10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.  20549

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2013

Commission File Number: 000-53650

Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Maryland	20-8198863
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

15601 Dallas Parkway, Suite 600, Addison, Texas 75001

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:  (866) 655-3600

None

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant:  (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:

Large accelerated filer o	Accelerated filer o
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company x

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes o No x

As of July 31, 2013, Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc. had 26,038,553 shares of common stock outstanding.

BEHRINGER HARVARD OPPORTUNITY REIT II, INC.

FORM 10-Q

Quarter Ended June 30, 2013

		Page
PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Financial Statements (Unaudited).
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012	3
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 and 2012	4
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Equity for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 and 2012	5
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 and 2012	6
	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	7
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	23
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	35
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	35
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	35
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	36
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	36
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	37
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosure	37
Item 5.	Other Information	37
Item 6.	Exhibits	41
Signature		42

2

PART I

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.                   Financial Statements (Unaudited).

Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(in thousands, except shares)

(unaudited)

	June 30,			December 31,
	2013			2012
Assets
Real estate
Land and improvements, net	$	67,736		$	73,380
Buildings and improvements, net	240,220			199,915
Real estate under development	254			838
Total real estate	308,210			274,133
Cash and cash equivalents	68,720			77,752
Restricted cash	6,986			3,491
Accounts receivable, net	2,718			3,008
Receivable from related party	—			3,269
Prepaid expenses and other assets	1,249			1,781
Investment in unconsolidated joint venture	11,635			—
Furniture, fixtures and equipment, net	7,952			6,864
Deferred financing fees, net	3,540			3,398
Lease intangibles, net	4,580			5,370
Total assets	$	415,590		$	379,066
Liabilities and Equity
Notes payable	$	218,505		$	183,308
Accounts payable	1,166			1,777
Payables to related parties	626			—
Acquired below-market leases, net	841			904
Accrued and other liabilities	8,357			6,544
Total liabilities	229,495			192,533
Commitments and contingencies
Equity
Preferred stock, $.0001 par value per share; 50,000,000 shares authorized, none outstanding	—			—
Convertible stock, $.0001 par value per share; 1,000 shares authorized, 1,000 outstanding	—			—
Common stock, $.0001 par value per share; 350,000,000 shares authorized, 26,038,553 and 26,060,612 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively	3			3
Additional paid-in capital	233,095			233,283
Accumulated distributions and net loss	(56,567		)	(58,249		)
Accumulated other comprehensive income	81			126
Total Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc. equity	176,612			175,163
Noncontrolling interest	9,483			11,370
Total equity	186,095			186,533
Total liabilities and equity	$	415,590		$	379,066

See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

3

Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss)

(in thousands, except per share amounts)

(unaudited)

	Three Months ended June 30,						Six Months ended June 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012
Revenues
Rental revenue	$	9,931		$	8,239		$	18,596		$	16,163
Hotel revenue	3,395			2,432			7,012			4,907
Total revenues	13,326			10,671			25,608			21,070
Expenses:
Property operating expenses	3,554			3,083			6,615			5,889
Hotel operating expenses	2,734			2,390			5,488			4,845
Interest expense, net	2,144			2,012			4,188			3,890
Real estate taxes	1,463			1,067			2,652			2,119
Property management fees	490			410			936			790
Asset management fees	864			804			1,545			1,574
General and administrative	832			768			1,633			1,392
Acquisition expense	1,185			729			3,056			729
Depreciation and amortization	4,689			3,481			8,373			7,254
Total expenses	17,955			14,744			34,486			28,482
Interest income, net	28			44			60			75
Other income	21			50			10			80
Loss from continuing operations	(4,580		)	(3,979		)	(8,808		)	(7,257		)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, including gains on disposition	14,153			(767		)	13,868			6,633
Net income (loss)	9,573			(4,746		)	5,060			(624		)
Noncontrolling interest in continuing operations	223			226			347			470
Noncontrolling interest in discontinued operations	(3,782		)	160			(3,725		)	(513		)
Net (income) loss attributable to the noncontrolling interest	(3,559		)	386			(3,378		)	(43		)
Net income (loss) attributable to the Company	$	6,014		$	(4,360	)	$	1,682		$	(667	)
Amounts attributable to the Company
Continuing operations	$	(4,357	)	$	(3,753	)	$	(8,461	)	$	(6,787	)
Discontinued operations	10,371			(607		)	10,143			6,120
Net income (loss) attributable to the Company	$	6,014		$	(4,360	)	$	1,682		$	(667	)
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic and diluted	26,039			26,089			26,046			25,908
Net income (loss) per share
Continuing operations	$	(0.17	)	$	(0.15	)	$	(0.33	)	$	(0.26	)
Discontinued operations	0.40			(0.02		)	0.39			0.24
Basic and diluted income (loss) per share	$	0.23		$	(0.17	)	$	0.06		$	(0.02	)
Comprehensive income (loss):
Net income (loss)	$	9,573		$	(4,746	)	$	5,060		$	(624	)
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Reclassification of unrealized loss on interest rate derivatives to net income	56			—			88			—
Unrealized loss on interest rate derivatives	—			—			—			(1		)
Foreign currency translation gain (loss)	225			(451		)	(127		)	(354		)
Total other comprehensive income (loss)	281			(451		)	(39		)	(355		)
Comprehensive income (loss)	9,854			(5,197		)	5,021			(979		)
Comprehensive (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interest	(3,562		)	386			(3,384		)	(43		)
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to common shareholders	$	6,292		$	(4,811	)	$	1,637		$	(1,022	)

See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

4

Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of  Equity

(unaudited)

(in thousands)

														Accumulated
	Convertible Stock			Common Stock				Additional			Accumulated			Other
	Number	Par		Number		Par		Paid-in			Distributions and			Comprehensive			Noncontrolling			Total
	of Shares	Value		of Shares		Value		Capital			Net (Loss)			Income (loss)			Interest			Equity
Balance at January 1, 2012	1	$	—	25,267		$	3	$	225,968		$	(43,657	)	$	83		$	14,607		$	197,004
Net income (loss)											(667		)				43			(624		)
Issuance of common stock, net				910		—		8,346												8,346
Redemption of common stock				(103	)			(914		)										(914		)
Distributions declared on common stock											(16,257		)							(16,257		)
Contributions from noncontrolling interest																	1,492			1,492
Distributions to noncontrolling interest																	(7,066		)	(7,066		)
Other comprehensive loss:
Unrealized losses on interest rate derivatives														(1		)	—			(1		)
Foreign currency translation loss														(354		)				(354		)
Balance at June 30, 2012	1	—		26,074		3		233,400			(60,581		)	(272		)	9,076			$	181,626
Balance at January 1, 2013	1	$	—	26,060		$	3	$	233,283		$	(58,249	)	$	126		$	11,370		$	186,533
Net income											1,682						3,378			5,060
Redemption of common stock				(22	)			(188		)										(188		)
Contributions from noncontrolling interest																	1,541			1,541
Distributions to noncontrolling interest																	(6,812		)	(6,812		)
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Reclassification of unrealized loss on interest rate derivatives to net income														82			6			88
Foreign currency translation loss														(127		)				(127		)
Balance at June 30, 2013	1	$	—	26,038		$	3	$	233,095		$	(56,567	)	$	81		$	9,483		$	186,095

See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

5

Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(in thousands)

(unaudited)

	Six months ended June 30,
	2013			2012
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss)	$	5,060		$	(624	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	8,640			8,451
Amortization of deferred financing fees	489			525
Gain on sale of discontinued operations	(14,455		)	(9,264		)
Loss on early extinguishment of debt	260			1,236
Loss on derivatives	30			—
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable	(87		)	(908		)
Prepaid expenses and other assets	431			(625		)
Accounts payable	(594		)	(918		)
Accrued and other liabilities	971			2,583
Payables to related parties	63			274
Addition of lease intangibles	(571		)	(236		)
Cash provided by operating activities	237			494
Cash flows from investing activities:
Acquisition deposits	250			—
Purchases of real estate	(63,510		)	(11,039		)
Investment in unconsolidated joint venture	(14,079		)	—
Return of investment in unconsolidated joint ventures	2,444			—
Proceeds from sale of discontinued operations	39,106			38,684
Additions of property and equipment	(4,270		)	(5,982		)
Change in restricted cash	(2,007		)	(540		)
Cash provided by (used in) investing activities	(42,066		)	21,123
Cash flows from financing activities:
Financing costs	(893		)	(1,013		)
Proceeds from notes payable	47,589			7,311
Payments on notes payable	(12,224		)	(23,369		)
Purchase of interest rate derivatives	(133		)	—
Issuance of common stock	—			6,142
Redemptions of common stock	(188		)	(914		)
Offering costs receivable from related party	3,832			(553		)
Distributions	—			(14,536		)
Contributions from noncontrolling interest holders	1,541			1,492
Distributions to noncontrolling interest holders	(6,812		)	(7,066		)
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities	32,712			(32,506		)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents	85			13
Net change in cash and cash equivalents	(9,032		)	(10,876		)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	77,752			80,130
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	68,720		$	69,254

See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

6

Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(unaudited)

1.Business and Organization

Business

Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc. (which may be referred to as the “Company,” “we,” “us,” or “our”) was organized as a Maryland corporation on January 9, 2007 and has elected to be taxed, and currently qualifies, as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) for federal income tax purposes.

We acquire and operate commercial real estate and real estate-related assets.  In particular, we focus generally on acquiring commercial properties with significant possibilities for capital appreciation, such as those requiring development, redevelopment, or repositioning, those located in markets and submarkets with high growth potential, and those available from sellers who are distressed or face time-sensitive deadlines.  In addition, our current opportunistic investment strategy also includes investments in real estate-related assets that present opportunities for higher current income.  Such investments may have capital gain characteristics, whether as a result of a discount purchase or related equity participations.  We may acquire a wide variety of commercial properties, including office, industrial, retail, hospitality, recreation and leisure, single-tenant, multifamily, and other real properties.  These properties may be existing, income-producing properties, newly constructed properties, or properties under development or construction.  They may include multifamily properties purchased for conversion into condominiums and single-tenant properties that may be converted for multi-tenant use.  We may invest in real estate-related securities, including securities issued by other real estate companies, either for investment or in change of control transactions completed on a negotiated basis or otherwise.  Further, we also may originate or invest in collateralized mortgage-backed securities and mortgage, bridge or mezzanine loans, or in entities that make investments similar to the foregoing.  We expect to make our investments in or in respect of real estate assets located in the United States and other countries based on our view of existing market conditions.  As of June 30, 2013, we had 12 real estate investments including an investment in a portfolio of nine medical office buildings, 11 of which were consolidated into our condensed consolidated financial statements.

Substantially all of our business is conducted through Behringer Harvard Opportunity OP II LP, a limited partnership organized in Delaware (“Behringer Harvard Opportunity OP II”).  As of June 30, 2013, our wholly-owned subsidiary, BHO II, Inc., a Delaware corporation, was the sole general partner of Behringer Harvard Opportunity OP II and owned a 0.1% partnership interest in Behringer Harvard Opportunity OP II.  As of June 30, 2013, our wholly-owned subsidiary, BHO Business Trust II, a Maryland business trust, was the sole limited partner of Behringer Harvard Opportunity OP II and owned the remaining 99.9% interest in Behringer Harvard Opportunity OP II.

We are externally managed and advised by Behringer Harvard Opportunity Advisors II, LLC.  The Advisor is responsible for managing our day-to-day affairs and for identifying and making acquisitions and investments on our behalf.

Organization

In connection with our initial capitalization, on January 19, 2007, we issued 22,471 shares of our common stock and 1,000 shares of our convertible stock to Behringer Harvard Holdings.  Behringer Harvard Holdings transferred its shares of convertible stock to the Advisor on April 2, 2010.

As of June 30, 2013, we had issued 26.7 million shares of our common stock, including 22,471 shares owned by Behringer Harvard Holdings and 2.2 million shares issued through the distribution reinvestment plan (the “DRP”).  As of June 30, 2013, we had redeemed 0.7 million shares of our common stock and had 26.0 million shares of common stock outstanding.  As of June 30, 2013, we had 1,000 shares of convertible stock issued and outstanding to the Advisor.

Our common stock is not currently listed on a national securities exchange.  Depending upon then prevailing market conditions, it is our intention to consider beginning the process of liquidating our assets and distributing the net proceeds to our stockholders within three to six years after the termination of our initial public offering of common stock.  If we do not begin an orderly liquidation within that period, we may seek to have our shares listed on a national securities exchange.

2.Interim Unaudited Financial Information

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, which was filed with the SEC on March 28, 2013.  Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted in this report on Form 10-Q pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC.

The results for the interim periods shown in this report are not necessarily indicative of future financial results.  The accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2013, the condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 and condensed

7

Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(unaudited)

consolidated statements of equity and cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 have not been audited by our independent registered public accounting firm.  In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include all adjustments necessary to fairly present our condensed consolidated financial position as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 and our condensed consolidated results of operations and cash flows for the periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.  Such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature.

3.Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Described below are certain of our significant accounting policies.  The disclosures regarding several of the policies have been condensed or omitted in accordance with interim reporting regulations specified by Form 10-Q.  Please see our Annual Report on Form 10-K for a complete listing of all of our significant accounting policies.

Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  These estimates include such items as purchase price allocation for real estate acquisitions, impairment of long-lived assets, depreciation and amortization, and allowance for doubtful accounts.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation

Our consolidated financial statements include our accounts and the accounts of other subsidiaries over which we have control.  All inter-company transactions, balances, and profits have been eliminated in consolidation.  Interests in entities acquired will be evaluated based on applicable GAAP, which includes the requirement to consolidate entities deemed to be variable interest entities (“VIE”) in which we are the primary beneficiary.  If the interest in the entity is determined not to be a VIE, then the entity will be evaluated for consolidation based on legal form, economic substance, and the extent to which we have control and/or substantive participating rights under the respective ownership agreement.  For entities in which we have less than a controlling interest or entities which we are not deemed to be the primary beneficiary, we account for the investment using the equity method of accounting.

There are judgments and estimates involved in determining if an entity in which we have made an investment is a VIE and, if so, whether we are the primary beneficiary.  The entity is evaluated to determine if it is a VIE by, among other things, calculating the percentage of equity being risked compared to the total equity of the entity.  Determining expected future losses involves assumptions of various possibilities of the results of future operations of the entity, assigning a probability to each possibility and using a discount rate to determine the net present value of those future losses.  A change in the judgments, assumptions, and estimates outlined above could result in consolidating an entity that should not be consolidated or accounting for an investment using the equity method that should in fact be consolidated, the effects of which could be material to our financial statements.

In the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, all dollar and share amounts in tabulation are in thousands of dollars and shares, respectively, unless otherwise noted.

Real Estate

Upon the acquisition of real estate properties, we recognize the assets acquired, the liabilities assumed and any noncontrolling interest as of the acquisition date, measured at their fair values.  The acquisition date is the date on which we obtain control of the real estate property.  The assets acquired and liabilities assumed may consist of land, inclusive of associated rights, buildings, assumed debt, identified intangible assets and liabilities and asset retirement obligations. Identified intangible assets generally consist of above-market leases, in-place leases, in-place tenant improvements, in-place leasing commissions and tenant relationships.  Identified intangible liabilities generally consist of below-market leases. Goodwill is recognized as of the acquisition date and measured as the aggregate fair value of the consideration transferred and any noncontrolling interests in the acquiree over the fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired.  Likewise, a bargain purchase gain is recognized in current earnings when the aggregate fair value of the consideration transferred and any noncontrolling interests in the acquiree is less than the fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired.  Acquisition-related costs are expensed in the period incurred.  Initial valuations are subject to change until our information is finalized, which is no later than twelve months from the acquisition date.

The fair value of the tangible assets acquired, consisting of land and buildings, is determined by valuing the property as if it were vacant, and the “as-if-vacant” value is then allocated to land and buildings.  Land values are derived from appraisals, and building values are calculated as replacement cost less depreciation or management’s estimates of the fair

8

Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(unaudited)

value of these assets using discounted cash flow analyses or similar methods believed to be used by market participants.  The value of buildings is depreciated over the estimated useful life of 25 years using the straight-line method.

We determine the fair value of assumed debt by calculating the net present value of the scheduled mortgage payments using interest rates for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities that management believes we could obtain at the date of the debt assumption.  Any difference between the fair value and stated value of the assumed debt is recorded as a discount or premium and amortized over the remaining life of the loan using the effective interest method.

We determine the value of above-market and below-market leases for acquired properties based on the present value (using an interest rate that reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the difference between (1) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in-place leases and (2) management’s estimate of current market lease rates for the corresponding in-place leases, measured over a period equal to (a) the remaining non-cancelable lease term for above-market leases, or (b) the remaining non-cancelable lease term plus any below-market fixed rate renewal options that, based on a qualitative assessment of several factors, including the financial condition of the lessee, the business conditions in the industry in which the lessee operates, the economic conditions in the area in which the property is located, and the ability of the lessee to sublease the property during the renewal term, are reasonably assured to be exercised by the lessee for below-market leases.  We record the fair value of above-market and below-market leases as intangible assets or intangible liabilities, respectively, and amortize them as an adjustment to rental income over the determined lease term.

The total value of identified real estate intangible assets acquired is further allocated to in-place leases, in-place tenant improvements, in-place leasing commissions and tenant relationships based on our evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant’s lease and our overall relationship with that respective tenant.  The aggregate value for tenant improvements and leasing commissions is based on estimates of these costs incurred at inception of the acquired leases, amortized through the date of acquisition.  The aggregate value of in-place leases acquired and tenant relationships is determined by applying a fair value model.  The estimates of fair value of in-place leases include an estimate of carrying costs during the expected lease-up periods for the respective spaces considering current market conditions.  In estimating the carrying costs that would have otherwise been incurred had the leases not been in place, we include such items as real estate taxes, insurance and other operating expenses as well as lost rental revenue during the expected lease-up period based on current market conditions.  The estimates of the fair value of tenant relationships also include costs to execute similar leases including leasing commissions, legal fees and tenant improvements as well as an estimate of the likelihood of renewal as determined by management on a tenant-by-tenant basis.

We amortize the value of in-place leases, in-place tenant improvements and in-place leasing commissions to expense over the initial term of the respective leases.  The tenant relationship values are amortized to expense over the initial term and any anticipated renewal periods, but in no event does the amortization period for intangible assets or liabilities exceed the remaining depreciable life of the building.  Should a tenant terminate its lease, the unamortized portion of the acquired lease intangibles related to that tenant would be charged to expense.

Anticipated amortization expense associated with the acquired lease intangibles for each of the following five years as of June 30, 2013 is as follows:

Year	Lease / Other Intangibles
July 1, 2013 - December 31, 2013	$	798
2014	705
2015	368
2016	230
2017	181

9

Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(unaudited)

Accumulated depreciation and amortization related to our consolidated investments in real estate assets and intangibles were as follows:

										Acquired
	Buildings and			Land and			Lease			Below-Market
June 30, 2013	Improvements			Improvements			Intangibles			Leases
Cost	$	261,887		$	69,923		$	14,651		$	(2,297	)
Less: depreciation and amortization	(21,667		)	(2,187		)	(10,071		)	1,456
Net	$	240,220		$	67,736		$	4,580		$	(841	)

										Acquired
	Buildings and			Land and			Lease			Below-Market
December 31, 2012	Improvements			Improvements			Intangibles			Leases
Cost	$	217,343		$	75,873		$	14,041		$	(2,196	)
Less: depreciation and amortization	(17,428		)	(2,493		)	(8,671		)	1,292
Net	$	199,915		$	73,380		$	5,370		$	(904	)

Real Estate Held for Sale

We classify properties as held for sale when certain criteria are met, in accordance with GAAP.  At that time we present the assets and obligations of the property held for sale separately in our consolidated balance sheet and we cease recording depreciation and amortization expense related to that property.  Properties held for sale are reported at the lower of their carrying amount or their estimated fair value, less estimated costs to sell.  We had no property classified as held for sale at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

Investment Impairment

For all of our real estate and real estate related investments, we monitor events and changes in circumstances indicating that the carrying amounts of the real estate assets may not be recoverable.  Examples of the types of events and circumstances that would cause management to assess our assets for potential impairment include, but are not limited to:  a significant decrease in the market price of an asset; a significant adverse change in the manner in which the asset is being used; an accumulation of costs in excess of the acquisition basis plus construction of the property; major vacancies and the resulting loss of revenues; natural disasters; a change in the projected holding period; legitimate purchase offers and changes in the global and local markets or economic conditions.  Our assets may at times be concentrated in limited geographic locations and, to the extent that our portfolio is concentrated in limited geographic locations, downturns specifically related to such regions may result in tenants defaulting on their lease obligations at a portion of our properties within a short time period, which may result in asset impairments.  When such events or changes in circumstances are present, we assess potential impairment by comparing estimated future undiscounted operating cash flows expected to be generated over the life of the asset and from its eventual disposition to the carrying amount of the asset.  In the event that the carrying amount exceeds the estimated future undiscounted operating cash flows, we recognize an impairment loss to adjust the carrying amount of the asset to estimated fair value.  We consider projected future undiscounted cash flows, trends, strategic decisions regarding future development plans, and other factors in our assessment of whether impairment conditions exist.  While we believe our estimates of future cash flows are reasonable, different assumptions regarding factors such as market rents, economic conditions, and occupancy rates could significantly affect these estimates.

In evaluating our investments for impairment, management may use appraisals and make estimates and assumptions, including, but not limited to, the projected date of disposition of the properties, the estimated future cash flows of the properties during our ownership, and the projected sales price of each of the properties.  A future change in these estimates and assumptions could result in understating or overstating the carrying value of our investments, which could be material to our financial statements.

We also evaluate our investments in unconsolidated joint ventures at each reporting date.  If we believe there is an other than temporary decline in market value, we will record an impairment charge based on these evaluations.  We assess potential impairment by comparing our portion of estimated future undiscounted operating cash flows expected to be generated by the joint venture over the life of the joint venture’s assets to the carrying amount of the joint venture.  In the event that the carrying amount exceeds our portion of estimated future undiscounted operating cash flows, we recognize an impairment loss to adjust the carrying amount of the joint venture to its estimated fair value.

10

Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(unaudited)

We believe the carrying value of our operating real estate is currently recoverable.  Accordingly, there were no impairment charges for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 or 2012.  However, if market conditions worsen beyond our current expectations, or if changes in our strategy significantly affect any key assumptions used in our fair value calculations, we may need to take charges in future periods for impairments related to our existing investments.  Any such non-cash charges would have an adverse effect on our consolidated financial position and results of operations.

Investment in Unconsolidated Joint Venture

We provide funding to third party developers for the acquisition, development and construction of real estate (“ADC Arrangement”).  Under the ADC Arrangement, we may participate in the residual profits of the project through the sale or refinancing of the property.  We evaluate this arrangement to determine if they have characteristics similar to a loan or if the characteristics are more similar to a joint venture or partnership such as participating in the risks and rewards of the project as an owner or an investment partner.  When we determine that the characteristics are more similar to a jointly-owned investment or partnership, we account for the arrangement as an investment in an unconsolidated joint venture under the equity method of accounting (Note 8) or a direct investment (consolidated basis of accounting) instead of applying loan accounting.  The ADC Arrangement is periodically reassessed.

Revenue Recognition

We recognize rental income generated from leases of real estate assets on a straight-line basis over the terms of the respective leases, including the effect of rent holidays, if any.  Straight-line rental revenue of $0.1 million and $0.3 million was recognized in rental revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively, and includes amounts recognized in discontinued operations.  Straight-line rental revenue of $0.1 million and $0.2 million was recognized in rental revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively, and includes amounts recognized in discontinued operations.   Net below market lease amortization of less than $0.1 million was recognized in rental revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013.  Net below market lease amortization of less than $0.1 million and $0.1 million was recognized in rental revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively, and includes amounts recognized in discontinued operations.

Hotel revenue is derived from the operations of the Courtyard Kauai at Coconut Beach Hotel, consisting of guest room, food and beverage, and other revenue, and is recognized as the services are rendered.

Accounts Receivable

Accounts receivable primarily consist of receivables related to our consolidated properties of $2.7 million which includes straight-line rental revenue receivables of $1.4 million as of June 30, 2013.  Accounts receivable primarily consisted of receivables related to our consolidated properties of $2.8 million which includes straight-line rental revenue receivables of $1.2 million as of December 31, 2012.

Furniture, Fixtures, and Equipment

Furniture, fixtures, and equipment are recorded at cost and are depreciated according to the Company’s capitalization policy which uses the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives of five to seven years.  Maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred.  Accumulated depreciation associated with our furniture, fixtures, and equipment was $3.2 million and $2.3 million as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

Deferred Financing Fees

Deferred financing fees are recorded at cost and are amortized to interest expense of our notes payable using a straight-line method that approximates the effective interest method over the life of the related debt.  Accumulated amortization of deferred financing fees was $1.6 million and $1.4 million as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

Income Taxes

We have elected to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), and have qualified as a REIT since the year ended December 31, 2008.  To qualify as a REIT, we must meet a number of organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement that we distribute at least 90% of our REIT taxable income to our stockholders.  As a REIT, we generally will not be subject to federal income tax at the corporate level.  We are organized and operate in such a manner as to qualify for taxation as a REIT under the Code and intend to continue to operate in such a manner, but no assurance can be given that we will operate in a manner so as to qualify or remain qualified as a REIT.

11

Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(unaudited)

We have reviewed our tax positions under GAAP guidance that clarifies the relevant criteria and approach for the recognition and measurement of uncertain tax positions.  The guidance prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition of a tax position taken, or expected to be taken, in a tax return.  A tax position may only be recognized in the financial statements if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained upon examination.  We believe it is more likely than not that the tax positions taken relative to our status as a REIT will be sustained in any tax examination.

Foreign Currency Translation

For our international investment where the functional currency is other than the U.S. dollar, assets and liabilities are translated using period-end exchange rates, while the statement of operations amounts are translated using the average exchange rates for the respective period.  Gains and losses resulting from the change in exchange rates from period to period are reported separately as a component of other comprehensive income (loss) (“OCI”).  Gains and losses resulting from foreign currency transactions are included in the condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).

The Euro is the functional currency for the operations of Holstenplatz and Alte Jakobstraße.  We also maintain a Euro-denominated bank account that is translated into U.S. dollars at the current exchange rate at each reporting period.  For the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, the foreign currency translation adjustment was a gain of $0.2 million and a loss of $0.1 million, respectively.  For the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, the foreign currency translation adjustment was a loss of $0.5 million and a loss $0.4 million, respectively.

Concentration of Credit Risk

At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, we had cash and cash equivalents deposited in certain financial institutions in excess of federally insured levels.  We have diversified our cash and cash equivalents among several banking institutions in an attempt to minimize exposure to any one of these entities.  We regularly monitor the financial stability of these financial institutions and believe that we are not exposed to any significant credit risk in cash and cash equivalents or restricted cash.

Noncontrolling Interest

Noncontrolling interest represents the noncontrolling ownership interest’s proportionate share of the equity in our consolidated real estate investments.  Income and losses are allocated to noncontrolling interest holders based generally on their ownership percentage.  In certain instances, our joint venture agreement provides for liquidating distributions based on achieving certain return metrics (“promoted interest”).  If a property reaches a defined return threshold, then it will result in distributions to noncontrolling interest which is different from the standard pro-rata allocation percentage.

Earnings per Share

Net income (loss) per share is calculated based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each period.  The weighted average shares outstanding used to calculate both basic and diluted income (loss) per share were the same for each of the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, as there were no potentially dilutive securities outstanding.

Reclassification

To conform to the current year presentation, which presents hotel operating expense as a separate component of property operating expense on our condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, we reclassified $2.4 million and $4.8 million from property operating expense to hotel operating expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively.

Subsequent Events

We have evaluated subsequent events for recognition or disclosure in our condensed consolidated financial statements and noted no subsequent events that would require adjustment to the condensed consolidated financial statements or additional disclosure other than the one disclosed herein.

4.  New Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2013-02 (“ASU 2013-02”), Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income.  The update clarifies how to report the effect of significant reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income.  ASU 2013-02 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years,

12

Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(unaudited)

beginning after December 15, 2012 and is to be applied prospectively.  Our adoption of this ASU did not materially change the presentation of our consolidated condensed financial statements.

5.Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value

Fair value measurements are determined based on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.  As a basis for considering market participant assumptions in fair value measurements, a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between market participant assumptions based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity (observable inputs that are classified within Levels 1 and 2 of the hierarchy) and the reporting entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions (unobservable inputs classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy) has been established.

Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets and liabilities that we have the ability to access.  Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.  Level 2 inputs may include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, as well as inputs that are observable for the asset or liability (other than quoted prices), such as interest rates, foreign exchange rates, and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals.  Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability that are typically based on an entity’s own assumptions, as there is little, if any, related market activity.  In instances where the determination of the fair value measurement is based on inputs from different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement falls is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety.  Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.

Recurring Fair Value Measurements

Currently, we use interest rate swaps and caps to manage our interest rate risk.  The valuation of these instruments is determined using widely accepted valuation techniques, including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative.  This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves, implied volatilities, and foreign currency exchange rates.

We incorporate credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both our own nonperformance risk and the respective counterparty’s nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements.  Although we have determined that the majority of the inputs used to value our derivatives fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments associated with our derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads, to evaluate the likelihood of default by itself and its counterparties.  However, as of June 30, 2013, we have assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of our derivative positions and have determined that the credit valuation adjustments are not significant to the overall valuation of our derivatives.  As a result, we have determined that our derivative valuations in their entirety are classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

The following fair value hierarchy table presents information about our assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

June 30, 2013	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Assets
Derivative financial instruments	$	—	$	205	$	—	$	205

December 31, 2012	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Assets
Derivative financial instruments	$	—	$	13	$	—	$	13

Derivative financial instruments classified as assets are included in prepaid expenses and other assets on the balance sheet.

