XML 28 R10.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT  v2.3.0.11
Significant Accounting Policies
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2011
Significant Accounting Policies [Abstract]  
Significant Accounting Policies
Note 3. Significant Accounting Policies
Principles of Consolidation
The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of HeartWare International, Inc., and its subsidiaries described in Note 1. All inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Accounting Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“US GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents are recorded in the condensed consolidated balance sheets at cost, which approximates fair value. All highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less at the date of purchase are considered to be cash equivalents.
Investments
Our investments classified as available-for-sale are stated at fair value with unrealized gains and losses reported in accumulated other comprehensive loss within stockholders’ equity. We classify our available-for-sale investments as short-term if their remaining time to maturity at purchase is beyond three months. Investments with maturities beyond one year may be classified as short-term based on their highly liquid nature and because such marketable securities represent the investment of cash that is available for current operations. Interest on investments classified as available-for-sale is included in investment income, net. Premiums paid on our short-term investments are amortized over the remaining term of the investment and such amortization is included in investment income, net.
Receivables
Accounts receivable consists of amounts due from the sale of our HeartWare® Ventricular Assist System (the “HeartWare System”) to our customers, which include hospitals, health research institutions and medical device distributors. Our receivables are geographically dispersed, with a significant portion from customers located in Europe and other foreign countries. As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, one customer had an accounts receivable balance representing approximately 11% and 13%, respectively, of our total accounts receivable.
We maintain allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses that may result from an inability to collect payments owed to us for product sales. We regularly review the allowance by considering factors such as historical experience, the age of the accounts receivable balances and current economic conditions that may affect a customer’s ability to pay.
The following table summarizes the change in our allowance for doubtful accounts for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010:
                 
    Six months ended  
    June 30,  
    2011     2010  
Beginning balance
  $ 600,000     $  
Additions (bad debt expense)
    300,000       285,000  
Deductions (charge-offs)
           
 
           
Ending balance
  $ 900,000     $ 285,000  
 
           
As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we did not have an allowance for returns.
Inventories, net
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined using a first-in, first-out, or FIFO, method. Work-in-process and finished goods include direct and indirect labor and manufacturing overhead. Finished goods include product which is ready-for-use and which is held by us or by our customers on a consignment basis.
We review our inventory for excess or obsolete inventory and write-down obsolete or otherwise unmarketable inventory to its estimated net realizable value. Obsolescence may occur due to product expiring or product improvements rendering previous versions obsolete. In May 2011, we began shipping a sintered version of the HeartWare System on a global basis. Sintering is commonly used in medical devices to facilitate tissue adhesion. The extent to which this product enhancement will cause obsolescence of existing non-sintered inventory is difficult to determine because the rate of product adoption of sintered product is dependent on individual customer acceptance, implantation rates and approval timeframes of Institutional Review Boards at U.S. sites. As of June 30, 2011, we had $3.5 million of non-sintered inventory on hand and this product continues to be implanted at customer sites. However, a write-down of all or a portion of this inventory as obsolete could have a material impact on our results of operations.
Deferred Financing Costs
Costs incurred in connection with the issuance of our convertible senior notes in December 2010 have been allocated between the liability component and the equity component as further discussed in Note 11. The liability component of the issuance costs incurred was capitalized and is included in deferred financing costs, net on the condensed consolidated balance sheets. These costs are being amortized using the effective interest method through December 15, 2017, the maturity date of the notes, and such amortization expense is reflected in interest expense on our condensed consolidated statements of operations. The amount of amortization for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 was approximately $71,000 and $139,000, respectively.
Product Warranty
Certain patient accessories sold with the HeartWare System are covered by a limited warranty ranging from one to two years. Estimated contractual warranty obligations are recorded as an expense when the related revenue is recognized and are included in cost of revenues on the condensed consolidated statements of operations. Factors that affect the estimated warranty liability include the number of units sold, historical and anticipated rates of warranty claims, cost per claim, and vendor supported warranty programs. We periodically assess the adequacy of our recorded warranty liabilities and adjust the amounts as necessary.
The amount of the liability recorded is equal to the estimated costs to repair or otherwise satisfy claims made by customers. Accrued warranty expense is included as a component of accrued expenses and other current liabilities on the condensed consolidated balance sheets.
The costs to repair or replace products associated with product recalls and voluntary service campaigns are recorded when they are determined to be probable and reasonably estimable as a cost of revenues and are not included in the product warranty liability. No such costs were incurred in the six months ended June 30, 2011 and approximately $411,000 was incurred in the six months ended June 30, 2010.
The following table summarizes the change in our warranty liability for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010:
                 
