XML 27 R17.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.8.0.1
Note 12 - Fair Value Measurements
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2018
Notes to Financial Statements  
Fair Value Disclosures [Text Block]
12.
Fair Value Measurements
 
Accounting standards define fair value, outline a framework for measuring fair value, and detail the required disclosures about fair value measurements. Under these standards, fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date in the principal or most advantageous market. Standards establish a hierarchy in determining the fair market value of an asset or liability. The fair value hierarchy has
three
levels of inputs, both observable and unobservable. Standards require the utilization of the highest possible level of input to determine fair value.
 
Level 
1
– inputs include quoted market prices in an active market for identical assets or liabilities.
 
Level 
2
– inputs are market data, other than Level 
1,
that are observable either directly or indirectly. Level 
2
inputs include quoted market prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted market prices in an inactive market, and other observable information that can be corroborated by market data.
 
Level 
3
– inputs are unobservable and corroborated by little or
no
market data.
 
 These tables present the carrying value and fair value, by fair value hierarchy, of our financial instruments, excluding cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable at
March 31, 2018
and
December 31, 2017,
respectively (in thousands).
 
   
 
 
 
 
Fair Value Measurements at March 31, 2018
(In
thousands)
 
   
Fair Value at
March 31,
2018
   
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
   
Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
   
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs (Level 3)
 
Recurring:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivative Warrant Liability
  $
1,474
    $
-
    $
-
    $
1,474
 
2020 Embedded Derivative Liability
   
2,366
     
-
     
-
     
2,366
 
Total Recurring Fair Value Measurements
  $
3,840
    $
-
    $
-
    $
3,840
 
                                 
                                 
Nonrecurring
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Corn and finished goods inventory
  $
1,835
    $
33
    $
1,802
    $
-
 
Total Non-Recurring Fair Value Measurements
  $
1,835
    $
33
    $
1,802
    $
-
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2017
(In thousands)
 
   
Fair Value at
December 31,
2017
   
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
   
Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
   
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs (Level 3)
 
Recurring:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivative Warrant Liability
  $
1,951
    $
    $
    $
1,951
 
2020 Notes Embedded Derivative Liability
   
5,224
     
     
     
5,224
 
Total Recurring Fair Value Measurements
  $
7,175
    $
    $
    $
7,175
 
                                 
                                 
Nonrecurring
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Corn and finished goods inventory
  $
1,916
    $
189
    $
1,727
    $
 
Total Non-Recurring Fair Value Measurements
  $
1,916
    $
189
    $
1,727
    $
 
 
The following table provides changes to those fair value measurements using Level
3
inputs for the
three
months ended
March 31, 2018.
 
   
Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3) (in thousands)
 
             
   
Derivative Warrant
Liability
   
2020 Notes Embedded
Derivative
 
Opening Balance
  $
1,951
    $
5,224
 
Transfers into Level 3
   
     
 
Transfers out of Level 3
   
     
 
Total (gains) or losses for the period
               
Included in earnings
   
(477
)
   
(2,858
)
Included in other comprehensive income
   
     
 
Purchases, issues, sales and settlements
               
Purchases
   
     
 
Issues
   
     
 
Sales
   
     
 
Settlements
   
     
 
Closing balance
  $
1,474
    $
2,366
 
 
Inventories.
The Company records its corn inventory at fair value only when the Company’s cost of corn purchased exceeds the market value for corn. The Company determines the market value of corn and dry distiller’s grain based upon Level
1
inputs using quoted market prices. The Company records its ethanol, isobutanol and hydrocarbon inventory at market using Level
2
inputs.
 
2020
Notes Embedded Derivative
. The Company had estimated the fair value of the embedded derivative on a stand-alone basis to be
$2.4
million at
March 31, 2018
and
$5.2
million at
December 31, 2017
based upon Level
3
inputs. Changes in the fair value of the embedded derivative is recognized each reporting period as a “
Change in fair value of
2020
Notes embedded derivative
” in the consolidated Statements of Operations and Statements of Cash Flows. See Note
6,
Embedded Derivatives and Derivative Warrant Liabilities, for the fair value inputs used to estimate the fair value of the embedded derivative.
 
Derivative Warrant Liability
. Prior to
2017,
the Company estimated the fair value of the Series A, Series F and Series K warrants using a Monte-Carlo model (Level
3
). For all other warrants the Company valued these using a standard Black-Scholes model (Level
2
). However, beginning in the
first
quarter
2017,
the Company valued the Series F and K using a Monte-Carlo model (Level
3
) and other warrants using Black-Scholes models comprised of some inputs requiring the use of Monte-Carlo models (Level
3
). During the
first
quarter of
2018,
only the Series K warrants were valued using a Monte-Carlo model. The Company has estimated the fair value of the derivative warrant liability to be
$1.5
million as of
March 31, 2018.
Changes in the fair value of the derivative warrant liability is recognized each reporting period as a “
Change in fair value of derivative warrant liability
” in the consolidated Statements of Operations and Statements of Cash Flows.
 
 While the Company believes that its valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, it recognizes that the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different estimate of fair value at the reporting date.