XML 63 R20.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Fair Value Measurements
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2013
Fair Value Measurements [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements
Note 13 — Fair Value Measurements

Under generally accepted accounting principles, our consolidated balance sheet reflects a mixture of measurement methods for financial assets and liabilities ("financial instruments"). Derivative financial instruments are reported at fair value in our consolidated balance sheet. Other financial instruments are reported at historical cost or amortized cost in our consolidated balance sheet, with fair value measurements for these instruments provided as supplemental information.

The following is additional qualitative and quantitative disclosures regarding fair value measurements of financial instruments.

Fair Value of Derivative Financial Instruments

The Partnership's derivative instruments consist of financially settled commodity swap and option contracts and fixed price commodity contracts with certain counterparties. The Partnership determines the fair value of its derivative contracts using a discounted cash flow model for swaps and a standard option pricing-model for options, based on inputs that are readily available in public markets. The Partnership has consistently applied these valuation techniques in all periods presented and we believe the Partnership has obtained the most accurate information available for the types of derivative contracts the Partnership holds.

The fair values of the Partnership's derivative instruments, which aggregate to a net asset position of $8.2 million as of March 31, 2013, are sensitive to changes in forward pricing on natural gas, NGLs and crude oil. This asset position reflects the present value, adjusted for counterparty credit risk, of the amount the Partnership expects to receive in the future on its derivative contracts. If forward pricing on natural gas, NGLs and crude oil were to increase by 10%, the result would be a fair value reflecting a net liability of $18.7 million, ignoring an adjustment for counterparty credit risk. If forward pricing on natural gas, NGLs and crude oil were to decrease by 10%, the result would be a fair value reflecting a net asset of $35.1 million, ignoring an adjustment for counterparty credit risk.

Fair Value of Other Financial Instruments
 
The contingent consideration obligation related to the Partnership's Badlands acquisition is reported at fair value. Due to their cash or near-cash nature, the carrying value of other financial instruments included in working capital (i.e., cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable) approximates their fair value. As such, long-term debt is primarily the other financial instrument for which our carrying value could vary significantly from fair value. We determined the supplemental fair value disclosures for our long-term debt as follows:

senior secured revolving credit facilities and the Partnership's Securitization Facility are based on carrying value which approximates fair value as its interest rate is based on prevailing market rates;

senior unsecured notes are based on quoted market prices derived from trades of the debt.

Fair Value Hierarchy

We categorize the inputs to the fair value measurements using a three-tier fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the significant inputs used in measuring fair value:

Level 1 – observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets;

Level 2 – inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that we can directly or indirectly observe to the extent that the markets are liquid for the relevant settlement periods; and

Level 3 – unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore we must develop our own assumptions.

The following table shows a breakdown by fair value hierarchy category for (1) financial instruments measurements included in our consolidated balance sheet at fair value and (2) supplemental fair value disclosures for other financial instruments:

 
March 31, 2013
 
 
Carrying Value
 
Fair Value
 
 
Total
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Financial Instruments Recorded on Our Consolidated Balance Sheet at Fair Value:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Assets from commodity derivative contracts
 
$
21.4
 
 
$
21.4
 
 
$
-
 
 
$
21.4
 
 
$
-
 
Liabilities from commodity derivative contracts
 
 
13.2
 
 
 
13.2
 
 
 
-
 
 
 
12.2
 
 
 
1.0
 
Badlands contingent consideration liability
 
 
15.6
 
 
 
15.6
 
 
 
-
 
 
 
-
 
 
 
15.6
 
Financial Instruments Recorded on Our Consolidated Balance Sheet at Carrying Value:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
 
 
112.7
 
 
 
112.7
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
TRC Senior secured revolving credit facility
 
 
72.0
 
 
 
72.0
 
 
 
-
 
 
 
72.0
 
 
 
-
 
Partnership's Senior secured revolving credit facility
 
 
565.0
 
 
 
565.0
 
 
 
-
 
 
 
565.0
 
 
 
-
 
Partnership's Senior unsecured notes
 
 
1,774.0
 
 
 
1,949.8
 
 
 
-
 
 
 
1,949.8
 
 
 
-
 
Partnership's accounts receivable securitization facility
 
 
111.4
 
 
 
111.4
 
 
 
-
 
 
 
111.4
 
 
 
-
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
December 31, 2012
 
 
Carrying Value
 
Fair Value
 
 
Total
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Financial Instruments Recorded on Our Consolidated Balance Sheet at Fair Value:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Assets from commodity derivative contracts
 
$
34.3
 
 
$
34.3
 
 
$
-
 
 
$
34.3
 
 
$
-
 
Liabilities from commodity derivative contracts
 
 
12.1
 
 
 
12.1
 
 
 
-
 
 
 
11.5
 
 
 
0.6
 
Badlands contingent consideration liability
 
 
15.3
 
 
 
15.3
 
 
 
-
 
 
 
-
 
 
 
15.3
 
Financial Instruments Recorded on Our Consolidated Balance Sheet at Carrying Value:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
 
 
76.3
 
 
 
76.3
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
TRC Senior secured revolving credit facility
 
 
82.0
 
 
 
82.0
 
 
 
-
 
 
 
82.0
 
 
 
-
 
Partnership's Senior secured revolving credit facility
 
 
620.0
 
 
 
620.0
 
 
 
-
 
 
 
620.0
 
 
 
-
 
Partnership's Senior unsecured notes
 
 
1,773.3
 
 
 
1,945.2
 
 
 
-
 
 
 
1,945.2
 
 
 
-
 

Additional Information Regarding Level 3 Fair Value Measurements

As of March 31, 2013, we reported certain of the Partnership's natural gas basis swaps at fair value using Level 3 inputs due to such derivatives not having observable market prices for substantially the full term of the derivative asset or liability. For valuations that include both observable and unobservable inputs, if the unobservable input is determined to be significant to the overall inputs, the entire valuation is categorized in Level 3. This includes derivatives valued using indicative price quotations whose contract length extends into unobservable periods.

The fair value of these natural gas basis swaps is determined using a discounted cash flow valuation technique based on a forward commodity basis curve. For these derivatives, the primary input to the valuation model is the forward commodity basis curve, which is based on observable or public data sources and extrapolated when observable prices are not available.

As of March 31, 2013, the Partnership had five natural gas basis swaps categorized as Level 3. The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurements of the Partnership's Level 3 derivatives are the forward natural gas basis curves, for which a significant portion of the derivative's term is beyond available forward pricing. The change in the fair value of Level 3 derivatives associated with a 10% change in the forward basis curve where prices are not observable is immaterial.

As of March 31, 2013, the Partnership had a contingent consideration liability, which was included in the preliminary valuation of the Badlands acquisition (see Note 4). The preliminary fair value was determined by a probability-based model measuring the likelihood of meeting certain volumetric measures identified in the MIPSA. Consequently, as these probability-based inputs are not observable, the entire valuation of the contingent consideration is categorized in Level 3.

The following table sets forth a reconciliation of the changes in the fair value of our and the Partnership's financial instruments classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy:
 
 
Commodity Derivative Contracts
 
 
Contingent Liability
 
Balance, December 31, 2012
 
$
0.6
 
 
$
15.3
 
Loss included in Revenue
 
 
0.4
 
 
 
-
 
Loss included in Other expense
 
 
-
 
 
 
0.3
 
Balance, March 31, 2013
 
$
1.0
 
 
$
15.6
 
 
The losses for the period included in earnings are attributable to the change in unrealized losses of liabilities held at the reporting dates. There have been no transfers of assets or liabilities between the three levels of the fair value hierarchy during the three months ended March 31, 2013.