6.Financial Instruments not Reported at Fair Value

We determined the following disclosure of estimated fair values using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies.  However, considerable judgment is necessary to interpret market data and develop the related estimates of fair value.  The use of different market assumptions and/or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.

13

Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(unaudited)

As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, management estimated that the carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable, prepaid expenses and other assets, accounts payable, accrued expenses, other liabilities and payables/receivables from related parties were at amounts that reasonably approximated their fair value based on their highly-liquid nature and/or short-term maturities.  The notes payable of $218.5 million and $183.3 million as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, have a fair value of approximately $213.4 million and $179.4 million as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, based upon interest rates for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities that management believes we could obtain.  The fair value of the notes payable is categorized as a Level 2 basis.  The fair value is estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis valuation on the borrowing rates currently available for loans with similar terms and maturities.  The fair value of the notes payable was determined by discounting the future contractual interest and principal payments by a market rate.  Disclosure about fair value of financial instruments is based on pertinent information available to management as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

7.Real Estate and Real Estate-Related Investments

As of June 30, 2013, we consolidated 11 real estate investments on our condensed consolidated balance sheet.  The following table presents certain information about our consolidated investments as of June 30, 2013:

Property Name	Location	Date Acquired	Ownership Interest
1875 Lawrence	Denver, CO	October 28, 2008	100	%
Holstenplatz	Hamburg, Germany	June 30, 2010	100	%
Florida MOB Portfolio (1)	South Florida	October 8, 2010/October 20, 2010	90	%
Courtyard Kauai Coconut Beach Hotel	Kauai, Hawaii	October 20, 2010	80	%
River Club and the Townhomes at River Club	Athens, Georiga	April 25, 2011	85	%
Babcock Self Storage	San Antonio, Texas	August 30, 2011	85	%
Lakes of Margate	Margate, Florida	October 19, 2011	92.5	%
Arbors Harbor Town	Memphis, Tennessee	December 20, 2011	94	%
Alte Jakobstraße	Berlin, Germany	April 5, 2012	99.7	%
Wimberly at Deerwood (“Wimberly”)	Jacksonville, Florida	February 19, 2013	95	%
22 Exchange	Akron, Ohio	April 16, 2013	90	%

(1)We acquired a portfolio of eight medical office buildings, known as the Original Florida MOB Portfolio on October 8, 2010.  We acquired a medical office building known as Gardens Medical Pavilion on October 20, 2010.  Collectively, the Original Florida MOB Portfolio and Gardens Medical Pavilion are referred to as the Florida MOB Portfolio.  The Florida MOB Portfolio consists of nine medical office buildings.  We own 90% of each of eight of the buildings.  We own approximately 79.8% in the ninth building, Gardens Medical Pavilion.

Real Estate Asset Acquisitions

During the six months ending June 30, 2013, we made two separate real estate acquisitions: a 95% interest in Wimberly and a 90% interest in 22 Exchange for an aggregate purchase price, excluding closing costs, of approximately $63.5 million.  The purchase was partially funded with proceeds of new loans of approximately $46.2 million.

The following table summarizes the amounts of identified assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date :

	Total  Acquisitions
Buildings	$	52,875
Land	6,721
Land improvements	667
Lease intangibles, net	1,251
Furniture, fixtures and equipment	1,645
Signage, landscaping and misc. site improvements	465
Acquired below-market leases, net	(99		)
Total identifiable net assets	$	63,525

The following table summarizes the amounts recognized for revenues, acquisition expenses and net loss from the acquisition dates to June 30, 2013 (in millions):

	Wimberly		22 Exchange
Revenue	$	1.3	$	0.8
Acquisition expenses with unaffiliated third party	$	0.8	$	0.4
Net loss	$	1.7	$	0.8

14

Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(unaudited)

The following unaudited pro forma summary presents our consolidated information for the two acquisitions as if the business combinations had occurred on January 1, 2012:

	Pro Forma for the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013			2012
Revenue	$	52,749		$	45,863
Depreciation and amortization	$	(1,255	)	$	(2,407	)
Net income (loss)	$	7,245		$	(4,508	)
Net income (loss) per share	$	0.28		$	(0.17	)

These pro forma amounts have been calculated after applying our accounting policies and adjusting the results to reflect additional depreciation and amortization that would have been charged assuming the fair value adjustments to the tangible and intangible assets had been applied from January 1, 2012.

Wimberly at Deerwood

On February 19, 2013, we acquired Wimberly, a 322-unit multifamily community in Jacksonville, Florida, from an unaffiliated third party.  The purchase price for Wimberly, excluding closing costs, was approximately $35.6 million.  In connection with the acquisition of Wimberly, on February 19, 2013, we entered into a loan for approximately $26.7 million with an unaffiliated third party.   The loan bears interest at a variable annual rate of approximately 2.28% plus 30-day LIBOR and requires interest-only payments for the first 24 months.  The loan may not be prepaid in whole or in part during the first year.  After the first year, the loan may be prepaid in whole (but not in part) with payment of prepayment fees.  The loan must be repaid in its entirety by March 2023.

22 Exchange

We acquired a 90% interest in 22 Exchange, a student housing complex in Akron, Ohio on April 16, 2013 from an unaffiliated third party.  The contract purchase price for the property, excluding closing costs, was approximately $28.1 million.  In connection with the purchase, we entered into a loan for approximately $19.5 million with an unaffiliated third party.  The loan bears interest at a fixed rate of 3.93% and requires interest-only payments for the first 36 months.  During the first 60 months, the loan may be prepaid in whole with payment of prepayment fees.  The loan must be repaid in its entirety by May 2023.

We are in the process of finalizing our acquisition allocations, which are subject to change until the information is finalized, which will be no later than twelve months from the acquisition date.

Real Estate Asset Dispositions

Interchange Business Center

On October 18, 2012, we sold one of the four industrial buildings at Interchange Business Center for a contract sales price of approximately $7.5 million, excluding transaction costs.  On April 12, 2013, we sold the remaining three buildings for a contract sales price of approximately $40.4 million, excluding transaction costs and recorded a gain on sale of real estate property of $14.5 million and loss on early extinguishment of debt of $0.3 million which is reflected in discontinued operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013.  A portion of the proceeds from the sale of the asset were used to pay off in full the existing indebtedness of approximately $11.3 million secured by the property.

8.Investment in Unconsolidated Joint Venture

On May 24, 2013, we provided mezzanine financing under the ADC Arrangement totaling $13.7 million to an unaffiliated third-party entity that owns and will develop an apartment complex in Denver, Colorado (“Prospect Park”).  The developer also had a senior construction loan with a third-party lender, in an aggregate principal amount of $35.6 million.  The senior construction loan is guaranteed by the owners of the developer.  Our mezzanine loan to the developer is subordinate to the senior construction loan.  The loan is collateralized by the property and has an annual interest rate of 10% for the first three years of the term; followed by two one-year extension options at which point, the annual interest rate would increase to 14%.  We have evaluated this arrangement and determined that the characteristics are similar to a jointly-owned investment or partnership, and accordingly, the investment is accounted for as an unconsolidated joint venture under the equity method of accounting instead of loan accounting as we will participate in the residual interests through the sale or refinancing of the property.

As of June 30, 2013, the outstanding principal balance under our mezzanine loan was $13.7 million.  In connection with this investment, we capitalized acquisition-related costs and fees totaling $0.4 million.  Interest capitalized for the three

15

Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(unaudited)

and six months ending June 30, 2013 was less than $0.1 million.  For the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, no equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated joint venture related to our investment in Prospect Park.

The following table sets forth our ownership interest in Prospect Park that is recorded as an equity investment:

	Ownership Interest	Carrying Amount at
Property Name	at June 30, 2013	June 30, 2013
Prospect Park	N/A	$	11,635	(1)

(1)During the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, we received distributions (return of capital) of approximately $2.4 million and capitalized $0.4 million of acquisition expense.  Approximately $2 million of the $2.4 million distributions is interest reserve (restricted cash on the condensed consolidated balance sheet).

9.Notes Payable

The following table sets forth information on our notes payable as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

	Notes Payable as of				Interest	Maturity
Description	June 30, 2013		December 31, 2012		Rate	Date
1875 Lawrence	$	15,500	$	15,500	30-day LIBOR + 5.35% (1)	01/01/16
Interchange Business Center	—		9,882		30-day LIBOR + 5% (1)(2)(3)	12/01/13
Holstenplatz	10,105		10,375		3.887%	04/30/15
Courtyard Kauai at Coconut Beach Hotel	38,000		38,000		30-day LIBOR + .95% (1)	11/09/15
Florida MOB Portfolio - Palmetto Building	6,001		6,077		4.55%	01/01/16
Florida MOB Portfolio - Victor Farris Building	12,097		12,249		4.55%	01/01/16
Florida MOB Portfolio - Gardens Medical Pavilion	14,215		14,385		4.9%	01/01/18
River Club and the Townhomes at River Club	25,175		25,200		5.26%	05/01/18
Babcock Self Storage	2,204		2,225		5.80%	08/30/18
Lakes of Margate	15,074		15,182		5.49% and 5.92%	01/01/20
Arbors Harbor Town	26,000		26,000		3.985%	01/01/19
Alte Jakobstraße	7,949		8,233		2.3%	12/30/15
Wimberly	26,685		—		30-day LIBOR + 2.28%	03/01/23
22 Exchange	19,500		—		3.93%	05/05/23
	$	218,505	$	183,308

(1)30-day LIBOR was 0.19% at June 30, 2013.

(2)The 30-day LIBOR rate was set at a minimum value of 2.5%.

(3)On October 18, 2012, we sold one of the four industrial buildings at Interchange Business Center to an unaffiliated third party.  On April 12, 2013, we sold the remaining three buildings to an unaffiliated third party.  A portion of the proceeds from the sale of the remaining three buildings were used to pay off in full the existing indebtedness associated with the property.

At June 30, 2013, our notes payable balance was $218.5 million and consisted of the notes payable related to our consolidated properties.  We have guaranteed payment of certain recourse liabilities with respect to certain customary nonrecourse carveouts as set forth in the guaranties in favor of the unaffiliated lenders with respect to the Courtyard Kauai at Coconut Beach Hotel, Wimberly and 22 Exchange notes payable.  For the six months ended June 30, 2013, in connection with the acquisition of Wimberly and 22 Exchange, we entered into loans for approximately $26.7 million and $19.5 million, respectively, with unaffiliated third parties.  On April 12, 2013, we sold the remaining three industrial buildings at Interchange Business Center to an unaffiliated third party and used a portion of the proceeds from the sale to pay off in full the existing indebtedness of $11.3 million.  See footnote 16, Discontinued Operations for further details.  Interest capitalized for the three and six months ending June 30, 2013 was less than $0.1 million.

We are subject to customary affirmative, negative, and financial covenants and representations, warranties and borrowing conditions, all as set forth in our loan agreements.  As of June 30, 2013, we believe we were in compliance with the covenants under our loan agreements.

16

Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(unaudited)

The following table summarizes our contractual obligations for principal payments as of June 30, 2013:

Year	Amount Due
July 1, 2013 - December 31, 2013	$	1,081
2014	2,351
2015	57,584
2016	34,695
2017	2,519
Thereafter	120,275
	$	218,505

10.Leasing Activity

Future minimum base rental payments of our office and industrial properties due to us under non-cancelable leases in effect as of June 30, 2013 for our consolidated properties are as follows:

July 1, 2013 - December 31, 2013	$	14,296
2014	12,784
2015	10,213
2016	7,468
2017	3,754
Thereafter	4,944
Total	$	53,459

The schedule above does not include rental payments due to us from our multifamily, hotel, student housing, and self-storage properties, as leases associated with these properties typically are for periods of one year or less.  As of June 30, 2013, none of our tenants accounted for 10% or more of our aggregate annual rental revenues from our consolidated properties.

11.Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

We may be exposed to the risk associated with variability of interest rates that might impact our cash flows and the results of operations.  The hedging strategy of entering into interest rate caps and swaps, therefore, is to eliminate or reduce, to the extent possible, the volatility of cash flows.  As of June 30, 2013, none of our derivative instruments were designated as hedging instruments.

Derivative instruments classified as assets were reported at their combined fair values of $0.2 million and less than $0.1 million in prepaid expenses and other assets at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.  During the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, we recorded a reclassification of unrealized loss to interest expense of $0.1 million and unrealized loss of less than $0.1 million to other comprehensive income (loss) (“OCI”) in our statement of equity to adjust the carrying amount of the interest rate caps at June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

The following table summarizes the notional values of our derivative financial instruments.  The notional values provide an indication of the extent of our involvement in these instruments, but do not represent exposure to credit, interest rate, or market risks:

Type / Description	Notional Value		Interest Rate / Strike Rate	Index	Maturity
Not Designated as Hedging Instruments
Interest rate cap - Courtyard Kauai Coconut Beach Hotel	$	38,000	3.00% - 6.00%	30-day LIBOR	October 15, 2014
Interest rate cap - 1875 Lawrence	$	20,100	2.75%	30-day LIBOR	January 1, 2016
Interest rate cap - Wimberly	$	26,685	4.56%	30-day LIBOR	March 1, 2018

The table below presents the fair value of our derivative financial instruments, as well as their classification on the consolidated balance sheets as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

17

Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(unaudited)

	Balance	Asset Derivatives
Derivatives designated as	Sheet	June 30, 2013		December 31, 2012
hedging instruments:	Location	2013		2012
Interest rate derivative contracts	Prepaid expenses and other assets	$	—	$	13

	Balance	Asset Derivatives
Derivatives not designated as	Sheet	June 30, 2013		December 31, 2012
hedging instruments:	Location	2013		2012
Interest rate derivative contracts	Prepaid expenses and other assets	$	205	$	—

The table below presents the effect of our derivative financial instruments on the consolidated statements of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012:

Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships
Amount of Loss Reclassified from OCI into Income (Effective Portion)
Three Months ended June 30, 2012			Six Months ended June 30, 2012
$	(8	)	$	(14	)
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments
Amount of Gain or (Loss) (1)
Three months ended June 30, 2013			Six months ended June 30, 2013
$	41		$	(30	)

(1)Amounts included in interest expense.  For the three and six months ending June 30, 2013, reclassification out of OCI for $56 thousand and $88 thousand, respectively, was due to all derivatives being designated as non-hedging instruments as of January 1, 2013 compared to being designated as hedging instruments as of December 31, 2012.

12.Commitments and Contingencies

Our operating leases consist of ground leases on each of eight buildings acquired in connection with the purchase of the Original Florida MOB Portfolio.  Each ground lease is for a term of 50 years, with a 25-year extension option.  The annual payment for each ground lease increases by 10% every five years.  For each of the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, we incurred $0.2 million in lease expense related to our ground leases.  Future minimum lease payments for all operating leases from June 30, 2013 are as follows:

July 1, 2013 - December 31, 2013	$	147
2014	293
2015	301
2016	301
2017	301
Thereafter	21,227
Total	$	22,570

13.Distributions

Distributions are authorized at the discretion of our board of directors based on its analysis of our performance over the previous period and expectations of performance for future periods.  These analyses may include actual and anticipated operating cash flow, changes in market capitalization rates for investments suitable for our portfolio, capital expenditure needs, general financial and market conditions and other factors that our board deems relevant.  The board’s decision will be influenced, in substantial part, by its obligation to ensure that we maintain our status as a REIT.  In light of the continued

18

Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(unaudited)

uncertainty in the global financial and real estate markets, we cannot provide assurance that we will be able to achieve expected cash flows necessary to pay distributions at any particular level, or at all.

On March 20, 2012, our board of directors declared a special distribution of $0.50 per share of common stock payable to our stockholders of record as of April 3, 2012 and determined to cease regular, monthly distributions in favor of payment of periodic distributions from excess proceeds from asset dispositions or from other sources as necessary to maintain our REIT tax status.  The special distribution was paid on May 10, 2012.

We have paid and may in the future pay some or all of our distributions from sources other than operating cash flow.  We have, for example, generated cash to pay distributions from financing activities, components of which may include proceeds from our public offerings of shares of our common stock and borrowings (including borrowings secured by our assets) in anticipation of future operating cash flow.  We have also utilized cash from refinancings and dispositions, the components of which may represent a return of capital and/or the gains on sale.  In addition, from time to time, our Advisor may agree to waive or defer all or a portion of the acquisition, asset management or other fees or incentives due to it, pay general administrative expenses, or otherwise supplement investor returns in order to increase the amount of cash that we have available to pay distributions to our stockholders.

We did not pay any distributions to stockholders during the three and six months ended June 30, 2013.  Total regular distributions paid to stockholders during the three months ended June 30, 2012 were $1.1 million including DRP of $0.7 million.  The special cash distribution of $13 million declared during the first quarter of 2012 was paid in the second quarter of 2012 and was based upon the number of stockholders as of April 3, 2012.  Total distributions paid to stockholders during the six months ended June 30, 2012 were $17.3 million consisting of the special cash distribution of $13 million and regular distributions of $4.3 million including DRP of $2.8 million.  A portion of the $4.3 million regular distributions to stockholders were funded from cash flow provided by operations.  The special cash distribution was funded from proceeds from asset dispositions.  Regular cash distributions were funded from proceeds from our public offerings of shares of our common stock, borrowings and cash flow from operations.  Future distributions, if any, declared and paid may exceed cash flow from operating activities until such time as we invest in additional real estate or real estate-related assets at favorable yields and our investments reach stabilization.

Distributions declared per share assume the share was issued and outstanding each day during the period.  Beginning January 2012 through March 2012, the declared daily regular distribution rate was $0.0013699 per share of common stock, which was equivalent to an annualized distribution rate of 5.0% assuming the share was purchased for $10.00.

14.Related Party Transactions

The Advisor and certain of its affiliates receive fees and compensation in connection with the acquisition, management, and sale of our assets.

Pursuant to a Dealer Manager Agreement, we engaged Behringer Securities LP (“Behringer Securities”) to act as our dealer manager in connection with our public offerings.  Behringer Securities received commissions of up to 7% of gross primary offering proceeds.  Behringer Securities reallowed 100% of selling commissions earned to participating broker-dealers.  In addition, we paid Behringer Securities a dealer manager fee of up to 2.5% of gross offering proceeds.  Pursuant to separately negotiated agreements, Behringer Securities reallowed a portion of its dealer manager fee in an aggregate amount up to 2% of gross offering proceeds to broker-dealers participating in our public offerings; provided, however, that Behringer Securities reallowed, in the aggregate, no more than 1.5% of gross offering proceeds for marketing fees and expenses, conference fees and non-itemized, non-invoiced due diligence efforts and no more than 0.5% of gross offering proceeds for out-of-pocket and bona fide, separately invoiced due diligence expenses incurred as fees, costs or other expenses from third parties.  Further, in special cases pursuant to separately negotiated agreements and subject to applicable limitations imposed by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Behringer Securities used a portion of its dealer manager fee to reimburse certain broker-dealers participating in our public offerings for technology costs and expenses associated with our public offerings and costs and expenses associated with the facilitation of the marketing and ownership of our shares by such broker-dealers’ customers.  No selling commissions, dealer manager fees or organization and offering expenses were paid for sales under the DRP.  We terminated the primary portion of the follow-on public offering effective March 15, 2012 and the DRP portion of the follow-on offering effective April 3, 2012.  For the six months ended June 30, 2012, Behringer Securities earned selling commissions and dealer manager fees of $0.4 million and $0.2 million, respectively, which were recorded as a reduction to additional paid-in capital.

We reimbursed the Advisor and its affiliates for organization and offering expenses (other than selling commissions and the dealer manager fee) incurred on our behalf in connection with the primary offering component of our public offerings of our common stock.  The total we were required to remit to the Advisor for organization and offering expenses (other than selling commissions and the dealer manager fee) was limited to 1.5% of the gross proceeds raised in the completed primary

19

Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(unaudited)

offering components of the public offerings as determined upon completion of the public offerings.  The Advisor or its affiliates determined the amount of organization and offering expenses owed based on specific invoice identification, as well as an allocation of costs to us and other Behringer Harvard programs, based on respective equity offering results of those entities in offering.

The Advisor was required to reimburse us to the extent that the total amount spent on organization and offering expenses (other than selling commissions and the dealer manager fee) in the public offerings exceeded 1.5% of the gross proceeds raised in the primary component of the public offerings.  Based on the gross proceeds from our public offerings, we recorded a receivable from the Advisor for approximately $3.8 million of organization and offering expenses that were previously reimbursed to the Advisor.  The receivable of $3.8 million is presented net of other payables of $0.5 million to the Advisor on our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2012.  We received payment of $3.8 million from the Advisor for this receivable in March 2013.

The Advisor or its affiliates will also receive acquisition and advisory fees of 2.5% of the amount paid and/or in respect of the purchase, development, construction, or improvement of each asset we acquire, including any debt attributable to those assets.  The Advisor and its affiliates will also receive acquisition and advisory fees of 2.5% of the funds advanced in respect of a loan investment.  We incurred acquisition and advisory fees payable to the Advisor of $1.9 million and $0.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

The Advisor or its affiliates also receive an acquisition expense reimbursement in the amount of 0.25% of (i) the funds paid for purchasing an asset, including any debt attributable to the asset, (ii) the funds budgeted for development, construction, or improvement in the case of assets that we acquire and intend to develop, construct, or improve, and (iii) the funds advanced in respect of a loan investment.  In addition, to the extent the Advisor or its affiliates directly provide services formerly provided or usually provided by third parties, including, without limitation, accounting services related to the preparation of audits required by the SEC, property condition reports, title services, title insurance, insurance brokerage or environmental services related to the preparation of environmental assessments in connection with a completed investment, the direct employee costs and burden to the Advisor of providing these services will be acquisition expenses for which we will reimburse the Advisor.  We also pay third parties, or reimburse the Advisor or its affiliates, for any investment-related expenses due to third parties in the case of a completed investment, including, but not limited to, legal fees and expenses, travel and communication expenses, costs of appraisals, accounting fees and expenses, third-party brokerage or finder’s fees, title insurance, premium expenses, and other closing costs.  In addition, acquisition expenses for which we will reimburse the Advisor, include any payments made to (i) a prospective seller of an asset, (ii) an agent of a prospective seller of an asset, or (iii) a party that has the right to control the sale of an asset intended for investment by us that are not refundable and that are not ultimately applied against the purchase price for such asset.  Except as described above with respect to services customarily or previously provided by third parties, the Advisor is responsible for paying all of the expenses it incurs associated with persons employed by the Advisor to the extent that they are dedicated to making investments for us, such as wages and benefits of the investment personnel.  The Advisor and its affiliates are also responsible for paying all of the investment-related expenses that we or the Advisor or its affiliates incur that are due to third parties or related to the additional services provided by the Advisor as described above with respect to investments we do not make, other than certain non-refundable payments made in connection with any acquisition.  For the six months ended June 30, 2013, we incurred acquisition expense reimbursements of $0.2 million.  We incurred acquisition expense reimbursements of less than $0.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012.

We pay the Advisor or its affiliates a debt financing fee of 1% of the amount available under any loan or line of credit made available to us.  It is anticipated that the Advisor will pay some or all of these fees to third parties with whom it subcontracts to coordinate financing for us.  We incurred debt financing fees of $0.4 million and $0.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

We pay the Advisor or its affiliates a development fee in an amount that is usual and customary for comparable services rendered to similar projects in the geographic market of the project if such affiliate provides the development services and if a majority of our independent directors determines that such development fee is fair and reasonable and on terms and conditions not less favorable than those available from unaffiliated third parties.  We incurred no such fees for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.

We pay our property manager and affiliate of the Advisor, Behringer Harvard Opportunity II Management Services, LLC (“BHO II Management”), or its affiliates, fees for the management, leasing, and construction supervision of our properties.  Property management fees are 4.5% of the gross revenues of the properties managed by BHO II Management or its affiliates, plus leasing commissions based upon the customary leasing commission applicable to the same geographic location of the respective property.  In the event that we contract directly with a third-party property manager in respect of a property, BHO II Management or its affiliates receives an oversight fee equal to 0.5% of the gross revenues of the property

20

Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(unaudited)

managed.  In no event will BHO II Management or its affiliates receive both a property management fee and an oversight fee with respect to any particular property.  In the event we own a property through a joint venture that does not pay BHO II Management directly for its services, we will pay BHO II Management a management fee or oversight fee, as applicable, based only on our economic interest in the property.  We incurred and expensed property management fees or oversight fees to BHO II Management of approximately $0.5 million and $0.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

We pay the Advisor or its affiliates a monthly asset management fee of one-twelfth of 1.0% of the sum of the higher of the cost or value of each asset.  For the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, we expensed $1.5 million of asset management fees.  Amounts include asset management fees which were classified to discontinued operations for our held for sale property and our disposed properties.

We reimburse the Advisor or its affiliates for all expenses paid or incurred by the Advisor in connection with the services provided to us, subject to the limitation that we will not reimburse the Advisor for any amount by which our operating expenses (including the asset management fee) at the end of the four preceding fiscal quarters exceeds the greater of:  (A) 2% of our average invested assets, or (B) 25% of our net income determined without reduction for any additions to reserves for depreciation, bad debts or other similar non-cash reserves and excluding any gain from the sale of our assets for that period.  Notwithstanding the above, we may reimburse the Advisor for expenses in excess of this limitation if a majority of our independent directors determines that such excess expenses are justified based on unusual and non-recurring factors. For the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, we incurred and expensed such costs for administrative services of $0.8 million and $0.7 million, respectively.

We are dependent on the Advisor and BHO II Management for certain services that are essential to us, including asset acquisition and disposition decisions, property management and leasing services, and other general administrative responsibilities.  In the event that these companies were unable to provide us with their respective services, we would be required to obtain such services from other sources.

15.Supplemental Cash Flow Information

Supplemental cash flow information is summarized below:

	Six months ended June 30,
	2013		2012
Interest paid, net of amounts capitalized	$	3,838	$	5,050
Non-cash investing activities:
Capital expenditures for real estate in accounts payable	$	24	$	156
Capital expenditures for real estate in accrued liabilities	$	358	$	725
Non-cash financing activities:
Common stock issued in distribution reinvestment plan	$	—	$	2,790
Offering costs payable to related parties	$	—	$	8

16.  Discontinued Operations

During the six months ended June 30, 2012, we sold the Palms of Monterrey.  On April 12, 2013, we sold the remaining three buildings at Interchange Business Center for a contract sales price of approximately $40.4 million, excluding transaction costs.  A portion of the proceeds from the sale were used to pay off in full the existing indebtedness associated with the buildings.

The following table summarizes the disposition of our properties during 2012 and 2013.

Property Name	Date of Disposition	Contract Sales Price
Palms of Monterrey	January 5, 2012	$	39,300
Parrot’s Landing	October 31, 2012	$	56,300
Interchange Business Center (1)	October 18, 2012	$	7,500
Interchange Business Center (1)	April 12, 2013	$	40,400

21

Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(unaudited)

(1)On October 18, 2012, we sold one of the four industrial buildings at Interchange Business Center to an unaffiliated third party.  On April 12, 2013, we sold the remaining three buildings to an unaffiliated third party.

We have classified the results of operations for the properties above into discontinued operations in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations.

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012
Rental revenue	$	81		$	1,862		$	465		$	3,864
Expenses
Property operating expenses	40			721			101			1,421
Interest expense	70			757			319			1,543
Real estate taxes	(48		)	416			33			811
Property management fees	6			72			13			152
Asset management fees	13			48			50			96
Depreciation and amortization	42			615			276			1,237
Total expenses	123			2,629			792			5,260
Interest income, net	—			—			—			1
Loss on early extinguishment of debt (1)	(260		)	—			(260		)	(1,236		)
Gain on sale of real estate property	14,455			—			14,455			9,264
Income (loss) from discontinued operations	$	14,153		$	(767	)	$	13,868		$	6,633

(1)Loss on early extinguishment of debt for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 was approximately $0.3 million and was comprised of the write-off of deferred financing fees of $0.1 million and an early termination fee of $0.2 million.  Loss on early extinguishment of debt for the six months ended June 30, 2012 was approximately $1.2 million and was comprised of the write-off of deferred financing fees of $0.4 million and an early termination fee of $0.8 million.

17.  Subsequent Event

We, through a joint venture between our indirect wholly owned subsidiary, Behringer Harvard Florida MOB Member, LLC (“BH Member”), AW SFMOB Investor, LLC (“AW Investor”) and AW SFMOB Managing Member, LLC (“AW Managing Member” and collectively with AW Investor, “AW”) are the 90% owner of ground leasehold interests in a portfolio of eight medical office buildings known as Original Florida MOB Portfolio in South Florida and approximately 7.8 acres excess land related to the buildings (collectively, the Original MOB Portfolio).

On July 8, 2013, the nine special purpose entities that own the Original MOB Portfolio properties, BH Member, and AW entered into a purchase and sale agreement to sell the Original MOB Portfolio to AW for a contract sales price of approximately $64.8 million.  AW has made an earnest money deposit in the amount of approximately $0.1 million.  A second earnest money deposit of $0.1 million is expected to be made on or about September 6, 2013.  We acquired the Original Florida MOB Portfolio on October 8, 2010.  We do not believe that as of June 30, 2013 the property met the criteria for classification as held for sale.  Substantial due diligence effort remain and closing is contingent on a successful completion of those efforts.  Accordingly, we cannot give any assurance that the closing of the sale is probable.

On August 8, 2013 we acquired a 90% interest in Parkside Apartments, a 240-unit multifamily community in Sugarland, Texas, from an unaffiliated third party.  The contract purchase price for the property was $21.5 million.  In connection with the purchase, we assumed a loan of approximately $10.5 million.