    Six months ended  
    June 30,  
    2011     2010  
Beginning balance
  $ 290,891     $ 99,169  
Accrual for (reversal of) warranty expense
    (20,491 )     97,362  
Warranty costs incurred during the period
    (28,295 )     (47,363 )
 
           
Ending balance
  $ 242,105     $ 149,168  
 
           
Fair Value Measurements
The carrying amounts reported in the condensed consolidated balance sheets for cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses and other current liabilities approximate their fair value based on the short-term maturity of these instruments. Investments are considered available-for-sale as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 and are carried at fair value. See Note 6, “Fair Value Measurements” and Note 10, “Debt” for more information.
Vendor Concentration
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, we purchased approximately 55% of our inventory components and supplies from two vendors. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, we purchased approximately 62% and 51%, respectively, of our inventory components and supplies from the same two vendors. In addition, one of these vendors supplies consulting services and material used in research and development activities. As of June 30, 2011 and 2010, the amounts due to these vendors totaled approximately $788,000 and $1.1 million, respectively.
Concentration of Credit Risk and other Risks and Uncertainties
Financial instruments that potentially expose us to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, investments and trade accounts receivable. Cash and cash equivalents are primarily on deposit with financial institutions in the United States and these deposits generally exceed the amount of insurance provided by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”). The Company has not experienced any historical losses on its deposits of cash and cash equivalents. Our investments consist of investment grade rated corporate and government agency debt.
Concentration of credit risk with respect to our trade accounts receivable from our customers is primarily limited to hospitals, health research institutions and medical device distributors. Credit is extended to our customers, based on an evaluation of a customer’s financial condition and collateral is not required. To date, we have not experienced any credit losses, but have established an allowance for doubtful accounts of $900,000 at June 30, 2011.
We are subject to certain risks and uncertainties including, but not limited to, our ability to achieve profitability, to generate cash flow sufficient to satisfy our indebtedness, to run clinical trials in order to receive and maintain FDA and foreign regulatory approvals for our products, the ability to achieve widespread acceptance of our product, our ability to manufacture our products in a sufficient volume and at a reasonable cost, the ability to protect our proprietary technologies and develop new products, the risks associated with operating in foreign countries, and general competitive and economic conditions. Changes in any of the preceding areas could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial position.
New Accounting Standards
In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs. ASU No. 2011-04 clarifies some existing concepts, eliminates wording differences between U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”), and in some limited cases, changes some principles to achieve convergence between U.S. GAAP and IFRS. ASU No. 2011-04 results in a consistent definition of fair value and common requirements for measurement of and disclosure about fair value between U.S. GAAP and IFRS. ASU No. 2011-04 also expands the disclosures for fair value measurements that are estimated using significant unobservable (Level 3) inputs. The provisions of ASU No. 2011-04 will become effective for us on January 1, 2012 and are to be applied prospectively. We do not expect the adoption of the provisions of ASU No. 2011-04 to have a material effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows and we do not expect to materially modify or expand our financial statement footnote disclosures.
In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income. ASU No. 2011-05 requires an entity to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income, or in two separate but consecutive statements. ASU No. 2011-05 eliminates the option to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of stockholders’ equity. The presentation requirements will become effective for us on January 1, 2012. As ASU No. 2011-05 applies to financial statement presentation matters, the adoption of ASU No. 2011-05 will not affect our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows and we believe our current presentation of comprehensive income complies with the new presentation requirements.