XML 18 R8.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.3.0.15
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities as a Non-Controlling Interest
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2011
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities as a Non-Controlling Interest [Abstract] 
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities as a Non-Controlling Interest
 
(3)
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities as a Non-Controlling Interest
 
The Company regularly performs a review of the container funds that it manages for investors to determine whether a fund is a variable interest entity (VIE) and whether the Company has a variable interest that provides it with a controlling financial interest and is the primary beneficiary of the VIE in accordance with ASC 810, Consolidation. If the fund is determined to be a VIE, a further analysis is performed to determine if the Company has a variable interest in, and is a primary beneficiary of, the VIE and meets both of the following criteria under Paragraph 14A of ASC 810:
 
 
it has power to direct the activities of a VIE that most significantly impact the entity's economic performance; and
 
 
it has the obligation to absorb losses of the entity that could be potentially significant to the VIE or the right to receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE.
 
If in the Company's judgment both of the above criteria are met, the VIE's financial statements are included in the Company's consolidated financial statements as required under ASC 810. The equity attributable to the VIE is shown as a non-controlling interest on our consolidated balance sheet and the after tax result attributable to its operations is shown as net income or loss attributable to non-controlling interest on the Company's consolidated statement of operations.
 
Included among the funds that the Company manages are several Japanese container funds that were established by a related party under separate investment agreements allowed under Japanese commercial laws (see Note 10). Each of the funds is financed by unrelated Japanese third party investors. The container funds under management are considered VIEs because as manager of the funds, the Company has the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity's economic performance such as leasing and managing the containers owned by the funds. With the exception of two specific Japanese funds established in September 2010, the fees earned for arranging, managing and establishing the funds are not significant to the expected returns of the funds so the Company does not have a variable interest in the funds. The rights to receive benefits and obligations to absorb losses that could potentially be significant to the funds belong to the third party investors, so the Company concluded that it is not the primary beneficiary of the funds. With the exception of the sale of containers to the two Japanese funds established in September 2010, the Company recognized gains on sale of containers to the unconsolidated VIEs as sales in the ordinary course of the business. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Company sold $12.2 million and $24.9 million, respectively, of container portfolios to the Japanese VIEs and recognized gains of $0.7 million and $2.3 million, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company sold $12.4 million of containers and recognized a gain of $0.6 million. No sales of containers were made to the Japanese VIEs in the three months ended September 30, 2010.
 
In September 2010, the Company transferred approximately $16.0 million of containers to two specific Japanese funds that are considered VIEs. The terms of the transaction included options for the Company to purchase the containers from the funds at a fixed price. As a result of the residual interest resulting from the fixed price call option, the Company concluded that it may absorb a significant amount of the variability associated with the funds' anticipated economic performance so the Company has a variable interest in the funds. As the Company has the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of the VIEs and the variable interest provides the Company with the right to receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the funds, the Company determined that it is the primary beneficiary of these two specific VIEs and included the VIEs' assets and liabilities as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 and the results of the VIEs' operations and cash flows for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 in the Company's consolidated financial statements.
 
The containers transferred to the two consolidated Japanese VIEs had a net book value of $14.5 million as of September 30, 2011. The container equipment along with $1.6 million of cash held by these container funds and $1.7 million of net investment in direct finance leases, have been included on the Company's consolidated balance sheet with the offsetting equity related to the funds presented separately as non-controlling interest of $18.7 million in the equity section of the Company's consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2011. No gain or loss was recognized upon the initial consolidation of the VIEs in September 2010. The net income of $0.2 million and $0.6 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively, attributable to the two Japanese funds is presented as net income attributable to non-controlling interest and was deducted from the Company's consolidated statements of income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011.