*****

22

Item 2.          Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our accompanying financial statements and the notes thereto.

Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).  These forward-looking statements include discussion and analysis of the financial condition of Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc. and our subsidiaries (which may be referred to herein as the “Company,” “we,” “us” or “our”), including our ability to rent space on favorable terms, to address our debt maturities and to fund our liquidity requirements, the value of our assets, our anticipated capital expenditures, the amount and timing of anticipated future cash distributions to our stockholders, and other matters.  Words such as “may,” “anticipates,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “seeks,” “estimates,” “would,” “could,” “should” and variations of these words and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements.

These forward-looking statements are not historical facts but reflect the intent, belief or current expectations of our management based on their knowledge and understanding of the business and industry, the economy and other future conditions.  These statements are not guarantees of future performance, and we caution stockholders not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements.  Actual results may differ materially from those expressed or forecasted in the forward-looking statements due to a variety of risks, uncertainties and other factors, including but not limited to the factors listed and described herein and under Item 1A, “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 28, 2013 and the factors described below:

·market and economic challenges experienced by the U.S. economy or real estate industry as a whole and the local economic conditions in the markets in which our properties are located;

·our ability to make accretive investments in a diversified portfolio of assets;

·future changes in market factors that could affect the ultimate performance of our development or redevelopment projects, including but not limited to construction costs, plan or design changes, schedule delays, availability of construction financing, performance of developers, contractors and consultants and growth in rental rates and operating costs;

·the availability of cash flow from operating activities for distributions, if any;

·our level of debt and the terms and limitations imposed on us by our debt agreements;

·the availability of credit generally, and any failure to obtain debt financing at favorable terms or a failure to satisfy the conditions and requirements of that debt;

·our ability to secure resident leases at favorable rental rates;

·our ability to retain our executive officers and other key personnel of our advisor, our property manager and their affiliates;

·conflicts of interest arising out of our relationships with our Advisor and its affiliates;

·unfavorable changes in laws or regulations impacting our business, our assets or our key relationships; and

·factors that could affect our ability to qualify as a real estate investment trust.

Forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q reflect our management’s view only as of the date of this Report, and may ultimately prove to be incorrect.  We undertake no obligation to update or revise forward-looking statements to reflect changed assumptions, the occurrence of unanticipated events or changes to future operating results, except as required by applicable law.  We intend for these forward-looking statements to be covered by the applicable safe harbor provisions created by Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act.

23

Cautionary Note

The representations, warranties, and covenants made by us in any agreement filed as an exhibit to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are made solely for the benefit of the parties to the agreement, including, in some cases, for the purpose of allocating risk among the parties to the agreement, and should not be deemed to be representations, warranties, or covenants to or with any other parties.  Moreover, these representations, warranties or covenants should not be relied upon as accurately describing or reflecting the current state of our affairs.

Executive Overview

We were formed primarily to acquire and operate commercial real estate and real estate-related assets on an opportunistic basis.  In particular, we focus generally on acquiring commercial properties with significant possibilities for capital appreciation, such as those requiring development, redevelopment or repositioning, those located in markets and submarkets with high growth potential, and those available from sellers who are distressed or face time-sensitive deadlines.  In addition, our opportunistic investment strategy may also include investments in loans secured by or related to real estate at more attractive rates of current return than have been available for some time.  These loan investments may have capital gain characteristics, whether as a result of a discount purchase or related equity participations.  We may acquire a wide variety of commercial properties, including office, industrial, retail, hospitality, recreation and leisure, single-tenant, multifamily, and other real properties.  These properties may be existing, income-producing properties, newly constructed properties or properties under development or construction and may include multifamily properties purchased for conversion into condominiums or single-tenant properties that may be converted for multi-tenant use.  Further, we may invest in real estate-related securities, including securities issued by other real estate companies, either for investment or in change of control transactions completed on a negotiated basis or otherwise.  We also may originate or invest in collateralized mortgage-backed securities and mortgage, bridge or mezzanine loans, or in entities that make investments similar to the foregoing.  We expect to make our investments in or in respect of real estate assets located in the United States and other countries based on current market conditions.

We commenced an initial public offering of up to 125,000,000 shares of our common stock on January 21, 2008 of which 25,000,000 shares were offered pursuant to DRP.  On July 3, 2011, our initial public offering terminated in accordance with its terms.  On July 5, 2011, we commenced a follow-on public offering of up to 75,000,000 shares of our common stock of which 25,000,000 shares were offered pursuant to the DRP.  We terminated the primary portion of the follow-on public offering effective March 15, 2012 and the DRP component effective April 3, 2012.  We raised gross offering proceeds of approximately $265.3 million from the sale of approximately 26.7 million shares under the Offerings, including shares sold under the DRP.

Market Outlook

During the second quarter of 2013, the Federal Reserve gave its first public announcement that as unemployment reaches the 7% level, it may soon start to taper its economic stimulus programs, setting off increased volatility in the capital markets. In reaction, in less than a month the stock market fell by over 5% and in about 60 days long term treasury rates increased almost 1%, hitting highs for the last two years.  However, as the quarter progressed, the Federal Reserve re-emphasized that any tapering would only be implemented if warranted by the state of the overall economy, which while showing some progress, was still not at a level that justified a change in the current support levels.  Economic indicators supporting the view that the recovery was still not fully sustainable included: GDP for the second quarter of 2013 was at 1.7%, an improvement from the 1.1% growth rate in the first quarter, but still below levels indicative of sustained, robust growth.  Similarly job growth has averaged over 190,000 for the first seven months of 2013, a reasonable level but also below the level required to quickly and significantly sustain higher levels of growth, particularly as a higher percentage of the jobs are lower paying service positions or temporary jobs, where the overall labor participation rate still remains at historic lows.  Housing starts, a critical component in most recoveries, is also reporting very significant progress with many markets at prior sales values but new home construction is still restrained.  Other areas showing modest but uneven improvements were manufacturing hiring and production and consumer spending; however, slower government spending and the increased payroll tax was still a net drag on economic growth.  Consequently, by early August 2013, concerns over immediate Federal Reserve actions had abated,  allowing the stock market to reach all-time highs and while interest rates were still elevated from earlier in the year, they had stabilized.  The general consensus was now that it was unlikely that the Federal Reserve was going to focus solely on unemployment as the triggering event for scaling back its stimulus program and that broader economic measures, which may still need additional time, would be considered.

Going into the third quarter, many analysts are expecting slightly increased economic growth, but are lowering their estimates from earlier in the year.  July’s job growth was the lowest since March 2013 and revised figures for May and June were lower than initially reported.  Interest rates, while still low compared to historical averages, could dampen the housing sector improvements, particularly if they rise any further and start to squeeze out lower income or first time home buyers. Still job growth is exceeding the population growth and the unemployment rate is at the lowest level since December 2008.

24

Also factoring into second half projections are renewed debates over the U.S. federal budget, spending and debt limits, which appear to never reach a consistent resolution and represent an overhang of uncertainty that may further disrupt economic growth.  We believe that businesses and consumers tend to be very conservative when confronted with these kinds of issues, which could disrupt what could otherwise be a stronger recovery.  On a net basis, we believe the U.S. economy can overcome a certain degree of these issues, and along with most analysts, we expect moderate, but uneven U.S. growth for the near term.  However, these issues have the potential to significantly affect the economy.

A portion of our portfolio is currently invested in nine medical office buildings.  The demand for health care services, and consequently health care properties, is projected to increase in the near future.  The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services project that national health care expenditures will rise to $3.3 trillion in 2015, or 18.2% of gross domestic product.  The annual growth in national health expenditures for 2013 through 2021 is expected to be 5.9%.  While demographics are the primary driver of demand, economic conditions and availability of services contribute to health care service utilization rates.  We believe the health care property market may be less susceptible to fluctuations and economic downturns relative to other property sectors.

The total U.S. population is projected to increase by 18.6% through 2030.  The population aged 65 and over is projected to increase by 78.3% through 2030.  This population is an important component of health care utilization.  Most health care services are provided within a health care facility such as a hospital, a physician’s office, or a senior housing facility.

We own an interest in one hotel property.  Smith Travel Research indicates that during the second quarter of 2013 national overall occupancy rate for hospitality properties in the United States increased 1.3% in year-over-year measurement to 65.9% and the national overall Average Daily Rate (“ADR”) increased 3.6% to $110.47.  The hotel industry is expected to see continued modest growth in 2013.  If the economy continues to improve, we expect room rates for hotels to increase since increased demand for hotel rooms generally correlates with growth in the U.S. gross domestic product (GDP).  Compared to the prior year, Courtyard Kauai at Coconut Beach Hotel experienced a double digit increase in occupancy rate and an approximately 20% increase in ADR in year-over-year measurement.

As of June 30, 2013, a portion of our portfolio is invested in three multifamily properties.  While the US economy continues on a modest recovery, the multifamily sector continues to maintain favorable rent growth and occupancy levels even while the supply fundamentals move back to historical levels.  This performance of the multifamily sector appears consistent with historical trends where real estate investments in the multifamily sector tend to perform better than real estate investments in other sectors during periods of economic recovery.  From a demand perspective, the demographics for the targeted multifamily renter, the age group from 20 to 34 years old, are still positive in the sector.  This group is growing in size, and while the other age segments have experienced employment declines, the 20 to 34 year old segment’s aggregate employment has increased.  Further, while this age group in previous economic cycles experienced increasing single family home ownership, higher credit standards for single family mortgages and more reluctance to commit to home ownership are currently leading to more rental demand.  Also affecting home ownership is a national trend toward delayed marriage.  Given that first time home ownership often follows marriage, this delay is also delaying home ownership.  As a result, single family home ownership, which had peaked at 69.2% in late 2004, has now reduced to approximately 65% as of June 30, 2013.  While improvements in the single family housing sector should eventually affect this trend, we believe the overall positive effects of such an important component of the economy will be a net benefit to the multifamily sector.

On the supply side, after a substantial decline in new developments of multifamily communities from about 2008, supply changes as measured by new permitting have generally returned to historic averages or higher.  We believe that the multifamily fundamentals noted above are leading to this increased development activity; however, this supply for the most part is only making up for lost activity coming out of the recession, which had a trough in 2012.  Further, since high quality multifamily developments can take 18 to 36 months to entitle, permit and construct, we believe there is, even in the most aggressive outlook, a continued window of limited supply.  As a result of these factors, many analysts are still projecting continued multifamily rental growth, albeit at a slower pace due in part to the high correlation with job and income growth.  Some analysts’ reports are already starting to indicate for certain markets that renting is starting to lose its cost advantage over home ownership and that rental increases will eventually hit limits in relation to disposable income.  While the overall factors noted above should still position the multifamily sector to perform better in a slow growth environment, eventually the multifamily sector will need stronger employment, disposable consumer income and household formation to maintain rental growth.

Current interest rates and the availability of multifamily financing are also very favorable factors in the multifamily sector, although, in the past quarter, rates have increased 100 basis points.  For the last three years for the period ended June 30, 2013, five and ten year treasury rates, key benchmarks for multifamily financings, have primarily ranged between 0.6% to 2.8% and 1.0% to 4.0%, respectively.  As of June 30, 2013, five and ten year treasury rates were 1.4% and 2.5%, respectively, which while up from the near term averages are still low by historical standards.  In addition to favorable,

25

general interest rates, government sponsored entities have been a core source for multifamily financing, providing a  favorable base level of support for the sector.  Further, the positive multifamily fundamentals, particularly in high quality, stabilized communities such as ours, have brought in other lending sources.  In addition to government sponsored entities (“GSE”) like Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, Federal Housing Administration (“FHA”), insurance companies, and commercial banks have been aggressive lenders in this sector.  Recently, the Federal Housing Finance Administration, which oversees the operations of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, set a target to reduce the multifamily mortgage market by 10% from the 2012 levels.  It expects this reduction to be achieved through a combination of increased pricing, more limited product offerings, and tighter overall underwriting standards.

In student housing, unlike traditional multifamily housing, all leases typically commence and terminate on the same dates.  In the case of our typical student housing leases, this date coincides with the commencement of the fall academic term with the leases typically terminating at the completion of the last summer school session of the academic year.  As such, we must re-lease each property in its entirety each year during a highly compressed time period, resulting in significant turnover in our tenant population from year to year.  As a result, we are highly dependent upon the effectiveness of our marketing and leasing efforts during the short annual leasing season that typically begins in January and ends in August of each year.  Our properties’ occupancy rates are therefore typically relatively stable during the August to July academic year, but are susceptible to fluctuation at the commencement of each new academic year, which may be greater than the fluctuation in occupancy rates experienced by traditional multifamily properties.  At June 30, 2013, a portion of our portfolio is invested in three student housing complexes which includes two complexes located in Georgia and one complex located in Ohio.

Although the current outlook on these financing trends appears relatively stable, there are risks.  The potential changes in the U.S. Federal Reserve’s monetary policy could further affect interest rates, while the U.S. political deadlock over the debt ceiling, tax policy and government spending levels can affect the overall level of domestic economic growth.  Although the European debt crisis has moderated, there is a risk that the higher-risk European countries, such as Italy, Greece and Spain, could face new pressures over proposed austerity measures or levels of sovereign borrowings or that new problem countries could surface, the latest being Cyprus.  Any of these domestic or global issues could slow growth or push the U.S. into a recession, which could affect the amount of capital available or the costs charged for financings.  Specifically related to the multifamily sector, changes related to GSE’s and other regulatory restrictions could result in less multifamily debt capital and potentially higher borrowing costs.

We are continuing to evaluate an active pipeline of prospective acquisitions.  We generally intend to further stabilize our existing portfolio of assets and prudently invest cash and the proceeds from asset sales into additional value-added opportunities.  We will continue to target income-producing acquisitions including multifamily opportunities in states with strong economies, well-located office properties, value-added investments in real estate with in-place cash flow, and selected mezzanine-financing opportunities with an attractive risk/reward profile.

We expect the activities above to bring us closer to our ultimate goal of maximizing returns to our investors.  Any significant improvement in the currently slow pace of economic recovery should also bode well for our future success in achieving our strategic objectives.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our principal demands for funds will be for the (a) acquisition of real estate and real estate-related assets, (b) payment of operating expenses and (c) payment of interest on our outstanding indebtedness.  Generally, we expect to meet cash needs for the payment of operating expenses and interest on our outstanding indebtedness from our cash flow from operations.  To the extent that our cash flow from operations is not sufficient to cover our operating expenses, interest on our outstanding indebtedness, redemptions or distributions, we expect to use borrowings and asset sales to fund such needs.

We continually evaluate our liquidity and ability to fund future operations and debt obligations.  As part of those analyses, we consider lease expirations and other factors.  Leases at our consolidated office and industrial properties representing 11.8% of our annualized base rent and 13.5% of our rentable square footage (effective monthly rent per square foot of $1.31) will expire by the end of 2013.  As a normal course of business, we are pursuing renewals, extensions and new leases.  If we are unable to renew or extend the expiring leases under similar terms or are unable to negotiate new leases, it would negatively impact our liquidity and adversely affect our ability to fund our ongoing operations.

We expect to fund our short-term liquidity requirements by using cash on hand, cash flow from the operations of our investments and asset sales.  Operating cash flows are expected to increase as additional real estate assets are added to the portfolio and our existing portfolio stabilizes.  Although we intend to diversify our real estate portfolio, to the extent our portfolio is concentrated in certain geographic regions, types of assets, industries or business sectors, downturns relating generally to such regions, assets, industry or business sectors may result in tenants defaulting on their lease obligations at a number of our properties within a short time period.  Such defaults could negatively affect our liquidity and adversely affect our ability to fund our ongoing operations.

26

We may, but are not required to, establish capital reserves from cash flow generated by operating properties and other investments, or net sale proceeds from the sale of our properties and other investments.  Capital reserves are typically utilized for non-operating expenses such as tenant improvements, leasing commissions and major capital expenditures.  Alternatively, a lender may establish its own criteria for escrow of capital reserves.

We intend to borrow money to acquire properties and make other investments.  There is no limitation on the amount we may invest in any single property or other asset or on the amount we can borrow for the purchase of any individual property or other investment.  Under our charter, the maximum amount of our indebtedness is limited to 300% of our “net assets” (as defined by our charter) as of the date of any borrowing; however, we may exceed that limit if approved by a majority of our independent directors.  In addition to our charter limitation, our board of directors has adopted a policy to generally limit our aggregate borrowings to approximately 75% of the aggregate value of our assets unless substantial justification exists that borrowing a greater amount is in our best interests.  Our policy limitation, however, does not apply to individual real estate assets.

Commercial real estate debt markets have experienced volatility and uncertainty as a result of certain related factors, including the tightening of underwriting standards by lenders and credit rating agencies, macro-economic issues related to fiscal, tax and regulatory policies and global financial issues arising from the European debt crisis and recessionary implications.  Should the overall cost of borrowings increase, either by increases in the index rates or by increases in lender spreads, we will need to factor such increases into the economics of our acquisitions, developments and investments.  This may result in our investment operations generating lower overall economic returns and a reduced level of cash flow, which could potentially impact our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.  In addition, the dislocations in the debt markets have reduced the amount of capital that is available to finance real estate, which in turn: (a) leads to a decline in real estate values generally; (b) slows real estate transaction activity; (c) reduces the loan to value ratio upon which lenders are willing to extend debt; and (d) results in difficulty in refinancing debt as it becomes due, all of which may reasonably be expected to have a material adverse impact on the value of real estate investments and the revenues, income or cash flow from the operations of real properties and mortgage loans.

Debt Financings

We may, from time to time, obtain mortgage, bridge or mezzanine loans for acquisitions and investments, as well as property development.  We may obtain financing at the time an asset is acquired or an investment is made or at such later time as determined to be necessary, depending on multiple factors.

At June 30, 2013, our notes payable balance was $218.5 million and has a weighted average interest rate of 3.7%.  We have guaranteed payment of certain recourse liabilities with respect to certain customary nonrecourse carveouts as set forth in the guaranties in favor of the unaffiliated lenders with respect to the Courtyard Kauai at Coconut Beach Hotel, Wimberly and 22 Exchange notes payable.  On April 12, 2013, we sold the remaining three industrial buildings at Interchange Business Center to an unaffiliated third party and used a portion of the proceeds from the sale to pay off in full the existing indebtedness of $11.3 million associated with the property which was scheduled to mature on December 1, 2013.  As of December 31, 2012, our outstanding note payable balance was $183.3 million.

Our loan agreements stipulate that we comply with certain reporting and financial covenants.  These covenants include, among other things, maintaining minimum debt service coverage ratios and liquidity.  As of June 30, 2013, we believe we were in compliance with the debt covenants under our loan agreements.

One of our principal long-term liquidity requirements includes the repayment of maturing debt.  The following table provides information with respect to the maturities and scheduled principal repayments of our indebtedness as of June 30, 2013.  The table does not represent any available extension options ($ in thousands).

	Payments Due by Period
	July 1, 2013 -December 31, 2013		2014		2015		2016		2017		Thereafter		Total
Principal payments - variable rate debt	$	—	$	—	$	38,446	$	16,036	$	536	$	25,167	$	80,185
Principal payments - fixed rate debt	1,081		2,351		19,138		18,659		1,983		95,108		138,320
Interest payments - variable rate debt (based on rates in effect as of June 30, 2013)	995		1,980		1,950		728		638		3,128		9,419
Interest payments - fixed rate debt	3,139		6,177		5,843		4,724		4,557		7,574		32,014
Operating leases (1)	147		293		301		301		301		21,227		22,570
Total	$	5,362	$	10,801	$	65,678	$	40,448	$	8,015	$	152,204	$	282,508

27

(1)Our operating leases consist of ground leases on each of eight buildings acquired in connection with the purchase of the Original Florida MOB Portfolio.  Each ground lease is for a term of 50 years, with a 25-year extension option.  The annual payment for each ground lease increases by 10% every five years.

Results of Operations

As of June 30, 2013, we had 12 real estate investments (including an investment in a portfolio of nine medical office buildings), 11 of which were consolidated in our condensed consolidated financial statements.  During the six months ended June 30, 2013, we completed one acquisition in the first quarter and two acquisitions including an investment in an unconsolidated joint venture in the second quarter.  During the six months ended June 30, 2013, we sold the remaining three buildings at Interchange Business Center in April 2013.

As of June 30, 2012, we had 11 real estate investments of which nine were consolidated in our continuing operations.  During the six months ended June 30, 2012, we sold one property in January 2012.

Three months ended June 30, 2013 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2012.

Continuing Operations

Our results of operations for the respective periods presented primarily reflect increases in most categories due to the growth of our portfolio in each period presented.  Management expects increases in most categories in the near future as we purchase additional real estate and real estate-related assets, begin to realize the full year impact of our acquisitions and continue to improve the performance of our investments.

Revenues.  Revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2013 were $13.3 million, an increase of $2.7 million from the three months ended June 30, 2012.  The change in revenue is primarily due to:

·an increase in rental revenue of $1.7 million as a result of our 2013 acquisitions of Wimberly and 22 Exchange; and

·an increase of hotel revenue of $1 million at the Courtyard Kauai at Coconut Beach Hotel due to double digit increases in occupancy rate and ADR as a result of improved operating performance.

Property Operating Expenses.  Property operating expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 were $3.6 million and $3.1 million, respectively.  The increase in property operating expenses was due to our acquisitions of Wimberly and 22 Exchange.

Hotel Operating Expenses.  Hotel operating expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 were $2.7 million and $2.4 million, respectively.  The increase in hotel operating expenses was due to the increased activity at Courtyard Kauai at Coconut Beach Hotel.

Interest Expense.  Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 was $2.1 million and $2 million, respectively.  The increase was primarily due to the acquisitions of Wimberly and 22 Exchange.  Interest capitalized for the three months ended June 30, 2013 was less than $0.1 million.

Real Estate Taxes.  Real estate taxes were $1.5 million and $1.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.  The increase for the three months ended June 30, 2013 was primarily due to the acquisitions of Wimberly and 22 Exchange.

Property Management Fees.  Property management fees for each of the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 were $0.5 million and $0.4 million and were comprised of property management fees paid to unaffiliated third parties and BHO II Management.

Asset Management Fees.  Asset management fees for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 were $0.9 million and $0.8 million, respectively and were comprised of asset management fees for our investments.

Acquisition Expense.  Acquisition expense for the three months ended June 30, 2013 of $1.2 million was primarily due to expenses incurred as a result of our acquisition of 22 Exchange.  Acquisition cost capitalized related to our equity method investment in Prospect Park for the six months ended June 30, 2013 was $0.4 million.  Acquisition expense for the three months ended June 30, 2012 of $0.7 million was primarily due to expenses incurred as a result of our acquisition of Alte Jakobstraße.

General and Administrative Expenses.  General and administrative expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 were $0.8 million and were comprised of auditing fees, legal fees, board of directors’ fees, and other administrative expenses.

28

Depreciation and amortization.  Depreciation and amortization for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 was $4.7 million and $3.5 million, respectively.  The increase is primarily a result of our acquisition of Wimberly and 22 Exchange.

Six months ended June 30, 2013 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2012.

Continuing Operations

Our results of operations for the respective periods presented primarily reflect increases in most categories due to the growth of our portfolio in each period presented.  Management expects increases in most categories in the near future as we purchase additional real estate and real estate-related assets, begin to realize the full year impact of our acquisitions and continue to improve the performance of our investments.

Revenues.  Revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2013 were $25.6 million, an increase of $4.5 million from the six months ended June 30, 2012.  The change in revenue is primarily due to:

·an increase in rental revenue of $2.4 million as a result of our 2013 acquisition of Wimberly and 22 Exchange and the second quarter 2012 acquisition of Alte Jakobstraße; and

·an increase of hotel revenue of $2.1 million at the Courtyard Kauai at Coconut Beach Hotel due to double digit increases in occupancy rate and ADR as a result of improved operating performance after the completion of renovations in the first quarter of 2012.

Property Operating Expenses.  Property operating expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 were $6.6 million and $5.9 million, respectively.  The acquisitions of both Wimberly and 22 Exchange accounted for $0.5 million of the increase.

Hotel Operating Expenses.  Hotel operating expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 were $5.5 million and $4.8 million, respectively.  The increase in hotel operating expenses was due to the increased activity at Courtyard Kauai at Coconut Beach Hotel.

Interest Expense.  Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 was $4.2 million and $3.9 million, respectively.  The increase was primarily due to interest expense for acquisitions of $0.4 million, partially offset by a $0.2 million decrease at 1875 Lawrence as a result of a lower outstanding loan balance during the period.  Interest capitalized for the six months ended June 30, 2013 was less than $0.1 million.

Real Estate Taxes.  Real estate taxes were $2.7 million and $2.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.  The increase for the six months ended June 30, 2013 was primarily due to the acquisitions of both Wimberly and 22 Exchange.

Property Management Fees.  Property management fees for each of the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 were $0.9 million and $0.8 million, respectively and were comprised of property management fees paid to unaffiliated third parties and BHO II Management.

Asset Management Fees.  Asset management fees for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 were $1.5 million and $1.6 million, respectively and were comprised of asset management fees for our investments.

Acquisition Expense.  Acquisition expense, net of amounts capitalized for the six months ended June 30, 2013 of $3.1 million was primarily due to expenses incurred as a result of our acquisition of both Wimberly and 22 Exchange.  Acquisition cost capitalized related to our equity method investment in Prospect Park for the six months ended June 30, 2013 was $0.4 million.  Acquisition expense for the six months ended June 30, 2012 of $0.7 million was primarily due to expenses incurred as a result of our acquisition of Alte Jakobstraße.

General and Administrative Expenses.  General and administrative expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2013 were $1.6 million, as compared to $1.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012, and were comprised of auditing fees, legal fees, board of directors’ fees, and other administrative expenses.  The increase is primarily a result of certain costs capitalized during our public offerings that are now expensed due to the termination of the offering in 2012.

Depreciation and amortization.  Depreciation and amortization for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 was $8.4 million and $7.3 million, respectively.  The increase is primarily a result of our acquisition of Wimberly and 22 Exchange.

See Note 16 to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further information regarding discontinued operations.

29

Cash Flow Analysis

Cash provided by operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2013 was $0.2 million and was primarily comprised of the net income of $5.1 million, adjusted for depreciation and amortization, including amortization of deferred financing fees of $9.1 million, loss on early extinguishment of debt of $0.3 million and cash used for working capital and other operating activities of approximately $0.2 million, offset by a gain on the sale of the remaining three buildings at Interchange Business Center of $14.5 million.  Cash provided by operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2012 was $0.5 million and was primarily comprised of the net loss of $0.6 million, adjusted for depreciation and amortization, including amortization of deferred financing fees of $9 million, offset by a gain on sale of the Palms of Monterrey of $9.3 million and cash used for working capital and other operating activities of approximately $1.4 million.

Cash used by investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2013 was $42.1 million, and was comprised of purchases of real estate of $63.5 million, an investment in Prospect Park of $14.1 million, additions of property and equipment of $4.3 million and a change in restricted cash of $2 million, offset by proceeds from the sale of the remaining three buildings at Interchange Business Center of $39.1 million, a return of investment in Prospect Park of $2.4 million and acquisition deposits of $0.3 million.  Cash provided by investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2012 was $21.1 million, and was comprised of net proceeds from sale of the Palms of Monterrey of $38.7 million, offset by purchase of real estate of $11 million, additions of property and equipment of $6 million and an increase in restricted cash of $0.6 million.

Cash provided by financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2013 was $32.7 million, and was comprised of net proceeds and financing costs of $34.5 million and offering costs receivable from related party of $3.8 million, offset by net distributions to non-controlling interest holders of $5.3 million, redemptions of common stock of $0.2 million and purchases of interest rate derivatives of $0.1 million.  Cash used in financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2012 was $32.5 million, and was comprised of payments to notes payable, net of proceeds and financing costs, of $17.1 million, cash distributions to our stockholders of $14.5 million, net distributions to non-controlling interest holders of $5.6 million, redemptions of common stock of $0.9 million, offset by the issuance of common stock, net of offering costs, of $5.6 million.

Funds from Operations

Funds from operations (“FFO”) is a non-GAAP financial measure that is widely recognized as a measure of REIT operating performance.  We use FFO as defined by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”) in the April 2002 “White Paper of Funds From Operations” which is net income (loss), computed in accordance with GAAP, excluding extraordinary items, as defined by GAAP, and gains (or losses) from sales of property and impairments of depreciable real estate (including impairments of investments in unconsolidated joint ventures and partnerships which resulted from measurable decreases in the fair value of the depreciable real estate held by the joint venture or partnership), plus depreciation and amortization on real estate assets, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships, joint ventures, subsidiaries, and noncontrolling interests as one measure to evaluate our operating performance.

Historical cost accounting for real estate assets in accordance with GAAP implicitly assumes that the value of real estate diminishes predictably over time.  Since real estate values have historically risen or fallen with market conditions, many industry investors and analysts have considered the presentation of operating results for real estate companies that use historical cost accounting alone to be insufficient.  As a result, our management believes that the use of FFO, together with the required GAAP presentations, provides a more complete understanding of our performance.

We believe that FFO is helpful to investors and our management as a measure of operating performance because it excludes depreciation and amortization, gains and losses from property dispositions, impairments of depreciable assets, and extraordinary items, and as a result, when compared year to year, reflects the impact on operations from trends in occupancy rates, rental rates, operating costs, development activities, general and administrative expenses, and interest costs, which is not immediately apparent from net income.

