to the periodic evaluation of impairment of long-lived assets, the selection of estimated useful lives of identifiable intangible assets, revenue recognition and the provision for sales returns, the allowance for doubtful accounts, the provision for excess and obsolete inventory, and the recoverability of net deferred tax assets.
Principles of Consolidation	These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its controlled subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
Reclassifications	Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior period balances in order to conform to the current period presentation. These reclassifications had no impact on working capital, net (loss) income, stockholders’ deficit or cash flows as previously reported.
Recent accounting pronouncements	In April 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-08 “Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity.” ASU No. 2014-08 changes the criteria for reporting discontinued operations and modifies related disclosure requirements. The new guidance is effective on a prospective basis for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2014, and interim periods within annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2015. The Company is currently assessing the future impact of ASU No. 2014-08 on its financial statements. In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers,” which requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. ASU 2014-09 will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in U.S. GAAP when it becomes effective. ASU 2014-09 is effective for the Company on January 1, 2018, and early application is not permitted. ASU 2014-09 permits the use of either the retrospective or cumulative effect transition method. The Company is evaluating the effect that ASU 2014-09 will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. The Company has not yet selected a transition method nor has it determined the effect of the standard on its ongoing financial reporting. In November 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-16, “Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Determining Whether the Host Contract in a Hybrid Financial Instrument Issued in the Form of a Share Is More Akin to Debt or to Equity ”. ASU 2014-16 does not change the current criteria in U.S. GAAP for determining when separation of certain embedded derivative features in a hybrid financial instrument is required, but clarifies how current U.S. GAAP should be interpreted in the evaluation of the economic characteristics and risks of a host contract in a hybrid financial instrument that is issued in the form of a share, reducing existing diversity in practice. The standard will be effective for our interim periods beginning on January 1, 2016. The Company is evaluating ASU 2014-16 to determine if this guidance will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, “Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern” (ASU No. 2014-15) that will require management to evaluate whether there are conditions and events that raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the financial statements are issued on both an interim and annual basis. Management will be required to provide certain footnote disclosures if it concludes that substantial doubt exists or when its plans alleviate substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. ASU No. 2014-15 becomes effective for annual periods beginning in 2016 and for interim reporting periods starting in the first quarter of 2017. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this ASU on its financial statements. In February 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-02, Consolidation (Topic 810): Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis. The new standard is intended to improve targeted areas of consolidation guidance for legal entities such as limited partnerships, limited liability corporations, and securitization structures (collateralized debt obligations, collateralized loan obligations, and mortgage-backed security transactions). The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial position and results of operations. In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-03, Interest-Imputation of Interest, which requires the presentation of debt issuance costs as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the related debt liabilities. The Company does not expect ASU 2015-03 to have a material impact on the Company's results of operations, however, adoption will result in the elimination of debt issuance costs as an asset and a corresponding reduction in the carrying amount of the Company's debt financings applied retrospectively to all periods. The Company is required to adopt this ASU for annual and interim financial statements issued for the year ending December 31, 2016.

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Policies)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2015

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant estimates inherent in the preparation of the accompanying financial statements include assumptions used to determine the fair value of (i) debt with conversion features and embedded derivatives, (ii) the warrant liability, (iii) stock-based compensation, and (iv) the initial valuation of acquisition intangibles and other net assets acquired or assumed. Other significant estimates include assumptions related to the periodic evaluation of impairment of long-lived assets, the selection of estimated useful lives of identifiable intangible assets, revenue recognition and the provision for sales returns, the allowance for doubtful accounts, the provision for excess and obsolete inventory, and the recoverability of net deferred tax assets.

Principles of Consolidation

These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its controlled subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior period balances in order to conform to the current period presentation. These reclassifications had no impact on working capital, net (loss) income, stockholders’ deficit or cash flows as previously reported.

Recent accounting pronouncements

In April 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-08 “Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity.” ASU No. 2014-08 changes the criteria for reporting discontinued operations and modifies related disclosure requirements. The new guidance is effective on a prospective basis for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2014, and interim periods within annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2015. The Company is currently assessing the future impact of ASU No. 2014-08 on its financial statements.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers,” which requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. ASU 2014-09 will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in U.S. GAAP when it becomes effective. ASU 2014-09 is effective for the Company on January 1, 2018, and early application is not permitted. ASU 2014-09 permits the use of either the retrospective or cumulative effect transition method. The Company is evaluating the effect that ASU 2014-09 will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. The Company has not yet selected a transition method nor has it determined the effect of the standard on its ongoing financial reporting.

In November 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-16, “Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Determining Whether the Host Contract in a Hybrid Financial Instrument Issued in the Form of a Share Is More Akin to Debt or to Equity ”. ASU 2014-16 does not change the current criteria in U.S. GAAP for determining when separation of certain embedded derivative features in a hybrid financial instrument is required, but clarifies how current U.S. GAAP should be interpreted in the evaluation of the economic characteristics and risks of a host contract in a hybrid financial instrument that is issued in the form of a share, reducing existing diversity in practice. The standard will be effective for our interim periods beginning on January 1, 2016. The Company is evaluating ASU 2014-16 to determine if this guidance will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, “Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern” (ASU No. 2014-15) that will require management to evaluate whether there are conditions and events that raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the financial statements are issued on both an interim and annual basis. Management will be required to provide certain footnote disclosures if it concludes that substantial doubt exists or when its plans alleviate substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. ASU No. 2014-15 becomes effective for annual periods beginning in 2016 and for interim reporting periods starting in the first quarter of 2017. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this ASU on its financial statements.

In February 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-02, Consolidation (Topic 810): Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis. The new standard is intended to improve targeted areas of consolidation guidance for legal entities such as limited partnerships, limited liability corporations, and securitization structures (collateralized debt obligations, collateralized loan obligations, and mortgage-backed security transactions). The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial position and results of operations.

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-03, Interest-Imputation of Interest, which requires the presentation of debt issuance costs as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the related debt liabilities. The Company does not expect ASU 2015-03 to have a material impact on the Company's results of operations, however, adoption will result in the elimination of debt issuance costs as an asset and a corresponding reduction in the carrying amount of the Company's debt financings applied retrospectively to all periods. The Company is required to adopt this ASU for annual and interim financial statements issued for the year ending December 31, 2016.