XML 20 R9.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.7.0.1
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2017
Accounting Policies [Abstract]  
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
 
The majority of the Company's significant accounting policies have remained unchanged from the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 29, 2017 ("2016 Annual Report"). As such, in addition to the below, refer to the Company's 2016 Annual Report for further discussion.

Basis of Presentation
 
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all normal recurring adjustments, which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for the fair presentation of the Company’s results for the interim periods presented. The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and entities established to complete secured financing transactions that are considered to be variable interest entities (“VIEs”) and for which the Company is the primary beneficiary. Also included in the condensed consolidated financial statements are the financial results of certain entities, which are not considered VIEs, but in which the Company is presumed to have control. The ownership interests held by third parties are reflected as noncontrolling interests in the accompanying financial statements.
Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The Company uses historical experience and various other assumptions and information that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances in developing its estimates and judgments. Estimates and assumptions about future events and their effects cannot be predicted with certainty and, accordingly, these estimates may change as new events occur, as more experience is acquired, as additional information is obtained and as the Company’s operating environment changes. While the Company believes that the estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of the condensed consolidated financial statements are appropriate, actual results could differ from those estimates.

Consolidation
 
KKR Financial CLO 2012-1, Ltd. (“CLO 2012-1"), KKR Financial CLO 2013-1, Ltd. (“CLO 2013-1"), KKR Financial CLO 2013-2, Ltd. (“CLO 2013-2"), KKR CLO 9, Ltd. (“CLO 9”), KKR CLO 10, Ltd. (“CLO 10”), KKR CLO 15, Ltd. ("CLO 15") and KKR CLO 16, Ltd. ("CLO 16") (collectively the “Cash Flow CLOs”) are entities established to complete secured financing transactions. During 2016, the Company called KKR 2016-1, Ltd. ("CLO 2016-1"), KKR Financial CLO 2007-1 (“CLO 2007-1") and KKR Financial CLO 2011-1 (“CLO 2011-1") and during 2015, the Company called KKR Financial CLO 2005-2, Ltd. (“CLO 2005-2"), KKR Financial CLO 2005-1, Ltd. ("CLO 2005-1") and KKR Financial CLO 2006-1, Ltd ("CLO 2006-1"), whereby the Company repaid all senior and mezzanine notes outstanding. These entities are VIEs which the Company consolidates as the Company has determined it has the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact these entities’ economic performance and the Company has both the obligation to absorb losses of these entities and the right to receive benefits from these entities that could potentially be significant to these entities. In CLO transactions, subordinated notes have the first risk of loss and conversely, the residual value upside of the transactions.

In addition, during 2016, the Company declared a distribution in kind on its common shares of certain subordinated notes of KKR CLO 11, Ltd ("CLO 11") and KKR CLO 13, Ltd ("CLO 13") to its Parent as the sole holder of its common shares. CLO 11 and CLO 13 had previously been consolidated by the Company as they were VIEs which the Company determined it had the power to direct the activities that most significantly impacted these entities’ economic performance and the Company had both the obligation to absorb losses of these entities and the right to receive benefits from these entities that could potentially be significant to these entities. Following the distribution, the Company determined that it no longer met the consolidation criteria and de-consolidated CLO 11 and CLO 13, resulting in a reduction in both consolidated assets and liabilities of approximately $1.0 billion as of December 31, 2016. Also, as a result of the de-consolidation, the related CLO interest expense and management fees that were previously consolidated will no longer be included in the Company's condensed consolidated statements of operations.

The Company finances the majority of its corporate debt investments through its CLOs. As of March 31, 2017, the Company’s CLOs held $3.1 billion par amount, or $3.1 billion estimated fair value, of corporate debt investments. As of December 31, 2016, the Company's CLOs also held $3.1 billion par amount, or $3.1 billion estimated fair value, of corporate debt investments. The assets in each CLO can be used only to settle the debt of the related CLO. As of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the aggregate par amount of CLO debt to unaffiliated and affiliated parties totaled $3.1 billion and $3.2 billion, respectively.
 
The Company consolidates all non‑VIEs in which it holds a greater than 50 percent voting interest. Specifically, the Company consolidates majority owned entities for which the Company is presumed to have control. The ownership interests of these entities held by third parties are reflected as noncontrolling interests in the accompanying financial statements. The Company began consolidating a majority of these non‑VIE entities as a result of the asset contributions from its Parent during the second half of 2014. For certain of these entities, the Company previously held a percentage ownership, but following the incremental contributions from its Parent, was presumed to have control.

In addition, the Company has noncontrolling interests in joint ventures and partnerships that do not qualify as VIEs and do not meet the control requirements for consolidation as defined by GAAP.
All inter‑company balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. 
Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Accounting Changes and Error Corrections and Investments - Equity Method and Joint Ventures

In January 2017, FASB issued ASU No. 2017-03, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections (Topic 250) and Investments – Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 232) – Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to staff Announcements at the September 22, 2016 and November 17, 2016 EITF Meetings (“ASU 2017-03”).  The amendments included in this update expand required qualitative disclosures when registrants cannot reasonably estimate the impact that adoption of the ASU will have on the financial statements. Such qualitative disclosures would include a comparison of the registrant’s new accounting policies, if determined, to current accounting policies, a description of the status of the registrant’s process to implement the new standard and a description of the significant implementation matters yet to be addressed by the registrant. Other than enhancements to the qualitative disclosures regarding future adoption of new ASUs, adoption of the provisions of this standard is not expected to have any material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

Consolidation

In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-17, Consolidation (Topic 810): Interests Held through Related Parties under Common Control ("ASU 2016-17"). This guidance states that reporting entities deciding whether they are primary beneficiaries no longer have to consider indirect interests held through related parties that are under common control to be the equivalent of direct interests in their entirety. Decision makers would include those indirect interests on a proportionate basis. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company's condensed consolidated financial statements.

Financial Instruments

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01, Financial Instruments (Topic 825): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Liabilities (“ASU 2016-01”). The amended guidance (i) requires equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting or those that result in consolidation of the investee) to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income; (ii) eliminates the requirement to disclose the method(s) and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value that is currently required to be disclosed for financial instruments measured at fair value; (iii) requires an entity to present separately in other comprehensive income the portion of the total change in the fair value of a liability resulting from a change in the instrument-specific credit risk when the entity has elected to measure the liability at fair value in accordance with the fair value option for financial instruments and (iv) requires separate presentation of financial assets and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset (that is, securities or loans and receivables) on the balance sheet or the accompanying notes to the financial statements. This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years and should be applied by means of a cumulative-effect adjustment to the balance sheet as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. The amended guidance related to equity securities without readily determinable fair values (including the disclosure requirements) should be applied prospectively to equity investments that exist as of the date of adoption. The Company is currently evaluating the impact on its financial statements.

Cash Flow Classification

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (“ASU 2016-15”), which amends the guidance on the classification of certain cash receipts and payments in the statement of cash flows. The amended guidance adds or clarifies guidance on eight cash flow matters: (i) debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs, (ii) settlement of zero-coupon debt instruments or other debt instruments with coupon interest rates that are insignificant in relation to the effective interest rate of the borrowing, (iii) contingent consideration payments made after a business combination, (iv) proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims, (v) proceeds from the settlement of corporate-owned life insurance policies, (vi) distributions received from equity method investees, (vii) beneficial interests in securitization transactions and (viii) separately identifiable cash flows and application of the predominance principle. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The guidance must be applied retrospectively to all periods presented but may be applied prospectively from the earliest date practicable if retrospective application would be impracticable. The Company is currently evaluating the impact on its financial statements.