FFO should not be considered as an alternative to net income (loss), as an indication of our liquidity, nor as an indication of funds available to fund our cash needs, including our ability to make distributions and should be reviewed in connection with other GAAP measurements.  Additionally, the exclusion of impairments limits the usefulness of FFO as a historical operating performance measure since an impairment charge indicates that operating performance has been permanently affected.  FFO is not a useful measure in evaluating net asset value because impairments are taken into account in determining net asset value but not in determining FFO.  Our FFO as presented may not be comparable to amounts calculated by other REITs that do not define these terms in accordance with the current NAREIT definition or that interpret the definition differently.

30

Our calculation of FFO for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 is presented below ($ in thousands except per share amounts):

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012
Net income (loss) attributable to the Company	$	6,014		$	(4,360	)	$	1,682		$	(667	)
Adjustments for (1):
Real estate depreciation and amortization(2)	4,503			3,615			8,018			7,472
Gain on sale of real estate (3)	(10,569		)	—			(10,569		)	(8,338		)
Funds from operations (FFO)	$	(52	)	$	(745	)	$	(869	)	$	(1,533	)
GAAP weighted average shares:
Basic and diluted	26,039			26,089			26,046			25,908
FFO per share	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.06	)
Net income (loss) per share	$	0.23		$	(0.17	)	$	0.06		$	(0.02	)

(1)Reflects continuing operations, as well as discontinued operations.

(2)Includes our consolidated amount and the noncontrolling interest adjustment for the third-party partners’ share.

(3)For the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, includes our proportionate share of the gain on the sale of real estate related to the remaining three buildings at Interchange Business Center.  For the six months ended June 30, 2012, includes our proportionate share of the gain on the sale of real estate related to Palms of Monterrey.

Provided below is additional information related to selected items included in net gain (loss) above, which may be helpful in assessing our operating results.

·Straight-line rental revenue of $0.1 million and $0.3 million was recognized for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively.  Straight-line rental revenue of $0.1 million and $0.2 million was recognized for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively.  The noncontrolling interest portion of straight-line rental revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 was less than $0.1 million.

·Net above/below market lease amortization of less than $0.1 million was recognized as a decrease and an increase to rental revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.  The noncontrolling interest portion of net above/below market lease amortization for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 was less than $0.1 million.

·Amortization of deferred financing costs of $0.2 million and $0.5 million was recognized as interest expense for our notes payable for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively.  Amortization of deferred financing costs of $0.2 million and $0.5 million was recognized as interest expense for our notes payable for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively.

·During the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, we recognized loss on early extinguishment of debt of $0.3 million comprised of the write-off of deferred financing fees of $0.1 million and an early termination fee of $0.2 million.  During the six months ended June 30, 2012, we recognized loss on early extinguishment of debt of $1.2 million comprised of the write-off of deferred financing fees of $0.4 million and an early termination fee of $0.8 million.

In addition, cash flows generated from FFO may be used to fund all or a portion of certain capitalizable items that are excluded from FFO, such as capital expenditures and payments of principal on debt, each of which may impact the amount of cash available for distribution to our stockholders.

Distributions

Distributions are authorized at the discretion of our board of directors based on its analysis of our performance over the previous periods and expectations of performance for future periods.  These analyses may include actual and anticipated operating cash flow, changes in market capitalization rates for investments suitable for our portfolio, capital expenditure needs, general financial and market conditions and other factors that our board deems relevant.  The board’s decision will be substantially influenced by its obligation to ensure that we maintain our status as a REIT.  In light of the continued uncertainty in the global financial and real estate markets, we cannot provide assurance that we will be able to achieve expected cash flows necessary to pay distributions at any particular level, or at all.

On March 20, 2012, our board of directors declared a special distribution of $0.50 per share of common stock payable to our stockholders of record as of April 3, 2012 and determined to cease regular, monthly distributions in favor of

31

payment of periodic distributions from excess proceeds from asset dispositions or from other sources as necessary to maintain our REIT tax status.  The special distribution was paid on May 10, 2012.

We have paid and may in the future pay some or all of our distributions from sources other than operating cash flow.  We have, for example, generated cash to pay distributions from financing activities, components of which include proceeds from the Offerings and borrowings (including borrowings secured by our assets) in anticipation of future operating cash flow.  We have also utilized cash from refinancing and dispositions, the components of which may represent a return of capital and/or the gains on sale.  In addition, from time to time, our Advisor may agree to waive or defer all or a portion of the acquisition, asset management or other fees or incentives due to it, pay general administrative expenses or otherwise supplement investor returns in order to increase the amount of cash that we have available to pay distributions to our stockholders.

The following summarizes certain information related to the sources of distributions ($ in thousands):

	Six months ending
	June 30,
	2012
Total Distributions Paid (1)	$	17,326
Principal Sources of Funding:
Distribution Reinvestment Plan	$	2,790
Cash flow provided by operating activities	$	494
Cash available at the beginning of the period (2)	$	80,130

(1)Includes special cash distribution of $13 million.

(2)Represents the cash available at the beginning of the reporting period (January 1, 2012) primarily attributable to excess funds raised from the issuance of common stock and borrowings, after the impact of historical operating activities, other investing and financing activities.

We did not pay any distributions to stockholders during the six months ended June 30, 2013.  Total distributions paid to stockholders during the three months ending June 30, 2012 were $14.1 million consisting of the special cash distribution of $13 million and regular distributions of $1.1 million.  The special cash distribution was funded from proceeds from asset dispositions and the regular distributions were funded from cash flow provided by operations.  Total distributions paid to stockholders during the six months ending June 30, 2012 were $17.3 million consisting of the special cash distribution of $13 million and the regular distributions of $4.3 million.  The special cash distribution was funded from proceeds from asset dispositions.  A portion of the $4.3 million regular distributions to stockholders was funded from cash flow provided by operations.  Future distributions declared and paid may exceed cash flow from operating activities or funds from operations until such time as we invest in additional real estate or real estate-related assets at favorable yields and our investments reach stabilization.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements that are reasonably likely to have a current or future material effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is based upon our condensed consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with GAAP.  The preparation of these financial statements requires our management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities.  On a regular basis, we evaluate these estimates, including investment impairment.  These estimates are based on management’s historical industry experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances.  Actual results may differ from these estimates.

Below is a discussion of the accounting policies that we consider to be critical in that they may require complex judgment in their application or require estimates about matters that are inherently uncertain.

Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation

Our condensed consolidated financial statements include our accounts and the accounts of other subsidiaries over which we have control.  All inter-company transactions, balances, and profits have been eliminated in consolidation.

32

Interests in entities acquired will be evaluated based on applicable GAAP, which includes the requirement to consolidate entities deemed to be variable interest entities in which we are the primary beneficiary.  If the interest in the entity is determined not to be a VIE, then the entity will be evaluated for consolidation based on legal form, economic substance, and the extent to which we have control and/or substantive participating rights under the respective ownership agreement.

There are judgments and estimates involved in determining if an entity in which we have made an investment is a VIE and, if so, whether we are the primary beneficiary.  The entity is evaluated to determine if it is a VIE by, among other things, calculating the percentage of equity being risked compared to the total equity of the entity.  Determining expected future losses involves assumptions of various possibilities of the results of future operations of the entity, assigning a probability to each possibility and using a discount rate to determine the net present value of those future losses.  A change in the judgments, assumptions and estimates outlined above could result in consolidating an entity that should not be consolidated or accounting for an investment using the equity method that should in fact be consolidated, the effects of which could be material to our financial statements.

Real Estate

Upon the acquisition of real estate properties, we recognize the assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest as of the acquisition date, measured at their fair values.  The acquisition date is the date on which we obtain control of the real estate property.  The assets acquired and liabilities assumed may consist of land, inclusive of associated rights, buildings, assumed debt, identified intangible assets and liabilities and asset retirement obligations.  Identified intangible assets generally consist of above-market leases, in-place leases, in-place tenant improvements, in place leasing commissions and tenant relationships.  Identified intangible liabilities generally consist of below market leases.  Goodwill is recognized as of the acquisition date and measured as the aggregate fair value of the consideration transferred and any noncontrolling interests in the acquiree over the fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired.  Likewise, a bargain purchase gain is recognized in current earnings when the aggregate fair value of the consideration transferred and any noncontrolling interests in the acquiree is less than the fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired.  Acquisition-related costs are expensed in the period incurred.  Initial valuations are subject to change until our information is finalized, which is no later than twelve months from the acquisition date.

The fair value of the tangible assets acquired, consisting of land and buildings, is determined by valuing the property as if it were vacant, and the “as-if-vacant” value is then allocated to land and buildings.  Land values are derived from appraisals, and building values are calculated as replacement cost less depreciation or management’s estimates of the fair value of these assets using discounted cash flow analyses or similar methods believed to be used by market participants.  The value of buildings is depreciated over the estimated useful life of 25 years using the straight-line method.

We determine the fair value of assumed debt by calculating the net present value of the scheduled mortgage payments using interest rates for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities that management believes we could obtain at the date of the debt assumption.  Any difference between the fair value and stated value of the assumed debt is recorded as a discount or premium and amortized over the remaining life of the loan using the effective interest method.

We determine the value of above-market and below-market leases for acquired properties based on the present value (using an interest rate that reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the difference between (1) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in-place leases and (2) management’s estimate of current market lease rates for the corresponding in-place leases, measured over a period equal to (a) the remaining non-cancelable lease term for above-market leases, or (b) the remaining non-cancelable lease term plus any below-market fixed rate renewal options that, based on a qualitative assessment of several factors, including the financial condition of the lessee, the business conditions in the industry in which the lessee operates, the economic conditions in the area in which the property is located, and the ability of the lessee to sublease the property during the renewal term, are reasonably assured to be exercised by the lessee for below-market leases.  We record the fair value of above-market and below-market leases as intangible assets or intangible liabilities, respectively, and amortize them as an adjustment to rental income over the determined lease term.

The total value of identified real estate intangible assets acquired is further allocated to in-place leases, in place tenant improvements, in place leasing commissions and tenant relationships based on our evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant’s lease and our overall relationship with that respective tenant.  The aggregate value for tenant improvements and leasing commissions is based on estimates of these costs incurred at inception of the acquired leases, amortized through the date of acquisition.  The aggregate value of in-place leases acquired and tenant relationships is determined by applying a fair value model.  The estimates of fair value of in-place leases include an estimate of carrying costs during the expected lease-up periods for the respective spaces, considering current market conditions.  In estimating the carrying costs that would have otherwise been incurred had the leases not been in place, we include such items as real estate taxes, insurance and other operating expenses, as well as lost rental revenue during the expected lease-up period based on current market conditions.  The estimates of the fair value of tenant relationships also include costs to execute similar leases,

33

including leasing commissions, legal fees and tenant improvements, as well as an estimate of the likelihood of renewal as determined by management on a tenant-by-tenant basis.

We amortize the value of in-place leases, in place tenant improvements and in place leasing commissions to expense over the initial term of the respective leases.  The tenant relationship values are amortized to expense over the initial term and any anticipated renewal periods, but in no event does the amortization period for intangible assets or liabilities exceed the remaining depreciable life of the building.  Should a tenant terminate its lease, the unamortized portion of the acquired lease intangibles related to that tenant would be charged to expense.

Investment in Unconsolidated Joint Venture

We provide funding to third party developers for the acquisition, development and construction of real estate.  Under the ADC Arrangement, we may participate in the residual profits of the project through the sale or refinancing of the property.  We evaluate these arrangements to determine if they have characteristics similar to a loan or if the characteristics are more similar to a joint venture or partnership such as participating in the risks and rewards of the project as an owner or an investment partner.  When we determine that the characteristics are more similar to a jointly-owned investment or partnership, we account for the arrangements as an investment in an unconsolidated joint venture under the equity method of accounting (Note 8) or a direct investment (consolidated basis of accounting) instead of applying loan accounting.  The ADC Arrangement is periodically reassessed.

Investment Impairments

For all of our real estate and real estate related investments, we monitor events and changes in circumstances indicating that the carrying amounts of the real estate assets may not be recoverable.  Examples of the types of events and circumstances that would cause management to assess our assets for potential impairment include, but are not limited to:  a significant decrease in the market price of an asset; a significant adverse change in the manner in which the asset is being used; an accumulation of costs in excess of the acquisition basis plus construction of the property; major vacancies and the resulting loss of revenues; natural disasters; a change in the projected holding period; legitimate purchase offers and changes in the global and local markets or economic conditions.  Our assets may at times be concentrated in limited geographic locations and, to the extent that our portfolio is concentrated in limited geographic locations, downturns specifically related to such regions may result in tenants defaulting on their lease obligations at a portion of our properties within a short time period, which may result in asset impairments.  When such events or changes in circumstances are present, we assess potential impairment by comparing estimated future undiscounted operating cash flows expected to be generated over the life of the asset and from its eventual disposition to the carrying amount of the asset.  In the event that the carrying amount exceeds the estimated future undiscounted operating cash flows, we recognize an impairment loss to adjust the carrying amount of the asset to estimated fair value.  We consider projected future undiscounted cash flows, trends, strategic decisions regarding future development plans, and other factors in our assessment of whether impairment conditions exist.  While we believe our estimates of future cash flows are reasonable, different assumptions regarding factors such as market rents, economic conditions, and occupancy rates could significantly affect these estimates.

In evaluating our investments for impairment, management may use appraisals and make estimates and assumptions, including, but not limited to, the projected date of disposition of the properties, the estimated future cash flows of the properties during our ownership, and the projected sales price of each of the properties.  A future change in these estimates and assumptions could result in understating or overstating the carrying value of our investments, which could be material to our financial statements.

We also evaluate our investments in unconsolidated joint ventures at each reporting date.  If we believe there is an other than temporary decline in market value, we will record an impairment charge based on these evaluations.  We assess potential impairment by comparing our portion of estimated future undiscounted operating cash flows expected to be generated by the joint venture over the life of the joint venture’s assets to the carrying amount of the joint venture.  In the event that the carrying amount exceeds our portion of estimated future undiscounted operating cash flows, we recognize an impairment loss to adjust the carrying amount of the joint venture to its estimated fair value.

We believe the carrying value of our operating real estate is currently recoverable.  Accordingly, there were no impairment charges for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.  However, if market conditions worsen beyond our current expectations, or if changes in our strategy significantly affect any key assumptions used in our fair value calculations, we may need to take charges in future periods for impairments related to our existing investments.  Any such non-cash charges would have an adverse effect on our consolidated financial position and results of operations.

34

Item 3.                   Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Foreign Currency Exchange Risk

As of June 30, 2013, we maintained approximately $2 million in Euro-denominated accounts at European financial institutions.  We currently have two investments in Europe.  As the cash is held in the same currency as the real estate assets and related loans, we believe that we are not materially exposed to any significant foreign currency fluctuations related to these accounts as it relates to ongoing property operations.  Material movements in the exchange rate of Euros could materially impact distributions from our foreign investments.

Interest Rate Risk

We may be exposed to interest rate changes primarily as a result of long-term debt used to acquire properties and make loans and other permitted investments.  Our management’s objectives, with regard to interest rate risks, are to limit the impact of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows and to lower overall borrowing costs.  To achieve these objectives, we will borrow primarily at fixed rates or variable rates with the lowest margins available and in some cases, with the ability to convert variable rates to fixed rates.  With regard to variable rate financing, we will assess interest rate cash flow risk by continually identifying and monitoring changes in interest rate exposures that may adversely impact expected future cash flows and by evaluating hedging opportunities.  We may enter into derivative financial instruments such as options, forwards, interest rate swaps, caps, or floors to mitigate our interest rate risk on a related financial instrument or to effectively lock the interest rate portion of our variable rate debt.  Of our $218.5 million in notes payable at June 30, 2013, $80.2 million represented debt subject to variable interest rates, of which $15.5 million is subject to minimum interest rates.  If our variable interest rates increased 100 basis points, we estimate that total annual interest cost, including interest expensed and interest capitalized, would increase by $0.8 million.

Interest rate caps classified as assets were reported at their combined fair value of $0.2 million within prepaid expenses and other assets at June 30, 2013.  A 100 basis point decrease in interest rates would result in a $0.2 million net decrease in the fair value of our interest rate caps.  A 100 basis point increase in interest rates would result in a $0.4 million net increase in the fair value of our interest rate caps.

Item 4.   Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As required by Rule 13a-15(b) and Rule 15d-15(b) under the Exchange Act, our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated, as of June 30, 2013, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e).  Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective, as of June 30, 2013, to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in this report is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the rules and forms of the Exchange Act and is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

We believe, however, that a controls system, no matter how well designed and operated, cannot provide absolute assurance that the objectives of the controls systems are met, and no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud or error, if any, within a company have been detected.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There has been no change in internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2013 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II

OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.                   Legal Proceedings.

We are not a party to, and none of our properties are subject to, any material pending legal proceedings.

35

Item 1A.                Risk Factors.

There have been no material changes from the risk factors set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.

Item 2.                   Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

During the period covered by this quarterly report, we did not sell any equity securities that were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933.

Share Redemption Program

Our board of directors has adopted a share redemption program that permits stockholders to sell their shares back to us after they have held them for at least one year, subject to the significant conditions and limitations of the program.  Our board of directors can amend the provisions of our share redemption program without the approval of our stockholders.

The terms on which we redeem shares may differ between redemptions upon a stockholder’s death, “qualifying disability” (as defined in the share redemption program) or confinement to a long-term care facility (collectively, “Exceptional Redemptions”) and all other redemptions (“Ordinary Redemptions”).  Our board of directors determined to suspend until further notice accepting Ordinary Redemptions effective April 1, 2012.  Under our share redemption program in effect for the six months ended June 30, 2013, the purchase price for shares redeemed under the redemption pursuant to an Exceptional Redemption request is set forth below.

In the case of Exceptional Redemptions, prior to the first valuation conducted by the board of directors, or a committee thereof (the “Initial Board Valuation”), the purchase price per share for the redeemed shares will equal 90% of the difference of (a) average price per share the original purchaser or purchasers of shares paid to us for all of his or her shares (as adjusted for any stock dividends, combinations, splits, recapitalizations and the like with respect to our common stock) (the “Original Share Price”) less (b) the aggregate distributions per share of any net sale proceeds from the sale of one or more of our assets, or other special distributions so designated by the board of directors (the “Special Distributions”), distributed to stockholders prior to the redemption date and declared from the date of first issue of such redeemed Shares.

On or after the Initial Board Valuation, the purchase price per share for the redeemed shares will equal the lesser of 90% of:

·the current estimated value per share (the “Valuation”) as determined in accordance with the Valuation Policy; and

·the Original Share Price less any Special Distributions distributed to stockholders prior to the redemption date and declared from the date of first issue of such redeemed Shares.

Notwithstanding the redemption prices set forth above, our board of directors may determine, whether pursuant to formulas or processes approved or set by our board of directors, the redemption price of the shares, which may differ between Ordinary Redemptions and Exceptional Redemptions; provided, however, that we must provide at least 30 days’ notice to stockholders before applying this new price determined by our board of directors.

Any shares approved for redemption will be redeemed on a periodic basis as determined from time to time by our board of directors, and no less frequently than annually.  We will not redeem, during any twelve-month period, more than 5% of the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the twelve-month period immediately prior to the date of redemption.  In addition, the cash available for redemption in any quarterly period will generally be limited to no more than $250,000, and in no event more than $1,000,000 in any twelve-month period.  The redemption limitations apply to all redemptions, whether Ordinary or Exceptional Redemptions.

During the six months ended June 30, 2013 our board of directors redeemed all nine Exceptional Redemption requests received that complied with the applicable requirements and guidelines of the share redemption program for an aggregate of 22,059 shares redeemed for $0.2 million (approximately $8.52 per share).  All redemptions were funded with cash on hand.

We have not presented information regarding submitted and unfulfilled Ordinary Redemption requests for the six months ended June 30, 2013 as our board of directors suspended Ordinary Redemptions effective April 1, 2012 and we believe many stockholders who may otherwise desire to have their shares redeemed have not submitted a request due to the suspension of Ordinary Redemptions.

Any Ordinary Redemption requests submitted while Ordinary Redemptions are suspended will be returned to investors and must be resubmitted upon resumption of Ordinary Redemptions. If Ordinary Redemptions are resumed, we will give all stockholders notice that we are resuming Ordinary Redemptions, so that all stockholders will have an equal opportunity to submit shares for redemption.  Upon resumption of Ordinary Redemptions, any redemption requests will be

36

honored pro rata among all requests received based on funds available.  Requests will not be honored on a first come, first served basis.

During the quarter ended June 30, 2013, we redeemed shares as follows:

2013	Total Number of Shares Redeemed	Average Price Paid Per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs	Maximum Number of Shares That May Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
April	—	$	—	—
May	2,029	$	8.51	2,029	(1	)
June	—	$	—	—
	2,029	$	8.51	2,029	(1	)

(1) A description of the maximum number of shares that may be purchased under our redemption program is included in the narrative preceding this table.

Item 3.Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

None.

Item 4.Mine Safety Disclosures.

None.

Item 5.Other Information.

Determination of Estimated Per Share Value

On August 7, 2013, pursuant to the Amended and Restated Policy for Estimation of Common Stock Value (the “Estimated Valuation Policy”), our board of directors met and established an estimated per share value of the Company’s common stock as of August 1, 2013 of $10.09.  This estimate is being provided to assist broker-dealers in connection with their obligations under applicable Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) rules with respect to customer account statements and to assist fiduciaries in discharging their obligations under Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) reporting requirements.

Process and Methodology

Our board of directors’ objective in determining an estimated value per share was to arrive at an estimated value that it believes is reasonable after consultation with our Advisor and with an independent, third party valuation and advisory firm engaged by the Company, using what the board of directors deems to be appropriate valuation methodologies and assumptions under current circumstances in accordance with the Estimated Valuation Policy.

In arriving at an estimated value per share for the board’s consideration, the Advisor utilized valuation methodologies that it believes are standard and acceptable in the real estate industry for the types of assets held by the Company.  As a part of the Company’s valuation process, the Company obtained the opinion of Duff & Phelps, LLC (“Duff & Phelps”), an independent third party, to estimate the “as is” market value of the Company’s real estate investments and to render an opinion as to the reasonableness of the valuation methodology and valuation conclusions of the Advisor for the Company’s other assets and liabilities.  Duff & Phelps is a global financial advisory and investment banking firm.

Our board of directors met on August 7, 2013 to review and consider the valuation analyses prepared by the Advisor and Duff & Phelps.  The Advisor presented a report to the board of directors with an estimated per share value, and the board of directors conferred with the Advisor and a representative from Duff & Phelps regarding the methodologies and assumptions used.  The board of directors, which is responsible for determining the estimated per share valuation, considered all information provided in light of its own familiarity with our assets and unanimously approved an estimated value of $10.09 per share.

In forming their conclusion of the value of the real estate investment properties held by the Company as of August 1, 2013, Duff & Phelps conducted appraisals of all of our real estate investment properties acquired before April 2013.  For investments made after April 1, 2013, Duff & Phelps relied on third party appraisals that were obtained in connection with those investments.  Duff & Phelps’ conclusion was subject to various limitations.  Duff & Phelps scope included:

·Review of the Company’s real estate investment historical performance and  business plans related to operations of the investment;

·Review of the applicable markets by means of publications and other resources to measure current market conditions, supply and demand factors, and growth patterns;

·Review of key market assumptions for mezzanine investments and mortgage liabilities, including but not limited to interest rates and collateral;

·Review of the data models supporting the valuation for each investment;

·Review of key assumptions utilized in the valuation models, including but not limited to terminal capitalization rates, discount rates, and growth rates;

·Review of Advisor calculations related to value allocations to non-controlling interests and joint venture interests, based on contractual terms and market assessments; and

·Review of valuation methodology for other assets and liabilities.

In forming its opinion, Duff & Phelps relied on information provided by our Advisor and third parties without independent verification.  Duff & Phelps did not perform engineering or structural studies or environmental studies of any of the properties, nor did they perform an independent appraisal of the other assets and liabilities

37

included in our estimated value per share.  Our Advisor provided Duff & Phelps with information regarding lease terms and the physical condition and capital expenditure requirements of each property.

Duff & Phelps provided an opinion that the resulting “as is” market value for the Company’s properties as calculated by Duff &Phelps, and the other assets and liabilities as valued by the Advisor, along with the corresponding net asset value (NAV) valuation methodologies and assumptions used by the Advisor to arrive at a recommended value of $10.09 per share as of August 1, 2013, are appropriate and reasonable.

Duff & Phelps has acted as a valuation advisor to the Company in connection with this assignment.  The compensation paid to Duff & Phelps in connection with this assignment was not contingent upon the successful completion of any transaction or conclusion reached by Duff & Phelps.  Duff & Phelps has rendered valuation advisory services to another Behringer Harvard sponsored investment program during the past two years for which it received usual and customary compensation.  Duff & Phelps may be engaged to provide financial advisory services to the Company, its Advisor or other Behringer Harvard sponsored investment programs or their affiliates in the future.

The following is a summary of the valuation methodologies used for each type of asset:

Investments in Real Estate.  The Company has focused on acquiring commercial real estate properties in different asset classes requiring development, redevelopment, or repositioning.  Due to the opportunistic or value-added nature of the Company’s real estate investments, both Duff & Phelps and our Advisor utilized a variety of valuation methodologies, each as appropriate for the asset type under consideration to assign an estimated value to each asset.  Our Advisor estimated the value of our investments in real estate utilizing multiple valuation methods, as appropriate for each asset, including an income approach using discounted cash flow analysis and a sales comparable analysis.  We believe that real estate investments with non-recurring operating results related to property redevelopment, tenant improvements, leasing costs, short-term vacancies, and other elements of opportunistic and value-add strategies, are appropriately valued using a discounted cash flow approach.  The key assumptions used in this approach were specific to each property type, market location, and quality of each property, and were based on similar investors’ return expectations and market assessments.  In calculating values for our assets, our Advisor used balance sheet and cash flow estimates as of June 30, 2013 after an appropriate marketing process and giving effect to forecasted cash flows for the third quarter of 2013.

While our Advisor believes that the approaches used by appraisers in valuing our real estate assets, including an income approach using discounted cash flow analysis and sales comparable analysis, is standard in the real estate industry, the estimated values for our investments in real estate may or may not represent current market values or fair values determined in accordance with GAAP.  Real estate is currently carried at its amortized cost basis in our financial statements, subject to any adjustments applicable under GAAP.

Duff & Phelps prepared appraisals of our properties in connection with the valuation.  The appraisals estimated values by using discounted cash flow, sale comparables, or a weighting of these approaches in determining each property’s value.  The appraisals employed a range of terminal capitalization rates, discount rates, growth rates, and other variables that fell within ranges that Duff & Phelps and the Advisor believed would be used by similar investors to value the properties we own.  The assumptions used in developing these estimates were specific to each property (including holding periods) and were determined based upon a number of factors including the market in which the property is located, the specific location of the property within the market, property and market vacancy, tenant demand for space and investor demand and return requirements.

Investment in Mezzanine Loan.  The value of our Mezzanine Loan investment, which was entered into on May 24, 2013, was valued at the outstanding principal balance.  The loan is accounted for as an investment in unconsolidated joint venture on our condensed consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2013.

Mortgage Loans.  Values for mortgage loans were estimated by the Advisor using a discounted cash flow analysis, which would use inputs based on the remaining loan terms and estimated current market interest rates for mortgage loans with similar characteristics, including remaining loan term and loan-to-value ratios.  The current market interest rate was generally determined based on market rates for available comparable debt.  The estimated current market interest rates for mortgage loans ranged from 2.6% to 6.2%.

Other Assets and Liabilities.  For a majority of our other assets and liabilities, consisting of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, accounts payable and other liabilities, the carrying values as of June 30, 2013, adjusted for significant activity to August 1, 2013, were considered equal to fair value by the Advisor due to their

38

cost-based characteristics or short maturities.  In connection with our estimated valuation of operating properties, notes receivable and mortgage loans payable, certain GAAP balances related to accumulated depreciation and amortization, straight-lining of rents, deferred revenues and expenses, and debt and notes receivable premiums and discounts have been eliminated as the accounts were already considered in the estimated values.

Noncontrolling Interests.  In those situations where our consolidated assets and liabilities are held in joint venture structures in which other equity holders have an interest, the Advisor has valued those noncontrolling interests based on the terms of the joint venture agreement applied in the liquidation of the joint venture.  The resulting noncontrolling interests are a deduction to the estimated value.

Common Stock Outstanding.  In deriving an estimated per share value, the total estimated value was divided by 26.04 million, the total number of common shares outstanding as of August 1, 2013, on a fully diluted basis, which includes financial instruments that can be converted into a known or determinable number of common shares.  As of the valuation date, none of the financial instruments that could be converted into common shares are currently convertible into a known or determinable number of common shares.  The determination of the number of common shares outstanding used in the estimated value per share is the same as used in GAAP computations for per share amounts.

Our estimated value per share was calculated by aggregating the value of our assets, subtracting the value of our liabilities, and dividing the net total by the fully-diluted common stock outstanding.  Our estimated value per share is effective as of August 1, 2013.  As a practical consideration, certain of the inputs and assumptions are based on amounts as of June 30, 2013 or later dates through August 1, 2013, as described above. We believe such amounts are reasonable and representative of value estimates as of August 7, 2013.

The estimated per share value does not reflect a liquidity discount for the fact that the shares are not traded on a national securities exchange, a discount for the non-assumability or prepayment obligations associated with certain of the Company’s debt, or a discount for our corporate level overhead and other costs that may be incurred, including any costs related to the sale of the Company’s assets.  Different parties using different assumptions and estimates could derive a different estimated value per share, and these differences could be significant.  The markets for real estate can fluctuate and values are expected to change in the future.

This value does not reflect “enterprise value,” which could include premiums or discounts for:

·the size of our portfolio: although some buyers may pay more for a portfolio compared to prices for individual properties;

·the characteristics of our working capital, leverage, credit facility and other financial structures where some buyers may ascribe different values based on synergies, cost savings or other attributes;

·disposition and other expenses that would be necessary to realize the value;

·the provisions under our advisory agreement and our potential ability to secure the services of a management team on a long-term basis; or

·the potential difference in our share value if we were to list our shares on a national securities exchange.

Allocation of Estimated Value

As of August 1, 2013, our estimated per share value was allocated as follows (amounts in thousands, except per share):

39

				Estimated
	Estimated			Value
	Value			per share
Real Estate:
Operating	$	417,080		$	16.01
Mezzanine loan investment (1)	13,750			0.53
Cash and cash equivalents	68,720			2.64
Restricted cash	6,986			0.27
Notes payable	(213,418		)	(8.20		)
Other assets and liabilities	(7,105		)	(0.27		)
Noncontrolling interests	(23,247		)	(0.89		)
Estimated value	$	262,766		$	10.09

(1)Accounted for as an investment in unconsolidated joint venture on our condensed consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2013.

The following are the key assumptions (shown on a weighted average basis) which are used in the discounted cash flow models to estimate the value of the real estate assets we currently own.

	Office			Student
	Buildings	Hotel	Multifamily	Housing	Self-storage
Exit capitalization rate	6.83%	7.50%	6.61%	7.25%	8.50%
Discount rate	7.92%	9.50%	7.59%	8.25%	9.50%
Annual market rent growth	2.78%	3.00%	3.00%	2.50%	2.50%
Average holding period	10.5 yrs	10.0 yrs	10.0 yrs	10.0 yrs	10.0 yrs

The following are ranges of the key assumptions which are used in the discounted cash flow models to estimate the value of the real estate assets we currently own. The discounted cash flow analyses for our hotel, student housing, and self-storage properties contained only one property per category, and therefore, no range of values is available.

	Office
	Buildings	Multifamily
Exit capitalization rate	5.50% - 7.50%	6.25% - 7.00%
Discount rate	6.00% - 8.75%	7.25% - 8.00%

As of June 30, 2013, we had 26,038,553 shares outstanding.  The potential dilutive effect of our common stock equivalents does not affect our estimated per share value as there were no potentially dilutive securities outstanding at June 30, 2013.

The real estate assets we owned as of June 30, 2013 reflect an overall increase of 16.7% from the original purchase price (excluding acquisition costs and operating deficits) plus post-acquisition capital investments.

While we believe that our assumptions utilized are reasonable, a change in these assumptions would affect the calculation of value of our real estate assets. The table below presents the estimated increase or decrease to our estimated value per share for a 25 basis point increase and decrease in the discount rates and capitalization rates, our more significant assumptions used in our estimated value. The table is only hypothetical to illustrate possible results if only one change in assumptions was made, with all other factors held constant. Further, each of these assumptions could change by more than 25 basis points or not change at all. We have also invested in non-U.S. dollar denominated real property and real estate-related securities exposing us to fluctuating currency rates. A change in the foreign exchange currency rates may have an adverse impact on our value.

	Change in Estimated Value per Share
	Increase of 25 basis points			Decrease of 25 basis points
Capitalization rate	$	(0.29	)	$	0.31
Discount rate	$	(0.26	)	$	0.27

40

Limitations of Estimated Value Per Share

As with any valuation methodology, our methodology is based upon a number of estimates and assumptions that may prove later to be inaccurate or incomplete.  Further, different parties using different assumptions and estimates could derive a different estimated value per share, which could be significantly different from our board’s estimated value per share.  The estimated per share value determined by our board of directors neither represents the fair value according to GAAP of our assets less liabilities, nor does it represent the amount our shares would trade at on a national securities exchange or the amount a shareholder would obtain if he tried to sell his shares or if we liquidated our assets.  Accordingly, with respect to the estimated value per share, the Company can give no assurance that:

·a stockholder would be able to resell his or her shares at this estimated value;

·a stockholder would ultimately realize distributions per share equal to the Company’s estimated value per share upon liquidation of the Company’s assets and settlement of its liabilities or a sale of the Company;

·the Company’s shares would trade at the estimated value per share on a national securities exchange; or

·the methodologies used to estimate the Company’s value per share would be acceptable to FINRA or under ERISA for compliance with their respective reporting requirements.

For further information regarding the limitations of the estimated value per share, see the Estimated Valuation Policy filed as Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 28, 2012.  Although our Estimated Valuation Policy requires us to update our estimated per share value at least every 18 months, we intend to update our estimated per share value on an annual basis.

The estimated value of our shares was calculated as of a particular point in time.  The value of the Company’s shares will fluctuate over time in response to developments related to individual assets in the portfolio and the management of those assets and in response to the real estate and finance markets.  There is no assurance of the extent to which the current estimated valuation should be relied upon for any purpose after its effective date regardless that it may be published on any statement issued by the Company or otherwise.

The Company is diligently working to secure new leases with quality tenants to: increase net operating income and the ultimate value of our assets; complete, market, and sell development assets; execute on other value creation strategies; and minimize expenses when possible.

Share Redemption Price for Share Redemption Program

In accordance with the Company’s Second Amended and Restated Share Redemption Program, as of August 7, 2013, the per share redemption price for redemptions automatically adjusted as a result of the initial determination by our Board of the estimated per share value.

Beginning August 7, 2013, the per share redemption price for exceptional redemptions, which are those redemptions made on circumstances of death, qualifying disability or need for long-term care of an investor, will equal the lesser of 90% of (a) $10.09, which is the estimated per share value disclosed above, and (b) the average price per share that investor paid for all of his shares (as adjusted for any stock dividends, combinations, splits, recapitalizations and the like with respect to our common stock) less aggregate per share amount of any special distributions so designated by the Board distributed to stockholders prior to the redemption date and declared from the date of first issue of the shares redeemed (the “Special Distributions”).

For all other ordinary redemptions, the per share redemption price will be the lesser of 80% of (i) $10.09 and (ii) the average price per share that the investor paid for all of his shares less any Special Distributions.  However, as previously disclosed, the Company has suspended redemptions other than exceptional redemptions until further notice.

Item 6.Exhibits.

The exhibits filed in response to Item 601 of Regulation S-K are listed on the Exhibit Index attached hereto.

41

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	BEHRINGER HARVARD OPPORTUNITY REIT II, INC.
Dated: August 13, 2013	By:	/s/ Andrew J. Bruce
		Andrew J. Bruce
		Chief Financial Officer
		Principal Financial Officer

42

Index to Exhibits

Exhibit Number	Description
3.1	Third Articles of Amendment and Restatement, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Form 10-Q filed on November 14, 2012
3.2	Second Amended and Restated Bylaws, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Form 10-Q filed on November 14, 2012
4.1	Statement regarding restrictions on transferability of shares of common stock (to appear on stock certificate or to be sent upon request and without charge to stockholders issued shares without certificates), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Form 10-K filed on March 28, 2013
31.1*	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification
31.2*	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification
32.1*	Section 1350 Certification**
32.2*	Section 1350 Certification**
99.1	Second Amended and Restated Share Redemption Program (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Form 10-K filed on March 28, 2012)
101**	The following financial statements from the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2013, filed on August 13, 2013, formatted in XBRL: (i) Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Equity, (iv) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (v) the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

* Filed herewith

** In accordance with Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K, this Exhibit is not deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section.  Such certifications will not be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.

43

EX-31.1

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Michael J. O’Hanlon, certify that:

1.I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc.;

2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Dated this 13th day of August, 2013.

/s/ Michael J. O’Hanlon

Michael J. O’Hanlon

Chief Executive Officer

Principal Executive Officer

EX-31.2

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Andrew J. Bruce, certify that:

1.I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc.;

2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Dated this 13th day of August, 2013.

/s/ Andrew J. Bruce

Andrew J. Bruce

Chief Financial Officer

Principal Financial Officer

EX-32.1

Exhibit 32.1

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

This Certificate is being delivered pursuant to the requirements of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 (Mail Fraud) of Title 18 (Crimes and Criminal Procedures) of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

The undersigned, who is the Chief Executive Officer of Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to his knowledge:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company (the “Report”), which accompanies this Certificate, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and all information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 13th day of August, 2013.

/s/ Michael J. O’Hanlon

Michael J. O’Hanlon

Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

EX-32.2

Exhibit 32.2

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

This Certificate is being delivered pursuant to the requirements of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 (Mail Fraud) of Title 18 (Crimes and Criminal Procedures) of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

The undersigned, who is the Chief Financial Officer of Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to his knowledge:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company (the “Report”), which accompanies this Certificate, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and all information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 13th day of August, 2013.

/s/ Andrew J. Bruce

Andrew J. Bruce

Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

XML

Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

11. Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

We may be exposed to the risk associated with variability of interest rates that might impact our cash flows and the results of operations.  The hedging strategy of entering into interest rate caps and swaps, therefore, is to eliminate or reduce, to the extent possible, the volatility of cash flows.  As of June 30, 2013, none of our derivative instruments were designated as hedging instruments.

Derivative instruments classified as assets were reported at their combined fair values of $0.2 million and less than $0.1 million in prepaid expenses and other assets at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.  During the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, we recorded a reclassification of unrealized loss to interest expense of $0.1 million and unrealized loss of less than $0.1 million to other comprehensive income (loss) (“OCI”) in our statement of equity to adjust the carrying amount of the interest rate caps at June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

The following table summarizes the notional values of our derivative financial instruments.  The notional values provide an indication of the extent of our involvement in these instruments, but do not represent exposure to credit, interest rate, or market risks:

Type / Description	Notional Value		Interest Rate / Strike Rate	Index	Maturity
Not Designated as Hedging Instruments
Interest rate cap - Courtyard Kauai Coconut Beach Hotel	$	38,000	3.00% - 6.00%	30-day LIBOR	October 15, 2014
Interest rate cap - 1875 Lawrence	$	20,100	2.75%	30-day LIBOR	January 1, 2016
Interest rate cap - Wimberly	$	26,685	4.56%	30-day LIBOR	March 1, 2018

The table below presents the fair value of our derivative financial instruments, as well as their classification on the consolidated balance sheets as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

	Balance	Asset Derivatives
Derivatives designated as	Sheet	June 30, 2013		December 31, 2012
hedging instruments:	Location	2013		2012
Interest rate derivative contracts	Prepaid expenses and other assets	$	—	$	13

	Balance	Asset Derivatives
Derivatives not designated as	Sheet	June 30, 2013		December 31, 2012
hedging instruments:	Location	2013		2012
Interest rate derivative contracts	Prepaid expenses and other assets	$	205	$	—

The table below presents the effect of our derivative financial instruments on the consolidated statements of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012:

Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships
Amount of Loss Reclassified from OCI into Income (Effective Portion)
Three Months ended June 30, 2012			Six Months ended June 30, 2012
$	(8	)	$	(14	)
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments
Amount of Gain or (Loss) (1)
Three months ended June 30, 2013			Six months ended June 30, 2013
$	41		$	(30	)

(1) Amounts included in interest expense.  For the three and six months ending June 30, 2013, reclassification out of OCI for $56 thousand and $88 thousand, respectively, was due to all derivatives being designated as non-hedging instruments as of January 1, 2013 compared to being designated as hedging instruments as of December 31, 2012.

XML

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) (USD $) In Thousands, except Per Share data, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2012
Revenues
Rental revenue	$ 9,931	$ 8,239	$ 18,596	$ 16,163
Hotel revenue	3,395	2,432	7,012	4,907
Total revenues	13,326	10,671	25,608	21,070
Expenses:
Property operating expenses	3,554	3,083	6,615	5,889
Hotel operating expenses	2,734	2,390	5,488	4,845
Interest expense, net	2,144	2,012	4,188	3,890
Real estate taxes	1,463	1,067	2,652	2,119
Property management fees	490	410	936	790
Asset management fees	864	804	1,545	1,574
General and administrative	832	768	1,633	1,392
Acquisition expense	1,185	729	3,056	729
Depreciation and amortization	4,689	3,481	8,373	7,254
Total expenses	17,955	14,744	34,486	28,482
Interest income, net	28	44	60	75
Other income	21	50	10	80
Loss from continuing operations	(4,580)	(3,979)	(8,808)	(7,257)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, including gains on disposition	14,153	(767)	13,868	6,633
Net income (loss)	9,573	(4,746)	5,060	(624)
Noncontrolling interest in continuing operations	223	226	347	470
Noncontrolling interest in discontinued operations	(3,782)	160	(3,725)	(513)
Net (income) loss attributable to the noncontrolling interest	(3,559)	386	(3,378)	(43)
Net income (loss) attributable to the Company	6,014	(4,360)	1,682	(667)
Amounts attributable to the Company
Continuing operations	(4,357)	(3,753)	(8,461)	(6,787)
Discontinued operations	10,371	(607)	10,143	6,120
Net income (loss) attributable to the Company	6,014	(4,360)	1,682	(667)
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic and diluted (in shares)	26,039	26,089	26,046	25,908
Net income (loss) per share
Continuing operations (in dollars per share)	$ (0.17)	$ (0.15)	$ (0.33)	$ (0.26)
Discontinued operations (in dollars per share)	$ 0.40	$ (0.02)	$ 0.39	$ 0.24
Basic and diluted income (loss) per share (in dollars per share)	$ 0.23	$ (0.17)	$ 0.06	$ (0.02)
Comprehensive income (loss):
Net income (loss)	9,573	(4,746)	5,060	(624)
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Reclassification of unrealized loss on interest rate derivatives to net income	56		88
Unrealized loss on interest rate derivatives				(1)
Foreign currency translation gain (loss)	225	(451)	(127)	(354)
Total other comprehensive income (loss)	281	(451)	(39)	(355)
Comprehensive income (loss)	9,854	(5,197)	5,021	(979)
Comprehensive (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interest	(3,562)	386	(3,384)	(43)
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to common shareholders	$ 6,292	$ (4,811)	$ 1,637	$ (1,022)

XML

New Accounting Pronouncements

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

New Accounting Pronouncements

New Accounting Pronouncements

4.  New Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2013-02 (“ASU 2013-02”), Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income.  The update clarifies how to report the effect of significant reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income.  ASU 2013-02 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2012 and is to be applied prospectively.  Our adoption of this ASU did not materially change the presentation of our consolidated condensed financial statements.

XML

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements

Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  These estimates include such items as purchase price allocation for real estate acquisitions, impairment of long-lived assets, depreciation and amortization, and allowance for doubtful accounts.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation

Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation

Our consolidated financial statements include our accounts and the accounts of other subsidiaries over which we have control.  All inter-company transactions, balances, and profits have been eliminated in consolidation.  Interests in entities acquired will be evaluated based on applicable GAAP, which includes the requirement to consolidate entities deemed to be variable interest entities (“VIE”) in which we are the primary beneficiary.  If the interest in the entity is determined not to be a VIE, then the entity will be evaluated for consolidation based on legal form, economic substance, and the extent to which we have control and/or substantive participating rights under the respective ownership agreement.  For entities in which we have less than a controlling interest or entities which we are not deemed to be the primary beneficiary, we account for the investment using the equity method of accounting.

There are judgments and estimates involved in determining if an entity in which we have made an investment is a VIE and, if so, whether we are the primary beneficiary.  The entity is evaluated to determine if it is a VIE by, among other things, calculating the percentage of equity being risked compared to the total equity of the entity.  Determining expected future losses involves assumptions of various possibilities of the results of future operations of the entity, assigning a probability to each possibility and using a discount rate to determine the net present value of those future losses.  A change in the judgments, assumptions, and estimates outlined above could result in consolidating an entity that should not be consolidated or accounting for an investment using the equity method that should in fact be consolidated, the effects of which could be material to our financial statements.

In the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, all dollar and share amounts in tabulation are in thousands of dollars and shares, respectively, unless otherwise noted.

Real Estate

Real Estate

Upon the acquisition of real estate properties, we recognize the assets acquired, the liabilities assumed and any noncontrolling interest as of the acquisition date, measured at their fair values.  The acquisition date is the date on which we obtain control of the real estate property.  The assets acquired and liabilities assumed may consist of land, inclusive of associated rights, buildings, assumed debt, identified intangible assets and liabilities and asset retirement obligations. Identified intangible assets generally consist of above-market leases, in-place leases, in-place tenant improvements, in-place leasing commissions and tenant relationships.  Identified intangible liabilities generally consist of below-market leases. Goodwill is recognized as of the acquisition date and measured as the aggregate fair value of the consideration transferred and any noncontrolling interests in the acquiree over the fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired.  Likewise, a bargain purchase gain is recognized in current earnings when the aggregate fair value of the consideration transferred and any noncontrolling interests in the acquiree is less than the fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired.  Acquisition-related costs are expensed in the period incurred.  Initial valuations are subject to change until our information is finalized, which is no later than twelve months from the acquisition date.

The fair value of the tangible assets acquired, consisting of land and buildings, is determined by valuing the property as if it were vacant, and the “as-if-vacant” value is then allocated to land and buildings.  Land values are derived from appraisals, and building values are calculated as replacement cost less depreciation or management’s estimates of the fair value of these assets using discounted cash flow analyses or similar methods believed to be used by market participants.  The value of buildings is depreciated over the estimated useful life of 25 years using the straight-line method.

We determine the fair value of assumed debt by calculating the net present value of the scheduled mortgage payments using interest rates for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities that management believes we could obtain at the date of the debt assumption.  Any difference between the fair value and stated value of the assumed debt is recorded as a discount or premium and amortized over the remaining life of the loan using the effective interest method.

We determine the value of above-market and below-market leases for acquired properties based on the present value (using an interest rate that reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the difference between (1) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in-place leases and (2) management’s estimate of current market lease rates for the corresponding in-place leases, measured over a period equal to (a) the remaining non-cancelable lease term for above-market leases, or (b) the remaining non-cancelable lease term plus any below-market fixed rate renewal options that, based on a qualitative assessment of several factors, including the financial condition of the lessee, the business conditions in the industry in which the lessee operates, the economic conditions in the area in which the property is located, and the ability of the lessee to sublease the property during the renewal term, are reasonably assured to be exercised by the lessee for below-market leases.  We record the fair value of above-market and below-market leases as intangible assets or intangible liabilities, respectively, and amortize them as an adjustment to rental income over the determined lease term.

The total value of identified real estate intangible assets acquired is further allocated to in-place leases, in-place tenant improvements, in-place leasing commissions and tenant relationships based on our evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant’s lease and our overall relationship with that respective tenant.  The aggregate value for tenant improvements and leasing commissions is based on estimates of these costs incurred at inception of the acquired leases, amortized through the date of acquisition.  The aggregate value of in-place leases acquired and tenant relationships is determined by applying a fair value model.  The estimates of fair value of in-place leases include an estimate of carrying costs during the expected lease-up periods for the respective spaces considering current market conditions.  In estimating the carrying costs that would have otherwise been incurred had the leases not been in place, we include such items as real estate taxes, insurance and other operating expenses as well as lost rental revenue during the expected lease-up period based on current market conditions.  The estimates of the fair value of tenant relationships also include costs to execute similar leases including leasing commissions, legal fees and tenant improvements as well as an estimate of the likelihood of renewal as determined by management on a tenant-by-tenant basis.

We amortize the value of in-place leases, in-place tenant improvements and in-place leasing commissions to expense over the initial term of the respective leases.  The tenant relationship values are amortized to expense over the initial term and any anticipated renewal periods, but in no event does the amortization period for intangible assets or liabilities exceed the remaining depreciable life of the building.  Should a tenant terminate its lease, the unamortized portion of the acquired lease intangibles related to that tenant would be charged to expense.

Anticipated amortization expense associated with the acquired lease intangibles for each of the following five years as of June 30, 2013 is as follows:

Year	Lease / Other Intangibles
July 1, 2013 - December 31, 2013	$	798
2014	705
2015	368
2016	230
2017	181

Accumulated depreciation and amortization related to our consolidated investments in real estate assets and intangibles were as follows:

										Acquired
	Buildings and			Land and			Lease			Below-Market
June 30, 2013	Improvements			Improvements			Intangibles			Leases
Cost	$	261,887		$	69,923		$	14,651		$	(2,297	)
Less: depreciation and amortization	(21,667		)	(2,187		)	(10,071		)	1,456
Net	$	240,220		$	67,736		$	4,580		$	(841	)

										Acquired
	Buildings and			Land and			Lease			Below-Market
December 31, 2012	Improvements			Improvements			Intangibles			Leases
Cost	$	217,343		$	75,873		$	14,041		$	(2,196	)
Less: depreciation and amortization	(17,428		)	(2,493		)	(8,671		)	1,292
Net	$	199,915		$	73,380		$	5,370		$	(904	)

Real Estate Held for Sale

Real Estate Held for Sale

We classify properties as held for sale when certain criteria are met, in accordance with GAAP.  At that time we present the assets and obligations of the property held for sale separately in our consolidated balance sheet and we cease recording depreciation and amortization expense related to that property.  Properties held for sale are reported at the lower of their carrying amount or their estimated fair value, less estimated costs to sell.  We had no property classified as held for sale at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

Investment Impairment

Investment Impairment

For all of our real estate and real estate related investments, we monitor events and changes in circumstances indicating that the carrying amounts of the real estate assets may not be recoverable.  Examples of the types of events and circumstances that would cause management to assess our assets for potential impairment include, but are not limited to:  a significant decrease in the market price of an asset; a significant adverse change in the manner in which the asset is being used; an accumulation of costs in excess of the acquisition basis plus construction of the property; major vacancies and the resulting loss of revenues; natural disasters; a change in the projected holding period; legitimate purchase offers and changes in the global and local markets or economic conditions.  Our assets may at times be concentrated in limited geographic locations and, to the extent that our portfolio is concentrated in limited geographic locations, downturns specifically related to such regions may result in tenants defaulting on their lease obligations at a portion of our properties within a short time period, which may result in asset impairments.  When such events or changes in circumstances are present, we assess potential impairment by comparing estimated future undiscounted operating cash flows expected to be generated over the life of the asset and from its eventual disposition to the carrying amount of the asset.  In the event that the carrying amount exceeds the estimated future undiscounted operating cash flows, we recognize an impairment loss to adjust the carrying amount of the asset to estimated fair value.  We consider projected future undiscounted cash flows, trends, strategic decisions regarding future development plans, and other factors in our assessment of whether impairment conditions exist.  While we believe our estimates of future cash flows are reasonable, different assumptions regarding factors such as market rents, economic conditions, and occupancy rates could significantly affect these estimates.

In evaluating our investments for impairment, management may use appraisals and make estimates and assumptions, including, but not limited to, the projected date of disposition of the properties, the estimated future cash flows of the properties during our ownership, and the projected sales price of each of the properties.  A future change in these estimates and assumptions could result in understating or overstating the carrying value of our investments, which could be material to our financial statements.

We also evaluate our investments in unconsolidated joint ventures at each reporting date.  If we believe there is an other than temporary decline in market value, we will record an impairment charge based on these evaluations.  We assess potential impairment by comparing our portion of estimated future undiscounted operating cash flows expected to be generated by the joint venture over the life of the joint venture’s assets to the carrying amount of the joint venture.  In the event that the carrying amount exceeds our portion of estimated future undiscounted operating cash flows, we recognize an impairment loss to adjust the carrying amount of the joint venture to its estimated fair value.

We believe the carrying value of our operating real estate is currently recoverable.  Accordingly, there were no impairment charges for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 or 2012.  However, if market conditions worsen beyond our current expectations, or if changes in our strategy significantly affect any key assumptions used in our fair value calculations, we may need to take charges in future periods for impairments related to our existing investments.  Any such non-cash charges would have an adverse effect on our consolidated financial position and results of operations.

Investment in Unconsolidated Joint Venture

Investment in Unconsolidated Joint Venture

We provide funding to third party developers for the acquisition, development and construction of real estate (“ADC Arrangement”).  Under the ADC Arrangement, we may participate in the residual profits of the project through the sale or refinancing of the property.  We evaluate this arrangement to determine if they have characteristics similar to a loan or if the characteristics are more similar to a joint venture or partnership such as participating in the risks and rewards of the project as an owner or an investment partner.  When we determine that the characteristics are more similar to a jointly-owned investment or partnership, we account for the arrangement as an investment in an unconsolidated joint venture under the equity method of accounting (Note 8) or a direct investment (consolidated basis of accounting) instead of applying loan accounting.  The ADC Arrangement is periodically reassessed.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue Recognition

We recognize rental income generated from leases of real estate assets on a straight-line basis over the terms of the respective leases, including the effect of rent holidays, if any.  Straight-line rental revenue of $0.1 million and $0.3 million was recognized in rental revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively, and includes amounts recognized in discontinued operations.  Straight-line rental revenue of $0.1 million and $0.2 million was recognized in rental revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively, and includes amounts recognized in discontinued operations.   Net below market lease amortization of less than $0.1 million was recognized in rental revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013.  Net below market lease amortization of less than $0.1 million and $0.1 million was recognized in rental revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively, and includes amounts recognized in discontinued operations.

Hotel revenue is derived from the operations of the Courtyard Kauai at Coconut Beach Hotel, consisting of guest room, food and beverage, and other revenue, and is recognized as the services are rendered.

Accounts Receivable

Accounts Receivable

Accounts receivable primarily consist of receivables related to our consolidated properties of $2.7 million which includes straight-line rental revenue receivables of $1.4 million as of June 30, 2013.  Accounts receivable primarily consisted of receivables related to our consolidated properties of $2.8 million which includes straight-line rental revenue receivables of $1.2 million as of December 31, 2012.

Furniture, Fixtures, and Equipment

Furniture, Fixtures, and Equipment

Furniture, fixtures, and equipment are recorded at cost and are depreciated according to the Company’s capitalization policy which uses the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives of five to seven years.  Maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred.  Accumulated depreciation associated with our furniture, fixtures, and equipment was $3.2 million and $2.3 million as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

Deferred Financing Fees

Deferred Financing Fees

Deferred financing fees are recorded at cost and are amortized to interest expense of our notes payable using a straight-line method that approximates the effective interest method over the life of the related debt.  Accumulated amortization of deferred financing fees was $1.6 million and $1.4 million as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

Income Taxes

Income Taxes

We have elected to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), and have qualified as a REIT since the year ended December 31, 2008.  To qualify as a REIT, we must meet a number of organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement that we distribute at least 90% of our REIT taxable income to our stockholders.  As a REIT, we generally will not be subject to federal income tax at the corporate level.  We are organized and operate in such a manner as to qualify for taxation as a REIT under the Code and intend to continue to operate in such a manner, but no assurance can be given that we will operate in a manner so as to qualify or remain qualified as a REIT.

We have reviewed our tax positions under GAAP guidance that clarifies the relevant criteria and approach for the recognition and measurement of uncertain tax positions.  The guidance prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition of a tax position taken, or expected to be taken, in a tax return.  A tax position may only be recognized in the financial statements if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained upon examination.  We believe it is more likely than not that the tax positions taken relative to our status as a REIT will be sustained in any tax examination.

Foreign Currency Translation

Foreign Currency Translation

For our international investment where the functional currency is other than the U.S. dollar, assets and liabilities are translated using period-end exchange rates, while the statement of operations amounts are translated using the average exchange rates for the respective period.  Gains and losses resulting from the change in exchange rates from period to period are reported separately as a component of other comprehensive income (loss) (“OCI”).  Gains and losses resulting from foreign currency transactions are included in the condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).

The Euro is the functional currency for the operations of Holstenplatz and Alte Jakobstraße.  We also maintain a Euro-denominated bank account that is translated into U.S. dollars at the current exchange rate at each reporting period.  For the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, the foreign currency translation adjustment was a gain of $0.2 million and a loss of $0.1 million, respectively.  For the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, the foreign currency translation adjustment was a loss of $0.5 million and a loss $0.4 million, respectively.

Concentration of Credit Risk

Concentration of Credit Risk

At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, we had cash and cash equivalents deposited in certain financial institutions in excess of federally insured levels.  We have diversified our cash and cash equivalents among several banking institutions in an attempt to minimize exposure to any one of these entities.  We regularly monitor the financial stability of these financial institutions and believe that we are not exposed to any significant credit risk in cash and cash equivalents or restricted cash.

Noncontrolling Interest

Noncontrolling Interest

Noncontrolling interest represents the noncontrolling ownership interest’s proportionate share of the equity in our consolidated real estate investments.  Income and losses are allocated to noncontrolling interest holders based generally on their ownership percentage.  In certain instances, our joint venture agreement provides for liquidating distributions based on achieving certain return metrics (“promoted interest”).  If a property reaches a defined return threshold, then it will result in distributions to noncontrolling interest which is different from the standard pro-rata allocation percentage.

Earnings per Share

Earnings per Share

Net income (loss) per share is calculated based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each period.  The weighted average shares outstanding used to calculate both basic and diluted income (loss) per share were the same for each of the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, as there were no potentially dilutive securities outstanding.

Reclassification

Reclassification

To conform to the current year presentation, which presents hotel operating expense as a separate component of property operating expense on our condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, we reclassified $2.4 million and $4.8 million from property operating expense to hotel operating expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively.

Subsequent Events

Subsequent Events

We have evaluated subsequent events for recognition or disclosure in our condensed consolidated financial statements and noted no subsequent events that would require adjustment to the condensed consolidated financial statements or additional disclosure other than the one disclosed herein.

XML

Commitments and Contingencies

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

Commitments and Contingencies

Commitments and Contingencies

12. Commitments and Contingencies

Our operating leases consist of ground leases on each of eight buildings acquired in connection with the purchase of the Original Florida MOB Portfolio.  Each ground lease is for a term of 50 years, with a 25-year extension option.  The annual payment for each ground lease increases by 10% every five years.  For each of the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, we incurred $0.2 million in lease expense related to our ground leases.  Future minimum lease payments for all operating leases from June 30, 2013 are as follows:

July 1, 2013 - December 31, 2013	$	147
2014	293
2015	301
2016	301
2017	301
Thereafter	21,227
Total	$	22,570

XML

Supplemental Cash Flow Information (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2012
Supplemental Cash Flow Information
Interest paid, net of amounts capitalized	$ 3,838	$ 5,050
Non-cash investing activities:
Capital expenditures for real estate in accounts payable	24	156
Capital expenditures for real estate in accrued liabilities	358	725
Non-cash financing activities:
Common stock issued in distribution reinvestment plan		2,790
Offering costs payable to related parties		$ 8

XML

Financial Instruments not Reported at Fair Value (Details) (USD $)	Jun. 30, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Financial Instruments not Reported at Fair Value
Notes payable	$ 218,505,000	$ 183,308,000
Fair value of notes payable	$ 213,400,000	$ 179,400,000

XML

Real Estate and Real Estate-Related Investments (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

Real Estate and Real Estate-Related Investments

Schedule of information pertaining to consolidated investments

Property Name	Location	Date Acquired	Ownership Interest
1875 Lawrence	Denver, CO	October 28, 2008	100	%
Holstenplatz	Hamburg, Germany	June 30, 2010	100	%
Florida MOB Portfolio (1)	South Florida	October 8, 2010/October 20, 2010	90	%
Courtyard Kauai Coconut Beach Hotel	Kauai, Hawaii	October 20, 2010	80	%
River Club and the Townhomes at River Club	Athens, Georiga	April 25, 2011	85	%
Babcock Self Storage	San Antonio, Texas	August 30, 2011	85	%
Lakes of Margate	Margate, Florida	October 19, 2011	92.5	%
Arbors Harbor Town	Memphis, Tennessee	December 20, 2011	94	%
Alte Jakobstraße	Berlin, Germany	April 5, 2012	99.7	%
Wimberly at Deerwood (“Wimberly”)	Jacksonville, Florida	February 19, 2013	95	%
22 Exchange	Akron, Ohio	April 16, 2013	90	%

(1) We acquired a portfolio of eight medical office buildings, known as the Original Florida MOB Portfolio on October 8, 2010.  We acquired a medical office building known as Gardens Medical Pavilion on October 20, 2010.  Collectively, the Original Florida MOB Portfolio and Gardens Medical Pavilion are referred to as the Florida MOB Portfolio.  The Florida MOB Portfolio consists of nine medical office buildings.  We own 90% of each of eight of the buildings.  We own approximately 79.8% in the ninth building, Gardens Medical Pavilion.

Schedule of amounts of identified assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date

	Total  Acquisitions
Buildings	$	52,875
Land	6,721
Land improvements	667
Lease intangibles, net	1,251
Furniture, fixtures and equipment	1,645
Signage, landscaping and misc. site improvements	465
Acquired below-market leases, net	(99		)
Total identifiable net assets	$	63,525

Summary of the amounts recognized for revenues, acquisition expenses and net loss

The following table summarizes the amounts recognized for revenues, acquisition expenses and net loss from the acquisition dates to June 30, 2013 (in millions):

	Wimberly		22 Exchange
Revenue	$	1.3	$	0.8
Acquisition expenses with unaffiliated third party	$	0.8	$	0.4
Net loss	$	1.7	$	0.8

Schedule of unaudited pro forma information

	Pro Forma for the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013			2012
Revenue	$	52,749		$	45,863
Depreciation and amortization	$	(1,255	)	$	(2,407	)
Net income (loss)	$	7,245		$	(4,508	)
Net income (loss) per share	$	0.28		$	(0.17	)

XML

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value

Schedule of information about assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis

June 30, 2013	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Assets
Derivative financial instruments	$	—	$	205	$	—	$	205

December 31, 2012	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Assets
Derivative financial instruments	$	—	$	13	$	—	$	13

XML

Distributions (Details) (USD $) In Millions, except Per Share data, unless otherwise specified	0 Months Ended	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Mar. 20, 2012	Jun. 30, 2012	Mar. 31, 2012	Jun. 30, 2012
Distributions
Declared Distribution Per Share, Special (in dollars per share)	$ 0.50
Total regular distributions paid to stockholders		$ 1.1		$ 17.3
Regular cash distributions paid				4.3
Total regular distributions under DRP		0.7		2.8
Special cash distribution declared			13
Special cash distribution paid		$ 13		$ 13
Declared daily regular distribution rate of common stock (in dollars per share)			$ 0.0013699
Annualized distribution rate (as a percent)			5.00%
Share purchase price (in dollars per share)			$ 10.00

XML

Discontinued Operations (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

Discontinued Operations

Schedule of disposition of properties

Property Name	Date of Disposition	Contract Sales Price
Palms of Monterrey	January 5, 2012	$	39,300
Parrot’s Landing	October 31, 2012	$	56,300
Interchange Business Center (1)	October 18, 2012	$	7,500
Interchange Business Center (1)	April 12, 2013	$	40,400

(1) On October 18, 2012, we sold one of the four industrial buildings at Interchange Business Center to an unaffiliated third party.  On April 12, 2013, we sold the remaining three buildings to an unaffiliated third party.

Schedule of discontinued operations in consolidated statements of operations

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012
Rental revenue	$	81		$	1,862		$	465		$	3,864
Expenses
Property operating expenses	40			721			101			1,421
Interest expense	70			757			319			1,543
Real estate taxes	(48		)	416			33			811
Property management fees	6			72			13			152
Asset management fees	13			48			50			96
Depreciation and amortization	42			615			276			1,237
Total expenses	123			2,629			792			5,260
Interest income, net	—			—			—			1
Loss on early extinguishment of debt (1)	(260		)	—			(260		)	(1,236		)
Gain on sale of real estate property	14,455			—			14,455			9,264
Income (loss) from discontinued operations	$	14,153		$	(767	)	$	13,868		$	6,633

(1) Loss on early extinguishment of debt for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 was approximately $0.3 million and was comprised of the write-off of deferred financing fees of $0.1 million and an early termination fee of $0.2 million.  Loss on early extinguishment of debt for the six months ended June 30, 2012 was approximately $1.2 million and was comprised of the write-off of deferred financing fees of $0.4 million and an early termination fee of $0.8 million.

XML

Investment in Unconsolidated Joint Venture (Details) (USD $)	0 Months Ended	6 Months Ended	3 Months Ended	6 Months Ended	3 Months Ended	6 Months Ended
	May 24, 2013 item	Jun. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2013 Less than	Jun. 30, 2013 Less than	Jun. 30, 2013 Prospect Park	Jun. 30, 2013 Prospect Park
Investment in Unconsolidated Joint Venture
Mezzanine financing to an unaffiliated third-party entity	$ 13,700,000
Amount of senior construction loan taken by unconsolidated joint venture from a third-party lender	35,600,000
Annual interest rate for the first three years (as a percent)	10.00%
Period for which annual interest rate will be 10 percent	3 years
Number of extensions of the term of mezzanine loan at the option of the borrower	2
Period of extension of the term of mezzanine loan at the option of the borrower	1 year
Annual interest rate after two extensions of mezzanine loan (as a percent)	14.00%
Outstanding principal balance under mezzanine loan		13,700,000
Acquisition-related costs and fees capitalized					400,000	400,000
Interest capitalized			100,000	100,000		200,000
Return of capital received		2,444,000			2,400,000	2,400,000
Carrying Amount					$ 11,635,000	$ 11,635,000

XML

Discontinued Operations (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended		0 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2012	Jan. 05, 2012 Palms of Monterrey	Oct. 31, 2012 Parrot's Landing	Apr. 12, 2013 Interchange Business Center item	Oct. 18, 2012 Interchange Business Center item
Discontinued Operations
Number of industrial buildings								4
Number of industrial buildings sold							3	1
Contract sales price			$ 39,106,000	$ 38,684,000	$ 39,300,000	$ 56,300,000	$ 40,400,000	$ 7,500,000
Rental revenue	81,000	1,862,000	465,000	3,864,000
Expenses:
Property operating expenses	40,000	721,000	101,000	1,421,000
Interest expense	70,000	757,000	319,000	1,543,000
Real estate taxes	(48,000)	416,000	33,000	811,000
Property management fees	6,000	72,000	13,000	152,000
Asset management fees	13,000	48,000	50,000	96,000
Depreciation and amortization	42,000	615,000	276,000	1,237,000
Total expenses	123,000	2,629,000	792,000	5,260,000
Interest income, net				1,000
Loss on early extinguishment of debt	(260,000)		(260,000)	(1,236,000)
Gain on sale of real estate property	14,455,000		14,455,000	9,264,000
Income (loss) from discontinued operations	14,153,000	(767,000)	13,868,000	6,633,000
Write-off of deferred financing fees	100,000		100,000	400,000
Early termination fees	$ 200,000		$ 200,000	$ 800,000

XML

Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

Summary of notional value of derivative financial instruments

Type / Description	Notional Value		Interest Rate / Strike Rate	Index	Maturity
Not Designated as Hedging Instruments
Interest rate cap - Courtyard Kauai Coconut Beach Hotel	$	38,000	3.00% - 6.00%	30-day LIBOR	October 15, 2014
Interest rate cap - 1875 Lawrence	$	20,100	2.75%	30-day LIBOR	January 1, 2016
Interest rate cap - Wimberly	$	26,685	4.56%	30-day LIBOR	March 1, 2018

Summary of fair value of derivative financial instruments

	Balance	Asset Derivatives
Derivatives designated as	Sheet	June 30, 2013		December 31, 2012
hedging instruments:	Location	2013		2012
Interest rate derivative contracts	Prepaid expenses and other assets	$	—	$	13

	Balance	Asset Derivatives
Derivatives not designated as	Sheet	June 30, 2013		December 31, 2012
hedging instruments:	Location	2013		2012
Interest rate derivative contracts	Prepaid expenses and other assets	$	205	$	—

Summary of effect of derivative financial instruments on consolidated statements of operations

Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships
Amount of Loss Reclassified from OCI into Income (Effective Portion)
Three Months ended June 30, 2012			Six Months ended June 30, 2012
$	(8	)	$	(14	)
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments
Amount of Gain or (Loss) (1)
Three months ended June 30, 2013			Six months ended June 30, 2013
$	41		$	(30	)

(1) Amounts included in interest expense.  For the three and six months ending June 30, 2013, reclassification out of OCI for $56 thousand and $88 thousand, respectively, was due to all derivatives being designated as non-hedging instruments as of January 1, 2013 compared to being designated as hedging instruments as of December 31, 2012.

XML

Leasing Activity (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2013
Future minimum base rental payments due to entity under non-cancelable leases
July 1, 2013 - December 31, 2013	$ 14,296
2014	12,784
2015	10,213
2016	7,468
2017	3,754
Thereafter	4,944
Total	$ 53,459
Maximum lease term	1 year
Rental revenue | Tenant
Leasing Activity
Number of tenants	0

XML

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Schedule of anticipated amortization expense associated with the acquired lease intangibles excluding properties classified as discontinued operations

Year	Lease / Other Intangibles
July 1, 2013 - December 31, 2013	$	798
2014	705
2015	368
2016	230
2017	181

Schedule of accumulated depreciation and amortization related to entity's consolidated investments in real estate assets and intangibles

										Acquired
	Buildings and			Land and			Lease			Below-Market
June 30, 2013	Improvements			Improvements			Intangibles			Leases
Cost	$	261,887		$	69,923		$	14,651		$	(2,297	)
Less: depreciation and amortization	(21,667		)	(2,187		)	(10,071		)	1,456
Net	$	240,220		$	67,736		$	4,580		$	(841	)

										Acquired
	Buildings and			Land and			Lease			Below-Market
December 31, 2012	Improvements			Improvements			Intangibles			Leases
Cost	$	217,343		$	75,873		$	14,041		$	(2,196	)
Less: depreciation and amortization	(17,428		)	(2,493		)	(8,671		)	1,292
Net	$	199,915		$	73,380		$	5,370		$	(904	)

XML

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2012
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss)	$ 5,060	$ (624)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	8,640	8,451
Amortization of deferred financing fees	489	525
Gain on sale of discontinued operations	(14,455)	(9,264)
Loss on early extinguishment of debt	260	1,236
Loss on derivatives	30
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable	(87)	(908)
Prepaid expenses and other assets	431	(625)
Accounts payable	(594)	(918)
Accrued and other liabilities	971	2,583
Payables to related parties	63	274
Addition of lease intangibles	(571)	(236)
Cash provided by operating activities	237	494
Cash flows from investing activities:
Acquisition deposits	250
Purchases of real estate	(63,510)	(11,039)
Investment in unconsolidated joint venture	(14,079)
Return of investment in unconsolidated joint ventures	2,444
Proceeds from sale of discontinued operations	39,106	38,684
Additions of property and equipment	(4,270)	(5,982)
Change in restricted cash	(2,007)	(540)
Cash provided by (used in) investing activities	(42,066)	21,123
Cash flows from financing activities:
Financing costs	(893)	(1,013)
Proceeds from notes payable	47,589	7,311
Payments on notes payable	(12,224)	(23,369)
Purchase of interest rate derivatives	(133)
Issuance of common stock		6,142
Redemptions of common stock	(188)	(914)
Offering costs receivable from related party	3,832	(553)
Distributions		(14,536)
Contributions from noncontrolling interest holders	1,541	1,492
Distributions to noncontrolling interest holders	(6,812)	(7,066)
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities	32,712	(32,506)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents	85	13
Net change in cash and cash equivalents	(9,032)	(10,876)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	77,752	80,130
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$ 68,720	$ 69,254

XML

Interim Unaudited Financial Information

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

Interim Unaudited Financial Information

Interim Unaudited Financial Information

2. Interim Unaudited Financial Information

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, which was filed with the SEC on March 28, 2013.  Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted in this report on Form 10-Q pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC.

The results for the interim periods shown in this report are not necessarily indicative of future financial results.  The accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2013, the condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 and condensed consolidated statements of equity and cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 have not been audited by our independent registered public accounting firm.  In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include all adjustments necessary to fairly present our condensed consolidated financial position as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 and our condensed consolidated results of operations and cash flows for the periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.  Such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature.

XML

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value

5. Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value

Fair value measurements are determined based on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.  As a basis for considering market participant assumptions in fair value measurements, a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between market participant assumptions based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity (observable inputs that are classified within Levels 1 and 2 of the hierarchy) and the reporting entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions (unobservable inputs classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy) has been established.

Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets and liabilities that we have the ability to access.  Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.  Level 2 inputs may include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, as well as inputs that are observable for the asset or liability (other than quoted prices), such as interest rates, foreign exchange rates, and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals.  Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability that are typically based on an entity’s own assumptions, as there is little, if any, related market activity.  In instances where the determination of the fair value measurement is based on inputs from different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement falls is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety.  Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.

Recurring Fair Value Measurements

Currently, we use interest rate swaps and caps to manage our interest rate risk.  The valuation of these instruments is determined using widely accepted valuation techniques, including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative.  This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves, implied volatilities, and foreign currency exchange rates.

We incorporate credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both our own nonperformance risk and the respective counterparty’s nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements.  Although we have determined that the majority of the inputs used to value our derivatives fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments associated with our derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads, to evaluate the likelihood of default by itself and its counterparties.  However, as of June 30, 2013, we have assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of our derivative positions and have determined that the credit valuation adjustments are not significant to the overall valuation of our derivatives.  As a result, we have determined that our derivative valuations in their entirety are classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

The following fair value hierarchy table presents information about our assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

June 30, 2013	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Assets
Derivative financial instruments	$	—	$	205	$	—	$	205

December 31, 2012	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Assets
Derivative financial instruments	$	—	$	13	$	—	$	13

Derivative financial instruments classified as assets are included in prepaid expenses and other assets on the balance sheet.

XML

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Described below are certain of our significant accounting policies.  The disclosures regarding several of the policies have been condensed or omitted in accordance with interim reporting regulations specified by Form 10-Q.  Please see our Annual Report on Form 10-K for a complete listing of all of our significant accounting policies.

Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  These estimates include such items as purchase price allocation for real estate acquisitions, impairment of long-lived assets, depreciation and amortization, and allowance for doubtful accounts.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation

Our consolidated financial statements include our accounts and the accounts of other subsidiaries over which we have control.  All inter-company transactions, balances, and profits have been eliminated in consolidation.  Interests in entities acquired will be evaluated based on applicable GAAP, which includes the requirement to consolidate entities deemed to be variable interest entities (“VIE”) in which we are the primary beneficiary.  If the interest in the entity is determined not to be a VIE, then the entity will be evaluated for consolidation based on legal form, economic substance, and the extent to which we have control and/or substantive participating rights under the respective ownership agreement.  For entities in which we have less than a controlling interest or entities which we are not deemed to be the primary beneficiary, we account for the investment using the equity method of accounting.

There are judgments and estimates involved in determining if an entity in which we have made an investment is a VIE and, if so, whether we are the primary beneficiary.  The entity is evaluated to determine if it is a VIE by, among other things, calculating the percentage of equity being risked compared to the total equity of the entity.  Determining expected future losses involves assumptions of various possibilities of the results of future operations of the entity, assigning a probability to each possibility and using a discount rate to determine the net present value of those future losses.  A change in the judgments, assumptions, and estimates outlined above could result in consolidating an entity that should not be consolidated or accounting for an investment using the equity method that should in fact be consolidated, the effects of which could be material to our financial statements.

In the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, all dollar and share amounts in tabulation are in thousands of dollars and shares, respectively, unless otherwise noted.

Real Estate

Upon the acquisition of real estate properties, we recognize the assets acquired, the liabilities assumed and any noncontrolling interest as of the acquisition date, measured at their fair values.  The acquisition date is the date on which we obtain control of the real estate property.  The assets acquired and liabilities assumed may consist of land, inclusive of associated rights, buildings, assumed debt, identified intangible assets and liabilities and asset retirement obligations. Identified intangible assets generally consist of above-market leases, in-place leases, in-place tenant improvements, in-place leasing commissions and tenant relationships.  Identified intangible liabilities generally consist of below-market leases. Goodwill is recognized as of the acquisition date and measured as the aggregate fair value of the consideration transferred and any noncontrolling interests in the acquiree over the fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired.  Likewise, a bargain purchase gain is recognized in current earnings when the aggregate fair value of the consideration transferred and any noncontrolling interests in the acquiree is less than the fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired.  Acquisition-related costs are expensed in the period incurred.  Initial valuations are subject to change until our information is finalized, which is no later than twelve months from the acquisition date.

The fair value of the tangible assets acquired, consisting of land and buildings, is determined by valuing the property as if it were vacant, and the “as-if-vacant” value is then allocated to land and buildings.  Land values are derived from appraisals, and building values are calculated as replacement cost less depreciation or management’s estimates of the fair value of these assets using discounted cash flow analyses or similar methods believed to be used by market participants.  The value of buildings is depreciated over the estimated useful life of 25 years using the straight-line method.

We determine the fair value of assumed debt by calculating the net present value of the scheduled mortgage payments using interest rates for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities that management believes we could obtain at the date of the debt assumption.  Any difference between the fair value and stated value of the assumed debt is recorded as a discount or premium and amortized over the remaining life of the loan using the effective interest method.

We determine the value of above-market and below-market leases for acquired properties based on the present value (using an interest rate that reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the difference between (1) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in-place leases and (2) management’s estimate of current market lease rates for the corresponding in-place leases, measured over a period equal to (a) the remaining non-cancelable lease term for above-market leases, or (b) the remaining non-cancelable lease term plus any below-market fixed rate renewal options that, based on a qualitative assessment of several factors, including the financial condition of the lessee, the business conditions in the industry in which the lessee operates, the economic conditions in the area in which the property is located, and the ability of the lessee to sublease the property during the renewal term, are reasonably assured to be exercised by the lessee for below-market leases.  We record the fair value of above-market and below-market leases as intangible assets or intangible liabilities, respectively, and amortize them as an adjustment to rental income over the determined lease term.

The total value of identified real estate intangible assets acquired is further allocated to in-place leases, in-place tenant improvements, in-place leasing commissions and tenant relationships based on our evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant’s lease and our overall relationship with that respective tenant.  The aggregate value for tenant improvements and leasing commissions is based on estimates of these costs incurred at inception of the acquired leases, amortized through the date of acquisition.  The aggregate value of in-place leases acquired and tenant relationships is determined by applying a fair value model.  The estimates of fair value of in-place leases include an estimate of carrying costs during the expected lease-up periods for the respective spaces considering current market conditions.  In estimating the carrying costs that would have otherwise been incurred had the leases not been in place, we include such items as real estate taxes, insurance and other operating expenses as well as lost rental revenue during the expected lease-up period based on current market conditions.  The estimates of the fair value of tenant relationships also include costs to execute similar leases including leasing commissions, legal fees and tenant improvements as well as an estimate of the likelihood of renewal as determined by management on a tenant-by-tenant basis.

We amortize the value of in-place leases, in-place tenant improvements and in-place leasing commissions to expense over the initial term of the respective leases.  The tenant relationship values are amortized to expense over the initial term and any anticipated renewal periods, but in no event does the amortization period for intangible assets or liabilities exceed the remaining depreciable life of the building.  Should a tenant terminate its lease, the unamortized portion of the acquired lease intangibles related to that tenant would be charged to expense.

Anticipated amortization expense associated with the acquired lease intangibles for each of the following five years as of June 30, 2013 is as follows:

Year	Lease / Other Intangibles
July 1, 2013 - December 31, 2013	$	798
2014	705
2015	368
2016	230
2017	181

Accumulated depreciation and amortization related to our consolidated investments in real estate assets and intangibles were as follows:

										Acquired
	Buildings and			Land and			Lease			Below-Market
June 30, 2013	Improvements			Improvements			Intangibles			Leases
Cost	$	261,887		$	69,923		$	14,651		$	(2,297	)
Less: depreciation and amortization	(21,667		)	(2,187		)	(10,071		)	1,456
Net	$	240,220		$	67,736		$	4,580		$	(841	)

										Acquired
	Buildings and			Land and			Lease			Below-Market
December 31, 2012	Improvements			Improvements			Intangibles			Leases
Cost	$	217,343		$	75,873		$	14,041		$	(2,196	)
Less: depreciation and amortization	(17,428		)	(2,493		)	(8,671		)	1,292
Net	$	199,915		$	73,380		$	5,370		$	(904	)

Real Estate Held for Sale

We classify properties as held for sale when certain criteria are met, in accordance with GAAP.  At that time we present the assets and obligations of the property held for sale separately in our consolidated balance sheet and we cease recording depreciation and amortization expense related to that property.  Properties held for sale are reported at the lower of their carrying amount or their estimated fair value, less estimated costs to sell.  We had no property classified as held for sale at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

Investment Impairment

For all of our real estate and real estate related investments, we monitor events and changes in circumstances indicating that the carrying amounts of the real estate assets may not be recoverable.  Examples of the types of events and circumstances that would cause management to assess our assets for potential impairment include, but are not limited to:  a significant decrease in the market price of an asset; a significant adverse change in the manner in which the asset is being used; an accumulation of costs in excess of the acquisition basis plus construction of the property; major vacancies and the resulting loss of revenues; natural disasters; a change in the projected holding period; legitimate purchase offers and changes in the global and local markets or economic conditions.  Our assets may at times be concentrated in limited geographic locations and, to the extent that our portfolio is concentrated in limited geographic locations, downturns specifically related to such regions may result in tenants defaulting on their lease obligations at a portion of our properties within a short time period, which may result in asset impairments.  When such events or changes in circumstances are present, we assess potential impairment by comparing estimated future undiscounted operating cash flows expected to be generated over the life of the asset and from its eventual disposition to the carrying amount of the asset.  In the event that the carrying amount exceeds the estimated future undiscounted operating cash flows, we recognize an impairment loss to adjust the carrying amount of the asset to estimated fair value.  We consider projected future undiscounted cash flows, trends, strategic decisions regarding future development plans, and other factors in our assessment of whether impairment conditions exist.  While we believe our estimates of future cash flows are reasonable, different assumptions regarding factors such as market rents, economic conditions, and occupancy rates could significantly affect these estimates.

In evaluating our investments for impairment, management may use appraisals and make estimates and assumptions, including, but not limited to, the projected date of disposition of the properties, the estimated future cash flows of the properties during our ownership, and the projected sales price of each of the properties.  A future change in these estimates and assumptions could result in understating or overstating the carrying value of our investments, which could be material to our financial statements.

We also evaluate our investments in unconsolidated joint ventures at each reporting date.  If we believe there is an other than temporary decline in market value, we will record an impairment charge based on these evaluations.  We assess potential impairment by comparing our portion of estimated future undiscounted operating cash flows expected to be generated by the joint venture over the life of the joint venture’s assets to the carrying amount of the joint venture.  In the event that the carrying amount exceeds our portion of estimated future undiscounted operating cash flows, we recognize an impairment loss to adjust the carrying amount of the joint venture to its estimated fair value.

We believe the carrying value of our operating real estate is currently recoverable.  Accordingly, there were no impairment charges for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 or 2012.  However, if market conditions worsen beyond our current expectations, or if changes in our strategy significantly affect any key assumptions used in our fair value calculations, we may need to take charges in future periods for impairments related to our existing investments.  Any such non-cash charges would have an adverse effect on our consolidated financial position and results of operations.

Investment in Unconsolidated Joint Venture

We provide funding to third party developers for the acquisition, development and construction of real estate (“ADC Arrangement”).  Under the ADC Arrangement, we may participate in the residual profits of the project through the sale or refinancing of the property.  We evaluate this arrangement to determine if they have characteristics similar to a loan or if the characteristics are more similar to a joint venture or partnership such as participating in the risks and rewards of the project as an owner or an investment partner.  When we determine that the characteristics are more similar to a jointly-owned investment or partnership, we account for the arrangement as an investment in an unconsolidated joint venture under the equity method of accounting (Note 8) or a direct investment (consolidated basis of accounting) instead of applying loan accounting.  The ADC Arrangement is periodically reassessed.

Revenue Recognition

We recognize rental income generated from leases of real estate assets on a straight-line basis over the terms of the respective leases, including the effect of rent holidays, if any.  Straight-line rental revenue of $0.1 million and $0.3 million was recognized in rental revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively, and includes amounts recognized in discontinued operations.  Straight-line rental revenue of $0.1 million and $0.2 million was recognized in rental revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively, and includes amounts recognized in discontinued operations.   Net below market lease amortization of less than $0.1 million was recognized in rental revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013.  Net below market lease amortization of less than $0.1 million and $0.1 million was recognized in rental revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively, and includes amounts recognized in discontinued operations.

Hotel revenue is derived from the operations of the Courtyard Kauai at Coconut Beach Hotel, consisting of guest room, food and beverage, and other revenue, and is recognized as the services are rendered.

Accounts Receivable

Accounts receivable primarily consist of receivables related to our consolidated properties of $2.7 million which includes straight-line rental revenue receivables of $1.4 million as of June 30, 2013.  Accounts receivable primarily consisted of receivables related to our consolidated properties of $2.8 million which includes straight-line rental revenue receivables of $1.2 million as of December 31, 2012.

Furniture, Fixtures, and Equipment

Furniture, fixtures, and equipment are recorded at cost and are depreciated according to the Company’s capitalization policy which uses the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives of five to seven years.  Maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred.  Accumulated depreciation associated with our furniture, fixtures, and equipment was $3.2 million and $2.3 million as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

Deferred Financing Fees

Deferred financing fees are recorded at cost and are amortized to interest expense of our notes payable using a straight-line method that approximates the effective interest method over the life of the related debt.  Accumulated amortization of deferred financing fees was $1.6 million and $1.4 million as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

Income Taxes

We have elected to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), and have qualified as a REIT since the year ended December 31, 2008.  To qualify as a REIT, we must meet a number of organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement that we distribute at least 90% of our REIT taxable income to our stockholders.  As a REIT, we generally will not be subject to federal income tax at the corporate level.  We are organized and operate in such a manner as to qualify for taxation as a REIT under the Code and intend to continue to operate in such a manner, but no assurance can be given that we will operate in a manner so as to qualify or remain qualified as a REIT.

We have reviewed our tax positions under GAAP guidance that clarifies the relevant criteria and approach for the recognition and measurement of uncertain tax positions.  The guidance prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition of a tax position taken, or expected to be taken, in a tax return.  A tax position may only be recognized in the financial statements if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained upon examination.  We believe it is more likely than not that the tax positions taken relative to our status as a REIT will be sustained in any tax examination.

Foreign Currency Translation

For our international investment where the functional currency is other than the U.S. dollar, assets and liabilities are translated using period-end exchange rates, while the statement of operations amounts are translated using the average exchange rates for the respective period.  Gains and losses resulting from the change in exchange rates from period to period are reported separately as a component of other comprehensive income (loss) (“OCI”).  Gains and losses resulting from foreign currency transactions are included in the condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).

The Euro is the functional currency for the operations of Holstenplatz and Alte Jakobstraße.  We also maintain a Euro-denominated bank account that is translated into U.S. dollars at the current exchange rate at each reporting period.  For the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, the foreign currency translation adjustment was a gain of $0.2 million and a loss of $0.1 million, respectively.  For the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, the foreign currency translation adjustment was a loss of $0.5 million and a loss $0.4 million, respectively.

Concentration of Credit Risk

At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, we had cash and cash equivalents deposited in certain financial institutions in excess of federally insured levels.  We have diversified our cash and cash equivalents among several banking institutions in an attempt to minimize exposure to any one of these entities.  We regularly monitor the financial stability of these financial institutions and believe that we are not exposed to any significant credit risk in cash and cash equivalents or restricted cash.

Noncontrolling Interest

Noncontrolling interest represents the noncontrolling ownership interest’s proportionate share of the equity in our consolidated real estate investments.  Income and losses are allocated to noncontrolling interest holders based generally on their ownership percentage.  In certain instances, our joint venture agreement provides for liquidating distributions based on achieving certain return metrics (“promoted interest”).  If a property reaches a defined return threshold, then it will result in distributions to noncontrolling interest which is different from the standard pro-rata allocation percentage.

Earnings per Share

Net income (loss) per share is calculated based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each period.  The weighted average shares outstanding used to calculate both basic and diluted income (loss) per share were the same for each of the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, as there were no potentially dilutive securities outstanding.

Reclassification

To conform to the current year presentation, which presents hotel operating expense as a separate component of property operating expense on our condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, we reclassified $2.4 million and $4.8 million from property operating expense to hotel operating expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively.

Subsequent Events

We have evaluated subsequent events for recognition or disclosure in our condensed consolidated financial statements and noted no subsequent events that would require adjustment to the condensed consolidated financial statements or additional disclosure other than the one disclosed herein.

XML

Notes Payable (Details) (USD $)			3 Months Ended	6 Months Ended	0 Months Ended		6 Months Ended	0 Months Ended	6 Months Ended				6 Months Ended				6 Months Ended												6 Months Ended						6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Jun. 30, 2013 Less than	Jun. 30, 2013 Less than	Apr. 12, 2013 Interchange Business Center item	Oct. 18, 2012 Interchange Business Center item	Jun. 30, 2013 Interchange Business Center item	Feb. 20, 2013 Wimberly at Deerwood	Jun. 30, 2013 Wimberly at Deerwood	Jun. 30, 2013 22 Exchange	Jun. 30, 2013 Notes payable 1875 Lawrence	Dec. 31, 2012 Notes payable 1875 Lawrence	Jun. 30, 2013 Notes payable Interchange Business Center	Dec. 31, 2012 Notes payable Interchange Business Center	Jun. 30, 2013 Notes payable Holstenplatz	Dec. 31, 2012 Notes payable Holstenplatz	Jun. 30, 2013 Notes payable Courtyard Kauai at Coconut Beach Hotel	Dec. 31, 2012 Notes payable Courtyard Kauai at Coconut Beach Hotel	Jun. 30, 2013 Notes payable Florida MOB Portfolio - Palmetto Building	Dec. 31, 2012 Notes payable Florida MOB Portfolio - Palmetto Building	Jun. 30, 2013 Notes payable Florida MOB Portfolio - Victor Farris Building	Dec. 31, 2012 Notes payable Florida MOB Portfolio - Victor Farris Building	Jun. 30, 2013 Notes payable Florida MOB Portfolio - Gardens Medical Pavilion	Dec. 31, 2012 Notes payable Florida MOB Portfolio - Gardens Medical Pavilion	Jun. 30, 2013 Notes payable River Club and the Townhomes at River Club (formerly referred to as the UGA Portfolio)	Dec. 31, 2012 Notes payable River Club and the Townhomes at River Club (formerly referred to as the UGA Portfolio)	Jun. 30, 2013 Notes payable Babcock Self Storage	Dec. 31, 2012 Notes payable Babcock Self Storage	Jun. 30, 2013 Notes payable Lakes of Margate	Dec. 31, 2012 Notes payable Lakes of Margate	Jun. 30, 2013 Notes payable Arbors Harbor Town	Dec. 31, 2012 Notes payable Arbors Harbor Town	Jun. 30, 2013 Notes payable Alte Jakobstrabe	Dec. 31, 2012 Notes payable Alte Jakobstrabe	Jun. 30, 2013 Notes payable Wimberly at Deerwood	Jun. 30, 2013 Notes payable 22 Exchange
Notes Payable
Notes payable	$ 218,505,000	$ 183,308,000									$ 15,500,000	$ 15,500,000		$ 9,882,000	$ 10,105,000	$ 10,375,000	$ 38,000,000	$ 38,000,000	$ 6,001,000	$ 6,077,000	$ 12,097,000	$ 12,249,000	$ 14,215,000	$ 14,385,000	$ 25,175,000	$ 25,200,000	$ 2,204,000	$ 2,225,000	$ 15,074,000	$ 15,182,000	$ 26,000,000	$ 26,000,000	$ 7,949,000	$ 8,233,000	$ 26,685,000	$ 19,500,000
Amount of loan entered in connection with acquisition								26,700,000	26,700,000	19,500,000
Variable rate basis									30-day LIBOR		30-day LIBOR		30-day LIBOR				30-day LIBOR																		30-day LIBOR
Variable interest rate (as a percent)									2.28%		5.35%		5.00%				0.95%																		2.28%
Variable rate (as a percent)	0.20%										0.19%		0.19%				0.19%
Interest rate (as a percent)															3.887%				4.55%		4.55%		4.90%		5.26%		5.80%				3.985%		2.30%			3.93%
Notes payable of assets held for sale					11,300,000
Minimum interest rate (as a percent)																													5.49%
Maximum interest rate (as a percent)																													5.92%
Minimum reference rate (as a percent)													2.50%
Number of industrial buildings						4	3
Notes payable, including notes payable related to assets held for sale	218,500,000
Number of industrial buildings sold					3	1
Interest capitalized			$ 100,000	$ 100,000

XML

Investment in Unconsolidated Joint Venture (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

Investment in Unconsolidated Joint Venture

Schedule of ownership interest in Prospect Park that is recorded as equity investment

	Ownership Interest	Carrying Amount at
Property Name	at June 30, 2013	June 30, 2013
Prospect Park	N/A	$	11,635	(1)

(1) During the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, we received distributions (return of capital) of approximately $2.4 million and capitalized $0.4 million of acquisition expense.  Approximately $2 million of the $2.4 million distributions is interest reserve (restricted cash on the condensed consolidated balance sheet).

XML

Commitments and Contingencies (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

Commitments and Contingencies

Future minimum lease payments for all operating leases

July 1, 2013 - December 31, 2013	$	147
2014	293
2015	301
2016	301
2017	301
Thereafter	21,227
Total	$	22,570

XML

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value (Details) (Recurring, USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Jun. 30, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Level 2
Assets
Derivative financial instruments	$ 205	$ 13
Total
Assets
Derivative financial instruments	$ 205	$ 13

XML

Subsequent Event (Details) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	6 Months Ended	0 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2013 Original MOB Portfolio item acre	Aug. 08, 2013 Subsequent event Parkside Apartments in Sugarland, Texas item	Jul. 08, 2013 Subsequent event Original MOB Portfolio item	Jul. 08, 2013 Subsequent event AW Original MOB Portfolio
Subsequent Event
Ownership interest through joint venture (as a percent)	90.00%
Number of medical office buildings	8
Area of excess land related to the buildings	7.8
Number of special purpose entities which own the Original MOB Portfolio properties			9
Sale price			$ 64.8
Earnest money deposit				0.1
Expected earnest money payment				0.1
Ownership Interest (as a percent)		90.00%
Contract purchase price of the property acquired		21.5
Business acquisition loan assumed		$ 10.5
Number of dwelling units acquired		240

XML

Commitments and Contingencies (Details) (USD $)	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2013 item	Jun. 30, 2012
Commitments and Contingencies
Number of buildings acquired in connection with purchase of MOB Portfolio	8
Term of ground lease	50 years
Extended term of ground lease	25 years
Percentage increase in annual payment for each ground lease	10.00%
Number of years for which annual payment for each ground lease increases	5 years
Ground leases	$ 200,000	$ 200,000
Future minimum lease payments for all operating leases
July 1, 2013 - December 31, 2013	147,000
2014	293,000
2015	301,000
2016	301,000
2017	301,000
Thereafter	21,227,000
Total	$ 22,570,000

XML

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Parenthetical) (USD $)	Jun. 30, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
Preferred stock, par value (in dollars per share)	$ 0.0001	$ 0.0001
Preferred stock, shares authorized	50,000,000	50,000,000
Preferred stock, shares outstanding	0	0
Convertible stock, par value (in dollars per share)	$ 0.0001	$ 0.0001
Convertible stock, shares authorized	1,000	1,000
Convertible stock, shares outstanding	1,000	1,000
Common stock, par value (in dollars per share)	$ 0.0001	$ 0.0001
Common stock, shares authorized	350,000,000	350,000,000
Common stock, shares issued	26,038,553	26,060,612
Common stock, shares outstanding	26,038,553	26,060,612

XML

Investment in Unconsolidated Joint Venture

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

Investment in Unconsolidated Joint Venture

Investment in Unconsolidated Joint Venture

8. Investment in Unconsolidated Joint Venture

On May 24, 2013, we provided mezzanine financing under the ADC Arrangement totaling $13.7 million to an unaffiliated third-party entity that owns and will develop an apartment complex in Denver, Colorado (“Prospect Park”).  The developer also had a senior construction loan with a third-party lender, in an aggregate principal amount of $35.6 million.  The senior construction loan is guaranteed by the owners of the developer.  Our mezzanine loan to the developer is subordinate to the senior construction loan.  The loan is collateralized by the property and has an annual interest rate of 10% for the first three years of the term; followed by two one-year extension options at which point, the annual interest rate would increase to 14%.  We have evaluated this arrangement and determined that the characteristics are similar to a jointly-owned investment or partnership, and accordingly, the investment is accounted for as an unconsolidated joint venture under the equity method of accounting instead of loan accounting as we will participate in the residual interests through the sale or refinancing of the property.

As of June 30, 2013, the outstanding principal balance under our mezzanine loan was $13.7 million.  In connection with this investment, we capitalized acquisition-related costs and fees totaling $0.4 million.  Interest capitalized for the three and six months ending June 30, 2013 was less than $0.1 million.  For the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, no equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated joint venture related to our investment in Prospect Park.

The following table sets forth our ownership interest in Prospect Park that is recorded as an equity investment:

	Ownership Interest	Carrying Amount at
Property Name	at June 30, 2013	June 30, 2013
Prospect Park	N/A	$	11,635	(1)

(1) During the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, we received distributions (return of capital) of approximately $2.4 million and capitalized $0.4 million of acquisition expense.  Approximately $2 million of the $2.4 million distributions is interest reserve (restricted cash on the condensed consolidated balance sheet).

XML

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Equity (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Total USD ($)	Common Stock USD ($)	Additional Paid-in Capital USD ($)	Accumulated Distributions and Net (Loss) USD ($)	Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (loss) USD ($)	Noncontrolling Interest USD ($)	Convertible Stock
Balance at Dec. 31, 2011	$ 197,004	$ 3	$ 225,968	$ (43,657)	$ 83	$ 14,607
Balance (in shares) at Dec. 31, 2011		25,267					1
Increase (Decrease) in Stockholders' Equity
Net income (loss)	(624)			(667)		43
Issuance of common stock, net	8,346		8,346
Issuance of common stock, net (in shares)		910
Redemption of common stock	(914)		(914)
Redemption of common stock (in shares)		(103)
Distributions declared on common stock	(16,257)			(16,257)
Contributions from noncontrolling interest	1,492					1,492
Distributions to noncontrolling interest	(7,066)					(7,066)
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Unrealized losses on interest rate derivatives	(1)				(1)
Foreign currency translation loss	(354)				(354)
Balance at Jun. 30, 2012	181,626	3	233,400	(60,581)	(272)	9,076
Balance (in shares) at Jun. 30, 2012		26,074					1
Balance at Dec. 31, 2012	186,533	3	233,283	(58,249)	126	11,370
Balance (in shares) at Dec. 31, 2012		26,060					1
Increase (Decrease) in Stockholders' Equity
Net income (loss)	5,060			1,682		3,378
Redemption of common stock	(188)		(188)
Redemption of common stock (in shares)		(22)
Contributions from noncontrolling interest	1,541					1,541
Distributions to noncontrolling interest	(6,812)					(6,812)
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Reclassification of unrealized loss on interest rate derivatives to net income	88				82	6
Foreign currency translation loss	(127)				(127)
Balance at Jun. 30, 2013	$ 186,095	$ 3	$ 233,095	$ (56,567)	$ 81	$ 9,483
Balance (in shares) at Jun. 30, 2013		26,038					1

XML

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Jun. 30, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Real estate
Land and improvements, net	$ 67,736	$ 73,380
Buildings and improvements, net	240,220	199,915
Real estate under development	254	838
Total real estate	308,210	274,133
Cash and cash equivalents	68,720	77,752
Restricted cash	6,986	3,491
Accounts receivable, net	2,718	3,008
Receivable from related party		3,269
Prepaid expenses and other assets	1,249	1,781
Investment in unconsolidated joint venture	11,635
Furniture, fixtures and equipment, net	7,952	6,864
Deferred financing fees, net	3,540	3,398
Lease intangibles, net	4,580	5,370
Total assets	415,590	379,066
Liabilities and Equity
Notes payable	218,505	183,308
Accounts payable	1,166	1,777
Payables to related parties	626
Acquired below-market leases, net	841	904
Accrued and other liabilities	8,357	6,544
Total liabilities	229,495	192,533
Commitments and contingencies
Equity
Preferred stock, $.0001 par value per share; 50,000,000 shares authorized, none outstanding
Convertible stock, $.0001 par value per share; 1,000 shares authorized, 1,000 outstanding
Common stock, $.0001 par value per share; 350,000,000 shares authorized, 26,038,553 and 26,060,612 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively	3	3
Additional paid-in capital	233,095	233,283
Accumulated distributions and net loss	(56,567)	(58,249)
Accumulated other comprehensive income	81	126
Total Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc. equity	176,612	175,163
Noncontrolling interest	9,483	11,370
Total equity	186,095	186,533
Total liabilities and equity	$ 415,590	$ 379,066

XML

Notes Payable (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

Notes Payable

Schedule of information on notes payable

	Notes Payable as of				Interest	Maturity
Description	June 30, 2013		December 31, 2012		Rate	Date
1875 Lawrence	$	15,500	$	15,500	30-day LIBOR + 5.35% (1)	01/01/16
Interchange Business Center	—		9,882		30-day LIBOR + 5% (1)(2)(3)	12/01/13
Holstenplatz	10,105		10,375		3.887%	04/30/15
Courtyard Kauai at Coconut Beach Hotel	38,000		38,000		30-day LIBOR + .95% (1)	11/09/15
Florida MOB Portfolio - Palmetto Building	6,001		6,077		4.55%	01/01/16
Florida MOB Portfolio - Victor Farris Building	12,097		12,249		4.55%	01/01/16
Florida MOB Portfolio - Gardens Medical Pavilion	14,215		14,385		4.9%	01/01/18
River Club and the Townhomes at River Club	25,175		25,200		5.26%	05/01/18
Babcock Self Storage	2,204		2,225		5.80%	08/30/18
Lakes of Margate	15,074		15,182		5.49% and 5.92%	01/01/20
Arbors Harbor Town	26,000		26,000		3.985%	01/01/19
Alte Jakobstraße	7,949		8,233		2.3%	12/30/15
Wimberly	26,685		—		30-day LIBOR + 2.28%	03/01/23
22 Exchange	19,500		—		3.93%	05/05/23
	$	218,505	$	183,308

(1) 30-day LIBOR was 0.19% at June 30, 2013.

(2) The 30-day LIBOR rate was set at a minimum value of 2.5%.

(3) On October 18, 2012, we sold one of the four industrial buildings at Interchange Business Center to an unaffiliated third party.  On April 12, 2013, we sold the remaining three buildings to an unaffiliated third party.  A portion of the proceeds from the sale of the remaining three buildings were used to pay off in full the existing indebtedness associated with the property.

Contractual obligations for principal payments

Year	Amount Due
July 1, 2013 - December 31, 2013	$	1,081
2014	2,351
2015	57,584
2016	34,695
2017	2,519
Thereafter	120,275
	$	218,505

XML

Subsequent Event

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

Subsequent Event

Subsequent Event

17.  Subsequent Event

We, through a joint venture between our indirect wholly owned subsidiary, Behringer Harvard Florida MOB Member, LLC (“BH Member”), AW SFMOB Investor, LLC (“AW Investor”) and AW SFMOB Managing Member, LLC (“AW Managing Member” and collectively with AW Investor, “AW”) are the 90% owner of ground leasehold interests in a portfolio of eight medical office buildings known as Original Florida MOB Portfolio in South Florida and approximately 7.8 acres excess land related to the buildings (collectively, the Original MOB Portfolio).

On July 8, 2013, the nine special purpose entities that own the Original MOB Portfolio properties, BH Member, and AW entered into a purchase and sale agreement to sell the Original MOB Portfolio to AW for a contract sales price of approximately $64.8 million.  AW has made an earnest money deposit in the amount of approximately $0.1 million.  A second earnest money deposit of $0.1 million is expected to be made on or about September 6, 2013.  We acquired the Original Florida MOB Portfolio on October 8, 2010.  We do not believe that as of June 30, 2013 the property met the criteria for classification as held for sale.  Substantial due diligence effort remain and closing is contingent on a successful completion of those efforts.  Accordingly, we cannot give any assurance that the closing of the sale is probable.

On August 8, 2013 we acquired a 90% interest in Parkside Apartments, a 240-unit multifamily community in Sugarland, Texas, from an unaffiliated third party.  The contract purchase price for the property was $21.5 million.  In connection with the purchase, we assumed a loan of approximately $10.5 million.

XML

Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended	6 Months Ended					3 Months Ended	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2012 Maximum	Jun. 30, 2013 Interest rate cap Courtyard Kauai at Coconut Beach Hotel	Jun. 30, 2013 Interest rate cap 1875 Lawrence	Jun. 30, 2013 Interest rate cap Wimberly at Deerwood	Jun. 30, 2012 Derivative designated as hedging instruments:	Jun. 30, 2012 Derivative designated as hedging instruments:	Jun. 30, 2013 Derivative designated as hedging instruments: item	Dec. 31, 2012 Derivative designated as hedging instruments: Interest rate derivative contracts	Jun. 30, 2013 Derivative not designated as hedging instruments: Interest rate derivative contracts	Jun. 30, 2013 Derivative not designated as hedging instruments: Interest rate cap Courtyard Kauai at Coconut Beach Hotel	Jun. 30, 2013 Derivative not designated as hedging instruments: Interest rate cap 1875 Lawrence	Jun. 30, 2013 Derivative not designated as hedging instruments: Interest rate cap Wimberly at Deerwood
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
Number of derivative instruments									0
Notional Value												$ 38,000,000	$ 20,100,000	$ 26,685,000
Interest Rate/ Strike Rate (as a percent)					2.75%	4.56%
Interest Rate/ Strike Rate, low end of range (as a percent)				3.00%
Interest Rate/ Strike Rate, high end of range (as a percent)				6.00%
Index				30-day LIBOR	30-day LIBOR	30-day LIBOR
Fair value of derivative assets										13,000	205,000
Unrealized loss recognized to OCI			100,000
Amount of Loss Reclassified from OCI into Income	56,000	88,000					(8,000)	(14,000)
Amount of gain or (loss) on derivative not designated as hedging instrument	41,000	(30,000)
Reclassification out of OCI due to all derivatives being designated as non-hedging instruments	$ 56,000	$ 88,000

XML

Real Estate and Real Estate-Related Investments (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended													0 Months Ended	6 Months Ended						0 Months Ended		3 Months Ended	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2013 item	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2013 item	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2013 1875 Lawrence, Denver, CO	Jun. 30, 2013 Holstenplatz, Hamburg, Germany	Jun. 30, 2013 Florida MOB Portfolio, South Florida property	Jun. 30, 2013 Original Florida MOB Portfolio, South Florida property	Jun. 30, 2013 Gardens Medical Pavilion, South Florida	Jun. 30, 2013 Courtyard Kauai Coconut Beach Hotel, Kauai, Hawaii	Jun. 30, 2013 River Club and the Townhomes at River Club, Athens, Georgia	Jun. 30, 2013 Babcock Self Storage, San Antonio, Texas	Jun. 30, 2013 Lakes of Margate, Margate, Florida	Jun. 30, 2013 Arbors Harbor Town, Memphis, Tennessee	Jun. 30, 2013 Alte Jakobstrabe, Berlin, Germany	Feb. 20, 2013 Wimberly at Deerwood, Jacksonville, Florida item	Jun. 30, 2013 Wimberly at Deerwood, Jacksonville, Florida	Jun. 30, 2013 22 Exchange, Akron, Ohio	Jun. 30, 2013 22 Exchange and Wimberly	Jun. 30, 2012 22 Exchange and Wimberly	Jun. 30, 2013 22 Exchange and Wimberly Lease intangibles, net	Jun. 30, 2013 22 Exchange and Wimberly Acquired below-market leases, net	Apr. 12, 2013 Interchange Business Center, San Bernardino, California item	Oct. 18, 2012 Interchange Business Center, San Bernardino, California item	Jun. 30, 2013 Interchange Business Center, San Bernardino, California	Jun. 30, 2013 Interchange Business Center, San Bernardino, California item
Real Estate and Real Estate-Related Investments
Number of real estate assets consolidated	11		11
Number of properties							9	8
Ownership Interest (as a percent)					100.00%	100.00%	90.00%	90.00%		80.00%	85.00%	85.00%	92.50%	94.00%	99.70%		95.00%
Ownership interest through joint venture (as a percent)									79.80%
Number of real estate acquisitions			2
Purchase price, excluding closing costs																$ 35,600,000			$ 63,500,000
Loan payables																			46,200,000
Amount of loan entered in connection with acquisition																26,700,000	26,700,000	19,500,000
Fixed interest rate (as a percent)																		3.93%
Period for which fixed annual rate of interest is applied																		36 months
Period for which debt may be prepaid in whole with payment of prepayment fees																		60 months
Amounts of identified assets acquired at acquisition date
Building																			52,875,000
Land																			6,721,000
Land improvements																			667,000
Lease intangibles, net																					1,251,000	(99,000)
Furniture, fixtures and equipment																			1,645,000
Signage, landscaping and misc. site improvements																			465,000
Total identifiable net assets																			63,525,000
Amounts recognized for revenues, acquisition expenses and net loss
Revenue	13,326,000	10,671,000	25,608,000	21,070,000													1,300,000	800,000
Acquisition expenses with unaffiliated third party																	800,000	400,000
Net loss	9,573,000	(4,746,000)	5,060,000	(624,000)													1,700,000	800,000
Pro forma information
Revenue																			52,749,000	45,863,000
Depreciation and amortization																			(1,255,000)	(2,407,000)
Net income (loss)																			7,245,000	(4,508,000)
Net income (loss) per share (in dollars per share)																			$ 0.28	$ (0.17)
Variable interest rate (as a percent)																	2.28%
Variable rate basis																	30-day LIBOR
Period for interest-only payments																	24 months
Contract sales price			39,106,000	38,684,000																			40,400,000	7,500,000
Number of units																322
Number of industrial buildings																								4		3
Number of industrial buildings sold																							3	1
Gain on sale of discontinued operations			(14,455,000)	(9,264,000)																					(14,500,000)	(14,500,000)
Loss on early extinguishment of debt			260,000	1,236,000																					(300,000)	(300,000)
Sale proceeds used to pay off in full the indebtedness secured by the property																							$ 11,300,000

XML

Business and Organization (Details)	6 Months Ended		6 Months Ended			6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2013 item	Dec. 31, 2012	Jun. 30, 2013 Minimum	Jun. 30, 2013 Maximum	Jun. 30, 2013 Behringer Harvard Opportunity Advisors II, LLC	Jun. 30, 2013 Initial Offering	Jun. 30, 2013 Initial Capitalization Behringer Harvard Holdings	Jan. 19, 2007 Initial Capitalization Behringer Harvard Holdings
Business and Organization
Number of Real Estate Investments	12
Number of medical office buildings, investment	9
Number of real estate assets consolidated	11
Percentage of ownership interest by BHO II, Inc	0.10%
Percentage of remaining ownership interest held by BHO Business Trust II	99.90%
Common stock, shares issued	26,038,553	26,060,612				26,700,000		22,471
Convertible stock issued (in shares)					1,000			1,000
Common stock, shares outstanding	26,038,553	26,060,612					22,471
Common stock issued pursuant to reinvestment plan						2,200,000
Convertible stock outstanding	1,000	1,000			1,000
Redemption of common stock (in shares)	700,000
Liquidation period of assets and distribution of net proceeds to stockholders			3 years	6 years

XML

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2013 property	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2013 property	Jun. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2012 property
Anticipated amortization expense associated with acquired lease intangibles
July 1, 2013 - December 31, 2013	$ 798,000		$ 798,000
2014	705,000		705,000
2015	368,000		368,000
2016	230,000		230,000
2017	181,000		181,000
Real estate
Total real estate	308,210,000		308,210,000		274,133,000
Accumulated depreciation and amortization related to consolidated investments in real estate intangibles
Net	4,580,000		4,580,000		5,370,000
Real Estate Held for Sale
Number of real estate properties held for sale	0		0		0
Investment Impairment
Impairment charges	0	0	0	0
Revenue Recognition
Straight-line rental revenue	100,000	100,000	300,000	200,000
Market lease amortization included in rental revenue	100,000	100,000	100,000	100,000
Accounts Receivable
Accounts receivable related to consolidated properties	2,700,000		2,700,000		2,800,000
Straight-line rental revenue	1,400,000		1,400,000		1,200,000
Deferred Financing Fees
Accumulated amortization, deferred financing fees	1,600,000		1,600,000		1,400,000
Income Taxes
Required minimum percentage distribution of ordinary taxable income to stockholders to qualify as a REIT			90.00%
Foreign Currency Translation
Gain (loss) on foreign currency translation adjustment	300,000	(500,000)	(100,000)	(400,000)
Net income (loss) per share attributable to common shareholders
Number of potentially dilutive securities outstanding	0	0	0	0
Reclassification
Reclassification from property operating expense to hotel operating expense		2,400,000		4,800,000
Maximum
Real Estate
Period for change in initial valuations from acquisition date			12 months
Lease Intangibles
Accumulated depreciation and amortization related to consolidated investments in real estate intangibles
Cost	14,651,000		14,651,000		14,041,000
Less: depreciation and amortization	(10,071,000)		(10,071,000)		(8,671,000)
Net	4,580,000		4,580,000		5,370,000
Acquired Below-Market Leases
Accumulated depreciation and amortization related to consolidated investments in real estate intangibles
Cost	(2,297,000)		(2,297,000)		(2,196,000)
Less: depreciation and amortization	1,456,000		1,456,000		1,292,000
Net	(841,000)		(841,000)		(904,000)
Buildings and Improvements
Real Estate
Estimated useful lives			25 years
Real estate
Cost	261,887,000		261,887,000		217,343,000
Less: depreciation and amortization	(21,667,000)		(21,667,000)		(17,428,000)
Total real estate	240,220,000		240,220,000		199,915,000
Furniture, Fixtures, and Equipment
Estimated useful lives			25 years
Land and Improvements
Real estate
Cost	69,923,000		69,923,000		75,873,000
Less: depreciation and amortization	(2,187,000)		(2,187,000)		(2,493,000)
Total real estate	67,736,000		67,736,000		73,380,000
Furniture, Fixtures and Equipment
Furniture, Fixtures, and Equipment
Accumulated depreciation associated with furniture, fixtures, and equipment	$ 3,200,000		$ 3,200,000		$ 2,300,000
Furniture, Fixtures and Equipment | Maximum
Real Estate
Estimated useful lives			7 years
Furniture, Fixtures, and Equipment
Estimated useful lives			7 years
Furniture, Fixtures and Equipment | Minimum
Real Estate
Estimated useful lives			5 years
Furniture, Fixtures, and Equipment
Estimated useful lives			5 years

XML

Real Estate and Real Estate-Related Investments

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

Real Estate and Real Estate-Related Investments

Real Estate and Real Estate-Related Investments

7. Real Estate and Real Estate-Related Investments

As of June 30, 2013, we consolidated 11 real estate investments on our condensed consolidated balance sheet.  The following table presents certain information about our consolidated investments as of June 30, 2013:

Property Name	Location	Date Acquired	Ownership Interest
1875 Lawrence	Denver, CO	October 28, 2008	100	%
Holstenplatz	Hamburg, Germany	June 30, 2010	100	%
Florida MOB Portfolio (1)	South Florida	October 8, 2010/October 20, 2010	90	%
Courtyard Kauai Coconut Beach Hotel	Kauai, Hawaii	October 20, 2010	80	%
River Club and the Townhomes at River Club	Athens, Georiga	April 25, 2011	85	%
Babcock Self Storage	San Antonio, Texas	August 30, 2011	85	%
Lakes of Margate	Margate, Florida	October 19, 2011	92.5	%
Arbors Harbor Town	Memphis, Tennessee	December 20, 2011	94	%
Alte Jakobstraße	Berlin, Germany	April 5, 2012	99.7	%
Wimberly at Deerwood (“Wimberly”)	Jacksonville, Florida	February 19, 2013	95	%
22 Exchange	Akron, Ohio	April 16, 2013	90	%

(1) We acquired a portfolio of eight medical office buildings, known as the Original Florida MOB Portfolio on October 8, 2010.  We acquired a medical office building known as Gardens Medical Pavilion on October 20, 2010.  Collectively, the Original Florida MOB Portfolio and Gardens Medical Pavilion are referred to as the Florida MOB Portfolio.  The Florida MOB Portfolio consists of nine medical office buildings.  We own 90% of each of eight of the buildings.  We own approximately 79.8% in the ninth building, Gardens Medical Pavilion.

Real Estate Asset Acquisitions

During the six months ending June 30, 2013, we made two separate real estate acquisitions: a 95% interest in Wimberly and a 90% interest in 22 Exchange for an aggregate purchase price, excluding closing costs, of approximately $63.5 million.  The purchase was partially funded with proceeds of new loans of approximately $46.2 million.

The following table summarizes the amounts of identified assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date :

	Total  Acquisitions
Buildings	$	52,875
Land	6,721
Land improvements	667
Lease intangibles, net	1,251
Furniture, fixtures and equipment	1,645
Signage, landscaping and misc. site improvements	465
Acquired below-market leases, net	(99		)
Total identifiable net assets	$	63,525

The following table summarizes the amounts recognized for revenues, acquisition expenses and net loss from the acquisition dates to June 30, 2013 (in millions):

	Wimberly		22 Exchange
Revenue	$	1.3	$	0.8
Acquisition expenses with unaffiliated third party	$	0.8	$	0.4
Net loss	$	1.7	$	0.8

The following unaudited pro forma summary presents our consolidated information for the two acquisitions as if the business combinations had occurred on January 1, 2012:

	Pro Forma for the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013			2012
Revenue	$	52,749		$	45,863
Depreciation and amortization	$	(1,255	)	$	(2,407	)
Net income (loss)	$	7,245		$	(4,508	)
Net income (loss) per share	$	0.28		$	(0.17	)

These pro forma amounts have been calculated after applying our accounting policies and adjusting the results to reflect additional depreciation and amortization that would have been charged assuming the fair value adjustments to the tangible and intangible assets had been applied from January 1, 2012.

Wimberly at Deerwood

On February 19, 2013, we acquired Wimberly, a 322-unit multifamily community in Jacksonville, Florida, from an unaffiliated third party.  The purchase price for Wimberly, excluding closing costs, was approximately $35.6 million.  In connection with the acquisition of Wimberly, on February 19, 2013, we entered into a loan for approximately $26.7 million with an unaffiliated third party.   The loan bears interest at a variable annual rate of approximately 2.28% plus 30-day LIBOR and requires interest-only payments for the first 24 months.  The loan may not be prepaid in whole or in part during the first year.  After the first year, the loan may be prepaid in whole (but not in part) with payment of prepayment fees.  The loan must be repaid in its entirety by March 2023.

22 Exchange

We acquired a 90% interest in 22 Exchange, a student housing complex in Akron, Ohio on April 16, 2013 from an unaffiliated third party.  The contract purchase price for the property, excluding closing costs, was approximately $28.1 million.  In connection with the purchase, we entered into a loan for approximately $19.5 million with an unaffiliated third party.  The loan bears interest at a fixed rate of 3.93% and requires interest-only payments for the first 36 months.  During the first 60 months, the loan may be prepaid in whole with payment of prepayment fees.  The loan must be repaid in its entirety by May 2023.

We are in the process of finalizing our acquisition allocations, which are subject to change until the information is finalized, which will be no later than twelve months from the acquisition date.

Real Estate Asset Dispositions

Interchange Business Center

On October 18, 2012, we sold one of the four industrial buildings at Interchange Business Center for a contract sales price of approximately $7.5 million, excluding transaction costs.  On April 12, 2013, we sold the remaining three buildings for a contract sales price of approximately $40.4 million, excluding transaction costs and recorded a gain on sale of real estate property of $14.5 million and loss on early extinguishment of debt of $0.3 million which is reflected in discontinued operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013.  A portion of the proceeds from the sale of the asset were used to pay off in full the existing indebtedness of approximately $11.3 million secured by the property.

XML

Leasing Activity (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

Leasing Activity

Future minimum base rental payments of our office and industrial properties due to us under non-cancelable leases

July 1, 2013 - December 31, 2013	$	14,296
2014	12,784
2015	10,213
2016	7,468
2017	3,754
Thereafter	4,944
Total	$	53,459

XML

Notes Payable (Details 2) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Jun. 30, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Contractual obligations for principal payments
July 1, 2013 - December 31, 2013	$ 1,081
2014	2,351
2015	57,584
2016	34,695
2017	2,519
Thereafter	120,275
Notes payable	$ 218,505	$ 183,308

XML

Leasing Activity

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

Leasing Activity

Leasing Activity

10. Leasing Activity

Future minimum base rental payments of our office and industrial properties due to us under non-cancelable leases in effect as of June 30, 2013 for our consolidated properties are as follows:

July 1, 2013 - December 31, 2013	$	14,296
2014	12,784
2015	10,213
2016	7,468
2017	3,754
Thereafter	4,944
Total	$	53,459

The schedule above does not include rental payments due to us from our multifamily, hotel, student housing, and self-storage properties, as leases associated with these properties typically are for periods of one year or less.  As of June 30, 2013, none of our tenants accounted for 10% or more of our aggregate annual rental revenues from our consolidated properties.

XML

Financial Instruments not Reported at Fair Value

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

Financial Instruments not Reported at Fair Value

Financial Instruments not Reported at Fair Value

6. Financial Instruments not Reported at Fair Value

We determined the following disclosure of estimated fair values using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies.  However, considerable judgment is necessary to interpret market data and develop the related estimates of fair value.  The use of different market assumptions and/or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.

As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, management estimated that the carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable, prepaid expenses and other assets, accounts payable, accrued expenses, other liabilities and payables/receivables from related parties were at amounts that reasonably approximated their fair value based on their highly-liquid nature and/or short-term maturities.  The notes payable of $218.5 million and $183.3 million as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, have a fair value of approximately $213.4 million and $179.4 million as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, based upon interest rates for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities that management believes we could obtain.  The fair value of the notes payable is categorized as a Level 2 basis.  The fair value is estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis valuation on the borrowing rates currently available for loans with similar terms and maturities.  The fair value of the notes payable was determined by discounting the future contractual interest and principal payments by a market rate.  Disclosure about fair value of financial instruments is based on pertinent information available to management as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

XML

Business and Organization

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

Business and Organization

Business and Organization

1. Business and Organization

Business

Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc. (which may be referred to as the “Company,” “we,” “us,” or “our”) was organized as a Maryland corporation on January 9, 2007 and has elected to be taxed, and currently qualifies, as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) for federal income tax purposes.

We acquire and operate commercial real estate and real estate-related assets.  In particular, we focus generally on acquiring commercial properties with significant possibilities for capital appreciation, such as those requiring development, redevelopment, or repositioning, those located in markets and submarkets with high growth potential, and those available from sellers who are distressed or face time-sensitive deadlines.  In addition, our current opportunistic investment strategy also includes investments in real estate-related assets that present opportunities for higher current income.  Such investments may have capital gain characteristics, whether as a result of a discount purchase or related equity participations.  We may acquire a wide variety of commercial properties, including office, industrial, retail, hospitality, recreation and leisure, single-tenant, multifamily, and other real properties.  These properties may be existing, income-producing properties, newly constructed properties, or properties under development or construction.  They may include multifamily properties purchased for conversion into condominiums and single-tenant properties that may be converted for multi-tenant use.  We may invest in real estate-related securities, including securities issued by other real estate companies, either for investment or in change of control transactions completed on a negotiated basis or otherwise.  Further, we also may originate or invest in collateralized mortgage-backed securities and mortgage, bridge or mezzanine loans, or in entities that make investments similar to the foregoing.  We expect to make our investments in or in respect of real estate assets located in the United States and other countries based on our view of existing market conditions.  As of June 30, 2013, we had 12 real estate investments including an investment in a portfolio of nine medical office buildings, 11 of which were consolidated into our condensed consolidated financial statements.

Substantially all of our business is conducted through Behringer Harvard Opportunity OP II LP, a limited partnership organized in Delaware (“Behringer Harvard Opportunity OP II”).  As of June 30, 2013, our wholly-owned subsidiary, BHO II, Inc., a Delaware corporation, was the sole general partner of Behringer Harvard Opportunity OP II and owned a 0.1% partnership interest in Behringer Harvard Opportunity OP II.  As of June 30, 2013, our wholly-owned subsidiary, BHO Business Trust II, a Maryland business trust, was the sole limited partner of Behringer Harvard Opportunity OP II and owned the remaining 99.9% interest in Behringer Harvard Opportunity OP II.

We are externally managed and advised by Behringer Harvard Opportunity Advisors II, LLC.  The Advisor is responsible for managing our day-to-day affairs and for identifying and making acquisitions and investments on our behalf.

Organization

In connection with our initial capitalization, on January 19, 2007, we issued 22,471 shares of our common stock and 1,000 shares of our convertible stock to Behringer Harvard Holdings.  Behringer Harvard Holdings transferred its shares of convertible stock to the Advisor on April 2, 2010.

As of June 30, 2013, we had issued 26.7 million shares of our common stock, including 22,471 shares owned by Behringer Harvard Holdings and 2.2 million shares issued through the distribution reinvestment plan (the “DRP”).  As of June 30, 2013, we had redeemed 0.7 million shares of our common stock and had 26.0 million shares of common stock outstanding.  As of June 30, 2013, we had 1,000 shares of convertible stock issued and outstanding to the Advisor.

Our common stock is not currently listed on a national securities exchange.  Depending upon then prevailing market conditions, it is our intention to consider beginning the process of liquidating our assets and distributing the net proceeds to our stockholders within three to six years after the termination of our initial public offering of common stock.  If we do not begin an orderly liquidation within that period, we may seek to have our shares listed on a national securities exchange.

XML

Related Party Transactions (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended			6 Months Ended							3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended			6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2013	Mar. 31, 2013	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2013 Behringer Securities LP	Jun. 30, 2013 Behringer Securities LP Maximum	Jun. 30, 2013 Behringer Harvard Opportunity II Management Services, LLC	Jun. 30, 2012 Behringer Harvard Opportunity II Management Services, LLC	Jun. 30, 2013 Behringer Harvard Opportunity II Management Services, LLC Minimum	Jun. 30, 2013 Advisor	Jun. 30, 2012 Advisor	Jun. 30, 2013 Advisor	Jun. 30, 2012 Advisor	Dec. 31, 2012 Advisor	Jun. 30, 2013 Advisor Minimum	Jun. 30, 2013 Advisor Maximum	Jun. 30, 2012 Advisor Maximum
Related party transaction
Commissions as percentage of gross offering proceeds							7.00%
Reallowance of selling commissions earned to participating broker Dealers (as a percent)						100.00%
Manager fee as percentage of gross offering proceeds							2.50%
Manager fee as percentage of gross offering proceeds to broker dealers participating in offerings							2.00%
Percentage of gross offering proceeds for marketing fees and expenses, conference fees and non Itemized, non Invoiced due diligence efforts							1.50%
Percentage of gross offering proceeds for out Of Pocket and bona fide, separately invoiced due diligence expenses incurred as fees, costs or other expenses from third parties							0.50%
Reduction in selling commissions included in additional paid-in capital						$ 400,000
Reduction in dealer manager fees included in additional paid-in capital						200,000
Percentage of gross proceeds raised for remittance to Advisor for organization and offering expenses																	1.50%
Reimbursement of organization and offering expenses as a percentage of gross proceeds raised in primary component of offerings																1.50%
Organization and offering expenses, receivable															3,800,000
Other payables to related parties															500,000
Payments received from related party		3,800,000
Acquisition and advisory fees as percentage of purchase, development, construction, or improvement of each asset acquired													2.50%
Acquisition and advisory fees as percentage of funds advanced in respect of loan or other investment													2.50%
Acquisition and advisory fees incurred													1,900,000	500,000
Percentage of reimbursement of acquisition expense														0.25%
Reimbursement of acquisition expense													200,000					100,000
Percentage of debt financing fee payable under loan or line of credit													1.00%
Debt financing fee payable under loan or line of credit											400,000	100,000	400,000	100,000
Development fee paid to advisor or its affiliates											0	0	0	0
Property management fees as percentage of gross revenues of properties								4.50%
Oversight fee as percentage of gross revenues of property managed								0.50%
Property management fees or oversight fees incurred								500,000	600,000
Monthly asset management fee as percentage of sum of higher of cost or value of each asset													0.0833%
Asset management fees incurred	864,000		804,000	1,545,000	1,574,000								1,500,000	1,500,000
Non reimbursement of operating expenses in excess of average invested assets (as a percent)										2.00%
Non reimbursement of operating expenses in excess of net income (as a percent)										25.00%
Administrative services cost incurred and expensed													$ 800,000	$ 700,000

XML

Supplemental Cash Flow Information (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

Supplemental Cash Flow Information

Schedule of supplemental cash flow information

	Six months ended June 30,
	2013		2012
Interest paid, net of amounts capitalized	$	3,838	$	5,050
Non-cash investing activities:
Capital expenditures for real estate in accounts payable	$	24	$	156
Capital expenditures for real estate in accrued liabilities	$	358	$	725
Non-cash financing activities:
Common stock issued in distribution reinvestment plan	$	—	$	2,790
Offering costs payable to related parties	$	—	$	8

XML

Distributions

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

Distributions

Distributions

13. Distributions

Distributions are authorized at the discretion of our board of directors based on its analysis of our performance over the previous period and expectations of performance for future periods.  These analyses may include actual and anticipated operating cash flow, changes in market capitalization rates for investments suitable for our portfolio, capital expenditure needs, general financial and market conditions and other factors that our board deems relevant.  The board’s decision will be influenced, in substantial part, by its obligation to ensure that we maintain our status as a REIT.  In light of the continued uncertainty in the global financial and real estate markets, we cannot provide assurance that we will be able to achieve expected cash flows necessary to pay distributions at any particular level, or at all.

On March 20, 2012, our board of directors declared a special distribution of $0.50 per share of common stock payable to our stockholders of record as of April 3, 2012 and determined to cease regular, monthly distributions in favor of payment of periodic distributions from excess proceeds from asset dispositions or from other sources as necessary to maintain our REIT tax status.  The special distribution was paid on May 10, 2012.

We have paid and may in the future pay some or all of our distributions from sources other than operating cash flow.  We have, for example, generated cash to pay distributions from financing activities, components of which may include proceeds from our public offerings of shares of our common stock and borrowings (including borrowings secured by our assets) in anticipation of future operating cash flow.  We have also utilized cash from refinancings and dispositions, the components of which may represent a return of capital and/or the gains on sale.  In addition, from time to time, our Advisor may agree to waive or defer all or a portion of the acquisition, asset management or other fees or incentives due to it, pay general administrative expenses, or otherwise supplement investor returns in order to increase the amount of cash that we have available to pay distributions to our stockholders.

We did not pay any distributions to stockholders during the three and six months ended June 30, 2013.  Total regular distributions paid to stockholders during the three months ended June 30, 2012 were $1.1 million including DRP of $0.7 million.  The special cash distribution of $13 million declared during the first quarter of 2012 was paid in the second quarter of 2012 and was based upon the number of stockholders as of April 3, 2012.  Total distributions paid to stockholders during the six months ended June 30, 2012 were $17.3 million consisting of the special cash distribution of $13 million and regular distributions of $4.3 million including DRP of $2.8 million.  A portion of the $4.3 million regular distributions to stockholders were funded from cash flow provided by operations.  The special cash distribution was funded from proceeds from asset dispositions.  Regular cash distributions were funded from proceeds from our public offerings of shares of our common stock, borrowings and cash flow from operations.  Future distributions, if any, declared and paid may exceed cash flow from operating activities until such time as we invest in additional real estate or real estate-related assets at favorable yields and our investments reach stabilization.

Distributions declared per share assume the share was issued and outstanding each day during the period.  Beginning January 2012 through March 2012, the declared daily regular distribution rate was $0.0013699 per share of common stock, which was equivalent to an annualized distribution rate of 5.0% assuming the share was purchased for $10.00.

XML

Notes Payable

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

Notes Payable

Notes Payable

9. Notes Payable

The following table sets forth information on our notes payable as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

	Notes Payable as of				Interest	Maturity
Description	June 30, 2013		December 31, 2012		Rate	Date
1875 Lawrence	$	15,500	$	15,500	30-day LIBOR + 5.35% (1)	01/01/16
Interchange Business Center	—		9,882		30-day LIBOR + 5% (1)(2)(3)	12/01/13
Holstenplatz	10,105		10,375		3.887%	04/30/15
Courtyard Kauai at Coconut Beach Hotel	38,000		38,000		30-day LIBOR + .95% (1)	11/09/15
Florida MOB Portfolio - Palmetto Building	6,001		6,077		4.55%	01/01/16
Florida MOB Portfolio - Victor Farris Building	12,097		12,249		4.55%	01/01/16
Florida MOB Portfolio - Gardens Medical Pavilion	14,215		14,385		4.9%	01/01/18
River Club and the Townhomes at River Club	25,175		25,200		5.26%	05/01/18
Babcock Self Storage	2,204		2,225		5.80%	08/30/18
Lakes of Margate	15,074		15,182		5.49% and 5.92%	01/01/20
Arbors Harbor Town	26,000		26,000		3.985%	01/01/19
Alte Jakobstraße	7,949		8,233		2.3%	12/30/15
Wimberly	26,685		—		30-day LIBOR + 2.28%	03/01/23
22 Exchange	19,500		—		3.93%	05/05/23
	$	218,505	$	183,308

(1) 30-day LIBOR was 0.19% at June 30, 2013.

(2) The 30-day LIBOR rate was set at a minimum value of 2.5%.

(3) On October 18, 2012, we sold one of the four industrial buildings at Interchange Business Center to an unaffiliated third party.  On April 12, 2013, we sold the remaining three buildings to an unaffiliated third party.  A portion of the proceeds from the sale of the remaining three buildings were used to pay off in full the existing indebtedness associated with the property.

At June 30, 2013, our notes payable balance was $218.5 million and consisted of the notes payable related to our consolidated properties.  We have guaranteed payment of certain recourse liabilities with respect to certain customary nonrecourse carveouts as set forth in the guaranties in favor of the unaffiliated lenders with respect to the Courtyard Kauai at Coconut Beach Hotel, Wimberly and 22 Exchange notes payable.  For the six months ended June 30, 2013, in connection with the acquisition of Wimberly and 22 Exchange, we entered into loans for approximately $26.7 million and $19.5 million, respectively, with unaffiliated third parties.  On April 12, 2013, we sold the remaining three industrial buildings at Interchange Business Center to an unaffiliated third party and used a portion of the proceeds from the sale to pay off in full the existing indebtedness of $11.3 million.  See footnote 16, Discontinued Operations for further details.  Interest capitalized for the three and six months ending June 30, 2013 was less than $0.1 million.

We are subject to customary affirmative, negative, and financial covenants and representations, warranties and borrowing conditions, all as set forth in our loan agreements.  As of June 30, 2013, we believe we were in compliance with the covenants under our loan agreements.

The following table summarizes our contractual obligations for principal payments as of June 30, 2013:

Year	Amount Due
July 1, 2013 - December 31, 2013	$	1,081
2014	2,351
2015	57,584
2016	34,695
2017	2,519
Thereafter	120,275
	$	218,505

XML

Discontinued Operations

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

Discontinued Operations

Discontinued Operations

16.  Discontinued Operations

During the six months ended June 30, 2012, we sold the Palms of Monterrey.  On April 12, 2013, we sold the remaining three buildings at Interchange Business Center for a contract sales price of approximately $40.4 million, excluding transaction costs.  A portion of the proceeds from the sale were used to pay off in full the existing indebtedness associated with the buildings.

The following table summarizes the disposition of our properties during 2012 and 2013.

Property Name	Date of Disposition	Contract Sales Price
Palms of Monterrey	January 5, 2012	$	39,300
Parrot’s Landing	October 31, 2012	$	56,300
Interchange Business Center (1)	October 18, 2012	$	7,500
Interchange Business Center (1)	April 12, 2013	$	40,400

(1) On October 18, 2012, we sold one of the four industrial buildings at Interchange Business Center to an unaffiliated third party.  On April 12, 2013, we sold the remaining three buildings to an unaffiliated third party.

We have classified the results of operations for the properties above into discontinued operations in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations.

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012
Rental revenue	$	81		$	1,862		$	465		$	3,864
Expenses
Property operating expenses	40			721			101			1,421
Interest expense	70			757			319			1,543
Real estate taxes	(48		)	416			33			811
Property management fees	6			72			13			152
Asset management fees	13			48			50			96
Depreciation and amortization	42			615			276			1,237
Total expenses	123			2,629			792			5,260
Interest income, net	—			—			—			1
Loss on early extinguishment of debt (1)	(260		)	—			(260		)	(1,236		)
Gain on sale of real estate property	14,455			—			14,455			9,264
Income (loss) from discontinued operations	$	14,153		$	(767	)	$	13,868		$	6,633

(1) Loss on early extinguishment of debt for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 was approximately $0.3 million and was comprised of the write-off of deferred financing fees of $0.1 million and an early termination fee of $0.2 million.  Loss on early extinguishment of debt for the six months ended June 30, 2012 was approximately $1.2 million and was comprised of the write-off of deferred financing fees of $0.4 million and an early termination fee of $0.8 million.

XML

Related Party Transactions

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

Related Party Transactions

Related Party Transactions

14. Related Party Transactions

The Advisor and certain of its affiliates receive fees and compensation in connection with the acquisition, management, and sale of our assets.

Pursuant to a Dealer Manager Agreement, we engaged Behringer Securities LP (“Behringer Securities”) to act as our dealer manager in connection with our public offerings.  Behringer Securities received commissions of up to 7% of gross primary offering proceeds.  Behringer Securities reallowed 100% of selling commissions earned to participating broker-dealers.  In addition, we paid Behringer Securities a dealer manager fee of up to 2.5% of gross offering proceeds.  Pursuant to separately negotiated agreements, Behringer Securities reallowed a portion of its dealer manager fee in an aggregate amount up to 2% of gross offering proceeds to broker-dealers participating in our public offerings; provided, however, that Behringer Securities reallowed, in the aggregate, no more than 1.5% of gross offering proceeds for marketing fees and expenses, conference fees and non-itemized, non-invoiced due diligence efforts and no more than 0.5% of gross offering proceeds for out-of-pocket and bona fide, separately invoiced due diligence expenses incurred as fees, costs or other expenses from third parties.  Further, in special cases pursuant to separately negotiated agreements and subject to applicable limitations imposed by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Behringer Securities used a portion of its dealer manager fee to reimburse certain broker-dealers participating in our public offerings for technology costs and expenses associated with our public offerings and costs and expenses associated with the facilitation of the marketing and ownership of our shares by such broker-dealers’ customers.  No selling commissions, dealer manager fees or organization and offering expenses were paid for sales under the DRP.  We terminated the primary portion of the follow-on public offering effective March 15, 2012 and the DRP portion of the follow-on offering effective April 3, 2012.  For the six months ended June 30, 2012, Behringer Securities earned selling commissions and dealer manager fees of $0.4 million and $0.2 million, respectively, which were recorded as a reduction to additional paid-in capital.

We reimbursed the Advisor and its affiliates for organization and offering expenses (other than selling commissions and the dealer manager fee) incurred on our behalf in connection with the primary offering component of our public offerings of our common stock.  The total we were required to remit to the Advisor for organization and offering expenses (other than selling commissions and the dealer manager fee) was limited to 1.5% of the gross proceeds raised in the completed primary offering components of the public offerings as determined upon completion of the public offerings.  The Advisor or its affiliates determined the amount of organization and offering expenses owed based on specific invoice identification, as well as an allocation of costs to us and other Behringer Harvard programs, based on respective equity offering results of those entities in offering.

The Advisor was required to reimburse us to the extent that the total amount spent on organization and offering expenses (other than selling commissions and the dealer manager fee) in the public offerings exceeded 1.5% of the gross proceeds raised in the primary component of the public offerings.  Based on the gross proceeds from our public offerings, we recorded a receivable from the Advisor for approximately $3.8 million of organization and offering expenses that were previously reimbursed to the Advisor.  The receivable of $3.8 million is presented net of other payables of $0.5 million to the Advisor on our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2012.  We received payment of $3.8 million from the Advisor for this receivable in March 2013.

The Advisor or its affiliates will also receive acquisition and advisory fees of 2.5% of the amount paid and/or in respect of the purchase, development, construction, or improvement of each asset we acquire, including any debt attributable to those assets.  The Advisor and its affiliates will also receive acquisition and advisory fees of 2.5% of the funds advanced in respect of a loan investment.  We incurred acquisition and advisory fees payable to the Advisor of $1.9 million and $0.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

The Advisor or its affiliates also receive an acquisition expense reimbursement in the amount of 0.25% of (i) the funds paid for purchasing an asset, including any debt attributable to the asset, (ii) the funds budgeted for development, construction, or improvement in the case of assets that we acquire and intend to develop, construct, or improve, and (iii) the funds advanced in respect of a loan investment.  In addition, to the extent the Advisor or its affiliates directly provide services formerly provided or usually provided by third parties, including, without limitation, accounting services related to the preparation of audits required by the SEC, property condition reports, title services, title insurance, insurance brokerage or environmental services related to the preparation of environmental assessments in connection with a completed investment, the direct employee costs and burden to the Advisor of providing these services will be acquisition expenses for which we will reimburse the Advisor.  We also pay third parties, or reimburse the Advisor or its affiliates, for any investment-related expenses due to third parties in the case of a completed investment, including, but not limited to, legal fees and expenses, travel and communication expenses, costs of appraisals, accounting fees and expenses, third-party brokerage or finder’s fees, title insurance, premium expenses, and other closing costs.  In addition, acquisition expenses for which we will reimburse the Advisor, include any payments made to (i) a prospective seller of an asset, (ii) an agent of a prospective seller of an asset, or (iii) a party that has the right to control the sale of an asset intended for investment by us that are not refundable and that are not ultimately applied against the purchase price for such asset.  Except as described above with respect to services customarily or previously provided by third parties, the Advisor is responsible for paying all of the expenses it incurs associated with persons employed by the Advisor to the extent that they are dedicated to making investments for us, such as wages and benefits of the investment personnel.  The Advisor and its affiliates are also responsible for paying all of the investment-related expenses that we or the Advisor or its affiliates incur that are due to third parties or related to the additional services provided by the Advisor as described above with respect to investments we do not make, other than certain non-refundable payments made in connection with any acquisition.  For the six months ended June 30, 2013, we incurred acquisition expense reimbursements of $0.2 million.  We incurred acquisition expense reimbursements of less than $0.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012.

We pay the Advisor or its affiliates a debt financing fee of 1% of the amount available under any loan or line of credit made available to us.  It is anticipated that the Advisor will pay some or all of these fees to third parties with whom it subcontracts to coordinate financing for us.  We incurred debt financing fees of $0.4 million and $0.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

We pay the Advisor or its affiliates a development fee in an amount that is usual and customary for comparable services rendered to similar projects in the geographic market of the project if such affiliate provides the development services and if a majority of our independent directors determines that such development fee is fair and reasonable and on terms and conditions not less favorable than those available from unaffiliated third parties.  We incurred no such fees for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.

We pay our property manager and affiliate of the Advisor, Behringer Harvard Opportunity II Management Services, LLC (“BHO II Management”), or its affiliates, fees for the management, leasing, and construction supervision of our properties.  Property management fees are 4.5% of the gross revenues of the properties managed by BHO II Management or its affiliates, plus leasing commissions based upon the customary leasing commission applicable to the same geographic location of the respective property.  In the event that we contract directly with a third-party property manager in respect of a property, BHO II Management or its affiliates receives an oversight fee equal to 0.5% of the gross revenues of the property managed.  In no event will BHO II Management or its affiliates receive both a property management fee and an oversight fee with respect to any particular property.  In the event we own a property through a joint venture that does not pay BHO II Management directly for its services, we will pay BHO II Management a management fee or oversight fee, as applicable, based only on our economic interest in the property.  We incurred and expensed property management fees or oversight fees to BHO II Management of approximately $0.5 million and $0.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

We pay the Advisor or its affiliates a monthly asset management fee of one-twelfth of 1.0% of the sum of the higher of the cost or value of each asset.  For the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, we expensed $1.5 million of asset management fees.  Amounts include asset management fees which were classified to discontinued operations for our held for sale property and our disposed properties.

We reimburse the Advisor or its affiliates for all expenses paid or incurred by the Advisor in connection with the services provided to us, subject to the limitation that we will not reimburse the Advisor for any amount by which our operating expenses (including the asset management fee) at the end of the four preceding fiscal quarters exceeds the greater of:  (A) 2% of our average invested assets, or (B) 25% of our net income determined without reduction for any additions to reserves for depreciation, bad debts or other similar non-cash reserves and excluding any gain from the sale of our assets for that period.  Notwithstanding the above, we may reimburse the Advisor for expenses in excess of this limitation if a majority of our independent directors determines that such excess expenses are justified based on unusual and non-recurring factors. For the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, we incurred and expensed such costs for administrative services of $0.8 million and $0.7 million, respectively.

We are dependent on the Advisor and BHO II Management for certain services that are essential to us, including asset acquisition and disposition decisions, property management and leasing services, and other general administrative responsibilities.  In the event that these companies were unable to provide us with their respective services, we would be required to obtain such services from other sources.

XML

Document and Entity Information	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2013	Jul. 31, 2013
Document and Entity Information
Entity Registrant Name	Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc.
Entity Central Index Key	0001387061
Document Type	10-Q
Document Period End Date	Jun. 30, 2013
Amendment Flag	false
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--12-31
Entity Current Reporting Status	Yes
Entity Filer Category	Smaller Reporting Company
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding		26,038,553
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2013
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q2

XML

Supplemental Cash Flow Information

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

Supplemental Cash Flow Information

Supplemental Cash Flow Information

15. Supplemental Cash Flow Information

Supplemental cash flow information is summarized below:

	Six months ended June 30,
	2013		2012
Interest paid, net of amounts capitalized	$	3,838	$	5,050
Non-cash investing activities:
Capital expenditures for real estate in accounts payable	$	24	$	156
Capital expenditures for real estate in accrued liabilities	$	358	$	725
Non-cash financing activities:
Common stock issued in distribution reinvestment plan	$	—	$	2,790
Offering costs payable to related parties	$	—	$	8